Next Article in Journal
Tribute to Professor Raphael Mechoulam, The Founder of Cannabinoid and Endocannabinoid Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Astaxanthin as a Modulator of Nrf2, NF-κB, and Their Crosstalk: Molecular Mechanisms and Possible Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Different Fruit-Specific Promoters Drive AtMYB12 Expression to Improve Phenylpropanoid Accumulation in Tomato
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Possible Strategies for Drug Modification of Gemcitabine and Future Contributions to Personalized Medicine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in the Development of Indole-Based Compounds Active against Malaria, Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis

by
Paulo A. F. Pacheco
and
Maria M. M. Santos
*
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(1), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010319
Submission received: 10 December 2021 / Revised: 31 December 2021 / Accepted: 1 January 2022 / Published: 5 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecules Medicinal Chemistry Reviews)

Abstract

:
Human protozoan diseases represent a serious health problem worldwide, affecting mainly people in social and economic vulnerability. These diseases have attracted little investment in drug discovery, which is reflected in the limited available therapeutic arsenal. Authorized drugs present problems such as low efficacy in some stages of the disease or toxicity, which result in undesirable side effects and treatment abandonment. Moreover, the emergence of drug-resistant parasite strains makes necessary an even greater effort to develop safe and effective antiparasitic agents. Among the chemotypes investigated for parasitic diseases, the indole nucleus has emerged as a privileged molecular scaffold for the generation of new drug candidates. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the indole-based compounds developed against important parasitic diseases, namely malaria, trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis, by focusing on the design, optimization and synthesis of the most relevant synthetic indole scaffolds recently reported.

1. Introduction

Although parasitic diseases, such as malaria, trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis, have been neglected for a long time, research interest and investments have intensified in recent years [1]. In fact, the elimination of these diseases is proposed as a priority in the third goal of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [2,3]. However, there is still a long way to go. Together, neglected diseases (NTDs) and malaria caused 747,000 deaths worldwide in 2019 and represented an estimated burden of about 62.9 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) [4]. Despite advances in control and prevention, it is estimated that these diseases still affect a large contingent of people in social and economic vulnerability, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. Moreover, human migration and climate changes have impacted the distribution and transmission pattern of some of these diseases, making them a public health problem also for more developed regions [5,6].
Among NTDs, trypanosomiasis and leishmaniosis are vector-borne diseases caused by protozoa of the class Kinetoplastea and family Trypanosomatidae, which includes different monoflagellated parasites [7]. The genus Trypanosoma is divided into two sections, depending on the mode of transmission: Salivaria (transmitted by saliva) and Stercoraria (transmitted by feces) [8]. Two examples of trypanosomes of medical importance are Trypanosoma cruzi (Stercoraria), the causative agent of Chagas disease (CD), and Trypanosoma brucei (Salivarian), which causes sleeping sickness. Both diseases are responsible for high mortality, morbidity and economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America [9,10].
Chagas disease, also known as American trypanosomiasis (AT), is a life-threatening zoonosis caused by the protozoan T. cruzi and that is endemic in 21 countries. It is transmitted to humans mainly by the bite of triatomine bugs or by ingestion of contaminated food [11,12]. Transmission can also occur in nonendemic areas by nonvectorial routes such as blood transfusions, congenital infection and organ transplantation [12,13]. The latest World Health Organization (WHO) reports estimate that 6 to 7 million people worldwide are infected with T. cruzi and another 75 million are at risk of infection due to under-diagnosis and inappropriate healthcare [14]. Since AT can be associated with progressive disability and early mortality, often in the most productive population, it also represents a serious economic burden in regions that already struggle with profound socioeconomic issues. The estimated global economic burden reaches USD 7.19 billion per year [7,15]. Despite AT having been discovered 112 years ago, AT treatment remains quite limited [16]. To date, there are only two available drugs, benznidazole (1) and nifurtimox (2) (Figure 1), approved for clinical use more than 50 years ago [17]. Since then, little progress has been made in this area. Both drugs have variable effectiveness, depending on the clinical stage of the disease. They are nearly 100% effective in curing or reducing parasitic burden in acute or early phases, in congenital cases and in reactivation in immunosuppressed patients [18]. However, their effectiveness is very restricted in chronic CD, and their advantages of use in these patients are still debatable [17]. These medications are also contraindicated during pregnancy or for people with renal or liver failure [17]. Furthermore, these drugs offer other inconveniences for chronic AT management such as requirement of high dosage and prolonged period of treatment to achieve therapeutic efficacy, resulting in a wide range of side effects and consequent therapy discontinuation [19,20]. In the case of nifurtimox, the low safety profile, due to the high risk of heart failure and gastrointestinal and neurological problems in prolonged treatment regimen, turned it a second-line option for AT in many endemic countries [21]. Another problem associated with the lack of therapeutic options for chronic patients is the need for adjunctive therapy for the management of cardiac, digestive or neurological complications [11].
Sleeping sickness, or human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), is another potentially disabling and fatal disease of medical and veterinary importance that is endemic in 36 sub-Saharan African countries [22,23]. This disease affects mainly rural populations in remote areas with very limited access to proper health assistance, which complicates the epidemiological surveillance scenario, diagnosis and treatment [24]. Although the sustained effort to control the disease has significantly impacted the disease incidence, the estimated population at risk accounts for 65 million people [24]. The main route of transmission is the bite of blood-sucking tsetse fly species (Glossina spp.) which makes HAT a focal disease [25]. The etiological agents are protozoa of two subspecies of Trypanosoma brucei, which cause different pathologies with specific epidemiology and geographical distribution: Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense [9]. T. b. gambiense has humans as main reservoir host and is transmitted by tsetse flies of the species Glossina palpalis. It is predominant in 24 countries in Western and Central Africa and causes a slow-progressing anthroponotic disease that can stay at an asymptomatic state for a long period [26]. This disease variant represents most of the reported HAT cases [24]. On the other hand, T. b. rhodesiense is transmitted to humans by tsetse flies of the Glossina morsitans group and is concentrated in 13 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa [24]. The main reservoir for T. b. rhodesiense is ungulates and cattle, with humans being occasional hosts, which makes this disease extremely difficult to eradicate [27]. For this reason, strategies for HAT eradication have focused on T. b. gambiense control [26,27]. The infection caused by T. b. rhodesiense manifests as a fast-progressing, acute and severe syndrome [28]. The clinical manifestation of HAT depends on different factors such as the parasite subspecies, host immune response or disease stage. In general, the disease progresses through two stages: a hemolymphatic stage, which is characterized by the proliferation and spread of trypanosomes within the blood and lymphatic system, followed by a meningoencephalitic stage, in which parasites cross the blood–brain barrier and invade the central nervous system [28]. Regardless of the parasite subspecies, if left untreated HAT can lead to coma and fatal outcome. As for American trypanosomiasis, HAT therapy relies on a limited set of drugs (Figure 2), most of them developed many years ago and presenting a certain degree of toxicity [29]. The most critical example is the melarsoprol (5), an organic arsenical drug used for treatment of second-stage T. b. rhodesiense disease, which can lead to encephalopathic syndrome in 5–18% of treated patients and to fatality in 3–10% [30]. Another complicating factor in the treatment of HAT is the route of administration of these drugs, mostly parenteral, which creates logistical difficulties in regions with scarce health infrastructure [28]. Therefore, a drug preferably oral, safe and effective for late-stage disease is highly necessary to achieve the goal of HAT eradication.
Other kinetoplastid diseases that have been long neglected in terms of chemotherapy development are the leishmaniases. They consist of a complex group of parasitic diseases that are caused by intracellular flagellate protozoa of the genus Leishmania and have multiple clinical manifestations [31]. To date, over 20 species of Leishmania parasites, from the subgenera Leishmania and Viannia, have been identified as infective for humans [32]. In general, they are divided into Old and New World parasites, according to their geographic dispersion [33]. The main mode of transmission is the bite of hematophagous phlebotomine sand flies (mainly of the genera Phlebotomus and Lutzomyia) [34]. Leishmaniases have virtually global distribution, being present in almost 100 countries and endemic in Africa, the Americas, Asia and the Mediterranean region [31]. An estimated 700,000 to 1 million new cases occur worldwide annually [35]. The strict association with poverty and its sociopolitical implications (e.g., malnutrition, poor housing or population displacement) has relegated these diseases to a considerable underdevelopment regarding new diagnostic methods and effective and safe chemotherapeutic agents [36]. Despite the diversity of causative agents, the clinical manifestations can be categorized into three main forms, cutaneous leishmaniasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis (also known as kala-azar), that will differ in severity and geographical occurrence [37]. The cutaneous form is caused by the so-called Old World Leishmania species, such as L. major, L. tropica and L. aethiopica, or New World species such as L. amazonensis, L. mexicana, L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis. It is characterized by self-healing diffuse ulcerations on skin that can leave permanent scars, disability and social stigma [33,38]. Some patients infected with parasites from Viannia subgenus (i.e., L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis) can also evolve to the mucocutaneous form, which is characterized by disfiguring lesions in the face and destruction of mucous tissues in the mouth and nose [33]. The visceral leishmaniasis, caused by the Old World species L. infantum (syn. L. chagasi) and L. donovani, is the most lethal form, since it provokes serious dysfunctions in several organs, such as liver, spleen and bone marrow [33,39]. Unlike the other forms, visceral leishmaniasis presents high lethality in the absence of treatment [33,39]. In addition, coinfection with HIV even further complicates the management of visceral leishmaniasis [40]. Although the chemotherapy for leishmaniasis is more diverse than that for other kinetoplastid diseases, it suffers from the same limitations such as prolonged and high-cost treatment, low therapeutic index, leading to side effects, treatment discontinuation and reported emergence of drug resistance [20,31,33]. The first-line treatments for leishmaniasis (Figure 3) are pentavalent antimonials (e.g., sodium stibogluconate (8) and meglumine antimoniate (9)), but other alternatives such as pentamidine (3), miltefosine (10), ketoconazole (11), amphotericin B (12) and paromomycin (13) can be used [41]. It is important to highlight that none of these medications were designed specifically for leishmaniasis treatment and the need for new chemotherapeutic alternatives is high.
In the absence of approved human vaccines to combat these groups of diverse kinetoplastid diseases, the control and eradication effort still relies largely on the use of small molecules targeting these parasites. Furthermore, vaccine development for protozoan diseases itself is a very challenging task due to the high diversity and complex nature of the parasites and host response [42,43]. An exception in this scenario is the recently approved RTS,S malaria vaccine targeting the deadly parasite Plasmodium falciparum, recommended for children in sub-Saharan Africa and in other regions of moderate or high malaria transmission [44]. Although it represents a breakthrough and paradigm shift in malaria control, some obstacles, such as a modest efficacy and complex dose regimen, still need to be addressed before the total success of reducing the burden of disease [45].
In this sense, the use of antimalarial drugs remains an essential tool to mitigate the burden of malaria. Despite some progress in control and prevention of this disease, malaria remains one of the most relevant parasitic diseases regarding morbidity and mortality worldwide [46]. It is estimated that half of the world population is at risk from Malaria. In 2019, there were an estimated 229 million cases of malaria in 87 endemic countries, with 94% of cases concentrated in the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region [46]. The malaria death rate (i.e., deaths/100,000 population at risk) has decreased between 2000 and 2019, but the rate of decline is experiencing a deceleration in recent years [46]. According to the latest WHO malaria report, the disease was responsible for 409,000 deaths globally (95% of them concentrated in only 31 countries) [46]. Malaria can be caused by six species of Plasmodium parasites [47]. Among them, P. vivax and P. falciparum are the most epidemiologically relevant species [48]. In the case of P. falciparum infection, lack of treatment can lead to severe illness and death [49]. In Figure 4, the available drugs for the treatment of malaria patients and the different options of combination therapies are presented. The existence of parasite strains of both species that are resistant to most conventional drug treatments is well established in several endemic areas [50,51,52,53]. Because of this, the best recommended treatment, particularly for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, involves the combination of a short-acting artemisinin derivative with one or more partner drugs with long-lasting effects and different mechanisms of action [54]. This regimen is known as artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) [54,55]. However, there have been reports of the emergence of Plasmodium strains resistant to artemisinin, which poses a great threat to all achievements in the combat against malaria in recent decades [56]. Therefore, it is urgently necessary to develop new antimalarial agents based on different chemical scaffolds and targeting multiple stages of parasite development to prevent the development of cross-resistance between similar chemical families.
In this regard, the indole moiety has long proven to be one of the most promising chemotypes for the development of new and effective antiparasitic drugs [57]. In the following sections, we discuss the recent advances in the medicinal chemistry of indole-based compounds targeting these three relevant parasitic diseases.

2. Recent Development of Indole-Based Small Molecules Targeting Malaria, Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis

2.1. Indole Derivatives with Antiplasmodial Activity

Several good reviews have been published in recent years that are focused on indole derivatives, mainly natural products, with antimalarial activity [58,59,60,61,62]. For this reason, in this section, we only focus on the most relevant indole synthetic derivatives reported in the last decade.
In 2012, a SAR study for the indoloisoquinoline template, present in the natural product dihydrousambarensine, was reported. Several compounds derived from L- or D-tryptophan were prepared and evaluated against the Dd2 chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum strain. Optimization by chemical modification of the indole nitrogen, the hydroxymethyl substituent and the lactam ring led to three compounds with low micromolar activity (Figure 5). Results showed that (i) compounds derived from D-tryptophan were more active, (ii) aromatic groups were preferred on the indole nitrogen and (iii) introduction of allyl at the hydroxymethyl and at the piperidone ring led to an increase in activity [63].
In 2015, a novel class of indole-based compounds (indolizinoindolones) with in vitro activity against blood- and liver-stage malaria parasites was developed. The rationale was to merge the isoindolinone and indole moieties in the same scaffold and evaluate the effect on antiplasmodial activity. The enantiopure target indolizinoindolones were synthesized by cyclocondensation reaction of (S)- or (R)-tryptophanol and 2-acyl benzoic acids, followed by Pictet–Spengler cyclization. Starting from (S)-tryptophanol, only the 7S,13bR stereoisomer was detectable by NMR spectroscopy. However, cyclocondensation of (S)-tryptophanol with 2-formylbenzoic acid led directly to 7S,13bS stereoisomer (Scheme 1). The effect on activity of hydroxymethyl O-protection and indole N-protection was also evaluated [64].
The synthesized indolizinoindolones showed activities in the low micromolar range against erythrocytic stages of the human malaria parasite P. falciparum (chloroquine-resistant W2 strain) and liver stages of the rodent parasite Plasmodium berghei [64]. Protection of the indole nitrogen atom with a benzyl group had a small impact on activity, and most compounds derived from (S)-tryptophanol were more active than the corresponding enantiomers derived from (R)-tryptophanol [64]. The substitution of the isoindolinone moiety with a pyrrolidone group resulted in a loss of activity, indicating that the isoindolinone probably is relevant for activity. The (S)-tryptophanol-derived isoindolinones 48a and 48b were the most active derivatives, combining excellent activity against both stages of Plasmodium’s life-cycle with IC50 values in the low micromolar range, having low cytotoxicity against human liver cell line and good metabolic and chemical stability (Scheme 1) [64].
The indolo[3,2-b]quinoline alkaloid cryptolepine is a natural product with antimalarial activity; it binds to heme and inhibits hemozoin formation inside the parasite digestive vacuole. To optimize the activity of this natural product, bis-alkylamine indolo[3,2-b]quinolines were synthesized and evaluated against chloroquine-resistant and sensitive strains of P. falciparum. The synthetic process to obtain the bisalkylamines (Scheme 2) started with the reaction between anthranilic acids and bromoacetyl bromide, followed by nucleophilic substitution using the appropriate aniline. Bicyclization, promoted by polyphosphoric acid (PPA), afforded the corresponding quindolones, which were then reacted with different chloroalkylamines in the presence of sodium carbonate and sodium iodide. The most active compound, a N10,O11-bis-alkylamine indolo[3,2-b]quinoline derivative, presented IC50 values of 25 and 156 nM for PfW2 and Pf3D7, respectively, and LD50 values of 39.9 and 23.3 µM for PfDd2 and Pf3D7, respectively. SAR studies showed that lipophilicity and a chlorine at C3 increased cytostatic and cytocidal activities for this scaffold. Moreover, the compounds bind to hematin monomer, inhibiting β-hematin formation and delaying intraerythrocytic parasite development [65].
Following this work, the same authors developed a series of N10,N11-di-alkylamine bioisosteres (Scheme 2), with the rationale that replacement of the oxygen atom by a NH group would increase the basicity of the quinoline nitrogen, leading to improved accumulation in the digestive vacuole by a pH-trap mechanism. Results showed that the compounds exhibited selectivity for malaria parasite compared to human cells, with IC50 values against P. falciparum W2 strain in the nanomolar range, and showed improved vacuolar accumulation ratios [66].
In 2015, the same authors developed 38 3-piperidin-4-yl-1H-indoles to be tested as antimalarials, based on the hit TCMDC-134281 that emerged in the GSK HTS whole-cell screen against P. falciparum to identify novel indole-based antimalarials. Condensation of indole with N-benzyl-4-piperidone in the presence of KOH, followed by debenzylation and olefin reduction, afforded the common intermediate 3-piperidin-4-yl-1H-indole (Scheme 3). Reductive amination of the amine intermediate with the corresponding aldehyde led to the synthesis of compounds with N-piperidinyl modifications. The amide derivatives, prepared to evaluate the importance of the basic amine versus an amide linkage, were prepared by coupling the amine intermediate with acyl chlorides/carboxylic acids or through a nucleophilic substitution with 4,6-dichloroquinoline (67). The SAR study showed that the 4-aminoquinolinyl moiety can be replaced by smaller groups without much of an effect on the activity. Only three compounds were active, and of these, only one showed antimalarial activity against drug-resistant and sensitive strains, selectivity for malaria parasite and no cross-resistance with chloroquine [67].
Melatonin analogs 68 were tested against 3D7 P. falciparum strain. The results showed that compounds with a hydrogen instead of a methoxy (R substituent) and with chain elongation of the amino group lead to a decrease P. falciparum cell cycle modulation. Compound 69 inhibited the P. falciparum growth in the low micromolar range, displaying an IC50 value of 2.93 µM (Figure 6) [68].
To expand a previous SAR study regarding a novel class of indole-based compounds with promising antimalarial activity (representative compounds 70 and 71, Figure 7), Lunga et al. designed a library of 20 derivatives, using a bioisosteric replacement approach and combinations of promising substituents. Results showed that the replacement of the thiocarbonyl group with an α-oxo carbonyl group was well tolerated, although the sulfur analogs exhibited superior performance in terms of parasite growth inhibition. Another structural trend that proved to be beneficial in terms of activity was the presence of electron-withdrawing groups at the phenyl ring substituent (although it seemed to have size restriction). Regarding the C-5 substitution, hydrophobicity appears to be more significant than the electron-withdrawing nature, with chlorine atom generating the best results. From this study, Lunga et al. identified two analogs, 72a and 72b, with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range against 3D7 P. falciparum strain. In addition, these compounds proved to be nonhemolytic and nontoxic against the HeLa cell line [69].
Re-engineering of the indole alkaloid yohimbine (73) through ring rearrangement and ring cleavage synthesis pathways led to a new class of antiplasmodial agents (Figure 8). The most active compound (74d) presented an IC50 of 1.60 µM against chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum Dd2 strain and was selective over HepG2 cells (CC50 = 18.9 µM) [70].
More recently, a series of bisindolylcyclobutenediones (Scheme 4), analogs of the bisindolylmaleimide protein kinase inhibitors, were designed in order to obtain plasmodial kinase inhibitors. Based on the results of docking into the ATP binding pockets of some plasmodial protein kinases, some compounds were synthesized and evaluated against transgenic NF54-luc P. falciparum parasites. Most derivatives showed submicromolar activity, and some displayed some selectivity against the human cell line THP-1. The most active compounds did not inhibit the plasmodial protein kinase PfGSK-3, so further studies are required to elucidate the mechanism of action of these compounds and to design derivatives with optimized aqueous solubility [71].
NITD609 was obtained by optimization of a lead compound identified by a high-throughput screening of approximately 12,000 compounds. From this screening emerged a racemic spiroazepineindole (compound 82), an inhibitor of asexual blood-stage P. falciparum growth, with IC50 values of 90 and 80 nM against wild-type (NF54) and chloroquine-resistant (K1) strains, respectively. A single 100 mg/kg dose of compound 82 led to a reduction of 96% in parasitemia in a P. berghei infected mouse model [72]. The individual enantiomers were isolated by chiral separation and tested in vitro. Biological evaluation showed that enantiomer 1R,3S (compound 83a) is 250-fold more potent than enantiomer 1S,3R (compound 83b) (Figure 9) [73].
To increase potency and in vivo activity, a series of spirotetrahydro β-carbolines were also prepared. The synthesis involved Vilsmeier–Haack formylation of the indole, followed by condensation with nitroethane, which led to the corresponding nitroalkene that was reduced to the corresponding amine [73]. Condensation of the indoleamine 88 with 5-chloroisatin (89) led to the target racemic products 90 (Scheme 5). The diastereomers were isolated by chiral chromatography and tested individually, and it was also observed that the 1R,3S configuration was the required stereochemistry for activity against P. falciparum. In the SAR study with spiroazepineindoles and spirotetrahydro β-carbolines, it was also concluded that (i) the spirocenter is an essential feature for activity; (ii) the only halogens well tolerated at position 5′ are chloro and bromide; (iii) monosubstituted 5′-chloro derivatives have the optimum balance between potency, favorable pharmacokinetics and synthetic accessibility compared with other mono- and disubstituted oxindole derivatives prepared; and (iv) increasing the size of the central ring azepine ring by one carbon leads to an inactive compound. Interestingly, while the C-3 methyl does not seem to be essential for activity in the azepineindoles, it enhances potency in the tetrahydro β-carbolines [73].
The active enantiomer that displayed subnanomolar potency and possessed better metabolic stability was NITD609 (91) (also known as KAE609 and cipargamin, Figure 10), with both C6 and C7 substitutions. NITD609 showed excellent in vitro potency, good bioavailability, long oral exposure, a half-life of 3 h and excellent in vivo activity in a P. berghei malaria mouse model. NITD609 was active against P. falciparum and P. vivax with IC50 in the low nanomolar range, dysregulating the sodium and osmotic homeostasis of Plasmodium through inhibition of PfATP4, while not displaying significant cytotoxicity against mammalian cells [73,74,75].
Most indole-based compounds with antiplasmodial activity are natural-based compounds (e.g., indole alkaloid cryptolepine) and exert their activity against chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium strains by an unknown mechanism of action or by inhibiting hemozoin formation [59,60]. An exception is the spiroindolone NITD609; reported in 2010, it is the first molecule with a novel mechanism of action to successfully complete phase II studies for malaria in the last 25 years [76].

2.2. Indole Derivatives with Antitrypanosomal Activity

Farahat et al. reported the synthesis of a library of diamidine indole derivatives (Figure 11) which were evaluated for their antiparasitic activity against T. brucei and P. falciparum. The target compounds were designed based on the antitrypanosomal activity of the fluorescent dye DAPI (92). Most of the indole diamidines exhibited excellent inhibitory activity, with IC50 values in nanomolar range for both parasites, and presented superior selectivity index in comparison to the parental molecule DAPI and other diamidines in clinical use, such as furamidine and pentamidine. A structural feature that proved to be essential for activity was the presence of two amidine groups in the compounds [77,78,79].
In a screening of inhibitors and substrates for T. cruzi trans-sialidase (TcTS), Harrison et al. identified that the presence of an indole in the structure of galactosides could be an advantageous feature for the development of TcTS inhibitors. In particular, the thioglycopyranoside 94 ranked among the top five inhibitors in this study (Figure 12) [80].
Another successful example of a Trypanosoma enzyme inhibitor containing an indole moiety is the N-[4-pyridyl]-formamide LP10 (95) (Figure 13), a non-azolic sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) inhibitor. This compound exhibited high binding affinity for the T. cruzi CYP51 (TcCYP51) (Kd = 42 nM) and high trypanocidal activity (IC50 lower than 1 nM) along with low cytotoxicity. Importantly, the indole ring appeared to be an essential structural feature for interactions with the enzyme. Due to pharmacokinetic problems, such as low stability in liver microsome and poor selectivity against the human cytochrome P450 enzymes, an extensive hit-to-lead optimization of compound 95 was developed. The results showed that R-enantiomers have increased potency for the target enzyme [81,82,83,84,85] and that the replacement of the cyclohexane ring with structurally rigid substituted biphenyl rings could enhance pharmacokinetic properties while reducing cross-reactivity against human CYP proteins [81,82,83,84,85,86].
Inspired by the results of the antileishmanial activity with synthetic paullone–chalcone hybrids, Kunick and collaborators decided to extend the study for T. brucei parasites (Figure 14). Initially, the authors investigated the influence of Michael acceptor groups at position C2 of the paullone ring system on the selectivity of these compounds, since α,β-unsaturated electrophilic groups can lead to the formation of Michael adducts with host biomolecules and undesired toxicity. From this screening, they were able to identify that the enone group at this position was irrelevant for inhibitory activity on parasite growth, while the replacement with an aryl group improved the cytotoxic profile of the compounds (compound 97 IC50 = 4.0 µM and compound 98 IC50 = 0.51 µM). Part of the toxicity of these compounds could be attributed to host protein kinase inhibition, and therefore, the authors continued the optimization process by synthesizing 4-azapaullone derivatives substituted at C-9 and C-11 positions (Figure 14). The new generated 4-azapaullone derivatives retained antiparasitic properties and exhibited limited cytotoxicity against mammalian cells. Particularly, compounds with phenyl or phenyl-amino substituent at position C-11 showed improved inhibitory profile (compound 99a IC50 = 0.18 µM and compound 99b IC50 = 0.12 µM). In addition, the most active compounds failed to inhibit a panel of mammal kinases. Finally, following a structure-based rational design to target the enzyme trypanothione synthetase (TryS), the same research group developed a new series of N(5)-substituted paullones containing benzyl or heteroarylmethyl substituents. Although the new compounds showed potent and selective trypanocidal activity (compound 100 IC50 = 40 nM) on infective forms of T. brucei, they exhibited only a modest improvement over the template molecule in the inhibitory activity towards the TryS enzyme, suggesting a possible different mechanism of action [87,88,89].
Aiming to develop potent T. brucei histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, Ferrigno et al. reported the synthesis and optimization of 2,5-disubstituted imidazole-based compounds, bearing a naphthyl group at position 5 and a 2-piperazinyl ring at position 2 [90]. The initial SAR study identified the importance of the substituent at the N-1 position of the piperazine ring for the trypanocidal activity, and the electron-rich 2-methyl-5-methoxy indole group was responsible for the best activity profile in the first set of compounds. Further steps of optimization led to the discovery of an inhibitor (103) that exhibited strong trypanocidal activity in the single-digit nanomolar range (Figure 15). However, the compound exhibited only a modest half-life in presence of human and mouse hepatocytes, indicating the need for further modifications aiming at better pharmacokinetic properties [90].
Using a molecular hybridization approach, Kryshchyshyn et al. generated a diverse library of compounds bearing 4-thiazolidone or thiazole group tethered by a hydrazone linker to a phenyl-indole or phenyl-imidazothiadiazole fragment. The synthesis of phenyl-indole compounds bearing thiosemicarbazones was accomplished in three steps: (1) reaction of phenylhydrazine with substituted aryl methyl ketones, via Fisher indole method; (2) Vilsmeier–Haack reaction to generate the indole-3-carbaldehyde derivative (107); (3) condensation with thiosemicarbazides (Scheme 6). Then, thiazolidinone–indole hybrids were obtained by [2+3]-cyclocondensation reaction with different electrophilic reagents. The thiazole-hydrazone analog was synthetized by reaction with α-halogenated ketones [91]. This chemical library was screened against T. brucei, and compounds with submicromolar IC50 values and low cytotoxicity in human primary fibroblasts were identified. The SAR study evidenced that the indole scaffold was essential for the inhibitory activity as 2-arylindole-based compounds (109110) were more active than the 6-aryl-imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole counterparts [91].
Working on the development of antimalarial compounds containing an indole moiety, Guillon et al. reported the trypanocidal activity of another 2-phenylindole derivative. The synthesis started with the preparation of o-(phenylethynyl)aniline by a Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction between commercially available o-iodoaniline and phenylacetylene, which was converted to o-alkynyltrifluoroacetanilide upon reaction with trifluoroacetic anhydride (Scheme 7). In sequence, the 2-phenylindole scaffold was obtained by an aminopalladation–reductive elimination protocol, yielding the aldehyde 115 [92,93]. Finally, the target compound 117 was obtained by condensation of 115 with 3-dimethylaminopropylamine followed by reduction with sodium borohydride [93]. The compound exhibited antiparasitic activity against all evaluated protozoa with moderate cytotoxicity towards the human cell line HepG2. However, in the case of T. b. brucei (IC50 = 220 nM), the selectivity index showed reasonable value, which indicates that compound 117 may be valuable for future optimizations [93].
Considering that the particular amino acid metabolism by trypanosomatid parasites, especially T. brucei, may be a target for the design of new and selective inhibitors, Cockram et al. investigated the trypanocidal activity of halo-substituted L-tryptophan free acids and methyl ether derivatives (Scheme 8). In general, the SAR indicated that, regardless of the halogen atom, the 7-substituted compounds exhibited significantly higher potency compared to the 5- and 6-substituted counterparts. Except for natural L-tryptophan, methyl esterification also increased the activity of the compounds. The authors also identified that these analogs exhibited a competitive relationship with natural tryptophan. Although the metabolomic studies suggested an effect on the transamination processes of the parasite, the authors were unable to determine the exact mechanism of action of the compounds [94].
Inspired by the two indole-based Yohimbine and Corynanthe alkaloids, Lepovitz et al. generated a diverse series of hydroxyalkyl δ-lactam, δ-lactam and piperidine indole derivatives, following a structure-based rational design of small-molecule inhibitors for the T. brucei methionyl-tRNA synthetase (TbMetRS) (Figure 16). Most compounds exhibited a good trypanocidal profile, although there was no significant improvement in the potency of TbMetRS inhibition in relation to the hit compound, which suggests an alternative mechanism of action [95].
Fernandes et al. envisioned a molecular hybridization approach to unite two known bioactive heterocyclic scaffolds, oxadiazoles and 3-hydroxy-2-oxindoles, to generate new antiparasitic compounds (Scheme 9). To achieve this purpose, the authors performed a Morita–Baylis–Hillman (MBH) reaction between 3-phenyl-5-vinyl-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives and N-ethyl-isatin in the presence of DABCO and acetic acid, obtaining 3-hydroxy-2-oxindoles (Scheme 9). In addition, they also synthetized two spirooxindole derivatives using a two-step procedure: O-allylation followed by ring-closing metathesis. Interestingly, some of the hybrid compounds exhibited excellent antiparasitic activity (IC50 = 2.30 µM and 2.20 µM) and a low cytotoxic profile against human fibroblasts (CC50 > 64 µM). Moreover, some of them also presented efficacy values similar or superior to benznidazole [96].
By a high-throughput screening over a large library of kinase inhibitors, using as a filter the trypanocidal activity, low toxicity over mammal cells and other physicochemical properties, Klug et al. selected the 3,5-disubstituted-7-azaindole (129) (NEU-1207) as hit compound for further structural optimization, aiming to improve inhibitory activity and pharmacokinetic properties (Figure 17). Using a very detailed SAR, the authors identified compound (130) that presented both submicromolar potency against T. brucei and an adequate pharmacokinetic profile. However, the compound also presented a low potential to penetrate the central nervous system, which would prevent it from acting as an effective antitrypanosomal agent in stage 2 of HAT [97].

2.3. Indole Derivatives with Antileishmanial Activity

Drug discovery for leishmaniasis treatment has also suffered from slow progress, with few drug candidates entering clinical trials in recent years [98,99]. Besides problems with toxicity and low efficacy of the available treatments, the emergence of drug resistance has further complicated the disease management scenario [100]. Thus, the identification of new chemotypes plays an essential role in addressing these urgent issues.
Through a Pd-catalyzed asymmetric spirocyclization approach, Zhang et al. achieved the intricate task of preparing the spiroindimicins A and H and analogs in a gram scale (Scheme 10). The synthesis of spiroindimicin A (134) involved a nine-step route starting from the commercially available 4-nitroindole (131), which was converted to the key triaryl intermediate (132), followed by a Pd-catalyzed spirocyclization and removal of a benzenesulfonyl group with Bu4NOH [101]. Using the appropriate combination of chiral ligand, bases and reaction conditions, the authors were able to obtain the desired product in moderate yields and with high enantioselectivity. With this optimized methodology, they also achieved the synthesis of spiroindimicin H (138) from 4-bromoindole (135) in eight steps (Scheme 10) [101]. The final compounds, as well as some intermediates, were evaluated against T. brucei, P. falciparum and L. amazonensis. Several compounds presented good inhibitory activity against the different parasites, particularly spiroindimicin A, which showed IC50 = 1.3 µM with minimal toxicity for mammal HepG2 and RAW 264.7 cells (CC50 > 10 µM) [101].
Over the years, synthetic compounds inspired by indole alkaloids have been investigated for their antileishmanial potential, mainly due to evidence of the inhibitory properties of this class against other trypanosomatid parasites. One example is the β-carboline family, which has shown inhibitory activity against both T. cruzi and Leishmania spp. parasites. Working with β-carboline-3-carboxamide derivatives, Tonin et al. studied the influence of the piperidine ring oxidation on the antiprotozoal activity. The target compounds were prepared by a Pictet–Spengler condensation of the L-tryptophan methyl ester with aromatic aldehydes, followed by oxidation with sulfur in xylene reflux (Scheme 11). Subsequently, the corresponding carboxylates were reacted with different amines to generate the desired carboxamides. The compounds were evaluated in vitro against the epimastigote form of T. cruzi and the promastigote form of L. amazonensis. The authors observed that 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-β-carboline exhibited lower potency than the corresponding oxidized counterparts, indicating that ring aromatization is an important structural feature regarding the biological activity [102]. In a subsequent study with axenic amastigote forms, it was also possible to identify the relevance of the nature of the substituent at the C-3 of the β-carboline nucleus. In general, this type of compounds exhibited low to moderate cytotoxicity and high selectivity towards parasite cells, indicating that it is indeed a promising scaffold for further optimizations [103].
Keeping the carboxamide group at the C-3 position, Ashok et al. designed a series of piperazinyl-β-carboline hybrids, bearing a thiophene ring in the C-1 position of the pyridine ring (Figure 18) [104]. They generated a small library of 15 compounds, changing the nature and position of the substituent of the aromatic ring attached to the piperazine group. With this approach, the authors were able to map the most relevant structural characteristics for the activity. The first conclusion was that an unsubstituted ring resulted in very weak potency against promastigote parasites, while para-substitution with small and ortho–para directing groups generated compounds with high antileishmanial activity. Substitution in other positions (e.g., 2-methoxy or 3-methoxy) produced an increase in growth inhibition, as well as cytotoxicity. Replacement with a benzyl group could also generate a positive effect in potency with a moderate selectivity index. Some of these compounds also showed high activity against intracellular amastigote forms [104]. In a subsequent SAR study with N-methylated beta-carboline-3-carboxamide compounds, the same research group was able to corroborate the substitution patterns of the piperazinyl group that can impact the activity of this family. Some compounds containing aromatic rings with para-methoxy, para- or meta-chloro or even the replacement with benzyl group presented strong activity against both promastigote and amastigote forms of L. donovani and L. infantum, with high selectivity against parasite cells [105]. From this work, it is possible to assume that N-protection of indole moiety can also be a relevant modification [105].
Indirubins are another example of indole alkaloids that have been investigated for their antileishmanial properties. Naturally, this class of bis-indole compounds is found in different living organisms such as indigo-bearing plants (e.g., Isatis spp. and Polygonum spp.), marine mollusks and bacteria [106,107]. It has been identified that indirubins are potent ATP-competitive inhibitors of protein kinases (CDKs) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3β) [108]. In addition, it has been shown that 6-substituted indirubin derivatives could inhibit both leishmanial cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) homologs, cdc2-related protein kinase 3 (LCRK3) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (LGSK-3), two enzymes essential for parasite viability [109]. Interestingly, a higher selectivity towards LCRK3 over LGSK was further observed, a reverse selectivity in comparison to the mammalian counterparts [109]. Thus, Efstathiou et al. performed an SAR study over a library of indirubin derivatives to identify structural features that are necessary to change the selectivity pattern of these two leishmanial enzymes. From this study, some structural assumptions could be made regarding selectivity towards LGSK-3 and the protein binding mode of these compounds (Figure 19). First, it was identified that the presence of halogen groups in the position C-7 had no significant effect on activity against both promastigote and amastigote forms. In addition, it was observed that the introduction of N-containing saturated ring in the position C-3′ was sufficient to reverse the selectivity towards LGSK-3, probably by increasing the affinity of the compounds for hydrophilic sites of the binding pocket, which could result in the displacement of unstable water molecules from the kinase hydration shell [110].
Aiming to obtain new inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), another enzyme important for the parasite survival, Chauhan’s group planned a molecular hybridization approach, joining a 1,3,5-triazine or pyridine unit to the [1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b] indole moiety (Scheme 12). This strategy resulted in 22 hybrids that were subjected to in vitro biological evaluation against L. donovani parasites [111]. The results showed triazine derivatives (150) were more potent than the corresponding pyrimidine analogs, particularly the triazine derivative with R1 = piperidine (L. donovani IC50 = 4.01 µM, J774.A1 CC50 = of 227.04 µM), which was 20- to 10-fold more selective than standard drugs such as pentamidine and sodium stibogluconate [111]. Subsequently, the same research group developed a series of [1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b] indole hybrids (151) with 4-amino-7-chloroquinoline. Changing the linker size, the protection group attached to the nitrogen atom of the indole moiety and the nature of substituent in the position C-6 or C-8 of the aromatic ring, the authors were able to identify some lead compounds with high antileishmanial activity and low cytotoxicity. It also was observed that compounds with a linker size of two carbon atoms and with a small alkyl group at nitrogen atom or unsubstituted aromatic ring produced a very potent hybrid for both promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes [112].
The association of indole with β-lactam ring also produced compounds with potent antileishmanial activity. These compounds were synthetized by reaction of N-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyleneamines with 2-diazo-1,2-diarylethanones (Scheme 13). Both indole-based imines and azetidin-2-ones were evaluated against L. major promastigotes. Compared to imine precursors 155, the azetidin-2-one derivatives 156 showed considerable improvement of activity, and two compounds exhibited inhibitory activity in the same range as that of the standard drug amphotericin B [113].
Different types of spiro-oxindole derivatives have been synthetized and evaluated against Leishmania spp. parasites, showing potent inhibitory activity. Scala et al. reported a simple and fast synthetic way to functionalize the C-3 position of N-unprotected oxindoles (Scheme 14). Using dibenzalacetones as reactants and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) as base catalyst, the authors achieved the synthesis of spiro[cyclohexanone-oxindoles] 161. In general, the evaluation of antileishmanial activity revealed that both oxindole precursors and spirooxindole derivatives exhibited significant dose-dependent inhibitory activity against promastigote and amastigote forms of L. infantum, low cytotoxic profile against RAW 264.7 cells and high therapeutic index [114].
Reinforcing the antiparasitic potential of this class of compounds, a small library of spirooxindoles and bis-spirooxindoles was screened against L. donovani topoisomerase IB (LdTopIB), another enzyme essential in the maintenance of cellular functioning and a relevant molecular target for antileishmanial therapy [115]. The compounds were synthetized by reaction of isatin (or N-benzyl isatin) with L-proline (163) in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves, followed by the addition of an appropriate dipolarophile (Scheme 15) [115]. Among 10 compounds, the authors identified one derivative (compound 165) that exhibited a dose-dependent inhibitory activity with a competitive inhibitor profile, possibly by preventing the formation of the DNA–topoisomerase complex (Kd = 6.65 µM). Docking models of the compound and the topoisomerase identified two possible binding sites in the small subunit and the hinge region of the large subunit of LdTopIB [115]. Moreover, compound 165 was highly active against promastigote (IC50 values ranging between 1.25 and 1.41 µM) and amastigote (IC50 values ranging between 0.51 and 0.91 µM) forms of both wild-type and drug-resistant strains of L. donovani with low toxicity towards host cells (CC50 of 11.80 µM), indicating that this scaffold presents the adequate characteristics to advance for further optimization [115].
Another group of spirooxindole derivatives 170172, containing a dihydroquinoline group, was prepared by an imino Diels–Alder reaction between ketimine-isatins and trans-isoeugenol, using boron trifluoride etherate as acid catalyst [116]. Alternatively, two other spiro compounds were synthetized by a three-component reaction of isatin, aniline and thioglycolic acid and by a two-component reaction of isatin and thioglycolic acid (Scheme 16). Except for only one derivative, most of the evaluated compounds significantly inhibited the proliferation of L. braziliensis promastigotes with a very low cytotoxic effect on murine bone marrow-derived macrophages [116]. Particularly, one derivative (170, L. braziliensis promastigotes IC50 = 6.0 μM) exhibited antileishmanial activity superior to the standard drug used as a control in the study (miltefosine, L. braziliensis promastigotes IC50 = 21 μM) with SI > 50. Comparing the activity of spiro dihydroquinoline-oxindoles 170 with the ones of spiro compounds 171172 prepared from the thioglycolic acid, it was possible to observe that the spiro annulation between quinoline and oxindole backbone was essential for the inhibitory effect on promastigote proliferation. Interestingly, the most active compound also proved to be more potent and selective against intracellular forms of the parasite [116]. The investigation of the mechanism of action showed that this family possibly acts by affecting the activity of the squalene epoxidase enzyme, and consequently the squalene epoxidase enzyme, and/or by disrupting the regulatory volume decrease mechanism [116].
Investigating the antileishmanial potential of the 2-amino-thiophene scaffold, Rodrigues et al. prepared a small library of 2-amino-cycloalkyl[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile derivatives (Scheme 17) [117]. In particular, the examples containing a lateral indole ring exhibited the best results against promastigote and axenic amastigote forms of L. amazonensis, causing an apoptosis-like cell death [117]. These compounds exhibited low toxicity against macrophages and red blood cells. Moreover, the selectivity index values were superior to the values calculated for the reference drug meglumine antimoniate [117]. Docking studies identified the trypanothione reductase enzyme as the putative molecular target. In a subsequent study, the authors studied the influence of the cycloalkane size and the nature of the substituent on the indole ring [118]. From 32 evaluated derivatives, they identified 3 other new compounds with a potency superior to reference drugs (IC50 values ranging between 2.1 µg/mL and 3.2 µg/mL) and efficacy even against drug-resistant strains [118].
Pandey et al. prepared a diversified library of C2-functionalized indole derivatives, using a previously reported protocol of post-Ugi transformation [119,120]. The synthesis of the target compounds was achieved in two steps. First, the multicomponent reaction between 1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid (179), isocyanide, an amino ester and an aldehyde generated different intermediate indole-fused diketopiperazines. In sequence, the intermediates were refluxed in ethanol with various amines to afford the corresponding carboxamides by a regioselective ring-opening of a diketopiperazine unit by an intermolecular transamidation reaction (Scheme 18). 17 1H-indole-2-carboxamides 184 were obtained and their antileishmanial activity evaluated against intracellular amastigote form of L. donovani and cytotoxicity on mammal cell line [120]. Most of the compounds exerted antileishmanial activity in the low micromolar range with a potency higher than the standard drug miltefosine [120]. Particularly, two compounds, 184a (R1 = 4-Br, R2 = 3-propyl morpholine) and 184b (R1 = 4-MeO, R2 = 4-MeO), displayed low cytotoxic activity (CC50 > 400 µM in Vero cell line) and potent inhibitory activity with IC50 = 1.0 µM and 0.6 µM, respectively [120]. Similar to what was observed for other indole-based compounds, it seems that this series also exert their antileishmanial activity by induction of an apoptosis-like cell death [120]. In addition, preliminary pharmacokinetic studies in an experimental model indicated that this class of compounds presents good oral bioavailability with no signs of toxicity [120].
Having previously identified the antileishmanial activity of a synthetic analog of aplysinopsin (185, Scheme 19), Porwal et al. envisioned the conjugation of a H2S-donating moiety to enhance the pharmacological properties of this class of compounds [121]. A multicomponent protocol was used to convert 1-alkylated indole-3-carbaldehyde (186) into gem-dithioacetylated indole derivatives [121]. Gem-dithioacetyl and cyanophenoxy groups were shown to be important for the antileishmanial activity of these compounds, since the corresponding analogs without these two moieties were revealed to be inactive [121]. Moreover, the size of the linker chain was another structural feature that proved to be quite relevant [121].
By combining an indole scaffold with other pharmacophores commonly found in compounds with antileishmanial activity, Anand et al. designed two series of C3-functionalized indole derivatives, containing pyrazolopyridine and pyrazolodihydropyridine units [122]. These compounds were easily accessed by a multicomponent reaction between 1-aryl-3-indolyl-5-amino pyrazoles 189, an aldehyde and a 1,3-diketone source (Scheme 20). The in vitro evaluation of the antileishmanial activity revealed two derivatives (192a: R1 = 3,4-dichlorophenyl, R2 = 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl; 192b: R1 = 3,4-dichlorophenyl, R2 = 2,5-dimethoxyphenyl) with potent growth inhibition activity against promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes. Moreover, these compounds displayed negligible toxicity against two different mammal cell lines with CC50 values > 400 µM. Interestingly, similar SAR trends were observed for both groups of compounds, with those with electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., p-chloro, 3,4-dichlorophenyl) on the R1 position of the pyrazole ring and electron-donating groups (e.g., 2,5-dimethoxy, 3,4-dimethoxy or 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl) on R2 of the dihydropyridine or pyridine ring exhibiting the best activity. To corroborate the efficacy and low toxicity of the compounds, the authors also performed in vivo assays and verified that both compounds could reduce parasitic burden in the liver and spleen. In addition, the combination therapy with subcurative concentration of miltefosine allowed a considerable improvement in the disease pattern in murine experimental models [122].
The molecular hybridization of indole nucleus with polyphenolic compounds was shown to be another strategy to obtain derivatives with high pharmacological potential. In this sense, Yousuf et al. reported that the covalent conjugation of an oxindole moiety enhanced the biological activity of bis-phenols and bis-arylidenes [123]. Aiming to develop novel antileishmanial compounds, Yousuf et al. functionalized the C-5 of bis-arylidene oxindoles by the introduction of a styrene unit [124]. The compounds were obtained in four synthetic steps, starting with the preparation of the 5-bromo bis-arylidene oxindole derivative via McMurry cross-coupling reaction between 4,4′-dihydroxybenzophenone and p-methoxybenzyl-protected 5-bromoisatin in presence of TiCl4 (Scheme 21) [124]. The final step was a Heck coupling with different styrene precursors in presence of Pd-catalyst (Scheme 21) [124]. The removal of methoxy groups from the 3,4-dimethoxy styrene conjugated bis-arylidene oxindole (198) was performed by treatment with BBr3 in dry DCM. Among the group of stilbenic oxindole derivatives, the polyhydroxylated compound (199) exhibited the best activity against promastigote (IC50 = 15 µM) and amastigote (IC50 = 1 µM) forms of L. donovani, with negligible toxicity towards murine splenocytes at the highest tested concentration, even after four days of treatment. Moreover, mechanistic studies showed that the treatment with this compound promoted oxidative stress in the cells of the parasites and a type of apoptosis-like cell death [124].
Inspired by the biological potential of natural bis-indole compounds, Taha et al. synthetized 27 synthetic bis-indole analogs and investigated their antileishmanial activity [125]. The compounds were obtained via a simple three-step procedure, starting with the condensation of two equivalents of indole with methyl-4-formylbenzoate (200) (Scheme 22) [125]. In sequence, the intermediate was treated with hydrazine hydrate to generate the acyl hydrazide that was converted to the final products 203 by the reaction with different isothiocyanates [125]. In comparison to the standard drug (pentamidine), most derivatives potently inhibited the in vitro growth of the parasite. The SAR study was able to identify structural features that most impacted the activity. In particular, the presence of vicinal dihydroxy systems is the most relevant feature [125]. Docking studies with the most active compound indicated that compounds of this class tend to interact with key residues on pteridine reductase, which could explain the inhibitory activity [125].
Tiwari et al. studied the pharmacological properties of a group of N-substituted indole derivatives [126]. Using different synthetic approaches, the authors accomplished the synthesis of chalcone-based and hydrazine–hydrazide derivatives (Scheme 23). It was observed that chalcone-based compounds exhibited the best activities regarding antileishmanial activity, particularly compounds with electron-withdrawing substituents (e.g., p-chloro, IC50 = 21.5 µM) [126].
Silva et al. derivatized the indole nucleus by the introduction of thiosemicarbazone, another biologically privileged group with antileishmanial properties. For this, they reacted substituted indole-carboxaldehyde with previously synthetized thiosemicarbazides (Scheme 24) [127]. The authors investigated the activity against two species of Leishmania parasites, L. infantum and L. amazonensis [127]. In general, the compounds were shown to be more active against L. infantum promastigotes, with IC50 ranging from 4.36 µM to 23.25 µM. In general, the synthetized compounds exhibited low cytotoxicity against the murine macrophage J774 cell line (CC50 ranging from 53.23 µM to 357.97 µM). From this series of compounds, it was possible to identify that the substitution pattern in the phenyl ring of the thiosemicarbazone moiety was relevant for the antileishmanial activity [127].
Interestingly, Schadich et al. demonstrated that the cyclization of indole-based thiosemicarbazone appears to be another strategy for generating compounds with promising antileishmanial activity (Scheme 25). It should be noted that these compounds had already demonstrated antitrypanosomal activity [91]. Among the most active compounds bearing a thiazolidinone unit 216 presented the clearest structure–activity relationships in assays against L. major FV1 promastigotes [128]. Particularly, it was identified that activity was strongly dependent on the presence of small substituents on the C-5 position of the thiazolidinone core or the absence of substituents on the N-3 position [128].

3. Conclusions

Parasitic diseases, such as malaria, trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis, are still a cause of great health, social and economic burden in endemic countries and cause a considerable number of preventable deaths around the world, especially in tropical and subtropical countries. In addition to problems with toxicity and low efficacy, the emergence of drug resistance has further complicated the already limited clinical management of these diseases. From a medicinal chemistry perspective, it is of utmost interest to identify new chemotypes that exhibit different mechanisms of action than the drugs already used in the clinic. In this review, we present several pieces of evidence that support the high pharmacological potential of indole-based compounds for the development of drugs to treat these diseases. A concrete example is the spiroindolone cipargamin (91) (KAE609), an inhibitor of the Plasmodium falciparum P-type ATPase 4, which has successfully completed phase II studies for malaria treatment. Despite having good antiparasitic activity, in most cases, the mechanism of action of indole-based compounds is not properly investigated. Therefore, we expect that this review will encourage more medicinal chemists to continue investing their creative strength in the discovery of new indole-based antiparasitic agents with novel mechanisms of action.

Author Contributions

P.A.F.P. and M.M.M.S. collected the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) for the funding through iMed.ULisboa (UIDB/04138/2020) and project PTDC/QUI-QOR/29664/2017.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Molyneux, D.H.; Savioli, L.; Engels, D. Neglected tropical diseases: Progress towards addressing the chronic pandemic. Lancet 2017, 389, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pastrana, N.A.; Beran, D.; Somerville, C.; Heller, O.; Correia, J.C.; Suggs, L.S. The process of building the priority of neglected tropical diseases: A global policy analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. DESA, UN. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  4. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD 2019 Cause and Risk Summary: Neglected Diseases and Malaria; IHME, University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_summaries/2019/neglected-tropical-diseases-and-malaria-level-2-cause (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  5. Aagaard-Hansen, J.; Nombela, N.; Alvar, J. Population movement: A key factor in the epidemiology of neglected tropical diseases. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2010, 15, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tidman, R.; Abela-Ridder, B.; De Castañeda, R.R. The impact of climate change on neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 115, 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Altamura, F.; Rajesh, R.; Catta-Preta, C.M.C.; Moretti, N.S.; Cestari, I. The current drug discovery landscape for trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis: Challenges and strategies to identify drug targets. Drug Dev. Res. 2020, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lukeš, J.; Skalický, T.; Týč, J.; Votýpka, J.; Yurchenko, V. Evolution of parasitism in kinetoplastid flagellates. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2014, 195, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Büscher, P.; Cecchi, G.; Jamonneau, V.; Priotto, G. Human African Trypanosomiasis. Lancet 2017, 390, 2397–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Echeverria, L.E.; Morillo, C.A. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas Disease). Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 33, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nunes, M.C.P.; Dones, W.; Morillo, C.A.; Encina, J.J.; Ribeiro, A.L. Chagas disease: An overview of clinical and epidemiological aspects. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Coura, J.R. The main sceneries of Chagas disease transmission. The vectors, blood and oral transmissions—A comprehensive review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2015, 110, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Coura, J.R.; Vĩas, P.A. Chagas disease: A new worldwide challenge. Nature 2010, 465, S06–S07. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chagas Disease (American Trypanosomiasis). Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/chagas-disease#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  15. Lee, B.Y.; Bacon, K.M.; Bottazzi, M.E.; Hotez, P.J. Global economic burden of Chagas disease: A computational simulation model. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Steverding, D. The history of Chagas disease. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lascano, F.; García Bournissen, F.; Altcheh, J. Review of pharmacological options for the treatment of Chagas disease. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lidani, K.C.F.; Andrade, F.A.; Bavia, L.; Damasceno, F.S.; Beltrame, M.H.; Messias-Reason, I.J.; Sandri, T.L. Chagas disease: From discovery to a worldwide health problem. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2019, 49, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. García-Huertas, P.; Cardona-Castro, N. Advances in the treatment of Chagas disease: Promising new drugs, plants and targets. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 142, 112020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Santos, S.S.; de Araújo, R.V.; Giarolla, J.; El Seoud, O.; Ferreira, E.I. Searching for drugs for Chagas disease, leishmaniasis and schistosomiasis: A review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bermudez, J.; Davies, C.; Simonazzi, A.; Pablo Real, J.; Palma, S. Current drug therapy and pharmaceutical challenges for Chagas disease. Acta Trop. 2016, 156, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hide, G. History of sleeping sickness in East Africa. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Malvy, D.; Chappuis, F. Sleeping sickness. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. WHO. Trypanosomiasis, Human African (Sleeping Sickness). 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/trypanosomiasis-human-african-(sleeping-sickness) (accessed on 13 October 2021).
  25. Wamwiri, F.N.; Changasi, R.E. Tsetse Flies (Glossina) as vectors of human African Trypanosomiasis: A review. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6201350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kennedy, P.G.E. Update on human African Trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 2334–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sutherland, C.S.; Stone, C.M.; Steinmann, P.; Tanner, M.; Tediosi, F. Seeing beyond 2020: An economic evaluation of contemporary and emerging strategies for elimination of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense. Lancet Glob. Health 2017, 5, e69–e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kennedy, P.G.E.; Rodgers, J. Clinical and neuropathogenetic aspects of human African Trypanosomiasis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Babokhov, P.; Sanyaolu, A.O.; Oyibo, W.A.; Fagbenro-Beyioku, A.F.; Iriemenam, N.C. A current analysis of chemotherapy strategies for the treatment of human African Trypanosomiasis. Pathog. Glob. Health 2013, 107, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sutherland, C.S.; Yukich, J.; Goeree, R.; Tediosi, F. A Literature Review of Economic Evaluations for a Neglected Tropical Disease: Human African Trypanosomiasis (“Sleeping Sickness”). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Mann, S.; Frasca, K.; Scherrer, S.; Henao-Martínez, A.F.; Newman, S.; Ramanan, P.; Suarez, J.A. A Review of Leishmaniasis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2021, 8, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Akhoundi, M.; Kuhls, K.; Cannet, A.; Votýpka, J.; Marty, P.; Delaunay, P.; Sereno, D. A Historical Overview of the Classification, Evolution, and Dispersion of Leishmania Parasites and Sandflies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karunaweera, N.D.; Ferreira, M.U. Leishmaniasis: Current challenges and prospects for elimination with special focus on the South Asian region. Parasitology 2018, 145, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Alemayehu, B.; Alemayehu, M. Leishmaniasis: A Review on Parasite, Vector and Reservoir Host. Health Sci. J. 2017, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. WHO. Leishmaniasis. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis (accessed on 13 October 2021).
  36. Croft, S.L.; Olliaro, P. Leishmaniasis chemotherapy-challenges and opportunities. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1478–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Burza, S.; Crof, S.L.; Boelaert, M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet 2018, 392, 951–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Salman, S.M.; Rubeiz, N.G.; Kibbi, A.G. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: Clinical features and diagnosis. Clin. Dermatol. 1999, 17, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chappuis, F.; Sundar, S.; Hailu, A.; Ghalib, H.; Rijal, S.; Peeling, R.W.; Alvar, J.; Boelaert, M. Visceral leishmaniasis: What are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, S7–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santos, D.O.; Coutinho, C.E.R.; Madeira, M.F.; Bottino, C.G.; Vieira, R.T.; Nascimento, S.B.; Bernardino, A.; Bourguignon, S.C.; Corte-Real, S.; Pinho, R.T.; et al. Leishmaniasis treatment—A challenge that remains: A review. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burrows, J.N.; Elliott, R.L.; Kaneko, T.; Mowbray, C.E.; Waterson, D. The role of modern drug discovery in the fight against neglected and tropical diseases. Med. Chem. Comm. 2014, 5, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bethony, J.M.; Cole, R.N.; Guo, X.; Kamhawi, S.; Lightowlers, M.W.; Loukas, A.; Petri, W.; Reed, S.; Valenzuela, J.G.; Hotez, P.J. Vaccines to combat the neglected tropical diseases. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 239, 237–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Boutayeb, A. Developing countries and neglected diseases: Challenges and perspectives. Int. J. Equity Health 2007, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Laurens, M.B. RTS,S/AS01 vaccine (MosquirixTM): An overview. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2019, 16, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Scientists Hail Historic Malaria Vaccine Approval—But Point to Challenges Ahead. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02755-5 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  46. WHO. World Malaria Report 2020: 20 Years of Global Progress and Challenges. 2020. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337660 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  47. Lalremruata, A.; Jeyaraj, S.; Engleitner, T.; Joanny, F.; Lang, A.; Bélard, S.; Mombo-Ngoma, G.; Ramharter, M.; Kremsner, P.G.; Mordmüller, B.; et al. Species and genotype diversity of Plasmodium in malaria patients from Gabon analysed by next generation sequencing. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Plewes, K.; Leopold, S.J.; Kingston, H.W.F.; Dondorp, A.M. Malaria: What’s New in the Management of Malaria? Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 33, 39–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bousema, T.; Drakeley, C. Epidemiology and infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in relation to malaria control and elimination. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 377–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Cui, L.; Mharakurwa, S.; Ndiaye, D.; Rathod, P.K.; Rosenthal, P.J. Antimalarial drug resistance: Literature review and activities and findings of the ICEMR network. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mita, T.; Tanabe, K. Evolution of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance: Implications for the development and containment of artemisinin resistance. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 65, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Price, R.N.; von Seidlein, L.; Valecha, N.; Nosten, F.; Baird, J.K.; White, N.J. Global extent of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ashley, E.A.; Pyae Phyo, A.; Woodrow, C.J. Malaria. Lancet 2018, 391, 1608–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tse, E.G.; Korsik, M.; Todd, M.H. The past, present and future of anti-malarial medicines. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Belete, T.M. Recent progress in the development of new antimalarial drugs with novel targets. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 3875–38892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. WHO. Artemisinin Resistance and Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy Efficacy. 2018. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274362 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  57. Thanikachalam, P.V.; Maurya, R.K.; Garg, V.; Monga, V. An insight into the medicinal perspective of synthetic analogs of indole: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 180, 562–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kumari, A.; Singh, R.K. Medicinal chemistry of indole derivatives: Current to future therapeutic prospectives. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 89, 103021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chauhan, M.; Saxena, A.; Saha, B. An insight in anti-malarial potential of indole scaffold: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 218, 113400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Surur, A.S.; Huluka, S.A.; Mitku, M.L.; Asres, K. Indole: The after next scaffold of antiplasmodial agents? Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 4855–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kumar, D.; Sharma, S.; Kalra, S.; Singh, G.; Monga, V.; Kumar, B. Medicinal Perspective of Indole Derivatives: Recent Developments and Structure-Activity Relationship Studies. Curr. Drug Targets 2020, 21, 864–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lopes, E.A.; Santos, M.M.M.; Mori, M. Pharmacological treatment of malaria. In Antiprotozoal Drug Development and Delivery; Springer, 2021; accepted; Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/7355_2021_125 (accessed on 27 August 2021).
  63. Horrocks, P.; Fallon, S.; Denman, L.; Devine, O.; Duffy, L.J.; Harper, A.; Meredith, E.L.; Hasenkamp, S.; Sidaway, A.; Monnery, D.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel series of indoloisoquinolines as small molecule anti-malarial leads. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 1770–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pereira, N.A.L.; Monteiro, Â.; Machado, M.; Gut, J.; Molins, E.; Perry, M.J.; Dourado, J.; Moreira, R.; Rosenthal, P.J.; Prudêncio, M.; et al. Enantiopure Indolizinoindolones with in vitro Activity against Blood- and Liver-Stage Malaria Parasites. ChemMedChem 2015, 10, 2080–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Paulo, A.; Figueiras, M.; MacHado, M.; Charneira, C.; Lavrado, J.; Santos, S.A.; Lopes, D.; Gut, J.; Rosenthal, P.J.; Nogueira, F.; et al. Bis-alkylamine indolo[3,2-b]quinolines as hemozoin ligands: Implications for antimalarial cytostatic and cytocidal activities. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 3295–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Figueiras, M.; Coelho, L.; Wicht, K.J.; Santos, S.A.; Lavrado, J.; Gut, J.; Rosenthal, P.J.; Nogueira, F.; Egan, T.J.; Moreira, R.; et al. N10,N11-di-alkylamine indolo[3,2-b]quinolines as hemozoin inhibitors: Design, synthesis and antiplasmodial activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 1530–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Santos, S.A.; Lukens, A.K.; Coelho, L.; Nogueira, F.; Wirth, D.F.; Mazitschek, R.; Moreira, R.; Paulo, A. Exploring the 3-piperidin-4-yl-1H-indole scaffold as a novel antimalarial chemotype. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 102, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schuck, D.C.; Jordão, A.K.; Nakabashi, M.; Cunha, A.C.; Ferreira, V.F.; Garcia, C.R.S. Synthetic indole and melatonin derivatives exhibit antimalarial activity on the cell cycle of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 78, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lunga, M.J.; Chisango, R.L.; Weyers, C.; Isaacs, M.; Taylor, D.; Edkins, A.L.; Khanye, S.D.; Hoppe, H.C.; Veale, C.G.L. Expanding the SAR of Nontoxic Antiplasmodial Indolyl-3-ethanone Ethers and Thioethers. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Paciaroni, N.G.; Perry, D.L.; Norwood, V.M.; Murillo-Solano, C.; Collins, J.; Tenneti, S.; Chakrabarti, D.; Huigens, R.W. Re-Engineering of Yohimbine’s Biological Activity through Ring Distortion: Identification and Structure-Activity Relationships of a New Class of Antiplasmodial Agents. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lande, D.H.; Nasereddin, A.; Alder, A.; Gilberger, T.W.; Dzikowski, R.; Grünefeld, J.; Kunick, C. Synthesis and antiplasmodial activity of bisindolylcyclobutenediones. Molecules 2021, 26, 4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Plouffe, D.; Brinker, A.; McNamara, C.; Henson, K.; Kato, N.; Kuhen, K.; Nagle, A.; Adrián, F.; Matzen, J.T.; Anderson, P.; et al. In silico activity profiling reveals the mechanism of action of antimalarials discovered in a high-throughput screen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9059–9064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yeung, B.K.S.; Zou, B.; Rottmann, M.; Lakshminarayana, S.B.; Ang, S.H.; Leong, S.Y.; Tan, J.; Wong, J.; Keller-Maerki, S.; Fischli, C.; et al. Spirotetrahydro β-carbolines (spiroindolones): A new class of potent and orally efficacious compounds for the treatment of malaria. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5155–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rottmann, M.; McNamara, C.; Yeung, B.K.S.; Lee, M.C.S.; Zou, B.; Russell, B.; Seitz, P.; Plouffe, D.M.; Dharia, N.V.; Tan, J.; et al. Spiroindolones, a potent compound class for the treatment of malaria. Science 2010, 329, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Spillman, N.J.; Allen, R.J.W.; McNamara, C.W.; Yeung, B.K.S.; Winzeler, E.A.; Diagana, T.T.; Kirk, K. Na+ regulation in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum involves the cation ATPase PfATP4 and is a target of the spiroindolone antimalarials. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 13, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. A Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety of KAE609 in Adult Patients with Acute Malaria Mono-Infection, Identifier: NCT01860989. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01860989 (accessed on 10 November 2021).
  77. Farahat, A.A.; Kumar, A.; Say, M.; Barghash, A.E.D.M.; Goda, F.E.; Eisa, H.M.; Wenzler, T.; Brun, R.; Liu, Y.; Mickelson, L.; et al. Synthesis, DNA binding, fluorescence measurements and antiparasitic activity of DAPI related diamidines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Farahat, A.A.; Kumar, A.; Say, M.; Wenzler, T.; Brun, R.; Paul, A.; Wilson, W.D.; Boykin, D.W. Exploration of DAPI analogues: Synthesis, antitrypanosomal activity, DNA binding and fluorescence properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 128, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Farahat, A.A.; Ismail, M.A.; Kumar, A.; Wenzler, T.; Brun, R.; Paul, A.; Wilson, W.D.; Boykin, D.W. Indole and Benzimidazole Bichalcophenes: Synthesis, DNA Binding and Antiparasitic Activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 143, 1590–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Harrison, J.A.; Kartha, K.P.R.; Fournier, E.J.L.; Lowary, T.L.; Malet, C.; Nilsson, U.J.; Hindsgaul, O.; Schenkman, S.; Naismith, J.H.; Field, R.A. Probing the acceptor substrate binding site of Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase with systematically modified substrates and glycoside libraries. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Doyle, P.S.; Chen, C.K.; Johnston, J.B.; Hopkins, S.D.; Leung, S.S.F.; Jacobson, M.P.; Engel, J.C.; McKerrow, J.H.; Podust, L.M. A nonazole CYP51 inhibitor cures Chagas’ disease in a mouse model of acute infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 2480–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Chen, C.K.; Doyle, P.S.; Yermalitskaya, L.V.; Mackey, Z.B.; Ang, K.K.H.; McKerrow, J.H.; Podust, L.M. Trypanosoma cruzi CYP51 inhibitor derived from a Mycobacterium tuberculosis screen hit. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Choi, J.Y.; Calvet, C.M.; Gunatilleke, S.S.; Ruiz, C.; Cameron, M.D.; McKerrow, J.H.; Podust, L.M.; Roush, W.R. Rational development of 4-aminopyridyl-based inhibitors targeting Trypanosoma cruzi CYP51 as anti-chagas agents. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 7651–7668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Choi, J.Y.; Calvet, C.M.; Vieira, D.F.; Gunatilleke, S.S.; Cameron, M.D.; McKerrow, J.H.; Podust, L.M.; Roush, W.R. R-configuration of 4-aminopyridyl-based inhibitors of CYP51 confers superior efficacy against Trypanosoma cruzi. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Calvet, C.M.; Vieira, D.F.; Choi, J.Y.; Kellar, D.; Cameron, M.D.; Siqueira-Neto, J.L.; Gut, J.; Johnston, J.B.; Lin, L.; Khan, S.; et al. 4-Aminopyridyl-based CYP51 inhibitors as anti-Trypanosoma cruzi drug leads with improved pharmacokinetic profile and in vivo potency. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6989–7005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Vieira, D.F.; Choi, J.Y.; Calvet, C.M.; Siqueira-Neto, J.L.; Johnston, J.B.; Kellar, D.; Gut, J.; Cameron, M.D.; McKerrow, J.H.; Roush, W.R.; et al. Binding mode and potency of N-indolyloxopyridinyl-4-aminopropanyl-based inhibitors targeting Trypanosoma cruzi CYP51. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10162–10175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ryczak, J.; Papini, M.; Lader, A.; Nasereddin, A.; Kopelyanskiy, D.; Preu, L.; Jaffe, C.L.; Kunick, C. 2-Arylpaullones are selective antitrypanosomal agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 64, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Orban, O.C.F.; Korn, R.S.; Benítez, D.; Medeiros, A.; Preu, L.; Loaëc, N.; Meijer, L.; Koch, O.; Comini, M.A.; Kunick, C. 5-Substituted 3-chlorokenpaullone derivatives are potent inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 3790–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Maiwald, F.; Benítez, D.; Charquero, D.; Dar, M.A.; Erdmann, H.; Preu, L.; Koch, O.; Hölscher, C.; Loaëc, N.; Meijer, L.; et al. 9- and 11-substituted 4-azapaullones are potent and selective inhibitors of African trypanosoma. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 83, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ferrigno, F.; Biancofiore, I.; Malancona, S.; Ponzi, S.; Paonessa, G.; Graziani, R.; Bresciani, A.; Gennari, N.; Di Marco, A.; Kaiser, M.; et al. Discovery of 2-(1H-imidazo-2-yl)piperazines as a new class of potent and non-cytotoxic inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei growth in vitro. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 3689–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kryshchyshyn, A.; Kaminskyy, D.; Karpenko, O.; Gzella, A.; Grelier, P.; Lesyk, R. Thiazolidinone/thiazole based hybrids – New class of antitrypanosomal agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 174, 292–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Parisi, L.M. Preparation of indoles from o-alkynyltrifluoroacetanilides through the aminopalladation-reductive elimination process. Synthesis 2004, 2004, 1889–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Guillon, J.; Boudot, C.; Cohen, A.; Savrimoutou, S.; Rubio, S.; Milano, V.; Marchivie, M.; Azas, N.; Mullié, C.; Sonne, P.; et al. Synthesis of 1H-3-{4-[(3-dimethylaminopropyl)aminomethyl]phenyl}-2-phenylindole and evaluation of its antiprotozoal activity. Molbank 2019, 2019, M1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Cockram, P.E.; Dickie, E.A.; Barrett, M.P.; Smith, T.K. Halogenated tryptophan derivatives disrupt essential transamination mechanisms in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lepovitz, L.T.; Meis, A.R.; Thomas, S.M.; Wiedeman, J.; Pham, A.; Mensa-Wilmot, K.; Martin, S.F. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel anti-trypanosomal compounds. Tetrahedron 2020, 76, 131086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Fernandes, F.S.; Santos, H.; Lima, S.R.; Conti, C.; Rodrigues, M.T.; Zeoly, L.A.; Ferreira, L.L.G.; Krogh, R.; Andricopulo, A.D.; Coelho, F. Discovery of highly potent and selective antiparasitic new oxadiazole and hydroxy-oxindole small molecule hybrids. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 201, 112418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Klug, D.M.; Mavrogiannaki, E.M.; Forbes, K.C.; Silva, L.; Diaz-Gonzalez, R.; Pérez-Moreno, G.; Ceballos-Pérez, G.; Garcia-Hernández, R.; Bosch-Navarrete, C.; Cordón-Obras, C.; et al. Lead Optimization of 3,5-Disubstituted-7-Azaindoles for the Treatment of Human African Trypanosomiasis. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 9404–9430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zulfiqar, B.; Shelper, T.B.; Avery, V.M. Leishmaniasis drug discovery: Recent progress and challenges in assay development. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 1516–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Caridha, D.; Vesely, B.; van Bocxlaer, K.; Arana, B.; Mowbray, C.E.; Rafati, S.; Uliana, S.; Reguera, R.; Kreishman-Deitrick, M.; Sciotti, R.; et al. Route map for the discovery and pre-clinical development of new drugs and treatments for cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2019, 11, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ponte-Sucre, A.; Gamarro, F.; Dujardin, J.C.; Barrett, M.P.; López-Vélez, R.; García-Hernández, R.; Pountain, A.W.; Mwenechanya, R.; Papadopoulou, B. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Z.; Ray, S.; Imlay, L.; Callaghan, L.T.; Niederstrasser, H.; Mallipeddi, P.L.; Posner, B.A.; Wetzel, D.M.; Phillips, M.A.; Smith, M.W. Total synthesis of (+)-spiroindimicin A and congeners unveils their antiparasitic activity. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 10388–10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tonin, L.T.D.; Panice, M.R.; Nakamura, C.V.; Rocha, K.J.P.; dos Santos, A.O.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; da Costa, W.F.; Sarragiotto, M.H. Antitrypanosomal and antileishmanial activities of novel N-alkyl-(1-phenylsubstituted-β-carboline)-3-carboxamides. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2010, 64, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pedroso, R.B.; Tonin, L.T.D.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; Dias Filho, B.P.; Sarragiotto, M.H.; Nakamura, C.V. Beta-carboline-3-carboxamide derivatives as promising antileishmanial agents. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2011, 105, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ashok, P.; Chander, S.; Chow, L.M.C.; Wong, I.L.K.; Singh, R.P.; Jha, P.N.; Sankaranarayanan, M. Synthesis and in vitro anti-leishmanial activity of (4-arylpiperazin-1-yl)(1-(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-3-yl)methanone derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 70, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ashok, P.; Chander, S.; Smith, T.K.; Prakash Singh, R.; Jha, P.N.; Sankaranarayanan, M. Biological evaluation and structure activity relationship of 9-methyl-1-phenyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole derivatives as anti-leishmanial agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 84, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Plitzko, I.; Mohn, T.; Sedlacek, N.; Hamburger, M. Composition of Indigo naturalis. Planta Med. 2009, 75, 860–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Vougogiannopoulou, K.; Skaltsounis, A.L. From tyrian purple to kinase modulators: Naturally halogenated indirubins and synthetic analogues. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 1515–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Wei, C.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Bai, G.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y. Anticancer potential of indirubins in medicinal chemistry: Biological activity, structural modification, and structure-activity relationship. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 223, 113652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xingi, E.; Smirlis, D.; Myrianthopoulos, V.; Magiatis, P.; Grant, K.M.; Meijer, L.; Mikros, E.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Soteriadou, K. 6-Br-5methylindirubin-3′oxime (5-Me-6-BIO) targeting the leishmanial glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) short form affects cell-cycle progression and induces apoptosis-like death: Exploitation of GSK-3 for treating leishmaniasis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 1289–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Efstathiou, A.; Gaboriaud-Kolar, N.; Smirlis, D.; Myrianthopoulos, V.; Vougogiannopoulou, K.; Alexandratos, A.; Kritsanida, M.; Mikros, E.; Soteriadou, K.; Skaltsounis, A.L. An inhibitor-driven study for enhancing the selectivity of indirubin derivatives towards leishmanial Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 over leishmanial cdc2-related protein kinase 3. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Gupta, L.; Sunduru, N.; Verma, A.; Srivastava, S.; Gupta, S.; Goyal, N.; Chauhan, P.M.S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new [1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b]indol-3-ylthio-1,3,5-triazines and [1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b]indol-3-ylthio-pyrimidines against Leishmania donovani. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2359–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sharma, R.; Pandey, A.K.; Shivahare, R.; Srivastava, K.; Gupta, S.; Chauhan, P.M.S. Triazino indole-quinoline hybrid: A novel approach to antileishmanial agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Singh, G.S.; Al-Kahraman, Y.M.S.A.; Mpadi, D.; Yasinzai, M. Synthesis of N-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyleneamines and 3,3-diaryl-4-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)azetidin-2-ones as potential antileishmanial agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 5704–5706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Scala, A.; Cordaro, M.; Grassi, G.; Piperno, A.; Barberi, G.; Cascio, A.; Risitano, F. Direct synthesis of C3-mono-functionalized oxindoles from N-unprotected 2-oxindole and their antileishmanial activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Saha, S.; Acharya, C.; Pal, U.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Sarkar, K.; Maiti, N.C.; Jaisankar, P.; Majumder, H.K. A novel spirooxindole derivative inhibits the growth of Leishmania donovani parasites both in vitro and in vivo by targeting type IB topoisomerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6281–6293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Leañez, J.; Nuñez, J.; García-Marchan, Y.; Sojo, F.; Arvelo, F.; Rodriguez, D.; Buscema, I.; Alvarez-Aular, A.; Serrano-Martín, X. Anti-leishmanial effect of spiro dihydroquinoline-oxindoles on volume regulation decrease and sterol biosynthesis of Leishmania braziliensis. Exp. Parasitol. 2019, 198, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Rodrigues, K.A.D.F.; Dias, C.N.D.S.; Neris, P.L.D.N.; Rocha, J.D.C.; Scotti, M.T.; Scotti, L.; Mascarenhas, S.R.; Veras, R.C.; De Medeiros, I.A.; Keesen, T.D.S.L.; et al. 2-Amino-thiophene derivatives present antileishmanial activity mediated by apoptosis and immunomodulation in vitro. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 106, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Félix, M.B.; de Souza, E.R.; de Lima, M.d.C.A.; Frade, D.K.G.; Serafim, V.d.L.; Rodrigues, K.A.d.F.; Néris, P.L.d.N.; Ribeiro, F.F.; Scotti, L.; Scotti, M.T.; et al. Antileishmanial activity of new thiophene–indole hybrids: Design, synthesis, biological and cytotoxic evaluation, and chemometric studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 3972–3977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Pandey, S.; Khan, S.; Singh, A.; Gauniyal, H.M.; Kumar, B.; Chauhan, P.M.S. Access to indole- and pyrrole-fused diketopiperazines via tandem Ugi-4CR/intramolecular cyclization and its regioselective ring-opening by intermolecular transamidation. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 10211–10227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pandey, S.; Chauhan, S.S.; Shivahare, R.; Sharma, A.; Jaiswal, S.; Gupta, S.; Lal, J.; Chauhan, P.M.S. Identification of a diverse indole-2-carboxamides as a potent antileishmanial chemotypes. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 110, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Porwal, S.; Gupta, S.; Chauhan, P.M.S. gem-Dithioacetylated indole derivatives as novel antileishmanial agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 4643–4646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Anand, D.; Yadav, P.K.; Patel, O.P.S.; Parmar, N.; Maurya, R.K.; Vishwakarma, P.; Raju, K.S.R.; Taneja, I.; Wahajuddin, M.; Kar, S.; et al. Antileishmanial Activity of Pyrazolopyridine Derivatives and Their Potential as an Adjunct Therapy with Miltefosine. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 1041–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pal, A.; Ganguly, A.; Chowdhuri, S.; Yousuf, M.; Ghosh, A.; Barui, A.K.; Kotcherlakota, R.; Adhikari, S.; Banerjee, R. Bis-arylidene oxindole-betulinic acid conjugate: A fluorescent cancer cell detector with potent anticancer activity. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Yousuf, M.; Mukherjee, D.; Dey, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Pal, A.; Sarkar, B.; Pal, C.; Adhikari, S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of polyhydroxylated oxindole derivatives as potential antileishmanial agent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Taha, M.; Uddin, I.; Gollapalli, M.; Almandil, N.B.; Rahim, F.; Farooq, R.K.; Nawaz, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Alqahtani, M.A.; Bamarouf, Y.A.; et al. Synthesis, anti-leishmanial and molecular docking study of bis-indole derivatives. BMC Chem. 2019, 13, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tiwari, S.; Kirar, S.; Banerjee, U.C.; Neerupudi, K.B.; Singh, S.; Wani, A.A.; Bharatam, P.V.; Singh, I.P. Synthesis of N-substituted indole derivatives as potential antimicrobial and antileishmanial agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 99, 103787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Da Silva, P.R.; de Oliveira, J.F.; da Silva, A.L.; Queiroz, C.M.; Feitosa, A.P.S.; Duarte, D.M.F.A.; da Silva, A.C.; de Castro, M.C.A.B.; Pereira, V.R.A.; da Silva, R.M.F.; et al. Novel indol-3-yl-thiosemicarbazone derivatives: Obtaining, evaluation of in vitro leishmanicidal activity and ultrastructural studies. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2020, 315, 108899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Schadich, E.; Kryshchyshyn-Dylevych, A.; Holota, S.; Polishchuk, P.; Džubak, P.; Gurska, S.; Hajduch, M.; Lesyk, R. Assessing different thiazolidine and thiazole based compounds as antileishmanial scaffolds. Bioorg. Med. Chem.Lett. 2020, 30, 127616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Currently available drugs in clinical use for American trypanosomiasis management.
Figure 1. Currently available drugs in clinical use for American trypanosomiasis management.
Molecules 27 00319 g001
Figure 2. Approved drugs for human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) treatment.
Figure 2. Approved drugs for human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) treatment.
Molecules 27 00319 g002
Figure 3. Currently available drugs for leishmaniasis treatment.
Figure 3. Currently available drugs for leishmaniasis treatment.
Molecules 27 00319 g003
Figure 4. Antimalarial drugs and combination therapies in clinical use.
Figure 4. Antimalarial drugs and combination therapies in clinical use.
Molecules 27 00319 g004
Figure 5. Optimization of the indoloisoquinoline scaffold.
Figure 5. Optimization of the indoloisoquinoline scaffold.
Molecules 27 00319 g005
Scheme 1. Synthesis of indolizinoindolones.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of indolizinoindolones.
Molecules 27 00319 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of bis-alkylamine indolo[3,2-b]quinolines tested against P. falciparum.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of bis-alkylamine indolo[3,2-b]quinolines tested against P. falciparum.
Molecules 27 00319 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 3-piperidin-4-yl-1H-indoles.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 3-piperidin-4-yl-1H-indoles.
Molecules 27 00319 sch003
Figure 6. Melatonin derivatives tested against P. falciparum.
Figure 6. Melatonin derivatives tested against P. falciparum.
Molecules 27 00319 g006
Figure 7. SAR study of indolyl-3-ethanone ethers and thioethers.
Figure 7. SAR study of indolyl-3-ethanone ethers and thioethers.
Molecules 27 00319 g007
Figure 8. Yohimbine (73) ring distortion led to analogs active against Dd2.
Figure 8. Yohimbine (73) ring distortion led to analogs active against Dd2.
Molecules 27 00319 g008
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 3,4-bis(indol-3-yl)cyclobut-3-ene-1,2-diones.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 3,4-bis(indol-3-yl)cyclobut-3-ene-1,2-diones.
Molecules 27 00319 sch004
Figure 9. Activities of racemic spiroazepineindole 82 and individual stereoisomers.
Figure 9. Activities of racemic spiroazepineindole 82 and individual stereoisomers.
Molecules 27 00319 g009
Scheme 5. Synthesis of spirotetrahydro β-carbolines.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of spirotetrahydro β-carbolines.
Molecules 27 00319 sch005
Figure 10. Optimization of compound 82.
Figure 10. Optimization of compound 82.
Molecules 27 00319 g010
Figure 11. SAR for DAPI analogs 93.
Figure 11. SAR for DAPI analogs 93.
Molecules 27 00319 g011
Figure 12. Example of an indole-based galactoside with inhibitory activity of T. cruzi trans-sialidase.
Figure 12. Example of an indole-based galactoside with inhibitory activity of T. cruzi trans-sialidase.
Molecules 27 00319 g012
Figure 13. SAR for indolylpirimidinecarboximide-based TcCYP51 inhibitors.
Figure 13. SAR for indolylpirimidinecarboximide-based TcCYP51 inhibitors.
Molecules 27 00319 g013
Figure 14. Paullone scaffold optimization.
Figure 14. Paullone scaffold optimization.
Molecules 27 00319 g014
Figure 15. Optimization of compound 101.
Figure 15. Optimization of compound 101.
Molecules 27 00319 g015
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 4-thiazolidone and thiazole phenyl-indole derivatives.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 4-thiazolidone and thiazole phenyl-indole derivatives.
Molecules 27 00319 sch006
Scheme 7. Synthetic route to obtain 1H-3-{4-[(3-dimethylaminopropyl)aminomethyl]phenyl}-2-phenylindole (117).
Scheme 7. Synthetic route to obtain 1H-3-{4-[(3-dimethylaminopropyl)aminomethyl]phenyl}-2-phenylindole (117).
Molecules 27 00319 sch007
Scheme 8. Halogenated L-tryptophan analogs 119 with trypanocidal activity against T. brucei parasites.
Scheme 8. Halogenated L-tryptophan analogs 119 with trypanocidal activity against T. brucei parasites.
Molecules 27 00319 sch008
Figure 16. Rationale for structure-based design of novel hydroxyalkyl δ-lactam, δ-lactam and piperidine indole derivatives.
Figure 16. Rationale for structure-based design of novel hydroxyalkyl δ-lactam, δ-lactam and piperidine indole derivatives.
Molecules 27 00319 g016
Scheme 9. Synthesis and antitrypanosomal activity of oxadiazole–oxindole hybrids.
Scheme 9. Synthesis and antitrypanosomal activity of oxadiazole–oxindole hybrids.
Molecules 27 00319 sch009
Figure 17. Hit-to-lead optimization of 3,5-disubstituted-7-azaindole NEU-1207 (129).
Figure 17. Hit-to-lead optimization of 3,5-disubstituted-7-azaindole NEU-1207 (129).
Molecules 27 00319 g017
Scheme 10. Summary of the total synthesis of spiroindimicins A (134) and H (138).
Scheme 10. Summary of the total synthesis of spiroindimicins A (134) and H (138).
Molecules 27 00319 sch010
Scheme 11. Synthesis of β-carboline-3-carboxamides with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 11. Synthesis of β-carboline-3-carboxamides with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch011
Figure 18. General structure of piperazinyl-β-carboline-carboxamides with antileishmanial activity.
Figure 18. General structure of piperazinyl-β-carboline-carboxamides with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 g018
Figure 19. Structure–activity relationship of indirubin analogs for the LGSK3 enzyme.
Figure 19. Structure–activity relationship of indirubin analogs for the LGSK3 enzyme.
Molecules 27 00319 g019
Scheme 12. Triazino[5,6-b]indole hybrids with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 12. Triazino[5,6-b]indole hybrids with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch012
Scheme 13. Indole-based azetidin-2-ones with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 13. Indole-based azetidin-2-ones with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch013
Scheme 14. Synthesis of C-3-mono-functionalized N-unprotected indolin-2-ones.
Scheme 14. Synthesis of C-3-mono-functionalized N-unprotected indolin-2-ones.
Molecules 27 00319 sch014
Scheme 15. Synthesis of spirooxindole (165), a possible competitive inhibitor of LdTopIB enzyme.
Scheme 15. Synthesis of spirooxindole (165), a possible competitive inhibitor of LdTopIB enzyme.
Molecules 27 00319 sch015
Scheme 16. Synthesis of spiro dihydroquinoline-oxindoles with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 16. Synthesis of spiro dihydroquinoline-oxindoles with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch016
Scheme 17. Synthesis and structure–activity relationship study of indole-based 2-amino-thiophene derivatives.
Scheme 17. Synthesis and structure–activity relationship study of indole-based 2-amino-thiophene derivatives.
Molecules 27 00319 sch017
Scheme 18. Synthesis of indole-2-carboxamide derivatives via post-Ugi transformation.
Scheme 18. Synthesis of indole-2-carboxamide derivatives via post-Ugi transformation.
Molecules 27 00319 sch018
Scheme 19. Synthesis and SAR studies of gem-dithioacetylated indole.
Scheme 19. Synthesis and SAR studies of gem-dithioacetylated indole.
Molecules 27 00319 sch019
Scheme 20. Synthesis of pyrazolodihydropyridine and pyrazolopyridine indole-based derivatives.
Scheme 20. Synthesis of pyrazolodihydropyridine and pyrazolopyridine indole-based derivatives.
Molecules 27 00319 sch020
Scheme 21. Synthesis of stilbenic oxindole derivatives 199 with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 21. Synthesis of stilbenic oxindole derivatives 199 with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch021
Scheme 22. Synthesis of bis-indole derivatives 203 with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 22. Synthesis of bis-indole derivatives 203 with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch022
Scheme 23. Synthesis of N-substituted indole hybrids.
Scheme 23. Synthesis of N-substituted indole hybrids.
Molecules 27 00319 sch023
Scheme 24. Procedure to obtain indol-3-yl-thiosemicarbazone derivatives with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 24. Procedure to obtain indol-3-yl-thiosemicarbazone derivatives with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch024
Scheme 25. Synthesis of thiazolidinonephenyl–indole hybrids with antileishmanial activity.
Scheme 25. Synthesis of thiazolidinonephenyl–indole hybrids with antileishmanial activity.
Molecules 27 00319 sch025
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pacheco, P.A.F.; Santos, M.M.M. Recent Progress in the Development of Indole-Based Compounds Active against Malaria, Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis. Molecules 2022, 27, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010319

AMA Style

Pacheco PAF, Santos MMM. Recent Progress in the Development of Indole-Based Compounds Active against Malaria, Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis. Molecules. 2022; 27(1):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pacheco, Paulo A. F., and Maria M. M. Santos. 2022. "Recent Progress in the Development of Indole-Based Compounds Active against Malaria, Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis" Molecules 27, no. 1: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010319

APA Style

Pacheco, P. A. F., & Santos, M. M. M. (2022). Recent Progress in the Development of Indole-Based Compounds Active against Malaria, Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis. Molecules, 27(1), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010319

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop