Next Article in Journal
Biological Activity of Pumpkin Byproducts: Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Phytochemical Profiles and Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, and Antihemolytic Properties of Sauropus androgynus Dried Leaf Extracts for Ruminant Health and Production
Previous Article in Journal
Can Crude Oil Exploration Influence the Phytochemicals and Bioactivity of Medicinal Plants? A Case of Nigerian Vernonia amygdalina and Ocimum gratissimum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extraction of Polyphenols and Vitamins Using Biodegradable ATPS Based on Ethyl Lactate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Grain and Leaf Anthocyanin Concentration Varies among Purple Rice Varieties and Growing Condition in Aerated and Flooded Soil

1
Program in Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50290, Thailand
2
Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
3
Plant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
4
Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
5
Agronomy Division, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
6
Lanna Rice Research Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8355; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238355
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022

Abstract

:
Anthocyanins are a group of pigments responsible for the red-blue color in plant parts, and have potential for health benefits and pharmaceutical ingredients. To evaluate whether anthocyanin concentrations in five purple rice varieties could be varied by water condition, plants were grown in waterlogged and aerobic (well-drained) soil. Grain anthocyanin concentration and grain yield were measured at maturity, while leaf anthocyanin concentrations were measured at booting and flowering stages. Four varieties grown under the waterlogged condition had 2.0–5.5 times higher grain anthocyanin than in the aerobic condition. There was a positive relationship between grain and leaf anthocyanin at booting in the waterlogged condition (r = 0.90, p < 0.05), while grain and leaf anthocyanin were positively correlated at flowering in both the waterlogged (r = 0.88, p < 0.05) and aerobic (r = 0.97, p < 0.01) conditions. The results suggest that water management should be adopted as a practical agronomic tool for improving the anthocyanin concentration of purple rice for specialist markets, but the specific responses between rice varieties to water management should be carefully considered.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In purple rice, anthocyanin pigments accumulate in the grain pericarp and their expression in other plant parts varies with rice varieties. Some varieties have anthocyanins in leaves, leaf sheath, stigma and pericarp, and others in all above-ground plant parts [1,2]. Recently, anthocyanins have gained commercial attention due to potential beneficial health effects in food and pharmaceuticals [3,4,5,6]. The major health benefits of Thai purple rice relate to their free radical scavenging, anti-hyperlipidemic, anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties [7,8,9]. Furthermore, it is claimed that anthocyanins in rice and other plants also are effective cosmetic ingredients for preventing skin aging, UV induced skin damage and hair loss [10,11,12]. Thus, cultivation of rice varieties with high anthocyanin concentration could provide an opportunity for producers to enhance the profitability of their farms.
There is wide variation in grain anthocyanin concentration among the purple rice germplasm in Thailand. For example, the anthocyanin concentration ranged from 9.8–245.4 mg 100 g−1 in purple rice varieties collected from southern Thailand [13]. Local purple rice germplasm from the highlands in northern Thailand have high anthocyanin (22.7 ± 77.3 mg 100 g−1) as well as possess other nutritional qualities such as high Fe and Zn contents and anti-oxidative capacity [14]. Furthermore, several studies have established that purple rice varieties have high phenolic acid and flavonoid contents, and high antioxidant capacity compared with red and white pericarp rice varieties [15,16,17]. Therefore, it is claimed that purple rice varieties are a quality source of nutrients and are rich in bioactive compounds that are beneficial to human health [18]. Apart from the observed genetic variation in pigmentation among rice varieties, environmental factors can affect the anthocyanin concentration in the other plant organs. Thus, understanding factors controlling anthocyanin accumulation in rice would assist producers to optimize the production of high anthocyanin rice for their health benefits.
Anthocyanins play a major role in plant protection under adverse environments such as ultraviolet radiation, temperature, nutrient imbalances and low or excess water conditions [19,20,21]. Growing rice plants at different altitudes, as in lowland and highland locations, has been reported to influence grain anthocyanin concentrations among purple rice varieties and this was attributed to differences in soil nutrients and soil moisture or the micro-climate between the different altitudes [22]. Furthermore, anthocyanin concentrations in rice plant parts may be affected by agronomic practices as high N fertilizer rates promoted anthocyanin accumulation in the shoot but not in the grain [23]. Water is essential for physiological processes in plants, including growth, ontogeny and metabolism. However, its supply is not always optimal and the role of water in anthocyanin biosynthesis has not been investigated. Whether water management affects anthocyanin accumulation in purple rice is unknown. Given that purple rice varieties can be successfully grown under rain-fed and irrigated conditions, it is useful to investigate how waterlogged and aerobic conditions influence grain and leaf anthocyanin concentration among purple rice varieties. The hypothesis was addressed that anthocyanin in grain and leaves in different purple rice varieties could be stimulated by suitable water management. The research findings in this study will be of benefit to rice breeders and producers.

2. Results

Grain yield and grain anthocyanin concentration in brown rice were significantly affected by variety and water and there was an interaction effect between variety and water regimes (Table 1).
Among the five varieties, grain yield ranged from 2.0–5.5 t ha−1 in the waterlogged condition and 2.5–5.8 t ha−1 in the aerobic condition (Figure 1a). Grain yields of Kum 8 and KN were 1.3 and 1.4 times higher, respectively, in the waterlogged than in the aerobic soil. There was no effect of water regime on grain yield in the other three varieties.
Grain anthocyanin concentration ranged from 4.6 to 24.0 mg 100 g−1 in plants grown in the waterlogged condition and from 1.8 to 9.8 mg 100 g−1 in the aerobic condition (Figure 1b). Concentrations in Kum 8, Kum 9, KDSK and Kum Na were 2.1, 2.0, 2.4 and 5.5 times higher, respectively, in waterlogged plants than in plants grown in the aerobic condition, but there was no effect of water regime in KSW.
Leaf anthocyanin concentrations were affected by variety, water and growth stage, and interaction effects between the three factors were also observed (Table 1, Figure 2). The leaf anthocyanin concentrations ranged from 3.3 to 34.4 mg 100 g−1 in the waterlogged condition and from 6.6–55.6 mg 100 g−1 in the aerobic condition. At booting, leaf anthocyanin ranged from 3.3–55.6 mg 100 g−1, and at flowering the range was 7.3–30.3 mg 100 g−1 (Figure 2). Under the aerobic condition, leaf anthocyanin concentrations at booting in KDSK and KWS were 2.1 and 7.8 times higher, respectively, than in waterlogged plants. Moreover, at flowering, the leaf anthocyanin concentration in Kum 8 was 1.6 times higher in aerobically grown plants (Figure 3). In contrast, leaf anthocyanin concentration in Kum 9 at booting was depressed by 5.2 times in the aerobic condition compared with plants grown in the wetland condition. However, water regime had no effect on leaf anthocyanin concentration in KN. However, the water regime had no effect on leaf anthocyanin concentration in KN.
Grain yield was not associated with the concentrations of anthocyanin in the grain or in leaves at booting and flowering stages in either water regimes (Data not shown). On the other hand, there was a significant positive correlation between grain and leaf anthocyanin concentrations at booting in the plants grown in the waterlogged condition (r = 0.90 at p < 0.05), but there was no correlation in the aerobic condition (Figure 4a). At flowering, grain anthocyanin was positively correlated with leaf anthocyanin in both the waterlogged (r = 0.88, p < 0.05) and aerobic (r = 0.97, p < 0.01) conditions (Figure 4b).

3. Discussion

This experiment showed that grain and leaf anthocyanin concentrations were influenced by water regimes, but the responses were affected by rice variety and growth stage for the leaf anthocyanin concentration. Grain anthocyanin in four of the five purple rice varieties increased substantially when grown in the waterlogged condition compared with the aerobic condition. The 2.0–5.5 times increase occurred without a dilution effect from grain yield as indicated by there being no correlation between grain anthocyanin and yield. Unlike for the grain of plants grown in the wetland soil, both positive and negative responses in leaf anthocyanin were found among rice varieties and growth stages. Furthermore, there were positive relationships between grain and leaf anthocyanin concentration in both the waterlogged and aerobic plants at flowering but only in waterlogged plants at booting.
Anthocyanin metabolism in plants is regulated by genes which could be induced by environmental stresses such as ultraviolet radiation, temperature extremes and water deficit at specific development stages in vegetative and reproductive organs [24,25,26]. Responses of anthocyanin biosynthesis to unfavorable water conditions have been reported in cereal crops. In purple wheat, mild drought stress altered grain anthocyanin without an impact on grain yield, whereas severe drought stress increased both grain yield and anthocyanin at the late grain filling stage [27]. Furthermore, it has been reported that drought slightly decreased grain anthocyanin with upregulation and downregulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis related genes occurring at the same time in purple wheat [21]. A range of environmental factors have been shown to alter the accumulation of anthocyanins in grain and leaves of purple rice. For example, foliar application of MgSO4 increased grain and leaf sheath anthocyanin in Hom nil, an improved purple rice variety in Thailand, which were grown under 16 °C air temperature for 28 days [28]. In purplish leaf varieties, salt stress enhanced anthocyanin levels in rice seedlings and simultaneously increased the level of gene expression involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis [29]. Decreasing the water supply in containers, by alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD), markedly increased the anthocyanin content in the riceberry variety of purple rice [30]. By contrast, our results found that growing plants in aerobic soil reduced the grain anthocyanin in most of the purple rice varieties originating as wetland ecotypes. Factors that may have contributed to this response include the water status of the plants not reaching a threshold to trigger the protective mechanism of anthocyanin pigmentation in grain, and genotypic variation of this mechanism among purple rice varieties. Further research is needed to explore the physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of purple rice under different water regimes to better understand grain anthocyanin accumulation.
Leaf anthocyanin concentrations were more variable than in the grain. Anthocyanin biosynthesis in vegetative and reproductive parts are governed by different gene suites [31]. For example, anthocyanin biosynthesis in most organs of rice, except the pericarp, was activated by the R2R3-MYB transcription factor (TF), OsC1 [32]. Furthermore, OsC1, OsRb and OsDFR were identified as the determinants of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice leaves [33]. It has been reported that the genes Rd, OsCH and Kala4 are involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in the rice pericarp [34]. The influence of water regimes on gene expression, anthocyanin synthesis and storage in rice remain to be determined.
Grain anthocyanin concentration was affected by an interaction between variety and water condition in this study. The grain anthocyanin concentration was highly correlated with the anthocyanin concentration in the leaf, especially at the flowering stage. Appropriate water management could help to increase synthesis and accumulation of anthocyanin in the leaf and subsequently improve the grain anthocyanin content in purple rice varieties. A similar effect of variety × environment on proanthocyanidin contents and total antioxidant capacity was found in red rice varieties [35]. The results from this study provide useful information on the selection of purple rice varieties and cultivation method to obtain high-quality grain for the end users.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Rice Varieties and Cultivation

Five purple rice varieties (Kum 8, Kum 9, KDSK, KN and KWS provided by the Agronomy Division, Chiang Mai University, Thailand), photoperiod sensitive and wetland ecotypes, and with anthocyanin pigments in all shoot parts, were used for this research (Figure 5). The varieties were local purple rice commonly grown in northern Thailand. Field experiments were conducted during the wet season (July to December) at Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Soil physical and chemical characters were as follows: soil texture; sandy loam, pH (soil: water, 1:1) 6.3, organic matter 1.6%, available P 51.0 mg kg−1 (Bray II), exchangeable K 120.3 mg kg−1 (NH4OAc) and extractable Zn 1.2 mg kg−1. They were grown in two water conditions: waterlogged cultivation (water level kept at 10–15 cm above the soil surface until 14 days before harvesting) and aerobic cultivation (irrigated daily and allowed to drain). One-month-old seedlings of each variety were transplanted in 2 × 2 m plots at 0.25 × 0.25 m spacing between hills with three replications. Fertilizers were applied to all plots on a surface area basis at the rate of 30 kg N ha−1 (as urea), 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 (as triple super phosphate) and 30 kg K2O ha−1 (as potassium chloride) at 15 days after transplanting, followed by 20 kg N ha−1 at panicle initiation. Youngest emerged leaf blade samples were collected at booting and flowering stages, placed on ice, stored at −20 °C and then freeze dried. Panicles were taken at maturity and grain yield was measured at 14% moisture content. The unhusked grain samples were de-husked by a laboratory husker (Model P-1 from Ngek Seng Huat Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) to produce brown rice (caryopsis) and then freeze dried.

4.2. Anthocyanin Analysis

Sub samples of freeze-dried leaves were mechanically ground in a hammer mill and monomeric anthocyanin measured by the pH-differential method [36]. About 1.0 g of leaf and 2.5 g of whole grain of brown rice samples were extracted in double deionized water (DDI) at 50 °C for 30 min. The extracted solution was filtered through Whatman grade 1 paper, transferred to volumetric flasks and then adjusted with potassium chloride buffer (pH 1.0) and sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Each dilution was allowed to equilibrate for 15 min. The absorbance of anthocyanin pigment in 2 dilutions was measured at 520 and 700 nm using a spectrophotometer (Biochrom Libra S22, London, UK), against a blank cell filled with distilled water. The anthocyanin pigment concentration in the sample was determined with the following formula:
Anthocyanin pigment (cyanidin-3-glucoside) = (A × MW× DF × 1000)/(ε × L)
where A = (A520–A700) pH 1.0 − (A520–A700) pH 4.5; MW, molecular weight of cyanidin-3-glucoside = 449.2 (g/mol), DF = dilution factor; ε, molar absorptivity of the pigment = 26,900 molar extinction coefficient, in L × mol −1 × cm−1 and L = 1 cm for cell path length.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance was conducted to determine the effect of each factor and interaction between factors for grain yield, grain and leaf anthocyanin concentration using Statistix 8 (analytical software, version SXW, Tallahassee, FL, USA). The least significant difference (LSD) at p < 0.05 was applied to compare the means for significant differences. The relationship between data sets were analyzed with linear correlation.

5. Conclusions

Grain and leaf anthocyanin accumulation of purple rice varieties varied with the water regime. In general, grain anthocyanin concentrations were higher in plants grown in waterlogged than in aerobic soil but there were differences between varieties. Therefore, water management should be carefully considered during cultivation of purple rice varieties as high anthocyanin concentrations may increase the return to growers. This is of particular interest to producers interested in growing functional foods with high nutritional values for niche markets. Further research is required to determine the mechanisms by which the water regime affects the biosynthesis and storage of anthocyanin in the rice plant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J. and C.P.-u.-t.; methodology, P.J.; validation, S.K., B.D. and H.R.; formal analysis, P.J.; investigation, P.J.; resources, C.P.-u.-t.; data curation, B.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.J.; writing—review and editing, B.D.; visualization, C.P.-u.-t. and H.R.; supervision, C.P.-u.-t.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, P.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Thailand Research Fund under the Royal Golden Jubilee Advanced Programme, (RAP60K0011) and Chiang Mai University, Thailand (R000029749).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Reddy, V.S.; Dash, S.; Reddy, A.R. Anthocyanin pathway in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Identification of a mutant showing dominant inhibition of anthocyanins in leaf and accumulation of proanthocyanidins in pericarp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995, 91, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yamuangmorn, S.; Prom-u-thai, C. The potential of high-anthocyanin purple rice as a functional ingredient in human health. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Khoo, H.E.; Azlan, A.; Tang, S.T.; Lim, S.M. Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: Colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 61, 1361779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhu, F. Anthocyanins in cereals: Composition and health effects. Food Res. Int. 2018, 109, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhu, F. Proanthocyanidins in cereals and pseudocereals. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nurt. 2019, 59, 1521–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gonçalves, A.C.; Nunes, A.R.; Falcão, A.; Alves, G.; Silva, L.R. Dietary effects of anthocyanins in human health: A comprehensive review. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sivamaruthi, B.; Kesika, P.; Chaiyasut, C. Anthocyanins in Thai rice varieties: Distribution and pharmacological significance. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 2024–2032. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wongwichai, T.; Teeyakasem, P.; Pruksakorn, D.; Kongtawelert, P.; Pothacharoen, P. Anthocyanins and metabolites from purple rice inhibit IL-1β-induced matrix metalloproteinases expression in human articular chondrocytes through the NF-κB and ERK/MAPK pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 112, 108610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mapoung, S.; Semmarath, W.; Arjsri, P.; Thippraphan, P.; Srisawad, K.; Umsumarng, S.; Phromnoi, K.; Jamjod, S.; Prom-u-thai, C.; Dejkriengkraikul, P. Comparative analysis of bioactive-phytochemical characteristics, antioxidants activities, and anti-inflammatory properties of selected black rice germ and bran (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rojo, L.; Roopchand, D.; Graf, B.; Cheng, D.; Ribnicky, D.; Fridlender, B.; Raskin, I.B. Role of Anthocyanins in Skin Aging and UV Induced Skin Damage. In Anthocyanins in Health and Disease, 1st ed.; Wallace, T.C., Giusti, M.M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 307–316. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ribeiro, A.S.; Estanqueiro, M.; Oliveira, M.B.; Sousa Lobo, J.M. Main benefits and applicability of plant extracts in skin care products. Cosmetics 2015, 2, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Manosroi, J.; Chankhampan, C.; Kitdamrongtham, W.; Zhang, J.; Abe, M.; Akihisa, T.; Manosroi, W.; Manosroi, A. In vivo anti-ageing activity of cream containing niosomes loaded with purple glutinous rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) extract. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2020, 42, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yodmanee, S.; Karrila, T.; Pakdeechanuan, P. Physical, chemical and antioxidant properties of pigmented rice grown in Southern Thailand. Int. Food Res. J. 2011, 18, 901–906. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jamjod, S.; Yimyam, N.; Lordkaew, S.; Prom-u-thai, C.; Rerkasem, B. Characterization of on-farm rice germplasm in an area of the crop’s center of diversity. Chiang Mai Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 2017, 16, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Vichapong, J.; Sookserm, M.; Srijesdaruk, V.; Swatsitang, P.; Srijaranai, S. High performance liquid chromatographic analysis of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activities in rice varieties. LWT Food Sci. Tech. 2010, 43, 1325–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, M.W.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhang, F.X.; Liu, R.H. Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of black rice bran of different commercially available varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 7580–7587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pengkumsri, N.; Chaiyasut, C.; Saenjum, C.; Sirilun, S.; Peerajan, S.; Suwannalert, P.; Sirisattha, S.; Sivamaruthi, B. Physicochemical and antioxidative properties of black, brown and red rice varieties of northern Thailand. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 35, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mbanjo, E.G.N.; Kretzschmar, T.; Jones, H.; Ereful, N.; Blanchard, C.; Boyd, L.A.; Sreenivasulu, N. The genetic basis and nutritional benefits of pigmented rice grain. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Khlestkina, E.K. The adaptive role of flavonoids: Emphasis on cereals. Cereal Res. Commun. 2013, 41, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naing, A.H.; Kim, C.K. Abiotic stress-induced anthocyanins in plants: Their role in tolerance to abiotic stresses. Physiol. Plant 2021, 172, 1711–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.; Lü, X.; Wang, X.; Peng, Q.; Zhang, M.; Ren, M. Biotic and abiotic stress-responsive genes are stimulated to resist drought stress in purple wheat. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rerkasem, B.; Jumrus, S.; Yimyam, N.; Prom-u-thai, C. Variation of grain nutritional quality among Thai purple rice genotypes grown at two different altitudes. Sci. Asia 2015, 41, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yamuangmorn, S.; Dell, B.; Rerkasem, B.; Prom-u-thai, C. Applying nitrogen fertilizer increased anthocyanin in vegetative shoots but not in grain of purple rice genotypes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4527–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chalker-Scott, L. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Winkel-Shirley, B. Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koes, R.; Verweij, W.; Quattrocchio, F. Flavonoids: A colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, X.; Lv, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, M.; Ren, M. Effects of abiotic stress on anthocyanin accumulation and grain weight in purple wheat. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019, 69, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tisarum, R.; Theerawitaya, C.; Samphumphuang, T.; Cha-um, S. Regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L. Subsp. indica) using MgSO4 spraying and low temperature. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2018, 64, 1663–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chunthaburee, S.; Sakuanrung, S.; Wongwarat, T.; Sanitchon, J.; Pattanagul, W.; Theerakulp, P. Changes in anthocyanin content and expression of anthocyanin synthesis genes in seedlings of black glutinous rice in response to salt stress. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2016, 15, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rungrat, T.; Poothab, C. Short-term water deficit stress induces anthocyanin accumulation and changes in grain yield and yield components in colored rice grain. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2019, 53, 292–297. [Google Scholar]
  31. Böhm, H. G. Mazza und E. Miniati: Anthocyanins in Fruits, Vegetables and Grains. 362 Seiten, zahlr. Abb. und Tab. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, Tokyo 1993. Preis: 144. Food Nahr. 1994, 38, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, X.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, C.; Wu, W.; Ren, N.; Jiang, C.; Yu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Q.; et al. The C-S-A gene system regulates hull pigmentation and reveals evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1485–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zheng, J.; Wu, H.; Zhu, H.; Huang, C.; Liu, C.; Chang, Y.; Kong, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, G.; Lin, Y.; et al. Determining factors, regulation system, and domestication of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice leaves. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, X.; Xia, X.; Zhang, Z.; Nong, B.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xiong, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, H.; Pan, Y.; et al. Identification of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes in rice pericarp using PCAMP. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1700–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shao, Y.; Xu, F.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Beta, T.; Bao, J. Analysis of genotype, environment, and their interaction effects on the phytochemicals and antioxidant capacities of red rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cereal Chem. 2015, 92, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Escribano-Bailón, M.T.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C. Anthocyanins in cereals. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1054, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Grain yield (a) and grain anthocyanin concentration (b) of 5 purple rice varieties grown under 2 water regimes (waterlogged, W+; aerobic, W0) (Significant interaction effect of variety × water regime at p < 0.01 **). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate least significant differences between water condition in each variety at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Grain yield (a) and grain anthocyanin concentration (b) of 5 purple rice varieties grown under 2 water regimes (waterlogged, W+; aerobic, W0) (Significant interaction effect of variety × water regime at p < 0.01 **). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate least significant differences between water condition in each variety at p < 0.05.
Molecules 27 08355 g001
Figure 2. Anthocyanin concentrations in leaves at booting and flowering stages of 5 purple rice varieties grown under waterlogged (W+) and aerobic (W0) conditions (Significant interaction effect of variety × water regime × growth). Significant interaction effect of variety × water regime × growth stage at p < 0.001 ***. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate least significant differences between treatment means in each variety at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Anthocyanin concentrations in leaves at booting and flowering stages of 5 purple rice varieties grown under waterlogged (W+) and aerobic (W0) conditions (Significant interaction effect of variety × water regime × growth). Significant interaction effect of variety × water regime × growth stage at p < 0.001 ***. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate least significant differences between treatment means in each variety at p < 0.05.
Molecules 27 08355 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of anthocyanin in leaves at booting and flowering stages of 5 purple rice varieties grown under waterlogged compared with aerobic condition. Each data point is the mean of 3 replications.
Figure 3. Comparison of anthocyanin in leaves at booting and flowering stages of 5 purple rice varieties grown under waterlogged compared with aerobic condition. Each data point is the mean of 3 replications.
Molecules 27 08355 g003
Figure 4. Correlation between grain anthocyanin and anthocyanin in leaves at booting (a) and flowering (b) under waterlogged (W+) and aerobic conditions (W0). Each data point is the mean of 3 replications. (Significant correlation at p < 0.05 * and p < 0.01 **).
Figure 4. Correlation between grain anthocyanin and anthocyanin in leaves at booting (a) and flowering (b) under waterlogged (W+) and aerobic conditions (W0). Each data point is the mean of 3 replications. (Significant correlation at p < 0.05 * and p < 0.01 **).
Molecules 27 08355 g004
Figure 5. Purple rice seedling of Kum 8, Kum 9 and KWS used in this experiment.
Figure 5. Purple rice seedling of Kum 8, Kum 9 and KWS used in this experiment.
Molecules 27 08355 g005
Table 1. Significant effects by ANOVA of variety, water and growth stage on grain yield and anthocyanin in grain and leaf of 5 purple rice varieties grown in waterlogged and aerobic condition.
Table 1. Significant effects by ANOVA of variety, water and growth stage on grain yield and anthocyanin in grain and leaf of 5 purple rice varieties grown in waterlogged and aerobic condition.
EffectGrain YieldAnthocyanin in GrainAnthocyanin in Leaf
Variety (V)p < 0.001p < 0.001p < 0.001
Water (W)p < 0.05p < 0.05p < 0.01
Stage (S)--p < 0.001
V × Wp < 0.01p < 0.01p < 0.001
V × S--p < 0.001
W × S--p < 0.05
V × W × S--p < 0.001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaksomsak, P.; Konseang, S.; Dell, B.; Rouached, H.; Prom-u-thai, C. Grain and Leaf Anthocyanin Concentration Varies among Purple Rice Varieties and Growing Condition in Aerated and Flooded Soil. Molecules 2022, 27, 8355. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238355

AMA Style

Jaksomsak P, Konseang S, Dell B, Rouached H, Prom-u-thai C. Grain and Leaf Anthocyanin Concentration Varies among Purple Rice Varieties and Growing Condition in Aerated and Flooded Soil. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8355. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaksomsak, Pennapa, Sawika Konseang, Bernard Dell, Hatem Rouached, and Chanakan Prom-u-thai. 2022. "Grain and Leaf Anthocyanin Concentration Varies among Purple Rice Varieties and Growing Condition in Aerated and Flooded Soil" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8355. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238355

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop