Next Article in Journal
Alcohol Selective Optical Sensor Based on Porous Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Polymer Networks
Previous Article in Journal
New 1,2,3-Triazoles from (R)-Carvone: Synthesis, DFT Mechanistic Study and In Vitro Cytotoxic Evaluation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules27030774
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anti-Diabetes, Anti-Gout, and Anti-Leukemia Properties of Essential Oils from Natural Spices Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis

by
Nguyen Van Quan
1,
La Hoang Anh
1,
Vu Quang Lam
2,
Akiyoshi Takami
2,
Rolf Teschke
3,
Tran Dang Khanh
4 and
Tran Dang Xuan
1,*
1
Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan
2
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan
3
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Hanau, Teaching Hospital of the Medical Faculty, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, 63450 Hanau, Germany
4
Agricultural Genetics Institute, Pham Van Dong Street, Hanoi 122000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(3), 774; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030774
Submission received: 23 December 2021 / Revised: 20 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 25 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Essential oils (EOs) of Clausena indica fruits, Zanthoxylum rhetsa fruits, and Michelia tonkinensis seeds were analyzed for their phytochemical profiles and biological activities, including anti-diabetes, anti-gout, and anti-leukemia properties. Sixty-six volatile compounds were identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), in which, myristicin (68.3%), limonene (44.2%), and linalool (49.3%) were the most prominent components of EOs extracted from C. indica, Z. rhetsa, and M. tonkinensis, respectively. In addition, only EOs from C. indica inhibited the activities of all tested enzymes comprising α-amylase (IC50 = 7.73 mg/mL), α-glucosidase (IC50 = 0.84 mg/mL), and xanthine oxidase (IC50 = 0.88 mg/mL), which are related to type 2 diabetes and gout. Remarkably, all EOs from C. indica, Z. rhetsa (IC50 = 0.73 mg/mL), and M. tonkinensis (IC50 = 1.46 mg/mL) showed a stronger anti-α-glucosidase ability than acarbose (IC50 = 2.69 mg/mL), a known anti-diabetic agent. Moreover, the growth of leukemia cell Meg-01 was significantly suppressed by all EOs, of which, the IC50 values were recorded as 0.32, 0.64, and 0.31 mg/mL for EOs from C. indica, Z. rhetsa, and M. tonkinensis, respectively. As it stands, this is the first report about the inhibitory effects of EOs from C. indica and Z. rhetsa fruits, and M. tonkinensis seeds on the human leukemia cell line Meg-01 and key enzymes linked to diabetes and gout. In conclusion, the present study suggests that EOs from these natural spices may be promising candidates for pharmaceutical industries to develop nature-based drugs to treat diabetes mellitus or gout, as well as malignant hematological diseases such as leukemia.

1. Introduction

In recent years, studies on natural products from plants have received much attention from researchers all over the world, but difficulties remain for a plant-based product to be officially registered as a drug and widely applied in clinical practice if a comprehensive evaluation about benefits over risks is lacking [1]. The prerequisite for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is the prior preclinical discovery of biological activities among plant species that have been commonly used for a long time as foodstuffs and folk remedies. Several studies on food-based drugs have included the essential oils (EOs) from the natural spices from plant organs as potential candidates, with diverse biological and pharmacological activities [2,3].
In this context, of special interest are promising biological properties of EOs obtained from Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis which have been popularly used as flavors and spices in many sub-tropical and tropical countries. More specifically, C. indica is widely distributed in South China, and South and Southeast Asia. Leaves and fruits of this plant have been widely used as a seasoning for many dishes in Vietnam [4]. Additionally, C. indica’s leaves and roots have shown therapeutic effects for many diseases. The essential oil from C. indica leaves was determined as having potential antimicrobial and antibacterial effects [5,6]. Bioactive components from C. indica roots were reported as having potential for antioxidants, anti-diabetes, and anti-aging via in vitro bioassays [4]. Similarly, Z. rhetsa is recognized as not only a spice, but also as a medicinal plant which has been popularly used in many tropical countries, such as Vietnam, Thailand, and Bangladesh [7]. Phytocompounds from parts of this plant were reported with extra health benefits, including antinociceptive and antidiarrheal [8], antioxidant, antimalarial, antimicrobial [9], and antibacterial [10] activities. In addition, EO from Z. rhetsa fruits has shown a preventative ability on several breast [11] and lung [12] cancer cell lines, as well as on leukemia [13]. On the other side, M. tonkinensis (syn. Magnolia balansae), is a medicinal plant, traditionally used to treat malaria, flu, and infections in Vietnam [14,15]. Hitherto, there has been little scientific information on the biological activity and biochemistry of this spice plant. Additionally, along with the medicinal purpose, the use of C. indica, Z. rhetsa, and M. tonkinensis as seasonings and condiments is a feature of the culinary culture of ethnic minorities in Northwestern Vietnam.
This study examines the antioxidant, anti-diabetic, anti-gout, and anti-leukemia properties of EOs from Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis via in vitro studies. In addition, the composition of the individual EOs was identified using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS).

2. Results

2.1. Phytochemical Composition of EOs

By hydro-distillation, all essential oils from the natural spices were obtained with a pale-yellow color, of which, the EO extraction yields were 0.4, 1.7, and 5.5% for the CI, ZR, and MT samples, respectively (Table 1). Among 66 identified compounds, myristicin (68.3%) was the most dominant compound of CI oil, while limonene (44.2%) and linalool (49.3%) were the most prominent components of ZR and MT oils, respectively (Table 1 and Figure 1).
In terms of classification, benzodioxoles (myristicin) was the principal group of CI oil, followed by monoterpene hydrocarbons (14.4%), whereas the oxygenated monoterpene group (70.1%) was prominent in MT oil. Besides, the leading compounds of ZR oil were monoterpene hydrocarbons (65.5%) followed by oxygenated monoterpenes (26.0%).

2.2. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity of CI, ZR, MT was determined via 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays (Figure 2). The results showed that EO from ZR (IC50 = 3.82 mg/mL) exerted the strongest antioxidant activity, followed by those of EO from CI (IC50 = 4.41 mg/mL) and MT (IC50 = 6.85 mg/mL), respectively, in terms of ABTS assay. In the DPPH assay, the most potent antiradical activity was exhibited by the EO from MT (IC50 = 2.27 mg/mL), followed by those of the CI (IC50 = 4.95 mg/mL) and ZR (IC50 = 4.93 mg/mL) oils. In general, EOs from CI, ZR, and MT performed with a negligible antioxidant activity in a comparison with that of the standard BHT (IC50 = 0.08 and 0.03 mg/mL for ABTS and DPPH assays, respectively).

2.3. Enzymatic Inhibitory Activity

The results indicating the inhibitory effect of EO samples on the target enzymes are presented in Table 2.
Accordingly, only EO from CI exhibited the inhibition of α-amylase with an IC50 of 7.73 mg/mL, meanwhile, the activities of well-known anti-diabetic agents, acarbose and palmitic acid, were 0.01 and 1.57 mg/mL, respectively. On the other hand, all samples performed a considerable suppression of α-glucosidase, of which, EOs from ZR displayed the strongest activity with an IC50 of 0.73 mg/mL, followed by the EOs from CI (IC50 = 0.84 mg/mL) and MT (IC50 = 1.46 mg/mL). The EO from ZR had a similar α-glucosidase inhibition to that of palmitic acid (IC50 = 0.72 mg/mL). Remarkably, the α-glucosidase inhibition of all EO samples was significantly stronger than that of acarbose (IC50 = 2.69 mg/mL).
In terms of the xanthine oxidase assay, the EO from CI expressed the most potent inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.88 mg/mL), followed by the EOs from MT (IC50 = 1.73 mg/mL) and ZR (IC50 = 2.80 mg/mL) (Table 2). The anti-xanthine oxidase activities of EO samples were lower than that of allopurinol, an outstanding anti-gout drug (IC50 = 0.01 mg/mL).

2.4. Cytotoxic Activity

In this research, in vitro MTT assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of EO samples on the expansion of the Meg-01 cell line. The cytotoxic activity of EOs from CI, ZR, and MT against Meg-01 cell line is demonstrated in Table 2 and Figure 3.
All samples manifested a significant inhibition of the growth of the Meg-01 cell line (Table 2 and Figure 3). Accordingly, stronger cytotoxicity was found in EOs of CI and MT which had IC50 values of 0.32 and 0.31 mg/mL, respectively, while lower activity was recorded in the EO of ZR, with an IC50 value of 0.64 mg/mL. Moreover, the dose–response curve shows a consistent result, of which, the EOs from CI and MT rapidly reduced the cell viability at concentrations ranging from 125 to 500 µg/mL; meanwhile, this point of ZR oil was from 250 to 1000 µg/mL (Figure 3). On the other hand, the standard anticancer drugs imatinib and doxorubicin exhibited stronger cytotoxicity on Meg-01, with IC50 values of 0.30 and 1.82 µg/mL, respectively.

3. Discussion

Numerous plant EOs have been used for therapeutic and cosmetic purposes throughout history, with special reference to monoterpenes that have been considered as their most dominant compounds. The biological benefits of some monoterpenes have been widely investigated [20]. Most monoterpenes may have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects [21]. Some valuable monoterpenes can be classified as β-myrcene, limonene, sabinene, terpinen-4-ol, linalool, and citral; β-myrcene can be found in numerous plant EOs. The safety of β-myrcene for human health has been widely confirmed. This volatile monoterpene showed potent antioxidant activity in the research of Ciftci et al. [22]. Additionally, β-myrcene can be used for osteoarthritis treatment [23] and as an alternative treatment after ischemic stroke [24]. Limonene is also an outstanding monoterpene, which can be easily perceived by its citrusy smell. This compound can be used to prevent many human disorders due to its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiviral, anti-diabetic, and anticancer properties [25]. Another common monoterpene is sabinene, which has been acknowledged as having antimicrobial, antioxidant, angiostatic, and anti-angiogenic effects [26]. Terpinen-4-ol found in the EO from tea tree displayed antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal capacities in previous studies [27]. Linalool is the most abundant monoterpene in lavender plants, which makes the flower rich in fragrance. The compound showed calming, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, neuroprotective, anti-depressant, anticancer, and anti-anxiety effects in previous studies [28]. Other monoterpenes consisting of citral with anti-inflammatory ability [29], and methyleugenol with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [30], were also reported. Due to the valuable benefits of monoterpenes for human health, these compounds can be a promising source for developing natural remedies and supplements. In addition, their attractive color and scent is profitable for producing food-based drugs, which can be applied in aromatherapy to improve human health. Apart from monoterpenes, myristicin belonging to the group of benzodioxoles is a valuable compound found in the EOs of several plant species. Myristicin can be used to treat various diseases, for example, diarrhea, stomach aches and anxiety, Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and encephalomyelitis [31]. Besides, myristicin reveals hepatoprotective [32], antioxidant [33], anti-cholinergic [34], antibacterial [35], and especially anti-inflammatory properties via numerous biological pathways [36]. Based on myristicin’s biological benefits, together with its attractive color and fragrance, the plant Eos rich in myristicin content can be exploited for developing aromatherapy and functional supplements.
This study determines the EO composition of whole ripe fruits of C. indica, which is not only used as a flavoring but also applied as folk medicine in many South Asian countries. Moreover, this is the first report about chemical constituents of EO from CI fruits grown in northern Vietnam. In the research of John et al. [6], sabinene (53.1%), terpinen-4-ol (13.1%), γ-terpinene (5.0%) and β-phellandrene (4.5%) were the major compounds of the EO from fresh leaves of CI collected in India. Other studies on EO constituents extracted from plant parts of CI growing in Vietnam performed different results. In a study of Diep and collaborators [5], EO from the branches and leaves of CI contained myristicin (35.3%), terpinolene (16.7%), and δ-3-carene (11.3%) as the main constituents. Meanwhile, the other investigation on EO from CI leaves by Trung et al. showed 1-menthone (70.6%) and β-phellandrene (13.0%) were the most abundant compounds [14]. Thai et al. indicated that terpinolene (56.1%) and myristicin (17.9 %) were the most dominant compounds in EO from leaves and small fruits of CI [18]. In the case of Z. rhetsa fruits and seeds, they are well-known natural spices in many tropical countries. To date, the composition of EO from Z. rhetsa has been investigated, which varied from different plant parts and growing regions. EO from Z. rhetsa seeds collected from India contained sabinene as the major compounds [37], meanwhile, that of pericarp was terpinen-4-ol [38]. Theeramunkong and Utsintong found a difference between the EO components of fresh and dried ZR fruits grown in northern Thailand, in which limonene, β-phellandrene, and sabinene were the most dominant substances [12]. In the present study, EO from the whole ZR fruits consisted of limonene (44.2%) as the main component, followed by terpinen-4-ol (11.5%), and sabinene (4.8%), respectively. For M. tonkinensis, there have been limited studies on EO from this plant so far. Dai et al. reported that EO from MT leaves (in middle Vietnam) comprised α-pinene (40.3%), β-phellandrene (7.6%), and β-pinene (7.4%) as the primary compounds [15]. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the EO composition of MT seeds. In particular, among the 21 identified compounds from the EO of MT seeds by GC–MS, linalool (49.3%), methyl eugenol (16.9%), α-citral (8.3%), and β-citral (5.6%) were the major phytocompounds of the sample collected in northern Vietnam. In general, the different results of the chemical profiles of CI, ZR, and MT essential oils, in previous and present studies, can be explained by the effects of various factors, such as climate, soil type, plant parts, growth stages, and especially extraction methods [20]. Since the chemical contents might determine the EO quantity and quality, appropriate collected samples and extraction methods can optimize the obtained EOs with multiple biological effects.
Among the three natural spices, the antioxidant property of EO from ZR has been widely investigated. This is the first report of the antioxidant capacity of EOs from CI fruits and MT seeds. The results show various free radical scavenging abilities among samples. These observed differences can be attributed to the distinctive phytochemical components involved in each sample. Myristicin, a benzodioxole compound, was recognized as an antioxidant agent [33]. On the other side, the two monoterpenes limonene [39] and terpinen-4-ol [40] were noted with a considerable antioxidant property. Notably, Seol et al. demonstrated that the inhalation of linalool (a noncyclic monoterpenoid) could enhance antioxidative activity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome [41]. Therefore, the combination of the principal compounds myristicin, limonene, and linalool with other constituents may contribute an important role to the antioxidant potentials of EOs from CI, ZR, and MT.
For human chronic disorders, the assessment of enzyme inhibition has been becoming a central target of current drug discovery and development [42]. Of the enzyme inhibitors, the natural-based inhibitors have attracted more interest in present clinical therapies because of their higher efficiency and safety compared with synthetic drugs. The present study examined the inhibitory capacities of Eos from CI, ZR, and MT on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, and xanthine oxidase, which are key enzymes related to type 2 diabetes and gout in humans. In our previous study, the CI fruits’ extract with a high content of myristicin showed a strong anti-α-amylase activity [43]. In addition, limonene and linalool performed significant antidiabetic activity via a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model [44]. Hence, myristicin, limonene, and linalool might possess a major role in the α-amylase inhibition of Eos from CI, ZR, and MT, respectively. In humans, α-amylase and α-glucosidase are the two major enzymes involved in carbohydrate digestion. These enzymes hydrolyze polysaccharides into smaller glucose molecules, which can be directly transferred to bloodstreams and result in postprandial hyperglycemia. In the current treatments for type 2 diabetic patients, most drugs and supplements are developed aiming to diminish the blood glucose level after meals through the suppressive action of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Therefore, the use of EOs from the natural spices CI, ZR, and MT is promising for preventing the risk of type 2 diabetes, as well as having potential for the treatment of this chronic disease.
In terms of hyperuricemia, xanthine oxidase participates in both uric acid production and oxidation. The over accumulated uric acid and free radicals in the body may lead to various problems, such as gout and cardiovascular diseases. Consequently, xanthine oxidase inhibitors have been regarded as a target enzyme and popularly applied for healing gout and oxidative stress [45]. This study, for the first time, revealed the xanthine oxidase inhibitory effect of EOs from CI and ZR fruits and MT seeds, which can be a paradigm for future dietetics and the further development of anti-gout drugs and antioxidants.
In addition, malignant hematological diseases are another serious disorder with an estimated 1.24 million cases that emerge annually in the world: their mortality rate accounts for 7% of global cancer deaths annually [46]. There are three main groups of malignant hematological disorders, including various forms of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Meg-01 is a human megakaryoblastic leukemia cell line, which is a common model for examining the anti-chronic myeloid leukemia capacity. A previous study demonstrated that the ethanolic extract of ZR significantly inhibited the growth of a leukemia cell HL-60 [13], but the tested plant part was not mentioned. Recently, Poma et al. indicated that EO from Euphorbia intisy rich in terpenes showed significant cytotoxicity on the acute myeloid leukemia cell line HL-60 [47]. Notably, myristicin [48], limonene [49], and linalool [50] have proven cytotoxic properties on leukemic cells; therefore, these compounds may preferentially be responsible for the cytotoxic activities of EOs from CI, ZR, and MT on the Meg-01 cell in the present study. Furthermore, this is the first report about the cytotoxicity of EOs from CI and ZR fruits and MT seeds on a human leukemia cell line, Meg-01. Of major clinical interest is the current observation that issues of liver injury by CI, ZR, or MT are unknown, although the use of many herbal products and medicines carry the risk of liver injury according to worldwide analyses of published reports [51,52,53].
In humans, the pathogenesis of chronic diseases is attributed by some scientists to the endogenous imbalance between oxidant and antioxidant levels [54]. In particular, oxidative stress can lead to the exacerbation of inflammation, and vice versa; therefore, antioxidants may contribute to therapeutic solutions for numerous chronic illnesses [55]. The relationship between oxidative stress and the etiology and pathogeneses of hyperuricemia and blood glucose level has been proven by both laboratory and clinical studies [56]. Accordingly, uric acid, the final products of the purine hydrolysis by xanthine oxidase, can be an intracellular oxidant if at a high concentration. In the body, the increase in serum uric acid will result in oxidative stress, which directly or/and indirectly leads to a series of disorders such as metabolic syndrome and cancers. Realistically, chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus mostly are multifactorial diseases, associated with complications and comorbidities [57]. Thus, the exploration of substances with simultaneous biological activities comprising antioxidant, anti-α-amylase, anti-α-glucosidase, anti-xanthine oxidase, and anti-Meg-01 cell, as shown in this present study, is essential in preventing and healing multiple serious diseases. In future studies, the mechanism of the anticancer activity as well as the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of the EOs from three natural spices should be elaborated. Additionally, although there have been no cases of poisoning reported when using these EOs, it is essential to investigate the toxicology and allergic potentials to determine the effective dose and dose-effect; especially, the tumor-selective property of these EOs should be further scrutinized. Although there are certain limitations to the phytochemical analysis, this research may contribute significant data to future metabolomic studies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Instrumentations and Reagents

The composition of EOs was analyzed by the DB-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Agilent Technologies, J&W Scientific Products, Folsom, CA, USA) equipped with a GC–MS system (JMS-T100 GCV, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), while biological activities were assayed by using a MultiskanTM microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Osaka, Japan) and SpectraMAX M5 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Reagents, enzymes, and necessary chemicals were purchased from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan), Fisher Scientific company (Hampton, NH, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The Meg-01 cell line was procured from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA).

4.2. Plant Materials

The ripe fruits of Clausena indica (CI) and Zanthoxylum rhetsa (ZR) and seeds of Michelia tonkinensis (MT) were collected in Thai Nguyen and Bac Kan provinces, Vietnam, in September 2019. The identification of the plant species was conducted by the first author, based on the morphological characteristics used by the Vietnam Plant Data Center (http://www.botanyvn.com, accessed on 22 December 2021) and the United States (TROPICOS-http://www.tropicos.org, accessed on 22 December 2021) as major references.

4.3. Essential Oil Extraction

All samples were sterilized by NaOCl (0.5%) solution within 1 h, and washed with distilled water several times. After draining, samples were dried in an oven at 35 ± 1 °C for 12 days. The dry samples were then separately subjected to the hydro-distillation system using a Clevenger apparatus for 6 h. The aqueous oil mixture was separated by diethyl ether with a ratio 1:2 v/v, three times. Subsequently, the organic phase was collected and evaporated under vacuum at 30 ± 1 °C to yield pure essential oils (EOs). EOs were preserved in individual screw-capped vials at 4 °C for further analyses.

4.4. Identification of Phytochemical Composition by GC–MS

The chemical constituents of EOs were analyzed by the GC–MS system. The DB-5MS column, 30 m × 0.25 mm (0.25 μm film thickness) was the stationary phase, while helium was the mobile carrier at the split ratio 5:1. Initially, the EO sample (1 μL, 1 mg/mL in hexane) was injected into the GC system by an autosampler. The temperatures of the injection port and detector temperature were set at 300 °C and 320 °C, respectively. The oven temperature was programmed as follows: from 50 °C pushing up to 300 °C (10 °C/min), then isothermally maintaining for 20 min. The mass range was set at 29–800 amu. The EO components were identified based on their linear retention indices (LRI) and Kovats retention indices (KI) were determined by reference to a homologous series of n-alkanes (C7-C30), and by the comparison of their mass spectral fragmentation patterns with those reported in the literature. Additionally, the data analysis was performed by the JEOL’s GC–MS Mass Center System version 2.65a software that used NIST 20 as a mass spectral database. The available online databases of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA (PUBCHEM—https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 22 December 2021) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce (NIST- https://webbook.nist.gov, accessed on 22 December 2021) were used as well.

4.5. Evaluation of Biological Activities

4.5.1. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant capacities of the EOs were examined by DPPH radical scavenging and ABTS radical cation decolorization assays [4]. Briefly, a mixture of sample, 0.5 mM DPPH, and acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.5) with a ratio of 2:1:1, v/v was incubated for 15 min at 25 °C in darkness. The resulting solution was scanned 517 nm by a microplate reader. In the ABTS assay, the working solution was prepared by diluting the 16 h-incubated mixture containing 7 mM ABTS and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate (1:1, v/v) in methanol. Afterwards, the EO sample and working solution (1:9, v/v) were homogenized, then incubated for 15 min at 25 °C in darkness. The absorbance was recorded at 734 nm. The radical scavenging percentage was determined by the following formula:
Radical scavenging activity (%) = [(A − B) − (C − D)]/(A − B) × 100
where A is the absorbance of the reaction with MeOH as a negative control, B is the absorbance of the negative control without radical solution, C is the absorbance of the reaction with the EO sample or the positive reference, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), D is the absorbance of the tested sample without a radical solution.

4.5.2. Enzymatic Assays

α-Amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory assays were conducted following previous protocols with minor modifications [58] in a comparison with acarbose and palmitic acid as positive references. In particular, 20 μL of porcine pancreatic α-amylase (10 U/mL in phosphate saline buffer, pH 6.9) was mixed with 20 μL of EO sample. The mixture was then incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The hydrolysis reaction was initiated by adding 30 μL of starch (0.5%). After 8 min-incubation at 37 °C, 20 μL of 1M HCl was added followed by 100 μL of 0.25 mM iodine solution. The absorbance was recorded at 565 nm. The inhibition of EOs on α-amylase was determined by the formula:
Inhibition percentage (%) = (E − Z)/(C − Z) × 100
where E is the absorbance of the reaction with EO samples, C is the absorbance of the reaction without α-amylase, and Z is the absorbance of the reaction without samples.
In the α-glucosidase assay, 20 μL of EO samples were blended with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) by a ratio of 1:2, v/v before incubation with 20 μL of enzyme (0.5 U/mL) at 25 °C for 5 min. Then, 20 μL of p-nitrophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) substrate was added to activate the reaction. After 10 min-incubation at 25 °C, 100 μL of 0.1 M Na2CO3 was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was then read at 405 nm. The inhibition of EOs on α-glucosidase was gauged by the following formula:
Inhibition percentage (%) = (C − E)/C × 100
where C is the absorbance of the reaction without inhibitors, and E is the absorbance of the reaction with EO samples.
The inhibition of EOs on xanthine oxidase was examined by a method described by Bui et al. [59] with minor adjustments. In brief, a mixture of EO sample (20 μL), 70 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.5 (40 μL), and xanthine oxidase (0.05 U/mL, 40 μL) was merged and incubated at 25 °C for 8 min. After adding 60 μL of 300 μM xanthine to the mixture, an incubation at 25 °C was implemented for 15 min. Thereafter, 20 μL of 1M HCl was pipetted to the reaction and the absorbance of the final solution was recorded at 290 nm. The inhibitory effect of EOs on xanthine oxidase was calculated by the formula (3). Allopurinol was used as a positive control.
For each test, EO samples were prepared in a series of concentrations. IC50 value expressing 50% inhibitory capacity of a sample on a certain reaction was calculated by analyzing concentration versus percent inhibition via linear regression analysis.

4.5.3. Cytotoxic Assay on Meg-01 Cell Line

The inhibition of EOs on the growth rate of the Meg-01 cell line was determined by MTT assay described by Anh et al. [60]. Initially, the cells were cultured with 90 µL of a medium including fetal bovine serum (10%), L-glutamine (5 mM), penicillin (100 IU/mL), and of streptomycin (100 µg/mL) in a 96-well plate. The cultivation was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h, then 10 µL of EO samples with different dilution ranges were added to each well. After 48 h, 10 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added to each well and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. Afterwards, 100 µL of cell lysis buffer (10% SDS in 0.01 M HCl) was added to each well to dissolve the colored formazan crystals produced by MTT. A SpectraMAX M5 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used to measure the cell viability at 595 nm. Instead of EO samples, the culture medium (10 µL) was used as the negative control. The inhibition percentage of samples was calculated as formula (3) and IC50 value was achieved in the same way mentioned above. Imatinib and doxorubicin were used as standard anticancer drugs.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The Minitab software version 16.0 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA) was used for statistical analyses in this study. All analyses were thrice repeated. Data were displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences among tests were determined by ANOVA (one-way) using Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The present study investigated the chemical composition and biological properties of EOs from natural spices Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis. Myristicin, limonene, and linalool are identified as the major components of EOs from C. indica, Z. rhetsa, and M. tonkinensis, respectively, which may play an important role in their remarkable bioactivities. All EO samples exerted potential anti-α-amylase, anti-α-glucosidase, anti-xanthine oxidase, and cytotoxic activities. In the context of food-based drugs, which are becoming increasingly universally studied nowadays, results from this research may provide prospective candidates with information for the future development of novel drugs for type 2 diabetes, gout, and chronic myeloid leukemia. However, to better evaluate the mechanism, toxicology, and bioaccessibility of those natural spices, in vivo, pre-clinical, and clinical trials are necessary to be carried out before the commercial production.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Total ion chromatogram of n-alkanes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.V.Q. and T.D.X.; methodology, N.V.Q., L.H.A. and V.Q.L.; software, L.H.A. and V.Q.L.; validation, N.V.Q., T.D.X. and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, N.V.Q.; writing—review and editing, N.V.Q., T.D.X. and R.T.; visualization, T.D.X., T.D.K., A.T. and R.T.; supervision, N.V.Q. and T.D.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Tomoko Amimoto for her supports in GC–MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Teschke, R.; Xuan, T.D. Active nature based ingredients for drug discovery with pivotal role of clinical efficacy: Review and prospective. J. Mod. Med. Chem. 2020, 8, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Skrinjar, M.; Nemet, N. Antimicrobial effects of spices and herbs essential oils. Acta Period. Technol. 2009, 2009, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bozin, B.; Mimica-Dukic, N.; Simin, N.; Anackov, G. Characterization of the volatile composition of essential oils of some Lamiaceae spices and the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the entire oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Quan, N.V.; Xuan, T.D.; Anh, L.H.; Tran, H.-D. Bio-guided isolation of prospective bioactive constituents from roots of Clausena indica (Dalzell) Oliv. Molecules 2019, 24, 4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Diep, P.T.M.; Pawlowska, A.M.; Cioni, P.L.; Van Minh, C.; Huong, L.M.; Braca, A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Clausena indica (Dalz) Oliv. (Rutaceae) essential oil from Vietnam. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. John, J.A.; Kurup, S.R.R.; Pradeep, N.S.; Sabulal, B. Chemical composition and Antibacterial activity of the leaf oil of Clausena indica from South India. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2011, 14, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahsan, M.; Haque, M.R.; Hossain, M.B.; Islam, S.N.; Gray, A.I.; Hasan, C.M. Cytotoxic dimeric quinolone-terpene alkaloids from the root bark of Zanthoxylum rhetsa. Phytochemistry 2014, 103, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahman, M.; Alimuzzaman, M.; Ahmad, S.; Chowdhury, A.A. Antinociceptive and antidiarrhoeal activity of Zanthoxylum rhetsa. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 340–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alphonso, P.; Saraf, A. Chemical profile studies on the secondary metabolites of medicinally important plant Zanthoxylum rhetsa (Roxb.) DC using HPTLC. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S1293–S1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tantapakul, C.; Phakhodee, W.; Ritthiwigrom, T.; Yossathera, K.; Deachathai, S.; Laphookhieo, S. Antibacterial compounds from Zanthoxylum rhetsa. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2012, 35, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wongkatiya, N.; Akekawatchai, C.; Sanguansermsri, P.; Fraser, L.H.; Pratoomsoot, C.; Sanguansermsri, D. Chemical compositions and biological properties of essential oils from Zanthoxylum rhetsa (Roxb.) DC and Zanthoxylum limonella Alston. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 15, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Theeramunkong, S.; Utsintong, M. Comparison between volatile oil from fresh and dried fruits of Zanthoxylum rhetsa (Roxb.) DC. and cytotoxicity activity evaluation. Pharmacogn. J. 2018, 10, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jiwajinda, S.; Santisopasri, V.; Murakami, A.; Kim, O.-K.; Kim, H.W.; Ohigashi, H. Suppressive effects of edible Thai plants on superoxide and nitric oxide generation. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2002, 3, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Trung, H.D.; Thang, T.D.; Ban, P.H.; Hoi, T.M.; Dai, D.N.; Ogunwande, I.A. Terpene constituents of the leaves of five Vietnamese species of Clausena (Rutaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dai, D.N.; Thang, T.D.; Ogunwande, I.A. Essential oil composition of four Magnoliaceae species cultivated in Vietnam. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2016, 22, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bastos, D.H.M.; Ishimoto, E.Y.; Marques, M.O.M.; Ferri, A.F.; Torres, E.A.F.S. Essential oil and antioxidant activity of green mate and mate tea (Ilex paraguariensis) infusions. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adams, R.P.; Elizondo, M.S.G.; Elizondo, M.G.; Slinkman, E. DNA fingerprinting and terpenoid analysis of Juniperus blancoi var. huehuentensis (Cupressaceae), a new subalpine variety from Durango, Mexico. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2006, 34, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thai, T.H.; Bazzali, O.; Hoi, T.M.; Hien, N.T.; Hung, N.V.; Félix, T.; Casanova, J.; Bighelli, A. Chemical composition of the essential oils from Vietnamese Clausena indica and C. anisum-olens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 1531–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corp: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; ISBN 1932633219. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stephane, F.F.Y.; Jules, B.K.J. Terpenoids as Important Bioactive Constituents of Essential Oils. In Essential Oils—Bioactive Compounds, New Perspectives and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. Santos, M.R.V.; Moreira, F.V.; Fraga, B.P.; Souza, D.P.D.; Bonjardim, L.R.; Quintans-Junior, L.J. Cardiovascular effects of monoterpenes: A review. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2011, 21, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ciftci, O.; Oztanir, M.N.; Cetin, A. Neuroprotective effects of β-myrcene following global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-mediated oxidative and neuronal damage in a C57BL/J6 mouse. Neurochem. Res. 2014, 39, 1717–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rufino, A.T.; Ribeiro, M.; Sousa, C.; Judas, F.; Salgueiro, L.; Cavaleiro, C.; Mendes, A.F. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory, anti-catabolic and pro-anabolic effects of E-caryophyllene, myrcene and limonene in a cell model of osteoarthritis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 750, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Burcu, G.B.; Osman, C.; Asli, C.; Namik, O.M.; Neşe, B.T. The protective cardiac effects of Β-myrcene after global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in C57BL/J6 mouse. Acta Cir. Bras. 2016, 31, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vieira, A.J.; Beserra, F.P.; Souza, M.C.; Totti, B.M.; Rozza, A.L. Limonene: Aroma of innovation in health and disease. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 283, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Sharma, S.; Gupta, J.; Prabhakar, P.K.; Gupta, P.; Solanki, P.; Rajput, A. Phytochemical repurposing of natural molecule: Sabinene for identification of novel therapeutic benefits using in silico and in vitro approaches. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2019, 17, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, W.-R.; Li, H.-L.; Shi, Q.-S.; Sun, T.-L.; Xie, X.-B.; Song, B.; Huang, X.-M. The dynamics and mechanism of the antimicrobial activity of tea tree oil against bacteria and fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 8865–8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pereira, I.; Severino, P.; Santos, A.C.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B. Linalool bioactive properties and potential applicability in drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 171, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Martins, H.B.; Selis, N.D.N.; Souza, C.L.S.E.; Nascimento, F.S.; Carvalho, S.P.d.; Gusmão, L.D.; Nascimento, J.D.S.; Brito, A.K.P.; Souza, S.I.D.; Oliveira, M.V.D.; et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of the essential oil citral in experimental infection with Staphylococcus aureus in a model air pouch. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gogoi, R.; Loying, R.; Sarma, N.; Begum, T.; Pandey, S.K.; Lal, M. Comparative analysis of in-vitro biological activities of methyl eugenol rich Cymbopogon khasianus Hack., leaf essential oil with pure methyl eugenol compound. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 927–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barceloux, D.G. Nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.). In Medical Toxicology of Natural Substances: Foods, Fungi, Medicinal Herbs, Toxic Plants, and Venomous Animals, 1st ed.; Barceloux, D.G., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  32. Morita, T.; Jinno, K.; Kawagishi, H.; Arimoto, Y.; Suganuma, H.; Inakuma, T.; Sugiyama, K. Hepatoprotective effect of myristicin from nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) on lipopolysaccharide/D-galactosamine-induced liver injury. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1560–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ansory, H.M.; Sari, E.N.; Nilawati, A.; Handayani, S.; Aznam, N. Sunscreen and antioxidant potential of myristicin in nutmeg essential oils (Myristica fragrans). In Proceedings of the 2nd Bakti Tunas Husada-Health Science International Conference (BTH-HSIC 2019), Tasikmalaya, Indonesia, 5–6 October 2019; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  34. Seneme, E.F.; Dos Santos, D.C.; Silva, E.M.R.; Franco, Y.E.M.; Longato, G.B. Pharmacological and therapeutic potential of myristicin: A literature review. Molecules 2021, 26, 5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Narasimhan, B.; Dhake, A.S. Antibacterial principles from Myristica fragrans seeds. J. Med. Food 2006, 9, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Martins, C.; Doran, C.; Laires, A.; Rueff, J.; Rodrigues, A.S. Genotoxic and apoptotic activities of the food flavourings myristicin and eugenol in AA8 and XRCC1 deficient EM9 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shafi, P.M.; Saidutty, A.; Clery, R.A. Volatile constituents of Zanthoxylum rhetsa leaves and seeds. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Naik, R.R.; Shakya, A.K.; Khalaf, N.A. GC-MS Analysis and biological evaluation of essential oil of Zanthoxylum rhetsa (Roxb.) DC pericarp. Jordan J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 8, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roberto, D.; Micucci, P.; Sebastian, T.; Graciela, F.; Anesini, C. Antioxidant activity of limonene on normal murine lymphocytes: Relation to H2O2 modulation and cell proliferation. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 106, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Souza, C.F.; Baldissera, M.D.; Silva, L.d.L.; Geihs, M.A.; Baldisserotto, B. Is monoterpene terpinen-4-ol the compound responsible for the anesthetic and antioxidant activity of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil (tea tree oil) in silver catfish? Aquaculture 2018, 486, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Seol, G.-H.; Kang, P.; Lee, H.S.; Seol, G.H. Antioxidant activity of linalool in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Holdgate, G.A.; Meek, T.D.; Grimley, R.L. Mechanistic enzymology in drug discovery: A fresh perspective. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anh, L.H.; Xuan, T.D.; Thuy, N.T.D.; Quan, N.V.; Trang, L.T. Antioxidant and α-amylase inhibitory activities and phytocompounds of Clausena indica fruits. Medicines 2020, 7, 10. [Google Scholar]
  44. More, T.A.; Kulkarni, B.R.; Nalawade, M.L.; Arvindekar, A.U. Antidiabetic activity of linalool and limonene in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat: A combinatorial therapy approach. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dawson, J.; Walters, M. Uric acid and xanthine oxidase: Future therapeutic targets in the prevention of cardiovascular disease? Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 62, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Poma, P.; Labbozzetta, M.; Ramarosandratana, A.V.; Rosselli, S.; Tutone, M.; Sajeva, M.; Notarbartolo, M. In vitro modulation of p-glycoprotein activity by Euphorbia intisy essential oil on acute myeloid leukemia cell line HL-60R. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Martins, C.; Doran, C.; Silva, I.C.; Miranda, C.; Rueff, J.; Rodrigues, A.S. Myristicin from nutmeg induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway and down regulates genes of the DNA damage response pathways in human leukaemia K562 cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2014, 218, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shah, B.B.; Baksi, R.; Chaudagar, K.K.; Nivsarkar, M.; Mehta, A.A. Anti-leukemic and anti-angiogenic effects of D-limonene on K562-implanted C57BL/6 mice and the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2018, 1, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chang, M.-Y.; Shieh, D.-E.; Chen, C.-C.; Yeh, C.-S.; Dong, H.-P. Linalool induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in leukemia cells and cervical cancer cells through CDKIs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 28169–28179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Quan, N.V.; Xuan, T.D.; Teschke, R. Potential hepatotoxins found in herbal medicinal products: A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Teschke, R.; Zhu, Y.; Jing, J. Herb induced liver injury (HILI) in the Asian region and current role of RUCAM for causality assessment in 11,160 published cases: Analysis and outlook. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2020, 8, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Teschke, R.; Eickhoff, A.; Schulze, J.; Danan, G. Herb-induced liver injury (HILI) with 12,068 worldwide cases published with causality assessments by Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM): An overview. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 6, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moylan, J.S.; Reid, M.B. Oxidative stress, chronic disease, and muscle wasting. Muscle Nerve 2007, 35, 411–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ambade, A.; Mandrekar, P. Oxidative stress and inflammation: Essential partners in alcoholic liver disease. Int. J. Hepatol. 2012, 2012, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wardhana, W.; Rudijanto, A. Effect of uric acid on blood glucose levels. Acta Med. Indones. 2018, 50, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Victor, V.M. Mitochondrial oxidative stress in diabetes. In Diabetes: Oxidative Stress and Dietary Antioxidants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  58. Quan, N.V.; Xuan, T.D.; Tran, H.-D.; Ahmad, A.; Khanh, T.D.; Dat, T.D. Contribution of momilactones A and B to diabetes inhibitory potential of rice bran: Evidence from in vitro assays. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bui, T.H.; Nguyen, N.T.; Dang, P.H.; Nguyen, H.X.; Nguyen, M.T.T. Design and synthesis of chalcone derivatives as potential non-purine xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Anh, L.H.; Quan, N.V.; Lam, V.Q.; Iuchi, Y.; Takami, A.; Teschke, R.; Xuan, T.D. Antioxidant, anti-tyrosinase, anti-α-amylase, and cytotoxic potentials of the invasive weed Andropogon virginicus. Plants 2020, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 00774 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of the major compounds of EOs from C. indica, Z. rhetsa, and M. tonkinensis.
Figure 1. Structure of the major compounds of EOs from C. indica, Z. rhetsa, and M. tonkinensis.
Molecules 27 00774 g001
Molecules 27 00774 g002 550
Figure 2. Antioxidant activities of essential oils extracted from Clausena indica (CI), Zanthoxylum rhetsa (ZR), and Michelia tonkinensis (MT). The letters represent the rank of antioxidant activity strength.
Figure 2. Antioxidant activities of essential oils extracted from Clausena indica (CI), Zanthoxylum rhetsa (ZR), and Michelia tonkinensis (MT). The letters represent the rank of antioxidant activity strength.
Molecules 27 00774 g002
Molecules 27 00774 g003 550
Figure 3. Dose–response curve for cytotoxic activity of essential oils from Clausena indica (CI), Zanthoxylum rhetsa (ZR), and Michelia tonkinensis (MT) against Meg-01 cell line.
Figure 3. Dose–response curve for cytotoxic activity of essential oils from Clausena indica (CI), Zanthoxylum rhetsa (ZR), and Michelia tonkinensis (MT) against Meg-01 cell line.
Molecules 27 00774 g003
Table
Table 1. Identified compounds in the essential oils of Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis.
Table 1. Identified compounds in the essential oils of Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis.
Peak No.Identified CompoundComposition (%)LRIKIIdentification
CIZRMT
1β-Thujene-0.3-923926MS, ref
2α-Pinene0.12.2-933936MS, ref
35-Methylfurfural0.1--955959MS, ref
4Sabinene-4.80.1973976MS, ref
56-Methyl-5-heptene-2-one--1.0981983MS
6β-Myrcene6.51.2-985987MS, ref
7α-Phellandrene-2.2-10091010MS, ref
83-Carene0.4--10081009MS, ref
93,6-Dimethylene-1,7-octadiene0.1--10131015ref
10α-Terpinene-1.4-10191021MS, ref
11p-Cymene0.24.2-10231026MS, ref
12Limonene5.544.2-10291031MS, ref
13β-Phellandrene-4.0-10341037MS, ref
14Eucalyptol--0.910361039MS
151-Octanol-0.1-10681070MS, ref
16p-Cresol0.1--10661069MS, ref
17cis-Linalool oxide--0.810721074MS
18cis-Linaloloxide--0.810881089MS
19α-Terpinolene1.61.1-10841086MS, ref
20p-Cymenene1.20.1-10881090MS, ref
21Linalool-1.349.310991101MS
226-Camphenone0.3--10951095ref
231,5,7-Octatrien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl---0.311031104ref
241,3,8-p-Menthatriene0.1--11111112MS, ref
25cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dienol-0.2-11241126ref
262-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, trans--0.5-11271129ref
27trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol0.20.3-11381141MS, ref
28Pinocarveol-0.3-11451148ref
291,5,7-Octatrien-3-ol, 2,6-dimethyl-0.4--11511154MS, ref
30E-β-Terpineol-0.2-11601163ref
31Octanoic acid-0.3-11641166ref
322-Isopropenyl-5-methylhex-4-enal0.8--11781180MS, ref
33Terpinen-4-ol-11.50.911841186MS, ref
34p-Cymen-8-ol1.62.8-11881189MS, ref
35α-Terpineol0.52.30.411971198MS, ref
36cis-Carveol0.11.8-12211222MS, ref
37Citronellol--1.712251226MS
38cis-p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol0.1--12281229MS, ref
39Nerol-0.3-12341236ref
40β-Citral--5.612381240MS
41Phenol, 2-ethyl-4,5-dimethyl-0.1--12401242MS, ref
42Carvone-3.3-12471249ref
43trans-Geraniol--3.812491251MS
44Nonanoic acid-0.2-12601262MS
45α-Citral--8.312671269MS
46Phellandral-0.4-12821283MS
47p-Cymen-7-ol-0.3-12921293MS, ref
48Safrole--4.612921293MS
49p-Cymen-2-ol-0.3-12971297MS, ref
50Geranic acid methyl ester--0.113191320MS
51p-Mentha-1,4-dien-7-ol-0.2-13291331MS, ref
52Eugenol0.1--13491350MS, ref
532,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate-1.4-13751377MS, ref
54Methyleugenol0.4-16.913991399MS, ref
55Caryophyllene0.6-0.214281429MS, ref
56trans-α-Bergamotene0.1--14331434MS, ref
57cis-β-Famesene0.1--14481449MS, ref
58β-Eudesmene--0.414971497MS
59β-Bisabolene2.6-0.115101510MS, ref
60δ-Cadinene--0.215221523MS
61Myristicin68.3--15241525MS, ref
62Elemicin1.9--15401542MS, ref
63Spathulenol0.20.1-15811582MS, ref
64Isoelemicin0.1--16391640MS, ref
65α-Cadinol--0.216611662MS
66α-Springene2.9--19641965MS, ref
Monoterpene hydrocarbons14.465.50.1
Oxygenated monoterpenes2.526.070.1
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons3.400.9
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes0.20.10
Others76.61.925.5
Total identified96.993.596.6
Yield % (w/w)0.361.695.49
CI, Clausena indica; ZR, Zanthoxylum rhetsa; MT, Michelia tonkinensis; LRI and KI, linear retention index and Kovats index calculated from DB5-MS column against n-alkanes (Figure S1); MS, identified based on matching the mass spectra with those from NIST 20 library; ref, identification based on comparing calculated retention indices with those reported from the literature [5,6,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Table
Table 2. Inhibitory activities of essential oils extracted from Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, xanthine oxidase and Meg-01 cell line.
Table 2. Inhibitory activities of essential oils extracted from Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, xanthine oxidase and Meg-01 cell line.
SampleIC50 (mg/mL)
α-Amylase Assayα-Glucosidase AssayXanthine Oxidase AssayMeg-01 Assay
CI7.73 ± 0.100.84 ± 0.03 b0.88 ± 0.05 a0.32 ± 0.01 a
ZR-0.73 ± 0.01 a2.80 ± 0.14 c0.64 ± 0.04 b
MT-1.46 ± 0.01 c1.73 ± 0.16 b0.31 ± 0.01 a
Acarbose0.01 ± 0.002.69 ± 0.07ndnd
Palmitic acid1.57 ± 0.040.72 ± 0.01ndnd
Allopurinolndnd0.01 ± 0.00nd
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); dissimilar superscript letters in the same column show significant differences among tested samples at p < 0.05; -, no effect; nd, not determined; CI, Clausena indica; ZR, Zanthoxylum rhetsa; MT, Michelia tonkinensis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quan, N.V.; Anh, L.H.; Lam, V.Q.; Takami, A.; Teschke, R.; Khanh, T.D.; Xuan, T.D. Anti-Diabetes, Anti-Gout, and Anti-Leukemia Properties of Essential Oils from Natural Spices Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis. Molecules 2022, 27, 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030774

AMA Style

Quan NV, Anh LH, Lam VQ, Takami A, Teschke R, Khanh TD, Xuan TD. Anti-Diabetes, Anti-Gout, and Anti-Leukemia Properties of Essential Oils from Natural Spices Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis. Molecules. 2022; 27(3):774. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quan, Nguyen Van, La Hoang Anh, Vu Quang Lam, Akiyoshi Takami, Rolf Teschke, Tran Dang Khanh, and Tran Dang Xuan. 2022. "Anti-Diabetes, Anti-Gout, and Anti-Leukemia Properties of Essential Oils from Natural Spices Clausena indica, Zanthoxylum rhetsa, and Michelia tonkinensis" Molecules 27, no. 3: 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030774

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop