Next Article in Journal
The Kinetics of Formation of Microporous Polytriazine in Diphenyl Sulfone
Next Article in Special Issue
An Ionic-Liquid-Imprinted Nanocomposite Adsorbent: Simulation, Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies of Triclosan Endocrine Disturbing Water Contaminant Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Analysis of the Adsorption and Micellization Activity of the Mixtures of Rhamnolipid and Surfactin with Triton X-165
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Computational Analysis of the Reaction of SO2 with Amino Acid Anions: Implications for Its Chemisorption in Biobased Ionic Liquids

1
Chemistry Department, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(11), 3604; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113604
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 31 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 3 June 2022

Abstract

:
We report a series of calculations to elucidate one possible mechanism of SO2 chemisorption in amino acid-based ionic liquids. Such systems have been successfully exploited as CO2 absorbents and, since SO2 is also a by-product of fossil fuels’ combustion, their ability in capturing SO2 has been assessed by recent experiments. This work is exclusively focused on evaluating the efficiency of the chemical trapping of SO2 by analyzing its reaction with the amino group of the amino acid. We have found that, overall, SO2 is less reactive than CO2, and that the specific amino acid side chain (either acid or basic) does not play a relevant role. We noticed that bimolecular absorption processes are quite unlikely to take place, a notable difference with CO2. The barriers along the reaction paths are found to be non-negligible, around 7–11 kcal/mol, and the thermodynamic of the reaction appears, from our models, unfavorable.

1. Introduction

SO2 is a colorless and poisonous gas and represents one of the main atmospheric pollutants generated by anthropic activities. Each year, around 150 million tons of SO2 are produced by various human activities, mainly burning fossil fuels, industrial processes, and energy production [1,2,3]. The anthropic SO2 is mainly produced by fossil fuel processing since SO2 is typically removed from liquid fuels before usage. Atmospheric SO2 can be oxidated to SO3, which reacts with water to form H2SO4, leading to the appearance of corrosive agents in the atmosphere. The ensuing soil and water acidification has been an environmental problem that has fortunately decreased its impact in recent years due to the adoption of measures aimed at a strong reduction of SO2 emissions, especially from gas exhaust due to the automotive compartment [4,5].
A reduction in SO2 pollution is achieved either by removing the gas from fuel prior to combustion or removing the gas after combustion by treatment of the flue gas (FDG, flue gas desulfurization) [6,7].
In FGD, different chemistries can be used to remove SO2, among others the most notable involve the use of limestone, magnesium oxide, and ammonia [8]. Most, if not all, of these absorption processes are irreversible and do not allow for SO2 recycling despite it being a useful chemical in industry. The only reversible absorption processes are those based on the use of amine solutions (in the same way they are employed for CO2 absorption [9]), but the process is far from being optimal due to the loss of amines in the stream gas.
Due to their low vapor pressure and their intrinsic ability to be functionalized for specific purposes [10], ionic liquids (ILs) have been proposed as possible green absorbing agents for CO2 and SO2 removal from gasses in industrial settings [8,11,12]. The absorption of SO2 in ILs can be physical [8,13,14] or chemical [15,16,17,18]. Our interest, in the present work, is the chemical absorption process whereby an SO2 molecule reacts with a specific group of the IL molecular ions and gives rise to a new chemical specie.
In analogy with what has been seen for CO2 [19,20], we explore the reaction mechanisms between an amino acid (AA) anion and SO2. Amino acid-based ILs (AAILS) have attracted the interest of a part of the research community because of their intrinsic biocompatibility [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] and, in particular, have been implemented as efficient chemisorbing media for CO2 absorption from flue gas [30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
A possible mechanism of the chemical reaction has already been proposed in [37], where the products have been characterized using FTIR spectroscopy. In [38], it has been shown how aqueous solutions of AAILs are efficient absorbent media and how SO2 can be regenerated after absorption by heating at 100 °C. In [39], a guanidium-based IL has been shown to undergo chemical reaction by means of its NH2 group to yield an –NH–SO2 structure.
This work is focused on understanding the mechanisms of the reaction between an AA anion and the SO2 molecule using ab initio calculations. We do not consider the problem of the diffusion of the SO2 molecule inside the fluid, nor do we include water in the calculation, but we shall assume an anhydrous IL and that the SO2 is already in the proximity of the reactive terminal of the AA anion, which is the NH2 group. To maintain generality, we had to adopt a simplified model that produces universal results, possibly independent of the many variables at play in real systems: we treat environmental effects using an approximate, continuum solvent model, and we do not include a cationic partner. While the latter sounds like an oversimplification, it is the only way to maintain the widest generality. While the cation does play a role in the reaction, it appears very difficult to assess it using ab initio modeling, since the binding motif and energy of an ionic couple in the bulk phase would be inevitably different from those that we can obtain in an isolated system. We also point out that the study of the effect of the cationic partner on the reaction mechanisms would require a different computational strategy and a systematic study of its presence upon varying coordinating properties, size, and steric shape. Such study lies outside the scope of the present work, which focuses exclusively on the reactivity of the anions.
Finally, to support our choice, we mention the data reported in [32,40] for the analogous reaction with CO2, that show how different cations have a limited effect in modifying both the reaction profile and the energetic barriers associated with the proton transfer step, especially when compared to the effect of a change in the AA anion.

2. Methods

The calculations have been performed using the g16 program [41] and the B3LYP functional combined with the 6−311+G(d,p) basis set, and corrected for dispersion interaction using the empirical GD3 approach of Grimme [42]. All structures have been fully optimized without constraints. Each stationary point has been further characterized by a harmonic frequency calculation, and the zero-point-energies (ZPE) have been added to the electronic energy. Thermodynamic functions such as the Gibbs free energy have been computed under room conditions. The uniqueness of the transition state has been verified using a suitable IRC (intrinsic reaction coordinate) calculation for all the structures presented. Electronic density and population analysis has been performed using Janpa [43].
All calculations have been performed in gas phase and in the solvent phase using the SMD, the universal solvation model based on solute electron density [44], with parameters of the acetonitrile solvent that can be used as representative of the dielectric screening acting in these liquids [19]. When possible, the SMD model has been modified to account for the measured dielectric constant of the IL.
The three AA anions that have been used to study the SO2 absorption process are: glycine (Gly), cysteine (Cys), and lysine (Lys), which have different chemical motifs on their side chains and could be representative of the variety of AA. The generic chemical reaction [37] between SO2 and the AA anion proceeds as reported in Scheme 1: Initially, there is a non-covalent complex, R, between the two molecules. This complex evolves through a transition state, TS, where a proton transfer occurs to produce the product, P. The specific mechanism depends on the type of AA anion and, in particular, in which way the proton transfer proceeds; for example, it can also take place between the –NH2+– and the SO2 groups, thus producing, first, a sulfinic acid derivative, which undergoes an isomerization to the carboxylic acid form P. In addition, and as we shall see below, a second basic functional group of the AA can be, at least in principle, involved in the proton transfer step.

3. Results

3.1. The Glycinate Reaction

We begin our presentation by looking at the results on the simplest AA anion, i.e., Gly, that serves here as an exemplar case for all aliphatic AA anions. The optimized structures along two possible reaction paths (that differs from the nature of the proton transfer) are reported in Figure 1. The top one involves a transition state with a 5-member ring (Gly-TS5) structure, and the bottom one a 4-member ring (Gly-TS4). In the former, the proton transfer involves the carboxylate, and in the latter the SO2 group. Both transition states require the formation of a positive charge formally located on the tetravalent nitrogen atom and of a negative charge on the oxygens of the –SO2 group.
While for a CO2 molecule the pre-reaction complex has a strong zwitterionic character, for SO2, the appearance of a charge separation takes place only when the process has already significantly evolved through the reaction coordinate [19]. Our calculations show that for SO2, there is almost no trace of zwitterion formation in the pre-reaction complex. This is already a clear sign of a diminished propensity of SO2 to react with the amino group.
The path involving Gly-TS5 terminates to the product P1 that has the proton on the carboxylate, as expected, and the final product Pf is only a more stable conformer of the same structure. The path involving Gly-PT4 produces a structure that has the proton on the –SO2 group that evolves to the same Pf product of the first path by isomerization. The energetic path is in accordance with the expected acidity of the –SO2H and –CO2H groups.
The energies of the Gly-TS5 path in the gas phase are reported in Figure 2. With respect to the isolated reactants (IR), the reaction is highly exothermic with a Δ r H of −26.4 kcal/mol and a Δ r G of −13.0 kcal/mol. The reduced value of the reaction free energy is due to the unfavorable entropic contribution that emerges in an association reaction. If the initial reaction complex, R, is efficiently quenched by the environment, the addition reaction of SO2 to the AA anion is almost isoergonic, with little or no thermodynamic propensity.
The energies of the Gly-TS4 reaction path are reported in Figure 3. This path is hindered by a substantial activation barrier of about 27 kcal/mol that is due to the strain in the 4-member ring that characterizes the transition state. This path is obviously very inefficient, especially in an environment that can quench the initial reactant energy.
The same calculations performed in a solvent model with a dielectric constant of 35.8 (acetonitrile) produced the numbers shown in Figure 4, where we report only the Gly-TS5 path since the Gly-TS4 path remains hindered by a barrier of 28.8 kcal/mol. The addition of the solvent has the effect of lowering the energy of the isolated reactants and to reduce the overall enthalpic gain to 14.82 kcal/mol and the corresponding Δ r G to only −0.5 kcal/mol. The barrier with respect to the quenched reactants R is increased to 7.1 kcal/mol, a value that still allows the reaction to proceed quite efficiently at moderate temperatures.
Notably, the glycinate reaction with SO2 in a solvent medium becomes slightly endoergic if the pre-reaction complex R is sufficiently long-lived to be quenched by the environment. While this reduces the overall efficiency of the incorporation process, it also indicates that the above reaction can be reversible and that the AA anions can serve as a temporary storage of SO2.
The final product is characterized by an unusual NH–SO2 bond that is the sulfur equivalent of the N–C bond in carbamates. The N–S bond is significantly weaker than its N–C counterpart. Its bond distance (from our calculations) is large and is 1.8 Å for all three AA derivatives. The lowest energy dissociation path in vacuo is heterolytic and leads to negative –NH and neutral SO2. The adiabatic bond dissociation energies with respect to this fragmentation are 25.4, 22.2, and 24.0 kcal/mol for Gly, Cys, and Lys, respectively. This is a much lower bond energy when compared to that of the C–N bond in carbamates, which is about 100 kcal/mol [45]. In the sulfinic derivative, both the NH group and the SO2 are negatively charged with roughly half an electron each, as computed from natural orbital populations. The Wiberg–Mayer bond indices of the S–N bond for the three AA derivatives are 0.85, 0.72, and 0.70 for Gly, Cys, and Lys, respectively, again pointing to a weak single bond. The N–S bond can be described by the localized molecular orbital (CLPO) arising from the combination of two optimally paired hybrids [43], where the contribution of the N hybrid is the dominant one, as shown in Figure 5 for the Gly derivative.

3.2. The Cysteinate Reaction

The reaction with a cysteinate anion proceeds substantially in the same way. A first possible path (Cys-TS5) for the reaction with SO2 requires a 5-member transition state and a proton migration toward the carboxylate group. This path in the gas phase, as in the Gly case, has a low activation barrier of 5.1 kcal/mol, and the Δ r H   and   Δ r G are −23.19 and −9.65 kcal/mol, respectively. The same calculation repeated in the SMD model, with the dielectric constant of 9.5 (which is the measured dielectric constant for the [Ch][Cys] IL reported in [46]), yields a Δ r H of −14.4 kcal/mol and a Δ r G of −1.0 kcal/mol. The reaction paths in vacuo and in solvent are reported in Figure 6, along with the geometries of the stationary points.
As we have shown in [47], the cysteinate anion can present itself in an isomeric form, where the proton of the thiol group has migrated onto the carboxylate. The result is that this isomeric form of the AA anion can bind the SO2 molecule only via the reaction path that requires a proton transfer from the –NH2 group through the highly unstable transition state characterized by a 4-member ring. Needless to say, this path is hindered by a large activation barrier of 27.1 kcal/mol. In addition, the overall reaction free energy becomes positive and equal to 5.8 kcal/mol, thus rendering this reaction channel extremely unlikely to be of any relevance for the pollutant absorption.
We tried to locate a possible reaction path that involved a proton transfer toward the thiolate group, but none of our attempts were successful. In other words, it appears that the –SH group does not play an active role in the SO2 absorption processes.

3.3. The Lysinate Reaction

A third set of calculations were repeated on the Lys anion, where it can be argued that the additional basic NH2 group on the side chain could play a role in the reaction mechanism or even give rise to a bimolecular absorption path, in which both amino groups are converted to sulfinic acids.
The analogous of the Gly-TS5 and Cys-TS5 mechanisms is also active for Lys and is reported in terms of energies and structures in Figure 7. The barriers in the gas phase and in the model solvent (with a dielectric constant of 9.8 [46]) are 6.8 and 11.2 kcal/mol, respectively. For the gas phase, the Δ r H   and   Δ r G are −26.4 and −11.8 kcal/mol, respectively. These values are reduced to −15.6 and −2.4 kcal/mol in the solvent model.
We have tried to trace a possible reactive path that involved the side chain NH2, but this group seems impervious to the SO2 attack. This is probably due to its higher basicity and to the absence of the carboxylate in β that can activate the reaction. This result, albeit negative, is important because the SO2 molecule appears less reactive than CO2, especially toward the AA side chains. It therefore appears unlikely that a single AA anion would be able to capture more than one SO2 molecule unless its molecular structure is purposedly engineered by placing more than one “activated” amino group. In comparison, we defer the reader to our study in [20], where we had shown how efficient a bimolecular reaction of the same AA can be when CO2 is involved.

4. Conclusions

This study attempted to elucidate a possible reaction mechanism based on the chemisorption of SO2 in biobased ionic liquids, namely, its reaction with the amino group of the AA anion. The model employed here did not account for the problem of SO2 diffusion in the liquid, and instead only focused on the reactive step once the SO2 had the chance to attack the amino group of the AA anion. Solvation and stabilization due to a dielectric has been nevertheless considered by using an approximate continuum solvent model. This approach, albeit quite simplified, has already been successfully used by us to illustrate the mechanisms at the basis of the quite efficient absorption of CO2 in these liquids [19,20].
In comparison to CO2, where a set of reaction mechanisms were found to be essentially barrierless and strongly exoergic with negative Δ r G , SO2 was less reactive towards the AA anions. This reduced reactivity substantially prevents SO2 from taking advantage of the presence of specific functional side chains, and the only mechanism that is viable is a direct addition of it to the amino group next to the carboxylate, a reactive path that should be common to all AA anions.
The mechanism involves passing through a cyclic transition state, where one of the protons initially belonging to NH2 is transferred to the carboxylate, neutralizing it. The resulting deprotonated sulfinic acid derivative is the final product. We have tried to find other mechanisms that involve the side chain, but we were unable to find any other efficient route. In contrast with the case of CO2, where the slightness or even absence of kinetic barriers makes the reaction extremely efficient, SO2 appears less prone to chemisorption due to the appearance of non-negligible barriers and to a much less exoergic thermodynamic of the involved reactions. In general, the barrier to the chemisorption reaction appeared to lie in the 7–11 kcal/mol interval, while the reaction free energies were only slightly negative, with values between −0.5 and −2 kcal/mol. The reason for this behavior lies in the relative weakness of the N–S bond when compared to its analogous in carbamates (the result of the CO2 reaction). The bond tends to break heterolytically, leading to neutral SO2, and its dissociation requires only 22–25 kcal/mol. This last aspect, albeit reducing the overall reaction rate, did however indicate a facile reversibility of the absorption reaction, thus pointing to a possible use of these materials as temporary storage for SO2.
While in the case of CO2 the overall absorption process, due to the high rate of the absorption reaction, seemed to be dominated by the rate of diffusion of the molecule in the liquid, for SO2, the chemical step is very likely to be much slower (especially at room temperature) and thermodynamically inefficient. This means that the absorption of SO2 in these liquids can easily be dominated by physisorption, with chemisorption being only a minor factor contributing to their overall intake capacity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing, E.B.; investigation, V.P., S.R. and A.L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization (Ed.) Air Quality Guidelines: Global Update 2005: Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Sulfur Dioxide; World Health Organization: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006; ISBN 978-92-890-2192-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoesly, R.M.; Smith, S.J.; Feng, L.; Klimont, Z.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Pitkanen, T.; Seibert, J.J.; Vu, L.; Andres, R.J.; Bolt, R.M.; et al. Historical (1750–2014) Anthropogenic Emissions of Reactive Gases and Aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geosci. Model Dev. 2018, 11, 369–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Yao, Q. The Health Costs of the Industrial Leap Forward in China: Evidence from the Sulfur Dioxide Emissions of Coal-Fired Power Stations. China Econ. Rev. 2018, 49, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lawrence, G.B.; Hazlett, P.W.; Fernandez, I.J.; Ouimet, R.; Bailey, S.W.; Shortle, W.C.; Smith, K.T.; Antidormi, M.R. Declining Acidic Deposition Begins Reversal of Forest-Soil Acidification in the Northeastern U.S. and Eastern Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 13103–13111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kahl, J.S.; Stoddard, J.L.; Haeuber, R.; Paulsen, S.G.; Birnbaum, R.; Deviney, F.A.; Webb, J.R.; DeWalle, D.R.; Sharpe, W.; Driscoll, C.T.; et al. Peer Reviewed: Have U.S. Surface Waters Responded to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 484A–490A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hansen, B.B.; Kiil, S.; Johnsson, J.E.; Sønder, K.B. Foaming in Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Plants: The Influence of Particles, Electrolytes, and Buffers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 3239–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mirdrikvand, M.; Moqadam, S.I.; Kharaghani, A.; Roozbehani, B.; Jadidi, N. Optimization of a Pilot-Scale Amine Scrubber to Remove SO2: Higher Selectivity and Lower Solvent Consumption. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2016, 39, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, S.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, K.; Wu, W. Ionic Liquids: Functionalization and Absorption of SO2. Green Energy Environ. 2018, 3, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bates, E.D.; Mayton, R.D.; Ntai, I.; Davis, J.H. CO2 Capture by a Task-Specific Ionic Liquid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 926–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Giernoth, R. Task-Specific Ionic Liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2834–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, S.; Han, F.; Hou, Q.; Zhang, S.; Ai, S. Recent Advances in Ionic Liquid-Mediated SO2 Capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 13804–13818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rashid, T.U. Ionic Liquids: Innovative Fluids for Sustainable Gas Separation from Industrial Waste Stream. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 321, 114916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, S.; Gao, H.; Zhang, X.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S. Efficient and Reversible Capture of SO2 by Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 251, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, L.; Mei, K.; Chen, K.; Dao, R.; Li, H.; Wang, C. Design and Prediction for Highly Efficient SO2 Capture from Flue Gas by Imidazolium Ionic Liquids. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 7, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xie, H.; Xu, Y.; Wei, J. SO2 Absorption in Pure Ionic Liquids: Solubility and Functionalization. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 392, 122504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mao, F.-F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, W.; Sang, X.-Y.; Li, Z.-M.; Tao, D.-J. Synthesis of Guanidinium-Based Poly(Ionic Liquids) with Nonporosity for Highly Efficient SO2 Capture from Flue Gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 5984–5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Geng, Z.; Xie, Q.; Fan, Z.; Sun, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Xu, Y. Investigation of Tertiary Amine-Based PILs for Ideal Efficient SO2 Capture from CO2. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hou, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, M.; Ren, S.; Wu, W. Absorption and Conversion of SO2 in Functional Ionic Liquids: Effect of Water on the Claus Reaction. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 10413–10419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Onofri, S.; Adenusi, H.; Le Donne, A.; Bodo, E. CO2 Capture in Ionic Liquids Based on Amino Acid Anions With Protic Side Chains: A Computational Assessment of Kinetically Efficient Reaction Mechanisms. ChemistryOpen 2020, 9, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Onofri, S.; Bodo, E. CO2 Capture in Biocompatible Amino Acid Ionic Liquids: Exploring the Reaction Mechanisms for Bimolecular Absorption Processes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 5611–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hou, X.-D.; Liu, Q.-P.; Smith, T.J.; Li, N.; Zong, M.-H. Evaluation of Toxicity and Biodegradability of Cholinium Amino Acids Ionic Liquids. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gontrani, L.; Scarpellini, E.; Caminiti, R.; Campetella, M. Bio Ionic Liquids and Water Mixtures: A Structural Study. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 19338–19344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gontrani, L. Choline-Amino Acid Ionic Liquids: Past and Recent Achievements about the Structure and Properties of These Really “Green” Chemicals. Biophys. Rev. 2018, 10, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Caparica, R.; Júlio, A.; Baby, A.; Araújo, M.; Fernandes, A.; Costa, J.; Santos de Almeida, T. Choline-Amino Acid Ionic Liquids as Green Functional Excipients to Enhance Drug Solubility. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Le Donne, A.; Adenusi, H.; Porcelli, F.; Bodo, E. Structural Features of Cholinium Based Protic Ionic Liquids through Molecular Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 5568–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, X.; Luo, X.; Li, J.; Qiu, R.; Lin, J. Cooperative CO2 Absorption by Amino Acid-Based Ionic Liquids with Balanced Dual Sites. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 7751–7757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Bodo, E. Modelling Biocompatible Ionic Liquids Based on Organic Acids and Amino Acids: Challenges for Computational Models and Future Perspectives. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 4002–4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dhattarwal, H.S.; Kashyap, H.K. Unique and Generic Structural Features of Cholinium Amino Acid-Based Biocompatible Ionic Liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 10662–10669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bodo, E. Perspectives in the Computational Modeling of New Generation, Biocompatible Ionic Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hussain, M.A.; Soujanya, Y.; Sastry, G.N. Evaluating the Efficacy of Amino Acids as CO2 Capturing Agents: A First Principles Investigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8582–8588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bhattacharyya, S.; Shah, F.U. Ether Functionalized Choline Tethered Amino Acid Ionic Liquids for Enhanced CO2 Capture. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 5441–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Firaha, D.S.; Kirchner, B. Tuning the Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Amino Acid Ionic Liquids. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1591–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, F.-F.; Huang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Zhu, X.; Tao, D.-J.; Jiang, D.; Dai, S. Multi-Molar Absorption of CO2 by the Activation of Carboxylate Groups in Amino Acid Ionic Liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7166–7170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, K.; Wang, Y.; Yao, J.; Li, H. Equilibrium in Protic Ionic Liquids: The Degree of Proton Transfer and Thermodynamic Properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Latini, G.; Signorile, M.; Crocellà, V.; Bocchini, S.; Pirri, C.F.; Bordiga, S. Unraveling the CO2 Reaction Mechanism in Bio-Based Amino-Acid Ionic Liquids by Operando ATR-IR Spectroscopy. Catal. Today 2019, 336, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Davarpanah, E.; Hernández, S.; Latini, G.; Pirri, C.F.; Bocchini, S. Enhanced CO2 Absorption in Organic Solutions of Biobased Ionic Liquids. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2020, 4, 1900067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Meng, X.; Wang, J.; Jiang, H.; Shi, X.; Hu, Y. 2-Ethyl-4-Methylimidazolium Alaninate Ionic Liquid: Properties and Mechanism of SO2 Absorption. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 2996–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, H.; Wu, P.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Deng, R. Reversible and Efficient Absorption of SO2 with Natural Amino Acid Aqueous Solutions: Performance and Mechanism. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 4451–4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, C.; Lü, R.; Gates, I.D. Computational Study on the Absorption Mechanisms of SO2 by Ionic Liquids. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 4330–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shaikh, A.R.; Ashraf, M.; AlMayef, T.; Chawla, M.; Poater, A.; Cavallo, L. Amino Acid Ionic Liquids as Potential Candidates for CO2 Capture: Combined Density Functional Theory and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020, 745, 137239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  42. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Nikolaienko, T.Y.; Bulavin, L.A. Localized Orbitals for Optimal Decomposition of Molecular Properties. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2019, 119, e25798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaur, R.P.; Singh, H. Effect of Cyclization on Bond Dissociation Enthalpies, Acidities and Proton Affinities of Carbamate Molecules: A Theoretical Study. Results Chem. 2019, 1, 100003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bennett, E.L.; Song, C.; Huang, Y.; Xiao, J. Measured Relative Complex Permittivities for Multiple Series of Ionic Liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 294, 111571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Le Donne, A.; Bodo, E. Isomerization Patterns and Proton Transfer in Ionic Liquids Constituents as Probed by Ab-Initio Computation. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 249, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Generic reaction for the addition of SO2 to an AA anion.
Scheme 1. Generic reaction for the addition of SO2 to an AA anion.
Molecules 27 03604 sch001
Figure 1. Stationary point geometries along the reaction of [Gly] with SO2. (Top): Path with a 5-mamber transition state that sees the transfer of a proton toward the carboxylate. (Bottom): Path involving a 4-member ring with proton transfer on the SO2. The last two structures in the top sequence are conformers, while those of the bottom sequence are isomers.
Figure 1. Stationary point geometries along the reaction of [Gly] with SO2. (Top): Path with a 5-mamber transition state that sees the transfer of a proton toward the carboxylate. (Bottom): Path involving a 4-member ring with proton transfer on the SO2. The last two structures in the top sequence are conformers, while those of the bottom sequence are isomers.
Molecules 27 03604 g001
Figure 2. Reaction energies of the Gly-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies.
Figure 2. Reaction energies of the Gly-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies.
Molecules 27 03604 g002
Figure 3. Reaction energies of the Gly-TS4 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies.
Figure 3. Reaction energies of the Gly-TS4 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies.
Molecules 27 03604 g003
Figure 4. Reaction energies of the Gly-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies in the SMD solvent model.
Figure 4. Reaction energies of the Gly-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies in the SMD solvent model.
Molecules 27 03604 g004
Figure 5. Localized molecular orbitals characterizing the N–S bond in the Gly derivative, Pf. (a,b): Optimized atomic hybrids (LHOs) centered on S and N, respectively. (c): CLPO responsible for the bond, where the LHO centered on N accounts for 0.64% of the linear combination.
Figure 5. Localized molecular orbitals characterizing the N–S bond in the Gly derivative, Pf. (a,b): Optimized atomic hybrids (LHOs) centered on S and N, respectively. (c): CLPO responsible for the bond, where the LHO centered on N accounts for 0.64% of the linear combination.
Molecules 27 03604 g005
Figure 6. Reaction energies of the Cys-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies. (a): Reaction in the gas phase. (b): Reaction in the SMD solvent model. (c): Optimized geometries in the gas phase of the stationary points along the reaction path.
Figure 6. Reaction energies of the Cys-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using ZPE corrected electronic energies. (a): Reaction in the gas phase. (b): Reaction in the SMD solvent model. (c): Optimized geometries in the gas phase of the stationary points along the reaction path.
Molecules 27 03604 g006aMolecules 27 03604 g006b
Figure 7. Reaction energies of the Lys-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using zero-point energy-corrected electronic energies. (a): Reaction in the gas phase. (b): Reaction in the SMD solvent model. (c): Optimized geometries in the gas phase of the stationary points along the reaction path. The P1 product is a high-energy isomer of P2.
Figure 7. Reaction energies of the Lys-TS5 path with respect to isolated reactants as computed using zero-point energy-corrected electronic energies. (a): Reaction in the gas phase. (b): Reaction in the SMD solvent model. (c): Optimized geometries in the gas phase of the stationary points along the reaction path. The P1 product is a high-energy isomer of P2.
Molecules 27 03604 g007aMolecules 27 03604 g007b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piacentini, V.; Le Donne, A.; Russo, S.; Bodo, E. A Computational Analysis of the Reaction of SO2 with Amino Acid Anions: Implications for Its Chemisorption in Biobased Ionic Liquids. Molecules 2022, 27, 3604. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113604

AMA Style

Piacentini V, Le Donne A, Russo S, Bodo E. A Computational Analysis of the Reaction of SO2 with Amino Acid Anions: Implications for Its Chemisorption in Biobased Ionic Liquids. Molecules. 2022; 27(11):3604. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piacentini, Vanessa, Andrea Le Donne, Stefano Russo, and Enrico Bodo. 2022. "A Computational Analysis of the Reaction of SO2 with Amino Acid Anions: Implications for Its Chemisorption in Biobased Ionic Liquids" Molecules 27, no. 11: 3604. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113604

APA Style

Piacentini, V., Le Donne, A., Russo, S., & Bodo, E. (2022). A Computational Analysis of the Reaction of SO2 with Amino Acid Anions: Implications for Its Chemisorption in Biobased Ionic Liquids. Molecules, 27(11), 3604. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113604

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop