Next Article in Journal
Ultrasensitive Detection of COVID-19 Causative Virus (SARS-CoV-2) Spike Protein Using Laser Induced Graphene Field-Effect Transistor
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen and Lithium Bonds—Lewis Acid Units Possessing Multi-Center Covalent Bonds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules26226948
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Antifungal Activity, 3D-QSAR, and Molecular Docking Study of Novel Menthol-Derived 1,2,4-Triazole-thioether Compounds

by
Mei Huang
1,2,
Wen-Gui Duan
1,*,
Gui-Shan Lin
1,* and
Bao-Yu Li
1
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2
Guangxi Research Institute of Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Nanning 530001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6948; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226948
Submission received: 24 October 2021 / Revised: 7 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of novel menthol derivatives containing 1,2,4-triazole-thioether moiety were designed, synthesized, characterized structurally, and evaluated biologically to explore more potent natural product-based antifungal agents. The bioassay results revealed that at 50 μg/mL, some of the target compounds exhibited good inhibitory activity against the tested fungi, especially against Physalospora piricola. Compounds 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph), 5i (R = o-Cl Ph), 5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph) and 5x (R = α-furyl) had inhibition rates of 93.3%, 79.4%, and 79.4%, respectively, against P. piricola, much better than that of the positive control chlorothalonil. Compounds 5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph) and 5g (R = o-Cl Ph) held inhibition rates of 82.4% and 86.5% against Cercospora arachidicola and Gibberella zeae, respectively, much better than that of the commercial fungicide chlorothalonil. Compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) displayed antifungal activity of 90.5% and 83.8%, respectively, against Colleterichum orbicalare and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Compounds 5m (R = o-I Ph) had inhibition rates of 88.6%, 80.0%, and 88.0%, respectively, against F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinu, Bipolaris maydis and C. orbiculare. Furthermore, compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) showed the best and broad-spectrum antifungal activity against all the tested fungi. To design more effective antifungal compounds against P. piricola, 3D-QSAR analysis was performed using the CoMFA method, and a reasonable 3D-QSAR model (r2 = 0.991, q2 = 0.514) was established. The simulative binding pattern of the target compounds with cytochrome P450 14α-sterol demethylase (CYP51) was investigated by molecular docking.

1. Introduction

Fungicides have been widely used for controlling the disease caused by plant pathogens. However, the developed resistance of plant-pathogenic fungi to currently commercial fungicides has shown great threat to the production and quality of plants, which lead to the exploration of novel antifungal agents.
Peppermint (Mentha Canadensis Linnaeus) is an important herb spice plant mainly planted in Jiangsu and Anhui regions of China, as well as a traditional Chinese medicine. Menthol, (1R, 2S, 5R)-2- isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexan-1-ol, is the dominant constituent of the essential oil which is obtained by steam distillation of the fresh leaves of peppermint [1]. The content of menthol in peppermint essential oil can be as high as 30% to 55% [2]. Because menthol is a monocyclic monoterpene alcohol with three chiral carbons, it can be employed to synthesize bioactive compounds except its use in flavors and fragrances. Menthol and its derivatives have a wide range of applications in medicine and agrochemical, such as anti-inflammatory [3], antimicrobial [4,5], antifungal [6], insecticidal [7], anticancer [8,9], analgesic [10,11], anesthetic [12] and penetration-enhancing activities [13]. Thus, menthol deserves further study for agrochemical or pharmaceutical use based on its bioactive property and chemical reactivity.
On the other hand, 1,2,4-triazole, as the representative of five-membered unsaturated heterocycles, showed diverse biological activities, such as antimicrobial [14,15], antifungal [16,17,18], anticancer [19,20], insecticidal [21,22], herbicidal [23,24] and anti-inflammatory activities [25]. In particular, several compounds such as cytochrome P450 14α-sterol demethylase (CYP51) inhibitors in the FRAC classification of fungicides (http://www.frac.info/ accessed on 7 November 2021) were found to contain 1,2,4-triazole moiety. In addition, thioether derivatives have considerable applications in agriculture and medicine because of their various bioactive activities such as insecticidal [26], antifungal, antibacterial [27] and anticancer [28] activities.
In continuation of our interest in the bioactive properties of natural product-based compounds [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], a series of novel menthol-derived 1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds were synthesized by integrating bioactive 1,2,4-triazole and thioether moieties into the molecular skeleton of menthol. Structural characterization, antifungal evaluation, three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) and molecular docking of the title compounds were also carried out.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

As illustrated in Scheme 1, (-)-menthyl-2-chloroacetate (2) was prepared by the O-acylation reaction of (-)-menthol (1) with chloroacetyl chloride. Meanwhile, a series of substituted aryl hydrazides were converted to the corresponding 5-substituted 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones (4). Lastly, a series of menthol-derived 1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds (5a-z) were synthesized by the nucleophilic substitution of compounds 4 with 2 under alkaline condition.
The structures of all the target compounds and the key intermediate 2 were characterized by FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and elemental analysis, and the related spectra could be found in the Supplementary Materials. In the FT-IR spectra of the target compounds, the characteristic absorption bands at about 1731 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching vibrations of C=O. The characteristic absorption bands at about 1457–1486 cm−1 were assigned to C=N in the 1,2,4-triazole moiety. Additionally, the characteristic absorption bands in the region of 686–714 cm−1 was attributed to the vibrations of C-S-C. In the 1H-NMR spectra, the protons of benzene ring showed signals at 6.57–7.95 ppm. The characteristic signals at 3.38–3.86 ppm were assigned to the methyl protons linked to the 1,2,4-triazole heterocycle. The methylene protons bonded to the S atom displayed the signals at about 3.40 ppm. The characteristic signals at about 4.71 ppm were assigned to the protons on the saturated carbon bonded to the O atom. The protons of the menthol moiety displayed signals in the range of 0.71–2.02 ppm. The 13C NMR spectra of the target compounds showed peaks for the carbon atom of C=O at about 168.00 ppm and carbon atoms of the benzene ring at 96.62–163.92 ppm. For the 1,2,4-triazole moiety, the signals at 150.36–157.37 ppm and 144.06–151.45 ppm were assigned to the unsaturated carbons, and at 31.41–33.40 ppm to the methyl. The methylene carbon bonded to the S atom showed signals at 35.77–36.35 ppm. The carbon bonded to the O atom displayed signals at about 76.45 ppm. The other saturated carbons of menthol displayed signals in the region of 16.22–47.06 ppm. Their molecular weights and the C, H, and N elemental ratios agreed with the results of ESI-MS and elemental analysis, respectively.

2.2. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activities of the target compounds menthol-derived 1,2,4-triazole-thioethers 5a–5z were evaluated by the in vitro method against fusarium wilt on cucumber (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum), speckle on peanut (Cercospora arachidicola), apple ring rot (Physalospora piricola), tomato early blight (Alternaria solani), wheat scab (Gibberella zeae), rice sheath blight (Rhizoeotnia solani), corn southern leaf blight (Bipolaris maydis), and watermelon anthracnose (Colleterichum orbicalare) at 50 µg/mL, using the commercial antifungal agent chlorothalonil as positive control. The results are listed in Table 1.
The bioassay results indicated that at the concentration of 50 µg/mL, the target compounds 5a–5z exhibited certain antifungal activity against the eight tested fungi, especially against P. piricola. Compounds 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph), 5i (R = o-Cl Ph), 5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph) and 5x (R = α-furyl) had inhibition rates of 93.3%, 79.4%, 79.4% and 79.4%, respectively, against P. piricola, better than that of the positive control chlorothalonil with inhibition rate of 75.0%. Compounds 5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph), 5i (R = o-Cl Ph) and 5o (R = o-CF3 Ph) held inhibition rates of 82.4%, 79.0% and 79.0% against C. arachidicola, respectively, better than that of the commercial fungicide chlorothalonil with inhibition rate of 73.3%. Compound 5g (R = m-F Ph) displayed inhibitory activity of 86.5% against G. zeae, better than that of the positive control chlorothalonil with inhibition rate of 73.1%. Compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) displayed antifungal activity of 90.5% and 83.8%, respectively, against C. orbicalare and F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinu. Compounds 5m (R = o-I Ph) had inhibition rates of 88.6%, 80.0%, and 88.0%, respectively, against F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinu, B. myadis and C. orbiculare. In addition, compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) displayed the best and broad-spectrum antifungal activity against all the tested fungi. Therefore, compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) deserved further study. To further investigate the structure–activity relationship, 3D-QSAR and molecular docking studies were subsequently performed.

2.3. CoMFA Analysis

The 3D-QSAR analysis of the antifungal activity against P. piricola of the target compounds was carried out by the CoMFA method to study the structure-activity relationship of the synthesized compounds. In this work, 23 derivatives were selected to perform 3D-QSAR study and the results of CoMFA model are listed in Table 2. This model with cross-validated coefficient (q2 = 0.514 > 0.5), correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.991 > 0.8), standard error of estimate (S = 0.050) and Fischer ratio (F value = 183.384) was reliable and effective. In addition, the Scatter plot of predicted ED values vs experimental ED values shown in Figure 1 was drawn by the data presented in Table 3. In Figure 1, it was easily observed that the all points were placed at the nearby of Y = X line.
The electrostatic and steric contribution maps of CoMFA are shown in Figure 2. The contribution rate of the electrostatic field and the steric field were 24.8% and 75.2%, respectively, revealing that the steric field was the major contributor to the increase in the antifungal activity against P. piricola. In Figure 2A, there were some green regions located around the 2-position of the benzene ring indicating that the introduction of bulky group in this position was beneficial to increase the antifungal activity. For example, compounds 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph), 5d (R = o-OCH3 Ph), 5f (R = o-F Ph), 5i (R = o-Cl Ph), 5m (R = o-I Ph), 5o (R = o-CF3 Ph), 5q (R = o-OH Ph) and 5s (R = o-NH2 Ph) displayed higher antifungal activity than compound 5a (R = Ph). In contrast, the yellow regions (Figure 2A) at the 4-position of the phenyl ring, indicated that the introduction of bulky group in this position was associated with worse antifungal activities. For example, compounds 5c (R = p-CH3 Ph), 5h (R = p-F Ph), 5k (R = p-Cl Ph), 5l (R = p-Br Ph) and 5r (R = p-OH Ph) displayed worse antifungal activity than compound 5a (R = Ph). In Figure 2B, the electrostatic field contours were displayed in two distinguishing colors. The blue block represents that the introduction of electron donor groups is conducive to enhancing activity and the opposite for the red block. Therefore, the introduction of electron-donating groups at the 4-position and electron-withdrawing groups at the 2-position of benzene rings were both favorable for antifungal activity. For instance, compound 5c (R = p-CH3 Ph) and 5e (R = p-OCH3 Ph) exhibited better antifungal activity than that of 5h (R = p-F Ph), 5k (R = p-Cl Ph) and 5l (R = p-Br Ph), compounds 5f (R = o-F Ph), 5i (R = o-Cl Ph), and 5m (R = o-I Ph) possessed a higher inhibitory rate than 5d (R = o-OCH3 Ph).

2.4. Molecular Docking Analysis

For investigating the binding modes of the target compounds in the active site of cytochrome P450 14α-sterol demethylase (CYP51), molecular docking study was carried out using Sybyl-X 2.1.1 software. As a representative sample, the binding modes of compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) are respectively presented in the 2D and 3D pattern (Figure 3). It was found that compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) could readily embed into the binding pocket and interact with the residues around. In particular, the formed hydrogen bond between the O atom of the ester group of the ligand and the hydroxyl of the residue Tyr76(A) was observed. In addition, the small-molecule ligand also generated hydrophobic interactions with other residues, such as Phe78(A), Met79(A), Leu100(A), and Leu321(A). For comparison, imibenconazole, a commercial CYP51 inhibitor, was also evaluated for its binding modes in the active site, and the obtained results were shown in the 2D pattern (Figure 3D). Most of the residues around compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) could be also observed in the case of imibenconazole, revealing that they exhibited similar binding modes in the active site.
Moreover, their binding affinity with the target protein could be expressed by total score [38], which was automatically generated from the docking process. To our delight, all of the total scores of the target compounds (6.5160–9.1989) were higher than that of imibenconazole (5.4657), indicating that the target compounds showed stronger binding affinity with CYP51 than imibenconazole.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

The GC analysis was conducted on an Agilent 6890 GC (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with column HP-1 (30 m, 0.530 mm, 0.88 μm). The IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Co., Ltd., Madison, WI, USA) using the KBr pellet method. The HPLC analysis was conducted on Waters 1525 HPLC instrument (Waters Co., Ltd., Milford, MA, USA) equipped with column C18 5 µm (4.6 mm × 150 mm) and Waters 2998 PDA detector. The melting points were recorded using an MP420 automatic melting point apparatus (Hanon Instruments Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) and were not corrected. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were determined on a Bruker Avance III HD 500 MHz/600 MHz spectrometer (Switzerland Bruker Co., Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland) using CDCl3 as the solvent and TMS as an internal standard. Mass spectra were obtained by means of the electrospray ionization (ESI) method on the TSQ Quantum Access MAX HPLC-MS instrument (Thermo Scientific Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). Elemental analyses were measured using a PE 2400 II elemental analyzer (Perkin-Elmer Instruments Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). L-menthol (GC purity 99%) was provided by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). A series of substituted aryl hydrazides were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Other reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as received.

3.2. Synthesis of (-)-Menthyl-2-chloroacetate (2)

A solution of chloroacetyl chloride (12.42 g, 0.11 mol) in dry DCM (20 mL) was added slowly to a mixture of (-)-menthol (15.63 g, 0.10 mol), triethylamine (11.13 g, 0.11 mol) and DMAP (0.80 g, 0.006 mol) in dry DCM (15 mL) with ice-bath cooling. The reaction process was monitored by TLC. Upon completion, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (5 mL) was added to destroy the unreacted acyl chloride. Then, the organic layer was separated, washed with deionized water three times, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was further purified by silica gel chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 10:1, v/v) to obtain the intermediate 2 as a colorless transparent liquid. Yield 92%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.73 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (s, 2H), 2.00 (dt, J = 12.1, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (pt, J = 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.69 (dt, J = 13.9, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (dtd, J = 12.1, 6.7, 6.1, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.40 (s, 1H), 1.07–0.98 (m, 2H), 0.92–0.88 (m, 6H), 0.85 (dd, J = 12.3, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 0.75 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.07, 76.35, 46.93, 40.63, 36.03, 34.11, 31.41, 26.18, 23.36, 21.97, 20.75, 16.28. These data were in agreement with that of the literature [39].

3.3. General Procedure of Menthol-Based 1,2,4-Triazole-thioether Compounds (5a–5w)

Intermediate 4 was prepared according to a method described in the literature [40]. The intermediate 4 (2.0 mmol) and sodium acetate trihydrate (0.27 g, 2.0 mmol) were dissolved in 15 mL mixed solvent of ethanol and water (ethanol/water 2:1, v/v). Then, the mixture was stirred at 45 °C for 2 h. Afterwards, a solution of menthyl chloroacetate 2 (0.46 g, 2.0 mmol) in 5 mL EtOH was slowly added to the mixture and continuously refluxed at 80 °C for 6 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was concentrated in vacuum. Then, the crude product was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, and the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was washed with saturated NaCl solution three times, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and purified by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 3:1, v/v) to afford the target compounds 5a–5w in yields of 50% to 76%.
Compound (5a): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-phenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl) thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 63.0%, m.p. 124.7–125.1 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2960, 2934, 2915, 2864 (s, C-H), 1735(s, C=O), 1482 (s, C=N), 703 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62 (dd, J = 6.6, 3.0 Hz, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 7.54–7.46 (m, 3H, C17-H, C18-H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.08 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.86–1.79 (m, 1H, C7-H), 1.69–1.64 (m, 2H, C4-Ha, C3-Ha), 1.45 (ddt, J = 8.8, 5.6, 2.6 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (t, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.06–0.95 (m, 2H, C6-Hb, C3-Hb), 0.88 (dd, J = 8.7, 6.7 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.83 (dd, J = 12.7, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.73 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.07, 156.10, 150.54, 130.15, 128.92, 128.62, 126.99, 76.35, 46.93, 40.63, 36.03, 34.11, 31.86, 31.41, 26.18, 23.36, 21.97, 20.75, 16.28; ESI-MS m/z: 388.20 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H29N3O2S: C, 65.08; H, 7.54; N,10.84; Found: C, 65.06; H, 7.52; N, 10.37.
Compound (5b): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-(o-tolyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 58.3%, IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2927, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731(s, C=O), 1457 (s, C=N), 706 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.42 (ddd, J = 8.5, 6.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.35 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 7.32–7.29 (m, 2H, C18-H, C17-H), 4.75 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.12 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.44 (s, 3H, C21-H), 2.25 (s, 3H, C22-H), 2.01 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.90 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.71 (t, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.68 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.49 (dddd, J = 12.1, 8.9, 6.3, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.45–1.38 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.11–1.04 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.04–0.99 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.92 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 3H, C10-H), 0.91 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.88 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.76 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.21, 155.91, 149.79, 138.45, 130.79, 130.54, 130.34, 126.57, 126.11, 76.47, 47.05, 40.76, 36.05, 34.23, 31.53, 31.00, 26.32, 23.49, 22.09, 20.86, 19.82, 16.41; ESI-MS m/z: 402.22 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C22H31N3O2S: C, 65.80; H, 7.78; N,10.46; Found: C, 65.72; H, 7.73; N, 10.40.
Compound (5c): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-(p-tolyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 70.0%, m.p. 124.0–125.2 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2947, 2935, 2917, 2865(s, C-H), 1735(s, C=O), 1475 (s, C=N), 707 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, C15-H, C20-H), 7.30 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.07 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.65 (s, 3H, C21-H), 2.42 (s, 3H, C22-H), 1.98 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.82 (dt, J = 6.9, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (h, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (dddt, J = 12.3, 9.6, 6.6, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (ddt, J = 14.1, 10.9, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.89 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, C10-H), 0.87 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.11, 156.18, 150.29, 140.35, 129.59, 128.49, 124.06, 76.33, 46.92, 40.63, 36.06, 34.11, 31.83, 31.41, 26.17, 23.36, 21.97, 21.44, 20.75, 16.27; ESI-MS m/z: 402.21 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C22H31N3O2S: C, 65.80; H, 7.78; N,10.46; Found: C, 65.70; H, 7.72; N, 10.42.
Compound (5d): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 68.2%, IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2928, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731(s, C=O), 1476 (s, C=N), 700 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51–7.45 (m, 2H, C20-H, C18-H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, C17-H), 4.72 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.10 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.81 (s, 3H, C22-H), 3.44 (s, 3H, C21-H), 2.02–1.96 (m, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.86 (dd, J = 7.0, 4.2 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.8, 2.2 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.47 (dddq, J = 15.3, 8.9, 6.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.42–1.35 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.09–1.02 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.96 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.89 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.83 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.74 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.14, 157.23, 154.60, 149.85, 132.27, 132.15, 121.12, 116.15, 111.07, 76.30, 55.55, 46.93, 40.63, 35.86, 34.13, 31.42, 31.16, 26.18, 23.38, 21.98, 20.74, 16.28; ESI-MS m/z: 418.22 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C22H31N3O3S: C, 63.28; H, 7.48; N,10.06; Found: C, 63.25; H, 7.45; N, 10.05.
Compound (5e): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 66.8%, m.p. 106.9–108.4 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2952, 2936, 2869 (s, C-H), 1735(s, C=O), 1477 (s, C=N), 714 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.70 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.06 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.85 (s, 3H, C22-H), 3.64 (s, 3H, C21-H), 2.00–1.95 (m, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.82 (qt, J = 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.67 (q, J = 2.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.64 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dtd, J = 12.1, 5.9, 5.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.42–1.35 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.93 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, C10-H), 0.87 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.80 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.13, 161.01, 156.00, 150.12, 130.06, 119.26, 114.36, 76.33, 55.41, 46.92, 40.63, 36.09, 34.11, 31.83, 31.41, 26.17, 23.35, 21.97, 20.75, 16.27; ESI-MS m/z: 418.23 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C22H31N3O3S: C, 63.28; H, 7.48; N,10.06; Found: C, 63.23; H, 7.43; N, 10.02.
Compound (5f): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio) acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 62.8%, IR (KBr, cm−1): 2955, 2928, 2869 (s, C-H), 1732(s, C=O), 1474 (s, C=N), 671 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (td, J = 7.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.52 (tdd, J = 7.5, 5.3, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 1H, C17-H), 4.72 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.10 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.55 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 3H, C21-H), 1.99 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.85 (qd, J = 7.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddq, J = 12.3, 9.5, 6.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (ddt, J = 14.2, 11.0, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.83 (dd, J = 12.3, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.73 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.99, 159.72 (d, J = 249.9 Hz), 152.21, 150.82, 132.67 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), 132.27, 124.97 (d, J = 3.6 Hz), 116.07 (d, J = 21.3 Hz), 115.18 (d, J = 14.6 Hz), 76.40, 46.92, 40.61, 35.84, 34.12, 31.41, 31.32 (d, J = 6.2 Hz), 26.19, 23.37, 21.96, 20.73, 16.26; ESI-MS m/z: 406.20 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28FN3O2S: C, 62.20; H, 6.96; N,10.36; Found: C, 61.18; H, 6.94; N, 10.32.
Compound (5g): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio) acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 65.3%, IR (KBr, cm−1): 2959, 2933, 2868 (s, C-H), 1736(s, C=O), 1484 (s, C=N), 683 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46 (td, J = 7.9, 5.6 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 7.42–7.38 (m, 1H, C20-H), 7.35 (dt, J = 9.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H, C16-H), 7.17 (td, J = 8.9, 8.4, 2.5 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 4.69 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.06 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.95 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.80 (pd, J = 7.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.66 (q, J = 2.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.64–1.61 (m, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.44 (dddt, J = 12.1, 8.8, 6.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.36 (ddt, J = 14.2, 10.9, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.06–0.98 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 0.99–0.93 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88–0.84 (m, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.83– 0.78 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.70 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.11, 162.85(d, J = 248.0 Hz), 155.02, 151.17, 130.82 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), 129.03 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 124.35 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 117.36 (d, J = 21.0 Hz), 115.86 (d, J = 23.3 Hz), 76.55, 47.05, 40.76, 36.08, 34.23, 32.06, 31.53, 26.31, 23.48, 22.08, 20.86, 16.40; ESI-MS m/z: 406.20 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28FN3O2S: C, 62.20; H, 6.96; N,10.36; Found: C, 61.17; H, 6.93; N, 10.31.
Compound (5h): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio) acetate. White solid. Yield: 60.1%, m.p. 136.5–137.9 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2958, 2929, 2869 (s, C-H), 1732 (s, C=O), 1484 (s, C=N), 689 (w, C-S-C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62 (dd, J = 8.8, 5.2 Hz, 2H, C20-H, C16-H), 7.20 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C19-H, C17-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.07 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.65 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.83 (qd, J = 7.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddd, J = 12.0, 8.9, 6.4, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (ddt, J = 14.2, 10.8, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.07–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 0.99–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.90–0.86 (m, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.17, 163.92 (d, J = 251.1 Hz), 155.35, 150.81, 130.80 (d, J = 8.6 Hz), 123.27 (d, J = 3.6 Hz), 116.32 (d, J = 22.1 Hz), 76.53, 47.05, 40.76, 36.12, 34.23, 31.97, 31.54, 26.31, 23.49, 22.09, 20.87, 16.41; ESI-MS m/z: 406.19 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28FN3O2S: C, 62.20; H, 6.96; N,10.36; Found: C, 61.17; H, 6.92; N, 10.30.
Compound (5i): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 60.8%; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2927, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1467 (s, C=N), 698 (w, C-S-C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54–7.44 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.42- 7.36 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 4.73 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.11 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.48 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (dd, J = 10.7, 5.9 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.87 (dt, J = 7.1, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (ddt, J = 8.9, 5.7, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.42–1.35 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.05 (ddd, J = 13.1, 9.7, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.91–0.87 (m, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.87–0.82 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.74 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.99, 154.22, 150.37, 134.23, 132.65, 131.97, 129.89, 127.26, 126.58, 76.39, 46.93, 40.63, 35.85, 34.12, 31.41, 31.11, 26.20, 23.37, 21.98, 20.75, 16.29; ESI-MS m/z: C 422.17 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28ClN3O2S: C, 59.77; H, 6.69; N,9.96; Found: C, 59.76; H, 6.67; N, 9.93.
Compound (5j): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(3-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 72.1%, m.p. 68.4–70.0 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2955, 2935, 2869 (s, C-H), 1732 (s, C=O), 1471 (s, C=N), 685 (s, C-S-C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.52 (dt, J = 7.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C16-H), 7.48 (dt, J = 8.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 1H, C18-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.08 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.67 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.97 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.82 (qt, J = 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddt, J = 12.1, 8.9, 6.1, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (ddt, J = 14.2, 10.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.10–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.73 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.98, 154.79, 151.06, 134.99, 130.30, 130.25, 128.66, 128.63, 126.65, 76.43, 46.93, 40.64, 35.98, 34.11, 31.93, 31.41, 26.19, 23.36, 21.97, 20.75, 16.29; ESI-MS m/z: 422.18 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28ClN3O2S: C, 59.77; H, 6.69; N,9.96; Found: C, 59.75; H, 6.65; N, 9.92.
Compound (5k): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 66.2%, m.p. 121.9–123.7 °C; IR (KBr, v/cm−1): 2956, 2932, 2869 (s, C-H), 1732(s, C=O), 1478 (s, C=N), 713 (w, C-S-C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.07 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.97 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.81 (qd, J = 7.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddt, J = 12.0, 8.9, 6.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.41–1.35 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.09–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (dd, J = 8.5, 6.7 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.79 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.01, 155.09, 150.92, 136.47, 129.83, 129.28, 125.43, 76.42, 46.93, 40.63, 35.98, 34.10, 31.90, 31.41, 26.18, 23.36, 21.97, 20.74, 16.28; ESI-MS m/z: 422.17 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28ClN3O2S: C, 59.77; H, 6.69; N,9.96; Found: C, 59.74; H, 6.63; N, 9.93.
Compound (5l): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(4-bromophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 67.1%, m.p. 144.4–145.2 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2955, 2931, 2870 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1477 (s, C=N), 713 (w, C-S-C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68–7.62 (m, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.08 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.97 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.82 (pd, J = 7.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddd, J = 12.1, 8.9, 6.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (ddt, J = 14.2, 10.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (dd, J = 8.7, 6.7 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.00, 155.13, 150.97, 132.24, 130.02, 125.88, 124.74, 76.42, 46.92, 40.63, 35.97, 34.10, 31.91, 31.41, 26.18, 23.35, 21.97, 20.74, 16.28; ESI-MS m/z: 466.13 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28BrN3O2S: C, 54.08; H, 6.05; N,9.01; Found: C, 54.06; H, 6.02; N, 9.00.
Compound (5m): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 50.6%; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2927, 2868 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1466 (s, C=N), 692 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.95 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, C17-H), 7.50–7.46 (m, 1H, C18-H), 7.38 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.22 (td, J = 7.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 4.73 (td, J = 11.0, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.12 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.44 (s, 3H, C21-H), 2.00 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.88 (pd, J = 7.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.69 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.66 (h, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.47 (dddt, J = 15.3, 8.8, 6.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.43–1.37 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.10–1.03 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.03–0.97 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.90 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 3H, C10-H), 0.89 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.87–0.84 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.75 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.11, 157.37, 150.15, 139.51, 133.05, 132.13, 132.08, 128.53, 98.86, 76.52, 47.06, 40.79, 36.04, 34.25, 31.54, 31.39, 26.32, 23.50, 22.12, 20.90, 16.45; ESI-MS m/z: 514.13 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28IN3O2S: C, 49.13; H, 5.50; N, 8.18; Found: C, 49.11; H, 5.48; N, 8.15.
Compound (5n): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio) acetate. White solid. Yield: 67.1%, m.p. 131.1–131.8 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2929, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1475 (s, C=N), 710 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.89–7.81 (m, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 4.70 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.07 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.65 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.97 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.82 (pd, J = 7.1, 2.9 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.5, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.66–1.63 (m, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (dddt, J = 12.2, 9.5, 6.5, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.38 (ddt, J = 14.1, 10.9, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.89 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, C10-H), 0.87 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.00, 155.24, 151.00, 138.17, 130.04, 126.42, 96.62, 76.43, 46.93, 40.64, 35.97, 34.10, 31.91, 31.41, 26.18, 23.36, 21.97, 20.75, 16.28. ESI-MS m/z: 514.11 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H28IN3O2S: C, 49.13; H, 5.50; N,8.18; Found: C, 49.10; H, 5.49; N, 8.16.
Compound (5o): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 56.1%, m.p. 88.6–90.2 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2929, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1475 (s, C=N), 710 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.88–7.80 (m, 1H, C20-H), 7.72–7.64 (m, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 7.49–7.43 (m, 1H, C18-H), 4.73 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.11 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.38 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (dd, J = 10.6, 5.9 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.88 (ddt, J = 14.0, 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.69 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.66 (q, J = 3.3, 2.6 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.48 (dddq, J = 12.0, 8.9, 6.1, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.40 (ddt, J = 13.8, 11.0, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.09–1.02 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.02–0.97 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.89 (dd, J = 6.8, 4.9 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.84 (dd, J = 12.3, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.75 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.11, 153.42, 150.34, 132.54, 132.16, 131.06, 131.02, 127.21, 125.59, 124.57, 76.56, 47.04, 40.72, 36.06, 34.25, 31.55, 31.11, 26.3, 23.51, 22.07, 20.85, 16.39; ESI-MS m/z: 456.19 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C22H28F3N3O2S: C, 58.01; H, 6.20; N,9.22; Found: C, 58.00; H, 6.19; N, 9.21.
Compound (5p): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 70.1%, m.p. 81.5–82.3 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2961, 2928, 2869 (s, C-H), 1735 (s, C=O), 1459 (s, C=N), 704 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.92 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, C16-H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.09 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.69 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.83 (qt, J = 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddt, J = 12.1, 9.5, 6.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.42–1.35 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.96 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.73 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.09, 154.86, 151.45, 132.48, 129.74, 128.00, 127.00 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 125.56 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 125.15, 76.60, 47.06, 40.77, 36.11, 34.23, 32.06, 31.54, 26.33, 23.49, 22.08, 20.86, 16.41; ESI-MS m/z: 456.22 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C22H28F3N3O2S: C, 58.01; H, 6.20; N,9.22; Found: C, 57.98; H, 6.18; N, 9.20.
Compound (5q): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 65.1%, m.p. 158.9–160.9 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3429(w, O-H), 2961, 2942, 2914, 2864 (s, C-H), 1735 (s, C=O), 1486 (s, C=N), 683 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.18 (s, 1H, OH-H), 7.53 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.39–7.31 (m, 1H, C18-H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, C17-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.07 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.86 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.96 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.81 (qt, J = 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.67 (q, J = 2.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.64 (t, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (dddt, J = 12.2, 9.4, 6.6, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.37 (ddt, J = 14.2, 11.0, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.07–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.94 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, C10-H), 0.86 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.80 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.71 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.77, 157.57, 154.11, 151.18, 131.67, 125.49, 119.10, 118.15, 110.96, 76.54, 46.92, 40.63, 35.77, 34.08, 33.40, 31.40, 26.14, 23.31, 21.94), 20.72, 16.22; ESI-MS m/z: 404.20 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H29N3O3S: C, 62.50; H, 7.24; N,10.41; Found: C, 62.48; H, 7.20; N, 10.39.
Compound (5r): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 76.0%, m.p. 137.3–138.2 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3435(w, O-H), 2953, 2929, 2866 (s, C-H), 1741 (s, C=O), 1476 (s, C=N), 698 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.26 (s, 1H, OH-H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.06 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.62 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.97 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.81 (td, J = 7.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.66 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.63 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.44 (ddt, J = 15.3, 8.8, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.40–1.34 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.07–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.93 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.86 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.81 (dd, J = 12.5, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.71 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.02, 159.76, 156.50, 150.24, 130.02, 116.50, 116.42, 76.49, 46.91, 40.61, 35.87, 34.09, 31.86, 31.40, 26.18, 23.34, 21.95, 20.72, 16.25; ESI-MS m/z: 404.19 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H29N3O3S: C, 62.50; H, 7.24; N,10.41; Found: C, 62.48; H, 7.22; N, 10.40.
Compound (5s): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio) acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 59.6%; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3454, 3351 (m, N-H), 2954, 2928, 2869 (s, C-H), 1729 (s, C=O), 1469 (s, C=N), 707 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.22 (td, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.17 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 6.82–6.76 (m, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.84 (s, 2H, NH2-H), 4.72 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.09 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.61 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.99 (dtd, J = 12.1, 4.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.85 (pd, J = 7.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddd, J = 12.1, 8.9, 6.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.39 (ddt, J = 14.2, 10.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.04 (ddd, J = 15.7, 9.7, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.83 (dd, J = 12.3, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.73 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.01, 154.57, 150.25, 146.68, 131.11, 129.14, 117.40, 116.59, 110.43, 76.39, 46.93, 40.62, 35.68, 34.11, 32.04, 31.41, 26.19, 23.37, 21.96, 20.74, 16.28; ESI-MS m/z: 403.23 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H30N4O2S: C, 62.66; H, 7.51; N, 13.92; Found: C, 62.65; H, 7.50; N, 13.90.
Compound (5t): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(2-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 52.7%; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3452, 3348 (m, N-H), 2954, 2927, 2868 (s, C-H), 1728 (s, C=O), 1469 (s, C=N), 702 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.70 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.04 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.65–3.59 (m, 3H, C21-H), 2.95 (s, 2H, NH2-H), 2.00–1.94 (m, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.81 (td, J = 7.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.67 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.64 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (dddt, J = 12.0, 8.8, 6.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.37 (ddt, J = 14.4, 10.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.93 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.90–0.85 (m, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.79 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.17, 156.46, 149.75, 148.34, 129.88, 116.36, 114.84, 76.31, 46.91, 40.62, 36.12, 34.11, 31.85, 31.40, 26.16, 23.35, 21.97, 20.75, 16.27; ESI-MS m/z: 403.23 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C21H30N4O2S: C, 62.66; H, 7.51; N,13.92; Found: C, 62.64; H, 7.49; N, 13.91.
Compound (5u): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 66.1%, m.p. 100.3–102.6 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2955, 2926, 2871 (s, C-H), 1743(s, C=O), 1468 (s, C=N), 704 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58–7.54 (m, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 7.53–7.49 (m, 2H, C17-H, C19-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.08 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.84 (dd, J = 7.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.68 (q, J = 2.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (tdd, J = 8.7, 5.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.43–1.36 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.35 (s, 9H, C23-H, C24-H, C25-H), 1.08–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.88 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.86 (s, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.73 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.23, 156.28, 153.58, 150.41, 128.44, 126.01, 124.14, 76.46, 47.05, 40.76, 36.15, 35.02, 34.24, 31.97, 31.54, 31.32, 26.30, 23.49, 22.09, 20.88, 16.40; ESI-MS m/z: 444.28 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C25H37N3O2S: C, 67.68; H, 8.41; N, 9.47; Found: C, 67.66; H, 8.40; N, 9.46.
Compound (5v): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 50.9%; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2955, 2926, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1422 (s, C=N), 686 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.23 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, C20-H), 7.10 (dd, J = 8.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H, C16-H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 4.70 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.06 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.92 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H, C22-H, C23-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.97 (dd, J = 11.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.81 (ddd, J = 14.0, 7.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.69–1.66 (m, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.64 (q, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (dddd, J = 12.1, 8.9, 6.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.37 (ddt, J = 14.2, 10.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.00 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.94 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.87 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.80 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.11, 156.00, 150.62, 150.28, 149.34, 120.98, 119.48, 112.01, 110.99, 76.35, 56.09, 56.01, 46.93, 40.64, 36.08, 34.11, 31.93, 31.41, 26.17, 23.35, 21.97, 20.75, 16.28; ESI-MS m/z: 448.25 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C23H33N3O4S: C, 61.72; H, 7.43; N, 9.39; Found: C, 61.70; H, 7.42; N, 9.36.
Compound (5w): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Pale yellow liquid. Yield: 62.7%; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2954, 2926, 2869 (s, C-H), 1731 (s, C=O), 1474 (s, C=N), 713 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) 6.75 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 2H, C16-H, C20-H), 6.57 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 4.71 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.07 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 2H, C12-H), 3.82 (s, 6H, C22-H, C23-H), 3.66 (s, 3H, C21-H), 1.98 (dtd, J = 12.0, 4.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.82 (ddd, J = 11.2, 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.67 (q, J = 2.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.66–1.62 (m, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.46 (dddt, J = 12.1, 8.9, 6.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.41–1.34 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.08–1.01 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.90–0.86 (m, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.81 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.16, 161.15, 156.06, 150.76, 128.66, 106.82, 102.30, 76.49, 55.70, 47.04, 40.75, 36.10, 34.23, 32.06, 31.52, 26.29, 23.47, 22.08, 20.87, 16.39; ESI-MS m/z: 448.24 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C23H33N3O4S: C, 61.72; H, 7.43; N, 9.39; Found: C, 61.71; H, 7.40; N, 9.37.
Compound (5x): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((5-(furan-2-yl)-4-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 51.3%, m.p. 136.2–137.7 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2961, 2935, 2866 (s, C-H), 1734 (s, C=O), 1474 (s, C=N), 707 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (t, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 7.05 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H, C16-H), 6.56 (dd, J = 3.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C17-H), 4.69 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.03 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 2H, C12-H), 3.83 (s, 3H, C19-H), 1.95 (dd, J = 10.8, 6.0 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.78 (td, J = 6.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.69–1.66 (m, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.64 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.44 (dddd, J = 13.0, 9.9, 6.6, 3.6 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.40–1.32 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.07–0.99 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 0.99–0.93 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.86 (dd, J = 11.1, 6.8 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.84–0.79 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.71 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.10, 150.36, 148.42, 144.06, 142.43, 111.97, 111.91, 76.48, 47.02, 40.72, 36.35, 34.22, 32.08, 31.52, 26.26, 23.45, 22.06, 20.84, 16.35; ESI-MS m/z: 378.19 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C19H27N3O3S: C, 60.45; H, 7.21; N, 11.13; Found: C, 60.43; H, 7.20; N, 11.12.
Compound (5y): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-(thiophen-2-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. White solid. Yield: 62.5%, m.p. 127.2–127.9 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2952, 2934, 2915, 2864 (s, C-H), 1736 (s, C=O), 1474 (s, C=N), 707 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.1 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 7.46 (dd, J = 3.7, 1.1 Hz, 1H, C16-H), 7.16 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.7 Hz, 1H, C17-H), 4.69 (td, J = 10.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.04 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H, C12-H), 3.76 (s, 3H, C19-H), 1.96 (ddq, J = 9.7, 3.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.79 (qd, J = 7.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 1.67 (q, J = 2.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.66–1.62 (m, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (tdt, J = 12.2, 6.6, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.39–1.34 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.07–0.99 (m, 1H, C3-Hb), 0.99–0.93 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.87 (dd, J = 9.0, 6.7 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.79 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.71 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.13, 151.15, 150.66, 128.49, 128.09, 127.90, 127.86, 76.50, 47.03, 40.73, 36.34, 34.21, 32.05, 31.52, 26.27, 23.45, 22.06, 20.85, 16.37; ESI-MS m/z: 394.16 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C19H27N3O2S2: C, 57.99; H, 6.92; N,10.68; Found: C, 57.98; H, 6.90; N, 10.66.
Compound (5z): (1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-((4-methyl-5-(pyridin-3-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetate. Yellow solid. Yield: 61.5%, m.p. 156.1–158.0 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 2962, 2945, 2916, 2866 (s, C-H), 1733 (s, C=O), 1481 (s, C=N), 712 (w, C-S-C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.88 (dt, J = 2.1, 1.1 Hz, 1H, C19-H), 8.73 (dd, J = 4.1, 2.4 Hz, 1H, C18-H), 8.04–7.99 (m, 1H, C16-H), 7.45 (ddt, J = 7.9, 4.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H, C17-H), 4.71 (td, J = 11.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H, C1-H), 4.09 (s, 2H, C12-H), 3.70 (s, 3H, C20-H), 1.97 (dt, J = 12.2, 4.0 Hz, 1H, C6-Ha), 1.84–1.78 (m, 1H, C7-H), 1.67 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, C4-Ha), 1.65 (t, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, C3-Ha), 1.45 (dt, J = 15.8, 5.3 Hz, 1H, C5-H), 1.41–1.34 (m, 1H, C2-H), 1.03 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.4, 3.3 Hz, 1H, C3-Hb), 1.00–0.95 (m, 1H, C6-Hb), 0.87 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, C10-H, C8-H or C9-H), 0.85–0.80 (m, 1H, C4-Hb), 0.72 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, C8-H or C9-H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.05, 153.54, 151.60, 151.24, 148.96, 136.26, 123.89, 123.59, 76.60, 47.06, 40.76, 36.05, 34.21, 32.06, 31.52, 26.31, 23.47, 22.08, 20.86, 16.40; ESI-MS m/z: 389.19 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C20H28N4O2S: C, 61.83; H, 7.26; N,14.42; Found: C, 61.82; H, 7.25; N, 14.40.

3.4. Antifungal Activity Test

The primary biological activity of the menthol-based 1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds was evaluated by agar dilution method against the tested fungi. The tested compound was dissolved in acetone. Sorporl-144 (200 mg/L), an emulsifier, was added to dilute the solution of each sample to 500 mg/L. Then, 50 µg/mL of the test compounds were obtained by mixing 1 mL of drug solution with 9 mL of PSA culture medium. A bacterium tray of 5-mm diameter cut along the external edge of the mycelium was transferred to the flat surface containing the tested compound and put in equilateral triangular style in triplicate. Later, the culture plates were cultivated at 24.0 ± 1.0 °C and the extended diameters of the circles of mycelium were measured after 48 h. Compared with the blank control, the relative inhibition percentage was calculated. All the experiments were performed in three replicates, and chlorothalonil (a commercial fungicide) was used as positive control. Activity grading indicators: Grade A: ≥90%; Grade B: 70~90%; Grade C: 50~70%; Grade D: <50%.

3.5. 3D-QSAR Analysis

The 3D-QSAR model for finding out the correlation between the structure and activity of the target compounds was built using the CoMFA method of Sybyl-X 2.1.1 software. According to the literature [41], the antifungal activities of the title compounds against P. piricola were transferred to ED values through the formula:
ED = lg {I/[(100 − I) × MW]}
where I was the inhibitory percentage at 50 µg/mL and MW was the molecular weight of the target compounds. Complete conformational optimization of each structure was performed using a conjugate gradient procedure based on the Tripos force field with termination convergence energy of 0.005 kcal/(mol*Å) and Gasteiger-Hückel charges. Compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) was selected as the template molecule, in which the atoms marked with asterisks constituted the common superimposed skeleton (Figure 4), twenty-three test compounds as training set were superimposed (Figure 5). CoMFA descriptors as independent variables and ED values as dependent variables. The cross-validation using the leave-one-out method was performed to obtain the cross-validated q2 and the optimal number N of components. Then, a non-cross-validation analysis under the optimal number of components was performed. The modeling capability was indicated by the correlation coefficient squared r2, and the prediction capability was judged by the r2 and q2.

3.6. Molecular Docking Analysis

Molecular docking study was performed on Sybyl-X 2.1.1 program, using cytochrome P450 14α-sterol demethylase (CYP51, PDB ID 1EA1) as the receptor. The 3D structures of small-molecule ligands were obtained and minimized by the reported method [42]. Surflex-Dock was employed for the docking process, and the binding site of its original ligand was selected as the docking site. The docking result was also observed in the 2D diagrams drawn by LigPlot+ v2.1 (EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

4. Conclusions

In search of natural product-based antifungal agents, 26 novel menthol-based 1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds were synthesized. Their structures were confirmed by FT-IR, NMR, ESI-MS, and elemental analysis. The in vitro antifungal activity of the target compounds 5a–5z was preliminarily evaluated against eight plant pathogens at the concentration of 50 µg/mL. The bioassay results indicated that some of the target compounds showed good inhibitory activity against the tested fungi, especially against P. piricola. Compounds 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph), 5i (R = o-Cl Ph), 5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph) and 5x (R = α-furyl) had inhibition rates of 93.3%, 79.4%, and 79.4%, respectively, against P. piricola, much better than that of the positive control chlorothalonil. Compounds 5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph) and 5g (R = o-Cl Ph) held inhibition rates of 82.4% and 86.5% against C. arachidicola and G. zeae, respectively, much better than that of the commercial fungicide chlorothalonil. Compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) displayed antifungal activity of 90.5% and 83.8%, respectively, against C. orbicalare and F. oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinu. Compound 5m (R = o-I Ph) had inhibition rates of 88.6%, 80.0%, and 88.0%, respectively, against F. oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinu, B. myadis and C. orbiculare. Furthermore, compound 5b (R=o-CH3 Ph) displayed the best and broad-spectrum antifungal activity against all the tested fungi. To design more effective antifungal molecules against P. piricola, 3D-QSAR analysis was carried out using CoMFA method. A reasonable and effective 3D-QSAR model (r2 = 0.991, q2 = 0.514) has been established. Molecular docking study revealed that there were H bonds and hydrophobic interactions between the target compounds and CYP51. Overall, compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) was a potential CYP51 inhibitor worthy of further study.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figures S1–S106: FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and ESI-MS spectra of compounds 2 and 5a–5z.

Author Contributions

M.H. carried out the experimental work, participated in the discussion of biological activities, and wrote the paper; W.-G.D. and G.-S.L. designed the target compounds, directed and supervised the whole experimentation, discussed the biological activities, and revised the paper; B.-Y.L. participated in the discussion of biological activities, 3D-QSAR and molecular docking studies. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31870556).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or the Supplementary Data File.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the State Key Laboratory of Element-Organic Chemistry, Nankai University, China, for the bioassay test.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Çam, M.; Yüksel, E.; Alaşalvar, H.; Başyiğit, B.; Şen, H.; Yılmaztekin, M.; Ahhmed, A.; Sağdıç, O. Simultaneous extraction of phenolics and essential oil from peppermint by pressurized hot water extraction. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Walasek, M. Preparative separation of menthol and pulegone from peppermint oil (Mentha piperita L.) by high-performance counter-current chromatography. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 10, xciv–xcviii. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zaia, M.G.; Cagnazzo, T.O.; Feitosa, K.A.; Soares, E.G.; Faccioli, L.H.; Allegretti, S.M.; Afonso, A.; Anibal, F.F. Anti-Inflammatory properties of menthol and menthone in schistosoma mansoni infection. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Desam, N.R.; Al-Rajab, A.J.; Sharma, M.; Mylabathula, M.M.; Gowkanapalli, R.R.; Albratty, M. Chemical constituents, in vitro antibacterial and antifungal activity of Mentha × Piperita L. (peppermint) essential oils. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2017, 31, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elahe, J.; Seyed, E.H.; Abdorreza, M.N.; Leila, N. The effects of methylcellulose coating containing carvacrol or menthol on the physicochemical, mechanical, and antimicrobial activity of polyethylene films. Food Sci. Nutrition. 2021, 9, 2768–2778. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dambolena, J.S.; López, A.G.; Cánepa, M.C.; Theumer, M.G.; Zygadlo, J.A.; Rubinstein, H.R. Inhibitory effect of cyclic terpenes (limonene, menthol, menthone and thymol) on Fusarium verticillioides MRC 826 growth and fumonisin B1 biosynthesis. Toxicon 2008, 51, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Murcia-Meseguer, A.; Alves, T.J.S.; Budia, F.; Ortiz, A.; Medina, P. Insecticidal toxicity of thirteen commercial plant essential oils against Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Phytoparasitica 2018, 46, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zielińska-Błajet, M.; Pietrusiak, P.; Feder-Kubis, J. Selected monocyclic monoterpenes and their derivatives as effective anticancer therapeutic agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nagai, K.; Fukuno, S.; Omachi, A.; Omotani, S.; Hatsuda, Y.; Myotoku, M.; Konishi, H. Enhanced anti-cancer activity by menthol in HepG2 cells exposed to paclitaxel and vincristine: Possible involvement of CYP3A4 downregulation. Drug Metab. Pers. Ther. 2019, 34, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ton, H.T.; Smart, A.E.; Aguilar, B.L.; Olson, T.T.; Kellar, K.J.; Ahern, G.P. Menthol Enhances the Desensitization of Human α3β4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 2015, 88, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, B.; Fan, L.; Balakrishna, S.; Sui, A.; Morris, J.B.; Jordt, S.E. TRPM8 is the principal mediator of menthol-induced analgesia of acute and inflammatory pain. Pain 2013, 154, 2169–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cantanhêde, S.M.; Amado, L.L.; da Costa, B.M.P.A.; Barbas, L.A.L.; Torres, M.F.; Hamoy, A.O.; da Paz, C.A.; da Silva Ferreira, C.B.; Lima, G.O.; de Sousa, J.R.; et al. Menthol exposure induces reversible cardiac depression and reduces lipid peroxidation in the heart tissue of tambaqui Colossoma macropomum. Aquaculture 2021, 541, 7368–7377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Otake, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Ogata, F.; Deguchi, S.; Yamamoto, N.; Sasaki, H.; Kawasaki, N.; Nagai, N.; Nagai, N. Energy-dependent endocytosis is responsible for skin penetration of formulations based on a combination of indomethacin nanoparticles and L-menthol in rat and göttingen minipig. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, Y.J.; Wang, Z.W.; Wang, Y.X.; Tong, X.T.; Ke, Q.; Zhang, P. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of 1,5-benzothiazepines incorporated with triazole moiety. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 41, 2361–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amin, N.H.; El-Saadi, M.T.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Abdel-Rahman, H.M. Design, synthesis and mechanistic study of new 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as antimicrobial agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 111, 104841–104853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Flavia, M.; Maurizio, B.; Federico, C.; Antonella, P. Chiral azole derivatives. Part 5: Synthesis of enantiomerically pure 1-[α-(benzofuran-2-yl)arylmethyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazoles, antifungal and antiaromatase agents. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4895–4901. [Google Scholar]
  17. He, Q.W.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, F.C.; Liu, X.H.; Feng, X.M. Asymmetric catalytic epoxidation of terminal enones for the synthesis of triazole antifungal agents. Organ. Lett. 2021, 23, 6961–6966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bitla, S.; Gayatri, A.A.; Puchakayala, M.R.; Kumar Bhukya, V.; Vannada, J.; Dhanavath, R.; Kuthati, B.; Kothula, D.; Sagurthi, S.R.; Atcha, K.R. Design and synthesis, biological evaluation of bis-(1,2,3- and 1,2,4)-triazole derivatives as potential antimicrobial and antifungal agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 41, 128004–128012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Maddali, N.K.; Ivaturi, V.K.V.; Murthy Yellajyosula, L.N.; Malkhed, V.; Brahman, P.K.; Pindiprolu, S.K.S.S.; Kondaparthi, V.; Nethinti, S.R. New 1,2,4-triazole scaffolds as anticancer agents: Synthesis, biological evaluation and docking studies. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 6788–6796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, C.J.; Wu, J.Q.; Hu, Y.; Pu, S.; Lin, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Hu, J.; Chen, W.H. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of indole-based [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-α] pyridine derivatives as novel microtubule polymerization inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 223, 113629–113644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, C.S.; Huang, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.T.; Ma, D.S.; Yu, Y.H.; Gao, J.S. Three new coordination polymers based on bis(4-(4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)phenyl)methane: Syntheses, structures, multiresponsive luminescent sensitive detection for antibiotics and pesticides, and antitumor activities. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 42272–42283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. You, Y.; Chen, Y.J.; You, C.H.; Wang, J.W.; Weng, Z.Q. Synthesis of 3-(tri/difluoromethyl)-1H-1,2,4- triazol-5(4H)-ones via the cyclization of hydrazinecarboxamides with tri/difluoroacetic anhydride. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 9343–9347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mu, J.X.; Zhai, Z.W.; Tan, C.X.; Weng, J.Q.; Wu, H.K.; Duke, S.O.; Zhang, Y.G.; Liu, X.H. Synthesis and herbicidal activity of 1,2,4-triazole derivatives containing a pyrazole moiety. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2019, 56, 968–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, G.X.; Yang, M.Y.; Zhao, W.; Sun, Z.H.; Wu, H.K. Crystal structure, DFT theoretical study and herbicidal activity of novel 1,2,4-triazole compound containing cyclopropyl group. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2015, 37, 567–573. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, S.M.; Tsai, S.E.; Chiang, C.Y.; Chung, C.Y.; Chuang, T.J.; Tseng, C.C.; Jiang, W.P.; Huang, G.J.; Lin, C.Y.; Yang, Y.C.; et al. New methyl 5-(halomethyl)-1-aryl-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxylates as selective COX-2 inhibitors and anti-inflammatory agents: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and docking study. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 104, 104333–104346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Luo, D.X.; Guo, S.G.; He, F.; Wang, H.Y.; Xu, F.Z.; Dai, A.; Zhang, R.F.; Wu, J. Novel anthranilic amide derivatives bearing the chiral thioether and trifluoromethylpyridine: Synthesis and bioactivity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 126902–126922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peng, F.; Liu, T.T.; Wang, Q.F.; Liu, F.; Cao, X.; Yang, J.S.; Liu, L.W.; Xie, C.W.; Xue, W. Antibacterial and antiviral activities of 1,3,4-oxadiazole thioether 4H-chromen-4-one derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 37, 11085–11094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nutt, M.J.; Yee, Y.S.; Buyan, A.; Andrewartha, N.; Corry, B.; Yeoh, G.C.T.; Stewart, S.G. In pursuit of a selective hepatocellular carcinoma therapeutic agent: Novel thalidomide derivatives with antiproliferative, antimigratory and STAT3 inhibitory properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 217, 113353–113372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lin, G.S.; Bai, X.; Duan, W.G.; Cen, B.; Huang, M.; Lu, S.Z. High value-added application of sustainable natural forest product α-pinene: Synthesis of myrtenal oxime esters as potential KARI inhibitors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 7862–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, M.; Huang, M.; Wang, X.; Duan, W.G.; Lin, G.S.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis, antifungal activity and 3D-QSAR study of novel acyl thiourea compounds containing gem-dimethylcyclopropane ring. Mol. Divers. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Duan, W.G.; Lin, G.S.; Chen, M.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis, antifungal activity and 3D-QSAR study of novel nopol-based 1,3,4-thiadiazole–thioether compounds. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2021, 47, 4029–4049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, C.F.; Cen, B.; Duan, W.G.; Lin, G.S.; Wang, X.; Li, B.Y. Synthesis, herbicidal activity and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study of 4-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds containing natural styrene structure. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 41, 2485–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, Y.P.; Duan, W.G.; Lin, G.S.; Kang, G.Q.; Wang, X.Y.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis, biological activity and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study of novel 4-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-thioethers containing gem-dimethylcyclopropane ring. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 40, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, M.; Duan, W.G.; Lin, G.S.; Fan, Z.T.; Wang, X. Synthesis, antifungal activity, and 3D-QSAR study of novel nopol-derived 1,3,4-thiadiazole-thiourea compounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, X.P.; Lin, G.S.; Duan, W.G.; Li, Q.M.; Li, F.Y.; Lu, S.Z. Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of novel longifolene-derived tetralone derivatives bearing 1,2,4-triazole moiety. Molecules 2020, 25, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Lin, G.S.; Duan, W.G.; Yang, L.X.; Huang, M.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel myrtenal-based 4-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-thioethers. Molecules 2017, 22, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, G.S.; Chen, Z.C.; Duan, W.G.; Wang, X.Y.; Lei, F.H. Synthesis and biological activity of novel myrtenal-derived 2-acyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione compounds. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 2085–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tao, M.L.; Sun, H.J.; Liu, L.; Luo, X.; Lin, G.Y.; Li, R.B.; Zhao, Z.X.; Zhao, Z.X. Graphitized porous carbon for rapid screening of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide GAMVVH from silkworm pupa protein and molecular insight into inhibition mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8626–8633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Er, M.; Coskun, N. Substituent Effect on the Asymmetric Induction with (1R,2S,5R)-and (1S,2R,5S)-menthol Auxiliaries. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2010, 32, 198–208. [Google Scholar]
  40. Saeed, A.; Ashraf, Z.; Nadeem, H.; Simpson, J.; Pérez, H.; Erben, M.F. An investigation of supramolecular synthons in 1,2,4-triazole-3(4H)-thione compounds. X-ray crystal structures, energetic and hirshfeld surface analysis. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1195, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.H.; Shi, Y.X.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, C.Y.; Dong, W.L.; Pan, L.; Wang, B.L.; Li, B.J.; Li, Z.M. Synthesis, antifungal activities and 3D-QSAR study of N-(5-substituted-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)cyclopropane- carboxamides. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 2782–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Parkali, P.M.; Shyam Kumar, A.; Johanna, K.P.; Prodensia, T.S.; Turaga, S.; Shaiva, V.; Pujar, G.V.; Joshi, S.D.; Aminabhavi, T.M.; Dixit, S.R. Molecular docking and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships for antitubercular pyrimidine derivatives. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 06948 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of menthol-derived 1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds 5a–5z. Reagents and conditions: (a) Chloroacetyl chloride, TEA, DMAP, 0 °C; (b) Methyl isothiocyanate, EtOH, 80 °C, 3h; NaOH 10%, 100 °C, 4 h; (c) Sodium acetate trihydrate, H2O, EtOH, 80 °C, 6 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of menthol-derived 1,2,4-triazole-thioether compounds 5a–5z. Reagents and conditions: (a) Chloroacetyl chloride, TEA, DMAP, 0 °C; (b) Methyl isothiocyanate, EtOH, 80 °C, 3h; NaOH 10%, 100 °C, 4 h; (c) Sodium acetate trihydrate, H2O, EtOH, 80 °C, 6 h.
Molecules 26 06948 sch001
Molecules 26 06948 g001 550
Figure 1. Predicted ED values of CoMFA model vs experimental ED value.
Figure 1. Predicted ED values of CoMFA model vs experimental ED value.
Molecules 26 06948 g001
Molecules 26 06948 g002 550
Figure 2. Contours of CoMFA analysis: (A) contours of steric contribution are represented in yellow and green; (B) contours of electrostatic contribution are represented in red and blue.
Figure 2. Contours of CoMFA analysis: (A) contours of steric contribution are represented in yellow and green; (B) contours of electrostatic contribution are represented in red and blue.
Molecules 26 06948 g002
Molecules 26 06948 g003 550
Figure 3. The binding pocket (A) and modes of compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) respectively presented in the 2D (B) and 3D pattern (C), along with the binding modes of imibenconazole presented in the 2D pattern (D).
Figure 3. The binding pocket (A) and modes of compound 5b (R = o-CH3 Ph) respectively presented in the 2D (B) and 3D pattern (C), along with the binding modes of imibenconazole presented in the 2D pattern (D).
Molecules 26 06948 g003
Molecules 26 06948 g004 550
Figure 4. The asterisk skeleton of title compounds.
Figure 4. The asterisk skeleton of title compounds.
Molecules 26 06948 g004
Molecules 26 06948 g005 550
Figure 5. Superposition modes of compounds.
Figure 5. Superposition modes of compounds.
Molecules 26 06948 g005
Table
Table 1. Antifungal activity of the target compounds 5a–5z at 50 µg/mL.
Table 1. Antifungal activity of the target compounds 5a–5z at 50 µg/mL.
CompoundsRelative Inhibition Rate (%) against the Fungi
F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumC. arachidicolaP. piricolaA. solaniG. zeaeR. solaniB. myadisC. orbicalare
5a (R = Ph)22.548.945.745.022.222.332.730.8
5b (R = o-CH3 Ph)83.868.693.372.549.241.777.590.5
5c (R = p-CH3 Ph)24.347.954.435.029.614.927.524.6
5d (R = o-OCH3 Ph)74.354.862.856.949.246.677.556.3
5e (R = p-OCH3 Ph)26.765.260.060.049.214.932.527.1
5f (R = o-F Ph)79.072.173.972.547.352.772.566.1
5g (R = m-F Ph)24.351.446.153.886.514.930.017.3
5h (R = p-F Ph)22.521.117.130.023.916.232.735.0
5i (R = o-Cl Ph)76.779.079.469.462.941.770.073.4
5j (R = m-Cl Ph)45.758.362.850.649.213.755.039.3
5k (R = p-Cl Ph)14.221.117.145.023.916.214.526.7
5l (R = p-Br Ph)24.351.435.041.329.613.737.522.2
5m (R = o-I Ph)88.668.673.963.159.038.080.088.0
5n (R = p-I Ph)24.354.865.650.635.514.932.522.2
5o (R = o-CF3 Ph)64.879.065.666.359.039.367.566.1
5p (R = m-CF3 Ph)38.651.457.247.545.319.842.534.4
5q (R = o-OH Ph)31.454.865.656.959.023.437.517.3
5r (R = p-OH Ph)18.332.224.340.032.255.728.222.5
5s (R = o-NH2 Ph)71.972.160.072.551.256.375.063.7
5t (R = p-NH2 Ph)76.768.662.856.953.155.155.056.3
5u (R = p-C(CH3)3 Ph)38.658.360.047.545.317.342.536.8
5v (R = m,p-OCH3 Ph)76.782.479.456.943.334.455.046.6
5w (R = m,m-OCH3 Ph)50.561.773.953.851.235.657.556.3
5x (R = α-furyl)26.737.679.438.123.714.935.022.2
5y (R = α-thienyl)31.458.351.738.139.411.232.522.2
5z (R = β-pyridyl)26.765.262.844.419.817.330.022.2
Chlorothanil10073.375.073.973.196.190.491.3
Table
Table 2. Summary of CoMFA analysis.
Table 2. Summary of CoMFA analysis.
Statistical ParametersCoMFA
q20.514
r20.991
S0.050
F184.384
Field Contribution (%)
Steric75.2
Electrostatic24.8
q2: cross-validated correlational coefficient; r2: non-validated correlational coefficient; S: standard error of estimate; F: the Fischer ratio.
Table
Table 3. The ED values of experimental and predicted activities.
Table 3. The ED values of experimental and predicted activities.
CompoundRWMEDED”Residue
5aPh387.20−2.66−2.61−0.05
5bo-CH3 Ph401.21−1.46−1.45−0.01
5cp-CH3 Ph401.21−2.53−2.49−0.04
5do-OCH3 Ph417.21−2.39−2.35−0.04
5ep-OCH3 Ph417.21−2.44−2.480.04
5fo-F Ph405.19−2.16−2.170.01
5gm-F Ph405.19−2.68−2.710.03
5hp-F Ph405.19−3.29−3.340.04
5io-Cl Ph421.16−2.04−2.130.09
5jm-Cl Ph421.16−2.40−2.39−0.01
5kp-Cl Ph421.16−3.31−3.28−0.03
5lp-Br Ph465.11−2.94−2.980.04
5mo-I Ph513.09−2.26−2.25−0.01
5np-I Ph513.09−2.43−2.40−0.03
5oo-CF3 Ph455.19−2.38−2.380.00
5pm-CF3 Ph455.19−2.53−2.530.00
5qo-OH Ph403.19−2.32−2.25−0.07
5rp-OH Ph403.19−3.10−3.04−0.06
5so-NH2 Ph402.21−2.43−2.470.04
5tp-NH2 Ph402.21−2.38−2.440.06
5up-C(CH3)3 Ph443.26−2.47−2.480.01
5vm,p-OCH3 Ph447.22−2.06−2.04−0.02
5w *m,m-OCH3 Ph447.22−2.20−2.220.02
ED: experimental value; ED”: predictive value; *: test-set compound.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, M.; Duan, W.-G.; Lin, G.-S.; Li, B.-Y. Synthesis, Antifungal Activity, 3D-QSAR, and Molecular Docking Study of Novel Menthol-Derived 1,2,4-Triazole-thioether Compounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 6948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226948

AMA Style

Huang M, Duan W-G, Lin G-S, Li B-Y. Synthesis, Antifungal Activity, 3D-QSAR, and Molecular Docking Study of Novel Menthol-Derived 1,2,4-Triazole-thioether Compounds. Molecules. 2021; 26(22):6948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226948

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Mei, Wen-Gui Duan, Gui-Shan Lin, and Bao-Yu Li. 2021. "Synthesis, Antifungal Activity, 3D-QSAR, and Molecular Docking Study of Novel Menthol-Derived 1,2,4-Triazole-thioether Compounds" Molecules 26, no. 22: 6948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226948

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop