Next Article in Journal
Co-Fermentation of Glucose–Xylose Mixtures from Agroindustrial Residues by Ethanologenic Escherichia coli: A Study on the Lack of Carbon Catabolite Repression in Strain MS04
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of High Temperature-Resistant Modified Starch Polyamine Anti-Collapse Water-Based Drilling Fluid System for Deep Shale Reservoir
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Citrus Canker Caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri

by
Edenilson dos Santos Niculau
1,2,*,
Douglas Ferreira
1,
Edson Rodrigues-Filho
1,
Franklin Behlau
3,
Rodrigo Facchini Magnani
3,
Leonardo Toffano
1,
Evandro Luis Prieto
1,
João Batista Fernandes
1 and
Maria Fátima das Graças Fernandes da Silva
1
1
Departamento de Química, Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luís, Km 235, São Carlos 13565-905, SP, Brazil
2
Centro de Ciências Integradas, Universidade Federal do Norte do Tocantins, Av. Paraguai, s/n—Esquina com Rua Uxiramas, Araguaína 77824-838, TO, Brazil
3
Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura—Fundecitrus, Av. Adhemar Pereira de Barros, 201, Araraquara 14807-040, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(24), 8947; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248947
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Citrus canker, caused by the bacterium Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc), is a disease that causes serious problems to the global citrus industry. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry (MS) has been used in human medicine to diagnose various diseases caused by both fungi and bacteria. In agriculture, this technique has potential for the diagnosis of diseases due to the low cost of large-scale analysis and quickness. This study showed that MALDI-TOF MS combined with chemometric analysis was effective for differentiating the macromolecule profile of orange leaves with canker lesions, healthy leaves, and leaves with phytotoxicity symptoms, proving that this technique may be used for the rapid diagnosis of citrus canker.

1. Introduction

Citrus is one of the fruit crops grown and produced in the world. China, Brazil, India, Mexico, and the United States are the biggest producers in the world. However, this crop is affected by a disease, citrus canker, that can harm the production, marketing, and consumption of this fruit [1]. Citrus canker (CC), caused by the bacterium Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc) is an important disease for the citrus industry in several countries, such as Brazil and the United States, the two largest orange producers in the world. The bacterium affects all commercially important citrus varieties and species. The impacts of this disease are related to the defoliation of plants, the depreciation of the quality and reduction of production due to the presence of lesions in the fruit, premature drop of fruit, and the restriction for the commercialization to canker frees areas [1]. Symptoms have similar characteristics in leaves, fruit, and twigs. Lesions are necrotic, protruding, and brown. Often, the lesions are surrounded by yellowish chlorotic halo. The spread of the bacteria occurs mainly through rain splashes carried by wind, but also through people, seedlings, tools, and contaminated machines. When it reaches the plant surface, the pathogen can penetrate the host through stomata or wounds. The infection of citrus plants by Xcc occurs in young plant tissues such as shoots up to 4 to 6 weeks old and fruit up to 3 to 4 months old or 5 cm diameter [2]. Free water and temperature are important environmental factors for the occurrence of citrus canker [3]. Whereas water is important for the spread and penetration of the bacteria, temperature influences the multiplication of the bacteria inside the host and the development of lesions. Greater favorability to the pathogen occurs when the temperature is between 25 to 35 °C and the leaf wetness period is equal or greater than four consecutive hours. These are the optimal conditions for the bacteria to grow and spread in the plant. In vitro growth of the microorganism changes according to the composition of the culture medium, temperature, and humidity [3,4].
The disease occurs endemically in several citrus-producing regions such as Florida (USA), Argentina, Uruguay, and southern Brazilian states [1]. However, in several other important citrus-producing areas, the disease is not present, such as in Europe, South Africa, Mexico, California (USA), and in the states of Bahia and Sergipe, which make up the second largest Brazilian citrus production belt. In these areas, the early diagnosis of the disease for an immediate adoption of containment measures is critical for the suppression or eradication of the pathogen [1,5].
The main techniques used for the diagnosis of citrus canker are molecular PCR-based methods [6,7], serology [8], injection–infiltration bioassay or needle-prick pathogenicity tests [9,10], and culture-based methods [9,11,12,13]. PCR detects the bacterium with high precision and sensitivity by using its genetic code [6,7]. This method, however, is expensive and laborious and, hence, it is ill-suited for large-scale use. Furthermore, plants may contain some natural compounds that inhibit the amplification of nucleic acids in PCR [14,15], which may generate false-negative results in the diagnosis of the disease. Serological detection is based on the ability of an antibody to recognize and bind to a specific antigen, a substance associated with the plant pathogen. This method is known as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Regarding molecular diagnosis, the serological method is faster and more practical, as it can be performed in the field, but it requires a greater titer of the pathogen in the tissue sampled [16]. In turn, injection–infiltration and culture-based methods are less accurate and more time-consuming than other methods, but they do not require sophisticated equipment, material, or training for their application [13].
Spectroscopic and spectrometric methods appear to be promising alternatives for the diagnosis of many plant diseases, including citrus canker [17,18,19]. These techniques can rapidly measure the chemical and physical properties of the samples that are related to their chemical composition. One of these approaches is related to compounds produced by the plant defense mechanism (phytoanticepins) or to new compounds (phytoalexins), which can be secondary metabolites or specific macromolecules biosynthesized by interaction between the phytopathogen and host [20,21,22].
One way to detect the presence of macromolecules produced by the plant defense mechanism or by a plant–host interaction can be performed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry. This technique has been demonstrated to be a useful tool in several applications, such as in clinical microbiology to identify pathogenic microorganisms, including fungi, yeast, and bacteria [23,24,25]. In agriculture, MALDI-TOF can also be an excellent means for diagnosing phytopathogens [26] due to the low cost of large-scale analyses, low sample consumption, high reproducibility, fast sample preparation, and rapid data acquisition. Despite the great potential, MALDI-MS has been restricted for investigation of the spatial distributions of metabolites in plant organs [27], as well as for taxonomic classification [28].
The aim of this study was to employ the MALDI-TOF MS technique associated with multivariate analysis as a potential tool for citrus canker diagnosis in infected C. sinensis leaves from the field.

2. Results and Discussion

The amplification of the 747 bp fragment, a specific fragment of the Xcc DNA region, referring to the atpD gene (F1-F0 subunit of ATP synthesis), confirmed the presence of the bacterium in the symptomatic leaves (Figure 1). Despite the accuracy and specificity, PCR and DNA sequencing analysis remains costly and time-consuming tools for plant pathogen diagnostics, reinforcing the need for the development of alternative or complementary techniques [29,30].
The analysis by MADI-TOF MS of Xcc (strain 306) allowed the identification of the bacteria at the genus level with high accuracy and at the species level with good probability in colonies from 48 h of cultivation (spotting and identifications in green) (Figure 2b and Figure 3b). In some repetitions (spots), the identification occurred only at the genus level with good probability (spots and identifications in yellow) (Figure 3b). When the bacterium was cultivated for 24 h, in only one repetition (spotting), it was possible to carry out the identification at the genus level with good probability (spotting in yellow) (Figure 3a), but in the other spots, it was not possible to accurately identify the bacterium at the genus and species level (spots and identifications in red) (Figure 2a and Figure 3a). There was a greater variation in ions detected between 24 and 96-h (Figure 2a and 2c, respectively). The ions detected at 96-h were the most discrepant compared to 24 and 48-h. Thus, the bacterium was not diagnosed with good probability in any of the 96-h repetition (spotting) (Figure 3c). The detection of ions with m/z 4664; 5859; 7418; and 9330 were important for the diagnosis in the battery in 48 h. These ions were also detected in the 24-h analysis; however, with small variations in the values. Some ions detected between m/z 4000 to 5000; 7000 to 7300; and 8700 to 10,000 were also relevant for the best classification of bacteria at the genus and species level in 48 h. They were not detected in 24 h and 96 h. This is justified probably by the fact that Xcc 306 reached the stationary phase of growth on NBY (Nutrient Broth Yeast) medium within 48 h of culture, so it led to a spectrum with many ions (Figure 2b); however, the optimal conditions for the in vitro growth of bacteria change according to the composition of the culture medium, temperature, and humidity. This hypothesis is based on the profile of macromolecules obtained by MALDI-TOF MS. Mass spectra are similar to those of bacteria in the software database (Figure 3b). The most characteristic ions of the bacterial macromolecules profile were detected in the range of m/z 5000 and m/z 7000. Sindt et al., 2017 also detected ions in this range in the analysis of some strains of this bacterium by MALDI-TOF MS [31].
The results of the chemometric analysis of samples healthy leaves tissue (HT), herbicide phytotoxicity leaves tissue (HP), infected leaves tissue (IT), and pure Xcc culture (PC) are represented by an MSP dendrogram (Figure 4). Three groups were formed at the 650-distance level: a group formed by samples containing IT samples, a mixed group formed by samples HT and HP, and another group formed only by PC.
Orange leaves can have necrotic symptoms caused by herbicide phytotoxicity that are similar to citrus canker, being very difficult to distinguish visually. Thus, the profile of macromolecules in leaves in the presence of herbicides was also extracted and evaluated. According to the dendrogram, there was no statistical difference between HT and HP, but all HP samples were separated from IT. This is likely because the profile of macromolecules extracted and detected in HP and IT differ from each other. The presence of the bacteria in IT causes a response in the plant; for example, a defense mechanism, producing phytoalexins or phytoanticipins [32], which, in the case of HP, may not be present, as they are not the same or change sharply in concentration. All PC samples differed from plant tissues (IT, HT, and HP), resulting in a separated group. This is likely due to the high similarity in the macromolecules profile considering only pure cultures and the high differentiation compared to plant samples.
Three ions detected in PC (m/z 3186.878; 4418.330; and 7327.092) (Figure 5a) and IT (m/z 3191.843; 4405.716; and 7315.839) (Figure 5b) are important to detect the presence of bacteria in the plant without using multivariate analysis; however, there are variations in the m/z values due to the low intensity of these ions in IT. Thus, it is recommended to perform a multivariate analysis similar to this work for the diagnoses of the microorganism and to separate the groups.
These results show that the multivariate analysis using the equipment software clearly differentiates the leaves containing the symptoms of citrus canker (IT) from the healthy leaves (HT) in 100% of the treatments. In other words, the technique is capable of detecting the Xcc + plant interaction, separating it from isolated samples of Xcc and healthy leaf tissues or with herbicide phytotoxicity lesions.
PCA clustering analysis (Figure 6) applied to our data shows that infected tissue samples (positive quadrant of PC1) were separated from the health tissue samples (negative quadrant of PC1), corroborating the results found in the dendrograms. Figure 7 shows the accumulated variance in each principal component, but the first two components represent most of the variance in the data.
The MALDI Biotyper PCA allows reducing the dimensionality of a data set in which there are a large number of interrelated variables, while retaining the variation. The data set consists of mass spectra obtained from different species. In mass spectra, the intensities of individual m/z ratios represent the variables. PCA calculates a new coordinate system that can be expressed as the linear combination of the original variables (mass-to-charge ratios m/z). This enables major trends in the data to be identified. PCA is based on eigenvalue/eigenvector decomposition of the covariance or the correlation matrix of the original variables. Data can usually be adequately described using far fewer coordinates (principal components) than original variables.
The loading plot for principal component 1 and principal component 2 showed that ions with m/z above 7000, framed in the positive quadrant of load1, have the highest weights for separating infected samples from healthy samples (Figure 8). Therefore, ions above this range can be used as disease markers. In fact, this range of ions was also detected in the analysis of bacterial cultures (Figure 2b).
As shown in Figure 9, a consistent reproducibility of mass spectra was obtained for the different treatments. This shows that the technique, together with the extraction procedures, is statistically favorable for use in many samples. There was also differentiation in the ions detected when they were compared between treatments (IT, HT, HP, and PC), with greater similarity between HP and HT and greater dissimilarity between IT and PC, corroborating the MSP dendrogram shown in Figure 4.
MALDI-TOF has already been used for diagnosis of diseases caused by microorganisms [24,25,26], including two pathovars of Xanthomonas oryzae [33], but in agriculture, it is still little employed [34,35]. The cost of the analyses described in this work is very low for a laboratory that has the MALDI-TOF MS equipment. The routine reagents used are distilled water, ultrapure water, and matrix solution containing 20 mg/mL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) in acetonitrile 0.2% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (1:1). For example, for each leaf sample in triplicate, only 1.5 mL of distilled water, 25 µL of ultrapure water, and 4.5 µL of matrix solution are used. Thus, the estimated cost per sample in triplicate is only US$ 0.12. Furthermore, the final diagnosis takes only 3 h for a plant sample in triplicate. The relative total time can be reduced if the experiment is done in large-scale. This is the first time that this technique has been applied for the diagnosis of citrus canker. These results suggest that the MALDI-TOF MS technique has potential for the rapid diagnosis of not only citrus canker, but also other bacterium-causing disease that affect crops.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sampling Groups

The extraction of the macromolecules was performed in four groups of samples, being (i) leaves with citrus canker lesion (IT), (ii) necrotic lesions resulting from phytotoxicity due to the herbicide Paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl- 4,4’-bipyridinium, C12H14N2) on leaves (HP), (iii) healthy leaves (HT), and (iv) pure cultures of Xcc (PC) (Figure 10). Leaves of Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) trees with no symptoms, with canker lesions, or with phytotoxicity injuries were collected in a 6-year-old orchard commercial located at the municipality of Guairaçá, Paraná state, Brazil. Necrotic lesions caused by herbicide phytotoxicity were included in the study because Paraquat is often used in citrus orchards for the control of weeds, and the accidental lesions on citrus leaves are often confused with citrus canker lesions in visuals diagnostics.
For each group of plant samples, forty-four leaves were collected, submitted to the macromolecule extraction process, and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. All plant samples were submitted to the same procedure for macromolecule extraction, according to Section 3.2.1. Fifteen isolates of pure cultures of Xcc from the bacterial collection of Fundecitrus (Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil) were also selected (Table 1). Prior to the extraction of macromolecules, isolates were grown on the NBY (Nutrient Broth Yeast) agar medium (containing per liter of water: 5.0 g phytone peptone, 3.0 g beef extract, 2.0 g yeast extract, 2.0 g K2HPO4, 0.5 g KH2PO4, and 16 g bacteriological agar) at 28 °C and a 12-h photoperiod. After 24 h, the macromolecules profile of each isolate was determined by MALDI-TOF MS. The macromolecules profile from the wild strain 306 (PC 306) was determined in 24, 48, and 96 h.

3.2. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

3.2.1. Extraction, Sample Preparation of Plant, and Analysis by MALDI-TOF MS

Citrus leaves with healthy tissue (HT), herbicide phytotoxicity (HP), and Xcc-infected tissue (IT) with canker infection lesions were collected and kept at −80 °C until the MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Pure culture (PC) of Xcc bacterium from different orchards were grown according to Section 3.1 before analysis by MALDI-TOF MS. PC samples were analyzed in the equipment using a direct spotting (smear) of bacterial colonies after each cultivation time. For the extraction of macromolecules from the leaves’ plant, lesions were excised (≈0.8 cm × 0.4 cm) and transferred to a vial tube, where 1.5 mL distilled water was added. Tubes were stirred for 2 h at 900 rpm. The supernatant was removed after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, 4 °C for 4 min. The precipitated pellet was resuspended into 25 microliters of ultrapure water. Two microliters of solutions were sampled onto each twenty-four target spot of a MTP 384 ground steel TF target plate (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and air-dried at room temperature. Colonies from each bacterium grown were smeared using a sterilized toothpick onto each twenty-four target spots. Spotted samples were overlaid by 1.5 µL of matrix solution and air dried at room temperature before analysis. The matrix solution contained 20 mg/mL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) in acetonitrile 0.2% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (1:1), and was sonicated before use to ensure the solubilization. The Protein Calibration Standard I (~5000–17,500 Da, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) was used for the internal calibration of the mass spectrometer.
MALDI-TOF analyses were performed in the linear mode acquiring positive-charged ions produced by using a Smartbeam-II laser technology with an adjustable repetition rate of up to 1 KHz (355 nm) mounted in a Autoflex Speed spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Acquisition was controlled by the FlexControl software package (version 3.3, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) with automatic data acquisition, and mass spectra were acquired in the mass range m/z 2–20 KDa. Steps of 250 laser shots were applied to random walk automatic location methods inside of each target spot. The intensity and resolution of the extracted mass spectra were evaluated according to the software fuzzy logic control system. One spectrum from each target spot was generated by adding 1500 satisfactory laser single-shot with adequate intensity and resolution. A total of 24 spectra were acquired for each sample.

3.3. Construction of Main Spectra (MSPs)

The 24 spectra acquired to each sample were loaded into the MALDI Biotyper 3.1 software (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) and preprocessed using standard algorithms for baseline subtraction, smoothing, and normalization described in the Biotyper Preprocessing Standard Method manual. Mass peaks in the range of m/z 3–15 KDa were used to compose a unified Main Spectrum (MSP) of each leaf sample.
The MSPs were created by using the Biotyper MSP Creation Standard Method of MALDI Biotyper 3.1 software. A peak list containing information on the average m/z and intensity of a maximum of 70 peaks present in at least 25% of the 24 spectra recorded for each sample was composed.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

The created MSPs were subjected to the Biotyper MSP Dendrogam Creation Standard Method for MSP Dendrogram construction.
The clustering PCA was created using the Standard Method of MALDI Biotyper 3.1 software with the number of principal components defined as automatic and following the mass parameters: lower bound (3000); upper bound (15,000); resolution (2).

3.5. Diagnosis of Citrus Canker by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Definitive confirmation of the presence of the bacteria in canker-like lesions on citrus leaves was performed by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique. A specific region of the leaves from healthy and symptomatic leaves was cut for the analysis and extraction of total genomic DNA (plant + bacteria or plant only) with adaptations [36,37,38]. Using a porcelain pistil, the leaf sections were macerated in liquid nitrogen and aseptically transferred to 1.5 mL microtubes containing 600 μL of extraction buffer (NaCl 0.5 M; EDTA 0.05 M; Tris- 0.1 M HCl; pH 8.0; β-mercapoethanol 0.2%). After maceration, 50 μL of 20% SDS was added to each microtube, followed by shaking for one minute and incubation at 60 °C for 15 min. Subsequently, 300 μL of 5 M sodium acetate was added, stirred for one minute, and the obtained mixture was washed to centrifugation at 14000 rpm for 10 min. Then, 400 μL of the supernatant was transferred to new microtubes containing 400 μL of isopropanol. A brief agitation was performed in the microtubes and then they were taken to centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was carefully removed from the microtube and 500 μL of 70% ethanol was introduced into each tube along with the precipitate. The microtubes were subjected to further centrifugation at 14000 rpm for 5 min. Finally, all the supernatant was discarded and the precipitate was dried at room temperature and resuspended into 50 μL of autoclaved Milli Q water to obtain the bacterial DNA.
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) reactions were performed to amplify the atpD gene (F1-F0 subunit of ATP synthesis) “housekeeping genes”. Amplifications of the atpD gene were conducted with the primers (Primers), 5’-GGG CAA GAT CGT TCA GAT-3’ and 5’-GCT CTT GGT CGA GGT GAT-3’ [39]. Reactions were performed in 50 μL (final volume), with 1 U of high-fidelity DNA polymerase enzyme (Phusion, Finnzymes), 1X enzyme buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM of each primer, and 50 ng of genomic DNA. The program used for the amplifications was carried out following the programming: 98 °C/30 s; 35 cycles at 98 °C/10 s, 68 °C/15 s, and 72 °C/15 s; and 72 °C/10 min. All amplifications were performed in an Eppendorf thermocycler model Mastercycler. The products generated were analyzed in 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (0.1 pg/mL), visualized under ultraviolet light, and photo-documented.

4. Conclusions

MALDI-TOF MS proved to be a promising technique for the diagnosis of citrus canker through chemometric analysis. Furthermore, it is possible to differentiate plants with symptoms of herbicide application from canker disease. It is noteworthy that the methodology described in this work aids in visual diagnosis, as it is often difficult to diagnose the disease visually, given that the application of herbicides and other biotic and abiotic agents can also produce symptoms similar to those of citrus canker. Furthermore, due to the low cost and speed of large-scale analysis by MALDI-TOF MS, this technique has potential for application in the diagnosis of citrus canker. The methodology of this work is a breakthrough for the rapid diagnosis of citrus canker disease without isolation of bacterial DNA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, and funding acquisition: E.d.S.N. Formal analysis, methodology: D.F. Methodology, writing—review and editing: F.B. Methodology: R.F.M., L.T. and E.L.P. Funding acquisition and project administration: E.R.-F. and J.B.F. Funding acquisition, visualization, and writing—review and editing: M.F.d.G.F.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by: CNPq—National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—INCT: 573742/2008-1; CNPq—INCT: 465357/2014-8; Process 141596/2011-2; Process 445518/2014-6); FAPESP—São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP—INCT: 08/57859-5; FAPESP—Phd scholarship: 11/22975-8); and CAPES—Higher Education Improvement Coordination.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

All samples are available from the authors.

References

  1. Behlau, F. An overview of citrus canker in Brazil. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2021, 46, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lanza, F.E.; Marti, W.; Silva, G.J., Jr.; Behlau, F. Characteristics of citrus canker lesions associated with premature drop of sweet orange fruit. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dalla, P.M.; Christiano, R.C.S.; Furtado, E.L.; Amori, L.; Bergamin, F.A. Effect of temperature and leaf wetness duration on infection of sweet oranges by Asiatic citrus canker. Plant Pathol. 2006, 55, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Christiano, R.S.C.; Dalla, P.M.; Jesus, J.W.C.; Amorim, L.; Bergamin, F.A. Modelling the progress of Asiatic citrus canker on Tahiti lime in relation to temperature and leaf wetness. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 124, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Behlau, F. Fonseca, A.E.; Belasque, J. A comprehensive analysis of the Asiatic citrus canker eradication program in São Paulo State, Brazil, from 1999 to 2009. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 1390–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cubero, J.; Graham, J.H. Genetic Relationship among Worldwide Strains of Xanthomonas Causing Canker in Citrus Species and Design of New Primers for Their Identification by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1257–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Robène, I.; Maillot-Lebon, V.; Chabirand, A.; Moreau, A.; Becker, N.; Moumène, A.; Rieux, A.; Campos, P.; Gagnevin, L.; Gaudeul, M.; et al. Development and comparative validation of genomic-driven PCR-based assays to detect Xanthomonas citri pv. citri in citrus plants. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, X.; Stall, R.E.; Jones, J.B.; Cubero, J.; Gottwald, T.R.; Graham, J.H.; Dixon, W.N.; Schubert, T.S.; Chaloux, P.H.; Stromberg, V.K.; et al. Detection and Characterization of a New Strain of Citrus Canker Bacteria from Key/Mexican Lime and Alemow in South Florida. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Naqvi, S.A.H.; Wang, J.; Malik, M.T.; Umar, U.U.D.; Rehman, A.U.; Hasnain, A.; Sohail, M.A.; Snakeel, M.T.; Nauman, M.; Rehman, H.U.; et al. Citrus Canker-Distribution, Taxonomy, Epidemiology, Diesease Cycle, Pathogen Biology, Detection, and Management: A Critical Review and Future Research Agenda. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schubert, T.S.; Rizvi, S.A.; Sun, X.; Gottwald, T.R.; Graham, J.H.; Dixon, W.N. Meeting the challenge of Eradicating Citrus Canker in Florida-Again. Plant Dis. 2001, 85, 340–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gottwald, T.; Graham, J.; Bock, C.; Bonn, G.; Civerolo, E.; Irey, M.; Leite, R.; McCollum, G.; Parker, P.; Ramalho, J.; et al. The epidemiological significance of post-packinghouse survival of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri for dissemination of Asiatic citrus canker via infected fruit. Crop Prot. 2009, 28, 508–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bock, C.H.; Parker, P.E.; Gottwald, T.R. Effect of Simulated Wind-Driven Rain on Duration and Distance of Dispersal of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri from Canker-Infected Citrus Trees. Plant Dis. 2005, 89, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bock, C.H.; Gottwald, T.R.; Graham, J.H. A Comparison of Pathogen Isolation in Culture and Injection-infiltration Bioassay of Citrus Leaves for Detecting Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. J. Phytopathol. 2014, 162, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cubero, J.; Graham, J.H.; Gottwald, T.R. Quantitative PCR method for diagnosis of citrus bacterial canker. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2849–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wilson, I.G. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 3741–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Alvarez, A.M.; Benedict, A.A.; Mizumoto, C.Y.; Pollard, L.W.; Civerolo, E.L. Analysis of Xanthomonas campestris pv citri and X. c. citrumelo with monoclonal-antibodies. Phytopathol. 1991, 81, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cardinali, M.C.D.B.; Villas Boas, P.R.; Milori, D.M.B.P.; Ferreira, E.J.; França e Silva, M.; Machado, M.A.; Bellete, B.S.; Da Silva, M.F.G.F. Infrared spectroscopy: A potential tool in huanglongbing and citrus variegated chlorosis diagnosis. Talanta 2012, 91, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cevallos-Cevallos, J.M.; Futch, D.B.; Shilts, T.; Folimonova, S.Y.; Reyes-De-Corcuera, J.I. GC-MS metabolomic differentiation of selected citrus varieties with different sensitivity to citrus huanglongbing. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 53, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sankaran, S.; Mishra, A.; Ehsani, R.; Davis, C. A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 72, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grayer, R.J.; Harborne, J.B. A survey of antifungal compounds from higher plants, 1982–1993. Phytochemistry 1994, 37, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stintzi, A.; Heitz, T.; Prasad, V.; Wiedemann-Merdinoglu, S.; Kauffmann, S.; Geoffroy, P.; Legrand, M.; Fritig, B. Plant ‘pathogenesis-related’ proteins and their role in defense against pathogens. Biochimie 1993, 75, 687–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vanetten, H.D.; Matthews, D.E.; Matthews, P.S. Phytoalexin detoxification: Importance for pathogenicity and practical implications. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1989, 27, 143–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stump, M.J.; Black, G.; Fox, A.; Fox, K.F.; Turick, C.E.; Matthews, M. Identification of marker proteins for Bacillus anthracis using MALDI-TOF MS and ion trap MS/MS after direct extraction or electrophoretic separation. J. Sep. Sci. 2005, 28, 1642–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Demirev, P.A.; Fenselau, C. Mass spectrometry for rapid characterization of microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008, 1, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bizzini, A.; Greub, G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial identification. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 1614–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ahmad, F.; Babalola, O.O.; Tak, H.I. Potential of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a rapid detection technique in plant pathology: Identification of plant-associated microorganisms. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopes, A.A.; Pina, E.S.; Silva, D.B.; Pereira, A.M.S.; da Silva, M.F.G.F.; Da Costa, F.B.; Lopes, N.P.; Pupo, M.T. A biosynthetic pathway of sesquiterpene lactones in Smallanthus sonchifolius and their localization in leaf tissues by MALDI imaging. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9989–9991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ernst, M.; Silva, D.B.; Silva, R.; Monge, M.; Semir, J.; Vêncio, R.Z.N.; Lopes, N.P. A metabolomic protocol for plant systematics by matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 859, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Valenzuela, A.D.S. In-Field molecular diagnosis od plant pathogens: Recent trends and future perspectives. Plant Pathol. 2018, 67, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar]
  30. Padliya, N.D.; Garret, W.M.; Campbell, K.B.; Tabb, D.L.; Cooper, B. Tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of plant patrhogenic fungi and the effects of database composition on protein inferences. Proteomics 2007, 7, 3932–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sindt, N.M.; Robison, F.; Brick, M.A.; Schwartz, H.F.; Heuberger, A.L.; Prenni, J.E. MALDI-TOF-MS with PLS modeling enables strain typing of the bacterial plant pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2018, 29, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tiku, A.R. Antimicrobial Compounds (Phytoanticipins and Phytoalexins) and Their Role in Plant Defense; Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 845–868. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ge, M.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Tao, Z.; Mao, S.; Wang, Y.; Xie, G.; Sun, G. Differentiation in MALDI-TOF MS and FTIR spectra between two pathovars of Xanthomonas oryzae. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 133, 730–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Božik, M.; Mrázková, M.; Novotná, K.; Hrabětová, M.; Maršik, P.; Klouček, P.; Černý, K. MALDI-TOF MS as a method for rapid identification of Phytophthora de Bary, 1876. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chun, S.; Gopal, J.; Muthu, M. A consolidative synopsis of the MALDI-TOF MS accomplishments for the rapid diagnosis of microbial plant disease pathogens. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 156, 116713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dellaporta, S.L.; Wood, J.; Hicks, J.B. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1983, 1, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Coletta-Filho, H.D.; Takita, M.A.; Souza, A.A.; Neto, J.R.; Destéfano, S.A.L.; Hartung, J.S.; Machado, M.A. Primers based on the rpf gene region provide improved detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in naturally and artificially infected citrus plants. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ah-you, N.; Gagnevin, J.; Grimont, P.A.D.; Brisse, S.; Nesme, X.; Chiroleu, F.; Bui Thi Ngoc, L.; Jouen, E.; Lefeuvre, P.; Vernière, C.; et al. Polyphasic characterization of xanthomonads pathogenic to members of the Anacardiaceae and their relatedness to species of Xanthomonas. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagnosis of citrus canker by PCR detection of Xcc in orange leaf samples characterized by the amplification of the 747 bp fragment. Four healthy leaves and four citrus canker leaves were used in the analysis.
Figure 1. Diagnosis of citrus canker by PCR detection of Xcc in orange leaf samples characterized by the amplification of the 747 bp fragment. Four healthy leaves and four citrus canker leaves were used in the analysis.
Molecules 27 08947 g001
Figure 2. Profile of Xcc macromolecules by MALDI-TOF MS at 24 (a), 48 (b), and 96 h (c) after plating onto NBY agar medium. y-axis: ion intensity. x-axis: mass/charge (m/z).
Figure 2. Profile of Xcc macromolecules by MALDI-TOF MS at 24 (a), 48 (b), and 96 h (c) after plating onto NBY agar medium. y-axis: ion intensity. x-axis: mass/charge (m/z).
Molecules 27 08947 g002
Figure 3. Diagnosis of Xcc by MALDI-TOF/MS using the software MALDI Biotyper after plating onto NBY agar medium in 24 (a), 48 (b), and 96 (c) h.
Figure 3. Diagnosis of Xcc by MALDI-TOF/MS using the software MALDI Biotyper after plating onto NBY agar medium in 24 (a), 48 (b), and 96 (c) h.
Molecules 27 08947 g003
Figure 4. Maldi Biotyper MSP dendrogram of C. sinensis leaves samples from the field (IT, HT, and HP) and Xcc strains. IT: canker lesion, HT: healthy tissue, HP: herbicide phytotoxicity, PC: pure culture of Xcc.
Figure 4. Maldi Biotyper MSP dendrogram of C. sinensis leaves samples from the field (IT, HT, and HP) and Xcc strains. IT: canker lesion, HT: healthy tissue, HP: herbicide phytotoxicity, PC: pure culture of Xcc.
Molecules 27 08947 g004
Figure 5. MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of pure culture (PC) of Xcc at 48 h after plating onto NBY agarmedium (a) and leaf sample with citrus canker (IT) (b). y-axis: ion intensity. x-axis: mass/charge (m/z).
Figure 5. MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of pure culture (PC) of Xcc at 48 h after plating onto NBY agarmedium (a) and leaf sample with citrus canker (IT) (b). y-axis: ion intensity. x-axis: mass/charge (m/z).
Molecules 27 08947 g005
Figure 6. Maldi Biotyper PCA Clustering analysis of infected and healthy C. sinensis leaves samples. The numbers indicate the treatments of the plant tissues: 1 to 128 = IT; 129 a 270 = HT.
Figure 6. Maldi Biotyper PCA Clustering analysis of infected and healthy C. sinensis leaves samples. The numbers indicate the treatments of the plant tissues: 1 to 128 = IT; 129 a 270 = HT.
Molecules 27 08947 g006
Figure 7. Variance explained from Maldi Biotyper PCA Clustering analysis of infected and healthy C. sinensis leaves samples. y-axis indicates the variance explained and x-axis indicates the principal component.
Figure 7. Variance explained from Maldi Biotyper PCA Clustering analysis of infected and healthy C. sinensis leaves samples. y-axis indicates the variance explained and x-axis indicates the principal component.
Molecules 27 08947 g007
Figure 8. Load plot from Maldi Biotyper PCA Clustering analysis of infected and healthy C. sinensis leaves samples. The numbers indicate the ions detected.
Figure 8. Load plot from Maldi Biotyper PCA Clustering analysis of infected and healthy C. sinensis leaves samples. The numbers indicate the ions detected.
Molecules 27 08947 g008
Figure 9. Mass spectra of C. sinensis leafsamples from the field, (a) IT, (b) HT, and (c) HP, and Xcc strains (d) PC. IT: canker lesion, HT: healthy tissue, HP: herbicide phytotoxicity, PC: pure culture of Xcc. y-axis: ion intensity. x-axis: mass/charge (m/z).
Figure 9. Mass spectra of C. sinensis leafsamples from the field, (a) IT, (b) HT, and (c) HP, and Xcc strains (d) PC. IT: canker lesion, HT: healthy tissue, HP: herbicide phytotoxicity, PC: pure culture of Xcc. y-axis: ion intensity. x-axis: mass/charge (m/z).
Molecules 27 08947 g009aMolecules 27 08947 g009b
Figure 10. Treatments used to extract macromolecules for MALDI-TOF mass spectrophotometry analysis. Citrus canker lesions on the upper (A) and lower (B) surface of Citrus sinensis leaves: IT; necrotic lesions resulting from phytotoxicity due to the herbicide Paraquat (C): HP; healthy leaves (D): HT; and pure cultures of Xcc (E): PC. Arrows indicate necrotic lesions resulting from phytotoxicity due to the herbicide Paraquat.
Figure 10. Treatments used to extract macromolecules for MALDI-TOF mass spectrophotometry analysis. Citrus canker lesions on the upper (A) and lower (B) surface of Citrus sinensis leaves: IT; necrotic lesions resulting from phytotoxicity due to the herbicide Paraquat (C): HP; healthy leaves (D): HT; and pure cultures of Xcc (E): PC. Arrows indicate necrotic lesions resulting from phytotoxicity due to the herbicide Paraquat.
Molecules 27 08947 g010
Table 1. Code for mass spectrometry and strains of Xcc.
Table 1. Code for mass spectrometry and strains of Xcc.
MS CodeStrain IdentificationOriginYear of Isolation
PC 1646Xcc-03-1622Bella Vista, Corrientes, Argentina2003
PC 16441645Tres Lagunas, Formosa, Argentina2010
PC 1647Xcc-07-3180Monte Caseros, Corrientes, Argentina2007
PC A44A44Bella Vista, Corrientes, Argentina2003
PC 1648FDC 1648Santa Rosa, Corrientes, Argentina2010
PC 1666FDC 1666Rondon, Paraná, Brazil2011
PC 1670FDC 1670Alto Paraná, Paraná, Brazil2011
PC 1705FDC 1705Paranavaí, Paraná, Brazil2013
PC 1707FDC 1707Alto Paraná, Paraná, Brazil2013
PC 1733FDC 1733Guairaçá, Paraná, Brazil2014
PC 306306Paranavaí, Paraná, Brazil1997
PC 75FDC 75Casa Branca, São Paulo, Brazil1998
PC 316FDC 316Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil2002
PC 621FDC 621Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil2001
PC 10FDC 10Guararapes, São Paulo, Brazil1980
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niculau, E.d.S.; Ferreira, D.; Rodrigues-Filho, E.; Behlau, F.; Magnani, R.F.; Toffano, L.; Prieto, E.L.; Fernandes, J.B.; Silva, M.F.d.G.F.d. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Citrus Canker Caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Molecules 2022, 27, 8947. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248947

AMA Style

Niculau EdS, Ferreira D, Rodrigues-Filho E, Behlau F, Magnani RF, Toffano L, Prieto EL, Fernandes JB, Silva MFdGFd. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Citrus Canker Caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Molecules. 2022; 27(24):8947. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248947

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niculau, Edenilson dos Santos, Douglas Ferreira, Edson Rodrigues-Filho, Franklin Behlau, Rodrigo Facchini Magnani, Leonardo Toffano, Evandro Luis Prieto, João Batista Fernandes, and Maria Fátima das Graças Fernandes da Silva. 2022. "MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Citrus Canker Caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri" Molecules 27, no. 24: 8947. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248947

APA Style

Niculau, E. d. S., Ferreira, D., Rodrigues-Filho, E., Behlau, F., Magnani, R. F., Toffano, L., Prieto, E. L., Fernandes, J. B., & Silva, M. F. d. G. F. d. (2022). MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Citrus Canker Caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Molecules, 27(24), 8947. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248947

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop