Next Article in Journal
Effect of Speed Sintering on Low Temperature Degradation and Biaxial Flexural Strength of 5Y-TZP Zirconia
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Wang et al. Exploration of the Inhibitory Potential of Varespladib for Snakebite Envenomation. Molecules 2018, 23, 391
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Lipids in Green Coffee by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry

1
Hainan Key Laboratory of Storage & Processing of Fruits and Vegetables, Agricultural Products Processing Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang 524001, China
2
Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Products Processing of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhanjiang 524001, China
3
College of Tropical Crops Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Pu’er 665099, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(16), 5271; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165271
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 13 August 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 18 August 2022

Abstract

:
Lipid components in green coffee were clarified to provide essential data support for green coffee processing. The types, components, and relative contents of lipids in green coffee were first analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS/MS). The results showed that the main fatty acids in green coffee were linoleic acid (43.39%), palmitic acid (36.57%), oleic acid (8.22%), and stearic acid (7.37%). Proportionally, the ratio of saturated fatty acids/unsaturated fatty acids/polyunsaturated fatty acids was close to 5.5:1:5.2. A total of 214 lipids were identified, including 15 sterols, 39 sphingosines, 12 free fatty acids, 127 glycerides, and 21 phospholipids. The main components of sterols, sphingosines, free fatty acids, glycerides, and phospholipids were acylhexosyl sitosterol, ceramide esterified omega-hydroxy fatty acid sphingosine, linoleic acid, and triglyceride, respectively. UPLC-TOF-MS/MS furnished high-quality and accurate information on TOF MS and TOF MS/MS spectra, providing a reliable analytical technology platform for analyzing lipid components in green coffee.

1. Introduction

Coffee, mainly composed of protein, fat, total sugar, crude fiber, water, caffeine, water leachate, and free amino acids, is a genus of coffee in the Rubiaceae family. Taking Yunnan coffee as an example, the protein content is 14.0–17.7%, caffeine 1.02–1.33%, hydrolysable sugar 9.4–11.4%, acid lytic sugars 31.4–40.4%, crude fiber 21.50–28.74%, free amino acids 0.7–1.2%, and fat 4.7–7.1% [1]. Functional components in green coffee, mainly composed of alkaloids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and terpenoids, play an important role in contributing to biological functions such as lowering blood sugar and protecting the liver and nerves [2].
Researchers have focused on coffee pretreatment processes, roasting methods, and coffee types [3,4,5,6,7]. For example, Yu et al. [8] used headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify 82, 72, and 76 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from green coffee roasted at three roasting speeds (namely, fast roast, medium roast, and slow roast), respectively, and the different roasting speeds affected the types and contents of VOCs. Juerg et al. [9] investigated the effect of roasting temperature and time on VOCs in green coffee. They found significant differences in aroma kinetic properties between high- and low-temperature conditions, and the concentration of compounds such as pyridine and dimethyl trisulfide in the aroma declined sharply. Some compounds increased when the temperature exceeded a certain level.
The coffee flavor was used as a critical indicator to assess coffee quality [10], and the results showed that fat in green coffee played a crucial role in flavor [11]. However, there have been few studies on the lipid analysis of coffee oil. Lipids play an essential physiological function in plant and animal growth and are closely related to human metabolism. However, there was a diversity of lipid structures, with over 40,000 lipids in the existing LIPIDMAPS lipid database and a narrow mass distribution range (0–1000 Da) [12], which posed a great difficulty for our analytical work. With the development of analytical techniques such as ultra-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS), the analyses of lipids in Prinsepia utilis Royle oil and other samples have significantly developed. Among them, ultra-performance liquid chromatography–time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS/MS) has been used to detect lipid components in samples because of its high detection sensitivity, short analysis time, simple pretreatment, and separation of lipid components at the mass spectrometry ion source. Xie et al. [13] performed qualitative and quantitative analysis of twenty triglyceride (TAG) molecules in cold-pressed rapeseed oil obtained before and after microwave pretreatment using direct injection multiplexed neutral loss scanning tandem mass spectrometry, and the results showed that the method could be applied to the detection of large sample volumes. This study aimed to establish a lipid analysis method based on high-performance liquid chromatography–time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS/MS) and apply it to the analysis of lipids in green coffee and provide basic data for the development and utilization of green coffee. Meanwhile, profiling the microscopic lipid composition in green coffee helped reveal its functional mechanism.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Analysis of Fatty Acid Composition in Green Coffee

The relative percentages were calculated according to the chromatographic peak area normalization method concerning the time characterization of each fatty acid standard. The content of green coffee was 111.48 ± 3.56 mg/g, and its fatty acid composition and relative percentages were palmitic acid (C16:0) 36.57%, stearic acid (C18:0) 7.37%, oleic acid (C18:1n9c) 8.22%, linoleic acid (C18:2n6c) 43.39%, linolenic acid (C18:3n3) 1.13%, arachidic acid (C20:0) 2.56%, gadoleic acid (C20:1) 0.26%, behenic acid (C22:1) 0.26%, and behenic acid (C22:0) 0.50%. The fatty acids of green coffee were mainly composed of palmitic and linoleic acids, both of which were above 35%, followed by oleic and stearic acids. Koshima et al. [14] determined the fatty acid composition in green coffee oil using gas chromatography, and the results were consistent with the present experiment, except for with behenic acid. In addition, the variability in the types of coffee led to differences in the fatty acid types and contents in the results of this study and the analysis of Hong et al. [15].
According to their saturation, fatty acids are divided into saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which have different nutritional values. Green coffee contained 47% saturated fatty acids and 53% unsaturated fatty acids, of which 8.48% were monounsaturated fatty acids and 44.52% were polyunsaturated fatty acids, and the ratio of fatty acid composition (SFA/MUFA/PUFA) was approximately 5.5:1:5.2.

2.2. Identification of Lipids

In lipid molecules in mass spectrometry, relatively weak chemical bonds in the molecule are broken due to ionization, forming specific product ions or neutral lost fragment ions. This study identified sterols, sphingosines, glycerolipids, phospholipids, and fatty acids in green coffee from the perspective of mass spectrometry cleavage patterns. The fatty acids were identified as ASG (acylhexose glutathione) 29:1; O; Hex; FA 16:0 in acylhexosyl sitosterol (AHexSIS), ceramide esterified omega-hydroxy fatty acid-sphingosine (Cer_EOS) in Cer 60:12, and diacylglycerol (DG) in DG 34:2 |DG 16:0_18:2 as examples to analyze their mass spectrometric behaviors and fracture mechanisms in detail.
The molecular species of the compounds were identified by retention time, isotope distribution, MS mass-to-charge ratio, and MS/MS secondary mass spectrometry pattern in positive and negative ion modes. ASG had an excellent mass spectrometric response in both positive and negative ion modes. In positive ion mode, specific diagnostic fragment ions could be generated to identify its sterol lipid molecular species. In negative ion mode, fatty acid acyl chain composition could be identified by forming free state fatty acid fragment ions through ester bond breakage.
Figure 1A represents the MS/MS spectrum of ASG 29:1 Hex; FA 16:0 in positive ion mode; m/z 832.6495 was the precursor ion [M+NH4]+, and m/z 397.3795 was the diagnostic fragment ion of the acyl hexose glutamate ST 29:1+ [C29H49]+ sterol ester. Figure 1B displays the MS/MS mass spectra of ASG 29:1 Hex; FA 16:0 in the negative ion mode, where m/z 873.6855 was the precursor ion [M+CH3COO]+, and m/z 255.2280 was the characteristic fragment ion [FA 16:0-H]. Since it was an ion formed by the loss of an H in the negative ion mode of the fatty acid formed in the free state after the ester bond was broken, it could be inferred that the fatty acid chain of this compound was Hex; FA 16:0. Figure 1C shows the MS/MS spectrum of DG 34:2 (16:0_18:2) in positive ion mode. From the figure, m/z 610.5323 could be tentatively determined as [M+NH4]+ of DG34:2, m/z 575.5026 represented [M+NH4-NH3-H2O]+, which was the fragment ion formed after the precursor ion [M+NH4]+ lost NH3 and H2O, and m/z 313.2735 and m/z 337.2728 represented [M+NH4-NH3-FA18:2]+ and [M+NH4-NH3-FA16:0]+, respectively, both of which were diagnostic fragment ions for fatty acid acyl chain characteristics. The monoglyceride sheet ions 16:0 DMAG+ and 18:2 DMAG+ formed after the loss of one fatty acid FA18:2 and FA16:0 from the precursor ion m/z 610.5323, respectively. Both di- and triglycerides were nonpolar lipids, forming ammonium addition ions [M+NH4]+ only in the positive ion mode, with no display in the negative ion mode, and the characteristic fragments were monoglyceride fragments and diglyceride fragments formed after the loss of one fatty acid, respectively. Figure 1D shows the MS/MS spectra of Cer 60:12;4O|Cer 42:9;3° (FA 18:2) in negative ion mode. m/z 910.7186 was the precursor ion [M-H] of Cer 60:12;4°, m/z 648.4904 was the fragment ion after the neutral loss of FA 18:2 of the precursor ion, and m/z 279.2293 was the characteristic fragment ion [FA 18:2-H].

2.3. Analysis of Lipid Composition in Green Coffee

UPLC-TOF-MS/MS analyzed the lipids in green coffee, and information on the precise relative molecular masses, isotopic distribution, and secondary mass spectrometry cleavage fragments of the lipids were obtained in compound scanning mode. As shown in Figure 2, a total of 214 lipids were identified in green coffee, including fifteen sterols, thirty-nine sphingomyelins, twelve free fatty acids, 127 glycerides, and twenty-one phospholipids. The above fifteen sterols mainly included four types of acylhexosyl campesterol (AHexCAS), five acylhexosyl sitosterols (AHexSIS), three acylhexosyl stigmasterols (AHexSTS), and three stigmasterol hexosides (SHex). The thirty-nine sphingosine species included seven types of ceramide alpha-hydroxy fatty acid phytosphingosine (Cer_AP), twenty-one types of ceramide esterified omega-hydroxy fatty acid dihydrosphingosine (Cer_EOS), one ceramide esterified omega-hydroxy fatty acid dihydrosphingosine (Cer_EODS), four ceramide nonhydroxy fatty acid phytosphingosine (Cer_NP), and six Hexosylceramide alpha-hydroxy fatty acid phytosphingosine (HexCer_AP). The twenty-one phospholipids included five types of phosphatidylcholine (PC), seven phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), one phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and eight phosphatidylinositols (PI). The 127 glycerol esters included twenty-four types of diacylglycerol (DG), three ether-linked triacylglycerols (EtherTG), three oxidized triglycerides (OxTG), one phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), one phosphatidylglycerol (PG), eight phosphatidylinositols (PI), twenty-five triglycerides (OxTG), seventy-one triglycerides (TG), and four monoacylglycerols (MG).
As shown in Table 1, the total number of carbon atoms in the fatty acid side chains of lipids in green coffee was 28–64, and the double bond number was 0–13. Most lipids contained at least one fatty acid side chain with a carbon number of 18 and a double bond number of 0–3. Among the sphingomyelinols, Cer_EOS had the highest number of double bonds. The number of carbon atoms of AHexCAS in sterols was 28, and the double bond number was one. The number of carbon atoms of AHexSTS and AHexSIS was 29, and the number of double bonds was one and two, respectively. The number of carbon atoms of Cer_EOS in sphingosine was 54–64, and the number of double bonds was 7–13. The number of carbon atoms of Cer_NP was 34–44, and the double bond number was 0–1. The number of carbon atoms of HexCer_AP was 36–44, and the number of double bonds was one. FA had a carbon atom number of 14–24 and a double bond number of 0–3. The number of carbon atoms of PC in phospholipids was 28, and the double bond number was 1–4. PE had a carbon atom number of 32–38 and a double bond number of 0–4. PG had a carbon atom number of 36 and a double bond number of zero. PI had a carbon atom number of 32–40 and a double bond number of 0–4. The number of carbon atoms of DG in glycerolipids was 32–4, and the number of double bonds was 0–5. EtherTG had a carbon atom number of 53–59 and a double bond number of 2–5. OxTG had a carbon atom number of 50–58 and a double bond number of 1–8. TG had a carbon atom number of 48–62 and a double bond number of 0–7. MG had a carbon atom number of 16–20 and a double bond number of 0–1.

2.4. Lipids’ Content in Green Coffee

Since the mass spectra of lipids of the same class under the same detection conditions should be similar and comparable, the peak areas of the extracted ion chromatographic peaks from the primary mass spectra in green coffee were used in this experiment for the quantitative calculation of similar lipids, as shown in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, green coffee was mainly dominated by glycerides and fatty acids, 90.96 mg/g and 18.23 mg/g, respectively, followed by phospholipids 0.27 mg/g, sphingomyelin 0.076 mg/g, and sterols 0.016 mg/g, of which phospholipids were mainly PI and PC, with 0.188 mg/g and 0.066 mg/g, accounting for 70.38% and 24.70% of the total phospholipids, respectively. The sterols were mainly AHexSIS and SHex, with 0.007 mg/g and 0.005 mg/g, accounting for 44.68% and 33.64% of the total sterols, respectively. The sphingosine was mainly Cer_EOS at 0.056 mg/g, accounting for 73.69% of the total sphingosine. The glycerol esters were mainly TG with 74.632 mg/g, accounting for 82.04% of the total glycerol esters. Dietary triglycerides are the main component of vegetable oils, and their main functions are to supply and store energy, fix and protect internal organs, participate in the energy supply in several aspects of maternal and intrauterine fetal growth and development during pregnancy, and play a key role in lipid metabolism [16,17]. In addition to being absorbed by the body, gut microbes may also act upon dietary phospholipids to produce various phospholipids and choline. When the acetylcholine content in the brain increases, the speed of information transfer between nerve cells in the brain is accelerated and memory function is enhanced. In addition, intervention with phospholipid nutrients could improve the composition of arterial blood vessels, maintain esterase activity, improve the metabolism of lipids in the body, emulsify neutral esters and cholesterol deposited in the walls of blood vessels, promote the absorption of fats and fat-soluble vitamins, and improve intelligence and cellular activity [18,19], so green coffee is very rich in phospholipids and triglycerides and has a critical exploitation value.
Additionally, lipid composition and content vary significantly with raw materials, extraction processes, and other factors. Differential metabolites based on lipids can provide data support for food traceability [20,21], quality control during food processing, storage [22], etc. Wang et al. [23] used the phospholipid profiles of fish muscle to reveal the phospholipid oxidation and hydrolysis. Therefore, fish phospholipid molecules can be used as indicators of fish muscle freshness. Gao [24] used the UHPLC-MS method to screen 27 lipid molecules that could be used as biomarkers for identifying bacilli and fermented milk, providing a database for analyzing the effect of hot processing treatment on yogurt and fermented milk lipid quality. Liu et al. [25] demonstrated the efficiency of lipidomic analysis in identifying the geographic region and secretion period of goat milk in China. Similarly, this study’s results are instrumental in providing data support for the later identification of coffee species and the determination of used treatment processes.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Green coffee was provided by the Yunnan International Coffee Trading Center, made by wet processing technology, and originated from the variety of Catimor, which belongs to the Arabica coffee family. Triglyceride deuterium TAG 48:1 (15:0/18:1(D7)/15:0) and carbon XVII fatty acid methyl ester standard (internal standard) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids, pure chromatographic methanol, ammonia, chloroform, and hexane were purchased from Fisher, and chromatographic pure 10% ammonia was purchased from Shanghai Ampoule Experimental Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chromatographic purity: dichloromethane for chromatographic purity was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Determination of Fatty Acid Composition by Gas Chromatography

The method was performed according to Wei et al. [26,27] with some modification of the parameters. Then, 1–2 mg of green coffee powder was added to the headspace vial, and 50 μL of 5 mg/mL of the internal standard carbon XVII fatty acid methyl ester, 2 mL of 5% concentrated sulfuric acid methanol solution, and 300 μL of toluene were pipetted sequentially. The headspace vial with an aluminum cap with a Teflon pad was sealed with a crimper, mixed with slight shaking, and extracted in a water bath at 95 °C for 1.5 h. At the end of extraction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution was added, mixed well, 1 mL of hexane was added for extraction, and the supernatant was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min in the supernatant bottle.
The GC-MS analytical conditions were equipped with a hydrogen flame ionization detector and DB-Fast FAME column (7890A gas chromatograph tandem hydrogen flame ionization detector, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A total of 1.0 μL of the sample was driven through the column under nitrogen gas with an inlet temperature of 250 °C and a splitting ratio of 20:1, in which the initial temperature of the column was 80 °C for 5 min, 165 °C with a 40 °C/min for 1 min, 230 °C with a 4 °C/min for 6 min, and the detector temperature was 260 °C.

3.2.2. Determination of Lipid Composition Using UPLC-TOF-MS/MS

The method was performed according to Xie et al. [28], with some modification of the parameters. Weigh approximately 20 mg of green coffee powder into a 10 mL tube, add 10 μL of 10 μg/mL of triglyceride deuterium internal standard and 2 mL of methanol, precipitate the protein overnight at −20 °C, add 2 mL of dichloromethane, vortex at 2000 rpm for 60 min and then add 2 mL of dichloromethane and 1.6 mL of ultrapure water, vortex and centrifuge, extract the lower clear, and add 4 mL of dichloromethane to extract the lower clear. The extraction was repeated twice, while the lower clear solution was collected three times. The supernatant was transferred into a 10 mL tube, blown dry with nitrogen, and then redissolved with 200 µL of dichloromethane/methanol (1:1, v/v), and the resulting solution was passed through a 0.22 μm organic filter membrane in the injection bottle for detection.
UPLC–mass spectrometry conditions of the chromatographic system: The analytical instrument was a Shimadzu UPLC LC-30A system (LC-30A liquid chromatograph, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Phenomenex Kinete C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm). One microliter of the sample was pumped onto the column at a rate of 0.4 mL/min. The column temperature was 60 °C, and the sample chamber temperature was 4 °C. Gradient elution was performed using phase A (H2O:MeOH:ACN = 1:1:1, containing 5 mM NH4Ac) and phase B (isopropanol/acetonitrile = 5:1, containing 5 mM NH4Ac) with elution conditions of 20% B for 0.5 min, 40% B for 1.5 min, 60% B for 3 min, 98% B for 13 min, 20% B for 13 min, and 20% B for 17 min. In addition, the mass spectrometry system (Q-TOF-6600 Mass Spectrometer, AB Sciex, Concord, Ontario, Canada) was an AB Sciex TripleTOF® 6600 coupled with an ESI source in positive and negative modes. The mass number collected by mass spectrometry ranged from m/z 100 to 1200, the ion spray voltage was 5500.00 V(+)/−4500 V(−), and the temperature was 600 °C.

3.3. Data Processing

Freely available MSDIAL, version 4.00 (http://prime.psc.riken.jp/Metabolomics_Software/MS-DIAL/index2.html, accessed on 5 November 2021), and commercially available software packages, Peak View, Master View, and Multiquanta (SCIEX, Washington, DC, USA), were used for lipid profiling. For lipid identification, the MS/MS spectrum of each feature was matched by MS-DIAL software with an integrated LipidBlast database [18]. Qualitative analysis of shotgun-MS data was performed using Lipid View software (v2.0, ABSciex, Concord, Ontario, Canada). Software parameter settings: Mass Tolerance = 0.5, Min % Intensity = 1, Minimum S/N = 10, Flow Injection Average Spectrum from Top = 30% TIC, Total Double Bonds ≤12.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

All data in this study were repeatedly measured three times, and data were analyzed statistically and significantly using IBM SPSS Statics analysis software and plotted using Origin Pro 2021.

4. Conclusions

In this study, 214 lipids were isolated and identified from green coffee by UPLC-TOF MS for the first time. The lipid content of green coffee lipids was 111.48 mg/g. The lipid components mainly consisted of sterols, sphingomyelin, free fatty acids, glycerides, and phospholipids at 0.016 mg/g, 0.076 mg/g, 18.23 mg/g, 90.96 mg/g, and 0.27 mg/g, respectively. The method combined high sensitivity, scanning speed, accuracy, and reproducibility. It processed the TOF MS/MS spectral information with high accuracy, providing a reliable analytical platform for the analysis of the lipid components of green coffee.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. (Yijun Liu) and Y.L. (Yimin Li); software, X.F.; validation, L.L. and M.C.; formal analysis, Y.C.; data curation, Y.C. and Y.L. (Yijun Liu); writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. (Yijun Liu) and Y.L. (Yimin Li); writing—review and editing, M.C. and L.L.; funding acquisition, M.C. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [the Natural Science Foundation of the Hainan Province of China] grant number [320QN326], [the Guangdong Province Special Fund for Promoting High-Quality Economic Development] grant number [2110024000461], [the National and Industry Standard Formulation and Revision Project] grant number [NY/Y 604-2020].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the study’s design, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Zheng, H.F.; Chen, N.P.; Zhou, J.; Qi, Z.Y.; Lu, Y. Investigation and detection of main components of green coffee beans in Yunnan Province. China Food Saf. Mag. 2019, 14, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, X.J.; Zi, C.T.; Hui, S.L.; Yang, J.T.; Wang, Q.; Cao, M.T.; Fang, J.P. Advances on chemical components and biological activities of coffee. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2021, 29, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhumiratana, N.; Adhikari, K.; Chambers, E. Evolution of sensory aroma attributes from coffee beans to brewed coffee. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2185–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dong, W.J.; Hu, R.S.; Zong, Y.; Long, Y.Z.; Zhao, J.P. Application of HS-SPME/GC-MS in volatile components analysis of green coffee from major production areas in Yunnan Province. J. Agric. 2018, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.L.; Chen, Z.H.; Jiang, K.L.; Dao, B.; Li, X.L. Influence of different primary processes on the quality of arabica coffee in Yunnan Province. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheong, M.W.; Tong, K.H.; Ong, J.J.M.; Liu, S.Q.; Curran, P.; Yu, B. Volatile composition and antioxidant capacity of Arabica coffee. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, W.J.; Hu, R.S.; Long, Y.Z.; Li, H.H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Zhu, K.X.; Chu, Z. Comparative evaluation of the volatile profiles and taste properties of roasted coffee beans as affected by drying method and detected by electronic nose, electronic tongue, and HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 723–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, F.; Dong, W.J.; Hu, R.S.; Long, Y.Z.; Chen, Z.H.; Jiang, K.L. Effects of roasting speed on the volatile components of Xinglong Coffee Beans. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2021, 42, 3316–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Juerg, B.; Luigi, P.; Ruth, K.; Rainer, P.; Felix, E. Coffee roasting and aroma formation: Application of different time-temperature conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5836–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Claudia, G.V.; Eden, T.; Sigfredo, F. Integrating a Low-Cost electronic nose and machine learning modeling to assess coffee aroma profile and intensity. Sensors 2021, 21, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panagiota, Z.; Fotini, P.; Anthia, M.; EvdoxiaMaria, V.; Georgios, B.; Adamantini, P. Single-origin coffee aroma: From optimized flavor protocols and coffee customization to instrumental volatile characterization and chemometrics. Molecules 2021, 26, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, B.F.; Wei, F.; Xie, Y.; Xu, S.L.; Lv, X.; Chen, H. Ion mobility mass spectrometry and its applications in lipids analysis. J. Instrum. Anal. 2018, 37, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, Y.; Wei, F.; Lv, X.; Dong, X.Y.; Chen, H. Analysis of triacylglycerols in cold-pressed rapeseed oil by shotgun electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 18, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Koshima, Y.; Kitamura, Y.; Islam, M.Z.; Kokawa, M. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of fatty acids in coffee oil and coffee residue: Notes. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 26, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hong, Q.D.; Dong, W.J.; Mei, L.B.; Long, Y.Z.; Hu, R.S.; Chu, Z.; Wang, H.R. Exploration of the accelerated oxidation process and change rule of bioactive components from green coffee based on thermal in-duction. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2021, 42, 3327–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, C.H.; Xu, J.X.; Peng, Z.Y. The latest research on nutrition and function of fatty acids. China Oils Fats 2000, 06, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Q.Y.; Xin, J.Y.; Lu, X.C.; Xiao, J.H.; Xia, C.G. Research progress on glyceryls ferulate. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2021, 36, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, X.; Sun, W.C.; Luo, Y.H. Research progress in detection and function of sphingomyelin in food. Food Res. Dev. 2020, 41, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rang, S.; Zhu, Y.F.; Xu, S.L.; Chen, X.F.; Xie, Y.; Lv, X.; Xiang, J.Q.; Wei, F.; Chen, H. Progress on structure, dietary source and nutrition of phospholipid. China Oils Fats 2022, 47, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mi, S.; Shang, K.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.H.; Liu, J.Q.; Huang, D.Q. Characterization and discrimination of selected China’s domestic pork using an LC-MS-based lipidomics approach. Food Control 2019, 100, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fiorino, G.M.; Losito, I.; De Angelis, E.; Arlorio, M.; Logrieco, A.F.; Monaci, L. Assessing fish authenticity by direct analysis in real time-high resolution mass spectrometry and multivariate analysis: Discrimination between wild-type and farmed salmon. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 1258–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xie, Y.; Wei, F.; Xu, S.; Wu, B.F.; Zheng, C.; Lv, X.; Wu, Z.Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, F.H. Profiling and quantification of lipids in cold-pressed rapeseed oils based on direct infusion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2019, 285, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Tracking phospholipid profiling of muscle from Ctennopharyngodon idellus during storage by shotgun lipidomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 11635–11642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gao, W.H.; Yin, Q.L.; Wang, Y.D.; Teng, X.Y.; Ren, H.W.; Liu, N. Investigation of the Effects of Heat Treatment and Fermentation on Milk Lipids Based on Lipidomics Techniques. Food Sci. 2021. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2206.TS.20211202.2006.018.html (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  25. Liu, H.Y.; Guo, X.Q.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Qin, Y.C.; Zhang, J.M. Lipidomics analysis for identifying the geographical origin and lactation stage of goat milk. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wei, H.L.; Lv, X.; Xie, Y.; Xu, S.L.; Chen, H.; Wei, F. Lipid of Principia utilis Royle oil by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry. Chin. J. Oil Crop. Sci. 2019, 41, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, A.P.; Wei, F.; Huang, F.H.; Xie, Y.; Wu, B.F.; Lv, X.; Chen, H. Comprehensive and high-coverage lipidomic analysis of oilseeds based on ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 8964–8980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xie, Y.; Wu, B.F.; Wu, Z.Y.; Tu, X.H.; Xu, S.L.; Lv, X.; Yin, H.Q.; Xiang, J.Q.; Chen, H.; Wei, F. Ultrasound-assisted one-phase solvent extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for efficient profiling of egg yolk lipids. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MS/MS spectra of ASG 29:1; O;Hex;FA 16:0 (A), DG 34:2 |DG 16:0_18:2 (C) in the positive ion mode and ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 16:0 (B), Cer 60:12 (D) in the negative ion mode.
Figure 1. MS/MS spectra of ASG 29:1; O;Hex;FA 16:0 (A), DG 34:2 |DG 16:0_18:2 (C) in the positive ion mode and ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 16:0 (B), Cer 60:12 (D) in the negative ion mode.
Molecules 27 05271 g001
Figure 2. Lipid species in green coffee.
Figure 2. Lipid species in green coffee.
Molecules 27 05271 g002
Figure 3. The composition of sterols, sphingosine, phospholipids, glycerides, and fatty acids in green coffee.
Figure 3. The composition of sterols, sphingosine, phospholipids, glycerides, and fatty acids in green coffee.
Molecules 27 05271 g003
Table 1. Composition of the 214 lipids in green coffee.
Table 1. Composition of the 214 lipids in green coffee.
NOR.Time
min
m/zLipid NameAdduct TypeFormulaOntologyContent
μg/g
16.654859.6649ASG 28:1;O;Hex;FA 16:0[M+CH3COO]−C50H88O7AHexCAS0.61 ± 0.09
27.182887.6971ASG 28:1;O;Hex;FA 18:0[M+CH3COO]−C52H92O7AHexCAS0.20 ± 0.02
36.722885.6755ASG 28:1;O;Hex;FA 18:1[M+CH3COO]−C52H90O7AHexCAS0.09 ± 0.02
46.316883.6581ASG 28:1;O;Hex;FA 18:2[M+CH3COO]−C52H88O7AHexCAS0.29 ± 0.05
56.845873.6815ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 16:0[M+CH3COO]−C51H90O7AHexSIS2.79 ± 0.28
67.355901.7115ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 18:0[M+CH3COO]−C53H94O7AHexSIS0.97 ± 0.17
76.923899.6962ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 18:1[M+CH3COO]−C53H92O7AHexSIS0.56 ± 0.07
86.508897.6824ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 18:2[M+CH3COO]−C53H90O7AHexSIS2.03 ± 0.21
96.111895.6605ASG 29:1;O;Hex;FA 18:3[M+CH3COO]−C53H88O7AHexSIS0.64 ± 0.09
106.689871.6605ASG 29:2;O;Hex;FA 16:0[M+CH3COO]−C51H88O7AHexSTS1.01 ± 0.15
117.204899.6945ASG 29:2;O;Hex;FA 18:0[M+CH3COO]−C53H92O7AHexSTS0.56 ± 0.07
126.349895.6656ASG 29:2;O;Hex;FA 18:2[M+CH3COO]−C53H88O7AHexSTS0.64 ± 0.09
135.504652.5873Cer 40:1;4O|Cer 18:1;3O/22:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C40H79NO5Cer_AP0.51 ± 0.05
145.962668.6175Cer 41:0;4O|Cer 18:0;3O/23:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C41H83NO5Cer_AP0.18 ± 0.02
155.71666.5975Cer 41:1;4O|Cer 18:1;3O/23:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C41H81NO5Cer_AP0.22 ± 0.04
166.224682.6332Cer 42:0;4O|Cer 18:0;3O/24:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C42H85NO5Cer_AP1.60 ± 0.28
175.978680.6147Cer 42:1;4O|Cer 18:1;3O/24:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C42H83NO5Cer_AP1.42 ± 0.26
186.491696.647Cer 43:0;4O|Cer 18:0;3O/25:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C43H87NO5Cer_AP0.26 ± 0.03
196.241694.6345Cer 43:1;4O|Cer 18:1;3O/25:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C43H85NO5Cer_AP0.32 ± 0.08
209.529838.7357Cer 54:6;4O|Cer 38:5;3O(FA 16:0)[M-H]−C54H97NO5Cer_EOS0.11 ± 0.02
219.561864.7435Cer 56:7;4O|Cer 40:6;3O(FA 16:0)[M-H]−C56H99NO5Cer_EOS1.55 ± 0.42
229.186862.7282Cer 56:8;4O|Cer 21:1;2O/17:4;O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C56H97NO5Cer_EOS13.16 ± 2.96
238.814860.702Cer 56:9;4O|Cer 40:8;3O(FA 16:0)[M-H]−C56H95NO5Cer_EOS0.26 ± 0.07
249.991892.7689Cer 58:7;4O|Cer 40:6;3O(FA 18:0)[M-H]−C58H103NO5Cer_EOS0.7 ± 0.16
259.637890.7576Cer 58:8;4O|Cer 40:7;3O(FA 18:0)[M-H]−C58H101NO5Cer_EOS5.81 ± 1.61
269.234888.7432Cer 58:9;4O|Cer 40:6;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C58H99NO5Cer_EOS5.51 ± 0.94
278.846886.7294Cer 58:10;4O|Cer 40:7;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C58H97NO5Cer_EOS14.84 ± 2.9
288.467884.7048Cer 58:11;4O|Cer 40:8;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C58H95NO5Cer_EOS0.64 ± 0.13
2910.396920.797Cer 60:7;4O|Cer 42:5;3O(FA 18:1)[M-H]−C60H107NO5Cer_EOS0.35 ± 0.04
3010.062918.7827Cer 60:8;4O|Cer 42:5;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C60H105NO5Cer_EODS2.40 ± 0.39
319.664916.7686Cer 60:9;4O|Cer 42:6;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C60H103NO5Cer_EOS1.57 ± 0.38
329.299914.7571Cer 60:10;4O|Cer 42:7;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C60H101NO5Cer_EOS3.34 ± 0.53
338.88912.743Cer 60:11;4O|Cer 42:8;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C60H99NO5Cer_EOS2.20 ± 0.36
348.478910.7285Cer 60:12;4O|Cer 42:9;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C60H97NO5Cer_EOS2.81 ± 0.54
358.111908.7169Cer 60:13;4O|Cer 42:9;3O(FA 18:3)[M-H]−C60H95NO5Cer_EOS0.27 ± 0.05
369.749942.7889Cer 62:10;4O|Cer 44:7;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C62H105NO5Cer_EOS1.15 ± 0.29
379.346940.7683Cer 62:11;4O|Cer 44:8;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C62H103NO5Cer_EOS0.20 ± 0.04
3810.456946.8187Cer 62:8;4O|Cer 44:5;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C62H109NO5Cer_EOS0.76 ± 0.16
3910.089944.8008Cer 62:9;4O|Cer 44:7;3O(FA 18:1)[M-H]−C62H107NO5Cer_EOS0.54 ± 0.07
4010.162970.8248Cer 64:10;4O|Cer 46:7;3O(FA 18:2)[M-H]−C64H109NO5Cer_EOS0.26 ± 0.06
4110.835974.8505Cer 64:8;4O|Cer 40:7;3O(FA 24:0)[M-H]−C64H113NO5Cer_EOS0.36 ± 0.07
424.35552.4949Cer 34:1;3O|Cer 18:1;3O/16:0[M-H]−C34H67NO4Cer_NP0.98 ± 0.21
436.497666.6363Cer 42:0;3O|Cer 18:0;3O/24:0[M-H]−C42H85NO4Cer_NP0.73 ± 0.08
446.241664.6186Cer 42:1;3O|Cer 18:1;3O/24:0[M-H]−C42H83NO4Cer_NP0.38 ± 0.02
457.033694.6718Cer 44:0;3O|Cer 18:0;3O/26:0[M-H]−C44H89NO4Cer_NP0.29 ± 0.01
461.685227.202FA 14:0[M-H]−C14H28O2FA15.53 ± 1.00
472.334255.2345FA 16:0[M-H]−C16H32O2FA5727.91 ± 450.89
482.642269.247FA 17:0[M-H]−C17H34O2FA39.88 ± 1.53
492.92283.2651FA 18:0[M-H]−C18H36O2FA3086.39 ± 333.03
502.486281.2492FA 18:1[M-H]−C18H34O2FA1149.61 ± 143.83
512.058279.2334FA 18:2[M-H]−C18H32O2FA6403.60 ± 526.28
521.654277.2187FA 18:3[M-H]−C18H30O2FA94.98 ± 13.02
533.453311.2959FA 20:0[M-H]−C20H40O2FA854.03 ± 56.21
543.002309.2787FA 20:1[M-H]−C20H38O2FA58.09 ± 6.27
553.941339.3272FA 22:0[M-H]−C22H44O2FA315.63 ± 18.01
563.945337.3143FA 22:1[M-H]−C22H42O2FA0.38 ± 0.05
574.381367.3573FA 24:0[M-H]−C24H48O2FA483.68 ± 53.91
584.272758.5736HexCer 36:1;4O|HexCer 18:1;3O/18:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C42H81NO10HexCer_AP0.72 ± 0.10
594.605786.608HexCer 38:1;4O|HexCer 18:1;3O/20:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C44H85NO10HexCer_AP0.7 ± 0.06
605.02814.6382HexCer 40:1;4O|HexCer 18:1;3O/22:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C46H89NO10HexCer_AP5.47 ± 0.06
615.27828.652HexCer 41:1;4O|HexCer 18:1;3O/23:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C47H91NO10HexCer_AP0.25 ± 0.06
625.504842.6694HexCer 42:1;4O|HexCer 18:1;3O/24:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C48H93NO10HexCer_AP3.33 ± 0.12
635.973870.6987HexCer 44:1;4O|HexCer 18:1;3O/26:0;(2OH)[M-H]−C50H97NO10HexCer_AP0.36 ± 0.04
645.537818.5863PC 34:1|PC 16:0_18:1[M+CH3COO]−C42H82NO8PPC10.41 ± 1.93
655.067816.5745PC 34:2|PC 16:0_18:2[M+CH3COO]−C42H80NO8PPC30.21 ± 4.00
665.711844.603PC 36:2|PC 18:1_18:1[M+CH3COO]−C44H84NO8PPC5.25 ± 0.81
675.082842.5946PC 36:3|PC 18:1_18:2[M+CH3COO]−C44H82NO8PPC9.94 ± 1.88
684.687840.5668PC 36:4|PC 18:2_18:2[M+CH3COO]−C44H80NO8PPC10.24 ± 1.85
693.553690.5078PE 32:0|PE 16:0_16:0[M-H]−C37H74NO8PPE0.11 ± 0.01
704.989716.5177PE 34:1|PE 16:0_18:1[M-H]−C39H76NO8PPE0.33 ± 0.07
714.57714.5034PE 34:2|PE 16:0_18:2[M-H]−C39H74NO8PPE4.69 ± 1.06
725.036742.5333PE 36:2|PE 18:0_18:2[M-H]−C41H78NO8PPE1.17 ± 0.2
734.611740.5236PE 36:3|PE 18:1_18:2[M-H]−C41H76NO8PPE0.97 ± 0.19
744.335738.5076PE 36:4|PE 18:2_18:2[M-H]−C41H74NO8PPE1.55 ± 0.17
755.521770.5684PE 38:2|PE 20:0_18:2[M-H]−C43H82NO8PPE0.13 ± 0.05
764.335777.5529PG 36:0|PG 18:0_18:0[M-H]−C42H83O10PPG4.18 ± 0.68
773.716809.5223PI 32:0|PI 16:0_16:0[M-H]−C41H79O13PPI1.53 ± 0.14
783.76835.5346PI 34:1|PI 16:0_18:1[M-H]−C43H81O13PPI13.77 ± 1.51
793.55833.5191PI 34:2|PI 16:0_18:2[M-H]−C43H79O13PPI132.36 ± 7.38
803.351831.4954PI 34:3|PI 18:0_16:3[M-H]−C43H77O13PPI3.09 ± 0.41
813.847861.5472PI 36:2|PI 18:0_18:2[M-H]−C45H83O13PPI9.82 ± 1.10
823.588859.5333PI 36:3|PI 16:0_20:3[M-H]−C45H81O13PPI4.40 ± 0.38
833.375857.5219PI 36:4|PI 18:2_18:2[M-H]−C45H79O13PPI9.28 ± 0.84
844.54919.6258PI 40:1|PI 20:0_20:1[M-H]−C49H93O13PPI13.94 ± 2.16
853.613621.4358SG 28:1;O;Hex[M+CH3COO]−C34H58O6SHex0.49 ± 0.09
863.774635.4494SG 29:1;O;Hex[M+CH3COO]−C35H60O6SHex3.51 ± 0.76
873.655633.4337SG 29:2;O;Hex[M+CH3COO]−C35H58O6SHex1.27 ± 0.19
885.634586.5302DG 32:0|DG 16:0_16:0[M+NH4]+C35H68O5DG85.39 ± 13.32
895.225584.5154DG 32:1|DG 16:0_16:1[M+NH4]+C35H66O5DG2.35 ± 0.26
906.161614.5614DG 34:0|DG 16:0_18:0[M+NH4]+C37H72O5DG41.68 ± 4.04
915.701612.5468DG 34:1|DG 16:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C37H70O5DG206.95 ± 32.99
925.321610.5339DG 34:2|DG 16:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C37H68O5DG3804.73 ± 356.39
935.002608.5155DG 34:3|DG 16:0_18:3[M+NH4]+C37H66O5DG103.33 ± 10.96
946.698642.5931DG 36:0|DG 18:0_18:0[M+NH4]+C39H76O5DG25.20 ± 1.70
956.228640.5801DG 36:1|DG 18:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C39H74O5DG36.32 ± 4.29
965.813638.5634DG 36:2|DG 18:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C39H72O5DG535.91 ± 43.92
975.378636.5472DG 36:3|DG 18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C39H70O5DG842.02 ± 76.18
985.022634.5318DG 36:4|DG 18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C39H68O5DG3737.90 ± 263.65
994.723632.5156DG 36:5|DG 18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C39H66O5DG107.66 ± 14.00
1007.235670.6293DG 38:0|DG 16:0_22:0[M+NH4]+C41H80O5DG5.84 ± 0.24
1016.76668.6097DG 38:1|DG 20:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C41H78O5DG11.47 ± 0.58
1026.345666.598DG 38:2|DG 20:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C41H76O5DG145.25 ± 8.6
1035.852664.5808DG 38:3|DG 20:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C41H74O5DG19.69 ± 1.43
1045.482662.5598DG 38:4|DG 18:2_20:2[M+NH4]+C41H72O5DG6.07 ± 1.20
1057.771698.6593DG 40:0|DG 20:0_20:0[M+NH4]+C43H84O5DG8.74 ± 0.61
1067.302696.6409DG 40:1|DG 22:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C43H82O5DG2.27 ± 0.18
1076.889694.6287DG 40:2|DG 22:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C43H80O5DG20.65 ± 1.90
1088.282726.6904DG 42:0|DG 20:0_22:0[M+NH4]+C45H88O5DG16.76 ± 1.30
1097.429722.6627DG 42:2|DG 24:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C45H84O5DG9.06 ± 0.21
1108.762754.7205DG 44:0|DG 22:0_22:0[M+NH4]+C47H92O5DG12.20 ± 1.17
1117.967750.6893DG 44:2|DG 26:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C47H88O5DG2.38 ± 0.38
1129.622876.8317TG O-53:2|TG O-19:2_16:0_18:0[M+NH4]+C56H106O5EtherTG66.61 ± 7.81
1138.966898.827TG O-55:5|TG O-19:1_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C58H104O5EtherTG66.51 ± 3.34
11410.136956.9129TG O-59:4|TG O-19:2_18:2_22:0[M+NH4]+C62H114O5EtherTG17.46 ± 2.97
1158.246866.7822TG 50:1;1O|TG 16:0_16:0_18:1;1O[M+NH4]+C53H100O7OxTG22.96 ± 6.44
1167.946864.7678TG 50:2;1O|TG 16:0_16:0_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C53H98O7OxTG504.38 ± 128.28
1177.576862.7489TG 50:3;1O|TG 16:0_16:0_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C53H96O7OxTG92.53 ± 28.21
1187.095860.737TG 50:4;1O|TG 16:0_18:2_16:2;1O[M+NH4]+C53H94O7OxTG4.16 ± 0.80
1198.721894.8135TG 52:1;1O|TG 16:0_18:0_18:1;1O[M+NH4]+C55H104O7OxTG10.19 ± 1.89
1208.429892.7969TG 52:2;1O|TG 16:0_18:0_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C55H102O7OxTG180.15 ± 42.4
1217.973890.783TG 52:3;1O|TG 16:0_18:1_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C55H100O7OxTG334.53 ± 82.77
1227.596888.7674TG 52:4;1O|TG 16:0_18:2_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C55H98O7OxTG1043.62 ± 205.51
1237.235886.7534TG 52:5;1O|TG 16:0_18:2_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C55H96O7OxTG273.4 ± 76.16
1246.871884.7346TG 52:6;1O|TG 16:0_18:3_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C55H94O7OxTG5.11 ± 1.5
1258.915920.8307TG 54:2;1O|TG 16:0_20:0_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C57H106O7OxTG49.40 ± 6.42
1268.488918.8096TG 54:3;1O|TG 18:0_18:1_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C57H104O7OxTG71.38 ± 16.36
1278.09916.7963TG 54:4;1O|TG 18:0_18:2_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C57H102O7OxTG198.9 ± 44.27
1287.651914.785TG 54:5;1O|TG 18:1_18:2_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C57H100O7OxTG191.35 ± 38.67
1297.246912.7684TG 54:6;1O|TG 18:2_18:2_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C57H98O7OxTG237.19 ± 41.13
1306.889910.7452TG 54:7;1O|TG 18:2_18:2_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C57H96O7OxTG44.14 ± 9.42
1316.505908.7288TG 54:8;1O|TG 18:2_18:3_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C57H94O7OxTG2.05 ± 0.34
1329.363948.8574TG 56:2;1O|TG 16:0_22:0_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C59H110O7OxTG11.20 ± 2.53
1338.948946.8486TG 56:3;1O|TG 20:0_18:1_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C59H108O7OxTG19.55 ± 2.11
1348.584944.8259TG 56:4;1O|TG 20:0_18:2_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C59H106O7OxTG57.93 ± 10.49
1358.228942.8184TG 56:5;1O|TG 20:0_18:2_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C59H104O7OxTG15.9 ± 2.36
1367.754940.8TG 56:6;1O|TG 20:1_18:2_18:3;1O[M+NH4]+C59H102O7OxTG1.88 ± 0.35
1379.783976.8939TG 58:2;1O|TG 20:0_20:0_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C61H114O7OxTG4.72 ± 0.58
1389.429974.8809TG 58:3;1O|TG 22:0_19:2_17:1;1O[M+NH4]+C61H112O7OxTG5.04 ± 1.09
1399.043972.858TG 58:4;1O|TG 22:0_18:2_18:2;1O[M+NH4]+C61H110O7OxTG9.83 ± 0.45
1409.524824.7681TG 48:0|TG 16:0_16:0_16:0[M+NH4]+C51H98O6TG138.29 ± 18.75
1419.099822.7542TG 48:1|TG 14:0_16:0_18:1/TG 16:0_16:0_16:1[M+NH4]+C51H96O6TG15.50 ± 1.73
1428.713820.7387TG 48:2|TG 14:0_16:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C51H94O6TG97.33 ± 17.62
1438.972834.7506TG 49:2|TG 15:0_16:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C52H96O6TG41.98 ± 2.67
1448.634832.7381TG 49:3|TG 16:0_15:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C52H94O6TG36.08 ± 4.77
1459.954852.7994TG 50:0|TG 16:0_16:0_18:0[M+NH4]+C53H102O6TG83.42 ± 13.03
1469.553850.7856TG 50:1|TG 16:0_16:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C53H100O6TG2563.84 ± 321.36
1479.17848.7705TG 50:2|TG 16:0_16:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C53H98O6TG15,433.4 ± 1243.63
1488.797846.7551TG 50:3|TG 16:0_16:0_18:3[M+NH4]+C53H96O6TG393.98 ± 70.02
1498.357844.7397TG 50:4|TG 14:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C53H94O6TG60.27 ± 11.04
1509.793864.799TG 51:1|TG 16:0_17:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C54H102O6TG19.04 ± 2.01
1519.424862.7835TG 51:2|TG 16:0_17:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C54H100O6TG128.18 ± 5.95
1529.066860.7667TG 51:3|TG 16:0_17:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C54H98O6TG26.49 ± 2.43
1538.619858.7512TG 51:4|TG 15:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C54H96O6TG51.37 ± 6.93
15410.373880.8313TG 52:0|TG 16:0_18:0_18:0[M+NH4]+C55H106O6TG37.16 ± 6.55
1559.984878.8175TG 52:1|TG 16:0_18:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C55H104O6TG1301.48 ± 206.72
1569.633876.8012TG 52:2|TG 16:0_18:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C55H102O6TG8843.51 ± 854.57
1579.227874.7888TG 52:3|TG 16:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C55H100O6TG5707.01 ± 503.57
1588.83872.7711TG 52:4|TG 16:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C55H98O6TG16,132.45 ± 1269.98
1598.46870.7558TG 52:5|TG 16:0_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C55H96O6TG1460.96 ± 308.25
1608.09868.7389TG 52:6|TG 16:0_18:3_18:3[M+NH4]+C55H94O6TG26.70 ± 6.32
16110.198892.8311TG 53:1|TG 17:0_18:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C56H106O6TG7.41 ± 0.98
1629.855890.8171TG 53:2|TG 17:0_18:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C56H104O6TG59.35 ± 5.01
1639.452888.8031TG 53:3|TG 17:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C56H102O6TG39.12 ± 1.76
1649.071886.7877TG 53:4|TG 17:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C56H100O6TG56.52 ± 6.54
1658.707884.7674TG 53:5|TG 17:0_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C56H98O6TG13.14 ± 3.22
16610.75908.8629TG 54:0|TG 16:0_18:0_20:0[M+NH4]+C57H110O6TG11.35 ± 2.42
16710.395906.8478TG 54:1|TG 16:0_20:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C57H108O6TG524.05 ± 89.67
16810.056904.8348TG 54:2|TG 16:0_20:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C57H106O6TG4254.17 ± 523.25
1699.666902.8181TG 54:3|TG 18:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C57H104O6TG1873.53 ± 213
1709.311900.803TG 54:4|TG 18:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C57H102O6TG3713.62 ± 253.08
1718.892898.7906TG 54:5|TG 18:1_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C57H100O6TG2189.29 ± 160.77
1728.488896.7725TG 54:6|TG 18:2_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C57H98O6TG4025.69 ± 559.05
1738.107894.7582TG 54:7|TG 18:2_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C57H96O6TG308.01 ± 56.35
17410.584920.8643TG 55:1|TG 16:0_21:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C58H110O6TG5.27 ± 1.86
17510.259918.8485TG 55:2|TG 16:0_21:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C58H108O6TG74.37 ± 12.78
17611.117936.8935TG 56:0|TG 16:0_18:0_22:0[M+NH4]+C59H114O6TG6.13 ± 0.95
17710.775934.882TG 56:1|TG 18:0_20:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C59H112O6TG103.09 ± 22.17
17810.452932.8689TG 56:2|TG 18:0_20:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C59H110O6TG1225.38 ± 193.62
17910.098930.851TG 56:3|TG 20:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C59H108O6TG593.99 ± 75.39
1809.75928.8354TG 56:4|TG 20:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C59H106O6TG1382.45 ± 140.08
1819.381926.8179TG 56:5|TG 20:0_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C59H104O6TG153.43 ± 14.49
1828.958924.7989TG 56:6|TG 20:1_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C59H102O6TG18.45 ± 2.23
18310.644946.8822TG 57:2|TG 16:0_23:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C60H112O6TG88.96 ± 21.60
18410.29944.8629TG 57:3|TG 21:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C60H110O6TG11.52 ± 2.00
1859.943942.8513TG 57:4|TG 21:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C60H108O6TG27.24 ± 1.39
18611.445964.9293TG 58:0|TG 16:0_18:0_24:0[M+NH4]+C61H118O6TG1.85 ± 0.27
18711.137962.9146TG 58:1|TG 16:0_24:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C61H116O6TG33.88 ± 4.51
18810.83960.8977TG 58:2|TG 16:0_24:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C61H114O6TG410.34 ± 71.01
18910.481958.8819TG 58:3|TG 22:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C61H112O6TG97.2 ± 17.00
19010.155956.8651TG 58:4|TG 22:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C61H110O6TG245.39 ± 42.5
1919.836954.8525TG 58:5|TG 22:0_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C61H108O6TG13.39 ± 2.75
19211.304976.9302TG 59:1|TG 16:0_25:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C62H118O6TG4.3 ± 0.62
19311.01974.9142TG 59:2|TG 16:0_25:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C62H116O6TG48.72 ± 7.73
19410.674972.8973TG 59:3|TG 23:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C62H114O6TG12.08 ± 2.99
19510.344970.8828TG 59:4|TG 23:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C62H112O6TG39.24 ± 8.01
19611.765992.9612TG 60:0|TG 16:0_20:0_24:0[M+NH4]+C63H122O6TG1.15 ± 0.28
19711.465990.9445TG 60:1|TG 16:0_26:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C63H120O6TG8.11 ± 0.65
19811.184988.9325TG 60:2|TG 16:0_26:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C63H118O6TG86.84 ± 5.72
19910.851986.9174TG 60:3|TG 24:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C63H116O6TG46.77 ± 6.62
20010.536984.8977TG 60:4|TG 24:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C63H114O6TG134.64 ± 16.89
20110.243982.8888TG 60:5|TG 24:0_18:2_18:3[M+NH4]+C63H112O6TG6.53 ± 1.10
20211.6261004.964TG 61:1|TG 18:0_25:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C64H122O6TG0.80 ± 0.07
20311.3461002.947TG 61:2|TG 18:0_25:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C64H120O6TG7.92 ± 1.08
20411.0231000.929TG 61:3|TG 25:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C64H118O6TG6.45 ± 1.03
20510.731998.915TG 61:4|TG 25:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C64H116O6TG20.13 ± 3.34
20612.0641020.994TG 62:0|TG 20:0_20:0_22:0[M+NH4]+C65H126O6TG1.39 ± 0.42
20711.7861018.98TG 62:1|TG 18:0_26:0_18:1[M+NH4]+C65H124O6TG0.99 ± 0.04
20811.5141016.964TG 62:2|TG 18:0_26:0_18:2[M+NH4]+C65H122O6TG9.31 ± 0.50
20911.2041014.949TG 62:3|TG 26:0_18:1_18:2[M+NH4]+C65H120O6TG9.49 ± 0.85
21010.9081012.931TG 62:4|TG 26:0_18:2_18:2[M+NH4]+C65H118O6TG20.87 ± 0.93
2112.59331.2843MG 16:0[M+H]+C19H38O4MG1199.53 ± 168.11
2123.09359.3156MG 18:0[M+H]+C21H42O4MG1711.34 ± 63.3
2132.69357.2999MG 18:1[M+H]+C21H40O4MG51.45 ± 4.19
2143.56387.3469MG 20:0[M+H]+C23H46O4MG39.13 ± 2.38
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Feng, X.; Chen, Y.; Lin, L. Analysis of Lipids in Green Coffee by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2022, 27, 5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165271

AMA Style

Liu Y, Chen M, Li Y, Feng X, Chen Y, Lin L. Analysis of Lipids in Green Coffee by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Molecules. 2022; 27(16):5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yijun, Min Chen, Yimin Li, Xingqin Feng, Yunlan Chen, and Lijing Lin. 2022. "Analysis of Lipids in Green Coffee by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry" Molecules 27, no. 16: 5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165271

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop