The Static Magnetic Field Regulates the Structure, Biochemical Activity, and Gene Expression of Plants
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Effect of MF on Photosynthesis, Cryptochromes, and Biomass Productivity
3. Effect of MFs at a Molecular Level
4. Effect of MFs on Reactive Oxygen Species, Nitric Oxide Content, and Enzyme Activity
Variety | Plant Species | Method | Effect | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basil (Ocimum basilicum) | 12-week-old plants | 30 mT SMF for 6 days at 5 h/day to plants | Decreased the activity of polyphenol oxidase (ap.24%) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (ap.68%) and phenolic compound content (ap.73%) in shoots; increased the amount of essential oils of methyl chavicol (46%) | [115] |
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) | 14-day-old plants | 130 mT SMF within growing plants | Increased the guaiacol peroxidase activity by 44% in leaves but no significant changes in roots and shoots | [19] |
Broad bean (Vicia faba L.) | Two-leaved plants | 15 mT SMF for 8 days, each 8 h/day of plants | Increased the SOD activity (ap.30%) and the rate of lipid peroxidation (MDA ap.6%); decreased the total flavonoid content (ap.25%), and peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity (ap.18%) | [101] |
Broad bean (Vicia faba L.) | 8-day-old seedlings | 30 mT SMF for 8 h/day of plants | Increased the content of hydrogen peroxide by 75% in the shoot and enzyme activity of CAT by about 100% in root and shoot | [110] |
Cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) | Germinating seeds | 50–150 mT SMF at 30 min and 1 h to seeds | Increased the radical content of superoxide (ap.100% at 4 h imbibition) and hydrogen peroxide (ap.60% at 24 h imb.) and antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD (ap.26%-36 h imb.), catalase (ap.36%-8 h imb.), POX (ap.78%-4 h imb.), APX (ap.150%-12 h imb) and GR (ap.50%-24 h imb.) | [40] |
Cucumber (var. Barsati) | 7-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 100 to 250 mT for 1, 2, or 3 h of seeds at imbibition time of | Increased the content of superoxide (40%), hydrogen peroxide (8%) and hydrolytic enzyme activity of b-amylase (51%), protease activities (13%), and the antioxidant enzyme activity of SOD (8%,), GR (77%), and CAT (83%) | [17] |
Lentils (Lens culinaris L.) | 15-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF from 0.06 to 0.36 T for 5, 10, and 20 min to seeds | Increased the enzyme activity of APX by 210% and 350% in shoot and root, respectively (at 0.36 T, 20 min) but no significant changes in SOD | [104] |
Lentils (10823 (ILL10823) | Shoots and roots of 7 days of plant growing | Pre-treatment of SMF 1–100 mT for 5–30 min to seeds | Increased the enzyme activity of SOD (to 170%), CAT (to280%), and APX (to 270%) in roots depending on the value of MFs; generally decreased the MDA enzyme (to 78%) in roots | [28] |
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. cabitat L.) | 14-week-old plants | Pre-treatment of 0.44, 0.77, 1 T for 1-3 h | Decreased the content of hydrogen peroxide ap.44%), superoxide (ap.44%), and malondialdehyde (31.7%) for 0.77 T at 1–2 h; increased the content of nitric oxide (ap.200%) and the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD (ap.94%), POD (ap.900%), and GPX (ap.428%) for 0.77 T at 2 h; APX (ap.383%) and CAT (ap.750%) for 0.77 T at 3 h; the non-enzymatic of anthocyanins (257%), ASA (68.3%), GSH (69.7%), and α-tocopherol (165%) for 0.77 T at 3 h; and flavonoids (211%) and phenolics (355%) for 0.77, 1, and 0.44 T at 2–3 h, respectively | [100] |
Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) | 14-day-old plants | 0.2 mT at16 Hz and 50 Hz MF in growing plants | Increased the guaiacol peroxidase activity by 53% at 50 Hz in roots but no significant changes in shoots | [116] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) | 7–10-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF 3 and 10 mT for 4 h of seeds | Increased the enzyme activities of SOD (178%, 432%), APX (90%, 100%), and CAT (160%, 468%) for plant (shoot, root) higher value at 3 mT | [104] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) var. HQPM.1 | 8-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 60 min and 100 mT for 120 min to seeds | Increased the content of superoxide (31–57%), hydroxyl radical (26–39%), hydrogen peroxide (13–48%), and the enzyme activity of POD (10–58%), with a higher value at 200 mT; decreased the SOD enzyme activity (26–64%), with a lower value at 200 mT | [41] |
Maize (Zea mays) var: HQPM.1 | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 100 mT for 2 h and 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Decreased the antioxidant enzymes of SOD (43%) and POD (26%) and reactive oxygen species content of superoxide (26%) and hydroxyl (5%) in leaves at 200 mT | [14] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) var. JM 216 | 45-day-old seedlings (leaves) | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of superoxide (52%), hydrogen peroxide (12%), α-amylase (76%), and protease activities (ap.3%) of seedlings; decreased the hydrogen peroxide (30%) in leaves | [45] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) var. JM-216), soybean (Glycine max L.) var. JS-335) | 8-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds and inhibition time of 96 h | Increased the radical content of superoxide by 81% and 30% hydrogen peroxide −320% and 28%, and enzyme activity of α-amylase (ap. 70%) and 170% for maize and soybean, respectively, and protease s (ap. 6%), depending on inhibition time | [51] |
Microalga (Chlorella kessleri LEB 113) | Plants with 10 days of cultivation | 30 mT or 60 mT within 10 days of growing, exposure time 24 h or 1 h per day | Increased the antioxidant activity of methanol extracts by 77–217% at 60 mT for 1 h/d depending on the method | [25] |
Microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) | Algae cells in culture medium | 10–50 mT SMF for 12 h to plant cells | Increased the antioxidant enzymes activities of SOD (124%), CAT (69%) at 50 mT, and POD (ap.50%) at 10–35 mT | [103] |
Mung bean (Vigna radiate) | 4-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of 600 mT SMF to seeds by conveyer belt | Increased the nitric oxide content (ap.32%, root; 36%, shoot), and the activity of nitric oxide synthase (ap.16, root; 25%, shoot); decreased the concentration of malondialdehyde (ap.56%, root; 8%, leaves), hydrogen peroxide (ap. 13%, leaves) | [95] |
Parsley (Petroselinum crispum L.) | Plant cells after 6 and 12 h of treatment | 30 mT SMF for 4 h | Increased the activity of CAT (38% at 6 h and 1500% at 12 h), and MDA indicator by ap.16% at 12 h; decreased the activity of APX by 30% and 70% after 6 and 12 h of treatment, respectively | [109] |
Radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. radicula D.C.) | 5-day-old seedlings | Treatment of 185–325 μT for 14 h to seedlings in light and darkness | Increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes of SOD (up to 135% μT), CAT (up to 135–150%) at 325–650 μT and soluble PO (up to 36–57%) at 185–310 μT, and malondialdehyde content (210%) at 325 μT; lowest value (110%) at 620 μT depending on the test | [117] |
Shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) bulbs | Plant of roots and leaves of 8, 12, and 17 days old (symplastic, apoplastic) | 7 mT SMF for 17 days | Increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of GPOD (ap.33% for apoplastic), CAT (ap.40–50% for apoplastic and leaves), SOD (ap.20%, leaves), APX (ap.17%, leaves), the non-enzymatic activity of ascorbate (ap.39%), glutathione (ap.24%), the enzyme activities of glucose-6-PDH (30%), and glutathione reductase (ap. 25%) for leaves of 12–17 d old | [118] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) | Germinating seeds of 1–144 h | 2.9–4.6 mT SMF at 2.2, 19.8, and 33 s to enzyme and seeds | Increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD (130% at 19.8 s for 0–24 h) and CAT (20% at 19.8 s for 24 and 72 h) of root | [102] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill J 357) | 28-day-old plants | 2.9–4.6 mT SMF at 2.2 and 19.8 s to seeds | Increased the peroxidase enzyme activity (36% at 19.8 s) and RNA concentrations (111%-2.2 s) for leaves | [119] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) | Approx. 15-day-old plants | 20 and 30 mT SMF for 5 days, 5 h/d of plants | Increased the radical content of hydrogen peroxide (ap. 8–50%) and the enzyme activity of CAT (ap.16% for 2 d) at 30 m, contrary at 20 mT MF | [64] |
Soybean (from Ayyub Agriculture Research Institute) | Seedling of early growth stage | Pre-treatment of SMF 50, 75, and 100 mT for 3 and 5 min to seeds | Increased the content of MDA (ap.40% at 50 mT for 3 min), ascorbic acid (ap.50–300% at 75 mT-3, 5 min), phenolics (ap.50%), and enzyme activity of PRT, α-AMY, SOD, CAT, and POD in the highest level of 75 mT at 3 and 5 min, and 50 mT and 100 mT at 3 min (over 50%) | [20] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) Merr. var: JS-335) | 8-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 150 and 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of superoxide (33–75%), hydroxyl radical (16–50%), hydrogen peroxide (58–30%) in seedlings (embryo hypocotyl), and enzyme of POD (27%, cytosolic; 67%, wall-bound) at 200 mT; decreased ascorbic acid (53%, embryo; 37%, hypocotyl), SOD (12%, cytosolic; 27%, wall-bound), APOX (38%, hypocotyl) at 200 mT | [14] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) var. JS-335) | Seedlings growing within 5 days | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of hydrogen peroxide (77%), nitric oxide (42%), superoxide (35%), and enzyme activity of 𝛼-amylase (48%), nitrate reductase (178%), and protease (17%) in roots | [52] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) variety JS-335) | 5-day-old seedlings | 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the radical content of superoxide (43%), hydrogen peroxide (104%), nitric oxide (50%), and enzyme activity of amylase (128%) NOS (75%), and NR (138%) | [42] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) Merr. var: JS-335) | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT for 1 h and 150 mT for 1 h to seeds | Decreased the superoxide radical content by 16% in leaves at 200 mT | [43] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Decreased hydrogen peroxide content by 46%, and activity of antioxidant enzymes of SOD, APX, GR, and POD by 30–300% in leaves Increased α-tocopherol by 36%, ASA/DHA over 30% in leaves, and activity of nitrogenase enzymes in roots by 161% | [51] |
Soybean (Glycine max) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the activity of carbonic anhydrase (33%) in leaves and nitrogenase (151%) in root and nitric oxide (86%); decreased the content of superoxide (12%), malondialdehyde (14%), and proline (54%) in leaves | [59] |
Soybean (Glycine max) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Decreased the hydrogen peroxide content (30%), activities of SOD (38%), POD (66%), and GR (60%) in leaves | [51] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) variety JS-335) | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of nitric oxide (ap.53%) and nitrate reductase activity (ap.33%); decreased the content of hydrogen peroxide (40%) and α-tocopherol (94%) | [48] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 0.2 m T SMF up to 24 h | Increased the content of NO radical (25–100% for 8 h), hydrogen peroxide (25–108% for 18 h), and salicylic acid (9–30% within 8–24 h) | [63] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 10 mT or 30 mT SMF for 5 days, from day 3 to 7 of subculture | Increased the activity of soluble peroxidase (61% at 10 mT), covalently bound peroxidase (46% at 30 mT), and decreased the ionically peroxidase activity fraction (ap.54% at 10 mT) | [53] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 10 and 30 mT SMF for 5 days, 5 h each day | Increased the enzyme activities of SOD (87% at 30 mT) and decreased activities of CAT (70% at 30 mT) and APX (27% at 10 mT) | [53] |
Tomato (var. Pusa Rohini) | Germinating seeds of 12 and 24 h | Pre-treatment of 100 mT SMF for 30 min | Increased the content of superoxide (38%), hydrogen peroxide (ap.100%), and antioxidant enzymes activities of catalase (3.7-fold) and ascorbate peroxidase (4.4-fold) at 24 and 12 h of imbibition, respectively | [57] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Tekirdag and Selimiye) | 28-day-old cultivars | Pre-treatment of SMF 2.9–4.7 mT at 2.2–19.8 s | Increased the enzyme activities of SOD (57%, 47%), POX (25%, 202%), APX (160%, 100%), CAT (190%, 100%) and FRAP value (40%, 43%) for Tekirdag cul. (leaf, root) higher value at 19.8 s | [107] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Kavir) | Approx. 4-day-old seedlings | 30 mT SMF) for 4 days, each 5 h of germinated seeds | Increased the antioxidant enzyme activity of CAT (ap.70%) and decreased PO activity (ap.24%) | [108] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Kavir) | Approx. 3-month-old plants | 30 mT SMF for 4 days, each 5 h of plants before harvest | Increased the activity of CAT (16-fold), radical scavenging capacity (13%) and decreased activity of PO (86%) and rate of lipid peroxidation of membranes (43%) of wheat seeds | [56] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum | 100-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing | Increased the phytohormones content of gibberellic acid (76%), indole acetic acid (143%), and benzyl-adenine (212%), and decreased abscisic acid (22%) for seed +water | [69] |
5. Effect of MFs on Structure and Cell Growth
6. Effect of MFs on Plant Components
7. Effect of MFs on Gene Expression
8. Possible Mechanisms
9. Conclusions and Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Radhakrishnan, R. Magnetic field regulates plant functions, growth and enhances tolerance against environmental stresses. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2019, 25, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Novitsky, Y.I.; Novitskaya, G.V.; Kocheshkoiva, T.K.; Nechiporenko, G.A.; Dobrovolskii, M.V. Growth of green onions in a weak permanent magnetic field. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 48, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nossol, B.; Buse, G.; Silny, J. Influence of weak static and 50 Hz magnetic fields on the redox activity of cytochrome-C oxidase. Bioelectromagnetics 1993, 14, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Dobránszki, J. Magnetic fields: How is plant growth and development impacted? Protoplasma 2016, 253, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dziergowska, K.; Lewandowska, S.; Mech, R.; Pol, M.; Detyna, J.; Michalak, I. Soybean germination response to algae extract and a static magnetic field treatment. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbic, M. Possible magneto-mechanical and magneto-thermal mechanisms of ion channel activation in magnetogenetics. Elife 2019, 8, e45807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrov, P.P.; Kroumova, Z.; Baidanova, V.D. Auxin content of corn and tomato plants following magnetic field treatments. Fiziol No Rastenyata. 1988, 14, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
- Repacholi, M.H.; Greenebaum, B. Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: Health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 1999, 20, 133–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belyavskaya, N. Biological effects due to weak magnetic field on plants. Adv. Space Res. 2004, 34, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dini, L.; Abbro, L. Bioeffects of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on cell cultures. Micron 2005, 36, 195–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sear, R.P. Diffusiophoresis in cells: A general nonequilibrium, nonmotor mechanism for the metabolism-dependent transport of particles in cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 128101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zablotskii, V.; Polyakova, T.; Dejneka, A. Effects of High Magnetic Fields on the Diffusion of Biologically Active Molecules. Cells 2021, 11, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stange, B.; Rowland, R.; Rapley, B.; Podd, J. ELF magnetic fields increase amino acid uptake into Vicia faba L. roots and alter ion movement across the plasma membrane. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2002, 23, 347–354. [Google Scholar]
- Shine, M.B.; Guruprasad, K.; Anand, A. Effect of stationary magnetic field strengths of 150 and 200 mT on reactive oxygen species production in soybean. Bioelectromagnetics 2012, 33, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, R. See pretreatment with magnetic field alters the storage proteins and lipid profiles in harvested soybean seeds. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plant. 2018, 24, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, T.; Dumlupinar, R.; Erdal, S. Acceleration of germination and early growth of wheat and bean seedlings grown under various magnetic field and osmotic conditions. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2010, 31, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhardwaj, J.; Anand, A.; Nagarajan, S. Biochemical and biophysical changes associated with magnetopriming in germinating cucumber seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 57, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maffei, M.E. Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mroczek-Zdyrska, M.; Tryniecki, Ł.; Kornarzyński, K.; Pietruszewski, S.; Gagoś, M. Influence of magnetic field stimulation on the growth and biochemical parameters in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2016, 5, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asghar, T.; Jamil, Y.; Iqbal, M.; Abbas, M. Laser light and magnetic field stimulation effect on biochemical, enzymes activities and chlorophyll contents in soybean seeds and seedlings during early growth stages. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 165, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iqbal, M.; ul Haq, Z.; Malik, A.; Ayoub, C.M.; Jamil, Y.; Nisar, J. Pre-sowing seed magnetic field stimulation: A good option to enhance bitter gourd germination, seedling growth and yield characteristics. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 5, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deamici, K.M.; Cardias, B.B.; Costa, J.A.V.; Santos, L.O. Static magnetic fields in culture of Chlorella fusca: Bioeffects on growth and biomass composition. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 912–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hozayn, M.; Abdallha, M.; Abd, E.M.A.; El-Saady, A.; Darwish, M.; Hozayn, M.; Abdallha, M.; Abd, E.M.A.; El-Saady, A.; Darwish, M. Applications of magnetic technology in agriculture: A novel tool for improving crop productivity (1): Canola. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindaraj, M.; Masilamani, P.; Albert, V.A.; Bhaskaran, M. Effect of physical seed treatment on yield and quality of crops: A review. Agric. Rev. 2017, 38, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, L.M.; Costa, J.A.V.; da Rosa, A.P.C.; Santos, L.O. Growth stimulation and synthesis of lipids, pigments and antioxidants with magnetic fields in Chlorella kessleri cultivations. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmiedchen, K.; Petri, A.K.; Driessen, S.; Bailey, W.H. Systematic review of biological effects of exposure to static electric fields. Part II: Invertebrates and plants. Environ. Res. 2018, 160, 60–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y.; Guo, W.; Hu, X.; Liu, M.; Xu, X.; Hu, F.; Lan, Y.; Lv, C.; Fang, Y.; Liu, M.; et al. Static magnetic field regulates Arabidopsis root growth via auxin signaling. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harb, A.M.; Alnawateer, B.M.; Abu-Aljarayesh, I. Influence of Static Magnetic Field Seed Treatments on the Morphological and the Biochemical Changes in Lentil Seedlings (Lens Culinaris Medik). Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 14, 179–186. [Google Scholar]
- Hilal, M.; Hilal, M. Application of magnetic technologies in desert agriculture. II-Effect of magnetic treatments of irrigation water on salt distribution in olive and citrus fields and induced changes of ionic balance in soil and plant. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 2000, 40, 423–435. [Google Scholar]
- Maheshwari, B.L.; Grewal, H.S. Magnetic treatment of irrigation water: Its effects on vegetable crop yield and water productivity. Agric. Water Manag. 2009, 96, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathod, G.R.; Anand, A. Effect of seed magneto-priming on growth, yield and Na/K ratio in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 21, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taimourya, H.; Oussible, M.; Baamal, L.; Harif, A.; Zaid, E.; Guedira, A.; Smouni, A. Magnetic treatment of culture medium enhance growth and minerals uptake of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in Fe deficiency conditions. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2017, 8, 1414–1436. [Google Scholar]
- Deamici, K.M.; Santos, L.O.; Costa, J.A.V. Magnetic field action on outdoor and indoor cultures of Spirulina: Evaluation of growth, medium consumption and protein profile. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, F.J.; Wan, T.J.; Pai, T.Y.; Lin, H.W.; Liu, S.H.; Huang, C.F. Use of magnetic fields and nitrate concentration to optimize the growth and lipid yield of Nannochloropsis oculata. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 253, 109680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selim, A.F.H.; Selim, D.A. Physio-biochemical behaviour, water use efficiency and productivity of wheat plants exposed to magnetic field. J. Plant Prod. 2019, 10, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sini Thomas, R.R.; Anand, A. Growth, Na+/K+ Partitioning and Yield of Chickpea Plants Alleviated From Salt Stress by Magnetopriming. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2019, 8, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, S.; Chen, X.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, W.; Chen, D.; Jin, N.; Cobb, K.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Ruan, R. Magnetic field intervention on growth of the filamentous microalgae Tribonema sp. in starch wastewater for algal biomass production and nutrients removal: Influence of ambient temperature and operational strategy. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michalak, I.; Bartniczak, A.; Baśladyńska, S.; Lewandowska, S.; Detyna, J.; Łoziński, M.; Niemczyk, K.; Bujak, H. Cladophora glomerata extract and static magnetic field influences the germination of seeds and multielemental composition of carrot. Ecol. Chem. Eng. 2020, 27, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchachenko, A. Why magnetic and electromagnetic effects in biology are irreproducible and contradictory? Bioelectromagnetics 2016, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, M.K.; Anand, A.; Paul, V.; Dahuja, A.; Singh, A. Reactive oxygen species mediated improvement in vigour of static and pulsed magneto-primed cherry tomato seeds. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 20, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shine, M.; Kataria, S.; Guruprasad, K.; Anand, A. Enhancement of maize seeds germination by magnetopriming in perspective with reactive oxygen species. J. Agric. Crop Res. 2017, 5, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
- Raipuria, R.K.; Kataria, S.; Watts, A.; Jain, M. Magneto-priming promotes nitric oxide via nitric oxide synthase to ameliorate the UV-B stress during germination of soybean seedlings. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2021, 220, 112211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shine, M.; Guruprasad, K.; Anand, A. Enhancement of germination, growth, and photosynthesis in soybean by pre-treatment of seeds with magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics 2011, 32, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghel, L.; Kataria, S.; Guruprasad, K.N. Static magnetic field treatment of seeds improves carbon and nitrogen metabolism under salinity stress in soybean. Bioelectromagnetics 2016, 37, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baghel, L.; Kataria, S.; Jain, M. Mitigation of adverse effects of salt stress on germination, growth, photosynthetic efficiency and yield in maize (Zea mays L.) through magnetopriming. Acta Agrobot. 2019, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deamici, K.M.; Cuellar-Bermudez, S.P.; Muylaert, K.; Santos, L.O.; Costa, J.A.V. Quantum yield alterations due to the static magnetic fields action on Arthrospira platensis SAG 21.99: Evaluation of photosystem activity. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fatima, A.; Kataria, S.; Prajapati, R.; Jain, M.; Agrawal, A.K.; Singh, B.; Kashyap, Y.; Tripathi, D.K.; Singh, V.P.; Gadre, R. Magnetopriming effects on arsenic stress-induced morphological and physiological variations in soybean involving synchrotron imaging. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kataria, S.; Jain, M.; Rastogi, A.; Brestic, M. Static magnetic field treatment enhanced photosynthetic performance in soybean under supplemental ultraviolet-B radiation. Photosynth. Res. 2021, 150, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarraf, M.; Deamici, K.M.; Taimourya, H.; Islam, M.; Kataria, S.; Raipuria, R.K.; Abdi, G.; Brestic, M. Effect of Magnetopriming on Photosynthetic Performance of Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, S.; Baghel, L.; Guruprasad, K. Pre-treatment of seeds with static magnetic field improves germination and early growth characteristics under salt stress in maize and soybean. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, S.; Baghel, L.; Guruprasad, K. Alleviation of adverse effects of ambient UV stress on growth and some potential physiological attributes in soybean (Glycine max) by seed pre-treatment with static magnetic field. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 36, 550–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, S.; Baghel, L.; Jain, M.; Guruprasad, K. Magnetopriming regulates antioxidant defense system in soybean against salt stress. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 101090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdolmaleki, P.; Ghanati, F.; Sahebjamei, H.; Sarvestani, A.S. Peroxidase activity, lignification and promotion of cell death in tobacco cells exposed to static magnetic field. Environ. 2007, 27, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahebjamei, H.; Abdolmaleki, P.; Ghanati, F. Effects of magnetic field on the antioxidant enzyme activities of suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2007, 28, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vashisth, A.; Nagarajan, S. Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanati, F.; Payez, A. Iron biofortification and activation of antioxidant system of wheat by static magnetic field. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. (Sci.) 2015, 39, 355–360. [Google Scholar]
- Anand, A.; Kumari, A.; Thakur, M.; Koul, A. Hydrogen peroxide signaling integrates with phytohormones during the germination of magnetoprimed tomato seeds. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kataria, S.; Jain, M.; Tripathi, D.K.; Singh, V.P. Involvement of nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide production in magnetopriming-induced salt tolerance in soybean. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 168, 422–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, S.; Rastogi, A.; Bele, A.; Jain, M. Role of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in static magnetic field pre-treatment induced tolerance to ambient UV-B stress in soybean. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotnik, T.; Frey, W.; Sack, M.; Meglič, S.H.; Peterka, M.; Miklavčič, D. Electroporation-based applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albuquerque, W.W.C.; Costa, R.M.P.B.; e Fernandes, T.D.S.; Porto, A.L.F. Evidences of the static magnetic field influence on cellular systems. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2016, 121, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhiman, S.K.; Galland, P. Effects of weak static magnetic fields on the gene expression of seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 231, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadi, F.; Ghanati, F.; Sharifi, M.; Chashmi, N.A. On the mechanism of the cell cycle control of suspension-cultured tobacco cells after exposure to static magnetic field. Plant Sci. 2018, 277, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shokrollahi, S.; Ghanati, F.; Sajedi, R.H.; Sharifi, M. Possible role of iron containing proteins in physiological responses of soybean to static magnetic field. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 226, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binhi, V.N.; Prato, F.S. Biological effects of the hypomagnetic field: An analytical review of experiments and theories. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179340. [Google Scholar]
- Binhi, V.N.; Prato, F.S. Rotations of macromolecules affect nonspecific biological responses to magnetic fields. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binhi, V. Primary physical mechanism of the biological effects of weak magnetic fields. Biophysics 2016, 61, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binhi, V. Nonspecific magnetic biological effects: A model assuming the spin-orbit coupling. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 204101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zadeh-Haghighi, H.; Simon, C. Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.09147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ureta-Leones, D.; García-Quintana, Y.; Vega-Rosete, S.; Pérez-Morell, L.; Bravo-Medina, C.A.; Arteaga-Crespo, Y. Effect of pre-germination treatment with direct magnetic field exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. For. Res. 2021, 140, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simkin, A.J.; Faralli, M.; Ramamoorthy, S.; Lawson, T. Photosynthesis in non-foliar tissues: Implications for yield. Plant J. 2020, 101, 1001–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foyer, C.H.; Ruban, A.V.; Nixon, P.J. Photosynthesis solutions to enhance productivity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miyake, C. Molecular mechanism of oxidation of P700 and suppression of ROS production in photosystem I in response to electron-sink limitations in C3 plants. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarraf, M.; Kataria, S.; Taimourya, H.; Santos, L.O.; Menegatti, R.D.; Jain, M.; Ihtisham, M.; Liu, S. Magnetic field (MF) applications in plants: An overview. Plants 2020, 9, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stirbet, A.; Lazár, D.; Kromdijk, J. Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction: Can just a one-second measurement be used to quantify abiotic stress responses? Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baby, S.M.; Narayanaswamy, G.K.; Anand, A. Superoxide radical production and performance index of Photosystem II in leaves from magnetoprimed soybean seeds. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1635–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Procopio, M.; Link, J.; Engle, D.; Witczak, J.; Ritz, T.; Ahmad, M. Kinetic modeling of the Arabidopsis cryptochrome photocycle: FADHo accumulation correlates with biological activity. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ozturk, N. Phylogenetic and functional classification of the photolyase/cryptochrome family. Photochem. Photobiol. 2017, 93, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, Z.; Liu, B.; Su, J.; Liao, J.; Lin, C.; Oka, Y. Cryptochromes orchestrate transcription regulation of diverse blue light responses in plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 2017, 93, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rredhi, A.; Petersen, J.; Schubert, M.; Li, W.; Oldemeyer, S.; Li, W.; Westermann, M.; Wagner, V.; Kottke, T.; Mittag, M. DASH cryptochrome 1, a UV-A receptor, balances the photosynthetic machinery of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 610–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Barshop, W.D.; Bian, M.; Vashisht, A.A.; He, R.; Yu, X.; Liu, B.; Nguyen, P.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; et al. The blue light-dependent phosphorylation of the CCE domain determines the photosensitivity of Arabidopsis CRY2. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shameer, S.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; Sweetlove, L.J. Leaf energy balance requires mitochondrial respiration and export of chloroplast NADPH in the light. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 1947–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hore, P.J.; Mouritsen, H. The radical-pair mechanism of magnetoreception. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2016, 45, 299–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Galland, P.; Ritz, T.; Wiltschko, R.; Wiltschko, W. Magnetic intensity affects cryptochrome-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2007, 225, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, C.; Lv, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, S. Blue light-dependent phosphorylations of cryptochromes are affected by magnetic fields in Arabidopsis. Adv. Space Res. 2014, 53, 1118–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, S. Suppression of Arabidopsis flowering by near-null magnetic field is affected by light. Bioelectromagnetics 2015, 36, 476–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pooam, M.; Arthaut, L.D.; Burdick, D.; Link, J.; Martino, C.F.; Ahmad, M. Magnetic sensitivity mediated by the Arabidopsis blue-light receptor cryptochrome occurs during flavin reoxidation in the dark. Planta 2019, 249, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Shalitin, D.; Liu, X.; Maymon, M.; Klejnot, J.; Yang, H.; Lopez, J.; Zhao, X.; Bendehakkalu, K.T.; Lin, C. Derepression of the NC80 motif is critical for the photoactivation of Arabidopsis CRY2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7289–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burney, S.; Hoang, N.; Caruso, M.; Dudkin, E.A.; Ahmad, M.; Bouly, J.P. Conformational change induced by ATP binding correlates with enhanced biological function of Arabidopsis cryptochrome. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1427–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, W.; Ebaid, R.; Abomohra, A.E.F.; Shahen, M. Enhancement of Spirulina biomass production and cadmium biosorption using combined static magnetic field. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 265, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ercan, I.; Tombuloglu, H.; Alqahtani, N.; Alotaibi, B.; Bamhrez, M.; Alshumrani, R.; Ozcelik, S.; Kayed, T.S. Magnetic field effects on the magnetic properties, germination, chlorophyll fluorescence, and nutrient content of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 170, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jovanic, B.; Jevtovic, R. Effect of a permanent magnetic field on the optical and physiological properties on green plant leaves. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2002, 59, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Small, D.P.; Hüner, N.P.; Wan, W. Effect of static magnetic fields on the growth, photosynthesis and ultrastructure of Chlorella kessleri microalgae. Bioelectromagnetics 2012, 33, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deamici, K.M.; Santos, L.O.; Costa, J.A.V. Magnetic field as promoter of growth in outdoor and indoor assays of Chlorella fusca. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.p.; Li, R.; He, J.M. Magnetic field can alleviate toxicological effect induced by cadmium in mungbean seedlings. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Selim, A.F.H.; El-Nady, M.F. Physio-anatomical responses of drought stressed tomato plants to magnetic field. Acta Astronaut. 2011, 69, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zandi, P.; Schnug, E. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant responses and implications from a microbial modulation perspective. Biology 2022, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aladjadjiyan, A. Study of the influence of magnetic field on some biological characteristics of Zea mais. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2002, 3, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latef, A.A.H.A.; Dawood, M.F.; Hassanpour, H.; Rezayian, M.; Younes, N.A. Impact of the static magnetic field on growth, pigments, osmolytes, nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, antioxidant defense system, and yield in lettuce. Biology 2020, 9, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jouni, F.J.; Abdolmaleki, P.; Ghanati, F. Oxidative stress in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) induced by static magnetic field under natural radioactivity. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagenesis 2012, 741, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Çelik, Ö.; Büyükuslu, N.; Atak, Ç.; Rzakoulieva, A. Effects of Magnetic Field on Activity of Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase in Glycine max (L.) Merr. Roots. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2009, 18, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.Y.; Zeng, X.B.; Guo, S.Y.; Li, Z.T. Effects of magnetic field on the antioxidant defense system of recirculation-cultured Chlorella vulgaris. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2008, 29, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabrangi, A.; Majd, A.; Sheidai, M. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on growth, cytogenetic, protein content and antioxidant system of Zea mays L. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 9362–9369. [Google Scholar]
- Novitskii, Y.; Novitskaya, G.; Kocheshkova, T.; Dobrovolskii, M.; Serdyukov, Y. Changes in the content of lipids in the seeds of magnetically-oriented radish types grown in a weak permanent magnetic field. In Doklady. Biochemistry and Biophysics; Springer Nature BV: Berlin, Germany, 2011; Volume 441, p. 248. [Google Scholar]
- Camak, D.T. Assessing the Impact of Low-Head Dams and Life History on Fine Scale Genetic Structure of Three Etheostomatine Darters (Percidae); Southeastern Louisiana University: Hammond, LA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Sen, A.; Alikamanoglu, S. Effects of static magnetic field Pre-treatment with and without PEG 6000 or NaCl exposure on wheat biochemical parameters. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 61, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payez, A.; Ghanati, F.; Behmanesh, M.; Abdolmaleki, P.; Hajnorouzi, A.; Rajabbeigi, E. Increase of seed germination, growth and membrane integrity of wheat seedlings by exposure to static and a 10-KHz electromagnetic field. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2013, 32, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajabbeigi, E.; Ghanati, F.; Abdolmaleki, P.; Payez, A. Antioxidant capacity of parsley cells (Petroselinum crispum L.) in relation to iron-induced ferritin levels and static magnetic field. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2013, 32, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haghighat, N.; Abdolmaleki, P.; Ghanati, F.; Behmanesh, M.; Payez, A. Modification of catalase and MAPK in Vicia faba cultivated in soil with high natural radioactivity and treated with a static magnetic field. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasanna, G.L.; Panda, T. Electroporation: Basic principles, practical considerations and applications in molecular biology. Bioprocess Eng. 1997, 16, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meloni, D.A.; Oliva, M.A.; Martinez, C.A.; Cambraia, J. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2003, 49, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Im, W. Static magnetic fields inhibit proliferation and disperse subcellular localization of gamma complex protein3 in cultured C2C12 myoblast cells. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 57, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haneda, T.; Fujimura, Y.; Iino, M. Magnetic field exposure stiffens regenerating plant protoplast cell walls. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2006, 27, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghanati, F.; Abdolmaleki, P.; Vaezzadeh, M.; Rajabbeigi, E.; Yazdani, M. Application of magnetic field and iron in order to change medicinal products of Ocimum basilicum. Environ. 2007, 27, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mroczek-Zdyrska, M.; Kornarzyn´ski, K.; Pietruszewski, S.; Gagos´, M. The effects of low-frequency magnetic field exposure on the growth and biochemical parameters in lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Plant Biosyst.-Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2017, 151, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serdyukov, Y.A.; Novitskii, Y.I. Impact of weak permanent magnetic field on antioxidant enzyme activities in radish seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 60, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, T.; Cakmak, Z.E.; Dumlupinar, R.; Tekinay, T. Analysis of apoplastic and symplastic antioxidant system in shallot leaves: Impacts of weak static electric and magnetic field. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atak, Ç.; Çelik, Ö.; Olgun, A.; Alikamanoğlu, S.; Rzakoulieva, A. Effect of magnetic field on peroxidase activities of soybean tissue culture. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2007, 21, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.G.; Lee, K.E.; Singh, M.; Kumar, P.; Matin, M.N. Rice lesion mimic mutants (LMM): The current understanding of genetic mutations in the failure of ROS scavenging during lesion formation. Plants 2021, 10, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chionna, A.; Dwikat, M.; Panzarini, E.; Tenuzzo, B.; Carla, E.; Verri, T.; Pagliara, P.; Abbro, L.; Dini, L. Cell shape and plasma membrane alterations after static magnetic fields exposure. Eur. J. Histochem. 2003, 47, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escobar, J.F.; Vaca-González, J.J.; Guevara, J.M.; Garzón-Alvarado, D.A. Effect of magnetic and electric fields on plasma membrane of single cells: A computational approach. Eng. Rep. 2020, 2, e12125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galland, P.; Pazur, A. Magnetoreception in plants. J. Plant Res. 2005, 118, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bitonti, M.; Mazzuca, S.; Ting, T.; Innocenti, A. Magnetic field affects meristem activity and cell differentiation in Zea mays roots. Plant Biosyst. 2006, 140, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosen, A.D. Effect of a 125 mT static magnetic field on the kinetics of voltage activated Na+ channels in GH3 cells. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2003, 24, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belyavskaya, N. Ultrastructure and calcium balance in meristem cells of pea roots exposed to extremely low magnetic fields. Adv. Space Res. 2001, 28, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reszczyn´ska, E.; Hanaka, A. Lipids composition in plant membranes. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2020, 78, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauréus Koch, C.; Sommarin, M.; Persson, B.; Salford, L.; Eberhardt, J. Interaction between weak low frequency magnetic fields and cell membranes. Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 2003, 24, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, A.L.; Ferl, R.J.; Meisel, M.W. High magnetic field induced changes of gene expression in arabidopsis. Biomagn. Res. Technol. 2006, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poinapen, D.; Toppozini, L.; Dies, H.; Brown, D.C.; Rheinstädter, M.C. Static magnetic fields enhance lipid order in native plant plasma membrane. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 6804–6813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maadane, A.; Merghoub, N.; Ainane, T.; El Arroussi, H.; Benhima, R.; Amzazi, S.; Bakri, Y.; Wahby, I. Antioxidant activity of some Moroccan marine microalgae: Pufa profiles, carotenoids and phenolic content. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 215, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waghmare, A.G.; Salve, M.K.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Arya, S.S. Concentration and characterization of microalgae proteins from Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2016, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.I.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.D. The promising future of microalgae: Current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dhawi, F.; Al-Khayri, J.M.; Hassan, E. Static magnetic field influence on elements composition in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
- Yaycili, O.; Alikamanoglu, S. The effect of magnetic field on Paulownia tissue cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2005, 83, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahamed, M.; Elzaawely, A.; Bayoumi, Y. Effect of magnetic field on seed germination, growth and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Asian J. Crop Sci. 2013, 5, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.; Jin, W.; Chen, Y.; Tu, R.; Abomohra, A.E.F. Enhancement of lipid production of Chlorella pyrenoidosa cultivated in municipal wastewater by magnetic treatment. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 180, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aladjadjiyan, A. The use of physical methods for plant growing stimulation in Bulgaria. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2007, 8, 369–380. [Google Scholar]
- Albaqami, M.; Hammad, M.; Pooam, M.; Procopio, M.; Sameti, M.; Ritz, T.; Ahmad, M.; Martino, C.F. Arabidopsis cryptochrome is responsive to Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirschvink, J.L.; Kobayashi-Kirschvink, A.; Woodford, B.J. Magnetite biomineralization in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 7683–7687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, N.A.R.; Karim, H.F.H. Impact of magnetic application on the parameters related to growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 3, 175–184. [Google Scholar]
- Dhawi, F.; Al-Khayri, J.M. Magnetic Fields Induce Changes in Photosynthetic Pigments Content in Date Palm Phoenix dactylifera (L.) Seedlings. Open Agric. J. 2009, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inhan-Garip, A.; Aksu, B.; Akan, Z.; Akakin, D.; Ozaydin, A.N.; San, T. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on growth rate and morphology of bacteria. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2011, 87, 1155–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shine, M.; Guruprasad, K. Impact of pre-sowing magnetic field exposure of seeds to stationary magnetic field on growth, reactive oxygen species and photosynthesis of maize under field conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Racuciu, M.; Creanga, D.; Galugaru, C. The influence of extremely low frequency magnetic field on tree seedlings. Rom J Phys 2008, 35, 337–342. [Google Scholar]
- Atak, Ç.; Emiroǧlu, Ö.; Alikamanoǧlu, S.; Rzakoulieva, A. Stimulation of regeneration by magnetic field in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) tissue cultures. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2003, 2, 113. [Google Scholar]
- Arosio, P.; Ingrassia, R.; Cavadini, P. Ferritins: A family of molecules for iron storage, antioxidation and more. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2009, 1790, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Findlay, G.; Hope, A. Electrical properties of plant cells: Methods and findings. In Transport in Plants II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1976; pp. 53–92. [Google Scholar]
- Das, R.K.; Zouani, O.F. A review of the effects of the cell environment physicochemical nanoarchitecture on stem cell commitment. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 5278–5293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Racuciu, M.; Creanga, D.; Horga, I. Plant growth under static magnetic field influence. Rom. J. Phys. 2008, 53, 353–359. [Google Scholar]
- Agliassa, C.; Narayana, R.; Christie, J.M.; Maffei, M.E. Geomagnetic field impacts on cryptochrome and phytochrome signaling. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 185, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agliassa, C.; Narayana, R.; Bertea, C.M.; Rodgers, C.T.; Maffei, M.E. Reduction of the geomagnetic field delays Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time through downregulation of flowering-related genes. Bioelectromagnetics 2018, 39, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Yin, X.; Lv, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Song, T. A near-null magnetic field affects cryptochrome-related hypocotyl growth and flowering in Arabidopsis. Adv. Space Res. 2012, 49, 834–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wei, S. Gibberellins are involved in effect of near-null magnetic field on Arabidopsis flowering. Bioelectromagnetics 2017, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wei, S. Suppression of Arabidopsis flowering by near-null magnetic field is mediated by auxin. Bioelectromagnetics 2018, 39, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martinez, E.; Florez, M.; Carbonell, M. Stimulatory effect of the magnetic treatment on the germination of cereal seeds. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 2, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trontelj, Z.; Thiel, G.; Jazbinsek, V. Magnetic measurements in plant electrophysiology. In Plant Electrophysiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 187–218. [Google Scholar]
- Brocklehurst, B. Magnetic fields and radical reactions: Recent developments and their role in nature. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kattnig, D.R.; Sowa, J.K.; Solov’yov, I.A.; Hore, P. Electron spin relaxation can enhance the performance of a cryptochrome-based magnetic compass sensor. New J. Phys. 2016, 18, 063007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solov’yov, I.A.; Schulten, K. Reaction kinetics and mechanism of magnetic field effects in cryptochrome. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 1089–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaezzadeh, M.; Noruzifar, E.; Faezeh, G.; Salehkotahi, M.; Mehdian, R. Excitation of plant growth in dormant temperature by steady magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 302, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penuelas, J.; Llusia, J.; Martínez, B.; Fontcuberta, J. Diamagnetic susceptibility and root growth responses to magnetic fields in Lens culinaris, Glycine soja, and Triticum aestivum. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2004, 23, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dao-liang, Y.; Yu-qi, G.; Xue-ming, Z.; Shu-wen, W.; Qin, P. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on rapid micropropagation of beach plum (Prunus maritima). Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldsworthy, A. Effects of electrical and electromagnetic fields on plants and related topics. In Plant Electrophysiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 247–267. [Google Scholar]
- Naidu, M.S. High Voltage Engineering; Tata McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Asemota, G.N.O. Alternating electromagnetic fields in plantains. Afr. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 4, 59–75. [Google Scholar]
- Scaiano, J.; Mohtat, N.; Cozens, F.; McLean, J.; Thansandote, A. Application of the radical pair mechanism to free radicals in organized systems: Can the effects of 60 Hz be predicted from studies under static fields? Bioelectromagn. J. Bioelectromagn. Soc. Soc. Phys. Regul. Biol. Med. Eur. Bioelectromagn. Assoc. 1994, 15, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Variety | Plant Species | Method | Effect | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Tarm-92) | 2-week-old seedlings | 20, 42, 125, and 250 mT SMF to germinating seeds (four days) or seedling (two weeks) | Increased the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (ap.6%) at 20 mT and electron transport rate (ap.38%) at 250 mT | [91] |
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) | 3-week-old plants | 60 mT, 100 mT, and 160 mT for plant growing | Increased the relative change in photosynthetic apparatus efficiency (28.5%) and chlorophyll concentration (16.15) at 160 mT | [92] |
Chickpea (Kabuli (Pusa 1053) and desi (Pusa 256) | 70-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 100 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the rate of photosynthesis by 36% | [36] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) var. JM 216 | 45-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the rate of photosynthesis (over 60%), performance index (65%), and the maximum quantum efficiency (ap.19%) | [45] |
Maize (Zea mays) var: HQPM.1 | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 100 mT for 2 h and 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the maximum quantum yield (5%), the quantum yield of electron transport (14%), and the performance index (103%) at 200 mT | [43] |
Maize (JM 216) | 50-day-old plant | Pre-treatment of SMF of 200 mT for 1 h | Increased the maximum potential quantum yield (ap.6%), the quantum yield of electron transport (ap.20%), the performance index (42%), the net rate of photosynthesis (52%), and the nitrate reductase activity (ap.80%) | [45] |
Arabidopsis thaliana | 5-day-old seedlings | 500 µT SMF to expose 10 min in dark and 5 min blue light, cycled for 90 min | Increased the cryptochrome phosphorylation (differential of 20%); cryptochrome responses to light were enhanced | [87] |
Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia ecotype Col-4 | Seedlings growing after 30, 60, and 90 min | 500 µT SMF to expose 10 min in dark and 1 h blue light | Increased the cryptochrome phosphorylation of CRY1(7.617% after 60 and 90 min) and CRY2 (16.3% after 60 min) and dephosphorylations of CRY1 17.5% at 30 min) and CRY2 (18% at 15 min) | [85] |
Microalga (Chlorella kessleri) (UTEX 398) | Plants growing in raceway pond and in flask cultures | 10 mT SMF for plant growing | Increased the net photosynthetic capacity (210%) and respiratory rate (310%) and maximum photosynthetic efficiency (109%) | [93] |
Microalga (Chlorella fusca LEB 111 C. fusca) | 15-day-old plants | 25 mT SMF for 24 h and 1 h/d | Increased the growth parameters of biomass by 32-85% (higher value for 24 h/d) depending on the environmental conditions | [94] |
Microalga (Arthrospira platensis SAG 21.99) | 10-day-old plants | 30 mT SMF for 1 h/d and 24 h for plant growing | Increased the maximum productivity by 63% at 1 h/d and the maximum quantum yield (14%), the quantum yield for electron transport (23%), the trapped energy flux (11%), and the electron transport flux (15%) at 24 h/day | [46] |
Microalga (Chlorella kessleri LEB 11) | Plants upon 10 days of cultivation | 30 mT or 60 mT within 10 days of growing, exposure time 24 h or 1 h per day | Increased the maximum biomass volumetric productivity (59%) at 60 mT, 1 h/d | [25] |
Mung bean (Vigna radiate) | 4-day-old seedling plants | Pre-treatment of 600 mT SMF to seeds by conveyer belt | Increased the net photosynthetic rate (ap.16%), intercellular CO2 concentration (ap.18%), nitrogen (ap.6%) and chlorophyll content (ap. 10%) | [95] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the rate of photosynthesis by 22.5% and total biomass accumulation (ap.50%) | [52] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) | 45-day-old plants (roots, leaves) | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the rate of photosynthesis (by 22%), indicator of sample vitality (85%), the maximum quantum efficiency (32%), electron transport per leaf (50%), the activity of nitrate reductase (28%), transpiration rate (21%) | [44] |
Soybean (Glycine max) variety JS-9560 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the maximum quantum yield (ap.10%), the performance index (ap.14%), and the rate of photosynthesis (ap.57%) | [47] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) variety JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the maximum quantum yield (ap.8%), the performance index potential (ap.140%), the quantum yield of electron transport (ap. 60%), and the rate of photosynthesis (ap.22%) | [48] |
Soybean (Glycine max) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the maximum quantum yield (ap.6%) and the density of active photosynthetic reaction centres (ap.9%) | [59] |
Soybean (Glycine max) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the maximum potential quantum yield (3%) and the rate of photosynthesis (32%) | [51] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) Merr. var:JS-335) | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF 150 and 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the density of reaction centres in the chlorophyll bed (17%), the exciton trapped per photon absorbed (27%), and the efficiency of trapped exciton moving in the electron transport chain (16%) at 200 mT | [76] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) Merr. var: JS-335) | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT for 1 h and 150 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the density of reaction centres (17%), the efficiency of light reaction (26%), the efficiency of biochemical reaction (16%), and the performance index (38%) at 200 mT | [76] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) Merr. var: JS-335) | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 0-300 mT SMF for 30, 60, and 90 min to seeds | Increased the performance index (59%), the active reaction centre per cross-section (34%), the maximum quantum yield (6%), and the quantum yield of electron transport (14%) at 200 mT for 60 min | [43] |
Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L. cv. Strain B) | 70-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Decreased the transpiration rate (45%) and increased the proline content (14%) for magnetised seed and osmotic pressure (14%) for magnetised water | [96] |
Wheat (genotypes Kharchia 65 and HD 2967) | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 50 mT SMF for 2 h to seeds | Increased the photosynthesis rate by 39% and 20% depending on the variety | [31] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Giza 168) | 100-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Increased the assimilation rate (24% for magnetised seeds and 57% for mag.water) and decreased the transpiration rate (46% mag.seed + water) | [35] |
Variety | Plant Species | Method | Effect | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arabidopsis | 7-day-old plants | With different directions of 300 mT or 600 mT within after 3 d of seed germination to 7 days of growing | Increased the meristematic cortex cell number (ap. 12%) and root meristem size (ap.10 %) | [27] |
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Tarm-92) | 2-week-old seedlings | 20, 42, 125, and 250 mT SMF to germinating seeds (four days) or seedlings (two weeks) | MFs induced cell membrane damage in roots Increased the cell membrane damage in the root tip cells at all MF strengths | [91] |
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) | 14-day-old plants | 130 mT SMF within 14 days of growing plants | Increased the number of cells in the metaphase and telophase stages, by 23% and 79%, respectively | [19] |
Catharanthus roseus (Vinca rosea, or Madagascar periwinkle) | Cell suspension cultures, intact cells, and their protoplasts | 302 mT SMF for 0–220 min | Increased the force to regenerating protoplasts by 3.6-fold but no significant changes in the elasticity and diameter of intact cells | [114] |
Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). | 14-day-old plants | 0.2 mT at16 Hz and 50 Hz within growing plants | Increased the number of cells in the prophase stage (4–18%) and metaphase (20%), anaphase (23%) at 16 Hz and decreased by 18% (metaphase), 23% (anaphase), and 16% (telophase) at 50 Hz MF | [19] |
Maize (Zea mays L., Pioneer HI-Bred) | 2-day-old seedlings | 7 T MF for 10–30 h | Increased the metaxylem cell length (ap. 20%), and area of root cap cells (54%) at 30 h Decreased the cell size (11%, height; 32%, width) and cell number (42%) | [124] |
Chlorella kessleri (UTEX 398) | Plants growing in raceway pond and in flask cultures | 10 mT SMF for plant growing | Increased the fatty acid composition of SFAs15:0 (20%) and MUFAs18:1n-7 (41%); increased the ultrastructure parameters of chloroplast area (31%), chloroplast starch granule area (148%), thylakoid area (41%), and starch granule number (176%); decreased pyrenoid starch area (54%), max. thylakoid stacking (33%) | [93] |
Microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris L.) | Algae cells in culture medium | 10–50 mT SMF for 12 h to plant cells | Increased the lipid peroxidation expressed (TBARS content) by 36% at 35–50 mT | [103] |
Chlorella kessleri LEB 113 | Plant upon 10 days of cultivation | 30 mT or 60 mT within 10 days of growing, exposure time 24 h or 1 h per day | Increased the biomass concentration by 83.2% at 60 mT, 1 h/d | [25] |
Chlorella fusca LEB 111 | 15-day-old plant | 30 mT or 60 mT at 24 h or 1 h/day | Increased the biomass concentration by 27% for 30 mT at 1 h/d for 8–11 days and 45% for 60 mT at 1 h/d for 9–12 days | [22] |
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) | 3-day-old seedlings | 0.5–2 nT MF for 3 days | Increased the number of organelles per cellular section (12%), the diameter of mitochondria (1.5–2-fold), and the number of lipid bodies along plasmalemma; decreased the number of deposits in cell walls | [126] |
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) | Plant plasma membrane vesicles | 27 to 37 μT SMF for 30 min | Increased the ratio of the mean efflux of Ca2+ through the cell membrane (ap. 15%) at 30 to 32 μT | [129] |
Spirulina sp. LEB 18 | 15-day-old plant | 25 mT SMF for 24 h or 1 h/day of seedlings | Increased the biomass concentration by 16% during period (8–12 d) application of MF for 24 h in greenhouse | [33] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 0.2 m T SMF up to 24 h | Decreased the dry weight of tobacco cells up to 75% for 3–12 and 24 h; decreased the cell cycle progression, a new cell cycle delayed 6 h | [63] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 10 mT or 30 mT SMF for 5 days and 3 to 7 days of subculture | Increased the lignin content of wall cells (ap. 17%) and dead cells (ap. 100%) and decreased the size of cells (24–30%) and cell viability (ap. 21%) higher value at 30 mT | [53] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 10 and 30 mT SMF for 5 days, 5 h each day | Increased the rate of the peroxidation of membrane lipids of suspension-cultured tobacco cells (ap. 33%) | [54] |
Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L. cv. Strain B) | 70-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Increased the stem structure parameters of the cortex (5%) and xylem (5%) thickness for magnetised seed and leaf parameters of the lamina (11%), palisade (10%), spongy (6%), and vascular bundles (19%) thickness for magnetised seed and water | [96] |
Tomato seeds (Solanum lycopersicum var Heinz H1439) | Plasma membrane | 126 and 208 mT SMF | Increased the gel lipid component by 481%, protein component by 76%, and decreased fluid lipid component by 60% at 208 mT | [130] |
Vicia faba | 11-day-old seedlings | 10, 100 uT or 1 mT AMF for 40 min to seedling root | Increased the rate of 3 H-alanine uptake across the membrane (40–92% at 100–10 uT 50 Hz) and ion efflux from the root cells (ap. 22% at 100 uT, 60 Hz) | [13] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Kavir) | Approx. 4-day-old seedlings | 30 mT SMF for 4 days, each 5 h of germinated seeds | Decreased the rate of membrane lipid peroxidation (26%) and membrane electrolyte leakage (ap. 6%) | [108] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Giza 168) | 100-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Increased the membrane integrity (membrane permeability) percentage by 29% for magnetised seeds and 97% for magnetised water | [35] |
Variety | Plant Species | Method | Effect | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Tarm-92) | 2-week-old seedlings | 20, 42, 125, and 250 mT SMFs to germinating seeds (four days) or seedlings (two weeks) | Increased the content of chlorophyll a and b, by about 35% and 18%; soluble protein in roots by 122% at 250 mT; chl a/b by 23% at 42 mT; and the microelement content (Fe, B, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Mo) of the leaves and roots up to 900%; decreased the content of carotenoids by 33% at 42 mT and macroelements (Mg, K, P, and Ca) by up to 800% in roots | [91] |
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) | 14-day-old plants | 130 mT SMF within growing plants | No significant changes in pigment chlorophyll a, b, a + b, and carotenoid content | [19] |
Canola (var. Serw-6) | 180-day-old plants | Irrigated magnetic water by SMF of max 60 mT used during the growing season | Increased the content of chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids by about 13%, oil by 14.3%, and composition of fatty acid (stearic acid by 16%, oleic acid by 140%); decreased the element contents of N (17.3), Fe (6.7%) and Zn (17.7%) and increased Mn (9.1%) and Cu (28.6%) | [23] |
Carrot | 7 and 14-week-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 500 mT and 1 T for 3, 6, and 12 min to seeds | Decreased the mineral content of Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, and Zn in the range of 37–52% at 1 T for 3 min and increased Na content by 44% at 500 mT for 12 min | [38] |
Chickpea (Kabuli (Pusa 1053 and desi (Pusa 256) | 70-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 100 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the total chlorophyll by 43–50% depending on the variety | [36] |
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) | 15-day-old seedlings old | 10, 50, and 100 mT SMF at 30, 60, 180, 240, and 360 min to seedlings | Increased the content of chlorophyll a (ap. 180%) and b (ap. 150%) and carotenoids (ap. 100%) for 100 mT at 240–360 min Increased the mineral content of Mn, Fe, Zn, Ca, Na over 100% and Mg, K over 30% for 100 mT at 360 min in leaves | [134,142], |
Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) | 14-day-old plants | 0.2 mT at16 Hz and 50 Hz within growing plants | Decreased the content of chlorophyll a (82%) and b (74%), and carotenoids (64%) at 50 Hz, with no significant changes in protein content | [116] |
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. cabitat L.) | 14-week-old plants | Pre-treatment of 0.44, 0.77, 1 T for 1–3 h | Increased the content of chlorophyll a (ap. 400%) for 1 T at 1 h, carotenoids (ap 200%) for all, proline (489%) and soluble proteins (208%) for 0.77 T at 2 h, soluble sugars (102%) and free amino (144) for 0.44 T at 3 h | [100] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) | 7–10-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF 3 and 10 mT for 4 h of seeds | Decreased the content of protein by 16% for shoots and 41% for roots; higher value at 3 mT | [143] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) var: HQPM.1 | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 100 mT for 2 h and 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of total chlorophyll (16%) and total carotenoids (16%) at 200 mT | [144] |
Maize (Zea mays L.) var. JM 216 | 45-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the chlorophyll content of a (26%) and b (83%) | [45] |
Microalga (Chlorella kessleri UTEX 398) | Plants growing in a raceway pond and in flask cultures | 10 mT SMF for plant growing | Increased the content of carbohydrate (8.5%), protein (8.7%), chlorophyll a (15%) and b (64%), and metal components of Ca, Zn, Mn, and Ni by 88–242%; decreased content of antioxidants (35%), and metal content of Fe and Cu by 30% | [93] |
Microalga (Nannochloropsis oculata) | Approx. 7-day-old plants | 20 mT,-40 mT SMF within 7 days of plant growing | Increased the crude lipid productivity by 65% and specific growth rate by 22% at 20 mT | [34] |
Microalga (Chlorella fusca LEB 111, C. fusca) | 15-day-old plants | 25 mT. SMF for 24 h and 1 h/d | Decreased the total chlorophyll content by 12–33% and increased by 130–2058% for uncontrolled and control conditions, respectively, depending on time exposure; increased the protein content by 32.7% at 1 h/d in control conditions | [94] |
Microalga (Spirulina sp. LEB 18) | 15-day-old plants | 25 mT SMF for 24 h or 1 h/of seedlings | Increased the chlorophyll a by 137.7% at 15 d in the chamber at exposure time of 24 h/d | [33] |
Microalga (Arthrospira platensis SAG 21.99) | 10-day-old plants | 30 mT SMF for 1 h/d and 24 h for plant growing | Increased the content of carbohydrates by 21% at 1 h/d; decreased the content of protein t (18%), phycocyanin (26%) and chlorophyll a (27%) at 24 h/day in control conditions | [46] |
Microalga (Tribonema sp.) | 25-day-old plants | 30 mT of SMF in plant growing | Increased the content of protein (6–48%), carbohydrate (4–15%), and oil (20–54%) depending on temperature | [37] |
Microalga (Chlorella kessleri LEB 113) | Plants of 10 days of cultivation | 30 mT or 60 mT within 10 days of growing, exposure time 24 h or 1 h per day | Increased the content of protein (8.9% at 30 mT-1 h/d) and carbohydrate (8.9% at 30 mt-24 h/d), with no significant changes in lipid; increased the chlorophyll a (38.9% at 60 mT, 1 h/d) and b (65% at 30 mT, 1 h/d) and carotenoids (57.8% at 30 mT, 1 h/d) depending on cultivation time | [25] |
Microalga (Chlorella fusca LEB 111) | 15-day-old plants | 30 mT or 60 mT at 24 h or 1 h/day | Increased the content of protein (6% at 30 mT,1 h/d) and carbohydrates (25% at 60 mT, 24 h/d) and decreased the lipid content (23% at 60 mT) | [22] |
Microalga (Chlorella fusca LEB 111) | 15-day-old plants | 30 mT or 60 mT SMF, for 24 h or 1 h/day | Increased the content of protein (9% at 30 mT, 24 h/d) and carbohydrates (45% at 60 mT, 24 h/d) and decreased the lipid content (15% at 30 mT-24 h) and biomass concentration (13% at 1 h) | [33] |
Microalga (Chlorella pyrenoidosa (FACHB-9) | 6-day-old plants | Irrigated wastewater treatment with SMF 0.5 T for 3 h/day | Increased the lipid productivity (10%) and biomass productivity (12%) and chlorophyll content (ap. 27%) | [137] |
Paulownia (Tomentosa and fortunei) | 28-day-old plants | 2.9–4.8 mT SMF for 2.2, 6.6, or 19.8 s to seedlings | Increased the chlorophyll content of a (19–71%), b (6.5–30%), and total (6.5–53%) depending on variety at 19.8 s | [135] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill J 357) | 28-day-old plants | 2.9–4.6 mT SMF at 2.2 and 19.8 s to seeds | Increased the content of chlorophyll a (21%), b (13%), and total 18%) at 2.2 s | [119] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) | Approx. 15-day-old plants | 20 and 30 mT SMF for 5 days, 5 h/d | Increased the content of ferrous (5–28%) total iron (100%), ferritin (ap. 40% for 2 d), iron chelating activity (50% for 2 d) at 30 mT, contrary at 20 mT MF | [64] |
Soybean (from Ayyub Agriculture Research Institute) | Seedling of early growth stage | Pre-treatment of SMF 50, 75, and 100 mT for 3 and 5 min to seeds | Increased over 2 times the content of chlorophyll a, b (highest at 75 mT-3 min) and proline (high at 75–100 mT-3 min) soluble sugar (high at 50–100 mT-3 min), and protein (50–100 mT-3–5 min) | [20] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) | 45-day-old plants (roots, leaves) | Pre-treatment of SMF 200 mT for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of total biomass accumulation by 105%, total chlorophyll (26%), rate of photosynthesis (22%), hemichromes (29%), leghaemoglobin (63%) | [44] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) variety JS-335) | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the total chlorophyll content (ap. 40%) | [48] |
Soybean (Glycine max) var. JS-335 | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of DNA (38%), RNA (17%), and protein (92%), and decreased chlorophyll a/b content (ap. 5%) in leaves | [59] |
Soybean (Glycine max) var. JS-335) | 45-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the content of total chlorophyll (35%) and carotenoids (24%) | [51] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill), cv. Abelina | 8-day-old seedlings | Pre-treatment of SMF 250 mT and 500 mT for 3 and 12 min to seeds | Increased the chlorophyll content of a (64%) and b (81%) and carotenoids (364%); highest value at 250 mT for 3 min | [5] |
Strawberry: (Camarosa), tomato (Micro-Tom) | 45-day-old plants | Irrigated magnetic water by SMF of max 60 mT used during the growing season | Increased the content of chlorophyll a, b (255.9–345.4%) for strawberries and (99.1–108.4%) for tomatoes; increased the mineral content of Mg, Ca, Fe, K, P, and Na in roots from 23.1%(Ca)-184.8% (Fe) for strawberries and from 12.7% (Mg)-84.3% (Fe) for tomatoes | [32] |
Sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) | 90-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 60 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Increased the content of chlorophyll a (12%) and b (21%), carotenoids (3%), and mineral of P (7%) in leaves for seed+ magnetised water | [136] |
Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L. cv. Strain B) | 70-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Increased the content of chlorophyll a (28%), b (35%), total (30%), and carotenoids (25%); higher value for magnetised water | [96] |
Tree seedlings (Robinia pseudoacacia) | 60-day-old seedlings | 10 mT (69 Hz) MF at 0.5–8 h daily | Increased the content of chlorophyll a by 40% for 0.5 = 1 h exposure time and decreased the nucleic acid level in leaves by ap. 36% | [145] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Tekirdag and Selimiye) | 28-day-old cultivars | Pre-treatment of SMF 2.9–4.7 mT at 2.2–19.8 s | Increased the content of chlorophyll a (24%, 32%) and b (70%, 75%), and carotenoids (42%, 33%) for cultivars (Selimiye, Tekirdag) at 2.2 s | [107] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Kavir) | Approx. 4-day-old seedlings | 30 mT SMF for 4 days, each 5 h of germinated seeds | Increased the proline content (29%) and decreased content of fructans (ap.20%) | [108] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Kavir) | Approx. 3-month-old plants | 30 mT SMF for 4 days, each 5 h of plants before harvest | Increased ferritin content of shoots by 30%, Fe-bound to total protein content in shoots (40%) and seeds (30%) | [140] |
Wheat (Kharchia 65 and HD 2967) | 30-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF of 50 mT for 2 h to seeds | Increased the chlorophyll content of a (4–6%) and b (12.5–16%) depending on the variety | [31] |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Giza 168) | 100-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of max SMF of 50 mT by seeds or water passing through the magnetic funnel | Increased the content of total chlorophyll (106%) and carotenoids (40%) for magnetised water and carbohydrate (16%) and protein (10–13%) in grains for magnetised seeds and water; increased the mineral content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Cu (338–514%) higher value for roots and magnetised water | [35] |
Variety | Plant Species | Method | Effect | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh | 5-day-old seedlings | 0–188 μT for 120 h of plant growing in darkness-or under red or blue light | Increased the transcript levels of the genes rbcl under red (about 4-fold) and blue light (in the peak 10-fold) at about 50 μT, gene pal4 for Ler ecotype (red light), and gene rbcl under blue light for cry1cry2 ecotype; decreased genes cab4 (about 60–100 μT), pal4 and ef1 over 50 μT under blue light for Ler ecotype | [62] |
Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) | 7-day-old plants | With different directions of 300 mT or 600 mT within after 3 d of seed germination to 7 days of growing | Significantly downregulated 85% of the total genes in roots; increased the transgenic line expressing the β-glucuronidase expression domain by 54% | [27] |
Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) | 9-day-old plants | 14 T SMF for 2.5 h and 21 T for 2.5 and 6.5 h to 21 days-old plants | Induced the expression of the Adh/GUS transgene in the roots and leaves at over 15 T, and 114 genes were differentially expressed to a degree greater than 2.5-fold | [128] |
Zea mays (L.) | 7–10-day-old plants | Pre-treatment of SMF 3 and 10 mT for 4 h of seeds | Increased the meiotic parameters of total chiasmata, intercalary chiasmata, ring bivalents from 23% to 47% at 3 mT and disorganised chromosome, Anaphase-laggards and -I bridges, micronuclei, clumping, and intertilepollen from 2.6-fold to over 10-fold at 3 and 10 mT | [143] |
Tomato seeds var. Pusa Rohini | Germinating seeds of 12 h | Pre-treatment of 100 mT SMF for 30 min | Increased the genes involved in H2O2 synthesis (AO, SOD1, SOD9) by 21.7-, 2.3-, and 5-fold, respectively, in signalling (ArcA2) by 5.7-fold and in scavenging (MT1) by 14.4-fold and genes involved in ABA deactivation (ABA-H) by 2.8-fold | [57] |
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21) | Plant cells | 0.2 mT SMF up to 24 h with an exposure time of 3–24 h | Increased the transcript accumulation of CDKA (ap. 100% after 8 h), CycD (p. 500% at 8 h), Rbp (ap. 300% for 3–6 h), E2F (300–500% for 3–8 h), and p21 (150–700% for 3–12 h), and TA (150–500% for 3–12 h) | [63] |
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) | Approx. 15-day-old plants | 20 and 30 mT SMF for 5 days, 5 h/d | Increased the expression of CAT gene (ap.38%), ferritin gene (ap.28% at 2 d), and Fe transporter gene (ap.60%) at 30 mT, contrary at 20 mT MF | [64] |
Soybean (Glycine max L.) variety JS-335) | 5-day-old seedlings | 200 mT SMF for 1 h to seeds | Increased the genes expression of alpha-amylase (80–110%), nitric oxide synthase (1150%), and nitrate reductase (300%) | [42] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Saletnik, B.; Saletnik, A.; Słysz, E.; Zaguła, G.; Bajcar, M.; Puchalska-Sarna, A.; Puchalski, C. The Static Magnetic Field Regulates the Structure, Biochemical Activity, and Gene Expression of Plants. Molecules 2022, 27, 5823. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185823
Saletnik B, Saletnik A, Słysz E, Zaguła G, Bajcar M, Puchalska-Sarna A, Puchalski C. The Static Magnetic Field Regulates the Structure, Biochemical Activity, and Gene Expression of Plants. Molecules. 2022; 27(18):5823. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185823
Chicago/Turabian StyleSaletnik, Bogdan, Aneta Saletnik, Ewelina Słysz, Grzegorz Zaguła, Marcin Bajcar, Anna Puchalska-Sarna, and Czesław Puchalski. 2022. "The Static Magnetic Field Regulates the Structure, Biochemical Activity, and Gene Expression of Plants" Molecules 27, no. 18: 5823. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185823
APA StyleSaletnik, B., Saletnik, A., Słysz, E., Zaguła, G., Bajcar, M., Puchalska-Sarna, A., & Puchalski, C. (2022). The Static Magnetic Field Regulates the Structure, Biochemical Activity, and Gene Expression of Plants. Molecules, 27(18), 5823. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185823