Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Direct Binding of Ark-Like E3 RING Ligases to Ubiquitin and Its Implication on Their Protein Interaction Network
Next Article in Special Issue
Kinetic Study of Glucosamine Production Using Aspergillus sydowii BCRC 31742 under Solid-State Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Fungal Dextranase Production and Its Antibiofilm Activity, Encapsulation and Stability in Toothpaste
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hemocyanin Modification of Chitosan Scaffolds with Calcium Phosphate Phases Increase the Osteoblast/Osteoclast Activity Ratio—A Co-Culture Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 20
10.3390/molecules25204785
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair

by
Die Hu
1,2,
Qian Ren
1,2,
Zhongcheng Li
1,2 and
Linglin Zhang
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Disease, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China
2
Department of Cariology and Endodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(20), 4785; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204785
Submission received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 9 October 2020 / Accepted: 16 October 2020 / Published: 19 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chitin and Chitosan: Derivatives and Applications)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chitosan is a natural, biodegradable cationic polysaccharide, which has a similar chemical structure and similar biological behaviors to the components of the extracellular matrix in the biomineralization process of teeth or bone. Its excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and polyelectrolyte action make it a suitable organic template, which, combined with biomimetic mineralization technology, can be used to develop organic-inorganic composite materials for hard tissue repair. In recent years, various chitosan-based biomimetic organic-inorganic composite materials have been applied in the field of bone tissue engineering and enamel or dentin biomimetic repair in different forms (hydrogels, fibers, porous scaffolds, microspheres, etc.), and the inorganic components of the composites are usually biogenic minerals, such as hydroxyapatite, other calcium phosphate phases, or silica. These composites have good mechanical properties, biocompatibility, bioactivity, osteogenic potential, and other biological properties and are thus considered as promising novel materials for repairing the defects of hard tissue. This review is mainly focused on the properties and preparations of biomimetically mineralized composite materials using chitosan as an organic template, and the current application of various chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in bone tissue engineering and dental hard tissue repair is summarized.

1. Introduction

Bone and teeth are the two main hard tissues in the human body. Bone is a mineralized inorganic-organic composite, which is mainly composed of carbonated hydroxyapatite (HAP) and type I collagen [1]. Dentin, cementum, and enamel are hard structures of teeth. Dentin and cementum are both collagenous composites similar to bone, with apatite as the mineral phase [2,3]. However, enamel is quite special, as it is acellular, non-collagenous, and composed of 95–97% mineral by weight, with less than 1% organic material [4]. While there are differences in the composition and structure of these hard tissues, they are all organic-inorganic composites formed through biomineralization processes regulated by a series of cells and organic matrices (proteins, polysaccharides, etc.) [5,6].
Bone tissue engineering is now a popular and promising method for repairing bone defects due to the large-scale destruction or loss of bone tissue caused by events, such as trauma, infection, and tumor [7]. It is a technique involving the provision of three-dimensional scaffolds that act as artificial extracellular matrices, allowing cells to proliferate and maintain their specific functions, and serve as a template for new bone formations [8]. Numerous biomimetic scaffolds of different biomaterials have been applied in bone tissue engineering [9,10]. Similarly, when dental caries, trauma, or erosion cause defects of dental hard tissue, current clinical treatments cannot restore the original structure and properties of teeth. Some biomimetic materials and strategies that have appeared in recent years may be promising ways to fabricate enamel-like or dentin-like structures [11,12,13].
Chitosan, a natural cationic polysaccharide, has a similar chemical structure and biological behaviors to the components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of bone and teeth. Chitosan has many biological properties, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, polyelectrolyte action, etc. [14], which make it a suitable organic scaffold or template for the fabrication of organic-inorganic composites. Unlike simply mixing chitosan and inorganic minerals to construct composite materials, biomimetic mineralization technology, which is inspired by the biomineralization process, can deposit minerals in situ on chitosan organic templates, thereby constructing composite materials with closer structures and functions to those of bone or teeth. In recent years, chitosan-based composite materials fabricated by the biomimetic mineralization technique have been widely used in the field of bone tissue engineering and enamel or dentin biomimetic repair. Comparing with the artificial materials currently used to repair human hard tissues in clinic, such as ceramics, alloys, etc., chitosan-based materials have reduced costs and improved biocompatibility, with low possibility of causing allergic and inflammatory reactions in human body [15]. Besides, the bioactivities and mechanical properties of chitosan-based materials can also be improved with the addition of inorganic minerals [16].
In this article, we first briefly introduce the basic structure and properties of chitosan and then focus on the properties and preparation methods of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials and their applications in human hard tissue repair in recent years. Since the composite materials are mainly composed of two parts—a chitosan organic template and inorganic minerals—we reviewed two aspects of the preparation methods of the composite materials: the preparations of various chitosan organic templates in composite materials and the biomimetic mineralization methods for preparing different inorganic minerals. Many aspects of the recent applications of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in the fields of bone tissue engineering and dental hard tissue repair were reviewed and presented in detail, including types of chitosan and minerals, composite forms, other organic/inorganic components, preparation techniques of chitosan templates, methods of biomimetic mineralization, and important properties of composite materials.

2. Structure, Properties and Applications of Chitosan

Chitosan is a natural cationic polysaccharide that is obtained by the N-deacetylation of chitin, which is the second most ubiquitous polymer-after cellulose-on earth [17]. It is a linear copolymer composed of D-glucosamine (GlcN) and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc), which are linked by the β-1, 4-glycosidic bond, with molecular weight ranges from 10 to over 1000 kDa [18,19]. The chemical structure of chitosan is similar to that of glycosaminoglycan, the main component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [20]. Deacetylation degree (DD), molecular mass, solubility, viscosity, crystallinity, flexibility, porosity, tensile strength, and conductivity are frequently evaluated physicochemical properties of chitosan [21,22]. Among them, DD and molecular mass are two of the most important physical characteristics that affect both the chemical and biological properties of chitosan [23,24,25]. In recent years, chitosan preparations with various DDs, molecular masses, and molecular derivatization patterns have attracted much attention because of their potentially beneficial biological properties. Chitosan has various outstanding biological properties, including a good polyelectrolyte action, biodegradability, biocompatibility, bioactivity, antimicrobial property, anticancer property, antioxidant property, cell adhesion properties, non-toxicity, and high flexibility for chemical functionalization [26,27,28]. However, as chitosan is only highly soluble in most diluted acidic solutions at a pH below 6.5 and has a poor solubility in water or most organic solvents, its application field is severely limited [15]. Therefore, improving the solubility of chitosan is a crucial step in extending its scope of application. Deacetylation, chemical modification by adding hydrophilic biomolecules to amino or hydroxyl groups (acylation, carboxylation, alkylation, quaternization, sulfonation, and phosphorylation), crosslinking and chemical or enzymatical depolymerization or degradation are available methods for improving the solubility of chitosan and also optimizing its biological properties [29,30]. Because of the diverse properties of chitosan and its derivatives, they have been extensively applied in the medical and pharmaceutical fields, for example, they have been used in drug delivery [31,32], tissue engineering [20,33], wound management [34,35], gene and cancer therapy [36,37,38], antibiofilm drugs [39], etc.

3. Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials

In this section, the basic concepts and properties of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials are briefly introduced, and then different preparation methods of the composite materials that have been introduced in recent years are presented, mainly discussing the preparations of chitosan organic templates and inorganic minerals in composite materials.

3.1. Properties of Composite Materials

Due to its poor mechanical properties and reduced bioactivities, pure chitosan is not suitable for repairing hard tissue defects. Therefore, various chitosan-based organic-inorganic composite materials have been developed for hard tissue repair in recent years, aiming at mimicking the mechanical properties and other biological properties of natural hard tissue. Generally, there are currently two common ways for constructing composite materials of chitosan-inorganics. One way is to mix inorganic substances into chitosan by simple mechanical blending, such as ultrasonic dispersion, and then obtaining the final composite material by freeze-drying [40,41,42]. Nevertheless, the composite material prepared in this way is uneven and heterogeneous due to particle aggregation and a lack of intermolecular interaction between the organic matrix and the inorganics [43]. Another way is to prepare the inorganic layer in situ on the surface of the chitosan scaffold, which acts as a template [44,45,46]. These composite materials are uniform and have excellent mechanical and biological properties [44]. Because of the nearly physiological conditions, without using special equipment or extremely high processing temperature, the latter way also belongs to a biomimetic mineralization technology, which simulates the process of biomineralization [47]. Biomimetic mineralization technology uses organic molecules (protein, peptide, collagen, polymer, etc.) as templates to effectively regulate the nucleation, crystal growth phase transformation, orientation, and particle assembly process of inorganic substances by mimicking the natural process of biomineralization, thus synthesizing organic-inorganic hybrid materials, which simulates natural mineralized tissues, such as bone and teeth [48,49,50]. It can fabricate organic-inorganic composites in a bottom-up way to develop various advanced materials with defined and controlled morphologies and superior mechanical properties under ambient conditions.
Combined with biomimetic mineralization technology, numerous chitosan-based organic-inorganic biomimetically mineralized composite materials have been prepared using chitosan as an organic template for mineralization, and these composite materials have become a research hotspot in the field of bone tissue engineering and dental hard tissue repair in recent years. In addition to their various excellent biological properties, such as biocompatibility, bioactivity, suitable mechanical strength, slow degradation rate, osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, etc., a more important advantage of these materials is that the bionic in the structure and function of the organic and inorganic components can be realized to a certain extent. In composite materials, chitosan has a similar chemical structure and biological behaviors to the components of the extracellular matrix in the biomineralization process of teeth or bone, and the inorganic minerals of the composites are usually biogenic minerals, including HAP, other forms of calcium phosphate, such as amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD), octacalcium phosphate (OCP), and dicalcium phosphate anhydrous (DCPA), and silica. While pure chitosan scaffolds show some limitations, such as rapid degradation, an insufficient mechanical strength, and a lack of bioactive cell signaling molecules [51], the addition of biominerals, especially HAP, can significantly improve the composite density, fracture toughness, and bioactivity [42]. Furthermore, the minerals prepared by biomimetic mineralization methods highly mimic the morphology, size, and crystallinity of the apatite found in natural bone or teeth, thus achieving composite materials that have a more ideal mechanical and biological activity. Therefore, these chitosan-based biomimetic mineralization composite materials are promising materials for biomedical applications and are starting to attract more of the attention of researchers.

3.2. Techniques for the Preparations of Chitosan Organic Templates with Composite Materials

Acting as a template, chitosan can be processed into different forms, like solutions, hydrogels, nanofibers, porous scaffolds, microspheres, nanoparticles, and membranes [52]. In addition to simply preparing chitosan aqueous solutions or using chitosan as a chemical modifier on the surface of other substances, there are currently four other common techniques for preparing chitosan templates, including electrospinning, freeze drying, gelation by physical or chemical crosslinking, and layer-by-layer self-assembly, which are introduced in detail in this section.

3.2.1. Electrospinning

Electrospinning is a simple and efficient technique for fabricating continuous polymer fibers mostly at the micro-scale (>1 μm) or nano-scale (<1000 nm) [53]. The nanofibers created using this method have a large surface area-to-volume ratio, high porosity, and small pore size, which mimic the characteristics of the extracellular matrix [54]. The major components of electrospinning methods are a high voltage power supply, a container (typically a syringe) of polymer solution, a pump, and a collector. A high voltage is applied to a syringe tip or metallic capillary, which is connected to the solution reservoir and pump. Upon the application of a sufficiently high electric field, electrostatic forces overcome the surface tension of the solution to form a jet. Finally, the polymer jet solidifies in nanofibers upon hitting the collector surface [55]. Many researchers have applied this method for the preparation of a chitosan-based scaffold for tissue engineering [56,57,58,59]. For instance, Doan et al. [56] prepared CS nanofibers with uniform diameters using electrospinning and then mineralized the nanofiber surfaces by a wet chemical process. The chitosan/hydroxyapatite (CS/HAP) composite nanofibers promoted osteogenic differentiation by inducing ossification and enhanced the expressions of collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein, and osterix, showing a considerable potential for use in future bone tissue engineering applications. However, when preparing chitosan organic templates for dental hard tissues, electrospinning technology is rarely used.

3.2.2. Freeze Drying

Freeze drying is one of the most commonly used methods for the preparation of three-dimensional porous polymer scaffolds [60,61,62]. It can transform a solution into solid materials with a sufficient stability for storage and distribution, while retaining the original structure and characteristics of the materials to the maximum extent. The technique involves three steps: freezing of the solution at a low temperature (around −70 °C to −80 °C); a vacuum treatment, which enables the vaporization of the frozen solvent, without passing through the liquid phase, known as sublimation; and applying heat to the frozen product to accelerate sublimation [52]. Many studies have used this technique to obtain porous chitosan-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering [41,63,64]. And a study gained the scaffold of carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC)/ACP nanocomplexes by lyophilizing CMC/ACP gel and used it to re-mineralize dentine in an in vitro tooth model of deep caries [65].

3.2.3. Gelation by Physical or Chemical Crosslinking

Gelation by physical or chemical crosslinking is a common way to prepare chitosan hydrogels. There are two mechanisms of this technique: physically crosslinked hydrogels are formed by intermolecular interaction (electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding interaction, and hydrophobic interaction), with small anionic molecules, polyanions, or hydrophobic polymers; and chemical crosslinked hydrogels are formed by the covalent linking of chitosan and other polymers or small cross-linkers through the reaction of their functional groups, where the bond formation is irreversible [66,67]. Belonging to physical crosslinking, ionotropic gelation is one of the most widespread techniques for the preparation of chitosan nanoparticles, which is based on the electrostatic interaction between the amine group of chitosan and a negatively charged group of polyanions, such as tripolyphosphate [68,69,70]. In this method, chitosan is firstly dissolved in acetic acid, then polyanion is added, and nanoparticles are formed spontaneously under mechanical stirring at room temperature [71]. This method has many advantages, such as the simple preparation process, mild preparation conditions, absence of organic solvents, high compatibility, and so on. Chemical crosslinking is often used for the fabrication of chitosan hydrogels with a good mechanical strength and uniform properties, while its preparation process is more complicated, and some crosslinkers have a high toxicity [67]. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) [72] and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [73] are two biocompatible synthetic polymers that have been used as chemical crosslinking agents to prepare chitosan-based hydrogels. Chitosan hydrogels formed by gelation can provide homogenous 3D scaffolds with good biocompatibility for cell growth and is promising for bone tissue engineering applications [72]. Besides, hydrogel is also a common application form of chitosan used to repair dental hard tissues [74,75].

3.2.4. Layer-by-Layer (LBL) Self-Assembly

Layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly is a highly versatile and simple multilayer self-assembly technique, which can be used to fabricate multilayer coatings with controlled structures and compositions in a variety of biomedical applications, particularly tissue engineering [76,77,78]. In general, the LBL assembly process involves the sequential adsorption of complementary molecules on the substrate surface driven by a variety of interactions involving electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interaction, and van der Waals interaction [79]. Between the deposition of each layer, washing and drying steps are usually applied to avoid contamination of the next solution due to the adhesion of the previous solution to the substrate and to elute the loose molecules and stabilize them in the formed layer. The desired number of deposited layers can be obtained by repeating the above steps. Besides, many factors like the concentration, ionic strength, and pH can affect the final composition, thickness, and topography of the materials [78]. Liang et al. [80] modified the surface of the electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers with positively-charged chitosan (CS) and negatively-charged phosvitin (PV) using the LBL self-assembly technique, and then in vitro biomimetic mineralization was carried out through the incubation of the fibrous mats in a simulated body fluid (SBF) solution. The composite scaffold exhibited an excellent cytocompatibility, as well as a good cell adhesion and spreading performance, which make it a promising versatile scaffold for bone tissue engineering. However, LBL assembly technique is less common in dental hard tissue repair than in tissue engineering.

3.3. Biomimetic Mineralization Materials and Techniques for the Fabrication of Chitosan-Based Composites

Inspired by the biomineralization process and biomineral components of natural organisms, the inorganic components that form the biomimetically mineralized composite material with chitosan are usually natural biominerals, and the most common are various calcium phosphates (CaP), such as HAP [81,82], ACP [65,83], DCPD [44], OCP [47], and other intermediate phases of calcium phosphate [84]. Silicas [85,86] are also included. HAP is the major inorganic constituent of natural bone and teeth, with an excellent mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and bioactivity. ACP, DCPD, and other metastable crystalline phases of calcium phosphate are precursors or intermediates during biomineralization, which can finally be transformed into HAP [87]. Silicas are also minerals produced by the biomineralization processes of some organisms. While directly mixing minerals with chitosan in certain proportions can cause 3D scaffold structures, with compositions similar to those of natural bone tissues by phase separation or freeze drying, it is difficult to simulate their microstructure and microenvironment via this method. Therefore, more and more researchers have been concentrating on the biomimetic mineralization technique to fabricate chitosan-based composites.
There are five main mineralization methods that use chitosan as an organic template to regulate the nucleation and growth of inorganic minerals, including the wet chemical method, simulated body fluid or artificial saliva soaking method, polymer-induced liquid precursor method, alkaline phosphatase enzyme-induced method, and solution-gelatin method (Figure 1).

3.3.1. Wet Chemical Method (WCM)

WCM is one of the most commonly used methods. It has many advantages, such as simple experimental operations, short preparation time, low working temperature, high purity of products, and low cost [88,89]. WCM precipitation is based on the reaction of soluble calcium salt (Ca(NO3)2, CaCl2, etc.) and soluble phosphates (K2HPO4, Na2HPO4, (NH4)2HPO4, etc.). There are two ways to prepare WCM. The first is the one-step process, which involves the simultaneous deposition of calcium and phosphorus. A calcium solution and phosphorus solution of a certain concentration are slowly added to the pre-dissolved chitosan solution simultaneously and incubated for a period of time. In some cases, stirring or pH adjustment is also used in this process [44,72,90]. Another is the alternate soaking process. Briefly, chitosan templates are firstly immersed in a calcium aqueous solution for some time to allow for the deposition of calcium ions and then soaked in deionized water to remove excess ions. Then, they are soaked in a phosphorus aqueous solution to allow for the deposition of the phosphate ion and washed in deionized water. The pH of the reaction system can be controlled using alkaline solutions, and the cycle is repeated a certain number of times [56,73,91,92]. The thickness of the mineral layer on the chitosan templates could be affected by various factors, such as the calcium to phosphorus ratio in the reaction system, soaking time, the cycle repetition times, pH, etc. Therefore, it is speculated that more ideal composites can be obtained by appropriately changing these conditions.

3.3.2. Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) or Artificial Saliva (AS) Soaking Method

The SBF or AS soaking method is also a common way to achieve calcium phosphate precipitation on chitosan templates, which involves soaking chitosan into an SBF or AS solution for a certain amount of time. Conventional SBF is a solution containing 2.5 mM Ca2+, 1 mM HPO42− and other components (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl−, HCO3−, SO42− and buffer), with ionic concentrations and a pH value similar to those of human blood plasma [93]. In addition to providing a uniform distribution of HAP, a good biocompatibility and bioactivity have been obtained using HA deposition by SBF immersion [94]. However, the fact that it is time-consuming is a disadvantage of the SBF method. It generally takes 7–21 days [80,95]. Therefore, to shorten the immersion time, SBF solutions with different ion concentrations and various times were used, such as the 1.5 times SBF (a 1.5 times ionic concentration of SBF) [80], Modified SBF (a two-fold increase in the concentrations of calcium and phosphate ions, compared to SBF) [47], and 5 times SBF (a 5 times ionic concentration of SBF) [59,95]. AS is an artificial solution that has a similar composition to that of human saliva, its recipes are varied but Ca2+ and PO43− are always contained [96]. AS is essential for tooth remineralization, because it supplies calcium and phosphate ions to precipitate HAP. When chitosan-calcium phosphate composites were applied in repairing dental hard tissue, the AS soaking method was usually used [74,75].

3.3.3. Polymer-Induced Liquid Precursor (PILP) Method

The PILP method based on nonclassical crystallization theory is usually applied for the mineralization of bone or dentin collagen scaffolds, and chitosan acts as a polymer template for stabilizing ACP precursors [65,83]. The ACP precursors stabilized by chitosan could be transferred into collagen fibers and finally transformed into HAP nanocrystals, thus achieving the intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen. The key of the PILP process is to find negatively charged polymers for stabilizing amorphous precursor particles in order to achieve a liquid-liquid phase separation. It has been demonstrated that carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC), the derivative of chitosan enriched in carboxyl groups, could stabilize ACP to form liquid-phase nanocomplexes of CMC/ACP, which could aid in the intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen and thereby facilitate the remineralization of demineralized dentine [83].

3.3.4. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Enzyme-Induced Method

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is highly expressed in the cells of mineralized tissue and plays a vital function in bone mineralization. It releases inorganic phosphate from the mineralization inhibitor inorganic pyrophosphate, thus promoting extracellular mineralization [97]. Inspired by this function of ALP, the ALP enzyme-induced mineralization method was applied in the mineralization of chitosan scaffolds. The method involves the ALP that already existed in chitosan gels or scaffolds providing phosphate ions by cleaving the organic glycerophosphate and then phosphate ions reacting with the Ca2+ in the system to form calcium phosphate precipitates, thereby constructing chitosan organic-inorganic mineralized composites [64,98]. It was reported that the slow mineralization induced by the ALP enzyme could form a much denser and more uniform nano HAP deposition in chitosan scaffolds, and the mineralized scaffolds promoted the osteogenic differentiation of pre-osteoblasts in vitro and demonstrated an excellent tissue integration in vivo [64].

3.3.5. Solution-Gelatin (sol-gel) Method

Silicon and silica are fundamental inorganic components that are widely found in organisms. Organisms produce silica by silica biomineralization (also called biosilicification) through biological macromolecule-mediated self-assembly. This self-assembly process is a “bottom-up” construction of nanostructured hierarchical silica materials with complex three-dimensional architectures [99]. Inspired by this, the biomimetic synthesis of silica-relevant hybrid materials using chitosan as a template via the silica biomineralization processes is attracting an increasing amount of attention, and the solution-gelatin (sol-gel) technique is a universal mineralization technique [85,86,100]. The sol-gel method is indeed a wet-chemical technique with two reactions: hydrolysis and polycondensation [101]. In general, polymeric molecules and metal-organic alkoxides, especially tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), are sol precursors to silicates, and the final gel of an integrated three-dimensional network structure can be obtained by sol-gel transition [102]. It was shown that silicon–chitosan hybrid hydrogels could be obtained by the biomimetic sol-gel mineralization of chitosan under mild conditions, with no catalyst or any organic solvent [100]. Besides, studies demonstrated that silicon–chitosan hybrid scaffolds can also act as a versatile template for the formation of apatite and may therefore be promising candidates for bone tissue engineering applications [85,86].

4. Applications of Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair

Because of the excellent biological properties of various chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials, they have been extensively applied in the fields of human hard tissue repair, including bone tissue engineering and dental hard tissue repair.

4.1. Applications in Bone Tissue Engineering

Natural bone exhibits a hierarchical structure, mainly consisting of multilayered collagen fibers and the inorganic component, HAP [103]. In consideration of events such as trauma, infection, and tumor, which cause the large-scale destruction or loss of bone tissue, exploring materials that can replace or even reconstruct bone structure is an urgent challenge in orthopedic clinical practice. Bone tissue engineering is currently a hot research field and aims to realize bone reconstruction and regeneration, focusing on scaffolds, cells, growth factors, and their interrelation in a microenvironment [104]. For a bone tissue engineering scaffold to be successful, it must be highly porous, osteoconductive, biodegradable, biocompatible, mechanically strong, and capable of efficiently guiding new bone formation in the defect [105]. Preparing organic-inorganic composite nanofibers to simulate the composition of the ECM is an effective strategy for providing bone tissue engineering scaffolds. According to the structure and composition of natural bone, natural macromolecule/HAP composite scaffolds synthesized by biomimetic mineralization with natural bioactive macromolecules are currently key research focuses in this field [59,106,107]. Among these macromolecules, chitosan is a popular alternative because of its excellent biological properties [108].
Different chitosan-based organic-inorganic composite materials using the biomimetic mineralization technique and their important properties in the field of bone tissue engineering are presented in Table 1. Using a wet chemical method, Doan et al. prepared chitosan/hydroxyapatite (CS/HAP) nanofibers with a homogeneous HAP deposit [56]. The composite nanofibrous scaffold promoted osteogenic differentiation by inducing ossification and enhanced the expressions of collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein, and osterix, thus showing that it has considerable potential in bone tissue engineering applications. Compared with ordinary chitosan, carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) has a better water-solubility, biodegradability, and bioactivity, which allows CMCS to chelate Ca2+ and induce the deposition of apatite [109,110]. HAP-coated electro-spun CMCS nanofibers prepared by biomimetic mineralization using 5 times simulated body fluid increased the ALP activity and the gene expression level of Runx2 and ALP and promoted new bone formation and maturation [59]. In order to fabricate a hybrid nanostructured HAP-CS composite scaffold with HAP nanorods perpendicularly-oriented to CS fibers, Guo and his co-workers [44] applied a two-stage preparation process using brushite (DCPD, CaHPO4·2H2O) as transitory precursors and mimicked the biomineralization process of the apatite in bone tissue. The process included the deposition of DCPD on the CS fiber porous scaffold using a dip-coating method and the formation of a hybrid nanostructured HAP-CS composite scaffold through the in-situ conversion of DCPD into HAP using a bioinspired mineralization process. The composite scaffold exhibited good mechanical properties and could support the adhesion and proliferation of hBMSCs. Moreover, it could promote the formation of new bone in rat calvarial defects. To further improve the mechanical and biological properties of chitosan-HAP composite scaffolds, graphene was also introduced into the composite scaffolds. Graphene and its derivatives, such as graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO), are highly biocompatible and can easily be functionalized by various organic and inorganic compounds due to the presence of various functional side groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, and epoxides) on its surface [111,112]. It was found that extensive mineralization occurred in the CS-GO conjugate system because of strong electrostatic interactions between the functional groups (carboxyl groups of GO and amino groups) of CS and calcium ions in an SBF solution. The combination of a chitosan–graphene oxide conjugate and biomimetic mineralization was advantageous in favorably modulating cellular activity. It induced homogeneous spatial osteoblastic cell growth and increased mineralization [95]. Another study showed that chitosan acted as an interfacial soft polymeric template on the surface of RGO, promoting an ordered growth of the hydroxyapatite particles. The three-component composite mineralized scaffold mimicked the structure and composition of natural bone and exhibited a relatively higher rate of cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and osteoid matrix formation [113].
In addition to the abovementioned composite materials, which contain chitosan as the only organic template, in recent years, researchers have also combined chitosan with other polymers to prepare multi-component biomimetically mineralized scaffold materials. In the field of bone tissue engineering, collagen (Col) is usually a good natural polymer for forming a hybrid scaffold with chitosan. Wang et al. used CMC as a polyelectrolyte template to stabilize ACP in order to form nanocomplexes of CMC/ACP and then fabricated mineralized collagen scaffolds using a biomimetic method based on the polymer-induced liquid precursor process. They found that nanocomplexes of CMC/ACP significantly increased the modulus of the collagen scaffolds, and the scaffolds could better promote the regeneration of bone tissue in defects [83]. Another similar study also prepared CMC/ACP nanocomplexes under acidic conditions (pH < 3.5) and realized biomimetic synchronous self-assembly/mineralization (SSM) of a collagen scaffold [114]. Zou et al. compounded three matrix materials (CS, Col, and PLA) uniformly, with the assistance of sonication and amidation to regulate the in-situ crystallization of nHAP in order to fabricate CS/Col/PLA/nHAP scaffolds. The scaffolds improved the mechanical properties and the formation of crystals in the SBF, and it had a good biocompatibility and could maintain the cell growth [72]. Moreover, gelatin, a protein derived from collagen with a similar structure to collagen, is a biodegradable biopolymer with a high biocompatibility [115], which has also been widely used in biomimetic composite scaffolds with chitosan [91,116,117]. A gelatin-chitosan core-shell structured nanofibers mat with a three-dimensional porous structure was fabricated by a coaxial electrospinning technique. An arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-like structure was formed to mimic the organic component of the natural bone extracellular matrix, and then homogeneous HAP was deposited on its surface using a wet chemical method. The biomimetic composite scaffolds could further enhance osteoblast cell proliferation [91]. Heinemann et al. prepared organically modified hydroxyapatite (ormoHAP) in gelatin gels using the double migration technique and mineralized chitosan porous scaffolds created using the Net-Shape-Nonwoven (NSN) technique. The mineralized NSN-scaffolds improved the attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of hBMSC, presenting a remarkable application potential for bone tissue engineering [116]. In addition to collagen and gelatin, other biodegradable polymers or proteins, such as cellulose [80], PLA [118], PEG [73], and silk fibroin [92], were also effective organic additives, acting as crosslinking agents or scaffolds of the chitosan-based composite materials. While various chitosan/calcium phosphates are the most common biomimetically mineralized composite materials used in bone tissue engineering, some chitosan/silica biomimetically mineralized scaffolds have also been applied due to their capability in inducing the formation of apatite and good potential for promoting new bone regeneration [85,86].

4.2. Applications in Dental Hard Tissue Repair

Dental caries, acid erosion, and trauma are common causes of the demineralization and defects in teeth. Conventional treatments, such as remineralization treatment using fluoride agents and restorations with materials of metals, composite resins, or ceramics, cannot restore the original structure and properties of teeth. Therefore, exploring new biomimetic materials that can promote the remineralization of dental hard tissues and reconstruct the structure of enamel or dentin is a major research direction in relation to the repairing of dental hard tissues [12,119]. In recent years, chitosan has been used as a carrier or stabilizing agent of calcium phosphates due to its excellent biological properties and further combined with biomimetic mineralization technology. The composite materials obtained in this way are widely applied in dental hard tissue restorations, especially in the biomimetic remineralization of enamel and dentin.
Recent studies on the application of chitosan-based composite materials combined with the biomimetic mineralization technique in repairing dental hard tissue are presented in Table 2. Xiao et al. synthesized CMC/ACP nanocomplexes using CMC as a stabilizer of ACP, and with the help of NaClO and chimaeric peptide, which mimics amelogenin, well-organized enamel-like crystals, equipped with strong mechanical properties, formed on the demineralized enamel surface [120]. A biomimetic CS-HAP hybrid coating was fabricated under CS-Emdogain hydrogel action by in situ biomimetic mineralization. The coating that was mainly composed of carbonate-substituted HAP, B-type, with a c-axis orientation, and presented a highly organized enamel-like structure may be a promising hybrid material for enamel remineralization [75]. Furthermore, Simeonov et al. developed novel hybrid chitosan/calcium phosphate microgels using chitosan microgels as a template for calcium phosphate in situ deposition. The hybrid materials have several advantages as a re-mineralizing agent, including bio-adhesiveness, antimicrobial properties, and a continuous supply of calcium and phosphate ions to ensure the successful remineralization of the model’s initial caries lesions [121].
Chitosan was also introduced into agarose hydrogel to induce a continuous compact CS-HAP composite layer growing on the etched dentinal surface, showing a beneficial effect in the remineralization of etched dentine [74]. Since the intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen is an important goal of dentin remineralization [122], CMC was used as the analog of acid non-collagenous protein and acted as the template for stabilizing ACP to form CMC/ACP nanocomplexes, thus further accomplishing the intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen. Besides, the completely demineralized dentine was partially re-mineralized in an in vitro tooth model of deep caries, suggesting that CMC/ACP nanocomplexes may be a potential indirect pulp capping material for the management of deep caries during vital pulp therapy [65]. Another study modified collagen fibers with phosphorylated chitosan and created new nucleation sites for ACP on the fiber, thus promoting the intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen through the PILP mineralization process and achieving the remineralization of calcium-depleted dentin within 96 h [123].

5. Conclusion

Nowadays, various synthetic composite materials are becoming more popular than human-derived biomaterials in the field of tissue engineering. Although biomaterials, such as decellularized ECM, have similar components and structure to natural ECM of organisms, they have some limits such as complicated preparation technique, possible immunogenicity and mechanical properties that are difficult to control [124]. In contrast, the structure and mechanical properties of synthetic composite materials can be manipulated and controlled, and the presence of some components in synthetic materials can endow them with specific biological properties [125].
As a natural cationic biopolymer with a unique molecular structure and various excellent biological properties, chitosan is a suitable organic template or scaffold for regulating mineral formation during the biomimetic mineralization process. It can thereby form biomimetically mineralized composite materials with various advantages (good bionic characteristics, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, bioactivity, and osteogenic potential), and these materials have been widely applied in the fields of bone tissue engineering and dental hard tissue repair. In different studies, different results were found for these chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials regarding, e.g., the preparation techniques of chitosan organic templates, methods of biomimetic mineralization, types of inorganic minerals, and application forms of composites. These are also the key factors affecting the final properties and functions of the composite. By changing or optimizing these factors, it may be possible to prepare composite materials with better biocompatibility, bioactivity, osteoinductivity, mechanical properties and bionic abilities, which may be promising products for clinical applications. In recent years, in order to optimize the performance of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials, simple two-component composite materials have been investigated by researchers but have been unable to meet their expectations. Thus, many studies have incorporated other organic or inorganic components into composite materials and prepared multi-component biomimetically mineralized composite materials with multiple biological functions. This may be a major development direction for the development of chitosan-related biomimetically mineralized composite materials in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—review & editing, D.H.; Q.R.; Z.L.; and L.Z.; writing—original draft preparations, D.H.; Funding acquisition, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 81771062.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Luo, D.; Wang, T. Hierarchical Structures of Bone and Bioinspired Bone Tissue Engineering. Small 2016, 12, 4611–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Goncalves, P.F.; Sallum, E.A.; Sallum, A.W.; Casati, M.Z.; Nociti, F.H. Dental cementum reviewed:development, structure, composition, regeneration and potential functions. Braz. J. Oral Sci. 2005, 4, 12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldberg, M.; Kulkarni, A.B.; Young, M.; Boskey, A. Dentin: Structure, composition and mineralization. Front. Biosci. 2011, 3, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ruan, Q.; Moradian-Oldak, J. Amelogenin and enamel biomimetics. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 3112–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Uskokovic, V. When 1 + 1 > 2: Nanostructured composites for hard tissue engineering applications. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2015, 57, 434–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Elsharkawy, S.; Mata, A. Hierarchical Biomineralization: From Nature’s Designs to Synthetic Materials for Regenerative Medicine and Dentistry. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, e1800178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wubneh, A.; Tsekoura, E.K.; Ayranci, C.; Uludağ, H. Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018, 80, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holzwarth, J.M.; Ma, P.X. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 9622–9629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Park, J.Y.; Park, S.H.; Kim, M.G.; Park, S.H.; Yoo, T.H.; Kim, M.S. Biomimetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1064, 109–121. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tania, L.; Luca, T.; Francesca, P.; Andrea, G.; Marco, A.; Gerardo, P.; Patrizio, C.; Enzo, D.F. Fabrication and Applications of Micro/Nanostructured Devices for Tissue Engineering. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 9, 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding, C.M.; Chen, Z.X.; Li, J.S. From molecules to macrostructures: Recent development of bioinspired hard tissue repair. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 5, 1435–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pandya, M.; Diekwisch, T.G.H. Enamel biomimetics-fiction or future of dentistry. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2019, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ahmed, G.M.; Abouauf, E.A.; AbuBakr, N.; Dörfer, C.E.; El-Sayed, K.F. Tissue Engineering Approaches for Enamel, Dentin, and Pulp Regeneration: An Update. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 5734539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Aguilar, A.; Zein, N.; Harmouch, E.; Hafdi, B.; Bornert, F.; Offner, D.; Clauss, F.; Fioretti, F.; Huck, O.; Benkirane-Jessel, N.; et al. Application of Chitosan in Bone and Dental Engineering. Molecules 2019, 24, 3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Vukajlovic, D.; Parker, J.; Bretcanu, O.; Novakovic, K. Chitosan based polymer/bioglass composites for tissue engineering applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 96, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, R.; Shitiz, K.; Singh, A. Chitin and chitosan: Biopolymers for wound management. Int. Wound J. 2017, 14, 1276–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Husain, S.; Al-Samadani, K.H.; Najeeb, S.; Zafar, M.S.; Khurshid, Z.; Zohaib, S.; Qasim, S.B. Chitosan Biomaterials for Current and Potential Dental Applications. Materials 2017, 10, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Varlamov, V.P.; Il’ina, A.V.; Shagdarova, B.T.; Lunkov, A.P.; Mysyakina, I.S. Chitin/Chitosan and Its Derivatives: Fundamental Problems and Practical Approaches. Biochemistry 2020, 85, S154–S176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, C.H.; Park, S.J.; Yang, D.H.; Chun, H.J. Chitosan for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1077, 475–485. [Google Scholar]
  21. Detsi, A.; Kavetsou, E.; Kostopoulou, I.; Pitterou, I.; Pontillo, A.R.N.; Tzani, A.; Christodoulou, P.; Siliachli, A.; Zoumpoulakis, P. Nanosystems for the Encapsulation of Natural Products: The Case of Chitosan Biopolymer as a Matrix. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Philibert, T.; Lee, B.H.; Fabien, N. Current Status and New Perspectives on Chitin and Chitosan as Functional Biopolymers. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 1314–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Foster, L.J.; Ho, S.; Hook, J.; Basuki, M.; Marçal, H. Chitosan as a Biomaterial: Influence of Degree of Deacetylation on Its Physiochemical, Material and Biological Properties. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chatelet, C.; Damour, O.; Domard, A. Influence of the degree of acetylation on some biological properties of chitosan films. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tangsadthakun, C.; Kanokpanont, S.; Sanchavanakit, N.; Pichyangkura, R.; Banaprasert, T.; Tabata, Y.; Damrongsakkul, S. The influence of molecular weight of chitosan on the physical and biological properties of collagen/chitosan scaffolds. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2007, 18, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Augustine, R.; Rehman, S.R.U.; Ahmed, R.; Zahid, A.A.; Sharifi, M.; Falahati, M.; Hasan, A. Electrospun chitosan membranes containing bioactive and therapeutic agents for enhanced wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Islam, S.; Bhuiyan, M.A.R.; Islam, M.N. Chitin and Chitosan: Structure, Properties and Applications in Biomedical Engineering. J. Polym. Environ. 2016, 25, 854–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shariatinia, Z. Carboxymethyl chitosan: Properties and biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120 (Pt B), 1406–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fakhri, E.; Eslami, H.; Maroufi, P.; Pakdel, F.; Taghizadeh, S.; Ganbarov, K.; Yousefi, M.; Tanomand, A.; Yousefi, B.; Mahmoudi, S.; et al. Chitosan biomaterials application in dentistry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 956–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, W.; Meng, Q.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhou, M.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, K. Chitosan Derivatives and Their Application in Biomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ali, A.; Ahmed, S. A review on chitosan and its nanocomposites in drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ahsan, S.M.; Thomas, M.; Reddy, K.K.; Sooraparaju, S.G.; Asthana, A.; Bhatnagar, I. Chitosan as biomaterial in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 110, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Preethi Soundarya, S.; Haritha Menon, A.; Viji Chandran, S.; Selvamurugan, N. Bone tissue engineering: Scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 1228–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bano, I.; Arshad, M.; Yasin, T.; Ghauri, M.A.; Younus, M. Chitosan: A potential biopolymer for wound management. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 380–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Park, J.U.; Song, E.H.; Jeong, S.H.; Song, J.; Kim, H.E.; Kim, S. Chitosan-Based Dressing Materials for Problematic Wound Management. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1077, 527–537. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fathi, M.; Majidi, S.; Zangabad, P.S.; Barar, J.; Erfan-Niya, H.; Omidi, Y. Chitosan-based multifunctional nanomedicines and theranostics for targeted therapy of cancer. Med. Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 2110–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Santos-Carballal, B.; Fernández Fernández, E.; Goycoolea, F.M. Chitosan in Non-Viral Gene Delivery: Role of Structure, Characterization Methods, and Insights in Cancer and Rare Diseases Therapies. Polymers 2018, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Chuan, D.; Jin, T.; Fan, R.; Zhou, L.; Guo, G. Chitosan for gene delivery: Methods for improvement and applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 268, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Khan, F.; Pham, D.T.N.; Oloketuyi, S.F.; Manivasagan, P.; Oh, J.; Kim, Y.M. Chitosan and their derivatives: Antibiofilm drugs against pathogenic bacteria. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 185, 110627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsiourvas, D.; Sapalidis, A.; Papadopoulos, T. Hydroxyapatite/chitosan-based porous three-dimensional scaffolds with complex geometries. Mater. Today. Commun. 2016, 7, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, L.; Dong, Y.S.; Xue, Y.M.; Shi, J.; Zhang, X.Y.; Liu, Y.F.; Midgley, A.C.; Wang, S.F. Multifunctional Triple-Layered Composite Scaffolds Combining Platelet-Rich Fibrin Promote Bone Regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 6691–6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, P.; Saini, M.; Dehiya, B.S.; Umar, A.; Sindhu, A.; Mohammed, H.; Al-Hadeethi, Y.; Guo, Z.H. Fabrication and in-vitro biocompatibility of freeze-dried CTS-nHA and CTS-nBG scaffolds for bone regeneration applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, F.; Ding, H.; Song, F.; Wang, J. Effects of preparation methods on the bone formation potential of apatite-coated chitosan microspheres. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2014, 25, 2080–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Guo, Y.-P.; Guan, J.-J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.-Q.; Ke, Q.-F. Hybrid nanostructured hydroxyapatite-chitosan composite scaffold: Bioinspired fabrication, mechanical properties and biological properties. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 4679–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, J.; Zhu, D.; Yin, J.; Liu, Y.; Yao, F.; Yao, K. Formation of nano-hydroxyapatite crystal in situ in chitosan-pectin polyelectrolyte complex network. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2010, 30, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hu, Y.; Chen, J.; Fan, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, Q. Biomimetic mineralized hierarchical hybrid scaffolds based on in situ synthesis of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/chondroitin sulfate/hyaluronic acid for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 157, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, K.H.; Kim, S.J.; Hwang, M.J.; Song, H.J.; Park, Y.J. Biomimetic fabrication of calcium phosphate/chitosan nanohybrid composite in modified simulated body fluids. Express Polym. Lett. 2017, 11, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Fok, A.; Rodriguez-Cabello, J.C.; Aparicio, C. Biomimetic Mineralization of Recombinamer-Based Hydrogels toward Controlled Morphologies and High Mineral Density. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25784–25792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cochrane, N.J.; Cai, F.; Huq, N.L.; Burrow, M.F.; Reynolds, E.C. New approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 1187–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, A.-W.; Ma, Y.; Cölfen, H. Biomimetic mineralization. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 415–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Porter, J.R.; Ruckh, T.T.; Popat, K.C. Bone tissue engineering: A review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25, 1539–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ahmed, S.; Annu; Ali, A.; Sheikh, J. A review on chitosan centred scaffolds and their applications in tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 849–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Reneker, D.H.; Chun, I. Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 1999, 7, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Schiffman, J.D.; Schauer, C.L. One-step electrospinning of cross-linked chitosan fibers. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2665–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kalantari, K.; Afifi, A.M.; Jahangirian, H.; Webster, T.J. Biomedical applications of chitosan electrospun nanofibers as a green polymer - Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Doan Van Hong, T.; Ho, M.H.; Hsiao, S.W.; Li, C.H. Wet chemical process to enhance osteoconductivity of electrospun chitosan nanofibers. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 1575–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yu, Y.; Hua, S.; Yang, M.; Fu, Z.; Teng, S.; Niu, K.; Zhao, Q.; Yi, C. Fabrication and characterization of electrospinning/3D printing bone tissue engineering scaffold. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Araujo, J.V.; Carvalho, P.P.; Best, S.M. Electrospinning of Bioinspired Polymer Scaffolds. In Engineering Mineralized and Load Bearing Tissues; Bertassoni, L.E., Coelho, P.G., Eds.; Springer Nature: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 33–53. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao, X.; Zhou, L.; Li, Q.; Zou, Q.; Du, C. Biomimetic mineralization of carboxymethyl chitosan nanofibers with improved osteogenic activity in vitro and in vivo. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lv, Q.; Feng, Q. Preparation of 3-D regenerated fibroin scaffolds with freeze drying method and freeze drying/foaming technique. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17, 1349–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Valencia, C.; Valencia, C.H.; Zuluaga, F.; Valencia, M.E.; Mina, J.H.; Grande-Tovar, C.D. Synthesis and Application of Scaffolds of Chitosan-Graphene Oxide by the Freeze-Drying Method for Tissue Regeneration. Molecules 2018, 23, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Lu, T.; Li, Y.; Chen, T. Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Matinfar, M.; Mesgar, A.S.; Mohammadi, Z. Evaluation of physicochemical, mechanical and biological properties of chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose reinforced with multiphasic calcium phosphate whisker-like fibers for bone tissue engineering. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2019, 100, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, N.; Zhou, L.; Xie, W.L.; Zeng, D.Y.; Cai, D.Q.; Wang, H.Y.; Zhou, C.R.; Wang, J.; Li, L.H. Alkaline phosphatase enzyme-induced biomineralization of chitosan scaffolds with enhanced osteogenesis for bone tissue engineering. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 371, 618–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, Z.; Cao, S.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Kishen, A.; Deng, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Cong, C.; Wang, H.; et al. Biomimetic Remineralization of Demineralized Dentine Using Scaffold of CMC/ACP Nanocomplexes in an In Vitro Tooth Model of Deep Caries. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0016553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hamedi, H.; Moradi, S.; Hudson, S.M.; Tonelli, A.E. Chitosan based hydrogels and their applications for drug delivery in wound dressings: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 199, 445–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Pella, M.C.G.; Lima-Tenorio, M.K.; Tenorio-Neto, E.T.; Guilherme, M.R.; Muniz, E.C.; Rubira, A.F. Chitosan-based hydrogels: From preparation to biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 196, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Desai, K.G. Chitosan Nanoparticles Prepared by Ionotropic Gelation: An Overview of Recent Advances. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 2016, 33, 107–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Koukaras, E.N.; Papadimitriou, S.A.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Froudakis, G.E. Insight on the formation of chitosan nanoparticles through ionotropic gelation with tripolyphosphate. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 2856–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kleine-Brueggeney, H.; Zorzi, G.K.; Fecker, T.; El Gueddari, N.E.; Moerschbacher, B.M.; Goycoolea, F.M. A rational approach towards the design of chitosan-based nanoparticles obtained by ionotropic gelation. Colloids Surf. B 2015, 135, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Divya, K.; Jisha, M.S. Chitosan nanoparticles preparation and applications. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 16, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zou, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Q. Biomimetic mineralization on natural and synthetic polymers to prepare hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf. B 2019, 178, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nitta, S.; Komatsu, A.; Ishii, T.; Ohnishi, M.; Inoue, A.; Iwamoto, H. Fabrication and characterization of water-dispersed chitosan nanofiber/poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/calcium phosphate-based porous composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zaharia, A.; Plescan, V.G.; Anghel, E.M.; Musat, V. Human Dentine Remineralization under Non-colagen Materials Action. Rev. Chim. 2017, 68, 928–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zaharia, A.; Musat, V.; Anghel, E.M.; Atkinson, I.; Mocioiu, O.-C.; Busila, M.; Plescan, V.G. Biomimetic chitosan-hydroxyapatite hybrid biocoatings for enamel remineralization. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11390–11402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Richardson, J.J.; Björnmalm, M.; Caruso, F. Multilayer assembly. Technology-driven layer-by-layer assembly of nanofilms. Science 2015, 348, aaa2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Tang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Podsiadlo, P.; Kotov, N.A. Biomedical applications of layer-by-layer assembly: From biomimetics to tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 3203–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zhang, S.; Xing, M.; Li, B. Biomimetic Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly of Nanofilms, Nanocoatings, and 3D Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Yoshida, M.; Langer, R.; Lahann, J.; Lendlein, A. From Advanced Biomedical Coatings to Multi-Functionalized Biomaterials. J. Macromol. Sci. C 2006, 46, 347–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liang, H.; Sheng, F.; Zhou, B.; Pei, Y.; Li, B.; Li, J. Phosphoprotein/chitosan electrospun nanofibrous scaffold for biomineralization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shakir, M.; Jolly, R.; Khan, M.S.; Iram, N.; Khan, H.M. Nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan-starch nanocomposite as a novel bone construct: Synthesis and in vitro studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 80, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ding, C.C.; Teng, S.H.; Pan, H. In-situ generation of chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite microspheres for biomedical application. Mater. Lett. 2012, 79, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, Y.; Ngo Van, M.; Wang, H.; Zhong, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, C. Synergistic intrafibrillar/extrafibrillar mineralization of collagen scaffolds based on a biomimetic strategy to promote the regeneration of bone defects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 2053–2067. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ruan, Q.; Liberman, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, D.; Zhang, Y.; Nutt, S.; Moradian-Oldak, J. Assembly of Layered Monetite-Chitosan Nanocomposite and Its Transition to Organized Hydroxyapatite. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1049–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Pipattanawarothai, A.; Suksai, C.; Srisook, K.; Trakulsujaritchok, T. Non-cytotoxic hybrid bioscaffolds of chitosan-silica: Sol-gel synthesis, characterization and proposed application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 178, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Salama, A.; Hesemann, P. Synthesis and characterization of N-guanidinium chitosan/silica ionic hybrids as templates for calcium phosphate mineralization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Olszta, M.J.; Cheng, X.; Jee, S.S.; Kumar, R.; Kim, Y.Y.; Kaufman, M.J.; Douglas, E.P.; Gower, L.B. Bone structure and formation: A new perspective. Mat. Sci. Eng. R. 2007, 58, 77–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Akao, M.; Aoki, H.; Kato, K. Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite for prosthetic applications. J. Mater. Sci. 1981, 16, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kong, L.B.; Ma, J.; Boey, F. Nanosized hydroxyapatite powders derived from coprecipitation process. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 1131–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ivan, F.D.; Marian, A.; Tanase, C.E.; Butnaru, M.; Verestiuc, L. Biomimetic composites based on calcium phosphates and chitosan-hyaluronic acid with potential application in bone tissue engineering. Key Eng. Mater. 2014, 587, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, P.; Liu, L.; Pan, J.; Mei, J.; Li, C.; Zheng, Y. Biomimetic composite scaffold of hydroxyapatite/gelatin-chitosan core-shell nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2019, 97, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, Z.; Xu, D.; Tong, S.; Tian, Y.; Li, G.; Sun, X.; Wang, X. Comparison studies of mineralized and non-mineralized SF/CS hybrid bone scaffolds co-cultured with the osteoblast cell line MC3T3-E1 in vitro. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 10, 8969–8978. [Google Scholar]
  93. Lu, X.; Leng, Y. Theoretical analysis of calcium phosphate precipitation in simulated body fluid. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hong Thien, D.; Hsiao, S.W.; Ho, M.H.; Li, C.H.; Shih, J.L. Electrospun chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 1640–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Depan, D.; Pesacreta, T.C.; Misra, R.D.K. The synergistic effect of a hybrid graphene oxide-chitosan system and biomimetic mineralization on osteoblast functions. Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Leung, V.W.; Darvell, B.W. Artificial salivas for in vitro studies of dental materials. J. Dent. 1997, 25, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Vimalraj, S. Alkaline phosphatase: Structure, expression and its function in bone mineralization. Gene 2020, 754, 144855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Douglas, T.E.L.; Skwarczynska, A.; Modrzejewska, Z.; Balcaen, L.; Schaubroeck, D.; Lycke, S.; Vanhaecke, F.; Vandenabeele, P.; Dubruel, P.; Jansen, J.A.; et al. Acceleration of gelation and promotion of mineralization of chitosan hydrogels by alkaline phosphatase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 56, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, B.; Cao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Duan, Y.; Che, S. Silica biomineralization via the self-assembly of helical biomolecules. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 479–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ivanenko, M.V.; Nikitina, E.Y.; Khonina, T.G.; Shadrina, E.V.; Novoselova, M.E.; Kuznetsov, D.K.; Karabanalov, M.S. Features of formation and structure of silicon-polysaccharide-containing polyolate hydrogels obtained by the method of biomimetic mineralization. J. Sol.-Gel. Sci. Technol. 2019, 92, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Singh, V.; Srivastava, P.; Singh, A.; Singh, D.; Malviya, T. Polysaccharide-Silica Hybrids: Design and Applications. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Owens, G.J.; Singh, R.K.; Foroutan, F.; Alqaysi, M.; Han, C.-M.; Mahapatra, C.; Kim, H.-W.; Knowles, J.C. Sol–gel based materials for biomedical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 77, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Reznikov, N.; Shahar, R.; Weiner, S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 3815–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chahal, S.; Kumar, A.; Hussian, F.S.J. Development of biomimetic electrospun polymeric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. A review. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2019, 30, 1308–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Przekora, A. The summary of the most important cell-biomaterial interactions that need to be considered during in vitro biocompatibility testing of bone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2019, 97, 1036–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Venkatesan, J.; Kim, S.K. Nano-hydroxyapatite composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering--a review. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 10, 3124–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Farokhi, M.; Mottaghitalab, F.; Samani, S.; Shokrgozar, M.A.; Kundu, S.C.; Reis, R.L.; Fatahi, Y.; Kaplan, D.L. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 68–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tao, F.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, X.; Zheng, H.; Du, Y.; Xiang, W.; Deng, H. Applications of chitin and chitosan nanofibers in bone regenerative engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Budiraharjo, R.; Neoh, K.G.; Kang, E.T. Hydroxyapatite-coated carboxymethyl chitosan scaffolds for promoting osteoblast and stem cell differentiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 366, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Upadhyaya, L.; Singh, J.; Agarwal, V.; Tewari, R.P. The implications of recent advances in carboxymethyl chitosan based targeted drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. J. Control. Release 2014, 186, 54–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Liu, H.; Xi, P.; Xie, G.; Shi, Y.; Wang, J. Simultaneous Reduction and Surface Functionalization of Graphene Oxide for Hydroxyapatite Mineralization. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 3334–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Liu, H.; Cheng, J.; Chen, F.; Bai, D.; Shao, C.; Wang, J.; Xi, P.; Zeng, Z. Gelatin functionalized graphene oxide for mineralization of hydroxyapatite: Biomimetic and in vitro evaluation. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5315–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Asha, S.; Ananth, A.N.; Jose, S.P.; Rajan, M.A.J. Reduced graphene oxide aerogel networks with soft interfacial template for applications in bone tissue regeneration. Appl. Nanosci. 2018, 8, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lin, M.L.; Liu, H.H.; Deng, J.J.; An, R.; Shen, M.J.; Li, Y.Q.; Zhang, X. Carboxymethyl chitosan as a polyampholyte mediating intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen via collagen/ACP self-assembly. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 1894–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kuttappan, S.; Mathew, D.; Nair, M.B. Biomimetic composite scaffolds containing bioceramics and collagen/gelatin for bone tissue engineering—A mini review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 1390–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Heinemann, C.; Bruenler, R.; Kreschel, C.; Kruppke, B.; Bernhardt, R.; Aibibu, D.; Cherif, C.; Wiesmann, H.P.; Hanke, T. Bioinspired calcium phosphate mineralization on Net-Shape-Nonwoven chitosan scaffolds stimulates human bone marrow stromal cell differentiation. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 14, 045017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Cojocaru, F.D.; Balan, V.; Popa, M.I.; Lobiuc, A.; Antoniac, A.; Antoniac, I.V.; Verestiuc, L. Biopolymers-Calcium phosphates composites with inclusions of magnetic nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lin, C.C.; Fu, S.J.; Lin, Y.C.; Yang, I.K.; Gu, Y. Chitosan-coated electrospun PLA fibers for rapid mineralization of calcium phosphate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 68, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Cao, C.Y.; Mei, M.L.; Li, Q.L.; Lo, E.C.; Chu, C.H. Methods for biomimetic remineralization of human dentine: A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 4615–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xiao, Z.; Que, K.; Wang, H.; An, R.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, Z.; Lin, M.; Song, J.; Yang, J.; Lu, D.; et al. Rapid biomimetic remineralization of the demineralized enamel surface using nano-particles of amorphous calcium phosphate guided by chimaeric peptides. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Simeonov, M.; Gussiyska, A.; Mironova, J.; Nikolova, D.; Apostolov, A.; Sezanova, K.; Dyulgerova, E.; Vassileva, E. Novel hybrid chitosan/calcium phosphates microgels for remineralization of demineralized enamel - A model study. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 119, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, J.; Yang, J.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Liang, K.; Wu, W.; Chen, X.; Li, J. Bioinspired intrafibrillar mineralization of human dentine by PAMAM dendrimer. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 6738–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zheng, B.; Mao, C.; Gu, T.; Pan, H.; Shao, C.; Sun, J.; Chen, C.; Tang, R.; Gu, X. Phosphorylated chitosan to promote biomimetic mineralization of type I collagen as a strategy for dentin repair and bone tissue engineering. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 2002–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gilpin, A.; Yang, Y. Decellularization Strategies for Regenerative Medicine: From Processing Techniques to Applications. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9831534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Deepthi, S.; Venkatesan, J.; Kim, S.K.; Bumgardner, J.D.; Jayakumar, R. An overview of chitin or chitosan/nano ceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 1338–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 25 04785 g001 550
Figure 1. Biomimetic mineralization methods for the fabrication of chitosan-based mineralized composites.
Figure 1. Biomimetic mineralization methods for the fabrication of chitosan-based mineralized composites.
Molecules 25 04785 g001
Table
Table 1. Applications of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in bone tissue engineering.
Table 1. Applications of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in bone tissue engineering.
Chitosan or Its DerivativesComposite FormsMineralsOther Organic/Inorganic ComponentsPreparation Techniques of Chitosan TemplateMethods of Biomimetic MineralizationImportant PropertiesReference
ChitosanNanofibersHAP-ElectrospinningAlternate soaking of WCMPromoted osteogenic differentiation by inducing ossification[56]
Carboxymethyl chitosanNanofibersHAP-ElectrospinningSoaking in 5 times SBF solutionIncreased the ALP activity, promoted the gene expression level of Runx2 and ALP, promoted new bone formation and maturation[59]
ChitosanPorous scaffoldsDCPD, HAP-Needle-punching processdip-coating method and in situ precipitation by WCMExcellent biocompatibility, osteoinductivity and mechanical properties[44]
ChitosanMembranesHAPGOChemical conjugation with GOSoaking in 5 times SBF solutionInfluenced osteoblastic cell differentiation, mineralization, and cell growth[95]
ChitosanAerogel networksHAPRGOFunctionalize RGOSoaking in 1.5 times SBF solutionExhibited relatively higher rate of cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and osteoid matrix formation[113]
Carboxymethyl chitosanNanocomplexesACPCollagenDissolved in waterPILP methodPromoted the proliferation and differentiation of mouse preosteoblasts, accelerated the regeneration of bone in the defects of rat calvaria bone[83]
ChitosanPorous scaffoldsnHAPCollagen, PLAEmulsion-crosslinkingWCMImproved the mechanical properties and the formation of crystals in SBF, had good biocompatibility, maintained the cell growth[72]
ChitosanCore-shell structured nanofibersHAPGelatinCoaxial electrospinning techniqueWCMEnhanced osteoblast cell proliferation[91]
ChitosanFibersHAPGelatinNet-Shape-Nonwoven (NSN) techniqueDouble migration techniqueImproved attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of hBMSC[116]
ChitosanNanofibersHAPCellulose, phosvitinLBL self-assembly techniqueSoaking in 1.5 times SBF solutionexcellent cytocompatibility, as well as good performance of cell adhesion and spreading[80]
ChitosanFibersHAPPLAModification on electrospun PLA nanofiberSoaking in 10 times SBF solutionMimicked structural, compositional, and biological functions of native bone[118]
ChitosanHydrogelHAP, DCPDPEGChemical crosslinking with PEGAlternate soaking of WCMInduced excellent cell adhesion ability[73]
ChitosanPorous scaffoldsHAPSilk fibroinFreeze dryingAlternate soaking of WCMGood mechanical property, promoted early cell attachment and enhanced osteogenic differentiation[92]
ChitosanPorous scaffoldsnHAPALPFreeze dryingALP enzyme-induced mineralization methodpromoted the osteogenic differentiation of pre-osteoblasts in vitro and demonstrated excellent tissue integration in vivo[64]
ChitosanThermosensitive hydrogelsCaPALPGelationALP enzyme-induced mineralization methodPromoted mineralization, may be suitable materials for bone replacement.[98]
ChitosanHybrid scaffoldsSilica-Freeze dryingSol-gel processNo cytotoxicity, excellent in vitro bone bioactivity[85]
N-guanidinium-chitosan acetateHybrid scaffoldsSilica-Freeze dryingSol-gel processActed as versatile templates for biomineralization, inducing the formation of HAP[86]
Hydroxyapatite (HAP); wet chemical method (WCM); simulated body fluid (SBF); alkaline phosphatase (ALP); dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD); graphene oxide (GO); reduced graphene oxide (RGO); amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP); polymer-induced liquid precursor (PILP); nanohydroxyapatite (HAP); layer-by-layer (LBL); poly(lactic acid) (PLA); poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), calcium phosphate (CaP).
Table
Table 2. Applications of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in dental hard tissue repair.
Table 2. Applications of chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in dental hard tissue repair.
Chitosan or Its DerivativesComposite FormsMineralsOther Organic/Inorganic ComponentsPreparation Techniques of Chitosan TemplateMethods of Biomimetic MineralizationImportant PropertiesReference
Carboxymethyl chitosanNano-complexesACPChimaeric peptidesDissolved in waterPILP method, immersing in AS solutionPromoted rapid biomimetic remineralization of the demineralized enamel, formed well-organized enamel-like crystals [120]
ChitosanCoatingCarbonate-substituted B-type HAPEmdogainGelationImmersing in AS solutionProvided highly organized enamel-like structure for teeth remineralization[75]
ChitosanHybrid microgelsAmorphous CaP and poorly crystalline carbonated B- type HAP-Ionotropic gelationin situ precipitation by WCMOwned several advantages as remineralizing agent, including bio-adhesiveness, antimicrobial properties as well as continuous supply of calcium and phosphate ions to ensure the successful remineralization of the model initial caries lesions[121]
ChitosanCoatingB-type Ca-deficient HAPAgaroseGelationImmersing in AS solutionShowed a benefic effect on remineralization of etched dentine[74]
Carboxymethyl chitosanNanocomplexesACPCollagenDissolved in waterPILP method, immersing in SBF solutionPartially remineralized the completely demineralized dentine in an in vitro tooth model of deep caries, a potential indirect pulp capping material[65]
Phosphorylated chitosanFibersACPCollagenChemical modification on collagen fibersPILP methodPromoted intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen, achieved remineralization of calcium-depleted dentin within 96 h[123]
Amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP); polymer-induced liquid precursor (PILP); artificial saliva (AS); calcium phosphate (CaP); wet chemical method (WCM); simulated body fluid (SBF).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, D.; Ren, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L. Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair. Molecules 2020, 25, 4785. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204785

AMA Style

Hu D, Ren Q, Li Z, Zhang L. Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair. Molecules. 2020; 25(20):4785. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204785

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Die, Qian Ren, Zhongcheng Li, and Linglin Zhang. 2020. "Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair" Molecules 25, no. 20: 4785. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204785

APA Style

Hu, D., Ren, Q., Li, Z., & Zhang, L. (2020). Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair. Molecules, 25(20), 4785. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204785

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop