Next Article in Journal
Use of Ferulic Acid in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Growth Parameters of Pseudomonas putida HSM-C2 with Coumarin-Degrading Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Brassica Genus Seeds: A Review on Phytochemical Screening and Pharmacological Properties

1
Laboratoire de Recherche, Biodiversité, Molécule et Application, Institut Supérieur de Biologie Appliquée de Médenine, Université de Gabès, Zrig, Gabès 6072, Tunisia
2
Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, UPS, F-31062 Toulouse, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(18), 6008; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27186008
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 11 September 2022 / Accepted: 12 September 2022 / Published: 15 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Traditionally, Brassica species are widely used in traditional medicine, human food, and animal feed. Recently, special attention has been dedicated to Brassica seeds as source of health-promoting phytochemicals. This review provides a summary of recent research on the Brassica seed phytochemistry, bioactivity, dietary importance, and toxicity by screening the major online scientific database sources and papers published in recent decades by Elsevier, Springer, and John Wiley. The search was conducted covering the period from January 1964 to July 2022. Phytochemically, polyphenols, glucosinolates, and their degradation products were the predominant secondary metabolites in seeds. Different extracts and their purified constituents from seeds of Brassica species have been found to possess a wide range of biological properties including antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective activities. These valuable functional properties of Brassica seeds are related to their richness in active compounds responsible for the prevention and treatment of various chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cancer, and COVID-19. Currently, the potential properties of Brassica seeds and their components are the main focus of research, but their toxicity and health risks must also be accounted for.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Brassicaceae family, commonly called crucifers, stands out as one of the most frequently cultivated and consumed all over the world with around 338 genera and more than 3700 species [1]. In recent years, cruciferous vegetables have attracted increased attention as they represent an excellent source of nutrients (carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, vitamins, and minerals) and health-promoting phytochemicals (phenolics, flavonoids, and glucosinolates) responsible for the prevention and treatment of various diseases via several biological qualities, including anti-obesity, antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic activities [1,2,3,4].
Among all the Brassicaceae family genera, the Brassica (B.) genus is the most known and the most important one [5]. It includes important vegetables, oilseed crops, and forage species, divided into six species. Brassica nigra L., Brassica oleracea L., and Brassica rapa L. are three diploid species, whereas Brassica carinata, Brassica juncea (L.), and Brassica napus L. are all amphidiploid [6]. These species are grown mostly in the northern hemisphere’s Mediterranean, temperate, and cold climates [7]. B. oleracea, the dominant vegetable species, includes a wide range of morphological variants such as broccoli (B. oleracea var. italica), cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata), kohlrabi (B. oleracea var. gongylodes), cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis), Brussels sprouts (B. oleracea var. gemmifera), and kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) [8]. B. napus, including oilseed rape or canola, is an allotetraploid oilseed crop derived from B. oleracea L. and B. rapa L. [9]. The botanical classifications and dietary nomenclature of the most cultivated and consumed Brassica species worldwide are listed in Table 1.
The Brassica genus constitutes a potential reservoir for food products with high economic and medicinal value in the world owing to the synergistic action of its bioactive compounds [6,11]. The phytochemical screening and the beneficial properties in the vegetative organs of various Brassica species have been well documented, such as B. nigra [12], B. oleracea [8,13], B. rapa [14], B. carinata [15], B. juncea [16,17], and B. napus [18,19].
Brassica species are mainly cultivated as vegetable crops, as fodder, and for their seeds as spices and oil sources. In particular, rapeseed oil is the world’s third-largest producer of edible oil, behind only soybeans and palm trees, accounting for 14% of global production [10,20]. Over the past few years, Nepal has been the leading producer of mustard seeds, with more than 32% of the worldwide global production in 2019, followed by Russia with 25% and Canada with 21%. The US, Germany, and France were the global highest importers of yellow and brown mustard seeds used as condiment and cooking oil. Notably, the FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2021) data report that the UK (221,000 tons), Germany (202,000 tons), and Italy (190,000 tons) consumed the most prepared mustard worldwide in 2019 [21].
Recently, special emphasis has been placed on the seeds of Brassica vegetables, and several research studies conducted on phytochemical screening have revealed that Brassica seeds, like all other organs of the vegetative system, are a very rich source of nutrients (carbohydrates, fats, proteins, vitamins, and minerals), and they contain a broad spectrum of various bioactive secondary metabolites of medicinal value, mainly phenolic compounds, glucosinolates and carotenoids. This richness in nutritional and medicinal compounds offers Brassica seeds a strong bioactive potential, mainly antioxidant, antiproliferative, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties.
Considering the versatility of the Brassica genus, this review provides a comprehensive summary of research progress on the Brassica species seed traditional and agronomic uses, phytochemical screening, and pharmacological properties. Furthermore, the bioactivities of isolated constituents and toxicological effects of Brassica seeds are also touched upon.

2. Traditional and Agronomic Uses of Brassica Seeds

Brassica seeds possess enormous bioactive compounds associated with a wide range of biological properties. Thanks to these virtues, Brassica plant seeds have been naturalized and adapted for use in agronomy and medicine [15,22]. Indeed, due to their high concentration of glucosinolates, seeds have been traditionally used as a spicy food condiment (Dijon mustard in France) [23,24]. Moreover, nonfood applications for seeds have become more popular, especially in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. In traditional and modern medicine, mustard seeds are employed in various folk remedies as an appetizer, aperitif, digestive stimulant, laxative, expectorant, and antiseptic agent to treat gastrointestinal, respiratory, and skin diseases, as well as arthritis, foot aches, rheumatism, and lumbago [15,25]. In addition, because seeds are rich in proteins, they form a vital component of the food supply for pigs, poultry, and other types of livestock, in addition to aquaculture [26,27]. It has also been proven that S. alba seed meal is able to suppress weeds, while B. juncea seed meal is employed as a broad-spectrum pesticide against fungi, insects, and nematodes [28]. Moreover, seeds play a crucial role in the soil enrichment and fertilization process due to the favorable C/N ratio, the high nitrogen-rich protein content (20–45%), and the presence of essential nutrients including phosphorus (1%), potassium (1%), calcium (1%), magnesium (0.5%), sulfur (0.5 to 2%), zinc (100 mg/kg of total dry matter), manganese (100 mg/kg of total dry matter), and copper (10 mg/kg of total dry matter) [29]. Similarly, soil amendment with 10 D intermediate doses (30 t/ha) of B. carinata seed meal improved soil fertility by enriching total organic carbon, humified carbon, and phosphorus without adverse effects on microorganisms [30]. With 87% coagulation activity, an active coagulant napin protein isolated from Brassica seeds (B. nigra) was described as a helpful method to treat pond water turbidity [31].

3. Functional Ingredients of Brassica Genus Seeds

3.1. Edible Oil Profile

Vegetable oils rich in essential unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) are an indispensable element of the human diet and are often suggested by nutritionists [32]. Brassica plants are well known for their seeds’ richness in edible oil, with an average content in B. napus, B. juncea, and B. rapa ranging from 45% to 50%. The oil content variability is attributable to genetic variances in Brassica species, environmental conditions, and agricultural practices [33]. Among all the Brassica species, B. napus, rapeseed, is one of the most important sources of edible oil. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA report, January 2015), B. napus is the second largest produced oilseed crop worldwide with 71.94 million MT and the third largest source of vegetable oil. Indeed, the average oil content of B. rapa (47.30%) and B. napus (46.40%) was significantly higher compared to that of B. carinata (40%) and B. nigra (37.68%). Additionally, the general composition of oils from different Brassica seeds consists of seven major fatty acids: palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), linolenic (C18:3), eicosanoic (C22:0), and erucic (C22:1) acids. B. napus, B. rapa, and B. carinata naturally accumulate high amounts of monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly erucic acid (C22:1ω9) (40–50%), while other species such as Sinapis alba and B. nigra have a moderate content of this fatty acid (Table 2).
This oil’s high concentration of erucic acid (about 40%) renders it unsuitable for human consumption [42]. Thus, the removal of erucic acid is required before rapeseed oil can be consumed by humans. The low-erucic-acid and low-glucosinolate cultivar is called “canola” in North America and “double-low” or “00” rapeseed in Europe. The oil extracted from double-low rapeseed is generally recognized as safe by the FDA [43]. It was demonstrated that mature oilseed rape seeds oil from double-low quality oilseed rape (low in erucic acid (up to 2% in consumption seeds) and low glucosinolate level (up to 25 μmol/g of seeds)) contained 60% monounsaturated oleic acid (C18:1), 30% polyunsaturated fatty acids (20% linoleic acid (C18:2) and 10% linolenic acid (C18:3)), 2% eicosenoic acid (C20:1), 7% saturated fatty acids (mainly palmitic (C16:0) and stearic acids (C18:0)), and 1% other acids [44]. As a result, double-low oil contained a high amount of oleic and linoleic acids, making it significantly healthier [45]. Oleic acid is suitable for low-cholesterol diets, for frozen food preparation, and to improve the stability of cooking and frying oils [46]. Moreover, linoleic (omega-6) acid reduces cholesterol and triglyceride levels and improves the viscosity of blood cells [33]. Linoleic acid (omega-6) and α-linolenic acid (omega-3) are essential fatty acids [47]. Furthermore, the low level of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) is beneficial for human health as their high consumption reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases [48], while oils with a high polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content are more sensitive to lipid oxidation [49].

3.2. Proteins, Minerals, and Secondary Metabolites

Several research studies have been undertaken to assess the chemical composition of the seeds of Brassica genus species. In addition to their high oil content, Brassica seeds exhibited a high content of carbohydrates, fat, dietary fiber, and proteins, especially in B. juncea, B. napus, and B. rapa seeds [50,51] (Table 3). Indeed, there is a growing trend to isolate proteins from Brassica seeds, e.g., from canola seed meal to be used in human food [52] and as a coproduct of oil recovery [53]. An acyl carrier protein [54] and a ~60 kDa aminopeptidase enzyme, with maximum activity at pH 6.5 and temperature of 40 °C for Phe-pNA as a substrate, were characterized and purified from maturing seeds of B. napus [55]. Furthermore, from B. napus var. oleifera seeds, a new low-molar-mass trypsin serine proteinase iso-inhibitor, 5-oxoPro1-Gly62-RTI-III (6767.8 Da), was isolated [56]. Mustard seeds are very rich in protein of low value due to the presence of napin seed storage proteins, which are difficult to digest and have been identified as major allergens in humans [57,58]. In seed meal, four candidate napin genes in R-o-18 and 10 in Chiifu-401 were identified with high sequence similarity to Arabidopsis thaliana 2S albumin-like napin genes, which might be responsible for a high prevalence of food allergies [59]. From B. rapa seeds, 7S globulin-like vicilin SSPs were identified as the dominant seed storage proteins in the mature seed along with 2S albumin-like napin seed storage proteins (SSPs) and 11/12S globulin-like cruciferin SSPs [60]. In addition to napin seed storage proteins, three allergens were found in S. alba: Sin a2 (cruciferin), Sin a3 (non-specific lipid transfer protein), and Sin a4 (profilin) [61].
Chemical investigation of seeds has also revealed the presence of phytonutrients such as trace minerals like phosphorus [39], vitamin E [62], carotenoids, and tocopherols [63] (Table 3).
Moreover, the aqueous and organic extracts of Brassica plant seeds have been found to contain considerable amounts of bioactive phytochemical compounds such as volatile oil, glycosides, reducing sugar, polyphenols, phenolic acids, flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, terpenoids, tannins, and glucosinolates. The major chemical constituents in Brassica seeds as reported in the relevant literature are quantitatively mentioned in Table 3. It is clear that the specific molecules and their content in seeds vary greatly within species, varieties, and the extracting solvent. Thus, for example, as demonstrated in Table 3, alkaloids, saponins, and tannins are present only in B. nigra and B. juncea seeds [64,65,66]. In addition, studies have found that Brassica seeds are a valuable source of polyphenols. Vanillin, catechin, and quercetin have also been detected in B. juncea L. Czern seed extract with a high content of catechin, followed by vanillin [62].
Within the polyphenol richness, Brassica seeds are characterized by the presence of glucosinolates, especially in B. campestris [67] and B. napus [39], along with a high value in the seed meal of B. rapa L. (6.0 g/kg) [51]. The concentration of glucosinolates changes depending on the species, habitat, location, stage, and plant component [68,69,70]. High glucosinolate content gives vegetable oil its pungent and distinctive flavor and makes it less healthy [71]. B. napus seeds are dominated by aliphatic glucosinolates, representing between 91% and 94% in the different groups. The main aliphatic glucosinolates are progoitrin and gluconapin. Progoitrin ranges from 30.11 to 71.57 μmol/g dry weight (DW) in oilseed crops and root vegetable crops, respectively, whereas gluconapin, the second glucosinolate in abundance in the seeds, showed the highest content in forage crops with 30.17 μmol/g DW. Indole and aromatic glucosinolates are less abundant in seeds (less than 10% of the total glucosinolate content) [72]. Sinigrin was detected in B. juncea with a high content in 50% acetonitrile Dolsan mustard seeds extract with 53.77 mg/g [73].
Table 3. Chemical composition of Brassica spp. seeds, their derivatives (oil, meal, and cake), and sprouts obtained with different extracting solvents (%).
Table 3. Chemical composition of Brassica spp. seeds, their derivatives (oil, meal, and cake), and sprouts obtained with different extracting solvents (%).
Chemical
Composition
SpeciesSubspecies/varSample AnalyzedExtracting SolventContentReference
Volatile oilB. nigra SeedsH2O25.13% (w/w)[64]
FatB. juncea Seed mealnf2.8% (w/w)[50]
B. napusCanolaSeed mealnf2.9% (w/w)
ProteinB. nigra Seedsnf24.70% (w/w)[64]
B. oleraceaitalica cv. LegacySeedsnf27.29% (w/w)[36]
B. rapa L.Rapa Catozza Napoletana (RCN)Seed mealnf38.2% (w/w)[51]
B. carinata Defatted cakenf24.6 to 35.4% (w/w)[74]
B. junceaCanolaSeed mealnf47.4% (w/w)[75]
Seed mealnf41.7% (w/w)[50]
B. napusCanolaSeed mealnf41.5% (w/w)
Seed mealnf48.6, 49.8% (w/w)[39,75]
B. hirta SeedsH2O0.77% (w/w)[76]
B. campestris Wild mealnf26% (w/w)[67]
Dehulled, defatted mealnf48% (w/w)
CarbohydratesB. nigra Seedsnf35.40% (w/w)[64]
B. oleraceaitalica cv. LegacySeedsnf58.89% (w/w)[36]
Dietary fiberB. junceaCanolaSeed mealnf25.8% (w/w)[75]
Seed mealnf27.7% (w/w)[50]
B. napusCanolaSeed mealnf33.8% (w/w)
Seed mealnf26.4%, 24.1% (w/w)[75]
Crude fiberB. oleraceaitalica cv. LegacySeedsnf15.47% (w/w)[36]
B. nigra Seedsnf0.30% (w/w)[64]
B. campestris Wild mealnf13.4% (w/w)[67]
Dehulled and defatted mealnf3.8% (w/w)
OligosaccharidesB. napus Seed mealnf2.1% (w/w)[39]
GlycosidesB. nigra SeedsH2O20.01% (w/w)[64]
Reducing sugarB. nigra SeedsH2O5.56% (w/w)[64]
StarchB. juncea Seed mealnf3.4% (w/w)[50]
B. napusCanolaSeed mealnf1% (w/w)
B. napus Seed mealnf2.3% (w/w)[39]
Nonstarch polysaccharidesB. napus Seed mealnf17.5% (w/w)
SucroseB. junceaCanolaSeed mealnf9.2% (w/w)[75]
B. juncea Seed mealnf6.9% (w/w)[50]
B. napuscanolaSeed mealnf5.6% (w/w)
B. napus Seed mealnf7.5%, 10.2% (w/w)[39,75]
MoistureB. nigra Seedsnf4.16% (w/w)[64]
B. campestris Wild mealnf4.8% (w/w)[67]
AshB. nigra Seedsnf5.14% (w/w)[64]
B. oleraceaitalica cv. LegacySeedsnf4.45% (w/w)[36]
B. campestris Wild mealnf4.4% (w/w)[67]
Dehulled and defatted mealnf7% (w/w)
PhosphorusB. napus Seed mealnf1.14% (w/w)[39]
Non-phytate phosphorusB. napus Seed mealnf0.83% (w/w)
Vitamin EB. juncea L. CzernSeeds80%
methanol, 20% H2O
0.08% (w/w)[62]
Vitamin CB. oleraceaitalica
Green King variety
Seeds70% methanol0.27% AAE (w/w)[77]
α-tocopherolB. nigra SeedsHexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol0.11% (w/v)[63]
B. oleracea L. var. acephalaOilnf70% (w/w)[35]
Total phenolicB. nigra Cold-press oilnf0.01% GAE (w/v)[78]
B. oleraceaitalica cv. LegacySeedsMethanol/water (80:20)0.89% GAE (w/w)[36]
italica
Green King variety
Seeds70% methanol1.66% GAE (w/w)[77]
SeedsMethanol0.39–0.46% GAE (w/w)[79]
B.rapa L. RCN seed mealnf1.30% (w/w)[51]
B. tournefortiiGouanOilnf1.61% GAE (w/w)[80]
Total phenolicB. carinata Defatted cakeMethanol0.04–0.13% (w/w)[74]
B. hirta SeedsH2O0.63% (w/w)[76]
Cold-press oilnf0.02% GAE (w/v)[78]
B. junceaCzernSeeds70% ethanol2.77% TAE (w/w)[81]
Seedsnf0.12% GAE (w/v)[65]
Dolsan mustard seeds (DMS)50% acetonitrile (ACN)40.43% GAE (w/w)[73]
B. napusCanolaSeeds80% methanol46.23% (w/w)[82]
CanolaDefatted oilseed cakesMethanol/acetone/water (MAW)2.11% GAE (w/w)[83]
Total flavonoidB. nigra SeedsH2O6.57% (w/w)[64]
Cold-press oilnf0.002% CE (w/v)[78]
B. oleracea var.italica
Green King variety
Seeds70% methanol0.37% CE (w/w)[77]
italica cv. LegacySeedsMethanol/water (80:20)3.3% QE (w/w)[36]
SeedsMethanol0.26–0.40% RE (w/w)[79]
B. juncea DMS50% ACN39.53% QE (w/w)[73]
Seedsnf2.48% RE (w/w)[65]
CzernSeeds70% ethanol12.68% QE (w/w)[81]
B. napusCanolaSeeds80% methanol7.54% (w/w)[82]
CanolaDefatted oilseed cakesMAW0.04% LUE (w/w)[83]
B. hirta Cold-press oilnf0.001% CE (w/v)[78]
VanillinB. junceaCzemSeeds80% methanol, 20% H2O0.21% (w/w)[62]
Catechin0.42% (w/w)
Quercetin0.01% (w/w)
AlkaloidsB. nigra SeedsH2O20.58% (w/w)[64]
B. juncea Seeds10% acetic in ethanol2.25% (w/w)[65]
TanninsB. nigra SeedsH2O15.05% (w/w)[64]
B. juncea Seedsnf7.75% TAE (w/v)[65]
SaponinsB. nigra SeedsH2O12.82% (w/w)[64]
B. juncea Seeds80% methanol4.25% Diosgenin equivalent (w/w)[65]
TerpenoidsB. juncea SeedsEthanol5.40% (w/w)
CarotenoidsB. nigra SeedsHexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol1.51% (w/v)[63]
GlucosinolatesB. oleraceaitalicaSproutsnf0.40% (w/w)[84]
italicaSeedsAqueous methanol (80% v/v)1.01% sinigrin equivalent (w/w) to
2.09% sinigrin equivalent (w/w)
[85]
B. napus Seed mealnf20.8% (w/w)[39]
SeedsMethanol, lead acetate 0,3 M, waterOilseed group: 2.3% (w/w)
Forage group: 4.88% (w/w)
[72]
B. rapa L. RCN seed mealnf0.6% (w/w)[51]
B. campestris Dehulled and defatted mealnf2.3% (w/w)[67]
SinigrinB. juncea L.CzernSeeds80% methanol, 20% H2O0.08% (w/w)[62]
B. juncea DMS50% ACN5.38% (w/w)[73]
nf: not found in original publication, AAE: ascorbic acid equivalent, GAE: gallic acid equivalent, TAE: tannic acid equivalent, CE: catechin equivalent, QE: quercetin equivalent, LUE: luteolin equivalent.

3.3. Aqueous, Organic Extracts and Essential Oil Phytochemical Profile

Due to the presence of major phytochemicals compounds in the seeds of Brassica genus, many studies have been oriented to their identification and quantification using different methods including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to DAD or UV detectors and HPLC fluorescence, reverse-phase HPLC (reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography), gas chromatography, qualitative LC–ESI-MSn analysis, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS), GC-FID, NMR spectroscopy, 13C-NMR, 1H-NMR, high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR-ESI), LH-20 chromatography, and Sephadex LH-20. The extraction solvents used are typically hexane, dichloromethane, petroleum ether, methanol, ethyl alcohol, ethyl acetate, acetone, water, and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).
The constituents identified and quantified from different Brassica plant seeds are represented and detailed in Table 4.
Phenolic compounds, made up of aromatic rings with hydroxyl groups, represent the most abundant secondary metabolites in plant with more than 8000 identified structures. Plants generate phenolics via the shikimic pathway [86]. As reported in Table 4, different polyphenols including phenolics, flavonoids (flavonols, flavones, flavan-3-ols, anthocyanidins, flavanones, isoflavones, and others), and non-flavonoids (phenolic acids, hydroxycinnamates, stilbenes, and others) have been identified and quantified in B. nigra, B. oleracea var. acephala, B. oleracea var. costata, B. rapa L., B. napus, and B. alba seeds. The most abundant and diversified groups of polyphenols in Brassica species are flavonoids (mostly flavonols and anthocyanins) and hydroxycinnamic acids [86]. Flavonols are the major representative of flavonoids. Brassica crops’ principal flavonols, quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin, are most typically found as O-glycosides [87]. In Brassica vegetables, the most common hydroxycinnamic acids are p-coumaric (4-hydroxycinnamic), sinapic (3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic), and ferulic acids (4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic) [11,88]. In Brassica seeds, the most prominent phenolic compounds were determined to be sinapic acid derivatives such as 1-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl sinapate and 1,2-di-O-sinapoyl-β-D-glucose [82].
The seed composition profile of Brassica differs with the variety, extraction solvent, and detection or quantification methods used. Compared to other Brassica species, B. napus seeds have been shown to be particularly rich in polyphenols through the detection of 91 flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives and the identification of 78 compounds, of which 55 were first reported in B. napus L. var. napus and 24 were first detected in the genus Brassica [89]. In another phytochemical investigation in B. napus seeds from different winter type oilseed rape genotypes (Aviso (00), CMB1039 (00), Doublol (00), JetNeuf (0þ), and PR3984 (00)), 13 different flavonoids were identified by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-MSn) and characterized for the first time in the seed coat of B. napus, and isorhamnetin-hexoside-sulfate and isorhamnetin-sinapoyltrihexoside were newly identified in Brassica spp. [90].
Glucosinolates are the major Brassica seed phytochemicals. Aliphatic, indolic, and aromatic glucosinolates are the three principal chemical groups of GLSs, classified according to the amino-acid precursor, forming more than 130 types. Aliphatic GLSs are mainly derived from methionine but also from alanine, leucine, isoleucine, or valine, while the indolic GLSs are tryptophan-derived compounds and aromatic GLSs are phenylalanine- and tyrosine-derived compounds [91]. Detecting and identifying GLS directly or indirectly mainly depend on the existence (intact) or absence (desulfo) of the sulfate group. GLSs are hydrolyzed by myrosinase after cell disruption and by the gut microbiota [92,93]. Isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (CNs), epithionitriles (EPNs), and thiocyanates are the common GLS breakdown products [69,94]. Myrosinase is inactivated at 60 °C and 700 MPa [95]. GLS content and profile vary with Brassica species and organ, with a high amount in the reproductive system including florets, flowers, and seeds. Variations in the profile of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products of different seeds have been detected, as shown in Table 4. Thus, for example, it has been reported that the major glucosinolates found in B. rapa L. seeds were progoitrin, glucoraphanin, gluconapin, and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin [51], whereas B. oleracea italica, the ethyl acetate oil of B. juncea raya, and B. campestris were characterized by the presence of glucosinolates hydrolytic products such as allyl isothiocyanate, 2-phethyl isothiocyanate, 3-butenyl isothiocyanate, and 3-(methylthio) propyl isothiocyanate [96,97]. Glucoerucin and glucoraphanin were the two major glucosinolates found in broccoli seeds [85]. Moreover, the indole glucosinolate, 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate, was purified and identified as a major constituent of cabbage seed and rapeseed [98]. In addition, it was found that sulforaphane is an abundant isothiocyanate of broccoli, containing 49.77 mg/g [96]. Given the richness of the seeds in sulforaphane (SFN), research work has focused on its isolation and purification in Brassica oleracea L. var. rubra seeds [99] and B. oleracea L. var. italica (broccoli) seeds, which were purified to 186 mg of sulforaphane from 850 mg of the ethyl acetate seed meal extract by solid-phase extraction, preparative high-performance liquid chromatography, and high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC) before being characterized by MS and H- or C-NMR [100,101].
A phytochemical investigation conducted on B. napus seeds led to the isolation by NMR spectroscopy of two new nitrogenous compounds, (2S)-2-sinapoyl-4-pentenenitrile and brassicalkaloid A, together with four known alkaloids, coixspirolactam C, 1H-indole-3-acetonitrile, 3-indolealdehyde, and indole-3-acetonitrile-2S β-D-glucopyranoside [102].
The phytochemical screening of B. oleracea L. var. acephala seeds demonstrated the presence of 13 carotenoids, among which all-elutein was the main component [35].
Furthermore, an investigation conducted on broccoli seeds (B. oleracea L. var. italica cv. Legacy) revealed a large number of amino acids with a predominance of glutamic acid (72.83 mg/g fresh weight (FW)), asparagine (51.81 mg/g FW), serine + histidine (34.16 mg/g FW), and proline (23.29 mg/g FW) [36].
Additionally, in B. oleracea L. var. costata DC seeds, seven organic acids were identified and quantified by HPLC-UV with a maximum concentration of ascorbic (8546 mg/kg, dry basis (DB)) followed by citric (4685 mg/kg, DB), and malic + quinic (3049 mg/kg, DB) acids [103].
Moreover, in the same analyzed sample, a variable profile was demonstrated in the metabolite families. Indeed, the GC–MS analysis of Brassica napus petroleum ether extract revealed the presence of different chemical compounds such as acetic acid butyl ester, docosane 11-decyl, 2-pentanone 4-hydroxy-4 methyl, bicyclooct-2-ene-4α, 6α-carbolactone, benzene 1,4-dimethyl, 2-methyl-5-phenyl-5-pentanonenitrile, 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid methyl ester, 3,4-dihydrothienyl-5-carboxtthiol, 1-butene 4-isothiocyanato, 7,7-dimethyl-tetracycloheptane, 9-methyl-l0-tetradecen-1-ol acetate, and 9-hydroxy-1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-8H-pyrido (1,2α) pyrazin-8-one [104].
Moreover, the essential oil composition of Brassica seeds is represented in Table 4. The essential oil of B. napus seeds was dominated by 2-phenyl ethyl isothiocyanate (39.2%) followed by bicyclohept-6-en-1-yl-tert-butyl ether (13.7%), 2-(allylthio) 1-nitrobutane (12.8%), 4-bromo-3-phenylbut-2-enoate (9.8%), 1,3,6,10-cyclotetradecatetraene 3,7,11-trimethyl-l4-(1-methylethyl) (5.2%), 1-butene 4-isothiocyanato (4.8%), cyclohexane 1,12-[1-(2, 2-dimethylbutyl)-1,3-propanediyl] bis (1.2%), and 4 trifluroacetoxytetradecane (1.1%) [104]. In research conducted to evaluate the Sinapis alba seeds, 14 components in the essential oil from mustard seeds representing 97.94% of the total amount were identified. The predominant component of the essential oil was allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), representing 71.06% [105]. The GC–MS analysis revealed that the main components in the essential oil of B. nigra seeds were di-(9-octadecenoyl)-glycerol (42.16%), 9,12-octadecadienoyl chloride, (Z,Z)-(41.40%), and hexadecanoic acid, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2-ethanediyl ester (13.20%), while the main components in the essential oil of B. hirta were cyclopropanenonanoic acid (48.70%), 2-[(2-butylcyclopropyl) methyl]-methyl ester, and hexadecanoic acid, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2-ethanediyl ester (42.08%) [78].
Overall, several phytochemistry studies have investigated the phytochemical compositional diversity in Brassica spp. seeds, and a wide range of bioactive compounds (polyphenols, glucosinolates, carotenoids, alkaloids, amino acids, fatty acids, and organic acids) have been identified and quantified using different analytical approaches such as HPLC-UV, HPLC-DAD, LC–MS, LC–MS/ESI, GC, and GC–MS. Polyphenols such as hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonoids were the most common. Flavonoids (flavonols) were mostly found as quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin derivatives. Glucosinolates were mostly found in aliphatic forms. The hydrolytic glucosinolates products with the highest content were allyl isothiocyanate, 2-phethyl isothiocyanate, 3-butenyl isothiocyanate, and 3-(methylthio) propyl isothiocyanate. Sulforaphane, a powerful anticancer isothiocyanate, was also identified and quantified in Brassica seeds (Figure 1).
However, available data of phytochemical screening of diverse Brassica spp. seeds are still limited, and different understudied phytochemicals require more detailed characterization.
The biosynthesis, variability, and abundance of Brassica seed phytochemicals depend on genotype, environmental factors, germination, and degree of maturity [106]. Indeed, germination improved the phenolic compounds content by 49% and 44% in Sinapis alba and Brassica nigra seeds, respectively, as well as in broccoli seeds [36,107]. Furthermore, asparagine, proline, and glutamic acid were much more abundant in broccoli seeds after germination [36]. Consequently, germination is a simple and effective approach to boost seed nutrients. Yet, the germination time reduced the broccoli seed total flavonoid content, probably resulting from the moisture accumulation [79].
As shown in Table 3 and Table 4, the phytochemical profile variation in different Brassica seed species is also dependent on the extraction solvent, the extraction methods, and the detection and quantification approaches. Sample preparation and extraction methods are crucial steps. Acetone, methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, and their mixtures with water are the most employed solvents in plant phenolic extraction [11]. Indeed, equal parts water and acetone has a better effect on the phenolic compounds extraction of mustard seed [108]. Generally, the extraction of phenolic compounds is most effective using solvents with high polarity [109]. Numerous conventional and advanced extraction techniques such as maceration, soxhlet, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) are applied for the phytochemical screening of Brassica seeds. It was reported that hydrodistillation increased the canola oil extraction level, while, in Indian mustard seed, soxhlet extraction with petroleum ether raised the oil content to 37% with strong antioxidant potential [104,110]. Furthermore, it was reported that the inactivation of myrosinase by a heating process (30 min at 60 °C), followed by methanol/water extraction and solid-phase extraction (SPE), is the preferable strategy for obtaining high GLS yield. The myrosinase inactivation by a heating process and high methanol concentration prevented the GLS enzymatic hydrolysis [111].
The most common analytical techniques applied in Brassica seed phytochemical profile analysis are GC and HPLC. A variable profile has been demonstrated within the Brassica spp. GC and GC–MS are applied to identify the volatile organics directly or indirectly after derivatization. They have been used to characterize the GLS breakdown products and fatty acids [78,97]. However, some isothiocyanates, such as sulforaphane, are thermally unstable and, consequently, GC is inadequate for their evaluation [36,112]. Additionally, due to the non-volatility or thermal instability of some GLSs, GC is not appropriate for their direct analysis and, consequently, must be converted into volatile derivatives which may be not suitable with some GLS structures [111]. HPLC is, thus, the preferred method with a desulfation step to reduce the polarity for the separation by reverse-phase chromatography (RPC) [113]. Therefore, as shown in Table 4, HPLC is the frequently used technique for GLS and amino-acid analysis in Brassica seeds [36,114]. However, the lack of standards of some compounds is a limiting factor of HPLC viability. Thus, to improve phytochemical detection and quantification, the combination of HPLC with the highly sensitive method MS (LC–MS) is needed as a rapid, selective and sensitive approach [35,115]. Yet, due to its insufficient precision and accuracy to identify some GLS peaks (e.g., similar m/z of both glucoiberin (m/z 422.0255) and gluconasturtiin (m/z 422.0585)) and the lack of reference materials, LC–MS use remains limited [111]. LC–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) can resolve this issue since fragmentation improves both selectivity and sensitivity [90,103]. Recently, ultra-HPLC–MS/MS (UHPLC–MS/MS) data were used to create a new platform (GLS-Finder) useful for intact GLS identification in 49 popular Brassica vegetables [116]. However, certain reviewers stated that the number of GLS/isomer chromatographic peaks was higher than the known GLS number of every extract, which should be verified with the published compositions [91,117].
Moreover, NMR has been utilized as the most effective technique for the final confirmation of the identified and isolated phytochemical compound structure [101,102,118].
The validation of the extraction methods and the analytical techniques is crucial for the precision and the accuracy of the phytochemical profile data.
Table 4. Bioactive compounds identified from Brassica seed/derivative extracts and essential oil using different analytical techniques (%).
Table 4. Bioactive compounds identified from Brassica seed/derivative extracts and essential oil using different analytical techniques (%).
Chemical
Composition
SpeciesSubspecies/varSample
Analyzed
Extracting SolventSeparation and Detection MethodsBioactive CompoundsReference
PolyphenolsB. nigra Seeds UHPLC–MS/MS4-hydroxybenzoic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, sinapic acid, and procatechuic acid[119]
B. oleraceavar. acephalaOil GC-FID, MS, HPLC-DAD, HPLC–MS, HPLC fluorescence11 polyphenols, 5 flavonoids, and 6 hydroxycinnamic acids[35]
var. costataSeedsH2OReverse-phase HPLC-DAD–MS/MS-ESI and HPLC-DAD13 phenolic compounds: 2 sinapoylgentiobiose isomers (sinapoylgentiobiose (0.03% (w/w)) and sinapoylgentiobiose isomer (0.03% (w/w))), 3 sinapoylglucose isomers (1-sinapoylglucose isomer (0.04% (w/w)), 1-sinapoylglucose isomer (0.04% (w/w)), and 1-sinapoylglucose (0.07% (w/w))), kaempferol-3 (sinapoyl) sophorotrioside-7-glucoside, sinapoylcholine, kaempferol-3,7-diglucoside-4’-(sinapoyl) glucoside, 3 disinapoylgentiobiose isomers (1,2-disinapoylgentiobiose isomer (0.02% (w/w)), 1,2-disinapoylgentiobiose isomer (0.04% (w/w)), and 1,2-disinapoylgentiobiose (0.10% (w/w))), 1,2,2’-trisinapoylgentiobiose, and 1,2-disinapoylglucose[103]
B. rapa L.RCNSeed meal70% methanol LC–MSPolyphenols: flavonol and hydroxycinnamic derivatives: K−3−O-(methoxycaffeoyl) sophotrioside−7−O-glc, K−3−O-sophotrioside−7−O-glc, Q−3−O-(coumaroyl) sophoroside −7−O-glc, K−3−O-(sinapoyl) sophotrioside−7−O-glc, I−3−O-(cumaroyl) sophotrioside−7−O-sophoroside, I-3,7−O-di-glc, I−3−O-glc−7−O-sophoroside, caffeoyl derivative, K−3−O-sophoroside, Q−3−O-sophoroside, K−3−O-(feruloyl) sophoroside, Q−3−O-glc, 1,2-disinapoylgentiobioside, 1-sinapoyl-2-feruloylgentiobioside, K−3−O-glc, and I−3−O-glc[51]
B. juncea Seeds UHPLC–MS/MS4-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, sinapic acid (0.02% (w/w), procatechuic acid, and kaempferol[119]
30% etthanolLC–MS/MSCaffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, epigallocatechin gallate, myricetin, apigenin, quercetin-3-O-(caffeoyl)-glucoside, and quercetin[120]
B. napusspring oilseed rape (Napus cv. Drakkar)SeedsHexane–80% aq. methanolCombination of high-field NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
(HR-ESI)
15 constituents: glucose, kaempferol glycoside esters, gentiobiose,, sinapine (sinapoylcholine), and sinapoylmalate; 1 of the glucose esters (1,6-di-O-sinapoylglucose), 2 kaempferol conjugates [4’-(6-O-sinapoylglucoside)-3,7-di-O-glucoside and 3-O-sophoroside-7-O-(2-O-sinapoylglucoside)], and 2 gentiobiose esters (1-O-caffeoylgentiobiose, and 1,2,6’-tri-O-sinapoylgentiobiose)are new plant products[121]
winter type: Aviso (00), CMB1039 (00), Doublol (00), JetNeuf (0þ) and PR3984 (00)Seed coatMethanol/acetone/water/TFA mixture (40:32:28:0.05 v/v/v/v)LC–ESI-MSn13 different flavonoids: (−)-epicatechin, 7 flavonols (quercetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin-dihexoside, kaempferol-sinapoyl-trihexoside, isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside, isorhamnetin-dihexoside, isorhamnetin-hexoside-sulfate, and isorhamnetin-sinapoyl-trihexoside), and 5 procyanidins[90]
CanolaSeeds80% methanolSephadex LH-20 chromatographyFree phenolic compound: trans-sinapic acid (19.34% (w/w)); sinapic acid derivatives: 1-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl sinapate and 1,2-di-O- sinapoyl-β-D-glucose[82]
cv.Yang 6Seeds80% methanolHPLC-PDA–ESI(−)-MSn/HRMSDetection of 91 flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives: 6 flavanols and their oligomers, 39 kaempferol derivatives, 5 quercetin derivatives, 11 isorhamnetin derivatives, and 30 hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives[89]
B. alba Seeds UHPLC–MS/MS4-hydroxybenzoic acid, apigenin, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid (0.12% (w/w))[119]
GlucosinolatesB. oleraceaitalica (broccoli)Seed isothiocyanates (ITCs)Ethyl acetateGC–MS3-BITC (3-butenyl isothiocyanate) (13.85% (w/w)) and sulforaphane (4.98% (w/w))[96]
Alboglabra (Chinese kale)3-BITC (7.76% (w/w))
italica (broccoli)SeedsH2OHPLCAliphatic glucosinolates: sinigrin (0–1.94% (w/w)), progoitrin (0–5.51% (w/w)), glucoraphanin (0.12–6.18% (w/w)), gluconapin (0–0.7% (w/w)), glucoerucin, glucoiberin, and glucoiberverin.
Indolic glucosinolates: glucobrassicin (0–0.17% (w/w)), and 4-hydroxy-glucobrassicin (0–0.33% (w/w))
[122]
italica cv. LegacySeedsDichloromethane (DCM)HPLCSulforaphane (0.36% (w/w))[36]
B. rapa L.Rapa LSeedsDCMGC–MSPhenylethylbrassinin and 3-phenylpropionitrile[123]
RCNSeed meal70% methanolLC–MS(R)-2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl (progoitrin), 4-methylsulfinylbutyl (glucoraphanin), 3-butenyl (gluconapin), 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl (4-hydroxyglucobrassicin), 4-pentenyl (glucobrassicanapin), 3-indolylmethyl (glucobrassicin), and N-methoxy-3-indolylmethy (neoglucobrassicin)[51]
B. juncea Seeds5% ethyl alcohol Allyl isothiocyanate (0.48% (w/w))[41]
rayaOilEthyl acetateGC/GC–MSGSLs hydrolytic products in ethyl acetate oil: allyl isothiocyanate (23% (w/w)), 2-phethyl isothiocyanate (~20% (w/w)), 3-butenyl isothiocyanate (18% (w/w)), 3-(methylthio) propyl isothiocyanate, allyl thiocyanate, and 1-isothiocyanato-3-methyl butane[97]
DCMGC/GC–MSGSLs hydrolytic products: phenethyl isothiocyanate (15.15% (w/w)), 4-pentenyl isothiocyanate (12.548% (w/w)), sec-butyl isothiocyanate, allyl isothiocyanate, and isothiocyanic acid
Coss and CzernSeedsMethanol13C-NMR, 1H-NMR3 native glucosinolates isolated: p-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolates, newly described in B. juncea seeds, and 2 new compounds 9-(methyl-sulfonyl) nonyl and 8-(methylsulfonyl) octyl glucosinolates[118]
SeedsDouble-distilled water (ddH2O)HPLC4 aliphatic GLSs: sinigrin, progoitrin, gluconapin, and glucoiberin, 4 indolic GLSs: glucobrassicin, neoglucobrassicin, 4-methoxyglucobrassicin and 4-hydroxy glucobrassicin, and one aromatic GLS: gluconasturtiin; sinigrin is the predominant GLS with 90% of total GLSs, followed by gluconapin[114]
SeedsDCMGCGlucosinolates breakdown products (GBPs): 5 ITCs: [2-propenyl isothiocyanate, 3-butenyl isothiocyanate, 5-vinyl-1,3-oxazolidine-2-thione, 3-methyl sulfinylpropyl isothiocyanate, and 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate], 2 CNs: [3-butenenitrile and 4-pentenenitrile], and 3 EPNs: [3,4-epithiobutanenitrile, 4,5-epithiopentanenitrile, and 3-hydroxy-4,5-epithiopentanenitrile]; 2-propenyl isothiocyanate is the predominant individual GBP with 51–98% of total GBPs, followed by 3-butenenitrile, 3,4-epithiobutanenitrile, 3,4-epithiobutanenitrile, and 3-butenyl isothiocyanate.
B. hirtaSinapis albaSeeds5% ethyl alcohol Allyl isothiocyanate (0.15% (w/w))[41]
B. campestris Isothiocyanates (ITCs)Ethyl acetateGC–MS3-BITC (3-butenyl isothiocyanate) contained (7.76% (w/w))[96]
CarotenoidsB. oleraceavar. acephalaSeed oil GC-FID, MS, HPLC-DAD, HPLC–MS, HPLC fluorescence13 carotenoids, with all-elutein as the main component[35]
Amino acidsB. oleraceaitalica cv. LegacySeedsHydrochloric acidHPLCGlutamic acid (7.28% (w/w)), asparagine (5.18% (w/w)), serine + histidine (3.42% (w/w)), proline (2.33% (w/w)), threonine (1.88% (w/w)), leucine (1.37% (w/w)), valine (1.03% (w/w)), tyrosine (0.95% (w/w)), phenylalanine (0.87% (w/w)), isoleucine (0.8% (w/w)), glycine (0.74% (w/w)), methionine (0.42% (w/w)), arginine (0.39% (w/w)), and alanine (0.23% (w/w))[36]
Fatty acidsB. nigra Cold-press oil GC–MSMethyl erucate (38.23% (w/w)), 8,11,14-docosatrienoic acid, methyl ester (23.72% (w/w)), 11-eicosenoic acid, methyl ester (15.82% (w/w)), and methyl linoleate (10.13% (w/w))[78]
B. hirta Cold-press oil GC–MSMethyl linoleate (68.19% (w/w)), methyl oleate (15.79% (w/w)), and hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (10.51% (w/w))
B. juncearayaOilEthyl acetate and DCMGC/GC–MSOctadecenoic acid (5.67–23.3% (w/w)), hexaicenoic acid (4.98–20% (w/w)), butanedioic acid (1.6–16% (w/w)), and nonanedioic acid (4.73% (w/w))[97]
Organic acidsB. oleraceavar. costataSeedsH2OHPLC-UV7 organic acids: aconitic (0.02% (w/w)), citric (0.47% (w/w)), ascorbic (0.86% (w/w)), malic + quinic (0.31% (w/w)), shikimic, and fumaric acids[103]
SterolsB. juncea Seeds HPLC, GC, 1H-NMRSterol, 22-dehydrocampesterol [(24S)24-methylcholesta-5, E-22-dien-3β-ol], newly discovered in higher plants[124]
Essential oilB. hirtaSinapis albaEssential oilH2OGC–MS and GC-FID2-methylbutyronitrile, 3-pentenenitrile, hexanal, furfural, 2-furanmethanol, cyclopropyl isothiocyanate, allyl isothiocyanate, isobutyl isothiocyanate, 3-butenyl isothiocyanate, benzene acetaldehyde, 3-methylbutyl isothiocyanate, 3-(methylthio) propyl cyanide, 2-phenylethyl cyanide, and 2-phenethyl isothiocyanate[105]
Cold-press oil GC–MSCyclopropanenonanoic acid, 2-[(2-butylcyclopropyl) methyl] -, methyl ester (48.7% (w/w)), and hexadecanoic acid, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2-ethanediyl ester (42. 08% (w/w))[78]
B. oleraceavar. botrytis (L.), Romanesco groupSeed/volatile oilDCMGC and GC–MSNatalino variety: 43 compounds (99.7% (w/w)), contained 10 cyanides (88.1% (w/w)), 10 isothiocyanates (8.8% (w/w)), and 8 aldehydes (1.3% (w/w))
Campid oglio variety: 41 compounds (99.6% (w/w)) contained 10 cyanides (92.3% (w/w)), 10 isothiocyanates (6.2% (w/w)), and 6 aldehydes (0.4% (w/w))
Navona variety: 32 compounds (99.5% (w/w)) contained 9 cyanides (91.0% (w/w)), 6 isothiocyanates (7.5% (w/w)), and 6 aldehydes (0.6% (w/w))
Cyanides: 2-methylpropyl cyanide, but-3-enyl cyanide, 3-methylbutyl cyanide, n-pentyl cyanide, 4-methylpentyl cyanide, n-hexyl cyanide, 3-(methylthio) propyl cyanide, benzyl cyanide, 4-(methylthio) butyl cyanide, and 2-phenylethyl cyanide.
Isothiocyanates: allyl thiocyanate, allyl isothiocyanate, 2-methylpropyl isothiocyanate, but-3-enyl isothiocyanate, 3-methylbutyl isothiocyanate, 4-methylpentyl isothiocyanate, 3-(methylthio)propyl isothiocyanate, benzyl isothiocyanate, 4-(methylthio) butyl isothiocyanate, 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate, and 5-(methylthio) pentyl isothiocyanate
Aldehydes: hexanal, furfural; 3-(methylthio) propanal, phenylacetaldehyde, nonanal, non-2(E)-enal, deca-2(E),4(E)-dienal, and syringaldehyde
The predominant compounds were cyanides: 4-(methylthio) butyl cyanide (61.3%, 66.3%, and 79.6% (w/w), respectively), 3-(methylthio) propyl cyanide (21.7%, 21.6%, and 10.7% (w/w)), and isothiocyanates: 4-(methylthio) butyl isothiocyanate (5.3%, 4.0%, and 6.7% (w/w)) for the three oils
[125]
B. tournefortiiGouanVolatile oildiethyl etherGC–MS14 compounds (76.1% (w/w)): propane, 1-isothiocyanato-3-(methylthio) (24.39% (w/w)), 2-propenal, 3-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl), ionone (1.7% (w/w)), aromadendrene (6.69% (w/w)), 2-pentadecanone,6,10,14-trimethyl, elimicin (1.864% (w/w)), 8,11-octadecanoic acid, methyl ester, α –bisabolol, 1-hexadecanol, hexadecanoic acid, di-2-propenyltetrasulfide (19.803%), n-heneicosane, 12-octadecanoic acid, and n-octadecanoic acid[126]

4. Pharmacological Properties of Brassica Genus Seeds

According to the existing literature, Brassica genus seeds are full of many biologically active compounds which have been associated with a host of potential health benefits. Indeed, the mustard extract seeds have been linked to several biological properties such as antioxidant, antiproliferative, antimicrobial, antibacterial, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective activities.

4.1. Antioxidant Activity

Brassica species constitute a source of antioxidant compounds such as α-tocopherol, ascorbic acid, canolol, carotenoids (lutein and β-carotene), phenolic acids (gallic acid, caffeic acid, sinapic acid, ferulic acid, and 3,4-di-hydroxybenzoic acid), and flavonoids (rutin, quercetin, and kaempferol), which can protect the immune system by neutralizing free radicals [6,10,106,127]. Antioxidants, such as phenolic compounds, considered as protective agents, are involved in the adsorption and neutralization of reactive oxygen species (ROS), quenching singlet and triplet oxygen or decomposing peroxides. Many long-term illnesses, including cancer, atherosclerosis, aging, inflammation, and neurological illnesses such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, are directly linked to ROS [128,129]. Additionally, a positive correlation between the antioxidant capacity of Brassica species and their profile and content of polyphenols, especially flavonoids, was established because phenolic compounds show higher antioxidant activity than vitamins and carotenoids [6,130]. Sinapic acid, 3,4-di-hydroxybenzoic acid, ferulic acid, and rutin identified from Brassica seeds were strongly associated with the antioxidant capability [108]. Quercetin, the major representative of the flavonol subclass, shows antioxidant potential by scavenging free radicals and chelating transition metal ions [131]. Furthermore, kaempferol is also characterized by a remarkable antioxidant potential [132].
Because various oxidants have distinct recovery processes, several assays are employed to assess the total antioxidant capacity of samples. The seeds have a high antioxidant potential, as evaluated by their ability to reduce and chelate metals, reduce lipids, and scavenge free radicals. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) are the most widely used tests for evaluation of the antioxidant capacity of plant samples. The antioxidant activities of different mustard seeds as reported in the relevant literature are summarized in Table 5. In vitro antioxidant activity has been the subject of numerous studies for different Brassica species seeds. Several reports have highlighted the strong antioxidant potential of seeds in terms of positive DPPH radical-scavenging activity, Fe2⁺-chelating effect (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), and [2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] (ABTS) radical-cation-scavenging activity. As indicated in Table 5, the cold-press oil of Sinapis alba (white mustard) and B. nigra (black mustard) seed extract are characterized by a higher inhibition of DPPH with 94.24% and 89.25%, respectively [78], followed by B. juncea with 83.17% [81]. The antioxidant potency of B. juncea seeds has been largely reported [62,81,133,134,135]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the dichloromethane extract of B. rapa L. (Turnip) seeds exhibited a potent in vivo antioxidant effect through the inhibition of the hydroxyl radicals responsible for oxidative damage to DNA at 1000 μg/mL concentration by phenylethylbrassinin and 3-phenylpropionitrile [123]. Recently, special emphasis was placed on the antioxidant potential of broccoli (B. oleracea. var. italica), especially its seeds [77,136] and their isolated compounds such as sulforaphane [79]. The antioxidant potential of different Brassica species seeds and their bioactive compounds was evaluated in animals to better highlight and understand their mechanism action. An in vivo investigation on female albino rats exposed to cadmium chloride, CdCl2, showed that the aqueous extract of B. nigra seeds prevented the oxidative stress of cadmium chloride and its toxicity in hematological parameters and lung tissue [137]. Moreover, a mustard-seed-enriched diet improved the antioxidant status in mice by increasing plasma antioxidant enzyme activity and dose-dependently reducing lipid peroxidation [138]. Moreover, the administration of broccoli and seed-purified glucoraphanin proved effective to reduce oxidative stress promoted by a high-fat diet (HFD) in mice by raising superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities [139]. The marked antioxidant and antigenotoxic status of B. juncea seeds and their nanoparticles were demonstrated in an in vivo male Wistar rat model against metal toxicity, particularly arsenic, responsible for oxidative damage in the brain [140].
In summary, Brassica spp. seeds and their bioactive compounds have exhibited a strong antioxidant effect in both in vitro and in vivo experiments, indicating their potential application in antioxidant treatments of chronic disorders induced by ROS.

4.2. Cytotoxic Activity

The drugs used for cancer therapy are toxic and affect both cancer cells and normal cells. Hence, it is necessary to use compounds isolated from natural sources to reduce cancer risk in several cancer types, including colon cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and breast cancer. The significant antiproliferative and preventative effect of Brassica vegetables seeds on tumor cells, most consistently colon and lung cancers [143,144], are related to their richness in bioactive components such as phenolics, flavonoids, glucosinolates, and their degradation products allyl isothiocyanate acid, sulforaphane, and indole-3-methanol. In addition to their antioxidant capacity, phenolics and flavonoids have been found to possess antitumor activity [145,146]. Quercetin and kaempferol have been shown to inhibit cell growth in human intestinal cancer lines in a synergistic manner [147]. In addition, quercetin and rutin have shown antiproliferative activity against largeous spectrum of different cancers [148,149]. It has also been reported that sinigrin inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells [150] and liver cancer cells [151]. As it is known, glucosinolates and their degradation products such as allyl isothiocyanate, benzyl isothiocyanate, phenethylnate, and sulforaphane inhibit the activity of various cancer cells [152,153,154,155,156]. Sulforaphane, 3,3′-diindolylmethane, and indole-3-carbinol inhibit several carcinoma cells by inhibiting the transcription factors (STAT) and by suppressing cyclin-dependent kinase CDK2/4/6, cyclin D, and P27Kip expression [157,158,159].
The reported anticarcinogenic activity of mustard seeds is shown in Table 6. Compared to other Brassica seeds, the oil seed of B. juncea var. raya revealed a remarkable anti-proliferative activity against a large spectrum of different human cancer cell lines, mainly breast (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231), prostate (PC-3), lung (A-549), cervix (HeLa), and colon (HCT-116) with a high inhibition in MCF-7 cells with an IC50=32.93 μg/mL. It was proven that seed oil reduced the increase in cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in apoptosis and cell death [97]. Another study in B. oleracea var. capitata seed fractions revealed moderate anticancer activities of fractions II (IC50=27.32 μg/mL) and III (IC50=15.56 μg/mL) on A-549 cells compared to those of sulforaphane (IC50=3.53 μg/mL) > iberin (IC50=4.93 μg/mL) > iberverin (IC50=7.07 μg/mL). They also induced cell apoptosis by increasing early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis and activating caspase-3, -8, and -9 [160]. Hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol, and methanol extracts of broccoli seeds exhibited high anticancer activity on A-549, LAC, HeLa, HepG-2, and Caco-2 with a high inhibition of LAC with IC50 of 10.38 mg/g [63,77]. However, the essential oil extracted using diethyl ether from B. tournefortii seeds showed the highest antiproliferative activity against MCF-7 (IC50=1.34 µg/mL) and HCT-116 (IC50=4.5 µg/mL) [126]. Furthermore, the cytotoxic activity of the ethalonic extract of B. nigra seeds was exerted via the reduction in viability and clonogenic survival of A-549 and H-1299 cells, the induction of cellular apoptosis in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, and the increase in caspase-3 activity [161]. Canolol at 100 μM concentration, isolated from rapeseed oil, reduced human colon cancer cell line (SW480) apoptotic death, and it was also found to be an effective anticarcinogenic chemical in the Salmonella typhimurium modified Ames assay [162]. In addition, mustard seed emulsion was found to be able to attenuate 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) and azoxymethane (AOM)-induced mice colon carcinogenesis, by reducing growth and activating the apoptotic death of (SW480) [138,163]. At a concentration of 800 mg/kg, the isothiocynate-rich hydro-alcoholic extract of B. nigra seeds exhibited an antiproliferative effect on the liver tissue of phenobarbital-exposed mice by ameliorating histopathological changes including moderate diffuse proliferation and eosinophilic cytoplasm [164].

4.3. Antimicrobial Activity

In addition to their agricultural and nutritional importance, numerous studies have highlighted the appreciable antimicrobial and fungicidal potential of Brassica seeds against various important pathogens, as they are a predominant source of proteins, polyphenols, glucosinolates, and essential oils [6]. RCN seed meal of B. rapa showed a large antimicrobial spectrum, mainly against food-borne pathogens, Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)=32 µg/mL), Staphylococcus aureus (MIC=32 µg/mL), Enterococcus faecalis (MIC=16 µg/mL), and Listeria monocytogenes (MIC=128 µg/mL)), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli (MIC=256 µg/mL), Proteus mirabilis (MIC=128 µg/mL), Proteus vulgaris (MIC=128 µg/mL), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC=256 µg/mL), Salmonella typhi (MIC=128 µg/mL), Enterobacter cloaceae (MIC=64 µg/mL), Yersinia enterocolitica (MIC=64 µg/mL), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC=128 µg/mL)), yeasts (Candida albicans 10231 (MIC=64 µg/mL), and Candida albicans 90028 (MIC=64 µg/mL)), and molds (Fusarium oxysporum (MIC=128 µg/mL), Cladosporium herbarum (MIC=128 µg/mL), Botrytis cinerea (MIC=64 µg/mL), and Aspergillus flavus (MIC=128 µg/mL)). Individually, the best antimicrobial activity of RCN seed meal extract was toward Enterococcus faecalis (MIC=16 µg/mL) and Staphylococcus aureus (MIC=32 µg/mL) [51]. However, with B. rapa seeds, positive activity was found only against Plasmodium berghei infection in mice and Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Salmonella para-typhi, Pseudomonas aeuriginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus, with the inhibition zone diameters ranging between 7 and 23 mm [64,165]. Moreover, it has been reported that ethanol, methanol, and water broccoli seed extracts showed an inhibitory effect against Gram-negative bacteria, e.g., Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, and Gram-positive bacteria, e.g., Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli [77].
Isolation of antimicrobial proteins and peptides, identified as APPs, from seeds of Brassica species is immensely increased owing to their remarkable antimicrobial activity with various mechanisms of action. These natural chemicals are being studied as anti-infectives [166]. Several AMPs from Brassica seeds have been isolated with promising antimicrobial potential against numerous pathogens responsible for microbial infections. Indeed, the 8.5 kDa purified antifungal peptide, BGAP, from the crude extract of B. oleracea var. gongylodes seeds demonstrated a large antifungal spectrum, mainly against Colletotrichum higginsianum (IC50=17.33 μg/mL), Exserohilum turcicum (IC50=12.37 μg/mL), Magnaporthe oryzae (IC50=16.81 μg/mL), and Mycosphaerella arachidicola (IC50=5.60 μg/mL) [167]. Another study found that broccoli seed peptides BraDef1 and BraDef2, identified as class I definsins, provided antimicrobial properties against fungi such as Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Alternaria alternata and against pathogenic bacteria strains such as Bacillus cereus 183, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio parahaemolyticus ATCC 17,802, and Salmonella typhimurium [168]. Furthermore, a novel antifungal protein (15 kDa), a napin-like protein named broccoli napin (BoNap), was isolated from B. oleracea L. var. italica and shown to be responsible for blocking the germination of Fusarium culmorum and Penicillium expansum’s spores with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 2.31 µΜ. Moreover, BoNap was found to induce the permeabilization of mycelium membrane, trypsin-inhibitory properties, and the reduction of fungal contamination of cereals [169]. Allergen Sin a1, the 14 kDa mustard Napin protein purified from B. hirta seeds (white mustard), was determined as a potent bioactive agent against a broad spectrum of microbial strains, especially Saccharomyces cerevisiae DSM 70449, Zygosaccharomyces bailii Sa 1403, and Fusarium culmorum FST 4.05, with an MIC range between 3 μM and 6 μM, and with a noncytotoxic effect in mammalian cells. Sin a1 is a stable protein, resistant to α-chymotrypsin digestion, high temperature, pH changes, and salts [170]. The purified peptide, γ-thionin (BoT), from B. oleracea seeds was reported as a potent antifungal agent against Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus at 2 μM concentration and led to the death of the insects Tribolium castaneum and Sitophilus oryzae at 0.12 μM concentration [171].
Beyond their anti-cancer potential, glucosinolates, especially sinigrin (prop-2-enylglucosinolate), glucotropeolin (benzylglucosinolate), and gluconasturtiin (phenethylglucosinolate), isolated from mustard seed meal, are characterized as potent bioactive agents against different fungi such as Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Aphanomyces euteiches var. pisi, Pseudocercosporella herpotricoides, Rhizoctonia solani, Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, and Verticillium dahlia [172]. Furthermore, purified sulforaphane from broccoli seeds had a significant effect on Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 growth at low levels (5–25 μg/mL), whereas levels of sulforaphane exceeding 200 µg/mL may cause sigmoid growth kinetics deform [173].
Moreover, recent clinical trials on SARS-CoV-2 patients proved that the intake of broccoli seed capsules with glucoraphanin and myrosinase reduced COVID-19 symptoms for 6 to 12 h as a function of the Nrf2-interacting nutrients [174].
Collectively, these research data suggest that Brassica seeds and their derived compounds (e.g., functional peptides, GLS, and sulforaphane) could be exploited as natural antimicrobials in the food and pharmaceutical sectors.

4.4. Antidiabetic Activity

Diabetes is one of the major diseases causing morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several research studies have demonstrated the potential hypoglycemic effect of seeds of the Brassica genus. Brassica seed extracts have been tested in vitro and in animals. The B. juncea seed diet (10%, 15%) showed potent antihyperglycemic effects in alloxan diabetic rats, whereas daily oral feeding of 10% powder of seeds of B. juncea for 60 days showed weak antihyperglycemic activity in a severe hyperglycemic state in streptozotocin (STZ) diabetic rats [175,176]. Another in vivo study of aqueous seed extract of B. juncea (250, 350, 450 mg/kg) proved that the significant hypoglycemic activity on STZ-induced diabetic male albino rats was related to the presence of isothiocyanate glycoside sinigrin, protein, and fixed oil [177]. Moreover, the administration of oil purified from B. nigra seeds at a dose of 500 and 1000 mg/kg body weight to STZ diabetic rats caused a reduction in blood glucose level of STZ diabetic rats from 335 to 280 mg/dL and from 330 to 265 mg/dL at 4 h, respectively, as compared with the diabetic control, along with a significant increase in body weight, liver glycogen content, and plasma insulin level, as well as a decrease in glycosylated hemoglobin, a decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA), and an increase in reduced glutathione (GSH) in test groups as compared to the control group. The obtained results indicated that the B. nigra seed oil at both doses remarkably induced an antihyperglycemic effect [178].
The consumption of padding enriched with soluble dietary fiber (DF) from mustard seed mucilage significantly attenuated the blood glucose and insulin levels at specified post-meal intervals in adults with high type 2 diabetes risk [179].

4.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

In addition to the properties already mentioned, it has been reported that Brassica seeds, particularly broccoli seeds, showed a stronger anti-inflammatory effect higher than carrot and cucumber seeds [136]. Furthermore, Sinapis alba seeds exhibited a significant inhibition of the mouse prostatic hyperplasia induced by testosterone propionate and the serum acid phosphatase activity by sinalbin and beta-sitosterol (16.0 and 8.0 mg/kg/day). Sinalbin and beta-sitosterol have anti-androgen and anti-inflammatory activities [180,181].

4.6. Regulation of Metabolic Syndrome

Hypertension, obesity, T2D, and dyslipidemia are common metabolic syndrome disorders prevalent worldwide [182]. The regulatory effects of Brassica seeds and their derivatives on metabolic syndrome have been confirmed in numerous studies.
The seed glucoraphanin diet modulated obesity in HFD-fed mice by regulating lipid metabolism genes and increasing the abundance and diversity of the gut microbiota [139].
Cold-press rapeseed oil preserved a high level of bioactive compounds (MUFA, PUFA, tocopherols, and phytosterols) that were positively correlated with numerous health benefits, such as hyperlipidemia regulation [183]. Its consumption considerably lessened the oxidative stress, the total cholesterol, oxidized LDL, and LDL cholesterol levels among metabolic syndrome-afflicted men [184]. Additionally, the oral treatment of melatonin-rich mustard seeds in rats downregulated de novo cholesterol production by inhibiting the activity of hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase and scavenging the hypercholesterolemia-related ROS [185]. Overdosing on paracetamol acetaminophen (APAP) damaged the liver tissue, whereas the in vitro intervention of the extracted antioxidant-rich fraction from mustard seeds and their isolated phytoconstituents (quercetin, catechin, and vitamin E) successfully restored the APAP-induced toxicity in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell line. The hepatoprotective potential of the hydromethanolic mustard seed extract was linked to its ability to maintain the hepatocyte membrane integrity by blocking radical–macromolecule binding and reducing hepatic enzymes levels to normal values [62].

4.7. Neuroprotective Activity

Psychological and neurodegenerative disorders include depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, Parkinson’s, and schizophrenia which exhibit oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and neural damage [186]. Current research has proven the neuroprotective benefits of Brassica seeds and their derivatives in vitro and in humans. The new nitrogenous compound, brassicalkaloid A, and the known alkaloid coixspirolactam C, isolated from B. napus L. seeds, displayed an anti-neuroinflammatory effect by suppressing the nitric oxide (NO) production induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in BV-2 cells with IC50 = 36.6 and IC50 = 51.0 μM respectively, compared to the positive control NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (IC50 = 17.4 μM) [102]. A recent clinical study on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) children revealed that the consumption of high-sulforaphane broccoli seed and sprout tablets improved their behavior and social responsiveness and identified changes in urinary metabolites correlated with clinical improvements. Consequently, sulforaphane’s neuroprotective effect probably stemmed from transcription factor (Nrf2) activation [187].
Brassica seeds and their derived compounds have proven several health benefits in vitro, in vivo, and in clinical trials. However, additional research is needed to evaluate the potential of other isolated bioactive compounds and to investigate the unrecognized bioactivities and their action mechanisms in vitro and in vivo assays such as cardioprotective, gastroprotective, and renoprotective potentials.

5. Toxicological Effects of Brassica Seeds

Currently, special emphasis has been placed on the use of Brassica seeds in the food and beverage industry, as well as in nonfood uses as they represent a rich source of biologically bioactive compounds, strongly associated with broadly recognized nutritional and functional properties. Among these compounds, erucic acid, glucosinolates, and their degradation products, as well as allergens, have been characterized by undesirable effects on human and animal health, mainly when consumed in high doses and in concentrated or isolated form [188].
Erucic acid or cis-13-docosenoic acid (C22:1) is the predominant monounsaturated fatty acid in Brassica seeds. The intake of high amounts of erucic acid damages the liver, kidneys, muscles, and testes. In animal trials, the heart is the most negatively affected by erucic acid’s harmful effect after either brief or prolonged exposure due to the accumulation of triacylglycerol (TAG), known as myocardial lipidosis. In 2016, the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) set an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 7 mg/kg body weight [189], whereas, according to the Food Standards Code of Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) and the Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1870, a maximum amount of 20 g/kg (2%) in edible oils is imposed [190,191]. To ensure the safety of oils for both human and livestock consumption, antinutritional components of the seed have to be removed using the conventional breeding process through the development of canola (1970). Canola edible oil seed, with low erucic acid (less than 2%) and low aliphatic glucosinolate (less than 25 µmol/g), is considered one of the most popular healthy cooking oils for its low saturated fatty acid content, high monounsaturated fatty acids, and balanced content of omega-3 fatty acids. Additionally, to raise the nutritional quality and quantity of oil from B. napus L., different modifications involving biotechnology, agronomy, genetic interventions, and bioengineering processes have been applied [192]. Despite the toxic effects of erucic acid intake on human and animal health, it is used in a diverse range of nonfood applications, including cosmetics, medicines, plasticizers, and detergents. Brassica oils with high erucic acid levels exceeding 55% still receive interest for application in industry processes [193]. In particular, to produce seeds with high oil for industrial uses, genetic studies of candidate genes and their regulatory mechanisms are being developed [194,195].
Brassica seeds have abundant proteins with a predominance of napin and cruciferin seed storage proteins, identified as major allergens in humans [59]. Despite the positive nutritional and antimicrobial effects of the proteins isolated from Brassica seeds, it has been proven in numerous clinical trials and case reports that the intake of mustard seeds or products made from them, even in small amounts, immediately causes severe systemic reactions, including anaphylaxis [196]. With the lack of effective preventive treatment for mustard allergy, informative labeling remains the only solution for allergy prevention in children and consumers allergic to mustard protein.
Glucosinolates, mustard oil glucosides, are one of the most relevant biomolecules of Brassica vegetables, responsible for their bitter and pungent taste. GLS content and profile differ by Brassica species and organ, with a high amount in seeds. Generally, B. nigra (L.) W. D. J. Koch was declared to have the highest GLS content followed by B. oleracea Alboglabra with 201.95  and 180.9 µmol/g, respectively [197]. Interestingly, the intake of Brassica vegetables and seeds is closely associated with a wide range of therapeutic properties in the prevention and treatment of several chronic diseases, especially cancer risks due to the richness in GLS and their breakdown products [97,153,155,164]. Conversely, the intake of Brassica plants caused death [198] and liver disease in animals [199]. Similarly, the consumption of de-oiled seeds with excess amounts of hydrophilic glucosinolates is deleterious to domestic animals, according to numerous studies [200]. This is mainly due to the accumulation of progoitrin and sinigrin in Brassica seeds after oil extraction, leading to a bitter aftertaste responsible for reduced dietary intake [201]. Intact GLSs are nontoxic, while the degradation products generated after myrosinase hydrolysis are more toxic. It has been shown that nitrile progoitrin with 2–3 mmol/kg induced liver, pancreatic, and kidney toxicity in rats [198], and the progoitrin breakdown generates goitrogenic compounds [200]. The principal toxic consequences in animals that have been documented are fetal death in mammals, decreased avian egg production, liver and kidney hypertrophy, and thyroid gland modification [202]. Typically, these harmful and antinutritional effects appear mostly in animal species rather than in humans at high doses. Thus, the removal of maximum GLS without coextraction of proteins in oil-extracted meal was required in animal feed [203]. Furthermore, thiocyanate ions and axazolidin-2-thiones formed from GLS are goitrogenic and cause thyroid cancer [204]. It was proven that Brassica vegetable intake was linked to thyroid cancer in a study on 293 women [205]. The ADI set by EFSA is 20 g/kg of body weight, while AITC’s daily intake should be 1 mg without exceeding the ADI of 1.4 mg for an adult of 70 kg of body weight [206]. Therefore, in order to reduce the seed GSL content (SGC) in mature seeds to increase their economic and nutritional value, research has been directed toward the study of the genetic structure of SGC to deeply understand the regulatory genes and their genetic mechanisms controlling both seed GSL synthesis and accumulation [207].

6. Conclusions

Black mustard (B. nigra), B. oleracea, rapeseed (B. rapa), Ethiopian mustard (B. carinata), Asian mustard (B. juncea), oilseed rape (B. napus), African mustard (B. tournefortii), and canola plants are nutritionally, economically, medicinally, and pharmaceutically important in the world. They are the major economically important oilseed crops in many countries. Brassica seeds have been employed since antiquity as an oil source, as a food condiment, in traditional medicine, and as animal feed. Recently, they have gained increasing interest for the extraction and characterization of their health-promoting compounds. In this review, we summarized the research data on the chemical composition, pharmacological proprieties, and toxicological effects of Brassica spp. seeds and their derivatives. Research has proven their richness in proteins, minerals, vitamins, phenolic compounds, GLS, and carotenoids with a variable profile. Several phytochemical compounds belonging to this group have been identified and quantified, but data remain limited, and further investigations are needed. The bioactive compounds of Brassica seeds (proteins, polyphenols, GLS, carotenoids, fatty acids, and alkaloids) are responsible for different medicinally significant pharmacological properties such as antioxidant, anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective activities, as well as in metabolic disorder regulation. Due to their wide range of benefits, Brassica seeds show a significant opportunity for the development of natural antioxidant products and drugs. Further research is needed to investigate the potential of isolated and purified bioactive compounds for use in the food industry to enrich and improve food quality and in clinical interventions in the field of human health, e.g., to increase the activity of established treatments for cancer, diabetic, and metabolic syndrome diseases, taking into account the health toxicity of seed compounds, such as glucosinolates and erucic acid, in clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D. and J.B.; methodology, J.A., M.D. and J.B.; software, R.R.; validation, M.D. and J.B.; investigation, J.A., M.D., R.R. and J.B.; resources, J.B.; data curation, J.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A. and R.R.; writing—review and editing, J.A., M.D. and J.B.; supervision, M.D. and J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Shankar, S.; Segaran, G.; Sundar, R.D.V.; Settu, S.; Sathiavelu, M. Brassicaceae-A Classical Review on Its Pharmacological Activities. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2019, 55, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ramirez, D.; Abellán-Victorio, A.; Beretta, V.; Camargo, A.; Moreno, D.A. Functional Ingredients from Brassicaceae Species: Overview and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peña, M.; Guzmán, A.; Martínez, R.; Mesas, C.; Prados, J.; Porres, J.M.; Melguizo, C. Preventive Effects of Brassicaceae Family for Colon Cancer Prevention: A Focus on in Vitro Studies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 151, 113145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. da Mattosinhos, P.S.; Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; Esposito, D.; Gonçalves, R.V. Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Skin Regenerative Potential of Secondary Metabolites from Plants of the Brassicaceae Family: A Systematic Review of in Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Evidence (Biological Activities Brassicaceae Skin Diseases). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. El-Esawi, M.A. Taxonomic Relationships and Biochemical Genetic Characterization of Brassica Resources: Towards a Recent Platform for Germplasm Improvement and Utilization. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2015, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Salehi, B.; Quispe, C.; Butnariu, M.; Sarac, I.; Marmouzi, I.; Kamle, M.; Tripathi, V.; Kumar, P.; Bouyahya, A.; Capanoglu, E. Phytotherapy and Food Applications from Brassica Genus. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 3590–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dixon, G.R. Origins and Diversity of Brassica and Its Relatives. In Vegetable Brassicas and Related Crucifers; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2006; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Šamec, D.; Pavlović, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B. White Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. Capitata f. Alba): Botanical, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Overview. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chalhoub, B.; Denoeud, F.; Liu, S.; Parkin, I.A.P.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Chiquet, J.; Belcram, H.; Tong, C.; Samans, B. Early Allopolyploid Evolution in the Post-Neolithic Brassica Napus Oilseed Genome. Science 2014, 345, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nawaz, H.; Shad, M.A.; Muzaffar, S. Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Potential of Brassica. Brassica Germplasm Charact. Breed. Util. 2018, 1, 7–26. [Google Scholar]
  11. Favela-González, K.M.; Hernández-Almanza, A.Y.; De la Fuente-Salcido, N.M. The Value of Bioactive Compounds of Cruciferous Vegetables (Brassica) as Antimicrobials and Antioxidants: A Review. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Zoysa, H.K.S.; Waisundara, V.Y. Mustard (Brassica Nigra) Seed. In Oilseeds: Health Attributes and Food Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 191–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, H.; Xia, Y.; Liu, H.-Y.; Guo, H.; He, X.-Q.; Liu, Y.; Wu, D.-T.; Mai, Y.-H.; Li, H.-B.; Zou, L. Nutritional Values, Beneficial Effects, and Food Applications of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea Var. Italica Plenck). Trends. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 119, 288–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jan, S.A.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Malik, M.; Ilyas, M. Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Brassica Rapa: A Review. MOJ Biol. Med. 2018, 3, 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rahman, M.; Khatun, A.; Liu, L.; Barkla, B.J. Brassicaceae Mustards: Traditional and Agronomic Uses in Australia and New Zealand. Molecules 2018, 23, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tian, Y.; Deng, F. Phytochemistry and Biological Activity of Mustard (Brassica juncea): A Review. CYTA J. Food. 2020, 18, 704–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rai, P.K.; Yadav, P.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Rai, P. Brassica Juncea: A Crop for Food and Health. In The Brassica juncea Genome; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chmielewska, A.; Kozłowska, M.; Rachwał, D.; Wnukowski, P.; Amarowicz, R.; Nebesny, E.; Rosicka-Kaczmarek, J. Canola/Rapeseed Protein–Nutritional Value, Functionality and Food Application: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nut. 2021, 61, 3836–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raboanatahiry, N.; Li, H.; Yu, L.; Li, M. Rapeseed (Brassica napus): Processing, Utilization, and Genetic Improvement. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. USDA-FAS (Foreign Agricultural Service). Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade; Foreign Agricultural Service/USDA: U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; pp. 1–35.
  21. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). FAOSTAT. Statistical Database of the United Nation Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Statistical Division; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Han, J.; Lu, C.; Li, Y.; Deng, Z.; Fu, B.; Geng, Z. Discrimination of Rapeseeds (Brassica napus L.) Based on the Content of Erucic Acid by 1H NMR. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lozano-Baena, M.-D.; Tasset, I.; Obregón-Cano, S.; de Haro-Bailon, A.; Muñoz-Serrano, A.; Alonso-Moraga, Á. Antigenotoxicity and Tumor Growing Inhibition by Leafy Brassica Carinata and Sinigrin. Molecules 2015, 20, 15748–15765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aydin, S. Total Phenolic Content, Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities, FT-IR Analyses of Brassica oleracea L. Var. Acephala and Ornithogalum umbellatum L. Genetika 2020, 52, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Szőllősi, R. Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Seeds in Health. Nuts Seeds Health Dis. Prev. 2020, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kasprzak, M.M.; Houdijk, J.G.M.; Liddell, S.; Davis, K.; Olukosi, O.A.; Kightley, S.; White, G.A.; Wiseman, J. Rapeseed Napin and Cruciferin Are Readily Digested by Poultry. J Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lakwani, M.A.S.; Kenanoğlu, O.N.; Taştan, Y.; Bilen, S. Effects of Black Mustard (Brassica nigra) Seed Oil on Growth Performance, Digestive Enzyme Activities and Immune Responses in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kayacetin, F. Botanical Characteristics, Potential Uses, and Cultivation Possibilities of Mustards in Turkey: A Review. Turk. J. Bot. 2020, 44, 101–127. [Google Scholar]
  29. Balesh, T.; Zapata, F.; Aune, J.B. Evaluation of Mustard Meal as Organic Fertiliser on Tef (Eragrostis Tef (Zucc) Trotter) under Field and Greenhouse Conditions. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2005, 73, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Monaci, E.; Casucci, C.; De Bernardi, A.; Marini, E.; Landi, L.; Toscano, G.; Romanazzi, G.; Vischetti, C. Brassica carinata Seed Meal as Soil Amendment and Potential Biofumigant. Crops 2022, 2, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khaliq, B.; Sarwar, H.; Akrem, A.; Azam, M.; Ali, N. Isolation of Napin from Brassica nigra Seeds and Coagulation Activity to Turbid Pond Water. Water Supply 2022, 22, 6050–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kowalski, R.; Kowalska, G.; Pankiewicz, U.; Mazurek, A.; Włodarczyk-Stasiak, M.; Sujka, M.; Wyrostek, J. The Effect of an Addition of Marjoram Oil on Stabilization Fatty Acids Profile of Rapeseed Oil. LWT 2019, 109, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Beyzi, E.; Gunes, A.; Beyzi, S.B.; Konca, Y. Changes in Fatty Acid and Mineral Composition of Rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. Oleifera L.) Oil with Seed Sizes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaur, G.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, S. Studies on Physiochemical Properties of Oil Extracted from Brassica Nigra and Brassica Rapa Toria. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 48, 1645–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cacciola, F.; Beccaria, M.; Oteri, M.; Utczas, M.; Giuffrida, D.; Cicero, N.; Dugo, G.; Dugo, P.; Mondello, L. Chemical Characterisation of Old Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L. Var. Acephala) Seed Oil by Liquid Chromatography and Different Spectroscopic Detection Systems. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 1646–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. López-Cervantes, J.; Tirado-Noriega, L.G.; Sánchez-Machado, D.I.; Campas-Baypoli, O.N.; Cantú-Soto, E.U.; Núñez-Gastélum, J.A. Biochemical Composition of Broccoli Seeds and Sprouts at Different Stages of Seedling Development. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 2267–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cartea, E.; Haro-Bailón, D.; Padilla, G.; Obregón-Cano, S.; del Rio-Celestino, M.; Ordás, A. Seed Oil Quality of Brassica napus and Brassica rapa Germplasm from Northwestern Spain. Foods 2019, 8, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Aghdam, A.M.; Sayfzadeh, S.; Rad, A.H.S.; Valadabadi, S.A.; Zakerin, H.R. The Assessment of Water Stress and Delay Cropping on Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Rapeseed Genotypes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 131, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Slominski, B.A.; Meng, X.; Jia, W.; Nyachoti, M.; Jones, O.; Rakow, G. Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Yellow-Seeded Brassica Napus Canola. In Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress, Wuhan, China, 26–30 March 2007; pp. 253–255. [Google Scholar]
  40. Miyazawa, M.; Kawata, J. Identification of the Main Aroma Compounds in Dried Seeds of Brassica hirta. J. Nat. Med. 2006, 60, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abul-Fadl, M.M.; El-Badry, N.; Ammar, M.S. Nutritional and Chemical Evaluation for Two Different Varieties of Mustard Seeds. World Appl. Sci. J. 2011, 15, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar]
  42. Stefansson, B.R.; Hougen, F.W. Selection of Rape Plants (Brassica napus) with Seed Oil Practically Free from Erucic Acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1964, 44, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quiñones, J.; Maggiolino, A.; Bravo, S.; Muñoz, E.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Cancino, D.; Díaz, R.; Saenz, C.; Sepúlveda, N.; De Palo, P. Effect of Canola Oil on Meat Quality and Fatty Acid Profile of Araucano Creole Lambs during Fattening Period. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 248, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mollers, C. Development of High Oleic Acid Oilseed Rape. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for Renewable Resources and Plant Biotechnology NAROSSA 2002, Magdeburg, Germany, 10–11 June 2002; pp. 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  45. Velioglu, S.D.; Temiz, H.T.; Ercioglu, E.; Velioglu, H.M.; Topcu, A.; Boyaci, I.H. Use of Raman Spectroscopy for Determining Erucic Acid Content in Canola Oil. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, J.; Liu, J.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y. The Mathematical Prediction Model for the Oxidative Stability of Vegetable Oils by the Main Fatty Acids Composition and Thermogravimetric Analysis. LWT 2018, 96, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amjad Khan, W.; Chun-Mei, H.; Khan, N.; Iqbal, A.; Lyu, S.-W.; Shah, F. Bioengineered Plants Can Be a Useful Source of Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 7348919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alejandre, M.; Astiasarán, I.; Ansorena, D.; Barbut, S. Using Canola Oil Hydrogels and Organogels to Reduce Saturated Animal Fat in Meat Batters. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 122, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Seyyedi, S.M.; Afshari, R.T.; Daneshmandi, M.S. The Relationships between Fatty Acids and Heterotrophic Seedling Growth in Winter Canola Cultivars during Accelerated Seed Aging Process. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 119, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Radfar, M.; Rogiewicz, A.; Slominski, B.A. Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Canola-Quality Brassica juncea Meal for Poultry and the Effect of Enzyme Supplementation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 225, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carlo Tenore, G.; Troisi, J.; Di Fiore, R.; Basile, A.; Novellino, E. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Rapa Catozza Napoletana (Brassica Rapa L. Var. Rapa DC.) Seed Meal, a Promising Protein Source of Campania Region (Southern Italy) Horticultural Germplasm. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1716–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wanasundara, J.P.D.; McIntosh, T.C.; Perera, S.P.; Withana-Gamage, T.S.; Mitra, P. Canola/Rapeseed Protein-Functionality and Nutrition. OCl 2016, 23, D407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hossain, Z.; Johnson, E.N.; Wang, L.; Blackshaw, R.E.; Gan, Y. Comparative Analysis of Oil and Protein Content and Seed Yield of Five Brassicaceae Oilseeds on the Canadian Prairie. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 136, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Slabas, A.R.; Harding, J.; Hellyer, A.; Roberts, P.; Bambridge, H.E. Induction, Purification and Characterization of Acyl Carrier Protein from Developing Seeds of Oil Seed Rape (Brassica napus). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Lipids Lipid Metab. 1987, 921, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kania, J.; Gillner, D.M. Characterisation of the Aminopeptidase from Non-Germinated Winter Rape (Brassica napus L.) Seeds. Food Chem. 2016, 207, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ascenzi, P.; Ruoppolo, M.; Amoresano, A.; Pucci, P.; Consonni, R.; Zetta, L.; Pascarella, S.; Bortolotti, F.; Menegatti, E. Characterization of Low-molecular-mass Trypsin Isoinhibitors from Oil-rape (Brassica napus Var. Oleifera) Seed. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 261, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wanasundara, J.P.D. Proteins of Brassicaceae Oilseeds and Their Potential as a Plant Protein Source. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 635–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wanasundara, J.P.D.; Abeysekara, S.J.; McIntosh, T.C.; Falk, K.C. Solubility Differences of Major Storage Proteins of Brassicaceae Oilseeds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rahman, M.; Baten, A.; Mauleon, R.; King, G.J.; Liu, L.; Barkla, B.J. Identification, Characterization and Epitope Mapping of Proteins Encoded by Putative Allergenic Napin Genes from Brassica Rapa. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2020, 50, 848–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rahman, M.; Guo, Q.; Baten, A.; Mauleon, R.; Khatun, A.; Liu, L.; Barkla, B.J. Shotgun Proteomics of Brassica Rapa Seed Proteins Identifies Vicilin as a Major Seed Storage Protein in the Mature Seed. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sirvent, S.; Palomares, O.; Vereda, A.; Villalba, M.; Cuesta-Herranz, J.; Rodríguez, R. NsLTP and Profilin Are Allergens in Mustard Seeds: Cloning, Sequencing and Recombinant Production of Sin a 3 and Sin a 4. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 1929–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Parikh, H.; Pandita, N.; Khanna, A. Phytoextract of Indian Mustard Seeds Acts by Suppressing the Generation of ROS against Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatotoxicity in HepG2 Cells. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Syafiqah, N.; Asnuzilawati, A.; Syara, K.; AW, N.H.; Norhayati, Y. Preliminary Study of Phytochemical Properties & Antioxidant Activities in Seeds of Trigonella Foenum-Graecum, Brassica Nigra and Salvia Hispanica Species. EAS J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 1, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  64. Danlami, U.; Orishadipe Abayomi, T.; Lawal, D.R. Phytochemical, Nutritional and Antimicrobial Evaluations of the Aqueous Extract of Brassica Nigra (Brassicaceae) Seeds. Am. J. Appl. Chem. 2016, 4, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ogidi, O.I.; Omu, O.; Ezeagba, P.A. Ethno Pharmacologically Active Components of Brassica Juncea (Brown Mustard) Seeds. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Dev. 2019, 1, 9–13. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sontakke, K.S.; Shinde, S.L. Evaluation of the Phytochemical Potential of Brassica junceal Seeds. VIIR J. 2020, 2, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  67. ALanís-Guzmán, M.A.; Wesche-Ebeling, P.; Maiti, R. Chemical, Nutritional and Functional Characterization of Proteins Extracted from Wild Mustard (Brassica Campestris, Brassicaceae) Seeds from Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Econ. Bot. 1995, 49, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bhandari, S.R.; Jo, J.S.; Lee, J.G. Comparison of Glucosinolate Profiles in Different Tissues of Nine Brassica Crops. Molecules 2015, 20, 15827–15841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hanschen, F.S.; Schreiner, M. Isothiocyanates, Nitriles, and Epithionitriles from Glucosinolates Are Affected by Genotype and Developmental Stage in Brassica Oleracea Varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fusari, C.M.; Nazareno, M.A.; Locatelli, D.A.; Fontana, A.; Beretta, V.; Camargo, A.B. Phytochemical Profile and Functionality of Brassicaceae Species. Food Biosci. 2020, 36, 100606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Altendorf, K.; Isbell, T.; Wyse, D.L.; Anderson, J.A. Significant Variation for Seed Oil Content, Fatty Acid Profile, and Seed Weight in Natural Populations of Field Pennycress (Thlaspi Arvense L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Velasco, P.; Soengas, P.; Vilar, M.; Cartea, M.E.; del Rio, M. Comparison of Glucosinolate Profiles in Leaf and Seed Tissues of Different Brassica Napus Crops. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 133, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Oh, S.; Kim, K.; Choi, M. Antioxidant Activity of Different Parts of Dolsan Leaf Mustard. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 1463–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Abdelazim Mohdaly, A.A.; Ramadan, M.F. Characteristics, Composition and Functional Properties of Seeds, Seed Cake and Seed Oil from Different Brassica Carinata Genotypes. Food Biosci. 2021, 100752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Slominski, B.A.; Jia, W.; Rogiewicz, A.; Nyachoti, C.M.; Hickling, D. Low-Fiber Canola. Part 1. Chemical and Nutritive Composition of the Meal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 12225–12230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Krishnaveni, M.; Saranya, S. Secondary metabolites, antioxidant activity, phytonutrient analysis of Nigella sativa and Brassica hirta seeds. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2016, 6, 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  77. Le, T.N.; Sakulsataporn, N.; Chiu, C.-H.; Hsieh, P.-C. Polyphenolic Profile and Varied Bioactivities of Processed Taiwanese Grown Broccoli: A Comparative Study of Edible and Non-Edible Parts. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Olgun, Ç.; Özkan, O.E.; Güney, B.; Pattabanoglu, E.S.; Güney, K.; Gür, M. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity in Cold Press Oil of Fennel, Anise, White and Black Mustard Seeds. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2017, 51, S200–S204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lv, X.; Meng, G.; Li, W.; Fan, D.; Wang, X.; Espinoza-Pinochet, C.A.; Cespedes-Acuña, C.L. Sulforaphane and Its Antioxidative Effects in Broccoli Seeds and Sprouts of Different Cultivars. Food Chem. 2020, 316, 126216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Singh, B.K.; Bala, M.; Rai, P.K. Fatty Acid Composition and Seed Meal Characteristics of Brassica and Allied Genera. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2014, 37, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lee, J.-E.; Kim, A.-J.; Lee, J.-E.; Kim, A.-J. Antioxidant Activity, Whitening and Anti-Wrinkle Effects of Leaf and Seed Extracts of Brassica Juncea L. Czern. Asian J. Beauty. Cosmetol. 2020, 18, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jun, H.-I.; Wiesenborn, D.P.; Kim, Y.-S. Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds from Canola (Brassica Napus) Seed. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Teh, S.-S.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.; Birch, J. Antioxidative Polyphenols from Defatted Oilseed Cakes: Effect of Solvents. Antioxidants 2014, 3, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Villaño, D.; López-Chillón, M.T.; Zafrilla, P.; Moreno, D.A. Bioavailability of Broccoli Sprouts in Different Human Overweight Populations. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 59, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Thomas, M.; Badr, A.; Desjardins, Y.; Gosselin, A.; Angers, P. Characterization of Industrial Broccoli Discards (Brassica Oleracea Var. Italica) for Their Glucosinolate, Polyphenol and Flavonoid Contents Using UPLC MS/MS and Spectrophotometric Methods. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 1204–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cartea, M.E.; Francisco, M.; Soengas, P.; Velasco, P. Phenolic Compounds in Brassica Vegetables. Molecules 2010, 16, 251–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vallejo, F.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Ferreres, F. Characterisation of Flavonols in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Italica) by Liquid Chromatography–UV Diode-Array Detection–Electrospray Ionisation Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1054, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Price, K.R.; Casuscelli, F.; Colquhoun, I.J.; Rhodes, M.J.C. Hydroxycinnamic Acid Esters from Broccoli Florets. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 1683–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shao, Y.; Jiang, J.; Ran, L.; Lu, C.; Wei, C.; Wang, Y. Analysis of Flavonoids and Hydroxycinnamic Acid Derivatives in Rapeseeds (Brassica napus L. Var. Napus) by HPLC-PDA–ESI (−)-MS n/HRMS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 2935–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Auger, B.; Marnet, N.; Gautier, V.; Maia-Grondard, A.; Leprince, F.; Renard, M.; Guyot, S.; Nesi, N.; Routaboul, J.-M. A Detailed Survey of Seed Coat Flavonoids in Developing Seeds of Brassica napus L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 6246–6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Blažević, I.; Montaut, S.; Burčul, F.; Olsen, C.E.; Burow, M.; Rollin, P.; Agerbirk, N. Glucosinolate Structural Diversity, Identification, Chemical Synthesis and Metabolism in Plants. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pardini, A.; Tamasi, G.; De Rocco, F.; Bonechi, C.; Consumi, M.; Leone, G.; Magnani, A.; Rossi, C. Kinetics of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis by Myrosinase in Brassicaceae Tissues: A High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Approach. Food Chem. 2021, 355, 129634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gu, H.; Mao, X.; Du, M. Metabolism, Absorption, and Anti-Cancer Effects of Sulforaphane: An Update. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 3437–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Eisenschmidt-Bönn, D.; Schneegans, N.; Backenköhler, A.; Wittstock, U.; Brandt, W. Structural Diversification during Glucosinolate Breakdown: Mechanisms of Thiocyanate, Epithionitrile and Simple Nitrile Formation. Plant J. 2019, 99, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Van Eylen, D.; Hendrickx, M.; Van Loey, A. Temperature and Pressure Stability of Mustard Seed (Sinapis alba L.) Myrosinase. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, N.; Shen, L.; Qiu, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Hao, J.; Xu, M. Analysis of the Isothiocyanates Present in Three Chinese Brassica Vegetable Seeds and Their Potential Anticancer Bioactivities. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bassan, P.; Bhushan, S.; Kaur, T.; Arora, R.; Arora, S.; Vig, A.P. Extraction, Profiling and Bioactivity Analysis of Volatile Glucosinolates Present in Oil Extract of Brassica juncea Var. Raya. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2018, 24, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Truscott, R.J.W.; Burke, D.G.; Minchinton, I.R. The Characterisation of a Novel Hydroxindole Glucosinolate. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1982, 107, 1258–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Devi, J.R.; Thangam, E.B. Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity of Sulforaphane from Brassica Oleracea in HEp-2 Human Epithelial Carcinoma Cell Line. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 2095–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liang, H.; Li, C.; Yuan, Q.; Vriesekoop, F. Separation and Purification of Sulforaphane from Broccoli Seeds by Solid Phase Extraction and Preparative High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8047–8053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liang, H.; Li, C.; Yuan, Q.; Vriesekoop, F. Application of High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography for the Isolation of Sulforaphane from Broccoli Seed Meal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7746–7749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jing, W.; Zhao, X.; Liu, A.; Wei, F.; Ma, S. Two New Nitrogenous Compounds from the Seeds of Brassica napus. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2022, 58, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ferreres, F.; Sousa, C.; Valentão, P.; Seabra, R.M.; Pereira, J.A.; Andrade, P.B. Tronchuda Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Costata DC) Seeds: Phytochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Potential. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Park, S.-A.; Chung, I.-M.; Ahmad, A. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil and Petroleum Ether Extract of Brassica napus Seeds. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants. 2012, 15, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Peng, C.; Zhao, S.-Q.; Zhang, J.; Huang, G.-Y.; Chen, L.-Y.; Zhao, F.-Y. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial Property and Microencapsulation of Mustard (Sinapis alba) Seed Essential Oil by Complex Coacervation. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Grygier, A. Mustard Seeds as a Bioactive Component of Food. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rasera, G.B.; Hilkner, M.H.; de Castro, R.J.S. Free and Insoluble-Bound Phenolics: How Does the Variation of These Compounds Affect the Antioxidant Properties of Mustard Grains during Germination? Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Rasera, G.B.; Hilkner, M.H.; de Alencar, S.M.; de Castro, R.J.S. Biologically Active Compounds from White and Black Mustard Grains: An Optimization Study for Recovery and Identification of Phenolic Antioxidants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 135, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.; Baharlouei, A.; Watson, D.G.; Lightfoot, D.A. Phytochemicals: Extraction, Isolation, and Identification of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Extracts. Plants 2017, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Verma, A.; Sharma, A.; Rai, P.K. Impact of Soxhlet Extraction Method on Oil Yield and Antioxidant Potential of Brassica juncea. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 1134–1137. [Google Scholar]
  111. Almushayti, A.Y.; Brandt, K.; Carroll, M.A.; Scotter, M.J. Current Analytical Methods for Determination of Glucosinolates in Vegetables and Human Tissues. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1643, 462060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cirilli, R.; Gallo, F.R.; Multari, G.; Palazzino, G.; Mustazza, C.; Panusa, A. Study of Solvent Effect on the Stability of Isothiocyanate Iberin, a Breakdown Product of Glucoiberin. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 92, 103515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rochfort, S.J.; Jones, R. Glucosinolate Phytochemicals from Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Botrytis L.) Seeds and Their Potential Health Effects. In Nuts and Seeds in Health and Disease Prevention; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, C.; Di, H.; Lin, P.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Lai, Y.; Li, H.; Sun, B.; Zhang, F. Genotypic Variation of Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products in Mustard (Brassica juncea) Seeds. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 294, 110765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Franco, P.; Spinozzi, S.; Pagnotta, E.; Lazzeri, L.; Ugolini, L.; Camborata, C.; Roda, A. Development of a Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray Ionization–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Simultaneous Analysis of Intact Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanates in Brassicaceae Seeds and Functional Foods. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1428, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sun, J.; Zhang, M.; Chen, P. GLS-Finder: A Platform for Fast Profiling of Glucosinolates in Brassica Vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4407–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Olsen, C.E.; Huang, X.-C.; Hansen, C.I.C.; Cipollini, D.; Ørgaard, M.; Matthes, A.; Geu-Flores, F.; Koch, M.A.; Agerbirk, N. Glucosinolate Diversity within a Phylogenetic Framework of the Tribe Cardamineae (Brassicaceae) Unraveled with HPLC-MS/MS and NMR-Based Analytical Distinction of 70 Desulfoglucosinolates. Phytochemistry 2016, 132, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fabre, N.; Bon, M.; Moulis, C.; Fouraste, I.; Stanislas, E. Three Glucosinolates from Seeds of Brassica juncea. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nicácio, A.E.; Rodrigues, C.A.; Visentainer, J.V.; Maldaner, L. Evaluation of the QuEChERS Method for the Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Yellow (Brassica alba), Brown (Brassica juncea), and Black (Brassica nigra) Mustard Seeds. Food Chem. 2021, 340, 128162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Aziz, S.S.; El-Zayat, M.M.; El-Khateeb, A.Y. Phytochemical Characterization, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Brassica juncea (L.) Mustard Seeds Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts. J. Plant Prod. 2020, 11, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Baumert, A.; Milkowski, C.; Schmidt, J.; Nimtz, M.; Wray, V.; Strack, D. Formation of a Complex Pattern of Sinapate Esters in Brassica Napus Seeds, Catalyzed by Enzymes of a Serine Carboxypeptidase-like Acyltransferase Family? Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1334–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, J.; Yu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Sheng, X.; Shen, Y.; Gu, H. Natural Variation of Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea Var. Italica) Seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12528–12537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Arora, S.; Vig, A.P. Inhibition of DNA Oxidative Damage and Antimutagenic Activity by Dichloromethane Extract of Brassica Rapa Var. Rapa L. Seeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Matsumoto, T.; Shimizu, N.; Shigemoto, T.; Itoh, T.; Iida, T.; Nishioka, A. Isolation of 22-Dehydrocampesterol from the Seeds of Brassica Juncea. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 789–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Valette, L.; Fernandez, X.; Poulain, S.; Lizzani-Cuvelier, L.; Loiseau, A. Chemical Composition of the Volatile Extracts from Brassica oleracea L. Var. Botrytis ‘Romanesco’Cauliflower Seeds. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Shabana, M.M.; Fathy, F.I.; Salama, M.M.; Hashem, M.M. Cytotoxic and Antioxidant Activities of the Volatile Constituents of Brassica Tournefortii Gouan: Growing in Egypt. Cancer. Sci. Res. 2013, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Dua, A.; Chander, S.; Agrawal, S.; Mahajan, R. Antioxidants from Defatted Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) Protect Biomolecules against in Vitro Oxidation. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2014, 20, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Mullen, W.; Marks, S.C.; Crozier, A. Evaluation of Phenolic Compounds in Commercial Fruit Juices and Fruit Drinks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3148–3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Shen, S.; Callaghan, D.; Juzwik, C.; Xiong, H.; Huang, P.; Zhang, W. ABCG2 Reduces ROS-mediated Toxicity and Inflammation: A Potential Role in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Neurochem. 2010, 114, 1590–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Podsędek, A. Natural Antioxidants and Antioxidant Capacity of Brassica Vegetables: A Review. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Azeem, M.; Hanif, M.; Mahmood, K.; Ameer, N.; Chughtai, F.R.S.; Abid, U. An Insight into Anticancer, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antidiabetic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Quercetin: A Review. Polym. Bull. 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Bangar, S.P.; Chaudhary, V.; Sharma, N.; Bansal, V.; Ozogul, F.; Lorenzo, J.M. Kaempferol: A Flavonoid with Wider Biological Activities and Its Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Parikh, H.; Khanna, A. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Analysis of Brassica Juncea Seeds. Pharmacogn. J. 2014, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chaudhary, A.; Choudhary, S.; Sharma, U.; Vig, A.P.; Arora, S. In Vitro Evaluation of Brassica Sprouts for Its Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Potential. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 78, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bopitiya, D.; Hearn, M.T.W.; Zhang, J.; Bennett, L.E. Demonstration of Anti-Oxidant Properties of Mustard Seed (Brassica juncea) Protein Isolate in Orange Juice. Food Chem. 2022, 396, 133648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Choe, U.; Li, Y.; Gao, B.; Yu, L.U.; Wang, T.T.Y.; Sun, J.; Chen, P.; Liu, J.; Yu, L. Chemical Compositions of Cold-Pressed Broccoli, Carrot, and Cucumber Seed Flours and Their in Vitro Gut Microbiota Modulatory, Anti-Inflammatory, and Free Radical Scavenging Properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9309–9317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Asaad, N.K.; Razooqi, Q.A. Protective Role of the Aqueous Extract of Brassica Nigra Seed against Cadmium Chloride Toxicity in Lung Tissue and Hematological Parameters of Female Rats. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 60, 1497–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yuan, H.; Zhu, M.; Guo, W.; Jin, L.; Chen, W.; Brunk, U.T.; Zhao, M. Mustard Seeds (Sinapis alba Linn) Attenuate Azoxymethane-Induced Colon Carcinogenesis. Redox Report 2011, 16, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Xu, X.; Dai, M.; Lao, F.; Chen, F.; Hu, X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J. Effect of Glucoraphanin from Broccoli Seeds on Lipid Levels and Gut Microbiota in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. J. Funct. Foods. 2020, 68, 103858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Virk, P.; Alajmi, S.T.A.; Awad, M.; Elobeid, M.; Ortashi, K.M.O.; Asiri, A.M.; Merghani, N.M.; Fouad, D. Attenuating Effect of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) Seed and Its Nano Formulation on Arsenic Induced-Oxidative Stress and Associated Genotoxicity in Rat. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 102134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chaudhary, A.; Sharma, U.; Vig, A.P.; Singh, B.; Arora, S. Free Radical Scavenging, Antiproliferative Activities and Profiling of Variations in the Level of Phytochemicals in Different Parts of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea italica). Food Chem. 2014, 148, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Anwar, F.; Kalsoom, U.; Sultana, B.; Mushtaq, M.; Mehmood, T.; Arshad, H.A. Effect of Drying Method and Extraction Solvent on the Total Phenolics and Antioxidant Activity of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) Extracts. Int. Food Res. J. 2013, 20, 653. [Google Scholar]
  143. Kwak, Y.; Lee, J.; Ju, J. Anti-Cancer Activities of Brassica Juncea Leaves in Vitro. EXCLI J. 2016, 15, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mori, N.; Shimazu, T.; Sasazuki, S.; Nozue, M.; Mutoh, M.; Sawada, N.; Iwasaki, M.; Yamaji, T.; Inoue, M.; Takachi, R. Cruciferous Vegetable Intake Is Inversely Associated with Lung Cancer Risk among Current Nonsmoking Men in the Japan Public Health Center (JPHC) Study. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Fang, Y.; Yang, C.; Yu, Z.; Li, X.; Mu, Q.; Liao, G.; Yu, B. Natural Products as LSD1 Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ghanbari-Movahed, M.; Jackson, G.; Farzaei, M.H.; Bishayee, A. A Systematic Review of the Preventive and Therapeutic Effects of Naringin against Human Malignancies. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 639840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ackland, M.L.; Van De Waarsenburg, S.; Jones, R. Synergistic Antiproliferative Action of the Flavonols Quercetin and Kaempferol in Cultured Human Cancer Cell Lines. In Vivo 2005, 19, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  148. Almatroodi, S.A.; Alsahli, M.A.; Almatroudi, A.; Verma, A.K.; Aloliqi, A.; Allemailem, K.S.; Khan, A.A.; Rahmani, A.H. Potential Therapeutic Targets of Quercetin, a Plant Flavonol, and Its Role in the Therapy of Various Types of Cancer through the Modulation of Various Cell Signaling Pathways. Molecules 2021, 26, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Imani, A.; Maleki, N.; Bohlouli, S.; Kouhsoltani, M.; Sharifi, S.; Maleki Dizaj, S. Molecular Mechanisms of Anticancer Effect of Rutin. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 2500–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Li, S.; Lin, J.; Wei, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, P.; Qu, S. Sinigrin Impedes the Breast Cancer Cell Growth through the Inhibition of PI3K/AKT/MTOR Phosphorylation-Mediated Cell Cycle Arrest. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2022, 41, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Jie, M.; Cheung, W.M.; Yu, V.; Zhou, Y.; Tong, P.H.; Ho, J.W.S. Anti-Proliferative Activities of Sinigrin on Carcinogen-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Melim, C.; Lauro, M.R.; Pires, I.M.; Oliveira, P.J.; Cabral, C. The Role of Glucosinolates from Cruciferous Vegetables (Brassicaceae) in Gastrointestinal Cancers: From Prevention to Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ağagündüz, D.; Şahin, T.Ö.; Yılmaz, B.; Ekenci, K.D.; Duyar Özer, Ş.; Capasso, R. Cruciferous Vegetables and Their Bioactive Metabolites: From Prevention to Novel Therapies of Colorectal Cancer. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 1534083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Chang, P.; Tsai, F.; Bau, D.; Hsu, Y.; Yang, J.; Tu, M.; Chiang, S. Potential Effects of Allyl Isothiocyanate on Inhibiting Cellular Proliferation and Inducing Apoptotic Pathway in Human Cisplatin-Resistant Oral Cancer Cells. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2021, 120, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kaiser, A.E.; Baniasadi, M.; Giansiracusa, D.; Giansiracusa, M.; Garcia, M.; Fryda, Z.; Wong, T.L.; Bishayee, A. Sulforaphane: A Broccoli Bioactive Phytocompound with Cancer Preventive Potential. Cancers 2021, 13, 4796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dinh, T.N.; Parat, M.-O.; Ong, Y.S.; Khaw, K.Y. Anticancer Activities of Dietary Benzyl Isothiocyanate: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 169, 105666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, X.; Zhao, Z.; Li, M.; Liu, M.; Bahena, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Nambiar, C.; Liu, G. Sulforaphane Promotes Apoptosis, and Inhibits Proliferation and Self-Renewal of Nasopharyngeal Cancer Cells by Targeting STAT Signal through MiRNA-124-3p. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 103, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Dong, N.; Su, X.; Duan, M.; Wei, Y.; Wei, J.; Liu, G.; Peng, Q.; Zhao, Y. Sulforaphane Induces S-Phase Arrest and Apoptosis via P53-Dependent Manner in Gastric Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. El-Daly, S.M.; Gamal-Eldeen, A.M.; Gouhar, S.A.; Abo-Elfadl, M.T.; El-Saeed, G. Modulatory Effect of Indoles on the Expression of MiRNAs Regulating G1/S Cell Cycle Phase in Breast Cancer Cells. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 192, 1208–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Wang, N.; Wang, W.; Liu, C.; Jin, J.; Shao, B.; Shen, L. Inhibition of Growth and Induction of Apoptosis in A549 Cells by Compounds from Oxheart Cabbage Extract. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 3813–3820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Ahmed, A.G.; Hussein, U.K.; Ahmed, A.E.; Kim, K.M.; Mahmoud, H.M.; Hammouda, O.; Jang, K.Y.; Bishayee, A. Mustard Seed (Brassica Nigra) Extract Exhibits Antiproliferative Effect against Human Lung Cancer Cells through Differential Regulation of Apoptosis, Cell Cycle, Migration, and Invasion. Molecules 2020, 25, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Kuwahara, H.; Kanazawa, A.; Wakamatu, D.; Morimura, S.; Kida, K.; Akaike, T.; Maeda, H. Antioxidative and Antimutagenic Activities of 4-Vinyl-2, 6-Dimethoxyphenol (Canolol) Isolated from Canola Oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4380–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhu, M.; Yuan, H.; Guo, W.; Li, X.; Jin, L.; Brunk, U.T.; Han, J.; Zhao, M.; Lu, Y. Dietary Mustard Seeds (Sinapis alba Linn) Suppress 1, 2-Dimethylhydrazine-Induced Immuno-Imbalance and Colonic Carcinogenesis in Rats. Nutr. Cancer 2012, 64, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Salman, I.N.; Hanna, D.B.; Mshimesh, B.A.-R. Antiproliferative Activity of Brassica Nigra Seeds Extract in Liver Tissue of Mice Exposed to Phenobarbital. Al Mustansiriyah J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 22, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Muluye, A.B.; Melese, E.; Adinew, G.M. Antimalarial Activity of 80% Methanolic Extract of Brassica nigra (L.) Koch. (Brassicaceae) Seeds against Plasmodium Berghei Infection in Mice. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Wang, Y.; Chang, R.Y.K.; Britton, W.J.; Chan, H.-K. Advances in the Development of Antimicrobial Peptides and Proteins for Inhaled Therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 180, 114066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, S.; Ng, T.; Ye, X. Purification of an Antifungal Peptide from Seeds of Brassica oleracea Var. Gongylodes and Investigation of Its Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Action. Molecules 2019, 24, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Pacheco-Cano, R.D.; Salcedo-Hernández, R.; Casados-Vázquez, L.E.; Wrobel, K.; Bideshi, D.K.; Barboza-Corona, J.E. Class I Defensins (BraDef) from Broccoli (Brassica oleracea Var. Italica) Seeds and Their Antimicrobial Activity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Thery, T.; Lynch, K.M.; Zannini, E.; Arendt, E.K. Isolation, Characterisation and Application of a New Antifungal Protein from Broccoli Seeds–New Food Preservative with Great Potential. Food Control 2020, 117, 107356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mignone, G.; Shwaiki, L.N.; Arendt, E.K.; Coffey, A. Isolation of the Mustard Napin Protein Allergen Sin a 1 and Characterisation of Its Antifungal Activity. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2022, 29, 101208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Khaliq, B.; Abdalla, M.; Mehmood, S.; Saeed, A.; Munawar, A.; Saeed, M.Q.; Saeed, Q.; Ibrahim, M.; Ali, Z.; Hussain, S. Comprehensive Structural and Functional Characterization of a Seed γ-Thionin as a Potent Bioactive Molecule against Fungal Pathogens and Insect Pests. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Bellostas, N.; Casanova, E.; Garcia-Mina, J.M.; Hansen, L.M.; Jørgensen, L.N.; Kudsk, P.; Madsen, P.H.; Sørensen, J.C.; Sørensen, H. Biological Activity of Glucosinolate Derived Compounds Isolated from Seed Meal of Brassica Crops and Evaluated as Plant and Food Protection Agents. In Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress, Wuhan, China, 26–30 March 2007; Available online: https://orgprints.org/11398 (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  173. García-Saldaña, J.S.; Parra-Delgado, J.; Campas-Baypoli, O.N.; Sánchez-Machado, D.I.; Cantú-Soto, E.U.; López-Cervantes, J. Changes in Growth Kinetics and Motility Characteristics of Escherichia coli in the Presence of Sulphoraphane Isolated from Broccoli Seed Meal. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Bousquet, J.; Le Moing, V.; Blain, H.; Czarlewski, W.; Zuberbier, T.; de la Torre, R.; Lozano, N.P.; Reynes, J.; Bedbrook, A.; Cristol, J.-P. Efficacy of Broccoli and Glucoraphanin in COVID-19: From Hypothesis to Proof-of-Concept with Three Experimental Clinical Cases. World Allergy Organ. J. 2021, 14, 100498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Grover, J.K.; Yadav, S.; Vats, V. Hypoglycemic and Antihyperglycemic Effect of Brassica Juncea Diet and Their Effect on Hepatic Glycogen Content and the Key Enzymes of Carbohydrate Metabolism. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 241, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Grover, J.K.; Yadav, S.P.; Vats, V. Effect of Feeding Murraya Koeingii and Brassica Juncea Diet Kidney Functions and Glucose Levels in Streptozotocin Diabetic Mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 85, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Thirumalai, T.; Therasa, S.V.; Elumalai, E.K.; David, E. Hypoglycemic Effect of Brassica juncea (Seeds) on Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Male Albino Rat. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2011, 1, 323–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kumar, M.; Sharma, S.; Vasudeva, N. In Vivo Assessment of Antihyperglycemic and Antioxidant Activity from Oil of Seeds of Brassica Nigra in Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Rats. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2013, 3, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Kay, B.A.; Trigatti, K.; MacNeil, M.B.; Klingel, S.L.; Repin, N.; Goff, H.D.; Wright, A.J.; Duncan, A.M. Pudding Products Enriched with Yellow Mustard Mucilage, Fenugreek Gum or Flaxseed Mucilage and Matched for Simulated Intestinal Viscosity Significantly Reduce Postprandial Peak Glucose and Insulin in Adults at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 37, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wu, G.-X.; Lin, Y.-X.; Ou, M.-R.; Tan, D.-F. An Experimental Study (I) on the Inhibition of Prostatic Hyperplasia with Extract of Seeds of Brassica alba. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2002, 27, 766–768. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  181. Wu, G.-X.; Lin, Y.; Ou, M.-R.; Tan, D. An Experimental Study (II) on the Inhibition of Prostatic Hyperplasia by Extract of Seeds of Brassica alba. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2003, 28, 643–646. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  182. Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z. The Metabolic Syndrome. Lancet 2005, 365, 1415–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Chew, S.C. Cold-Pressed Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Oil: Chemistry and Functionality. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 108997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Palomäki, A.; Pohjantähti-Maaroos, H.; Wallenius, M.; Kankkunen, P.; Aro, H.; Husgafvel, S.; Pihlava, J.-M.; Oksanen, K. Effects of Dietary Cold-Pressed Turnip Rapeseed Oil and Butter on Serum Lipids, Oxidized LDL and Arterial Elasticity in Men with Metabolic Syndrome. Lipids Health Dis. 2010, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Chakraborty, S.; Paul, K.; Mallick, P.; Pradhan, S.; Das, K.; Chakrabarti, S.; Nandi, D.K.; Bhattacharjee, P. Consortia of Bioactives in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracts of Mustard and Small Cardamom Seeds Lower Serum Cholesterol Levels in Rats: New Leads for Hypocholesterolaemic Supplements from Spices. J. Nutr. Sci. 2019, 8, e32/1–e32/15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Bhandari, R.; Kaur, J.; Kaur, S.; Kuhad, A. The Nrf2 Pathway in Psychiatric Disorders: Pathophysiological Role and Potential Targeting. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2021, 25, 115–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Bent, S.; Lawton, B.; Warren, T.; Widjaja, F.; Dang, K.; Fahey, J.W.; Cornblatt, B.; Kinchen, J.M.; Delucchi, K.; Hendren, R.L. Identification of Urinary Metabolites That Correlate with Clinical Improvements in Children with Autism Treated with Sulforaphane from Broccoli. Mol. Autism 2018, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Lietzow, J. Biologically Active Compounds in Mustard Seeds: A Toxicological Perspective. Foods 2021, 10, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Knutsen, H.K.; Alexander, J.; Barregård, L.; Bignami, M.; Brüschweiler, B.; Ceccatelli, S.; Dinovi, M.; Edler, L.; Grasl-Kraupp, B. Erucic Acid in Feed and Food. EFSA J. 2016, 14, e04593. [Google Scholar]
  190. FSANZ (Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code). Maximum Levels of Contaminants and Natural Toxicants. 19 2016, 1991, 3. Available online: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/code/Documents/Sched%2019%20Contaminant%20MLs%20v157.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  191. Russo, M.; Yan, F.; Stier, A.; Klasen, L.; Honermeier, B. Erucic Acid Concentration of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Oils on the German Food Retail Market. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 3664–3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Beszterda, M.; Nogala-Kałucka, M. Current Research Developments on the Processing and Improvement of the Nutritional Quality of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1800045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lei, W.U.; JIA, Y.; Gang, W.U.; LU, C. Molecular Evidence for Blocking Erucic Acid Synthesis in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by a Two-Base-Pair Deletion in FAE1 (Fatty Acid Elongase 1). J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Chao, H.; Guo, L.; Zhao, W.; Li, H.; Li, M. A Major Yellow-Seed QTL on Chromosome A09 Significantly Increases the Oil Content and Reduces the Fiber Content of Seed in Brassica Napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 1293–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Lang, C.; Wang, F.; Liu, R.; Zheng, T.; Hu, Z.; Wu, X.; Wu, G. Genetic Regulation of Fatty Acid Biosynthesis in Brassica napus Seeds Based on FAE1 and FAD2 Genes. Mol. Plant Breed. 2022, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Pałgan, K.; Żbikowska-Gotz, M.; Bartuzi, Z. Dangerous Anaphylactic Reaction to Mustard. Arch. Med. Sci. 2018, 14, 477–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Sikorska-Zimny, K.; Beneduce, L. The Glucosinolates and Their Bioactive Derivatives in Brassica: A Review on Classification, Biosynthesis and Content in Plant Tissues, Fate during and after Processing, Effect on the Human Organism and Interaction with the Gut Microbiota. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2544–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Matthews, Z.M.; Parton, K.H.; Collett, M.G. Investigating the Cause of Brassica-Associated Liver Disease (BALD) in Cattle: Progoitrin-Derived Nitrile Toxicosis in Rats. Toxicon X 2020, 5, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Collett, M.G.; Stegelmeier, B.L.; Tapper, B.A. Could Nitrile Derivatives of Turnip (Brassica rapa) Glucosinolates Be Hepato-or Cholangiotoxic in Cattle? J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7370–7375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Griffiths, D.W.; Birch, A.N.E.; Hillman, J.R. Antinutritional Compounds in the Brasi Analysis, Biosynthesis, Chemistry and Dietary Effects. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 1998, 73, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Mithen, R.F. Glucosinolates and Their Degradation Products. Adv. Bot. Res. 2001, 35, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Tripathi, M.K.; Mishra, A.S. Glucosinolates in Animal Nutrition: A Review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 132, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Hebert, M.; Mhemdi, H.; Vorobiev, E. Selective and Eco-Friendly Recovery of Glucosinolates from Mustard Seeds (Brassica Juncea) Using Process Optimization and Innovative Pretreatment (High Voltage Electrical Discharges). Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 124, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Chandra, A.K. Goitrogen in Food: Cyanogenic and Flavonoids Containing Plant Foods in the Development of Goiter. In Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 691–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Truong, T.; Baron-Dubourdieu, D.; Rougier, Y.; Guénel, P. Role of Dietary Iodine and Cruciferous Vegetables in Thyroid Cancer: A Countrywide Case–Control Study in New Caledonia. Cancer Causes Control 2010, 21, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion on the Safety of Allyl Isothiocyanate for the Proposed Uses as a Food Additive. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1943. [Google Scholar]
  207. Tan, Z.; Xie, Z.; Dai, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Tang, S.; Wan, L.; Yao, X.; Guo, L.; Hong, D. Genome-and Transcriptome-wide Association Studies Reveal the Genetic Basis and the Breeding History of Seed Glucosinolate Content in Brassica Napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structures of the main bioactive compounds present in Brassica spp. seeds.
Figure 1. Molecular structures of the main bioactive compounds present in Brassica spp. seeds.
Molecules 27 06008 g001
Table 1. Diversity of the genus Brassica species [10].
Table 1. Diversity of the genus Brassica species [10].
SpeciesSubspecies/var.Common Name
Brassica nigraKoch L.Black mustard
ViridisCollards
Brassica oleraceaCapitata F. albaWhite cabbage
Capitata F. rubraRed or purple cabbage
Capitata L.Green cabbage
ItalicaItalian broccoli, Chinese broccoli
GemmiferaBrussels sprouts
Sabellica L.Curly kale
Acephala L.Kale
AlboglabraChinese kale, kailan
BotrytisCauliflower, Italian cauliflower
SabaudaSavoy cabbage
GongylodesKohlrabi, stem turnip, Knol khol
CostataPortuguese cole, Tronchuda cabbage
Brassica carinata Ethiopian rapeseed
Brassica junceaCzern L.Mustard, Indian mustard, leaf mustard
Coss L.,Green mustard
IntegrifoliaKorean leaf mustard, multi-shoot mustard
CrispifoliaCurled mustard
RosularisTatsoi
Brassica napusNapobrassicaOilseed rape, rape, canola
Brassica hirtaSinapis albaWhite or yellow mustard
Brassica tournefortiiGouanAsian mustard, Africain mustard
Brassica rapa/campestrisRapifera L./Rapa L.Sarson, turnip rape, field mustard, bird, rape, canola, turnip top
Pekinensis L.Chinese cabbage
ParachinesisChines cabbage, Choi sum, Sawi
Table 2. Mean composition of oil content and main fatty acids (%).
Table 2. Mean composition of oil content and main fatty acids (%).
Fatty Acid Composition in the Oil
SpeciesOil ContentPalmitic Acid Stearic AcidOleic AcidEicosenoic AcidLinoleic AcidLinolenic AcidErucic AcidReference
B. nigra37.683.161.4127.16.8314.877.9832.96[12,34]
B. oleracea L. var. acephala 10 1010>50[35]
B. oleracea. L. var. italica cv. Legacy 7.431.1015.444.6418.1512.379.36[36]
B. rapa47.3 128–9138–950–51[37]
B. carinata40 [38]
B. napus42.8; 46.4 128–9138–942–54[37,39]
B. hirta 14.55 9.67 [40]
Sinapis alba 23.90[41]
Table 5. Study on antioxidant activity of different Brassica species seeds.
Table 5. Study on antioxidant activity of different Brassica species seeds.
SpeciesSubspecies/varSample AnalyzedExtracting SolventDPPHFRAPORACABTSROSReducing PowerSOAHydroxyl RadicalReference
B. nigra Cold-press oilEthanol89.25%
(10% oil–methanol)
23.85%
(10% oil–methanol)
[78]
SeedsHexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol36.30% (1 mL of crude extracts) [63]
B. oleraceaL. var. costata DCLyophilized extractH2O IC25 at 197 µg/mLIC25 = 4 µg/mL[103]
italica5 day old sprout (PS5) SeedsH2O 94.25%
(2 mg/mL)
[141]
Seeds (USA)50% acetone 633.50 μM TE/g (133 mg/mL)175.88 μM TE/g (133 mg/mL) [136]
botrytis5 day sprouts (C5D)
7 day sprouts (C7D)
DCM62.2%; 39.63% (2 mg/mL) [134]
IC50 = 1510 µg/mL, IC50 = 2750 µg/mL IC50 = 170 µg/mL, IC50 = 260 µg/mL
Seeds80% methanol70% (25 µg/mL) [142]
B. rapaRCNSeed mealmethanol2947.2 µmol/L (10 mg/L)1852.1 µmol/L (10 mg/L) [51]
Rapifera L.(T5D) (T7D)DCM21.98%; 40.45%
(2 mg/mL)
[134]
IC50 = 5920 µg/mL, IC50 = 2780 µg/mL IC50 = 53 µg/mL, IC50 = 0.32 µg/mL
B. juncea Seeds80% alcoholIC50 = 103 µg/mL [133]
L. Czern and CossSeedsHydromethanol (80:20 ratio)IC50 = 103.37 µg AAE/mgIC50 = 83.26 µg AAE/mgIC50 = 1115 µM GAE/mLIC50 = 83.05 µg GAE/mLPost-treatment (700 µg/mL): 58.37 to 15.55%
Pretreatment (1000 µg/mL): 90.5%
IC50 = 345.22 µg AAE/mg [62]
(M5D)/(M7D)DCM40.78%; 19.67%
(2 mg/mL)
[134]
IC50 = 2760 µg/mL, IC50 = 5790 µg/mL IC50 = 59 µg/mL, IC50 = 463 µg/mL
SeedsEthanol83.17%
(200 mg/mL)
60.57%
(200 mg/mL)
[81]
Seeds30% ethanol, waterIC50 = 170 µg/mL, IC50 = 390 µg/mL 75.5%
68.9%
(50 mg/mL)
[120]
B. napusCanolaDefatted oilseed cakeMethanol/acetone/water (MAW)33.03%
(60 mg/mL)
8.78 μmol Fe(II)/g FW (60 mg/mL) [83]
B. hirta SeedsH2O 6.4 mg/g
(75 mg/mL)
[76]
Sinapis albaCold-press oilEthanol94.24%
(10% oil–methanol)
8.92%
(10% oil–methanol)
[78]
B. tournefortiiGouanEssential oilDiethyl ether45.17 vitamin C (IC50 = 75.28 µg/mL) [126]
IC50: inhibitory concentration required for 50% inhibition, TE: Trolox equivalent.
Table 6. Antiproliferative activity of the Brassica seed extracts IC50 (µg/mL).
Table 6. Antiproliferative activity of the Brassica seed extracts IC50 (µg/mL).
SpeciesSubspecies/varSample
Analyzed
Extracting SolventA-549MCF-7MDA-MB-231PC-3HeLaHCT-116LACHepG-2Reference
B. oleraceacapitataITCs: fraction IIEthyl acetate, hexane27.3223.85%
(10% oil–methanol)
[160]
ITCs: fraction III15.56
italica (broccoli)SeedsHexane, ethyl acetate, methanol14.38 mg/g 19.45 mg/g 10.38 mg/g26.75 mg/g[96]
botrytisSprouts C5D; C7DDCM 95.57, 71.58 [134]
B. rapaRapifera L. 63.5, 43.61
B. juncearayaVolatile oilEthyl acetate, DCM 32.9337.1654.7367.2561.50 [97]
L. CzernM5D; M7DDCM 111.6, 81.11 [134]
B. tournefortiiGouanEssential oilDiethyl ether 1.34 4.5 [126]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ayadi, J.; Debouba, M.; Rahmani, R.; Bouajila, J. Brassica Genus Seeds: A Review on Phytochemical Screening and Pharmacological Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27186008

AMA Style

Ayadi J, Debouba M, Rahmani R, Bouajila J. Brassica Genus Seeds: A Review on Phytochemical Screening and Pharmacological Properties. Molecules. 2022; 27(18):6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27186008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ayadi, Jawaher, Mohamed Debouba, Rami Rahmani, and Jalloul Bouajila. 2022. "Brassica Genus Seeds: A Review on Phytochemical Screening and Pharmacological Properties" Molecules 27, no. 18: 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27186008

APA Style

Ayadi, J., Debouba, M., Rahmani, R., & Bouajila, J. (2022). Brassica Genus Seeds: A Review on Phytochemical Screening and Pharmacological Properties. Molecules, 27(18), 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27186008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop