Cannabidiol as Self-Assembly Inducer for Anticancer Drug-Based Nanoparticles

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a biologically active compound present in the plants of the Cannabis family, used as anticonvulsant, anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, and more recently, anticancer drug. In this work, its use as a new self-assembly inducer in the formation of nanoparticles is validated. The target conjugates are characterized by the presence of different anticancer drugs (namely N-desacetyl thiocolchicine, podophyllotoxin, and paclitaxel) connected to CBD through a linker able to improve drug release. These nanoparticles are formed via solvent displacement method, resulting in monodisperse and stable structures having hydrodynamic diameters ranging from 160 to 400 nm. Their biological activity is evaluated on three human tumor cell lines (MSTO-211H, HT-29, and HepG2), obtaining GI₅₀ values in the low micromolar range. Further biological assays were carried out on MSTO-211H cells for the most effective NP 8B, confirming the involvement of paclitaxel in cytotoxicity and cell death mechanism

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology is an increasingly interesting approach in medicinal chemistry, allowing to improve the bioavailability and, thus, the delivery of drugs to their site of action. Among all types of nanoparticles (NPs), we have been primarily interested in lipidic, self-assembled NPs, formed by the spontaneous aggregation in water of compounds made by the conjugation of the drug of choice to a self-assembly inducer [1]. These nanostructures, in which the drug moiety is already contained in its building blocks instead of being loaded on inert carriers, present several advantages: (1) A high and precisely tunable drug-loading capacity; (2) a simple adjustment of the physicochemical features of the NPs by optimizing the molecular design; (3) an easy preparation; and (4) an increased biocompatibility as there is no potential carrier-induced cytotoxicity and immunogenicity [2].

For several years we have been interested in using this kind of NPs to improve the properties of both anticancer and neuroprotective drugs [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. We designed conjugates able to form NPs that can release the drug in cellular media, [3,8,11,14] hetero-NPs bearing two different drugs [6,9] and fluorescent NPs obtained mixing drug- and fluorophore-based conjugates [4,5]. In our previous works, squalene, [3,4,5,6,11,12,13] 4-(1,2-diphenylbut-1-en-1-yl)aniline, [7,8,14] 20-hydroxyecdisone [9], or betulinic acid [10] was used. The goal of the present work is to identify a molecule that, besides being able to induce the aggregation, would also present some biological activity to further improve the NPs pharmacological properties.

Cannabidiol (CBD, 1, Figure 1) is a nonpsychoactive phytocannabinoid compound extracted from flowers or leaves of the plants of the Cannabis genus and, in particular, from Cannabis sativa. It was first isolated between 1930 and 1940, but its chemical structure was only clarified in 1963. The biological effects of this compound were investigated in the following years and included anticonvulsant, anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, and anti-cancer activities, along with beneficial effects for the immune system [15,16]. In particular, CBD, alone or in combination with other agents, has been shown to successfully induce cell death, inhibit cell migration and invasion in vitro, decrease tumor size, vascularization, growth, and weight, and increase survival and induce tumor regression in vivo [17,18,19].

Based on the above statements, we considered CBD for its potential dual activity (cytotoxic compound and self-assembly inducer) and to conjugate it to well-known tubulin binder drugs, N-desacetyl thiocolchicine (2), podophyllotoxin (3), and paclitaxel (4), through two different linkers, 5a and 5b (Figure 1). The synthesis and characterization of the planned conjugates and their ability to form self-assembled NPs are here reported. The ability to induce an antiproliferative effect was assayed on three human tumor cell lines (MSTO-211H, HT-29 and HepG2) and the maintenance of the cell target was assessed by confocal microscopy.

2. Results and Discussion

The following Scheme 1 shows the retrosynthetic approach for the preparation of the CBD-based conjugates 6–8a,b.

Said conjugates should be obtained through a condensation reaction between one among the cytotoxic drug-linker intermediates 9–11a,b and CBD 1. Compounds 9–11a,b could derive from the deprotection of carboxy-protected intermediates 12–14a,b, which could be formed as the result of another condensation reaction between the selected drugs and the mono carboxy-protected esters 15a,b. Eventually, said compounds could be protected by reacting the linkers 5a,b with the proper protecting group under esterification conditions. Starting with the description of the conjugates obtained involving N-desacetyl thiocolchicine 2 as the drug, the pathway depicting their synthesis is shown below in Scheme 2. As the conjugates differ only by the linker (being either sebacic or 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid), their synthesis was carried out following the same protocol: the initial protection of the dicarboxylic acids was avoided and the direct reaction was tried leading to the 9a,b intermediates in good enough yields (step a, Scheme 2). The latter were coupled with our potential self-assembly inducer 1 under Steglich esterification conditions leading to final products 6a,b (step b, Scheme 2).

In both syntheses, diamides and diesters were the principal generated by-products, even though all the condensation reactions were performed with excess of the moiety presenting the double functionality.

Then, we will consider the synthesis of the two compounds 7a,b, presenting podophyllotoxin as the drug, as shown in Scheme 3.

The first step of the synthesis is the selective protection of one of two carboxylic acids of sebacic acid 5a and 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid 5b (step a, Scheme 3). This reaction was needed as it was seen that, in this case, the use of dicarboxylic acids under condensation conditions led to the formation of significant amounts of dimeric side products, losing precious quantities of drugs and complicating the purification of target compounds. We decided to use 2-(trimethylsilyl)ethanol (0.3 eq.) as the protective group in a Steglich esterification. It is to be noted that even using low amounts of esterifying agent to reduce the diesterification that can occur, we obtained both target monoesters 16a,b and minoritary diester by-products. We then proceeded with the coupling of these monoprotected linkers with the drug podophyllotoxin 3, using Steglich esterification, obtaining TMSE-protected linker-drug conjugates 17a,b in good yields (step b, Scheme 3). Conjugates 17a,b were then deprotected with TBAF to obtain the corresponding free carboxylic acids 10a,b with acceptable yields (step c, Scheme 3). The final step of this synthetic pathway is the coupling of CBD, the self-assembly inducer, with the conjugates 10a,b. The esterification reaction is again performed under Steglich conditions in the presence of EDC·HCl and DMAP, leading to the obtainment of target compounds 7a,b (step d, Scheme 3). For both conjugates the diesterification by-products were not detected, probably due to the restricted rotation of the CBD cyclohexenyl moiety that could shield the second free hydroxy group.

The last conjugates to be synthetized were the two paclitaxel-based derivatives. At first, we followed the strategy used to synthesize conjugates 7a,b: the TMSE-protected esters 16a,b were reacted with 4 under Steglich esterification conditions to obtain intermediates 18a,b quantitatively (step a, Scheme 4). We then studied the cleavage of the silylated protecting group to obtain the corresponding carboxylic acids 11a,b (step b, Scheme 4). The deprotection was performed with different experimental conditions. Unfortunately, all the studied conditions led to the degradation of the products. This result is probably generated by the instability of paclitaxel in the presence of TBAF. As the previous synthetic strategy failed, we decided to change the protecting group of the linker into another one that could be removed in different conditions.

We then protected one of the two carboxylic acids of sebacic acid 5a and of 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid 5b as 2,2,2-trichloroethyl esters (TCEs), which are cleavable in reductive conditions, with metallic zinc at mildly acidic pH (step a, Scheme 5). We proceeded again with the coupling to the drug, performing once again a Steglich esterification in the presence of 4 with the usual conditions, obtaining the derivatives 19a,b with high yields (step b, Scheme 5). At this point, we tried the reductive cleavage of the previously synthesized conjugates 19a,b to obtain the corresponding carboxylic acids 11a,b (step c, Scheme 5). For what regards the paclitaxel-sebacic-TCE 19a, it was dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of glacial acetic acid/methanol at room temperature, and after adding a large excess of zinc dust and waiting four hours, we could successfully isolate the target carboxylic acid 11a with a 57% yield (step c, Scheme 5).

Unfortunately, performing the same reaction on protected ester 19b did not lead to the same result, as we assisted at the degradation of the starting material with no formation of desired compound 11b. This may be due to the presence of the disulfide bond, which could be particularly sensitive in the presence of zinc, which shows a great tendency to form Zn-S bonds (soft-soft interactions). However, we were able to complete the synthesis with conjugate 11a, performing its conjugation with cannabidiol 1 and obtaining target compound 8a in moderate yield (step d, Scheme 5).

Since all the previous attempts failed when we tried to synthesize the target conjugate 8b, as the concomitant presence of the paclitaxel and disulfide moiety makes the molecule more sensitive and delicate under various conditions, we decided to change the synthetic strategy. In Scheme 6, the second synthetic strategy is reported. Here the order of the condensation steps is reversed, as we first reacted cannabidiol with the protected linker and only then with paclitaxel. We started this different synthetic approach with the monoesterification under Steglich conditions between two equivalents of 1 and the already prepared mono-protected TMSE-carboxylic acid 16b (step a, Scheme 6), trying to limit the diesterification by-product formation. The desired conjugate 20b was successfully obtained with a 57% yield, as despite the cannabidiol excess, we also obtained 11% of the undesired diesterification by-product. The following step was the deprotection of intermediate 20b using TBAF to achieve the carboxylic acid 21b (step b, Scheme 6). Having the linker-self-assembly inducer conjugate 21b in our hands, we could perform the last reaction step to obtain the target compound 8b, which consisted once again in a Steglich coupling between paclitaxel and the carboxylic acid 21b. Although the CBD conjugate contains another free hydroxy group, we could obtain the target derivative 7–4c with a good yield (step c, Scheme 6).

To test the self-assembly ability imparted by cannabidiol to the obtained conjugates 6–8a,b, we proceeded with the preparation and characterization of their nanoparticles (Figure 2).

The six nanosuspensions—one for each 6–8a,b conjugate—were prepared in accordance with standard solvent evaporation protocols [20]. The NP suspensions 6–8A,B obtained were then characterized for what regards their bio-physical properties. DLS and Z-potential measurements were carried out on each NP after 10 minutes’ sonication, giving the following results (

Table 1. Hydrodynamic diameter and Z-potential of nanoformulations 6–8A,B.

Drug	NP	Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm)	Z-Potential (mV)	Polydispersity Index (PI)
2	6A	163.1 ± 4.1	−38.9 ± 9.3	0.051 ± 0.012
	6B	175.2 ± 6.2	−33.0 ± 7.8	0.100 ± 0.027
3	7A	229.4 ± 5.0	−38.32 ± 0.75	0.137 ± 0.031
	7B	393.3 ± 5.1	−39.95 ± 1.32	0.173 ± 0.018
4	8A	396.0 ± 9.2	−37.5 ± 0.6	0.207 ± 0.059
	8B	275.0 ± 4.5	−45.60 ± 0.28	0.103 ± 0.024

).

DLS confirmed the formation of nanoassemblies in aqueous medium. Namely, the low polydispersity index values (PI < 0.2) indicated that each CBD-linker-drug conjugate 6–8a,b was able to give monodisperse suspensions of NPs, with hydrodynamic diameters (HDs) in the 160–400 nm range. Even though the dimension of some of them is around the higher end of NPs’ definition (500 nm), we expect them to be able to exert their action and be internalized in cells. The zeta potential was negative (<−25 mV) for all the nanoassemblies, suggesting that electrostatic repulsion contributes to the colloidal stability of each suspension.

The antiproliferative effect of the obtained NPs was evaluated on three human tumor cell lines, MSTO-211H (biphasic mesothelioma), HT-29 (colorectal adenocarcinoma), and HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma). The cytotoxicity exerted by CBD (1), N-desacetyl thiocolchicine (2), podophyllotoxin (3), and paclitaxel (4) was also determined in all cell lines. The results are expressed as GI₅₀ values, that is the concentration inducing a 50% reduction in cell number with respect to a control culture, and are shown in

Table 2. Antiproliferative effect of NPs and the corresponding reference drugs, CBD (1), N-desacetyl thiocolchicine (2), podophyllotoxin (3), and paclitaxel (4).

	GI50 (μM) a
	MSTO-211H	HT-29	HepG2
1	10.1 ± 1.8	10.1 ± 0.5	13.3 ± 1.7
2	0.014 ± 0.001	0.021 ± 0.003	0.021 ± 0.003
6A	12.1 ± 1.9	7.2 ± 0.3	>20
6B	1.1 ± 0.2	1.4 ± 0.5	3.9 ± 0.7
3	0.012 ± 0.001	0.013 ± 0.002	0.018 ± 0.003
7A	4.8 ± 0.8	6.1 ± 0.9	14.5 ± 1.7
7B	2.5 ± 0.7	2.6 ± 0.1	2.6 ± 0.6
4	0.0035 ± 0.0002	0.0035 ± 0.0005	0.025 ± 0.006
8A	9.5 ± 0.5	>20	>20
8B	0.43 ± 0.01	2.5 ± 0.2	4.8 ± 0.7

^a GI₅₀ values are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments in duplicate.

.

According to the literature data [21], the self-assembly inducer CBD (1) shows an antiproliferative effect on human tumor cell lines with GI₅₀ values in the micromolar range, while the well-known antiproliferative agents, n-desacetylthiocolchicine (2), podophyllotoxin (3) and paclitaxel (4), provoke a strong cytotoxicity, assessed by GI₅₀ values in the nanomolar range.

The treatment with NPs 6A,B, 7A,B, and 8A,B induced a cytotoxicity that appears less pronounced with respect to that of the corresponding free drugs, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, with GI₅₀ values ranging from 0.43 μM to 14.5 μM. Because the cell effect of NPs depends on the release of the cytotoxic agent, it is possible that the hydrolysis of the linker and the kinetics of such release account for a lower intracellular content with respect to the incubation with free drugs, leading to NPs that are not so effective as pure drugs. Moreover, the antiproliferative activity exerted by the NPs depends on the cell line, with MSTO211-H generally the most sensitive and in particular, the lowest GI₅₀ value, 0.43 μM, was obtained by treating this cell line with 8B. This result appears in agreement with the literature data demonstrating that the treatment with paclitaxel-loaded NPs prolonged the survival of a murine model of malignant pleural mesothelioma, obtained by intrathoracic injection of MSTO-211H cells [22]. Overall, these results suggest that the poor clinical response of mesothelioma to paclitaxel could be attributable to an ineffective delivery kinetics of the systemic administration rather than to the mechanism of drug itself, and allow to consider the use of NPs extremely interesting for the development of effective antitumor therapy. The antiproliferative effect appears to depend also on the type of linker. In this connection, it is to note that NPs prepared with conjugates carrying 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid as the linker and then characterized by the presence of a disulfide bond (6B, 7B and 8B) are remarkably more effective in inducing cell death with respect to the corresponding NPs where the linker of the conjugates is the sebacic acid (6A, 7A and 8A). The more pronounced difference in activity emerges by comparing 6A vs. 6B and 8A vs. 8B, and indeed, in these NP pairs the presence of the disulfide bond induces a decrease in GI₅₀ values of about 11 and 22 times, respectively.

Furthermore, the treatment of MeT-5A, human mesothelial cells, with paclitaxel allowed to obtain a GI₅₀ value of 3.2 ± 0.6 nM, similar to that of human mesothelioma MSTO-211H (3.5 ± 0.2 nM, Table 2), confirming the absence of tumor selectivity by the drug. Otherwise, the incubation of MeT-5A with 8B showed a GI₅₀ value of 2.1 ± 0.5 µM, that is about four times higher than that obtained for mesothelioma tumor cells (0.43 ± 0.01 µM, Table 2), indicating a lower effect in normal cells. These data are in agreement with the observation that intracellular levels of reduced glutathione are upregulated in a number of human cancers [23] and support the rationale of the synthetic approach, in accordance with the ability of the disulfide-containing bivalent conjugates to release the active drug inside cells, as already reported [3,11].

The interesting cell effect of 8B suggested us to investigate its possible mechanism of action, taking into account that the major intracellular effect of paclitaxel is the kinetic suppression of microtubule dynamics and then their stabilization [24]. For this purpose, confocal microscopy experiments were performed in the most sensitive MSTO-211H cells treated with 8B. Figure 3 shows the results obtained by incubating cells in standard conditions (A,B), in the presence of free paclitaxel (C,D) or 8B (E,F) for 4 h at 1 μM and 100 μM, respectively, that is a difference in concentration comparable to that observed between the GI₅₀ values (see Table 2).

As shown by confocal microscope imaging, the cells in control condition (Figure 3A,B) exhibited a normal microtubule array with filamentous microtubules distributed in the cytoplasm. As expected, treatment with paclitaxel (Figure 3C,D), induced the formation of a highly organized network of microtubules with the formation of long microtubule bundles, mainly surrounding the nucleus. In the presence of 8B, a partial displacement of the microtubule network present in non-treated cells is observed, with the onset of a concurrent microtubule aggregation (Figure 3E,F).

It is well-known that cell death induced by paclitaxel occurs through multiple mechanisms that depend on cell type, concentrations, and cell cycle stage [25,26,27].

Starting from these considerations and based on the interesting cytotoxic effect of 8B, we investigated the cell death mediated by the NP, in comparison with paclitaxel, to assess the mechanism of cell death. In detail, the most sensitive MSTO-211H were incubated with 8B or paclitaxel for 24 h at a concentration about three times higher with respect to the GI₅₀ value, stained with Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry. Annexin V stains apoptotic cells by binding to phosphatidylserine, a marker of apoptosis, while propidium iodide stains late apoptotic and necrotic cells because it is internalized only in cells undergoing the loss of plasma and nuclear membrane integrity. Figure 4 shows the dot plots of a representative experiment (A) and the percentages of viable, apoptotic, and necrotic cells (B).

The treatment with paclitaxel provokes a clear decrease in cell viability, from about 85% in control condition to about 60%, accompanied by a significant increase in both apoptotic and necrotic cells, more than 20% and 15%, respectively. A similar behavior is also observed in cells incubated in the presence of 8B. In this experimental condition, the decrease in viability is pronounced, with about 50% of cell death, which occurs through both apoptosis (35%) and necrosis (10%) pathway.

These results confirm the involvement of paclitaxel in cytotoxicity and cell death mechanism mediated by 8B, supporting the rationale of the approach and confirming the ability of the NP to address the cytotoxic drug inside the cell, allowing the related effect.

3. Materials and Methods

All reactions were carried out in oven-dried glassware and dry solvents under nitrogen atmosphere. Unless otherwise stated, all solvent and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy), Fluorochem (Hadfield, UK), or TCI (Zwijndrecht, Belgium) and used without further purification. CBD was extracted through dynamic maceration (DM) of Cannabis sativa inflorescences using EtOH, following a published protocol [28]. HPLC analysis was performed to assess its purity (>95%) on an ASCENTIS RP-C₁₈ column (5 μm × 4.6 × 150 mm). The pressure was set at about 101 bar, and the temperature was maintained at 40 °C, with a constant flow rate of 0.95 mL/min. UV spectra were recorded at 228 nm using a gradient elution method. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of A (0.1% v/v HCOOH in H₂O) and B (0.1% v/v HCOOH in MeCN). The gradient elution program was adapted to a 30 min duration to obtain RRT 1.00 for CBD, following a published protocol [29]. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck precoated 60F254 plates. Reactions were monitored by TLC on silica gel, with detection by UV light (254 nm) or by staining with p-anisaldehyde or potassium permanganate solutions with heating. Purification of intermediates and final products was mostly carried out by flash chromatography using as stationary phase high purity grade silica gel (Merck Grade, pore size 60 Å, 230–400 mesh particle size, Sigma Aldrich). Alternatively, purification was performed by a Biotage^® system in normal phase using Biotage^® Sfär Silica D cartridges (10/25 g). Intermediates and final products were structurally characterized by ¹H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy at 400/500 MHz, using a Bruker AC 400/500 spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) for proton and carbon resonances are quoted in parts per million (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS), which was used as an internal standard. ¹H and ¹³C spectra of all synthetized compounds can be found in Supplementary Materials. HRMS spectra were recorded using electrospray ionization (ESI) technique on a FT-ICR APEXII (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Specific rotations were measured with a P-1030-Jasco polarimeter with 10 cm optical path cells and 1 mL capacity (Na lamp, λ = 589 nm).

3.1. Synthetic Procedures

General Procedure for Steglich Coupling

To a stirred solution of the corresponding carboxylic acid (1.0–1.2 eq) in dry dichloromethane (CH₂Cl₂) (0.02–0.05 M), N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC∙HCl) (1.5 eq), and N,N-dimethyl-4-aminopyridine (DMAP) (0.5 eq) are added under nitrogen atmosphere and at r.t. The reaction is stirred for 15 min, and the corresponding alcohol (1.0–1.2 eq) is added. The reaction mixture is then left stirring overnight at r.t. After reaction completion (TLC monitoring), 1M HCl solution is added, and the mixture is extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The collected organic phases are then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude reaction mixtures are eventually purified by flash column chromatography or Biotage^®, when needed.

• 4-((4-oxo-4-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxy)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoic acid (16b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid 5b (1000 mg, 4.20 mmol), EDC∙HCl (472 mg, 2.46 mmol), DMAP (75 mg, 0.62 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (25 mL, 0.1 M) and pyridine (2.5 mL), trimethylsilyl ethanol (0.26 mL, 1.84 mmol) is added to obtain 503 mg of product 16b with 81% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (7:3 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH) and purified by flash chromatography (8:2 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.17 (m, 2H), 2.73 (m, 4H), 2.52 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.03 (m, 4H), 0.98 (m, 2H), 0.04 (s, 9H).

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₁₃H₂₆O₄S₂SiNa, 361.0939; found, 361.0940.

Spectroscopic data are consistent with those described in the literature [9].

• 10-oxo-10-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxy)decanoic acid (16a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of sebacic acid 5a (1000 mg, 4.94 mmol), EDC∙HCl (559 mg, 2.92 mmol), DMAP (89 mg, 0.73 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (25 mL, 0.1 M) and pyridine (2.5 mL), trimethylsilyl ethanol (0.31 mL, 2.18 mmol) were added to obtain 560 mg of product 16a with 85% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (7:3 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH) and purified by flash chromatography (8:2 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.20–4.11 (m, 2H), 2.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.69–1.55 (m, 4H), 1.37–1.25 (m, 8H), 1.03–0.93 (m, 2H), 0.04 (s, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 180.2, 174.2, 62.5, 34.6, 34.2, 29.2, 29.1, 29.1, 25.0, 24.7, 17.4, −1.4.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₁₅H₃₀O₄SiNa, 325.1811; found, 325.1815.

• 4-((4-oxo-4-(2,2,2-trichloroethoxy)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoic acid (18b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid 5b (1.56 g, 6.54 mmol), EDC∙HCl (751 mg, 3.92 mmol), DMAP (478 mg, 3.91 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (52 mL, 0,05 M), 2,2,2-trichloro ethanol (0.25 mL, 2.61 mmol) is added to obtain 567 mg of product 18b with 59% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (7:3 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH) and purified by flash chromatography (8:2 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.75 (s, 2H), 2.74 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 2.61 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.50 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.16–1.98 (m, 4H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 179.4, 171.4, 95.0, 74.0, 37.6, 37.6, 32.4, 32.3, 24.0, 23.9.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₁₀H₁₅Cl₃O₄S₂Na, 390.9375; found, 390.9377.

• 10-oxo-10-(2,2,2-trichloroethoxy)decanoic acid (18a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of sebacic acid 5a (1.32 g, 6.53 mmol), EDC∙HCl (750 mg, 3.91 mmol), DMAP (480 mg, 3.93 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (52 mL, 0.05 M), 2,2,2-trichloro ethanol (0.25 mL, 2.61 mmol) is added to obtain 472 mg of product 18a with 52% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (7:3 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH) and purified by flash chromatography (8:2 n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.74 (s, 2H), 2.46 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (m, 4H), 1.40–1.26 (m, 8H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 180.4, 172.2, 95.2, 73.9, 34.1, 34.0, 29.1, 29.0, 29.0, 29.0, 24.8, 24.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₁₂H₁₉Cl₃O₄Na, 355.0247; found, 355.0248

• (S)-10-oxo-10-((1,2,3-trimethoxy-10-(methylthio)-9-oxo-5,6,7,9-tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalen-7-yl)amino)decanoic acid (9a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 5a (135 mg, 0.67 mmol), EDC∙HCl (56 mg, 0.29 mmol), DMAP (4 mg, 0.03 mmol), TEA (0.30 mL, 2.14 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (3.0 mL, 0.09 M), 2 (100 mg, 0.27 mmol) is added to obtain 93 mg of product 9a with 62% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH 95:5) and purified by flash chromatography (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH 95:5 eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.44 (s, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 4.71 (dt, J = 12.8, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.51 (dd, J = 13.2, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.41–2.25 (m, 3H), 2.26–2.17 (m, 3H), 1.95–1.84 (m, 1H), 1.67–1.49 (m, 4H), 1.34–1.21 (m, 8H).

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₃₀H₃₉NO₇SNa, 580.2345; found, 580.2348.

Spectroscopic data are consistent to the ones reported in the literature [30].

• (1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl 10-oxo-10-(((S)-1,2,3-trimethoxy-10-(methylthio)-9-oxo-5,6,7,9-tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalen-7-yl)amino)decanoate (6a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 9a (50 mg, 0.09 mmol), EDC∙HCl (19 mg, 0.98 mmol), DMAP (1 mg, 0.01 mmol), TEA (0.01 mL, 0.98 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL, 0.04 M), 1 (28 mg, 0.09 mmol) are added to obtain 36 mg of product 6a with 45% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (n-hex/EtOAc 1:1) and purified by flash chromatography (n-hex/EtOAc 1:1).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.36–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (s, 2H), 6.45 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 5.95 (bs, 1H), 5.51 (bs, 1H), 4.67 (dt, J = 13.2, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.62–4.57 (m, 1H), 4.44 (bs, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.49 (bs, 1H), 2.59–2.32 (m, 9H), 2.31–2.13 (m, 4H), 2.11–1.64 (m, 12H), 1.65–1.50 (m, 3H), 1.39–1.22 (m, 14H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 182.2, 173.0, 172.2, 158.4, 153.8, 152.0, 151.3, 141.8, 138.8, 135.8, 135.1, 134.5, 129.9, 128.6, 127.8, 127.0, 125.8, 123.5, 114.5, 111.4, 107.5, 61.8, 61.5, 56.2, 52.0, 45.7, 37.9, 37.0, 36.5, 35.5, 34.4, 31.6, 30.6, 30.3, 30.1, 29.8, 29.4, 29.2, 28.1, 27.0, 25.6, 24.9, 23.7, 22.6, 19.9, 15.3, 14.1.

HRMS (ESI⁺):m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₅₁H₆₇NO₈SNa, 876.4485; found, 876.4491.

${\left[\alpha \right]}_D^{25}$: -72.8 (c 1 in CHCl₃).

• (S)-4-((4-oxo-4-((1,2,3-trimethoxy-10-(methylthio)-9-oxo-5,6,7,9-tetrahydrobenzo[a] heptalen-7-yl)amino)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoic acid (9b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 5b (238 mg, 1.0 mmol), EDC∙HCl (84 mg, 0.44 mmol), DMAP (5 mg, 0.04 mmol), TEA (0.45 mL, 3.2 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (4.5 mL, 0.01 M), 2 (150 mg, 0.40 mmol) is added to obtain 117 mg of product 9b with 49% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH 98:2 + 1% HCOOH) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (s, 1H), 4.85–4.72 (m, 1H), 3.97–3.89 (m, 6H), 3.76–3.59 (m, 3H), 2.88–2.67 (m, 5H), 2.63–2.41 (m, 9H), 2.43–2.26 (m, 2H), 2.13–1.88 (m, 4H).

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₂₈H₃₅NO₇S₃Na, 616.1473; found, 616.1478.

Spectroscopic data are consistent to the ones reported in literature [31].

• (1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl 4-((4-oxo-4-(((S)-1,2,3-trimethoxy-10-(methylthio)-9-oxo-5,6,7,9-tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalen-7 yl)amino)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoate (6b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 9b (70 mg, 0.18 mmol), EDC∙HCl (38 mg, 0.20 mmol), DMAP (3 mg, 0.02 mmol), TEA (0.2 mL, 1.44 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (4 mL, 0.01 M), 1 (57 mg, 0.18 mmol) is added to obtain 32 mg of product 6b with 20% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (n-hex/EtOAc 3:7) and purified by flash chromatography (n-hex/EtOAc 3:7 + 1% HCOOH).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.37–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.99–6.83 (m, 1H), 6.76–6.65 (m, 1H), 6.53 (bs, 2H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 5.97 (bs, 1H), 5.47 (bs, 1H), 4.64 (dt, J = 11.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.61–4.56 (m, 1H), 4.44 (s, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.83–2.72 (m, 3H), 2.72–2.60 (m, 4H), 2.55–2.41 (m, 7H), 2.42–2.29 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.05 (m, 4H), 1.99 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.85–1.68 (m, 5H), 1.62–1.47 (m, 3H), 1.36–1.18 (m, 8H), 0.97–0.77 (m, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 182.4, 171.8, 171.7, 158.5, 155.7, 153.8, 151.4, 142.9, 141.8, 138.5, 134.9, 134.5, 128.6, 126.8, 125.8, 124.5, 114.7, 111.5, 107.6, 61.8, 61.5, 56.2, 52.1, 45.8, 38.4, 38.0, 37.6, 36.9, 35.5, 35.3, 34.6, 32.5, 31.6, 30.6, 30.5, 30.3, 30.1, 29.8, 24.7, 24.7, 24.3, 23.8, 22.6, 20.0, 15.3, 14.2.

HRMS (ESI⁺):m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₄₉H₆₃NO₈S₃Na, 912.3613; found, 912.3619.

${\left[\alpha \right]}_D^{25}$: -117.1 (c 0.96 in CHCl₃).

• (5R,5aR,8aR,9R)-8-oxo-9-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-5,5a,6,8,8a,9-hexahydrofuro[3’,4’:6,7] naphtho[2,3-d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl 4-((4-oxo-4-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxy)butyl)disulfaneyl) butanoate (17b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 16b (74.0 mg, 0.22 mmol), EDC∙HCl (41.7 mg, 0.22 mmol), DMAP (11.0 mg, 0.09 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (9 mL, 0.02 M), 3 (75 mg, 0.18 mmol) is added to obtain 1 mg of product 17b quantitatively. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.74 (s, 1H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 6.36 (s, 2H), 5.95 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H), 5.86 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.39–4.30 (m, 1H), 4.22–4.09 (m, 3H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 6H), 2.90 (dd, J = 14.5, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.87–2.75 (m, 1H), 2.77–2.65 (m, 4H), 2.65–2.45 (m, 2H), 2.38 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.12–1.93 (m, 4H), 1.00–0.91 (m, 2H), 0.01 (s, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 173.6, 173.3, 172.9, 152.5 (2C), 148.1, 147.5, 137.0, 134.8, 132.3, 128.2, 109.6, 108.0 (2C), 106.9, 101.6, 73.6, 71.3, 62.6, 60.6, 56.1 (2C), 45.4, 43.6, 38.6, 37.7, 37.6, 32.7, 32.5, 24.2, 24.0, 17.3, −1.5 (3C).

HRMS (ESI⁺):m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₃₅H₄₆O₁₁S₂SiNa, 757.2148; found, 757.2150.

• 4-((4-oxo-4-(((5R,5aR,8aR,9R)-8-oxo-9-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-5,5a,6,8,8a,9-hexahydrofuro[3’,4’:6,7]naphtho[2,3-d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)oxy)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoic acid (10b)

To a well-stirred solution of compound 17b (141 mg, 0.192 mmol) in dry THF (3.9 mL, 0.05M), 1M TBAF in THF (1.92 mL, 1.92 mmol) is added at 0 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction is stirred at r.t. and monitored by TLC (n-hex/EtOAc 1:1 + 1% HCOOH). After 1 h, the reaction is quenched with saturated NH₄Cl aqueous solution and extracted with abundant CH₂Cl₂. The organic phase is then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture is then purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH eluent mixture) to obtain 59 mg of the desired product 10b (48% yield).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.74 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.38 (s, 2H), 5.99–5.92 (m, 2H), 5.73 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.47–4.33 (m, 2H), 4.28 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 6H), 3.29 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.03–2.92 (m, 1H), 2.79–2.62 (m, 4H), 2.52–2.45 (m, 2H), 2.43–2.25 (m, 2H), 2.08–1.90 (m, 4H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 178.5, 177.5, 172.7, 153.3 (2C), 148.5, 147.3, 139.0, 136.9, 131.3, 126.2, 109.9, 108.4, 105.5 (2C), 101.5, 72.6, 70.9, 61.0, 56.3 (2C), 45.5, 44.3, 39.8, 37.8, 37.6, 32.5, 32.3, 24.0, 24.0.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₃₀H₃₄O₁₁S₂Na, 657.1440; found, 657.1443.

• (1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl 4-((4-oxo-4-(((5R,5aR,8aR,9R)-8-oxo-9-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-5,5a,6, 8,8a,9-hexahydrofuro[3’,4’:6,7]naphtho[2,3-d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)oxy)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoate (7b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 10b (59 mg, 0.093 mmol), EDC∙HCl (22 mg, 0.112 mmol), DMAP (6 mg, 0.047 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL, 0.05 M), 1 (44 mg, 0.140 mmol) is added to obtain 69 mg of product 7b with 80% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (1:1 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.73 (s, 1), 6.54 (s, 2H), 6.40–6.37 (m, 3H), 5.95 (dd, J = 10.4, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 5.74 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 4.63–4.57 (m, 1H), 4.48–4.35 (m, 3H), 4.28 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 6H), 3.47 (s, 1H), 3.28 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.02–2.92 (m, 1H), 2.83–2.72 (m, 2H), 2.68 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (s, 2H), 2.58–2.44 (m, 3H), 2.44–2.27 (m, 2H), 2.28–2.16 (m, 1H), 2.17–2.05 (m, 3H), 1.98 (p, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.87–1.69 (m, 5H), 1.63–1.50 (m, 5H), 1.36–1.24 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 177.3, 172.7, 171.4, 153.4 (2C), 148.6, 147.4, 143.0, 142.2, 139.0, 133.0, 131.4, 126.3, 123.3, 114.8, 114.1, 111.5, 111.2, 110.0, 108.3, 105.6 (2C), 101.6, 72.6, 70.9, 61.0, 56.4 (2C), 53.6, 45.7, 45.6, 44.3, 39.9, 38.1, 37.6 (2C), 35.5, 32.5 (2C), 31.6, 30.6, 30.3, 29.8, 28.0, 24.1, 24.0, 23.7, 22.6, 14.1.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₅₁H₆₂O₁₂S₂Na, 953.3580; found, 953.3582.

${\left[\alpha \right]}_D^{25}$: -39.5 (c 0.32 in CHCl₃).

• 1-((5R,5aR,8aR,9R)-8-oxo-9-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-5,5a,6,8,8a,9-hexahydrofuro [3’,4’:6,7]naphtho[2,3-d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl) 10-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl) decanedioate (17a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 16a (67 mg, 0.22 mmol), EDC∙HCl (42 mg, 0.22 mmol), DMAP (11 mg, 0.09 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (9 mL, 0.02 M), 3 (75 mg, 0.18 mmol) is added to obtain 91 mg of product 17a with 72% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.74 (s, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 6.39 (s, 2H5.98 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 5.88 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (dd, J = 9.3, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.11 (m, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 6H), 2.92 (dd, J = 14.5, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.88–2.74 (m, 1H), 2.49–2.33 (m, 2H), 2.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.73–1.54 (m, 4H), 1.36–1.26 (m, 8H), 1.03–0.92 (m, 2H), 0.03 (s, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 174.2, 174.0, 173.7, 152.7 (2C), 148.1, 147.6, 137.2, 134.9, 132.4, 128.5, 109.7, 108.1 (2C), 107.0, 101.6, 73.4, 71.4, 62.4, 60.8, 56.2 (2C), 45.6, 43.8, 38.8, 34.5, 34.4, 29.1, 29.1, 29.1, 29.1, 25.0, 24.9, 17.3, −1.5 (3C).

HRMS (ESI⁺):m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₃₇H₅₀O₁₁SiNa, 721.3020; found, 721.3023.

• 10-oxo-10-(((5R,5aR,8aR,9R)-8-oxo-9-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-5,5a,6,8,8a,9-hexahydrofuro[3’,4’:6,7]naphtho[2,3-d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)oxy)decanoic acid (10a)

To a well-stirred solution of compound 17a (139 mg, 0.199 mmol) in dry THF (4.0 mL, 0.05M), 1M TBAF in THF (2.00 mL, 2.00 mmol) is added at 0 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction is stirred at r.t. and monitored by TLC (n-hex/EtOAc 1:1 + 1% HCOOH). After 1 h, the reaction is quenched with saturated NH₄Cl aqueous solution and extracted with abundant CH₂Cl₂. The organic phase is then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture is then purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH eluent mixture) to obtain 57 mg of the desired product 10a (48% yield).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.52 (s, 1H), 6.39 (s, 2H), 5.94 (dd, J = 10.8, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 5.72 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (dd, J = 9.6, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (dd, J = 9.7, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.26 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.99–2.88 (m, 1H), 2.33 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (td, J = 7.5, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 1.66–1.49 (m, 4H), 1.35–1.22 (m, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 179.6, 177.4, 173.5, 153.3 (2C), 148.4, 147.3, 138.9, 136.9, 131.3, 126.4, 109.8, 108.2, 105.5 (2C), 101.5, 72.3, 71.0, 60.9, 56.2 (2C), 45.6, 44.2, 39.9, 34.3, 34.0, 29.0 (2C), 29.0, 29.0, 24.8, 24.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₃₂H₃₈O₁₁Na, 621.2312; found, 621.2313.

• 1-((1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl) 10-((5R,5aR,8aR,9R)-8-oxo-9-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-5,5a,6,8,8a,9-hexahydrofuro[3’,4’:6,7] naphtho[2,3-d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl) decanedioate (7a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 10a (59 mg, 0.093 mmol), EDC∙HCl (22 mg, 0.112 mmol), DMAP (6 mg, 0.047 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL, 0.05 M), 1 (44 mg, 0.140 mmol) is added to obtain 69 mg of product 7a with 80% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (1:1 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.72 (s, 1H), 6.56–6.51 (m, 2H), 6.40 (s, 2H), 6.37 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (dd, J = 11.0, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 5.74 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 4.62–4.57 (m, 1H), 4.47–4.35 (m, 3H), 4.31 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 6H), 3.47 (s, 1H), 3.26 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.99–2.89 (m, 1H), 2.59–2.37 (m, 5H), 2.30–2.14 (m, 3H), 2.11–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.86–1.61 (m, 7H), 1.60 (s, 3H), 1.59–1.50 (m, 4H), 1.42–1.21 (m, 12H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 177.3, 173.5, 153.4, 148.5, 147.3, 139.0, 137.0, 131.3, 126.5, 109.9, 108.2, 105.6 (2C), 101.5, 72.3, 71.0, 68.1, 60.9, 56.3 (2C), 45.7 (2C), 44.3, 39.9, 38.0, 35.5 (2C), 34.4, 34.3, 31.6, 30.6, 30.3, 29.2, 29.2, 29.2, 29.2, 28.2, 25.7, 24.9, 24.9, 23.7, 22.6, 20.0, 14.1.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₅₃H₆₆O₁₂Na, 917.4452; found, 917.4457.

${\left[\alpha \right]}_D^{25}$: -24.5 (c 1.07 in CHCl₃).

• (2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-9-(((R)-17-((S)-benzamido(phenyl)methyl)-2,2-dimethyl-6,15-dioxo-5,16-dioxa-10,11-dithia-2-silaoctadecan-18-oyl)oxy)-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a-decahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4] benzo[1,2-b]oxete-6,12b(2aH)-diyl diacetate (18b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 16b (36 mg, 0.11 mmol), EDC∙HCl (21 mg, 0.11 mmol), DMAP (6 mg, 0.045 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (1.5 mL, 0.05 M), 4 (75 mg, 0.09 mmol) is added to obtain 100 mg of product 18b quantitatively. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.17–8.10 (m, 2H), 7.77–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.46–7.30 (m, 7H), 6.94 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.32–6.21 (m, 2H), 5.98 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd, J = 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.18–4.08 (m, 2H), 3.82 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.75–2.61 (m, 4H), 2.61–2.48 (m, 4H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 2.42–2.32 (m, 3H), 2.24–2.12 (m, 4H), 2.09–1.96 (m, 4H), 1.94 (s, 3H), 1.92–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 1.03–0.91 (m, 2H), 0.03 (s, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 203.9, 171.2, 169.9, 168.1, 167.3, 167.0, 142.7, 137.0, 133.7, 132.1, 130.3 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 127.2 (2C), 126.6 (2C), 84.5, 76.5, 75.7, 75.2, 74.1, 72.1, 71.9, 62.8, 58.5, 52.8, 45.7, 37.7, 37.1, 35.7, 35.6, 32.8, 32.0, 26.9, 24.3, 24.0, 22.8, 22.2, 17.4, 14.9, 9.7, −1.4 (3C).

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₆₀H₇₅NO₁₇S₂SiNa, 1196.4143; found, 1196.4149.

• 1-((1S,2R)-1-benzamido-3-(((2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-6,12b-diacetoxy-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxet-9-yl)oxy)-3-oxo-1-phenylpropan-2-yl) 10-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl) decanedioate (18a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 16a (71 mg, 0.071 mmol), EDC∙HCl (14.0 mg, 0.071 mmol), DMAP (4.0 mg, 0.030 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (1.5 mL, 0,05 M), 4 (50 mg, 0.059 mmol) is added to obtain 59.9 mg of product 18a with 87% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.10 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.44 (m, 3H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 6H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (s, 1H), 6.27–6.16 (m, 1H), 5.93 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (dd, J = 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.21–4.09 (m, 3H), 3.79 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.60–2.46 (m, 1H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.42–2.28 (m, 3H), 2.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.17–2.07 (m, 1H), 1.92 (s, 3H), 1.90–1.76 (m, 1H), 1.65 (s, 3H), 1.63–1.50 (m, 4H), 1.32–1.18 (m, 11H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 1.01–0.91 (m, 2H), 0.02 (s, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 203.9, 174.0, 172.8, 171.2, 169.8, 168.2, 167.2, 167.0, 142.8, 137.1, 133.8, 133.7, 132.8, 132.0, 130.2 (2C), 129.3, 129.1 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 128.5, 127.2 (2C), 126.7 (2C), 84.5, 81.1, 79.1, 76.5, 75.6, 75.2, 73.9, 72.1, 71.8, 62.4, 58.5, 53.0, 45.7, 43.2, 35.6, 34.5 (2C), 33.8, 29.1, 29.1, 29.0, 28.9, 26.8, 24.9, 24.7, 22.7, 22.2, 20.9, 17.3, 14.8, 9.7, −1.4 (3C).

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₆₂H₇₉NO₁₇SiNa, 1160.5015; found, 1160.5019.

• 1-((1S,2R)-1-benzamido-3-(((2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-6,12b-diacetoxy-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxet-9-yl)oxy)-3-oxo-1-phenylpropan-2-yl) 10-(2,2,2-trichloroethyl) decanedioate (19a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 18a (24 mg, 0.071 mmol), EDC∙HCl (14 mg, 0.071 mmol), DMAP (4 mg, 0.030 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (1.5 mL, 0.05 M), 4 (50 mg, 0.059 mmol) is added to obtain 60 mg of product 19a with 87% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.18–8.10 (m, 2H), 7.78–7.70 (m, 2), 7.65–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.46–7.30 (m, 7H), 6.87 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.32–6.21 (m, 2H), 5.95 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (dd, J = 9.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (s, 2H), 4.45 (dd, J = 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (ddd, J = 14.7, 9.8, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.49–2.28 (m, 8H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.21–2.10 (m, 1H), 1.94 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3H), 1.89 (ddd, J = 14.6, 11.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.79–1.51 (m, 7H), 1.35–1.21 (m, 11H), 1.13 (s, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 203.9, 172.8 (2C), 171.3, 169.9, 168.2, 167.2, 167.1, 142.9, 137.1, 133.8, 133.8, 132.9, 132.1, 130.3, 129.3 (4C), 129.1 (4C), 128.8, 128.6, 127.2 (2C), 126.6 (2C), 95.2, 84.6, 81.2, 79.2, 76.5, 75.7, 75.2, 74.0, 73.9, 72.2, 71.9, 58.6, 52.9, 45.7, 43.3, 35.7, 35.6, 34.0, 33.8, 29.1, 29.0 (2C), 28.9, 26.9, 24.8, 22.8, 22.2, 20.9, 14.9, 14.3, 9.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₅₉H₆₈Cl₃NO₁₇Na, 1190.3451; found, 1190.3454.

• 1-((1S,2R)-1-benzamido-3-(((2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-6,12b-diacetoxy-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxet-9-yl)oxy)-3-oxo-1-phenylpropan-2-yl) 10-(2,2,2-trichloroethyl) decanedioate (19b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 18b (26.0 mg, 0.071 mmol), EDC∙HCl (14.0 mg, 0.071 mmol), DMAP (4.0 mg, 0.030 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (1.5 mL, 0,05 M), 4 (50.0 mg, 0.059 mmol) is added to obtain 77.7 mg of product 19b with 91% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.17–8.10 (m, 2H), 7.78–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.31 (m, 7H), 6.90 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.32–6.21 (m, 2H), 5.97 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (dd, J = 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (s, 2H), 4.45 (dd, J = 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.23–4.17 (m, 1H), 3.82 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.74–2.46 (m, 9H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 2.38 (dd, J = 15.4, 9.3 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.22–2.12 (m, 1H), 2.12–1.95 (m, 4H), 1.95 (s, 3H), 1.94–1.83 (m, 1H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 203.9, 172.8 (2C), 171.3, 169.9, 168.2, 167.2, 167.1, 142.9, 137.1, 133.8, 133.8, 132.9, 132.1, 130.3, 129.3 (4C), 129.1 (4C), 128.8, 128.6, 127.2 (2C), 126.6 (2C), 95.2, 84.6, 81.2, 79.2, 76.5, 75.7, 75.2, 74.0, 73.9, 72.2, 71.9, 58.6, 52.9, 45.7, 43.3, 35.7, 35.6, 34.0, 33.8, 28.9, 26.9, 24.8, 22.8, 22.2, 20.9, 14.9, 14.3, 9.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₅₇H₆₄Cl₃NO₁₇S₂Na, 1226.2579; found, 1226.2583.

• 10-(((1S,2R)-1-benzamido-3-(((2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-6,12b-diacetoxy-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxet-9-yl)oxy)-3-oxo-1-phenylpropan-2-yl)oxy)-10-oxodecanoic acid (11a)

Following the reported procedure described by Negretti et al. [32], to a solution of the trichloroethyl ester 19a (59.9 mg, 0.051 mmol) in AcOH/MeOH 1:1 (2 mL, 0.03 M), zinc dust (83.4 mg, 1.275 mmol) is added at r.t. under vigorous stirring. The reaction is monitored by TLC (n-hex/EtOAc 4:6 + 1% HCOOH) and, after 4 h, is filtered over celite washing with MeOH. The organic phase is then washed with H₂O extracting with abundant EtOAc, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture is purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc + 1% HCOOH as eluent mixture), obtaining 30.1 mg of product 11a with 57% yield.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.12 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (dd, J = 8.7, 6.6 Hz, 3H), 7.45–7.29 (m, 7H), 6.97 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.25 (t, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (dd, J = 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (dd, J = 10.9, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.63–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.49–2.30 (m, 6H), 2.30–2.11 (m, 6H), 1.93 (s, 3H), 1.92–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.62–1.49 (m, 4H), 1.33–1.18 (m, 11H), 1.13 (s, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 203.9, 178.5, 172.9, 171.4, 170.0, 168.3, 167.6, 167.1, 142.8, 137.0, 133.8, 133.7, 133.0, 132.2, 130.3, 129.4 (4C), 129.2 (2C), 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 127.2 (2C), 126.7 (2C), 84.6, 81.2, 79.1, 76.6, 75.8, 75.3, 73.9, 72.2, 71.9, 58.6, 53.0, 45.7, 43.3, 35.7, 33.9, 33.8, 29.0, 28.8, 26.9, 24.7, 24.7, 22.8, 22.2, 20.9, 14.9, 9.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₅₇H₆₇NO₁₇Na, 1060.4307; found, 1060.4311.

• 10-(((1S,2R)-1-benzamido-3-(((2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-6,12b-diacetoxy-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxet-9-yl)oxy)-3-oxo-1-phenylpropan-2-yl)oxy)-10-oxodecanoic acid (8a)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 11a (30.1 mg, 0.029 mmol), EDC∙HCl (7.0 mg, 0.044 mmol), DMAP (2.0 mg, 0.015 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (1 mL, 0.05 M), 1 (14 mg, 0.044 mmol) is added to obtain 34.1 mg of product 8a with 88% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.13 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.56–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.45–7.30 (m, 7H), 6.88 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.38 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.32–6.20 (m, 2H), 5.96 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 2H), 4.97 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 1H), 4.49–4.40 (m, 2H), 4.31 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (s, 1H), 2.64–2.31 (m, 11H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.20–1.98 (m, 3H), 1.95 (s, 3H), 1.93–1.70 (m, 6H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.63–1.52 (m, 7H), 1.42–1.24 (m, 12H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 204.0, 175.6, 172.8, 171.4, 171.3, 170.9, 169.9, 168.2, 167.2, 167.2, 142.9, 137.1, 135.1, 133.8, 132.9, 132.2, 130.4, 129.3 (4C), 129.2 (4C), 128.9, 128.6, 127.2 (2C), 126.6 (2C), 84.6, 81.2, 79.3, 76.6, 75.7, 75.2, 73.9, 72.3, 71.9, 58.6, 52.9, 45.7, 43.3, 38.0, 35.7, 35.6, 35.5, 34.4, 33.9, 31.6, 30.8, 30.6, 29.3, 29.2, 29.0, 26.9, 24.9, 24.8, 23.7, 22.8, 22.6, 22.3, 20.9, 14.9, 14.1, 9.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₇₈H₉₅NO₁₈Na, 1356.6447; found, 1356.6452.

${\left[\alpha \right]}_D^{25}$: -65.9 (c 0.69 in CHCl₃).

• (1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl 4-((4-oxo-4-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxy)butyl)disulfaneyl)butanoate (20b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 16b (150 mg, 0.44 mmol), EDC∙HCl (93 mg, 0.049 mmol), DMAP (71 mg, 0.58 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (9 mL, 0.05 M), 1 (279 mg, 0.89 mmol) is added to obtain 159 mg of product 20b with 57% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (9:1 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) 6.54 (bs, 1H), 6.38 (s, 1H), 5.98 (bs, 1H), 5.52 (bs, 1H), 4.65–4.55 (m, 1H), 4.44 (bs, 1H), 4.24–4.10 (m, 2H), 3.48 (bs, 1H), 2.78 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.68–2.58 (m, 2H), 2.53–2.38 (m, 5H), 2.29–2.07 (m, 4H), 2.07–1.98 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.61–1.51 (m, 5H), 1.38–1.21 (m, 5H), 1.03–0.95 (m, 2H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.04 (s, 9H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 172.9, 171.4, 156.8, 149.2, 143.1, 140.7, 139.1, 123.3, 114.8, 114.1, 111.6, 62.6, 45.7, 38.1, 37.6, 35.5, 32.5, 31.6, 30.6, 30.3, 29.8, 28.0, 24.1, 23.8, 22.6, 20.1, 17.3, 14.2, −1.5.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₃₄H₅₄O₅S₂SiNa, 657.3080; found, 657.3084.

• 4-((4-(((1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl)oxy)-4-oxobutyl)disulfaneyl)butanoic acid (21b)

To a well-stirred solution of compound 20b (155.0 mg, 0.244 mmol) in dry THF (5.0 mL, 0.05M), 1M TBAF in THF (2.44 mL, 2.44 mmol) is added at 0 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction is stirred at r.t. and monitored by TLC (n-hex/EtOAc 7:3 + 1% HCOOH). The reaction is quenched with saturated NH₄Cl aqueous solution and extracted with abundant EtOAc. The organic phase is then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture is then purified by flash chromatography (n-hex/EtOAc 8:2 + 1% HCOOH eluent mixture) to obtain 78 mg of the desired product 21b with 65% yield.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.54 (bs, 1H), 6.38 (s, 1H), 5.98 (bs, 1H), 5.52 (bs, 1H), 4.60 (s, 1H), 4.44 (s, 1H), 3.48 (bs, 1H), 2.78 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.68–2.59 (m, 2H), 2.53–2.38 (m, 4H), 2.23–2.07 (m, 3H), 2.03 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.66 (m, 5H), 1.62–1.52 (m, 5H), 1.35–1.24 (m, 5H), 0.93–0.82 (m, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 176.9, 171.4, 155.8, 149.2, 143.1, 140.7, 139.1, 123.3, 114.8, 114.1, 111.6, 45.7, 38.1, 37.6, 35.5, 32.5, 31.6, 30.6, 30.3, 29.8, 28.0, 24.1, 23.8, 22.6, 20.1, 14.2.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₂₉H₄₂O₅S₂Na, 557.2371; found, 557.2377.

• (2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-9-(((2R,3S)-3-benzamido-2-((4-((4-(((1’R,2’R)-6-hydroxy-5’-methyl-4-pentyl-2’-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1’,2’,3’,4’-tetrahydro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-2-yl)oxy)-4-oxobutyl)disulfaneyl)butanoyl)oxy)-3-phenylpropanoyl)oxy)-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a-decahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca [3,4]benzo [1,2-b]oxete-6,12b(2aH)-diyl diacetate (8b)

Following the general procedure for the Steglich coupling, to a solution of carboxylic acid 21b (32 mg, 0.059 mmol), EDC∙HCl (11 mg, 0.059 mmol), DMAP (4 mg, 0.030 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (1.5 mL, 0.05 M), 4 (50 mg, 0.059 mmol) is added to obtain 49 mg of product 8b with 61% yield. Reaction is monitored by TLC (4:6 n-hex/EtOAc) and purified by Biotage^® (gradient with n-hex/EtOAc eluent mixture).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.13 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.76–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.64–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.45–7.30 (m, 7H), 6.93 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.37 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.32–6.20 (m, 2H), 5.97 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 4.61–4.56 (m, 1H), 4.48–4.39 (m, 2H), 4.31 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (bs, 1H), 2.76–2.43 (m, 15H), 2.37 (dd, J = 15.3, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 2.20–1.95 (m, 8H), 1.96–1.92 (m, 3H), 1.92–1.69 (m, 8H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.62–1.50 (m, 6H), 1.35–1.25 (m, 4H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).

¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 203.9, 172.0, 171.3, 169.9, 168.1, 167.2, 167.1, 142.8, 137.0, 133.8, 132.9, 132.1, 130.3, 129.3, 129.2, 128.8, 128.6, 127.2, 126.6, 117.2, 114.8, 84.6, 81.2, 79.2, 76.5, 75.7, 75.2, 74.2, 72.2, 72.0, 60.5, 58.6, 52.8, 45.7, 43.3, 38.1, 37.5, 37.1, 35.6, 35.5, 32.5, 32.0, 31.6, 30.6, 24.1, 24.0, 23.7, 22.8, 22.6, 22.2, 21.1, 20.9, 20.1, 14.9, 14.3, 14.1, 9.7.

HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₇₆H₉₁NO₁₈S₂Na, 1392.5575; found, 1392.5579.

3.2. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

DLS measurements were carried out by a 90 plus particle size analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, Holtsville, NY, USA) equipped with a solid state He−Ne laser (wavelength = 661 nm). Experiments were carried out at a scattering angle of 90° on samples at 298 K. For both DLS and ζ-potential analysis, the purified samples were diluted in distilled water to a concentration of 200 µg/mL and briefly sonicated prior to the analysis. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three measurements.

3.3. Nanoparticle Preparation

Nanoparticle suspensions were prepared by a solvent displacement method [33]. Briefly, CBD containing analogs were dissolved in either ethanol (6a,b) or tetrahydrofuran (7a,b and 8a,b) (4 mg/mL) and the solution was added dropwise to ultrapure water under stirring in order to have a final aqueous suspension 2 mg/mL. Finally, the organic solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure.

3.4. Cell Cultures

MSTO-211H (human biphasic mesothelioma) and MeT-5A (human mesothelial) cells were grown in RPMI-1640 (R6504, Sigma Chemical Co.) modified by the addition of 2.38 g/L Hepes, 0.11 g/L pyruvate sodium and 2.5 g/L glucose. HT-29 (human colorectal adenocarcinoma) and HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma) cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 (R6504, Sigma Chemical Co.) and MEM (M0894, Sigma Chemical Co.), respectively. 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Biowest), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B (Sigma Chemical Co.) were added to both media. The cells were cultured at 37 °C in a moist atmosphere of 5% carbon dioxide in air.

3.5. Inhibition Growth Assay

Cells (2.5–4 × 10⁴) were seeded into each well of a 24-well cell culture plate. After incubation for 24 h in standard conditions, various concentrations of the test nanoparticles or reference drug were added, and cells were then incubated for a further 72 h. Cells reached about 80% confluence in control condition. Untreated cells and cells treated with vehicle alone were also taken into consideration as controls. The trypan blue exclusion assay was performed to determine cell viability. Cytotoxicity data were expressed as GI₅₀ values, that is, the concentration of the test agent inducing 50% reduction in cell number compared with control cultures.

3.6. Evaluation of Cell Death by Annexin V-FITC and Propidium Iodide Staining

The cell death was detected by a FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmigen). MSTO-211H cells (2.5 × 10⁵) were seeded into each cell culture plate in complete growth medium. After incubation for 24 h, cells were treated with the test nanoparticle or the reference drug for a further 24 h so that in control condition about 50% confluence was reached. After treatment, cells were collected and resuspended in the supplied Binding Buffer at a density of at least 10⁶ cells/mL. Cell suspensions (500 μL) were added with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, as indicated by the supplier’s instructions. The viable (Annexin V-negative/PI-negative), early apoptotic (Annexin V-positive/PI-negative), late apoptotic (Annexin V-positive/PI-positive) and necrotic (Annexin V-negative/PI-positive) cells were analyzed by FACSAria III flow cytometer and evaluated by FACSDiva software (BectonDickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA).

3.7. Confocal Microscopy Analysis

MSTO-211H cells (2 × 10⁴) were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates and cultured until reached approximately 50% confluence. Cells were then incubated for a further 4 h in the presence of 100 μM tested nanoparticle or 1 μM paclitaxel, as reference drug. At the end of the experimental protocols, cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Then, cells were blocked by the incubation in 3% fetal bovine serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, and stained with the antibody conjugate Alexa Fluor 488 mouse anti-β-tubulin (BD Pharmingen) for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides by using Mowiol 40–88 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) added with 1 μg/mL DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich). Images were acquired through a ×60 CFI Plan Apochromat Nikon objectives with a Nikon C1 confocal microscope and finally analyzed using NIS Elements software (Nikon Instruments, Florence, Italy), NIH Image J and Adobe Photoshop CS4 version 11.

4. Conclusions

A series of conjugates (6–8A,B) where CBD was used as a self-assembly inducer coupled with three different anticancer drugs was synthesized and characterized. These conjugates are able to self-assemble forming NPs, confirming the ability of CBD to induce this aggregation. The obtained NPs were characterized both for their physico-chemical properties and their biological activity. The ability to exert an antiproliferative effect was evaluated on three human tumor cell lines (MSTO-211H, HT-29, and HepG2), obtaining GI₅₀ values in the low micromolar range. In particular, all the NPs containing 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid as the linker, characterized by the presence of a disulfide bond (6B, 7B, and 8B), are remarkably more effective in inducing cell death with respect to the corresponding NPs presenting sebacic acid as linker, as predictable due to their easier intracellular cleavage. Further biological assays were carried out on MSTO-211H cells for the most effective NP 8B, containing paclitaxel as the drug and 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid as the linker, confirming the involvement of paclitaxel in cytotoxicity and cell death mechanism. This result supports the rationale of the approach, confirming the ability of the NP to address the drug inside the cell allowing its cytotoxic effect. In conclusion, these data further demonstrate the easy obtainment of self-assembled NPs by chemical functionalization of known anticancer drugs with a suitable self-assembly inducer, and of the possible modulation of their activity by varying the nature of the linker.