Next Article in Journal
Natural Product-Based Potential Therapeutic Interventions of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition Analysis, Cytotoxic, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Physalis angulata L.: A Comparative Study of Leaves and Fruit
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules27051479
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis, and Cytotoxic Activity of Novel Natural Arylsulfonamide-Inspired Molecules

by
Wenbo Huang
1,2,
Liqiao Shi
1,2,
Manli Liu
1,2,
Zhigang Zhang
1,2,
Fang Liu
1,2,
Tong Long
1,2,
Shaohua Wen
1,2,
Daye Huang
1,2,
Kaimei Wang
1,2,
Ronghua Zhou
1,2,
Wei Fang
1,2,*,
Hongtao Hu
1,2,* and
Shaoyong Ke
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Microbial Pesticides, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430064, China
2
National Biopesticide Engineering Research Centre, Hubei Biopesticide Engineering Research Centre, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(5), 1479; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051479
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2022 / Published: 22 February 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Primary arylsulfonamide functional groups feature prominently in diverse pharmaceuticals. However, natural arylsulfonamides are relatively infrequent. In this work, two novel arylsulfonamide natural products were first synthesized, and then a series of novel molecules derived from natural arylsulfonamides were designed and synthesized, and their in vitro cytotoxic activities against A875, HepG2, and MARC145 cell lines were systematically evaluated. The results indicate that some of these arylsulfonamide derivatives exhibit significantly good cytotoxic activity against the tested cell lines compared with the control 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), such as compounds 10l, 10p, 10q, and 10r. In particular, the potential molecule 10q, containing a carbazole moiety, exhibited the highest inhibitory activity against all tested cell lines, with IC50 values of 4.19 ± 0.78, 3.55 ± 0.63, and 2.95 ± 0.78 μg/mL, respectively. This will offer the potential to discover novel drug-like compounds from the sparsely populated area of natural products that can lead to effective anticancer agents.

1. Introduction

Natural products (NPs) and their molecular scaffolds have a long tradition of offering chemists a range of uncharted chemotypes as valuable starting points for the development of novel drugs [1,2,3], and have also been a major source of anticancer drug discovery [4,5,6,7].
Sulfonamides have a functional group (R-SO2-NH2) called the sulfonamide group; sulfonamide scaffolds are also very important structural motifs that are present in diverse pharmaceuticals (Figure 1), showing important and extensive biological activities, such as antitumor [8,9,10,11,12], anti-inflammatory [13,14], and antiviral activities [15,16]. However, due to the structural particularity, natural products that contain a primary sulfonamide group in their structures are rare. Sulfadixiamycin A, (−)-altemicidin, and psammaplin C are a few examples of natural products that contain the structure of a sulfonamide moiety [17,18] (Figure 1).
Recently, sargassulfamide A, bearing a rare and unique sulfonamide group, was isolated from the seaweed Sargassum naozhouense [19]. Almost simultaneously, another novel arylsulfonamide natural product was isolated together with sargassulfamide A from the roots and rhizomes of Tupistra chinensis Baker [20], whereas the result of in vitro cytotoxic activity in the human cancer cell lines indicated that the novel arylsulfonamide natural products displayed weak cytotoxicity.
Natural products are among the most important sources of the lead compounds in drug discovery; however, most of them cannot be used as drugs directly. In addition, owing to their low fermentation and extraction levels, further research exploring the potential bioactivity of some natural compounds has been seriously limited. Accordingly, structural optimization and derivation of natural products becomes a powerful strategy for improving the efficiency and success rate of NP-based drug development. Our research group has committed to discovering highly active compounds from natural products [21,22,23,24,25,26], so the rare natural product sargassulfamide A, bearing a privileged scaffold of arylsulfonamide, aroused our interest. It is well known that molecular skeletons determine whether molecules have bioactivity; despite the natural arylsulfonamide sargassulfamide A being less effective against the human cancer cell lines, we wondered whether we could modulate or improve the activities of these analogues of natural products by changing the position of the amide unit and pharmacophore hybridization.
Meanwhile, aryls and hetero-aryls are important pharmacological units that always increase the potential bioactivity of corresponding molecules [27,28,29]. Hence, several different types of (hetero)aryl groups—including biphenyl, diphenyl ether, and heterocycles—were selected to construct diversity molecules, and theses selected aromatic aryl amines (Ar1NH2) and aryl acids (Ar2COOH) are usually classical pharmacological units. Taking into account the above considerations, we wish herein to report the molecule design, convenient synthesis, and biological evaluation of a series of novel natural arylsulfonamide-inspired molecules (Figure 2).
In this study, sargassulfamide A (NC2) was used as a key starting point for the development of high-efficiency cytotoxic agents; a series of novel derivatives containing arylsulfonamide and carboxamide pharmacophores 10a-r were designed and synthesized as shown in Scheme 1, and their cytotoxic activities against several human cancer cell lines—including A875, HepG2, and MARC145—were systematically evaluated by the MTT colorimetric method for the first time. Beyond that, the possible structure and activity relationships are also summarized and discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

Chemistry: In this work, a series of novel aryl-carboxamide derivatives bearing sulfonamide units were designed and synthesized by integrating natural arylsulfonamides with carboxamide pharmacophores. The general synthetic route for these compounds is outlined in Scheme 1.
Synthesis of natural arylsulfonamide-containing carboxylic acid (NC1) and sargassulfamide A (NC2): First, the ethyl anthranilate 1 was treated with the biphenylsulfonyl chloride 2 via sulfonamidation reaction to yield the key intermediate arylsulfonamide 3; subsequently, compound 3 was conveniently hydrolyzed to the natural compound NC1, which was transformed to the corresponding acyl chloride 4 and then reacted with the ethyl anthranilate to obtain the target sargassulfamide A (NC2).
Synthesis of aryl-carboxamide derivatives bearing sulfonamide units 10a–r: The arylsulfonamide derivatives 7a–d were prepared via the reaction of various aryl amines and 4-acetamidobenzene-1-sulfonyl chloride 6 in the presence of Et3N/DCM, and then the corresponding arylsulfonamide derivatives were transformed into the intermediate arylsulfonamide derivatives 8a–d via deacetylation reaction. Subsequently, the obtained compounds 8a–d were condensed with various aromatic acids 9a–e under EDCI/HOBt-promoted conditions to construct target aryl-carboxamide derivatives bearing sulfonamide units 10a–r.
Spectroscopy studies: The structures of all of the target compounds in this work gave satisfactory chemical analyses, including 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 19F NMR, and mass spectroscopy, and all of these spectral data were in good agreement with the proposed structures. For the 1H NMR spectrum of all arylsulfonamide derivatives, the signals at 11.74–10.76 ppm showed a single peak, which was attributed to NH protons attached to the sulfonyl group as indicated in the molecular structures. Correspondingly, the signals in the range of 10.65–9.40 ppm were assigned to the NH protons, which attached to the carbonyl group. The signal peaks of the remaining at low fields were attributed to aromatic ring proton peaks. All of the characteristic peaks observed within the 1H NMR spectra for title compounds are given in the Experimental section, and the representative 1H NMR spectral analysis of the target sargassulfamide A is shown in Figure 3.
Pharmacological evaluation: All target carboxamide derivatives derived from natural arylsulfonamides 10a–r were screened for their potential in vitro cytotoxic effects on A875 (human melanoma), HepG2 (human hepatocellular liver carcinoma), and MARC145 (A subclone of African green monkey kidney cell line MA-104) cell lines using the standard MTT assay [30,31], with 5-FU (5-fluorouracil) as a positive control. The results are summarized in Figure 4 and Table 1. The IC50 value represents the drug concentration required to inhibit cell growth by 50%.
Based on the preliminary screening results, we found that some of these arylsulfonamide derivatives indicated moderate-to-good inhibition activity against all tested cell lines. Notably, the compounds 10l, 10p, 10q, and 10r exhibited significantly higher activities compared with the control at a concentration of 40 µg/mL (Figure 4), demonstrating that these natural-product-inspired molecules derived from sargassulfamide A could be considered as promising scaffolds for developing effective anticancer agents.
In order to further explore their potential antitumor activity, the IC50 values of two novel arylsulfonamide natural products and a series of novel molecules derived from natural arylsulfonamide derivatives were all systematically evaluated. The potential inhibitory activities expressed as IC50 values for all compounds are shown in Table 1. As indicated in Table 1, the natural arylsulfonamide NC1 showed poor activity against tested cell lines, and sargassulfamide A (NC2) almost completely lost inhibitory activity (IC50 > 40 µg/mL). Compounds 10l, 10p 10q, and 10r, containing a trifluoromethyl unit, had higher inhibitory effects on all cell lines compared to the positive control 5-FU. It should be noted that introduction of a trifluoromethyl group to natural products and organic molecules is vitally important for lipophilicity, hydrophobicity, and metabolic stability. Hence, trifluoromethylation has played an important role in discovering high-activity drugs [32]. Compound 10q, containing a carbazole scaffold, showed the strongest inhibitory effect on all three cell lines, with an IC50 of 4.19 ± 0.78 (A875), 3.55 ± 0.63 (HepG2), and 2.95 ± 0.78 (MARC145) μg/mL, which may be due to the carbazole ring being favorable for such activity. The results showed in Table 1 can further demonstrate the cytotoxic effect of arylsulfonamide derivatives as potential anticancer reagents for cancer cell lines.
Subsequently, the dose–response analysis for the high-potential compounds 10l, 10q, 10r, and 5-FU was conducted, as shown in Figure 5, indicating that the cytotoxic effects of arylsulfonamide derivatives on A875 cells (left), HepG2 cells (middle), and MARC145 cells (right) are significantly concentration-dependent.
Structure and activity relationships (SARs): The structural evolution here was to modify natural arylsulfonamides with diverse aryl amines (5a–d) and aromatic acid scaffolds (9a–e). According to the in vitro bioassay results presented in Figure 4 and Table 1, we obtained the preliminary structure–activity relationships (SARs) for these prepared arylsulfonamides derivatives. We concluded that the results indicate that modifying the carboxyl group of natural arylsulfonamide can yield superior cytotoxicity activity against different cancer cells. Meanwhile, changing the position of the amide unit also significantly affected the antitumor activity (Figure 6). In addition, the compounds containing trifluoromethyl-substituted arylsulfonamide derivatives presented greater cytotoxicity activity (10d, 10h, 10l, and 10p). In particular, the compounds containing a special carbazole moiety showed the highest inhibitory activity (10q and 10r), indicating that the carbazole ring is beneficial to increase the activity. It should be noted that carbazole skeletons are ubiquitous in diverse antitumor pharmaceuticals [33,34,35]. Above all, the obtained SARs could contribute to the discovery of potential cytotoxic agents from natural products in our subsequent research.

3. Conclusions

In summary, we have described the molecular design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel arylsulfonamides inspired by natural sulfadixiamycin A. These novel natural arylsulfonamides and their derivatives were conveniently synthesized and characterized by typical spectral analyses, including 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 19F NMR, and ESI-MS. The preliminary in vitro bioassay indicated that some of these arylsulfonamides bearing carbazole rings displayed good cytotoxic activity against the A875 and HepG2 cancer cell lines, and the high-potential molecule 10q exhibited the highest inhibitory activity against all tested cell lines, with IC50 values of 4.19 ± 0.78, 3.55 ± 0.63, and 2.95 ± 0.78 μg/mL, respectively. However, the possible mechanisms for their antitumor activities still need to be explored further, and these results may promote further development of our research inspired by natural products to discover potential drug candidates.

4. Experimental

Instrumentation and chemicals: All reagents from commercial sources were used directly, without purification. All melting points (m.p.) were measured using a digital model X-5 apparatus (Shanghai Instrument Physical Optics Instrument Co., LTD, Shanghai, China), and were uncorrected. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz FT-NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), using CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as the solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Chemical shifts are reported in δ (parts per million) values, and coupling constants nJ are reported in Hz. Mass spectra were recorded on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC® H-Class PDA (Waters®) instrument (Waters®, Milford, MA, USA). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on precoated GF254 silica gel plates (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical, Qingdao, China), and spots were visualized with ultraviolet light. All commercially available starting materials and reagents were used without further purification, unless otherwise specified.
Synthetic procedures for natural compound NC1: To a solution of ethyl anthranilate 1 (3.30 g, 20 mmol) and triethylamine (4.04 g, 40 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (40 mL), we added 4-biphenylsulfonyl chloride (6.06 g, 24 mmol) dropwise, which dissolved in DCM under an ice bath, and then the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and detected by thin-layer chromatography. After the completion of the reaction, we washed the crude mixture with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine solution, and then the mixture was extracted with DCM and dried over Na2SO4. The obtained crude product 3 was used for the next reaction without further purification. To the obtained compound 3 in methanol (80 mL), we added 20 mL of aqueous sodium hydroxide (0.1 mol), which was stirred at room temperature overnight. After the completion of the reaction, the mixture was adjusted to pH 3 with diluted hydrochloric acid under an ice bath, and the precipitate was filtered and washed with a small amount of alcohol to yield the pure natural compound NC1. The physico-chemical properties for compound NC1 are as follows, and the corresponding spectrum are indicated in Supplementary Materials.
  • 2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-sulfonamido)benzoic acid (NC1), white solid, m.p. 205–207 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 11.22 (s, 1H), 7.94–7.89 (m, 3H), 7.86 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.71–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.16–7.12 (m, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 170.3, 145.4, 140.2, 138.5, 137.8, 135.1, 132.1, 129.6, 129.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.6, 123.8, 118.8, 117.1 ppm. MS m/z 354.2 = [M + H]+, calculated for C19H15NO4S m/z = 353.0.
Synthetic procedures for natural compound NC2: Thionyl chloride (25 mL) was added dropwise under an ice bath to natural compound NC1 (1.59 g, 4.5 mmol); after addition, the mixture was slowly heated to 80 °C overnight, and then the reaction solution was concentrated to obtain compound 4, which was used for the next reaction without further purification. To a mixture of ethyl anthranilate (0.83 g, 5 mmol) and triethylamine (1.2 equivalents) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL), we added compound 4 dropwise under an ice bath, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature until TLC indicated that the reaction was complete. Then, 30 mL of water was added to the mixture, the aqueous solution was extracted with CH2Cl2, and the combined organic phases were washed with NaHCO3 and dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. After removing the volatile component, the desired natural compound NC2 was obtained. Sargassulfamide A (NC2) was subjected to isolation with silica column chromatography (eluting solution: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 3/1 (v/v)). The physico-chemical properties for compound NC2 are as follows, and the corresponding spectrum are indicated in Supplementary Materials.
  • Methyl 2-(2-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-sulfonamido)benzamido)benzoate (NC2), white solid, m.p. 148–149 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 11.74 (s, 1H), 10.48 (s, 1H), 8.75 (dd, J = 8.4, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (dd, J = 8.3, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.67 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.60 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.22 (m, 1H), 7.17–7.13 (m, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 168.0, 166.6, 144.9, 139.6, 138.3, 137.6, 137.2, 134.6, 133.3, 131.0, 129.5, 129.1, 128.7, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 126.3, 125.9, 124.5, 123.7, 122.1, 118.6, 53.0 ppm. MS m/z 487.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C27H22N2O5S m/z = 486.1.
General synthetic procedures for aryl-carboxamide derivatives bearing sulfonamide units 10a–r: To a solution of aryl amine (10 mmol) and triethylamine (12 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in anhydrous DCM (20 mL), we added phenylsulfonyl chloride (12 mmol) dropwise, which dissolved in DCM under an ice bath. After the completion of the reaction, we washed the crude mixture with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine solution, and then the mixture was extracted with DCM and dried over Na2SO4. The obtained crude products 7a–d were used for the next reaction without further purification. The crude products 7a–d (1 equivalent) in methanol (20 mL) was added to 5 mL of aqueous sodium hydroxide (4 equivalents), and then the mixture stirred at 50 °C for 10 h. After the completion of the reaction, the mixture was adjusted to pH 5–6 with diluted hydrochloric acid under an ice bath, and the precipitate was filtered and washed with a small amount of alcohol to yield 8a–d. To a solution of 8a–d (1.2 mmol) in DMF (4 mL), we added HOBt (1.5 mmol), EDCI (1.5 mmol), Et3N (2.5 mmol) and appropriate substituted acids 9a–e (1.0 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After the completion of the reaction, water was added to the mixture, which was extracted with DCM, and the organic layer was washed with water and brine, and then dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed to yield crude target compounds, which were purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluting solution: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 2/1 (v/v)) or recrystallization to yield pure compounds. The physico-chemical properties for some intermediates and target compounds are as follows, and the corresponding spectrum are indicated in Supplementary Materials.
  • N-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-2-yl)-4-aminobenzenesulfonamide (8a), m.p. 128–129 °C. MS m/z 347.3 = [M + Na]+, calculated for C18H16N2O2S m/z = 324.1.
  • 4-Amino-N-(2-phenoxyphenyl)benzenesulfonamide (8b), m.p. 119–120 °C. MS m/z 363.4 = [M + Na]+, calculated for C18H16N2O3S m/z = 340.1.
  • 4-Amino-N-(4,5-dimethylisoxazol-3-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8c), m.p. 162–163 °C. MS m/z 290.3 = [M + Na]+, calculated for C11H13N3O3S m/z = 267.1.
  • 4-Amino-N-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)benzenesulfonamide (8d), m.p. 95–96 °C. MS m/z 317.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C13H11F3N2O2S m/z = 316.0.
  • N-(4-(N-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-2-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide (10a), white solid, m.p. 151–152 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, TMS, 25 °C) δ = 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 3H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.8 Hz, 4H), 7.18 (td, J = 7.5, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (dt, J = 7.5, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 6.65 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 165.9, 141.7, 137.2, 135.1, 134.5, 134.4, 133.4, 132.4, 130.7, 130.4, 129.2, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 127.2, 126.7, 125.3, 123.4 (q, J = 274.8 Hz), 122.0, 119.6. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −58.8. MS m/z 497.3 = [M + H]+, calculated for C26H19F3N2O3S m/z = 496.1.
  • N-(4-(N-(2-Phenoxyphenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide (10b), white solid, m.p. 161–162 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 oC) δ = 10.93 (s, 1H), 9.85 (s, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.70–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.12–7.07 (m, 3H), 6.71 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 171.2, 161.3, 154.8, 147.8, 140.9, 140.1, 138.0, 135.6, 134.9, 134.8, 133.8, 133.1, 133.0, 131.7, 131.2, 131.0, 129.0 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 128.8, 128.6, 124.5, 123.7, 123.6. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −53.1. MS m/z 513.5 = [M + H]+, calculated for C26H19F3N2O4S m/z = 512.1.
  • N-(4-(N-(4,5-Dimethylisoxazol-3-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide (10c), white solid, m.p. 183–184 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 oC) δ = 10.99 (s, 1H), 10.65 (s, 1H), 7.89–7.84 (m, 5H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.80 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 166.6, 166.2, 157.2, 143.3, 136.1, 134.8, 133.2, 130.9, 129.0, 128.9, 127.0, 126.4, 124.2 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 119.7, 105.0, 11.2, 6.4. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −57.9. MS m/z 440.3 = [M + H]+, calculated for C19H16F3N3O4S m/z = 439.0.
  • 2-(Trifluoromethyl)-N-(4-(N-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)benzamide (10d), white solid, m.p. 128–129 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.91 (s, 1H), 9.92 (s, 1H), 8.54 (dd, J = 4.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (dd, J = 8.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 156.3, 148.7, 147.8, 142.3, 140.1, 139.6, 136.6, 134.6, 133.7, 129.0, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 127.3, 127.2, 126.6, 123.7 (q, J = 274.8 Hz), 120.5, 111.8. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −58.0. MS m/z 489.3 = [M + H]+, calculated for C21H14F6N2O3S m/z = 488.0.
  • N-(4-(N-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-2-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-3-bromo-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (10e), white solid, m.p. 156–157 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.88 (s, 1H), 9.44 (s, 1H), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.27–8.23 (m, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.36–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.31 (dt, J = 5.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 156.3, 148.7, 147.8, 141.9, 140.1, 139.7, 139.2, 139.0, 136.4, 133.7, 131.4, 129.7, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.5, 127.3, 127.2, 127.1, 120.4, 111.8 ppm. MS m/z 608.2 = [M + H]+, calculated for C27H19BrClN5O3S m/z = 607.0.
  • 3-Bromo-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-N-(4-(N-(2-phenoxyphenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (10f), white solid, m.p. 177–178 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.82 (s, 1H), 10.82 (s, 1H), 9.84 (s, 1H), 8.54 (dd, J = 4.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.60 (m, 5H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 7.36 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.12–7.03 (m, 3H), 6.67 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.63–6.55 (m, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 156.4, 156.2, 150.2, 148.7, 147.8, 142.1, 140.1, 139.7, 135.8, 130.1, 128.3, 128.1, 127.3, 127.2, 126.5, 123.9, 123.8, 120.4, 119.0, 118.8, 111.7 ppm. MS m/z 624.2 = [M + H]+, calculated for C27H19BrClN5O4S m/z = 623.0.
  • 3-Bromo-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-N-(4-(N-(4,5-dimethylisoxazol-3-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxmide (10g), white solid, m.p. 171–172 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.91 (s, 1H), 10.66 (s, 1H), 8.53 (dd, J = 4.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.24 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.79 (m, 4H), 7.66 (dd, J = 8.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 1.77 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 166.3, 157.1, 156.3, 148.7, 147.8, 142.4, 140.1, 139.7, 135.3, 128.9, 128.2, 127.3, 127.2, 120.4, 111.8, 105.1, 11.2, 6.4 ppm. MS m/z 651.2 = [M + H]+, calculated for C20H16BrClN6O4S m/z = 649.9.
  • 3-Bromo-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-N-(4-(N-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (10h), white solid, m.p. 181–182 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.91 (s, 1H), 9.92 (s, 1H), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (dd, J = 8.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 156.3, 148.7, 147.8, 142.3, 140.1, 139.6, 136.6, 134.6, 133.7, 128.9, 128.4, 128.3, 127.9, 127.5, 127.3, 127.2, 126.6, 123.7 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 120.5, 111.8. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −57.9. MS m/z 600.5 = [M + H]+, calculated for C22H14F3BrClN5O3S m/z = 598.9.
  • N-(4-(N-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-2-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-2-methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-carboxamide (10i), white solid, m.p. 197–198 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.79 (s, 1H), 9.40 (s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.57–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.43–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 4H), 7.34–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.11–7.08 (m, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 169.1, 143.2, 142.9, 141.3, 139.1, 139.0, 138.7, 135.6, 133.9, 132.4, 131.5, 131.4, 129.7, 129.5, 128.9, 128.5, 128.1, 127.7, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.7, 126.3, 119.7, 17.7 ppm. MS m/z 519.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C32H26N2O3S m/z = 518.1.
  • 2-Methyl-N-(4-(N-(2-phenoxyphenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-carboxamide (10j), white solid, m.p. 170–171 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.76 (s, 1H), 9.84 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.50–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.42–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.36–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.29–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.07 (m, 3H), 6.71 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (dd, J = 8.6, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 2.24 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 169.1, 156.6, 150.0, 143.4, 143.0, 141.3, 138.6, 135.0, 132.4, 130.1, 129.6, 129.5, 128.8, 128.7, 128.3, 127.7, 127.0, 126.7, 126.3, 126.1, 124.1, 123.9, 119.6, 118.9, 118.8, 17.7 ppm. MS m/z 535.5 = [M + H]+, calculated for C32H26N2O4S m/z = 534.1.
  • N-(4-(N-(4,5-Dimethylisoxazol-3-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-2-methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-carboxamide (10k), white solid, m.p. 156–157 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.84 (s, 1H), 10.65 (s, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.87–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.43–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.33 (m, 3H), 2.23 (s, 6H), 1.81 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 169.2, 166.2, 157.2, 143.7, 142.9, 141.3, 138.6, 134.5, 132.5, 131.5, 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 127.7, 126.7, 126.3, 119.6, 105.0, 17.7, 11.2, 6.4 ppm. MS m/z 462.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C25H23N3O4S m/z = 461.1.
  • 2-Methyl-N-(4-(N-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-carboxamide (10l), m.p. 178–180 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.84 (s, 1H), 9.88 (s, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50–7.44 (m, 4H), 7.40 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.36–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 169.2, 143.5, 143.0, 141.3, 138.6, 135.8, 134.8, 133.8, 132.5, 131.5, 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 128.4, 127.8, 127.7, 127.5, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 123.7 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 119.8, 17.7. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −57.9. MS m/z 511.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C27H21F3N2O3S m/z = 510.1.
  • N-(4-(N-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-2-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-4′-(trifluoromethyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-carboxamide (10m), white solid, m.p. 163–164 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.76 (s, 1H), 9.40 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.67 (m, 3H), 7.65–7.61(m, 3H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.28 (m, 5H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.21–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.14 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 168.3, 144.6, 142.9, 139.1, 139.0, 138.6, 137.0, 135.6, 133.8, 131.3, 130.9, 130.6, 129.7, 129.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 127.9, 127.4, 127.2, 127.1, 126.7, 126.6, 124.7 (q, J = 272.0 Hz), 119.7. MS m/z 573.6 = [M + H]+, calculated for C32H23F3N2O3S m/z = 572.1.
  • N-(4-(N-(2-Phenoxyphenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-4′-(trifluoromethyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-carboxamide (10n), white solid, m.p. 173–174 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.74 (s, 1H), 9.82 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.67 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.63–7.56 (m, 6H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.11–7.03 (m, 3H), 6.70 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J = 8.6, 0.9 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 168.3, 156.6, 149.9, 144.7, 143.1, 138.6, 136.9, 135.1, 130.9, 130.7, 130.1, 129.6, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 126.9, 125.7 (q, J = 3.0 Hz), 124.1 (q, J = 272.0 Hz), 123.8, 119.6, 118.9, 118.8. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −60.9. MS m/z 589.6 = [M + H]+, calculated for C32H23F3N2O4S m/z = 588.1.
  • N-(4-(N-(4,5-Dimethylisoxazol-3-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-4′-(trifluoromethyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-carboxamide (10o), white solid, m.p. 199–200 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.82 (s, 1H), 10.61 (s, 1H), 7.78–7.76 (m, 3H), 7.75–7.73 (m, 3H), 7.69 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.64–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.58 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.53 (m, 2H), 2.22 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 169.4, 168.3, 166.2, 157.2, 144.6, 143.5, 140.5, 138.6, 136.8, 134.5, 132.2, 131.8, 130.9, 128.8, 128.3 (q, J = 31.7 Hz), 125.8 (q, J = 3.0 Hz), 124.7 (q, J = 273.0 Hz), 119.6, 105.0, 11.2, 6.3. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −60.9. MS m/z 516.3 = [M + H]+, calculated for C25H20F3N3O4S m/z = 515.1.
  • 4′-(Trifluoromethyl)-N-(4-(N-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-carboxamide (10p), white solid, m.p. 160–161 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.77 (s, 1H), 9.86 (s, 1H), 7.76–7.73 (m, 4H), 7.72–7.69 (m, 4H), 7.64–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 168.4, 144.6, 143.2, 138.6, 136.9, 135.8, 134.7, 133.7, 131.8, 130.9, 130.7, 130.1, 129.7, 129.6, 128.8, 127.8, 127.5, 126.6 (q, J = 28.7 Hz), 125.7 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 125.4 (q, J = 4.5 Hz), 123.8, 123.7 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 122.9 (q, J = 274.0 Hz), 119.7. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −58.0, −60.9. MS m/z 565.5 = [M + H]+, calculated for C27H18F6N2O3S m/z = 564.0.
  • 2-(6-Chloro-9H-carbazol-2-yl)-N-(4-(N-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)propanamide (10q), white solid, m.p. 159–160 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 11.39 (s, 1H), 10.52 (s, 1H), 9.83 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.72–7.65 (m, 3H), 7.56–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.23 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.05–4.02 (m, 1H), 1.52 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 173.6, 141.0, 140.4, 138.8, 133.6, 128.4, 127.5 (q, J = 4.5 Hz), 125.6, 124.1, 123.3, 121.1, 121.0, 120.1, 119.3, 119.2, 112.8, 110.1, 47.0, 19.5. 19F NMR (565 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = −57.9. MS m/z 572.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C28H21ClF3N3O3S m/z = 571.0.
  • 2-(6-Chloro-9H-carbazol-2-yl)-N-(4-(N-(2-phenoxyphenyl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)propanamide (10r), white solid, m.p. 166–167 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 10.87 (s, 1H), 9.45 (s, 1H), 8.56 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.77–7.66 (m, 3H), 7.59–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 4H), 7.06 (s, 1H), 4.04 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.21 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ = 170.8, 156.3, 148.8, 147.8, 142.0, 140.1, 139.8, 139.2, 139.1, 136.4, 133.7, 131.4, 129.7, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 127.2, 120.4, 111.8, 60.2, 21.2 ppm. MS m/z 596.4 = [M + H]+, calculated for C33H26ClN3O4S m/z = 595.1.
Bioassays: The in vitro cytotoxicity of the novel carbazole derivatives against human melanoma (A875), human hepatocellular liver carcinoma (HepG2), and a subclone of African green monkey kidney cell line MA-104 (MARC145) cell lines was evaluated using the MTT assay. All data were analyzed with SPSS software, and the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of each compound for the different cell lines were determined. All assays were performed in triplicate on three independent experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Instrumentation and chemicals, and Spectroscopy for target compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K., W.F. and H.H.; methodology, W.H., S.K. and L.S.; validation, M.L., Z.Z. and F.L.; formal analysis, S.K. and W.H.; investigation, T.L., S.W. and D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H. and S.K.; writing—review and editing, W.F. and H.H.; supervision, K.W. and R.Z.; funding acquisition, S.K. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Innovation and Application of Key Technologies of Quality Improving and Efficiency Increasing of Fengtou Ginger Industry (2020-620-002-06), and by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2020CFB717).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this research are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the partial support from the Youth Science Foundation of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2021NKYJJ17), the Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Crops in Central China, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Key Laboratory for Crop Diseases, Insect Pests, and Weeds Control in Hubei Province (2020ZTSJJ5), and the Program for Leading Talents of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences (L2018031).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds 8a–d are available from the authors.

References

  1. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rodrigues, T.; Reker, D.; Schneider, P.; Schneider, G. Counting on Natural Products for Drug Design. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fang, Y.; Li, H.; Ji, B.; Cheng, K.; Wu, B.; Li, Z.; Zheng, C.; Hua, H.; Li, D. Renieramycin-Type Alkaloids from Marine-Derived Organisms: Synthetic Chemistry, Biological Activity and Structural Modification. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 210, 113092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ren, X.; Xie, X.; Chen, B.; Liu, L.; Jiang, C.; Qian, Q. Marine Natural Products: A Potential Source of Anti-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 7879–7899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schulz, G.; Victoria, C.; Kirschning, A.; Steinmann, E. Rocaglamide and Silvestrol: A Long Story from Anti-tumor to Anti-Coronavirus Compounds. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ren, Y.; Kinghorn, A.D. Development of Potential Antitumor Agents from The Scaffolds of Plant-derived Terpenoid Lactones. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 15410–15448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kwon, Y.; Song, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, E.-Y.; Lee, K.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, S. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Activity of Sulfonamide Analogues of Antofine and Cryptopleurine as Potent and Orally Active Antitumor Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7749–7762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lad, N.P.; Kulkarni, S.; Sharma, R.; Mascarenhas, M.; Kulkarni, M.R.; Pandit, S.S. Piperlongumine Derived Cyclic Sulfonamides (sultams): Synthesis and In Vitro Exploration for Therapeutic Potential Against HeLa Cancer Cell Lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 126, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Sun, L.; Gu, Y.; Hu, L. Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationship Study of Water-soluble Carbazole Sulfonamide Derivatives as New Anticancer Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 191, 112181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmed, M.F.; Santali, E.Y. Discovery of Pyridine-sulfonamide Hybrids as A New Scaffold for The Development of Potential VEGFR-2 Inhibitors and Apoptosis Inducers. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 111, 104842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kachaeva, M.V.; Hodyna, D.M.; Semenyuta, I.V.; Pilyo, S.G.; Prokopenko, V.M.; Kovalishyn, V.V.; Metelytsia, L.O.; Brovarets, V.S. Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Sulfonamides as Potential Anticancer Agents. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2018, 74, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharma, P.; Dayma, V.; Dwivedi, A.; Baroliya, P.K.; Tripathi, I.P.; Vanangamudi, M.; Chauhan, R.S.; Goswami, A.K. Synthesis of Sulpha Drug Based Hydroxytriazene Derivatives: Anti-diabetic, Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory Activity and Their Molecular Docking Studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 96, 103642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdel-Aziz, A.A.-M.; Angeli, A.; El-Azab, A.S.; Hammouda, M.E.A.; El-Sherbeny, M.A.; Supuran, C.T. Synthesis and Anti-inflammatory Activity of Sulfonamides and Carboxylates Incorporating Trimellitimides: Dual Cyclooxygenase/Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitory Actions. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 84, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, C.; Pei, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, S.; Jiang, C.; Tan, X.; Dong, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, G. Discovery of (1H-Pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridin-5-yl) Sulfonamide Analogues as Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Assembly Modulators by Conformation Constraint. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 6066–6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, F.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Gan, X.; Song, B.; Hu, D. Synthesis, Antiviral Activity, and Mechanisms of Purine Nucleoside Derivatives Containing A Sulfonamide Moiety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8459–8467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mujumdar, P.; Poulsen, S.-A. Natural Product Primary Sulfonamides and Primary Sulfamates. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1470–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kende, A.S.; Liu, K.; Jos Brands, K.M. Total Synthesis of (-)-Altemicidin: A Novel Exploitation of The Potier-polonovski Rearrangement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10597–10598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peng, Y.; Cao, L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, R. Sargassulfamide A, An Unprecedented Amide Derivative from the Seaweed Sargassum naozhouense. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Y.; Liang, X.; Li, Y.; Liang, Z.; Huang, W.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Cui, J.; Song, X. Arylsulfonamides from The Roots and Rhizomes of Tupistra chinensis Baker. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, T.; Shi, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, K.; Yang, Z.; Ke, S. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Marine Alkaloid-oriented β-Carboline Analogues. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 168, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, S.; Bao, L.; Song, D.; Wang, J.; Cao, X.; Ke, S. Amino Acid-oriented Poly-substituted Heterocyclic Tetramic Acid Derivatives as Potential Antifungal Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 179, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ke, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Fang, W.; Huang, D.; Wan, Z.; Zhou, R.; Wang, K.; Shi, L. Synthesis and Bioevaluation of Novel Steroidal Isatin Conjugates Derived from Epiandrosterone/Androsterone. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019, 34, 1607–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Huang, D.; Wang, S.; Song, D.; Cao, X.; Huang, W.; Ke, S. Discovery of γ-Lactam Alkaloid Derivatives as Potential Fungicidal Agents Targeting Steroid Biosynthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 14438–14451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, W.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, W.; Wang, Z.; Wan, Z.; Shi, L.; Wang, K.; Ke, S. Selective and Effective Anticancer Agents: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Structure-Activity Relationships of Novel Carbazole Derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 113, 104991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ke, S.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, L.; Liu, M.; Fang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wan, Z.; Long, T.; Wang, K. An Efficient Synthesis and Bioactivity Evaluation of Oxazole-containing Natural Hinduchelin A-D and Their Derivatives. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 3635–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mahmood, N.; Rasool, N.; Ikram, H.M.; Hashmi, M.A.; Mahmood, T.; Zubair, M.; Ahmad, G.; Rizwan, K.; Rashid, T.; Rashid, Y. Synthesis of 3,4-Biaryl-2,5-Dichlorothiophene through Suzuki Cross-Coupling and Theoretical Exploration of Their Potential Applications as Nonlinear Optical Materials. Symmetry 2018, 10, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sial, N.; Rasool, N.; Rizwan, K.; Altaf, A.A.; Ali, S.; Malik, A.; Zubair, M.; Akhtar, A.; Kausar, S.; Shah, S.A.A. Efficient Synthesis of 2,3-Diarylbenzo[b]thiophene Molecules Through Palladium (0) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-coupling Reaction and Their Antithrombolyitc, Biofilm Inhibition, Hemolytic Potential and Molecular Docking Studies. Med. Chem. Res. 2020, 29, 1486–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Masand, N.; Gupta, S.P.; Khosa, R.L. N-Substituted Aryl Sulphonamides as Potential Anti-Alzheimer’s Agents: Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 2018, 14, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alley, M.C.; Scudiero, D.A.; Monks, A.; Hursey, M.L.; Czerwinski, M.J.; Fine, D.L.; Abbott, B.J.; Mayo, J.G.; Shoemaker, R.H.; Boyd, M.R. Feasibility of Drug Screening with Panels of Human Tumor Cell Lines using A Microculture Tetrazolium Assay. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 589–601. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ke, S.; Shi, L.; Cao, X.; Yang, Q.; Liang, Y.; Yang, Z. Heterocycle-Functional Gramine Analogues: Solvent- and Catalyst-free Synthesis and Their Inhibition Activities Against Cell Proliferation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 54, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Meanwell, N.A. Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in The Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xi, D.; Niu, Y.; Li, H.; Noha, S.M.; Temml, S.M.; Schuster, D.; Wang, C.; Xu, F.; Xu, P. Discovery of Carbazole Derivatives as Novel Allosteric MEK Inhibitors by Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 178, 802–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, B.-Y.; Lin, Y.-C.; Lai, Y.-T.; Ou, J.-Y.; Chang, W.-W.; Chu, C.-C. Targeted Photoresponsive Carbazole-coumarin and Drug Conjugates for Efficient Combination Therapy in Leukemia Cancer Cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, X.-L.; Zhu, S.-S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.-W.; Shi, Y.-T.; Zeng, K.-W.; Tu, P.-F.; Jiang, Y. Carbazole Alkaloids with Potential Cytotoxic Activities Targeted on PCK2 Protein from Murraya Microphylla. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 114, 105113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 01479 g001 550
Figure 1. Prototypical natural products and drugs containing a sulfonamide group.
Figure 1. Prototypical natural products and drugs containing a sulfonamide group.
Molecules 27 01479 g001
Molecules 27 01479 g002 550
Figure 2. Design strategy of natural arylsulfonamide-inspired molecules.
Figure 2. Design strategy of natural arylsulfonamide-inspired molecules.
Molecules 27 01479 g002
Molecules 27 01479 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of natural arylsulfonamides and aryl-carboxamide derivatives bearing sulfonamide units 10a–r. Reagents and conditions: a. Et3N, DCM, rt; b. NaOH, MeOH/H2O, 60 °C; c. SOCl2, reflux; d. Et3N, DCM, rt; e. Et3N, DCM, rt; f. NaOH, MeOH/H2O, 45-50 °C; g. Ar2COOH, HOBt, EDCI, Et3N, DMF, r.t.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of natural arylsulfonamides and aryl-carboxamide derivatives bearing sulfonamide units 10a–r. Reagents and conditions: a. Et3N, DCM, rt; b. NaOH, MeOH/H2O, 60 °C; c. SOCl2, reflux; d. Et3N, DCM, rt; e. Et3N, DCM, rt; f. NaOH, MeOH/H2O, 45-50 °C; g. Ar2COOH, HOBt, EDCI, Et3N, DMF, r.t.
Molecules 27 01479 sch001
Molecules 27 01479 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative 1H NMR spectral analysis of sargassulfamide A.
Figure 3. Representative 1H NMR spectral analysis of sargassulfamide A.
Molecules 27 01479 g003
Molecules 27 01479 g004 550
Figure 4. Inhibitory activity of compounds 10a–r at the concentration of 40 µg/mL. Abbreviations: A875—human melanoma cell line; HepG2—human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line; MARC145—a subclone of African green monkey kidney cell line MA-104; 5-FU—5-fluorouracil, used as a positive control.
Figure 4. Inhibitory activity of compounds 10a–r at the concentration of 40 µg/mL. Abbreviations: A875—human melanoma cell line; HepG2—human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line; MARC145—a subclone of African green monkey kidney cell line MA-104; 5-FU—5-fluorouracil, used as a positive control.
Molecules 27 01479 g004
Molecules 27 01479 g005 550
Figure 5. Dose–response analysis of cell growth inhibition activity for compounds 10l, 10q, 10r, and 5-FU (positive control) against A875 cells (A), HepG2 cells (B), and MARC145 cells (C).
Figure 5. Dose–response analysis of cell growth inhibition activity for compounds 10l, 10q, 10r, and 5-FU (positive control) against A875 cells (A), HepG2 cells (B), and MARC145 cells (C).
Molecules 27 01479 g005
Molecules 27 01479 g006 550
Figure 6. General SARs of target compounds.
Figure 6. General SARs of target compounds.
Molecules 27 01479 g006
Table
Table 1. In vitro cytotoxic activities of target compounds against tested cell lines.
Table 1. In vitro cytotoxic activities of target compounds against tested cell lines.
Molecules 27 01479 i001
EntryCompd.
No.		SubstratesIn Vitro cytotoxicity IC50 a(μg/mL)
Ar1NH2Ar2CO2HA875 bHepG2 bMARC145 b
110a5a9a>4022.06 ± 3.9913.16 ± 2.49
210b5b9a>40>40>40
310c5c9a>40>40>40
410d5d9a>4033.08 ± 2.1324.89 ± 4.45
510e5a9b>40>40>40
610f5b9b>40>4011.79 ± 2.93
710g5c9b>40>40>40
810h5d9b16.79 ± 1.1414.36 ± 1.896.75 ± 0.89
910i5a9c>40>40>40
1010j5b9c>40>40>40
1110k5c9c>4034.69 ± 2.94>40
1210l5d9c10.76 ± 2.289.03 ± 1.495.62 ± 0.98
1310m5a9d>40>40>40
1410n5b9d>40>4022.56 ± 2.78
1510o5c9d>40>40>40
1610p5d9d20.42 ± 3.999.60 ± 0.888.50 ± 2.55
1710q5d9e4.19 ± 0.783.55 ± 0.632.95 ± 0.78
1810r5b9e15.15 ± 2.408.84 ± 1.685.96 ± 1.33
19NC1--27.17 ± 5.39-25.80 ± 10.40
20NC2-->40->40
215-FUc--11.76 ± 2.0315.14 ± 1.0613.05 ± 1.32
a IC50—Compound concentration required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by 50%. b Abbreviations: A875—human melanoma cell line; HepG2—human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line; MARC145—a subclone of African green monkey kidney cell line MA-104. c Used as a positive control.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, W.; Shi, L.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F.; Long, T.; Wen, S.; Huang, D.; Wang, K.; Zhou, R.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Cytotoxic Activity of Novel Natural Arylsulfonamide-Inspired Molecules. Molecules 2022, 27, 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051479

AMA Style

Huang W, Shi L, Liu M, Zhang Z, Liu F, Long T, Wen S, Huang D, Wang K, Zhou R, et al. Design, Synthesis, and Cytotoxic Activity of Novel Natural Arylsulfonamide-Inspired Molecules. Molecules. 2022; 27(5):1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Wenbo, Liqiao Shi, Manli Liu, Zhigang Zhang, Fang Liu, Tong Long, Shaohua Wen, Daye Huang, Kaimei Wang, Ronghua Zhou, and et al. 2022. "Design, Synthesis, and Cytotoxic Activity of Novel Natural Arylsulfonamide-Inspired Molecules" Molecules 27, no. 5: 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051479

APA Style

Huang, W., Shi, L., Liu, M., Zhang, Z., Liu, F., Long, T., Wen, S., Huang, D., Wang, K., Zhou, R., Fang, W., Hu, H., & Ke, S. (2022). Design, Synthesis, and Cytotoxic Activity of Novel Natural Arylsulfonamide-Inspired Molecules. Molecules, 27(5), 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051479

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop