Next Article in Journal
Bioavailability Enhancement of Cepharanthine via Pulmonary Administration in Rats and Its Therapeutic Potential for Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with COVID-19 Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrophobically Associating Polymers Dissolved in Seawater for Enhanced Oil Recovery of Bohai Offshore Oilfields
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules27092738
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis, and Antifungal Activity of 4-Amino Coumarin Based Derivatives

by
Lu Xu
,
Jinmeng Yu
,
Lu Jin
* and
Le Pan
*
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(9), 2738; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092738
Submission received: 9 February 2022 / Revised: 17 April 2022 / Accepted: 19 April 2022 / Published: 24 April 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of 30 succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs) of 4-amino coumarin-based derivatives were designed and synthesized. According to the analysis of fungicidal activity in vitro, most of the compounds expressed broad-spectrum antifungal activity against four plant pathogenic fungi (Alternaria alternata, Alternaria solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea) using the mycelium growth inhibition method. The results showed that compounds 3n with the group of 2-ene-3-methyl-butyl and 4e with the group of 2-bromo-1-oxo-hexyl displayed excellent activity against Alternaria alternata and Alternaria solani, with EC50 values of 92~145 μg/mL. Molecular docking showed that the inhibitor 3n was completely locked into the cavity of SDH, forming a conventional hydrogen bond interacting with the amino acid residue TYR58. The present work indicates that these derivatives would serve as novel potential fungicides targeting SDH.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Plant disease caused by phytopathogenic fungi is a worldwide threat to food security and crop protection. Antifugal agrochemicals are crucial to fight against plant pathogens. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), the only enzyme involved in both the respiratory chain and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, plays an important role in the mitochondrial electron transfer chain. Fungicides that can inhibit SDH have been classified and named as SDH inhibitors (SDHIs) by the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee [1]. The unique mode of SDHIs is to block the TCA cycle, inhibiting the respiratory chain of fungi and leading to fungi death. Since carboxin was first commercially applied in 1969, more than 20 SDHIs fungicides have been commercialized, most of which have an amide bond [2]. The research of SDH inhibition of some carboxamide fungicides has indicated that the carboxamide competes with ubiquione rather than succinate. Here, the carbonyl oxygen of the carboxamide can form hydrogen bonds with two key amino acid residues (TRP and TYP) [3].
Despite advances in the development of SDHIs for fungicides, there has been rapid development in pathogen resistance due to the unrestricted usage of fungicides. All commercial fungicides of SDHIs, possessing a similar scaffold, can easily generate cross-resistance [4]. In addition, some reported fungicides of SDHIs have also retained their essentially common amide bond, and other aspects of structural diversity were tested [5,6,7]. For example, Wu and coworkers studied N-(pyridine-4-yl)-1-phenyl-5-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide derivatives as potential SDHIs [8,9]. The results showed that some compounds exhibited excellent antifungal activity against four phytopathogenic fungi (G. zeae, F. oxysporum, C. mandshurica, and P. infestans). Zhao et al. reported on the antifungal activity of novel longifolene derived diacylhydrazine compounds [10]. A combination of experimental and theoretical investigations revealed that the relative inhibitory rate is over 70% for some compounds. Systemically using some pyrazole-containing carboxamides as potent SDH inhibitors was reported recently [11]. Therefore, it is urgently required to develop some novel SDHIs with different scaffolds in order to prevent cross-resistance.
It would be very interesting and challenging to design and find new compounds possessing antifungal properties for application in agriculture or forestry. The heterocyclic structure is a key feature in natural products and synthetic compounds used as medicines or pesticides [12,13,14]. Of these, coumarin is related to a large class of natural compounds [15,16]. Molecules with a coumarin moiety have displayed great potency in the treatment of diseases [17,18,19], and over 1300 coumarins have been identified principally as secondary metabolites in plants, fungi, and bacteria [20,21,22,23]. In addition, synthetic coumarins with a wide variety of groups at the C-3, C-4, and C-7 positions have been screened for their biological properties.
Inspired by our previous work, in which some C7-substituted umbelliferone derivatives (UDs) exhibited excellent fungicidal activity [24,25], we expanded the scope and designed the title compounds to screen for antifungal activity. The amino group, an electron-donating substituent, can affect the molecular orbitals, electron transfer, and molecular interaction. To our knowledge, the biological activity of coumarine substituted by an amino group has been rarely reported, and especially 4-amino derivatives. The preliminary molecular docking experiments indicated that the core structure could match with the ubiquinone (UQ)-site pocket and enter into it. As shown in Scheme 1, based on the core structure of 4-amino coumarines, we designed flexible groups to be installed at the 7-hydroxy position for fitting with the target site. In total, 30 derivatives were synthesized, and we explored their antifungal activity on Alternaria alternata, Alternaria solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea. The in vitro inhibitory activity was evaluated to screen a novel SDHI. The typical inhibition with mycelium growth in solid medium was used to study the primary antifungal activities of the four pathogens in this work.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

The synthesis of 4-amino coumarine derivatives is outlined in Scheme 1. In total, 30 derivatives were obtained by procedures i~iii in moderate to high yields. The structures have been confirmed by MS, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR. Details of the procedures and characterization are provided in the experimental section. As far as we know, 28 compounds, except 3a [18] and 4k [26,27], are reported for the first time herein. The key precursor 7-hydroxy-4-amino coumarin (denoted as 2) was formed by the reported procedure i [18]. The 1H NMR peaks of 7.73, 6.78 and 6.67 Hz were assigned to the signals of H at the C-5, C-6, and C-8 sites in 2, which were inconsistent with the reported data [18]. Note that the signals of hydroxy, amino, and H at C-3 would be missed due to the isotopic exchange of the solvent (CD3OD). After installing the substituent at the C-7 position, 4-amino-7-(2-bromo ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (3a) indicated the signals of H at C-5, C-6, C-8 and C-3, as well as two positions of the side chain, which were 7.83, 6.96, 6.89, 5.28, 4.40, and 3.7 Hz, respectively, according to 1H NMR, and these were also inconsistent with the reported data [18]. The corresponding [M + H]+ peak of 284.98 was found in the mass spectrum. Our observed melting point was 190 °C, which is lower than the reported value (222 °C) [18]. The mass (285 of M+) of 4k was reported without any other data on the characterization [26,27]. For other products, we have carefully checked and confirmed the signals.
Although 30 derivatives are not enough, we have considered the degree of rotation (length of chain, branched chain, and ring) and the bioactive groups, such as halogen, carbonyl, and amine group, etc. Moreover, a methyl at the C-8 position was taken into account to compare the bioactivity in parallel.

2.2. Screening of Antifungal Activity

As we were limited by our experimental conditions, only four typical pathogens (Alternaria alternata, Alternaria salani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea) were prepared and used to test the antifungal activity with the obtained 30 compounds at 200 µg/mL. To evaluate the tolerance of the antifungal activity, the duration times of 48, 72, and 96 h were considered, respectively. It was found that the inhibition rate had slightly changed with a longer time. Here, we only discuss the inhibition rate over 96 h, and other results are shown in the Supplementary Materials.
Note that the substituent groups at 7-hydroxy are crucial in compounds without the 8-methyl group (3a–3o), because 2 exhibited very poor activity against the four tested pathogens. As shown in Table 1, after the 7-hydroxy was modified by substituent groups, the antifungal activities of most of the derivatives were successfully improved. From the comparative results, it can be seen that most of the synthesized compounds exhibited more antifungal activity against A. Salani and A. Alternata than B. Cinerea and F. Oxysporum. For example, compounds 3c and 4c, with a flexible bromo-n-butyl chain, showed moderate bioactivity (20~30%) for A. Salani and A. Alternata, whereas they had little effect on B. Cinerea and F. Oxysporum. Therefore, we mainly discuss the antifungal activity against A. Salani and A. Alternata hereafter. Interestingly, the results indicate that both the length of the side chain and the 8-methyl group would account for the inhibitory activity. As shown in Table 1, the antifungal activity of 3a (possessing a 2-carbon chain) was higher than tose of 3b (possessing a 3-carbon chain) and 3c (possessing a 4-carbon chain), revealing that a compound bearing a short side chain would show high inhibitory activity. On the contrary, as for the 8-methyl group-installed compounds (Table 2), 4c (possessing a 4-carbon chain) was more active than 4a (possessing a 2-carbon chain) and 4b (possessing a 3-carbon chain), indicating that the long length of the chain would result in high activity. Importantly, this simple rule as stated above was also relevant to other compounds, such as 3e (possessing a six-carbon chain) vs. 3o (possessing a five-carbon chain), and 4e (possessing a six-carbon chain) vs. 4o (possessing a five-carbon chain). Namely, 4e, including the 8-methyl group, has higher antifungal activity than 4o, whereas the activity of 3e was lower than that of 3o without the 8-methyl group. Both 3o and 4e expressed somewhat strong antifungal activity against B. Cinerea and F. Oxysporum. In order to assess the lipophilicity, the corresponding logPO/W was calculated for all tested compounds (see details in the Supplementary Materials). The calculated values of logPO/W showed that the 8-methyl group could improve the lipophilicity, and that the lipophilicity would gradually increase with the growth of the side chain. In this sense, it has been difficult to provide a unified relationship between the different activities originating from the length of the side chain and the trend of the lipophilicity. We have deemed that the inhibitory activity might be influenced by the interaction of the docking target. Furthermore, if the cyclic fragment was included in the substituent, our results indicate that the antifungal activity would be poor, such as with 3h, 4h, 3i, 4i, 3j, 4j, 3k, and 4k.
It was found that compound 3n demonstrated the highest antifungal activity out of the 30 molecules tested against the four fungi. Interestingly, the substituent group of 3-methyl-2-butenyl in compound 3n is a common moiety in coumarin-based natural products, such as osthol, pyranocoumarin after intramolecular condensation, and peucedanin. Similarly, compared with B. Cinerea and F. Oxysporum (ca. 40%), A. Salani and A. Alternata (ca. 80%) suffered about two-fold inhibition by compound 3n. After the methyl group was installed at the C-8 position (compound 4n), the inhibitory activity dramatically reduced by half, showing a negative effect. The pictures of inhibition given by the mycelium growth rate method for the representative compounds 3n and 4n are shown in Figure 1. From the size of growth, we can see that 3n obviously showed stronger inhibition than 4n against both A. Salani and A. Alternata. On the contrary, some other compounds showed a positive effect after the methyl group was installed at the C-8 position. For example, the average inhibitory activity of compound 3e containing 2-bromo-1-oxo-hexyl chain was about 11%, except for the 21% achieved by A. Alternata, whereas the 8-methyl group in compound 4e yielded an averaged inhibitory activity, which increased by about four-fold to 40%. In this sense, as they vary with the substituent groups at the 7-hydroxy position, the effects of the 8-methyl group would not be clear at a glance.
As mentioned above, of the 30 tested compounds, 3n and 4n showed good activity, with inhibitory rates of above 70% and 40% against A. Salani and A. Alternata, respectively. In addition, compounds 4e and 4g, containing 1-oxo-2-substituent-hexyl, showed moderate antifungal activity (>40%) against A. Salani and A. Alternata. Accordingly, compounds 3e and 3g without the 8-methyl group should be compared in further EC50 studies. Note that the bromide group would be more active than methyl in the moiety of 1-oxo-2-substituent-hexyl, namely, 3e > 3g and 4e > 4g.

2.3. Antifungal Activity Affected by Concentration (EC50 Value)

Furthermore, in order to comprehensively study the antifungal activity, a series of concentrations of the effective compounds were examined for the evaluation of their EC50 values. As discussed above, three compounds (3n, 4e and 4g) showed fair to good activity, and were taken as candidates to test their EC50 values at concentrations of 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 μg/mL over 96 h, in order to determine their antifungal activity against A. Salani and A. Alternata. In order to compare the antifungal effect with and without methyl groups at the C8 position, three relevant compounds, 4n, 3e and 3g, were also chosen to evaluate EC50 values. Three replicates were applied in each treatment, and EC50 (μg/mL) values were obtained by probit analysis using the SPSS program. As shown in Table 3, compounds 3n and 4e demonstrated the best antifungal activities against A. Salani and A. Alternata. The corresponding EC50 values of 3n were 107.4 and 96.7 μg/mL, while the EC50 values of 4e were 144.5 and 92.1 μg/mL. It was worth noting that the competitive candidate 4n lagged in the EC50 examination. Finally, we screened out two potent SDH inhibitors, 3n and 4e, in this work.

2.4. Molecular Docking

As stated above, compound 3n has high activity, and we therefore selected this compound as the docking ligand. To study the binding details of compound 3n with succinate dehydrogenase, a docking study was performed using the Autodock Vina code [28]. Based on the X-ray crystal structure (PDB code: 1YQ3) [29], the UQ-site was considered as the docking cavity. As shown in Figure 2, the coumarin moiety was completely incorporated into the substrate cavity, forming a conventional hydrogen bond interacting with the amino acid residues TYR58. The corresponding hydrogen bond distance was 2.21 Å. Besides this, compound 3n was surrounded by the hydrophobic residues HIS42, ARG43, HIS105, ILE40, ILE218, and PRO169. Note that the substituent was very crucial for docking. The substituent not only controlled the binding mode, but also had an effect on the interaction energy. For 3n, due to the suitable size of the substituent and the strong interaction with residues, the moiety of the substituent was considered as the head in the docking with SDH, differently from some other tested structures, in which the substituent groups acted as the tail.

3. Conclusions

A series of novel coumarin derivatives containing an amino group were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their antifungal activity against four phytopathogenic fungi (Alternaria alternata, Alternaria salani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea). Most expressed antifungal activity, and the antifungal activity against A. Salani and A. Alternata was generally better than that against F. oxysporum and B. cinerea. After screening via the method of the mycelium growth rate and evaluating by EC50, the two compounds (3n and 4e) that showed the best antifungal activity against A. Salani and A. Alternata were taken as potential candidates for the SDH inhibitor.
The promising compound 3n was selected as the ligand in the docking study. This indicated that the compound was entirely embedded in the cavity, and a conventional hydrogen bond formed between the coumarin moiety and the amino acid residue. TYR58 played an important role in the hydrogen bond. The results of the docking study can be conducive to further exploring the possible fungicidal mechanism, and the interactions between similar fungicidal compounds and SDH.
Furthermore, all these compounds have simple structures, and were easily synthesized. They can act as lead compounds in designing and synthesizing more analogues to screen out an outstanding inhibitor. Further investigations are under way to modify the positions of amino groups or build scaffolds of derivatives in our group.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Chemicals and Instruments

Resorcinol, cyanoacetic acid, tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB), 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,3-dibromopropane, 1,4-dibromobutane, 1,4-dibromo-2-butene, dibromohexanoic acid, 2-methylvaleric acid, 2-methylhexanoic acid, piperidine hydrochloride, isonipecotic acid, 3-furoic acid, 2-furoic acid, propanedioic acid, 3-hydroxy hexanoic acid, and 3,3-dimethyl allyl bromide were purchased from Sinopharm Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. ZnCl2, NaCl, K2CO3, and thionyl chloride were purchased from Aladdin Reagent Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. All other chemicals were commercially available and used without further purification. The progress of the reactions and the purity of products were monitored by TLC using silica gel GF/UV 254. The melting points of synthesized compounds were measured on an X-4 apparatus (uncorrected). 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were detected on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer with TMS as an internal standard. Mass spectra (Waters Corp., Massachusetts, USA) were also applied to confirm the synthesized structures.

4.2. Synthesis and Characterization

4.2.1. General Procedure of Synthesis

Details of general procedures i~iii as shown in Scheme 1 are provided as follows.
Procedure i [18]: Note that the synthesis of compound 2 is taken as an example here. All manipulations were carried out under nitrogen protection using a vacuum system. The continuous injection of hydrogen chloride and anhydrous ZnCl2 was used. The preparation of HCl gas: abundant NaCl was dissolved in 400 mL of HCl solution, and we then added H2SO4 in drops at room temperature. Resorcinol (22.84 g, 0.2 mol), cyanoacetic acid (19.33 g, 0.2 mol), ZnCl2 (13.95 g, 0.1 mmol), and ether (50 mL) were added to a 250 mL three-neck flask fitted with a stirring bar. As the mixture melted, it turned dark yellow. After 5 h of stirring under HCl, a white solid precipitated. At the end of the reaction, ice water was added to quench and refrigerate. A white powdered solid was collected by filtration.
Procedure ii: Note that the synthesis of compound 3a is taken as an example here. 7-Hydroxy-4-amino coumarin (226.0 mg, 1.25 mmol), anhydrous K2CO3 (346.9 mg, 2.5 mmol), and tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) (209.1 mg, 0.625 mmol) were dissolved in acetone (10 mL), then the mixture was added to a 50 mL round-bottomed flask fitted with a stirring bar and a condenser at 56 °C. After 30 min, 1,2-dibromoethane (748.4 mg, 4 mmol) was added to the mixture. The reaction was stopped after 23 h. Reprocessing: the mixture was washed with a large amount of ethyl acetate, the filtrate was extracted by saturated NaCl solution 2~3 times, and the organic phase was finally collected.
Procedure iii: Note that the synthesis of compound 3e is taken as an example here. Dibromohexanoic acid (602.5 mg, 3 mmol) and thionyl chloride (0.6 mL, 7.8 mmol) were added to a 25 mL round-bottomed flask fitted with a stirring bar and a condenser connecting with a gas absorber for SO2. When the mixture was heated to 70 °C, it turned brown. The mixture was refluxed for 4 h, then the thionyl chloride was removed under reduced pressure. After adding 7-hydroxy-4-amino coumarin (51.7 mg, 0.3 mmol) and acetone (4 mL), the solution was heated to 56 °C. The reaction was stopped after 24 h.
Procedure i was used for the formation 2 and 2′. Procedure ii was used for the formation of 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3h, 3n, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4h, and 4n. Procedure iii was used for the formation of 3e, 3f, 3g, 3i, 3j, 3k, 3l, 3m, 3o, 4e, 4f, 4g, 4i, 4j, 4k, 4l, 4m, and 4o.

4.2.2. Characterization

7-hydroxy-4-amino coumarin (2): Yield: 8.41 g (23.7%). m.p.: 292.2 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C9H7NO3 [M + H]+: 178.05; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.73 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H).
7-hydroxy-4-amino-8-methyl coumarin (2′): 2-methylresorcinol (0.15 mol) was used. Yield: 7.165 g (25%). m.p.: 292.2 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C10H9NO3 [M + H]+: 192.06; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.60 (s, 1H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 5.25 (s, 1H), 2.26 (s, 3H).
4-amino-7-(2-bromo ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (3a): 1,2-dibromoethane (4 mmol) was used. Yield: 144.2 mg (40.6%). m.p.: 188–190 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C11H10BrNO3 [M + H]+: 284.98; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.83 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H), 4.49–4.34 (m, 2H), 3.83–3.67 (m, 2H).
4-amino-7-(3-bromopropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (3b): 1,3-dibromopropane (0.75 mmol) was used. Yield: 50.8 mg (68.2%). m.p.: 197.4 °C. ESI-MS m/z: 299.0; [M + H]+ C12H12BrNO3. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ 7.81 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (s, 1H), 4.21 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.65 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.39–2.28 (m, 2H).
4-amino-7-(4-bromobutoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (3c): 1,4-dibromobutane (0.25 mmol) was used. Yield: 45.4 mg (58.2%). m.p.: 211 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C13H14BrNO3 [M + H]+: 313.01; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.79 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (s, 1H), 4.11 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.54 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.05 (dd, J = 13.7, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.98 (dd, J = 13.3, 6.7 Hz, 2H).
(E)-4-amino-7-(4-bromo-2-enoxy) -2H-chromen-2-one (3d): 1,4-dibromo-2-butene (3.75 mmol) was used. Yield: 49.3 mg (21.2%). m.p.: 222.7 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C13H12BrNO3 [M + H]+: 311.0; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.80 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (dd, J = 15.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (dd, J = 10.1, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (s, 1H), 4.67 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 4.06 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.31 (dd, J = 6.1, 4.8 Hz, 2H).
4-amino-2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl-(2-bromohexanoate) (3e): dibromohexanoic acid (3 mmol) was used. Yield: 47.8 mg (45.0%). m.p.: 161–168 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H16BrNO4 [M + H]+: 355.02; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.74–7.61 (m, 1H), 6.73–6.41 (m, 1H), 5.45 (s, 1H), 4.30 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.90 (s, 2H), 1.53 (s, 2H), 1.29 (s, 2H), 0.99 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
4-amino-2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl-(2-methylvalerate) (3f): 2-methylvaleric acid (3 mmol) was used. Yield: 19.8 mg (24.0%). m.p.: 158–165 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H17NO4. [M + H]+: 276.12; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.07 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 9.1, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 2.64 (s, 1H), 1.54 (s, 4H), 1.51 (s, 6H).
4-amino-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-methylhexanoate) (3g): 2-methylhexanoic acid (3 mmol) was used. Yield: 41.0 mg (47.3%). m.p.: 168.3 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C16H19NO4 [M + H]+: 290.13; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.90 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (s, 1H), 2.62 (s, 1H), 1.90 (s, 2H), 1.53 (s, 4H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.34–1.06 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ 178.16, 165.26, 161.14, 157.55, 153.29, 125.37, 124.24, 122.68, 120.90, 86.38, 38.71, 31.50, 26.28, 24.13, 19.53, 15.18.
4-amino-7-(piperidin-N-) ethoxy -2H-chromen-2-one (3h): piperidine hydrochloride (0.75 mmol) was used. Yield: 45.1 mg (62.6%). m.p.: 193.4 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C16H20N2O3 [M + H]+: 289.15; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.80 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (s, 1H), 4.22 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (s, 4H), 1.64 (dt, J = 11.0, 5.6 Hz, 6H).
4-amino-2-oxochromen-7-yl-piperidine formanoate (3i): isonipecotic acid (18 mmol) was used. Yield: 83.2 mg (1.6%). m.p.: > 235 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H16N2O4 [M + H]+: 289.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.79 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.38–2.13 (m, 4H), 1.29 (s, 4H).
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(3-furancarboxanoate) (3j): 3-furoic acid (0.45 mmol) was used. Yield: 53.8 mg (44.1%). m.p.: 210–222 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C14H9NO5 [M + H]+: 272.05; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.44 (s, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.74–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (s, 1H).
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-furancarboxanoate) (3k): 2-furoic acid (0.45 mmol) was used. Yield: 28.3 mg (28.3%). m.p.: 207–210 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C14H9NO5 [M + H]+: 272.05; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (dd, J = 3.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (s, 1H).
4-amino-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(monomethyl malonate) (3l): propanedioic acid (3 mmol) was used. Yield: 20.3 mg (23.1%). m.p.: 166–171 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C13H11NO6 [M + H]+: 278.06; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.01 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (dd, J = 9.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.65 (s, 2H).
4-amino-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(3-hydroxyhexanoate) (3m): 3-hydroxy hexanoic acid (3.5 mmol) was used. Yield: 15.1 mg (17.3%). m.p.: 127–135 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H17NO5 [M + H]+: 292.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.89 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (s, 1H), 3.82 (s, 1H), 1.88 (s, 2H), 1.51 (s, 2H), 1.27 (s, 2H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
4-amino-7-(3-methylbutyl-2-enoxy) 2H-chromen-2-one (3n): 3,3-dimethyl allyl bromide (1.25 mmol) was used. Yield: 19.0 mg (31.0%). m.p.: 248.6 °C. ESI-MS m/z: 246.11; [M + H]+ C14H15NO3. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (s, 2H), 4.83 (s, 2H), 1.80 (s, 6H).
4-amino-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-bromoamanoate) (3o): 2-bromovaleric acid (10 mmol) was used. Yield: 120.3 mg (11.8%). m.p.: 173 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C14H14BrNO4 [M + H]+: 341.01; 13C NMR (151 MHz, MeOD) δ: 8.18 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 9.1, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 2.68 (s, 2H), 1.29 (s, 2H), 1.02–0.76 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, MeOD) δ: 172.85, 161.61, 156.87, 153.77, 126.03, 124.65, 120.72, 120.46, 87.77, 38.61, 31.48, 26.30, 14.96.
4-amino-7-(2-bromo ethoxy)-8-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (4a): Yield: 19.6 mg (26.31%). m.p.: 193.2 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C12H12BrNO3 [M + H]+: 299.0; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.74 (s, 1H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 2.32 (s, 3H).
4-amino-7-(3-bromopropoxy)-8-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (4b): Yield: 45.4 mg (58.21%). m.p.: 212.4 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C13H14BrNO3 [M + H]+: 313.01; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.74 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.18 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.58 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 2.07 (dd, J = 8, 6.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 165.90, 162.80, 155.83, 150.74, 125.31, 120.22, 116.27, 110.85, 95.08, 72.24, 31.75, 29.85.
4-amino-7-(4-bromobutoxy)-8-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (4c): Yield: 16.7 mg (20.49%). m.p.: 152 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C14H16BrNO3 [M + H]+: 327.03; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.74 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.18 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.58 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 2.11 (dd, J = 8, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.03 (m, 2H).
(E)-4-amino-8-methyl-7-(4-bromo-2-enoxy) -2H-chromen-2-one (4d): Yield: 45.67 mg (9.40%). m.p.: 248.6 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C14H14BrNO3 [M + H]+: 325.01; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 3.96–3.75 (m, 2H), 3.55 (dd, J = 12.7, 6 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (s, 3H).
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-bromohexanoate) (4e): Yield: 13.8 mg (7.5%). m.p.: 174–183 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C16H18BrNO4 [M + H]+: 369.04; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.73–6.66 (m, 1H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 4.22 (s, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 1.96 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (s, 2H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.11 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 164.87, 164.00, 162.24, 154.67, 153.92, 125.06, 123.40, 120.52, 116.11, 87.81, 46.79, 31.47, 26.34, 23.19, 14.25.
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-methylvaleranoate) (4f): Yield: 21.9 mg (5.05%). m.p.: > 302 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C16H19NO4 [M + H]+: 290.13; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.68 (dd, J = 4, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 2.66 (s, 1H), 1.91 (s, 3H), 1.55 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 2H), 1.36 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 0.92 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ 171.38, 165.30, 161.37, 152.65, 150.85, 130.49, 129.87, 124.52, 112.66, 88.82, 40.18, 30.74, 24.03, 15.15, 14.39.
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-methylhexanoate) (4g): Yield: 12.7 mg (2.65%). m.p.: > 302 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C17H21NO4 [M + H]+: 304.15; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.16 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 3.88 (s, 1H), 2.70 (s, 2H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.34 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.24 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 0.94–0.87 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 170.92, 164.74, 162.17, 154.60, 153.97, 125.07, 123.53, 120.52, 116.42, 87.71, 38.51, 31.48, 30.74, 26.34, 15.16, 14.43.
4-amino-8-methyl-7-(piperidin-N-) ethoxy -2H-chromen-2-one (4h): Yield: 31.0 mg (41.33%). m.p.: 221.6 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C17H22N2O3 [M + H]+: 303.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.75 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.30 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 1.68 (s, 2H), 1.53 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (dd, J = 7.36, 7.36 Hz, 2H), 1.28 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 4H).
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-piperidine formanoate (4i): Yield: 26.5 mg (4.39%). m.p.: > 302 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C16H18N2O4 [M + H]+: 592.26; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.06 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 2.68 (s, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 1.58 (s, 4H), 1.56 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 184.35, 171.63, 169.29, 156.58, 155.89, 124.85, 123.25, 117.83, 87.29, 45.11, 38.58, 26.34.
4-amino-7-(3-furoyloxy)-8-methyl-benzopyran-2-one (4j): Yield: 20.8 mg (3.65%). m.p.: 220 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H11NO5 [M + H]+: 286.07; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (s, 1H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.72 (s, 1H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 166.44, 162.13, 154.27, 153.15, 150.92, 149.33, 146.22, 145.37, 121.62, 120.69, 120.39, 119.28, 110.79, 84.36.
4-amino-7-(2-furoyloxy)-8-methyl-benzopyran-2-one (4k): Yield: 18.5 mg (25.96%). m.p.: 212 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H11NO5 [M + H]+: 286.07; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.82 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 2.28 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 166.44, 158.70, 157.49, 154.17, 152.86, 149.68, 146.05, 121.68, 121.47, 120.77, 119.55, 118.60, 113.66, 84.44.
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(monomethyl malonate) (4l): Yield: 21.1 mg (1.94%). m.p.: > 302 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C14H13NO6 [M + H]+: 292.08; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.64 (dd, J = 9.24, 9.1 Hz, 1H), 6.79–6.58 (m, 1H), 5.38 (s, 1H), 3.78 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 3H), 3.48 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.12 (d, J = 19.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 170.41, 168.67, 165.96, 161.17, 154.17, 150.37, 122.79, 118.09, 86.10, 56.84, 31.53.
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(3-hydroxyhexanoate) (4m): Yield: 73.9 mg (16.15%). m.p.: 236–244 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C16H19NO5 [M + H]+: 306.13; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.56 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.34 (s, 1H), 3.65 (s, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.18–2.13 (m, 2H), 1.39 (s, 2H), 1.36 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.21 (s, 3H).
4-amino-8-methyl-7-(3-methylbutyl-2-enoxy) 2H-chromen-2-one (4n): Yield: 29.9 mg (11.54%). m.p.: 220 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H17NO3 [M + H]+: 260.12; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 7.64 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 4.31 (s, 1H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 1.80 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ: 165.90, 159.74, 151.29, 147.39, 132.35, 129.87, 120.91, 120.54, 114.31, 112.40, 89.12, 66.66, 24.95, 20.26. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD_SPE) δ 165.90, 159.74, 151.29, 147.39, 132.35, 129.87, 120.91, 120.54, 114.31, 112.40), 89.12, 66.66, 24.95, 20.26.
4-amino-8-methyl-2-oxochromen-7-yl-(2-bromoamanoate) (4o): Yield: 243.2 mg (34.35%). m.p.: 245.2 °C. ESI-MS m/z for C15H16BrNO4 [M + H]+: 355.02; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 8.08 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.21 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (dd, J = 12.48, 12.6 Hz, 3H), 1.28 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 163.99, 162.26, 154.73, 154.68, 153.93, 125.05, 123.35, 120.55, 116.08, 87.83, 38.47, 31.47, 26.34, 8.19, 3.24.

4.3. Procedure of Antifungal Activity

The in vitro antifungal activity of compounds 3a–3o and 4a–4o against Alternaria alternata, Alternaria salani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea was assessed by the mycelium growth rate method [6,7]. The tested fungi were supplied by Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The synthesized compounds were dissolved in a 20% DMSO aqueous solution. The solution of each compound was added to sterilized potato dextrose agar to produce a final concentration of 200 µg/mL for the following antifungal test. After the mycelium of the fungi was transferred to the test plate and incubated at 25 °C over a certain period, the diameter of each strain was measured. Each experiment was performed three times, and the data were averaged. The percentage inhibition was calculated as follows: I = (B − A)/(B − 0.7) × 100%, where I is the percentage of inhibition, A is the average mycelia diameter (mm) with the compounds in Petri dishes, B is the average mycelia diameter in the blank Petri dishes, and the value of 0.7 mm is the hyphal diameter.

4.4. Docking Studies and Results Visualization

The most promising inhibitor, 3n, was docked into the active UQ-site of SDH (PDB code: 1YQ3) [29] using the open-source Autodock Vina code [28]. Docked positions in the active site were visualized, and the analysis of docking results was performed using the PyMOL program [30]. Gasteiger charges were added to atoms. Grid points for the search space were set to 15 × 15 × 15 Å3 around the active center. The empirical free energy function and Lamarckian genetic algorithm were applied. The scoring function included the van der Waals interaction, the hydrogen bonding, and the Coulombic electrostatic potential.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27092738/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, L.J. and L.P.; methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, L.X. and J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, visualization, L.X.; software, writing—review and editing, L.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21762043 and No. 31960547); Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province, China (No. 2019D01B20).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Hui Jin for providing the fungi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Mckay, A.H.; Hagerty, G.C.; Follas, G.B.; Moore, M.S.; Christie, M.S.; Beresford, R.M. Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide resistance prevention strategy. N. Z. Plant Prot. 2011, 64, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Veloukas, T.; Markoglou, A.N.; Karaoglanidis, G.S. Differential effect of Sdh B gene mutations on the sensitivity to SDHI fungicides in Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Fellman, J.K.; Tourneau, D.L.; Stiers, D.L. Effects of some carboxamide fungicides on growth and sclerotium formation of Sclerotium rolfsii. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1983, 80, 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, J.H.; Brannen, P.M.; Schnabel, G. Resistance in Alternaria alternata to SDHI fungicides causes rare disease outbreak in peach orchards. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Engelhardt, G.; Wallnfer, P.R.; Plapp, R. Degradation of linuron and some other herbicides and fungicides by a linuron-inducible enzyme obtained from Bacillus sphaericus. Appl. Microbiol. 1971, 22, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, G.F.; Song, B.A.; Pinaki, S.B.; Yang, S.; Zhang, P.W.; Jin, L.H.; Xue, W.; Hu, D.Y.; Lu, P. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel s-substituted 6-fluoro-4-alkyl (aryl) thioquinazoline derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 3768–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tarun, K.C.; Prem, D.J. Antifungal activity of 4-methyl-6-alkyl-2H-pyran-2-ones. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2006, 54, 2129–2133. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Ye, Y.; Wang, P.; Yang, S. Design, synthesis and insecticidal activities of novel 1-substituted-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide derivatives. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Z.; Yang, G.; Zhao, X.; Wu, J.; Wu, S. Design, synthesis and antifungal evaluation of N-substituted-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-N-(pyridin-4-yl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide Derivatives. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2019, 56, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, S.; Lin, G.; Duan, W.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, Y.; Lei, F. Design, synthesis, and antifungal activity of novel longifolene-derived diacylhydrazine compounds. ACS Omega. 2021, 6, 9104–9111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, B.; Zhao, B.; Hao, Z.; Chen, L.; Cao, L.; Guo, X.; Zhang, N.; Yang, D.; Tang, L.; Fan, Z. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of pyrazole-aromatic containing carboxamides as potent SDH inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 214, 113230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kabeya, L.M.; de Marchi, A.A.; Kanashiro, A.; Lopes, N.P.; da Silva, C.H.T.P.; Pupo, M.T.; Lucisano-Valim, Y.M. Inhibition of horseradish peroxidase catalytic activity by new 3-phenylcoumarin derivatives: Synthesis and structure–activity relationships. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 516–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Traykova, M.; Kostova, I. Coumarin derivatives and oxidative stress. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 1, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  14. Belluti, F.; Fontana, G.; Bo, L.D.; Carenini, N.; Giommarelli, C.; Zunino, F. Design, synthesis and anticancer activities of stilbene-coumarin hybrid compounds: Identification of novel proapoptotic agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3543–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kostova, I.; Bhatia, S.; Grigorov, P.; Balkansky, S.; Parmar, V.S.; Prasad, A.K.; Saso, L. Coumarins as antioxidants. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 3929–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matos, M.J.; Gaspar, A.; Kachler, S.; Klotz, K.N.; Borges, F.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E. Targeting adenosine receptors with coumarins: Synthesis and binding activities of amide and carbamate derivatives. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lan, J.S.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kang, P.; Hou, J.W.; Zhang, X.Y.; Xie, S.S.; Zhang, T. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel coumarin-N-benzyl pyridinium hybrids as multi-target agents for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 139, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xie, S.; Wang, X.; Jiang, N.; Yu, W.; Wang, K.D.G.; Lan, J.; Li, Z.; Kong, L. Multi-target tacrine-coumarin hybrids: Cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase B inhibition properties against Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 95, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roussaki, M.; Kontogiorgies, C.A.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Hamilaki, S.; Detsi, A. A novel synthesis of 3-aryl coumarins and evaluation of their antioxidant and lipoxygenase inhibitory activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3889–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ostrov, D.A.; Prada, J.A.H.; Corsino, P.E.; Finton, K.A.; Le, N.; Rowe, T.C. Discovery of novel DNA gyrase inhibitors by high-throughput virtual screening. Anti-Microb Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3688–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Matos, M.J.; Vina, D.; Picciau, C.; Orallo, F.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E. Synthesis and evaluation of 6-methyl-3-phenylcoumarins as potent and selective MAO-B inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5053–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kostova, I. Coumarins as inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase. Curr. HIV Res. 2006, 4, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mu, J.; Shi, Y.; Yang, M.; Sun, Z.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; Sun, N. Design, synthesis, DFT study and antifungal activity of pyrazolecarboxamide derivatives. Molecules. 2016, 21, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Pan, L.; Li, X.; Yan, Z.; Guo, H.; Qin, B. Phytotoxicity of umbelliferone and its analogs: Structure–activity relationships and action mechanisms. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 97, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pan, L.; Lei, D.; Jin, L.; He, Y.; Yang, Q. Promising fungicides from allelochemicals: Synthesis of umbelliferone derivatives and their structure–activity relationships. Molecules. 2018, 23, 3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Afonso, A.; World Intellectual Property Organization. Antiviral Compounds and Antihypertensive Compounds. International publication number: WO 92/04327, 19 March 1992. [Google Scholar]
  27. Afonso, A. Ester and alkoxy substituted benzopyransHypotensive and antiviral agents. U.S. Patent 5412104, Schering Corp: Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  28. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comp. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huang, L.; Sun, G.; Cobessi, D.; Wang, A.C.; Shen, J.T.; Tung, E.Y.; Anderson, V.E.; Berry, E.A. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 5965–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Schrödinger, L.; DeLano, W. PyMOL, version 2.3; Schrödinger Inc: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 02738 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis routes of compounds 3a–3o and 4a–4o. R1 refers to the substituent labeled (a–o). (i) Cyanoacetic acid, anhydrous ZnCl2 and HCl gas, at room temperature, 5 h; (ⅱ) substitutes, anhydrous K2CO3, TBAB, acetone, reflux; (ⅲ) substitutes, thionyl chloride, acetone, reflux.
Scheme 1. Synthesis routes of compounds 3a–3o and 4a–4o. R1 refers to the substituent labeled (a–o). (i) Cyanoacetic acid, anhydrous ZnCl2 and HCl gas, at room temperature, 5 h; (ⅱ) substitutes, anhydrous K2CO3, TBAB, acetone, reflux; (ⅲ) substitutes, thionyl chloride, acetone, reflux.
Molecules 27 02738 sch001
Molecules 27 02738 g001a 550Molecules 27 02738 g001b 550
Figure 1. In vitro inhibition of mycelial growth of A. Alternata and A. Salani by compounds 3n and 4n. (A) 3n at 200 μg/mL for A. Alternata; (B) 4n at 200 μg/mL for A. Alternata; (C) 3n at 200 μg/mL for A. Salani; (D) 4n at 200 μg/mL for A. Salani.
Figure 1. In vitro inhibition of mycelial growth of A. Alternata and A. Salani by compounds 3n and 4n. (A) 3n at 200 μg/mL for A. Alternata; (B) 4n at 200 μg/mL for A. Alternata; (C) 3n at 200 μg/mL for A. Salani; (D) 4n at 200 μg/mL for A. Salani.
Molecules 27 02738 g001aMolecules 27 02738 g001b
Molecules 27 02738 g002 550
Figure 2. Binding mode and the interaction of inhibitor 3n docking with SDH (PDB code: 1YQ3).
Figure 2. Binding mode and the interaction of inhibitor 3n docking with SDH (PDB code: 1YQ3).
Molecules 27 02738 g002
Table
Table 1. Antifungal activity of synthesized compounds without 8-methyl at 200 μg/mL in 96 h.
Table 1. Antifungal activity of synthesized compounds without 8-methyl at 200 μg/mL in 96 h.
Compd.The Inhibition Rate (96 h) (%; Mean ± SD; N = 3)
B. CinereaA. SalaniF. OxysporumA. Alternata
2-1.70 ± 2.4-3.10 ± 2.6
3a18.40 ± 2.233.10 ± 1.215.40 ± 2.549.60 ± 1.0
3b5.50 ± 3.419.40 ± 0.98.20 ± 1.817.60 ± 2.5
3c0.00 ± 1.920.00 ± 1.0-31.10 ± 2.5
3d23.90 ± 2.213.70 ± 1.210.60 ± 0.624.40 ± 1.8
3e10.00 ± 3.412.62 ± 1.610.86 ± 3.822.64 ± 2.9
3f20.65 ± 3.137.22 ± 2.316.10 ± 1.623.90 ± 1.9
3g5.81 ± 1.04.21 ± 3.17.12 ± 2.42.52 ± 4.0
3h0.06 ± 12.60.21 ± 5.7-0.02 ± 6.6
3i14.84 ± 0.419.09 ± 2.013.86 ± 0.825.79 ± 4.2
3j0.00 ± 1.73.56 ± 1.6-0.63 ± 3.1
3k7.10 ± 1.66.15 ± 0.610.11 ± 3.86.29 ± 1.3
3l6.45 ± 2.6-2.62 ± 2.78.81 ± 0.6
3m9.68 ± 1.522.98 ± 1.0-8.18 ± 3.1
3n44.80 ± 0.676.00 ± 2.540.20 ± 2.073.70 ± 3.4
3o38.68 ± 0.128.70 ± 0.127.14 ± 0.123.68 ± 0.1
Carbendazim91.88 ± 0.015.16 ± 0.286.81 ± 0.014.67 ± 0.2
Chlorothalonil78.36 ± 0.058.25 ± 0.166.85 ± 0.056.69 ± 0.1
“-” represents negative growth.
Table
Table 2. Antifungal activity of synthesized compounds with 8-methyl at 200 μg/mL in 96 h.
Table 2. Antifungal activity of synthesized compounds with 8-methyl at 200 μg/mL in 96 h.
Compd.The Inhibition Rate (96 h) (%; Mean ± SD; N = 3)
B. CinereaA. SalaniF. OxysporumA. Alternata
2′2.00 ± 3.8-12.80 ± 3.422.88 ± 3.3
4a7.20 ± 2.44.00 ± 0.92.42 ± 0.719.75 ± 3.8
4b7.74 ± 2.8--1.80 ± 8.3
4c-15.69 ± 1.25.19 ± 1.727.90 ± 3.0
4d2.62 ± 9.221.51 ± 3.26.71 ± 4.216.37 ± 3.0
4e38.34 ± 4.345.00 ± 4.938.00 ± 0.749.28 ± 4.3
4f16.70 ± 1.827.60 ± 2.515.11 ± 5.10.95 ± 1.9
4g22.70 ± 2.840.59 ± 2.728.33 ± 8.044.06 ± 8.3
4h-4.00 ± 1.013.49 ± 1.94.08 ± 2.2
4i32.00 ± 0.735.31 ± 3.95.47 ± 1.610.48 ± 1.5
4j14.40 ± 2.8-5.88 ± 1.412.85 ± 1.8
4k1.60 ± 1.73.38 ± 0.95.19 ± 1.412.85 ± 1.7
4l6.19 ± 4.36.49 ± 4.92.86 ± 0.717.12 ± 4.3
4m7.38 ± 1.838.43 ± 2.421.21 ± 12.121.56 ± 2.6
4n16.00 ± 1.645.85 ± 0.921.11 ± 1.844.20 ± 2.1
4o8.04 ± 0.227.29 ± 0.020.71 ± 0.030.22 ± 0.0
Carbendazim91.88 ± 0.015.16 ± 0.286.81 ± 0.014.67 ± 0.2
Chlorothalonil78.36 ± 0.058.25 ± 0.166.85 ± 0.056.69 ± 0.1
“-” represents negative growth.
Table
Table 3. In vitro EC50 values of selected compounds against A. Alternata and A. Salani at 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 μg/mL.
Table 3. In vitro EC50 values of selected compounds against A. Alternata and A. Salani at 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 μg/mL.
Compd.EC50 (μg/mL)
A. AlternataA. Salani
3n107.496.7
3e>500>500
4n492.4474
4e144.592.1
3g>500>500
4g436.9>500
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Yu, J.; Jin, L.; Pan, L. Design, Synthesis, and Antifungal Activity of 4-Amino Coumarin Based Derivatives. Molecules 2022, 27, 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092738

AMA Style

Xu L, Yu J, Jin L, Pan L. Design, Synthesis, and Antifungal Activity of 4-Amino Coumarin Based Derivatives. Molecules. 2022; 27(9):2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Lu, Jinmeng Yu, Lu Jin, and Le Pan. 2022. "Design, Synthesis, and Antifungal Activity of 4-Amino Coumarin Based Derivatives" Molecules 27, no. 9: 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092738

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop