Next Article in Journal
β-Boswellic Acid Inhibits RANKL-Induced Osteoclast Differentiation and Function by Attenuating NF-κB and Btk-PLCγ2 Signaling Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Approximate Atomic Green Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zerumbone Inhibits Helicobacter pylori Urease Activity

1
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Korea
2
Division of Crop Foundation, National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju 55365, Korea
3
School of Oriental Medicine and Bio Convergence Sciences, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Korea
4
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2663; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092663
Submission received: 19 March 2021 / Revised: 28 April 2021 / Accepted: 30 April 2021 / Published: 1 May 2021

Abstract

:
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) produces urease in order to improve its settlement and growth in the human gastric epithelium. Urease inhibitors likely represent potentially powerful therapeutics for treating H. pylori; however, their instability and toxicity have proven problematic in human clinical trials. In this study, we investigate the ability of a natural compound extracted from Zingiber zerumbet Smith, zerumbone, to inhibit the urease activity of H. pylori by formation of urease dimers, trimers, or tetramers. As an oxygen atom possesses stronger electronegativity than the first carbon atom bonded to it, in the zerumbone structure, the neighboring second carbon atom shows a relatively negative charge (δ) and the next carbon atom shows a positive charge (δ+), sequentially. Due to this electrical gradient, it is possible that H. pylori urease with its negative charges (such as thiol radicals) might bind to the β-position carbon of zerumbone. Our results show that zerumbone dimerized, trimerized, or tetramerized with both H. pylori urease A and urease B molecules, and that this formation of complex inhibited H. pylori urease activity. Although zerumbone did not affect either gene transcription or the protein expression of urease A and urease B, our study demonstrated that zerumbone could effectively dimerize with both urease molecules and caused significant functional inhibition of urease activity. In short, our findings suggest that zerumbone may be an effective H. pylori urease inhibitor that may be suitable for therapeutic use in humans.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

According to the WHO in 2018, gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related morbidity [1]. Among certain factors responsible for the high gastric cancer rate, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a common cause and prevalent in East-Asian countries, including South Korea, Japan and China [2]. To eradicate H. pylori infection in South Korea, physicians have adopted a standard triple therapy that typically includes one proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antimicrobial agents administered over the course of 10–14 days [3,4]. Unfortunately, antibiotic resistance has become more prevalent over time and has resulted in a failure to eradicate H. pylori in South Korea. In particular, clarithromycin resistance has greatly increased in Asia, starting at 15.28% in 2009 and advancing to 32.46% by 2014 [5].
Urease is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into carbon dioxide (CO2) and ammonia (NH3) [6]. H. pylori urease exists as a heterodimer of the structural subunits urease A (UreA) and urease B (UreB), which are arranged in a dodecameric ((AB)3)4 structure with two nickel ions (Ni2+) bound by each urease dimer [7]. The catalytic activity of urease only becomes active after nickel is inserted into the active site of the urease B subunit by the action of four accessory proteins (urease D–G) [8,9]. H. pylori can survive in hostile pH conditions due to its abundant secretion of urease, and despite not being an acidophile [6], can reach and colonize the gastric mucosa in humans [10].
Zerumbone is a major constituent of the tropical zingiberaceous plant Zingiber zerumbet (also known as shampoo ginger) [11]. The rhizomes, which contain large amounts of zerumbone, have been used as an anti-inflammatory folk medicine in Southeast Asia as far back as the early second century [12]. Zerumbone is well-known for its pharmacological activities which include antioxidant [13], anti-inflammatory [14] and anti-cancer effects [15]. Vishwanatha et al. reported the antimicrobial activity of zerumbone against Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Aspergillus oryza, and A. niger [16]. The antibacterial effect of zerumbone against H. pylori has been reported by Sidahmed et al., but only the results for the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) were studied in any real detail [17]. Herein, we investigated the effects of zerumbone on the protein expression of virulence factors (including CagA) in H. pylori via two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) analysis [18]. Additionally, we investigated the effects of zerumbone on urease activity, which is known to be essential for H. pylori survival in vitro.

2. Results

2.1. Confirmation of the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of Zerumbone

H. pylori strain 60190 was inoculated into Mueller–Hinton agar containing 10% bovine serum and zerumbone at various concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM, Figure 1A). As Figure 1A shows, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 50 μM in agar (Figure 1A). H. pylori was also cultured in Mueller–Hinton broth containing 10% bovine serum and varying concentrations of zerumbone for 3 days (Figure 1B); the MIC of zerumbone in the broth dilution was 100 μM (* p < 0.05, Figure 1B). We found a relatively lower inhibitory concentration in the agar dilution than in the broth dilution method. Therefore, we determined the concentration of zerumbone below the MIC appropriate to measure urease activity through repeated preliminary experiments; 20 μM of condition to the maximum.

2.2. The Expression of Urease A and Urease B after Zerumbone Treatment

H. pylori was treated with varying concentrations of zerumbone in a broth culture (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM). After three days, RT-PCR was performed for bacterial RNA and the transcription levels of the ureA and ureB genes were found to be unchanged under all conditions. The UDP-galactose 4 epimerase gene (galE) was utilized as an internal control (Figure 2A). We also performed Western blot analysis using anti-H. pylori urease antibodies in order to analyze the expression levels of urease A and urease B; no quantitative changes in the expressions of either protein were detected (Figure 2B). Anti-H. pylori whole antibodies were used as an internal control and were designed by our lab as previously published (see Materials and Methods). These whole antibodies were utilized to compare the relative change of urease A and urease B to other proteins (Figure 2B).

2.3. Zerumbone Inhibited H. pylori Urease Activity

Urease activity was determined by measuring ammonia production using the indophenol method. H. pylori was cultured and treated with either 0, 5, 10, or 20 μM zerumbone concentrations. Urease activity was found to decrease in a dose-dependent manner (* p < 0.05) to 56%, 66%, and 73% of the untreated control, respectively (Figure 3).

2.4. Urease Submolecules (Urease A and Urease B) Formed a Dimer, Trimer, or Tetramer with Zerumbone

Using the same culture and zerumbone treatment conditions as above, cultured supernatant was collected and concentrated before being utilized for the analysis of secretory urease protein expression. As SDS-free reagents were required to prevent the decomposition of the zerumbone–urease dimers, a native-PAGE process was used for this experiment (Figure 4). The expression of urease A protein (26 kDa) showed almost no change or slightly decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4A). On the other hand, anti-urease A antibody-positive proteins were detected around 52 and 78 kDa, which is between two and three times the size of urease A (Figure 4A). Urease B also showed dimerization and tetramerization with zerumbone (Figure 4B). Anti-urease B antibody-positive proteins were also detected around 122 and 244 kDa, which is once again about two to four times the size of urease B (Figure 4B).

3. Discussion

H. pylori produces an abundant amount of urease in order to neutralize the acidic gastric environment via the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide [6]. Although it is commonly thought that H. pylori favors an acidic environment, it did not exhibit sufficient viability in low pH conditions in our preliminary experiments (Supplementary Data 1). Viable H. pylori 60190 cells should secrete urease, but when grown in a pH range between 2~6, H. pylori could not survive or produce sufficient urease to increase the environmental pH (Supplementary Data 1). This suggests that H. pylori prefers a neutral pH, and thus the function of urease is pivotal for the settlement and growth of H. pylori.
The current study has confirmed that zerumbone possesses anti-urease activity. Although both the transcription of ureA and ureB genes and the expressions of urease A and urease B proteins were not affected by zerumbone treatment (Figure 2), zerumbone showed significant inhibitory effects on H. pylori urease activity. Urease activity dropped to 56%, 66%, and 73% of the control in a dose-dependent manner, as shown in Figure 3 (* p < 0.05). The structural characteristics of zerumbone are likely responsible for these actions.
In this study, we investigated the ability of a natural compound extracted from Zingiber zerumbet Smith, zerumbone to inhibit the urease activity of H. pylori by formation of urease-dimers, trimers, or tetramers (Figure 4A,B). As the oxygen atom possesses stronger electronegativity than the first carbon atom bonded to it, in the zerumbone structure, the neighboring second carbon atom at α-position shows a relatively negative charge (δ), and the next carbon atom at β-position shows a positive charge (δ+), sequentially (Figure 5). Due to this electrical gradient, it is possible that H. pylori urease with its negative charges (such as thiol radicals) might bind to the β-position carbon of zerumbone (Figure 6). Zerumbone exhibits electrical properties based on the above principles and it is believed that it inhibits the activity of urease by forming dimers, trimers, or tetramers with ureases by combining with the -SH radicals present on H. pylori urease molecules (Figure 6) [19]. Thus, we thought that the dimerization or more competitive bindings were found in Figure 4A,B.
Our experimental procedures involved numerous trials and errors. The electrical features possessed by zerumbone potentially created the conditions to allow other sulfuric radicals to bind to the β-position carbon. With that in mind, ethanol was used instead of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) when dissolving zerumbone. In addition, since SDS could potentially decompose the zerumbone–urease dimer, reagents containing SDS were excluded from all assays. In our results, we could successfully detect the formation of dimer, trimer, or tetramer through zerumbone with both urease A and urease B. In Figure 4A, urease A-specific antibody bindings of the sizes considered to be 26, 52 and 78 kDa were observed. In the case of urease B, it was possible to confirm the binding of urease B-specific antibodies, which were considered to be 61, 122, and 244 kDa, as shown in Figure 4B. These are evidence of the formation of dimers, trimers, or tetramers by zerumbone.
Urease is one of the primary etiological agents in many Gram-negative bacteria (Proteus vulgaris, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca) and has also been identified in one Gram-positive bacterium (Staphylococcus saprophyticus) [20,21,22]. Over the preceding decades, numerous synthetic compounds have been investigated as potential urease inhibitors; unfortunately, most of these compounds were too unstable or toxic to use in humans [23,24]. Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) is a well-known urease inhibitor and has been used to treat urinary tract infections, where it works by preventing urine alkalization [25,26]. However, as noted with many of the other previously developed compounds, AHA had severe side effects such as teratogenicity [27] as well as causing psychoneurological and musculo-integumentary symptoms [28,29]. Therefore, the search for novel and useful urease inhibitors continues. In this study, we found that zerumbone effectively inhibited urease activity via dimerization, trimerization, or tetramerization with the H. pylori urease subunits. Given this mechanism of action, zerumbone may represent a potentially useful urease inhibitor that does not cause the wide range of side effects seen in previous compounds. Now, we are preparing in vivo application using H. pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Culture and Determination of MIC

The H. pylori reference strain ATCC 49503 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). H. pylori was grown on Brucella agar plates (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 10% bovine serum (BRL Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) under microaerophilic and 100 percent humidity conditions at 37 °C and inspected after 3 to 5 days. For the agar dilution test, 10 μL of the H. pylori suspension (McFarland 2.0) was placed on the Mueller–Hinton agar (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 10% bovine serum including various concentrations of zerumbone. For the broth dilution test, zerumbone was added with H. pylori (McFarland 0.5) in Mueller–Hinton broth (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 72 h before the final optical density (600 nm) of the bacterial suspension was measured via spectrophotometry. In order to determine the MIC, bacteria were exposed to various concentrations of zerumbone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in culture with Mueller–Hinton agar and broth (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) containing 10% bovine serum for 3 days. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined based on the lowest concentration that resulted in growth inhibition. Zerumbone was dissolved in an ethanol solvent, not dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), in order to exclude the possibility of zerumbone binding with sulfur (S). For the vehicle control group, equal volumes of ethanol were administrated into cultures.

4.2. RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

H. pylori was grown in Muller–Hinton broth with the indicated concentrations of zerumbone (5, 10 and 20 μM) for 72 h. Cultured H. pylori were then washed twice with sterile saline and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described in the manufacturer’s instructions. GalE (UDP-galactose 4-epimerase) was used an internal control. The PCR primer sequences used in this study are as follows: ureA-F, 5′-GCCAATGGTAAATTAGTT-3′; ureA-R, 5′-CTCCTTAATTGTTTTTAC-3′; ureB-F, 5′-TCTATCCCTACCCCACAACC-3′; ureB-R, 5′-CCATCCACGAACACATGGTA-3′; galE-F, 5′-ATGGCATTATTATTCACAGG-3′; galE-R, GCTCCATAAGGATTAATGGG-3′.

4.3. Protein Extraction and Western Blot

H. pylori cultured with zerumbone for 72 h was lysed with radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail. The cell lysates were then incubated on ice for 10 min, centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min, and finally the supernatants were collected. Protein samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane over 90 min at 400 mA. For native-PAGE, a 6.5% (w/v) separating gel in 7.5 pH Tris-HCl buffer and a 3% (w/v) stacking gel in 5.5 pH Tris-phosphate acid buffer were prepared [30]. The protein sample was dissolved in native sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, and 0.1% bromophenol blue) without boiling and loaded onto the native-PAGE gel. A total of 0.01 M Tris-Barbital was used as the electrode buffer (pH 7.0) and electrophoresis was conducted at a constant voltage (100 V) at 4 °C until the sample reached the end of gel after 4–5 h. The protein bands were then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane for 90 min at 400 mA. Antibodies to detect urease A and urease B were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA) and the polyclonal antibody against whole H. pylori (ATCC 49503) was produced as previously described [31].

4.4. Urease Activity Test

Supernatants from the H. pylori cultured with zerumbone for 72 h were collected. An amount of 5 μL of 20% urea (Duksan Pure Chemical, South Korea) was added and incubated at 37 °C. After 10 min, the amount of ammonia was measured by an ammonia assay kit (Asan Pharmaceutical, Seoul, South Korea). Briefly, 400 μL of deproteinization solution was added, vortexed, and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min. An amount of 100 μL of supernatant was mixed with 100 μL of phenol (40 g/L), 50 μL of sodium hydroxide (35.6 g/L) and 100 μL of sodium hypochlorite (10%) and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The absorbance was measured at 630 nm wavelength using NanoQuant Infinite M200.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Data in the bar graphs are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All the data were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test and a p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: H. pylori could not survive and secret sufficient urease in acidic environments (pH 2~6).

Author Contributions

H.J.W. carried out all the experiments. J.Y.Y. wrote the manuscript and performed the analyses. P.L. aided in interpreting the results. J.-B.K. conceived the study and was in charge of overall direction. S.-H.K. oversaw the manuscript, designed the figures, and supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and Forestry (IPET) through the Future Innovation Food Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (119023-3) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Sciences and ICT) (No. 2019R1G1A1100451).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Savoldi, A.; Carrara, E.; Graham, D.Y.; Conti, M.; Tacconelli, E. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in World Health Organization Regions. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1372–1382.e1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Vilaichone, R.K.; Mahachai, V.; Shiota, S.; Uchida, T.; Ratanachu-ek, T.; Tshering, L.; Tung, N.L.; Fujioka, T.; Moriyama, M.; Yamaoka, Y. Extremely high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Bhutan. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 2806–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, S.Y.; Jung, S.W. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Korea. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 58, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chey, W.D.; Leontiadis, G.I.; Howden, C.W.; Moss, S.F. ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 112, 212–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ghotaslou, R.; Leylabadlo, H.E.; Asl, Y.M. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A recent literature review. World J. Methodol. 2015, 5, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kusters, J.G.; van Vliet, A.H.; Kuipers, E.J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 449–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Blum, F.C.; Hu, H.Q.; Servetas, S.L.; Benoit, S.L.; Maier, R.J.; Maroney, M.J.; Merrell, D.S. Structure-function analyses of metal-binding sites of HypA reveal residues important for hydrogenase maturation in Helicobacter pylori. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mobley, H.L. The role of Helicobacter pylori Urease in the pathogenesis of gastritis and peptic ulceration. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 10, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Voland, P.; Weeks, D.L.; Marcus, E.A.; Prinz, C.; Sachs, G.; Scott, D. Interactions among the seven Helicobacter pylori proteins encoded by the Urease gene cluster. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003, 284, G96–G106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ansari, S.; Yamaoka, Y. Survival of Helicobacter pylori in gastric acidic territory. Helicobacter 2017, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kalantari, K.; Moniri, M.; Moghaddam, A.B.; Rahim, R.A.; Bin Ariff, A.; Izadiyan, Z.; Mohamad, R. A Review of the Biomedical Applications of Zerumbone and the Techniques for Its Extraction from Ginger Rhizomes. Molecules 2017, 22, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ohnishi, K.; Irie, K.; Murakami, A. In vitro covalent binding proteins of zerumbone, a chemopreventive food factor. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 1905–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rosa, A.; Caprioglio, D.; Isola, R.; Nieddu, M.; Appendino, G.; Falchi, A.M. Dietary zerumbone from shampoo ginger: New insights into its antioxidant and anticancer activity. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 1629–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sulaiman, M.R.; Perimal, E.K.; Akhtar, M.N.; Mohamad, A.S.; Khalid, M.H.; Tasrip, N.A.; Mokhtar, F.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Lajis, N.H.; Israf, D.A. Anti-inflammatory effect of zerumbone on acute and chronic inflammation models in mice. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Girisa, S.; Shabnam, B.; Monisha, J.; Fan, L.; Halim, C.E.; Arfuso, F.; Ahn, K.S.; Sethi, G.; Kunnumakkara, A.B. Potential of Zerumbone as an Anti-Cancer Agent. Molecules 2019, 24, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Vishwantha, H.N.; Niraguna Babu, P.; Gowrishankar, B.S.; Shridhar, S.B. Antimicrobial activity of Zerumbone from Zingiber zurumbet against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Aspergillus spp. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. 2012, 3, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sidahmed, H.M.; Hashim, N.M.; Abdulla, M.A.; Ali, H.M.; Mohan, S.; Abdelwahab, S.I.; Taha, M.M.; Fai, L.M.; Vadivelu, J. Antisecretory, gastroprotective, antioxidant and anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of zerumbone from Zingiber zerumbet (L.) Smith. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kim, S.-H. Comparative Proteome Analysis of Zerumbone-treated Helicobacter pylori. Korean J. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2018, 50, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, S.H.; Lee, Y.J.; Seo, W.D.; Lee, H.J.; Nam, J.W.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, J.; Seo, E.K.; Lee, Y.S. Altered cross-linking of HSP27 by zerumbone as a novel strategy for overcoming HSP27-mediated radioresistance. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011, 79, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marques, L.P.J.; Flores, J.T.; Junior, O.D.O.B.; Rodrigues, G.B.; Mourão, C.D.M.; Moreira, R.M.P. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of urinary tract infection in community-dwelling elderly women. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 16, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nielubowicz, G.R.; Mobley, H.L. Host-pathogen interactions in urinary tract infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010, 7, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raz, R.; Colodner, R.; Kunin, C.M. Who are you—Staphylococcus saprophyticus? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 40, 896–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kosikowska, P.; Lesner, A. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as drug candidates: A patent review (2003–2015). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2016, 26, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, L.; Mulrooney, S.B.; Leung, A.F.; Zeng, Y.; Ko, B.B.; Hausinger, R.P.; Sun, H. Inhibition of Urease by bismuth(III): Implications for the mechanism of action of bismuth drugs. Biometals 2006, 19, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Griffith, D.P.; Gibson, J.R.; Clinton, C.W.; Musher, D.M. Acetohydroxamic acid: Clinical studies of a Urease inhibitor in patients with staghorn renal calculi. J. Urol. 1978, 119, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Williams, J.J.; Rodman, J.S.; Peterson, C.M. A randomized double-blind study of acetohydroxamic acid in struvite nephrolithiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1984, 311, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bailie, N.C.; Osborne, C.A.; Leininger, J.R.; Fletcher, T.F.; Johnston, S.D.; Ogburn, P.N.; Griffith, D.P. Teratogenic effect of acetohydroxamic acid in clinically normal beagles. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1986, 47, 2604–2611. [Google Scholar]
  28. Griffith, D.P.; Gleeson, M.J.; Lee, H.; Longuet, R.; Deman, E.; Earle, N. Randomized, double-blind trial of Lithostat (acetohydroxamic acid) in the palliative treatment of infection-induced urinary calculi. Eur. Urol. 1991, 20, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Griffith, D.P.; Khonsari, F.; Skurnick, J.H.; James, K.E. A randomized trial of acetohydroxamic acid for the treatment and prevention of infection-induced urinary stones in spinal cord injury patients. J. Urol. 1988, 140, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, L.; Wang, S. Allophycocyanin complexes from the phycobilisome of a thermophilic blue-green alga Myxosarcina concinna Printz. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2003, 72, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sharma, S.A.; Tummuru, M.K.; Blaser, M.J.; Kerr, L.D. Activation of IL-8 gene expression by Helicobacter pylori is regulated by transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B in gastric epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 2401–2407. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Confirmation of minimal inhibitory concentration of zerumbone. (A) H. pylori 60190 was inoculated into Mueller–Hinton agar containing 10% bovine serum and zerumbone at various concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μM). (B) H. pylori 60190 (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was cultured in Mueller–Hinton broth containing 10% bovine serum and varying concentrations of zerumbone for 3 days (* p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Confirmation of minimal inhibitory concentration of zerumbone. (A) H. pylori 60190 was inoculated into Mueller–Hinton agar containing 10% bovine serum and zerumbone at various concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μM). (B) H. pylori 60190 (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was cultured in Mueller–Hinton broth containing 10% bovine serum and varying concentrations of zerumbone for 3 days (* p < 0.05).
Molecules 26 02663 g001
Figure 2. The expressions of urease A and urease B were not affected by zerumbone treatment. (A) H. pylori was cultured in broth with varying concentrations of zerumbone (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM). RT-PCR was performed and the transcription levels of ureA and ureB genes were unchanged regardless of treatment. UDP-galactose 4 epimerase gene (galE) was utilized as a control. (B) Western blot analysis was performed using anti-H. pylori urease antibodies; the expression levels of urease A and urease B were found to be unchanged. To establish a control for comparing the relative change of urease A and urease B with other proteins, we utilized anti-H. pylori whole internal protein antibodies.
Figure 2. The expressions of urease A and urease B were not affected by zerumbone treatment. (A) H. pylori was cultured in broth with varying concentrations of zerumbone (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM). RT-PCR was performed and the transcription levels of ureA and ureB genes were unchanged regardless of treatment. UDP-galactose 4 epimerase gene (galE) was utilized as a control. (B) Western blot analysis was performed using anti-H. pylori urease antibodies; the expression levels of urease A and urease B were found to be unchanged. To establish a control for comparing the relative change of urease A and urease B with other proteins, we utilized anti-H. pylori whole internal protein antibodies.
Molecules 26 02663 g002
Figure 3. Zerumbone inhibited H. pylori urease activity. Urease activity was determined by measuring ammonia production using the indophenol method. H. pylori was grown in culture and treated with 0, 5, 10, or 20 μM zerumbone. Urease activity was found to decrease in a dose-dependent manner to 56%, 66%, and 73% of the untreated control, respectively (* p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Zerumbone inhibited H. pylori urease activity. Urease activity was determined by measuring ammonia production using the indophenol method. H. pylori was grown in culture and treated with 0, 5, 10, or 20 μM zerumbone. Urease activity was found to decrease in a dose-dependent manner to 56%, 66%, and 73% of the untreated control, respectively (* p < 0.05).
Molecules 26 02663 g003
Figure 4. Both urease A and urease B formed dimers, trimers, or tetramers with zerumbone. A native-PAGE assay was performed using culture supernatant proteins. (A) The expression of urease A protein (26 kDa) showed almost no change or slightly decreased dose-dependently. On the other hand, anti-urease A antibody-positive proteins were detected around 52 kDa and 78 kDa, which is about two or three times the size of urease A. (B) Urease B also showed dimerization, trimerization, or tetramerization with zerumbone. Anti-urease B antibody-positive proteins were detected around 61 kDa, 121 kDa and 244 kDa, which is once again about twice to three times the size of urease B. (C) To establish a control for comparing the relative change of urease A and urease B with other proteins, anti-H. pylori whole protein antibodies were utilized.
Figure 4. Both urease A and urease B formed dimers, trimers, or tetramers with zerumbone. A native-PAGE assay was performed using culture supernatant proteins. (A) The expression of urease A protein (26 kDa) showed almost no change or slightly decreased dose-dependently. On the other hand, anti-urease A antibody-positive proteins were detected around 52 kDa and 78 kDa, which is about two or three times the size of urease A. (B) Urease B also showed dimerization, trimerization, or tetramerization with zerumbone. Anti-urease B antibody-positive proteins were detected around 61 kDa, 121 kDa and 244 kDa, which is once again about twice to three times the size of urease B. (C) To establish a control for comparing the relative change of urease A and urease B with other proteins, anti-H. pylori whole protein antibodies were utilized.
Molecules 26 02663 g004
Figure 5. The electrical structure activity relationship of zerumbone. Due to the difference in electronegativity between O and C, the β-position carbon has a positive charge (δ+).
Figure 5. The electrical structure activity relationship of zerumbone. Due to the difference in electronegativity between O and C, the β-position carbon has a positive charge (δ+).
Molecules 26 02663 g005
Figure 6. Hypothetical principle for the formation of urease–zerumbone dimer, trimer, and tetramer. Due to the electrical gradient of zerumbone’s structure, it is possible that H. pylori urease with its negative charges (such as thiol radicals) might bind to the β-position carbon of zerumbone, sequentially.
Figure 6. Hypothetical principle for the formation of urease–zerumbone dimer, trimer, and tetramer. Due to the electrical gradient of zerumbone’s structure, it is possible that H. pylori urease with its negative charges (such as thiol radicals) might bind to the β-position carbon of zerumbone, sequentially.
Molecules 26 02663 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Woo, H.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Lee, P.; Kim, J.-B.; Kim, S.-H. Zerumbone Inhibits Helicobacter pylori Urease Activity. Molecules 2021, 26, 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092663

AMA Style

Woo HJ, Yang JY, Lee P, Kim J-B, Kim S-H. Zerumbone Inhibits Helicobacter pylori Urease Activity. Molecules. 2021; 26(9):2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Woo, Hyun Jun, Ji Yeong Yang, Pyeongjae Lee, Jong-Bae Kim, and Sa-Hyun Kim. 2021. "Zerumbone Inhibits Helicobacter pylori Urease Activity" Molecules 26, no. 9: 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092663

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop