Nickel Nanoparticles Induced Hepatotoxicity in Mice via Lipid-Metabolism-Dysfunction-Regulated Inflammatory Injury

Abstract

Nickel nanoparticles (NiNPs) have wide applications in industry and biomedicine due to their unique characteristics. The liver is the major organ responsible for nutrient metabolism, exogenous substance detoxification and biotransformation of medicines containing nanoparticles. Hence, it is urgent to further understand the principles and potential mechanisms of hepatic effects on NiNPs administration. In this study, we explored the liver impacts in male C57/BL6 mice through intraperitoneal injection with NiNPs at doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/day for 7 and 28 days. The results showed that NiNPs treatment increased serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and induced pathological changes in liver tissues. Moreover, hepatic triglyceride (TG) content and lipid droplet deposition identified via de novo lipogenesis (DNL) progression were enhanced after NiNPs injection. Additionally, sustained NiNPs exposure induced a remarkable hepatic inflammatory response, significantly promoted endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) sensors Ire1α, Perk and Atf6, and activated the occurrence of liver cell apoptosis. Overall, the research indicated that NiNPs exposure induced liver injury and disturbance of lipid metabolism. These findings revealed the public hazard from extreme exposure to NiNPs and provided new information on biological toxicity and biosafety evaluation.

1. Introduction

Over the past few decades, rapid advances in nanotechnology have led to the development of engineered nanomaterials for wide applications, including the chemical industry, materials manufacture and biomedicine [1,2,3,4]. It is reported that the global market value of nanomaterials is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.8% from 2023 to 2030 [5]. Nickel is one of the most abundant heavy metal elements in the Earth’s crust [6]. Soluble and insoluble nickel compounds are common in nature [7]. Nickel nanoparticles (NiNPs) have extensive utilization in batteries, catalysts, textile production, ceramics and biosensors due to their distinctive characteristics such as high reactivity, high magnetism, low melting point and large surface area [8,9,10,11,12]. The universal presence of NiNPs increased their release into the environment, which brings hazards to public health and safety. For example, in 1994, a 38-year-old healthy non-smoking male inhaled NiNPs while spraying nickel onto bushes for turbine bearings, he died of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) 13 days after exposure [13]. In another case, a 26-year-old female chemist developed a severe nickel allergy when working with nickel powder with no protective measures [14]. Recent theoretical developments have revealed that occupational or non-occupational exposure to NiNPs can cause pulmonary injury, reproductive dysfunction, atherosclerosis, renal damage and even carcinogenic effects [7,15,16,17,18]. In 1990, The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) recognized nickel compounds as Class I human carcinogens [6].

The liver is the largest internal organ, approximately 2–5% of the total body weight and responsible for about 13% of the body’s blood supply at any given time, and plays an important role in metabolism, protein synthesis, storage of micronutrients, production of bile and xenobiotic detoxification [19,20]. As demonstrated by previous studies, the liver is the primary component of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS); it is estimated that 30–99% of administered nanoparticles are sequestered and accumulated in the liver from the blood circulation system [21,22]. The flow rate of nanomaterials reduces 1000-fold when they interpenetrate the liver, and 7.5 times nanomaterials are accumulated through the acquisition of Kupffer cells, immune B cells and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells [23,24]. The excessive deposition of nanomaterials could induce adverse hepatic impacts including metabolic enzyme activity interference, oxidative stress, inflammation response, impaired lipogenesis, hepatocyte apoptosis and fibrosis [25,26]. Thus, hepatic nanotoxicology became a research area of interest in biological safety evaluation and biomedical applications.

NiNPs in the bloodstream are mainly detained by the liver [27,28,29]. Recent reports indicated that nickel and nickel-containing nanoparticles exhibited liver injury in vivo and in vitro. Ajdariand and co-authors demonstrated that intraperitoneal injection with 50 nm NiNPs (75 ppm) significantly induced liver pathological changes in mice and initiated cycle arrest with apoptosis in HepG2 [28,30,31]. Nickel oxide nanoparticle (nano NiO) regulated the activation of inflammation response to induce oxidative-stress-mediated liver toxicity in rats [32]. Nickel ferrite nanoparticles (NiFe₂O₄) provoked cell survival decrease in HepG2 through generating excessive ROS [33]. At present, the processes of these manifestations have not been completely elucidated, so it is a critical requirement to further explore the potential molecular mechanisms and development process of NiNPs effects on hepatotoxicity. Based on the confirmed research findings, we proposed the reasonable hypothesis that massive NiNPs exposure is able to initiate homeostatic imbalance of the energy metabolism, and persistent inflammation response induced toxicity and damage effects in the liver. In this study, we intraperitoneally injected C57/BL6 mice with 50 nm NiNPs with concentrations of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/day for 7 and 28 days to investigate lipid metabolism, hepatic inflammatory reaction, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) and liver cell apoptosis effects in the liver after NiNPs treatment.

2. Results

2.1. Physicochemical Characterization of NiNPs

The commercial NiNPs powder was characterized in terms of physical properties, particle diameter, chemical composition, crystal structure, hydrodynamic size, surface charge and surface area. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images showed NiNPs well dispersed in Milli-Q water and the statistical average diameter was 55.8 ± 14.0 nm (Figure 1A,B). The hydrodynamic size of NiNPs in Milli-Q water was observed to be 181.6 ± 4.6 nm with a narrow distribution of size (PDI: 0.25 ± 0.05); meanwhile, the zeta potential was detected as 15.9 ± 2.5 mV (Figure 1C,D). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern showed typical diffraction peaks of the cubic phase. The strong and narrow diffraction peaks indicated that the powder had a good crystal structure (Figure 1E). The BET analysis results showed that the specific surface area was 5.0 ± 0.09 m²/g (Figure 1F). In summary, NiNPs had good dispersibility and stability for administration.

2.2. NiNPs Treatment Induced Liver Damage and Pathological Changes in Mice

For the purpose of evaluating the hepatic effects on NiNPs-treated mice, NiNPs were intraperitoneally injected into the mice at doses of 10, 20and 40 mg/kg/day (body weight) for 7 and 28 days (Figure 2A). The levels of ALT and AST exhibited significant increases in high-concentration-treated mice after continuous 28-day exposure compared with the control group (Figure 2B,C). Moreover, the results of liver hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining displayed obvious inflammatory cell infiltration and hepatic vacuolation, suggesting the topical inflammatory response and hepatocyte lipid deposition (Figure 2D). Together, all these data confirmed that NiNPs exposure efficiently initiated liver damage and metabolism disturbance in C57/BL6 mice, indicating the possible pathogenic mechanisms of NiNPs-caused hepatotoxicity.

2.3. NiNPs Treatment Induced Lipid Deposition in Mice Liver

As represented in Figure 3A,B, there were no remarkable differences between NiNPs-treated and control groups in terms of the body weight of the mice. Notably, NiNPs administration leads to various manifestations of lipid accumulation and even steatosis, reflected in the weakened color of the liver (Figure 3C) and increased liver weight (Figure 3D). In addition, triglyceride (TG) levels in serum and liver tissues were elevated (Figure 3F,G), and Oil Red O (ORO) images showed that lipid deposition activated hepatic steatosis (Figure 3H,I). However, the liver index of the NiNPs treatment groups exhibited no significant differences (Figure 3E) compared with the control mice. The findings revealed that NiNPs injection evoked disorders of hepatic lipid metabolism, especially in high-concentration exposure group mice.

To a large extent, nanoparticle-induced imbalance of hepatic lipid metabolism owing to interference of Srebp1c-initiated de novo lipogenesis (DNL) [34,35]. The mRNA expressions of the Srebp1c regulator and its downstream lipogenic genes containing fatty acid synthase (Fasn) and stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase 1 (Scd1) were obviously increased (Figure 4A–C), and the molecular abundance of hepatic Fasn and Scd1 was also identically demonstrated through ELISA experiments (Figure 4E,F). In contrast, real-time PCR analysis represented the inhibitory effect on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (Pparα) enzyme in long-term exposure mice (Figure 4D). In summary, all of these data provided proof that NiNPs treatment disturbs homeostasis of liver lipid synthesis via strengthening the progress of DNL, which suggested the potential molecular principles on NiNPs-induced liver lipotoxicity in mice.

2.4. NiNPs Treatment Induced Liver Inflammation in Mice

The massive production of cytokines and chemokines were pivotal trigger factors in nanoparticle-induced inflamed liver [36]. Compared to the control mice, hepatic mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnf-α), interleukin-6 (Il-6), interleukin-1β (Il-1β) and chemokine factors monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (Ccl2/Mcp-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (Ccl3/Mip-1), the regulation of activation expression and secretion by normal T Cells (Ccl5/Rantes) were significantly increased after NiNPs injection (Figure 5A–F). Meanwhile, the results of the ELISA tests explained that NiNPs administration increased protein levels of Tnf-α, Il-1β, and Ccl2 in mice (Figure 5G–I). Apparently, NiNPs administration can induce a hepatic inflammatory response in mice livers.

2.5. NiNPs Treatment Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis in Mice Liver

It is well known that excessive nanoparticles exposure can mediate endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction and cell apoptosis in animals and cells [37,38]. This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanisms of NiNPs-induced hepatotoxicity in mice, and the gene expressions regarding endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) were examined. The data showed that the mRNA levels of typical ER stress regulatory elements inositol-requiring transmembrane kinase/endonuclease-1 (Ire1α), PKR-like ER kinase (Perk), activating transcription factor 6 (Atf6), immunoglobulin heavy-chain-binding protein (Bip), X-box-binding protein-1(Xbp1), and activating transcription factor 4 (Atf4) were obviously increased in NiNPs-treated mice compared with the DPBS-injected groups (Figure 6A–C).

To further investigate the pathological development and mechanism in NiNPs-affected mice liver, a TUNEL assay was used to evaluate hepatocyte apoptosis. As shown in Figure 5, positive liver cells were slightly increased in low-concentration exposure groups and stronger in 20- and 40 mg/kg-treated mice compared to the control mice (Figure 7A,B). Moreover, C/Ebp-homologous protein (Chop), Bcl-2 associated X protein (Bax), and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) gene expressions were measured to demonstrate the basic pathogenic mechanisms of apoptosis (Figure 7C–E). The results exhibited the upregulated mRNA levels of ER stress sensors and apoptosis-correlated factors in NiNPs-administrated mice livers, which were similar to the TUNEL staining results. Taken together, we found that NiNPs exposure stimulated ER stress and then mediated the downstream hepatocyte apoptosis signal pathway in mice.

3. Discussion

Nickel is known to have a dual nature in biological systems. Micronutrient nickel plays an essential role in catalyzing several metalloenzymes in bacteria and lower eukaryotes, which was recognized as a “possibly essential element” as early as the 1970s for animals and humans [39]. On the contrary, the combustion of nickel-containing fossil fuels, nickel-manufacturing industries and the utilization of nickel products has induced the excessive release of nickel compounds and nanoparticles into the environment, leading to hazardous health effects on organisms [39,40]. Previous studies have demonstrated that nickel nanoparticles have more intense toxicity and stronger sensitization than microparticles [29,41]. The liver is the major biological filtration barrier organ responsible for the sequestration and biodegradation of exogenous substances, medicines and nanomaterials [37]. It is well known that sustained and excess metallic nanoparticles exposure induces severe liver injury [26,42]. The findings of our study showed that continuous NiNPs administration at doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day for 7 and 28 days significantly increased hepatic steatosis, liver inflammatory responses, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) and apoptotic liver cells in male C57/BL mice, suggesting the molecular fundamentals and pathogenic progression of NiNPs-induced hepatotoxicity.

As we know, nanomaterial-mediated body weight reduction is an important biomarker of nanotoxicity in animals. Nevertheless, we found that the body weight showed no statistical differences in control and NiNPs-treated mice. In recent reports, low, medium and high concentrations of 90 nm NiNPs-induced male BALB/c mice reproductive toxicity, but no significant differences in body weight were observed compared to the control group via the intragastric approach [43]. Similarly, Kong and its colleagues found that intratracheal instillation NiNPs could provoke remarkable spermatogenic cell damage and slightly decrease mice body weight, yet the overall trend related to body weight is upward, and statistical differences were not measured during the whole experiment period [15]. Our results were consistent with these previous studies. Body weight loss is a centralized expression of metabolic system dysfunction and chronic disease. Within our exposure periods and dosages, a fraction of NiNPs may aggregate after intraperitoneal administration, which could alleviate its hepatotoxicity, so to some degree, compensatory and detoxification were still functioning in the healthy mice livers. In the following study, we will implement more explorations in response to this fact.

In our research, intraperitoneally injected (i.p.) NiNPs enhanced liver pathological characteristics, as well as serum ALT and AST levels, and elevated hepatic TG contents revealing impaired basic functions and excess lipid droplet deposition in mice livers [44]. To deeply explore the principles of NiNPs-stimulated lipotoxicity, ORO staining was detected, and we concluded that NiNPs administration induced liver steatosis in normal mice. Then, crucial genes related to the hepatic lipid metabolism process were examined through real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. Theoretically, the liver accounts for about 26% of circulating fatty acid flux in steatohepatitis patients; SREBP1c-mediated DNL plays an important role in the biosynthesis of free fatty acids and triglycerides in the liver [44,45]. Our data showed that the NiNPs treatment upregulated the mRNA expressions of Srebp1c, Fasn and Scd1, which indicated abnormal hepatic lipid synthesis in mice. Pparα is mainly responsible for assimilating carbohydrates and lipids and activating fatty acid oxidation in lipolysis. In this work, we found the inhibition of Pparα gene expression, in particular in long-term exposed mice [46]. We previously proved that the administration of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) significantly upregulated pivotal gene mRNA expression of DNL in normal ICR mice [25]. In addition, polyethylene glycol-modified GNPs (PEG-GNPs) increased lipogenesis and decreased the β-oxidation of fatty acids, resulting in aggravated hepatic steatosis and more severe liver inflammation in MCD-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mice [37]. In addition, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) exacerbated lipid accumulation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) mice through BMP-SMAD motivated iron overload effect [34]. Therefore, in our study, NiNPs injection evoked lipid synthesis disorder and liver fatty degeneration due to enhanced DNL progression and attenuated lipolysis in mice.

Hepatic inflammation is regarded as a key driver of the pathogenesis and development of chronic liver diseases and hepatotoxicity [47,48]. Excessive and sustained exposure to nanomaterials stimulated oxidative stress, hepatocyte injury and liver inflammatory responses [42]. Male mice administrated with NiNPs via oropharyngeal aspiration caused greater mRNA induction of Il-6 and Ccl2 in the liver [18]. ICR mice injected with mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) for 10 days showed significantly increased hepatic Il-1β, Tnf-α, and Il-6 [49]. In the development process of liver damage, Tnf-α is hypersensitive and contributes to the activation of immune cells and hepatic stellate cells (HSC) [50]. Il-1β is mainly secreted from macrophages; therefore, macrophage infiltration is an important pathological marker of inflammatory reaction, and the hyperproduction of Il-1β accelerated spontaneous fibrosis in the liver [50]. Il-6 can be produced through hepatic parenchymal cells in response to chronic liver diseases and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection [51]. The primary function of chemokines (Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl5) is to participate in wound-healing response and recruitment of immune and non-immune cells to inflamed areas [50]. In this study, the expressions of the involved inflammatory genes, including Tnf-α, Il-6, Il-1β and Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl5, were increased, indicating that consecutive treatment of NiNPs is closely associated with inflammation in mice liver, which was promoted via lipid deposition-mediated liver injury.

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an intracellular organelle and plays a critical role in molecule protein production, protein collapse, calcium ion homeostasis and lipid synthesis [52]. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is known as unfolded protein response (UPR), which is due to the accumulation of misfolded proteins. ER stress is characterized by the activation of three sensors, including IRE1α, PERK, and ATF6α. BIP is an ER-resident chaperone protein encoded by heat shock protein family A (Hsp70). In liver disease, misfolded proteins are detained and accumulated in the ER lumen, competitively combining with BIP, leading to its separation from the mentioned UPR sensors [53]. IRE1α is a highly conserved signal sensor, and when dissociated from BIP, IRE1α mediates the autophosphorylation of spliced Xbp1 protein (Xbp1s), and then Xbp1s regulates ER-associated degradation (ERAD) and subsequent cascade reactions. PERK is a kind of transmembrane protein, and in the ER stress state, PERK substrate eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (elf2α) is phosphorated, activates the translation of transcription factor 4 (ATF4), and then ATF4 is transferred to the nucleus, regulating the transcription of cell death genes. Unanchored BIP releases ATF6α, and then ATF6α is cleaved into ATF6p50 in the Golgi apparatus to regulate the effects of ERAD [54]. Various pieces of the literature indicated that, in a pathological state, chronic ER stress regulated the gene transcription of downstream spliced Xbp1s and ATF4, etc., by stimulating c-Jun N-terminal kinase (c-JNK), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and ROS, to achieve hepatic inflammatory response and hepatocyte apoptosis [55]. Chop is considered the key regulator in the ER stress-mediated apoptosis pathway. Bcl-2 is a classic antiapoptotic factor that can be downregulated by UPR-generated Chop [55]. Previous reports have demonstrated that the intratracheal instillation of 20 nm silver nanoparticles (0.1 and 0.5 μg /g BW) for 8 and 24 h increased mRNA and molecular protein levels of IRE1α, PERK, Xbp1s, and Bip in ICR mice liver. Furthermore, 20–40 nm copper oxide nanoparticles (Nano-CuO) treatment caused oxidative stress and triggered the ER stress pathway in male rat livers [38]. TUNEL staining and real-time qPCR data showed that the intraperitoneal administration of NiNPs significantly increased the amount of apoptotic-positive liver cells and enhanced mRNA expression levels of ER stress sensors Ire1a, Perk, and Atf6a, key regulating factors Bip, Xbp1s, and Atf4, apoptosis-associated genes Chop, Bcl-2 and Bax in our works. These findings exhibited that NiNPs injection resulted in the impaired function of ER and programmed cell death through persistent inflammation and lipogenesis disturbance in mice liver. However, it is necessary to admit that more details and verifications need to be confirmed in subsequent research.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, our studies demonstrated that the intraperitoneal administration of NiNPs at doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day (body weight) for 7 and 28 days in male C57/BL6 mice has significantly promoted the progression of hepatic lipid accumulation due to de novo lipogenesis (DNL) dysfunction. Furthermore, NiNPs administration triggered hepatic inflammation responses in mice livers. The chronic secretion of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines induced ER stress and hepatocyte apoptosis (Figure 8). These results, to a certain extent, verified the hypothesis that NiNPs injection induced impaired lipogenesis and liver damage manifested by liver steatosis and inflammation response. The findings further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of NiNPs-caused hepatotoxicity in mice, in addition to supplementing new thoughts for biotoxicology assessment.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Physicochemical Characterization of NiNPs

NiNPs powder was purchased from Shanghai Chao Wei Nanotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and characterized by the manufacturer as nanoparticles with 99.9% metal purity. The morphological characteristics and particle size of the NiNPs were measured using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F30, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The chemical composition and crystal structure were detected through X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Billerica, MA, USA). Dynamic light scattering (DLS, Malvern Panalytical Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK) was used to determine the average hydrocyanic size, zeta potential and polydispersity index (PDI). The surface area was detected using nitrogen sorption isotherms (Micromeritics, TriStar II 3020 3.02, Brentwood, TN, USA). Prior to exposure, NiNPs were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (Solarbio Life Science, Beijing, China) with 0.1% pluronic F-68 (Sigma, Cream Ridge, NJ, USA) and ultrasonic dispersed for 30 min, and subsequently vortexed immediately before each experiment [18,56].

5.2. Animals and Treatments Design

Male C57/BL6 mice (8–10-week-old, 20 ± 2 g) were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The mice were placed in an air-conditioned room (temperature of 20 °C ± 2, relative humidity of 60 ± 10%) under a regular 12 h light/dark cycle. The mice were allowed ad libitum access to rodent chow and water during the entire experiment period. The mice were exposed to NiNPs via intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) at concentrations of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/day (n = 6 per group) for 7 and 28 days. The mice injected with 200 μL phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) containing 0.1% pluronic F-68 (Sigma) were utilized as the control group [56].

5.3. Serum Biochemical Indexes Analysis

After sacrificing mice, the blood was collected and centrifugated at 3000 rpm/min for 15 min at 4 °C. ALT, AST and TG levels in the mice serum were detected using a 7180 clinical analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

5.4. Histopathological Analysis

The liver samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature and then embedded in paraffin. Tissue fragments were cut into 4 μm thick sections using a Leica RM2255 Fully Automated Rotary Microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Hepatic inflammation was evaluated by recording inflammatory cell infiltration and steatosis.

5.5. TUNEL Staining Assay

Collected liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then embedded in paraffin. Next, the fragments were sectioned into 5 μm segments using Leica RM2016 Microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and then attached to glass slides for heat treatment for 2 h at 60 °C. After dewaxing with xylene, the slices were cleaned in absolute ethanol (5 min), 90% ethanol (2 min), 70% ethanol (2 min), and deionized water (2 min). Finally, the slices were treated with a TUNEL kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) and DAB (Sigma-Aldrich) agent for color visualization. The negative nucleus was blue dyed with hematoxylin, and the positive apoptosis nucleus was brown under DAB.

5.6. Oil Red O Staining

For the measurement of lipid accumulation in mice livers, the tissues were fixed in OCT. The 7 μm frozen liver tissue sections were cut using a CRAFTEK CR-601ST Semi-motorized Rotary Microtome (CRAFTEK, Wuhan, China), stained with Oil Red O agent (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min and then the nucleus was counterstained with hematoxylin for 10 min at room temperature. Lipid droplets in the liver tissues were observed as being red.

5.7. Detection of Mice Liver TG Content

Liver tissues were homogenized, and the content of hepatic TG was tested using a commercial kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

5.8. RNA Extraction and Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from 30 to 50 mg frozen liver tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was quantified with NanoDrop^TM 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Waltham, MA, USA). In total, 5 μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA following 20 μL mixture system: 5 μL total RNA, 10 μL 2 × ES Reaction Mix, 1 μL RT/RI Enzyme Mix, 1 μL Anchored Oligo (dT)₁₈, 3 μL RNase-free water according to cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The determination system was performed on Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher. The reaction procedures are as follows: 94 °C for 30 s, 94 °C for 5 s with 40 cycles and 60 °C for 30 s. The PCR primers are listed in Table S1.

5.9. Elisa Experiment

Liver tissues (100 mg) were homogenated and then centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the levels of Tnf-α, Il-1β and Ccl2 were measured using commercial EILSA kits (Elabscience, Wuhan, China). The content of hepatic Fasn and Scd1 was detected through the use of kits (Shanghai YuBo Biological Technology, Shanghai, China).

5.10. Statistical Analysis

All data were represented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) of 6 animals per groups by GraphPad Prism software (version 9.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The statistical significance was calculated using t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.