Next Article in Journal
Systematical Ingredient Investigations of Ficus tikoua Bur. Fruit and Immunoregulatory and Antioxidant Effects of Different Fractions
Next Article in Special Issue
Constructing a Visible-Active CoFe2O4@Bi2O3/NiO Nanoheterojunction as Magnetically Recoverable Photocatalyst with Boosted Ofloxacin Degradation Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of α-(N-Biphenyl)-Substituted 2,2′-Bipyridine-Based Push–Pull Fluorophores
Previous Article in Special Issue
Size-Dependent Impact of Magnetic Nanoparticles on Growth and Sporulation of Aspergillus niger
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Synthesis of Phenylboronic Acid-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles for Sensitive Soil Enzyme Assays

Molecules 2022, 27(20), 6883; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206883
by Can Li 1, Zhishang Shi 2, Jinxing Cai 1, Ping Wang 1, Fang Wang 3, Meiting Ju 1, Jinpeng Liu 1,* and Qilin Yu 2
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Molecules 2022, 27(20), 6883; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206883
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 28 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 14 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been written very well by the authors and I don't feel there is any change required in the paper. 

Author Response

Thanks for your affirmation of this paper.

Reviewer 2 Report

English editing is required. Discussion could be improved.

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. English of the paper and discussion were improved.

Reviewer 3 Report

Soil enzyme is an important active component in soil, so it is very important to establish a rapid and accurate method to detect soil enzyme. This research is of great significance, but it needs to be revised before publication.

1, This paper does not fully review the previous research progress. What are the shortcomings of the current soil enzyme testing methods? What efforts have the predecessors made for these shortcomings? What is the scientific problem of this paper?

2, The results in Fig. 5 show that the enzyme activity measured by the magnetic nanoparticles method is much higher than that measured by the traditional test method. How can the author ensure the accuracy of which method? What is your verification method?

3, The conclusion should be further enriched. The author should also give a prospect of the application prospect of this method. What is the biggest limitation of the promotion and application of this method? Such as stability, accuracy or cost?

4, The format of the article should be carefully checked. For example, some references use the full name of the magazine, but some are abbreviated.

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions.Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop