Next Article in Journal
Photorelaxation Pathways of 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)-4′-nitrostilbene Upon S1 Excitation Revealed by Conical Intersection and Intersystem Crossing Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Multivariate Analysis of Photoacoustic Spectra for the Detection of Short-Chained Hydrocarbon Isotopologues
Previous Article in Journal
Trifluoromethoxypyrazines: Preparation and Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applications of Near Infrared Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Analysis of Human Respiration: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules25092227
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Sensing Techniques for Exhaled Breath Diagnostics

by
Ramya Selvaraj
1,*,
Nilesh J. Vasa
1,
S. M. Shiva Nagendra
2 and
Boris Mizaikoff
3
1
Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
3
Institute of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(9), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092227
Submission received: 3 April 2020 / Revised: 28 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 April 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Human exhaled breath consists of more than 3000 volatile organic compounds, many of which are relevant biomarkers for various diseases. Although gas chromatography has been the gold standard for volatile organic compound (VOC) detection in exhaled breath, recent developments in mid-infrared (MIR) laser spectroscopy have led to the promise of compact point-of-care (POC) optical instruments enabling even single breath diagnostics. In this review, we discuss the evolution of MIR sensing technologies with a special focus on photoacoustic spectroscopy, and its application in exhaled breath biomarker detection. While mid-infrared point-of-care instrumentation promises high sensitivity and inherent molecular selectivity, the lack of standardization of the various techniques has to be overcome for translating these techniques into more widespread real-time clinical use.

1. Introduction

Human breath has always been a matrix of interest for disease diagnostics and monitoring owing to its inherently noninvasive access. Even in ancient times, human beings used to relate the odor of breath to diseases. Ancient Greek physicians assessed the aroma of human breath for disease diagnosis. Nebelthau (mid-1800s) identified acetone in the breath of diabetes patients, while Anstie (1874) isolated ethanol from the breath of alcoholics [1]. Linus Pauling’s work in the 1970s in breath analysis led to the detection of more than 200 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled human breath matrix, apart from then known compounds including CO2, O2, H2O, and N2 [2,3,4]. More recently, owing to advancements in detection and sensing technologies, researchers have found that more than 3000 VOCs may be present in exhaled human breath. However, trace quantities of gases, including VOCs, are also found anywhere in our immediate environments [5,6]. Figure 1 shows pathways for VOCs in the human body and the body pool of VOCs. VOCs are known to be present within the human body as a result of regular metabolic activity in the body, pathological disorders, and exposure to drugs. These endogenous VOCs are usually released into the bloodstream, and eventually metabolized or excreted from the human body by exhalation, skin emission, and urine [7]. On the basis of the analysis of breath samples collected from healthy and diseased human subjects during various studies, it was found that VOCs and their concentration in exhaled breath may act as biomarkers of selected diseases or pathophysiological conditions [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Despite the advantages of breath analysis as a non-invasive approach, the challenges with breath analysis remain in the variation in the concentration of target compounds from the subject. The variation or accurate quantification of the metabolic markers is influenced by gender, socio-economic and human demographic factors, use of medications, and dietary intake. Saturated hydrocarbons such as ethane, pentane, acetone, and aldehydes present in human exhale are an indication of lipid peroxidation of fatty acids [12,13]. For patients with diabetes, the body cannot synthesize insulin to break down glucose in the blood to provide energy. Therefore, the body undergoes lipolysis causing decarboxylation of acetoacetate, leading to the production of significantly increased concentrations of acetone in the breath, as shown in Figure 1b. Isoprene is formed along the mevalonic pathway in cholesterol synthesis [14]. Higher levels of breath pentane were also detected for cases of breast cancer, heart transplant rejection, myocardial infarction, schizophrenia, and rheumatoid arthritis [15,16,17,18,19,20].
Similarly, sulfur-containing compounds in breath are the result of incomplete metabolism of methionine in the transamination pathway. Moreover, nitrogen-containing compounds are at elevated levels in human breath for liver impairment or uremia. Nitric oxide has been identified as a biomarker of airway inflammation such as in asthma, allergic rhinitis, eosinophilic bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [21,22,23,24]. Carbon monoxide is indicative of an increase in oxidative stress or stimulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as during smoking cessation [25,26].
The list of VOCs and inorganic compounds and their relation to potential disease states, as reported in various studies, is shown in Table 1. Breath analysis can reduce dependence on invasive diagnostics, such as bronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage for preliminary assessments. It can allow online examination with a shorter time for diagnosis compared with conventional analytical techniques, such as blood sample analysis. The research and analysis of VOCs in human breath gas considering the potential in assessment of environmental exposure to VOCs, as well as clinical diagnosis and disease state monitoring through evaluation of endogenous VOCs, have seen much interest in the past few decades. Numerous approaches have been reported for the assessment of VOCs in human breath. The exhaled breath (EB) matrix predominantly comprises CO2, H2O, O2, and N2 (% levels) next to much lower concentrated VOCs (ppm–ppt levels), which may mask the presence of other biomarkers for certain detection techniques. Hence, analysis techniques with pronounced sensitivity and selectivity are required for identifying and quantifying disease-related biomarkers against the highly variable breath matrix background.
Conventional breath analysis methods are usually based on offline sampling. Gas chromatography (GC) based separation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) remains the ‘gold standard technique’ for trace gas analysis. Owing to its historical presence and analytical capabilities, GC–MS capitalizes on extensively developed libraries, which facilitate rapid compound identification at sensitivities down to ppt levels. However, these techniques involve manual sampling procedures and sample preparation [27,28,29,30,31]. Alternative technologies such as selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT–MS), resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization mass spectrometry (REMPI–MS), and proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR–MS) provide rapid response times [32,33,34,35,36,37]. However, all these techniques involve very high instrumental costs, require highly trained personnel, and are laboratory-based tools. GC techniques coupled with the mass spectrometry are selective and sensitive, but cannot perform rapid trace-gas measurements, and precise calibration of the chromatographic column is required, which are not desirable for single-breath resolved breath analysis.
Alternative techniques like electronic nose sensors have found rapid developmental interest for their applications in small, affordable, point-of-care systems in breath analysis. Predominately, conducting polymer-based and metal–oxide semiconductor (MOS)-based arrays of sensors are used for determining multiple analytes. However, they are limited in molecular selectivity, high moisture sensitivity, and power demand [38].
Alternatively, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) techniques such as those based on time-of-flight (TOFIMS) and differential ion mobility (DMS) have been reported for the detection of VOCs. DMS involves the separation of different ion species owing to differences in their ion mobilities in low and high electric fields. High-frequency asymmetric waveform field is used for the filtering of other species while selectively allowing ions of a particular species through the filter by tuning a low amplitude compensation field. DMS has resulted in a cost-effective, compact sensor without moving parts that allows real-time gas analysis [39,40,41]. However, owing to the low output current signal, the signal-to-noise ratio is low. Further, the sensitivity in measurements is also small and varies with the measurement species. For example, in the case of acetone and hexane, the sensitivity was estimated to be ≈120 pA per ppm (parts per million) and ≈700 pA/ppm, respectively [42].
Driven by the need for point-of-care (POC) medical instrumentation, laser spectroscopic-based noninvasive human exhale analysis has drawn increasing attention during the last decades since the development of new mid-infrared (MIR) laser sources [43,44,45]. POC instruments can be developed for monitoring of exhaled breath with high accuracy, sensitivity, detection limits, and reasonable prices. The major laser spectroscopic techniques under development for breath analysis include tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS), cavity leak-out absorption spectroscopy (CALOS), hollow waveguide (HWG) absorption spectroscopy, and quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70].
A basic schematic of the setup for MIR laser absorption spectroscopy is given in Figure 2a. The VOCs to be measured are usually in the ppm to ppb range, and hence the most sensitive techniques of absorption measurement have to be adopted for detection. Variations to the conventional laser spectroscopic method to improve the sensitivity of the sensor system include multi-pass spectroscopy (MUPASS) and CRDS, which are most widely used for such applications. Simplified schematics of such experimental systems are presented in Figure 2b,c. Their experimental setup and operation are detailed in [47,48,49,50,51].
Quantum cascade lasers and interband cascade lasers (QCLs, ICLs) in the MIR range have potential application, where many molecules relevant in exhaled breath diagnostics exhibit strong rovibrational absorptions are present. QCLs offer wide tunability and pronounced output power, leading to molecular selectivity, sensitivity, and improved signal-to-noise ratio for the detection of trace biomarkers in the exhaled breath matrix. Li et al. have used the ICL-based TDLAS approach for ethane detection in an exhaled breath at 3.34 µm, which is indicative of lung cancer and asthma. A detection limit of 1.2 ppbv was achieved at 4 s data acquisition time [52]. Ghorbani et al. have used an ICL-based TDLAS system for the identification of carbon monoxide (CO) in an exhaled breath at 4.69 µm using a multi-pass gas cell with a detection limit of 9 ± 5 ppbv at 0.07 s acquisition time, thereby resolving individual breath cycles (i.e., exhalation and inhalation profiles) [53]. Conventional spectroscopic methods like direct absorption spectroscopy are limited in sensitivity by the path length, as longer path length improves the sensitivity of the measurement. In such cases, integrated cavity output spectroscopy (ICOS), cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (CEAS), and CRDS, allowing a sufficient path length of many kilometers with sensitivity as small as parts per billion or even parts per trillion, are used to improve the sensor system [54,55,56].
A variation of the CRDS technique is the CALOS, where, in contrast to the CRDS technique, a continuous wavelength (CW) source is used to tune one of the resonance modes of the cavity, allowing energy to build up inside the cavity [57,58,59,60]. At the time when the laser is turned off, the energy builds up, leaks out, and is detected by the photodetector. Murtz et al. developed this technique for the detection of ethylene (C2H4) using the spectral signature in the 10 µm band of the CO2 laser [57]. Later, Halmer et al. from the same group have demonstrated this technique for carbonyl sulfide (OCS) detection in breath samples with a detection limit of 438 ± 4.4 ppt. This group has also worked on ethane (C2H6) detection in breath samples in the 3.34 μm region. They compared the performance of CALOS with gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC–FID). Repeated tests concluded that the spectroscopy setup could detect ethane in less than 1 min, making it more suitable for continuous monitoring of patients, whereas chromatography required 30 to 60 min [58].
Though such techniques offer high sensitivity and can be adopted for continuous real-time monitoring of patients, such methods need excellent tuning of the cavity length. The optical cavity or multi-pass cell is also sensitive to mechanical vibration. Even the availability of either tunable light sources or high reflectance mirrors precisely for a particular wavelength of the target gas sample limits this technique from being widely used. Moreover, the need for high reflectance mirrors makes it relatively more expensive when compared with the other optical methods.
Recent advances in MIR waveguide technology have the potential to design advanced and compact instrumentation for trace gas analysis in this spectral regime. Hollow-core waveguides (HCW) in this region (3–20 µm) can facilitate the development of highly compact and sensitive trace gas sensing devices with potential usage in POC scenarios. Hollow-core photonic bandgap waveguides (HC-PBW) absorption spectroscopy for methane detection in the 3.4 µm region has been demonstrated by Nikodem et al. with sensitivities at the ppm-level [61]. For higher sensitivities, the length of the HC waveguide may be increased. However, bending the fiber for maintaining a compact footprint will cause optical losses.
Recently, a novel concept of substrate-integrated hollow waveguides has been introduced [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. The substrate-integrated hollow waveguide (iHWG) is based on a layered structure with the light-guiding channels integrated into a rigid solid-state substrate material. The geometry of the iHWGs studied with a 2.0 mm hollow core edge length and a yin-yang structure is shown in Figure 3a. The experimental setup and the integration of the iHWG with the detector are shown in Figure 3b and explained in [62]. The significant advantage of the iHWG is that any low-cost substrate material combined with a cost-effective fabrication or replication technique, including hot embossing or even 3D printing of iHWGs [68], may enable a device fabrication strategy that is fundamentally different from conventional fiber optic HWG fabrication technology at a fraction of the cost. The analytical performance, that is, the energy throughput of iHWG, depends on the channel geometry and the surface roughness. Superior surface coatings are essential to reduce the reflection losses, and the iHWG channel length has to be specifically tailored for individual breath gases under study. However, the detection limits of this technique for breath gas analysis can be further improved when combined with other analytical methods.
Alternatively, hollow core waveguides have also been used in fibre enhanced Raman spectroscopy (FERS) [71,72]. FERS is based on spontaneous Raman scattering (SRS), which is an inelastic scattering process that can measure multiple gas species with a single laser at a fixed wavelength [73]. Hence, SRS has potential in exhaled breath analysis for its inherent ability to determine a large number of species. However, the major disadvantage of SRS in gaseous medium is the low intensity of the scattered signal, which can be overcome by signal amplification techniques like multi-pass optical cavities [74,75]. On the other hand, the application of HWGs serving as a miniaturized sample container can also improve the sensitivity by increasing the interaction of the propagating light with the molecules at low sample volumes. The detection limits, spectral characteristics, and laser techniques employed for significant biomarkers are shown in Table 2. PAS is another technique, where instead of a photodetector for laser absorption measurement, a microphone is used for acoustic signal measurement. This paper specifically discusses photoacoustic spectroscopy and its application to breath gas analysis. It also presents the challenges and perspectives of the suitability of PA-based spectroscopic methods for the development of point-of-care instruments for breath gas analysis.

2. Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Breath Gas Analysis

PAS is a zero-background technique and the PA signal is less affected by scattering. Hence, it has been widely used for trace gas detection at the part per billion or even part per trillion levels. Figure 4a shows the schematic of the PA signal generation process.
In photoacoustic spectroscopy, as the name suggests, light energy is converted into sound energy in a series of steps. The modulated or pulsed light is focused into a gas cell containing the target sample to be analyzed. If the frequency of the light source matches with the vibrational frequency of the gas molecule to be analyzed, the light is absorbed. Periodic amplitude modulation in the light source causes a periodic acoustic vibration in the gas cell. This acoustic vibration is detected by the microphone and converted into an electrical signal [76,77,78,79,80]. The general schematic for the PAS technique is shown in Figure 4b. Mid-IR light sources like QCL and optical parametric oscillator (OPO) are widely preferred for their narrow linewidths and tunability.
On the other hand, broadband sources matching with broadband spectra of species of interest can be used, which allows low power based multiple-gas sensing. Recently, QEPAS based on quartz tuning forks (QTF) as a sound transducer for the PAS technique has been increasingly used for selective and sensitive sensing [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]. The general architecture of a QEPAS system is shown in Figure 5. Commercially available QTFs are tiny (4 mm × 1.5 mm × 0.35 mm), and hence allow small sampling volumes.

2.1. Selected Breath Biomarkers Detected by Photoacoustic Techniques

2.1.1. Ammonia (NH3)

Many studies have shown that ammonia in exhaled breath can be used for detecting chronic kidney disease (CKD), because, in patients with CKD, the accumulated urea cannot be excreted by the kidneys, but is degraded by the salivary urease into ammonia, which is exhaled through the breath. A variety of medical conditions, including liver and kidney disorders [93,94], as well as helicobacter pylori infections [95], can be detected by exhaled ammonia concentration. Narasimhan et al. have used a tunable line switched CO2 laser operating in the 9 and 10 µm wavelength range. They were able to detect 100 ppb ammonia-detection sensitivity [96]. Lewicki et al. employed an EC-QCL centered at 10.2 um with an output power of 42 mW using the QEPAS technique for ammonia measurement in human breath. The detection sensitivity for exhaled ammonia is at <10 ppb level with 1 s time resolution [97]. On the other hand, Bakhirkin et al. used a CW mid-infrared DFB quantum cascade laser centered at 10 µm, an output power of 30 mW, and quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy for ammonia detection with a detection sensitivity of 20 ppbv (1σ) at a 0.3 s time resolution [98].

2.1.2. Ethane (C2H6)

Lipid peroxidation that is the reaction between omega-3 fatty acids and reactive oxygen species releases ethane in the human body, which can be identified in the human breath. Ethane has also been noted as an indicator of oxidative stress, which in turn has been said to play an essential role in the pathophysiology of several common diseases. Studies show that cancer, cardiac disease neurodegenerative disease, psychiatric illness, stroke, and diabetes patients have high oxidative stress, and hence it has been proposed to have any involvement in the initiation of disease such as in cancer [99,100]. Moreover, studies on patients with disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity (ADH), schizophrenia, asthma, and hypertension during pregnancy show a common underlying factor of increased oxidative stress and ethane in the exhaled breath [101,102,103]. However, it is unclear as to whether systemic lipid peroxidation changes ethane concentrations or whether they are mainly pulmonary in origin, because, in addition to pulmonary diseases, smoking tobacco has been said to elevate ethane concentrations [104,105]. Herpen et al. demonstrate a detection limit of 0.01 ppb with a high power (1.2 W) OPO (tuning range 3–3.8 µm) that is continuously tuned over 24 GHz during the trace gas measurements [106]. Ethane concentrations in healthy humans range between 0 and 12 ppb, hence low ppb detection limits are required for such breath gas measurements.

2.1.3. Ethylene (C2H4)

Ethylene, as a biomarker, has been studied in dialysis patients. Studies show a relation between oxidative stress and fatality in patients with renal failure, especially elderly patients. A conventional PAS sensor using a CW carbon dioxide laser (10.53 µm) was developed to monitor C2H4 concentration in elderly patients (age 70–80 years) [107]. The ethylene concentration was found to vary between 0.15 ppm and 0.8 ppm before and after Hemodialysis, respectively. The healthy concentration level was found to be ~0.007 ppm. QEPAS-based C2H4 sensors were reported previously using a 3.32 µm DFB laser (1.5 mW) to achieve a minimum detection limit of 63 ppm at 25 s averaging time [108]. Wang et al. used QEPAS-based C2H4 sensor by exploiting the C2H4 spectra near 10.5 µm. The CW DFB QCL with ~23 mW power output at the target wavelength near 10.5 µm achieved a minimum detection limit of 50 parts per billion (ppb) at an averaging time of 70 s [109].

2.1.4. Acetone (CO(CH3)2)

For patients with diabetes, the body cannot synthesize insulin to break down glucose in the blood to provide energy. Therefore, the body undergoes lipolysis, causing decarboxylation of acetoacetate, leading to the production of significantly increased concentrations of acetone in the breath [110,111]. Hence, the breath of diabetic patients is characterized by the fruity odor of acetone. Tyas et al. have used a CO2 laser in the 10.6 um range for the detection of acetone. A group of healthy individuals was studied against a group of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). In the group with type 2 DM, the acetone range was to vary between 101 and 162 ppb, while in healthy individuals, the acetone range was between 15 and 85 ppb [112].

2.1.5. Nitric Oxide (NO)

Nitric oxide is an important biomarker for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The patients often exhibit symptoms that alter their performance statuses such as productive cough, worsening dyspnea, peripheral muscle weakness, and nutritional abnormalities. Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a non-invasive method of assessing airway inflammation. In patients with COPD, the peripheral airway (bronchioles) is the leading site of obstruction and inflammation [113,114], and the peripheral nitric oxide levels may be more predictive of the disease course and control. Tittel et al. have designed a 2f wavelength-modulation spectroscopy-based QEPAS detection approach for NO monitoring in COPD patients. They utilized an EC-QCL source operating at the NO R (6.5) absorption doublet centered at 1900.08 cm−1 (λ ~ 5.263 μm). The minimum detection limit achievable is ~5 ppbv with a 1 s data acquisition time [115]. The estimated exhaled breath nitric oxide concentrations are between 0 and 100 ppb in healthy humans.

2.1.6. Methane (CH4)

Methane as a breath gas is of considerable interest because it is considered as a potential biomarker for stomach inflammatory diseases and colorectal cancer. Various studies demonstrate that high lipid, low-fat diet, and elevated bile salts, as well as the presence of colonic anaerobic bacteria, are a source of methane in the intestine, which then traverse the intestinal mucosa and are absorbed into the systemic circulation. As it has low solubility, it is rapidly excreted by the lungs. Breath methane analysis has been shown in various studies for the diagnosis of carbohydrate malabsorption syndromes and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and, if the exhaled methane is more than one ppm as compared with ambient levels, the patient is considered a methane producer. Bauer et al. presented the development of a Raman amplifier system operating at 1651 nm and its application for trace gas sensing with a miniaturized 3D printed PAS cell. The system exhibited high sensitivity towards methane sensing with the least detection limit of 17 ppb at a signal acquisition time of 130 s [116].
As the amplitude of the photoacoustic signal is directly proportional to the input power and the absorption cross-section of the target gas, in recent years, many research groups have used QCL and ICL in the mid-infrared and THz regions, which are considered as the molecular fingerprint regimes. Furthermore, the QEPAS technique, along with a QTF, has been used to fabricate small, compact PAS systems [117]. Petersen et al. developed a QEPAS sensor using an OPO as a light source in the 3.1–3.7 µm region for detecting methane in exhaled breath. A minimum detection limit of 32 ppbv at 190 s integration time was achieved [118]. A broadband photoacoustic technique for CH4 detection in the 1.65 µm region was developed, where multiple absorption lines of methane were utilized to produce the photoacoustic signal. A bandpass filter with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 12 nm was chosen with a centre wavelength at 1.65 µm where the interference owing to moisture is minimal, as shown in Figure 6 [119]. A multi-wavelength algorithm can be used to estimate the cumulative PA signal amplitude analytically and a least detection limit of 0.05 ppm was reported [120].

3. Challenges and Perspectives

While the potential advantages of breath analysis are apparent, the variability of breath measurements has been quite high, and thus their potential has not been fully utilized to date. Though chromatography is considered the gold standard in breath gas analysis, real-time monitoring is not feasible via such laboratory-based techniques probing discrete samples. On the other hand, laser spectroscopic methods can be applied to real-time monitoring of breath gases. With the advancement in MIR lasers, compact handheld devices can be established with high sensitivity, molecular selectivity, and reproducibility. Even though such laser spectroscopic techniques offer sensitivities in the ppb to ppt concentration range, there are still several improvements required to render MIR spectroscopy a useful clinical tool in routine breath gas monitoring. This an issue for all sensing techniques, as MIR spectroscopies need to deal with the uncertainty on how the presence and/or up/down regulation of selected biomarkers may be mapped onto specific diseases, disease progression, or therapeutic interventions. For example, ethane can be indicative of cancer, cardiac disease neurodegenerative disease, psychiatric illness, stroke, and diabetes. Hence, the pathobiology of the breath compounds has to be extensively studied for establishing diagnostically relevant and usable correlations between biomarkers and the disease. As several studies have shown that, indeed, multiple rather than individual VOCs giving rise to pattern changes may be used to more reliably associate with a particular condition, MIR diagnostics are certainly at the forefront of multi-component sensing techniques utilizing fingerprint patters for detecting several VOCs. Appropriate selection of broadly tunable QCL, ICL, OPO, or supercontinuum light sources enables addressing such complex fingerprints, and may aid in further lowering detection limits, especially in broadband PAS measurements. In conclusion, even though more work certainly needs to be done on MIR sensing technologies as well as on establishing reliable pathobiologically relevant breath biomarker panels, appropriate MIR sensing systems may differentiate between healthy and diseased individuals in a statistically sound fashion appear to be on the horizon.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S., N.J.V. and B.M.; methodology, R.S.; software, R.S.; validation, R.S., N.J.V., S.M.S.N and B.M.; formal analysis, R.S.; investigation, R.S.; resources, R.S. and N.J.V.; data curation, R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S.; writing—review and editing, R.S., N.J.V., S.M.S.N., and B.M.; visualization, R.S.; supervision, N.J.V., S.M.S.N., and B.M.; project administration, R.S. and N.J.V.; funding acquisition, N.J.V., S.M.S.N. and B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

B.M. acknowledges support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant agreement No. GRK2203-PULMOSENS, and by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union within the Project VOGAS (project number 824986). N.J.V. acknowledges support by the Joint National Center for Combustion Research and Development (NCCRD) at IIT Madras (project number IR/S3/EU-01/2009).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hubbard, R.S. Determination of Acetone in Expired Air. J. Biol. Chem. 1920, 43, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pauling, L.; Robinson, A.B.; Teranishit, R.O.Y.; Cary, P. Quantitative Analysis of Urine Vapor and Breath by Gas-Liquid Partition Chromatography. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1971, 68, 2374–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dweik, R.A.; Amann, A. Exhaled breath analysis: The new frontier in medical testing. J Breath Res. 2008, 2, 030301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Matsumoto, K.; Mizuno, R.; Igawa, M. Volatile organic compounds in ambient aerosols. Atmos. Res. 2010, 97, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. VOC Facts, Minnesota Department of Health. Available online: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/air/toxins/voc.html (accessed on 30 July 2019).
  6. Sun, X.; He, J.; Yang, X. Human breath as a source of VOCs in the built environment, Part I: A method for sampling and detection species. Build. Environ. 2017, 125, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phillips, M.; Herrera, J.; Krishnan, S.; Zain, M.; Greenberg, J.; Cataneo, R.N. Variation in Volatile Organic Compounds in the Breath of Normal Humans. J. Chromatogr. 1999, 729, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haines, A.; Dilawari, J.; Metz, G.; Blendis, L.; Wiggins, H. Breath methane in patients with cancer of the large bowel. Lancet 1977, 310, 481–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kearney, D.J.; Hubbard, T.; Putnam, D. Breath ammonia measurement in Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2002, 47, 2523–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carpagnano, G.E.; Kharitonov, S.A.; Resta, O.; Foschino-Barbaro, M.P.; Gramiccioni, E.; Barnes, P.J. Increased 8-isoprostane and interleukin-6 in breath condensate of obstructive sleep apnea patients. Chest. 2002, 122, 1162–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carpagnano, G.E.; Resta, O.; Foschino-Barbaro, M.P.; Gramiccioni, E.; Carpagnano, F. Interleukin-6 is increased in breath condensate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2002, 2, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Salazar, M. Breath Markers of Oxidative Stress in Patients with Unstable Angina. Heart Dis. 2003, 5, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sedghi, S.; Keshavarzian, A.; Klamut, M.; Eiznhamer, D.; Zarling, E. Elevated Breath Ethane Levels in Active Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence for Excessive Lipid Peroxidation. Am. J. Gastroent. 1994, 89, 2217–2221. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kapishon, V.; Koyanagi, G.K.; Blagojevic, V.; Bohme, D.K. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry of pyridine and isoprene: Potential breath exposure and disease biomarkers. J. Breath Res. 2013, 7, 026005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szulejko, J.E.; McCulloch, M.; Jackson, J.; McKee, D.L.; Walker, J.C.; Solouki, T. Evidence for Cancer Biomarkers in Exhaled Breath. IEEE Sens. J. 2009, 10, 185–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Corradi, M.; Mutti, A. Exhaled Breath Analysis: From Occupational to Respiratory Medicine. Acta. Biomed 2005, 76, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Sehnert, S.; Jiang, L.; Burdick, J.; Risby, T. Breath Biomarkers for Detection of Human Liver Diseases: Preliminary Study. Biomarkers 2002, 7, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Phillips, M.; Sabas, M.; Greenberg, J. Increased Pentane and Carbon Disulfide in the Breath of Patients with Schizophrenia. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993, 46, 861–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Weitz, Z.; Birnbaum, A.; Sobotka, P.; Zarling, E.; Skosey, J. High Breath Pentane Concentrations during Acute Myocardial Infarction. Lancet 1991, 337, 933–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olopade, C.; Zakkar, M.; Swedler, W.; Rubinstein, I. Exhaled Pentane Levels in Acute Asthma. Chest 1997, 111, 862–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kistenev, Y.V.; Karapuzikov, A.I.; Kostyukova, N.Y.; Starikova, M.K.; Boyko, A.A.; Bukreeva, E.B.; Bulanova, A.A.; Kolker, D.B.; Kuzmin, D.A.; Zenov, K.G.; et al. Screening of patients with bronchopulmonary diseases using methods of infrared laser photoacoustic spectroscopy and principal component analysis. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20, 065001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kistenev, Y.V.; Bukreeva, E.B.; Bulanova, A.A.; Kuzmin, D.A.; Tuzikov, S.A.; Yumov, E.L. Laser spectroscopy and chemometric study of the specific features of air exhaled by patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Phys. Wave Phenom. 2014, 22, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Menzies-Gow, A.; Mansur, A.H.; Brightling, C.E. Clinical utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in severe asthma management. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 1901633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cazzola, M.; Novelli, G. Biomarkers in COPD. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 23, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vasthare, R.; Kumar, S.; Arron, L. Carbon monoxide breath analyzers and its role in tobacco cessation: A narrative review of literature. J. Int. Oral Health 2018, 10, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ryter, S.W.; Choi, A.M. Carbon monoxide in exhaled breath testing and therapeutics. J. Breath Res. 2013, 7, 017111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Basanta, M.; Ibrahim, B.; Dockry, R.; Douce, D.; Morris, M.; Singh, D.; Woodcock, A.; Fowler, S.J. Exhaled volatile organic compounds for phenotyping chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study. Respir. Res. 2012, 13, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Miekisch, W.; Schubert, J.K.; Noeldge-Schomburg, G.F.E. Diagnostic Potential of Breath Analysis—Focus on Volatile Organic Compounds. Clin. Chim. Acta 2004, 347, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lu, Z.; Huang, W.; Wang, L.; Xu, N.; Ding, Q.; Cao, C. Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 2695–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Song, G.; Qin, T.; Liu, H.; Xu, G.-B.; Pan, Y.-Y.; Xiong, F.-X.; Gu, K.-S.; Sun, G.-P.; Chen, Z.-D. Quantitative breath analysis of volatile organic compounds of lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 2010, 67, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deng, C.; Zhang, J.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X. Determination of Acetone in Human Breath by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Solid-Phase Microextraction with On-Fiber Derivatization. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 810, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dryahina, K.; Smith, D.; Bortlík, M.; Machková, N.; Lukáš, M.; Španěl, P. Pentane and other volatile organic compounds, including carboxylic acids, in the exhaled breath of patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. J. Breath Res. 2017, 12, 16002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Short, L.C.; Frey, R.; Benter, T. Real-Time Analysis of Exhaled Breath via Resonance-Enhanced Multiphoton Ionization-Mass Spectrometry with a Medium Pressure Laser Ionization Source: Observed Nitric Oxide Profile. Appl. Spectrosc. 2006, 60, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Del Río, R.F.; O’Hara, M.E.; Holt, A.; Pemberton, P.; Shah, T.; Whitehouse, T.; Mayhew, C.A. Volatile biomarkers in breath associated with liver cirrhosis—comparisons of pre-and postliver transplant breath samples. Ebiomedicine 2015, 2, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kumar, S.; Huang, J.; Ghadi, N.A.; Spanel, P.; Smith, D.; Hanna, G.B. Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Exhaled Breath for Volatile Organic Compound Profiling of Esophago-gastric Cancer. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 6121–6128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Smith, D.; Wang, T.; Sulé-Suso, J.; Španěl, P.; Haj, A.E. Quantification of acetaldehyde released by lung cancer cells in vitro using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smith, D.; Wang, T.; Pysanenko, A.; Spanel, P. A selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry study of ammonia in mouth- and nose-exhaled breath and in the oral cavity. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilson, A.D. Advances in Electronic-Nose Technologies for the Detection of Volatile Biomarker Metabolites in the Human Breath. Metabolites 2015, 5, 140–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weis, P.; Gilb, S.; Gerhardt, P.; Kappes, M.M. A Time-Of-Flight, Drift Cell, Quadrupole Apparatus for Ion Mobility Measurements. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 216, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ruzsanyi, V.; Sielemann, S.; Baumbach, J.I. Determination of VOCs in Human Breath using IMS. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spec. 2002, 5, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  41. Baumbach, J.I.; Sielemann, S.; Xie, Z.; Schmidt, H. Detection of the Gasoline Components methyl tert-butyl ether, benzene, toluene, and m-xylene using Ion Mobility Spectrometers and UV Ionization Source. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1483–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Suresh, M.; Vasa, N.J.; Agarwal, V.; Chandapillai, J. UV photoionization based asymmetric field differential ion mobility sensor for trace gas detection. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 195, 44–51. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, C.; Sahay, P. Breath Analysis Using Laser Spectroscopic Techniques: Breath Biomarkers, Spectral Fingerprints, and Detection Limits. Sensors 2009, 9, 8230–8262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Henderson, B.; Khodabakhsh, A.; Metsälä, M.; Ventrillard, I.; Schmidt, F.M.; Romanini, D.; Ritchie, G.A.D.; Hekkert, L.; Briot, R.; Risby, T.; et al. Laser spectroscopy for breath analysis: Towards clinical implementation. Appl. Phys. B 2018, 124, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Stacewicz, T.; Bielecki, Z.; Wojtas, J. Detection of disease markers in human breath with laser absorption spectroscopy. Opto-Electronics Rev. 2016, 24, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Roller, C.; Namjou, K.; Jeffers, J.D.; Camp, M.; Mock, A.; McCann, P.J.; Grego, J. Nitric oxide breath testing by tunable-diode laser absorption spectroscopy: Application in monitoring respiratory inflammation. Appl. Opt. 2002, 41, 6018–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. McManus, J.B.; Zahniser, M.S., Jr.; Nelson, D.D.; Shorter, J.H.; Herndon, S.C.; Wood, E.C.; Wehr, R. Application of quantum cascade lasers to high-precision atmospheric trace gas measurements. Opt. Eng. 2010, 49, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Manne, J.; Sukhorukov, O.; Jäger, W.; Tulip, J. Pulsed quantum cascade laser-based cavity ring-down spectroscopy for ammonia detection in breath. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 9230–9237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nadeem, F.; Mandon, J.; Khodabakhsh, A.; Cristescu, S.M.; Harren, F.J.M. Sensitive Spectroscopy of Acetone Using a Widely Tunable External-Cavity Quantum Cascade Laser. Sensors 2018, 18, 2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Xia, J.; Zhu, F.; Kolomenskii, A.A.; Bounds, J.; Zhang, S.; Amani, M.; Fernyhough, L.J.; Schuessler, H.A. Sensitive acetone detection with a mid-IR interband cascade laser and wavelength modulation spectroscopy. OSA Contin. 2019, 2, 640–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Owen, K.; Farooq, A. A calibration-free ammonia breath sensor using a quantum cascade laser with WMS 2f/1f. Appl. Phys. B 2014, 116, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, C.; Dong, L.; Zheng, C.; Tittel, F.K. Compact TDLAS based optical sensor for ppb-level ethane detection by use of a 3.34μm room-temperature CW interband cascade laser. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 232, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ghorbani, R.; Schmidt, F.M. ICL-based TDLAS sensor for real-time breath gas analysis of carbon monoxide isotopes. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 12743–12752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. McCurdy, M.R.; Bakhirkin, Y.A.; Wysocki, G.; Tittel, F.K. Performance of an exhaled nitric oxide and carbon dioxide sensor using quantum cascade laser-based integrated cavity output spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wojtas, J. Application of cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy to the detection of nitric oxide, carbonyl sulphide, and ethane—Breath biomarkers of serious diseases. Sensors 2015, 15, 14356–14369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ciaffoni, L.; Hancock, G.; Harrison, J.J.; van Helden, J.-P.H.; Langley, C.E.; Peverall, R.; Ritchie, G.A.D.; Wood, S. Demonstration of a Mid-Infrared Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectrometer for Breath Acetone Detection. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 846–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mürtz, M.; Frech, B.; Urban, W. High-resolution cavity leak-out absorption spectroscopy in the 10-μm region. Appl. Phys. B 1999, 68, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Halmer, D.; von Basum, G.; Hering, P.; Mürtz, M. Mid-infrared cavity leak-out spectroscopy for ultrasensitive detection of carbonyl sulfide. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 2314–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Heinrich, K.; Fritsch, T.; Hering, P.; Mürtz, M. Infrared laser-spectroscopic analysis of 14NO and 15NO in human breath. Appl. Phys. B 2009, 95, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Thelen, S.; Miekisch, W.; Halmer, D.; Schubert, J.; Hering, P.; Mürtz, M. Intercomparison of Infrared Cavity Leak-Out Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization for Trace Analysis of Ethane. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2768–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nikodem, M.; Krzempek, K.; Dudzik, G.; Abramski, K. Hollow core fiber-assisted absorption spectroscopy of methane at 3.4 µm. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 21843–21848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wilk, A.; Chance Carter, J.; Chrisp, M.; Manuel, A.M.; Mirkarimi, P.; Alameda, J.B.; Mizaikoff, B. Substrate-integrated hollow waveguides: A new level of integration in mid-infrared gas sensing. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 11205–11210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Perez-Guaita, D.; Kokoric, V.; Wilk, A.; Garrigues, S.; Mizaikoff, B. Towards the determination of isoprene in human breath using substrate-integrated hollow waveguide mid-infrared sensors. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, 26003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fortes, P.R.; da Silveira Petruci, J.F.; Wilk, A.; Cardoso, A.A.; Raimundo Jr, I.M.; Mizaikoff, B. Optimized design of substrate-integrated hollow waveguides for mid-infrared gas analyzers. J. Opt. 2014, 16, 94006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kokoric, V.; Theisen, J.; Wilk, A.; Penisson, C.; Bernard, G.; Mizaikoff, B.; Gabriel, J.C.P. Determining the Partial Pressure of Volatile Components via Substrate-Integrated Hollow Waveguide Infrared Spectroscopy with Integrated Microfluidics. Anal. Chem 2018, 90, 4445–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mizaikoff, B. Waveguide-enhanced mid-infrared chem/bio sensors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8683–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, S.S.; Young, C.; Mizaikoff, B. Miniaturized mid-infrared sensor technologies. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 390, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Stach, R.; Haas, J.; Tütüncü, E.; Daboss, S.; Kranz, C.; Mizaikoff, B. PolyHWG: 3D Printed Substrate-Integrated Hollow Waveguides for Mid-Infrared Gas Sensing. ACS Sensors 2017, 2, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rohwedder, J.J.R.; Pasquini, C.; Fortes, P.R.; Raimundo, I.M.; Wilk, A.; Mizaikoff, B. iHWG-μNIR: A miniaturised near-infrared gas sensor based on substrate-integrated hollow waveguides coupled to a micro-NIR-spectrophotometer. Analyst 2013, 139, 3572–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Flávio da Silveira Petruci, J.; Fortes, P.R.; Kokoric, V.; Wilk, A.; Raimundo, I.M.; Cardoso, A.A.; Mizaikoff, B. Monitoring of hydrogen sulfide via substrate-integrated hollow waveguide mid-infrared sensors in real-time. Analyst 2014, 139, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bögözi, T.; Popp, J.; Frosch, T. Fiber-enhanced Raman multi-gas spectroscopy: What is the potential of its application to breath analysis? Bioanalysis 2015, 7, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hanf, S.; Keiner, R.; Yan, D.; Popp, J.; Frosch, T. Fiber-enhanced raman multigas spectroscopy: A versatile tool for environmental gas sensing and breath analysis. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 5278–5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Petrov, D.V.; Matrosov, I.I.; Tikhomirov, A.A. High-Sensitivity Spontaneous Raman Spectrometer for Gaseous Media. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2015, 82, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Schlüter, S.; Krischke, F.; Popovska-Leipertz, N.; Seeger, T.; Breuer, G.; Jeleazcov, C.; Schüttler, J.; Leipertz, A. Demonstration of a signal enhanced fast Raman sensor for multi-species gas analyses at a low pressure range for anesthesia monitoring. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2015, 46, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Petrov, D. V Multipass optical system for a Raman gas spectrometer. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 9521–9525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sigrist, M.W. Trace gas monitoring by laser photoacoustic spectroscopy and related techniques (plenary). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2003, 74, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Petra, N.; Zweck, J.; Kosterev, A.A.; Minkoff, S.E.; Thomazy, D. Theoretical analysis of a quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy sensor. Appl. Phys. B 2009, 94, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Miklós, A.; Hess, P.; Bozóki, Z. Application of acoustic resonators in photoacoustic trace gas analysis and metrology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001, 72, 1937–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Meyer, P.L.; Sigrist, M.W. Atmospheric pollution monitoring using CO2-laser photoacoustic spectroscopy and other techniques. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1990, 61, 1779–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Besson, J.P.; Schilt, S.; Thévenaz, L. Multi-gas sensing based on photoacoustic spectroscopy using tunable laser diodes. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2004, 60, 3449–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yehya, F.; Chaudhary, A.K. Designing and Modeling of Efficient Resonant Photo Acoustic Sensors for Spectroscopic Applications. J. Mod. Phys. 2011, 2, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Haisch, C. Photoacoustic spectroscopy for analytical measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2011, 23, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kosterev, A.; Wysocki, G.; Bakhirkin, Y.; So, S.; Lewicki, R.; Fraser, M.; Tittel, F.; Curl, R.F. Application of quantum cascade lasers to trace gas analysis. Appl. Phy. B 2008, 90, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ma, Y.; Tong, Y.; He, Y.; Yu, X.; Tittel, F.K. High-Power DFB Diode Laser-Based CO-QEPAS Sensor: Optimization and Performance. Sensors 2018, 18, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ma, Y.F.; Lewicki, R.; Razeghi, M.; Tittel, F.K. QEPAS based ppb-level detection of CO and N2O using a high power CW DFB-QCL. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 1008–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Li, Z.L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Ren, W. Optical fiber tip-based quartz-enhanced photoacoustic sensor for trace gas detection. Appl. Phys. B 2016, 122, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yi, H.M.; Maamary, R.; Gao, X.M.; Sigrist, M.W.; Fertein, E.; Chen, W.D. Short-lived species detection of nitrous acid by external-cavity quantum cascade laser based quartz-enhanced photoacoustic absorption spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 101109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dong, L.; Spagnolo, V.; Lewicki, R.; Tittel, F.K. Ppb-level detection of nitric oxide using an external cavity quantum cascade laser based QEPAS sensor. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 24037–24045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zheng, H.; Dong, L.; Ma, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Yin, X.; Zhang, L.; Ma, W.; Yin, W.; Xiao, L.; et al. Scattered light modulation cancellation method for sub-ppb-level NO2 detection in a LD-excited QEPAS system. Opt. Express 2016, 24, A752–A761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Triki, M.; Nguyen, B.T.; Vicet, A. Compact sensor for methane detection in the mid infrared region based on quartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2015, 69, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Waclawek, J.P.; Moser, H.; Lendl, B. Compact quantum cascade laser based quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy sensor system for detection of carbon disulfide. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 6559–6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Milde, T.; Hoppe, M.; Tatenguem, H.; Mordmüller, M.; Ogorman, J.; Willer, U.; Schade, W.; Sacher, J. QEPAS sensor for breath analysis: A behavior of pressure. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, C120–C127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shimamoto, C.; Hirata, I.; Katsu, K. Breath and blood ammonia in liver cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology 2000, 47, 443–445. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Wakabayashi, H.; Kuwabara, Y.; Murata, H.; Kobashi, K.; Watanabe, A. Measurements of the Expiratory Ammonia Concentration and its Clinical Significance. Metab. Brain Dis. 1997, 12, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dunn, C.D.R.; Black, M.; Cowell, D.C.; Penault, C.; Ratcliffe, N.M.; Spence, R.; Teare, C. Ammonia vapour in the mouth as a diagnostic marker for Helicobacter pylori infection:preliminary ‘proof of principle’ pharmacological investigations. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2001, 58, 66–75. [Google Scholar]
  96. Narasimhan, L.R.; Goodman, W.; Patel, C.K. Correlation of breath ammonia with blood urea nitrogen and creatinine during hemodialysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4617–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Lewicki Rafałand Kosterev, A.A.; Thomazy, D.M.; Risby, T.H.; Solga, S.; Schwartz, T.B.; Tittel, F.K. Real time ammonia detection in exhaled human breath using a distributed feedback quantum cascade laser based sensor. Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, 24 January 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bakhirkin, Y.A.; Kosterev, A.A.; Wysocki, G.; Tittel, F.K.; Risby, T.H.; Bruno, J.D. Quantum Cascade Laser-Based Sensor Platform for Ammonia Detection in Exhaled Human Breath. In Proceedings of the Laser Applications to Chemical, Security and Environmental Analysis, St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 17–20 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lawless, M.W.; O’Byrne, K.J.; Gray, S.G. Targeting oxidative stress in cancer. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 1225–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rains, J.L.; Jain, S.K. Oxidative stress, insulin signaling, and diabetes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Cantor, E.J.; Mancini, E.V.; Seth, R.; Yao, X.H.; Netticadan, T. Oxidative stress and heart disease: Cardiac dysfunction, nutrition, and gene therapy. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2003, 5, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, B. Oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2013, 2013, 316523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Ross, B.M.; McKenzie, I.; Glen, I.; Bennett, C.P. Increased levels of ethane, a non-invasive marker of n-3 fatty acid oxidation, in breath of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Nutr. Neurosci. 2003, 6, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mahadik, S.P.; Mukherjee, S. Free radical pathology and antioxidant defense in schizophrenia: A review. Schiz. Res. 1996, 19, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kharitonov, S.A.; Barnes, P.J. Biomarkers of some pulmonary diseases in exhaled breath. Biomarkers 2002, 7, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. van Herpen, M.M.J.W.; Li, S.; Bisson, S.E.; Harren, F.J.M. Photoacoustic trace gas detection of ethane using a continuously tunable, continuous-wave optical parametric oscillator based on periodically poled lithium niobate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 1157–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Popa, C.; Patachia, M.; Banita, S.; Matei, C.; Bratu, A.M.; Dumitras, D.C. The level of ethylene biomarker in the renal failure of elderly patients analyzed by photoacoustic spectroscopy. Laser Phys. 2013, 23, 125701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nguyen Ba, T.; Triki, M.; Desbrosses, G.; Vicet, A. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy sensor for ethylene detection with a 3.32 μm distributed feedback laser diode. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015, 86, 23111–23115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Ren, W. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic detection of ethylene using a 10.5 μm quantum cascade laser. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 4143–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Güntner, A.T.; Kompalla, J.F.; Landis, H.; Theodore, S.J.; Geidl, B.; Sievi, N.A.; Kohler, M.; Pratsinis, S.E.; Gerber, P.A. Guiding Ketogenic Diet with Breath Acetone Sensors. Sensors 2018, 18, 3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Saasa, V.; Malwela, T.; Beukes, M.; Mokgotho, M.; Liu, C.-P.; Mwakikunga, B. Sensing Technologies for Detection of Acetone in Human Breath for Diabetes Diagnosis and Monitoring. Diagnostics 2018, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Tyas, F.H.; Nikita, J.G.; Apriyanto, D.K.; Mitrayana, L.; Amin, M.N. The Performance of CO2 Laser Photoacoustic Spectrometer in Concentration Acetone Detection as Biomarker for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1011, 012056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Alving, K.; Weitzberg, E.; Lundberg, J.M. Increased amount of nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatics. Eur. Respir. J. 1993, 6, 1368–1370. [Google Scholar]
  114. Ojoo, J.C.; Mulrennan, S.A.; Kastelik, J.A.; Morice, A.H.; Redington, A.E. Exhaled breath condensate pH and exhaled nitric oxide in allergic asthma and in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2005, 60, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Tittel, F.K.; Dong, L.; Lewicki, R.; Spagnolo, V.; Zhang, Y. Sensitive detection of nitric oxide using a quantum cascade laser based QEPAS sensor. In Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Photonics and Optoelectronics (SOPO), Shanghai, China, 21–23 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
  116. Bauer, R.; Legg, T.; Mitchell, D.; Flockhart, G.M.H.; Stewart, G.; Johnstone, W.; Lengden, M. Miniaturized Photoacoustic Trace Gas Sensing Using a Raman Fiber Amplifier. J. Lightwave Technol. 2015, 33, 3773–3780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Kim, M.; Canedy, C.L.; Kim, C.S.; Bewley, W.W.; Lindle, J.R.; Abell, J.; Vurgaftman, I.; Meyer, J.R. Room Temperature Interband Cascade Laser. Phys. Procedia 2010, 3, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Petersen, J.; Lamard, L.; Feng, Y.; Focant, J.-F.; Peremans, A.; Lassen, M. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy as a platform for non-invasive trace gas analyser targeting breath analysis. In Proceedings of the Optics and Biophotonics in Low-Resource Settings III, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3 March 2017; Available online: https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/208228/3/1005503.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2020).
  119. Selvaraj, R.; Vasa, N.J.; Shiva Nagendra, S.M. Off-resonant photoacoustic spectroscopy for analysis of multicomponent gas mixtures at high concentrations using broadband vibrational overtones of individual gas species. Appl. Opt. 2019, 58, 4118–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Selvaraj, R.; Vasa, N.J.; Shiva Nagendra, S.M. Off-Resonance Photoacoustic Spectroscopy Technique for Multi-Gas Sensing in Biogas Plants. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 14239–14246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 25 02227 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Pathways for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the human body; (b) Schematic diagram of the formation of acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and acetone, which takes place in the mitochondrial matrix of the liver.
Figure 1. (a) Pathways for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the human body; (b) Schematic diagram of the formation of acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and acetone, which takes place in the mitochondrial matrix of the liver.
Molecules 25 02227 g001
Molecules 25 02227 g002 550
Figure 2. Simplified schematic of (a) mid-infrared (MIR) absorption spectroscopy, (b) cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), and (c) multi-pass spectroscopy (MUPASS). (DAQ: Data Acquisition system).
Figure 2. Simplified schematic of (a) mid-infrared (MIR) absorption spectroscopy, (b) cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), and (c) multi-pass spectroscopy (MUPASS). (DAQ: Data Acquisition system).
Molecules 25 02227 g002
Molecules 25 02227 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Substrate-integrated hollow waveguide (iHWG) assembly with a yin-yang structure; (b) Schematic of the iHWG sensor system [62]. (FTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer; MCT: Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride).
Figure 3. (a) Substrate-integrated hollow waveguide (iHWG) assembly with a yin-yang structure; (b) Schematic of the iHWG sensor system [62]. (FTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer; MCT: Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride).
Molecules 25 02227 g003
Molecules 25 02227 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) General schematic of the photoacoustic (PA) signal generation process; (b) general schematic of the PA sensor architecture.
Figure 4. (a) General schematic of the photoacoustic (PA) signal generation process; (b) general schematic of the PA sensor architecture.
Molecules 25 02227 g004
Molecules 25 02227 g005 550
Figure 5. General quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) sensor architecture.
Figure 5. General quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) sensor architecture.
Molecules 25 02227 g005
Molecules 25 02227 g006 550
Figure 6. Broadband absorption spectra for methane.
Figure 6. Broadband absorption spectra for methane.
Molecules 25 02227 g006
Table
Table 1. List of biomarkers and their relation to potential disease states.
Table 1. List of biomarkers and their relation to potential disease states.
S. NoDiseasePotential Source of BiomarkerBiomarkerConcentration (diseased)Concentration (healthy)Reference
1DiabetesOxidation of non-osterified fatty acidsAcetone (CH3)2COT1D: >2.2 ppm, typically >10 ppm0.39 to 0.85 ppm[1,31]
2Colorectal cancer(1) High lipid, low-fat diet; (2) increased presence of bile salts;
(3) presence of colonic anaerobic bacteria		Methane (CH4)8 to 50 ppm3 to 8 ppm[8]
3Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Oxidative stressInterleukin-69.3 to 9.9 pg/mL3.3 to 3.7 pg/mL[11]
4Blood cholesterolMevalonate pathway of lipid (cholesterol) metabolismIsoprene-3.5 to 10.5 nmol/L.[14]
5Myocardial infarctionLipid peroxidation, leading to the pathogenesis of tissue damagePentane (C5H12)-0.3 to 0.8 nmol/L[18,19,20,32]
6Obstructive sleep apneaOxidative stressInterleukin-6 (IL-6), 8-isoprostane8.4 to 9.0 pg/mL
6.7 to 7.1 pg/mL		1.5 to 1.7 pg/mL
4 to 5 pg/mL		[10]
7Smoking Carbon Monoxide (CO)2 to 20 ppm (smokers)0.4 to 0.8 ppm (non-smokers)[25,26]
8Renal failure, oral cavity diseaseLipid peroxidationAmmonia (NH3) 0.25 to 2.9 ppm[9,37]
9Scleroderma, cystic fibrosis Ethane (C2H6) 0 to 12 ppb[8,13]
10Asthma, acute lung injury, inflammatory lung diseases, lung infection, lung cancer, rhinitisNitric oxide synthaseNitric Oxide (NO) <35 ppb[21,22,23]
Table
Table 2. Spectral fingerprints, laser techniques employed, and detection limit of select few biomarkers.
Table 2. Spectral fingerprints, laser techniques employed, and detection limit of select few biomarkers.
S. NoBiomarkerTechniqueLight SourceWavelength (µm)Detection LimitReference
1Nitric Oxide (NO)CEASQCL5.2629615 ppb[45]
ICOSQCL5.220.4 ppb[46]
CALOSCO laser57 ppt[47]
TDLASIV–VI laser5.21.5 ppb[48]
MP absorption spectroscopyQCL5.26300.3 ppb[49]
CEASQCL5.263030 ppb[50]
2Carbonyl Sulphide (OCS)CALOSCO laser5438 ± 4.4 ppt[51]
CEASQCL4.87160.9 ppb[50]
3Ethane (C2H6)CALOSECDL 800 nm an d Nd-YAG 1064 nm with PPLN3.341–100 ppb[52]
CEASTunable laser system3.34810.3 ppb[50]
TDLASICL3.341.2 ppb[53]
4Methane (CH4)HCF 3.4ppm[54]
MP absorption spectroscopyQCL7.8741 ppb[49]
5Acetone (CO(CH3)2)WMSDFB-ICL3.3670.58 ppm (1 s) 0.12 ppm (60 s)[55]
WMS-MP-Broadband DASEC-QCL~7.415 ppbv (<10 s)[56]
CEASQCL8.220.51 ppm[57]
6Ammonia (NH3)MP absorption spectroscopyQCL10.3410.2 ppb[49]
WMS-MPQCL9.0627 ppbv[58]
Pulsed CRDSQCL10.30950 ppb[59]
7Carbon Monoxide (CO)TDLAS-MPICL4.699 ± 5 ppbv[60]
8Ethylene (C2H4)MP absorption spectroscopyQCL10.4160.5 ppb[49]
CALOSCO2 laser10 [61]
9Formaldehyde (HCHO)MP absorption spectroscopyQCL5.6650.15 ppb[49]
CEAS: cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy, ICOS: integrated cavity output spectroscopy, CALOS: cavity leak-out absorption spectroscopy, TDLAS: tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, MP: multipass, WMS: wavelength modulation spectroscopy, DAS: direct absorption spectroscopy, CRDS: cavity ring-down spectroscopy, QCL: quantum cascade laser, ECDL: external cavity diode laser, DFB-ICL: distributed feedback-intracavity laser, HCF: hollow core fibre, PPLN: periodically poled lithium niobate.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Selvaraj, R.; Vasa, N.J.; Nagendra, S.M.S.; Mizaikoff, B. Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Sensing Techniques for Exhaled Breath Diagnostics. Molecules 2020, 25, 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092227

AMA Style

Selvaraj R, Vasa NJ, Nagendra SMS, Mizaikoff B. Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Sensing Techniques for Exhaled Breath Diagnostics. Molecules. 2020; 25(9):2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Selvaraj, Ramya, Nilesh J. Vasa, S. M. Shiva Nagendra, and Boris Mizaikoff. 2020. "Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Sensing Techniques for Exhaled Breath Diagnostics" Molecules 25, no. 9: 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092227

APA Style

Selvaraj, R., Vasa, N. J., Nagendra, S. M. S., & Mizaikoff, B. (2020). Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Sensing Techniques for Exhaled Breath Diagnostics. Molecules, 25(9), 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092227

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop