Next Article in Journal
Partial Characterization of Lectins Purified from the Surco and Vara (Furrow and Rod) Varieties of Black Phaseolus vulgaris
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Optoelectronic Properties of D-A and A-D-A 2,2′-bi[3,2-b]thienothiophene Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Investigations on the Sensing Mechanism of Phenanthroimidazole Fluorescent Probes for the Detection of Selenocysteine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and the Crystal Structure of a New Chiral 1D Metal–Organic Coordination Polymer Based on L-Prolineamide-Substituted Diarylacetylenedicarboxylic Acid Derivative
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Deep Eutectic Solvents as à-la-Carte Medium for Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Organic Processes

Departamento de Química Orgánica and Instituto de Síntesis Orgánica (ISO), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8445; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238445
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Organic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Our society is facing a tremendous challenge to become more sustainable in every sphere of life. Regarding the chemical industry, one of the most significant issues to be addressed is the use of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as solvents because they are petrol-derived and most of them are toxic and flammable. Among the possible solutions, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as sustainable alternatives to VOCs in organic catalyzed transformations and other fields. The advantages of these new reaction media are not only related to their more benign physical and chemical properties and, for most of them, their renewable sources but also due to the possibility of being recycled after their use, increasing the sustainability of the catalyzed process in which they are involved. However, their use as media in catalytic transformations introduces new challenges regarding the compatibility and activity of known catalysts. Therefore, designed catalysts and “à-la-carte” DESs systems have been developed to overcome this problem, to maximize the reaction outcomes and to allow the recyclability of the catalyst/media system. Over the last decade, the popularity of these solvents has steadily increased, with several examples of efficient metal-catalyzed organic transformations, showing the efficiency of the catalysts/DES system, compared to the related transformations carried out in VOCs. Additionally, due to the inherent properties of the DES, unknown transformations can be carried out using the appropriated catalyst/DES system. All these examples of sustainable catalytic processes are compiled in this review.

1. Introduction

Over the last decades, sustainability has been a key factor in modern life. Rapidly evolving society and its needs cause an increase in industrial production, and thus more environmental concerns. This trend was reflected in 2015 by the United Nations when a development plan that was focused on sustainability was published under the title “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” [1]. This trend applies to all aspects of modern society, including chemistry.
The use of solvents in the chemical industry can easily be identified as one of the major concerns when applying sustainable principles. Traditionally, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been employed as solvents. Most of these compounds are fossil fuel derivatives, which are not renewable, highly toxic, non-degradable, and are accumulated in the atmosphere due to their low boiling points, leaving behind a very high carbon footprint. According to recent reports, solvents constitute 80 to 90% of the non-aqueous mass employed when synthesizing an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) [1]. Owing to these facts, finding alternative solvents is crucial to improve the sustainability of these industries.
In this sense, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have been proposed as alternative solvents in organic chemistry. DESs are defined as systems formed from a eutectic mixture of two or more components, usually Lewis or Brønsted acids and bases that can contain a variety of anionic and/or cationic species [2]. Eutectic formation occurs through intermolecular interactions between DES constituents (with hydrogen bonds being one of the most significant ones), but there are non-covalent or ionic bonds involved. These interactions decrease the lattice energy, explaining the drop in melting point, compared with their components.
According to their composition, DESs can be divided into five main types [2,3]:
  • Type I: formed by a quaternary ammonium salt and a metal chloride.
  • Type II: differs from type I in having hydrated metal halides instead of non-hydrated ones.
  • Type III: formed from quaternary ammonium salt and hydrogen bond donors (HBDs), e.g., alcohols, amino acids or amides.
  • Type IV: formed from transition-metal salts and HBDs.
  • Type V: formed exclusively by non-ionic components.
Eutectic mixtures can be synthesized by mixing their components in an appropriate ratio and heating them slightly until a melt is formed. Thus, the atom economy of the process is complete, and no by-products are formed. The easy preparation and atom economy are two of the main advantages offered by DESs, compared to the related ionic liquids. In addition to this, other advantages in their use are their negligible boiling points, the cost of their components, their renewable origin and low toxicity, and high biodegradability. These facts make them promising candidates to be used for the replacement of VOCs in organic reactions.
Not surprisingly, although early applications of DESs were related to metal extraction, electrodeposition or electropolishing were soon considered as a reaction media for organic transformations. Although, in the past 10 years, DESs proved to be useful reaction media in a myriad of organic transformations, this review will focus on transition-metal-catalyzed processes, tackling especially homogeneous catalysis. Attending to the previous classification, types I, II and IV can contain a transition metal in their composition and may act as both a solvent and catalyst, while the more environmentally friendly types III and V require the use of an external metal precursor as a reaction catalyst. In these catalytic transformations, it is essential to ensure the compatibility of the catalyst with the used DESs to provide the expected products selectively and efficiently. Due to the high polar nature of DESs, sometimes transition-metal salts can be used as a catalyst, but in most cases, the design of ligands to stabilize or modify the reactivity of the metals is required. In any case, DESs provide a unique advantage compared to VOCs, which is the possible recovery of the ligand–metal–solvent system. This allows their recyclability and enhances the sustainability of a given process. Therefore, this advantage has been highlighted in this review by including the number of reaction cycles that can be performed for each discussed example. Additionally, DESs can solubilize some gases to a greater extent, compared to VOCs and, therefore, they are excellent solvent systems to perform hydrogenations, oxidations and carbonylation reactions. In fact, through the careful choice of the appropriate DESs and catalysts, sulfonylation reactions can be performed in DESs by generating in situ SO2 from simple inorganic sulfur salts.
In view of greater clarity, references have been classified, according to the described transformation in the main blocks: RedOx processes, cyclization, cross-couplings, C-H functionalization, multicomponent and miscellaneous reactions. At the end of each section, a table summarizing the encountered results for each transformation has been added, providing a straightforward and clear view of the state of the art for each transformation and allowing comparisons of the achieved results.

2. RedOx Processes

As commented in the introduction, types I, II and IV DESs contain metallic salts as part of their structure. Therefore, some of these eutectic mixtures can be used as solvents and catalysts at the same time. One catalytic DES system used for oxidation reactions is the mixture FeCl3.6H2O:(CH2OH)2 (2:1), which has been applied to the oxidation of cellulose to gluconic acid. The product, which could be obtained in up to 52% yield, precipitated from the reaction medium, facilitating product isolation. In addition, the DES could be reused up to five times without losing its activity with an O2 treatment after each cycle (Figure 1, Table 1, entry 1) [4]. Similarly, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) has been obtained in high yields by treatment of glucose at 130 °C with the eutectic ChCl:CrCl3.6H2O in a biphasic mixture with solvents, such as EtOAc, through different dehydration processes [5].
Another example of a catalytic DES system was employed for the oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides by H2O2 using catalytic amounts of the mixture ZrOCl2.H2O:urea (1:5), although MeOH was needed as a solvent. However, in the case of oxidizing aryl boronic acids to phenols, no methanol as a co-solvent was required, performing the reaction with only DESs and 30% aqueous H2O2 as the solvent. The DES dissolved in water could be concentrated and reused up to three times, observing a slight decrease in the reaction yield [6]. Much more recently, the catalytic system based on CuCl2, TMEDA and TEMPO was employed in water and in the mixture d-fructose:urea (3:2) to perform the selective aerobic oxidation of alcohols. In addition, telescoped one-pot-hybrid reactions are feasible, in such a way that either an addition of Grignard reagents or a Henry reaction can be performed on the in situ generated aldehyde (Figure 2, Table 1, entry 2) [7].
Other oxidations are based on heterogeneous catalysts, such as metal-organic frameworks. These catalysts have been used in combination with DESs to perform reactions, such as the synthesis of HMF from carbohydrates [8] or the epoxidation of styrene [9].
Hydrogenation and hydroformylation reactions have been more extensively studied. One of the earliest examples was performed in a mixture of DMU and a ß-cyclodextrin derivative as a solvent, using Rh(acac)(CO)2 in combination with the ligand triphenylphosphine-3,3′,3′′-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt. This ionic phosphine derivative enhanced the compatibility of the catalysts with the polar solvent. Therefore, 1-decene was converted at 90 °C, 1 h into the corresponding aldehyde using 50 bar of a mixture of CO/H2, affording a ratio of the linear to the branched product of 2.3:1 [10]. Further studies by the same group on this topic using different solvent mixtures determined that the conversion was highly dependent on the solubility of the substrate and inversely dependent on the solvent viscosity [11]. The hydroformylation of 1-decene was also studied in different choline chloride-based eutectic mixtures. After screening different conditions, including several eutectic mixtures and ligands, the best results were obtained with Rh(acac)(CO)2 using BiPhePhos as a ligand in ChCl:urea (1:2) as reaction media. In this way, the yield of aldehydes was 41%, showing high selectivity to the linear aldehyde over the branched one (97:3, Figure 3, Table 1, entry 3) [12].
Palladium-catalyzed hydrogenations have also been investigated in DESs media, although given the nature of these reactions, most of the systems are based on heterogeneous catalysts. One of the earliest examples is the Pd/C-catalyzed hydrogenation of phenacyl azides in ChCl:glycerol (1:2), providing intermediates, which yielded symmetrical 2,5-diarylpyrazines. In addition, the nucleophilic substitution of α-halo ketones with sodium azide can be performed in a one-pot manner using the eutectic mixture as a solvent (Figure 4, Table 1, entry 4) [13].
The use of a mixture of choline tosylalaninate with glycerol was reported for performing Pd-NPs-catalyzed hydrogenations of 4-phenylbut-3-en-2-one and 4-phenylbutan-2-one. An interesting effect must be pointed out. This is the fact that the use of high pressures of mixtures of CO2 and H2 improved the results over the use of pure H2 atmospheres. It was rationalized that high pressures of CO2 decreased the viscosity of the DESs while improving the diffusion coefficient of H2 and reactants to almost two times their initial values, thus enhancing the catalytic activity [14]. The depolymerization of lignin is another pertinent topic in current sustainable chemistry. A linear homopolymer can be found in castor seed coats and a model benzodioxane compound present in this polymer was subjected to hydrogenolysis using Pd/C or Ru/C at 180 °C for 3 h under 3 MPa H2 atmosphere and ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2) as a solvent (Figure 5, Table 1, entry 5) [15].
Pd NPs have also been synthetized directly on DES based on bio-ammonium salts and glycerol methyl ethers. The corresponding solutions were applied to the hydrogenation of alkenes, alkynes and carbonyl compounds (Figure 6) [16].
Other hydrogenation processes involve the use of DESs to prepare supported metallic catalysts, although the hydrogenation reactions are performed in other solvents, as is the case of Pd supported on pyrolyzed DES [17], Pd-DES@SiO2 [18], Pd immobilized on a composite of halloysite and DES [19] or gold nanoparticles dispersed in ChCl:urea (1:2) [20].
All these DES-mediated procedures try to reduce the environmental impact of chemical transformations by using sustainable solvents. Hydrogenations, however, fail to follow another principle of green chemistry, namely, safety, since hydrogenations require high hydrogen pressures. To avoid that, a safer method was developed by the in situ generation of hydrogen from aluminum powder and water in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as a solvent. Thus, the generated hydrogen was employed to reduce a wide variety of functional groups, such as aldehydes, epoxides, nitro-compounds, imines, nitriles, alkenes or alkynes in good yields at only 40 °C in 8 h reaction time (Figure 7, Table 1, entry 6) [21].
To conclude, although most hydrogenations are performed using a palladium catalyst, a Ru(II)-transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds was described in the biphasic mixture of TBABr:HCOOH (1:1) and cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME). In this case, the eutectic mixture acts as a reaction medium, as well as a hydrogen source, with the complex [RuCl(p-cymene)Cl2]2 in combination with the ligand 1,1′-Ferrocenediyl-bis(diphenylphosphine) (dppf) being the catalyst. Reactions were performed between 40 and 80 °C (depending on the substrate reactivity) using triethylamine as a base (Figure 8, Table 1, entry 7) [22].
Table 1. Selected examples of RedOx processes catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
Table 1. Selected examples of RedOx processes catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
EntryReactionDESConditionsProductRef.
1Hydrolysis and oxidationFeCl6H2O:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)120 °CGluconic acid[4]
2Alcohol Oxidationd-fructose:urea (3:2)25–40 °CKetones/Aldehydes[7]
3HydroformylationDMU: RAME-ß-CDCO/H2 (50 bar)Aldehydes[12]
4HydrogenationsChCl:glycerol (1:2)Pd/C, H2Diarylpyrazines[13]
5HydrogenolysisChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)Ru/C or Pd/C, H2Resorcinol derivatives[15]
6HydrogenationChCl:glycerol (1:2)Al, KOH, H2OAlkanes/alcohols/amines [21]
7Transfer hydrogenationTBAB:HCOOH (1:1)[Ru], NEt3, CPMESecondary alcohols[22]

3. Cyclization Reactions

Heterocyclic compounds are broadly present in nature, as well as in biologically active compounds used in the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, loads of synthetic methods have been developed, with several strategies being carried out in DESs as reaction media. Two main strategies to generate new rings will be discussed, i.e., cycloadditions and condensation reactions.

3.1. Cycloadditions

One of the first examples of cycloadditions in DESs is based on the cycloisomerization of γ-alkynoic acids in ChCl:urea (1:2) using a gold-based catalyst. The reaction was performed under air atmosphere at room temperature and completed in 0.25–3.5 h, with the catalyst being reusable in up to four cycles without losing its catalytic activity (Table 2, entry 1) [23]. Shortly after, the same group reported the cycloisomerization of (Z)-enynols into furans. In that case, a bis(iminophosphorane)-Au(I) complex was used in the mixture ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as a reaction medium in the absence of any other co-catalyst. In addition, the in situ generated furan derivative could be further transformed via a Diels–Alder reaction in a one-pot manner (Table 2, entry 2) [24]. Another iminophosphorane-Au complex was also described to catalyze the cycloisomerization of various alkynyl amides into alkylidene lactams using water or ChCl:urea (1:2) as solvents in good-to-excellent yields [25]. Moreover, the cycloisomerization of γ-alkynoic acids was described using a recyclable palladium supported on a magnetite catalyst. Although water was found to be an excellent solvent for this transformation, the reaction also proceeded with good yields using the mixture ChCl:urea (1:2) at 90 °C in 10 min reaction time (Figure 9) [26].
Other cycloadditions take advantage of the properties of type I DESs, using them as solvents and catalysts. In this sense, the mixture ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) was employed for promoting the [2 + 3] cycloaddition of nitriles and sodium azide. The reaction, performed at 140 °C for 0.5–12 h, afforded excellent yields of 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles using aromatic or benzylic nitriles as starting materials [27]. However, the more sustainable mixture ChCl:urea (1:2) can also be used to carry out this transformation using Cu(OAc)2 as catalyst. Thus, the one-pot reaction of aromatic aldehydes, hydroxylamine hydrochloride and sodium azide was performed at 100 °C for 12 h (Figure 10, Table 2, entry 3) [28].
Similarly, the synthesis of triazoles via copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAc) has been described in DESs media. Namely, ChCl:glycerol (1:2) was employed as a solvent to perform the copper-catalyzed azidation of aryl bromides, followed by the cycloaddition to an alkyne to yield the corresponding 1,4-disubstituted triazole derivatives. In addition, the catalytic system could be reused several times, although results were improved when fresh ligand (N,N′-dimethylethylendiamine) was added after the third cycle [29]. NADES have also been shown to promote this transformation, acting both as solvents and in stabilizing catalytic copper intermediates, as well as by interacting with the alkyne through the H bond, as demonstrated by DFT calculations. Thus, the mixtures ascorbic acid:choline chloride (1:2) and glycolic acid:trimethylglycine (2:1) were effectively used as solvents and avoided the need of using external bases or reducing agents, with the solvent being recyclable up to three times without loss of activity (Table 2, entry 4) [30]. In addition, a heterogeneous catalyst based on copper iodide supported on 3-thionicotinyl-urea-modified magnetic nanoparticles was also employed to perform this transformation using ChCl:PEG (1:4) as a solvent (Figure 11) [31].

3.2. Cyclizations through Condensation

Condensation reactions are a second approach to perform cyclization reactions. Early reports of condensation-based cyclizations in DES media were reported using heterogeneous catalysts. For instance, the mixture citric acid:DMU (7:2) was used as a solvent for performing the synthesis of [1,2-a]pyridines using 5 mol% of recyclable CuFeO2 to catalyze the reaction between 2-aminopyridine derivatives, aldehydes and alkynes. The reaction did not proceed in traditional solvents under these conditions. However, the use of an acid as a component of the eutectic mixture was crucial to obtaining good yields, proving that DES played a double role, both as a solvent and also as an acidic catalyst (Table 2, entry 5) [32]. These compounds have also been prepared in TBAB:glycerol (1:2) using copper iodide supported on magnetic nanoparticles [33]. Another example of a heterogeneous catalyst for performing cyclization reactions in DESs is based on molybdenum supported on graphene oxide/Fe3O4, which was employed for the synthesis of spiro-oxindole dihydropyridines in ChCl:urea (1:2). These reactions were carried out by the combination of isatins, malononitrile and anilinolactones at 90 °C under microwave irradiation. The catalytic system could be reused up to eight times, showing almost negligible leaching for Fe and Mo in the ChCl:urea (1:2) phase (Figure 12, Table 2, entry 6) [34]. Similarly, 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4-(1H)-ones and spiroquinazolin-4(3H)-ones derivatives were prepared with Fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2-OSO3H magnetic nanoparticles as a catalyst in the mixture ChCl:urea (1:2), by reaction of isatonic anhydride, anilines (or ammonium chloride) and cyclic aliphatic ketones or benzaldehyde derivatives [35]. The same eutectic mixture was also employed for the preparation of 7-aryl-benzo[h]tetrazolo[5,1-b]quinazoline-5,6-dione, employing a magnetic polymeric nanostructure, with DES-catalyst being recyclable up to six times [36]. Finally, a DES-coated metal-organic framework was employed for the multicomponent synthesis of 2-amino-4H-chromenes, although, in this case, reactions were carried out in a solvent-free fashion [37].
The S-heterocyclodehydration of 1-mercapto-3-yn-2-ols catalyzed by PdI2 was reported in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) at 50 °C, affording seven examples of thiophene derivatives with good yields. The catalytic system was recycled up to six times without any loss of activity (Figure 13; Table 2, entry 7). Moreover, the starting material of this reaction could also be prepared in eutectic solvent as reaction media [38].
Due to the nature of most condensation reactions, the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst is beneficial for the reaction to take place in good yields. Thus, type II DESs based on hydrated metallic salts and quaternary ammonium salts can be applied not only as solvents but also as catalysts to perform these transformations. In this sense, the mixture ChCl:ZnCl2 (3:2) was used for synthesizing tetrahydroquinolines from anilines, aromatic aldehydes and trans-anethole, a naturally occurring essential oil. Firstly, condensation takes place to form an imine derivative, followed by an aza-Diels–Alder reaction to afford the desired heterocycle. Moderate-to-excellent yields were obtained with high diastereoselectivity and wide substrate scope (Table 2, entry 8) [39]. The same eutectic mixture was also reported as a catalyst for the synthesis of 4-aryldeneisoxazol-5(4H)-ones, although the reaction was performed in water as a solvent [40]. In addition, the type-IV mixture ZnCl2:urea (2:7) has also been employed as a catalytic solvent for performing reactions, such as the synthesis of 2,4,5-triaryl-1H-imidazoles and 2-aryl-1H-phenantro[9,10-d]imidazoles. Those compounds were prepared by the reaction between dicarbonyl compounds, ammonium acetate and aromatic aldehydes. Up to 25 examples were reported with excellent yields, with the DES being recovered by dissolution in water, filtration and lyophilization. This allowed the DES to be reused up to four times with only a slight decrease in the catalytic activity (Table 2, entry 9) [41]. Another heterocyclic synthesis in ZnCl2:urea (2:7) is the synthesis of 2-benzimidazolones and 2-imidazolones, which relies on a triple role for the DES, i.e., the eutectic mixture acts as a solvent, as a Lewis acid catalyst and as a reagent (urea). Therefore, arene-1,2-diamine derivatives were heated at 100 °C for 4 h in the aforementioned DES, affording seven examples of the corresponding 2-benzimidazolone derivatives in moderate-to-excellent yields. If benzoin derivates were employed instead of the diamine compounds, the corresponding 2-imidazolone products could be obtained in good yields, employing a method that avoids the generation of gas ammonia evolution (Figure 14, Table 2, entry 10) [42].
Apart from ZnCl2-based DES, the use of ZrOCl2.8H2O in combination with different hydrogen bond donors (HBD) has also been explored. One example is the synthesis of 1,8-dioxooctahydroxanthenes from dimedone and aromatic aldehydes. This reaction was explored using urea, ethylene glycol and glycerol as HBD. The best results were obtained with the mixture ZrOCl2.8H2O:(CH2OH)2 (1:2), which was explained by the ability of ethylene glycol to activate the aldehyde through hydrogen bonding and the lower viscosity of the mixture, compared to the glycerol one, which favors the free motion of reactants. Furthermore, DES could be recovered and reused up to five times without a noticeable loss in its catalytic activity (Figure 15, Table 2, entry 11) [43]. However, the synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives was far more efficient in the mixture ZrOCl2.8H2O:urea (1:5), which was achieved by the reaction of arene-1,2-diamine with aromatic aldehydes. The main reasons behind the good results obtained with this DES are the higher acidity and lower viscosity of this mixture compared with their ethylene glycol or glycerol HBD analogues (Table 2, entry 12) [44].
Table 2. Selected examples of cyclization processes catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
Table 2. Selected examples of cyclization processes catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
EntryReactionDESConditionsProductRef.
1Cycloisomerization of alkynoic acidsChCl:urea (1:2)[Au]Enol-lactones[23,26]
2Cycloisomerization of Z-enynolsChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Au]Furans[24]
33+2 CycloadditionChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)100–140 °C1H-Tetrazoles[27,28]
43+2 CycloadditionChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Cu], 50–75 °CTriazoles[29,30]
5A3 couplingCitric acid:DMU (7:2)CuFeO2imidazo[1,2a]pyridines[32,33]
6CondensationChCl:urea (1:2)[Fe/Mo], MWspirooxyndoles[34]
7S-heterocyclizationChCl:glycerol (1:2)PdI2/KIThiophene derivatives[38]
8Condensation + D.A.ChCl:ZnCl2 (3:2)110 °CTetrahydroisoquinolines[39]
9CondensationZnCl2:urea (2:7)110 °Cphenantro[9,10a]imidazoles[41]
10CondensationZnCl2:urea (2:7)100 °C2-benzimidazolones[42]
11CondensationZrOCl2:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)r.t.dioxooctahydroxanthenes[43]
12CondensationZrOCl2:urea (1:5)r.t.benzimidazoles[44]

4. Cross-Coupling Reactions

One of the first reports of metal-catalyzed processes in DESs was the biaryl synthesis through Stille reaction in mixtures of sugars, dimethylurea and ammonium chloride. Alkylation and arylations were performed with aryl bromides as coupling partners, obtaining excellent yields. It is worth mentioning that this reaction was performed under palladium catalysis using triphenyl arsine as the ligand, while using the more common (2-biphenyl)dicyclohexylphosphine resulted in a lower yield. Melt and catalyst could be reused three times, showing a slow conversion decrease after each cycle (Figure 16) [45].
When it comes to transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, there is one that stands out, the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling. In fact, the first Suzuki reaction performed in DESs was already reported in 2006 by the König group. At that time, three examples of biaryl products were obtained from the reaction between phenylboronic acid and different aryl bromides, using 10 mol% of Pd(OAc)2 and sodium carbonate as a base in mixtures of sugars–urea and chloride salts at 90 °C with yields ranging from 78 to 97% (Figure 17) [46].
Eight years after the first report, the use of ß-cyclodextrin-capped Pd0 nanoparticles (NPs) was described in the mixture ß-CD/N-methyl urea. In this case, K2CO3 was used as a base and only 0.05 mol% catalyst loading was required when the reaction was carried out with aryl iodides and bromides, while 0.5 mol% and longer reaction times were employed in the case of aryl chlorides. Anyhow, good-to-excellent yields were obtained for the coupling of phenyl boronic acid with different aryl halides [47]. The ligand effect for achieving Suzuki–Miyaura couplings in DESs was first studied in 2017 by Ramón’s group. It was found that traditional ligands were not as efficient in DESs as they were in common organic solvents. Therefore, pyridiniophosphine ligands were synthesized, which were found to perform better than their non-ionic analogues. After this small structural modification, these ligands in combination with 1 mol% of PdCl2 were used to perform the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling between PhB(OH)2 and aryl bromides and in just 2 h using ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as a solvent at 100 °C. In the case of using more reactive aryl iodides instead of bromides, only 0.1 mol% catalyst loading was required. In addition, catalysts and solvents could be recycled up to five times without losing their catalytic activity, taking advantage of the unique properties of DESs. The same catalytic system was also efficiently employed on the Sonogashira and Heck reactions [48]. Another ionic phosphine ligand, namely the commercially available triphenylphosphine-3,3′,3′′-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (TPPTS) was also employed in combination with PdCl2 in ChCl:glycerol (1:2), although in this case, an aqueous buffer (pH 8.5) was also added. Several biaryls containing ketone substituents were synthesized with excellent yields, and those products were used to perform the enzyme-catalyzed enantioselective reduction to benzylic alcohols [49]. A similar strategy was later applied for the enzymatic transamination of biaryl ketones obtained by Suzuki coupling in DES (Figure 18) [50].
ChCl:glycerol (1:2) was also employed as a solvent for the ligand-free coupling of aryl trifluoroborates with aryl iodides, bromides and chlorides with excellent yields using Pd(OAc)2 (1–5 mol%) and Na2CO3 (1.0–1.5 equiv.) [51]. Not only biphenyls were synthesized in this report but also the same strategy was employed for the synthesis of terphenyls with moderate-to-excellent yields. It is worth mentioning that the catalytic system could be recycled up to four times when 1 mol% Pd loading was employed, or up to five times when using the initial 5 mol% catalyst loading. An interesting application of Suzuki–Miyaura coupling in DESs was reported by Delaye et al. performing the reaction between aryl boronic acids and imidazole-fused heterocycle iodides. Good results were obtained with ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as the solvent, with the catalytic system being recyclable up to five times (Figure 19) [52].
A novel bipyridine–palladium complex was reported to catalyze several cross-coupling reactions. Due to the hydrogen bond formation capability of the ligand with DESs components, the compatibility of the air-stable pre-catalyst was improved, being effective at performing Hiyama, Suzuki–Miyaura, Heck–Mizoroki and Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions. The most efficient solvents for the aforementioned reactions were found to be ChCl:glycerol (1:2) for Hiyama, ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2) for Suzuki and Heck and Ph3PMeBr:glycerol (1:2) for Sonogashira couplings. An amount of 1–3 mol% of pre-catalyst were used. The catalytic system could be recycled up to five times for the Hiyama and Suzuki reactions and up to three times for the case of Heck and Sonogashira couplings. TEM and XPS analyses of the residue form, after the reaction completion, indicated that Pd NPs were formed during the reaction course. A mercury test proved that those were the active catalytic species. Therefore, the bipyridine–palladium complex acted as a pre-catalyst and helped to stabilize the in situ generated NPS (Figure 20) [53].
Similar behaviour was observed with a palladium mesoionic carbene pre-catalyst. In this case, the mixture AcChCl:urea (1:2) was found to be more effective for the Sonogashira and Heck couplings, while ChCl:glycerol (1:2) and ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2) were still the preferred choice for Hiyama and Suzuki couplings, respectively. Regarding this latest reaction, it is worth mentioning that only 0.5 mol% catalyst loading was employed, and good-to-excellent yields were obtained using aryl bromides and even chlorides. In addition, biaryl products containing ketone functionalities were used to perform organometallic additions in DESs (Figure 21) [54].
Another interesting application of Suzuki–Miyaura coupling in DESs proposed the regioselective ortho-lithiation of aryl amides followed by iodination to obtain the corresponding aryl iodide, which is directly used to perform a Suzuki–Miyaura coupling catalyzed by Pd(OAc)2 in ChCl:glycerol (1:2)/CPME [55]. The symmetric arylation and alkenylation of benzodithiophenes were also described in the mixture ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as the solvent, yielding products with potential electrochromic properties (Figure 22) [56].
In addition, there is one report in which the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling in DESs is performed with a Ni catalyst instead of a Pd one. In this case, 5 mol% of Ni(cod)2 is employed to carry out the reaction between 2-bromothiophene and several aryl boronic acids in ChCl:urea (1:2) as the solvent, using potassium carbonate as a base for 5 h at 60 °C. Good-to-excellent yields were obtained for the 20 reported examples (Figure 23) [57].
Besides the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling for the synthesis of biaryls, other well-studied palladium-catalyzed C-C cross-coupling reactions include Heck and Sonogashira reactions. One of the earliest reports was published by König in 2009. An example of Heck reaction between 1-bromo-4-iodobenzene and n-butyl acrylate was reported using sodium acetate as a base and palladium acetate as the catalyst at 80 °C in the mixture L-carnitine:urea in 75% yield. In the same study, the Sonogashira coupling between phenylacetylene and two aryl bromides was reported in the mixture d-mannose:DMU at 80 °C. In that case, PdCl2(PPh3)2 was employed as a catalyst and iPrNH2 as a base. Reactions were carried out for 2 h at 80 °C, affording the coupling products in 61–79% yield (Figure 24) [58].
Some applications of the Sonogashira coupling in DESs include the synthesis of hydrogen-substituted graphynes through the reaction of 1,3,5-tribromobenzene and 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene catalyzed by Pd(PPh3)4/CuI with Et3N as a base. ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:3), ChCl:phenol (1:2) and ChCl:urea (1:2) were used as solvents, observing different morphologies on the obtained graphynes depending on the solvent employed [59]. Furthermore, the cyclization of 6-bromo-2-chloro quinoline-3-carbaldehyde with 2-amino phenol was reported in the mixture K2CO3:(CH2OH)2 (1:10), affording an intermediate, which was subsequently employed to perform Pd-catalyzed Suzuki or Sonogashira reactions in a one-pot manner [60]. The iodocyclization of 2-methylthiophenylacetylenes to 3-iodobenzothiophenes was also described, followed by Sonogashira or Suzuki couplings in the mixtures ChCl:glycerol (1:2). A total of 17 examples of coupling products were reported with good-to-excellent yields, with the catalysts and DESs being recyclable up to five times without any loss in the catalytic activity [61]. Regarding the Heck coupling, González-Sabín and García-Álvarez described the one-pot chemoenzymatic decarboxylation of p-hydroxicynnamic acid, followed by a Pd(PPh3)4-catalyzed Heck reaction with PhI in a mixture of ChCl:glycerol:water (1:2:1, Figure 25) [62].
Although the main goal of this review is to describe homogeneous catalysts in DESs, it is worth mentioning that some authors have employed palladium NPs using diverse supports, such as ß-cyclodextrin@graphene [63], DNA-Fe3O4 [64], magnetically retrievable phosphine-functionalized cellulose (Fe3O4@PFC-Pd(0) [65], cellulose-modified Fe3O4/GO [66,67], to perform reactions, such as Suzuki or Hiyama couplings. Other reactions performed in DESs based on heterogeneous catalysts include the Sonogashira coupling using Pd/C in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) [68], Pd-cellulose-GO@Fe3O3 to perform Sonogashira and Heck couplings in dimethylammonium chloride:glycerol (1:2) as a solvent [69], Pd NPs@poly-N-vinylpirrolidone catalyzing Heck reactions in glycerol-derived DESs [70] and a Pd-MOF as catalyst of Heck cross-coupling in the ternary mixture ChCl:(CH2OH)2:DABCO (1:2:1) [71]. Ullmann homocoupling between aryl iodides has been described with Pd NPs@pentaamide-f-multi-wall carbon nanotubes in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) [72]. More recently, the use of Pd/C and Ca(OH)2 has been reported to efficiently catalyze the homocoupling of electron-deficient (hetero)aryl chlorides in the same solvent [73].
In addition, other Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions performed in DES include Tsuji–Trost, Hiyama or Negishi couplings. In 2014, Jérôme et al. described two examples of cleavage of allyl alkyl carbonates with diethylamine at 90 °C using Pd/TPPTS catalytic system in a mixture of DMU and a ß-cyclodextrin derivative as a solvent. Quantitative yields were obtained in 5 min, with the catalyst and solvent being reused for up to four cycles without loss of activity [10]. Regarding the Hiyama coupling, a palladium NCN–pincer complex was used as a catalyst in the reaction between aryl-, vinyl- and allyl- trimethoxysilanes with aryl iodides and bromides using potassium carbonate as a base. Those reactions were performed in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as a solvent, as well as in neat glycerol for comparison. In general, slightly better results were obtained in neat glycerol. However, the use of DES improved the recyclability process, with the solvent and catalyst being reused for up to four cycles without losing their catalytic activity [74]. More recently, the reaction between organozinc compounds and (hetero)aryl bromides have been reported in ChCl:urea (1:2) using Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2 as a catalyst at 60 °C. The reaction takes place in just 20 s, obtaining yields ranging from 35% to 95%. Interestingly, the reaction in water with 1 equiv. of NaCl afforded even better results in most cases (Figure 26) [75].
C-N cross-coupling reactions have also been explored in DESs as reaction media. CuI-catalyzed Ullmann amine synthesis was reported in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) using K2CO3 as a base in the case of aliphatic primary and secondary amines and tBuOK as a base for aromatic amines at temperatures between 60–100 °C. Good-to-excellent yields were obtained for (hetero)aryl iodides and bromides, with the catalyst, base and solvent being recyclable up to six times [76]. Similarly, Goldberg-type C-N coupling between aryl iodides and amides was reported using CuI, ethylene diamine as ligand, KOH as a base and ChCl:H2O (1:2) as a solvent at 80 °C for 12 h, obtaining moderate-to-excellent yields (Figure 27) [77]. Very recently, a two-step approach for the synthesis of the antihistamine drug Thenfadil and some analogues has been developed in the mixture ChCl:glycerol (1:2). The first step is based on a reductive amination between an aldehyde and a primary amine using NaBH4, and then an Ullman coupling takes places on the generated secondary amine to afford the desired compounds. It is worth noting that no chromatographic steps were required to purify the products and that the reaction was scaled up to 50 g [78] (Figure 27). Other C-N coupling transformations based on supported heterogeneous catalysts include: Cu-NPs-carboxamide-f-GO@Fe3O4 [79], Cu(I)-creatine@Fe3O4 [80], Cu(I)-Si(CH2)3N-acyclovir-SiO2@Fe3O4 [81] and Pd(II)-vitamin B6@Fe3O4 [82].
Cu-catalyzed Ullmann-type O-arylation has also been explored in these neoteric solvents. Specifically, mixtures of ChCl with HBD, such as ethylene glycol, glycerol, 1,3-propanediol or lactic acid, were employed as solvents and reagents to be coupled with aryl bromides or iodides, using CuI as a catalyst and K2CO3 as a base at 80 °C for 6 h. Three pharmacologically active compounds were obtained, with gram-scale synthesis being feasible. In addition, the catalyst, DES and base system could be reused for up to seven cycles without an important catalytic decrease (Figure 28) [83]. Heterogeneous C-O coupling has also been reported with Cu(I)-Benzoylthiophene-SiO2@Fe3O4 [84].
A table summarizing the main results for each type of reaction and conditions has been included (Table 3)

5. C-H Functionalization

C-H bonds are ubiquitous in organic molecules, and direct functionalization of this functionality greatly reduces the number of steps, thereby saving solvents, reagents, energy, and time. One of the first examples of C-H functionalization in DESs was based on performing a cross-dehydrogenative coupling between 1-aryl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines and different pro-nucleophiles in the mixture ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2). Although a heterogeneous catalyst based on copper oxide impregnated on magnetite was used, it was reported that the active catalytic species were, probably, solubilized copper salts, with the inorganic support acting as a reservoir. The oxidant required for regenerating the catalyst was atmospheric oxygen, releasing a molecule of water as the only by-product. In addition, the eutectic mixture and catalyst could be recycled up to 10 times without losing its catalytic activity (Figure 29, Table 4, entry 1) [85].
The acidic mixture ChCl:malonic acid (1:1) was employed as a catalytic solvent to perform the sequential Friedländer reaction followed by a Pd(PPh3)4/Xantphos-catalyzed α-alkylation of the quinolinyl methyl ketone with benzyl alcohol through a hydrogen auto-transfer reaction (Table 4, entry 2) [86]. A similar approach was also applied in the mixture DMU:tartaric acid (7:3) in the presence of an iridium catalyst to access (E)-4-benzylidenylacridines and (E)-2-styrilquinoline-3-carboxamides [87]. To further expand this strategy, the same authors also synthesized a series of spiro[indoline-3,3′-pyrrolizin]-2′-yl)-4-phenylquinoline-3-carboxylates, in this case performing the C(sp3)-H functionalization using Cu(OAc)2 and TEMPO as a catalytic system (Figure 30, Table 4, entry 3) [88].
Regarding C-H functionalization processes, the strategy that has attracted the attention of synthetic chemists over the last decades is the C-H activation process. The first example found in the literature is the direct arylation through the C-H activation of thiophene derivatives. Pd2(dba)3 in combination with P(o-MeOPh)3 was used as a catalyst in the presence of pivalic acid and caesium carbonate for the diarylation of 5-octylthieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione with aryl iodides in ChCl:urea (1:2) as a solvent at 110 °C for 48 h. A total of 10 examples of diarylated products were reported, showing moderate-to-excellent yields for apolar aryl iodides, although a drastic decrease in the reaction yield was reported when using iodobenzene derivatives bearing nitro, acetyl or methoxy groups. However, in those cases, the addition of cyclopentyl methyl ether as a co-solvent improved the reaction yields (Table 4, entry 4) [89]. A graphene oxide-supported palladium catalyst was also employed for the direct arylation of imidazole derivatives, using K2CO3/glycerol (1:5) as a solvent. The reaction was conducted at 130 °C for 17 h using (hetero)aryl bromides as coupling partners, affording the corresponding arylated imidazoles in moderate-to-excellent yields. In addition, the catalyst could be recycled up to 10 times with only a slight decrease in the reaction yield(Table 4, entry 6) [90]. More recently, ChCl:glycerol (1:2) has been proposed as a better solvent for the arylation of thiophene derivatives. In this case, PdCl2 and P(o-MeOPh)3 were used as catalysts, employing pivalic acid as an additive and potassium carbonate as a base with the reaction between aryl bromides and thiophene derivatives being stirred at 110 °C for 24 h. Good-to-excellent yields were obtained, especially when electron-poor aromatic bromides were employed, yielding products with application in the photovoltaic field (Figure 31, Table 4, entry 5) [91].
A breakthrough ruthenium-catalyzed C-H activation method was recently described for the synthesis of several heteroaromatic compounds. Using ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2) as a solvent, NaOAc as a base and simple [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 as pre-catalyst, the formation of isoquinoline derivatives was achieved by the reaction between N-methoxybenzamide derivatives and disubstituted alkynes at 70 °C for 16 h. The same method could be efficiently applied to N-phenoxyacetamide, obtaining the corresponding benzofurane derivative in good yield. Electron-poor olefins could also be used, obtaining cyclic or acyclic products depending on the substrate. In addition, the reaction between benzoic acid and electron-deficient olefins was also tested, obtaining the corresponding cyclic products. In that case, the mixture betaine:HFIP (1:2) was employed as a solvent, while the catalytic system was composed of a combination of [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 and a catalytic amount of Cu(OAc)2, which was employed as an oxidant. However, the final oxidant was an atmospheric oxygen. If disubstituted alkynes were used instead of olefines, the corresponding isocumarin derivatives were obtained in good-to-excellent yields. In addition, 2-thiophenecarboxylic acid could also be used as a starting material with olefines, affording the corresponding acyclic products. Finally, the same method could be applied to the reaction between 1-arylpyrazol derivatives as substrates with electron-poor olefins. Even a gram-scale reaction was reported, with the reaction being recyclable up to three times. Several green metrics were analyzed proving that the method outperforms classical approaches in terms of sustainability (Table 4, entry 7) [92].
Although the previous reports of C-H activation in DESs were focused on Csp2-H bond activation, a recent example describes the arylation and alkynylation of unactivated aliphatic amides through a palladium-catalyzed Csp3-H activation. The 8-aminoquinoline motif was used as a directing group to carry out the selective arylation at the ß-position to the carbonyl group. Pd(OAc)2 was used as the pre-catalyst and 2-pyridone as the ligand, as well as the inexpensive sodium bicarbonate as a base at 110 °C. Two DESs were effectively employed as solvents. On the one hand, the reaction proved to be efficiently performed in the inexpensive mixture ChCl:acetamide (1:2), obtaining moderate-to-good yields with different aliphatic amides and p-substituted aryl iodides in 12 h. However, the usage of betaine:HFIP (1:2) as a solvent outperformed the previous DES, with the reaction being much faster in 2.5 h. The solvent and catalyst could be recycled once, although the yield dramatically dropped after the third cycle. The directing group could be removed after the reaction in a one-pot manner by treatment with 40% H2SO4, releasing the corresponding carboxylic acid with good yield. The reaction with (bromoethynyl)triisopropylsilane was also possible under the same conditions, affording the corresponding alkynylated product without the need of using any silver salt required when the reaction is carried out in classical organic solvents. The TIPS group could then be removed and examples of traditional alkyne chemistry, such as Sonogashira coupling or CuAAC click-chemistry in DES, were reported (Figure 32, Table 4, entry 8) [93].
Table 4. Selected examples of C-H functionalizations catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
Table 4. Selected examples of C-H functionalizations catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
EntryReactionDESConditionsProductRef.
1CDCChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)[Cu], 50 °C1-ArTetrahydroisoquinolines[85]
2Hydrogen auto-transferChCl:malonic acid (1:1)[Pd], 90 °CQuinolines[86]
3Hydrogen auto-transferDMU:tartaric acid (7:3)[Cu] + TEMPOSpiroindoles[88]
4Direct arylationChCl:urea (1:2)[Pd], 110 °CThienyl derivatives[89]
5Direct arylationChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 110 °CThienyl derivatives[91]
6Direct arylationK2CO3:glycerol (1:5)[Pd], 130 °CImidazole derivatives[90]
7Csp2-H activationChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)Betaine:HFIP (1:2)[Ru], 70–120 °C(Het)Ar derivatives[92]
8Csp3-H activationChCl:acetamide (1:2)Betaine:HFIP (1:2)[Pd], 110 °Carylated amides derivatives[93]

6. Multicomponent Reactions

A multicomponent reaction (MCR) is an organic transformation in which three or more starting materials combine to form a product containing most of the initial atoms. One of the earliest examples uses the eutectic mixture ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) as a catalyst, due to its Lewis acid character, to perform the Kabachnik–Fields reaction. A total of 15 examples were reported with yields ranging from 70 to 98%. The catalyst could be reused up to five times, showing only a slight decrease in its catalytic activity (Table 5, entry 1) [94]. Similarly, the same eutectic mixture was employed as a catalyst for performing the Mannich-type reaction of aldehyde, amines and ketones. The catalyst could be reused up to four times. In these reactions, water was the solvent, with DESs only being the catalyst of the reaction [95], as in the case of an immobilized deep eutectic solvent on a recyclable nanocomposite to perform the Mannich-type reaction where EtOH was the solvent (Table 5, entry 2) [96]. Finally, the mixture ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:3) was employed as a catalyst for the solvent-free condensation of indoles, aldehydes and activated methylene compounds (Figure 33, Table 3, entry 3) [97].
The use of the mixture ZnCl2:DMU (2:7) was reported both as a catalyst and solvent for performing the A3-coupling of aldehydes, amines and alkynes at 80 °C for 20 h, affording the corresponding propargyl amines. A total of 19 examples were described with yields ranging from 34–88% (Table 3, entry 4) [98]. Other examples of A3 coupling in DESs have been described in ChCl:urea (1:2) using CuCl as a catalyst, showing good yields at 60 °C using only 5 mol% of catalyst loading. In addition, the DES could be recycled up to four times, although a 30% loss in the catalytic activity was observed after three cycles [99]. In addition, the same authors proposed the use of salicylic aldehyde derivatives, yielding the corresponding 3-aminobenzofuran products after in situ cyclizations instead of the propargylamine. In that case, 5 mol% of CuI was employed as a catalyst and ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2) as a solvent at 80 °C for 7 h (Table 4, entry 5) [100]. In addition, the A3 coupling in DESs has also been reported using 5 mol% of a silver complex based on a macrocyclic pyridine-containing ligand. The eutectic mixture was composed of phenylacetic acid and N,N-dimethyldodecylamine N-oxide (1:1) and the coupling reaction was performed in a microwave reactor at 60 °C for 6 h (Figure 34, Table 4, entry 6) [101].
Another type-IV DES, namely, ZrOCl2.8H2O:Urea (1:2), was used as a catalyst and solvent for the Kabachnik–Fields reaction between aldehydes, amines and dimethyl phosphite. A total of 21 examples were reported with yields ranging from 88 to 98%. These reactions were performed at room temperature and completed in 5–25 min. Once the reaction was finished, water was added, dissolving the DESs, which were then recovered and reused for up to five cycles showing only a slight loss in the catalytic activity [102].
The palladium-catalyzed synthesis of unsymmetrical substituted sulfones and sulfides is one of the first examples of multicomponent reactions in which DESs act solely as solvents. Although sulfones can be obtained by the direct insertion of SO2, handling this toxic gas is extremely dangerous. Therefore, the inexpensive food additive sodium metabisulfite was used as a SO2 surrogate. This helped to generate aryl sulfinates through the reaction of aryl boronic acids using PdCl2 and a cationic phosphine ligand as a catalytic system. This reaction was conducted in ChCl:acetamide (1:2) as a solvent at 80 °C in the presence of several electrophiles, affording the corresponding sulfones. The in situ generated sulfinate species could also react with I2 in a one-pot manner, yielding the disulfide products, which could then react with electron-rich aromatic rings or radical scavengers to afford different unsymmetrical substituted sulfides [103]. A similar strategy was developed for the synthesis of sulfonamides. Thus, using Na2S2O5 as a sulfur dioxide surrogate and non-toxic triarylbismuthines as aryl source sulfinates were generated. They reacted with nitrocompounds, giving an adduct that was reduced in situ by a copper-catalyzed process using NaHSO3 as a reductant, which comes from a decomposition product generated in the first reaction step. In this case, the mixture AcChCl:acetamide (1:2) was found to be the optimal solvent (Figure 35, Table 5, entry 7) [104].
The research group of Capriati and Salomone described another palladium-catalyzed process in the mixtures ChCl:urea (1:2) and ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as the aminocarbonylation of aryl iodides. Using palladium acetate as a catalyst, 27 atm of CO and K2CO3 as a base, primary or secondary amines and (hetero)aryl iodides were transformed into the corresponding amide products at 60 °C in 12 h. Both DESs mixtures proved to be more efficient solvents for this transformation than pure glycerol, DMF or water. Moderate-to-excellent yields were obtained with electron-deficient aryl iodides, while the presence of electro-donating groups attached to the aromatic ring produced a decrease in the reaction yield. In addition, the catalyst could be recycled up to four times with a slight decrease in the reaction yield (Table 5, entry 8) [105]. More recently, a multicomponent radical conjugate addition was described in ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2). The addition of di- and tri-substituted unactivated alkenes to electron-deficient olefins was achieved by employing Fe(acac)3 as a catalyst and the inexpensive and non-toxic poly(methylhydrosiloxane) as a reducing agent. Reactions were carried out for 2 h at 60 °C, and 16 examples were reported with yields ranging from 48 to 98% (Figure 36, Table 5, entry 9) [106].
Table 5. Selected examples of MCR catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
Table 5. Selected examples of MCR catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
EntryReactionDESConditionsProductRef.
1Kabachnik–FieldsChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)ZrOCl2:urea (1:5)r.t.Aminophosphonates[94]
2MannichChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)r.t.Aminocarbonyls[96]
3CondensationChCl:ZnCl2 (1:3)r.t.3-indole derivatives[97]
4A3 couplingZnCl2:DMU (2:7)r.t.Propargylamines[98]
5A3 couplingChCl:urea (1:2)
ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)
[Cu], 60–80 °CPropargylamines[99,100]
6A3 couplingPAA:AO12 (1:1)[Ag], 60 °CPropargylamines[101]
7Sulfonylation(Ac)ChCl:acetamide (1:2)[Pd] or [Cu], 80 °CSulfones/sulfonamides[103,104]
8AminocarbonylationChCl:urea (1:2)ChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 60 °C(Het)Arylamides[105]
9Conjugate additionChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)[Fe]. 60 °CAddition products [106]

7. Miscellaneous

In this review, transition-metal-catalyzed reactions performed in DESs have been classified according to the nature of the described transformation for clarity. However, some reports do not fit into any of the previous reaction types and will be discussed in this section as miscellaneous reactions.
In 2014, the García-Álvarez group described the isomerization of allylic alcohols into carbonyl compounds in ChCl:glycerol (1:2) as a solvent. This reaction was catalyzed by the ruthenium complex [Ru(η33:-C10H16)Cl2(benzimidazole)] in the absence of any additive at 75 °C. Excellent yields were obtained using low catalyst loadings for mono-substituted allylic alcohols in less than 20 min. However, higher catalyst loadings and reaction times were required with 1,2-disubstituted compounds and no reaction was observed in the case of using trisubstituted allylic alcohols. Only a partial deactivation of the catalyst was observed when it was reused up to four times (Table 6, entry 1) [107]. This approach was later employed in collaboration with Prof. Capriati’s group, combining the aforementioned isomerization with the addition of organometallic reagents, such as organolithium or organomagnesium species, to the in situ generated carbonylic compounds, yielding tertiary alcohols in a one-pot manner. It is worth mentioning that these reactions were performed under air atmosphere at room temperature, yielding the corresponding products in only 3 s reaction time [108]. (Figure 37). Similarly, the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction between organolithium compounds and (hetero)aryl halides was studied in DESs, obtaining good results with mixtures, such as ChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2). However, the best results were found using an aqueous sodium chloride solution, favoring the C-C coupling over the protonolysis [109]. The Ru-catalyzed isomerization of racemic allylic alcohols was also coupled with the enantioselective bioreduction of the in situ generated ketones to afford the corresponding enantiopure alcohols in DES-buffer mixtures [110].
Another example is the iron-catalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate. This reaction was performed at 60 °C using several eutectic mixtures, such as acetamide:KSCN, acetamide:urea, caprolactam:urea, ChCl:urea or TBABr:glycerol, using FeBr2 as a catalyst, resulting in a greener and cheaper polymerization method, compared with the traditional ones [111].
As has been mentioned before, type I and type II DESs are formed by metal halides (hydrated or not) in combination with quaternary ammonium salts. Thus, mixtures, such as ChCl:ZnCl2, can be employed not only as reaction media but also as Lewis acid catalysts. Therefore, Friedel–Crafts alkylations have been widely studied in this kind of mixture. One example is the reaction between aldehydes with electron-rich arenes, affording the corresponding diarylalkanes or triarylmethanes, which are important building blocks in medicinal, materials and dye industries. In addition, DES can be dissolved in water after the reaction and then dried and reused up to five times without losing its activity (Table 6, entry 2) [112]. The same eutectic mixture was also employed to perform the acylation of electron-rich arenes using acid chlorides or anhydrides as acylating reagents; this is also recyclable up to five times (Table 6, entry 3) [113]. Finally, catalytic amounts of the ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) mixture (10 mol%) were employed in the solvent-free reaction between mono- or dialkylated anilines and β-nitrostyrenes, yielding the corresponding alkylated products in good yields and excellent regioselectivity towards the para-substituted adducts (Figure 38, Table 6, entry 4) [114].
Similarly, the iron-based eutectic mixture FeCl3.6H2O:glycerol (3:1) was described as a solvent and Lewis acid catalyst for performing the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement of propargylic alcohols to afford the corresponding ketones or aldehydes in excellent yields. Moreover, the catalytic DESs were recycled up to 10 times without losing their activity (Figure 39, Table 6, entry 5) [115].
Some examples of esterification reactions in DESs can also be found. For instance, free sugars reacted with acetic anhydride at 100 °C, affording the per-O-acetylated hemiacetals of sugars, such as d-glucose, d-galactose or d-lactose, among others. Although Brønsted acid-based type III DES, such as ChCl:oxalic acid or ChCl:malonic acid, were efficient solvents for this transformation, the best results were obtained with ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) [116]. The same strategy was also applied to the O-acetylation of chitin [117]. Similarly, the esterification of acetic and formic acids was performed in the eutectic mixture ChCl:CrCl3.6H2O (1:2). Several alcohols were used in combination with the aforementioned acids at room temperature for 24 h, obtaining moderate-to-excellent yields of the corresponding esters. In addition, the catalytic solvent could be recycled up to four times without any significant loss in its catalytic activity [118].
In 2015, Prof. Azizi described the use of magnetic nanoparticles to catalyze the cyanosilylation of aldehydes and epoxides in ChCl:urea (1:2), obtaining good-to-excellent yields of the corresponding cyanohydrins in 2 h reaction time (Figure 40, Table 6, entry 6) [119].
To conclude, several transformations involving the synthesis of amides, ureas and carbamates in DESs will be described. One of the first reported examples was the use of ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) as a catalyst and solvent to carry out the synthesis of primary amides from aldehydes and nitriles. When aldehydes were used as starting materials, they reacted with hydroxylamine hydrochloride in ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) at 100 °C, while in the case of nitriles, a mixture of DESs (4 g) and water (1 g) was employed as a solvent to afford the corresponding amides. The catalyst could be recycled up to five times, showing a higher decrease in the catalytic activity after the third cycle in the case of the synthesis through aldehydes [120]. The formylation of aniline derivatives was also studied under solvent-free conditions using a mesoporous heterogeneous catalyst functionalized with the eutectic mixture N-methylpyrrolidonium:ZnCl2 (Figure 41, Table 6, entry 7) [121].
The synthesis of carbamates was also performed using the mixture ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2). Thus, a series of primary and secondary amines were reacted with two equivalents of carbonates to yield the corresponding carbamate derivatives at 60 °C in just 30 min. In addition, some examples of urea derivatives were reported under the same reaction conditions by changing the stoichiometry of the starting materials. The eutectic mixture could be recycled up to six times without any loss of catalytic activity [122]. Other carbamates and monosubstituted ureas were prepared in a similar fashion using a heterogeneous catalyst based on superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the mixture ChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2) (Figure 42, Table 6, entry 8) [123]. Finally, N-acylureas were prepared using N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and benzoic acid derivatives at 60 °C in the mixture ChCl:urea (1:2) as a solvent. This reaction was catalyzed by copper oxide supported in magnetic iron nanoparticles [124].
Table 6. Selected examples of miscellaneous reactions catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
Table 6. Selected examples of miscellaneous reactions catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
EntryReactionDESConditionsProductRef.
1Allylic alcohol isomerizationChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Ru], 50–75 °Cketones[107,108]
2Friedel–Crafts alkylationChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)80 °CAr-R[112]
3Friedel–Crafts acylationChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)70 °CArCOR[113]
4Friedel–Crafts alkylationChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)70 °CAlkylated anilines[114]
5Meyer–SchusterFeCl3.6H2O:glycerol (3:1)r.t.Ketones/aldehydes[115]
6CyanosilylationChCl:urea (1:2)[Fe], r.t.cyanohydrins[119]
7Amide synthesisChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)100 °CPrimary amides[121]
8SubstitutionChCl:ZnCl2 (1:2)[Fe], 60–130 °CCarbamates/ureas[122,123,124]

8. Conclusions

Deep eutectic solvents were proposed more than a decade ago as an alternative reaction media in organic synthesis. Although their physicochemical properties seemed to differ too much from traditional volatile organic solvents and, therefore, several limitations were found at the beginning; nowadays, DESs have clearly become a serious option to take into consideration when planning a synthetic method. Types I, II and IV DESs, which contain a metal salt in their structure, can be used as recyclable solvents and catalysts for several organic transformations. Meanwhile, the knowledge about the compatibility of homogeneous and heterogeneous metallic catalysts in types III and V DESs has greatly improved over the last few years. This has allowed the catalyst/DES system design to improve the achieved selectivities and efficiencies. As a result, eutectic mixtures are no longer trivial solvents for very specific reactions and have proven to be a useful alternative to traditional solvents in transition-metal-catalyzed organic transformations. In most cases, the possible recovery and recycling of the catalyst/DES system have greatly enhanced the efficiencies of the reactions. The use of DESs has not only increased the sustainability of the reaction due to the benign properties of the solvents but has also allowed the use of milder conditions, in terms of the applied temperature and pressures, to perform some transformations; this significantly reduces the energetic costs. In addition, DESs have proven to not only be alternative solvents for known reactions but also to offer novel and exciting reactivities due to their unique properties, as has been shown, for instance, in the sulfonylation reaction. For these cases, the right choice of DES and the correct design of the metal–ligand are crucial to successfully obtaining the expected product. There is a clear trend towards increasing the popularity of DESs and the applications and knowledge about these solvents will keep growing in the coming years.

Author Contributions

X.M. and G.G. have equally contributed to writing and reviewing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been made possible with the financial support received from the University of Alicante (VIGROB-316FI), the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2021-127332NB-I00) and the Valencian Department of Innovation, Universities, Science and Digital Society (APOSTD/2020/235 and AICO/2021/013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

acacacetylacetonate
AcChClAcetylcholine chloride
APIActive Pharmaceutical Ingredient
β-CDβ-cyclodextrin
ChClCholine chloride
CPMECyclopentyl ethyl ether
CuAACCu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition
DABCO1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane
dbaDibenzylideneacetone
DCCDicyclohexylcarbodiimide
DESDeep Eutectic Solvent
DFTDensity Functional Theory
DMFDimethyl formamide
DMU1,3-Dimethylurea
dppf1,1′-Ferrocenediyl-bis(diphenylphosphine)
GOGraphene Oxide
HBAHydrogen bond acceptor
HBDHydrogen bond donor
HFIP1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-propanol
HMF5-Hydroxymethyl furfural
MCRMulticomponent Reaction
MWmicrowave
NADESNatural Deep Eutectic Solvent
NPNanoparticle
PEGPolyethylene glycol
PivOHPivalic acid
TBABTetrabuthyl ammonium bromide
TEMTransition Electron Microscopy
TEMPO2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl
TIPStriisopropylsilane
TPPTSTriphenylphosphine-3,3′,3′′-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt
VOCVolatile Organic Compound
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

References

  1. Constable, D.J.C.; Jiménez-González, C.; Henderson, R.K. Perspective on Solvent Use in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smith, E.L.; Abbott, A.P.; Ryder, K.S. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11060–11082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Abranches, D.O.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Type V deep eutectic solvents: Design and applications. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 35, 100612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, F.; Xue, Z.; Zhao, X.; Mou, H.; He, J.; Mu, T. Catalytic deep eutectic solvents for highly efficient conversion of cellulose to gluconic acid with gluconic acid self-precipitation separation. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 6140–6143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, X.; Zhu, H.; Si, Y.; Lyu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, L.; Wang, L.; Li, X. Conversion of Glucose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural in Deep Eutectic Solvent of Choline Chloride–Chromium Chloride. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 7216–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dutta, A.; Garg, A.; Borah, J.; Borah, R.P.; Sarma, D. Deep eutectic solvent mediated controlled and selective oxidation of organic sulfides and hydroxylation of arylboronic acids. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cicco, L.; Roggio, M.; López-Aguilar, M.; Ramos-Martín, M.; Perna, F.M.; García-Álvarez, J.; Vitale, P.; Capriati, V. Selective Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols in Low Melting Mixtures and Water and Use for Telescoped One-Pot Hybrid Reactions. ChemistryOpen 2022, 11, e202200160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, Y.; Yan, G.; Wang, T.; Jia, W.; Zeng, X.; Sperry, J.; Sun, Y.; Tang, X.; Lei, T.; Lin, L. Synthesis of MCM-41-Supported Metal Catalysts in Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Conversion of Carbohydrates into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, M.-Y.; Zhu, J.-N.; Li, P.; Li, W.; Cai, T.; Cheng, F.-F.; Xiong, W.-W. Structural variation of transition metal–organic frameworks using deep eutectic solvents with different hydrogen bond donors. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 10199–10209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jérôme, F.; Ferreira, M.; Bricout, H.; Menuel, S.; Monflier, E.; Tilloy, S. Low melting mixtures based on β-cyclodextrin derivatives and N,N′-dimethylurea as solvents for sustainable catalytic processes. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3876–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferreira, M.; Jérôme, F.; Bricout, H.; Menuel, S.; Landy, D.; Fourmentin, S.; Tilloy, S.; Monflier, E. Rhodium catalyzed hydroformylation of 1-decene in low melting mixtures based on various cyclodextrins and N,N′-dimethylurea. Catal. Commun. 2015, 63, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Esteban, J.; Warmeling, H.; Vorholt, A.J. Utilization of deep eutectic solvents based on choline chloride in the biphasic hydroformylation of 1-decene with rhodium complexes. Catal. Commun. 2019, 129, 105721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vitale, P.; Cicco, L.; Messa, F.; Perna, F.M.; Salomone, A.; Capriati, V. Streamlined Routes to Phenacyl Azides and 2,5-Diarylpyrazines Enabled by Deep Eutectic Solvents. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 5557–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Garg, G.; Masdeu-Bultó, A.M.; Farfán, N.; Ordóñez-Hernández, J.; Gómez, M.; Medina-González, Y. Palladium Nanoparticles in Glycerol/Ionic Liquid/Carbon Dioxide Medium as Hydrogenation Catalysts. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 12240–12249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, B.; Song, G. Catalytic hydrogenolysis of castor seeds C-lignin in deep eutectic solvents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 169, 113666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leal-Duaso, A.; Favier, I.; Pla, D.; Pires, E.; Gómez, M. Design of Glycerol-Based Solvents for the Immobilization of Palladium Nanocatalysts: A Hydrogenation Study. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 6875–6885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iwanow, M.; Finkelmeyer, J.; Söldner, A.; Kaiser, M.; Gärtner, T.; Sieber, V.; König, B. Preparation of Supported Palladium Catalysts using Deep Eutectic Solvents. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 12467–12470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Batarseh, C.; Levi-Zada, A.; Abu-Reziq, R. Preparation of catalytic deep eutectic solvent-based silica microreactors using a non-aqueous sol–gel route. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 2242–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sadjadi, S.; Akbari, M.; Kahangi, F.G.; Heravi, M.M. Pd immobilized on the composite of halloysite and low-cost bio-based eutectic solvent-derived carbon: An efficient catalyst for hydrogenation in the presence of cyclodextrin. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 192, 105640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. O’Neill, M.; Raghuwanshi, V.S.; Wendt, R.; Wollgarten, M.; Hoell, A.; Rademann, K. Gold Nanoparticles in Novel Green Deep Eutectic Solvents: Self-Limited Growth, Self-Assembly & Catalytic Implications. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 2015, 229, 221–234. [Google Scholar]
  21. Messa, F.; Dilauro, G.; Paparella, A.N.; Silvestri, L.; Furlotti, G.; Iacoangeli, T.; Perrone, S.; Salomone, A. Deep eutectic solvents meet safe, scalable and sustainable hydrogenations enabled by aluminum powder and Pd/C. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 4388–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cavallo, M.; Arnodo, D.; Mannu, A.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C.; Baratta, W.; Baldino, S. Deep eutectic solvents as H2-sources for Ru(II)-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds under mild conditions. Tetrahedron 2021, 83, 131997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.J.; Vidal, C.; Díez, J.; García-Álvarez, J. Introducing deep eutectic solvents as biorenewable media for Au(i)-catalysed cycloisomerisation of γ-alkynoic acids: An unprecedented catalytic system. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12927–12929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vidal, C.; Merz, L.; García-Álvarez, J. Deep eutectic solvents: Biorenewable reaction media for Au(i)-catalysed cycloisomerisations and one-pot tandem cycloisomerisation/Diels–Alder reactions. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 3870–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.J.; Vidal, C.; Schumacher, S.; Borge, J.; García-Álvarez, J. AuI Iminophosphorane Complexes as Efficient Catalysts for the Cycloisomerization of Alkynyl Amides under Air, at Room Temperature, and in Aqueous or Eutectic-Mixture Solutions. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 3425–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saavedra, B.; Pérez, J.M.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.J.; García-Álvarez, J.; Ramón, D.J. Impregnated palladium on magnetite as a water compatible catalyst for the cycloisomerization of alkynoic acid derivatives. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2151–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Padvi, S.A.; Dalal, D.S. Choline chloride–ZnCl2: Recyclable and efficient deep eutectic solvent for the [2+3] cycloaddition reaction of organic nitriles with sodium azide. Synth. Commun. 2017, 47, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiong, X.; Yi, C.; Liao, X.; Lai, S. A practical multigram-scale method for the green synthesis of 5-substituted-1H-tetrazoles in deep eutectic solvent. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kafle, A.; Handy, S.T. A one-pot, copper-catalyzed azidation/click reaction of aryl and heteroaryl bromides in an environmentally friendly deep eutectic solvent. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 7024–7029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giofrè, S.V.; Tiecco, M.; Ferlazzo, A.; Romeo, R.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Germani, R.; Iannazzo, D. Base-Free Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Click Cycloadditions (CuAAc) in Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents as Green and Catalytic Reaction Media**. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 2021, 4777–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mirshafiee, S.; Salamatmanesh, A.; Heydari, A. A sustainable approach for efficient one-pot synthesis of 1-aryl 1,2,3-triazoles using copper iodide supported on 3-thionicotinyl-urea-modified magnetic nanoparticles in DES. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, J.; Li, X.-T.; Ma, E.-Q.; Mo, L.-P.; Zhang, Z.-H. Superparamagnetic CuFeO2 Nanoparticles in Deep Eutectic Solvent: An Efficient and Recyclable Catalytic System for the Synthesis of Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 2854–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salamatmanesh, A.; Heydari, A. Magnetic nanostructure-anchored mixed-donor ligand system based on carboxamide and N-heterocyclic thiones: An efficient support of CuI catalyst for synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines in eutectic medium. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2021, 624, 118306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.-H.; Shang, Z.-R.; Hu, H.-C.; Zhang, Z.-H. Supported molybdenum on graphene oxide/Fe3O4: An efficient, magnetically separable catalyst for one-pot construction of spiro-oxindole dihydropyridines in deep eutectic solvent under microwave irradiation. Catal. Commun. 2017, 88, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maleki, A.; Kari, T.; Aghaei, M. Fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2-OSO3H: An efficient hierarchical nanocatalyst for the organic quinazolines syntheses. J. Porous Mater. 2017, 24, 1481–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maleki, A.; Aghaei, M.; Kari, T. Facile Synthesis of 7-Aryl-benzo[h]tetrazolo[5,1-b]quinazoline-5,6-dione Fused Polycyclic Compounds by Using a Novel Magnetic Polyurethane Catalyst. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2019, 39, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akbarian, M.; Sanchooli, E.; Oveisi, A.R.; Daliran, S. Choline chloride-coated UiO-66-Urea MOF: A novel multifunctional heterogeneous catalyst for efficient one-pot three-component synthesis of 2-amino-4H-chromenes. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 325, 115228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mancuso, R.; Maner, A.; Cicco, L.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; Gabriele, B. Synthesis of thiophenes in a deep eutectic solvent: Heterocyclodehydration and iodocyclization of 1-mercapto-3-yn-2-ols in a choline chloride/glycerol medium. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 4239–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peñaranda Gómez, A.; Rodríguez Bejarano, O.; Kouznetsov, V.V.; Ochoa-Puentes, C. One-Pot Diastereoselective Synthesis of Tetrahydroquinolines from Star Anise Oil in a Choline Chloride/Zinc Chloride Eutectic Mixture. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 18630–18639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Damghani, K.F.; Kiyani, H.; Pourmousavi, A.S. Green Three-component Synthesis of Merocyanin Dyes Based on 4-Arylideneisoxazol-5(4H)-ones. Curr. Green Chem. 2020, 7, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Higuera, N.L.; Peña-Solórzano, D.; Ochoa-Puentes, C. Urea–Zinc Chloride Eutectic Mixture-Mediated One-Pot Synthesis of Imidazoles: Efficient and Ecofriendly Access to Trifenagrel. Synlett 2019, 30, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  42. Aghapoor, K.; Mohsenzadeh, F.; Darabi, H.R.; Sayahi, H.; Jalali, M.R. ZnCl2/Urea Eutectic Solvent as Stable Carbonylation Source for Benign Synthesis of 2–Benzimidazolones and 2–Imidazolones: An Effective Strategy for Preventing NH3 Gas Evolution. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 11093–11097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shaibuna, M.; Abbas, A.; Kariyottu Kuniyil, M.J.; Sreekumar, K. Sustainable synthesis of 1,8-dioxooctahydroxanthenes in deep eutectic solvents (DESs). New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 8335–8344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shaibuna, M.; Hiba, K.; Shebitha, A.M.; Kariyottu Kuniyil, M.J.; Sherly mole, P.B.; Sreekumar, K. Sustainable and selective synthesis of benzimidazole scaffolds using deep eutectic solvents. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 5, 100285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Imperato, G.; Vasold, R.; König, B. Stille Reactions with Tetraalkylstannanes and Phenyltrialkylstannanes in Low Melting Sugar-Urea-Salt Mixtures. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2243–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Imperato, G.; Höger, S.; Lenoir, D.; König, B. Low melting sugar–urea–salt mixtures as solvents for organic reactions—Estimation of polarity and use in catalysis. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 1051–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, M. β-cyclodextrin-capped palladium nanoparticle-catalyzed ligand-free Suzuki and Heck couplings in low-melting β-cyclodextrin/NMU mixtures. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 28, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marset, X.; Khoshnood, A.; Sotorrios, L.; Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Alonso, D.A.; Ramón, D.J. Deep Eutectic Solvent Compatible Metallic Catalysts: Cationic Pyridiniophosphine Ligands in Palladium Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 1269–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Paris, J.; Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Morís, F.; Gröger, H.; González-Sabín, J. Novel Insights into the Combination of Metal- and Biocatalysis: Cascade One-Pot Synthesis of Enantiomerically Pure Biaryl Alcohols in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 4417–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Paris, J.; Telzerow, A.; Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Steiner, K.; Schwab, H.; Morís, F.; Gröger, H.; González-Sabín, J. Enantioselective One-Pot Synthesis of Biaryl-Substituted Amines by Combining Palladium and Enzyme Catalysis in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 5486–5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dilauro, G.; García, S.M.; Tagarelli, D.; Vitale, P.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Ligand-Free Bioinspired Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reactions using Aryltrifluoroborates as Effective Partners in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3495–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Delaye, P.-O.; Pénichon, M.; Boudesocque-Delaye, L.; Enguehard-Gueiffier, C.; Gueiffier, A. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents as Sustainable Solvents for Suzuki –Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions Applied to Imidazo-Fused Heterocycles. SynOpen 2018, 02, 0306–0311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saavedra, B.; González-Gallardo, N.; Meli, A.; Ramón, D.J. A Bipyridine-Palladium Derivative as General Pre-Catalyst for Cross-Coupling Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 3868–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Marset, X.; Saavedra, B.; González-Gallardo, N.; Beaton, A.; León, M.M.; Luna, R.; Ramón, D.J.; Guillena, G. Palladium Mesoionic Carbene Pre-catalyst for General Cross-Coupling Transformations in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ghinato, S.; Dilauro, G.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C. Directed ortho-metalation–nucleophilic acyl substitution strategies in deep eutectic solvents: The organolithium base dictates the chemoselectivity. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 7741–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pelliccioli, V.; Dilauro, G.; Grecchi, S.; Arnaboldi, S.; Graiff, C.; Perna, F.M.; Vitale, P.; Licandro, E.; Aliprandi, A.; Cauteruccio, S.; et al. Ligand-Free Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvents: Synthesis of Benzodithiophene Derivatives and Study of their Optical and Electrochemical Performance. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 6981–6988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Krishna, T.; Reddy, T.; Eppakayala, L.; Kalita, D. Nickel-catalyzed suzuki-miyaura cross- coupling reactions: One-pot synthesis of 2-arylthiophenes. Rasayan J. Chem. 2020, 13, 2438–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ilgen, F.; König, B. Organic reactions in low melting mixtures based on carbohydrates and l-carnitine—A comparison. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhu, T. Various morphologies of hydrogen-substituted graphynes: The importance of reaction solvents. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 296, 111958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Thiyagamurthy, P.; Khan, F.R.N. A Base-Free Pd-Precatalyst Mediated Suzuki-Miyaura and Sonogashira Cross-Coupling in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 2610–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mancuso, R.; Lettieri, M.; Strangis, R.; Russo, P.; Piccionello, A.P.; De Angelis, S.; Gabriele, B. Iodocyclization of 2-Methylthiophenylacetylenes to 3-Iodobenzothiophenes and their coupling Reactions under More Sustainable Conditions. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2022, 11, e202200353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.J.; Morís, F.; Kourist, R.; Comino, N.; López-Gallego, F.; González-Sabín, J.; García-Álvarez, J. DESign of Sustainable One-Pot Chemoenzymatic Organic Transformations in Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Synthesis of 1,2-Disubstituted Aromatic Olefins. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Heidari, B.; Heravi, M.M.; Nabid, M.R.; Sedghi, R.; Hooshmand, S.E. Novel palladium nanoparticles supported on β-cyclodextrin@graphene oxide as magnetically recyclable catalyst for Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with two different approaches in bio-based solvents. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Chakraborty, S.; Mruthunjayappa, M.H.; Aruchamy, K.; Singh, N.; Prasad, K.; Kalpana, D.; Ghosh, D.; Sanna Kotrappanavar, N.; Mondal, D. Facile Process for Metallizing DNA in a Multitasking Deep Eutectic Solvent for Ecofriendly C–C Coupling Reaction and Nitrobenzene Reduction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 14225–14235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Salamatmanesh, A.; Heydari, A.; Nahzomi, H.T. Stabilizing Pd on magnetic phosphine-functionalized cellulose: DFT study and catalytic performance under deep eutectic solvent assisted conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 235, 115947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Niakan, M.; Masteri-Farahani, M.; Karimi, S.; Shekaari, H. Hydrophilic role of deep eutectic solvents for clean synthesis of biphenyls over a magnetically separable Pd-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 324, 115078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Niakan, M.; Masteri-Farahani, M. An efficient clean and sustainable methodology for catalytic C-C coupling process over a Pd-free magnetically recoverable cobalt catalyst. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 355, 118932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Messa, F.; Dilauro, G.; Perna, F.M.; Vitale, P.; Capriati, V.; Salomone, A. Sustainable Ligand-Free Heterogeneous Palladium-Catalyzed Sonogashira Cross-Coupling Reaction in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 1979–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Niakan, M.; Masteri-Farahani, M.; Shekaari, H.; Karimi, S. Pd supported on clicked cellulose-modified magnetite-graphene oxide nanocomposite for C-C coupling reactions in deep eutectic solvent. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Leal-Duaso, A.; Mayoral, J.A.; Pires, E. Steps Forward toward the Substitution of Conventional Solvents in the Heck–Mizoroki Coupling Reaction: Glycerol-Derived Ethers and Deep Eutectic Solvents as Reaction Media. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 13076–13084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dang, M.-H.D.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Le, B.Q.G.; Nguyen, L.H.T.; Mai, N.X.D.; Nguyen, M.V.; Tran, P.H.; Doan, T.L.H. An effective combination of reusable Pd@MOF catalyst and deep eutectic solvents for high-performance C–C coupling reaction. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 111, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Afshari, R.; Emad Hooshmand, S.; Atharnezhad, M.; Shaabani, A. An insight into the novel covalent functionalization of multi-wall carbon nanotubes with pseudopeptide backbones for palladium nanoparticles immobilization: A versatile catalyst towards diverse cross-coupling reactions in bio-based solvents. Polyhedron 2020, 175, 114238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Paparella, A.N.; Messa, F.; Dilauro, G.; Troisi, L.; Perrone, S.; Salomone, A. A Glycerol-Based Deep Eutectic Solvent as Natural Medium and Organic Reductant for Homocoupling of (Hetero)Aryl Chlorides: A Green Route to 2,2′-Bipyridine and Biaryl Scaffolds. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202203438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Marset, X.; De Gea, S.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J. NCN–Pincer–Pd Complex as Catalyst for the Hiyama Reaction in Biomass-Derived Solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5743–5748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dilauro, G.; Azzollini, C.S.; Vitale, P.; Salomone, A.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Scalable Negishi Coupling between Organozinc Compounds and (Hetero)Aryl Bromides under Aerobic Conditions when using Bulk Water or Deep Eutectic Solvents with no Additional Ligands. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 10632–10636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Quivelli, A.F.; Vitale, P.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Reshaping Ullmann Amine Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Mild Approach for Cu-Catalyzed C–N Coupling Reactions With No Additional Ligands. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cicco, L.; Hernández-Fernández, J.A.; Salomone, A.; Vitale, P.; Ramos-Martín, M.; González-Sabín, J.; Presa Soto, A.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; García-Álvarez, J. Copper-catalyzed Goldberg-type C–N coupling in deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and water under aerobic conditions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 1773–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Quivelli, A.F.; Rossi, F.V.; Vitale, P.; García-Álvarez, J.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Sustainable and Scalable Two-Step Synthesis of Thenfadil and Some Analogs in Deep Eutectic Solvents: From Laboratory to Industry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 4065–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shaabani, A.; Afshari, R. Magnetic Ugi-functionalized graphene oxide complexed with copper nanoparticles: Efficient catalyst toward Ullman coupling reaction in deep eutectic solvents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 510, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bagheri, S.; Pazoki, F.; Radfar, I.; Heydari, A. Copper(I)–creatine complex on magnetic nanoparticles as a green catalyst for N- and O-arylation in deep eutectic solvent. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pazoki, F.; Heydari, A. Magnetic acyclovir-copper nanoparticle: DFT study and application as an efficient, magnetically separable and recyclable catalyst for N-arylation of amines under green condition. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 122, 108240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bagheri, S.; Pazoki, F.; Esfandiary, N.; Fadaei, M.M.; Heydari, A. Synthesis and characterization of Pd(II)–vitamin B6 complex supported on magnetic nanoparticle as an efficient and recyclable catalyst system for C–N cross coupling of amides in deep eutectic solvents. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Quivelli, A.F.; Marinò, M.; Vitale, P.; García-Álvarez, J.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Ligand-Free Copper-Catalyzed Ullmann-Type C−O Bond Formation in Non-Innocent Deep Eutectic Solvents under Aerobic Conditions. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Niakan, M.; Karimi, S.; Masteri-Farahani, M.; Shekaari, H. An efficient, cost-effective, and magnetically recoverable copper catalyst for O-arylation of phenols with aryl halides in choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 620, 126603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Marset, X.; Pérez, J.M.; Ramón, D.J. Cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction using copper oxide impregnated on magnetite in deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Teja, C.; Nawaz Khan, F.R. Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Systems in Sequential Friedländer Reaction and Palladium-Catalyzed sp3 CH Functionalization of Methyl Ketones. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 8046–8055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Prameela, S.; Nawaz Khan, F.-R. Ir(I)-Catalyzed Synthesis of (E)-4-Benzylidenylacridines and (E)-2-Styrylquinoline-3-carboxamide through Sequential Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling, Dehydrogenative Friedländer Reaction, and sp3-C–H Activation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 5394–5410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pavithra, D.; Ethiraj, K.R.; Nawaz Khan, F.-R. Cu-TEMPO Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Friedlander Annulation/sp3 C–H Functionalization/Spiroannulation towards Spiro[indoline-3,3′-pyrrolizin]-2′-yl)-4-phenylquinoline-3-Carboxylates. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 7035–7050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Punzi, A.; Coppi, D.I.; Matera, S.; Capozzi, M.A.M.; Operamolla, A.; Ragni, R.; Babudri, F.; Farinola, G.M. Pd-Catalyzed Thiophene–Aryl Coupling Reaction via C–H Bond Activation in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4754–4757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shariatipour, M.; Salamatmanesh, A.; Jadidi Nejad, M.; Heydari, A. Imidazole-aryl coupling reaction via CH bond activation catalyzed by palladium supported on modified magnetic reduced graphene oxide in alkaline deep eutectic solvent. Catal. Commun. 2020, 135, 105890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. D’Amico, F.; Papucci, C.; Franchi, D.; Reginato, G.; Calamante, M.; Zani, L.; Dessì, A.; Mordini, A. Sustainable Pd-Catalyzed Direct Arylation of Thienyl Derivatives with (Hetero)aromatic Bromides under Air in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 3037–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. González-Gallardo, N.; Saavedra, B.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J. A jackpot C–H activation protocol using simple ruthenium catalyst in deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 4941–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Marset, X. Palladium-catalysed Csp3–H functionalisation of unactivated 8-aminoquinoline amides in deep eutectic solvents. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022, 20, 7071–7075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Disale, S.T.; Kale, S.R.; Kahandal, S.S.; Srinivasan, T.G.; Jayaram, R.V. Choline chloride·2ZnCl2 ionic liquid: An efficient and reusable catalyst for the solvent free Kabachnik–Fields reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2277–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Keshavarzipour, F.; Tavakol, H. Deep Eutectic Solvent as a Recyclable Catalyst for Three-Component Synthesis of β-Amino Carbonyls. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 1062–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Azizi, N.; Edrisi, M. Deep eutectic solvent immobilized on SBA-15 as a novel separable catalyst for one-pot three-component Mannich reaction. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 240, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tran, M.-N.T.; Nguyen, X.-T.T.; Nguyen, H.T.; Chau, D.-K.N.; Tran, P.H. Deep eutectic solvent: An efficient and green catalyst for the three-component condensation of indoles, aromatic aldehydes, and activated methylene compounds. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Obst, M.; Srivastava, A.; Baskaran, S.; König, B. Preparation of Propargyl Amines in a ZnCl2–Dimethylurea Deep-Eutectic Solvent. Synlett 2018, 29, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Abtahi, B.; Tavakol, H. Choline chloride-urea deep eutectic solvent as an efficient media for the synthesis of propargylamines via organocuprate intermediate. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Abtahi, B.; Tavakol, H. CuI-catalyzed, one-pot synthesis of 3-aminobenzofurans in deep eutectic solvents. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brambilla, E.; Bortolla, A.; Pirovano, V.; Caselli, A.; Tiecco, M.; Abbiati, G. Silver-catalysed A3-coupling reactions in phenylacetic acid/alkylamine N-oxide eutectic mixture under dielectric heating: An alternative approach to propargylamines. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 36, e6669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shaibuna, M.; Sreekumar, K. Experimental Investigation on the Correlation between the Physicochemical Properties and Catalytic Activity of Six DESs in the Kabachnik-Fields Reaction. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 13454–13460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Marset, X.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J. Deep Eutectic Solvents as Reaction Media for the Palladium-Catalysed C−S Bond Formation: Scope and Mechanistic Studies. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 10522–10526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Marset, X.; Torregrosa-Crespo, J.; Martínez-Espinosa, R.M.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J. Multicomponent synthesis of sulfonamides from triarylbismuthines, nitro compounds and sodium metabisulfite in deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4127–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Messa, F.; Perrone, S.; Capua, M.; Tolomeo, F.; Troisi, L.; Capriati, V.; Salomone, A. Towards a sustainable synthesis of amides: Chemoselective palladium-catalysed aminocarbonylation of aryl iodides in deep eutectic solvents. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 8100–8103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Saavedra, B.; Ramón, D.J. Deep Eutectic Solvent as a Sustainable Medium for C–C Bond Formation Via Multicomponent Radical Conjugate Additions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 7941–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vidal, C.; Suárez, F.J.; García-Álvarez, J. Deep eutectic solvents (DES) as green reaction media for the redox isomerization of allylic alcohols into carbonyl compounds catalyzed by the ruthenium complex [Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)Cl2(benzimidazole)]. Catal. Commun. 2014, 44, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cicco, L.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.J.; Perna, F.M.; García-Álvarez, J.; Capriati, V. One-pot sustainable synthesis of tertiary alcohols by combining ruthenium-catalysed isomerisation of allylic alcohols and chemoselective addition of polar organometallic reagents in deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3069–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Dilauro, G.; Francesca Quivelli, A.; Vitale, P.; Capriati, V.; Perna, F.M. Water and Sodium Chloride: Essential Ingredients for Robust and Fast Pd-Catalysed Cross-Coupling Reactions between Organolithium Reagents and (Hetero)aryl Halides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1799–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cicco, L.; Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.J.; Moris, F.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; García-Álvarez, J.; González-Sabín, J. Programming cascade reactions interfacing biocatalysis with transition-metal catalysis in Deep Eutectic Solvents as biorenewable reaction media. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 3468–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wang, J.; Han, J.; Khan, M.Y.; He, D.; Peng, H.; Chen, D.; Xie, X.; Xue, Z. Deep eutectic solvents for green and efficient iron-mediated ligand-free atom transfer radical polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 1616–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, A.; Xing, P.; Zheng, X.; Cao, H.; Yang, G.; Zheng, X. Deep eutectic solvent catalyzed Friedel–Crafts alkylation of electron-rich arenes with aldehydes. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 59022–59026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jin, X.; Wang, A.; Cao, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Zheng, X.; Zheng, X. A new efficient method for the preparation of intermediate aromatic ketones by Friedel–Crafts acylation. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2018, 44, 5521–5530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ranjbari, M.A.; Tavakol, H.; Manoukian, M. Regioselective and solvent-free arylation of β-nitrostyrenes with mono- and dialkyl anilines. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2021, 47, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Cicco, L.; Yamamoto, K.; Hernández-Fernández, J.A.; Morís, F.; Capriati, V.; García-Álvarez, J.; González-Sabín, J. Deep eutectic solvent-catalyzed Meyer–Schuster rearrangement of propargylic alcohols under mild and bench reaction conditions. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 15165–15168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rokade, S.M.; Bhate, P.M. One-pot synthesis of per-O-acetylated hemiacetals from free sugars in a deep eutectic solvent. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 416, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hong, S.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, Q.; Chen, L.; Deng, J.; Chen, W.; Lian, H.; Mota-Morales, J.D.; Liimatainen, H. Choline chloride-zinc chloride deep eutectic solvent mediated preparation of partial O-acetylation of chitin nanocrystal in one step reaction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 220, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cao, J.; Qi, B.; Liu, J.; Shang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Lv, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X. Deep eutectic solvent choline chloride·2CrCl3·6H2O: An efficient catalyst for esterification of formic and acetic acid at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 21612–21616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Azizi, N.; Rahimi, Z.; Alipour, M. A magnetic nanoparticle catalyzed eco-friendly synthesis of cyanohydrins in a deep eutectic solvent. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 61191–61198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Patil, U.B.; Singh, A.S.; Nagarkar, J.M. Choline chloride based eutectic solvent: An efficient and reusable solvent system for the synthesis of primary amides from aldehydes and from nitriles. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 1102–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Azizi, N.; Edrisi, M.; Abbasi, F. Mesoporous silica SBA-15 functionalized with acidic deep eutectic solvent: A highly active heterogeneous N-formylation catalyst under solvent-free conditions. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dindarloo Inaloo, I.; Majnooni, S. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES) as Green and Efficient Solvent/Catalyst Systems for the Synthesis of Carbamates and Ureas from Carbonates. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 7811–7817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Inaloo, I.D.; Majnooni, S.; Esmaeilpour, M. Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in a Deep Eutectic Solvent: An Efficient and Recyclable Catalytic System for the Synthesis of Primary Carbamates and Monosubstituted Ureas. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 3481–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Abbasi, S.; Miraki, M.K.; Radfar, I.; Karimi, M.; Heydari, A. Efficient Synthesis of N-Acylureas Using Copper Oxide Supported on Magnetic Nanoparticles in Deep Eutectic Solvent. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Hydrolysis and oxidation of cellulose to gluconic acid.
Figure 1. Hydrolysis and oxidation of cellulose to gluconic acid.
Molecules 27 08445 g001
Figure 2. Oxidation of alcohols in DES and telescoped one-pot reactions.
Figure 2. Oxidation of alcohols in DES and telescoped one-pot reactions.
Molecules 27 08445 g002
Figure 3. Hydroformylation of 1-decene.
Figure 3. Hydroformylation of 1-decene.
Molecules 27 08445 g003
Figure 4. Hydrogenation of phenacyl azides.
Figure 4. Hydrogenation of phenacyl azides.
Molecules 27 08445 g004
Figure 5. Hydrogenolysis of benzodioxane derivative.
Figure 5. Hydrogenolysis of benzodioxane derivative.
Molecules 27 08445 g005
Figure 6. Pd-NPs-catalyzed hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds.
Figure 6. Pd-NPs-catalyzed hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds.
Molecules 27 08445 g006
Figure 7. Hydrogenation using in situ generated H2 from Al and H2O.
Figure 7. Hydrogenation using in situ generated H2 from Al and H2O.
Molecules 27 08445 g007
Figure 8. Ru-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation.
Figure 8. Ru-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation.
Molecules 27 08445 g008
Figure 9. Cycloisomerization reactions catalyzed by Au and Pd.
Figure 9. Cycloisomerization reactions catalyzed by Au and Pd.
Molecules 27 08445 g009
Figure 10. Tetrazole syntheses through [3 + 2] cycloadditions.
Figure 10. Tetrazole syntheses through [3 + 2] cycloadditions.
Molecules 27 08445 g010
Figure 11. Syntheses of triazole derivatives.
Figure 11. Syntheses of triazole derivatives.
Molecules 27 08445 g011
Figure 12. Heterocycle synthesis using heterogeneous catalysts in DESs.
Figure 12. Heterocycle synthesis using heterogeneous catalysts in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g012
Figure 13. Synthesis of substituted thiophenes by PdI2/KI-catalyzed heterocyclization.
Figure 13. Synthesis of substituted thiophenes by PdI2/KI-catalyzed heterocyclization.
Molecules 27 08445 g013
Figure 14. Condensation-based cyclization reactions using Zn-based type I and IV DESs.
Figure 14. Condensation-based cyclization reactions using Zn-based type I and IV DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g014
Figure 15. Cyclizations using Zr-based type IV DESs.
Figure 15. Cyclizations using Zr-based type IV DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g015
Figure 16. First example of a cross-coupling reaction in DESs.
Figure 16. First example of a cross-coupling reaction in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g016
Figure 17. First Suzuki reaction in DESs.
Figure 17. First Suzuki reaction in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g017
Figure 18. Phosphine ligands in cross-coupling reactions in DESs.
Figure 18. Phosphine ligands in cross-coupling reactions in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g018
Figure 19. Ligand-free Suzuki couplings.
Figure 19. Ligand-free Suzuki couplings.
Molecules 27 08445 g019
Figure 20. Pd-bipy-NH2 based cross-coupling transformations.
Figure 20. Pd-bipy-NH2 based cross-coupling transformations.
Molecules 27 08445 g020
Figure 21. Pd-abnormal N-heterocyclic carbene catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.
Figure 21. Pd-abnormal N-heterocyclic carbene catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.
Molecules 27 08445 g021
Figure 22. Application of Suzuki coupling to benzodithiophene derivatives.
Figure 22. Application of Suzuki coupling to benzodithiophene derivatives.
Molecules 27 08445 g022
Figure 23. Ni-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura coupling.
Figure 23. Ni-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura coupling.
Molecules 27 08445 g023
Figure 24. Early examples of Heck and Sonogashira couplings in DESs.
Figure 24. Early examples of Heck and Sonogashira couplings in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g024
Figure 25. One-pot decarboxylation and Heck cross-coupling.
Figure 25. One-pot decarboxylation and Heck cross-coupling.
Molecules 27 08445 g025
Figure 26. Tsuji-Trost, Hiyama and Negishi couplings in DESs.
Figure 26. Tsuji-Trost, Hiyama and Negishi couplings in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g026
Figure 27. C-N cross-coupling reactions.
Figure 27. C-N cross-coupling reactions.
Molecules 27 08445 g027
Figure 28. C-O cross-coupling reaction.
Figure 28. C-O cross-coupling reaction.
Molecules 27 08445 g028
Figure 29. Cross-dehydrogenative coupling of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines.
Figure 29. Cross-dehydrogenative coupling of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines.
Molecules 27 08445 g029
Figure 30. Sequential Friedländer condensation and C-H functionalization.
Figure 30. Sequential Friedländer condensation and C-H functionalization.
Molecules 27 08445 g030
Figure 31. Direct arylation of heterocyclic arenes.
Figure 31. Direct arylation of heterocyclic arenes.
Molecules 27 08445 g031
Figure 32. Ru and Pd catalyzed C-H functionalization.
Figure 32. Ru and Pd catalyzed C-H functionalization.
Molecules 27 08445 g032
Figure 33. Zn-based DESs catalyzed multicomponent reactions.
Figure 33. Zn-based DESs catalyzed multicomponent reactions.
Molecules 27 08445 g033
Figure 34. Examples of A3-coupling in DESs.
Figure 34. Examples of A3-coupling in DESs.
Molecules 27 08445 g034
Figure 35. Multicomponent synthesis of sulfones, sulfides and sulfonamides.
Figure 35. Multicomponent synthesis of sulfones, sulfides and sulfonamides.
Molecules 27 08445 g035
Figure 36. Aminocarbonylation and multicomponent radical addition.
Figure 36. Aminocarbonylation and multicomponent radical addition.
Molecules 27 08445 g036
Figure 37. Ru-catalyzed isomerization reaction.
Figure 37. Ru-catalyzed isomerization reaction.
Molecules 27 08445 g037
Figure 38. Friedel-Crafts-type alkylation/acylation.
Figure 38. Friedel-Crafts-type alkylation/acylation.
Molecules 27 08445 g038
Figure 39. Meyer-Schuster rearrangement of propargylic alcohols.
Figure 39. Meyer-Schuster rearrangement of propargylic alcohols.
Molecules 27 08445 g039
Figure 40. Cyanosilylation of aldehydes and epoxides.
Figure 40. Cyanosilylation of aldehydes and epoxides.
Molecules 27 08445 g040
Figure 41. Synthesis of primary amides from nitriles and aldehydes.
Figure 41. Synthesis of primary amides from nitriles and aldehydes.
Molecules 27 08445 g041
Figure 42. Synthesis of carbamates and urea derivatives.
Figure 42. Synthesis of carbamates and urea derivatives.
Molecules 27 08445 g042
Table 3. Selected examples of cross-coupling reactions catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
Table 3. Selected examples of cross-coupling reactions catalyzed by transition metals in DESs.
EntryReactionDESConditionsProductRef.
1StilleSugar:DMU:NH4Cl[Pd], 90 °CBiaryl[45]
2SuzukiSugar:DMU:NH4Cl[Pd], 90 °CBiaryl[46]
3SuzukiChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 60–100 °C (Het)biaryl[48,49,50,56,61]
4SuzukiChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)[Pd], 100 °C Biaryl[53,54]
5SuzukiChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 90 °C Imidazole-fused deriv.[52]
6SuzukiChCl:urea (1:2)[Ni], 60 °C(Het)biaryl[57]
7Heckl-carnitine:urea [Pd], 80 °CAr-CH=CHR[58]
8HeckChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 80–120 °CAr-CH=CHR[48,62]
9HeckChCl:(CH2OH)2 (1:2)[Pd], 120 °CAr-CH=CHR[53]
10HeckAcChCl:urea (1:2)[Pd],120 °CAr-CH=CHR[54]
11Sonogashirad-mannose:DMU (7:3)[Pd], 80 °CAr-C≡C-Ar’[58]
12SonogashiraPh3PMeBr:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 60 °CAr-C≡C-Ar’[48,53]
13SonogashiraAcChCl:urea (1:2)[Pd], 60 °CAr-C≡C-Ar’[54]
14HiyamaChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Pd], 100 °CAr-R[53,54,74]
15Tsuji–TrostRAME-ß-CD:urea (3:7)[Pd], 90 °CAllylamine[10]
16NegishiChCl:urea (1:2)[Pd], 60 °CAr-R[75]
17Ullmann C-NChCl:glycerol (1:2)[Cu], 60–100 °CArNR1R[76,78]
18GoldbergChCl:H2O (1:2)[Cu], 80 °CAmides[77]
19Ullmann C-OChCl:ROH[Cu], 80 °CAr-OR[83]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marset, X.; Guillena, G. Deep Eutectic Solvents as à-la-Carte Medium for Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Organic Processes. Molecules 2022, 27, 8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238445

AMA Style

Marset X, Guillena G. Deep Eutectic Solvents as à-la-Carte Medium for Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Organic Processes. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marset, Xavier, and Gabriela Guillena. 2022. "Deep Eutectic Solvents as à-la-Carte Medium for Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Organic Processes" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238445

APA Style

Marset, X., & Guillena, G. (2022). Deep Eutectic Solvents as à-la-Carte Medium for Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Organic Processes. Molecules, 27(23), 8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238445

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop