Next Article in Journal
Antifungal and Cytotoxic Activity of Diterpenes and Bisnorsesquiterpenoides from the Latex of Euphorbia resinifera Berg
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Acids from Fructus Chebulae Immaturus Alleviate Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice through the PPARα/NF-κB Pathway
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phytochemical Composition of Lichen Parmotrema hypoleucinum (J. Steiner) Hale from Algeria

Molecules 2022, 27(16), 5229; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165229
by Marwa Kerboua 1, Ali Ahmed Monia 1, Nsevolo Samba 2,3, Lúcia Silva 2,4, Cesar Raposo 5, David Díez 6 and Jesus Miguel Rodilla 2,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Molecules 2022, 27(16), 5229; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165229
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 9 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is very thorough research on lichen photochemistry. The authors have done great work on this. Especially for the compound identified by GCMS, if we have retention indices and reference RI that will surely help to make this research publication quality. For unidentified peaks, I would like to see a fragmentation pattern. 

Author Response

First of all thank you to the referees for their comments that has helped to improve the manuscript.

I send you the revised version with all the changes suggested by the referees done.

Thank you for your help and please tell me if you need anything else

Best regards

Jesús L. Rodilla

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled “Phytochemical composition of Lichen Parmotrema hypoleucinum (J. Steiner) Hale from Algeria” addresses a study for the chemical composition of hexane, chloroform and ethanol extracts from two samples of Parmotrema hypoleucinum lichen collected in Algeria.

The manuscript can be considered for publication after its improvement.

My suggestions are:

The abstract lacks purpose and a short conclusion.

Introduction:

The authors do not respect the rules of technical editing of the Journal. Quotations are written only by number. Ex line 68

The purpose is not detailed in the introduction either.

Results and Discussion

The results are well detailed, but the discussions are very brief. I recommend improving them.

The conclusion is very long and difficult to understand.

I recommend reformulating it.

Bibliographic references do not comply with the requirements of the Journal

Author Response

First of all thank you to the referees for their comments that has helped to improve the manuscript.

I send you the revised version with all the changes suggested by the referees done.

Thank you for your help and please tell me if you need anything else

Best regards

Jesús L. Rodilla

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

dear author see the comments in the attached file.

Improve the mentioned sections.

Table must be added in supplementary file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

First of all thank you to the referees for their comments that has helped to improve the manuscript.

I send you the revised version with all the changes suggested by the referees done.

Thank you for your help and please tell me if you need anything else

Best regards Jesús

L. Rodilla

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has been improved.

It can be published in its current form.

Back to TopTop