Next Article in Journal
Tuning up Transcription Factors for Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
The Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Potential of Selected Ethnomedicinal Plants from Sri Lanka
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental and Computational Studies Unraveling the Peculiarity of Enolizable Oxoesters in the Organocatalyzed Mannich-Type Addition to Cyclic N-Acyl Iminium Ions

Molecules 2020, 25(8), 1903; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081903
by Andrea Menichetti 1, Sebastiano Di Pietro 1, Valeria Di Bussolo 2, Lucilla Favero 1,* and Mauro Pineschi 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2020, 25(8), 1903; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081903
Submission received: 2 April 2020 / Revised: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 17 April 2020 / Published: 20 April 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this work, the authors studied a novel catalytic enantioselective direct α-amidoalkylation of quinolines and isoquinolines with γ- and δ-oxoesters. They show low diastereoselectivity and low to moderate values of enantioselectivity. The DFT was also used to support the experimental results. The manuscript is well written; the results are interesting and supported by the data presented. There are one or two minor typos within the text, which I am sure the authors will correct. I believe this manuscript is strong enough to be published 'as is'. Thank you.

Author Response

Some typos present in the text (extimated, aldehydic, polifunctionalized, not separable) have been corrected.

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript describes the full details of the asymmetric Mannich-type condensation of cyclic N-acyl iminium ions mediated by organocatalysts.  Furthermore, the authors carried out some computational studies to clarify the observed low diastereoselectivities of the reactions.

Chemistries described in this paper would be a nice piece of work and of interest for a number of researchers in this field.

I recommend this manuscript for publication in Molecules.

 

A few minor points:

The format of the Table 1 is confusing.  Particularly, the meaning of the number of ratios shown are difficult to understand what does this mean.  I would like to suggest to modify the Table simple and clear to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author Response

The meaning of the number of ratios in Table 1 has been modified in accordance with Reviewer’s suggestion.

Back to TopTop