Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effects of Myriocin on Non-Enzymatic Glycation of Bovine Serum Albumin
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Different Pretreatment Processes (Freezing, Ultrasound and High Pressure) on the Sensory and Functional Properties of Black Garlic (Allium sativum L.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 20
10.3390/molecules27206999
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of the CRISPR/Cas System in Pathogen Detection: A Review

by
Bowei Yuan
†,
Congcong Yuan
†,
Lulu Li
†,
Miao Long
* and
Zeliang Chen
*
Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Liaoning Province, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(20), 6999; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206999
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Analytical Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Early and rapid diagnosis of pathogens is important for the prevention and control of epidemic disease. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique requires expensive instrument control, a special test site, complex solution treatment steps and professional operation, which can limit its application in practice. The pathogen detection method based on the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas) system is characterized by strong specificity, high sensitivity and convenience for detection, which is more suitable for practical applications. This article first reviews the CRISPR/Cas system, and then introduces the application of the two types of systems represented by Type II (cas9), Type V (cas12a, cas12b, cas14a) and Type VI (cas13a) in pathogen detection. Finally, challenges and prospects are proposed.

1. Introduction

In the natural environment, there are many microorganisms and parasites that can cause diseases as pathogens. An epidemic may threaten the life and health of humans and animals and cause significant economic loss. The occurrence of a serious outbreak often leads to irreversible losses or damage, so an early and rapid diagnosis of the disease is particularly important.
The traditional microbial detection techniques are smear microscopy, pathogen isolation, culture and biochemical identification and serological examination. These traditional pathogen detection methods are relatively simple and convenient, can rapidly make preliminary judgments and do not require complex instruments, while still playing an important role at the grassroots level. In molecular biology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been the mainstream choice for molecular diagnostics. This technology uses DNA high-temperature denaturation, low-temperature renaturation and extension at the optimum temperature of polymerase to achieve the amplification of DNA fragments [1]. The PCR instrument manufactured based on this principle is a temperature-control device. Seen as the variable temperature amplification of PCR requires expensive instrument control, special test sites, complex solution processing steps and professional operations, it cannot be satisfactorily utilized in practice; therefore, rapid detection methods that rely on isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology have attracted increasing attention. Common isothermal amplification techniques include loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [2], recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and the like.
LAMP and RPA read amplified signals using colorimetric indicators [3,4], turbidimetry [5], lateral-flow immunoassay [6,7], fluorescence [8,9] and electrochemical methods [10,11]. As the research on the CRISPR/Cas system has intensified, scientists have attempted to combine CRISPR/Cas effectors as biosensors with nucleic acid amplification technology (especially isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology) to develop a simpler, faster and more field-suitable pathogen detection method.

2. Introduction to the CRISPR/Cas System

The CRISPR/Cas system is an adaptive immune defense system first discovered in Escherichia coli and used by bacteria and archaea as a defense against virus invasion. CRISPRs refers to clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, which was first described by Jansen et al. in a study of bacterial and archaeal genome sequences [12]. Its structure is shown in Figure 1.
CRISPR sequences consist of repeat sequences and spacer sequences. Repeat sequences are repeating palindromic sequences arranged one after the other, separated by spacer sequences, while the DNA of the spacer sequences is not identical. Research has found that spacer sequences match viral DNA, especially phage DNA [13,14,15]. The upstream gene located at the CRISPR/Cas locus is named CRISPR-associated gene, or Cas gene for short. The Cas gene is closely linked to the CRISPRs site, and the Cas protein expressed thereby plays a key role in the realization of the CRISPR/Cas system function. Cas proteins have helicase and nuclease activities that can cut DNA strands; based on these findings, scientists have proposed the theory that the CRISPR/Cas system defends against virus invasion through three stages of adaptation, expression and interference (Figure 2) [14,16,17,18].
The diversity of the CRISPR/Cas system is ascribed to its abundance of effector proteins, site structures and molecular mechanisms. According to the different types of effector proteins in the interference phase described above, the system is mainly divided into two categories, including 6 types and 33 subtypes. Class 1 systems have complex effectors consisting of multiple Cas proteins that often perform multiple functions when the system is functioning. In contrast, Class 2 systems contain only one crRNA-binding protein. Class 1 comprises Types I, III and IV, and Class 2 includes Types II, V and VI [19,20]; because Class 2 CRISPR/Cas systems contain the properties of a single multidomain effector protein, they are more widely studied and applied than Class 1 systems. Next, the application of two types of systems represented by Type II (Cas9), Type V (Cas12a, Cas12b, Cas14a) and Type VI (Cas13a) in pathogen detection is introduced.

3. In Vitro Pathogen Detection Based on the CRISPR/Cas System

3.1. Cas9

Cas9, as an endonuclease, contains two central HNH and RuvC that exert endonuclease activity. Jinek et al. found that Cas9 has a strong ability to cleave DNA under the mediation of tracrRNA and crRNA [21]. When the CRISPR/Cas system works, tracrRNA forms double-stranded RNA with pre-crRNA through complementary base pairing and assembles into a complex with the protein encoded by cas9. The spacer sequence is then cleaved under the action of RNase III, and finally a crRNA containing a spacer sequence RNA and a partial repeat sequence is formed. This complex binds to the target DNA under the guidance of crRNA, and then the two endonuclease active sites of Cas9 cut the DNA double-strand, in which the HNH site cuts one strand complementary to the crRNA, and RuvC cuts the other strand (Figure 3).
Moreover, crRNA and part of the tracrRNA also play the role of guiding Cas9 when they are fused into single guide RNA (sgRNA) [21]. People use artificially designed sgRNA to guide Cas9 gene modification, and have performed various far-reaching applications, including knock-out [22,23], knock-in [24], gene repression or activation [24,25], multiplex editing [24] and functional genomic screens.
When it comes to the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in pathogen detection, we must mention the work of Pardee et al. [26]. As mentioned above, the Cas9 protein can recognize PAM (protospacer adjacent motif) under the guidance of gRNA, and then exercise its ability to cleave (this is called cis-cleavage). They used the specific cleavage ability of Cas9 on different target sequences, combined with an isothermal RNA amplification technique called nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and the color reaction of filter paper (toehold activation) and developed a low-cost RNA virus detection method (NASBA-CRISPR cleavage, NASBACC). In this method, RNA is reverse-transcribed by NASBA, amplified to obtain dsDNA, and then Cas9 specifically recognizes and cuts dsDNA, and the signal is amplified by the filter-paper color reaction, which means it can accurately detect the Zika virus and use Cas9 to determine single-nucleotide polymorphisms to distinguish different strains with a sensitivity of 1 fM.
Wang et al. developed a Cas9 nickase-based amplification reaction (Cas9nAR) method. Cas9nAR uses a sgRNA-Cas9n complex with single-stranded nicking properties, a strand-displacing DNA polymerase and two primers with Cas9n cleavage sequences, through the cyclic process of initiation, extension, nicking and replacement reactions. The target sequence in the sample genomic DNA is amplified at a constant temperature (37 °C). In a sensitivity test for the detection of Salmonella typhimurium, a detection limit similar to that of qPCR was achieved [27]. Although this method has the advantage of amplifying the target sequence without length limitation, compared to NASBACC, its operation is cumbersome, and it is more difficult to apply in practice.
In addition, the two active sites of Cas9 were completely inactivated by amino acid mutation, and the resulting deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) still had the ability to bind target DNA under the guidance of sgRNA. Zhang et al. split the luciferase into two halves and then combined it with the dCas9 protein and designed a pair of sgRNAs targeting the upstream and downstream regions of the target DNA. When the dCas9 on both sides recognizes the target DNA and is adjacent, the luciferase activity is activated and emits a highly enhanced fluorescence signal, allowing for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis [28]. Based on this property, several DNA detection methods have been developed (Table 1).

3.2. Cas12a

CRISPR/Cas12a is a member of the Class II CRISPR/Cas system [36]. The CRISPR/Cas12a system contains the Cas12a protein and a shorter CRISPR RNA (crRNA). Unlike Cas9, Cas12a does not require the assistance of RNA or other proteins in the process of processing pre-crRNA into mature crRNA, nor does it require RNase III [37]. Therefore, Cas12a can achieve the cleavage of the target without tracrRNA. Cas12a identifies double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) via a single crRNA, thereby inducing staggered DNA breaks on the non-targeting and targeting strands via the RuvC and Nuc endonuclease domains, respectively [38]. Cas12a recognizes the double-stranded DNA of T (thymine)-rich PAM under the guidance of crRNA, and then unzips the double-stranded DNA. After melting, the target strand in the double-stranded DNA is complementary to the crRNA, causing a conformational change, exposing the RuvC site, which cuts the non-target strand (NTS) in the double-stranded DNA, and then cuts the TS; this is referred to as the cis-cleavage activity of Cas12a. After cleavage, the Cas12a-crRNA complex remains bound to the target dsDNA, the NTS is trimmed and the cleavage product is released after cleavage, which leaves the still active RuvC site exposed and able to bind to ssDNA and exert trans-cleavage activity (Figure 4). Therefore, the specificity of Cas12a can be guaranteed by designing crRNA complementary to the target sequence. Then, combined with fluorescent probes or immunochromatography technology, nucleic acid detection can be achieved.
Although CRISPR/Cas12a can be directly activated using unamplified target DNA in a sample, amplifying pathogenic nucleic acids to further improve its sensitivity is necessary. Li et al. integrated quenched fluorescent single-stranded DNA reporter probes with PCR amplification to develop a HOLMES detection platform for the rapid detection of target DNA and RNA (Figure 5). Before PCR amplification was added, the minimum detection limit was 0.1 nM, and after combining with PCR, the detection limit could be as low as 10 aM [39].
In addition to the combination of PCR technology, the introduction of isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology eliminates the dependence on high-end temperature control equipment, allowing for the detection method to be used beyond the laboratory and making it possible to implement on-site. Combining Cas12a single-stranded DNase activation with isothermal amplification, Chen et al. developed a method called DNA endonuclease-targeted CRISPR trans reporter (DETECTR); this method can identify HPV16 and 18 types in patient samples within one hour, and the method achieves the attomolar sensitivity of DNA detection [40]. Li et al. applied recombinase-mediated isothermal nucleic acid amplification to this system and established a simple and high-sensitivity detection platform for Listeria monocytogenes, with the detection limit reaching 26 cfu/mL [41]. Zhang et al. also combined recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) technology with CRISPR/Cas12a to detect SARS-CoV-2 [42].
To make the entire system more convenient and faster, the researchers also added immunochromatographic test strips to visualize the detection results. Wang et al. developed a fast, sensitive, instrument-free ASFV detection method (CRISPR/Cas12a-LFD) based on CRISPR/Cas12a technology and lateral flow detection, wherein ssDNA reporters labeled with quenching fluorescent molecules or digoxigenin and biotin were used for fluorescence and lateral flow detection, respectively. The method is able to complete the entire process from sampling to result reading in one hour, and the sensitivity can reach 20 copies/reaction [43].
Some scholars have also made attempts at signal conversion of the detection system; Liu et al. utilized the signal-amplifying ability of Cas12a and simultaneously used l-methionine stabilized gold nanoclusters as efficient ECL emitters to achieve ECL signal transduction. The method can complete the detection of HPV16 within 70 min, and its detection limit can reach 0.48 pM [44].
Due to its robust sensitivity and operability, Cas12a has also become increasingly active in pathogen detection applications (Table 2).
In addition to the above example of Cas12a as a signal sensor, scientists are also working on other easier and more efficient methods. Shen et al. also integrated magnetic nanoparticles with the system to detect Salmonella, which performed well in spiked chicken samples [55].

3.3. Cas12b

Like Cas12a, Cas12b, which is also from the Class II, Type V family, has trans-cleavage activity. That is, under the guidance of sgRNA, Cas12b can activate the ability to cleave any ssDNA in the system after it specifically recognizes and binds to the target DNA in the form of complementary base pairing. It was later found that trans-cleavage could be triggered regardless of whether the target is ssDNA or dsDNA. When targeting ssDNA, there is no cleavage site restriction (no PAM required), and the cleavage is faster; however, when dsDNA is used as the target, for Cas12b to perform efficient trans-cleavage, the target dsDNA is required to contain PAM. Based on the trans-cleavage characteristics of Cas12b, Li et al. developed a rapid nucleic acid detection method by combining Cas12b with LAMP isothermal amplification technology and named it HOLMESv2. This method can achieve a detection limit of 10−8 nM for the target, and the specificity reaches a single base [56]. Although they followed up with a one-step HOLMESv2 attempt, the sensitivity was much lower than that of the two-step method, which is also a possible direction for improvement in the future.
In recent years, there have also been studies on Cas12b, for example, Sam et al. combined LAMP and Cas12b detection to develop a DNA detection platform for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, named tb-QUICK, with a detection limit of 1.3 copies/μL in two hours [57]. Huang et al. constructed a Cas12b-based detection system for Campylobacter jejuni, and determined the detection limit of the system to be 11 copies/μL by simulating contamination [58]. However, this study took too much time in the early sample processing and nucleic acid extraction stage, which is also a problem that must be considered when attempting rapid nucleic acid detection.

3.4. Cas13a

Like other Class II system effector proteins, Cas13a also has a bilobal structure, but it also shows different structural features. It includes a REC flap with Helical-1 domain and a NUC flap with two HEPN domains, as well as two RNase catalytic pockets responsible for cleaving Pre-crRNA and target RNA which are located on Helical-1 and HEPN domains, respectively. When crRNA binds to it to induce significant conformational changes, two conserved HEPN domains form an external catalytic site for cleavage of the target RNA [59].
As early as 2016, Abudayyeh, working in Zhang Feng’s team, proposed, for the first time, that Cas13a (C2c2) has a trans-cleavage activity that does not depend on the nucleic acid sequence [60]. The so-called trans-cleavage activity of Cas13a means that Cas13a forms a ternary complex with the target RNA under the guidance of crRNA, and then realizes the cleavage of any ssRNA in the system. Kellner and others, in the same team, took advantage of this cleavage activity to develop a nucleic acid detection method, named specific high-sensitivity enzymatic reporter unlocking (SHERLOCK) [61,62] (Figure 6). This is also the first time upon which the trans-cleavage activity of the Cas protein has been used to achieve in vitro nucleic acid detection, showing high sensitivity at the aM level and single-base resolution in the detection of the Zika virus and the dengue virus. Recently, some researchers have applied this technology more widely (Table 3).
Although the first-generation SHERLOCK platform has been widely studied and applied, it still has some limitations. For example, the first generation of SHERLOCK can qualitatively detect nucleic acids but cannot provide quantitative data, and relies more on fluorescence reading equipment. To improve the detection performance, Feng’s team made improvements to the SHERLOCK system and created the second-generation SHERLOCK system—SHERLOCKv2 [63]. They used four Cas proteins with different cleavage preferences (LwaCas13a, PsmCas13b, CcaCas13b and AsCas12a) and individually designed specific reporters for them to detect the four viruses simultaneously. The researchers also found that the Cas13 cleavage product activates another Cas protein, namely Csm6,which can amplify the detection signal and further enhance the sensitivity of this method. The second single-stranded RNA structure can be cleaved by activated Csm6, which enhances the signal relative to background, improving the kinetics of the SHERLOCKv2 reaction, even achieving results without RPA amplification; compared to the first-generation method, SHERLOCKv2 uses far fewer primers in the pre-amplification step. The modified SHERLOCKv2 is not limited to the output of fluorescent signals, but can also be applied to test strip detection, which makes SHERLOCKv2 very easy to use. Provided that there is a sample, SHERLOCKv2 can play a role in the field.
Table
Table 3. More applications of CRISPR/Cas13a in pathogen detection.
Table 3. More applications of CRISPR/Cas13a in pathogen detection.
Cas ProteinPathogenPlatform NameAmplification
Methods		VisualizationSensitivityTimeReferences
LwCas13aPPRRSVSHERLOCKRPAEye/LFD172 copies/μL<1 h[64]
LwCas13aBVDVSHERLOCKRT-RPAFluorescence103 pM-[65]
LwCas13aStaphylococcus aureusCCB-DetectionPCR/T7transcriptionFluorescence1 CFU/mL<4 h[66]
LwCas13aH7N9-RT-RPAFluorescence1 fM50 min[67]
LwCas13aFeline calicivirus (FCV)-RPAFluorescence/LFD5.5 copies/μL-[68]
LwCas13aTMUV-RPAFluorescence100 copies/μL50 min[69]
LwCas13aASFVCRISPR/Cas13a–LFDRAALFD10 copies/μL<2 h[70]
LwCas13aEMCV-RAALFD10 copies/μL<1 h[71]
LwCas13aP. vivax/P. falciparumSHERLOCKRPAFluorescence10 aM-[72]
LwCas13aHBV-RCA/PCRFluorescence1 copies/μL-[73]
In nucleic acid detection, the sensing method of the signal is also particularly important. Due to the characteristics of low background noise and high signal output efficiency using fluorescence as a signal sensing method, various researchers have also used smartphones [74], microfluidic chips [75] and portable detectors [76] to record fluorescent signals. In addition to advances in fluorescence sensing, Heo et al. utilized reporter RNA (reRNA)-coupled electrochemical sensors as a signal output method. After the crRNA-Cas13a complex activates the activity of trans-cleavage through viral RNA, the cleavage of the reRNA immobilized on the electrode changes the current passing through the electrode, and then reading the current change can quantify the presence of the virus [77]. Liu et al. combined CRISPR/Cas13a with plasmon-enhanced fluorescence. Only reRNAs cleaved by Cas13a without activation could bind to plasmonic fluorescence; therefore, a higher signal intensity indicates that the amount of target RNA present in the original sample is lower. This signal-boosting method shows an almost 100-fold lower limit of detection.

3.5. Cas14a

Cas14 is a new DNA-targeting CRISPRs effector protein identified by Doudna et al. in the archaea “DPANN” phylum [78]. Cas14a, like Cas12a, is from the Type V family of the Class 2 system. Cas14a is the smallest Class 2 CRISPRs effector demonstrated to date, containing approximately 400–700 amino acids, half of the Cas9 protein (950–1400 amino acids). Akin to Cas12a, Cas14a also possesses RNA-guided ssDNA-targeting endonuclease activity (Figure 7). The Cas14a protein does not need to recognize the PAM site in the DNA sequence. By combining the non-specific single-stranded DNase activity of the Cas14 protein with isothermal amplification technology, it may be used for high-fidelity DNA single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and ssDNA virus detection [79].

3.6. Application of the CRISPR System in Pathogen Detection

We list the CRISPR/Cas proteins in the text and tabulate some of their properties for easy reading (Table 4).

4. Challenge

Nucleic acid detection methods based on CRISPR/Cas biosensors have the advantages of strong specificity, high sensitivity and simple operation, and do not require instruments under some conditions. These methods can detect even trace amounts of virus and distinguish between different subtypes or mutations. They can also be integrated with various technologies to suit the needs of different scenarios. However, these techniques still have some problems (described next) that cannot be ignored.

4.1. Sequence Restriction

Some CRISPR/Cas effector proteins, such as CRISPR/Cas12a, require PAM sequences to identify target dsDNA. On the one hand, this feature enhances the specificity of target recognition, but on the other hand, it also limits the range of selectable target sequences. Therefore, when detecting shorter sequences, or identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms, there may be less room for selection, limiting its application. To reduce the dependence on the PAM sequence, the PAM sequence was introduced into the PCR product using primers containing PAM in HOLMES, so that HOLMES can detect dsDNA independently of the PAM sequence [39]. Wang et al. also used the LAMP amplification method to design the core primer containing the PAM site, allowing for the LAMP amplicon to contain a specific PAM site for CRISPR/Cas12a recognition. This method can thus detect any target sequence, even without targets containing PAM sites, as long as the design requirements of LAMP are met [80].

4.2. Multiplexing and Quantitative Detection

SHERLOCKv2 uses four Cas proteins with different cleavage preferences to cleave individually designed reporters, enabling multiplex detection [62]; however, this has strict requirements on the amount of Cas protein in the system, and different Cas proteins and reporters may cross-cut, thus affecting the results. Therefore, it will be more conducive to multiple detection to find Cas effector proteins with different trans-cutting preferences and avoid Cas effector proteins cutting the same reporter or Cas effector proteins cutting different reporters at the same time. Ackerman et al. also proposed a multiplex virus detection method combining a microwell array with CRISPR/Cas, called ARMEN (arrayed reactions for multiplexed evaluation of nucleic acids); this method can simultaneously distinguish at least 10 related viruses among 169 human diseases with published genome sequences and can identify subtypes of influenza A strains [81]. Welch et al. also introduced microfluidic technology and developed microfluidic combinatorial arrayed reactions for the multiplexed evaluation of nucleic acids, which has been used to detect SARS-CoV-2 [82].
In terms of quantitative detection, the amplification product can easily reach a saturated state due to the high amplification efficiency of the introduced amplification method, and the limitation of reporters makes it difficult to quantify high-concentration targets. Before the introduction of CRISPR/Cas effectors, it is generally necessary to pre-amplify the sample nucleic acid. This step also affects the true concentration of the original sample, making quantitative detection difficult.

4.3. Sample Pre-Treatment

How to pre-treat samples rapidly and without contamination is the key to the nucleic acid detection process, especially for complex samples. Most CRISPR/Cas-based pathogen detection methods have pre-processing steps for the original sample. In vitro amplification of nucleic acid may introduce a base mutation of the target sequence due to the fidelity of DNA polymerase, thus interfering with the detection results. Shinoda et al. employed CRISPR/Cas13 and microarray technology to detect non-amplified RNA directly [83]. Although the quantification of nucleic acids is achieved due to the absence of amplification, the sensitivity is reduced compared to pre-amplification followed by detection (fM). In addition, the results of targeted amplification may be false positive due to aerosol pollution. Therefore, in the future, we should look for easier nucleic acid extraction methods to save time, and try to directly detect non-amplifying targets for quantification, find a balance between the two or determine a strong Cas effector protein that is more suitable for complex sample environments without amplification.

4.4. Contamination during Operation

When the CRISPR/Cas system is used for nucleic acid detection, a two-step method is generally used. The first step is to conduct nucleic acid pre-amplification, and the second step is to add effector protein complexes and reporters. This may expose the reaction system to RNase in the air during the second step, resulting in contamination and affecting the result. To avoid this, Li et al. integrated the target pre-amplification and biosensing stage in a one-step reaction to achieve the detection of SARS-CoV-2 [84]. Therefore, future research will also explore this aspect, which can not only simplify the operation, but also achieve the purpose of reducing pollution.

4.5. On-Site Deployment

Although most of the pathogen detection technologies based on the CRISPR/Cas system are in the research and development stage, they will eventually be applied in practice. How to design this technique to make it more suitable for practical deployment is also a suggested direction for future research. In addition to the efforts in sample handling, avoidance of contamination and quantitative detection, more efficient signal-reading techniques also need to be discovered. Finally, efforts should be made to develop detection methods with strong specificity, high sensitivity, simple operation, controllable costs and simple reading, which are more suitable for practical deployment.

4.6. The Lack of a Uniform Standard

The use of CRISPR/Cas biosensing technology for pathogen detection remains in the research and development stage, and many aspects remain in the exploratory stage, such as the concentration of each component in the reaction system, reaction time, reaction temperature, nucleic acid extraction method and signal output method (each of which will affect the result). For this technique to be used in point-of-care testing, food safety monitoring, etc., it is necessary to customize standards or specifications that conform to practical applications.

5. Summary

Pathogenic microorganisms present in nature seriously threaten public health and the global economy. Therefore, the development of rapid, sensitive, specific, economical and field-applicable pathogen diagnosis methods can help control and prevent disease transmission. The CRISPR/Cas system is not only an excellent gene-editing tool, but also a powerful diagnostic technology. For example, techniques for targeting DNA using the recognition and cleavage capabilities of CRISPR/Cas9 effectors have been developed for molecular diagnostics. Unlike CRISPR/Cas9, CRISPR/Cas12 and CRISPR/Cas13 have been applied in biosensing scenarios due to their trans-cutting ability, creating a new era of molecular diagnosis. Although the pathogen detection technique based on the CRISPR/Cas system has the advantages of rapid detection, low cost and wide applicability, there are still many areas that need to be improved before the actual performance in the complex environments encountered in practice can be accepted, for example: find more efficient methods for original sample processing and simplify nucleic acid extraction steps; to realize multiple detection and quantification of several pathogens; to avoid contamination during the Cas protein effect stage. In conclusion, a pathogen detection technology based on the CRISPR/Cas system provides a new means for pathogen detection molecular methods, and it is now effective and developing rapidly. It is foreseeable that when various disciplines such as materials, communication and AI are applied thereto, the pathogen detection technology based on the CRISPR/Cas system will become a more promising and widely used in vitro pathogen-detection tool.

Author Contributions

B.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Y., L.L. and M.L.; writing—review and editing, M.L.; supervision, M.L. and Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants Number 31872538, grants No. 31972746, grants No. 32273074 and 31772809, and Basic Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (LJKZ0632).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Canene-Adams, K. General PCR. Methods Enzym. 2013, 529, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Notomi, T.; Okayama, H.; Masubuchi, H.; Yonekawa, T.; Watanabe, K.; Amino, N.; Hase, T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dao Thi, V.L.; Herbst, K.; Boerner, K.; Meurer, M.; Kremer, L.P.; Kirrmaier, D.; Freistaedter, A.; Papagiannidis, D.; Galmozzi, C.; Stanifer, M.L.; et al. A colorimetric RT-LAMP assay and LAMP-sequencing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eabc7075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reid, M.S.; Le, X.C.; Zhang, H. Exponential Isothermal Amplification of Nucleic Acids and Assays for Proteins, Cells, Small Molecules, and Enzyme Activities: An EXPAR Example. Angew. Chem. (Int. Ed. Engl.) 2018, 57, 11856–11866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yan, C.; Cui, J.; Huang, L.; Du, B.; Chen, L.; Xue, G.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L.; Sun, Y.; et al. Rapid and visual detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, D.; Shin, Y.; Chung, S.; Hwang, K.S.; Yoon, D.S.; Lee, J.H. Simple and Highly Sensitive Molecular Diagnosis of Zika Virus by Lateral Flow Assays. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 12272–12278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiong, E.; Jiang, L.; Tian, T.; Hu, M.; Yue, H.; Huang, M.; Lin, W.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Zhou, X. Simultaneous Dual-Gene Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Based on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Lateral Flow Assay. Angew. Chem. (Int. Ed. Engl.) 2021, 60, 5307–5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shuryaeva, A.K.; Malova, T.V.; Tolokonceva, A.A.; Karceka, S.A.; Gordukova, M.A.; Davydova, E.E.; Shipulin, G.A. Development and application of LAMP assays for the detection of enteric adenoviruses in feces. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0051622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lobato, I.M.; O’Sullivan, C.K. Recombinase polymerase amplification: Basics, applications and recent advances. Trends. Anal. Chem. 2018, 98, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Safavieh, M.; Ahmed, M.U.; Ng, A.; Zourob, M. High-throughput real-time electrochemical monitoring of LAMP for pathogenic bacteria detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 58, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, H.E.; Schuck, A.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, Y.; Kang, M.; Kim, Y.-S. Sensitive electrochemical biosensor combined with isothermal amplification for point-of-care COVID-19 tests. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 182, 113168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jansen, R.; van Embden, J.D.; Gaastra, W.; Schouls, L.M. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 43, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miaowen, C.; Wei, L.; Yao, D. CRISPR-CAS system mediated new generation gene targeted modification technology and its application in industrial microorganisms. J. Microbiol. 2017, 57, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhaya, D.; Davison, M.; Barrangou, R. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: Versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Pourcel, C.; Salvignol, G.; Vergnaud, G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology 2005, 151, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jackson, S.A.; McKenzie, R.E.; Fagerlund, R.D.; Kieper, S.N.; Fineran, P.C.; Brouns, S.J.J. CRISPR-Cas: Adapting to change. Science 2017, 356, eaal5056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Barrangou, R.; Horvath, P. A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huan, Z.; Yanna, S.; Juan, W.; Qingping, W.; Yu, D. Research progress of nucleic acid detection based on CRISPR/Cas technology. J. Microbiol. 2021, 61, 3856–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Iranzo, J.; Shmakov, S.A.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Cheng, D.; Haft, D.H.; Horvath, P.; et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: A burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Costa, F.; Shah, S.A.; Saunders, S.J.; Barrangou, R.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Haft, D.H.; et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012, 337, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cong, L.; Ran, F.A.; Cox, D.; Lin, S.; Barretto, R.; Habib, N.; Hsu, P.D.; Wu, X.; Jiang, W.; Marraffini, L.A.; et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013, 339, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mali, P.; Yang, L.; Esvelt, K.M.; Aach, J.; Guell, M.; DiCarlo, J.E.; Norville, J.E.; Church, G.M. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013, 339, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hendriks, D.; Artegiani, B.; Hu, H.; Chuva de Sousa Lopes, S.; Clevers, H. Establishment of human fetal hepatocyte organoids and CRISPR-Cas9-based gene knockin and knockout in organoid cultures from human liver. Nat. Protoc. 2021, 16, 182–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gilbert, L.A.; Larson, M.H.; Morsut, L.; Liu, Z.; Brar, G.A.; Torres, S.E.; Stern-Ginossar, N.; Brandman, O.; Whitehead, E.H.; Doudna, J.A.; et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 2013, 154, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Pardee, K.; Green, A.A.; Takahashi, M.K.; Braff, D.; Lambert, G.; Lee, J.W.; Ferrante, T.; Ma, D.; Donghia, N.; Fan, M.; et al. Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell 2016, 165, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Sun, H.H.; Yin, B.C.; Ye, B.C. An RNA-Guided Cas9 Nickase-Based Method for Universal Isothermal DNA Amplification. Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 5436–5440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Lou, C.; Ouyang, Q.; Qian, L. Paired dCas9 design as a nucleic acid detection platform for pathogenic strains. Methods 2022, 203, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Xiong, E.; Tian, T.; Cheng, M.; Lin, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, G.; Sun, J.; Zhou, X. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9-Mediated Lateral Flow Nucleic Acid Assay. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 2497–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Ning, B.; Peng, Y.; He, J.; Hu, Y.; et al. CRISPR-Cas9 Triggered Two-Step Isothermal Amplification Method for O157:H7 Detection Based on a Metal-Organic Framework Platform. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 3032–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Qian, L.; Wei, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Lin, P.; Liu, W.; Xu, L.; Li, X.; Liu, D.; et al. Paired Design of dCas9 as a Systematic Platform for the Detection of Featured Nucleic Acid Sequences in Pathogenic Strains. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guk, K.; Keem, J.O.; Hwang, S.G.; Kim, H.; Kang, T.; Lim, E.K.; Jung, J. A facile, rapid and sensitive detection of MRSA using a CRISPR-mediated DNA FISH method, antibody-like dCas9/sgRNA complex. Biosens Bioelectron 2017, 95, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Koo, B.; Kim, D.E.; Kweon, J.; Jin, C.E.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.; Shin, Y. CRISPR/dCas9-mediated biosensor for detection of tick-borne diseases. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, X.; Luo, T.; Gao, J.; Lin, N.; Li, W.; Xia, X.; Wang, J. CRISPR-Assisted DNA Detection: A Novel dCas9-Based DNA Detection Technique. CRISPR J. 2020, 3, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, H.; Lee, S.; Seo, H.W.; Kang, B.; Moon, J.; Lee, K.G.; Yong, D.; Kang, H.; Jung, J.; Lim, E.-K.; et al. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Mediated Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Assay for Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 17241–17253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zetsche, B.; Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Slaymaker, I.M.; Makarova, K.S.; Essletzbichler, P.; Volz, S.E.; Joung, J.; van der Oost, J.; Regev, A.; et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 2015, 163, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fonfara, I.; Richter, H.; Bratovič, M.; Le Rhun, A.; Charpentier, E. The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 2016, 532, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yamano, T.; Nishimasu, H.; Zetsche, B.; Hirano, H.; Slaymaker, I.M.; Li, Y.; Fedorova, I.; Nakane, T.; Makarova, K.S.; Koonin, E.V.; et al. Crystal Structure of Cpf1 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA. Cell 2016, 165, 949–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, S.Y.; Cheng, Q.X.; Wang, J.M.; Li, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.L.; Gao, S.; Cao, R.B.; Zhao, G.P.; Wang, J. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted nucleic acid detection. Cell Discov. 2018, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Chen, J.S.; Ma, E.; Harrington, L.B.; da Costa, M.; Tian, X.; Palefsky, J.M.; Doudna, J.A. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 2018, 360, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, F.; Ye, Q.; Chen, M.; Zhou, B.; Zhang, J.; Pang, R.; Xue, L.; Wang, J.; Zeng, H.; Wu, S.; et al. An ultrasensitive CRISPR/Cas12a based electrochemical biosensor for Listeria monocytogenes detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 179, 113073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, W.S.; Pan, J.; Li, F.; Zhu, M.; Xu, M.; Zhu, H.; Yu, Y.; Su, G. Reverse Transcription Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Coupled with CRISPR-Cas12a for Facile and Highly Sensitive Colorimetric SARS-CoV-2 Detection. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 4126–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, X.; Ji, P.; Fan, H.; Dang, L.; Wan, W.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Yu, W.; Li, X.; Ma, X.; et al. CRISPR/Cas12a technology combined with immunochromatographic strips for portable detection of African swine fever virus. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, P.-F.; Zhao, K.-R.; Liu, Z.-J.; Wang, L.; Ye, S.-Y.; Liang, G.-X. Cas12a-based electrochemiluminescence biosensor for target amplification-free DNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 176, 112954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, Q.; Yu, D.; Bao, M.; Korensky, G.; Chen, J.; Shin, M.; Kim, J.; Park, M.; Qin, P.; Du, K. High-throughput and all-solution phase African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) detection using CRISPR-Cas12a and fluorescence based point-of-care system. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 154, 112068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, B.; Shi, Z.; Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Cao, L.; Luo, J.; Wan, Y.; Song, R.; Yan, Y.; Yuan, K.; et al. LAMP assay coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a system for portable detection of African swine fever virus. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, e216–e223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. You, Y.; Zhang, P.; Wu, G.; Tan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, S.; Song, Y.; Yang, R.; Du, Z. Highly Specific and Sensitive Detection of by Portable Cas12a-UPTLFA Platform. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 700016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, S.; Tao, D.; Liao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, P.; Tang, Y.; Chen, B.; Liu, Y.; et al. Highly Sensitive CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Fluorescence Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. ACS Synth. Biol. 2021, 10, 2499–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, F.; Ye, Q.; Chen, M.; Xiang, X.; Zhang, J.; Pang, R.; Xue, L.; Wang, J.; Gu, Q.; Lei, T.; et al. Cas12aFDet: A CRISPR/Cas12a-based fluorescence platform for sensitive and specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4c. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1151, 338248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiang, H.J.; Tan, R.; Jin, M.; Yin, J.; Gao, Z.X.; Li, H.B.; Shi, D.Y.; Zhou, S.Q.; Chen, T.J.; Yang, D.; et al. Visual Detection of using Combined CRISPR/Cas12a and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2022, 35, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, Q.-N.; Wang, M.; Zheng, L.-B.; Lin, Z.-Q.; Ehsan, M.; Xiao, X.-X.; Zhu, X.-Q. RAA-Cas12a-Tg: A Nucleic Acid Detection System for Based on CRISPR-Cas12a Combined with Recombinase-Aided Amplification (RAA). Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, Y.; Liang, X.; Xu, J.; Nan, L.; Liu, F.; Duan, G.; Yang, H. Rapid and Ultrasensitive Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Based on CRISPR-Cas12a Combined With Recombinase-Aided Amplification. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 903298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xiao, Y.; Ren, H.; Hu, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Feng, K.; Wang, C.; Cao, Q.; Guo, Y.; et al. Ultra-Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Pathogenic Based on the CRISPR/Cas12a Nucleic Acid Identification Platform. Foods 2022, 11, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jirawannaporn, S.; Limothai, U.; Tachaboon, S.; Dinhuzen, J.; Kiatamornrak, P.; Chaisuriyong, W.; Bhumitrakul, J.; Mayuramart, O.; Payungporn, S.; Srisawat, N. Rapid and sensitive point-of-care detection of Leptospira by RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a targeting lipL32. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shen, Y.; Jia, F.; He, Y.; Fu, Y.; Fang, W.; Wang, J.; Li, Y. A CRISPR-Cas12a-powered magnetic relaxation switching biosensor for the sensitive detection of Salmonella. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 213, 114437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, L.; Li, S.; Wu, N.; Wu, J.; Wang, G.; Zhao, G.; Wang, J. HOLMESv2: A CRISPR-Cas12b-Assisted Platform for Nucleic Acid Detection and DNA Methylation Quantitation. ACS Synth Biol. 2019, 8, 2228–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sam, I.K.; Chen, Y.Y.; Ma, J.; Li, S.Y.; Ying, R.Y.; Li, L.X.; Ji, P.; Wang, S.J.; Xu, J.; Bao, Y.J.; et al. TB-QUICK: CRISPR-Cas12b-assisted rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. 2021, 83, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, Y.; Gu, D.; Xue, H.; Yu, J.; Tang, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, X. Rapid and Accurate Detection With CRISPR-Cas12b Based on Newly Identified -Specific and -Conserved Genomic Signatures. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 649010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, L.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, P.; Yin, M.; Li, J.; Sheng, G.; Wang, Y. Two Distant Catalytic Sites Are Responsible for C2c2 RNase Activities. Cell 2017, 168, 121–134.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Abudayyeh, O.O.; Gootenberg, J.S.; Konermann, S.; Joung, J.; Slaymaker, I.M.; Cox, D.B.T.; Shmakov, S.; Makarova, K.S.; Semenova, E.; Minakhin, L.; et al. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science 2016, 353, aaf5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Lee, J.W.; Essletzbichler, P.; Dy, A.J.; Joung, J.; Verdine, V.; Donghia, N.; Daringer, N.M.; Freije, C.A.; et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 2017, 356, 438–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kellner, M.J.; Koob, J.G.; Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Zhang, F. SHERLOCK: Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 2986–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Kellner, M.J.; Joung, J.; Collins, J.J.; Zhang, F. Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. Science 2018, 360, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, J.; Wang, T.; Tan, F.; Li, X.; Tian, K. Visual detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus using CRISPR-Cas13a. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yao, R.; Xu, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Ren, L.; Ren, C.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Ni, W.; He, Y.; et al. CRISPR-Cas13a-Based Detection for Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 603919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhou, J.; Yin, L.; Dong, Y.; Peng, L.; Liu, G.; Man, S.; Ma, L. CRISPR-Cas13a based bacterial detection platform: Sensing pathogen Staphylococcus aureus in food samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1127, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, C.; Peng, L.; Khan, H.; Cui, L.; Huang, R.; Wu, C.; Shen, S.; Wang, S.; et al. CRISPR-Cas13a Nanomachine Based Simple Technology for Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Virus On-Site Detection. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2019, 15, 790–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; He, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, Y. CRISPR-Cas13a Based Visual Detection Assays for Feline Calicivirus Circulating in Southwest China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 913780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. He, D.; Liu, G.; Yang, J.; Jiang, X.; Wang, H.; Fan, Y.; Gong, S.; Wei, F.; Diao, Y.; Tang, Y. Specific High-Sensitivity Enzymatic Molecular Detection System Termed RPA-Based CRISPR-Cas13a for Duck Tembusu Virus Diagnostics. Bioconjug. Chem. 2022, 33, 1232–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wei, N.; Zheng, B.; Niu, J.; Chen, T.; Ye, J.; Si, Y.; Cao, S. Rapid Detection of Genotype II African Swine Fever Virus Using CRISPR Cas13a-Based Lateral Flow Strip. Viruses 2022, 14, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wei, N.; Xiong, J.; Ma, J.; Ye, J.; Si, Y.; Cao, S. Development of efficient, sensitive, and specific detection method for Encephalomyocarditis virus based on CRISPR/Cas13a. J. Virol Methods 2022, 309, 114592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cunningham, C.H.; Hennelly, C.M.; Lin, J.T.; Ubalee, R.; Boyce, R.M.; Mulogo, E.M.; Hathaway, N.; Thwai, K.L.; Phanzu, F.; Kalonji, A.; et al. A novel CRISPR-based malaria diagnostic capable of Plasmodium detection, species differentiation, and drug-resistance genotyping. EBioMedicine 2021, 68, 103415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhang, X.; Tian, Y.; Xu, L.; Fan, Z.; Cao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Ren, F. CRISPR/Cas13-assisted hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA detection. Hepatol. Int. 2022, 16, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fozouni, P.; Son, S.; Díaz de León Derby, M.; Knott, G.J.; Gray, C.N.; D’Ambrosio, M.V.; Zhao, C.; Switz, N.A.; Kumar, G.R.; Stephens, S.I.; et al. Amplification-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 with CRISPR-Cas13a and mobile phone microscopy. Cell 2021, 184, 323–333.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cao, G.; Huo, D.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, S.; Luo, X.; Hou, C. Automated, portable, and high-throughput fluorescence analyzer (APHF-analyzer) and lateral flow strip based on CRISPR/Cas13a for sensitive and visual detection of SARS-CoV-2. Talanta 2022, 248, 123594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Katzmeier, F.; Aufinger, L.; Dupin, A.; Quintero, J.; Lenz, M.; Bauer, L.; Klumpe, S.; Sherpa, D.; Dürr, B.; Honemann, M.; et al. A low-cost fluorescence reader for in vitro transcription and nucleic acid detection with Cas13a. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Heo, W.; Lee, K.; Park, S.; Hyun, K.-A.; Jung, H.-I. Electrochemical biosensor for nucleic acid amplification-free and sensitive detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA via CRISPR/Cas13a trans-cleavage reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 201, 113960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Doudna, J.A.; Harrington, L.B.; Burstein, D.; Chen, J.S.; Paez-Espino, D.; Ma, E.; Witte, I.P.; Cofsky, J.C.; Kyrpides, N.C.; Banfield, J.F. Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science 2018, 362, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Aquino-Jarquin, G. CRISPR-Cas14 is now part of the artillery for gene editing and molecular diagnostic. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2019, 18, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Zhu, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Tai, J. LAMP-CRISPR-Cas12-based diagnostic platform for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using real-time fluorescence or lateral flow test. Mikrochim. Acta 2021, 188, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ackerman, C.M.; Myhrvold, C.; Thakku, S.G.; Freije, C.A.; Metsky, H.C.; Yang, D.K.; Ye, S.H.; Boehm, C.K.; Kosoko-Thoroddsen, T.-S.F.; Kehe, J.; et al. Massively multiplexed nucleic acid detection with Cas13. Nature 2020, 582, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Welch, N.L.; Zhu, M.; Hua, C.; Weller, J.; Mirhashemi, M.E.; Nguyen, T.G.; Mantena, S.; Bauer, M.R.; Shaw, B.M.; Ackerman, C.M.; et al. Multiplexed CRISPR-based microfluidic platform for clinical testing of respiratory viruses and identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 1083–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shinoda, H.; Taguchi, Y.; Nakagawa, R.; Makino, A.; Okazaki, S.; Nakano, M.; Muramoto, Y.; Takahashi, C.; Takahashi, I.; Ando, J.; et al. Amplification-free RNA detection with CRISPR-Cas13. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, S.; Huang, J.; Ren, L.; Jiang, W.; Wang, M.; Zhuang, L.; Zheng, Q.; Yang, R.; Zeng, Y.; Luu, L.D.W.; et al. A one-step, one-pot CRISPR nucleic acid detection platform (CRISPR-top): Application for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Talanta 2021, 233, 122591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 06999 g001 550
Figure 1. CRISPR-Cas locus structure diagram. CRISPR-Cas includes transactivating crRNA, genes encoding Cas-related proteins (Cas genes), repeat sequences and spacer sequences.
Figure 1. CRISPR-Cas locus structure diagram. CRISPR-Cas includes transactivating crRNA, genes encoding Cas-related proteins (Cas genes), repeat sequences and spacer sequences.
Molecules 27 06999 g001
Molecules 27 06999 g002 550
Figure 2. The CRISPR/Cas system in action during the adaptation phase, short DNA fragments that are homologous to the viral or plasmid sequence are integrated into the CRISPRs site as spacers; during the expression stage, the CRISPRs sequence is first transcribed into pre-crRNA, which is then processed into crRNA that matches the target sequence of the virus or plasmid; during the interference phase, the crRNA guides the Cas protein to the target sequence of the virus or plasmid that matches the spacer, forming an effector complex, and then the cleavage ability of the Cas protein degrades the phage or plasmid DNA.
Figure 2. The CRISPR/Cas system in action during the adaptation phase, short DNA fragments that are homologous to the viral or plasmid sequence are integrated into the CRISPRs site as spacers; during the expression stage, the CRISPRs sequence is first transcribed into pre-crRNA, which is then processed into crRNA that matches the target sequence of the virus or plasmid; during the interference phase, the crRNA guides the Cas protein to the target sequence of the virus or plasmid that matches the spacer, forming an effector complex, and then the cleavage ability of the Cas protein degrades the phage or plasmid DNA.
Molecules 27 06999 g002
Molecules 27 06999 g003 550
Figure 3. TracrRNA and mature crRNA form a dimer to guide the cleavage of the target sequence.
Figure 3. TracrRNA and mature crRNA form a dimer to guide the cleavage of the target sequence.
Molecules 27 06999 g003
Molecules 27 06999 g004 550
Figure 4. Cas12a-crRNA complex binds a dsDNA substrate and generates a 5′-overhang staggered cut by using a single RuvC nuclease.
Figure 4. Cas12a-crRNA complex binds a dsDNA substrate and generates a 5′-overhang staggered cut by using a single RuvC nuclease.
Molecules 27 06999 g004
Molecules 27 06999 g005 550
Figure 5. HOLMES detection platform. The target DNA was specifically amplified by PCR or other amplification methods, and crRNAs were designed to target somewhere in the target DNA. The PAM sequence was designed on the primer, which could be introduced during amplification. The CRISPR/Cas12a-crRNA was then mixed with the amplified product to form a ternary complex if the target DNA was present. The quenched reporter was then cleaved in trans, activating the fluorescence.
Figure 5. HOLMES detection platform. The target DNA was specifically amplified by PCR or other amplification methods, and crRNAs were designed to target somewhere in the target DNA. The PAM sequence was designed on the primer, which could be introduced during amplification. The CRISPR/Cas12a-crRNA was then mixed with the amplified product to form a ternary complex if the target DNA was present. The quenched reporter was then cleaved in trans, activating the fluorescence.
Molecules 27 06999 g005
Molecules 27 06999 g006 550
Figure 6. Complete SHERLOCK experimental workflow. The substrate DNA or RNA was first amplified by RPA or RT-RPA to increase the substrate concentration. Subsequently, T7 transcriptase transcribes the amplified DNA into RNA and mixes it with Cas13a–crRNA reaction solution. According to different reporters, lateral flow test strips or fluorescent signals can be selected as the output mode. Four Cas proteins with different cutting preferences can also be used for multiple detection.
Figure 6. Complete SHERLOCK experimental workflow. The substrate DNA or RNA was first amplified by RPA or RT-RPA to increase the substrate concentration. Subsequently, T7 transcriptase transcribes the amplified DNA into RNA and mixes it with Cas13a–crRNA reaction solution. According to different reporters, lateral flow test strips or fluorescent signals can be selected as the output mode. Four Cas proteins with different cutting preferences can also be used for multiple detection.
Molecules 27 06999 g006
Molecules 27 06999 g007 550
Figure 7. CRISPR–Cas14a has cis- and trans-cleavage activity on single-stranded DNA.
Figure 7. CRISPR–Cas14a has cis- and trans-cleavage activity on single-stranded DNA.
Molecules 27 06999 g007
Table
Table 1. More applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in pathogen detection.
Table 1. More applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in pathogen detection.
Cas
Protein		Pathogen TypePathogenVisualizationSensitivityTimeReferences
Cas9VirusesZikaColorimetry1 fM2–3h[26]
Cas9BacteriaListeria monocytogenesLFA150–200 copies/μL2 h[29]
Cas9BacteriaE. coliSDA/RCA40 CFU/mL2–3 h[30]
Cas9nBacteriaS. typhimuriumFluorescence2 copies/μL<1 h[27]
dCas9BacteriaMycobacterium
tuberculosis		Bioluminescence5 × 10−5 nmol/mL<1 h[31]
dCas9BacteriaMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)Fluorescence10 CFU/mL<0.5 h[32]
dCas9BacteriaScrub typhus (ST)/severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS)SMR biosensor0.54 aM/0.63 aM0.5 h[33]
dCas9VirusesHPVMicroplate reader/eye-<0.5 h[34]
dCas9BacteriaAcinetobacter baumannii/Klebsiella pneumoniaeSpectrometry10−5 mol/L1 h[35]
Table
Table 2. More applications of CRISPR/Cas12a in pathogen detection.
Table 2. More applications of CRISPR/Cas12a in pathogen detection.
Cas
Protein		PathogenPlatform NameAmplification MethodsVisualizationSensitivityTimeReferences
LbCas12aASFVPOCRPA/LAMPFluorescence100 fmol<2 h[45]
Cas12aASFVLAMP-CRISPRLAMPFluorescence7 copies/μL<1 h[46]
Cas12aYersinia pestisCas12a-UPTLFARPAUPT-LFA3 aM<1 h[47]
Cas12aPRRSV-RT-RPAssDNA-FQ1 copies/μL25 min[48]
Cas12aListeria monocytogenesCas12aFDetPCR/RAAFluorescence0.64 aM15 min[49]
Cas12aVibrio parahaemolyticus-RPAEye10−18 M<30 min[50]
Cas12aToxoplasma gondiiRAA-Cas12a-TgRAAssDNA-FQ1 fM1 h[51]
Cas12aStaphylococcus aureusRAA-Cas12aRAAFluorescence10 copies/μL1 h[52]
Cas12apathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica-RPAEye1.7 CFU/mL45 min[53]
Cas12aLeptospira-RPAFluorescence/LFDA100 cells/mL<2 h[54]
Table
Table 4. Application of the CRISPR system in pathogen detection.
Table 4. Application of the CRISPR system in pathogen detection.
Cas ProteinDetection PlatformGuide RNATarget TypeTrans-Cleavage
Activity		Amplification MethodsSensitivity
Cas9 sgRNADNANoCAS-EXPARaM (10−18)
Cas12Cas12aHOLMEScrRNADNAYesPCR/RT-PCRaM
Cas12aDETECTRcrRNADNAYesRPAaM
Cas12bHOLMESv2sgRNADNAYesLAMPaM
Cas13Cas13aSHERLOCKcrRNARNAYesRPAaM
Cas13bSHERLOCKv2crRNARNAYesRPAzM (10−21)
Cas14Cas14aDETECTRsgRNAssDNAYesRPAaM
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, B.; Yuan, C.; Li, L.; Long, M.; Chen, Z. Application of the CRISPR/Cas System in Pathogen Detection: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 6999. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206999

AMA Style

Yuan B, Yuan C, Li L, Long M, Chen Z. Application of the CRISPR/Cas System in Pathogen Detection: A Review. Molecules. 2022; 27(20):6999. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Bowei, Congcong Yuan, Lulu Li, Miao Long, and Zeliang Chen. 2022. "Application of the CRISPR/Cas System in Pathogen Detection: A Review" Molecules 27, no. 20: 6999. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206999

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop