Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of Hydrogen Boride Thin Film by Ion Exchange in MgB2
Previous Article in Journal
Methyl Jasmonate Effect on Betulinic Acid Content and Biological Properties of Extract from Senna obtusifolia Transgenic Hairy Roots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Na-Montmorillonite on Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation

1
School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Deep Geodrilling Technology, Ministry of Land and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(20), 6211; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206211
Submission received: 20 August 2021 / Revised: 8 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 14 October 2021

Abstract

:
The use of additives has generated significant attention due to their extensive application in the microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) process. This study aims to discuss the effects of Na-montmorillonite (Na-MMT) on CaCO3 crystallization and sandy soil consolidation through the MICP process. Compared with the traditional MICP method, a larger amount of CaCO3 precipitate was obtained. Moreover, the reaction of Ca2+ ions was accelerated, and bacteria were absorbed by a small amount of Na-MMT. Meanwhile, an increase in the total cementing solution (TCS) was not conducive to the previous reaction. This problem was solved by conducting the reaction with Na-MMT. The polymorphs and morphologies of the CaCO3 precipitates were tested by using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. Further, when Na-MMT was used, the morphology of CaCO3 changed from an individual precipitate to agglomerations of the precipitate. Compared to the experiments without Na-MMT in the MICP process, the addition of Na-MMT significantly reduced the hydraulic conductivity (HC) of sandy soil consolidated.

1. Introduction

Portland cement (PC) used as a construction material and for soil improvement has contributed to about 5–8% of total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which has triggered the search for an alternative binder instead of PC [1]. A decade ago, microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) became a substitute for PC for soil improvement [2,3,4]. While the physical and chemical properties of the soil improved, MICP can also be used as an agricultural fertilizer [4]. Many studies have indicated that MICP used as a PC alternative can enhance soil strength and decrease soil permeability [5]. Unlike PC, MICP technology can be used at an ambient temperature. Therefore, it is cost-effective. Moreover, compared to PC, the construction process of MICP is simpler due to its low viscosity and the smaller amount of bacteria used [6].
MICP technology used for soil improvement is based on urea hydrolysis catalyzed by the urease of bacteria [7,8]. Numerous studies involving the precipitates of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) by bacterial urease have been carried out. However, the reaction mechanism of MICP is still undefined because the physiology and genetics involved are difficult to understand [9]. So far, it has been widely considered that the reaction mechanism of MICP can be concluded in line with Equations (1) and (2) [10,11,12], which summarize the biochemical reaction process of the CaCO3 precipitates with bacteria serve as nucleation sites.
CO ( NH 2 ) 2 + H 2 O + bacterial   urease     CO 3 2 + 2 NH 4 +
CO 3 2   + Ca 2 +     CaCO 3  
To date, the MICP method has been widely studied in many areas. Previous studies have reported that the unconfined compressive strength and the durability of loose sandy soil particles could be achieved via the MICP process to improve their engineering properties [13,14]. Meanwhile, fissures of cement and concrete can also be remediated by this method [15,16]. Moreover, the types of CaCO3 precipitates induced by MICP have also been investigated. As reported in the previous works in the literature, the minerals occur as three non-hydrated CaCO3 crystals: calcite, aragonite, and vaterite [12,17,18,19,20,21]. In addition to the above studies, wind erosion and fugitive dust generation are effectively controlled through the MICP process [8,22,23,24,25]. Some research on heavy metals immobilized by MICP has also been conducted [26]. For example, the remediation of copper-contaminated soil has been controlled [27,28] as well as the co-precipitation of strontium based on the MICP process [27,28].
In the MICP process, the additives are considered to be critically important. At the same time, it has been indicated that various additives, including PVA fibers [29], water-soluble nacre proteins [30], nanoparticles (NPs) [31], and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) [32] contribute to MICP technology. Research has shown that the physical properties (e.g., strength and permeability) of sandy soil have been enhanced with PVA fibers. CMC has improved the amount of CaCO3 produced. The water-soluble nacre proteins have controlled the CaCO3 precipitate rate. NPs on the CaCO3 surface can influence CaCO3 transport in the soil. Nevertheless, the uneven distribution of PVA fibers limits their large-scale use. Due to the cost factor and potential environmental issues, the water-soluble nacre proteins NPs and CMC used in the MICP process have been limited to the laboratory scale [33].
Therefore, searching for cheap and efficient additives is of great economic value. Na-montmorillonite (Na-MMT) is low cost and is widely used in industry. Applications have included water pollution treatment, drugs, catalysts, drilling materials, and coatings due to the highly specific surface and the high cation exchange capacity [34]. However, few studies in the literature have reported research on Na-MMT in the MICP process and the improvement of sandy soil.
This paper aims to investigate the effect of Na-MMT in the MICP process. The reaction rate of Ca2+ ions, the amount of bacteria adsorbed, the amount of CaCO3 precipitates, and the morphology of CaCO3 precipitates were assessed via the gravimetric method, a UV spectrophotometer, a pH meter, and permeability measurements. The MICP process with the addition of the Na-MMT samples was compared with the traditional MICP process using various analysis techniques. The morphology and microstructure with and without the Na-MMT samples were evaluated with X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Growth Conditions of Bacteria

The bacteria strain used was the Sporosarcina pasteurii (SP) (ATCC11859) to produce CaCO3 precipitates. CASO (15 g Casein peptone, 5 g soy peptone and 5 g NaCl) and 20 g urea were mixed into 1 L deionized water to prepare a culture medium. The final pH of approximately 7.3 was achieved by adjusting the culture medium. The culture medium was sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min. SP was cultured aerobically at 28 °C with a rotation rate of 120 rpm for 18 h. SP in the medium was centrifuged with 5434× g for 10 min. The centrifuged bacteria were resuspended in deionized water with an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 for future use. The amount of bacteria was expressed by measuring the absorbance of the bacterial solution (turbidimetric method). This principle was mainly based on the fact that the bacterial concentration was directly proportional to the turbidity of the bacterial solution. Therefore, it was also directly proportional to the absorbance. In this paper, the absorbance (OD600) of an ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer (model uv-1700, Shimadzu Company, Kyoto, Japan) at a wavelength of 600 nm was used to determine the amount of bacteria. The actual amount of bacteria was converted by Equation (3) [35].
Y = 8.59 × 107·Z1.3627
where Z is the OD600 value and Y is the bacterial concentration (bacterial mL−1). However, it should be noted that this formula can be used for conversion only when OD600 is between 0.2 and 0.8. When OD600 exceeds this range, it needs to be diluted before conversion. In this paper, the OD600 value is usually used to express the bacterial concentrations directly. All chemical reagents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All reagents used in this study were of analytical grade and were used without further purification.

2.2. Na-MMT and Sandy Soils Used

The sample used was Na-MMT provided by Zhejiang Fenghong New Material Co Ltd, Zhejiang, China. The sandy soil used was from river sand. The particle size distribution curves and the SEM images of Na-MMT and the sandy soil are shown in Figures S1 and S2. Na-MMT was composed of Na-MMT and SiO2, as shown in Figure S3A. FTIR analysis data of Na-MMT is shown in Figure S3B. The identification of Na-MMT was made by comparing the spectrum with IR pattern catalogues (The wavelength number of Na-MMT is shown in Table S1). The BET analysis data of Na-MMT are shown in Figure S4. The results show that Na-MMT’s surface area was 19.6012 m2/g.

2.3. Precipitation and Consolidation Experiments

A total of 55.5 g CaCl2 and 30.03 g urea were dissolved into 1 L deionized water to make the reaction solution (0.5 mol/L). The total cementing solution (TCS) of different quantities (TCS = 100, 200, 300, and 400 g) consisted of the mixture of the reaction solution and the bacterial suspension (bacterial suspension (OD600 = 1.0): reaction solution (0.5 mol/L) = 1:4). When TCS was prepared, Na-MMT was immediately added to TCS. Afterwards, experiments related to the CaCO3 precipitate and bacterial adsorption were carried out at 25 °C in beakers.
To study the effect of the Na-MMT content, various Na-MMT contents of 0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% were used in 300 g TCS. The amount of bacteria was determined after adding Na-MMT, and the Ca2+ ion contents and the pH were tested over time.
The effect of TCS quantities with and without 0.25% Na-MMT was also studied by changing TCS quantities at 100 g, varying from 100 to 400 g. The amount of bacteria was determined after adding Na-MMT and the Ca2+ ion contents were tested over time.
After the experiments (27 h), the CaCO3 precipitates were obtained by filtering the solution and then drying it at 105 °C for 24 h. Consolidated samples were achieved by full contact flexible molds [36]. The specification of the mold was a diameter of 30 mm and a height of 60 mm. The mold containing 60 g sandy soil in the presence of Na-MMT (0.0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.2%) was submerged in the TCS and reacted by using a gaseous diffusion system. The experimental setup is shown in Figure S5. The TCS (4 L) was composed of bacteria (OD600 = 1.0) and the reaction solution (0.5 mol/L). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Analytical Methods

The composition of the CaCO3 precipitates and Na-MMT were characterized by using XRD (Brook Company, Karlsruhe, Germany). The scan rate of 0.15 s step−1 was used and the range of 2θ was from 10° to 60°.
A total of 0.5 mg of the samples and 200 mg of potassium bromide powder were taken and ground in a mortar. The pressure glass pieces machine was used to prepare glass pieces of the finely ground powders. The glass pieces of the samples were obtained with the pressure 10 T cm−2, and then the samples were characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). The data were obtained over the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1.
The morphologies of the CaCO3 precipitates and Na-MMT were observed using SEM (Zeiss Supra 55, Karlsruhe, Germany). Scanning was performed using an accelerating voltage of 25 kV. The PHS-3C PH meter and a calcium ion electrode were used to measure pH and the concentrations of the Ca2+ ions. Bacterial concentrations were measured using a UV spectrophotometer (Model, 752, Shimadzu Company, Kyoto, Japan company).

3. Results

3.1. Mechanism of Na-MMT on CaCO3 Precipitates

The mechanism of the MICP process incorporated with Na-MMT is presented in Figure 1. The morphology of Na-MMT is shown in Figure 1a. The EDS result (Figure 1g and Table S2) proved the element composition of Na-MMT. With the addition of Na-MMT in TCS, the bacteria were adsorbed onto the Na-MMT surface, as shown in Figure 1b. After 30 min, CaCO3 crystals and aggregates of CaCO3 crystals were observed, as shown in Figure 1c. In 2 h, the aggregate of CaCO3 crystals became larger with the reaction progress, as shown in Figure 1e. The EDS data (Figure 1h and Table S2) show that the aggregate of the CaCO3 crystal consisted of CaCO3 and Na-MMT. By 24 h, the shape of precipitates became more regular. Meanwhile, the only rhombohedral CaCO3 crystals were found; Na-MMT was not found, as shown in Figure 1i and Table S2, which indicated that Na-MMT was encapsulated in the CaCO3 crystals, serving as nucleation sites. The above results indicate that the bacteria can be adsorbed onto the Na-MMT surface. As reported in the previous literature, Ca2+ ions can be adsorbed by negatively charged bacteria [12,37,38], and intercalate into Na-MMT [39]. Afterwards, CO 3 2 , formed via the hydrolysis of urea catalyzed bacterial urease, reacted directly with Ca2+ cross-linked with Na-MMT in the presence of bacteria to form CaCO3 crystals. Therefore, the growth of CaCO3 crystals can be achieved by the MICP process combined with Na-MMT.

3.2. Influence of Na-MMT on CaCO3 Precipitates

The amount of CaCO3 precipitates was influenced by Na-MMT. Thus, the concentrations of Na-MMT were crucially important in the MICP process. A change trend of Ca2+ concentration under the effect of Na-MMT concentrations was revealed (Figure 2a). The result showed that the introduction of Na-MMT proved to be effective in accelerating the reaction of the Ca2+ ions compared to the reaction without Na-MMT. When the concentration of Na-MMT was 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1%, the changes in the trend of the Ca2+ concentration were the same. However, the fastest reaction rate of Ca2+ was observed with 0.25% Na-MMT. Finally, the Ca2+ was completely reacted in the presence of 0.25% Na-MMT, and this occurred at least 15 h earlier than when Na-MMT was absent. The changes in pH, with and without Na-MMT, are shown in Figure 2b. In the beginning, the pH was lower with the presence of Na-MMT. The reason for the decrease in pH was that the polysaccharide produced by bacteria consisted of alginic acid and gellan gum. Gellan gum is a high-molecular tetrasaccharide containing one acidic residue in repeating units [18,40]. Afterwards, the polysaccharide was not produced with bacteria as nuclear sites. Nevertheless, the pH drastically decreased between 0 h and 12 h in the presence of Na-MMT. This was because that the concentration of carbonate decreased, and the acid dissociation equilibrium changed as the carbonate precipitated. By the Le Chatelier principle, the decrease in the carbonate in the solution (by the precipitation) shifted the equilibrium direction towards the production of more carbonate (i.e., the dissociation of carbonic acid and bicarbonate). Hence, more H+ was produced and the pH decreased.
The bacterial adsorption capacity in the presence of Na-MMT concentrations is shown in Figure 3a. The adsorption capacity of bacteria was the same with various concentrations of Na-MMT but the adsorption capacity was the best with 0.5% Na-MMT. Compared with the control sample, the adsorption capacity of bacteria was improved at most by 62% in the presence of 0.5% Na-MMT. The bacterial adsorption capacity of TCS of different quantities without and with 0.25% Na-MMT is shown in Figure 3b. Whether Na-MMT was added or not, the bacterial adsorption capacity increased when TCS increase. The reason was that the Ca2+ ions could be adsorbed by the negatively charged bacteria, which led to precipitates of bacteria. Therefore, the OD600 values of bacteria decreased significantly with the increase in the number of Ca2+ ions. Nevertheless, compared with the absence of Na-MMT, more bacteria were adsorbed in the presence of Na-MMT.
The reaction of Ca2+ ions decreased with increments of TCS in the absence of Na-MMT (Figure 4a) and the presence of Na-MMT (Figure 4b). The development of Ca2+ ion concentrations was the same in various TCS quantities. The results shown in Figure 4b are consistent with those shown in Figure 4a. However, compared with the traditional MICP method (Figure 4a), the reaction of Ca2+ ions was significantly enhanced in the presence of Na-MMT (Figure 4b).
The amount of CaCO3 precipitates in the presence of Na-MMT increased by about 118% compared to the traditional MICP method (Figure 5a). The amount of CaCO3 precipitates catalyzed by the use of urease of bacteria under the effect of Na-MMT concentrations was the same. This was because the urea completely decomposed and the Ca2+ ions completely reacted to form the CaCO3 precipitates when Na-MMT was added. Figure 5b shows that the precipitates of CaCO3 increased with an increase in TCS whether Na-MMT was added or not. Meanwhile, the presence of Na-MMT enhanced the amount of CaCO3 precipitates in the MICP process. Compared to the traditional MICP method, the amount of CaCO3 precipitates was significantly higher under the effect of Na-MMT. Theoretically, the precipitate of CaCO3 should have been 12 g in the 300 g TCS. However, the actual precipitate of CaCO3 was 6 g in the 300 g TCS, as shown in Figure 5a. Therefore, we thought that increasing the amount of TCS was not conducive to the precipitates of CaCO3. The actual precipitate of CaCO3 was 12 g in the 300 g TCS with the introduction of Na-MMT (Figure 5a), which confirmed that the actual precipitates of CaCO3 in the presence of Na-MMT reached the theoretical value.

3.3. Influence of Na-MMT on the Polymorph and Morphology of CaCO3 Precipitates

The morphology of the CaCO3 precipitates obtained with different quantities of TCS in the absence of Na-MMT was investigated by using SEM (Figure 6a–d). Irregular and regular rhombohedral CaCO3 precipitates were obtained with different quantities of TCS. The reason for the irregularity of the precipitates was that the concentration of TCS was too high. At the same time, the particle size distribution was the same under different quantities of TCS.
The morphologies of the CaCO3 precipitates that were prepared with different quantities of TCS with 0.25% Na-MMT were also investigated using SEM (Figure 7a–d) and were compared to the CaCO3 precipitates in the absence of Na-MMT. The agglomerated CaCO3 crystals were observed in the presence of Na-MMT. Meanwhile, the individual rhombohedral precipitates were rarely found. The above results indicate that CaCO3 crystal particles could be agglomerated by using Na-MMT during the MICP process, which is important because the agglomeration of the CaCO3 crystals may affect bio-cementation [29].
XRD analysis confirmed that with or without Na-MMT, the main component of CaCO3 precipitates was calcite at 27 h (Figure 8). This result is in line with that in Figure 1.

3.4. Influence of Na-MMT on Hydraulic Conductivity

The hydraulic conductivity (HC) is shown in Figure 9. The use of Na-MMT did not decrease HC without the MICP process (The data are not displayed here). HC reduced with an increase in the concentrations of Na-MMT in the MICP process. The HC of the initial conditions of the consolidated sandy soil obtained by the MICP process in the absence of Na-MMT was 3.8 × 10−2 cm/s. When the concentrations of Na-MMT was 0.15%, the HC was decreased to 2.03 × 10−3 cm/s. The HC decreased to the range of 1.34 × 10−3 to 1.8 × 10−6 cm/s when TCS was injected twice. The HC of the sandy soil consolidated by MICP decreased to 1.8 × 10−6 cm/s in the presence of Na-MMT, which was the lowest HC that was able to be measured in the batch experiments.
The images of SMEs show that cementation mainly occurred at the contact points between the sandy soil particles (Figure 10). Meanwhile, a small amount of CaCO3 was adsorbed on the surface of sandy soil particles (Figure 10a). The reason for this was the low adsorption capacity of the bacteria on the surface of the sandy soil [41]. Meanwhile, the large gap between the sandy soil particles was not filled tightly, which may have been due to the low output of CaCO3 between the sandy soil gap (Figure 10b). Thus, good hydraulic conductivity was achieved. The SEM images of the consolidated sandy soil by the MICP process with Na-MMT are shown in Figure 10c,d. These images show that CaCO3 precipitates tightly filled the voids between the sandy soil particles in the presence of Na-MMT. Na-MMT was not only a carrier for the formation of the CaCO3 precipitates, but also enhanced the yield of CaCO3 precipitates at the contact points. That is why there was a denser structure between the sandy soil particles during the MICP process in the presence of Na-MMT. Thus, a lower hydraulic conductivity can be achieved because of the more pronounced bio-clogging and bio-cemented effect.

4. Discussion

The effect of Na-MMT on MICP has been evaluated by using Sporosarcina pasteurii. Na-MMT is pure and natural and is not pathogenic for human beings, plants, or animals. Thus, the application of Na-MMT will not lead to a foreseeable issue. Na-MMT in various concentrations were used for the batch experiments. The plot showed that the optimum concentration of Na-MMT was 0.25% to achieve the maximum reaction rate of the Ca2+ ions. The above result is important for altering the reaction time of the MICP process, which has great value for field application [42,43,44].
Generally, a highly specific surface and the presence of Na+ and Ca2+ of Na-MMT may contribute to bacterial sorption. Ca2+ ions can be adsorbed by Na-MMT [45], which led to an increase in the positive charge around Na-MMT. Therefore, more negatively charged bacteria were immobilized by cations of Na-MMT in a rich calcium environment [46,47]. The strong adsorption capacity of Na-MMT is also an important reason [48,49]. Meanwhile, the literature has also reported that the microbial activity (such as a faster reaction rate), the distribution, and the biomineralization of bacteria could be altered by the sorption of MMT [50]. Thus, an understanding of the sorption of bacteria on the Na-MMT surface is of great geological significance.
The amount of the CaCO3 precipitates was greatest in TCS with 0.25% Na-MMT because Ca2+ was almost completely deposited. The reason was that Na-MMT was added, the urea was completely decomposed, and the Ca2+ ions completely reacted to form the CaCO3 precipitates. In theory, 0.4 mol of urea can be decomposed to form a precipitate of 0.4 mol of CaCO3 in the MICP process. Nevertheless, the above result was not found with different quantities of TCS without Na-MMT. This was because the activity of urease determines the hydrolysis rate of urea rather than the content of minerals in the reaction medium [51]. At the same time, the activity of bacteria may be inhibited due to excessive Ca2+ concentrations, and consequently may have affected the production of CaCO3 [52]. However, the precipitates of CaCO3 reached the theoretical value in the presence of Na-MMT. The weight of CaCO3 generated by the MICP process was proportional to the TSC of consolidated sandy soil [53,54], and inversely proportional to the hydraulic conductivity of consolidated sandy soil samples. Therefore, the production of CaCO3 was very crucial.
The properties of the CaCO3 precipitates, including their distribution, particle size, morphology, and specific surface area, have a tremendous impact on their application in industries [55]. In this study, compared to the traditional MICP method, the agglomeration of CaCO3 crystals occurred due to the fact that Na-MMT has a highly specific surface and a strong adsorption capacity. XRD analysis confirmed that in the presence of and in the absence of Na-MMT, the main component of the precipitates obtained was calcite, as shown in Figure 6. The basic components of Na-MMT were not detected. Therefore, we thought that Na-MMT can be used as nucleus sites.

5. Conclusions

The addition of Na-MMT has great potential to improve the efficiency of the MICP process. The results revealed that Na-MMT accelerated the reaction of Ca2+ ions, increased the amount of CaCO3 precipitates and bacteria adsorbed, and reduced the hydraulic conductivity of consolidated sandy soil samples. The characterization of SEM and XRD confirmed that individual CaCO3 precipitates were observed in the absence of Na-MMT and that the agglomeration of the precipitates occurred in the presence of Na-MMT. Calcites were obtained with and without Na-MMT. According to the above experiment, adding Na-MMT is an effective way to enhance the effect of the MICP process.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: Figure S1: Grading size distribution curves of NA-MMT (A) and the sandy soil (B) used in sample preparation, Figure S2: SEM images of NA-MMT (A) and the sandy soil (B) used in sample preparation, Figure S3: Characterization of NA-MMT investigated using XRD (A) and FTIR (B), Figure S4: Characterization of NA-MMT investigated using BET, Figure S5: Schematic drawing of the batch reactor, Table S1: IR Bands for NA-MMT Used in FTIR, Table S2: The EDS data of NA-MMT and CaCO3.

Author Contributions

G.T.: data collection and analysis, writing; H.Z.: data collection; G.W.: study design, literature search; C.J. and P.Y.: funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 41772388], and Key Laboratory of Deep Geodrilling Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources 2019 Open Project Fund [No. PY201904].

Institutional Review Board Statement

We exclude this statement because the study did not involve humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

We choose to exclude this statement because the study did not involve humans.

Data Availability Statement

We choose to exclude this statement because the study did not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Qiu, J.; Ruan, S.; Unluer, C.; Yang, E.-H. Autogenous healing of fiber-reinforced reactive magnesia-based tensile strain-hardening composites. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 115, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chan, K.Y.; Zwieten, L.V.; Meszaros, I.; Downie, A.; Joseph, S. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Res. 2008, 45, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ivanov, V.; Jian, C. Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marouek, J.; Struneck, O.; Stehel, V. Biochar farming: Defining economically perspective applications. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, L.; Shahin, M.A.; Chu, J. Soil bio-cementation using a new one-phase low-pH injection method. Acta Geotech. 2018, 14, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Paassen, L. Biogrout, Ground Improvement by Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cardoso, R.; Pires, I.; Duarte, S.O.D.; Monteiro, G.A. Effects of clay’s chemical interactions on biocementation. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 156, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dejong, J.T.; Soga, K.; Kavazanjian, E.; Burns, S.E.; Van Paassen, L.A.; Al Qabany, A.; Aydilek, A.; Bang, S.S.; Burbank, M.; Caslake, L.F.; et al. Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: Progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 2013, 63, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schwantes-Cezario, N.; Medeiros, L.P.; Nakazato, G.; Kobayashi, R.K.T.; Toralles, B.M. Bioprecipitation of calcium carbonate induced by Bacillus subtilis isolated in Brazil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 123, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fujita, M.; Nakashima, K.; Achal, V.; Kawasaki, S. Whole-cell evaluation of urease activity of Pararhodobacter sp. isolated from peripheral beachrock. Biochem. Eng. J. 2017, 124, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, M.N.H.; Amarakoon, G.; Shimazaki, S.; Kawasaki, S. Coral Sand Solidification Test Based on Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation Using Ureolytic Bacteria. Mater. Trans. 2015, 56, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nawarathna, T.H.K.; Nakashima, K.; Fujita, M.; Takatsu, M.; Kawasaki, S. Effects of Cationic Polypeptide on CaCO3 Crystallization and Sand Solidification by Microbial-Induced Carbonate Precipitation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 10315–10322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, M.D.; Li, L.; Ogbonnaya, U.; Wen, K.J.; Tian, A.G.; Amini, F. Influence of Fiber Addition on Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Sand. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soon, N.W.; Lee, L.M.; Khun, T.C.; Ling, H.S. Improvements in engineering properties of soils through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2013, 17, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghosh, P.; Mandal, S.; Chattopadhyay, B.D.; Pal, S. Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1980–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Manzur, T.; Rahman, F.; Afroz, S.; Huq, R.S.; Efaz, I.H. Potential of a Microbiologically Induced Calcite Precipitation Process for Durability Enhancement of Masonry Aggregate Concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2017, 29, 04016290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, W.; Liu, L.; Chen, W.; Yu, L.; Li, W.; Yu, H. Calcium carbonate precipitation and crystal morphology induced by microbial carbonic anhydrase and other biological factors. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Q.; Zhang, B.; Ge, Q.; Yang, X. Calcium carbonate precipitation induced by calcifying bacteria in culture experiments: Influence of the medium on morphology and mineralogy. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 134, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Daskalakis, M.I.; Rigas, F.; Bakolas, A.; Magoulas, A.; Kotoulas, G.; Katsikis, I.; Karageorgis, A.P.; Mavridou, A. Vaterite bio-precipitation induced by Bacillus pumilus isolated from a solutional cave in Paiania, Athens, Greece. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 99, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Chen, W.S.; Zhou, P.P.; Cao, L.; Yu, L.J. Influence of initial pH on the precipitation and crystal morphology of calcium carbonate induced by microbial carbonic anhydrase. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 102, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Han, Z.; Meng, R.; Yan, H.; Zhao, H.; Han, M.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, B.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhuang, D.; et al. Calcium carbonate precipitation by Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 at different Mg/Ca molar ratios under the laboratory condition. Carbonates Evaporites 2016, 32, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bao, R.T.; Li, J.H.; Li, L.; Cutright, T.J.; Chen, L.; Zhu, J.H.; Tao, J.L. Effect of Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation on Surface Erosion and Scour of Granular Soils Proof of Concept. Transp. Res. Rec. 2017, 2657, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maleki, M.; Ebrahimi, S.; Asadzadeh, F.; Tabrizi, M.E. Performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation on wind erosion control of sandy soil. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stabnikov, V.; Jian, C.; Myo, A.N.; Ivanov, V. Immobilization of Sand Dust and Associated Pollutants Using Bioaggregation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, K.L.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.L.; Li, D.; Nie, K.Y.; Zhang, S.C. Increasing wind erosion resistance of aeolian sandy soil by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 4271–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qian, C.X.; Pan, Q.F.; Wang, R.X. Cementation of sand grains based on carbonate precipitation induced by microorganism. Sci. China 2010, 53, 2198–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Achal, V.; Pan, X.; Zhang, D. Remediation of copper-contaminated soil by Kocuria flava CR1, based on microbially induced calcite precipitation. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 1601–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kang, C.H.; Shin, Y.; Anbu, P.; Nam, I.H.; So, J.S. Biosequestration of copper by bacteria isolated from an abandoned mine by using microbially induced calcite precipitation. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 62, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Choi, S.G.; Wang, K.; Chu, J. Properties of biocemented, fiber reinforced sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Heinemann, F.; Gummich, M.; Radmacher, M.; Fritz, M. Modification of CaCO3 precipitation rates by water-soluble nacre proteins. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2011, 31, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Skuce, R.L.; Tobler, D.J.; Maclaren, I.; Lee, M.R.; Phoenix, V.R. Immobilization of nanoparticles by occlusion into microbial calcite. Chem. Geol. 2017, 453, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Meng, L.; Cheng, X.; Guo, H.; Yang, Z. Enhancement of the Yield and Strength of Microbially-induced Carbonate Precipitation by Optimum Cultivation and Grouting Measures for Civil Engineering Applications. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 7, 631–638. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, Y.A.; Jian, C.A.; Bc, A.; Hl, B.; Liang, C.C. Biocementation of soil using non-sterile enriched urease-producing bacteria from activated sludge. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pei, J.; Xing, X.; Xia, B.; Wang, Z.; Luo, Z. Study on the Adsorption Behavior between an Imidazolium Ionic Liquid and Na-Montmorillonite. Molecules 2019, 24, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ramachandran, S.K.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Bang, S.S. Remediation of Concrete Using Microorganisms. ACI Mater. J. 2001, 98, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, Q.; Li, L.; Li, C.; Li, M.D.; Amini, F.; Zhang, H.Z. Factors Affecting Improvement of Engineering Properties of MICP-Treated Soil Catalyzed by Bacteria and Urease. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2014, 26, 04014094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bundeleva, I.A.; Shirokova, L.S.; Bénézeth, P.; Pokrovsky, O.S.; Kompantseva, E.I.; Balor, S. Zeta potential of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria and Ca adsorption at the cell surface: Possible implications for cell protection from CaCO3 precipitation in alkaline solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 360, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Muynck, W.; De Belie, N.; Verstraete, W. Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 118–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takahashi, C.; Shirai, T.; Fuji, M. Study on intercalation of ionic liquid into montmorillonite and its property evaluation—Science Direct. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kawano, M.; Hwang, J. Roles of microbial acidic polysaccharides in precipitation rate and polymorph of calcium carbonate minerals. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 51, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, X.; Huang, Q.; Chen, S.; Yu, Z. Adsorption of the insecticidal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis on montmorillonite, kaolinite, silica, goethite and Red soil. Appl. Clay Sci. 2005, 30, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bains, A.; Dhami, N.K.; Mukherjee, A.; Reddy, M.S. Influence of Exopolymeric Materials on Bacterially Induced Mineralization of Carbonates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 175, 3531–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cuthbert, M.O.; Riley, M.S.; Handleysidhu, S.; Renshaw, J.C.; Tobler, D.J.; Phoenix, V.R.; Mackay, R. Controls on the rate of ureolysis and the morphology of carbonate precipitated by S. Pasteurii biofilms and limits due to bacterial encapsulation. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 41, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gat, D.; Tsesarsky, M.; Shamir, D.; Ronen, Z. Accelerated microbial-induced CaCO3 precipitation in a defined co-culture of ureolytic and non-ureolytic bacteria. Biogeosci. Discuss. 2014, 10, 17249–17273. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, X. Adsorption of Lysine on Na-Montmorillonite and Competition with Ca2+: A Combined XRD and ATR-FTIR Study. Langmuir 2016, 32, 4746–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, L.; Cord-Ruwisch, R. In situ soil cementation with ureolytic bacteria by surface percolation. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 42, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Harkes, M.P.; Paassen, L.A.V.; Booster, J.L.; Whiffin, V.S.; Loosdrecht, M.C.M.V. Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Belbel, A.; Kharroubi, M.; Janot, J.M.; Abdessamad, M.; Haouzi, A.; Lefkaier, I.K.; Balme, S. Preparation and characterization of homoionic montmorillonite modified with ionic liquid: Application in dye adsorption. Colloid Surf. A 2018, 558, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mignon, P.; Ugliengo, P.; Sodupe, M. Theoretical Study of the Adsorption of RNA/DNA Bases on the External Surfaces of Na-Montmorillonite. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 13741–13749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rong, X.; Huang, Q.; He, X.; Chen, H.; Cai, P.; Liang, W. Interaction of Pseudomonas putida with kaolinite and montmorillonite: A combination study by equilibrium adsorption, ITC, SEM and FTIR. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2008, 64, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bachmeier, K.L.; Williams, A.E.; Warmington, J.R.; Bang, S.S. Urease activity in microbiologically-induced calcite precipitation. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 93, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Seifan, M.; Samani, A.K.; Berenjian, A. Induced calcium carbonate precipitation using Bacillus species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Al Qabany, A.; Soga, K. Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Geotechnique 2013, 63, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Whiffin, V.S.; Paassen, L.A.V.; Harkes, M.P. Microbial Carbonate Precipitation as a Soil Improvement Technique. Geomicrobiol. J. 2007, 24, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vucak, M.; Pons, M.N.; Peric, J.; Vivier, H. Effect of precipitation conditions on the morphology of calcium carbonate: Quantification of crystal shapes using image analysis. Powder Technol. 1998, 97, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The SEM images of NA-MM (a) and CaCO3 precipitates with Na-MMT obtained at various times: 1 min (b), 30 min (c), 60 min (d), 2 h (e), 24 h (f), respectively. The EDS patterns of Na-MMT and CaCO3 precipitates from the marked area A (g), B (h) and C (i).
Figure 1. The SEM images of NA-MM (a) and CaCO3 precipitates with Na-MMT obtained at various times: 1 min (b), 30 min (c), 60 min (d), 2 h (e), 24 h (f), respectively. The EDS patterns of Na-MMT and CaCO3 precipitates from the marked area A (g), B (h) and C (i).
Molecules 26 06211 g001
Figure 2. The change in the concentration of the Ca2+ ions (a) and pH (b) with Na-MMT concentrations.
Figure 2. The change in the concentration of the Ca2+ ions (a) and pH (b) with Na-MMT concentrations.
Molecules 26 06211 g002
Figure 3. OD600 of bacteria with various Na-MMT concentrations (a) and TCS quantities in the absence of and in the presence of 0.25% Na-MMT (b).
Figure 3. OD600 of bacteria with various Na-MMT concentrations (a) and TCS quantities in the absence of and in the presence of 0.25% Na-MMT (b).
Molecules 26 06211 g003
Figure 4. The change in the concentration of Ca2+ ions with different quantities of TCS without Na-MMT (a) and with 0.25% Na-MMT (b).
Figure 4. The change in the concentration of Ca2+ ions with different quantities of TCS without Na-MMT (a) and with 0.25% Na-MMT (b).
Molecules 26 06211 g004
Figure 5. The total mass of CaCO3 precipitates with different Na-MMT concentrations (a) and with TCS quantities with and without Na-MMT (b).
Figure 5. The total mass of CaCO3 precipitates with different Na-MMT concentrations (a) and with TCS quantities with and without Na-MMT (b).
Molecules 26 06211 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of CaCO3 precipitates with different quantities of TCS (TCS = 100 (a), 200 (b), 300 (c), and 400 g (d)).
Figure 6. SEM images of CaCO3 precipitates with different quantities of TCS (TCS = 100 (a), 200 (b), 300 (c), and 400 g (d)).
Molecules 26 06211 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of CaCO3 crystals with different quantities of TCS with 0.25% Na-MMT (TCS = 100 (a), 200 (b), 300 (c), and 300 g (d)).
Figure 7. SEM images of CaCO3 crystals with different quantities of TCS with 0.25% Na-MMT (TCS = 100 (a), 200 (b), 300 (c), and 300 g (d)).
Molecules 26 06211 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of CaCO3 precipitates catalyzed by bacteria (TCS = 100) without (a) and with 0.25% Na-MMT (b).
Figure 8. XRD patterns of CaCO3 precipitates catalyzed by bacteria (TCS = 100) without (a) and with 0.25% Na-MMT (b).
Molecules 26 06211 g008
Figure 9. The hydraulic conductivity of consolidated sandy soil with different Na-MMT concentrations.
Figure 9. The hydraulic conductivity of consolidated sandy soil with different Na-MMT concentrations.
Molecules 26 06211 g009
Figure 10. SEM images of the consolidated sandy soil samples without (a,b) and with NA-MMT (c,d).
Figure 10. SEM images of the consolidated sandy soil samples without (a,b) and with NA-MMT (c,d).
Molecules 26 06211 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, G.; Jia, C.; Wang, G.; Yu, P.; Zhang, H. Role of Na-Montmorillonite on Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation. Molecules 2021, 26, 6211. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206211

AMA Style

Tang G, Jia C, Wang G, Yu P, Zhang H. Role of Na-Montmorillonite on Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation. Molecules. 2021; 26(20):6211. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Guowang, Cangqin Jia, Guihe Wang, Peizhi Yu, and Haonan Zhang. 2021. "Role of Na-Montmorillonite on Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation" Molecules 26, no. 20: 6211. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206211

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop