Next Article in Journal
Indigo Carmine in a Food Dye: Spectroscopic Characterization and Determining Its Micro-Concentration through the Clock Reaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Tuning Structural Colors of TiO2 Thin Films Using an Electrochemical Process
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Different Processing Methods Based on Different Drying Conditions on the Active Ingredients of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Quality Conjugated Polymers Achieving Ultra-Trace Detection of Cr2O72− in Agricultural Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CeO2 Nanoparticle-Loaded MnO2 Nanoflowers for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 at Low Temperatures

1
Institute of Quantum and Sustainable Technology (IQST), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
3
Foshan (Southern China) Institute for New Materials, Foshan 528200, China
4
Shunde Graduate School, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Foshan 528399, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(15), 4863; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154863
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysis, Electronics, Energy and Health at Nanoscale Domain)

Abstract

:
CeO2 nanoparticle-loaded MnO2 nanoflowers, prepared by a hydrothermal method followed by an adsorption-calcination technique, were utilized for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 at low temperatures. The effects of Ce/Mn ratio and thermal calcination temperature on the NH3–SCR activity of the CeO2-MnO2 nanocomposites were studied comprehensively. The as-prepared CeO2-MnO2 catalysts show high NOx reduction efficiency in the temperature range of 150–300 °C, with a complete NOx conversion at 200 °C for the optimal sample. The excellent NH3–SCR performance could be ascribed to high surface area, intimate contact, and strong synergistic interaction between CeO2 nanoparticles and MnO2 nanoflowers of the well-designed composite catalyst. The in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTs) characterizations evidence that the SCR reaction on the surface of the CeO2-MnO2 nanocomposites mainly follows the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L-H) mechanism. Our work provides useful guidance for the development of composite oxide-based low temperature NH3–SCR catalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the fast developing modern industrialization, nitrogen oxides (NOx) emitted from industrial production and automobile exhaust have become one of the major environmental pollution issues, which may cause acid rain and greenhouse effects [1,2]. Long-term exposure to NOx can cause several side effects to human health, such as reduced lung function, increased risk of respiratory conditions, and increased response to allergens. As an eco-friendly and efficient approach, selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 (NH3–SCR) is widely used for removing NOx [3,4,5,6,7]. The core of the NH3–SCR technology is the catalyst. Although V2O5-WO3(MoO3)/TiO2 catalysts have been utilized commercially in the temperature range of 300–400 °C [8], the increasing demands for outstanding catalytic activity at low working temperature with high stability have stimulated the development of novel SCR catalysts.
During the past few decades, enormous research work has been carried out to exploit mixed metal oxides NH3–SCR catalysts composed of TiO2, VOx, MnOx, CeO2, Fe2O3, ZrO3 or WO3 etc., owing to their high stability, strong synergistic interaction, excellent oxygen storage capacity, and redox ability [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Among all, CeO2-MnOx composites with outstanding low-temperature activity, excellent oxygen storage, and release capacity, and strong mechanical strength, have received considerable attention as a promising candidate NH3–SCR catalyst [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Nevertheless, CeO2-MnOx composite catalysts still suffer from several deficiencies in practical applications due to their poor thermal stability, low reduction efficiency, and low sulfur resistance. Considering that the architecture of composite with close contact between each component is crucial for promoting the SCR catalytic activity, considerable work have been conducted to the design and fabrication of hierarchical CeO2-MnOx composites at nanoscale. For instance, it has been reported that CeO2-MnOx mixed oxides with hollow structures possess excellent low temperature NOx storage capacity and NH3–SCR activity owing to the large surface area, rich active sites, and confined micro-environment [21,22,23,24]. Therefore, the development of well-designed CeO2-MnOx composite catalyst with desirable intimate contact at nanoscale is of importance for further enhancing their NH3–SCR catalytic performance.
In this work, a rational designed CeO2 nanoparticle-loaded MnO2 nanoflowers (NFs) with adjustable Ce/Mn ratios were prepared through combining a simple hydrothermal and subsequent ion-adsorption-calcination method, as illustrated in Scheme 1. A variety of physical and chemical characterization methods were used to investigate the phase composition, microstructure, and surface characteristics. The unique architecture of the CeO2-MnO2 nanocomposites consisting of MnO2 nanoflowers loaded with ultrasmall CeO2 nanoparticles allows the composite with high surface area, intimate contact, and strong synergistic interaction between CeO2 and MnO2. The catalysts displayed excellent low-temperature NH3–SCR activity for NOx reduction, obtaining a nearly 100% conversion efficiency at 200 °C. Moreover, the NH3–SCR reaction mechanism was revealed by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTs).

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The chemicals of CeCl3·7H2O (AR, ≥99.9%), MnCl2·4H2O (AR, ≥99.99%), and KMnO4 (AR, ≥99.5%) were purchased from Aladdin Reagents and used as received without any further purification. Water was deionized (D.I. water) to reach the Nanopure grade (18.2 MΩ∙cm at 25 °C).

2.2. Synthesis of MnO2 NFs

MnO2 NFs were synthesized using a hydrothermal method. Typically, 0.5 g KMnO4 was dissolved in 50 mL of D.I. water and stirred for 15 min. After that, 1 mol/L MnCl2·4H2O solution was added into the above solution and stirred for 1 h. Then the mixed solution was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated in a conventional oven at 100 °C for 12 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the as-obtained powder was washed with D.I. water for three times and dried at 60 °C.

2.3. Synthesis of CeO2-MnO2 Nanocomposites

Typically, 0.1 g of the as-synthesized MnO2 NFs powder was ultrasonically dispersed in 100 mL of aqueous solution containing certain amount of CeCl3·7H2O (0.02, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 g), denoted as Ce/Mn-1, Ce/Mn-2, Ce/Mn-3, and Ce/Mn-4, respectively. Subsequently, the suspension was magnetically stirred for 24 h to ensure the complete adsorption of the Ce ions onto the MnO2 NFs. Then the samples were collected after washing with D.I. water and dried at 60 °C for 12 h. Finally, the as-obtained sample was calcined at different temperatures (300 to 600 °C) for 2 h.

2.4. Materials Characterizations

The crystal structure was investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with CuKα radiation. The morphology and microstructure were studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss Merlin, Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Talos F200X , Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hillsboro, OR, USA), equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterizations were performed using a PHI 5600 XPS system (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The obtained spectra were calibrated with the C1s peak at 284.6 eV. The specific surface areas and pore size distributions were estimated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) methods with N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms obtained on a Micrometrics ASAP 2020 system.

2.5. NH3–SCR Activity Measurement

The SCR activity of the catalysts was evaluated using a conventional fixed-bed quartz microreactor operating in a steady state flow mode under atmospheric pressure. In a typical test, the as-obtained catalysts (50 mg) and quartz sand (200 mg) were mixed and packed between two quartz glass wool plugs. The simulated flue gas composition was NO (500 ppm), NH3 (500 ppm), O2 (2%), and balance gas N2. The total flow rate was 100 mL min−1, which corresponds to a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 16,000 h−1. The concentrations of NO were measured by a chemiluminescence NOx analyzer (42i-HL, Thermo Scientific). The NO conversion rate was calculated by the following equation:
NO conversion = NO in   -   [ NO ] out NO in   ×   100 %

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of CeO2 and MnO2 Ratio

The CeO2-MnO2 nanocomposites with different Ce/Mn ratios were synthesized first. The morphology of the catalysts (taking Ce/Mn-3 as a representative) was characterized by SEM and TEM. As shown in the SEM images (Figure 1a,b), the as-prepared CeO2-MnO2 catalyst possesses flower-like morphology with sizes of about 200–300 nm. The TEM images (Figure 1c,d,g) clearly display that the nanoflowers are composed of numerous sheets with thickness of several nanometers. From the HRTEM image (Figure 1e), the interplanar spacings were measured to be 0.32 and 0.70 nm, which can be assigned to the (111) plane of CeO2 and (001) plane of δ-MnO2, respectively. The EDS spectrum (Figure 1f) confirms that the composites contain three elements of Ce, Mn, and O, with atomic content of 7.2%, 31.2%, and 61.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, the EDS mapping diagrams (Figure 1h–j) clearly display the homogenous distribution of Mn, Ce, and O elements throughout the NFs, demonstrating the uniform growth of CeO2 nanoparticles on the MnO2 NFs. Such a uniform distribution is highly expected to promote their interaction and synergistic effect of Ce and Mn mixed oxides during the catalytic reactions [24,25].
The crystal structure of the CeO2-MnO2 catalysts with different Ce and Mn ratios after thermal treatment at 300 °C was analyzed by XRD. As shown in Figure 2, all diffraction peaks of the pristine MnO2 sample could be well indexed to δ-MnO2 crystal structure (JCPDS No. 80-1098) with predominant crystal planes of (001), (002), and (111). After the adsorption of Ce3+ and the following calcination treatment, the diffraction peaks corresponding to CeO2 (JCPDS No. 81-0792) appeared with predominant crystal planes of (111), (200), and (220), demonstrating the formation of CeO2-MnO2 composites. The peak intensity of CeO2 gradually increases with the increasing CeCl3·7H2O content. The broad diffraction peaks suggest the small crystal size of the loaded CeO2, which is consistent with the TEM observations.
The NH3–SCR activity of the as-prepared catalysts calcinated at 300 °C was evaluated. As shown in Figure 3, all the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalysts with different Ce and Mn ratios exhibit much higher activity in a relatively wide range of temperature from 50 to 300 °C, compared to pristine MnO2. As the Ce content increases, the NO conversion rate increases significantly, while decreases at higher Ce contents. Among all samples, Ce/Mn-3 (300) shows the optimal NH3–SCR catalytic performance, reaching the highest NO conversion rate of about 87.6% at 250 °C.
The specific surface areas (SSAs) and pore features are crucial factors determining the catalytic activity. As shown in Figure 4a, the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of the as-prepared catalysts exhibit type IV isotherm with H3 hysteresis loops, demonstrating their mesoporous structure. The CeO2-MnO2 composite catalysts possess significantly higher SSAs in comparison to the pristine MnO2, estimated by the BET method. The measured SSAs follow the order of Ce/Mn-3 (342 m2 g−1) > Ce/Mn-4 (206 m2 g−1) > Ce/Mn-2 (154 m2 g−1) > Ce/Mn-1 (145 m2 g−1) > MnO2 (67 m2 g−1). Figure 4b displays the pore size distribution curves estimated by the BJH method. For all samples, the pore size is mostly distributed in the range of 4 to 10 nm, which belongs to the mesoporous structure. The SSAs for the as-prepared CeO2 loaded MnO2 NFs are significantly higher than most of the reported CeO2-MnOx nanocomposite catalysts [26,27,28]. The large SSAs and porous features of the as-synthesized CeO2-MnO2 catalysts (e.g., Ce/Mn-3 (300)) with more catalytic active sites show great advantages for the adsorption and diffusion of gaseous reactants toward high NH3-SCR activity [29].

3.2. Effect of Thermal Treatment Temperature

To further optimize the NH3–SCR catalytic activity of the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalysts, the effect of thermal treatment temperature was investigated, selecting the Ce/Mn-3 sample with the highest activity. Figure 5 displays the XRD patterns of Ce/Mn-3 catalysts after calcinating at four different temperatures of 300 °C, 400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C. The samples of Ce/Mn-3 (300), Ce/Mn-3 (400), and Ce/Mn-3 (500) exhibit consistent diffraction peaks, which can be indexed to δ-MnO2 (JCPDS No. 80-1098) with predominant crystal planes of (001), (002) and (111) and CeO2 (JCPDS No. 81-0792) with predominant crystal planes of (111), (200), and (220). For the sample treated under 600 °C, secondary phases of Mn2O3 (JCPDS No. 89-2809) and Mn3O4 (JCPDS No. 75-1560) appeared.
The SEM images of Ce/Mn-3 catalysts after thermal treatment at different temperatures are displayed in Figure 6. It is clearly shown that spherical flower-like morphology structure was well maintained when the calcination temperature was under 500 °C (Figure 6a–d), compared with that of Ce/Mn-3 (300). Nevertheless, the flower-like hierarchical microstructure of the catalyst for Ce/Mn-3 (600) sample disappeared, forming irregular shaped particles (Figure 6e,f).
Subsequently, the NH3–SCR activity of different as-prepared Ce/Mn-3 catalysts were tested. As shown in Figure 7, in the range of 50~200 °C, the NO conversion rate of the catalysts (except for Ce/Mn-3 (300)) increases with the increasement of thermal treatment temperature. Among all the catalysts, Ce/Mn-3 (400) exhibited the highest SCR performance in the low-temperature window from 150 to 300 °C, reaching a 100% removal rate of NO at 200 °C. The activity declined for the catalysts treated at higher temperatures (above 500 °C), which could be ascribed to the changes of structural and surface characteristics of the catalyst, discussed as follows.
Figure 8 exhibits the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distributions of various Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures. From Figure 8a, all the catalysts display IV type N2 isotherm with H3 type loops, which correspond to the mesoporous structure. Among all samples, the Ce/Mn-3 catalyst prepared at 300 °C has the largest SSA. The SSAs follow the order of Ce/Mn-3 (300) (342 m2 g−1) > Ce/Mn-3 (400) (147 m2 g−1) > Ce/Mn-3 (500) (97 m2 g−1) > Ce/Mn-3 (600) (23 m2 g−1). Figure 8b displays the pore size distribution curves estimated by the BJH method, demonstrating that the mesopores are mainly distributed from 4 to 20 nm.
XPS spectra were measured to analyze the element oxidation states of the composite catalysts calcinated at different temperatures. Figure 9 shows the high-resolution Ce 3d, Mn 2p, and O 1s XPS spectra. As displayed in Figure 9a, the peaks of Ce3+ are located at ~885.7 eV and ~903.1 eV, while the remaining peaks are attributed to Ce4+ [30,31,32]. As listed in Table 1, the calculated Ce3+ content (24.84%) in Ce/Mn-3 (400) is the highest among all CeO2-MnO2 samples, which is beneficial for the adsorption of NH4+ [33]. In addition, the Mn 2p 3/2 peaks in Figure 9a can be fitted into three peaks, which belong to Mn2+ (640.7~641.5 eV), Mn3+ (642.2~643.5 eV), and Mn4+ (644.8 eV), respectively [34,35]. Generally, Mn with high oxidation states (Mn4+) can promote the oxidation performance of NO over CeO2-MnO2 catalysts at low temperatures. The Ce/Mn-3 (400) catalyst contains more Mn4+ (38.55%) than other samples (Table 1), indicating that the catalyst may exhibit outstanding NH3-SCR activity at low-temperature owing to the excellent oxidation ability. Figure 9c shows the XPS spectra of O 1s, which could be deconvoluted into lattice oxygen Olatt (~529.6 eV), surface oxygen Osurf (~531.3 eV), and chemically adsorbed oxygen Oads (~532.1 eV) [36]. As listed in Table 1, the Ce/Mn-3 sample contains the largest ratio of Oads (23.83%), which has great advantage for the SCR reaction [27,37]. These results are well consistent with the NH3–SCR activity of different catalysts as discussed above.

3.3. In Situ DRIFTs Studies

To disclose the NH3–SCR reaction mechanism over the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalysts, in situ DRIFTs analysis was conducted by tracking the changes in the adsorbed species on the catalyst (taking Ce/Mn-3 (300) as a representative) surface during the reaction process. Figure 10a shows the NH3 adsorption DRIFT spectra at 200 °C over the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalyst. The bands at 1692, 1642, and 1458 cm−1 belong to the NH4+ adsorbed on the Brønsted acid site, while the peaks at 3334, 1626, and 1040~1200 cm−1 belong to the NH3 adsorbed on the Lewis acid site [17,38,39]. In addition, the peaks at 992, 965, and 930 cm−1 represent weakly adsorbed gaseous NH3 on the catalyst’s surface. As increasing the adsorption time, the peak at 1458 cm−1 belonging to the Brønsted acid site gradually disappeared, indicating that the surface NH3 adsorption is dominated by the Lewis acid site. The DRIFT spectra of NO + O2 adsorption on the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalyst along with the time at 200 °C are presented in Figure 10b. The peaks at 1574, 1530, and 1514 cm−1 belonging to nitrates weakened after NO and O2 were introduced for 30 min, indicating the generation of intermediate products released from the active site to produce N2 and H2O [40].
The in situ DRIFT spectra of the CeO2-MnO2 catalyst with NO + 5% O2 reacted with the pre-adsorbed NH3 at 200 °C are displayed in Figure 10c. Notably, all vibration bands belonging to the adsorbed ammonia species (NH3 and NH4+) vanished rapidly after 3 min after introducing NO and O2, demonstrating the reaction with different ammonia species. The peak at 1455 cm−1 vanished in 30 min, and a new adsorption peak located at 1557 cm−1 assigned to the bipedal nitrate was observed. The peak at 1397 cm−1 could be ascribed to the intermediate species from the surface adsorbed NH3 and NOx species. As shown in Figure 10d, the in situ DRIFT spectra were further measured to reveal the reaction of NH3 with pre-adsorbed NO on the surface of the CeO2-MnO2 catalyst at 200 °C. After introducing NH3, the vibration peaks of weakly adsorbed NO2 at 1598 and 1574 cm−1 on the surface of Ce/Mn-3 disappeared rapidly. In addition, new vibration peaks at 1685 and 1469 cm−1 owing to the adsorption of NH4+ at the Brønsted acid site were observed. Additionally, a new adsorption peak at 1513 cm−1 was also detected, which can be ascribed to the bidentate nitrate species resulting from the oxidation of NH3 by O2 [9]. Based on the above analysis, we can conclude that the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L-H) may play an important role in the NH3–SCR reactions over the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalysts because of the formation of a larger amount of absorbed NH3 (NH4+), NO2, and NH2 intermediate [9,41].
Moreover, further studies were carried out to reveal the effect of SO2 and H2O on the NH3–SCR catalytic activity of the CeO2-MnO2 composite catalyst. The results indicated that the deactivation of the catalyst with the presence of H2O can be ascribed to the competitive adsorption between NH3 and H2O on the Lewis acid sites, which is a reversible process. In the case of SO2, it will lead to permanent catalyst poisoning through the sulfation of surface active sites. In addition, the competitive adsorption of NO and SO2 as well as the formation of (NH4)2SO4 on the catalysts’ surface may also contribute to the partial deactivation of the CeO2-MnO2 catalyst. These conclusions are consistent with previous reports [42]. To regenerate the deactivated CeO2-MnO2 catalyst, water washing and thermal or reductive regeneration methods can be used. Further works are still needed to clarify the mechanism of poisoning effect of SO2 and H2O and corresponding regeneration methods.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have synthesized a novel CeO2-MnO2 composite catalyst composed of CeO2 nanoparticles grown on MnO2 nanoflowers by combining hydrothermal method and ion-adsorption-calcination technique. The unique flower-like hierarchical microstructure and high specific surface area endow the catalysts with desirable intimate contact and synergistic effect, which leads to excellent NH3–SCR NOx reduction activity in a wide temperature window from 150 to 300 °C, obtaining a maximal NO conversion of nearly 100% at 200 °C. Moreover, the high contents of Ce3+, Mn4+, and surface Oads in the CeO2-MnO2 catalyst could be also responsible for their excellent catalytic performance. Furthermore, in situ DRIFT experiments reveal that the NH3–SCR reaction route on the surface of the CeO2-MnO2 hybrid catalysts is dominated by the L-H mechanism. The as-obtained CeO2-MnO2 composites in this work have great prospects for NH3-SCR reaction of NOx at low temperatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; investigation, Z.Z. (Zuquan Zheng), Z.Z. (Zhicheng Zhao). Y.W. and Y.Y.; resources, Z.Z. (Zuotai Zhang); writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, J.Z.; supervision, J.Z. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, S.L. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (JCYJ20180504165648211), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52172187), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515110557), the Foshan (Southern China) Institute for New Materials (2021AYF25022), and the startup funding for Jinshan Distinguished professor project of Jiangsu University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Y.; Zwolińska, E.; Chmielewski, A.G. Abatement technologies for high concentrations of NOx and SO2 removal from exhaust gases: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 46, 119–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gómez-García, M.; Pitchon, V.; Kiennemann, A. Pollution by nitrogen oxides: An approach to NOx abatement by using sorbing catalytic materials. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 445–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bosch, F.H. Formation and control of nitrogen oxides. Catal. Today 1988, 2, 369–379. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kijlstra, W.; Brands, D.S.; Smit, H.I.; Poels, E.K.; Bliek, A. Mechanism of the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3over MnOx/Al2O3. J. Catal. 1997, 171, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Han, L.; Cai, S.; Gao, M.; Hasegawa, J.-Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D. Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 by Using Novel Catalysts: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 10916–10976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Koebel, M.; Madia, G.; Elsener, M. Selective catalytic reduction of NO and NO2 at low temperatures. Catal. Today 2002, 73, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, M.; Li, C.; Lu, P.; Qu, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, M.; Fang, Y. A review on selective catalytic reduction of NOx by supported catalysts at 100–300 °C—Catalysts, mechanism, kinetics. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lietti, L.; Nova, I.; Forzatti, P. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3 over TiO2-supported V2O5–WO3 and V2O5–MoO3 catalysts. Top. Catal. 2000, 11, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.; Yu, Q.; Chen, H.; Jiang, P.; Li, J.; Shen, Z. The promoting effect of S-doping on the NH3-SCR performance of MnOx/TiO2 catalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 144694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, C.; Chen, T.; Liu, H.; Chen, D.; Xu, B.; Qing, C. Low temperature SCR reaction over Nano-Structured Fe-Mn Oxides: Characterization, performance, and kinetic study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 457, 1116–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Forzatti, P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 222, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nova, I.; Lietti, L.; Casagrande, L.; Dall’Acqua, L.; Giamello, E.; Forzatti, P. Characterization and reactivity of TiO2-supported MoO3 De-Nox SCR catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1998, 17, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Busca, G.; Lietti, L.; Ramis, G.; Berti, F. Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1998, 18, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Michalow-Mauke, K.A.; Lu, Y.; Kowalski, K.; Graule, T.; Nachtegaal, M.; Kröcher, O.; Ferri, D. Flame-Made WO3/CeOx-TiO2 Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5657–5672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. You, X.; Sheng, Z.; Yu, D.; Yang, L.; Xiao, X.; Wang, S. Influence of Mn/Ce ratio on the physicochemical properties and catalytic performance of graphene supported MnOx-CeO2 oxides for NH3-SCR at low temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 423, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, I.; Sadiq, M.; Khan, I.; Saeed, K. Manganese dioxide nanoparticles/activated carbon composite as efficient UV and visible-light photocatalyst. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 5140–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qi, G.; Yang, R.T.; Chang, R. MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 51, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, H.; Park, S.-J. Recent Advances in MnOx/CeO2-Based Ternary Composites for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3: A Review. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Z.; Yi, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, T.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst at low temperatures. Catal. Today 2013, 216, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Shi, L.; Fang, C.; Li, H.; Gao, R.; Huang, L.; Zhang, J. In situ supported MnOx–CeOx on carbon nanotubes for the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.; Gao, G.; Shi, J.-W.; He, C.; Li, G.; Bai, N.; Niu, C. MnOx-CeO2 shell-in-shell microspheres for NH3-SCR de-NOx at low temperature. Catal. Commun. 2016, 86, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, K.; Yan, W.; Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Cui, S.; Shen, X. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of MnOx-CeO2/reduced graphene oxide composite aerogels for low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 145024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, K.; Zou, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Yu, S.; Tang, C.; Gao, F.; Dong, L. Construction of hybrid multi-shell hollow structured CeO2–MnOx materials for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 5989–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Feng, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, D.; Kang, B.; Li, S.; Li, C.; Chen, G. Ce–Mn coordination polymer derived hierarchical/porous structured CeO2–MnOx for enhanced catalytic properties. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 16381–16388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Quiroz, J.; Giraudon, J.-M.; Gervasini, A.; Dujardin, C.; Lancelot, C.; Trentesaux, M.; Lamonier, J.-F. Total Oxidation of Formaldehyde over MnOx-CeO2 Catalysts: The Effect of Acid Treatment. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2260–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, D.; Zhang, M.; Li, G.; Jiang, H. Preparation and evaluation of MnOx–CeO2 nanospheres via a green route. Catal. Commun. 2012, 17, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Li, Q. Promoting effect of Ti addition on three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Mn-Ce catalysts for NH3-SCR reaction: Enhanced N2 selectivity and remarkable water resistance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 569, 151047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, G.; Shi, J.-W.; Liu, C.; Gao, C.; Fan, Z.; Niu, C. Mn/CeO2 catalysts for SCR of NOx with NH3: Comparative study on the effect of supports on low-temperature catalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, B.; Ran, R.; Guo, X.; Cao, L.; Xu, T.; Chen, Z.; Wu, X.; Si, Z.; Weng, D. Nb-modified Mn/Ce/Ti catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperature. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 545, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Z.; Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Woo, S.I. Novel Mn–Ce–Ti Mixed-Oxide Catalyst for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 14500–14508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, S.; Li, S.; Long, Y.; Shen, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z. Ce-based heterogeneous catalysts by partial thermal decomposition of Ce-MOFs in activation of peroxymonosulfate for the removal of organic pollutants under visible light. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, G.; Hou, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z. Understanding of Au-CeO2 interface and its role in catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 260, 118138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Z.; Li, R.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Tong, Y.; Yang, P.; Zhu, Y. Two steps synthesis of CeTiOx oxides nanotube catalyst: Enhanced activity, resistance of SO2 and H2O for low temperature NH3-SCR of NOx. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 282, 119542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Song, L.; Xu, T.; Gao, D.; Hu, X.; Li, C.; Li, S.; Chen, G. Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Derived Carbon-Mediated Interfacial Reaction for the Synthesis of CeO2−MnO2 Catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 6621–6627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Shen, G.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Y. Catalytic removal of benzene over CeO2–MnOx composite oxides prepared by hydrothermal method. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 138–139, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Machocki, A.; Ioannides, T.; Stasinska, B.; Gac, W.; Avgouropoulos, G.; Delimaris, D.; Grzegorczyk, W.; Pasieczna, S. Manganese–lanthanum oxides modified with silver for the catalytic combustion of methane. J. Catal. 2004, 227, 282–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ali, S.; Chen, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, T.; Li, R.; Bakhtiar, S.H.; Leng, X.; Yuan, F.; Niu, X.; Zhu, Y. Cux-Nb1.1-x (x = 0.45, 0.35, 0.25, 0.15) bimetal oxides catalysts for the low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 236, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, X.; Dong, F.; Zhang, G.; Guo, Y.; Tang, Z. A strategy for constructing highly efficient yolk-shell Ce@Mn@TiOx catalyst with dual active sites for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schneider, H.; Tschudin, S.; Schneider, M.; Wokaun, A.; Baiker, A. In Situ Diffuse Reflectance FTIR Study of the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO by NH3 over Vanadia-Titania Aerogels. J. Catal. 1994, 147, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Ma, L. Promoting effect of MoO3 on the NOx reduction by NH3 over CeO2/TiO2 catalyst studied with in situ DRIFTS. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, P.; Huang, S.-X.; Guo, R.-T.; Li, M.-Y.; Liu, S.-M.; Pan, W.-G.; Fu, Z.-G.; Liu, S.-W.; Sun, X.; Liu, J. The enhanced SCR performance and SO2 resistance of Mn/TiO2 catalyst by the modification with Nb: A mechanistic study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pan, S.; Luo, H.; Li, L.; Wei, Z.; Huang, B. H2O and SO2 deactivation mechanism of MnOx/MWCNTs for low-temperature SCR of NOx with NH3. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 377, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic of the synthesis process for CeO2-MnO2 nanocomposites.
Scheme 1. Schematic of the synthesis process for CeO2-MnO2 nanocomposites.
Molecules 27 04863 sch001
Figure 1. (a,b) SEM, (c) and (d) TEM, (e) HRTEM, (f) EDS spectrum, (g) HAADF-STEM, and (hj) mapping images of Ce/Mn-3 (300).
Figure 1. (a,b) SEM, (c) and (d) TEM, (e) HRTEM, (f) EDS spectrum, (g) HAADF-STEM, and (hj) mapping images of Ce/Mn-3 (300).
Molecules 27 04863 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of MnO2 NFs and CeO2-MnO2 composites with different Ce/Mn ratios calcinated at 300 °C.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of MnO2 NFs and CeO2-MnO2 composites with different Ce/Mn ratios calcinated at 300 °C.
Molecules 27 04863 g002
Figure 3. NO conversion curves of MnO2 NFs and CeO2-MnO2 catalysts with different Ce/Mn ratios.
Figure 3. NO conversion curves of MnO2 NFs and CeO2-MnO2 catalysts with different Ce/Mn ratios.
Molecules 27 04863 g003
Figure 4. (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm and (b) pore size distribution of MnO2 NFs and CeO2-MnO2 catalysts with different Ce/Mn ratios.
Figure 4. (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm and (b) pore size distribution of MnO2 NFs and CeO2-MnO2 catalysts with different Ce/Mn ratios.
Molecules 27 04863 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures.
Molecules 27 04863 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of the Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures: (a) and (b) 400 °C, (c) and (d) 500 °C, and (e) and (f) 600 °C.
Figure 6. SEM images of the Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures: (a) and (b) 400 °C, (c) and (d) 500 °C, and (e) and (f) 600 °C.
Molecules 27 04863 g006
Figure 7. (a) NO conversion curves of the Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures, (b) recycling catalytic activity tests of Ce/Mn-3 (400), and (c) SEM image of Ce/Mn-3 (400) after catalytic reactions.
Figure 7. (a) NO conversion curves of the Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures, (b) recycling catalytic activity tests of Ce/Mn-3 (400), and (c) SEM image of Ce/Mn-3 (400) after catalytic reactions.
Molecules 27 04863 g007
Figure 8. (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm and (b) pore size distribution of Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures.
Figure 8. (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm and (b) pore size distribution of Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures.
Molecules 27 04863 g008
Figure 9. High-resolution XPS spectra of Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures: (a) Ce 3d, (b) Mn 2p, and (c) O 1s.
Figure 9. High-resolution XPS spectra of Ce/Mn-3 catalysts calcinated at different temperatures: (a) Ce 3d, (b) Mn 2p, and (c) O 1s.
Molecules 27 04863 g009
Figure 10. In situ DRIFTs of Ce/Mn-3 (300) at 200 °C over different time: (a) NH3 adsorption, (b) NO + O2 adsorption, (c) reaction of pre-adsorbed NH3 with NO + O2, and (d) reaction of pre-adsorbed NO with NH3.
Figure 10. In situ DRIFTs of Ce/Mn-3 (300) at 200 °C over different time: (a) NH3 adsorption, (b) NO + O2 adsorption, (c) reaction of pre-adsorbed NH3 with NO + O2, and (d) reaction of pre-adsorbed NO with NH3.
Molecules 27 04863 g010
Table 1. The calculated ratios of Ce3+, Mn4+, and Oads in different catalysts based on XPS analysis.
Table 1. The calculated ratios of Ce3+, Mn4+, and Oads in different catalysts based on XPS analysis.
Ce3+/Ce (%)Mn4+/Mn (%)Oads/O (%)
Ce/Mn-3 (300)23.7934.419.8
Ce/Mn-3 (400)24.8438.5523.83
Ce/Mn-3 (500)11.817.326.47
Ce/Mn-3 (600)18.9410.12.89
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Zheng, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z. CeO2 Nanoparticle-Loaded MnO2 Nanoflowers for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 at Low Temperatures. Molecules 2022, 27, 4863. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154863

AMA Style

Li S, Zheng Z, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Yao Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Zhang Z. CeO2 Nanoparticle-Loaded MnO2 Nanoflowers for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 at Low Temperatures. Molecules. 2022; 27(15):4863. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shun, Zuquan Zheng, Zhicheng Zhao, Youling Wang, Yao Yao, Yong Liu, Jianming Zhang, and Zuotai Zhang. 2022. "CeO2 Nanoparticle-Loaded MnO2 Nanoflowers for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 at Low Temperatures" Molecules 27, no. 15: 4863. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154863

APA Style

Li, S., Zheng, Z., Zhao, Z., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). CeO2 Nanoparticle-Loaded MnO2 Nanoflowers for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 at Low Temperatures. Molecules, 27(15), 4863. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154863

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop