Next Article in Journal
Free Radical Mediated Oxidative Degradation of Carotenes and Xanthophylls
Next Article in Special Issue
Revealing the Iron-Catalyzed β-Methyl Scission of tert-Butoxyl Radicals via the Mechanistic Studies of Carboazidation of Alkenes
Previous Article in Journal
Sulfonamide Inhibition Studies of the β-Class Carbonic Anhydrase CAS3 from the Filamentous Ascomycete Sordaria macrospora
Previous Article in Special Issue
Iron-Catalysed C(sp2)-H Borylation Enabled by Carboxylate Activation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules25051040
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Solvent-Free Iron(III) Chloride-Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters

by
Blessing D. Mkhonazi
1,
Malibongwe Shandu
1,
Ronewa Tshinavhe
1,
Sandile B. Simelane
2 and
Paseka T. Moshapo
1,*
1
Research Centre in Synthesis and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Science, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Eswatini, Private Bag 4, Kwaluseni M201, Eswatini
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(5), 1040; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051040
Submission received: 10 January 2020 / Revised: 20 February 2020 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published: 26 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Iron Catalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Amide functional groups are prominent in a broad range of organic compounds with diverse beneficial applications. In this work, we report the synthesis of these functional groups via an iron(iii) chloride-catalyzed direct amidation of esters. The reactions are conducted under solvent-free conditions and found to be compatible with a range of amine and ester substrates generating the desired amides in short reaction times and good to excellent yields at a catalyst loading of 15 mol%.

1. Introduction

Amide functional groups are present in a plethora of natural and organic molecules with beneficial applications in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and textile industries. Examples include proteins; medicinal drugs such as apixaban, lenalidomide, and enzalutamide; as well as pesticides such as Boscalid® [1,2,3,4,5]. In 2018, amide functional groups were present in 68% of new small molecule drugs approved by the FDA [6]. In general, amides are synthesized by a reaction between carboxylic acids and amines using activating reagents such as HATU, PPh3, and DCC in excess amounts [7]. Alternatively, carboxylic acids can be converted to their acid chloride or anhydride derivatives that readily react with amines to form the desired amide bonds. These reactions are often not catalytic and generate large quantities of undesired co-products. The synthesis of amides using greener and more atom economic reaction conditions is therefore an attractive approach to curb this problem [8,9]. Alternative amidation methodologies have been reported and some of these methods include the use of boron-based catalysts for efficient coupling of carboxylic acids at mild reaction temperatures; however, these reactions generate boronic acid side products [10,11,12]. Transition metal catalysts have also been used to couple amines and azides with a variety of substrates such as carboxylic acids, aldehydes, alcohols, alkynes and aryl halides [13,14,15]. Esters are key features in several organic synthesis substrates and have also been reported as useful substrates for amide coupling under acidic or basic conditions [16,17,18,19,20]. Some of the recent reports in direct ester amidation reactions include the use of lanthanum trifluoromethanesulfonate (Ln(Otf)3) in low catalyst loading as reported by Ohshima and co-workers [21]. Hu and co-workers reported the use of a nickel catalyst for reductive amidation of esters using nitroarenes [22]. Similar reductive coupling reactions using chromium catalysts have also been recently reported by Zeng and co-workers [23]. Nickel has also been employed by Newman and co-workers for direct amidation of methyl esters at high reaction temperatures [24]. Therefore, there is a growing interest in the use of esters as substrates for direct amidation reactions. This interest provides an opportunity for the investigation of more catalysts as well as different amino substrates that can be used to promote ester amidation [25,26]. In this study, we report the direct amidation of esters using relatively cheap and readily available FeCl3 catalyst [27,28,29] under solvent-free reaction conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

To establish the optimal reaction conditions for amidation of esters, readily available ethyl acetate and benzyl amine were selected as the ester and amine of choice, respectively (Scheme 1). Iron catalysts, namely, FeCl3, FeCl2, and FeBr3, were evaluated as suitable promoters for the direct amidation of 1a and 2a under solvent-free conditions at 50 °C. These catalysts were also compared to other readily available catalysts such as AlCl3 and BiCl3 and as can be seen in Figure 1, FeCl3 was found to be the most active catalyst as it afforded a higher yield of the desired product 3a. A control experiment conducted at 50 °C in the absence of a catalyst did not form any product after 24 h. Thus, FeCl3 was selected as the preferred catalyst for further reaction optimization and evaluation.
We then investigated the optimal reaction temperature and FeCl3 catalyst loading (Figure 1). Eighty degrees Celsius was the most favorable reaction temperature as the reaction went to completion within 5 h at 10 mol% catalyst loading. Increasing the reaction temperature to 100 °C did not effect a notable change in the rate of the reaction. Furthermore, increasing the catalyst loading to 15 mol% improved the rate of the reaction as TLC indicated completion of the reaction within 90 min. As a result, 15 mol% catalyst loading and 80 °C were selected as our optimal reaction conditions. In anticipation of reaction conditions that may require solvents (i.e., cases where both ester and amine substrates are solids or reactions that solidify upon mixing of substrates), we also investigated suitable solvents for FeCl3 catalyzed direct amidation of esters. We randomly selected four common organic solvents for investigation and the reactions between ester 1a and amine 2a (Scheme 1) were left to proceed for 90 min upon which TLC analysis indicated reaction completion for reactions conducted in acetonitrile and 1,2 dichloroethane (Table 1). Starting amine 2a was observed in the tetrahydrofuran and toluene reactions after 90 min. Therefore, acetonitrile was found to be the most favorable solvent as it is relatively greener in comparison to 1,2 dichloroethane and it also afforded the product in high yield. The steric effect of alkoxy groups around the ester carbonyl carbon was also investigated (Scheme 2). An increase in steric bulk (isopropoxy) and chain length of the alkoxy group (n-butoxy) resulted in a decrease in ester reactivity and the reactions required longer reaction times to reach completion. However, there was no significant difference between esters with methoxy and ethoxy groups.
Having established the optimal reaction conditions, we then investigated the catalyst’s reaction scope by varying both ester 1 and amine 2 substrates according to Scheme 3. Reactions were monitored by TLC. Aqueous work-up and flash column chromatography afforded the various amide products shown in Scheme 3. Aryl esters containing electron withdrawing groups were more active towards amidation than those with electron donating groups (product 3d vs. 3e). Both primary and secondary amines reacted to form amide products 3 in good yields. No reaction was observed between aryl ester 1b (R = Et) and aniline. Interestingly, amidation of 2-pyridinecarboxylates with aryl amines was successful and afforded 2-pyridinecarboxamide products (3f to 3o) in high yields. The formation of these pyridinecarboxamide products can be attributed to the possible coordination of the carbonyl oxygen and pyridine nitrogen to iron, thus, forming a stabilized intermediate complex that can undergo the observed amidation.
To test the proposed nitrogen and oxygen iron coordination hypothesis, 3-pyridinecarboxylate was reacted with aniline and as expected, the reaction failed to afford the desired product. Reactions with 2-pyridinecarboxamide were successful with aryl amines possessing both electron donating and electron withdrawing groups as well as alkyl amines. No product formation was observed when 4-nitroaniline was used as a substrate and the starting materials were recovered. Phenyloxy esters were also found to be suitable substrates for direct amidation and afforded the desired amides in good yields ranging from 70% to 89% (3p to 3s).
We further investigated the direct amidation of esters possessing alkyl bromide functional groups according to Scheme 4. Amidation of 4-bromobutanoate 4a with benzyl amine 2a afforded lactam 3t. We then envisaged that increasing the alkyl chain length in Scheme 4 would enable us to synthesize lactams with varying ring sizes. 5-bromobutanoate 4b afforded lactam 3u in 73%; however, the reaction could not be replicated with 6-bromobutanoate as it formed several side products. Amidation using aniline afforded the substitution product 3v which failed to undergo an intramolecular cyclization to form the desired lactam product.
Finally, and having succeeded in the amidation of 2-pyridinecarboxylates, we then utilized the developed methodology in the synthesis of pyrimidine carboxamides 7. Although their mode of action is unknown, these molecules are worth investigating due to their reported potent anti-tubercular activities against clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains [30]. Direct amidation of the corresponding ester 6 synthesized from commercially available dichloropyrimidine 5 afforded the amide 7 in good isolated yields (Scheme 5).
In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated a solvent-free direct amidation of esters using FeCl3 as a Lewis acid catalyst at 80 °C. Amidation was effective with both primary and secondary amines and most of the reactions were complete in short reaction times (1.5–12 h) and good yields (47–99%). Linear and branched alkoxy groups on the corresponding esters could be displaced with ease to afford the desired amides. We have also demonstrated the synthesis of lactams with varying ring sizes from reactions between primary alkyl amines and 4-bromo or 5-bromoalkyl esters. The successful amidation of 2-pyridine carboxylates is currently being used in the synthesis of a library of novel aminopyrimidine carboxamides that will be screened for anti-TB activity.

3. Materials and Methods

All the solvents used were freshly distilled and dried by appropriate techniques. All reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich FeCl3 reagent grade 97% was used as the catalyst. All reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on aluminum-backed Merck silica gel 60 F254 plates using an ascending technique. The plates were visualized under UV light at 254 nm. Gravity column chromatography was done on Merck silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh). All proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra were recorded using deuterated chloroform solutions on a Bruker Ultrashield (400 or 500 MHz) spectrometer. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR) spectra were recorded on the same instruments at 100 MHz. All chemical shifts are reported in ppm. The chemical structures of the synthesized compounds were confirmed by comparison of their NMR data to literature reported data. Optimization reactions, 1H and 13C NMR data of all the compounds are available online as a Supplementary Materials.
Typical Experimental Procedure for FeCl3-Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters. An oven-dried pressure tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer was evacuated with nitrogen. To this was added of ester 1a (492 uL, 5.04 mmol), followed by amine 2a (0.5 mL, 4.58 mmol), and finally FeCl3 (111 mg, 0.684 mmol). The mixture was then sealed and stirred at 80 °C (0.5 mL of CH3CN was added if the reaction mixture solidified). The reaction was monitored by TLC until completion upon which it was diluted with EtOAc and washed once with saturated NaHCO3 and once with distilled H2O. The combined aqueous layers were extracted once with ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers were then dried over MgSO4, filtered and solvents removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel flash column chromatography using a combination of hexane and ethyl acetate (3:2).
N-Benzylacetamide (3a). Yield: 99%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30–7.15 (m, 5H), 6.44 (br, 1H), 4.34 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 1.94, (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.0, 138.2, 128.5, 127.6, 127.3, 43.5, 23.0. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [31]
N-Benzylbenzamide (3b). Yield: 97%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.55–7.20 (m, 8H), 6.49 (s, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.3, 138.2, 134.4, 131.5, 128.8, 128.6, 127.9, 127.6, 126.9, 44.1. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [32]
Phenyl(piperidin-1-yl)methanone (3c). Yield: 89%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ7.36 (br, 5H), 3.68 (br, 2H), 3.30 (br, 2H), 1.70–1.40 (m, 6H). (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [33]
N-(4-Nitrobenzyl)benzamide (3d). Yield: 92%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.23 (m, 5H), 6.83 (br, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.4, 149.6, 139.9, 137.5, 128.9, 128.2, 127.9, 127.8, 123.7, 44.4. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [32]
N-(4-Methylbenzyl)benzamide (3e). Yield: 47%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.67 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.18 (m, 7H), 6.51 (br, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.3, 141.9, 138.4, 131.6, 129.2, 128.7, 127.9, 127.5, 127.0, 44.1, 21.4. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [32]
N-Phenylpicolinamide (3f). Yield: 86%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.1 (br, 1H), 8.59 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 8.28 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.92 – 7.83 (m, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50 – 7.31 (m, 3H), 7.13 (t. J = 5.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.9, 149.8, 147.9, 137.7, 137.6, 129.0, 126.3, 124.2, 122.3, 119.6. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
N-(4-(tert-Butyl)phenyl)picolinamide (3g). Yield: 92%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.97 (br, 1H), 8.57 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.48 – 7.36 (m, 3H), 1.32 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.8, 149.9, 147.8, 147.1, 137.5, 135.1, 126.2, 125.9, 125.8, 122.2, 119.4, 34.6, 31.3. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
(N-(2-Isopropylphenyl)picolinamide (3h). Yield: 69%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.2 (br, 1H), 8.62 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.51–7.12 (m, 4H), 3.34 – 3.20 (m, 1H), 1.34 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.1, 150.3, 148.1, 139,0, 137.5, 134.5, 126.5, 126.4, 125.6, 125.2, 122.4, 118.9, 28.2, 22.9. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)picolinamide (3i). Yield: 52%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.89 (br, 1H), 8.57 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.78 – 7.62 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.40 (m, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.7, 156.4, 150.0, 147.9, 137.6, 131.0, 126.2, 122.2, 121.2, 114.2, 55.4. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
N-(4-Chlorophenyl)picolinamide (3j). Yield: 82%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.98 (br, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.8, 149.4, 147.8, 137.5, 136.3, 129.0, 128.9, 126.4, 122.2, 120.8. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
N-Benzylpicolinamide (3k). Yield: 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.52–8.38 (m, 2H), 8.20 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.20 (m, 6H), 4.63 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.0, 149.7, 147.8, 138.1, 137.1, 128.4, 127.6, 127.2, 125.9,122.1, 43.2. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
N-Benzyl-N-methylpicolinamide (3l). Yield: 92%; mixture of rotamers, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.52 (dd, J = 4.4 amd 14.0 Hz, 2H), 7.80 –7.58 (m, 4H), 7.35–7.10 (m, 12H), 4.72 (s, 2H), 4.62 (s. 2H), 2.97 (s, 3H), 2.91 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.1, 168.8, 154.4, 154.3, 148.1, 136.8, 136.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 127.4, 127.3, 124.2, 123.5, 123.4, 54.4, 51.0, 36.3, 33.1. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [34]
Piperidin-1-yl(pyridin-2-yl)methanone (3m). Yield: 77%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.15 (m, 1H), 3.81–3.65 (m, 2H), 3.31–3.48 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.43 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.5, 154.7, 148.3, 136.8, 124.0, 123.1, 48.1, 43.2, 26.4, 25.4, 24.4. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [35]
Morpholino(pyridin-2-yl)methanone (3n). Yield: 40%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.50 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.88–3.50 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.3, 153.6, 148.1, 137.0, 124.5, 124.0, 66.9, 66.6, 47.6, 42.7. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [36]
N-(2-morpholinoethyl)picolinamide (3o). Yield: 71%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.46 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (br, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.70–3.41 (m, 6H), 2.61–2.31 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.2, 149.9, 147.9, 127.0, 125.8, 122.0, 66.8, 57.2, 53.3, 35.8. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [37]
N-Benzyl-2-phenoxyacetamide (3p). Yield: 89%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48–7.21 (m, 7H), 7.10–6.87 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.1, 157.1, 137.7, 129.7, 128.6, 127.6, 127.5, 122.1, 114.6, 67.3, 42.9. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [38]
2-Phenoxy-N-phenylacetamide (3q). Yield: 87%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.32 (bs, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.42–7.29 (m, 4H), 7.25–6.92 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.2, 157.0, 136.8, 129.8, 129.0, 124.7, 122.3, 120.1, 114.8, 67.6. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [39]
2-Phenoxy-1-(piperidin-1-yl)ethanone (3r). Yield: 70%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38–7.20 (m, 2H), 7.12–6.87 (m, 3H), 4.63 (s, 2H), 3.60–3.42 (m, 4H), 1.69–1.48 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.0, 157.9, 129.4, 121.3, 114.5, 67.6, 46.3, 43.0, 26.3, 25.4, 24.3.
N-(2-Morpholinoethyl)-2-phenoxyacetamide (3s). Yield: 70%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.09 (br, 1H), 7.09–6.70 (m, 3H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 3.65–3.47 (m, 4H), 3.44–3.35 (m, 2H), 2.52–2.27 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0, 157.2, 129.6, 121.9, 67.2, 66.8, 56.5, 53.0, 35.1.
1-Benzylpyrrolidin-2-one (3t). Yield: 78%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.24–7.71 (m, 5H), 4.35 (s, 2H), 3.15 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 2.33 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.91–1.83 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.1, 135.9, 127.9, 127.3, 126.7, 45.8, 45.7, 30.1, 16.9. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [39]
1-Benzylpiperidin-2-one (3u). Yield: 73%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.35–7.18 (m, 5H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 3.13 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 2.59–2.31 (m, 2H), 1.81–1.67 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.7, 137.11, 128.4, 127.8, 127.1, 49.9, 47.1, 32.2, 23.0, 21.2. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [39]
Methyl 5-(phenylamino)pentanoate (3v). Yield: 64%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.16 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.68 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.27 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.45–2.30 (m, 2H), 1.82–1.59 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.7, 148.1, 129.2, 129.1, 117.2, 112.7, 51.4, 43.4, 33.7, 33.6, 28.8, 26.5, 22.4. (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [40]
6-((4-Fluorobenzyl)(methyl)amino)-N-phenylpyrimidine-4-carboxamide (7). Yield: 66%; Clear oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.94 (s, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.10–7.28 (m, 3H), 6.90–7.08 (m, 2H), 4.86 (br, 2H), 3.11 (br, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.2, 161.4, 157.1, 155.2, 137.4, 129.1, 124.6, 119.7, 115.8, 115.6, 100.3, 33.40. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -114.8 (The obtained NMR data agreed with the literature data for this compound.) [30]

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Materials and methods, results of optimization conditions as well as NMR spectra of products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.T.M.; methodology, B.D.M., M.S. and R.T.; formal analysis, P.T.M., S.B.S., B.D.M., M.S. and R.T.; writing—original draft preparation, P.T.M.; writing—review and editing, P.T.M., S.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Grant number 118082 and the article processing charge (APC) was funded by Prof. H.-J. Knölker.

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of Johannesburg and Chemical Science Department for providing the research infrastructure. We also express gratitude to our NMR technician Mutshinyalo Nwamadi for assisting us in acquiring the NMR data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Humphrey, J.M.; Chamberlin, A.R. Chemical Synthesis of Natural Product Peptides: Coupling Methods for the Incorporation of Noncoded Amino Acids into Peptides. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2243–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agrawal, R.; Jain, P.; Dikshit, S.N. Apixaban: A New Player in the Anticoagulant Class. Curr. Drug Targets 2012, 13, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ponomaryov, Y.; Krasikova, V.; Lebedev, A.; Chernyak, D.; Varacheva, L.; Chernobroviy, A. Scalable and green process for the synthesis of anticancer drug lenalidomide. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2015, 51, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, A.-N.; Li, B.; Ruan, L.; Wang, Y.; Duan, G.; Li, J. An improved and practical route for the synthesis of enzalutamide and potential impurities study. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Volovych, I.; Neumann, M.; Schmidt, M.; Buchner, G.; Yang, J.-Y.; Wölk, J.; Sottmann, T.; Strey, R.; Schomäcker, R.; Schwarze, M. A novel process concept for the three step Boscalid® synthesis. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 58279–58287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jarvis, L.M. The new drugs of 2018. C&EN 2019, 97, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunetz, J.R.; Magano, J.; Weisenburger, G.A. Large-Scale Applications of Amide Coupling Reagents for the Synthesis of Pharmaceuticals. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 140–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Constable, D.J.C.; Dunn, P.J.; Hayler, J.D.; Humphrey, G.R.; Leazer, Jr.J.L.; Linderman, R.J.; Lorenz, K.; Manley, J.; Pearlman, B.A.; Wells, A.; et al. Key green chemistry research areas—a perspective from pharmaceutical manufacturers. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pattabiraman, V.R.; Bode, J.W. Rethinking amide bond synthesis. Nature 2011, 480, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sabatini, M.T.; Boulton, L.T.; Sheppard, T.D. Borate esters: Simple catalysts for the sustainable synthesis of complex amides. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1701028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Moore, J.A. An assessment of boric acid and borax using the IEHR evaluative process for assessing human developmental and reproductive toxicity of agents. Reprod. Toxicol. 1997, 11, 123–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sabatini, M.T.; Boulton, L.T.; Sneddon, H.F.; Sheppard, T.D. A green chemistry perspective on catalytic amide bond formation. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Allen, C.L.; Williams, J.M.J. Metal-catalysed approaches to amide bond formation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3405–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Figueiredo, R.M.; Suppo, J.-S.; Campagne, J.-M. Nonclassical routes for amide bond formation. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 19–12029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ojeda-Porras, A.; Gamba-Sánchez, D. Recent developments in amide synthesis using nonactivated starting materials. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 11548–11555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ranu, B.C.; Dutta, P. A simple and convenient procedure for the conversion of esters to secondary amides. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Price, K.E.; Larriveé-Aboussafy, C.; Lillie, B.M.; McLaughlin, R.W.; Mustakis, J.; Hettenbach, K.W.; Hawkins, J.M.; Vaidyanathan, R. Mild and efficient DBU-catalyzed amidation of ayanoacetates. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2003–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kim, B.R.; Lee, H.-G.; Kang, S.-B.; Sung, G.H.; Kim, J.-J.; Park, J.K.; Lee, S.-G.; Yoon, Y.-J. tert-Butoxide-Assisted Amidation of Esters under Green Conditions. Synthesis 2012, 44, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ohshima, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Agura, K.; Fujii, Y.; Yoshiyama, A.; Mashima, K. Sodium methoxide: A simple but highly efficient catalyst for the direct amidation of esters. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5434–5436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rzhevskiy, S.A.; Ageshina, A.A.; Chesnokov, G.A.; Gribanov, P.S.; Topchiy, M.A.; Nechaev, M.S.; Asachenko, A.F. Solvent- and transition metal-free amide synthesis from phenyl esters and aryl amines. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 1536–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Morimoto, H.; Fujiwara, R.; Shimizu, Y.; Morisaki, K.; Ohshima, T. Lanthanum(III) triflate catalyzed direct amidation of esters. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2018–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cheung, C.W.; Ploeger, M.L.; Hu, X. Direct amidation of esters with nitroarenes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ling, L.; Chen, C.; Luo, M.; Zeng, X. Chromium-catalyzed activation of acyl C−O Bonds with magnesium for amidation of esters with nitroarenes. Org Lett. 2019, 21, 1912–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ben Halima, T.; Masson-Makdissi, J.; Newman, S.G. Nickel catalysed amide bond formation from methyl esters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12925–12929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, G.; Szostak, M. Highly selective transition-metal-free transamidation of amides and amidation of esters at room temperature. Nat Commun. 2018, 9, 4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Caldwell, N.; Campbell, P.S.; Jamieson, C.; Potjewyd, F.; Simpson, I.; Watson, A.J.B. Amidation of esters with amino alcohols using organobase catalysis. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 9347–9354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Correa, A.; Mancheño, O.G.; Bolm, C. Iron-catalysed carbon–heteroatom and heteroatom–heteroatom bond forming processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1108–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, C.-L.; Li, B.-J.; Shi, Z.-J. Direct C−H Transformation via Iron Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1293–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bauer, I.; Knölker, H.-J. Iron Catalysis in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wilson, C.R.; Gessner, R.K.; Moosa, A.; Seldon, R.; Warner, D.F.; Mizrahi, V.; de Melo, C.S.; Simelane, S.B.; Nchinda, A.; Abay, E.; et al. Novel antitubercular 6-dialkylaminopyrimidine carboxamides from phenotypic whole-cell high throughput screening of a softfocus library: Structure−activity relationship and target identification studies. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 10118–10134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Taylor, J.E.; Jones, M.D.; Williams, J.M.J.; Bull, S.D. N-Acyl DBN tetraphenylborate salts as N-acylating agents. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 2808–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sawant, D.N.; Bagal, D.B.; Ogawa, S.; Selvam, K.; Saito, S. Diboron-Catalyzed Dehydrative Amidation of Aromatic Carboxylic Acids with Amines. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 4397–4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Liebeskind, L.S. In Situ Carboxyl Activation Using a Silatropic Switch: A New Approach to Amide and Peptide Constructions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14256–14259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhu, M.; Fujita, K.-I.; Yamaguchi, R. Aerobic Oxidative Amidation of Aromatic and Cinnamic Aldehydes with Secondary Amines by CuI/2-Pyridonate Catalytic System. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9102–9109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Wan, X.; Xu, Q. Clean synthesis of primary to tertiary carboxamides by CsOH-catalyzed aminolysis of nitriles in water. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4865–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kiselyov, A.S. Reaction of N-fluoropyridinium fluoride with isonitriles and diazo compounds: A one-pot synthesis of (pyridin-2-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2631–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lundberg, H.; Tinnis, F.; Adolfsson, H. Direct Amide Coupling of Non-activated Carboxylic Acids and Amines Catalysed by Zirconium(IV) Chloride. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 3822–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nagarajan, S.; Ran, P.; Shanmugavelan, P.; Sathishkumar, M.; Ponnuswamy, A.; Suk, N.K.; Gnana, K. The catalytic activity of titania nanostructures in the synthesis of amides under solvent-free conditions. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, K.; Hong, S.H. Iridium-Catalyzed Single-Step N-Substituted Lactam Synthesis from Lactones and Amines. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 4152–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuan, M.-L.; Xie, J.-H.; Zhou, Q.-L. Boron Lewis Acid Promoted Ruthenium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Amides: An Efficient Approach to Secondary Amines. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 3036–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of all the compounds 3a–3v and 7 are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 01040 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Catalyst = AlCl3, FeCl3, FeCl2, FeBr3 or BiCl3.
Scheme 1. Catalyst = AlCl3, FeCl3, FeCl2, FeBr3 or BiCl3.
Molecules 25 01040 sch001
Molecules 25 01040 g001 550
Figure 1. Reaction optimization. N.D. = Not Detected.
Figure 1. Reaction optimization. N.D. = Not Detected.
Molecules 25 01040 g001
Molecules 25 01040 sch002 550
Scheme 2. a Reaction mixture solidified and 0.5 mL CH3CN was added.
Scheme 2. a Reaction mixture solidified and 0.5 mL CH3CN was added.
Molecules 25 01040 sch002
Molecules 25 01040 sch003 550
Scheme 3. General reaction scheme for FeCl3 substrate scope evaluation. a Reaction mixture solidified and 0.5 mL of CH3CN was added.
Scheme 3. General reaction scheme for FeCl3 substrate scope evaluation. a Reaction mixture solidified and 0.5 mL of CH3CN was added.
Molecules 25 01040 sch003
Molecules 25 01040 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Lactam synthesis.
Scheme 4. Lactam synthesis.
Molecules 25 01040 sch004
Molecules 25 01040 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Application of the developed protocol in the synthesis of anti-TB pyrimidine carboxamides.
Scheme 5. Application of the developed protocol in the synthesis of anti-TB pyrimidine carboxamides.
Molecules 25 01040 sch005
Table
Table 1. Solvent evaluation.
Table 1. Solvent evaluation.
EntrySolvent Product Yield
1Toluene84% a
2Acetonitrile96%
3Tetrahydrofuran 85% a
41,2 Dichloroethane94%
5No Solvent 99%
Reaction conditions: ester 1a (1.1 mmol), amine 2a (1 mmol), 15 mol% FeCl3, 80 oC. a Reaction did not reach completion within 90 min.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mkhonazi, B.D.; Shandu, M.; Tshinavhe, R.; Simelane, S.B.; Moshapo, P.T. Solvent-Free Iron(III) Chloride-Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters. Molecules 2020, 25, 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051040

AMA Style

Mkhonazi BD, Shandu M, Tshinavhe R, Simelane SB, Moshapo PT. Solvent-Free Iron(III) Chloride-Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters. Molecules. 2020; 25(5):1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mkhonazi, Blessing D., Malibongwe Shandu, Ronewa Tshinavhe, Sandile B. Simelane, and Paseka T. Moshapo. 2020. "Solvent-Free Iron(III) Chloride-Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters" Molecules 25, no. 5: 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051040

APA Style

Mkhonazi, B. D., Shandu, M., Tshinavhe, R., Simelane, S. B., & Moshapo, P. T. (2020). Solvent-Free Iron(III) Chloride-Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters. Molecules, 25(5), 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051040

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop