Next Article in Journal
The Pathological G51D Mutation in Alpha-Synuclein Oligomers Confers Distinct Structural Attributes and Cellular Toxicity
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Electrolyte Type on Kinetics of Redox Processes in the Polymer Films of Ni(II) Salen-Type Complexes
Previous Article in Journal
The Removal of Time–Concentration Data Points from Progress Curves Improves the Determination of Km: The Example of Paraoxonase 1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formation of Catalytically Active Nanoparticles under Thermolysis of Silver Chloroplatinate(II) and Chloroplatinate(IV)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules27041305
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zn(II) and Co(II) 3D Coordination Polymers Based on 2-Iodoterephtalic Acid and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane: Structures and Sorption Properties

by
Alexander S. Zaguzin
1,2,
Taisiya S. Sukhikh
2,
Ilyas F. Sakhapov
1,3,
Vladimir P. Fedin
2,
Maxim N. Sokolov
2 and
Sergey A. Adonin
1,2,*
1
South Ural State University, Lenina St. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia
2
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, SB RAS, Lavrentieva St. 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
3
Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry, RAS, Arbuzov St. 8, 420088 Kazan, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(4), 1305; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041305
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2022 / Accepted: 6 February 2022 / Published: 15 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Characterization and Crystal Structure of Coordination Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal-organic frameworks [M2(2-I-bdc)2bpe] (M = Zn(II) (1), Co(II) (2), 2-I-bdc = 2-iodoterephtalic acid, and bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane) were prepared and characterized by X-ray diffractometry. Both compounds retain their 3D structure after the removal of guest DMF molecules. Selectivity of sorption of different organic substrates from the gas phase was investigated for both complexes.

1. Introduction

Metal-organic frameworks, or MOFs, constitute a very important class of coordination compounds that remain a “hot topic” within the last decades [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Among the potential application areas making MOFs attractive objects, there are sensors, including detection of explosives, toxins, or even cancer biomarkers [8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], catalysis [17,18,19,20,21,22,23], and separation of different substrates (hydrocarbons [24,25], etc.). The latter field is especially important since different MOFs can demonstrate remarkable sorption selectivity towards mixtures that are relevant to those occurring in real industrial processes–for example, cyclohexane/benzene [26,27,28,29,30,31], hexane/cyclohexane, [32] acetylene/alkanes [33,34,35], etc. MOFs can also be used for the removal of contaminants (both organic and inorganic) from water [36,37,38].
The sorption ability of MOFs is closely related to the features of supramolecular contacts between organic ligands and guest molecules. These non-covalent interactions can be different. Usually, the main role is played by hydrogen bonding, but reports also appear where other types of supramolecular interactions, in particular, halogen bonding (XB) [39], have a major contribution. These examples are yet rare [40,41,42], but, in our opinion, they demonstrate that this topic can evolve further.
Among the great variety of building blocks able to form XB, there are halogenated hydrocarbons (alkanes [43,44,45,46] and, less commonly, alkynes [47,48]), perfluorinated iodoarenes [49,50,51,52], di- and polyhalogens [53,54,55], complexes with halogen-substituted pyridines [56,57,58,59,60], etc. For the design of MOFs, halogen-substituted aromatic polycarboxylic acids seem to be the suitable option: it can be assumed that halogens, especially iodine, can feature the presence of sigma-hole due to the impact of electron-withdrawing carboxylic groups. Of this family, 2-iodoterephtalic acid (2-I-bdc) is easily available [61]; very recently, we reported in [62] corresponding on [Zn2(I-bdc)2dabco] MOF and compared its sorption selectivity towards different organic substrates with parent [Zn2bdc2dabco]. Continuing this work, we changed the N,N-linker ligand for 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpe) and hereby present two new coordination polymers-[M2(2-I-bdc)2bpe] (M = Zn(II) (1) and Co(II) (2). Both compounds feature 3D structure; sorption selectivity was investigated and compared for 1 and 2.

2. Results and Discussion

The structures of 1 and 2 are based on similar building blocks. In both cases, there form dimeric paddlewheel-type {M2(OOCR)4(bpe)2} units (Figure 1), very common for carboxylate complexes. The M-O bond lengths in 1 and 2 are 2.029–2.051 and 2.013–2.036 Å, respectively, the M-N bonds are 2.019–2.030 and 2.044 Å, respectively. The iodine atoms of 2-I-bdc ligands are disordered over three positions in both structures (the occupancies are 0.444:0.307:0.249 and 0.641:0.160:0.199, respectively). In structure 1, one of two arene rings in bpe ligand is disordered as well (two positions with 0.68:0.32 occupancy).
The {M2(I-bdc)4} secondary building units are further connected via bpe ligands to a cuboid framework with rhombic-rod pores. Previously reported non-iodinated congener, [Zn2(bdc)2(bpe)] [63], reveals a tetragonal structure with bpe disordered over eight positions due to its proximity to a special position (4/mmm). Compound 1 comprises more ordered bpe (two crystallographically independent ligands) and two independent I-bdc ligands (Figure 2), thereby exhibiting a less symmetrical structure of ca. 4-fold increased cell volume as compared to [Zn2(bdc)2(bpe)]. For 1, the non-equivalence of the bpe and I-bdc ligands manifest in a different relative arrangement of the aromatic rings and (in the case of I-bdc) in a different disorder pattern of I atoms.
The structure of 2 is more symmetrical (namely, it has fewer translational symmetry elements per the same fragment of the structure), comprising only one independent I-bdc and half of bpe ligand (Figure 3). In structures of 1 and 2, the frameworks show two-fold interpenetration (Figure 4), which reduces the volume of voids accessible for the inclusion of solvate molecules. The potential volume is estimated to be 22% and 25% from the total volume of structures 1 and 2, respectively, although the actual values are higher due to the unaccounted volume taken by the disordered atoms. The topology of MOFs 1 and 2 is shown in Figure 5.
The experimental PXRD pattern for 1 resembles that for the sub-structure akin to 2 (Figure S1); compound 1 retains its structure after the removal of guest DMF molecules (see Experimental for details). The notable difference between the experimental and simulated patterns of 1 may arise from a slight change of the structure upon partial loss of solvate molecules under sample preparation and/or due to difference in the temperature of the single-crystal (150 K) and powder (298 K) experiments. To clarify this, we carried out PXRD experiments at 150 K for an as-synthesized sample under a small amount of the mother liquor; the data was in better agreement with the simulated pattern of the sub-structure. A few superstructural reflections were observed; however, they did not correspond to super-structure 1. The presence of sub- and super-structures for the family of MOFs seemed to be common. For instance, related MOFs formulated as [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)] (dabco is 1,8-diazabicyclooctane) revealed a variety of cuboid structures of the same topology that differ from each other mainly by spatial geometry of {Zn(bdc)} layers [62]. Relatively poor quality of the PXRD pattern of 1 did not allow us to evaluate the superstructural motif. The PXRD for a sample of 1 dried naturally, measured at 150 K (Figure S3, SI), slightly differed from that with the mother liquor, implying minor structural transformations upon partial loss of the solvate. It became similar to the room-temperature patterns for as-synthesized and activated samples (Figure S1). The same trend was observed for the PXRD patterns of sample 2 (Figures S2 and S4). Upon activation of sample 2, the structure changes more noticeably, which was reflected in the appearance of strong superstructural reflections.
Sorption selectivity of 1 and 2 towards different organic substrates was examined using NMR (see Supplementary Information for NMR spectra). Results are given in Table 1.
Both 1 and 2 more readily absorbed 1,2-dichloroethane from its mixture with benzene than MOFs of the dabco family. Although the difference was not large, these results are rather inspiring. The best selectivity was demonstrated by 1 for benzene/cyclohexane mixtures—it exceeded one of [Zn2(bdc)2dabco]. Interestingly, the selectivity in 1-butanol/1-bromobutane pair was reversed for bpe and dabco series; the reasons for this effect are unclear.

3. Materials and Methods

All reagents were obtained from commercial sources and used as purchased. Solvents were purified according to the standard procedures. 2-iodoterephtalic acid was prepared according to the method reported earlier [61] and identified by its 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
Synthesis of 1
Seventy-four and a half micrograms (0.25 mmol) of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, 73 mg (0.25 mmol) of 2-I-bdc, 23 mg (0.125 mmol) of bpe, and 8 mL of anhydrous DMF were placed into a glass ampoule which was sealed, kept in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min and kept at 120 °C for 48 h with slow cooling to room temperature—forming colorless crystals of 1 with a 79% yield.
Synthesis of 2
The procedure was the same as for 1, using 119 mg (0.5 mmol) of CoCl2·6H2O, 146 mg (0.5 mmol) of 2-I-bdc, 46 mg (0.25 mmol) of bpe, and 7.5 mL of anhydrous DMF—forming deep blue colorless crystals of 2 with a 73% yield.
Sorption of organic substrates
The method was identical to one described by us earlier [62]. Prior to sorption experiments, samples of 1 or 2 were kept in excess of acetone for 48 h, followed by drying in vacuo (4 h, 60 °C) in order to eliminate guest DMF molecules. After that, the sample of MOF (50 mg) was placed into an open smaller vial, which was then placed into the closed bigger vial containing a mixture of organic substrates in 1:1 M ratio so that the liquid phase level is below the edges of the smaller vial. By this, the MOF sample was allowed to absorb organic substrates from the gas phase. After 48 h, the MOF sample was placed into a DMF:d6-DMSO mixture (1:1) and kept for 48 h again in order to desorb the substrates from the pores. The organic solvents and the ratio between the extracted organic substrates were established by comparison of relevant 1H NMR intensities (see SI).
X-ray Diffractometry
Data sets for single crystals of 1 and 2 were obtained at 150 K on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with a CMOS PHOTON III detector and IµS 3.0 source (mirror optics, λ(MoKα) = 0.71073 Å). Absorption corrections were applied with the use of the SADABS program. The crystal structures were solved using the SHELXT [64] and were refined using SHELXL [65] programs with OLEX2 GUI [66]. Atomic displacement parameters for non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The available volume for solvate molecules is estimated using OLEX2 Solvent Mask Procedure to be minimum 214 Å3 and 240 Å3 per [M2(I-bdc)2(bpe)] formula unit for 1 and 2, respectively; actual space is larger due to the disorder of iodine atoms. Details of XRD experiments are given in SI (Table S1). CCDC 2142027–2142028 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
Powder X-ray Diffractometry (PXRD)
Powder XRD data for the compounds were collected at 150 K by a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with a CMOS PHOTON III detector and ImS 3.0 microfocus source (CuKα radiation, collimating Montel mirrors). Powder samples were mounted on a nylon loop with a small amount of epoxy resin [67,68]. By φ-scanning (360°), Debye diffraction patterns with continuous diffraction arcs were measured. To diminish the effect of the preferred orientations, five scans were made at different positions of a goniometer for ω from –240° to 0°. The external standard (Si) correction and integration were performed using the Dioptas program [69]. At 298 K, PXRD analysis was performed on Shimadzu XRD-7000 diffractometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments Incorporated, Kyoto, Japan) (CuK-alpha radiation, Ni–filter, linear One Sight detector, 5–50° 2θ range, 0.0143° 2θ step, 2 s per step).
NMR Spectroscopy
All NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance III 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at room temperature (25 °C).

4. Conclusions

We prepared two new metal-organic frameworks based on M(II), 2-iodoterephtalic acid, and bpe linkers. Both complexes reveal interpenetrating 3D structures. The Zn-based complex 1 features a relatively high gas-phase sorption selectivity for benzene:cyclohexane mixture. Despite the overall structural similarity, their adsorption selectivity towards various organic substrates is different, demonstrating that even minor changes in structure can strongly affect these characteristics. Experiments aiming preparation of other M(II)-based MOFs with the same ligand combination, as well as with other iodine-substituted carboxylates, are underway in our group.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: XRD, PXRD, and NMR data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.A., V.P.F. and M.N.S.; methodology, S.A.A. and V.P.F.; validation, S.A.A., T.S.S. and I.F.S.; formal analysis, S.A.A. and T.S.S.; investigation, T.S.S., A.S.Z. and I.F.S.; resources, S.A.A.; data curation, A.S.Z. and S.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.A.; visualization, A.S.Z., I.F.S. and T.S.S.; supervision, S.A.A. and M.N.S.; project administration, S.A.A.; funding acquisition, S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 21-73-20019) as well as the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (spectral characterization of the samples, 121031700313-8).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K.E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kitagawa, S.; Kitaura, R.; Noro, S.-I. Functional porous coordination polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2334–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sapchenko, S.A.; Demakov, P.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Schröder, M.; Fedin, V.P. A Cryptand Metal–Organic Framework as a Platform for the Selective Uptake and Detection of Group I Metal Cations. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 2286–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bolotov, V.A.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Han, X.; Zhang, X.; Smith, G.L.; MCormick, L.J.; Teat, S.J.; Yang, S.; Lennox, M.J.; et al. Enhancement of CO2 Uptake and Selectivity in a Metal–Organic Framework by the Incorporation of Thiophene Functionality. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 5074–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, X.; Da Silva, I.; Fazzi, R.; Sheveleva, A.M.; Han, X.; Spencer, B.F.; Sapchenko, S.A.; Tuna, F.; McInnes, E.J.L.; Li, M.; et al. Iodine Adsorption in a Redox-Active Metal-Organic Framework: Electrical Conductivity Induced by Host-Guest Charge-Transfer. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 14145–14150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sapchenko, S.A.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Belosludov, R.V.; Belosludov, V.R.; Kawazoe, Y.; Schröder, M.; Fedin, V.P. Selective gas adsorption in microporous metal-organic frameworks incorporating urotropine basic sites: An experimental and theoretical study. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13918–13921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cook, T.R.; Zheng, Y.-R.; Stang, P.J. Metal-organic frameworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: Comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal-organic materials. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 734–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lustig, W.P.; Mukherjee, S.; Rudd, N.D.; Desai, A.V.; Li, J.; Ghosh, S.K. Metal-organic frameworks: Functional luminescent and photonic materials for sensing applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3242–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cohen, S.M. Postsynthetic methods for the functionalization of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 970–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kreno, L.E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O.K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, Z.; Deibert, B.J.; Li, J. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cui, Y.; Chen, B.; Qian, G. Lanthanide metal-organic frameworks for luminescent sensing and light-emitting applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 273–274, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Yuan, S.; Day, G.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Zhou, H.-C. Luminescent sensors based on metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 354, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yin, Y.; Fang, W.; Xue, H. Metal-organic framework-based sensors for the detection of toxins and foodborne pathogens. Food Control 2022, 133, 108684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohan, B.; Kumar, S.; Xi, H.; Ma, S.; Tao, Z.; Xing, T.; You, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, P. Fabricated Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as luminescent and electrochemical biosensors for cancer biomarkers detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 197, 113738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gheorghe, A.; Lugier, O.; Ye, B.; Tanase, S. Metal-organic framework based systems for CO2 sensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 16132–16142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dey, G.; Shadab; Aijaz, A. Metal-Organic Framework Derived Nanostructured Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8, 3782–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, S.; Shan, S.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Li, Z.; Liang, Y.; Fei, J.; Xie, L.; Li, J. Photocatalytic degradation of hazardous organic pollutants in water by Fe-MOFs and their composites: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, T.; Lin, Y.; Li, W.; Ju, M. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by MOFs based materials: A review. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 2975–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, D.; Wang, G.; Cheng, M.; Zhang, G.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Xue, W.; Lei, L.; Xiao, R. Optimal preparation of catalytic Metal-organic framework derivatives and their efficient application in advanced oxidation processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 127817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhai, Z.; Yan, W.; Dong, L.; Deng, S.; Wilkinson, D.P.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. Catalytically active sites of MOF-derived electrocatalysts: Synthesis, characterization, theoretical calculations, and functional mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 20320–20344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Belousov, A.S.; Suleimanov, E.V. Application of metal-organic frameworks as an alternative to metal oxide-based photocatalysts for the production of industrially important organic chemicals. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 6172–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Adegoke, K.A.; Maxakato, N.W. Porous metal-organic framework (MOF)-based and MOF-derived electrocatalytic materials for energy conversion. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 21, 100816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sahoo, R.; Das, M.C. C2s/C1 hydrocarbon separation: The major step towards natural gas purification by metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 442, 213998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Separation and Purification of Hydrocarbons with Porous Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 18930–18949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Demakov, P.A.; Sapchenko, S.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Fedin, V.P. Coordination polymers based on zinc(ii) and manganese(ii) with 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2018, 67, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sapianik, A.A.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Barsukova, M.O.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Fedin, V.P. Exceptionally effective benzene/cyclohexane separation using a nitro-decorated metal-organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 8241–8244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mukherjee, S.; Sensharma, D.; Qazvini, O.T.; Dutta, S.; Macreadie, L.K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Babarao, R. Advances in adsorptive separation of benzene and cyclohexane by metal-organic framework adsorbents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 437, 213852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, J.-M.; Blatov, V.A.; Yu, B.; Van Hecke, K.; Cui, G.-H. An unprecedented “strongly” self-catenated MOF containing inclined catenated honeycomb-like units. Dalt. Trans. 2016, 45, 2426–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ye, C.-R.; Wang, W.-J.; Chen, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, H.-F.; Dai, B.-L.; Chen, S.-H.; Wu, X.-D.; Li, M.; Huang, X.-C. Harnessing Shape Complementarity for Upgraded Cyclohexane Purification through Adaptive Bottlenecked Pores in an Imidazole-Containing MOF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23590–23595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lysova, A.A.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Klyamkin, S.N.; Berdonosova, E.A.; Fedin, V.P. Hydrocarbon adsorption in a series of mesoporous metal-organic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 328, 111477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bozbiyik, B.; Duerinck, T.; Lannoeye, J.; De Vos, D.E.; Baron, G.V.; Denayer, J.F.M. Adsorption and separation of n-hexane and cyclohexane on the UiO-66 metal-organic framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 183, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, Y.; Yong, J.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, J.; Song, Z.; Gao, J. Spin crossover in metal–organic framework for improved separation of C2H2/CH4 at room temperature. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 304, 122554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; He, M.; Gao, X.; Li, S.; Xiong, S.; Krishna, R.; He, Y. Exploring the Effect of Ligand-Originated MOF Isomerism and Methoxy Group Functionalization on Selective Acetylene/Methane and Carbon Dioxide/Methane Adsorption Properties in Two NbO-Type MOFs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 20559–20568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meng, L.; Liu, K.; Fu, S.; Wang, L.; Liang, C.; Li, G.; Li, C.; Shi, Z. Microporous Cu metal-organic framework constructed from V-shaped tetracarboxylic ligand for selective separation of C2H2/CH4 and C2H2/N2 at room temperature. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 265, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mao, H.; Li, S.-H.; Zhang, A.-S.; Xu, L.-H.; Lu, H.-X.; Lv, J.; Zhao, Z.-P. Furfural separation from aqueous solution by pervaporation membrane mixed with metal organic framework MIL-53(Al) synthesized via high efficiency solvent-controlled microwave. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, P.; Cheng, J.; Yan, Y.; Xu, S.; Zhou, C. Ultrafast preparation of hydrophobic ZIF-67/copper mesh via electrodeposition and hydrophobization for oil/water separation and dyes adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 272, 118871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wei, X.; Wang, C.-C.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Wei, Q. The Z-scheme NH2-UiO-66/PTCDA composite for enhanced photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction under low-power LED visible light. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cavallo, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Milani, R.; Pilati, T.; Priimagi, A.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. The Halogen Bond. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2478–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Norouzi, F.; Khavasi, H.R. Iodine decorated-UiO-67 MOF as a fluorescent sensor for the detection of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 8937–8943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kalaj, M.; Momeni, M.R.; Bentz, K.C.; Barcus, K.S.; Palomba, J.M.; Paesani, F.; Cohen, S.M. Halogen bonding in UiO-66 frameworks promotes superior chemical warfare agent simulant degradation. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3481–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bertani, R.; Sgarbossa, P.; Venzo, A.; Lelj, F.; Amati, M.; Resnati, G.; Pilati, T.; Metrangolo, P.; Terraneo, G. Halogen bonding in metal–organic–supramolecular networks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 677–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Novikov, A.S.; Ivanov, D.M.; Avdontceva, M.S.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Diiodomethane as a halogen bond donor toward metal-bound halides. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 2517–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kinzhalov, M.A.; Kashina, M.V.; Mikherdov, A.S.; Mozheeva, E.A.; Novikov, A.S.; Smirnov, A.S.; Ivanov, D.M.; Kryukova, M.A.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Smirnov, S.N.; et al. Dramatically Enhanced Solubility of Halide-Containing Organometallic Species in Diiodomethane: The Role of Solvent Complex Halogen Bonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12785–12789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Afanasenko, A.M.; Avdontceva, M.S.; Novikov, A.S.; Chulkova, T.G. Halogen and hydrogen bonding in cis-dichlorobis(propionitrile)platinum(II) chloroform monosolvate. Z. Krist.-Cryst. Mater. 2016, 231, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zelenkov, L.E.; Ivanov, D.M.; Avdontceva, M.S.; Novikov, A.S.; Bokach, N.A. Tetrachloromethane as halogen bond donor toward metal-bound halides. Z. Krist.-Cryst. Mater. 2019, 234, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Torubaev, Y.V.; Skabitsky, I.V.; Saratov, G.A.; Barzilovich, P.Y. Halogen vs. ionic bonding: An unusual isomorphism between the neutral (C5Me5)2Fe/C2I2 cocrystal and ionic [(C5Me5)2Fe]Br3 crystal. Mendeleev Commun. 2021, 31, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Torubaev, Y.V.; Skabitsky, I.V. Halogen bonding in crystals of free 1,2-diiodo-ethene (C2H2I2) and its π-complex [CpMn(CO)2](π-C2H2I2). Z. Krist.-Cryst. Mater. 2020, 235, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Johnson, M.T.; Džolić, Z.; Cetina, M.; Wendt, O.F.; Öhrström, L.; Rissanen, K. Neutral organometallic halogen bond acceptors: Halogen bonding in complexes of PCPPdX (X = Cl, Br, I) with iodine (I2), 1,4- diiodotetrafluorobenzene (F4DIBz), and 1,4-diiodooctafluorobutane (F8DIBu). Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gao, Y.J.; Li, C.; Liu, R.; Jin, W.J. Phosphorescence of several cocrystals assembled by diiodotetrafluorobenzene and three ring angular diazaphenanthrenes via CI··· N halogen bond. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 173, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Eliseeva, A.A.; Ivanov, D.M.; Novikov, A.S.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Recognition of the π-hole donor ability of iodopentafluorobenzene-a conventional σ-hole donor for crystal engineering involving halogen bonding. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 616–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Eliseeva, A.A.; Ivanov, D.M.; Novikov, A.S.; Rozhkov, A.V.; Kornyakov, I.V.; Dubovtsev, A.Y.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Hexaiododiplatinate(ii) as a useful supramolecular synthon for halogen bond involving crystal engineering. Dalt. Trans. 2020, 49, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Okrut, A.; Feldmann, C. {[P(o-tolyl)3]Br}2[Cu2Br6](Br2) An Ionic Compound Containing Molecular Bromine. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 3084–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hausmann, D.; Feldmann, C. Bromine-rich Zinc Bromides: Zn6Br12(18-crown-6)2×(Br2)5, Zn4Br8(18-crown-6)2×(Br2)3, and Zn6Br12(18-crown-6)2×(Br2)2. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 6141–6147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Torubaev, Y.V.; Skabitskiy, I.V.; Pavlova, A.V.; Pasynskii, A.A. First structural evidence of a Se–Br–Br halogen-bonded molecular complex. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 3606–3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Puttreddy, R.; von Essen, C.; Rissanen, K. Halogen Bonds in Square Planar 2,5-Dihalopyridine-Copper(II) Bromide Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 2393–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Puttreddy, R.; von Essen, C.; Peuronen, A.; Lahtinen, M.; Rissanen, K. Halogen bonds in 2,5-dihalopyridine-copper(ii) chloride complexes. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 1954–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Awwadi, F.F.; Haddad, S.F.; Turnbull, M.M.; Landee, C.P.; Willett, R.D. Copper–halide bonds as magnetic tunnels; structural, magnetic and theoretical studies of trans-bis(2,5-dibromopyridine)dihalo copper(ii) and trans-bis(2-bromopyridine)dibromo copper(ii). CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 3111–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Awwadi, F.; Haddad, S.F.; Willett, R.D.; Twamley, B. The Analogy of C−Br···Br−C, C−Br···Br−Fe, and Fe−Br···Br−Fe Contacts: Crystal Structures of (26DAPH)FeBr 4 and (26DA35DBPH) 2 FeBr 4 ·Br. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Awwadi, F.F.; Turnbull, M.M.; Alwahsh, M.I.; Haddad, S.F. May halogen bonding interactions compete with Cu⋯Cl semi-coordinate bonds? Structural, magnetic and theoretical studies of two polymorphs of trans-bis(5-bromo-2-chloro pyridine)dichlorocopper(ii) and trans -bis(2,5-dichloropyridine)dichlorocopper(ii). New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 10642–10650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Christine, T.; Tabey, A.; Cornilleau, T.; Fouquet, E.; Hermange, P. Syntheses of o-iodobenzyl alcohols-BODIPY structures as potential precursors of bimodal tags for positron emission tomography and optical imaging. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 130765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zaguzin, A.S.; Sukhikh, T.S.; Kolesov, B.A.; Sokolov, M.N.; Fedin, V.P.; Adonin, S.A. Iodinated vs non-iodinated: Comparison of sorption selectivity by [Zn2(bdc)2dabco]n and superstructural 2-iodoterephtalate-based metal–organic framework. Polyhedron 2022, 212, 115587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, B.; Zhou, H.-F.; Guan, Z.-H.; Hou, L.; Cui, B.; Wang, Y.-Y. Cleavage of a C-C σ bond between two phenyl groups under mild conditions during the construction of Zn(II) organic frameworks. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 5418–5422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT–Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Sheldrick, G.M. IUCr Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alexeev, A.V.; Gromilov, S.A. Quantitative phase analysis on a single crystal X-ray diffractometer equipped with a two-dimensional flat detector. J. Struct. Chem. 2010, 51, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alexeev, A.V.; Gromilov, S.A. X-Ray Diffraction Study of Micro Amounts of Polycrystalline Samples. J. Struct. Chem. 2010, 51, 744–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Prescher, C.; Prakapenka, V.B. DIOPTAS: A program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Press. Res. 2015, 35, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 01305 g001 550
Figure 1. Coordination unit in structures 1 and 2. Metal green, C grey, O red, I purple, N deep blue. H atoms are omitted for clarity, only one of three possible positions of I is shown.
Figure 1. Coordination unit in structures 1 and 2. Metal green, C grey, O red, I purple, N deep blue. H atoms are omitted for clarity, only one of three possible positions of I is shown.
Molecules 27 01305 g001
Molecules 27 01305 g002 550
Figure 2. A fragment of the framework of 2. Hydrogen atoms are omitted, the occupancy of disordered I atoms is shown.
Figure 2. A fragment of the framework of 2. Hydrogen atoms are omitted, the occupancy of disordered I atoms is shown.
Molecules 27 01305 g002
Molecules 27 01305 g003 550
Figure 3. A fragment of the framework of 1. Hydrogen atoms are omitted, the occupancy of disordered I atoms is shown.
Figure 3. A fragment of the framework of 1. Hydrogen atoms are omitted, the occupancy of disordered I atoms is shown.
Molecules 27 01305 g003
Molecules 27 01305 g004 550
Figure 4. A fragment of the structures of the compounds on the example of 2 showing interpenetrated frameworks colored with blue and brown.
Figure 4. A fragment of the structures of the compounds on the example of 2 showing interpenetrated frameworks colored with blue and brown.
Molecules 27 01305 g004
Molecules 27 01305 g005 550
Figure 5. A fragment of the structures of the compounds in the example of 2 showing interpenetrated frameworks colored with blue and brown.
Figure 5. A fragment of the structures of the compounds in the example of 2 showing interpenetrated frameworks colored with blue and brown.
Molecules 27 01305 g005
Table
Table 1. Selectivity of vapor adsorption by 1, 2, [Zn2(2-I-bdc)2dabco] and [Zn2(bdc)2dabco] [62] from equimolar mixtures of different organic substrates.
Table 1. Selectivity of vapor adsorption by 1, 2, [Zn2(2-I-bdc)2dabco] and [Zn2(bdc)2dabco] [62] from equimolar mixtures of different organic substrates.
No.Substrates12[Zn2(2-I-bdc)2dabco][Zn2(bdc)2dabco]
11,2-dichloroethane:benzene2.54:12.57:11.5:11.2:1
2Chloroform:benzene3.3:11:11.3:12.0:1
3Benzene:cyclohexane43.8:110:115:125:1
41,2-dibromoethane:benzene8.3:13.1:1n/an/a
51-butanol:1-bromobutane1.3:11.17:10.38:10.5:1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaguzin, A.S.; Sukhikh, T.S.; Sakhapov, I.F.; Fedin, V.P.; Sokolov, M.N.; Adonin, S.A. Zn(II) and Co(II) 3D Coordination Polymers Based on 2-Iodoterephtalic Acid and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane: Structures and Sorption Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041305

AMA Style

Zaguzin AS, Sukhikh TS, Sakhapov IF, Fedin VP, Sokolov MN, Adonin SA. Zn(II) and Co(II) 3D Coordination Polymers Based on 2-Iodoterephtalic Acid and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane: Structures and Sorption Properties. Molecules. 2022; 27(4):1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaguzin, Alexander S., Taisiya S. Sukhikh, Ilyas F. Sakhapov, Vladimir P. Fedin, Maxim N. Sokolov, and Sergey A. Adonin. 2022. "Zn(II) and Co(II) 3D Coordination Polymers Based on 2-Iodoterephtalic Acid and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane: Structures and Sorption Properties" Molecules 27, no. 4: 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041305

APA Style

Zaguzin, A. S., Sukhikh, T. S., Sakhapov, I. F., Fedin, V. P., Sokolov, M. N., & Adonin, S. A. (2022). Zn(II) and Co(II) 3D Coordination Polymers Based on 2-Iodoterephtalic Acid and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane: Structures and Sorption Properties. Molecules, 27(4), 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041305

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop