Next Article in Journal
A Simple Turn-off Schiff Base Fluorescent Sensor for Copper (II) Ion and Its Application in Water Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Formulation on the Content of Phenolic Compounds in Snacks Enriched with Dracocephalum moldavica L. Seeds: Introduction to Receiving a New Functional Food Product
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Broadband Visible Light-Absorbing [70]Fullerene-BODIPY-Triphenylamine Triad: Synthesis and Application as Heavy Atom-Free Organic Triplet Photosensitizer for Photooxidation

1
School of Energy, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hefei University, Hefei 230601, China
2
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(5), 1243; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051243
Submission received: 6 February 2021 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021

Abstract

:
A broadband visible light-absorbing [70]fullerene-BODIPY-triphenylamine triad (C70-B-T) has been synthesized and applied as a heavy atom-free organic triplet photosensitizer for photooxidation. By attaching two triphenylmethyl amine units (TPAs) to the π-core of BODIPY via ethynyl linkers, the absorption range of the antenna is extended to 700 nm with a peak at 600 nm. Thus, the absorption spectrum of C70-B-T almost covers the entire UV–visible region (270–700 nm). The photophysical processes are investigated by means of steady-state and transient spectroscopies. Upon photoexcitation at 339 nm, an efficient energy transfer (ET) from TPA to BODIPY occurs both in C70-B-T and B-T, resulting in the appearance of the BODIPY emission at 664 nm. Direct or indirect (via ET) excitation of the BODIPY-part of C70-B-T is followed by photoinduced ET from the antenna to C70, thus the singlet excited state of C70 (1C70*) is populated. Subsequently, the triplet excited state of C70 (3C70*) is produced via the intrinsic intersystem crossing of C70. The photooxidation ability of C70-B-T was studied using 1,5-dihydroxy naphthalene (DHN) as a chemical sensor. The photooxidation efficiency of C70-B-T is higher than that of the individual components of C70-1 and B-T, and even higher than that of methylene blue (MB). The photooxidation rate constant of C70-B-T is 1.47 and 1.51 times as that of C70-1 and MB, respectively. The results indicate that the C70-antenna systems can be used as another structure motif for a heavy atom-free organic triplet photosensitizer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organic triplet photosensitizers (PSs) have received tremendous attention in recent years due to their wide application in photocatalysis [1,2], photodynamic therapy [3,4,5], and triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion (TTA) [6,7,8]. Broadband visible light-absorbance, hypotoxicity, high efficiency of intersystem crossing (ISC) and long triplet excited state lifetimes are the desired characteristics for triplet PSs [9,10]. However, it is still a challenge to attain the overall properties in one triplet PS.
PSs with heavy atoms can produce the triplet state, whereas the narrow visible light-absorbance, toxicity and high cost limit their applications [11,12,13,14,15]. PSs without heavy atoms usually suffer from the unpredictable ISC ability. In order to address the aforementioned problems, strategies such as using a twisted π-conjugation system [16,17], singlet fission [18,19], spin–orbit charge transfer [20,21], and radicals [22,23] have been developed to enhance the ISC of heavy atom-free PSs. However, the synthetic methods of these compounds are highly demanding. Using fullerene as a spin converter is a useful method to construct PSs with predictable ISC ability, because it possesses an ISC efficiency of unity even after derivatization [24]. Furthermore, fullerene also shows unique properties in biological systems. For example, fullerene exhibits excellent antioxidant [25], antiamyloid [26] and antibacterial [27] properties, has an adhesive and membrane-like potential [28], possesses excellent abilities in penetrating cell membranes and modulating ion transport [29,30], etc. Thus, fullerene-based PSs are promising scaffolds for designing high-technology nanomaterials and drugs in biological field.
C70, a higher molecular weight fullerene in the shape of a rugby ball [31], has a much more extended π system and higher absorption in the visible region compared to C60 [32]. Like C60, C70 also possesses high ISC efficiency (near 1.0) and can produce a high quantum yield of 1O2 (0.81 ± 0.15) [32]. The photodynamic activity and TTA quantum yield of C70 are higher than that of the C60 counterparts [33,34,35]. In consequence, it is highly promising to synthesize heavy atom-free organic triplet sensitizers with better properties using C70 as a spin converter. Similar to C60, C70 itself is not a good PS due to its low molar extinction coefficient in the visible region. Grafting suitable antennas onto a C70 cage seems to be a useful strategy, because significantly greater photosensitization efficiency has been achieved in C60-based triplet PSs due to improved visible light absorption [36,37,38,39,40]. Until now, most of the reported studies on the photosensitization of fullerenes have mainly been focused on C60. C70-antenna systems as triplet photosensitizers have rarely been reported [41].
Herein, we designed and synthesized a broadband visible light-absorbing [70]fullerene-BODIPY-triphenylamine triad (C70-B-T) as a heavy atom-free organic triplet photosensitizer for photooxidation. BODIPY, owing to its high chemical stability, simple synthetic route and adjustable π-conjugation framework [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49], was selected as the light-harvesting antenna in this triad. As we know, the absorption wavelength of unsubstituted BODIPY is at ~500 nm and the absorption range is relatively narrow. Therefore, the triphenylmethyl amine (TPA) units were grafted at the “2” and “6” positions of the BODIPY core to improve the absorption range. Direct carbon–carbon coupling at the “2” and “6” positions of the BODIPY will weaken the electronic conjugation and bend the molecule due to steric hindrance [50]. Thus, in this work, alkyne linkers were inserted between the TPA units and BODIPY core to release the steric congestion. In order to place C70 and antenna at a fixed distance, TPA-fused BODIPY (B-T) and C70 were connected by a rigid phenyl acetylene bridge via the Prato reaction. The structures of C70-B-T, B-T and C70-1 are shown in Figure 1. Both C70-B-T and B-T show broadband visible light-absorbance from 270 to 700 nm, covering almost the entire UV–visible region.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

The synthetic procedures of C70-B-T and B-T are outlined in Scheme 1, and the details are given in the Materials and Methods section.
By coupling with aromatic compounds at the “2” and “6” positions, the π-conjugation framework of BODIPY could be extended. In order to construct TPA-fused BODIPY, the preparation of 4-ethynyl-N,N-diphenylaniline (3) and 2,6-diiodo-BODIPY (6) was required. Compound 3 was synthesized by a standard Sonogashira reaction between trimethylsilylacetylene (TMSA) and 4-iodo-N,N-diphenylaniline, followed by deprotection of the trimethylsilyl group.
BODIPY 4 was synthesized according to the reported procedures [36]. The cross-coupling reaction of 4 with 4-iodobenzaldehyde afforded 5 in 83% yield. BODIPY 6 was prepared in 89% yield by treating 5 with N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) in the presence of CH3CO2H. A subsequent double Sonogashira coupling reaction of 6 with 3 afforded B-T in 68% yield. Finally, C70-B-T was obtained in 45% yield by treating B-T with C70 and sarcosine under nitrogen atmosphere in toluene. The reference compound C70-1 was prepared according to the Prato procedure [51] as described in the Materials and Methods section.
The structures of all the intermediates and final compounds were fully confirmed by NMR, mass and IR techniques. Due to the lower structural symmetry of C70, C70-B-T and C70-1 are mixture of isomers. The NMR spectra of all the compounds are given in the Supplementary Materials. For the sake of clarity, the expansion of the 1H-NMR spectrum of C70-B-T in CDCl3 is shown in Figure 2.
The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that there are more than three isomers in C70-B-T and gives all the expected proton signals. For instance, the peaks at ~7.90–6.96 ppm assign to the phenyl ring protons; peaks at ~5.30–2.39 ppm assign to the pyrrolidine protons, protons of N-CH3 and pyrrole ring CH3 and peaks at ~1.59–1.43 ppm assign to the protons of pyrrole ring CH3. The 13C-NMR spectrum of C70-B-T also shows the expected signals. For example, the peaks from 122–151 ppm assign to the sp2-C of C70 and benzene ring, peaks at ~80–117 ppm are carbons of alkyne, peaks from 58–71 ppm assign to the sp3-C of C70 and the carbons of pyrrolidine. The mass spectrum of C70-B-T gives a molecular peak at m/z 1854.4471, which is consistent with the calculated data.

2.2. UV–Vis Absorption and Steady-State Fluorescence

The UV–vis absorption and steady-state fluorescence of C70-B-T, and the reference compounds C70-1 and B-T were recorded in toluene in 1.0 × 10−5 M and are shown in Figure 3. Triad C70-B-T and dyad B-T show broadband absorption in the entire UV–visible region (270–700 nm) with a strong absorption peak at about 600 nm (ε = 58,804 L mol−1 cm−1). Compared with traditional BODIPY, a bathochromic shift of about 100 nm of the low-energy absorption peak is found in B-T, indicating that the TPA units extend the conjugation length effectively. The UV–vis spectrum of C70-B-T is the sum of C70-1 and B-T (the data are given in Table 1), suggesting no significant electronic communication between C70 and the antenna at ground state.
The steady-state fluorescence spectra of C70-B-T, C70-1 and B-T in toluene upon excitation at 339 and 605 nm are presented in Figure 3b and 3c, respectively. The emission maxima and fluorescence quantum yields of C70-B-T and B-T are listed in Table 1. When the TPA part was excited at 339 nm, only emissions of BODIPY moiety are observed both in B-T and C70-B-T. The fluorescence of TPA (447 nm) part is largely quenched, showing that efficient excitation energy transfer from TPA to BODIPY occurs [52]. The emission peaks of both the triad and dyad are located at 664 nm, but the emission intensity of C70-B-T is relatively weak compared with that of B-T (the quenching efficiency is 88%). Direct excitation of the BODIPY moiety of C70-B-T and B-T at 605 nm results in fluorescence spectra resemble those ones obtained upon TPA-part excitation. B-T still gives intense fluorescence with an emission peak at 664 nm (ΦF = 0.22), whereas the emission of C70-B-T is largely quenched (82%, ΦF = 0.04) due to intramolecular energy or electron transfer.
The emissions of C70-B-T and B-T in THF were also measured to investigate the effect of solvent polarity on the emission behavior. The results are shown in Figure 4. The emission intensities of C70-B-T and B-T are quite sensitive to solvent polarity due to the presence of dipole moments inside the molecules. For instance, the emission intensities drop largely in THF in comparison to that in toluene. Whereas the emission peak positions of both C70-B-T and B-T do not show an obvious shift. The low solvent polarity effect suggests the formation of a neutral excited state in C70-B-T [37,54]. Thus, the emission quenching of the BODIPY part observed in C70-B-T should mainly be ascribed to the intramolecular energy transfer from B-T to C70, and the electron transfer from the antenna to C70 is not significant [41,55]. The intramolecular energy transfer from B-T to C70 is possible, because the energy of the S1 state of B-T is higher than that of C70 [32,41]. In the magnified spectrum of Figure 3b, weak fluorescence emissions of C70 at 687 nm, 702 nm and 710 nm are observed. However, these emission bands are not observed in C70-B-T because of the fluorescence overlap.

2.3. Time-Resolved Fluorescence Spectroscopy

For deeper insight into the photoinduced intramolecular transfer processes, the fluorescence decays of C70-B-T and B-T were investigated using time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy techniques. The results are shown in Figure 5.
When excited at 510 nm and recorded the fluorescence signal at 664 nm, B-T gives monoexponential decay with fluorescence lifetime of 0.86 ns. Similar results are obtained when C70-B-T is excited, but the fluorescence lifetime of C70-B-T is reduced to 0.19 ns, shorter than that of B-T. The much shorter fluorescence lifetime of BODIPY part detected in C70-B-T indicates an effective excitation energy quenching of the BODIPY part by C70, which is consistent with the result obtained in the steady-state fluorescence spectra.
The efficiency of energy transfer from BODIPY to C70 in C70-B-T can be calculated by using Equation (1).
Φ 1 = k 1 ( k 0   +   k 1 ) =   1 / τ 1 1 / τ 0 1 / τ 1
where τ0 and τ1 are the fluorescence lifetimes of B-T and C70-B-T, respectively. Thus, the energy transfer efficiency Φ1 is determined as 0.78 for C70-B-T, which is in consistence with the result of the steady-state fluorescence spectra

2.4. Nanosecond Time-Resolved Transient Absorption Spectroscopy

Nanosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy was used to investigate the triplet excited states of the triad and C70-1. The nanosecond transient absorption spectra were recorded by a nanosecond flash photolysis system (LP980 ENDINBURGH) with a pulse laser (7 ns, 1 Hz) from a Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser at a wavelength of 532 nm. The results are shown in Figure 6.
Upon excitation at 532 nm, bleaching at about 474 and 538 nm was observed for both C70-B-T and C70-1 due to ground state absorption of C70. C70-1 shows a sharp transient absorption band at 420 nm and a broad transient absorption band from 644 to 735 nm (Figure 6c). In the time-resolved transient absorption spectrum of C70-B-T, no bleaching of the steady-state absorption of B-T part is observed. C70-B-T also shows a characteristic absorption band of 3C70* at 418 nm. However, the broad transient absorption band of C70-B-T is blue-shifted and splits into three bands with peaks at ~585, 622 and 695 nm due to the derivatization of C70 by the antenna [41]. The dynamic decay behaviors of the three bands are similar to that of the peak at 418 nm, suggesting that the three bands also belong to the absorptions of 3C70*, agreed well with the reported studies [41]. Therefore, the peaks observed in the transient absorption spectrum of C70-B-T should be ascribed to the absorptions of the 3C70*. When excited, the triplet state of C70-B-T is exclusively localized on the C70 unit. The lifetime of the triplet state of C70-B-T is 13.9 µs, slightly longer than that of C70-1 (12.5 µs).

2.5. Photooxidation of 1,5-Dihydroxy Naphthalene Mediated by 1O2

The photooxidation ability of C70-B-T was studied by using 1,5-dihydroxy naphthalene (DHN) as a 1O2 scavenger. In the presence of 1O2, DHN can be easily oxidized to juglone [56]. The kinetics of the photooxidation could be measured by following the decrease in the absorption of DHN at 301 nm or the increase in the absorption of juglone at 427 nm with time. The spectral responses of DHN using C70-B-T, B-T, C70-1, and methylene blue (MB) as the sensitizers upon broadband excitation with a xenon lamp are presented in Figure 7 and Figure S1, respectively. For C70-B-T, C70-1, and MB, the change of the absorption at 301 nm is obvious, indicating the significant consumption of DHN and the efficient photosensitization ability of the triplet PSs, whereas, nearly no UV–vis absorption change is observed in the spectral responses of DHN with B-T as the photosensitizer. The photostability of C70-B-T was also investigated by exposing to light for 1 h and no decrease is observed in the absorption (Figure S2). This further proves that the decrease in the absorption at 301 nm is caused by photooxidation instead of the decomposition of the photosensitizers.
The photooxidation ability of the triplet photosensitizers was quantitatively compared by plotting the ln[(A − A′)/A0] against the irradiation time. The photooxidation rate constant and the yield of singlet oxygen (ΦΔ) of the photosensitizers were calculated [37,57], and the data are listed in Table 2.
Among all the investigated photosensitizers, C70-B-T gives the highest photooxidation efficiency. The photooxidation rate constant (kobs) of C70-B-T is 67.5 × 10−3 min−1, which is 1.47 times as that of C70-1 (45.9 × 10−3 min−1) and 1.51 times as that of MB (44.8 × 10−3 min−1). B-T does not show obvious photooxidation ability. The more efficient photooxidation of C70-B-T compared with that of C70-1 demonstrates that the broadband visible light absorption antenna improves the photosensitizing ability. Here, the enhanced photosensitizing ability of C70-B-T compared with that of C70-1 and B-T should be attributed to the synergetic effect of C70 and B-T. First, B-T harvested a broadband visible light and be excited to its excited singlet easily, then efficient intramolecular energy transfer from B-T to C70 occurred and formed the 1C70*, finally the highly efficient ISC of C70 would eventually lead to the population of 3C70*. These photophysical processes can be supported by the steady-state and transient data mentioned above.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All reagents were obtained from commercial sources. C70, ethyl 2-(methylamino)acetate hydrochloride, ethyl glyoxylate, 4-iodo-N,N-diphenylaniline, cuprous iodide (CuI), triphenylphosphine (PPh3), trimethylsilylacetylene (TMSA), potassium carbonate (K2CO3), anhydrous sodium sulphate (Na2SO4), N-iodosuccinimide (NIS), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) and DHN were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Trans-dichlorobis(triphenyl-phosphine)Palladium(II) (Pd(PPh3)2Cl2) was purchased from Shanxi Kaida Chemical engineering Co., Ltd. Sarcosine, 4-iodobenzaldehyde and 1,2-dichlorobenzene (ODCB) were purchased from J&K Scientific LTD (Beijing, China).
Silica gel, carbon disulfide (CS2), dichloromethane (DCM), petroleum ether (PE), methanol (MeOH), tetrahydrofuran (THF), triethylamine (Et3N), acetic acid (CH3COOH), trichloromethane (CHCl3), and toluene were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). THF was distilled over sodium and benzophenone, other reagents used for the synthesis were used directly.
All synthesis compounds were characterized by 1H and 13C-NMR spectroscopy on a BRUKER 400 MHz spectrometer. The mess analyses were performed using a Bruker ultrafleXtreme MALDI TOF/TOF (Bremen, Germany).

3.2. Synthesis

3.2.1. Synthesis of C70-1

The solution of C70 (140 mg, 0.16 mmol), ethyl 2-(methylamino)acetate hydrochloride (49.1 mg, 0.32 mmol) in ODCB (15 mL) was bubbled with N2 for 30 min at room temperature. Ethyl glyoxylate (158 µL, 0.8 mmol, in a 50% toluene solution) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 130 °C for 90 min monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC). After the solvent was removed by reduced pressure, the mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography using CS2/DCM (2/1, v/v) as the eluent to give C70-1 as a brown black powder (70.0 mg, 42%). UV-vis (toluence) λmax/nm 284 (77230 L mol−1 cm−1), 307 (51491 L mol−1cm−1), 398 (32516 L mol−1 cm−1), 462 (26537 L mol−1 cm−1), 537 (14119 L mol−1cm−1), 666 (2426 L mol−1cm−1). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.83 (s, CHCO2), 5.35 (s, CHCO2), 5.30 (s, CHCO2), 4.81(s, CHCO2), 4.63–4.37(m, OCH2CH3), 4.32–4.17(m, OCH2CH3), 4.15-3.99 (m, OCH2CH3), 3.10 (s, NCH3), 2.83 (s, NCH3), 2.68 (s, NCH3), 2.62 (s, NCH3), 1.54 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, OCH2CH3), 1.42 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, OCH2CH3), 1.17 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, OCH2CH3), 1.04 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, OCH2CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.18, 170.06, 157.73, 155.60, 155.32, 154.87, 151.56, 151.20, 151.14, 150.89, 150.83, 150.50, 150.46, 150.01, 149.78, 149.46, 149.37, 149.23, 149.20, 149.06, 148.87, 148.83, 147.60, 147.54, 147.29, 147.25, 147.18, 147.14, 147.12, 147.06, 146.98, 146.32, 146.10, 145.99, 145.91, 143.52, 143.50, 143.48, 143.40, 143.21, 141.42, 140.74, 140.46, 140.23, 138.52, 137.64, 133.90, 133.70, 133.27, 131.86, 131.73, 131.53, 131.49, 131.36, 75.93, 72.28, 65.54, 64.58, 62.07, 61.65, 35.18, 29.86, 14.84, 14.50, 14.70, 14.35, 14.28. FT-IR υ/cm−1 (KBr) 2922, 2851, 1746, 1733, 1632, 1427, 1369, 1340, 1190, 1131, 1052, 795, 671, 637, 580, 534. HRMS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd for C79H15NO4[M−•]1041.1007, found 1041.1001.

3.2.2. Synthesis of Compound 2

4-Iodo-N,N-diphenylaniline 1 (500.0 mg, 1.35 mmol), CuI (128.3 mg, 0.67 mmol) and PPh3 (176.6 mg, 0.67 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of THF/Et3N (1/3, v/v) in an oven-dried, 50 mL one neck flask equipped with a gas inlet adaptor. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 atmosphere for 30 min. Then Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (189.0 mg, 0.27 mmol) and TMSA (945 µL, 6.74 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C under N2 atmosphere for 5 h until TLC monitoring indicated the disappearance of compound 1. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude reaction mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography using PE/CH2Cl2 (2/1, v/v) as eluent to give 2 [58] in 83% yield (391.0 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.31-7.27 (m, 4H), 7.12–7.06 (m, 6H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 0.27 (s, 9H).

3.2.3. Synthesis of Compound 3

Compound 2 (120.0 mg, 0.35 mmol) was dissolved in 7 mL of CH2Cl2/MeOH (1/1, v/v) in an oven-dried, 25 mL one neck flask equipped with a gas inlet adaptor. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 atmosphere for 30 min. Then, K2CO3 (145.5 mg, 1.05 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 atmosphere for 1.5 h until TLC monitoring indicated the disappearance of compound 2. The crude mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 and H2O three times. The organic layer was dried by Na2SO4 and the solvent was then removed. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using PE/CH2Cl2 (2/1, v/v) as eluent to give 3 [58] in 90% yield (85.8 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 4H), 7.11–7.04 (m, 6H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.02 (s, 1H).

3.2.4. Synthesis of Compound 5

Compound 4 was synthesized by adapting the literature procedure and used directly [36]. 4 (394.4 mg, 1.13 mmol), 4-iodobenzaldehyde (313.2 mg, 1.35 mmol), CuI (107.6 mg, 0.57 mmol) and PPh3 (148.2 mg, 0.57 mmol) were dissolved in 24 mL of THF/Et3N (1/2, v/v) in an oven-dried, 50 mL one-neck flask equipped with a gas inlet adaptor. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 atmosphere for 30 min. Then, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (158.6 mg, 0.23 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C under N2 atmosphere for 3.5 h until TLC monitoring indicated the disappearance of 4. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude reaction mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography using PE/CH2Cl2 (4/1, v/v) as eluent to give 5 in 83% yield (425.4 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.04 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.72–7.69 (m, 4H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.00 (s, 2H), 2.56 (s, 6H), 1.43 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.52, 156.02, 143.05, 140.63, 135.85, 135.80, 132.64, 132.31, 131.26, 129.80, 129.19, 128.53, 123.47, 121.57, 92.61, 89.91, 14.75. FT-IR υ/cm−1 (KBr) 2923, 2852, 1698, 1600, 1542, 1510, 1468, 1436, 1402, 1369, 1304, 1260, 1193, 1156, 1120, 1082, 1050, 1019, 979, 830, 766, 707, 477. HRMS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd for C28H23BF2N2O[M+•]452.1871, found 452.1876.

3.2.5. Synthesis of Compound 6

Compound 5 (200.1 mg, 0.44 mmol) and NIS (217.7 mg, 0.97 mmol) were dissolved in 12 mL of CHCl3/CH3COOH (2/1, v/v) in a 25 mL one-neck flask and the mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 12 h, monitored by TLC. Then the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 and a saturated sodium thiosulfate aqueous solution three times. The combined organic layer was dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude reaction mixture was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using PE/CH2Cl2 (2/1, v/v) as eluent to give 6 in 89% yield (280.0 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.05 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.66 (s, 6H), 1.45 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.50, 157.37, 145.26, 140.27, 135.90, 135.45, 132.91, 132.36, 131.15, 129.82, 129.03, 128.37, 124.15, 92.28, 90.37, 86.07, 17.36. FT-IR υ/cm−1 (KBr) 2923, 1690, 1599, 1544, 1530, 1489, 1439, 1399, 1345, 1307, 1204, 1181, 1113, 1089, 995,918, 823, 765, 706, 588, 525. HRMS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd for C28H21BF2I2N2O[M+•]703.9804, found 703.9809.

3.2.6. Synthesis of Compound B-T

Compound 6 (100.0 mg, 0.14 mmol), CuI (13.5 mg, 0.07 mmol) and PPh3 (18.6 mg, 0.07 mmol) were dissolved in 12 mL of toluene/Et3N (1/3, v/v) in an oven-dried, 25 mL one neck flask equipped with a gas inlet adaptor. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 atmosphere for 30 min. Then Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (19.9 mg, 0.03 mmol) and compound 3 (152.8 mg, 0.57 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 60 °C under N2 atmosphere for 48 h until TLC monitoring indicated the disappearance of compound 6. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude reaction mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography using PE/CH2Cl2 (4/1, v/v) as eluent to give B-T in 68% yield (95.4 mg). UV–vis (toluence) λmax/nm 330 (67,683 L mol−1 cm−1), 443 (13,215 L mol−1 cm−1), 603 (59,703 L mol−1 cm−1). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.04 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.74–7.71 (m, 4H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H),7.31–7.28 (m, 6H), 7.27–7.24 (m,6H), 7.11–7.08 (m, 8H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 4H), 6.99–6.97 (m, 4H), 2.71 (s, 6H), 1.56 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.53, 158.87, 148.03, 147.28, 143.25, 141.02, 135.91, 135.38, 132.79, 132.43, 132.35, 131.10, 129.82, 129.53, 129.14, 128.49, 125.06, 123.89, 123.69, 122.51, 116.89, 116.22, 97.05, 92.51, 90.19, 80.69, 13.90, 13.77. FT-IR υ/cm−1 (KBr) 2923, 2853, 1635, 1590, 1525, 1492, 1400, 1318, 1264, 1186, 1173, 1078, 1011, 795, 753, 710, 695, 586, 533, 506. HRMS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd for C68H49BF2N4O[M+•] 986.3973, found 986.3976.

3.2.7. Synthesis of Compound C70-B-T

The mixture of C70 (35.4 mg, 0.04 mmol), compound B-T (25.0 mg, 0.025 mmol) and sarcosine (18.8 mg, 0.21 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of toluene and stirred at 130 °C under N2 atmosphere for 8 h, monitored by TLC. Then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The mixture was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using CS2 as the eluent to afford unreacted C70, then using CS2/CH2Cl2 (2/1, v/v) as the eluent to give C70-B-T as a mixture of isomers (21.3 mg, 45%). UV–vis (toluene) λmax/nm 284 (111272 mol−1 cm−1), 310 (98534 mol−1 cm−1), 344 (83490 L mol−1 cm−1), 443 (31724 L mol−1 cm−1), 600 (58804 L mol−1 cm−1). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.90–7.61 (m, phenyl ring H), 7.54–7.43 (m, phenyl ring H), 7.35–7.19 (m, phenyl ring H), 7.11–7.03 (m, phenyl ring H), 7.00–6.96 (m, phenyl ring H), 5.30 (s, NCHPh), 5.07 (s, NCHPh), 5.01 (s, NCHPh), 4.97 (s, NCHPh), 4.70 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, NCH2), 4.32–4.21 (NCHPh, NCH2), 4.08 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, NCH2), 4.04 (s, NCHPh), 3.86 (s, NCHPh), 4.67–4.51 (NCHPh, NCH2), 3.41 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, NCH2), 3.22 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, NCH2), 2.72 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 2.70 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 2.69 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 2.56 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 2.55 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 2.46 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 2.39 (s, NCH3, pyrrole ring CH3), 1.59 (s, pyrrole ring CH3), 1.56 (s, pyrrole ring CH3), 1.55 (s, pyrrole ring CH3), 1.52 (s, pyrrole ring CH3), 1.51 (s, pyrrole ring CH3), 1.43 (s, pyrrole ring CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.85, 167.53, 158.95, 158.73, 158.50, 158.03, 156.54, 156.21, 155.52, 155.00, 154.96, 154.81, 154.77, 153.49, 152.54, 151.82, 151.66, 151.58, 151.56, 151.52, 151.47, 151.43, 151.21, 151.16, 151.02, 150.95, 150.83, 150.78, 150.76, 150.73, 150.64, 150.85, 150.55, 150.36, 150.32, 150.17, 150.07, 150.01, 149.96, 149.89, 149.83, 149.80, 149.77, 149.49, 149.44, 149.39, 149.34, 149.27, 149.21, 149.18, 149.10, 149.07, 149.05, 148.95, 148.91, 148.89, 148.79, 148.73, 148.43, 148.39, 148.37, 148.33, 148.25, 148.19, 148.15, 147.95, 147.89, 147.83, 147.60, 147.50, 147.24, 147.16, 147.02, 146.97, 146.95, 146.91, 146.75, 146.65, 146.57, 146.39, 146.32, 146.29, 146.23, 145.95, 145.89, 145.83, 145.78, 145.73, 145.65, 145.53, 145.44, 145.25, 145.17, 145.01, 144.87, 144.77, 144.64, 144.52, 144.48, 144.45, 144.39, 143.99, 143.90, 143.81, 143.73, 143.56, 143.51, 143.43, 143.36, 143.32, 143.28, 143.13, 142.99, 142.92, 142.85, 142.81, 142.40, 142.18, 142.08, 142.06, 142.02, 141.75, 141.28, 141.23, 141.15, 141.06, 140.95, 140.88, 140.81, 140.74, 140.67, 140.64, 140.54, 140.44, 140.29, 140.17, 138.75, 138.02, 137.97, 137.75, 137.58, 137.53, 137.42, 134.67, 134.61, 134.58, 133.92, 133.87, 133.75, 133.67, 133.60, 133.07, 132.67, 132.44, 132.11, 131.88, 131.82, 131.71, 131.68, 131.66, 131.60, 131.42, 131.35, 131.30, 131.19, 131.09, 131.05, 129.52, 128.97, 128.38, 128.28, 125.02, 124.57, 124.40, 123.66, 123.13, 122.86, 122.50, 116.87, 116.25, 97.12, 91.25, 91.14, 90.97, 89.61, 89.52, 89.44, 89.35, 88.09, 86.09, 83.15, 82.83, 82.18, 80.84, 79.93, 70.85, 70.27, 69.98, 68.86, 68.27, 66.68, 66.44, 66.28, 65.70, 62.18, 60.46, 58.87, 58.47, 39.69, 39.62, 32.06, 30.69, 30.44, 30.30, 30.18, 29.84, 29.50, 14.28, 13.89, 13.81. FT-IR υ/cm−1 (KBr) 2959, 2923, 2852, 1708, 1673, 1592, 1502, 1402, 1339, 1317, 1283, 1174, 1090, 796, 546, 419. HRMS (MALDI-TOF) m/z calcd for C21H19BF2N2 [M+•] 1857.4479, found 1854.4471.

3.3. Photooxidation Experiment

Compounds C70-B-T, C70-1, B-T and MB in a concentration of 2.0 × 10−5 mol L−1 and DHN in a concentration of 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 were dissolved in CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1, v/v), respectively. Then, the above solutions of sensitizers and DHN were mixed in a volume ratio of 1:1, and O2 was bubbled through the mixture for 10 min. The mixture was then placed in a quartz cell and irradiated with a broadband light source-xenon lamp using 0.72 M NaNO2 aqueous solution as a cutoff filter (0.17 mW/cm2). The consumption of DHN was monitored by a decrease in the absorption at 301 nm using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Mapada, Shanghai, China) at intervals of 5 min.
The singlet oxygen quantum yield (Φ) was determined by using Equation (2).
Φ Δ   =   Φ Δ   ( std ) k obs ( x ) I ( std ) k obs ( std ) I ( x )
In the equation, Φ(std) is the singlet oxygen generation quantum yield of MB (0.57 in CH2Cl2), kobs(x) and kobs(std) were the absolute value of the slopes of ln[(A-A′)/A0] versus irradiation time for the photooxidation of DHN by sensitizers and MB, respectively. I(x) and I(std) were the total light intensities absorbed by sensitizers and MB, respectively.

3.4. Photostability Experiment

C70-B-T in a concentration of 1.0 × 10−5 mol L−1 in CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1, v/v) was placed in a quartz cell and irradiated with a xenon lamp (0.17 mW/cm2) continuously for 1 h. The spectral response of C70-B-T was recorded using a UV–vis spectrophotometer at 0 h and 1 h, respectively.

3.5. Measurement of Photophysical Properties

UV–vis absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded via an absorption spectrometer (UV-1800, Mapada) and a fluorescence spectrophotometer (FP8500, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) at room-temperature, respectively. The fluorescence lifetime measurements were conducted using a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) apparatus at room temperature and a pulsed laser at a wavelength of 510 nm was used as the excitation source. The nanosecond transient absorption spectra were recorded by a nanosecond flash photolysis system (LP980, Edinburgh instruments, UK) with a pulse laser (7 ns, 1 Hz) from a Nd:YAG laser at a wavelength of 532 nm. The samples in 10 mm path length quartz cuvettes were freshly prepared and deoxygenated by bubbling nitrogen for over 20 min before measurement. The analyzing light was a 450 W pulsed xenon lamp. A monochromator equipped with a photomultiplier for collecting the spectral range from 350 to 850 nm was used to analyze transient absorption spectra. The decay curves were fitted by least-squares regression using a custom-written algorithm in the Matlab.
The corresponding fluorescence quantum yields were calculated by using Equation (3) [59] with (4-((trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)phenyl)-BODIPY as the standard, ΦF = 0.46 in CHCl3, λexc 484 nm [53].
Φ F ( x )   =   Φ F ( std ) A std F x A x F std   ( n x n std ) 2
where ΦF(x) and ΦF(std) are the fluorescence quantum yields of the sensitizers and standard, respectively. Ax and Astd are the absorbance of the sensitizers and standard, Fx and Fstd are the area under the emission curve of the sensitizers and standard, and n is the refractive index of the solvents used in measurement.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a broadband visible light-absorbing [70]fullerene-BODIPY-triphenylamine triad (C70-B-T) has been synthesized and used as a heavy atom-free organic triplet photosensitizer for photooxidation. Two TPA units were introduced to the π-core of BODIPY and the absorption spectrum of C70-B-T covered virtually the entire UV–visible region. Upon the direct or indirect excitation of the BODIPY-part of C70-B-T, the intramolecular singlet excited state energy transfer from BODIPY to C70 unit occurs and produces 1C70*. Then, the ISC of C70 produces 3C70*. The photophysical processes were confirmed by steady-state and transient spectroscopies. The photooxidation ability of the photosensitizers was investigated using DHN as a chemical sensor. Among all the investigated compounds, C70-B-T gives the best photooxidation efficiency. The photooxidation rate constant of C70-B-T is 1.47 and 1.51 times as that of C70-1 and MB, respectively. The results indicate that C70-antenna could be used as another heavy atom-free organic triplet photosensitizer structure motif, with potential applications in photodynamic therapy, photocatalysis, photovoltaics and TTA upconversion.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: the spectral response of DHN with MB as the sensitizer (Supplementary Figure S1), the photostability of C70-B-T (Supplementary Figure S2), high resolution mass spectra (Supplementary Figures S3–S7), 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra (Supplementary Figures S8–S23) are also provided.

Author Contributions

J.-H.Z. and Y.G. performed the experiments; J.-H.Z., Y.G., L.-F.D., L.-H.M., H.-D.L., C.-X.W., and H.C. analyzed the data; S.-E.Z., W.Y. and X.-F.W. conceived and designed the experiments; J.-H.Z. and S.-E.Z. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21702042, 81961138011), the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar (2008085J26), the China Scholarship Council in 2019, and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Chen, K.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, X.; Imran, M.; Tang, G.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Q. Bodipy Derivatives as Triplet Photosensitizers and the Related Intersystem Crossing Mechanisms. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhu, D.-L.; Li, H.-X.; Xu, Z.-M.; Li, H.-Y.; Young, D.J.; Lang, J.-P. Visible light driven, nickel-catalyzed aryl esterification using a triplet photosensitiser thioxanthen-9-one. Org. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 2353–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malimonenko, N.; Butenin, A.; Mester, I.; Kogan, B. Nonlinear photodynamic therapy using saturation of the photosensitizer triplet states. Laser Phys. Lett. 2019, 16, 55602–55604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Majumdar, P.; Nomula, R.; Zhao, J. Activatable triplet photosensitizers: Magic bullets for targeted photodynamic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 5982–5997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gierlich, P.; Mata, A.I.; Donohoe, C.; Brito, R.M.M.; Senge, M.O.; Gomes-Da-Silva, L.C. Ligand-Targeted Delivery of Photosensitizers for Cancer Treatment. Molecules 2020, 25, 5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Z.-S.; Ning, Y.; Yin, H.-Y.; Zhang, J.-L. Lutetium(III) porphyrinoids as effective triplet photosensitizers for photon upconversion based on triplet–triplet annihilation (TTA). Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 2291–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Mahboub, M.; Liang, Z.; Jaimes, P.; Xia, P.; Graham, K.R.; Tang, M.L.; Lian, T. Enhanced Near-Infrared-to-Visible Upconversion by Synthetic Control of PbS Nanocrystal Triplet Photosensitizers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9769–9772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.J.; Zhao, J.Z.; Di Donato, M.; Mazzone, G. Increasing the anti-Stokes shift in TTA upconversion with photosen-sitizers showing red-shifted spin-allowed charge transfer absorption but a non-compromised triplet state energy level. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1510–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cui, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, K.; Zhao, J. Application of singlet energy transfer in triplet state formation: Broadband visible light-absorbing triplet photosensitizers, molecular structure design, related photophysics and applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 8735–8759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, J.; Wu, W.; Sun, J.; Guo, S. Triplet photosensitizers: From molecular design to applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5323–5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mahammed, A.; Gross, Z. Corroles as triplet photosensitizers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 379, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, Y.; Conway-Kenny, R.; Wang, J.; Cui, X.; Zhao, J.; Draper, S.M. Exploiting coumarin-6 as ancillary ligands in 1,10-phenanthroline Ir(iii) complexes: Generating triplet photosensitisers with high upconversion capabilities. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 8585–8589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.; Lu, Y.; McCarthy, W.; Conway-Kenny, R.; Twamley, B.; Zhao, J.; Draper, S.M. Novel ruthenium and iridium complexes of N-substituted carbazole as triplet photosensitisers. Chem. Commun. 2017, 54, 1073–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, X.; Peng, J.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Zhao, D.; Ma, Y. Iridium-Based High-Sensitivity Oxygen Sensors and Photosensitizers with Ultralong Triplet Lifetimes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 8, 3591–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mai, D.K.; Kang, B.; Vales, T.P.; Badon, I.W.; Cho, S.; Lee, J.; Kim, E.; Kim, H.-J. Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of Tumor-Targeted Water-Soluble BODIPY Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 2020, 25, 3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, W.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.-F.; Shi, M.; Jia, M.; Hu, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, T. Minimizing the Electron Donor Size of Donor–Acceptor-Type Photosensitizer: Twisted Intramolecular Charge-Transfer-Induced Triplet State and Singlet Oxygen Formation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 23558–23566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, Y.; Dick, B.; Zhao, J. Twisted Bodipy Derivative as a Heavy-Atom-Free Triplet Photosensitizer Showing Strong Absorption of Yellow Light, Intersystem Crossing, and a High-Energy Long-Lived Triplet State. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 5535–5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, M.; Bae, Y.J.; Mauck, C.M.; Mandal, A.; Young, R.M.; Wasielewski, M.R. Singlet Fission in Covalent Terrylene-diimide Dimers: Probing the Nature of the Multiexciton State Using Femtosecond Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 9184–9192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mauck, C.M.; Hartnett, P.E.; Margulies, E.A.; Ma, L.; Miller, C.E.; Schatz, G.C.; Marks, T.J.; Wasielewski, M.R. Singlet Fission via an Excimer-Like Intermediate in 3,6-Bis(thiophen-2-yl)diketopyrrolopyrrole Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11749–11761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Zhao, J. Bodipy-Anthracene Dyads as Triplet Photosensitizers: Effect of Chromophore Orientation on Tri-plet-State Formation Efficiency and Application in Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4492–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ji, S.; Ge, J.; Escudero, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Jacquemin, D. Molecular Structure–Intersystem Crossing Relationship of Heavy-Atom-Free BODIPY Triplet Photosensitizers. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 5958–5963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Hussain, M.; Kundu, S.; Rane, V.; Hayvali, M.; Yildiz, E.A.; Zhao, J.; Yaglioglu, H.G.; Das, R.; et al. Efficient Radical-Enhanced Intersystem Crossing in an NDI-TEMPO Dyad: Photophysics, Electron Spin Polar-ization, and Application in Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 18663–18675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Barbon, A.; Toffoletti, A.; Liu, Y.; An, Y.; Xu, L.; Karatay, A.; Yaglioglu, H.G.; Yildiz, E.A.; et al. Radical-Enhanced Intersystem Crossing in New Bodipy Derivatives and Application for Efficient Tri-plet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7831–7842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arbogast, J.W.; Darmanyan, A.P.; Foote, C.S.; Rubin, Y.; Diederich, F.N.; Alvarez, M.M.; Anz, S.J.; Whetten, R.L. Photophysical Properties of C60. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gudkov, S.V.; Guryev, E.L.; Gapeyev, A.B.; Sharapov, M.G.; Bunkin, N.F.; Shkirin, A.V.; Zabelina, T.S.; Glinushkin, A.P.; Sevost’yanov, M.A.; Belosludtsev, K.N.; et al. Unmodified hydrated C60 fullerene molecules exhibit antioxidant properties, prevent damage to DNA and proteins induced by reactive oxygen spe-cies and protect mice against injuries caused by radiation-induced oxidative stress. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2019, 15, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siposova, K.; Petrenko, V.I.; Ivankov, O.I.; Musatov, A.; Bulavin, L.A.; Avdeev, M.V.; Kyzyma, O.A. Fullerenes as an Effective Amyloid Fibrils Disaggregating Nanomaterial. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 32410–32419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Skariyachan, S.; Parveen, A.; Garka, S. Nanoparticle Fullerene (C60) demonstrated stable binding with antibacterial po-tential towards probable targets of drug resistant Salmonella typhi-a computational perspective and in vitro investigation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 35, 3449–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pochkaeva, E.I.; Podolsky, N.E.; Zakusilo, D.N.; Petrov, A.V.; Charykov, N.A.; Vlasov, T.D.; Penkova, A.V.; Vasina, L.V.; Murin, I.V.; Sharoyko, V.V.; et al. Fullerene derivatives with amino acids, peptides and proteins: From synthesis to biomedical application. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2020, 57, 100255–100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goodarzi, S.; Da Ros, T.; Conde, J.; Sefat, F.; Mozafari, M. Fullerene: Biomedical engineers get to revisit an old friend. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 460–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rašović, I. Water-soluble fullerenes for medical applications. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 33, 777–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baker, J.; Fowler, P.W.; Lazzeretti, P.; Malagoli, M.; Zanasi, R. Structure and properties of C70. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 184, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arbogast, J.W.; Foote, C.S. Photophysical Properties of C70. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8886–8889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Q.; Guan, M.; Xu, L.; Shu, C.; Jin, C.; Zheng, J.; Fang, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C. Structural Effect and Mechanism of C70-Carboxyfullerenes as Efficient Sensitizers against Cancer Cells. Small 2012, 8, 2070–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Doi, Y.; Ikeda, A.; Akiyama, M.; Nagano, M.; Shigematsu, T.; Ogawa, T.; Takeya, T.; Nagasaki, T. Intracellular uptake and photodynamic activity of water-soluble [60]- and [70]fullerenes incorporated in liposomes. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8892–8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moor, K.; Kim, J.-H.; Snow, S.; Kim, J.-H. [C70] Fullerene-sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 10829–10831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, S.-E.; Zhang, J.; Dou, L.; Li, N.; Hu, K.; Gao, T.; Lu, H.; Si, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, W. Rigid axially symmetrical C60-BODIPY triplet photosensitizers: Effect of bridge length on singlet oxygen generation. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 20419–20427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, S.-E.; Liu, K.-Q.; Wang, X.-F.; Xia, A.-D.; Wang, G.-W. Synthesis and Properties of Axially Symmetrical Rigid Visible Light-Harvesting Systems Containing [60]Fullerene and Perylenebisimide. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 12223–12231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, P.; Wu, W.; Zhao, J.; Huang, D.; Yi, X. Using C60-bodipy dyads that show strong absorption of visible light and long-lived triplet excited states as organic triplet photosensitizers for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, W.; Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; Guo, S. Light-Harvesting Fullerene Dyads as Organic Triplet Photosensitizers for Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Upconversions. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5305–5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, X.; Liu, S. Solvent effects on triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion kinetics of perylene with a Bodipy-phenyl-C60 photosensitizer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 26372–26382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wei, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, X.; Liu, S. Application of a bodipy-C70 dyad in triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion of perylene as a metal-free photosensitizer. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 5598–5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, X.-F. BODIPY photosensitizers based on PET and heavy atom effect: A comparative study on the efficient formation of excited triplet state and singlet oxygen in BODIPY dimers and monomers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 355, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, J.; Yuan, X.; Küçüköz, B.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Majumdar, P.; Karatay, A.; Li, X.; Yaglioglu, H.G.; Elmali, A.; et al. Resonance energy transfer-enhanced rhodamine–styryl Bodipy dyad triplet photosensitizers. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 3900–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, W.; Cui, X.; Zhao, J. Hetero Bodipy-dimers as heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers showing a long-lived triplet excited state for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9009–9011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, P.; Zhao, J.; Wu, W.; Yu, X.; Liu, Y. Accessing the Long-Lived Triplet Excited States in Bodipy-Conjugated 2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl) Benzothiazole/Benzoxazoles and Applications as Organic Triplet Photosensitizers for Photooxidations. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6166–6178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, H.; Zhao, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y. BODIPY-Based Fluorescent Surfactant for Cell Membrane Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 3, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zou, J.; Yin, Z.; Wang, P.; Chen, D.; Shao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, L.; Huang, W.; Dong, X. Photosensitizer synergistic effects: D-A-D structured organic molecule with enhanced fluorescence and singlet oxygen quantum yield for photodynamic therapy. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2188–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Farinone, M.; Urbańska, K.; Pawlicki, M. BODIPY- and Porphyrin-Based Sensors for Recognition of Amino Acids and Their Derivatives. Molecules 2020, 25, 4523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Squeo, B.M.; Ganzer, L.; Virgili, T.; Pasini, M. BODIPY-Based Molecules, A Platform for Photonic and Solar Cells. Molecules 2020, 26, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, H.-Y.; Huang, W.-C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chou, H.-H.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Lin, J.T.; Lin, H.-W. BODIPY dyes with beta-conjugation and their applications for high-efficiency inverted small molecule solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8913–8915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maggini, M.; Scorrano, G.; Prato, M. Addition of azomethine ylides to C60: Synthesis, characterization, and functionalization of fullerene pyrrolidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9798–9799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, J.-Y.; Hou, X.-N.; Tian, Y.; Jiang, L.; Deng, S.; Röder, B.; Ermilov, E.A. Photoinduced energy and charge transfer in a bis(triphenylamine)–BODIPY–C60 artificial photosynthetic system. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 57293–57305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Godoy, J.; Vives, G.; Tour, J.M. Synthesis of Highly Fluorescent BODIPY-Based Nanocars. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1464–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, X.-F.; Zhang, X.-R.; Wu, Y.-S.; Zhang, J.-P.; Ai, X.-C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, M.-T. Two-photon photophysical properties of tri-9-anthrylborane. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 436, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, L.; Cui, X.; Therrien, B.; Zhao, J. Energy-funneling-based broadband visible-light-absorbing bodipy-C60 triads and tetrads as dual functional heavy-atom-free organic triplet photosensitizers for photocatalytic organic reactions. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 17472–17482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Takizawa, S.-Y.; Aboshi, R.; Murata, S. Photooxidation of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene with iridium complexes as singlet oxygen sensitizers. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2011, 10, 895–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ormond, A.B.; Freeman, H.S. Effects of substituents on the photophysical properties of symmetrical porphyrins. Dye. Pigment. 2013, 96, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dong, L.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Hua, J.; Hu, A. Co-sensitization of N719 with polyphenylenes from the Bergman cyclization of maleimide-based enediynes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11607–11614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, X.-F.; Feng, N. Photoinduced Electron Transfer-based Halogen-free Photosensitizers: Covalent meso -Aryl (Phenyl, Naphthyl, Anthryl, and Pyrenyl) as Electron Donors to Effectively Induce the Formation of the Excited Triplet State and Singlet Oxygen for BODIPY Compounds. Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 2447–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The structures of compounds [70]fullerene-BODIPY-triphenylamine triad (C70-B-T), C70-1 and B-T.
Figure 1. The structures of compounds [70]fullerene-BODIPY-triphenylamine triad (C70-B-T), C70-1 and B-T.
Molecules 26 01243 g001
Scheme 1. Synthetic procedures for C70-B-T and B-T.
Scheme 1. Synthetic procedures for C70-B-T and B-T.
Molecules 26 01243 sch001
Figure 2. Expansions of the 1H-NMR spectrum of C70-B-T in CDCl3.
Figure 2. Expansions of the 1H-NMR spectrum of C70-B-T in CDCl3.
Molecules 26 01243 g002
Figure 3. (a) UV–vis absorption spectra of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene (c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L). (b) Fluorescence of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene (excited at 339 nm, c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L). (c) Fluorescence of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene (excited at 605 nm, c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L).
Figure 3. (a) UV–vis absorption spectra of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene (c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L). (b) Fluorescence of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene (excited at 339 nm, c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L). (c) Fluorescence of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene (excited at 605 nm, c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L).
Molecules 26 01243 g003
Figure 4. Emission of (a) B-T and (b) C70-B-T in THF (redline) and toluene (black curve) (1 × 10−5 mol/L, exited at 605 nm).
Figure 4. Emission of (a) B-T and (b) C70-B-T in THF (redline) and toluene (black curve) (1 × 10−5 mol/L, exited at 605 nm).
Molecules 26 01243 g004
Figure 5. Fluorescence decay traces obtained with a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) of (a) B-T and (b) C70-B-T in toluene. Excited at 510 nm and recorded at 664 nm.
Figure 5. Fluorescence decay traces obtained with a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) of (a) B-T and (b) C70-B-T in toluene. Excited at 510 nm and recorded at 664 nm.
Molecules 26 01243 g005
Figure 6. (a) Nanosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectrum of C70-B-T upon excitation at 532 nm with a pulse laser (7 ns, 1 Hz) in deaerated toluene at room temperature. (b) Decay of C70-B-T at 700 nm. (c) Nanosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectrum of C70-1 upon excitation at 532 nm with a pulse laser (7 ns, 1 Hz) in deaerated toluene at room temperature. (d) Decay of C70-1 at 700 nm. Arrows indicate the spectral trend with time increasing.
Figure 6. (a) Nanosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectrum of C70-B-T upon excitation at 532 nm with a pulse laser (7 ns, 1 Hz) in deaerated toluene at room temperature. (b) Decay of C70-B-T at 700 nm. (c) Nanosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectrum of C70-1 upon excitation at 532 nm with a pulse laser (7 ns, 1 Hz) in deaerated toluene at room temperature. (d) Decay of C70-1 at 700 nm. Arrows indicate the spectral trend with time increasing.
Molecules 26 01243 g006
Figure 7. Absorption spectral evolution for the photooxidation of DHN using (a) C70-1, (b) B-T and (c) C70-B-T as sensitizers. (d) Plots of ln[(A − A′)/A0] vs. irradiation time (t) for the photooxidation of DHN using different sensitizers (collected at 301 nm). c[sensitizers] = 1.0 × 10−5 mol L−1, c[DHN] = 1.0 × 10−4 mol L−1. In CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1, v/v). A, A′, and A0 were the absorbances at 301 nm, where A was the absorption of DHN and sensitizer, A′ was the absorption of sensitizer, A0 was the initial absorption of DHN.
Figure 7. Absorption spectral evolution for the photooxidation of DHN using (a) C70-1, (b) B-T and (c) C70-B-T as sensitizers. (d) Plots of ln[(A − A′)/A0] vs. irradiation time (t) for the photooxidation of DHN using different sensitizers (collected at 301 nm). c[sensitizers] = 1.0 × 10−5 mol L−1, c[DHN] = 1.0 × 10−4 mol L−1. In CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1, v/v). A, A′, and A0 were the absorbances at 301 nm, where A was the absorption of DHN and sensitizer, A′ was the absorption of sensitizer, A0 was the initial absorption of DHN.
Molecules 26 01243 g007
Table 1. Characteristic spectroscopic data of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene and THF a.
Table 1. Characteristic spectroscopic data of C70-1, B-T and C70-B-T in toluene and THF a.
CompoundSolventλabs (nm)λem (nm)ΦF b
Ex. = 339 nmEx. = 605 nm
C70-1toluene284, 307, 398, 462, 537, 666 710--
THF----
B-Ttoluene330, 443, 603 6640.290.22
THF-668-0.01
C70-B-Ttoluene284, 310, 344, 443, 6006640.030.04
THF-666-0.005
a c = 1.0 × 10−5 M. b Using (4-((trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)phenyl)-BODIPY as reference, ΦF = 0.46 in CHCl3, λexc 484 nm [53].
Table 2. The photooxidation rate constant and yield of singlet oxygen of the photosensitizers a.
Table 2. The photooxidation rate constant and yield of singlet oxygen of the photosensitizers a.
Photosensitizerskobs b/min−1υi cΦ d
C70-B-T67.56.750.78
C70-145.94.590.81 e
B-T2.00.2-
MB44.84.480.57
a In CH2Cl2/CH3OH = 9:1 (v/v). c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L. b The rate constant kobs was calculated by the rule: ln[(A − A′)/A0] = −kobst. In 10−3 min−1. c Initial consumption rate of DHN, υi = kobs[DHN]. In 10−6 M min−1. d Quantum yield of singlet oxygen (1O2), with MB as standard (Φ = 0.57 in CH2Cl2). e Literature values [32].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, S.-E.; Zhang, J.-H.; Gong, Y.; Dou, L.-F.; Mao, L.-H.; Lu, H.-D.; Wei, C.-X.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.-F.; Yang, W. Broadband Visible Light-Absorbing [70]Fullerene-BODIPY-Triphenylamine Triad: Synthesis and Application as Heavy Atom-Free Organic Triplet Photosensitizer for Photooxidation. Molecules 2021, 26, 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051243

AMA Style

Zhu S-E, Zhang J-H, Gong Y, Dou L-F, Mao L-H, Lu H-D, Wei C-X, Chen H, Wang X-F, Yang W. Broadband Visible Light-Absorbing [70]Fullerene-BODIPY-Triphenylamine Triad: Synthesis and Application as Heavy Atom-Free Organic Triplet Photosensitizer for Photooxidation. Molecules. 2021; 26(5):1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, San-E, Jian-Hui Zhang, Yu Gong, Li-Feng Dou, Li-Hua Mao, Hong-Dian Lu, Chun-Xiang Wei, Hong Chen, Xue-Fei Wang, and Wei Yang. 2021. "Broadband Visible Light-Absorbing [70]Fullerene-BODIPY-Triphenylamine Triad: Synthesis and Application as Heavy Atom-Free Organic Triplet Photosensitizer for Photooxidation" Molecules 26, no. 5: 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051243

APA Style

Zhu, S. -E., Zhang, J. -H., Gong, Y., Dou, L. -F., Mao, L. -H., Lu, H. -D., Wei, C. -X., Chen, H., Wang, X. -F., & Yang, W. (2021). Broadband Visible Light-Absorbing [70]Fullerene-BODIPY-Triphenylamine Triad: Synthesis and Application as Heavy Atom-Free Organic Triplet Photosensitizer for Photooxidation. Molecules, 26(5), 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051243

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop