Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Specimen Fabrication
2.2. Retention Force Measurement
2.3. Artificial Aging
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Thomson, W.M.; Ma, S. An ageing population poses dental challenges. Singapore Dent. J. 2014, 35, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feine, J.S.; Carlsson, G.E.; Awad, M.A.; Chehade, A.; Duncan, W.J.; Gizani, S.; Head, T.; Heydecke, G.; Lund, J.P.; MacEntee, M.; et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Quintessence Int. 2003, 34, 78–79. [Google Scholar]
- Klemetti, E. Is there a certain number of implants needed to retain an overdenture? J. Oral. Rehabil. 2008, 35, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trakas, T.; Michalakis, K.; Kang, K.; Hirayama, H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: A literature review. Implant Dent 2006, 15, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ellis, J.S.; Levine, A.; Bedos, C.; Mojon, P.; Rosberger, Z.; Feine, J.; Thomason, J.M. Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology 2011, 28, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naert, I.; Alsaadi, G.; Quirynen, M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 10-year randomized clinical study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004, 17, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besimo, C.; Guarneri, A. In vitro retention force changes of prefabricated attachments for overdentures. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2003, 30, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Becerra, G.; MacEntee, M. A classification of precision attachments. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1987, 58, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petropoulos, V.C.; Smith, W. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 2002, 17, 526–535. [Google Scholar]
- Alsabeeha, N.H.; Payne, A.G.; Swain, M.V. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: A review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2009, 22, 429–440. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, K.H.; Chung, C.Y.; Cagna, D.R.; Cronin, R.J., Jr. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J. Prosthodont. 2004, 13, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rutkunas, V.; Mizutani, H.; Takahashi, H. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2007, 34, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pigozzo, M.N.; Mesquita, M.F.; Henriques, G.E.P.; Vaz, L.G. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2009, 102, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, F.; Duvernay, E.; Loup, A.; Vazquez, L.; Herrmann, F.; Schimmel, M. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: A randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res. 2013, 92 (Suppl. S12), 154S–160S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myshkin, N.; Petrokovets, M.; Kovalev, A. Tribology of polymers: Adhesion, friction, wear, and mass-transfer. Tribol. Int. 2005, 38, 910–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shastry, T.; Anupama, N.; Shetty, S.; Nalinakshamma, M. An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2016, 16, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, J.W.; Yun, B.H.; Jeong, C.M.; Huh, J.B. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 2018, 33, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleis, W.K.; Kämmerer, P.W.; Hartmann, S.; Al-Nawas, B.; Wagner, W. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: One-year report. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2010, 12, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadig, W. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures. Quintessence Int. 2009, 40. [Google Scholar]
- Mirchandani, B.; Zhou, T.; Heboyan, A.; Yodmongkol, S.; Buranawat, B. Biomechanical aspects of various attachments for implant overdentures: A review. Polymers 2021, 13, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najeeb, S.; Zafar, M.S.; Khurshid, Z.; Siddiqui, F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2016, 60, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schweyen, R.; Beuer, F.; Arnold, C.; Hey, J. Retentive characteristics of a vinylpolysiloxane overdenture attachment system. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2015, 19, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michelinakis, G.; Barclay, C.W.; Smith, P.W. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: Initial retention values. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2006, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Schweyen, R.; Arnold, C.; Setz, J.; Hey, J. Retentive characteristics of individual and prefabricated polyvinylsiloxane overdenture attachments: Alternative treatment options for geriatric patients. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2019, 23, 1425–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Can, G.; Özdemir, T.; Usanmaz, A. Effect of thermocycling and treatment with monomer on mechanical properties of soft denture liner Molloplast B. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009, 29, 812–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, J.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014, 112, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gale, M.; Darvell, B. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J. Dent. 1999, 27, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setz, J.; Lee, S.H.; Engel, E. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998, 80, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, L.P.Y.; Vitale, N.D.; Petridis, H.; McDonald, A. The effect of different water temperatures on retention loss and material degradation of locator attachments. J. Prosthodont. 2017, 26, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.; Hasselbeck, D.; Unkovskiy, A.; Sharghi, F.; Spintzyk, S. Retentive characteristics of a polyetheretherketone post-core restoration with polyvinylsiloxane attachments. Polymers 2020, 12, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnold, C.; Stampa, C.; Schweyen, R.; Hey, J.; Boeckler, A. Retentive Characteristics of a New Attachment System for Hybrid Dentures. Materials 2020, 13, 3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baschek, G.; Hartwig, G.; Zahradnik, F. Effect of water absorption in polymers at low and high temperatures. Polymer 1999, 40, 3433–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, P.; Yan, F. Accelerated degradation of polyetheretherketone and its composites in the deep sea. R Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 171775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McKeen, L.W. The Effect of Temperature and Other Factors on Plastics and Elastomers; William Andrew: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Katzer, A.; Marquardt, H.; Westendorf, J.; Wening, J.; Von Foerster, G. Polyetheretherketone—cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 1749–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, T.Y.; Lin, D.J.; Mine, Y.; Tasi, C.Y.; Li, P.J.; Shih, Y.H.; Chiu, K.C.; Wang, T.H.; Hsia, S.M.; Shieh, T.M. Biofilm formation on the surface of (poly) ether-ether-ketone and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy on peri-implant mucositis. Polymers 2021, 13, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abi Nader, S.; De Souza, R.; Fortin, D.; De Koninck, L.; Fromentin, O.; Albuquerque Junior, R. Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2011, 38, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Labeling | Description | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Abutment | Retention Insert | Retentive Element Materials | Retentive Value | |
NY | Locator® abutment * | Locator® retention insert | Nylon or Polyamide | Blue (680 g) |
PK | Novaloc® abutment * | Novaloc® retention insert | Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) | White (750 g) |
RL | Locator® abutment * | PVS retention insert | Polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) | Retention sil 600 (600 g) |
RN | Novaloc® abutment * | PVS retention insert | Polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) | Retention sil 600 (600 g) |
Parameter/ Time (Months) | Retentive Force (N) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PK | NY | RL | RN | |
0 | 46.34 (3.72) | 45.11 (4.22) | 9.86 (0.97) | 8.54 (0.90) |
3 | 27.76 (4.69) | 36.52 (4.53) | 8.82 (1.23) | 8.30 (0.83) |
6 | 18.77 (2.19) | 33.10 (3.56) | 8.88 (1.09) | 8.24 (0.91) |
12 | 19.61 (3.41) | 37.28 (4.42) | 7.83 (1.39) | 8.12 (0.80) |
Parameter/ Time (Months) | Percentage of Retention Loss | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PK | NY | RL | RN | |
0 | 0 a | 0 c | 0 e | 0 g |
3 | 40.33 (7.10) a | 19.15 (5.11) c | 10.75 (6.11) e | 2.76 (2.12) g |
6 | 59.36 (4.57) b | 26.35 (7.52) d | 10.04 (5.94) e | 3.49 (3.33) g |
12 | 57.83 (5.36) b | 17.44 (4.94) c | 20.82 (10.20) f | 4.82 (3.17) g |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chindarungruangrat, A.; Eiampongpaiboon, T.; Jirajariyavej, B. Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures. Molecules 2022, 27, 3925. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123925
Chindarungruangrat A, Eiampongpaiboon T, Jirajariyavej B. Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures. Molecules. 2022; 27(12):3925. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123925
Chicago/Turabian StyleChindarungruangrat, Atitiya, Trinuch Eiampongpaiboon, and Bundhit Jirajariyavej. 2022. "Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures" Molecules 27, no. 12: 3925. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123925