Next Article in Journal
Production of Bulk Chemicals with Biocatalysis: Drivers and Challenges Reflected in Recent Industrial Granted Patents (2015–2020)
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Propanols by Glycerol Hydrogenolysis over Bifunctional Nickel-Containing Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Probiotic Culture Supernatant on Cariogenic Biofilm Formation and RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis in RAW 264.7 Macrophages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improved Thermochemical Energy Storage Behavior of Manganese Oxide by Molybdenum Doping
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules26030738
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Meso/Microporous Carbons from Conjugated Hyper-Crosslinked Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene for High-Performance CO2 Capture and Supercapacitor

by
Mohamed Gamal Mohamed
1,2,
Mahmoud M. M. Ahmed
1,3,
Wei-Ting Du
1 and
Shiao-Wei Kuo
1,4,*
1
Department of Materials and Optoelectronic Science, Center of Crystal Research, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan
2
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
3
Chemistry Department, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
4
Department of Medicinal and Applied Chemistry, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(3), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030738
Submission received: 12 January 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2021 / Accepted: 28 January 2021 / Published: 31 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Chemistry of Sustainable Energy Conversion and Storage)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we successfully synthesized two types of meso/microporous carbon materials through the carbonization and potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation for two different kinds of hyper-crosslinked polymers of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2, which were synthesized by using Friedel–Crafts reaction of tetraphenylethene (TPE) monomer with or without cyanuric chloride in the presence of AlCl3 as a catalyst. The resultant porous carbon materials exhibited the high specific area (up to 1100 m2 g−1), total pore volume, good thermal stability, and amorphous character based on thermogravimetric (TGA), N2 adsoprtion/desorption, and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analyses. The as-prepared TPE-CPOP1 after thermal treatment at 800 °C (TPE-CPOP1-800) displayed excellent CO2 uptake performance (1.74 mmol g−1 at 298 K and 3.19 mmol g−1 at 273 K). Furthermore, this material possesses a high specific capacitance of 453 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1 comparable to others porous carbon materials with excellent columbic efficiencies for 10,000 cycle at 20 A g−1.

1. Introduction

The developing new storage technologies and other energy resources with high specific power and energy storage capability such as supercapacitors and batteries have become an important topic in both the academic and industry areas [1]. The replacing of fossil fuels by designing devices like supercapacitors and batteries can reduce and prevent global warming, inadequate environment, and polluted atmosphere [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Ultra-capacitors or electric double layer capacitors (also called supercapacitors) are energy storage devices that possess long cycle life, low maintenance, low internal resistance, light weight, delivering high energy and high efficiency, high power, flexible packaging, light weight and maintenance, and a wide range of temperature compared with other energy devices such as batteries [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Based on the supercapacitors mechanism for energy storage, supercapacitors can be divided into electrical double layer capacitor (EDLC), hybrid capacitor, and finally pseudocapacitor [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Hyper-crosslinked polymers (HCPs) [28,29,30,31,32,33], covalent organic frameworks (COF) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40], conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) [41,42,43,44,45], and polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs) are considered as types of microporous organic polymers (MOPs) [46,47,48,49]. As mentioned above, HCPs are considered as a kind of porous material that can be easily synthesized through the Friedel–Crafts alkylation reaction of rigid aromatic monomers with an external crosslinker such as formaldehyde dimethyl acetal, 1,3,5-trichlorotriazine, and 1,4-bis(chloromethyl)benzene [50,51,52]. Compared with other microporous material such as activated carbon, HCPs can be synthesized by low-cost monomers, catalysts, and suitable reaction conditions [53,54]. In addition, HCPs materials feature easy functionalization, good chemical and thermal properties, microporous nature, and large surface areas [50,51,52,53,54]. Nowadays, the preparation of porous carbon materials has attracted much attention due to their interesting properties such as excellent electrical conductivity, high surface areas and high pore volumes, and good chemical, thermal, and mechanical stabilities [55,56,57,58,59]. Therefore, porous carbonaceous materials have been applied in many real-life applications, for example catalysis, gas separation, gas capture, energy storage in supercapacitors and batteries, fuel cells, water treatment and purification, and electromagnetic interface shielding [60,61,62,63,64]. As reported, the preparation of porous carbonaceous materials with high surface area and excellent porosity nature can be achieved by chemical activation for many polymers’ precursors, for example conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), HCPs, and porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) [62,63,64]. Herein, we successfully prepared porous carbon materials derived from KOH activation at 800 °C of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 as hypercross-linked polymers, which were prepared by the Friedel–Crafts polymerization of tetraphenylethene with or without cyanuric chloride as an external crosslinker in the presence of AlCl3 as a catalyst. The TGA, XPS, Raman, BET, and PXRD measurements were used to understand and determine their thermal stability, chemical compositions, surface areas, and crystallinity properties. Furthermore, the electrochemical and CO2 uptake analyses for TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 after thermal treatment at 800 °C were done to investigate their potential application in energy storage and gas capture.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis and Character of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2

Scheme 1 shows the synthetic route for the preparation of hyper-crosslinked polymers and microporous carbon materials from TPE as a building monomer. Firstly, the TPE monomer was synthesized through the reaction of benzophenone with zinc and titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) in the presence of THF at 80 °C to give TPE as a white solid. Secondly, TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 were prepared through a simple Friedel–Crafts reaction of TPE monomer with or without cyanuric chloride in the presence of anhydrous 1, 2-dichloroethane as solvent and AlCl3 as a catalyst (Scheme 1a–d). Finally, TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 were prepared through the carbonization and KOH activation process for their corresponding polymers as presented in Scheme 1e.
The spectral analyses of TPE monomer were in agreement with our reported results (Figures S1 and S2). The chemical molecular structure of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 was carefully confirmed by using FTIR and the solid state 13C NMR spectra analyses. Figure 1 presents the FTIR profile of TPE monomer, TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2, respectively, recorded at room temperature. The characteristics absorption bands appeared at 3022 and 1599 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching C–H aromatic groups and C=C bonds as displayed in FTIR spectrum of TPE (Figure 1a). Meanwhile, the FTIR spectra (Figure 1b,c) of both TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 showed absorption bands at ca. 3447, 3022 and 1595 cm−1, which are attributed to the presence of a hydroxyl group from adsorbed water by these porous materials, the stretching C–H aromatic groups and C=C bonds, respectively.
The chemical structure of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 was further analyzed by solid-state 13C NMR measurements (Figure 2). The appearance peaks in the range 145.80–136.51 ppm in TPE-CPOP1 (Figure 2a) and 147–137 ppm in TPE-CPOP2 (Figure 2b), respectively; corresponded to the aromatic carbon nuclei. In addition, the peaks about 171 ppm in the TPE-CPOP2 could be assigned to the C=N in triazine units (Figure 2b).
Based on FTIR and solid-state NMR analyses showed the successful incorporation of the triazine ring into the TPE-CPOP2 framework. The thermal stability of porous materials is important for the real-life application. Thus, the thermal stability of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2, TPE-CPOP1-800, and TPE-CPOP2-800 were determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Figure 3, Table 1). The values of degradation temperatures when the weight loss of the sample reached 5% (Td5), 10% (Td10), and char yield for TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 were 412, 519 °C, and 69% and 284, 365 °C, and 67%, respectively. Meanwhile, after carbonization and KOH activation at 800 °C for 8 h, the degradation temperatures (Td5 and Td10) and char yield were 365, 464 °C, and 70%, respectively, for TPE-CPOP1-800 and 375, 500, and 72%, respectively, for TPE-CPOP2-800. According to TGA results, our materials featured good thermal stability comparable with other porous materials. As displayed in Figure S4, the XPS survey spectra showed signals at 284 eV and 530 eV representing the carbon atoms of the aromatic rings and oxygen atoms in both TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2. In addition, the XPS profile of TPE-CPOP2 displayed signal at 400 eV representing the nitrogen atoms in the triazine units.
All the as-synthesized materials in this study appeared a broad peak ca. 12.45° and all these porous materials are not crystalline polymers as illustrated in PXRD pattern (Figure 4).

2.2. Porosity

The porosity properties like Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas, total pore volume, and pore size diameter of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 before carbonization and KOH activation process were characterized by N2 adsorption/desorption measurements at 77 K and 1 bar, as presented in Figure 5. Both the N2 adsorption isotherms of TPE-CPOP-1 and TPE-CPOP2 showed increase the N2 capture at low- and high-pressure P/P0 values indicating that both two materials curves could be classified as type I according to IUPAC classification (Figure 5a). In addition, the N2 adsorption isotherms of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 at high-pressure values possesses a hysteresis loop, which indicates that the obtained polymer framework contains a mesoporous and microporous structure. Furthermore, the hysteresis loop for both materials does not close, which could be attributed to the flexibility network structure and the swelling of the frameworks during gas adsoprtion by elastic deformations [52]. The BET surface areas of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 were found to be 489 and 146 m2 g−1, respectively, and their pore volumes were found to be 0.269 and 0.1 cm3 g−1 at P/P0 = 0.996, respectively. In addition, the pore size diameter was estimated by the nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) and the results showed that the pore size diameter was 1.49 and 1.82 nm, respectively, for TPE-CPOP1 and 2.57 nm for TPE-CPOP2 (Figure 5b).
As shown in Table 1, the BET surface area of TPE-CPOP2 lower than that of TPE-CPOP1, presumably because of the low attachment of triazine units into TPE moiety during the Friedel–Crafts reaction [65,66]. Figure 6 shows the N2 adsorption/desorption and pore size distribution of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 to investigate their porous nature. As shown in Figure 6, both TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 exhibited a rapid N2 capture ability at low pressure and continued to increase for N2 adsorption at high-pressure regions, which indicated the presence of micropores and mesopores in the materials. Based on the IUPAC classification, the adsorption/desorption isotherm of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 possesses type I and type IV. The values of BET surface area, total pore volume, and pore size diameter were 1177 m2 g−1, 0.48 cm3 g−1, and 1.04–2.99 nm, respectively, for TPE-CPOP1-800 and 1165 m2 g−1, 0.62 cm3 g−1, and 1.02–2.29 nm, respectively, for TPE-CPOP2-800. In addition, the lack of difference in surface area between TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 due to the KOH acts as an activation agent for TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 to produce carbon materials and enhance their porosity properties such as specific surface area, pore size, and total pore volume [67].
The surface morphologies of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 showed ultra-micropours and these materials are amorphous based on TEM images as shown in Figure S5. The presence of the carbon and oxygen atoms in the surface of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 was confirmed by XPS analysis (Figure 7). As displayed in Figure 7, the XPS survey spectra for both these materials possesses signals at 284 eV and 530 eV representing the carbon atoms of the aromatic rings and oxygen atoms in the microporous carbon materials.
The Raman spectra (Figure 8) showed that TPE-CPOP1-800 exhibits a definite carbonized structure with two identical bands of D and G, which correspond to sp3 and sp2 carbons, respectively [68,69,70]. The D and G band positions were found at 1325.0 and 1580.9 cm−1, respectively. In addition, the ID/IG ratio was found to be 1.5, which clearly describes that sp3 carbons are higher than sp2 carbons due to the structural functionalization. This indicated that the activation process did not destroy the chemical structure. In addition, upon activating TPE-CPOP2-800 the band position was shifted. In detail, D band was found at 1308.4 cm−1 and G band was at 1577.2 cm−1, which indicated a change in the Fermi energy level caused by the Lewis acid reaction [71,72]. In addition, the ID/IG ratio reached 1.9 indicating further sp3 hybridizations was found upon the activation process possibly due to further functionalization occurred during the heating procedure. These results clearly indicated that the KOH activation did not destroy the graphitic structure and maintained the sp2 and sp3 hybridizations [11,73].

2.3. CO2 Uptake

Based on BET results, our new materials TPE-CPOP1, TPE-CPOP2, and their resulting microporous carbon materials (TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800), after carbonization and KOH activation process, feature high surface areas, large pore. volumes, and meso and microporous structures. Therefore, we expected that all these materials could be applied as candidates for gas capture and energy storage. The CO2 uptake performance of TPE-CPOP1, TPE-CPOP2, TPE-CPOP1-800, and TPE-CPOP2-800 were determined by CO2 isotherm measurements at 298 and 273 K, respectively (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The results revealed that the values of the CO2 adsorption capacity were found to be 0.89 and 1.15 mmol g−1 at 298 K for TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2, respectively (Figure 9a). On the contrary, the adsoprtion capacity of CO2 at 273 K reached 0.99 and 1.26 mmol g−1 for TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2, respectively (Figure 9b). We supposed the TPE-CPOP2 had higher and excellent CO2 uptake performance compared to TPE-CPOP1 due to the presence of triazine units in the TPE-CPOP2 framework, which facilitate the dipole–quadrupole interactions with the CO2 molecules. As previously reported, the improvement of CO2 uptake performance of porous polymers can be achieved by carbonization and KOH activation process at elevated temperatures [74]. Thus, we did the calcination and KOH activation process for TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 at 800 °C for 8 h under a N2 atmosphere to produce microporous carbon materials with high specific BET surface areas and pore size diameters. Interestingly, the values of CO2 uptake were 1.74 and 1.72 mmol g−1 at 298 K for TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800, respectively (Figure 10a). At 273 K, the CO2 adsorption capacity reached 3.19 and 2.93 mmol g−1 for the TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800, respectively (Figure 10b). We revealed that both TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 showed higher CO2 adsorption capacity that than that of the Th850 (2.4 mmol at 298 K) [74], which can be attributed to their high specific surface areas (up to 1100 m2 g−1) and total pore volume (up to 0.48 cm3 g−1).

2.4. Electrochemical Performance

The electrochemical characteristics of the TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 were investigated using cyclic voltammetry (CV), charge/discharge (CD) and cycling stability. The CV was tested over the potential range between –1.0 and 0.0 V at various scan rates of 5 mV/s up to 200 mV/s (Figure 11a). The CV shape of the TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 showed a perfect electric double layer behavior all over the potential range and at all investigated scan rates. It is important to notice the difference between the two cases of KOH activation; as it can be clearly seen in (Figure 11b), since the TPE-CPOP1-800 showed an almost double area of the CV loop at all investigated scan rates compared to TPE-CPOP2-800. This is clear evidence of the importance of a synergistic effect upon the activation processes in enhancing the electrochemical performances without defecting the main EDLC of the carbon structure [73,75]. The activation process provided an efficient increase in the surface area of the obtained porous carbon materials. The main difference between both porous carbon materials is the existence of the triazine moiety in the TPE-CPOP2 that is expected to have a strong steric hindrance that reduced the effect of KOH activation reaction to reach the inner carbon structure. Therefore, the obtained surface area of TPE-CPOP2 upon KOH activation was less than TPE-CPOP1-800. Moreover, upon plotting the capacitance versus scan rates, the achieved capacitance value for the TPE-CPOP1-800 reached 453 F g−1, which was 200 F g−1 for TPE-CPOP2-800 at the same scan rate of 5 mV/s (Figure 11c). It is believed that the well-designed porous structure in TPE-CPOP1-800 was yielded by the efficient electron transfer between KOH and TPE-CPOP1 that could promote the surface area of the porous carbon structure and provide better electron transfer efficiencies leading to an outstanding EDLC performance than other reported porous carbons including e.g., porous carbons derived from poly(caprolactone–b–ethylene oxide–b–caprolactone) triblock copolymer that reached a capacitance of 90 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1 [76]. In addition, both TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 exhibit dual pore features. However, TPE-CPOP1-800 has higher pore size (2.99 nm) than that of TPE-CPOP2-800 (2.29 nm) and this is leading to the rapid transfer of electrolyte ions at the interface between the electrolyte and the electrode [11,77,78]. In addition, this capacitance value is still higher than other reported results of porous carbon derived from natural resources of jackfruit seed and sorghum biomass-derived porous carbons, which achieved 292.2 F g−1 and 240 F g−1, respectively, at 5 mV s−1 [79,80]. Activation of Lapsi seed yielded porous carbon with high surface area of 1316.7 m2 g−1 with a capacitance of 317.5 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1 [81]. It is interesting to compare the effect of different Lewis acids e.g., FeCl3 in graphite intercalated compounds when reacted with dodcecyl amine and heated at higher temperatures of 900 °C and 2000 °C without activation to accomplish a surface area of 17 and 53 m2 g−1 and a capacitance of 42 and 90 F g−1, respectively [82,83]. Therefore, it is important to note the effect of KOH as activating agent here to provide such an enormous enhancement in the obtained surface area and electrochemical capacitance performances that would have been impossible without KOH activation. As presented in Table S1, The TPE-CPOP1-800 displayed the highest capacitance values compared with other porous carbon materials. In addition, the charge/discharge behavior was investigated at a wider potential range of (−1.0 to 1.0 V) to obtain a clear overview of the full potential range. The charge/discharge showed a symmetric behavior with no obvious IR drop at all investigated current densities. This indicated that there were no obvious defects in the structure after the activation process occurred [84]. Moreover, similar to the CV results, the charge/discharge behavior was compared for both TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 after the activation process, it was found that the activation process for TPE-CPOP1-800 yielded a double efficiency compared to the activated TPE-CPOP2-800 carbons at all investigated current densities (Figure 11d,e). These results also confirmed the CV results that triazine moiety has decreased the efficiencies of the KOH activation process in the electrochemical performance. Moreover, the columbic efficiencies were also compared for both conditions. It was found that the TPE-CPOP1-800 showed efficient stability of 96% as average stability upon cycling for 10,000 cycles at 20 A g−1, however the TPE-CPOP2-800 conditions only showed 93% of the average stability at the same current densities (Figure 11e,f). These results are supporting the previous results found from both CV and charge/discharge behavior. It also showed the efficient stabilities of both TPE-derived carbons after long cycles capacities and higher current densities. The calculated energy density vs. scan rates showed efficient energy densities values for TPE-CPOP1-800 at all scan rates as displayed in Figure S6. The energy density achieved 63 Wh Kg−1 at 5 mV s−1, which is mainly due to the efficient electrical double layer capacitor (EDLC) capacitive performance within the wide potential window. This value is considered much higher than other related graphene composites that achieved a maximum energy density of 46 Wh Kg−1 at 5 mV s−1 without activation [82,85]. Therefore, it is believed that the KOH activation has a unique characteristic to enrich the carbon materials with excellent electrochemical properties for high capacitive and high energy densities performances. We believe that this method will open the door for further investigations of activation procedures for various carbon-derived polymers for efficient energy storage applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

Benzophenone (99%), potassium carbonate (K2CO3, 99.9%), titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4, 99.9%), zinc (Zn, 98%), and 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, 99.8%) were ordered from Alfa Aesar. Anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4, 99.5%), ethylacetate (EA), tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetone, methanol (CH3OH), and dichloromethane (DCM) were purchased from Showa (Tokyo, Japan).

3.2. Synthesis

TPE: Tetraphenylethene (TPE) monomer was successfully synthesized according to our previous report [47,50]. FTIR (KBr, cm−1, Figure S1): 3047 (aromatic C–H stretching), 1602 (C=C stretching). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl3, Figure S2): 7.05–7.15 (m, 20H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl3, Figure S3): 140.7; 141.0; 131.3; 127.7; 126.4.
TPE-CPOP1: A solution tetraphenylethene (0.50 g, 1.51 mmol),) and AlCl3 (0.20 g, 1.51 mmol) in dry 1,2-dichloroethane (20 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h and then refluxed at 60 °C for 24 h. After cooling to 25 °C, the brown solid was filtered and washed three times with chloroform, dichloromethane, methanol, THF, and acetone to remove the unreacted TPE and AlCl3 and dried under vacuum at 60 °C to give TPE-CPOP1 as a brown powder (0.45 g, 90%).
TPE-CPOP2: A solution of tetraphenylethene (0.50 g, 1.51 mmol), cyanuric chloride (0.37 g, 2 mmol), and AlCl3 (0.20 g, 1.51 mmol) in dry 1,2-dichloroethane (20 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h and then heated at 60 °C for 24 h. After cooling at room temperature, the solid was filtered and washed three times with THF, methanol, chloroform, and acetone to remove the unreacted monomer and AlCl3 and dried under vacuum at 60 °C to obtain chloroform, dichloromethane, methanol, THF, and acetone to remove the unreacted TPE and AlCl3 and dried under vacuum at 60 °C to get TPE-CPOP2 as brown solid (0.4 g, 80%).
Preparation of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800: 0.4 g of TPE-CPOP1 or TPE-CPOP2 and 0.4 g of KOH were mixed in 3 mL of water and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature. After that, the water solution was removed from the mixture at 120 °C for 24 h. Then, the dried sample powder was calcinated in the furnace at 800 °C for 8 h under a N2 atmosphere (a heating rate of 5 °C min−1). After cooling to RT, the black solid was washed with 2 N HCl, water, THF, methanol, and acetone, respectively, to give TPE-CPOP1-800 (0.25 g, 63%) and TPE-CPOP2-800 (0.27 g, 68%).

4. Conclusions

In summary, two kinds of HCPs (TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2) were successfully prepared through the simple and friendly Friedel−Crafts polymerization of tetraphenylethene with or without cyanuric chloride in the presence of AlCl3 as a catalyst. Their chemical structures were confirmed by FTIR and NMR analyses. Interestingly, the obtained TPE-CPOP1-800 porous materials after the carbonization and KOH activation displayed good thermal stability, high surface area, excellent CO2 adsorption capacity (1.74 mmol g−1 at 298 K and 3.19 mmol g−1 at 273 K), a high specific capacitance of 453 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1, and efficient stability of 96% as average stability upon cycling for 10,000 cycles.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1. FT-IR spectrum of TPE. Figure S2. 1H NMR spectrum of TPE. Figure S3. 13C NMR spectrum of TPE. Figure S4. XPS profile of (a) TPE-CPOP1and (b) TPE-CPOP2. Figure S5. TEM images of (a) TPE-CPOP1-800 and (b) TPE-CPOP2-800. Figure S6. Energy density vs. scan rate for TPE-COP1-800 and TPE-COP2-800. Table S1. comparison list of other activated carbon materials.

Author Contributions

M.G.M. and M.M.M.A. conceptualized and designed the experiment route, performed all of the experiment work, participated in the discussion of results, and wrote the paper. W.-T.D. helped to design the reaction. S.-W.K. supervised the work and discussed the result. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported financially by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under contracts MOST 106-2221-E-110- 067-MY3, 108-2638-E-002-003-MY2, and 108-2221-E-110-014-MY3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to the staff at National Sun Yat-sen University for assistance with TEM (ID: EM022600) experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Vinodh, R.; Gopi, C.V.V.M.; Kummara, V.G.R.; Atchudanc, R.; Ahamad, T.; Sambasivam, S.; Yi, M.; Obaidat, I.M.; Kim, H.J. A review on porous carbon electrode material derived from hypercrosslinked polymers for supercapacitor applications. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vikström, H.; Davidsson, S.; Höök, M. Lithium availability and future production outlooks. Appl. Energy 2013, 110, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gonzalez, A.; Goikolea, E.; Barrena, J.A.; Mysyk, R. Review on supercapacitors: Technologies and materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 1189–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Choi, J.W.; Aurbach, D. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Yu, T.C.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Secondary Structures of Polypeptide-Based Diblock Copolymers Influence the Microphase Separation of Templates for the Fabrication of Microporous Carbons. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 1030–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tarascon, J.M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 441, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miller, J.R.; Simon, P. Electrochemical capacitors for energy management. Science 2008, 321, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Samy, M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Pyrene-functionalized tetraphenylethylene polybenzoxazine for dispersing single-walled carbon nanotubes and energy storage. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 199, 108360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Samy, M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Directly synthesized nitrogen-and-oxygen–doped microporous carbons derived from a bio-derived polybenzoxazine exhibiting high-performance supercapacitance and CO2 uptake. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 138, 109954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quan, T.; Bretesché, N.G.; Härk, E.; Kochovski, Z.; Mei, S.; Pinna, N.; Ballauff, M.; Lu, Y. Highly Dispersible Hexagonal Carbon–MoS2–Carbon Nanoplates with Hollow Sandwich Structures for Supercapacitors. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 4757–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohamed, M.G.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Kuo, S.W. Direct Synthesis of Microporous Bicarbazole-Based Covalent Triazine Frameworks for High-Performance Energy Storage and Carbon Dioxide Uptake. ChemPlusChem 2019, 84, 1767–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tang, J.; Wang, T.; Salunkhe, R.R.; Alshehri, S.M.; Malgras, V.; Yamauchi, Y. Three-Dimensional Nitrogen-Doped Hierarchical Porous Carbon as an Electrode for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 17293–17298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, G.; Xu, X.; Zhu, G.; Shi, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Hossain, M.S.A.; Wu, K.C.W.; Tang, J.; Yamauchi, Y. Flexible nitrogen-doped carbon heteroarchitecture derived from ZIF-8/ZIF-67 hybrid coating on cotton biomass waste with high supercapacitive properties. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2020, 303, 110257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Torad, N.L.; Salunkhe, R.R.; Li, Y.; Hamoudi, H.; Imura, M.; Sakka, Y.; Hu, C.C.; Yamauchi, Y. Electric Double-Layer Capacitors Based on Highly Graphitized Nanoporous Carbons Derived from ZIF-67. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 7895–7900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, M.; Puthiaraj, P.; Qian, Y.; Kim, Y.; Jang, S.; Hwang, S.; Na, E.; Ahn, W.S.; Shim, S.E. Double-shelled hollow carbon sphere with microporous outer shell towards high performance lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 284, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, W.C.; Liu, Y.T.; Kuo, S.W. Highly Thermal Stable Phenolic Resin Based on Double-Decker-Shaped POSS Nanocomposites for Supercapacitors. Polymers 2020, 12, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Zakaria, M.B.; Wang, H.X.; Chen, T.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kuo, S.W. Heteroporous bifluorenylidene-based covalent organic frameworks displaying exceptional dye adsorption behavior and high energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 25148–25155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hung, W.S.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Competing Hydrogen Bonding Produces Mesoporous/Macroporous Carbons Templated by a High-Molecular-Weight Poly (caprolactone–b–ethylene oxide–b–caprolactone) Triblock Copolymer. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, W.C.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Wang, C.F.; Huang, C.F.; Kuo, S.W. Highly thermally stable mesoporous Poly (cyanate ester) featuring double-decker–shaped polyhedral silsesquioxane framework. Polymer 2019, 185, 121940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, K.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, X.; Wu, J. Graphene/Polyaniline Nanofiber Composites as Supercapacitor Electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1392–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Snook, G.A.; Kao, P.; Best, A.S. Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stoller, M.D.; Park, S.; Zhu, Y.; An, J.; Rouf, R.S. Graphene-based Ultracapacitors. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3498–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mohamed, M.G.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Takashi, Y.; Kuo, S.W. Ultrastable conductive microporous covalent triazine frameworks based on pyrene moieties provide high-performance CO2 uptake and supercapacitance. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 8241–8253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.; Zheng, S.; Liu, X.; Li, P.; Sun, L.; Yang, R.; Wang, S.; Wu, Z.; Bao, X.; Deng, W.Q. Conductive Microporous Covalent Triazine-Based Framework for High-Performance Electrochemical Capacitive Energy Storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7992–7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bhanja, P.; Das, S.K.; Bhunia, K.; Pradhan, D.; Hayashi, T.; Hijikata, Y.; Irle, S.; Bhaumik, A. A New Porous Polymer for Highly Efficient Capacitive Energy Storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Z.S.; Parvez, K.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. Graphene based in-plane micro-supercapacitors with high power and energy densities. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mohamed, M.G.; Hung, W.S.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. High-Molecular-weight PLA-b-PEO-b-PLA triblock copolymer templated large mesoporous carbons for supercapacitors and CO2 capture. Polymers 2020, 12, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, Y.; Hao, X.; Wang, L.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Tian, X.; Yao, B. Facile synthesis of porous carbon materials with extra high nitrogen content for supercapacitor electrodes. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 3713–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohamed, M.G.; Zhang, X.; Mansoure, T.H.; El-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Huang, C.F.; Danko, M.; Xin, Z.; Kuo, S.W. Hypercrosslinked porous organic polymers based on tetraphenylanthraquinone for CO2 uptake and high-performance supercapacitor. Polymer 2020, 205, 122857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pan, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, J.H.; Yu, J.G.; He, Y.J.; Han, B.H. Hypercrosslinked porous polycarbazoles via one-step oxidative coupling reaction and Friedel–Crafts alkylation. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 2478–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fang, D.; Li, X.; Zou, M.; Guo, X.; Zhang, A. Carbazole-functionalized hyper-cross-linked polymers for CO2 uptake based on Friedel–Crafts polymerization on 9-phenylcarbazole. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2856–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Tan, L.; Tan, B. Hypercrosslinked porous polymer materials: Design, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3322–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Penchah, H.R.; Ghaemi, A.; Gilani, H.G. Benzene-based hyper-cross-linked polymer with enhanced adsorption capacity for CO2 capture. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 12578–12586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mohamed, M.G.; Lee, C.C.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Luder, J.; Yu, M.H.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Chueh, C.C.; Kuo, S.W. Exploitation of two-dimensional conjugated covalent organic frameworks based on tetraphenylethylene with bicarbazole and pyrene units and applications in perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11448–11459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Côté, A.P.; Benin, A.I.; Ockwig, N.W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Matzger, A.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 2005, 310, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Kuo, C.H.; Alshehri, A.; Young, C.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kim, J.; Kuo, S.W. Strategic design of triphenylamine- and triphenyltriazine-based two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for CO2 uptake and energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 19532–19541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Mansoure, T.H.; Yu, H.H.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. Ultrastable tetraphenyl-p-phenylenediamine-based covalent organic frameworks as platforms for high-performance electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 14890–14893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohamed, M.G.; Atayde, E.C.; Matsagar, B.M.; Na, J.; Yamauchi, Y.; Wu, K.C.W.; Kuo, S.W. Construction Hierarchically Mesoporous/Microporous Materials Based on Block Copolymer and Covalent Organic Framework. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2020, 112, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, T.; Yan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.D.; Fu, Q.T.; Zhu, H.; Li, Z.; Gu, Z.G. A 2D covalent organic framework involving strong intramolecular hydrogen bonds for advanced supercapacitors, A 2D covalent organic framework involving strong intramolecular hydrogen bonds for advanced supercapacitors. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Furukawa, H.; Yaghi, O.M. Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8875–8883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Elewa, A.M.; Huang, S.W.; Chou, H.H.; Kuo, S.W. Dual-Function Fluorescent Covalent Organic Frameworks: HCl Sensing and Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Water. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 18, 2000641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Lai, M.Y.; Kuo, S.W. Highly fluorescent covalent organic framework as hydrogen chloride sensor: Roles of Schiff base bonding and π-stacking. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 9520–9528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aly, K.I.; Sayed, M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W.; Younis, O. A facile synthetic route and dual function of network luminescent porous polyester and copolyester containing porphyrin moiety for metal ions sensor and dyes adsorption. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2020, 298, 110063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Meng, X.; Du, J.; Song, X.; Liang, Z. Ultrahigh volatile iodine capture by conjugated microporous polymer based on N,N,N’,N’-tetraphenyl-1,4-phenylenediamine. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 2608–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, J.X.; Su, F.; Trewin, A.; Wood, C.D.; Campbell, N.L.; Niu, H.; Dickinson, C.; Ganin, A.Y.; Rosseinsky, M.J.; Khimyak, Y.Z.; et al. Conjugated microporous poly(aryleneethynylene) networks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohamed, M.G.; Liu, N.Y.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Kuo, S.W. Ultrastable luminescent hybrid microporous polymers based on polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane for CO2 uptake and metal ion sensing. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2021, 311, 110695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohamed, M.G.; Tsai, M.Y.; Wang, C.F.; Huang, C.F.; Danko, M.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. Multifunctional Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Based Hybrid Porous Materials for CO2 Uptake and Iodine Adsoprtion. Polymers 2021, 13, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rabbani, M.G.; El-Kaderi, H.M. Synthesis and characterization of porous benzimidazole-linked polymers and their performance in small gas storage and selective uptake. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiong, S.; Tang, X.; Pan, C.; Li, L.; Tang, J.; Yu, G. Carbazole-bearing porous organic polymers with a mulberry-like morphology for efficient iodine capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 27335–27342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mohamed, M.G.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Meng, T.S.; Samy, M.M.; Kuo, S.W. Multifunctional Hypercrosslinked Porous Organic Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene and Triphenylamine Derivatives for High-Performance Dye Adsorption and Supercapacitor. Polymers 2020, 12, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, S.; Tu, M.; Peng, T.; Zhang, C.; Li, T.; Hussain, I.; Wang, J.; Tan, B. Porous hypercrosslinked polymer-TiO2-graphene composite photocatalysts for visible-light-driven CO2 conversion. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Geng, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, G.; Ma, L.; Yea, S.; Niu, Q. A covalent triazine-based framework from tetraphenylthiophene and 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine motifs for sensing o-nitrophenol and effective I2 uptake. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lu, Y.; Liang, J.; Deng, S.; He, Q.; Deng, S.; Hu, Y.; Wang, D. Hypercrosslinked polymers enabled micropore-dominant N, S Co-Doped porous carbon for ultrafast electron/ion transport supercapacitors. Nano Energy 2019, 65, 103993–104001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, T.X.; Liang, H.P.; Anito, D.A.; Ding, X.; Han, B.H. Emerging applications of porous organic polymers in visible-light photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 7003–7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stein, A.; Wang, Z.; Fierke, M.A. Functionalization of porous carbon materials with designed pore architecture. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 265–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Osman, S.; Senthil, R.A.; Pan, J.; Li, W. Highly activated porous carbon with 3D microspherical structure and hierarchical pores as greatly enhanced cathode material for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2018, 391, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, Y.; Guo, S.; Li, W.; Pan, J.; Fernandez, C.; Senthil, R.A.; Sun, X. A green and template-free synthesis process of superior carbon material with ellipsoidal structure as enhanced material for supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2018, 405, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mohamed, M.G.; Ebrahium, S.M.; Hammam, A.S.; Kuo, S.W.; Aly, K.I. Enhanced CO2 capture in nitrogen-enriched microporous carbons derived from Polybenzoxazines containing azobenzene and carboxylic acid units. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Khan, A.; Senthil, R.A.; Pan, J.; Osman, S.; Sun, Y.; Shu, X. A new biomass derived rod-like porous carbon from tea-waste as inexpensive and sustainable energy material for advanced supercapacitor application. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 335, 135588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, V.; Senthil, R.A.; Pan, J.; Khan, A.; Osman, S.; Wang, L.; Jiang, W.; Sun, Y. Highly ordered hierarchical porous carbon derived from biomass waste mangosteen peel as superior cathode material for high performance supercapacitor. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 855, 113616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, J.G.; Lee, P.Y.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Varying the Hydrogen Bonding Strength in Phenolic/PEO-b-PLA Blends Provides Mesoporous Carbons Having Large Accessible Pores Suitable for Energy Storage. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2020, 221, 2000040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shannon, M.A.; Bohn, P.W.; Elimelech, M.; Georgiadis, J.G.; Marinas, B.J.; Mayes, A.M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, H.W.; Yoon, H.W.; Yoon, S.M.; Yoo, B.M.; Ahn, B.K.; Cho, Y.H.; Shin, H.J.; Yang, H.; Paik, U.; Kwon, S.; et al. Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science 2013, 342, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Yang, Y.; Chiang, K.; Burke, N. Porous carbon supported catalysts for energy and environmental applications: A short review. Catal. Today 2011, 178, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Lyu, Y. POSS-based microporous polymers: Efficient Friedel-Crafts synthesis, CO2 capture and separation properties. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2017, 250, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gu, S.; Guo, J.; Huang, Q.; He, J.; Fu, Y.; Kuang, G.; Pan, C.; Yu, G. 1,3,5-Triazine-Based Microporous Polymers with Tunable Porosities for CO2 Capture and Fluorescent Sensing. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 8512–8520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ghosan, S.; Barron, A.R. The effect of KOH concentration on chemical activation of porous carbon sorbents for carbon dioxide uptake and carbon dioxide–methane selectivity: The relative formation of micro- (<2 nm) versus meso- (>2 nm) porosity. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 806. [Google Scholar]
  68. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Liu, T.E.; Kuo, S.W. Direct synthesis of nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbons from triazine-functionalized resol for CO2 uptake and highly efficient removal of dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abuzeid, H.R.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Kuo, S.W. Triazine-functionalized covalent benzoxazine framework for direct synthesis of N-doped microporous carbon. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 6010–6020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Malard, L.M.; Pimenta, M.A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 2009, 473, 51–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ujihara, M.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Imae, T.; Yamauchi, Y. Massive-exfoliation of magnetic graphene from acceptor-type GIC by long-chain alkyl amine. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4244–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vecera, P.; Eigler, S.; Gray, M.K.; Krstić, V.; Vierck, A.; Maultzsch, J.; Schäfer, R.A.; Hauke, F.; Hirsch, A. Degree of functionalisation dependence of individual Raman intensities in covalent graphene derivatives. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yu Wu, J.Y.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Directly synthesized nitrogen-doped microporous carbons from polybenzoxazine resins for carbon dioxide capture. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 5481–5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lee, J.S.M.; Briggs, M.E.; Hasell, T.; Cooper, A.I. Hyperporous Carbons from Hypercrosslinked Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9804–9810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khan, A.H.; Ghosh, S.; Pradhan, B.; Dalui, A.; Shrestha, L.K.; Acharya, S.; Ariga, K. Two-Dimensional (2D) Nanomaterials towards Electrochemical Nanoarchitectonics in Energy-Related Applications. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 90, 627–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, J.G.; Ho, Y.F.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Liang, H.C.; Kuo, S.W. Mesoporous Carbons Templated by PEO-PCL Block Copolymers as Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 10456–10463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Heimböckel, R.; Hoffmann, F.; Fröba, M. Insights into the influence of the pore size and surface area of activated carbons on the energy storage of electric double layer capacitors with a new potentially universally applicable capacitor model. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 3122–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kötz, R.; Carlen, M. Principles and applications of electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2483–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chaudhary, R.; Maji, S.; Shrestha, R.G.; Shrestha, R.L.; Shrestha, T.; Ariga, K.; Shrestha, L.K. Jackfruit Seed-Derived Nanoporous Carbons as the Electrode Material for Supercapacitors. C 2020, 6, 73. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kim, M.; Lim, H.; Xu, X.; Hossain, M.S.A.; Na, J.; Awaludin, N.N.; Shah, J.; Shrestha, L.K.; Ariga, K.; Nanjundan, A.K.; et al. Sorghum biomass-derived porous carbon electrodes for capacitive deionization and energy storage. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2021, 312, 110757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shrestha, R.L.; Chaudhary, R.; Shrestha, T.; Tamrakar, B.M.; Shrestha, R.G.; Maji, S.; Hill, J.P.; Ariga, K.; Shrestha, L.K. Nanoarchitectonics of Lotus Seed Derived Nanoporous Carbon Materials for Supercapacitor Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 5434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ahmed, M.M.M.; Imae, T. Electrochemical properties of a thermally expanded magnetic graphene composite with a conductive polymer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 10400–10410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ahmed, M.M.M.; Imae, T.; Hill, J.P.; Yamauchi, Y.; Ariga, K.; Shrestha, L.K. Defect-free exfoliation of graphene at ultra-high temperature. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 538, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shrestha, R.L.; Shrestha, T.; Tamrakar, B.M.; Shrestha, R.G.; Maji, S.; Ariga, K.; Shrestha, L.K. Nanoporous Carbon Materials Derived from Washnut Seed with Enhanced Supercapacitance. Materials 2020, 13, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ahmed, M.M.M.; Imae, T. Effect of external magnetic field on cyclic voltammetry of exfoliated graphene-based magnetic composites with conductive polymer and carbon dots. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 491, 165604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 00738 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Preparation of (b) tetraphenylethene (TPE), (c) TPE-CPOP1 (conjugated porous organic polymer), (d) TPE-CPOP2, and (e) microporous carbon materials from benzophenone (a).
Scheme 1. Preparation of (b) tetraphenylethene (TPE), (c) TPE-CPOP1 (conjugated porous organic polymer), (d) TPE-CPOP2, and (e) microporous carbon materials from benzophenone (a).
Molecules 26 00738 sch001
Molecules 26 00738 g001 550
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of (a) TPE, (b) TPE-CPOP1, and (c) TPE-CPOP2.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of (a) TPE, (b) TPE-CPOP1, and (c) TPE-CPOP2.
Molecules 26 00738 g001
Molecules 26 00738 g002 550
Figure 2. Solid state 13CNMR spectra (a) TPE-CPOP1 and (b) TPE-CPOP2. where * is the side band of solid-state NMR.
Figure 2. Solid state 13CNMR spectra (a) TPE-CPOP1 and (b) TPE-CPOP2. where * is the side band of solid-state NMR.
Molecules 26 00738 g002
Molecules 26 00738 g003 550
Figure 3. TGA diagram of (a) TPE-CPOP1 and (b) TPE-CPOP2, (c) TPE-CPOP1-800, and (d) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Figure 3. TGA diagram of (a) TPE-CPOP1 and (b) TPE-CPOP2, (c) TPE-CPOP1-800, and (d) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Molecules 26 00738 g003
Molecules 26 00738 g004 550
Figure 4. PXRD pattern of (a) TPE-CPOP1 and (b) TPE-CPOP2, (c) TPE-CPOP1-800, and (d) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Figure 4. PXRD pattern of (a) TPE-CPOP1 and (b) TPE-CPOP2, (c) TPE-CPOP1-800, and (d) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Molecules 26 00738 g004
Molecules 26 00738 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) N2 adsorption desorption pattern (filled cycles: adsorption; empty cycles: desorption) and (b) pore size diameter of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2.
Figure 5. (a) N2 adsorption desorption pattern (filled cycles: adsorption; empty cycles: desorption) and (b) pore size diameter of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2.
Molecules 26 00738 g005
Molecules 26 00738 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) N2 adsorption desorption pattern (filled cycles: adsorption; empty cycles: desorption) and (b) pore size diameter of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800.
Figure 6. (a) N2 adsorption desorption pattern (filled cycles: adsorption; empty cycles: desorption) and (b) pore size diameter of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800.
Molecules 26 00738 g006
Molecules 26 00738 g007 550
Figure 7. XPS profile of (a) TPE-CPOP1-800 and (b) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Figure 7. XPS profile of (a) TPE-CPOP1-800 and (b) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Molecules 26 00738 g007
Molecules 26 00738 g008 550
Figure 8. Raman profile of (a) TPE-CPOP1-800 and (b) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Figure 8. Raman profile of (a) TPE-CPOP1-800 and (b) TPE-CPOP2-800.
Molecules 26 00738 g008
Molecules 26 00738 g009 550
Figure 9. CO2 uptake of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 at 25 °C (a) and 0 °C (b).
Figure 9. CO2 uptake of TPE-CPOP1 and TPE-CPOP2 at 25 °C (a) and 0 °C (b).
Molecules 26 00738 g009
Molecules 26 00738 g010 550
Figure 10. CO2 uptake of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at 25 °C (a) and 0 °C (b).
Figure 10. CO2 uptake of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at 25 °C (a) and 0 °C (b).
Molecules 26 00738 g010
Molecules 26 00738 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) Comparison of CV performance between TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at 50 mV/s. (b) CV performance of TPE-CPOP1-800 at various scan rates (5~200 mV s−1). (c) Capacitance performance of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at various scan rates. (d) Galvanic charge/discharge (GCD) performance of TPE-CPOP1-800. (e) GCD performance of TPE-CPOP2-800. (f) Columbic efficiencies of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at 20 A g−1 for 10,000 cycles. The inset figure represents the first and last few cycles of GCD behavior at 20 A g−1.
Figure 11. (a) Comparison of CV performance between TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at 50 mV/s. (b) CV performance of TPE-CPOP1-800 at various scan rates (5~200 mV s−1). (c) Capacitance performance of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at various scan rates. (d) Galvanic charge/discharge (GCD) performance of TPE-CPOP1-800. (e) GCD performance of TPE-CPOP2-800. (f) Columbic efficiencies of TPE-CPOP1-800 and TPE-CPOP2-800 at 20 A g−1 for 10,000 cycles. The inset figure represents the first and last few cycles of GCD behavior at 20 A g−1.
Molecules 26 00738 g011
Table
Table 1. Thermal stability and porosity properties of TPE, TPE-CPOP1, TPE-CPOP2, TPE-CPOP1-800, and TPE-CPOP2-800.
Table 1. Thermal stability and porosity properties of TPE, TPE-CPOP1, TPE-CPOP2, TPE-CPOP1-800, and TPE-CPOP2-800.
SampleTd5 (°C)Td10 (°C)Char Yield (wt%)Surface Area (m2 /g)Pore Size (nm)
TPE-CPOP1412519694891.49, 1.82
TPE-CPOP2248365671462.57
TPE-CPOP1-8003564647011771.04, 2.99
TPE-CPOP2-8003755007211651.02, 2.29
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohamed, M.G.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Du, W.-T.; Kuo, S.-W. Meso/Microporous Carbons from Conjugated Hyper-Crosslinked Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene for High-Performance CO2 Capture and Supercapacitor. Molecules 2021, 26, 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030738

AMA Style

Mohamed MG, Ahmed MMM, Du W-T, Kuo S-W. Meso/Microporous Carbons from Conjugated Hyper-Crosslinked Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene for High-Performance CO2 Capture and Supercapacitor. Molecules. 2021; 26(3):738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohamed, Mohamed Gamal, Mahmoud M. M. Ahmed, Wei-Ting Du, and Shiao-Wei Kuo. 2021. "Meso/Microporous Carbons from Conjugated Hyper-Crosslinked Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene for High-Performance CO2 Capture and Supercapacitor" Molecules 26, no. 3: 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030738

APA Style

Mohamed, M. G., Ahmed, M. M. M., Du, W. -T., & Kuo, S. -W. (2021). Meso/Microporous Carbons from Conjugated Hyper-Crosslinked Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene for High-Performance CO2 Capture and Supercapacitor. Molecules, 26(3), 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030738

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop