Next Article in Journal
Micro-RNAs in Human Placenta: Tiny Molecules, Immense Power
Previous Article in Journal
Cold Atmospheric Plasma Activates Selective Photothermal Therapy of Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Identification of an α-Galactosidase-Producing Lactosphaera pasteurii Strain and Its Enzymatic Expression Analysis

1
Key Laboratory of Crop Epigenetic Regulation and Development in Hunan Province, Changsha 410128, China
2
College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
4
College of Food & Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(18), 5942; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185942
Submission received: 26 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022

Abstract

:
α-Galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22) refers to a group of enzymes that hydrolyze oligosaccharides containing α-galactoside-banded glycosides, such as stachyose, raffinose, and verbascose. These enzymes also possess great potential for application in sugar production, and in the feed and pharmaceutical industries. In this study, a strain of Lactosphaera pasteurii (WHPC005) that produces α-galactosidase was identified from the soil of Western Hunan, China. It was determined that the optimal temperature and pH for this α-galactosidase were 45 °C and 5.5, respectively. The activity of α-galactosidase was inhibited by K+, Al3+, Fe3+, fructose, sucrose, lactose, galactose, SDS, EDTA, NaCl, and (NH4)2SO4, and enhanced by Ca2+, Fe2+, Mn2, Zn2+, glucose, and raffinose. The optimal inducer was raffinose, and the optimal induction concentration was 30 μmol/L. The α-galactosidase gene was cloned using random fragment cloning methods. Sequence analysis demonstrated that the open reading frame of the α-galactosidase gene was 1230 bp, which encodes a putative protein of 409 amino acids in length. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the isoelectric point and molecular weight of this α-galactosidase were 4.84 and 47.40 kD, respectively. Random coils, alpha helixes, and beta turns were observed in its secondary structure, and conserved regions were found in the tertiary structure of this α-galactosidase. Therefore, this α-galactosidase-producing bacterial strain has the potential for application in the feed industry.

1. Introduction

α-Galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22) refers to a group of enzymes that hydrolyzes oligosaccharides containing α-galactoside-banded glycosides, such as stachyose, raffinose, and verbascose, and possesses great potential for application in sugar production and in the pharmaceutical and feed industries [1,2]. It was reported that approximately 1% of oligosaccharides in the most common feedstuffs and soybean meal are in the form of α-glycoside [3,4]. The oligosaccharides cannot be decomposed and utilized by livestock due to the lack of an enzyme in their digestive system [5]. The application of α-galactosidase in additive supplements will increase the utilization of these carbohydrates and reduce the flatus-producing factors in the feed. In addition, α-galactosidase can be applied to digest D-raffinose in sugar beet syrup to favor crystallization and increase the sucrose yield [6].
α-Galactosidases widely exist in many microorganisms, including prokaryotes and eukaryotes [7]. Many microbial α-galactosidases have been identified and purified from fungi, and they are suitable for industrial applications because of their extracellular localization, acidic pH optima, and broad stability profiles [8]. Many α-galactosidases have been purified and studied in detail [9]. Wang et al. [10] identified an extracellular α-galactosidase (Gal27A) with a high specific activity of 423 U/mg in thermophilic Neosartorya fischeri P1. This was also the first report on the purification and gene cloning of Neosartorya α-galactosidase. A protease-resistant α-galactosidase from Pleurotus djamor with broad pH stability and satisfactory hydrolytic activity toward raffinose family oligosaccharides was introduced by Hu et al. [8]. In addition, a novel α-galactosidase gene from Penicillium sp. F63 CGMCC 1669 was cloned, characterized, and expressed in Pichia pastoris [11]. However, research on the α-galactosidases and their enzymatic characteristics from Lactosphaera pasteurii remains rare.
Herein, a strain of Lactosphaera pasteurii that excretes α-galactosidase was identified, and its enzymatic characteristics were analyzed. Moreover, the α-galactosidase gene was further cloned via random fragment cloning methods, and its sequence was analyzed using bioinformatics software and databases. An enzymatic expression analysis of this α-galactosidase was also performed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of α-Galactosidase-Producing Strains

Five different soil samples were collected from locations rich in soybean meal near a tofu factory located in Xiangxi autonomous prefecture of Hunan province, China. Samples were diluted to 10−4 to 10−6 with saline solution and then spread on preliminary screening agar plates (yeast extract 5 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L, agar 15 g/L, and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (X-α-gal) 20 mg/L, pH 7.0). All plates were cultured at 37 °C for 48 h, and the positive colonies were identified by their blue color.

2.2. α-Galactosidase Activity Assays

The positive clones were transferred into the secondary screening medium (yeast extract 5 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, NaCl 5 g/L, and raffinose 2.5 g/L, pH 7.0). p-Nitrophenyl-d-galactopyranoside (p-NPG, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a substrate to measure the α-galactosidase activity. Briefly, cultures were collected via centrifugation at 4000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was used as an enzyme solution. Enzyme solution (0.1 mL) was mixed with p-NPG solution (0.2 mL, 0.002 M) in citrate phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0). The reaction was maintained at 45 °C for 60 min, and stopped by adding Na2CO3 (2.0 mL, 0.25 M). The released pNP was measured spectrophotometrically at 400 nm. The amount of enzyme that released 1.0 μmol of p-NP from p-NPG per minute per milliliter was defined as one unit of the enzyme [12].

2.3. Identification of the Selected Strain

For the phenotypic characterization assay of the selected strain, cells were identified via Gram staining, recorded with a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and then classified according to their morphotype.
For the molecular identification of the selected strain, the 16S rRNA gene was amplified through the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method with purified genomic DNA as a template. The PCR product was purified and then sequenced by a professional bio-sequencing company. A similarity search was performed using the GenBank databases. The specific primers used in this study are listed in Table S1, Supplementary Material. The evolutionary analysis was carried out using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version X software (MEGA X, The Biodesign Institute, Tempe, AZ, USA).

2.4. Effects of Temperature and pH on the Enzymatic Activity

To confirm the optimal temperature of the α-galactosidase for the selected strain, enzymatic activity was measured in disodium hydrogen phosphate and citric acid buffer (pH 5.5) ranging from 20 °C to 80 °C (20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80 °C) for 1 h.
To determine the optimal pH, enzymatic activity was measured under different pH values ranging from 2.6 to 8.0 (2.6, 3.0, 3.6, 4.0, 4.4, 5.2, 5.6, 6.0, 6.6, 7.2, and 8.0) at 45 °C for 1 h using p-NPG as the substrate.

2.5. Effects of Metal Ions and Chemical Reagents on the Enzymatic Activity

To investigate the influence of various metal ions and chemical reagents on the α-galactosidase enzymatic activity, the enzymatic activity was measured using metal ions (10, 5, and 1 mM) and chemical reagents (10, 50, and 100 mM) at 45 °C for 1 h with p-NPG as the substrate.

2.6. Effects of Glucose and Raffinose on the Enzymatic Activity

The cells of the selected strain were cultured in medium containing different concentrations of glucose or raffinose (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 μmol/L) at 37 °C for 48 h. After treatment, the enzymatic activity was measured as described above.

2.7. Cloning of the α-Galactosidase Gene from the Selected Strain

Genomic DNA of the target strain was prepared using a DNA Extraction Kit (Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and partially digesting the DNA with Sau3A I into random fragments 3–5 kb in length (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The pUC19 vector was treated with alkaline phosphatase and then digested with BamH I (Thermo Fisher). The recombinant DNA molecules were constructed with the digested genomic DNA and pUC19. The ligation mixture was transferred into competent E. coli DH5α via electroporation. The target clones were identified through culture on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing 20 µg/mL 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (X-α-gal) and 50 µg/mL ampicillin.

2.8. Bioinformatics Analysis of α-Galactosidase from the Selected Strain

The sequencing of the positive clones was completed by BGI (The Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, China). The nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acids using DNAMAN software (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA), and homology was compared using the online program BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast (accessed on 1 August 2022)) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA).
The isoelectric point and molecular weight were predicted using the Swiss Bioinformatics Research Center (http://www.expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.htmL (accessed on 1 August 2022)) protein analysis website. A prosite motif search was performed using protein online analysis software (http://www.predictprotein.org/ (accessed on 1 August 2022)). The secondary structure and tertiary structure prediction analyses were performed on the website of the International Laboratory for Biometrics and Evolutionary Biology and the Institute for Protein Biology and Chemistry (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa_dsc.htmL (accessed on 1 August 2022)). Transmembrane region prediction was conducted on the website of The Center for Biological Sequence Analysis (CBS) of the Technical University of Denmark (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/ (accessed on 1 August 2022)).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Excel 2010 software was used for data processing and plotting. Adobe Photoshop CS was applied to edit the figures. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Isolation of α-Galactosidase-Producing Strains

Eight isolates with high α-galactosidase production capacity were obtained via color reaction in preliminary selection medium containing 2 mg/mL X-α-gal substrate. The relative enzymatic activity of these colonies was further verified using the p-NPG method, and the isolate that produced the highest amount of α-galactosidase was WHPC005 (Figure 1). Therefore, this isolate was chosen for further analysis.

3.2. Identification of α-Galactosidase-Producing Strain WHPC005

First, Gram staining was performed to identify the characteristics of the α-galactosidase-producing strain WHPC005, and the observation showed that it is a Gram-positive bacteria. The morphological characteristics of WHPC005 colonies on the LB plate were convex, with mucous, and with a smooth edge (Figure 2A). The cellular morphology of WHPC005 was further identified and confirmed as Sphaerita through scanning electron microscopy (Figure 2B).
Moreover, the sequencing analysis indicated that WHPC005 shared 99% homology with Lactosphaera pasteurii by comparing the 16S rRNA sequences using the BLAST data package available on the NCBI website. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (Figure 3). WHPC005 shared the highest genetic relationship with Trichococcus pasteurii strain ATCC 35945, which belonged to genera of lactic acid bacteria, and in contrast, had the farest relationship with Wolbachia endosymbiont strain T2. Therefore, WHPC005 was thus verified as a strain of Lactosphaera pasteurii that produced the highest amount of α-galactosidase based on morphological and molecular evidence, and was designated as L. pasteurii WHPC005.

3.3. Effects of Temperature and pH on α-Glucosidase Activity from L. pasteurii WHPC005

To determine the effects of temperature on the α-galactosidase activity from L. pasteurii WHPC005, a series of different induction temperatures was tested, and the data suggested that 45 °C was the optimum temperature of α-galactosidase for L. pasteurii WHPC005 (Figure 4A).
In addition, the initial pH of the medium ranged from 2.5 to 8.0, and was adjusted to further evaluate the effects of pH on the productivity of α-galactosidase. The results showed that the highest enzymatic activity was obtained at pH 5.5 (Figure 4B).

3.4. Effects of Metal Ions and Chemical Reagents on α-Glucosidase Activity of L. pasteurii WHPC005

The sensitivity of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005 to various concentrations of metal ions was tested. The results are summarized in Table 1. The activity of α-galactosidase was significantly inhibited in the presence of K+ (7–23% residual activity) and Al3+ (0–12% residual activity), and was completely inhibited by Fe3+ (0% residual activity). In contrast, Ca2+ (110–146% residual activity), Fe2+ (128–155% residual activity), Mn2+ (109–140% residual activity), and Zn2+ (126–158% residual activity) significantly enhanced the activity of α-galactosidase among the tested concentrations. Mg2+ and Cu2+ inhibited α-galactosidase at the concentrations of 10 mM and 5 mM, whereas the concentration of 1 mM enhanced the α-galactosidase activity.
The sensitivity of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005 to various concentrations of chemical reagents was confirmed. The results are listed in Table 2. For the tested sugars, fructose (96.50–98.50% residual activity), sucrose (90.48–98.62% residual activity), lactose (86.64–96.38% residual activity), and galactose (32.76–94.52% residual activity) inhibited α-galactosidase. Moreover, when the galactose concentration was 100 mM was the inhibitory effect was very strong. On the contrary, the presence of glucose and raffinose enhanced the activity of α-galactosidase.
It should be noted that the inhibited or enhanced effects of sugars were concentration-dependent. As a strong denaturing reagent that disrupts the steric structures of proteins, SDS brought about a 84.32% to 94.76% loss of activity of α-galactosidase when the concentration of SDS was increased from 10 to 100 mM. Due to the disintegration of the tertiary structure, decreased activity was found in the presence of the chelating agent EDTA (85.56–91.23% residual activity), suggesting that the α-galactosidase from the WHPC005 strain is a metalloenzyme. NaCl (76.11% residual activity) and (NH4)2SO4 (87.16% residual activity) at 100 mM concentration had little effect on the α-galactosidase, which may be the consequence of a salt-stabilizing effect [13].

3.5. Induction and Expression of α-Galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005

To further confirm the induced effect of α-galactosidase by raffinose, we measured the enzymatic activity with different concentrations of raffinose and glucose. The data indicated that the expression of α-galactosidase could be induced by raffinose and glucose (Figure 5A). However, there was a stronger induced effect for raffinose than for glucose, and the maximum induced effect for raffinose occurred at a concentration of 30 μmol/L (Figure 5A,B). We also analyzed the α-galactosidase expression induced by raffinose (30 μmol/L) at different times, and the results showed that the molecular size of the α-galactosidase in WHPC005 was approximately 50 kD. The α-galactosidase was strongly induced by raffinose after 2 h of treatment, and a large accumulation resulted after 6 h of treatment (Figure 5C).

3.6. Cloning of the α-Galactosidase Gene from L. pasteurii WHPC005 and Its Sequence Analysis

The genomic DNA extracted from L. pasteurii WHPC005 was digested with different concentrations of Sau3A I (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 U/µL) to optimize the random digestion. As shown in Figure 6A, the optimal reaction conditions were 1 μg of genomic DNA digested with 0.8 U of Sau3A I for 120 min to obtain random genomic fragments 3–5 kb in length. These random fragments were ligated into the pUC19 plasmid through the BamH I site, and then transferred into competent DH5α cells. The positive clones were identified with X-α-gal (20 µg/mL) (Figure 6B).
Sequence analysis demonstrated that the cloned DNA fragment was 3039 bp in total and covered the entire α-galactosidase gene and its promoter. The α-galactosidase gene was named LpagaH. Further analysis indicated that the open reading frame of the LpagaH gene was 1230 bp, which encoded 409 putative amino acids (Figure S1).

3.7. Bioinformatics Analysis of the α-Galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005

The results of the prediction analysis showed that the isoelectric point (pI) of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005 was 4.84, and that its molecular weight (MW) was 47.40 kD. Prediction analysis also demonstrated that this α-galactosidase contained cAMP- and CGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation sites, protein kinase C-terminal phosphorylation sites, type II casein kinase phosphorylation sites, tyrosine kinase phosphorylation sites, and amination sites.
The secondary structure prediction results indicated that this α-galactosidase was rich in random coils (55.5%), and also contained alpha helixes (28.58%) and beta turns (14.91%) (Figure S2). In addition, the results of the transmembrane region prediction analysis showed that this α-galactosidase was not a transmembrane protein and had no transmembrane region structure (Figure S3).
Understanding and analyzing the tertiary structure of the protein is helpful for clarifying the relationship between protein structure and function. The tertiary structure of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005 was predicted, and the results are displayed in Figure 7. The arrow indicates the highly conserved region of this α-galactosidase when compared to other α-galactosidases, and highly variable regions are shown in blue (Figure 7A). Alpha helixes and beta turns were also found in the conserved region of this α-galactosidase (Figure 7B).

4. Discussion

Microorganisms are ideal sources of α-galactosidases due to their high expression level, short culture time, and extracellular secretion [14]. The production and enzymic properties of the α-galactosidases from various bacteria and fungus, such as Bacillus subtilis [15], Rhizomucor miehei [16], and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [17], have been widely studied and reported. However, reports on the α-galactosidases and their enzymatic characteristics from L. pasteurii remain rare.
Herein, a bacterial strain (numbered as WHPC005) with a high level of α-galactosidases production was obtained and subsequently identified as L. pasteurii. The enzymatic characteristic data indicated that the optimum temperature and pH for L. pasteurii WHPC005 were 45 °C and 5.5, respectively. Wang et al. purified α-galactosidases from Neosartorya fischeri with a higher optimum temperature of 60 °C to 70 °C, and a lower pH of 4.0, as compared to L. pasteurii WHPC005 [10]. Moreover, a novel α-galactosidase was purified and characterized from Bacillus megaterium, and its high specific activity at 37 °C and pH 6.8, which were parameters that were lower and higher than those of L. pasteurii WHPC00, respectively [18]. In addition, Chen et al. recombined the α-galactosidases from Rhizomucor miehei in Pichia pastoris [16]. The optimum temperature of this recombinant enzyme was 55 °C, which was higher than that of L. pasteurii WHPC005, and with the same optimum pH. Therefore, the optimum temperature and pH of α-galactosidases from different microorganism species are different.
It should be noted that the effects of metal ions on the activity of α-galactosidase were similar between Pleurotus djamor and L. pasteurii, whereas the effects of chemical reagents on the α-galactosidase activities of these two species had some different effects; for example, glucose increased the α-galactosidase activity for L. pasteurii, but had no effect for P. djamor (Table 1 and Table 2).
There are 11 genera of Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, and Carnobacterium [19]. In our research, we obtained an α-galactosidase-producing strain of lactic acid bacteria that was isolated from soil in the XiangXi autonomous prefecture. Its enzymatic activity can be induced in the presence of glucose and raffinose. However, there was a stronger induced effect by raffinose as compared to glucose. Raffinose, also called melitriose, is a trisaccharide with galactose residues joined by α-1,6-glycosidic bonds to sucrose and hydrolyzed by α-galactosidase [20]. Although the expression of α-galactosidase can be induced by raffinose, the optimum concentrations of raffinose required to induce α-galactosidase expression for different microbial species are different. We found that the optimum concentration of raffinose for L. pasteurii WHPC005 induction was 30 μmol/L, which was different from that for Thermus thermophilus HB27 [21], Bifidobacterium longum JCM 7052 [22], and Bacillus coagulans NRR1207 [23].
In Streptococcus mutans, the α-galactosidase gene is associated with a multiple-sugar metabolism operon [24]. This α-galactosidase gene is essential for growth when melibiose and raffinose exist. In the Gram-positive bacterium Carnobacterium piscicola, the α-galactosidase determinant is associated with two α-galactosidase genes, and both enzymatic activities are repressed in the presence of glucose and induced in the presence of melibiose or raffinose [25,26,27]. In the current study, we also cloned the α-galactosidase gene and performed a bioinformatics predictive analysis, which was helpful for further understanding the function of this α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
In this study, we only checked the α-galactosidase expression by SDS-PAGE. Pure α-galactosidase will be separated from this strain of L. pasteurii through the column chromatographic separation method, and the enzyme gene will also be modified via gene engineering to increase the activity of α-galactosidase in the future, which will expand its potential application in the feed industry, sugar production, and the pharmaceutical industry.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically analyze an α-galactosidase-producing Lactosphaera pasteurii strain, and its enzymatic expression analysis. The optimal temperature and pH for this α-galactosidase were 45 °C and 5.5, respectively. The activity of α-galactosidase was inhibited by K+, Al3+, Fe3+, fructose, sucrose, lactose, galactose, SDS, EDTA, NaCl, and (NH4)2SO4, and enhanced by Ca2+, Fe2+, Mn2, Zn2+, glucose, and raffinose. The optimal inducer was raffinose, and the optimal induction concentration was 30 μmol/L. The open reading frame of the α-galactosidase gene was 1230 bp, which encodes a putative protein of 409 amino acids in length. The isoelectric point and molecular weight of this α-galactosidase were 4.84 and 47.40 kD, respectively. Random coils, alpha helixes, and beta turns were observed in its secondary structure, and conserved regions were found in the tertiary structure of this α-galactosidase. Therefore, this α-galactosidase-producing bacterial strain has the potential for application in the feed industry.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27185942/s1. Figure S1. Sequences of LpagaH and its putative encoded amino acids. Figure S2. Result of secondary structure prediction of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005. Figure S3. Result of transmembrane region prediction of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005. Table S1. Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and data analysis, Y.Z.; methodology, J.Z. and S.D.; supervision, X.Z. and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was finished in Key Laboratory of Crop Epigenetic Regulation and Development in Hunan Province, and supported by the Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province (No. 2014FJ3082).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Bhatia, S.; Singh, A.; Batra, N.; Singh, J. Microbial production and biotechnological applications of α-galactosidase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 1294–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, J.; Caom, X.; Chen, W.; Xu, J.; Wu, B. Identification and Characterization of a thermostable GH36 α-Galactosidase from Anoxybacillus vitaminiphilus WMF1 and its application in synthesizing isofloridoside by reverse hydrolysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fei, Y.; Jiao, W.; Wang, Y.; Liang, J.; Liu, G.; Li, L. Cloning and expression of a novel α-galactosidase from Lactobacillus amylolyticus L6 with hydrolytic and transgalactosyl properties. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Q.; Ray, C.S.; Callow, N.V.; Loman, A.A.; Islam, S.M.M.; Ju, L.K. Aspergillus niger production of pectinase and α-galactosidase for enzymatic soy processing. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 2020, 134, 109476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shabalin, K.A.; Kulminskaya, A.A.; Savel’ev, A.N.; Shishlyannikov, S.M.; Neustroev, K.N. Enzymatic properties of α-galactosidase from Trichoderma reesei in the hydrolysis of galactooligosaccharides. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 2002, 30, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Donkor, O.N.; Henriksson, A.; Vasiljevic, T.; Nagendra, P.S. Probiotic strains as starter cultures improve angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity in soy yoghurt. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jang, J.M.; Yang, Y.; Wang, R.; Bao, H.F.; Yuan, L.H.; Yang, J.S. Characterization of a high performance α-galactosidase from Irpex lacteus and its usage in removal of raffinose family oligosaccharides from soymilk. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, Y.; Tian, G.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. A protease-resistant α-galactosidase from Pleurotus djamor with broad pH stability and good hydrolytic activity toward raffinose family oligosaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 94, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, R.; Zhao, R.; Tu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Deng, L.; Chen, X. A novel α-galactosidase from the thermophilic probiotic Bacillus coagulans with remarkable protease-resistance and high hydrolytic activity. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, H.; Shi, P.; Luo, H.; Huang, H.; Yang, P.; Yang, B. A thermophilic α-galactosidase from Neosartorya fischeri P1 with high specific activity, broad substrate specificity and significant hydrolysis ability of soymilk. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 153, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mi, S.; Meng, K.; Wang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Yuan, T.; Luo, H.; Yang, B. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel α-galactosidase gene from Penicillium sp. F63 CGMCC 1669 and expression in Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 2007, 40, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ben, P.; Duan, Y.; Lu, M.; Li, Z.; Cui, Z. Characterization of a novel GH36 α-galactosidase from Bacillus megaterium and its application in degradation of raffinose family oligosaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahmad, A.; Akhtar, M.S.; Bhakuni, V. Monovalent cation-induced conformational change in glucose oxidase leading to stabilization of the enzyme. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 1945–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Geng, X.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Chang, M.; Xu, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Meng, J. Good hydrolysis activity on raffinose family oligosaccharides by a novel α-galactosidase from Tremella aurantialba. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Katrolia, P.; Rajashekhara, E.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z. Biotechnological potential of microbial α-galactosidases. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol 2014, 34, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Z.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. High-level expression of a novel α-galactosidase gene from Rhizomucor miehei in Pichia pastoris and characterization of the recombinant enyzme. Protein Expr. Purif. 2015, 110, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naumoff, D.G. GH97 is a new family of glycoside hydrolases, which is related to the α-galactosidase superfamily. BMC Genom. 2005, 6, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Patil, A.G.G.; Kumar, S.K.P.; Mulimani, V.H.; Yaligara, V.; Kyoung, L. α-Galactosidase from Bacillus megaterium VHM1 and its application in removal of flatulence-causing factors from soymilk. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 1546–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khalid, K. An overview of lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Biosci. 2011, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ende, W.V. Multifunctional fructans and raffinose family oligosaccharides. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aulitto, M.; Fusco, S.; Limauro, D.; Fiorentino, G.; Bartolucci, S.; Contursi, P. Galactomannan degradation by thermophilic enzymes: A hot topic for biotechnological applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Saishin, N.; Ueta, M.; Wada, A.; Yamamoto, I. Purification and characterization of α-galactosidase I from Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum JCM 7052. J. Biol. Micromol. 2010, 10, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ra, S.H.; Renchinkhand, G.; Park, M.; Kim, W.S.; Paik, S.H.; Nam, M.S. Hydrolysis of non-digestible components of soybean meal by α-galactosidase from Bacillus coagulans NRR1207. J. Life Sci. 2018, 28, 1347–1353. [Google Scholar]
  24. Russell, R.R.; Aduse-Opoku, J.; Sutcliffe, I.C.; Tao, L.; Ferretti, J.J. A binding protein-dependent transport systerm in Streptococcus mutans responsible for multiple sugar metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 4631–4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guimaraes, V.M.; Rezende, S.T.; Moreira, M.A. Characterization of α-galactosidases from germinating soybean seed and their use for hydrolysis of oligosaccharides. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fridjonsson, O.; Watzlawick, H.; Gehweiler, A.; Mattes, R. Thermostable α-galactosidase from Bacillus stearothermophilus NUB3621: Cloning, sequencing and characterization. Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 176, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rosenow, C.; Maniar, M.; Trias, J. Regulation of the α-galactosidase activity in Streptococcus pneumoniae: Characterization of the raffinose utilization system. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Eight colonies (isolated from the soil near a tofu factory) producing α-galactosidase.
Figure 1. Eight colonies (isolated from the soil near a tofu factory) producing α-galactosidase.
Molecules 27 05942 g001
Figure 2. Phenotypic characterization assay of the isolated strains. (A) Gram staining of the isolated strains (400×); (B) scanning electron micrograph of the isolated strains (1000×). Bar = 1 μm.
Figure 2. Phenotypic characterization assay of the isolated strains. (A) Gram staining of the isolated strains (400×); (B) scanning electron micrograph of the isolated strains (1000×). Bar = 1 μm.
Molecules 27 05942 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rDNA gene sequences of L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rDNA gene sequences of L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Molecules 27 05942 g003
Figure 4. Effect of (A) temperature and (B) pH on the α-galactosidase activity from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Figure 4. Effect of (A) temperature and (B) pH on the α-galactosidase activity from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Molecules 27 05942 g004
Figure 5. Induction expression of the α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005 by raffinose. (A) α-Galactosidase activity with different induced concentrations of raffinose and glucose. (B) Induction effects with different concentrations of raffinose as indicated by the color reaction. (C) Induction of α-galactosidase expression with 30 μmol/L raffinose at various times (0 h, 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h) via SDS-PAGE.
Figure 5. Induction expression of the α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005 by raffinose. (A) α-Galactosidase activity with different induced concentrations of raffinose and glucose. (B) Induction effects with different concentrations of raffinose as indicated by the color reaction. (C) Induction of α-galactosidase expression with 30 μmol/L raffinose at various times (0 h, 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h) via SDS-PAGE.
Molecules 27 05942 g005
Figure 6. Cloning of the α-galactosidase gene from L. pasteurii WHPC005. (A) Genomic DNA digested using diluted Sau3AI in 0.8% agarose gel. Lane M: 1 kb DNA ladder; Lane 1: Genomic DNA without digestion; Lanes 2–5: digestion for 120 min with 0.2 U, 0.4 U, 0.6 U, or 0.8 U Sau3AI enzyme, respectively. (B) Positive clones were identified on X-α-gal medium via color reaction.
Figure 6. Cloning of the α-galactosidase gene from L. pasteurii WHPC005. (A) Genomic DNA digested using diluted Sau3AI in 0.8% agarose gel. Lane M: 1 kb DNA ladder; Lane 1: Genomic DNA without digestion; Lanes 2–5: digestion for 120 min with 0.2 U, 0.4 U, 0.6 U, or 0.8 U Sau3AI enzyme, respectively. (B) Positive clones were identified on X-α-gal medium via color reaction.
Molecules 27 05942 g006
Figure 7. Results of the tertiary structure prediction for the α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005. (A) Overall tertiary structure of the α-galactosidase. (B) Conserved tertiary structure of the α-galactosidase.
Figure 7. Results of the tertiary structure prediction for the α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005. (A) Overall tertiary structure of the α-galactosidase. (B) Conserved tertiary structure of the α-galactosidase.
Molecules 27 05942 g007
Table 1. Effects of metal ions on the activity of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Table 1. Effects of metal ions on the activity of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Metal Ion ConcentrationRelative α-Galactosidase Activity (%)
10 mM5 mM1 mM
K+17 ± 0.057 ± 0.0423 ± 0.08
Ca2+110 ± 0.50146 ± 0.80132 ± 1.20
Fe2+155 ± 0.60146 ± 0.40128 ± 0.00
Mg2+80 ± 0.3094 ± 0.20122 ± 0.40
Mn2+109 ± 0.60140 ± 1.20114 ± 0.70
Zn2+158 ± 1.60142 ± 0.70126 ± 0.80
Cu2+10 ± 0.028 ± 0.00110 ± 0. 40
Al3+0 ± 0.000 ± 0.0112 ± 0.05
Fe3+0 ± 0.000 ± 0.000 ± 0.00
Table 2. Effects of chemical reagents on the activity of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Table 2. Effects of chemical reagents on the activity of α-galactosidase from L. pasteurii WHPC005.
Effector ConcentrationRelative α-Galactosidase Activity (%)
100 mM50 mM10 mM
Glucose104 ± 0.10136 ± 0.42112 ± 0.30
Fructose96.50 ± 0.0598.4 ± 0.0398.5 ± 0.08
Sucrose 90.48 ± 0.0497.86 ± 0.1398.62 ± 0.09
Lactose86.64 ± 0.0292.11 ± 0.1296.38 ± 0.56
Galactose32.76 ± 0.0178.15 ± 0.2494.52 ± 0.47
Raffinose156.44 ± 0.48192.86 ± 1.36120.47 ± 0.35
SDS5.24 ± 0.127.65 ± 0.2415.68 ± 0.12
EDTA85.56 ± 0.2487.39 ± 0.5891.23 ± 0.45
NaCl76.11 ± 0.7292.85 ± 0.5094.37 ± 0.69
(NH4)2SO487.16 ± 0.1195.96 ± 0.3598.44 ± 0.12
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Dai, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X. Isolation and Identification of an α-Galactosidase-Producing Lactosphaera pasteurii Strain and Its Enzymatic Expression Analysis. Molecules 2022, 27, 5942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185942

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Zhou J, Dai S, Liu X, Zhang X. Isolation and Identification of an α-Galactosidase-Producing Lactosphaera pasteurii Strain and Its Enzymatic Expression Analysis. Molecules. 2022; 27(18):5942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185942

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yan, Jinghui Zhou, Shan Dai, Xiaozhu Liu, and Xuewen Zhang. 2022. "Isolation and Identification of an α-Galactosidase-Producing Lactosphaera pasteurii Strain and Its Enzymatic Expression Analysis" Molecules 27, no. 18: 5942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185942

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop