Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Halopyrazole Matrine Derivatives and Their Insecticidal and Fungicidal Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemistry, Biosynthesis and Pharmacology of Viniferin: Potential Resveratrol-Derived Molecules for New Drug Discovery, Development and Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Heterogeneous Catalysis of Ozone Using Iron–Manganese Silicate for Degradation of Acrylic Acid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cancer and Traditional Plant Knowledge, an Interesting Field to Explore: Data from the Catalan Linguistic Area
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 15
10.3390/molecules27154971
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibacterial Potential of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. and Its Bioactive Molecules against Uropathogens—An In Silico Study to Identify Potential Lead Molecule(s) for the Development of New Drugs to Treat Urinary Tract Infections

by
Jyoti Mehta
1,†,
Kumar Utkarsh
1,2,†,
Shivkanya Fuloria
3,*,†,
Tejpal Singh
2,
Mahendran Sekar
4,†,
Deeksha Salaria
1,
Rajan Rolta
1,
M. Yasmin Begum
5,
Siew Hua Gan
6,
Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani
7,
Kumarappan Chidambaram
8,
Vetriselvan Subramaniyan
9,
Kathiresan V. Sathasivam
10,
Pei Teng Lum
4,
Subasini Uthirapathy
11,
Olatomide A. Fadare
12,
Oladoja Awofisayo
13 and
Neeraj Kumar Fuloria
3,14,*,†
1
Faculty of Applied sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan 173212, India
2
DNA Lab’s Center for Applied Sciences, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand, India
3
Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Bedong 08100, Kedah, Malaysia
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh 30450, Perak, Malaysia
5
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
6
School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
7
Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh 30450, Perak, Malaysia
8
Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
9
Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Jalan SP 2, Bandar Saujana Putra, Jenjarom 42610, Selangor, Malaysia
10
Faculty of Applied Sciences, AIMST University, Bedong 08100, Kedah, Malaysia
11
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tishk International University, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
12
Organic Chemistry Research Lab, Obafemi Awolowo University, Osun 220282, Nigeria
13
Department of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry, University of Uyo, Uyo 520003, Nigeria
14
Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(15), 4971; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154971
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 5 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Development Inspired by Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are becoming more common, requiring extensive protection from antimicrobials. The global expansion of multi-drug resistance uropathogens in the past decade emphasizes the necessity of newer antibiotic treatments and prevention strategies for UTIs. Medicinal plants have wide therapeutic applications in both the prevention and management of many ailments. Bacopa monnieri is a medicinal plant that is found in the warmer and wetlands regions of the world. It has been used in Ayurvedic systems for centuries. The present study aimed to investigate the antibacterial potential of the extract of B. monnieri leaves and its bioactive molecules against UTIs that are caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis. This in vitro experimental study was conducted by an agar well diffusion method to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of 80% methanol, 96% ethanol, and aqueous extracts of B. monnieri leaves on uropathogens. Then, further screening of their phytochemicals was carried out using standard methods. To validate the bioactive molecules and the microbe interactions, AutoDock Vina software was used for molecular docking with the Klebsiella pneumoniae fosfomycin resistance protein (5WEW) and the Zn-dependent receptor-binding domain of Proteus mirabilis MR/P fimbrial adhesin MrpH (6Y4F). Toxicity prediction and drug likeness were predicted using ProTox-II and Molinspiration, respectively. A molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was carried out to study the protein ligand complexes. The methanolic leaves extract of B. monnieri revealed a 22.3 mm ± 0.6 mm to 25.0 mm ± 0.5 mm inhibition zone, while ethanolic extract seemed to produce 19.3 mm ± 0.8 mm to 23.0 mm ± 0.4 mm inhibition zones against K. pneumoniae with the use of increasing concentrations. In the case of P. mirabilis activity, the methanolic extracts showed a 21.0 mm ± 0.8 mm to 24.0 mm ± 0.6 mm zone of inhibition and the ethanol extract produced a 17.0 mm ± 0.9 mm to 23.0 mm ± 0.7 mm inhibition zone with increasing concentrations. Carbohydrates, flavonoids, saponin, phenolic, and terpenoid were common phytoconstituents identified in B. monnieri extracts. Oroxindin showed the best interactions with the binding energies with 5WEW and 6Y4F, −7.5 kcal/mol and −7.4 kcal/mol, respectively. Oroxindin, a bioactive molecule, followed Lipinski’s rule of five and exhibited stability in the MD simulation. The overall results suggest that Oroxindin from B. monnieri can be a potent inhibitor for the effective killing of K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis. Additionally, its safety has been established, indicating its potential for future drug discovery and development in the treatment for UTIs.

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial diseases for women and the elderly. Although they may result in illnesses that are not life-threatening, affected patients can face extreme distress [1]. UTIs are caused by a variety of organisms, including Escherichia (E.) coli, Klebsiella (K.) pneumoniae, Enterococcus (E.) faecalis, Proteus (P.) mirabilis, Staphylococcus (S.) saprophyticus, Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa, Enterobacter species, Streptococcus species, and S. aureus [2]. Initially, infections are usually caused by a single species of bacteria, such as the uropathogenic E. coli or E. faecalis [3]. However, over time, many organisms, including K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, and Morganella (M.) morganii, can colonize the urinary tract and form polymicrobial biofilms [4,5]. Both P. mirabilis and K. pneumoniae are Gram-negative bacteria that live in human fecal flora as harmless commensal bacteria, inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract. They are, however, known to cause a wide range of opportunistic human illnesses, particularly wound infections, respiratory tract infections, and UTIs [6,7].
UTIs predominantly affect women when the bacteria infect any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, the bladder, the uterus, or the urethra. Pregnancy, a history of an earlier UTI, age, sexual behavior, and lack of hygiene are among the risk factors for UTIs. A significant prevalence of UTIs exists across all socioeconomic categories, exacerbating economic pressure for some families. UTIs are one of the most prevalent healthcare-associated infections, with an estimated 150 million people infected worldwide each year, with 13,000 associated deaths [8]. Although many antibiotics are prescribed for the treatment of UTIs, a major cause for concern is the emergence of drug-resistant strains.
Because microbial infections tend to be more severe in immune-deficient patients, there is an urgent need for alternative therapies, including natural products, to ameliorate multidrug resistances (MDRs) that are commonly seen. The rapid, widespread emergence of resistance to newly introduced antimicrobial agents indicates that even new families of antimicrobial agents have a short life expectancy. Natural products have numerous advantages, including fewer side effects, improvements in patient tolerance, lower costs, widespread acceptance due to a long history of usage, and sustainability. Many essential drugs have been discovered and developed as a result of phytochemical and pharmacological studies of natural products [9]. Historically, medicinal plants deliver a wide variety of components with confirmed therapeutic qualities [10]. The renewed interest in plant-derived therapies seems to be due primarily to the widely held assumption that “green medicine is safe.”
The consumption of antiseptic and anti-adhesive herbs, including the leaf parts of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (Uva ursi) and Juniperus spp. (Juniper) and the fruit part of Vaccinium macrocarpon (cranberry), are able to excrete antimicrobial constituents, which may either kill microbes directly or interfere with their attachment to epithelial cells, thereby preventing acute as well as chronic UTIs [11]. Berberine extracted from Mahonia aquifolium (Oregon grape) and Hydrastis canadensis (Goldenseal) is found to be an effective drug in combating infections that are caused by E. coli and Proteus species by hindering their adherence to the host cell [12], suggesting their potent role in the treatment of UTIs.
Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. (B. monnieri), popularly known as Brahmi or water hyssop, is one of the perennial creeping plants found in various parts of the world. It is also known as “the herb of grace,” due to its various medicinal properties and memory-enhancing effects [13,14]. It belongs to the family Scrophulariaceae that grows optimally in wet, damp, and marshy areas, with succulent, oblong leaves and small white flowers as its descriptive features. The Bacopa species is a native herb that grows in the wetlands of southern and eastern India, Europe, Australia, Africa, Asia, North America, and South America. In addition to being known as a nootropic herb, the bacopa plant aids in the regeneration of injured neurons, neuronal synthesis, and synaptic activity restoration, as well as in strengthening brain activity.
B. monnieri contains brahmine, nicotinine, herpestine, bacosides A and B, saponins A, B, and C, triterpenoid saponins, stigmastanol, β-sitosterol, betulinic acid, D-mannitol, α-alanine, serine, pseudojujubogenin glycoside, aspartic and glutamic acids, and other elements [15]. For centuries, the magical herb has been used by Ayurveda medical practitioners for the treatment of various conditions, such as epilepsy, anxiety, and various stress-related disorders [16]. It also has positive effects in boosting brain function and improving memory [17]. Additionally, it is used to treat digestive complaints and skin disorders, as an antiepileptic, antipyretic, and analgesic [18,19], and as an antimicrobial agent against UTIs [20] (Figure 1).
The therapeutic activity of herbal medicines is attributed either to the individual activity or the synergistic activity of the phytomolecules. Synthetic drugs are expensive and may be inadequate for the treatment of some diseases; they are also often associated with adulterations and adverse effects. Likewise, while natural products possess a wide range of biological activities, some have toxicity issues. Therefore, computational techniques applied in drug designing have a vital role in predicting the toxicity of compounds and in determining their other properties [21]. For example, in silico studies that focus on predictions of toxicity, via ProTox-II server, can decrease the need for subsequent drug testing in animals (in vivo), while molecular docking for each phytochemical can determines its therapeutic efficiency. Such studies require less testing time, and they are economical in determining the effects of drugs on animals [22]. Hence, the aim of the present study was to explore the effects of B. monnieri against uropathogens, such as K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis, using in vitro methods, while studying their active molecules via in silico approaches.

2. Results

2.1. Antimicrobial Activity of Crude Extracts of B. monnieri

Using the agar well diffusion method, the diameter of the zone of inhibition less than 11 mm was not considered and was marked as no-zone. Overall, the methanolic extract of B. monnieri had the highest inhibition zone against both microorganisms (K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis) (Table 1). The effect was concentration dependent. The aqueous extract was least active against tested pathogens, while no activity was seen from the negative control, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

2.2. Phytochemical Screening

Based on phytochemical analysis, the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of B. monnieri were found to contain carbohydrates, flavonoids, tannin, saponins, steroids, phytosterols, and phenolic compounds (Table 2). The aqueous extract of B. monnieri indicated the presence of carbohydrates, flavonoids, saponins, steroids, and phytosterols. Tannins and phenolic compounds were absent in the aqueous extract of B. monnieri.

2.3. Molecular Docking Analysis of Major Bioactive Molecules from B. monnieri with UTI Proteins (5WEW and 6Y4F)

Molecular docking of 17 major bioactive molecules and a standard drug (Trimethoprim) with the Klebsiella pneumoniae fosfomycin resistance protein (5WEW) and the Zn-dependent receptor-binding domain of Proteus mirabilis MR/P fimbrial adhesin MrpH (6Y4F) was carried out using AutoDock Vina software to study the interaction of the bioactive molecules with the target protein. The results indicated that among all of the selected bioactive molecules—Bacopaside I (−8.4 kcal/mol), β-sitosterol (−7.7 kcal/mol), Oroxindin (−7.5 kcal/mol), and Bacoside A (−7.5 kcal/mol) with 5WEW—Bacopaside I achieved hydrogen bonding with Arg122, Tyr131, Tyr65, His115, Tyr103, Ser71, and showed hydrophobic interactions with Asp44, Phe70, His67, Leu119, and Alkyl, or π-alkyl interactions with Pro107 and Val89. β-sitosterol showed hydrophobic interactions with Gln 24, Pro 59, Pro 60, Asp 106, and Alkyl, or π-alkyl interactions with Ala 20, Leu 25, Phe 21, Val 57, Val 89, Ala 90, Leu 105, and Pro 107. Oroxindin achieved hydrogen bonding with Gly117, His115, Ser101, Tyr103, Arg122, His67, and Tyr 65, and showed hydrophobic interactions with Leu119, Ser118, Ile72, Ser71, Val116, Phe70, Ser97, and Alkyl, or π-alkyl interactions with Ala69. Bacoside A achieved hydrogen bonding with Tyr65, Lys93, Tyr131, Arg122, and Glu113, and showed hydrophobic interactions with Tyr103, Ser101, His67, Ala69, Leu45, Phe70, Leu5, Ser71, Leu119 and Alkyl, or π-alkyl interactions with Tyr68, Leu8, and His115 (Table 3 and Figure 2). In 6Y4F Luteolin (−7.5 kcal/mol), Oroxindin (−7.4 kcal/mol), and Bacopaside I (−7.3 kcal/mol) showed the best interactions. Luteolin achieved hydrogen bonding with Arg118, Thr116, and His72, and showed hydrophobic interactions with Ile140, His74, Asn82, Gly81, His117, Asn39, Ala40, and Thr4. Oroxindin achieved hydrogen bonding with Thr31 and Glu127, and showed hydrophobic interactions with Cys128, Gly153, Ile30, Ser33, Ser124, and Alkyl, or π-alkyl interactions with Ala155. Bacopaside I achieved hydrogen bonding with Ser138, Asn82, Ser137, Gln86, Ala84, and Phe85, and showed hydrophobic interactions with Glu112, Gly113, Gln114, Gly139, Pro83, and Tyr67 (Table 4 and Figure 3).

2.4. Drug-Likeness Predictions of Bioactive Molecules of B. monnieri

The drug-likeness properties of the major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri were determined using a Molinspiration online server. The drug-likeness predictions indicated that among the selected bioactive molecules, Apigenin, Nicotine, Loliolide, and Wogonin followed all the rules of drug likeness, while Rosavin, Oroxindin, Stigmastanol, β-sitosterol, Betulinic acid, Brahmic acid, Cucurbitacin B, D-mannitol, and Monnierasides I showed only one violation, which was also acceptable (Table 5), suggesting that they are phtocompounds with good binding affinities with 5WEW and 6Y4F.

2.5. Toxicity Predictions for Trimethoprim and the Major Bioactive Molecules from B. monnieri

The toxicity of the major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri was predicted using a Protox II server. Most of the selected bioactive molecules overcame all toxicity barriers in terms of binding energy or drug-likeness activity (Table 6). However, Oroxindin was considered as a potential bioactive molecule, and it was selected for further investigation as a promising future candidate for drug discovery and development.

2.6. Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation of Best Protein Ligand Complexes

The MD simulation of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F was carried out for 100 ns using GROMACS 2018.3 software to study the stability of protein ligand complexes. The MD simulation data showed that the RMSD of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F was stable from the start of the simulation and remained stable for up to 100 ns, as shown in Figure 4A. This showed that Oroxindin is competent to bind to the target protein’s binding pocket. At the same time, the RMSD showed some acceptable fluctuation between 0.5 A and 0.8 Å. Similarly, a RMSF was carried out to study the flexibility of the protein ligand complex. The RMSF plot showed that Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW had strong interactions, with 10–50 and 80–110 residues (Figure 4B), whereas Oroxindin in complex with 6Y4F showed strong interactions with residues of 25–160 (Figure 4B).
The radius of gyration for Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW was 1.7 nm and for 6Y4F it was 1.4 nm, as shown in Figure 5A. The solvent accessible surface area for Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW was 100 nm2 and with 6Y4F it was 70 nm2 as shown in Figure 5B. Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW achieved 2 hydrogen bonds up to 35 ns and 5 to 8 hydrogen bonds between 35 ns and 100 ns (Figure 6) whereas 6Y4F achieved 2 to 4 hydrogen bonds throughout the simulation (Figure 6). The radius of gyration, the solvent accessible surface area, and the hydrogen bonding interactions confirmed the stability of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F. The binding free energy of the protein ligand complexes is shown in Figure 7.

3. Discussion

Infectious diseases are a primary source of morbidity and mortality, and the number of MDR strains is on the rise, as is the development of strains with reduced antibiotic sensitivity. Currently, traditional medical systems are still society’s most valuable assets in dealing with a variety of ailments. Plant-based traditional medicines are widely used for a range of disorders, as they are effective as therapies and have no negative effects in patients, such as the demonstrated effects of synthetic pharmaceuticals in COVID-19 patients [23]. Pathogenic bacteria are thought to develop antibiotic resistance, making the hunt for novel antibiotics a never-ending process [24]. For these reasons, researchers have recently begun to concentrate their efforts on herbal products in order to develop more effective drugs and therapeutic targets against lethal MDR microbial strains [23,25,26,27]. These initiatives inspired us to perform the current study, which triggered the search for new antibacterial compounds generated from the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of B. monnieri that have been found to be effective against the bacteria that cause UTIs.
Several researchers have investigated B. monnieri’s antibacterial properties, but the majority of these studies have focused on standard bacterial strains [19,28,29]. Although clinical isolates of human pathogenic E. coli and K. pneumoniae have been evaluated, those strains are not MDR strains [30]. All of the tested B. monnieri extracts demonstrated antibacterial action against the pathogens. The methanolic extract of B. monnieri was found to have a stronger inhibitory effect against K. pneumoniae and S. aureus [31,32], which is consistent with our findings. Furthermore, the findings indicating that methanolic extracts are more powerful than aqueous extracts against bacterial strains are consistent with the findings of other studies [33,34,35].
The tested microorganisms were not inhibited by an aqueous extract at a concentration of 100 mg/mL, which could be due to the loss of some bioactive components during the sample extraction process. Furthermore, multiple studies have found that the type of solvent used for extraction plays a significant impact in defining the extract’s potential [36,37]. This is related to the fact that various phytochemicals have different relative solubilities in different polarities of solvents. The systemic phytoconstituent screening of plant extracts is an important technique for finding new medicinal lead compounds [38,39]. The antibacterial activities of phytochemicals are achieved through two basic pathways: direct bacterial death or the prevention of microbial adherence to epithelial cells [11]. Some of the extracts can be developed into medications or used as blueprints for drug development, due to the presence of various phytochemicals and antioxidants [40].
Antibacterial resistance has become one of the world’s most serious public health challenges in the last two decades [41,42]. Hence, there has been a growing interest in identifying and developing novel antimicrobial compounds from a variety of sources to tackle microbial resistance [43]. Herbal medicines such as turmeric and its bioactive molecule curcumin, have been shown to improve the symptoms of chronic UTIs, protect renal tubular function, and reduce inflammatory responses [44,45]. Herbal remedies have been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of UTIs [46].
The present study confirmed that both the ethanolic and methanolic extracts of B. monnieri provide inhibitory effects against the Gram-negative bacteria K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis. Different studies reported that B. monnieri extract can inhibit Gram-negative as well as Gram-positive bacteria [47]. Hema et al. [30] reported that K. pneumoniae and P. vulgaris were resistant to the ethanolic extract of B. monnieri, a finding that is contrary to those of many others, including ours. The present work on B. monnieri also showed that the crude methanolic extract was more effective than the ethanolic or aqueous extracts.
More investigations are required on different species of the bacteria that cause UTIs to provide a clearer indication for B. monnieri as a potential agent against UTIs. Based on the present work, it is plausible that a contributory effect against UTIs is provided by the alkaloids, tannins, and flavonoids, acting individually or in combination. Similarly, the presence of all major phytoconstituents, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, and saponins (except tannin) was investigated in the methanolic extract of B. monnieri. It was reported that different phytochemicals are responsible for antibacterial, cytotoxic, analgesic, and neuropharmacological activities [48]. Among the chemical constituents, alkaloids and flavonoids may be responsible for antibacterial properties [49].
Recently, many plants have been explored via in silico and in vitro methods to evaluate the antibacterial activities of their major bioactive molecules. For example, the bioactive molecules thymol and emodin of Thymus serpyllum and Rheum emodi, respectively, were found to reveal antimicrobial activity with the penicillin binding protein, together with drug likeness and toxicity prediction [50,51,52,53]. Similarly, a study carried out by Ramasamy et al. [54] revealed that aglycones and their derivatives of B. monnieri have better binding affinity and good central nervous system drug-like properties; they validated in silico receptor and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) models to predict the potential of bacosides and aglycones and their derivatives. The alcoholic extract was analyzed via an invivo study and was found to increase the memory of rats; the activity is attributed to saponin mixtures comprising the bacosides A and B [55]. Emran et al. [56] used via docking studies to show that luteolin, a phytochemical of B. monnieri, has potential to act against Staphylococcus aureus, as it has the highest fitness score and greater specificity toward the DNA gyrase binding site than the penicillin binding protein.
No study has been conducted to date to screen the major phytochemicals of B. monnieri against uropathogens. This is the first report that shows that the Oroxindin component, a flavone or a type of phenolic of B. monnieri, is a potent inhibitor of UTIs, establishing pathogens such as K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis. It is yet confirmed that the Oroxindin component is safe for future use against UTIs. Further research is necessary to validate the full spectrum of efficacy of the Oroxindin antibacterial compounds from B. monnieri via in vitro or in vivo approaches.
Additionally, nanotechnology could be used to improve the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of phytochemicals. Several issues that are commonly associated with the delivery of free phytochemicals, such as the rapid elimination of phytochemicals from the bloodstream, their limited absorption, and their bioavailability, reduce their potency and may necessitate greater dosages to achieve efficacy [57]. Some natural compounds are linked with undesirable side effects, such as toxicity; the use of a drug carrier may provide several benefits, including shielding the compounds from degradation in the body [58]. Nanocarriers can be altered to provide smart delivery mechanisms by using pH or temperature-sensitive materials [59], targeting ligands to improve cell uptake and selectivity, and using cellular membranes for cloaking to escape recognition by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) [60]. Several nanoparticles, liposomes, inorganic nanoparticles, and emulsions have been shown to be effective transporters for phytochemicals such as curcumin [61,62]. With respect to the future prospects of encapsulating B. monnieri, polymeric nanoparticles serve as excellent nanocarriers, due to their ability to entrap or surface-adsorb active compounds. They are versatile and can be coupled with cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), which can assist in molecular intake and absorption. CPPs can carry cargo into cells via endocytosis, which improves targeting and localization to the desired location [63]. Combining the above nanotechnology with bioactive molecules from B. monnieri could enhance antibacterial efficacy, increase bioavailability, and reduce toxicity, especially in UTIs (Figure 8).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection of B. monnieri

B. monnieri was collected and authenticated by Forest Research of India (FRI), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, under the guidance of Dr. P.K Tamta (accession number 102) and the plant name was checked in The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/, accessed on 15 October 2021). The collected samples were washed properly with normal tap water. Following washing, the leaves were clipped from the plant stem followed by rewashing 2–3 times with distilled water. Subsequently, the leaves were dried in a hot air oven for 30 min at 50 °C. The dried leaves were then grounded to fine powders, using mortar and pestle, before finally being stored in airtight containers.

4.2. Preparation of Aqueous Extracts of B. monnieri

The powdered plant material (30 g) was added to 300 mL of distilled water in a conical flask. Then, the mouth of the conical flask was covered. The flask was kept in an orbital shaker for 24 hrs and underwent a continuous agitation at 200 rpm to ensure a thorough mixing. The suspension was filtered using a Whatman No. 1 filter paper under aseptic conditions [64]. The filtrate was collected before being concentrated by evaporation at 40 °C on a water bath. The yielded crude extract was stored at 4 °C before further use.

4.3. Preparation of Methanolic and Ethanolic Extracts of B. monnieri

The dried powder (30 g) was thoroughly mixed with 300 mL of organic solvents (one in 96% ethanol and another in 80% methanol) in a conical flask for their respective extract preparation. The mixture was placed at room temperature on a shaker at 200 rpm. After 48 hrs, the mixture was filtered through a sterilized Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The plant residue was re-extracted with the addition of the same solvent as before, followed by a refiltration step after 24 hrs, to yield the final concentrated slurry. The combined filtrate that was yielded was further concentrated by complete solvent evaporation at 40 °C on a water bath to yield the crude extract. Finally, the extract was checked for sterility on nutrient agar plates before being stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator for further use [65]. The dry weight of the extracts obtained by solvent evaporation was used to determine the concentration (in mg/mL) [66]. Then, stock solutions of the crude extracts for each type of organic solvent were prepared by mixing well the appropriate amount of dried extracts with 5% DMSO solvent to obtain a final concentration of 100 mg/mL.

4.4. Antimicrobial Activity of Crude Extracts of B. monnieri

In vitro antimicrobial activity was investigated on the methanol, ethanol, and aqueous extracts from B. monnieri. Urine samples from eight UTI-infected patients were collected and stored in the DNA pathology lab at the Center for Applied Sciences, Dehradun, India, with their details provided. The samples were streaked over a nutrient agar plate by a spreading method and after incubation the colony was picked and streaked again for 24 hrs to obtain a pure culture. Then, the pure culture was obtained and confirmed by Gram staining and by biochemical tests. The cultures were characterized based on their cell and colony morphology, appearance, color, colony shape, and Gram staining. The pure bacterial cultures were stained according to the 1884 methods of the Danish scientist and a physician Hans Christian Joachim Gram. The stained cells were examined with an oil immersion objective lens of a light microscope. A Gram-negative organism is characterized by a pink color. The shape of the cells was recorded. All the strains were further characterized based on biochemical tests, such as indole, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, and citrate utilization (IMViC), as well as catalase, oxidase, carbohydrate fermentation, and urease tests to identify the organism at a species level using Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [67]. Both of the two microorganisms investigated were Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis (Table 7). A master plate was prepared for both organisms and maintained at 4 °C on MacConkey agar plates.
Approximately 20 mL of sterilized Mueller–Hinton agar was poured into petri dishes and allowed to solidify. Following solidification, the 24 hr nutrient broth grown with the pathogenic cultures was swabbed on the respective agar plate using sterilized cotton swabs. Subsequently, the antibacterial activity of each extract was investigated using the agar well diffusion method [68]. The concentration of the plant extracts used was 100 mg/mL. Four wells (6 mm diameter) were punched approximately 24 mm apart in the agar plates using a sterile aluminum borer. The wells were filled with 20 μL, 40 μL, and 60 μL of plant extract in three different wells, while DMSO alone was added as a negative control (for organic solvent) and distilled water (for aqueous extract) in the remaining well. Following 24 hrs of incubation at 37 °C, the plates were observed for the antibacterial activity and the diameter of the zone of inhibition for each extract was measured (in mm) with the help of a transparent plastic ruler. The experiment was performed in triplicate for each extract and the mean diameter was taken. The data represent the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation (SD).

4.5. Qualitative Tests for Phytochemical Analysis of Crude Extracts of B. monnieri

A phytochemical screening of extracts from different plant species was conducted to determine the presence of active secondary plant metabolites. The crude plant extracts were selected by screening, then analyzed for the presence of all major groups of bioactive molecules by employing various standard phytochemical methods [69,70,71].

4.5.1. Test for Flavonoid (Alkaline Reagent Test)

Approximately 1 mL of the crude extract was treated with 5 drops of 5% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution, followed by the addition of 1 mL of hydrochloric acid (HCl) (2 M). An increase in the intensity of the yellow color caused it to become colorless upon the addition of a few drops of 2M HCl, which is indicative of the presence of flavonoids.

4.5.2. Test for Saponins (Frothing Test)

Approximately 0.5 g of the crude extract was added to 3 mL of hot distilled water. Subsequently, the mixture was shaken vigorously for one minute. Any persistent foaming indicated the presence of saponins.

4.5.3. Test for Phenols (Ferric Chloride Test)

Approximately 2 mL of the extract was treated with ethanol (2 mL) and a 5% ferric chloride (3–4 drops) solution. A deep blue color indicated the presence of phenols.

4.5.4. Test for Tannins (Gelatin Test)

To a 1 mL of extract, 2 mL of 1% gelatin solution containing 10% sodium chloride was added in a test tube. The formation of white precipitate indicated the presence of tannins.

4.5.5. Test for Steroids (Salkowski Test)

To a 0.5 mL of extract, 5 mL of chloroform and concentrated sulfuric acid were added. A colored layer was formed, with the upper layer turning red; a sulfuric acid layer that turned yellow was indicative of the presence of steroids.

4.5.6. Test for Phytosterol (Salkowski Test)

Approximately 0.5 mL of extract was dissolved in 5 mL of chloroform and concentrated sulfuric acid along the side of the test tube. The presence of a brown ring in the middle indicated the presence of phytosterol.

4.6. In Silico Study of Selected Bioactive Molecules Present in B. monnieri

Open Babel GUI [72], UCSF Chimera 1.8.1, Pubchem (www.pubchem.com, accessed on 6–8 December 2021), RCSB PDB (http://www.rscb.org/pdb, accessed on 6–8 December 2021), AutoDock Vvina software [73], and Discovery Studio were used in our investigation. Docking was achieved to estimate the population of possible ligand conformations/orientations at the binding sites. To align the ligands in the same spatial coordinate, a Vina perl script was used [73]. The best conformation was selected with the minimum docked energy after the completion of the docking search. The PDB complex of protein, along with the ligands, was examined using Discovery Studio (https://discover.3ds.com/d, accessed on 6–8 December 2021) to study the interactions between the proteins and the ligands. The binding strength of the ligands was calculated as a negative score (kcal/mol).
Seventeen major bioactive molecules that are present in B. monnieri were selected from the 52 molecules on the basis of a literature survey [15,74,75] for the molecular docking analysis (Figure 9). The three-dimensional (3D) structures of all the bioactive molecules and the resistant trimethoprim drug were downloaded from Pubchem (www.pubchem.com, accessed on 6–8 December 2021) in .sdf format, which was further converted into a PDB file. Each selected ligand (bioactive molecules and drugs) was prepared via open Babel software, based on the command line on an Ubuntu terminal.
The Klebsiella pneumoniae fosfomycin resistance protein (5WEW) and the Zn-dependent receptor-binding domain of Proteus mirabilis MR/P fimbrial adhesin MrpH (6Y4F) of the investigated microbes were used for molecular docking with the major bioactive molecules detected in B. monnieri to identify potential inhibitors of uropathogens, such as K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis. The 3D structure protein (PDB ID = 5WEW & 6Y4F) was downloaded from the protein databank (http://www.rscb.org/pdb, accessed on 6–8 December 2021) as a dimer. Chain A was extracted for docking using PyMol. The active site was predicted by grid box generation (grid box dimensions = 40, 40, 40 Å) for both proteins and was centered at x, y, z = −35.853 A, 1.45 A, −20.711 Å, respectively, for 5WEW; the x, y, z values for 6Y4F were −7.534 A, −0.9 A, and 15.308 Å, respectively.

4.7. Drug-Likeness Calculations

The selected phytochemicals were scanned to determine the drug-likeness criteria. Lipinski’s rule of 5 using molinspiration (http://www.molinspiration.com, accessed on 6–7 December 2021) was considered to verify drug-likeness attributes, such as the number of hydrogen acceptors <10, the hydrogen donors <5, the molecular weight <500 Da, and the partition coefficient log p > 5. The SMILES format of all selected major phytoconstituents was uploaded for further screening [76].

4.8. ADMET Screening and Toxicity Prediction

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) assessments were conducted to determine the absorption, toxicity, and drug-likeness properties of the major bioactive molecules selected for the study. The 3D structures of 17 bioactive molecules (Apigenin, Bacopasaponin A, Bacopaside I, β-sitosterol, Betulinic acid, Brahmic acid, Cucurbitacin B, D-mannitol, Herpestine, Loliolide, Monnierasides I, Nicotine, Oroxindin, Plantainoside B, Rosavin, Stigmastanol, and Wogonin) were saved in SMILES format and uploaded on the SWISSADME (http://www.swissadme.ch/, accessed on 8–9 December 2021) (Molecular Modeling Group of the SIB (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics) and PROTOX-II (https://tox-new.charite.de/protox_II/, accessed on 8–9 December 2021) web tools (Charite University of Medicine, Institute for Physiology, Structural Bioinformatics Group, Berlin, Germany) [77]. SWISSADME is an online tool used to predict ADME and pharmacokinetic and physicochemical attributes of a molecule, which are the main predictors for clinical trials. Toxicity was estimated in compounds with a lethal dose of 50% (LD50) values ≤ 50 mg/kg (Class I), >50 mg/kg but < 500 mg/kg (Class II), 500 < LD50 ≤ 5000 mg/kg (Class III), and LD50 > 5000 mg/kg (Class IV). Classes I, II, and III exhibited less toxicity, whereas Class IV displayed no toxicity [78,79]. PROTOX is a rodent oral toxicity server that determines the LD50 value and the toxicity class of a target molecule [77].

4.9. MD Simulation of Protein Ligand Complexes

Oroxindin showed the best interactions in molecular docking and followed all the parameters for drug likeness and toxicity. To study the stability of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F, an MD simulation was carried out for 100 ns. The MD simulation was carried out using the GROMACS 2018.3 methods, as described in previous study. The solvent (using the TIP3P water model) addition was carried out in a cubic box using a box distance 1.0 nm from the closest atom in the protein. The addition of Cl- ions was used to neutralize the system [80,81,82,83].

5. Conclusions

K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis are sensitive against both the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of B. monnieri, indicating that B. monnieri has potential against UTIs. The extract of its leaves can confer the potential antibacterial activity due to the presence of different phytochemicals, such as alkaloids, phytosterols, saponin, phenol, flavonoids, and tannins. The present study suggests that Oroxindin, a molecule from B. monnieri, can be a potent inhibitor for the effective killing of K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis. Overall, this study revealed promising in vitro and in silico results that can be used to predict efficacy in in vivo models and possibly lead to a future drug candidate. Despite the fact that we presented several observations in support of our hypothesis, we focused on a limited data set with only two bacterial pathogens. More research is needed to determine whether our findings are transferable to various uropathogens. This will assist in the identification of novel therapeutic molecules for future UTI drug discovery and development.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft: K.U., T.S., J.M., S.F., and N.K.F.; conceptualization: D.S., R.R., O.A.F., K.U., T.S., J.M., S.F., and N.K.F.; resources: J.M., K.U., S.F., T.S., M.S., D.S., R.R., M.Y.B., S.H.G., N.N.I.M.R., K.C., V.S., K.V.S., P.T.L., S.U., O.A.F., O.A., and N.K.F.; data curation: J.M., K.U., S.F., T.S., M.S., D.S., R.R., M.Y.B., S.H.G., N.N.I.M.R., K.C., V.S., K.V.S., P.T.L., S.U., O.A.F., O.A., and N.K.F.; writing—review and editing: J.M., K.U., S.F., T.S., M.S., D.S., R.R., M.Y.B., S.H.G., N.N.I.M.R., K.C., V.S., K.V.S., P.T.L., S.U., O.A.F., O.A., and N.K.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia through the Research Group (Large) (project number RGP.2/31/43).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the DNA Lab and Shoolini University, Solan, India, for supporting this research. The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the Research Group (Large) (project number RGP.2/31/43). All the authors of this manuscript are thankful to their respective departments and universities for the successful completion of this study. The figures (1, 8 and 9) in this manuscript were created with the support of https://biorender.com (accessed on 6–8 December 2021) under a paid subscription (ref: C08A1A0B-0002; 3 November 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sheerin, N.S.; Glover, E.K. Urinary tract infection. Medicine 2019, 47, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Parekh, J.; Chanda, S. Antibacterial and phytochemical studies on twelve species of Indian medicinal plants. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 2010, 10, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sabir, N.; Ikram, A.; Zaman, G.; Satti, L.; Gardezi, A.; Ahmed, A.; Ahmed, P. Bacterial biofilm-based catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Causative pathogens and antibiotic resistance. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2017, 45, 1101–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Azevedo, A.S.; Almeida, C.; Melo, L.F.; Azevedo, N.F. Impact of polymicrobial biofilms in catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 43, 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kotaskova, I.; Obrucova, H.; Malisova, B.; Videnska, P.; Zwinsova, B.; Peroutkova, T.; Dvorackova, M.; Kumstat, P.; Trojan, P.; Ruzicka, F. Molecular techniques complement culture-based assessment of bacteria composition in mixed biofilms of urinary tract catheter-related samples. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Armbruster, C.; Mobley, H.; Pearson, M. Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis Infection. EcoSal Plus 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Martin, R.M.; Bachman, M.A. Colonization, infection, and the accessory genome of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sánchez, S.V.; Navarro, N.; Catalán-Figueroa, J.; Morales, J.O. Nanoparticles as potential novel therapies for urinary tract infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 656496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghani, A. Medicinal Plants of Bangladesh: Chemical Constituents and Uses; Asiatic Society of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chopra, R.N.; Nayar, S.L.; Chopra, I.C. Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research: New Dehli, India, 1956. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yarnell, E. Botanical medicines for the urinary tract. World J. Urol. 2002, 20, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amin, A.H.; Subbaiah, T.V.; Abbasi, K.M. Berberine sulfate: Antimicrobial activity, bioassay, and mode of action. Can. J. Microbiol. 1969, 15, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Charoenphon, N.; Anandsongvit, N.; Kosai, P.; Sirisidthi, K.; Kangwanrangsan, N.; Jiraungkoorskul, W. Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri): Up-to-date of memory boosting medicinal plant: A review. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2016, 50, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sivarajan, V.V.; Balachandran, I. Ayurvedic Drugs and Their Plant Sources; Oxford and IBH Publishing: New Delhi, India, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jeyasri, R.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Suba, V.; Ramesh, M.; Chen, J.T. Bacopa monnieri and their bioactive compounds inferred multi-target treatment strategy for neurological diseases: A cheminformatics and system pharmacology approach. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Phrompittayarat, W.; Wittaya-Areekul, S.; Jetiyanon, K.; Putalun, W.; Tanaka, H.; Ingkaninan, K. Stability studies of saponins in Bacopa monnieri dried ethanolic extracts. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 1756–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shinomol, G.; Bharath, M. Exploring the role of “Brahmi”(Bacopa monnieri and Centella asiatica) in brain function and therapy. Recent Pat. Endocr. Metab. Immune Drug Discov. 2011, 5, 33–49. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bammidi, S.R.; Volluri, S.S.; Chippada, S.C.; Avanigadda, S.; Vangalapati, M. A review on pharmacological studies of Bacopa monniera. J. Chem. Biol. Phys. Sci. 2011, 1, 250. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sampathkumar, P.; Dheeba, B.; Vidhyasagar, V.; Arulprakash, T.; Vinothkannan, R. Potential antimicrobial activity of various extracts of Bacopa monnieri (Linn.). Int. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 4, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Usharani, K.; Jincy, K.; Neeraja, P.T. Screening and evaluation of potential bioactive compounds for antibacterial activity in Indian medicinal plants of Bacopa monnieri, Eclipta alba, Aegle marmelos and Centella asiatica. Int. J. Front. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2021, 1, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-Vallejo, F.; Caulfield, T.; Martínez-Mayorga, K.; Giulianotti, M.A.; Nefzi, A.; Houghten, R.A.; Medina-Franco, J.L. Integrating virtual screening and combinatorial chemistry for accelerated drug discovery. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2011, 14, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, M.; Sharma, R.; Kumar, A. Docking techniques in pharmacology: How much promising? Comput. Biol. Chem. 2018, 76, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mehta, J.; Rolta, R.; Dev, K. Role of medicinal plants from North Western Himalayas as an efflux pump inhibitor against MDR AcrAB-TolC Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium: In vitro and In silico studies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 282, 114589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Berghe, A.V.; Vlietinck, A.J. Screening methods for antibacterial and antiviral agents from higher plants. Methods Biochem. 1991, 6, 47–68. [Google Scholar]
  25. Urmila, J. A synergistic and efflux pump inhibitory activity of plant extracts and antibiotics on staphylococcus aureus strains. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016, 9, 277–282. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mehta, J.; Rolta, R.; Salaria, D.; Awofisayo, O.; Fadare, O.A.; Sharma, P.P.; Rathi, B.; Chopra, A.; Kaushik, N.; Choi, E.H. Phytocompounds from Himalayan medicinal plants as potential drugs to treat multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium: An in silico approach. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qureshi, K.A.; Bholay, A.D.; Rai, P.K.; Mohammed, H.A.; Khan, R.A.; Azam, F.; Jaremko, M.; Emwas, A.-H.; Stefanowicz, P.; Waliczek, M. Isolation, characterization, anti-MRSA evaluation, and in-silico multi-target anti-microbial validations of actinomycin X2 and actinomycin D produced by novel Streptomyces smyrnaeus UKAQ_23. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Joshi, B.B.; Patel, M.G.H.; Dabhi, B.; Mistry, K.N. In vitro phytochemical analysis and anti-microbial activity of crude extract of Bacopa monniera. Bull. Pharm. Med. Sci. 2013, 1, 128–131. [Google Scholar]
  29. Alam, K.; Parvez, N.; Yadav, S.; Molvi, K.; Hwisa, N.; Sharif, S.; Pathak, D.; Murti, Y.; Zafar, R. Antimicrobial activity of leaf callus of Bacopa monnieri L. Der. Pharm. Lett. 2011, 3, 287–291. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hema, T.; As, A.; Suseelan, S.; Rk, J.C.; Pv, D. Antimicrobial activity of five South Indian medicinal plants against clinical pathogens. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2013, 4, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mathur, A.; Verma, S.K.; Purohit, R.; Singh, S.K.; Mathur, D.; Prasad, G.; Dua, V. Pharmacological investigation of Bacopa monnieri on the basis of antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2010, 2, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharath, R.; Krishna, V.; Sathyanarayana, B.; Harish, B. Antibacterial activity of Bacoside-A—An active constituent isolated of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettest. Pharmacol. Online 2008, 2, 517–528. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dar, K.B.; Bhat, A.H.; AmIN, S.; ANeeS, S.; Masood, A.; Zargar, M.I.; Ganie, S.A. Efficacy of aqueous and methanolic extracts of Rheum spiciformis against pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, BC18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bakkiyaraj, S.; Pandiyaraj, S. Evaluation of potential antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants against common food-borne pathogenic microorganism. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2011, 2, 484–491. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kavishankar, G.; Lakshmidevi, N.; Murthy, S.M.; Prakash, H.; Niranjana, S. Diabetes and medicinal plants-A review. Int. J. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2011, 2, 65–80. [Google Scholar]
  36. Al-Zubaydi, S.R.; Al-Hmdany, M.A.; Raesan, S. Antibacterial effect of some medicinal plant extracts against some pathogenic bacteria strains. J. Duhok Univ. 2009, 12, 244–249. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bakht, J.; Muhammad, T.; Ali, H.; Islam, A.; Shafi, M. Effect of different solvent extracted sample of Allium sativum (Linn) on bacteria and fungi. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 5910–5915. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mehta, J.; Jandaik, S.U.; Urmila, S. Evaluation of phytochemicals and synergistic interaction between plant extracts and antibiotics for efflux pump inhibitory activity against Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium strains. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Swamy, M.; Sudipta, K.; Lokesh, P.; Rashmi, W.; Vijay, R.; Ssn, K. Phytochemical screening and in vitro antimicrobial activity of Bougainvillea spectabilis flower extracts. Int. J. Phytomed. 2012, 4, 375. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaur, B.; Rolta, R.; Salaria, D.; Kumar, B.; Fadare, O.A.; da Costa, R.A.; Ahmad, A.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Raish, M.; Rather, I.A. An in silico investigation to explore anti-cancer potential of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Phytoconstituents for the management of human breast cancer. Molecules 2022, 27, 4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dey, D.; Ray, R.; Hazra, B. Antitubercular and antibacterial activity of quinonoid natural products against multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dey, D.; Ray, R.; Hazra, B. Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate fruit constituents against drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Fuloria, S.; Mehta, J.; Chandel, A.; Sekar, M.; Rani, N.N.I.M.; Subramaniyan, V.; Nordin, R.B.; Djearamane, S.; Wu, Y.S.; Sathasivam, K.V. A Comprehensive Review on the Therapeutic Potential of Curcuma longa in Relation to its Major Active Constituent Curcumin. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 820806. [Google Scholar]
  45. Xue, W.-Y.; Qi, J.-C.; Du, L. Intervention effect and mechanism of curcumin in chronic urinary tract infection in rats. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shaheen, G.; Akram, M.; Jabeen, F.; Ali Shah, S.M.; Munir, N.; Daniyal, M.; Riaz, M.; Tahir, I.M.; Ghauri, A.O.; Sultana, S. Therapeutic potential of medicinal plants for the management of urinary tract infection: A systematic review. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2019, 46, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ayyappan, S.; Srikumar, R.; Thangaraj, R. Phytochemical and antibacterial activity of Bacopa monniera against the common bacterial isolates from human. Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 1, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sabina, E.; Chandel, S.; Rasool, M.K. Evaluation of analgesic, antipyretic and ulcerogenic effect of Withaferin A. Int. J. Integr. Biol. 2009, 6, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  49. Leach, F.S. Anti-microbial properties of Scutellaria baicalensis and Coptis chinensis, two traditional Chinese medicines. Biosci. Horiz. 2011, 4, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Rolta, R.; Salaria, D.; Sharma, P.; Sharma, B.; Kumar, V.; Rathi, B.; Verma, M.; Sourirajan, A.; Baumler, D.J.; Dev, K. Phytocompounds of Rheum emodi, Thymus serpyllum, and Artemisia annua inhibit spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 binding to ACE2 receptor: In silico approach. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2021, 7, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rolta, R.; Yadav, R.; Salaria, D.; Trivedi, S.; Imran, M.; Sourirajan, A.; Baumler, D.J.; Dev, K. In silico screening of hundred phytocompounds of ten medicinal plants as potential inhibitors of nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of COVID-19: An approach to prevent virus assembly. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 7017–7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salaria, D.; Rolta, R.; Patel, C.N.; Dev, K.; Sourirajan, A.; Kumar, V. In vitro and in silico analysis of Thymus serpyllum essential oil as bioactivity enhancer of antibacterial and antifungal agents. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Salaria, D.; Rolta, R.; Sharma, N.; Patel, C.N.; Ghosh, A.; Dev, K.; Sourirajan, A.; Kumar, V. In vitro and in silico antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf. of North-Western Himalaya. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramasamy, S.; Chin, S.P.; Sukumaran, S.D.; Buckle, M.J.C.; Kiew, L.V.; Chung, L.Y. In silico and in vitro analysis of bacoside A aglycones and its derivatives as the constituents responsible for the cognitive effects of Bacopa monnieri. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Singh, H.; Rastogi, R.; Srimal, R.; Dhawan, B. Effect of bacosides A and B on avoidance responses in rats. Phytother. Res. 1988, 2, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Emran, T.B.; Rahman, M.A.; Uddin, M.M.N.; Dash, R.; Hossen, M.F.; Mohiuddin, M.; Alam, M.R. Molecular docking and inhibition studies on the interactions of Bacopa monnieri’s potent phytochemicals against pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 23, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.D.P.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kharat, M.; Aberg, J.; Dai, T.; McClements, D.J. Comparison of Emulsion and Nanoemulsion Delivery Systems: The Chemical Stability of Curcumin Decreases as Oil Droplet Size Decreases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9205–9212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Priya James, H.; John, R.; Alex, A.; Anoop, K.R. Smart polymers for the controlled delivery of drugs—A concise overview. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2014, 4, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Su, S.; Kang, P.M. Recent Advances in Nanocarrier-Assisted Therapeutics Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grama, C.N.; Suryanarayana, P.; Patil, M.A.; Raghu, G.; Balakrishna, N.; Kumar, M.N.; Reddy, G.B. Efficacy of biodegradable curcumin nanoparticles in delaying cataract in diabetic rat model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Sinjari, B.; Pizzicannella, J.; D’Aurora, M.; Zappacosta, R.; Gatta, V.; Fontana, A.; Trubiani, O.; Diomede, F. Curcumin/Liposome Nanotechnology as Delivery Platform for Anti-inflammatory Activities via NFkB/ERK/pERK Pathway in Human Dental Pulp Treated With 2-HydroxyEthyl MethAcrylate (HEMA). Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Borrelli, A.; Tornesello, A.L.; Tornesello, M.L.; Buonaguro, F.M. cell penetrating peptides as molecular carriers for anti-cancer agents. Molecules 2018, 23, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Harborne, J. Methods of plant analysis. In Phytochemical Methods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  65. Aneja, K.R.; Joshi, R.; Sharma, C. Potency of Barleria prionitis L. bark extracts against oral diseases causing strains of bacteria and fungi of clinical origin. N. Y. Sci. J. 2010, 3, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  66. Habsah, M.; Amran, M.; Mackeen, M.; Lajis, N.; Kikuzaki, H.; Nakatani, N.; Rahman, A.; Ali, A. Screening of Zingiberaceae extracts for antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 72, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bergey, D.H.; Breed, R.S.; Murray, E.G.D.; Hitchens, A.P. Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 5th ed.; Bailliere, Tindall & Cox: London, UK, 1939. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wayne, P.A. Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria, 9th ed.; CLSI Standard M11; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  69. Herborne, J.B. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: London, UK, 1973; Volume 2, pp. 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sofowora, A. Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa; Spectrum Books Ltd.: Karthala, Ibadan, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  71. Parekh, J.; Chanda, S. In vitro antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of some Indian medicinal plants. Turk. J. Biol. 2007, 31, 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  72. O’Boyle, N.M.; Banck, M.; James, C.A.; Morley, C.; Vandermeersch, T.; Hutchison, G.R. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 2011, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ganzera, M.; Gampenrieder, J.; Pawar, R.S.; Khan, I.A.; Stuppner, H. Separation of the major triterpenoid saponins in Bacopa monnieri by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 516, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sivaramakrishna, C.; Rao, C.V.; Trimurtulu, G.; Vanisree, M.; Subbaraju, G.V. Triterpenoid glycosides from Bacopa monnieri. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2719–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rosell, R.; Crinó, L. Pemetrexed combination therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2002, 29, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Banerjee, P.; Eckert, A.O.; Schrey, A.K.; Preissner, R. ProTox-II: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W257–W263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Cheng, F.; Li, W.; Zhou, Y.; Shen, J.; Wu, Z.; Liu, G.; Lee, P.W.; Tang, Y. admetSAR: A Comprehensive Source and Free Tool for Assessment of Chemical ADMET Properties; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  79. Yang, H.; Lou, C.; Sun, L.; Li, J.; Cai, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Liu, G.; Tang, Y. admetSAR 2.0: Web-service for prediction and optimization of chemical ADMET properties. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1067–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Abraham, M.J.; Murtola, T.; Schulz, R.; Páll, S.; Smith, J.C.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2015, 2, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kumari, R.; Kumar, R.; Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium; Lynn, A. g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 1951–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Egan, W.J.; Merz, K.M.; Baldwin, J.J. Prediction of drug absorption using multivariate statistics. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3867–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Salaria, D.; Rolta, R.; Mehta, J.; Awofisayo, O.; Fadare, O.A.; Kaur, B.; Kumar, B.; Araujo da Costa, R.; Chandel, S.R.; Kaushik, N.; et al. Phytoconstituents of traditional Himalayan Herbs as potential inhibitors of Human Papillomavirus (HPV-18) for cervical cancer treatment: An in silico approach. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 04971 g001 550
Figure 1. The use of B. monnieri to treat a variety of illnesses, including inflammations, cognitive problems, and gastrointestinal problems.
Figure 1. The use of B. monnieri to treat a variety of illnesses, including inflammations, cognitive problems, and gastrointestinal problems.
Molecules 27 04971 g001
Molecules 27 04971 g002 550
Figure 2. The 2D interactions of bioactive molecules of B. monnieri in complex with 5WEW: (A) Bacopaside I, (B) β-sitosterol, (C) Oroxindin, and (D) Bacoside A.
Figure 2. The 2D interactions of bioactive molecules of B. monnieri in complex with 5WEW: (A) Bacopaside I, (B) β-sitosterol, (C) Oroxindin, and (D) Bacoside A.
Molecules 27 04971 g002
Molecules 27 04971 g003 550
Figure 3. The 2D interactions of bioactive molecules of B. monnieri in complex with 6Y4F: (A) Luteolin, (B) Oroxindin, and (C) Bacopaside I.
Figure 3. The 2D interactions of bioactive molecules of B. monnieri in complex with 6Y4F: (A) Luteolin, (B) Oroxindin, and (C) Bacopaside I.
Molecules 27 04971 g003
Molecules 27 04971 g004 550
Figure 4. RMSD and RMSF plots of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F: (A) RMSD, and (B) RMSF.
Figure 4. RMSD and RMSF plots of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F: (A) RMSD, and (B) RMSF.
Molecules 27 04971 g004
Molecules 27 04971 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Radius of gyration, and (B) solvent accessible surface area of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F.
Figure 5. (A) Radius of gyration, and (B) solvent accessible surface area of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F.
Molecules 27 04971 g005
Molecules 27 04971 g006 550
Figure 6. Hydrogen bond interactions of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F.
Figure 6. Hydrogen bond interactions of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F.
Molecules 27 04971 g006
Molecules 27 04971 g007 550
Figure 7. Binding free energy of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F.
Figure 7. Binding free energy of Oroxindin in complex with 5WEW and 6Y4F.
Molecules 27 04971 g007
Molecules 27 04971 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the future application of B. monnieri loaded inside polymeric nanoparticles enhanced with a cell penetrating peptide for improving internalization and bacterial eradication in infected bladders. The application of nanotechnology may assist in addressing toxicity concerns, while extending the half-life of bioactive compounds for effective antibacterial activities.
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the future application of B. monnieri loaded inside polymeric nanoparticles enhanced with a cell penetrating peptide for improving internalization and bacterial eradication in infected bladders. The application of nanotechnology may assist in addressing toxicity concerns, while extending the half-life of bioactive compounds for effective antibacterial activities.
Molecules 27 04971 g008
Molecules 27 04971 g009 550
Figure 9. Overall process of the selected molecules from B. monnieri for in silico study.
Figure 9. Overall process of the selected molecules from B. monnieri for in silico study.
Molecules 27 04971 g009
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of crude extracts of B. monnieri against K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of crude extracts of B. monnieri against K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis.
No.UropathogenConcentration (μL)Ethanolic Extract of B. monnieriMethanolic Extract of B. monnieriAqueous Extract of B. monnieriNegative Control (DMSO)
Zone of inhibition (in mm)
1.K. pneumoniae2019.3 ± 0.822.3 ± 0.6--
4022.0 ± 0.524.0 ± 0.3--
6023.0 ± 0.425.0 ± 0.511.0 ± 0.2-
2.P. mirabilis2017.0 ± 0.921.0 ± 0.8--
4021.0 ± 1.221.3 ± 0.9--
6023.0 ± 0.724.0 ± 0.6--
(-): no zone of inhibition; DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide; values are expressed in mean ± SD (n = 3).
Table
Table 2. Phytochemical analysis of crude extracts of B. monnieri.
Table 2. Phytochemical analysis of crude extracts of B. monnieri.
No.PhytochemicalsMethanolic Extract of B. monnieriEthanolic Extract of B. monnieri Aqueous Extract of B. monnieri
1.Carbohydrates+++
2.Flavonoids (Alkaline reagent test)+++
3.Tannins (Gelatin test)++−
4.Saponins (Frothing test)+++
5.Steroids (Salkowski test)+++
6.Phytosterols (Salkowski test)+++
7.Phenolic compounds (Ferric chloride test)++−
+ Positive; − negative.
Table
Table 3. Molecular docking analysis of major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri with 5WEW.
Table 3. Molecular docking analysis of major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri with 5WEW.
Bioactive Molecules/AntibioticDocking ScoreHydrogen BondingHydrophobic InteractionsAlkyl or π-alkyl Interactions
Trimethoprim−4.9Lys 111, Thr 66His 110-
Apigenin−6.8-Ala20, Gln24, Phe21, Ala87, Gly88, Leu105, Asp106Pro107, Val89
Bacopasaponin A−7.8
Bacopaside I−8.4Arg122, Tyr131, Tyr65, His115, Tyr103, Ser71Asp44, Phe70, His67, Leu119Leu45, Ala69
β-sitosterol−7.7-Gln 24, Pro 59, Pro 60, Asp 106Ala 20, Leu 25, Phe 21, Val 57, Val 89, Ala 90, Leu 105, Pro 107
Betulinic acid−7.1
Brahmic acid−6.9Asp106Leu25, Gly88, Val89, Leu105, Asp108, Gly109, Val57Phe21, Pro107, Ala20, Pro17
Cucurbitacin B−6.7Thr58, Tyr68, Arg55Ser63, Lys111, His110, Gly109, Leu10, Thr9-
D-mannitol−4.8Tyr68, Arg55, Gly109, Ser63, Asp64Thr58, Lys111, Tyr65, Thr66-
Herpestine−7.0Ala69, Gly117, Ser71Phe70, Leu45, Tyr68, His67Leu5, Leu8
Loliolide−5.5Thr58, Arg55, Lys111, Thr66Asp64, Tyr68, His67, His110, Gly109, Ser63-
Monnierasides I−6.9Tyr68, Lys111, Thr58, Arg55, Arg56His67, Thr66, His110, Gly109, Ser63, Gln54, Asp52Ala11
Nicotine−4.5Tyr68, His110Lys111, Thr66, Ser63, Thr58
Oroxindin−7.5Gly117, His115, Ser101, Tyr103, Arg122, His67, Tyr65Leu119, Ser118, Ile72, Ser71, Val116, Phe70, Ser97Ala69
Plantainoside B−6.8Tyr65, Tyr103, Ser71, Leu119, Gly117, His115Glu113, His67, Lys93, Ser118Arg122, Ala69
Rosavin−6.9Gln54, Thr58, Arg56, Tyr68Asp64, Ser63, Thr66, Gly109, Thr9, Ser50, Asp52-
Stigmastanol−7.0-Gly109, Leu105, Pro60, Asp106, Ala90, Ala20, Gln24Pro107, Phe21, Leu25, Pro17, Val89, Ala87
Wogonin−6.2-Asp44, Gly43, Ser41, His31-
Bacoside A−7.5Tyr65, Lys93, Tyr131, Arg122, Glu113Tyr103, Ser101, His67, Ala69, Leu45, Phe70, Leu5, Ser71, Leu119Tyr68, Leu8, His115
Luteolin−7.0Ala69, Leu119, Tyr103Tyr65, Lys93, His67, Ser97, Ser101, Phe70, Ser71, Gly117, Ser118-
Table
Table 4. Molecular docking analysis of major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri with 6Y4F.
Table 4. Molecular docking analysis of major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri with 6Y4F.
Bioactive Molecules/AntibioticDocking ScoreHydrogen BondingHydrophobic InteractionsAlkyl or π-alkyl Interactions
Trimethoprim−5.1Asn 82, Ala 84, Arg 107, Ser 137--
Apigenin−6.2Ser124Ile30, Asn125, Gly153, Cys152, Cys128, Tyr29, Glu32, Ser33, -
Bacopasaponin A−7.0Cys152, Lys73, Tyr133, Leu146 Ile 154, Val76, Asn77, Gly78, Leu147, Pro148, Gly149, Ser150, Leu151, Asn125Lys145
Bacopaside I−7.3Ser138, Asn82, Ser137, Gln86, Ala84, Phe85Glu112, Gly113, Gln114, Gly139, Pro83, Tyr67-
β-sitosterol−6.5-Glu 32, Ser 33, Ser 124, Asn 125, Glu 127, Cys 152, Glu 153Ile 30
Betulinic acid−6.8-Arg100, Trp49, Ser108, Arg107Arg48, Phe109, Leu104, Lys105
Brahmic acid−6.5Leu146Cys152, Leu151, Ser150, Gly78, Asn77, Leu147, Pro148, Gly149, Ile154Lys73, Lys145
Cucurbitacin B−7.1Gln86, Arg107, Tyr44, Phe85Ser138, Ser137, Ala84, Thr115, Gly113, Glu112-
D-mannitol−5.0Pro83, Gln86, Ser137, Ser138Gly139, Asn82, Ala84, Phe85-
Herpestine−6.9Thr116, Asn82, Arg118Ile140, His117, Ala40, Asn39, Thr41His72, His74
Loliolide−5.4Cys128, Ile30Tyr29, Asn125, Gly153, Glu127, Cys152, Ser124, Val129-
Monnierasides I−7.0Ser137, Gln86, Arg107, Ile87Ser138, Ala84, Phe85, Ala88-
Nicotine−4.5Ile30Gly153, Ser124, Glu127, Thr31, Ser33, Glu32-
Oroxindin−7.4Thr31, Glu127Cys128, Gly153, Ile30, Ser33, Ser124Ala155
Plantainoside B−7.1Ser137, Gln86, Arg107 Ile87Tyr67, Ala88, Arg89, Phe85, Ser138-
Rosavin−7.1Ser33, Gly153, Ser124, Glu127, Ile30Thr31, Cys152, Glu32Ala155
Stigmastanol−6.4-Ser33, Glu32, Thr31, Ser124, Glu127, Gly153, Pro156, Glu47Ile30, Tyr29, Ala155
Wogonin−6.3Gly149, Ser150Leu147, Lys73, Gly78, Asn77, Tyr133Pro59, Lys145
Bacoside A−7.1Gln86Phe85, Arg107, Ile87, Asn106, Ile90Ala88, Leu93, Val102, Arg89, Lys92
Luteolin−7.5Arg118, Thr116, His72Ile140, His74, Asn82, Gly81, His117, Asn39, Ala40, Thr41-
Table
Table 5. Drug-likeness predictions of major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri.
Table 5. Drug-likeness predictions of major bioactive molecules from B. monnieri.
Bioactive MoleculesmiLog PTPSA (Å2)Number of AtomsNumber of Nitrogen and OxygenNumber of -OH and -NHnNumber of violationsNumber of RotationsMW
Trimethoprim0.99105.53217405290.32
Apigenin 2.4690.89205301270.24
Bacopasaponin A3.86176.775212635736.94
Bacopaside I2.54215.0054138310768.98
β-sitosterol8.6220.23301116414.72
Betulinic acid7.0457.53333212456.71
Brahmic acid3.78118.21366512504.71
Cucurbitacin B2.83138.20408316558.71
D-mannitol−3.10121.37126615182.17
Herpestine−1.04181.073513729481.52
Loliolide1.8446.53143100196.25
Monnierasides I−1.11170.052610614370.31
Nicotine1.0916.13122001162.24
Oroxindin0.82176.123311515460.39
Plantainoside B0.69186.373411729478.45
Rosavin−0.95158.303010617428.43
Stigmastanol 8.7120.23301116416.73
Wogonin2.9679.90215202284.27
miLogP: molinspiration LogP (to measure lipophilicity); TPSA: topological polar surface area; MW: molecular weight.
Table
Table 6. Toxicity predictions of major bioactive molecules of B. monnieri and standard drug used for UTIs, based on ADMET SAR and Protox-II software.
Table 6. Toxicity predictions of major bioactive molecules of B. monnieri and standard drug used for UTIs, based on ADMET SAR and Protox-II software.
Bioactive MoleculesProtox-II
LD50, (mg/kg)HepatotoxicityCarcinogenicityImmunotoxicityMutagenicityCytotoxicity
Trimethoprim3500 (class 5)InactiveActiveActiveInactiveInactive
Apigenin 2500 (class 5)InactiveInactiveInactiveInactiveInactive
Bacopasaponin A6000 (class 6)InactiveInactiveActive InactiveInactive
Bacopaside I1500 (class 4)InactiveInactiveActiveInactiveInactive
β-sitosterol 890 (Class 4)InactiveInactiveActiveInactiveInactive
Betulinic acid2610 (Class 5)InactiveActiveActiveInactiveInactive
Brahmic acid2000 (Class 4)InactiveInactiveActiveInactiveInactive
Cucurbitacin B1190 (Class 4)InactiveInactiveActiveInactiveInactive
D-mannitol13500 (Class 6)InactiveInactiveInactiveInactiveInactive
Herpestine500 (Class 4)InactiveInactiveInactiveInactiveInactive
Loliolide34 (Class 2)InactiveActive InactiveInactiveInactive
Monnierasides I190 (Class 4)Active InactiveActiveInactiveInactive
Nicotine3 (Class 1)InactiveInactiveActive InactiveInactive
Oroxindin5000 (Class 5)InactiveInactiveActive InactiveInactive
Plantainoside B5000 (Class 5)InactiveInactiveActive InactiveInactive
Rosavin2000 (Class 4)N/AN/AN/AN/AInactive
Stigmastanol 500 (Class 4)InactiveInactiveActive InactiveInactive
Wogonin1190 (Class 4)Active InactiveActive InactiveInactive
Table
Table 7. Profile of microorganisms used in this study.
Table 7. Profile of microorganisms used in this study.
No.Test PathogensPotential Infections
1K. pneumoniaePneumonia, UTIs, septicemia, and diarrhea
2P. mirabilisUTIs, including cystitis and pyelonephritis
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mehta, J.; Utkarsh, K.; Fuloria, S.; Singh, T.; Sekar, M.; Salaria, D.; Rolta, R.; Begum, M.Y.; Gan, S.H.; Rani, N.N.I.M.; et al. Antibacterial Potential of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. and Its Bioactive Molecules against Uropathogens—An In Silico Study to Identify Potential Lead Molecule(s) for the Development of New Drugs to Treat Urinary Tract Infections. Molecules 2022, 27, 4971. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154971

AMA Style

Mehta J, Utkarsh K, Fuloria S, Singh T, Sekar M, Salaria D, Rolta R, Begum MY, Gan SH, Rani NNIM, et al. Antibacterial Potential of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. and Its Bioactive Molecules against Uropathogens—An In Silico Study to Identify Potential Lead Molecule(s) for the Development of New Drugs to Treat Urinary Tract Infections. Molecules. 2022; 27(15):4971. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154971

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mehta, Jyoti, Kumar Utkarsh, Shivkanya Fuloria, Tejpal Singh, Mahendran Sekar, Deeksha Salaria, Rajan Rolta, M. Yasmin Begum, Siew Hua Gan, Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani, and et al. 2022. "Antibacterial Potential of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. and Its Bioactive Molecules against Uropathogens—An In Silico Study to Identify Potential Lead Molecule(s) for the Development of New Drugs to Treat Urinary Tract Infections" Molecules 27, no. 15: 4971. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154971

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop