Next Article in Journal
Mono-, Di- and Tetra-iron Complexes with Selenium or Sulphur Functionalized Vinyliminium Ligands: Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Antiproliferative Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Bioactive Compounds from Fungi as Potential Candidates for Protease Inhibitors and Immunomodulators to Apply for Coronaviruses
Previous Article in Journal
A Tryptophan Metabolite, 8-Hydroxyquinaldic Acid, Exerts Antiproliferative and Anti-Migratory Effects on Colorectal Cancer Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Nuphar lutea Extracts Exhibit Anti-Viral Activity against the Measles Virus

Molecules 2020, 25(7), 1657; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071657
by Hila Winer 1, Janet Ozer 1,*, Yonat Shemer 1,2, Irit Reichenstein 1, Brit Eilam-Frenkel 1, Daniel Benharroch 3, Avi Golan-Goldhirsh 4 and Jacob Gopas 1,5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2020, 25(7), 1657; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071657
Submission received: 16 February 2020 / Revised: 22 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 3 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antiviral Properties of Natural Products)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments

Activity (of any source) against the Measles Virus remains of great current interest, certainly in low-income countries. Yet, the present manuscript does not fulfill a few essential requirements:

  • What is NUP exactly? Just the extract? It needs to be chemically defined, so as to guarantee its reproducibility and confirmation by others.
  • What is the exact mechanism (target) of action?
  • What is the SAR (“structure-activity relationship”)?
  • What is the spectrum of antiviral action (only Measles, or other paramyxoviruses and possibly orthomyxoviruses as well?
  • What are the therapeutic perspectives?

These questions should be addressed in a thoroughly revised version of the present manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript is describing about anti-viral activity of Nuphar lutea extract against the measles virus. The experiments were organized well and the manuscript was written well. However, it must be revised to improve the descriptions at several points; 1) effective concentration of the extract should be clearly and discussed with other reports, 2) effective compound should be illustrated, at least, the fraction. 3) Abbreviations and full spells should be checked and revised.

Specific Comments;  

  • L17, Nuphar lutea L (NUP, yellow ...)
  • Figure legends should be positions at the bottom of the figures
  • L78, XIT -> full spell
  • Fig. 2 -> MOI -> full spell
  • 24hrs -> 24 h (* Space should be given between numeral and unit for all the data (ex. 24h -> 24 h, 10mM -> 10 mM, ........) 
  • L209-210, should be rewritten.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

All the comments were addressed and it is recommeded to be acceptable to This Journal.

Back to TopTop