Next Article in Journal
Candelilla Wax Extracted by Traditional Method and an Ecofriendly Process: Assessment of Its Chemical, Structural and Thermal Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Naringenin Nanoparticles to Improve the Antitussive Effects on Post-Infectious Cough
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules27123738
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Established Liposome-Coated IMB16-4 Polymeric Nanoparticles (LNPs) for Increasing Cellular Uptake and Anti-Fibrotic Effects In Vitro

by
Xia Niu
†,
Yanan Meng
†,
Yucheng Wang
* and
Guiling Li
*
Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(12), 3738; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123738
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 6 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nanochemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As a global health problem, liver fibrosis still does not have approved treatment. It was proved that N-(3,4,5-trichlorophenyl)-2(3-nitrobenzenesulfonamide) benzamide (IMB16-4) has anti-hepatic fibrosis activity. However, IMB16-4 displays poor water solubility and poor bioavailability. We are devoted to developing biodegraded liposome-coated polymeric nanoparticles (LNPs) as IMB16-4 delivery systems for improving aqueous solubility, cellular uptake, and anti-fibrotic effects. The physical states of IMB16-4−LNPs were analyzed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The results show that IMB16-4−LNPs increased the drug loading compared to liposomes and enhanced cellular uptake behavior compared with IMB16-4−NPs. In addition, IMB16-4−LNPs could repress the expression of hepatic fibrogenesis-associated proteins, indicating that IMB16-4−LNPs exhibited evident anti-fibrotic effects.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hepatic fibrosis, developed from chronic liver diseases, is considered one of the global health threats [1,2]. When hepatic parenchymal cells are stimulated by physical, chemical, and biological infections, adjacent hepatocytes, Kupffer cells and sinus endothelial cells secrete a variety of cytokines through paracrine action. These cytokines activate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which transform into myofibroblasts (MFC), proliferate, and synthesize the extracellular matrix (ECM) [3,4,5,6]. This destroys the inherent function and histological structure of the liver [7,8,9]. Activated HSCs are characterized by the overexpression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) as well as cytokines, such as transforming growth factor (TGF-β) [10]. Thus, a desired strategy for the treatment of liver fibrosis is warranted that can suppress the activation of HSCs or promote the apoptosis of activated HSCs [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Some types of hepatic fibrosis showed hardly any reversal by removal of the trigger of chronic inflammation [3]. Therefore, anti-fibrotic strategies will be needed to suppress the progression of liver fibrosis [21]. Despite recent advances in treatments for liver fibrosis in current clinical modalities, the therapeutic efficacy still needs improvement [22,23,24]. In response to this difficulty, ample research efforts have been made toward the resolution of liver fibrosis to improve patients’ quality of life and relieve their economic burden [25,26].
N-(3,4,5-trichlorophenyl)-2(3-nitrobenzenesulfonamido) benzamide, abbreviated as IMB16-4, is a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of cholestatic hepatic fibrosis. However, IMB16-4 is almost insoluble in water and displays poor oral bioavailability [27,28]. We developed some nano-delivery systems to increase the anti-fibrotic efficacy, including mesoporous silica, liposomes, and polymeric nanoparticles. To explore the advantages of liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles, we intended to construct biodegraded liposome-coated polymeric nanoparticles (LNPs) as drug delivery systems, which were composed of a lipid bilayer as the outer sphere and polymeric nanoparticles as the inner core [29,30,31]. LNPs possess a higher drug loading and decrease drug leakage compared to liposomes [32,33]. In addition, the phospholipid bilayer shell imparts many therapeutic benefits, such as easy modification, high biocompatibility, and low immunogenicity [34].
Herein, we first established IMB16-4−LNPs and discussed their stability, drug release, cell uptake, and anti-fibrotic effect in vitro. IMB16-4−LNPs were systematically studied using TEM, XRD, DSC, and HPLC. The anti-fibrotic effects of IMB16-4−LNPs were also measured on the human HSCs line (LX-2) by testing α-SMA and MMP2 protein activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. The Morphology and Particle Size

IMB16-4−NPs as hydrophilic cores were prepared for utilizing hydrophilic materials, PVPK30 by the anti-solvent method, and displayed a nearly monodispersed spherical shape with a size of 50~80 nm. IMB16-4−LNPs and blank liposomes were prepared by the film dispersion method, and the lipid membrane was dispersed in IMB16-4−NPs suspensions and distilled water, respectively. IMB16-4−LNPs with a size of 100~200 nm displayed lipid bilayer-coated IMB16-4−NPs and showed an excellent size distribution (PDI < 0.3) (Figure 1 and Table 1). The particle size and average Zeta potential of IMB16-4−LNPs were 119.0 ± 43.1 and −26.6 mV, respectively. The film-dispersed distilled water without IMB16-4−NPs formed the blank liposome, and most of the liposomes were in the shape of an oval with a size of 20~60 nm (Figure 1B,E).

2.2. Entrapment Efficiency (EE) and Drug Loading

The concentration of IMB16-4 was examined by HPLC. The EE of LNPs was found to be 46.1%. The IMB16-4 content was 1.03 mg/mL in LNPs suspension before freeze-drying. In addition, we tried to load IMB16-4 in the liposome membrane. However, the maximum drug loading was 52.2 μg/mL before freeze-drying; otherwise, IMB16-4 as white precipitate was precipitated at a concentration of more than 52.2 μg/mL during dispersing distilled water. Clearly, IMB16-4−LNPs greatly increased drug loading compared to liposomes.

2.3. Characterization of IMB16-4−LNPs

The intermolecular interaction between IMB16-4−NPs and the phospholipid bilayer usually leads to changes in FTIR spectra. The spectra of blank liposomes, IMB16-4−LNPs, IMB16-4−NPs, and IMB16-4 are shown in Figure 2. Pure IMB16-4 contained a C–H (unsaturated) stretching vibration at 3080~3200 cm−1 and NH stretching mode at 3375 cm−1, which were lost both in IMB16-4−NPs and IMB16-4−LNPs, and there appeared to be C–H aliphatic stretching at 2950 cm−1 and a CH2 symmetrical stretching vibration at 2857 cm−1. However, 1668 cm−1 in IMB16-4−LNPs vanished and was substituted by 1637 cm−1. The results indicate that the phospholipid bilayer and IMB16-4−NPs might be combined through physical interaction.
Small molecules presented a very sharp endothermic peak at the melting temperature during DSC analysis. As shown in Figure 3A, IMB16-4 showed a sharp endothermic peak at 253~258 °C, whereas no trace of an endothermic peak was observed for IMB16-4−NPs and IMB16-4−LNPs, indicating a decrease in the crystallinity of IMB16-4. Furthermore, we chose the XRD method to confirm the crystalline form. As shown in Figure 3B, the diffraction pattern of IMB16-4 was shown to be highly crystalline by the numerous peaks. However, no crystalline IMB16-4 was detected in IMB16-4−NPs or IMB16-4−LNPs, indicating that IMB16-4 existed as amorphous in IMB16-4−NPs and IMB16-4−LNPs.

2.4. Stability Measurements

IMB16-4 content, the size and Zeta potential of LNPs lyophilized powder were explored to measure its stability. Table 2 shows that the size, Zeta potential and IMB16-4 content of lyophilized powder did not significantly change during two months at 4 °C, indicating certain long-term storage stability.

2.5. In Vitro Release

The in vitro release behaviors of IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs were conducted by the dialysis method in a 3% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) release medium. As shown in Figure 4, IMB16-4 release from LNPs was obviously slower compared to that of IMB16-4−NPs at each time point. The release of IMB16-4 from IMB16-4−LNPs was evidently delayed before 12 h, at which time the accumulative dissolutions of IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs were 17.8% and 37.4%, respectively, indicating that the release of IMB16-4−LNPs was somewhat controlled by lipid membrane.

2.6. In Vitro Cellular Uptake

The cellular uptake behavior of IMB16-4–LNPs and IMB16-4–NPs was quantitatively evaluated by HPLC under an equal concentration of protein. As illustrated in Table 3, IMB16-4–LNPs showed higher cellular uptake on the human HSCs line (LX-2) compared to IMB16-4–NPs, indicating that the lipid membrane increased the uptake of IMB16-4.

2.7. The Cytotoxicity

To examine the biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of LNPs formulation, the cytotoxicity of raw IMB16-4, IMB16-4−LNPs, IMB16-4−NPs, PVPK30, and blank liposomes at various concentrations was investigated in LX-2 cells (Figure 5). Blank liposomes and PVPK30 showed no cytotoxicity at the tested concentration. Raw IMB16-4 was dissolved in DMSO, and then diluted with DMEM/GlutaMAX I without FBS. Clearly, the cell survival rate of IMB16-4−LNPs at 40 μM was higher compared with that of raw IMB16-4. However, raw IMB16-4 was directly suspended in DMEM/GlutaMAX I and showed no cytotoxicity at the tested concentration, which might be attributed to a low water solubility.
The cell survival rate of IMB16-4−LNPs at 40 μM was lower compared to that of IMB16-4−NPs, which was caused by increased cellular uptake (Table 3). Interestingly, there was no obvious cytotoxicity of IMB16-4−LNPs at the concentrations from 2 μM to 10 μM, which enlarged the safe and effective concentration. The results showed that IMB16-4−LNPs reduced cytotoxicity and increased biocompatibility compared to raw IMB16-4. In addition, IMB16-4−LNPs reduced cytotoxicity at concentrations lower than 10 μM compared to IMB16-4−NPs, indicating IMB16-4−LNPs would be a suitable and pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

2.8. In Vitro Antifibrotic Effects

LX-2 cells as human hepatic stellate cells were chosen to conduct anti-liver fibrosis effects in vitro. The TGF-β1 protein (2 ng/mL) further stimulated LX-2 cells into completely activated hepatic stellate cells. After being treated with TGF-β1, the hepaic fibrogenic makers from LX-2 were more secreted. Along with IMB16-4 treatment, the regulated expression of all hepaic fibrogenic makers is shown in Figure 6. IMB16-4−LNPs significantly decreased the protein levels of α-SMA and MMP2 on LX-2 cells. The anti-liver fibrosis effects of IMB16-4−LNPs were stronger than raw IMB16-4, indicating IMB16-4−LNPs increased anti-liver fibrosis effects. Furthermore, IMB16-4−LNPs better lowered the expression of MMP2 compared to IMB16-4−NPs, which can be attributed to the lipid membrane increasing its uptake of IMB16-4.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Egg yolk lecithin and cholesterol were purchased from AVT Pharmaceutical Tech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). IMB16-4 was synthesized by our team (Lot No.: IMB20191213, Beijing, China). PVPK30 was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Recombinant human TGF-β1 protein (TGF-β1) was purchased from R&D Systems (R&D, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Antibodies for glyceraldehyde-3-antiphosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), MMP2, and α-SMA were obtained from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies against mouse or rabbit IgG were obtained from Proteintech (Wuhan, China). All other reagents were the class of reagent grade.

3.2. Preparation of IMB16-4−LNPs

IMB16-4−NPs were obtained as previously reported [27]. Then, 10 mg IMB16-4 was dissolved in 1 mL N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF). Then, the resulting IMB16-4 solution was dropped into 10 mL 0.1% PVPK30 solution. After stirring at room temperature for 30 min, the mixture was centrifuged to remove the organic solvent. Finally, the precipitation was redispersed with 5 mL 0.1% PVPK30 solution, which was obtained IMB16-4−NPs suspension.
IMB16-4−LNPs and blank liposomes were prepared by thin film hydration method. Briefly, egg yolk lecithin (15 mg) and cholesterol (3 mg) were dissolved in 5 mL N-butanol, and the solution was then evaporated by rotary evaporation to form a homogeneous film at 37 °C. The film was hydrated with 5 mL above IMB16-4−NPs suspension at room temperature and sonicated for 2 min at 150 W. The roughening solution of IMB16-4−LNPs was obtained, and uncoupled IMB16-4 was separated using centrisart (Scilogex, Rocky Hill, Connecticut, USA) and 2.5 mL concentrator (20,000 MWCO) at 15,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The material trapped in the filter was reconstituted with deionized water and lyophilized with a 6% (w/v) mixture of sucrose, trehalose, and mannitol for long-term preservation. The final lyophilized powder was stored at 4 °C, which was named IMB16-4−LNPs.
In addition, the film (film containing IMB16-4) was hydrated with distilled water. The blank liposomes suspension (IMB16-4 liposomes suspension) was lyophilized with a 6% (w/v) mixture of sucrose, trehalose, and mannitol. The final lyophilized powder was stored at 4 °C, which was named blank liposomes (IMB16-4 liposomes).

3.3. The Content of IMB16-4−LNPs by HPLC

The encapsulation efficiency (EE) of IMB16-4−LNPs was analyzed on a Shim-pack C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 2 μm) at 258 nm using HPLC (LC-2030, Shimadzu, Shimada, Japan). The mobile phase contained 80% methanol and 20% phosphoric acid solutions (pH 2.0). IMB16-4−LNPs suspension was centrifuged for 20 min at 15,000 rpm, and the unentrapped IMB16-4 was removed. The encapsulation efficiency was determined by the following formula:
EE (%) = (total amount of drug-unentrapped drug)/total amount of drug × 100
IMB16-4−LNPs

3.4. Physicochemical Characterization

IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs were diluted with distilled water, and then their size distribution, polydispersity index, and Zeta potential were measured using the Malvern Zeta sizer Nano ZS.
After being diluted with water, IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs were dropped on a copper grid, stained with 2% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid and air-dried at room temperature to investigate the morphology of IMB16−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs using TEM (JEM1200EX, JEOL, Tokoy, Japan) performed at 80 kV under high vacuum.
FTIR spectra of blank liposomes, IMB16-4, IMB16-4−NPs, and IMB16-4−LNPs were obtained by Fourier transform spectrophotometer (Nicolet IS10, Belmont, MA, USA) with a frequency range of 400 to 4000 cm−1.
For DSC analysis, samples were heated from 30 to 300 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen purge of 50 mL/min with a DSC 1 instrument (Mettler Toledo, Sweden).
XRD patterns of IMB16-4, IMB16-4−NPs, and IMB16-4−LNPs were performed from 5° to 40° (diffraction angle 2θ) at a step size of 0.02°with an X-ray diffractometer (Brucker D8 Advance, Karlsruhe, Germany).

3.5. Stability Measurements

For long-term storage stability measurements, IMB16-4−LNPs powder was stored at 4 °C, and size, PDI, Zeta potential, and drug content were detected at different time points (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 days).

3.6. In Vitro Drug Release Study

The in vitro drug release from IMB16-4−NPs and IMB16-4−LNPs in PBS (pH 7.4, with 3% SDS) was determined by the dialysis method. Next, 1 mL of both IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs (0.25 mg/mL of IMB16-4) was placed in dialysis bags (8~12 KMWCO) and submerged in 100 mL PBS (pH 7.4) in thermostatic oscillator (Huamei, Taicang, China) at 37 °C and 100 rpm. Samples were taken at predetermined time intervals and replaced with the same volume of a pre-warmed fresh release medium. IMB16-4 concentrations were assayed by HPLC at a wavelength of 258 nm. The experiment was repeated in triplicates, and data are represented as mean ± SD.

3.7. In Vitro Cytotoxicity

The human HSCs line (LX-2) was chosen for in vitro cytotoxicity testing. LX-2 cells were cultured in DMEM/GlutaMAX I (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2, respectively. After being seeded into a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h, 100 μL of raw IMB16-4, blank liposomes, PVPK30, IMB16-4−NPs, and IMB16-4−LNPs with different concentrations (diluted with DMEM/GlutaMAX I, no FBS) were replaced and incubated for 24 h. Then, 10 μL cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) solutions were incubated together for 2 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm by an enzyme microplate reader (BioTek, SYNERGYH1, Winooski, VT, USA).

3.8. In Vitro Cellular Uptake

LX-2 cells were grown in a 6-well plate with DMEM/GlutaMAX I, containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere, the cells were treated with IMB16-4−LNPs or IMB16-4−NPs suspensions at different concentrations of IMB16-4 for 2 h. The cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (1×X PBS, pH 7.4). Cells were lysed with a 60 µL RIPA buffer containing a protease inhibitor on the ice for 30 min. Total proteins were extracted and quantified using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). IMB16-4 concentrations at equal amounts of protein were assayed by HPLC at a wavelength of 258 nm.

3.9. The Anti-Fibrotic Effects on LX-2 Cells

LX-2 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and cultured in DMEM/GlutaMAX I with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 24 h. Serum-free culture was replaced for starving cells. After 24 h, cells were treated with TGF-β1 (2 ng/mL) and IMB16-4 (2 µM), IMB16-4−NPs (2 µM), and IMB16-4−LNPs (2 µM) for 24 h. Then, cells were washed with PBS, and protein was extracted with RIPA buffer containing a protease inhibitor. Then mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatant was collected, and the total protein was determined by a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Equivalent amounts of proteins (80 µg) were added into the 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for 100 min, and were blocked with a rapid blocking buffer for 10 min. The membranes were incubated with desired primary antibodies of GAPDH, MMP2, and α-SMA antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody at 1:5000 dilutions for 2 h at room temperature. The protein bands were detected with the Tanon-5200 chemiluminescent imaging system.

3.10. Statistical Analysis

One way ANOVA was performed following Dunnett’s test for comparison with the control group. p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

Herein, we reported a new nanodrug delivery system: IMB16-4−LNPs for IMB16-4. IMB16-4−LNPs possessed an ideal size distribution, preferable biocompatibility, and excellent anti-liver fibrosis effect. IMB16-4−LNPs increased cell uptake compared to IMB16-4−NPs and exhibited higher drug loading compared to liposomes. IMB16-4−LNPs with complementary advantages would be a promising drug delivery in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.N. and Y.M.; methodology, X.N. and Y.M.; software, X.N. and Y.M.; validation, Y.W. and G.L.; formal analysis, X.N. and Y.M.; investigation, X.N. and Y.M.; resources, Y.W. and G.L.; data curation, Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.N. and Y.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.W. and G.L.; visualization, X.N. and Y.M.; supervision, Y.W., G.L., X.N. and Y.M.; funding acquisition, G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, grant number 2021-I2M-1-070.

Informed Consent Statement

Not application.

Data Availability Statement

Not application.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank center for analysis and Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds IMB16-4 are available from the authors.

References

  1. Tsochatzis, E.A.; Bosch, J.; Burroughs, A.K. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 2014, 383, 1749–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, F.-S.; Fan, J.-G.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, B.; Wang, H.-Y. The global burden of liver disease: The major impact of China. Hepatology 2014, 60, 2099–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Roehlen, N.; Crouchet, E.; Baumert, T.F. Liver Fibrosis: Mechanistic Concepts and Therapeutic Perspectives. Cells 2020, 9, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kisseleva, T.; Brenner, D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 18, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsuchida, T.; Friedman, S.L. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakano, Y.; Kamiya, A.; Sumiyoshi, H.; Tsuruya, K.; Kagawa, T.; Inagaki, Y. A Deactivation Factor of Fibrogenic Hepatic Stellate Cells Induces Regression of Liver Fibrosis in Mice. Hepatology 2020, 71, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Mezayen, N.S.; El-Hadidy, W.F.; El-Refaie, W.M.; Shalaby, T.I.; Khattab, M.M.; El-Khatib, A.S. Oral vitamin-A-coupled valsartan nanomedicine: High hepatic stellate cell receptors accessibility and prolonged enterohepatic residence. J. Control. Release 2018, 283, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramakrishna, G.; Rastogi, A.; Trehanpati, N.; Sen, B.; Khosla, R.; Sarin, S.K. From Cirrhosis to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: New Molecular Insights on Inflammation and Cellular Senescence. Liver Cancer 2013, 2, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campana, L.; Iredale, J.P. Regression of Liver Fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis. 2017, 37, 001–010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lo, R.C.; Kim, H. Histopathological evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis regression. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2017, 23, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Taimr, P. Fibrogenesis, hepatic stellate cells and the immune system. Immunol. Dis. Liver Gut 2004, 135, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kisseleva, T.; Brenner, D.A. Role of hepatic stellate cells in fibrogenesis and the reversal of fibrosis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22, S73–S78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Inoue, T.; Jackson, E.K. Strong antiproliferative effects of baicalein in cultured rat hepatic stellate cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 378, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Benyon, R.C.; Iredale, J.P.; Goddard, S.; Winwood, P.J.; Arthur, M.J. Expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 and 2 is increased in fibrotic human liver. Gastroenterology 1996, 110, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Iredale, J.P.; Benyon, R.C.; Pickering, J.; McCullen, M.; Northrop, M.; Pawley, S.; Hovell, C.; Arthur, M.J. Mechanisms of spontaneous resolution of rat liver fibrosis. Hepatic stellate cell apoptosis and reduced hepatic expression of metalloproteinase inhibitors. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 102, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Murphy, F.; Waung, J.; Collins, J.; Arthur, M.J.; Nagase, H.; Mann, D.; Benyon, R.C.; Iredale, J.P. N-Cadherin cleavage during activated hepatic stellate cell apoptosis is inhibited by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. Gut 2004, 3 (Suppl. 1), S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Murphy, F.R.; Issa, R.; Zhou, X.; Ratnarajah, S.; Nagase, H.; Arthur, M.J.; Benyon, C.; Iredale, J.P. Inhibition of apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 is mediated via effects on matrix metalloproteinase inhibition: Implications for reversibility of liver fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 11069–11076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ikejima, K.; Okumura, K.; Kon, K.; Takei, Y.; Sato, N. Role of adipocytokines in hepatic fibrogenesis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22 (Suppl. 1), S87–S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Derynck, R.; Zhang, Y.E. Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature 2003, 425, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yi, C.; Shen, Z.; Stemmer-Rachamimov, A.; Dawany, N.; Troutman, S.; Showe, L.C.; Liu, Q.; Shimono, A.; Sudol, M.; Holmgren, L.; et al. The p130 Isoform of Angiomotin Is Required for Yap-Mediated Hepatic Epithelial Cell Proliferation and Tumorigenesis. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6, ra77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sun, Y.-M.; Chen, S.-Y.; You, H. Regression of liver fibrosis: Evidence and challenges. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 1696–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Koyama, Y.; Brenner, D.A. New therapies for hepatic fibrosis. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2015, 39 (Suppl. 1), S75–S79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Traber, P.G.; Chou, H.; Zomer, E.; Hong, F.; Klyosov, A.; Fiel, M.-I.; Friedman, S.L. Regression of Fibrosis and Reversal of Cirrhosis in Rats by Galectin Inhibitors in Thioacetamide-Induced Liver Disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Colino, C.I.; Lanao, J.M.; Gutierrez-Millan, C. Targeting of Hepatic Macrophages by Therapeutic Nanoparticles. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Koyama, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Brenner, D.A. New Developments on the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis. Dig. Dis. 2016, 34, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tsuchida, T. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation as a therapeutic target for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi 2019, 154, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Niu, X.; Wang, X.; Niu, B.; Wang, Y.; He, H.; Li, G. New IMB16-4 Nanoparticles Improved Oral Bioavailability and Enhanced Anti-Hepatic Fibrosis on Rats. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Niu, X.; Wang, X.; Niu, B.; Li, G.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, G. Novel IMB16-4 Compound Loaded into Silica Nanoparticles Exhibits Enhanced Oral Bioavailability and Increased Anti-Liver Fibrosis In Vitro. Molecules 2021, 26, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garg, N.K.; Tandel, N.; Jadon, R.; Tyagi, R.K.; Katare, O.P. Lipid–polymer hybrid nanocarrier-mediated cancer therapeutics: Current status and future directions. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 1610–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hadinoto, K.; Sundaresan, A.; Cheow, W.S. Lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a new generation therapeutic delivery platform: A review. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2013, 85, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Jamal, W.T.; Kostarelos, K. Liposome–nanoparticle hybrids for multimodal diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mandal, B.; Bhattacharjee, H.; Mittal, N.; Sah, H.; Balabathula, P.; Thoma, L.A.; Wood, G.C. Core–shell-type lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a drug delivery platform. Nanomedicine 2013, 9, 474–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tan, S.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Z. Lipid-enveloped hybrid nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 860–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Raemdonck, K.; Braeckmans, K.; Demeester, J.; De Smedt, S.C. Merging the best of both worlds: Hybrid lipid-enveloped matrix nanocomposites in drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 444–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 03738 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM of IMB16-4−LNPs fabricated by coating bilayer lipid membrane to IMB16-4−NPs. (A,D) IMB16-4−NPs. (B,E) Blank liposome. (C,F) IMB16-4−LNPs. (G) Particle size and (H) Zeta potential of IMB16-4−NPs and IMB16-4−LNPs.
Figure 1. TEM of IMB16-4−LNPs fabricated by coating bilayer lipid membrane to IMB16-4−NPs. (A,D) IMB16-4−NPs. (B,E) Blank liposome. (C,F) IMB16-4−LNPs. (G) Particle size and (H) Zeta potential of IMB16-4−NPs and IMB16-4−LNPs.
Molecules 27 03738 g001
Molecules 27 03738 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of blank liposomes, IMB16-4−LNPs, IMB16-4−NPs, and IMB16-4 solid powder with a frequency range of 400 to 4000 cm−1.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of blank liposomes, IMB16-4−LNPs, IMB16-4−NPs, and IMB16-4 solid powder with a frequency range of 400 to 4000 cm−1.
Molecules 27 03738 g002
Molecules 27 03738 g003 550
Figure 3. DSC (A) and XRD (B) analysis of blank liposomes, IMB16-4−NPs, IMB16-4, and IMB16-4−LNPs. For DSC analysis, samples were heated from 30 to 300 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen purge of 50 mL/min. The patterns of XRD were performed from 5° to 40° (diffraction angle 2θ) at a step size of 0.02°.
Figure 3. DSC (A) and XRD (B) analysis of blank liposomes, IMB16-4−NPs, IMB16-4, and IMB16-4−LNPs. For DSC analysis, samples were heated from 30 to 300 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen purge of 50 mL/min. The patterns of XRD were performed from 5° to 40° (diffraction angle 2θ) at a step size of 0.02°.
Molecules 27 03738 g003
Molecules 27 03738 g004 550
Figure 4. The release of IMB16-4–LNPs and IMB16-4–NPs was carried out by the dialysis method. IMB6-4–NPs were used as control. Then, 1 mL of IMB16-4–LNPs or IMB16-4–NPs containing 0.25 mg IMB16-4 was sealed in dialysis bags and submerged in 50 mL of PBS buffer solution (pH 7.4). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4. The release of IMB16-4–LNPs and IMB16-4–NPs was carried out by the dialysis method. IMB6-4–NPs were used as control. Then, 1 mL of IMB16-4–LNPs or IMB16-4–NPs containing 0.25 mg IMB16-4 was sealed in dialysis bags and submerged in 50 mL of PBS buffer solution (pH 7.4). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Molecules 27 03738 g004
Molecules 27 03738 g005 550
Figure 5. Cell viability of LX-2 cells treated with raw IMB16-4, blank liposomes, and IMB16-4−LNPs for 24 h, respectively. All samples were diluted with DMEM/GlutaMAX I without FBS. The data are presented as mean ± SD of at least triplicate determinations.
Figure 5. Cell viability of LX-2 cells treated with raw IMB16-4, blank liposomes, and IMB16-4−LNPs for 24 h, respectively. All samples were diluted with DMEM/GlutaMAX I without FBS. The data are presented as mean ± SD of at least triplicate determinations.
Molecules 27 03738 g005
Molecules 27 03738 g006 550
Figure 6. Western blot analysis of MMP2 and α-SMA expression in LX-2 cells. LX-2 cells were treated with 2 ng/mL TGF-β1 with or without 2 μM IMB16-4, IMB16-4–LNPs, and IMB16-4–NPs. The protein levels were normalized against GAPDH. The values are calculated by one way ANOVA following Dunnett’s test for comparison with TGF-β1 treatment group and expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate independent assays. * p < 0.05, significantly different from TGF-β1 treatment group.
Figure 6. Western blot analysis of MMP2 and α-SMA expression in LX-2 cells. LX-2 cells were treated with 2 ng/mL TGF-β1 with or without 2 μM IMB16-4, IMB16-4–LNPs, and IMB16-4–NPs. The protein levels were normalized against GAPDH. The values are calculated by one way ANOVA following Dunnett’s test for comparison with TGF-β1 treatment group and expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate independent assays. * p < 0.05, significantly different from TGF-β1 treatment group.
Molecules 27 03738 g006
Table
Table 1. The size, PDI, and Zeta potential of IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs suspensions.
Table 1. The size, PDI, and Zeta potential of IMB16-4−LNPs and IMB16-4−NPs suspensions.
SampleParticle Size (nm)PDIZeta Potential (mV)
IMB16-4−NPs83.8 ± 35.00.148−23.9
IMB16-4−LNPs119.0 ± 43.10.183−26.6
Table
Table 2. The size, PDI, and the content of IMB16-4 of IMB16-4−LNPs lyophilized powder over 60 days. The drug content was measured three times.
Table 2. The size, PDI, and the content of IMB16-4 of IMB16-4−LNPs lyophilized powder over 60 days. The drug content was measured three times.
Date (Days)Particle Size (nm)PDIZPThe Content Percentage (%)
0117.7 ± 52.50.267−26.0100.0
10122.3 ± 72.60.217−26.0104.7
20121.7 ± 73.80.252−29.997.0
30122.5 ± 73.40.218−25.0102.2
40113.1 ± 43.90.233−28.495.4
50119.2 ± 64.70.221−25.098.0
60123.2 ± 45.60.241−26.7101.7
Table
Table 3. Quantitative analysis of cell uptakes. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Table 3. Quantitative analysis of cell uptakes. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Concentration (μM)IMB16-4−NPs (mg/g Prot)IMB16-4−LNPs (mg/g Prot)
10 ± 03.60 ± 0.89 **
21.48 ± 0.356.68 ± 2.85 *
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, significantly different from IMB16-4−NPs group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, X.; Meng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, G. Established Liposome-Coated IMB16-4 Polymeric Nanoparticles (LNPs) for Increasing Cellular Uptake and Anti-Fibrotic Effects In Vitro. Molecules 2022, 27, 3738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123738

AMA Style

Niu X, Meng Y, Wang Y, Li G. Established Liposome-Coated IMB16-4 Polymeric Nanoparticles (LNPs) for Increasing Cellular Uptake and Anti-Fibrotic Effects In Vitro. Molecules. 2022; 27(12):3738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Xia, Yanan Meng, Yucheng Wang, and Guiling Li. 2022. "Established Liposome-Coated IMB16-4 Polymeric Nanoparticles (LNPs) for Increasing Cellular Uptake and Anti-Fibrotic Effects In Vitro" Molecules 27, no. 12: 3738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123738

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop