Next Article in Journal
Stereoselective Synthesis of the Di-Spirooxindole Analogs Based Oxindole and Cyclohexanone Moieties as Potential Anticancer Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition, Insecticidal and Mosquito Larvicidal Activities of Allspice (Pimenta dioica) Essential Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Curcumin Analogues DMC and EF24 in Combination with the Cytokine TRAIL against Kidney Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition, Antipathogenic and Cytotoxic Activity of the Essential Oil Extracted from Amorpha fruticosa Fruits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition of Cinnamomum verum Leaf and Flower Essential Oils and Analysis of Their Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Larvicidal Properties

by
Arunaksharan Narayanankutty
1,*,
Krishnaprasad Kunnath
2,
Ahmed Alfarhan
3,*,
Rajakrishnan Rajagopal
3 and
Varsha Ramesh
4
1
Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, PG and Research Department of Zoology, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Calicut 673008, India
2
Department of Pharmacology, Devaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Chelembra, Malapuram 673634, India
3
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biotechnology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(20), 6303; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206303
Submission received: 18 September 2021 / Revised: 13 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Oils: Biological Activities and New Possible Applications)

Abstract

:
Cinnamomum verum is widely used in traditional medicines, and the different parts of the plant, such as bark, leaves, and flowers, are used for essential oil production. The present study compared the chemical composition of the essential oil of C. verum extracted from the leaves and flowers. In addition, efficacy of these essential oils against the two common pests Sitophilus oryzae and Callosobruchus maculatus was also evaluated. The results indicated the presence of cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, caryophyllene, and linalool in these essential oils, however, at different concentrations. The leaf essential oil was found to be 10–20% more effective as a fumigant against both the pests. Likewise, the leaf essential oil found to repel these pests even at lower concentrations than that of flower essential oil of C. verum. Besides, these essential oils were also effective in controlling the growth of various gram positive and gram negative microbial pathogens and possibly a safeguard for human health. On contrary, both the essential oils were found to be safe for the application on grains, as indicated by their germination potentials. It was also observed that these essential oils do not cause any significant toxicity to guppy fishes, thus confirming their ecological safety for use as a biopesticide.

1. Introduction

Essential oils are important pharmacological and commercial agents that are widely utilized for various industrial purposes, cosmetic uses, and medicinal applications, including aromatherapy [1]. Various essential oils are utilized as ecofriendly agents against varying classes of pests, vectors, and other insect agents [2]. Aromatic plants, especially spices, are the primary sources of essential oil with plenty of biological activities. Essential oils of Cinnamomum plants are widely used as promising antibacterial agents. Reports have indicated that the essential oils of C. camphora [3] and C. cassia [4,5] reverse antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation. Studies have also indicated that the C. zeylanicum (synonym of C. verum) has also found to be effective against multidrug resistant strains of clinical Shigella isolates [6]. Likewise, the C. cassia essential oil in combination with polymyxin B effectively reduces the growth of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens [7]. Studies by Yap, Krishnan, Chan, and Lim [8] have indicated the antibacterial activity against drug resistant E. coli strains. Antifungal potentials were also attributed to the essential oils of C. zeylanicum [9] and C. cassia [10,11].
Pests and vectors are major threats to the global food and health security, the risk of which is higher in developing countries compared to the developed nations [12,13]. Insect pests are major organisms with significant impact on the economy and agricultural productivity of a country [14]. These insect pests are known to inhibit the plant growth, grain production, and damage the stored products; the common insect pests of stored food products accounting for the severe damages include Sitophilus oryzae and Callosobruchus maculatus [15]. The attack of pests in conditions, such as pest outbreaks, can lead to the reduced production of food crops and lead to shortage of food sources. In addition, the damage of pest attack is more prominent in the case of stored products as it can damage the already produced materials. The majority of the global food supply is in the form of grains and cereals, as well as pulses [16]. There are several chemical pesticides are being used for the control of various pests: the pyrethroids, phosphines, and organochlorines [17,18]. These pesticides are known to cause several toxic effects to neural and other organ systems [19,20,21].
The vectors are other important organisms, primarily insects that are known to spread the diseases including dengue, chikungunya, malaria, plague, and so many others [22]. Among these, the mosquitoes are considered to be the most potent, with a higher propensity of mortality associated with vector borne diseases. Further, there are numerous diseases and pathogenic organisms that are passing from one person to another via these vector organisms. Among these, the mosquito vectors, such as Aedis, Anopheles, and Culex, are considered to be the most important. However, the roles of mosquito species, such as Armigeres sp, are emerging risk factors over the recent years.
Apart from the general bacterial, viral, and fungal diseases that are spreading through vectors, there are several other microbial diseases that are associated with elevated mortality [23]. In addition, the evolution of antibiotic insensitive microbes enhances the threat to present day health care systems. Despite the introduction of various antibiotics, microbial pathogens have gained the resistance against these antimicrobial compounds [24,25]. Several microbial pathogens are reported to be associated with human diseases; among these, some of the most relevant are E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas sp., etc.
The study, therefore, analyzed the antibacterial activity and possible use of biologically safe pesticide and larvicide agent. The insecticidal potential was analyzed against different pests of stored products, such as Sitophilus oryzae and Callosobruchus maculatus. The biological safety was evaluated in non-targeted organisms and also using grain germination potential.

2. Results

2.1. Percentage Yield of Essential Oil and Chemical Composition

The yield of leaf (LEO) and flower (FEO) essential oil by steam distillation was 1.44 ± 0.09 and 1.07 ± 0.12%. Both the essential oils possessed similar volatile components, with a different percentage composition. The common compounds among these two essential oils were the cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, and linalool (Table 1). The most abundant (< 10%) compounds in the LEO were (E) Cinnamaldehyde (35.6%), linalool (18.92%), eugenol (18.69%), and (E) Cinnamyl acetate (12.5%). In the FEO, compounds with highest abundance were (E) Cinnamaldehyde (42.88%), eugenol (21.33%), and linalool (15.62%).

2.2. Anti-Microbial Screening of the Leaf and Flower Essential Oils of C. verum

Antibacterial properties of the C. verum essential oils were evaluated against E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and Salmonella enteritidis (Table 2). The leaf essential oil was found to have higher zone of inhibition compared to the Cinnamomum verum leaf essential oil (FEO), except against salmonella strain. Similarly, as indicated in the Table 2, the Cinnamomum verum leaf essential oil (LEO) was found to be more effective and had the lowest minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) values compared to the Cinnamomum verum leaf essential oil (FEO) (p < 0.05).

2.3. Efficacy of C. verum Essential Oils as Possible Larvicidal Agent

The three mosquito species (Armigeres, Aedes, and Culex) were chosen for the larvicidal screening of the LEO and FEO (Table 3). Among all the three mosquito species, the LEO was found to be more effective compared to the flower essential oil of C. verum.
In Armigeres species, the IC50 values of LEO (88.34 ± 2.9 µg/mL) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the FEO (97.71 ± 3.6 µg/mL). Similarly, the activity of LEO as expressed in terms of IC50 values against Aedes (41.56 ± 4.1 µg/mL) and Culex (64.88 ± 1.9 µg/mL) species were significantly higher than the FEO.

2.4. Insecticide Properties of the Leaf and Flower Essential Oils of C. verum

The rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae was found to be more resistant compared to the C. maculatus from the toxicities of various essential oils (Figure 1). The application of flower essential oil of C. verum was more effective as an anti-feedant and repellant agent against S. oryzae (4.58 ± 0.15 and 6.19 ± 0.07 µg/L of air). Similarly, the fumigant and contact toxicity was also high in the FEO (88.64 ± 3.73 and 30.72 ± 1.45 µg/L).
A similar trend was also observed against C. maculatus; the half-maximum inhibition concentration for antifeedant activity, repellency, fumigant, and contact toxicity were found to be 4.52 ± 0.17, 8.80 ± 0.18, 52.81 ± 5.11, and 20.97 ± 2.05 µg/L, respectively.

2.5. Phytotoxicity of Essential Oil on Germinating Seeds

The leaf and flower essential oils of C. verum were found to be highly active against the mosquito larvae and various other pests. To elucidate the possible phytotoxic properties of the essential oils, the impact of wheat germination potential was evaluated; however, till 144 h, there observed no significant alterations in the percentage viability of grains in control and different essential oil treated groups (Table 4).

3. Discussion

Pests, vectors, and parasites are economically important in the areas of health care and agriculture/food sciences [26]. Both these organisms are predominated by different insects; hence, control of the insect pests/vectors is essential for the sustainable development of a country in terms of agricultural development, food security, and improvements in the health care status of people. Chemical pesticides are often reported to be phytotoxic to the vegetation [27] and animals, as well as humans [19,21]. The recent reports highlight the application of natural products, especially the volatile compounds for the repellency/control of these insects from the settlement areas [28]. Essential oils are the compounds with high volatility, as well as good aroma; their use is often encouraged as an insect repellant and insecticidal agent [2]. Cinnamomum is a genus of plants that is well-elucidated for their essential oils producing abilities and their applications in the control of various insect pests/vectors. However, the C. verum essential oils are less explored for such activities using experimental studies.
The present study indicated a higher potential of C. verum flower and leaf essential oils as potential insect repellents, especially against the pests of stored grains. The application of the essential oils was also capable of inhibiting the feed intake by these pests. Cinnamomum zeylanicum has already been shown to have repellent activity against Diaphania hyalinata [29]. Previous studies have also indicated similar repellant activity for C. camphora essential oil [30]; besides, the insecticidal property was also exhibited by the essential oil against S. oryzae and Bruchus rugimanus. Further, the results of the study also indicated the fumigant and contact toxicity of both the essential oils of C. verum against the selected stored pests, with a higher efficacy by the FEO. Previous studies by Jeon, Lee, and Lee [31] have indicated the possible insecticidal potential of the bark essential oil of c. zeylanicum against Dermatophagoides, Tyrophagus, and Ricania. Similar insecticidal property has been also shown by C. cassia against the insect vectors, such as mosquitoes [32]. Likewise our results also observed significant larvicidal potential of the C. verum essential oils; unlike their insecticidal property, the higher activities were observed for the LEO compared to the FEO. Previously, the bark essential oils of C. cassia, C. verum, C. loureiroi [33], and C. osmophloeum [34,35] were observed against the larvae of different species of mosquitoes. It is, thus, possible that the larvicidal properties of these essential oils may be enhancing the value of C. verum essential oils as a mosquito control agent.
Further, the essential oils extracted from the leaves and flowers of the plant were capable of inhibiting the microbial growth in the various bacterial strains including that of E. coli, Salmonella, Staphylococcus, and Pesudomonas; the leaf essential oil was more potent antibacterial agent over FEO. Reports have also indicated the antimicrobial properties of C. verum (or C. zeylanicum) had been previously reported in the multi-drug resistant strains of Shigella [6], Candida sp. [9], and other bacterial strains [36,37]. Bark essential oil of C. verum was found to destroy the membrane of Klebsiella sp by inducing oxidative damages [38]. It is, therefore, likely that, apart from the bark essential oils, the leaf and flower essential oils are also strong antimicrobial agents against different gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
Results also indicated the presence of bioactive compounds, such as eugenol, cinnamaldehyde, and linalool, in flower and leaf essential oils; the leaf essential oil is found to have higher proportion of linalool in LEO and eugenol in FEO. Previous studies have indicated that Cinnamomum zeylanicum (a synonym of C. verum) is rich in cinnamaldehyde and its derivatives, followed by linalool, caryophyllene, and eugenol [39]. It is, therefore, possible that the composition variation between the leaf and flower essential oils of C. verum may be responsible for its differential activities observed.
Overall, the bioactivities of both leaf and flower essential oils of C. verum are promising as insecticidal, larvicidal, and antimicrobial agent; besides, the non-toxic nature of these oils are also observed in germinating grains. Hence, it can be presumed that the C. verum-derived essential oil may act as a source of value added and environmentally safe products in pest and vector control in the coming years.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials Collection, Essential Oil Extraction, and Phytochemical Analysis by GC-MS

Cinnamomum verum leaves and flowers were collected from the Kerala Agriculture University, Thrissur, Kerala. The collected leaves and flowers were the washed, frozen, and powdered under −80 °C. About 500 g of the leaves and 100 g buds were weighed in a digital balance and then extracted by steam distillation methods that are previously mentioned in the article of Nagarajan et al. [40] for 5 h. The yield of essential oil was expressed in percentage (mL of essential oil yielded from 100 g plant material). The GC-MS analysis was carried out according to the conditions mentioned in the previous article by Nagarajan et al. using a SPB-1 column [40]. The percentage composition was estimated from the relative peak area obtained from the GC-MS chromatogram.

4.2. Antibacterial Activity of the C. verum Leaf and Flower Essential Oil

The flower and leaf essential oils were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against different strains of bacteria and fungi. The antibacterial activity was done as agar disc-diffusion method [41] and minimum inhibitory concentration [42] as described previously. The experiment was conducted in triplicate and repeated for five times to ensure accuracy. The microbial strains used in the study were relevant to the human diseases, which include Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella enteritidis.

4.3. Larvicidal Potential of Essential Oils from the Leaves and Flowers of C. verum

Different mosquito cultures of Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Armigeres subalbatus, and Aedes aegypti were collected and maintained under normal atmospheric conditions. The larval stages of each of the mosquito were maintained in glass jars and those in the third instar stage of development were used for the larvicidal studies. About 50 larvae from each culture were transferred to individual chambers, and different concentrations (0–100 µg/mL) of essential oils were transferred to these glass chambers and maintained for 24 h. The average mortality in each concentration was counted and LC50 value was estimated. The experiment was repeated three times each conducted in triplicate.

4.4. Insecticidal Potential of the Leaf and Flower Essential Oil of C. verum

The pests of stored grains were chosen as the model organisms; they include common rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) and pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus). Anti-feedant potential of the different essential oils was carried out as per the protocols of Yan et al. [43]. The fumigant effect of leaf and flower essential oils of C. verum was evaluated using the standard protocols previously described in the article of Bhavya et al. [44]. The repellant activity of leaf and flower essential of C. verum was determined according the protocols described by Kłyś et al. [45]. Contact toxicity profiles of the different essential oils were carried out by the methods of Patiño-Bayona et al. [46]. The half-maximal inhibition concentration of LC50 value was calculated using Probit analysis.
The IC50 values were expressed in terms of μg/g of food (anti-feedant activity), μg/L of air (fumigant toxicity and repellent activity), μg/mm2 area (contact toxicity).

4.5. Phytotoxic Potential of the Leaf and Flower Essential Oil of C. verum

The effect of leaf and flower essential oil of C. verum on the germination potential of wheat grains was evaluated for 144 h [30]. Briefly, the wheat grains planted in individual plates were exposed to 200 and 500 µg/mL of these essential oils, and the percentage of germination at each tested doses was determined by comparing with that of a control.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The extraction of individual essential oils was carried out by steam distillation in three individual sets of process. The results were represented as Mean± SD, and, using Student’s t-test, the statistical analysis of the data was performed.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results are supportive to the fact that the leaf and flower essential oils of C. verum are rich sources of various chemical volatiles, including Cinnamaldehyde. Further, these molecules are found to have strong insecticidal, larvicidal, and antimicrobial properties. It is also noteworthy that these essential oils have no toxic effects observed and are also found to be safe in germinating grains. Hence, it is possible that the C. verum essential oils may evolve as a promising green pesticide and antimicrobial agent in the near future.

Author Contributions

A.N. and A.A.: Concept design, Methodology, Analysis, Fund acquisition, Manuscript editing, Manuscript correction; K.K. and R.R.—Experimentation, Analysis, Manuscript Preparation; V.R.—Analysis, Manuscript Preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this research through Researchers Supporting Project No: RSP 2021/11. Infrastructural development was supported by DBT-STAR to St. Joseph’s College, Devagiri, Calicut.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data may be shared upon valid request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this research through Researchers Supporting Project No: RSP 2021/11. A.N. acknowledge DBT-STAR scheme for Infrastructural development in St. Joseph’s College, Devagiri, Calicut and KSCSTE for student project scheme funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples are available from A.N. on valid request.

References

  1. dos Santos, E.; Leitão, M.M.; Ito, C.N.A.; Silva-Filho, S.E.; Arena, A.C.; Silva-Comar, F.M.D.S.; Cuman, R.K.N.; Oliveira, R.J.; Formagio, A.S.N.; Kassuya, C.A.L. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory articular effects of essential oil and camphor isolated from Ocimum kilimandscharicum Gürke leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 269, 113697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Narayanankutty, A.; Sasidharan, A.; Job, J.T.; Rajagopal, R.; Alfarhan, A.; Kim, Y.O.; Kim, H.-J. Mango ginger (Curcuma amada Roxb.) rhizome essential oils as source of environmental friendly biocides: Comparison of the chemical composition, antibacterial, insecticidal and larvicidal properties of essential oils extracted by different methods. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, J.; Fu, J.; Li, J.; Wang, G.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Antibacterial Activity of Cinnamomum camphora Essential Oil on Escherichia coli During Planktonic Growth and Biofilm Formation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 561002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vasconcelos, N.G.; Silva, K.E.; Croda, J.; Simionatto, S. Antibacterial activity of Cinnamomum cassia L. essential oil in a carbapenem- and polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella aerogenes strain. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2020, 53, e20200032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Netopilova, M.; Houdkova, M.; Urbanova, K.; Rondevaldova, J.; van Damme, P.; Kokoska, L. In vitro antimicrobial combinatory effect of Cinnamomum cassia essential oil with 8-hydroxyquinoline against Staphylococcus aureus in liquid and vapour phase. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 906–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Akrami, S.; Amin, M.; Saki, M. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial effects of Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil against clinical multidrug-resistant Shigella isolates. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 2583–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vasconcelos, N.G.; Queiroz, J.; Silva, K.E.D.; Vasconcelos, P.C.P.; Croda, J.; Simionatto, S. Synergistic effects of Cinnamomum cassia L. essential oil in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yap, P.S.X.; Krishnan, T.; Chan, K.-G.; Lim, S.H.E. Antibacterial Mode of Action of Cinnamomum verum Bark Essential Oil, Alone and in Combination with Piperacillin, Against a Multi-Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli Strain. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 25, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hurtado, R.; Peltroche, N.; Mauricio, F.; Gallo, W.; Alvítez-Temoche, D.; Vilchez, L.; Mayta-Tovalino, F. Antifungal Efficacy of Four Different Concentrations of the Essential Oil of Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Canela) against Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2020, 10, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Giordani, R.; Regli, P.; Kaloustian, J.; Portugal, H. Potentiation of antifungal activity of amphotericin B by essential oil fromCinnamomum cassia. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gucwa, K.; Milewski, S.; Dymerski, T.; Szweda, P. Investigation of the antifungal activity and mode of action of Thymus vulgaris, Citrus limonum, Pelargonium graveolens, Cinnamomum cassia, Ocimum basilicum, and Eugenia caryophyllus essential oils. Molecules 2018, 23, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Dang, K.; Doggett, S.L.; Singham, G.V.; Lee, C.-Y. Insecticide resistance and resistance mechanisms in bed bugs, Cimex spp. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Farnsworth, D.; A Hamby, K.; Bolda, M.; E Goodhue, R.; Williams, J.C.; Zalom, F.G. Economic analysis of revenue losses and control costs associated with the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura), in the California raspberry industry. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nopsa, J.F.H.; Daglish, G.J.; Hagstrum, D.W.; Leslie, J.F.; Phillips, T.W.; Scoglio, C.; Thomas-Sharma, S.; Walter, G.H.; Garrett, K.A. Ecological Networks in Stored Grain: Key Postharvest Nodes for Emerging Pests, Pathogens, and Mycotoxins. Bioscience 2015, 65, 985–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kumar, D.; Kalita, P. Reducing Postharvest Losses during Storage of Grain Crops to Strengthen Food Security in Developing Countries. Foods 2017, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yaseen, M.; Kausar, T.; Praween, B.; Shah, S.J.; Jan, Y.; Shekhawat, S.S.; Malik, M.; Azad, Z.R.A.A. Insect Pest Infestation During Storage of Cereal Grains, Pulses and Oilseeds. In Health and Safety Aspects of Food Processing Technologies; Malik, A., Erginkaya, Z., Erten, H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 209–234. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jagadeesan, R.; Singarayan, V.T.; Chandra, K.; Ebert, P.R.; Nayak, M.K. Potential of Co-Fumigation with Phosphine (PH3) and Sulfuryl Fluoride (SO2F2) for the Management of Strongly Phosphine-Resistant Insect Pests of Stored Grain. J. Econ. Èntomol. 2018, 111, 2956–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, F.; Subramanyam, B. Management of five stored-product insects in wheat with pirimiphos-methyl and pirimiphos-methyl plus synergized pyrethrins. Pest Manag. Sci. 2005, 61, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alavanja, M.C.R.; Hofmann, J.; Lynch, C.F.; Hines, C.J.; Barry, K.H.; Barker, J.; Buckman, D.W.; Thomas, K.; Sandler, D.P.; Hoppin, J.; et al. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Risk and Insecticide, Fungicide and Fumigant Use in the Agricultural Health Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. van de Sijpe, P.; Lucas, D.; Canals, M.L.; Jensen, O. Acute occupational phosphine intoxications in the maritime shipping sector: Belgian and French reported cases. Int. Marit. Health 2020, 71, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, M.-G.; Choi, J.; Hong, Y.-S.; Park, C.G.; Kim, B.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Lim, H.-J.; Mo, H.-H.; Lim, E.; Cha, W. Negative effect of methyl bromide fumigation work on the central nervous system. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gan, S.J.; Leong, Y.Q.; Barhanuddin, M.F.H.B.; Wong, S.T.; Wong, S.F.; Mak, J.W.; Ahmad, R.B. Dengue fever and insecticide resistance in Aedes mosquitoes in Southeast Asia: A review. Parasit Vectors 2021, 14, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Elmassry, M.M.; Piechulla, B. Volatilomes of Bacterial Infections in Humans. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Culyba, M.J.; Van Tyne, D. Bacterial evolution during human infection: Adapt and live or adapt and die. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Doron, S.; Gorbach, S.L. Bacterial Infections: Overview. Int. Encycl. Public Health 2008, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Narladkar, B.W. Projected economic losses due to vector and vector-borne parasitic diseases in livestock of India and its significance in implementing the concept of integrated practices for vector management. Veter-World 2018, 11, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fatma, F.; Verma, S.; Kamal, A.; Srivastava, A. Phytotoxicity of pesticides mancozeb and chlorpyrifos: Correlation with the antioxidative defence system in Allium cepa. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 24, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Narayanankutty, A.; Unnikrishnan, K.; Jose, B.; Ramesh, V.; Rajagopal, R.; Alfarhan, A.; Al-Ansari, A. Analysis of the chemical composition of root essential oil from Indian Sarsaparilla (Hemidesmus indicus) and its application as an ecofriendly insecticide and pharmacological agent. Saudi J. Bio. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lobo, A.P.; da Camara, C.A.G.; de Melo, J.P.R.; de Moraes, M.M. Chemical composition and repellent activity of essential oils from the leaves of Cinnamomum zeylanicum and Eugenia uniflora against Diaphania hyalinata L. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2019, 126, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, C.H.; Mishra, A.K.; Tan, R.X.; Tang, C.; Yang, H.; Shen, Y.F. Repellent and insecticidal activities of essential oils from Artemisia princeps and Cinnamomum camphora and their effect on seed germination of wheat and broad bean. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1969–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jeon, Y.-J.; Lee, S.-G.; Lee, H.-S. Acaricidal and insecticidal activities of essential oils of Cinnamomum zeylanicum barks cultivated from France and India against Dermatophagoides spp., Tyrophagus putrescentiae and Ricania sp. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2017, 60, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, K.-S.; Tak, J.-H.; Kim, S.-I.; Lee, W.-J.; Ahn, Y.-J. Repellency of Cinnamomum cassia bark compounds and cream containing cassia oil to Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and indoor conditions. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aungtikun, J.; Soonwera, M. Improved adulticidal activity against Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) from synergy between Cinnamomum spp. essential oils. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mdoe, F.P.; Cheng, S.-S.; Msangi, S.; Nkwengulila, G.; Chang, S.-T.; Kweka, E.J. Activity of Cinnamomum osmophloeum leaf essential oil against Anopheles gambiae s.s. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Cheng, S.-S.; Liu, J.-Y.; Tsai, K.-H.; Chen, W.-J.; Chang, S.-T. Chemical Composition and Mosquito Larvicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Leaves of Different Cinnamomum osmophloeum Provenances. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4395–4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaskatepe, B.; Kiymaci, M.E.; Simsek, D.; Erol, H.B.; Erdem, S.A. Comparison of the Contents and Antimicrobial Activities of Commercial and Natural Cinnamon Oils. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 78, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.-Q.; Pan, X.-H.; Lu, Y.-H.; Cao, P. Antibacterial effects of cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) bark essential oil on Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, S.-K.; Yusoff, K.; Ajat, M.; Thomas, W.; Abushelaibi, A.; Akseer, R.; Lim, E.; Lai, K.-S. Disruption of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae membrane via induction of oxidative stress by cinnamon bark (Cinnamomum verum J. Presl) essential oil. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Behbahani, B.A.; Falah, F.; Arab, F.L.; Vasiee, M.; Yazdi, F.T. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Activities of Cinnamomum zeylanicum Bark Essential Oil. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nagarajan, S.; Rao, L.J.M.; Gurudutt, K.N. Chemical composition of the volatiles of Hemidesmus indicus R. Br. Flavour Fragr. J. 2001, 16, 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Walia, S.; Mukhia, S.; Bhatt, V.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, R. Variability in chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Tagetes minuta L. essential oil collected from different locations of Himalaya. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 150, 112449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2000, 6, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Yan, T.K.; Asari, A.; Salleh, S.A.; Azmi, W.A. Eugenol and Thymol Derivatives as Antifeedant Agents against Red Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) Larvae. Insects 2021, 12, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bhavya, M.L.; Obulaxmi, S.; Devi, S.S. Efficacy of Ocimum tenuiflorum essential oil as grain protectant against coleopteran beetle, infesting stored pulses. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1611–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kłyś, M.; Izdebska, A.; Malejky-Kłusek, N. Repellent Effect of the Caraway Carum carvi L. on the Rice Weevil Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera, Dryophthoridae). Insects 2020, 11, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Patiño-Bayona, W.; Galeano, L.N.; Cortes, J.B.; Ávila, W.D.; Daza, E.H.; Suárez, L.; Prieto-Rodríguez, J.; Patiño-Ladino, O. Effects of Essential Oils from 24 Plant Species on Sitophilus zeamais Motsch (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Insects 2021, 12, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Insect repellent and insecticidal properties of the Cinnamomum verum flower (FEO) (a) and leaf (LEO) (b) essential oils against the pests of stored grains Sitophilus oryzae (So) and Callosobruchus maculatus (Cm). The values shown on the Y-axis is the IC50 or half-maximal inhibition concentrations for respective biological activities compared to the untreated control group.
Figure 1. Insect repellent and insecticidal properties of the Cinnamomum verum flower (FEO) (a) and leaf (LEO) (b) essential oils against the pests of stored grains Sitophilus oryzae (So) and Callosobruchus maculatus (Cm). The values shown on the Y-axis is the IC50 or half-maximal inhibition concentrations for respective biological activities compared to the untreated control group.
Molecules 26 06303 g001
Table 1. GC-MS analysis of Cinnamomum verum LEO and FEO essential oils.
Table 1. GC-MS analysis of Cinnamomum verum LEO and FEO essential oils.
No.CompoundKovats Index (KI)% a
LEO bFEO c
1Camphene9450.240.41
2β-pinene9670.330.14
3Sabinene9720.850.22
4Myrcene9881.541.99
51,4-Cineole10100.520.13
6Limonene10200.380.64
7Cis-β-Ocimene10240.080.11
8trans-β-Ocimene10280.070.15
9p-Cymene10181.882.68
10Linalool109518.9215.62
11γ-Terpinene10540.190.55
12α-Terpineol12960.841.33
13Piperitone12470.220.41
14Geraniol12540.620.18
15(E)-Cinnamaldehyde126235.642.88
16(Z)-Cinnamaldehyde12710.650.88
17Eugenol135818.6921.33
18(E)-Cinnamyl acetate144312.58.26
19Eugenyl acetate14961.380.74
20Benzyl benzoate17540.250.22
a Relative area = relative contents expressed as percentages of the total oil composition. b LEO—essential oil obtained from leaves. c FEO—essential oil obtained from flowers.
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of C. verum leaf (LEO) and flower (FEO) essential oils in terms of zone of inhibition and the Minimum inhibitory concentrations (μg/mL).
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of C. verum leaf (LEO) and flower (FEO) essential oils in terms of zone of inhibition and the Minimum inhibitory concentrations (μg/mL).
BacteriaZone of Inhibition (mm)MIC (μg/mL)
LEOFEOLEOFEO
Escherichia coli14.9 ± 0.1 *11.2 ± 0.32.7 ± 0.1 *3.2 ± 0.2
Staphylococcus aureus17.2 ± 0.3 *15.2 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.4 *2.9 ± 0.2
Pseudomonas aeruginosa17.6 ± 0.4 *16.4 ± 0.23.3 ± 0.2 *4.1 ± 0.3
Salmonella enteritidis19.2 ± 0.318.9 ± 0.13.7 ± 0.2 *4.0 ± 0.2
(* indicate significance variation p < 0.05).
Table 3. Mosquito larvicidal activity of C. verum leaf (LEO) and flower (FEO) essential oils and expressed as LC50 value (μg/mL).
Table 3. Mosquito larvicidal activity of C. verum leaf (LEO) and flower (FEO) essential oils and expressed as LC50 value (μg/mL).
MosquitoLC50 (μg/mL)
LEOFEO
Armigeres subalbatus88.34 ± 2.9 **97.71 ± 3.6
Aedes aegypti41.56 ± 4.1 **58.04 ± 2.8
Culex tritaeniorhynchus64.88 ± 1.9 ***80.66 ± 3.6
(** indicate p < 0.01; *** indicate p < 0.001).
Table 4. The toxicity analysis of flower (FEO) and leaf (LEO) essential oil of Cinnamomum verum in the germinating wheat grains (estimated as germination index) (ns- indicate no significant variation with the negative control).
Table 4. The toxicity analysis of flower (FEO) and leaf (LEO) essential oil of Cinnamomum verum in the germinating wheat grains (estimated as germination index) (ns- indicate no significant variation with the negative control).
Duration of Exposure in HoursNegative ControlCinnamomum verum Essential Oil (µg/mL)
LEOFEO
250500250500
4811.4 ± 1.210.9 ± 1.1ns10.0 ± 1.5 ns12.2 ± 2.1 ns14.3 ± 2.2 ns
7227.7 ± 2.327.8 ± 2.4 ns25.3 ± 2.0 ns26.8 ± 2.0 ns30.4 ± 2.0 ns
9659.4 ± 1.459.3 ± 1.8 ns57.3 ± 0.8 ns55.4 ± 0.8 ns62.1 ± 3.4 ns
12078.8 ± 2.179.2 ± 1.5 ns78.8 ± 0.9 ns74.3 ± 2.4 ns72.4 ± 3.1 ns
14488.9 ± 2.386.9 ± 1.3 ns85.9 ± 2.1 ns84.3 ± 3.2 ns86.2 ± 2.7 ns
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Narayanankutty, A.; Kunnath, K.; Alfarhan, A.; Rajagopal, R.; Ramesh, V. Chemical Composition of Cinnamomum verum Leaf and Flower Essential Oils and Analysis of Their Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Larvicidal Properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206303

AMA Style

Narayanankutty A, Kunnath K, Alfarhan A, Rajagopal R, Ramesh V. Chemical Composition of Cinnamomum verum Leaf and Flower Essential Oils and Analysis of Their Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Larvicidal Properties. Molecules. 2021; 26(20):6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Narayanankutty, Arunaksharan, Krishnaprasad Kunnath, Ahmed Alfarhan, Rajakrishnan Rajagopal, and Varsha Ramesh. 2021. "Chemical Composition of Cinnamomum verum Leaf and Flower Essential Oils and Analysis of Their Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Larvicidal Properties" Molecules 26, no. 20: 6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206303

APA Style

Narayanankutty, A., Kunnath, K., Alfarhan, A., Rajagopal, R., & Ramesh, V. (2021). Chemical Composition of Cinnamomum verum Leaf and Flower Essential Oils and Analysis of Their Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Larvicidal Properties. Molecules, 26(20), 6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206303

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop