Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of a New UFLC–MS/MS Method for the Detection of Organophosphate Pesticide Metabolites in Urine
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Effects of Dioctyl Sulfosuccinate on the Photodegradation of Benzo[a]Pyrene in Aqueous Solutions under Various Wavelength Regimes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Preparation and Application of Magnetic Composites Using Controllable Assembly for Use in Water Treatment: A Review

1
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
2
College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
3
Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources, Pearl River Water Resources Commission of Ministry of Water Resources, Guangzhou 510611, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(15), 5799; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155799
Submission received: 26 June 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 29 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The use of magnetic composites in wastewater treatment has become widespread due to their high flocculating characteristics and ferromagnetism. This review provides an analysis and summary of the preparation and application of magnetic composites through controllable assembly for use in wastewater treatment. The applications of magnetic composites include the treatment of dye wastewater, heavy metal wastewater, microalgae suspensions, and oily wastewater. Additionally, the recycling and regeneration of magnetic composites have been investigated. In the future, further research could be focused on improving the assembly and regeneration stability of magnetic composites, such as utilizing polymers with a multibranched structure. Additionally, it would be beneficial to explore the recycling and regeneration properties of these composites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Due to rapid economic development and population growth, the water environment has been severely polluted by increasing domestic sewage and industrial wastewater. This has presented unprecedented challenges to water treatment. Currently, a combination of traditional physical methods (such as gravity sedimentation, physical adsorption, and membrane separation), chemical methods (including flocculation and electrochemistry), and biological methods (such as activated sludge) are widely used in water treatment [1,2,3]. Chemical flocculation is one of the techniques employed to destabilize colloids and suspended particles in water. By adding flocculants to the wastewater, the zeta-potential of the colloids and suspended particles in the water is reduced. This leads to the aggregation of these particles into larger flocs, which can then be further separated through sedimentation [4,5,6]. The process involves the continuous gathering and formation of flocs via the bridging and sweeping of the fine particles in the water [7]. As a result, the suspended particles are effectively separated and removed from the original suspensions.
Magnetic flocculation has emerged as a new method for flocculation in which magnetic flocculants are added to wastewater. The magnetic materials and colloidal particles combine to form magnetic flocs through various forces, including charge neutralization, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and others [8]. By applying an external magnetic field, the magnetic flocs can quickly aggregate and be separated from the suspensions [9]. Magnetic separation, due to its simplicity, low energy consumption, and cost-effectiveness, has found wide application in diverse water treatment processes. It has proven to be effective and reliable in various applications, such as kaolin removal, wastewater treatment in steel factories, mineral beneficiation for ore enrichment, dye wastewater decolorization, and the removal of metals like lead and copper from water [10,11,12]. Additionally, magnetic separation has found utility in biochemical processes, including cell separation, protein and DNA purification, and biocatalysis [13,14,15]. Given these versatile applications, magnetic separation solutions offer efficient and widespread usage in water treatment.
The choice of magnetic material plays a crucial role in the magnetic separation process. In recent years, various types of magnetic particles have been synthesized and have shown great potential for separation in water treatment applications. The commonly employed magnetic materials include naked Fe3O4 nanoparticles and magnetic composites that use Fe3O4 as the magnetic core [16,17,18]. However, naked Fe3O4 particles typically exhibit surface charge characteristics that are pH-dependent, with an isoelectric point around neutral or alkaline conditions. To enhance the separation efficiency, it is effective to functionalize the surface of naked Fe3O4 particles with cationic groups to prepare magnetic composites [19,20,21,22]. The cationic groups commonly used for coating purposes involve amino groups, such as polyethylenimine, poly dimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride, cationic starch, and chitosan [23,24,25,26]. The coating of a cationic polyelectrolyte was commonly achieved involving two strategies: the “attached-to” or the “immobilized-on” strategy [27,28,29]. The “attached-to” strategy involves first coating the separation objects with a polymer binder and then attaching them to the magnetic particles [22]. In the “immobilized-on” method, the naked Fe3O4 particles are first surface functionalized with a polyelectrolyte and then bound to the objects [30]. However, naked Fe3O4 particles often suffer from poor dispersibility and tend to aggregate into large clusters due to magnetostatic forces and van der Waals interactions. As a result, the “attached-to” strategy tends to achieve lower separation efficiency compared to the “immobilized-on” method [31,32,33]. Therefore, the “immobilized-on” strategy is widely applied in water treatment.
In recent years, the “immobilized-on” approach for preparing magnetic composites has gained widespread popularity. By surface functionalizing naked Fe3O4 particles, the isoelectric point of the composites generally increases, and the electrophoretic mobility also increases due to the presence of additional cationic functional groups on the surface of the magnetic particles. These particles demonstrate immense potential and efficient separation abilities in water treatment applications. This review focuses on the synthesis methods, preparation technologies, and applications of magnetic materials in the treatment of heavy metal wastewater, oily wastewater, dye wastewater, and microalgae removal or separation. This review also addresses the challenges associated with magnetic materials and discusses future developments in this field. Overall, the utilization of magnetic composites prepared using the “immobilized-on” approach holds great promise for addressing water treatment challenges. Further research and development in this area will contribute to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of magnetic materials in various water treatment applications.

2. Nano-Fe3O4 Particle Preparation

In the field of magnetic separation processes, naked Fe3O4 has been extensively used in water treatment due to its small size, ferromagnetism, and ease of preparation and modification. The preparation of nano-Fe3O4 primarily involves physical and chemical methods (Table 1). Physical methods such as ball milling and ultrasonic treatment are often employed. Although the operation process of this method is simple, the synthesized Fe3O4 particles frequently exhibit an uneven particle size distribution and different morphologies, making the obtained nano-Fe3O4 prone to oxidation. On the other hand, chemical methods typically involve liquid-phase reactions, which offer mild reaction conditions and a single reaction mechanism [34,35]. These methods allow for control over the nanoparticle size and result in prepared Fe3O4 particles with a uniform size distribution and good dispersion properties [16]. The commonly used chemical methods are primarily based on co-precipitation and hydrothermal synthesis.
The co-precipitation method is carried out under the protection of nitrogen or inert gas. The iron precursor (Fe2+ and Fe3+) solutions are mixed with an alkaline solution (NH3-H2O or NaOH) in a specific molar ratio at room temperature and standard atmospheric pressure. Subsequently, the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions precipitate to form Fe3O4. After precipitation, the precipitated Fe3O4 is prepared through a series of steps, including cooling, washing, and drying [36,37,38]. The formation principle of Fe3O4 via co-precipitation involves nucleation and growth mechanisms. Although co-precipitation is advantageous in terms of its simplicity and low toxicity, rapid precipitation often leads to the agglomeration of Fe3O4 particles and an irregular particle size distribution [39]. On the other hand, hydrothermal synthesis refers to a process where an aqueous solution is enclosed in a specially sealed reactor as the reaction medium [40,41,42]. By creating high temperature and high pressure conditions externally, soluble and insoluble substances are dissolved in the environment. Subsequently, the reaction undergoes recrystallization, separation, and heat treatment to obtain nano-Fe3O4 particles [43]. Hydrothermal synthesis offers advantages such as simple operation, low-cost raw materials, high purity, environmental friendliness, and low pollution. Moreover, the resulting nano-Fe3O4 particles possess a high surface area and excellent magnetic properties at room temperature [44,45]. However, strict requirements concerning the reaction equipment and conditions arise due to the high temperatures and pressures involved in hydrothermal synthesis [46].
Regardless of the co-precipitation or hydrothermal methods, the morphology, particle size, and other physicochemical properties of the resulting nano-Fe3O4 are influenced by factors such as the reaction precursors, temperature, and reaction time [46,47]. The properties of the prepared Fe3O4 particles vary depending on the chosen preparation technology and reaction conditions. Nano-Fe3O4 particles find applications in various fields of water treatment, including suspension particle separation, heavy metal adsorption in water, and dye wastewater discoloration [48,49,50]. However, traditional Fe3O4 particles typically possess an isoelectric point between 4.0 and 6.0, with some even lower than 4.0. Consequently, in wastewater treatment scenarios with a neutral or alkaline environment, nano-Fe3O4 particles often exhibit a negative charge, resulting in low efficiency for charge neutralization and pollutant adsorption [51,52,53]. To enhance the isoelectric point of nano-Fe3O4 particles and improve their water treatment performance, naked Fe3O4 is usually functionalized with polymers before use. Cationic polymers are commonly selected to coat the surface of Fe3O4, leading to the preparation of magnetic composites that enhance the charging properties of nano-Fe3O4 [54,55]. The isoelectric point of polymer-coated nano-Fe3O4 is increased to neutral or alkaline levels, and in some cases, nanocomposite magnetic materials can reach an isoelectric point of 13.5. The elevated isoelectric point also means that more ion exchange occurs between nano-Fe3O4 and the coated polymer, which results in magnetic composites with more functional groups. This significantly broadens the applicability of nano-Fe3O4 [56,57,58].

3. Controlled Assembly of Magnetic Composites

3.1. In Situ Assembly

The current methods for the functionalized assembly of polymers with nano-Fe3O4 mainly involve two approaches: in situ assembly and ectopic assembly (Table 2). In the in situ assembly process, cationic polymers are adequately mixed with iron precursors in a one-step method within the reactor [59,60,61]. This simultaneous synthesis of nano-Fe3O4 and coating with polymers allows for the preparation of magnetic composites with different particle sizes and shapes by controlling the reaction conditions [61,62,63]. In the reactor, Fe3+, Fe2+ and the coating materials are dissolved together. Then, the magnetic composites are formed after adding the alkaline solution and washing with ultrapure water. Additionally, higher nucleation rates and improved particle size distributions can be achieved using this method. As a result, in situ assembly has been considered as one of the main directions for synthesizing magnetic composites in recent years.
Wang et al. incorporated plant tannins (PP) into the precursor reaction solution of Fe and synthesized the magnetic composite Fe3O4@PP hydrothermally in a high-pressure reactor [51]. The Fe3O4@PP exhibited excellent adsorption properties for microalgae harvesting (589.99 mg/g biomass) and demonstrated strong ferromagnetic properties with a hydrodynamic diameter of 287 nm. Liu used the co-precipitation method to directly add larch tannin into a mixed solution containing Fe2+ and Fe3+, resulting in the synthesis of iron-based magnetic composites in a one-step process [64]. This material showed potential in removing Cd2+ from wastewater. In the in situ assembly process for magnetic composite preparation, the polymer assembly and Fe3O4 synthesis occur simultaneously. This ensures that the −NH2 groups of the polymer can firmly coat onto the Fe3O4 structure. Furthermore, the functional groups of the polymer on the Fe3O4 surface exhibit stable retention even after repeated recycling, indicating high cyclic stability (Figure 1). After five recycles, the harvesting efficiency remains at a high level (Figure 1a). In addition, the FTIR infrared spectra show that the peak position remained unchanged during five cycles of the recycle and reused processes, which indicated that the characteristic functional groups of the materials were not damaged (Figure 1b). The particle size, shape, and stability of the magnetic composites are determined by various operating conditions, such as the concentration of polymers and iron precursors, reaction temperature, and reaction time [65,66]. However, due to the surface properties, the obtained magnetic composites often have relatively low or even negative surface charges [31,67]. Therefore, addressing the dispersion and charging properties remains a major challenge in the preparation of magnetic composites via in situ assembly.
Table 2. Summary of the controlled assembly of magnetic composites.
Table 2. Summary of the controlled assembly of magnetic composites.
In Situ AssemblyEctopic Assembly
Ectopic Assembly with Inorganic PolymersEctopic Assembly with Organic PolymersEctopic Assembly with Biopolymers
CompositionIron precursors + polymersNano-Fe3O4+ inorganic polymersNano-Fe3O4+ organic polymersNano-Fe3O4+ biopolymer
Synthesis methodOne-step methodElectrostatic adherenceCoating,
“grafting-to” reaction
coating,
“grafting-to” reaction
PerformanceLow or even negative surface chargesStrong poly-aggregation characteristicsStrong flocculation performanceStrong flocculation and adsorption performance
SamplesFe3O4@PP [51]PAC/Fe3O4 [68], MFPAC [69]Fe3O4@PEI [70], Fe3O4@SiO2@PAMAM [71]Fe3O4@APFS-G-CS MNPs [72]
ApplicationMicroalgae harvestingMicroalgae harvesting,
pre-concentrating waste leachate
Microalgae harvesting,
graphene oxide wastewater
Oily wastewater

3.2. Ectopic Assembly

In contrast to the in situ assembly process, the ectopic assembly process is another common technique for preparing magnetic composites. In this approach, the nano-Fe3O4 particles, either synthesized in the laboratory or purchased directly, are assembled with cationic polymers through graft copolymerization or cross-linking modification [56,73]. The synthesis of polymer-coated nano-Fe3O4 can be conducted at room temperature without the need for high temperatures and pressures. This process is straightforward, and the experimental conditions can be easily controlled. Depending on their properties, the polymers used for ectopic assembly can be categorized as inorganic polymers, organic polymers, biopolymers, and so on [68,74,75].

3.2.1. Ectopic Assembly with Inorganic Polymers

In the realm of traditional inorganic polymers, aluminum salts and iron salts are commonly used, such as polymerized ferric sulfate (PFS), polymerized ferric aluminum sulfate (PFAS), and polymerized aluminum chloride (PAC) [76,77,78]. Generally, the nano-Fe3O4 coated with inorganic polymers materials are obtained through combining with inorganic polymer solution and Fe3O4 via stirring or shaking for enough time. In contrast to conventional inorganic polymers, high-molecular-weight inorganic polymers have the ability to synergistically react with two or more polymers. This leads to the formation of larger and denser flocs, resulting in improved polymerization performance. Consequently, the functionalized assembly of inorganic polymers with nano-Fe3O4 achieves strong poly-aggregation characteristics, including adsorption, bridging, and roll sweeping effects.
For instance, Zhao et al. combined PAC with nano-Fe3O4 particles to prepare PAC/Fe3O4 magnetic flocculant, which achieved a 91% harvesting efficiency of oleaginous microalgae from the original culture suspensions. Furthermore, when PAM (polyacrylamide) was added as a coagulant aid at a concentration of 3 mg/L, the harvesting efficiency improved to 99% [68]. Liu utilized PAC as a flocculant and NaH2PO4 as a stabilizer to prepare a novel composite magnetic flocculant (MFPAC) with nano-Fe3O4 for pre-concentrating waste leachate [69]. The combination of inorganic polymers with nano-Fe3O4 effectively enhances the density and sedimentation performance of magnetic flocculants, reduces the flocculation time, and exhibits good chemical separation performance.

3.2.2. Ectopic Assembly with Organic Polymers

Organic polymers, due to their effective adsorption and bridging properties, demonstrate strong flocculation performance in water treatment. When functionally assembled with Fe3O4, the resulting magnetic composites exhibit faster formation of magnetic flocs, require less hydraulic retention time, and have lower water content in the floc. These composites also maintain high magnetic separation performance even after multiple cycles of recycling and regeneration. In general, the first step in the assembly process is the synthesis of Fe3O4, which is then thoroughly mixed with organic polymers with a certain ratio. The raw materials react adequately by vibrating, ultrasound, stirring, and so on. The target magnetic composites are obtained through the external magnet and washed several times.
For example, Liu coated polyethylenimine (PEI) onto nano-Fe3O4 to obtain the magnetic composite Fe3O4@PEI [70]. This composite was used for microalgae harvesting, achieving an efficiency of over 98%. However, after 10 cycles of recycling and regeneration using the ultrasonic method, the harvesting efficiency of the Fe3O4@PEI composites reduced to 75%. Yang coated SiO2 on the surface of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and further modified it with polyamidoamine (PAMAM) to create a composite magnetic nano-flocculant (Fe3O4@SiO2@PAMAM), which exhibited excellent performance in treating graphene oxide wastewater [71].

3.2.3. Ectopic Assembly with Biopolymers

Biopolymers are natural materials derived from organisms or plants, possessing characteristics such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, environmental friendliness, low cost, and non-toxicity [79,80]. These biopolymers often exhibit strong flocculation and adsorption performance in water treatment due to the presence of active groups in their structure, such as amino, hydroxyl, and carboxyl groups [81]. The functionalized assembly of biopolymers with Fe3O4 nanoparticles is commonly employed to enhance the specific surface area and adsorption capacity of magnetic composites, with remarkable stability observed in wastewater treatment applications [82].
Chitosan is a typical representative of biopolymers, which is derived from chitin and is a representative example of biopolymers [75]. Due to its strong biocompatibility, biodegradability, and abundant functional groups (–NH2, –OH, –COOH), chitosan is often used for functionalized assembly with nano-Fe3O4 [83,84,85]. A complexation effect easily occurs between chitosan and nano-Fe3O4 particles, facilitated by the nitrogen atoms in the amine groups of the chitosan sharing lone electron pairs with divalent or trivalent iron on the surface of the nano-Fe3O4. This enables the Fe3O4 nanoparticles to embed onto the chitosan matrix structure, forming stable magnetic composites [86].
Lü conducted the synthesis of Fe3O4@APFS MNPs using a modified Stober method, where amino propyl-functionalized silica (APFS) and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were employed to stimulate the reaction [72]. The mixture was treated by a powerful ultrasonic wave and collected with the help of an external magnet. Subsequently, the chitosan-grafted magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4@APFS-G-CS MNPs) were obtained through a “grafting-to” reaction with chitosan. The synthesis procedure is depicted in Figure 2. The demulsification performance of these composites was evaluated under various conditions of oily wastewater. The results indicated that demulsification was achieved through electrostatic interactions. However, the Fe3O4@APFS-G-CS MNPs composites exhibited enhanced effectiveness for harvesting negatively charged materials (e.g., microalgae) in low pH conditions. This can be attributed to the magnetic chitosan surface being enriched with positive charges through rapid protonation [87]. Therefore, an important challenge to address is increasing the isoelectric point of chitosan-coated magnetic composites.

4. Application of Magnetic Composites in Water Treatment

Magnetic composites offer the combined advantages of functional polymers and magnetic properties, enabling not only efficient pollutant removal but also stable material recovery. These composites have demonstrated effective removal of pollutants from various types of contaminated water, including dye wastewater, heavy metal wastewater, and oily wastewater (Table 3). Additionally, they have proven to be efficient in separating microalgae from algal broth, catering to different processing requirements [88,89,90].

4.1. Decolorization of Dye Wastewater

The dyes in wastewater are often challenging to remove due to the presence of stable aromatic structures composed of chromophores and polar groups. Adsorption is a commonly used method for treating dye wastewater [97]. Magnetic composites, as a new type of adsorbent, possess a complex internal spatial structure that can accelerate the adsorption process of dyes. Additionally, these composites enable simultaneous material recycling and regeneration through their magnetic properties [98]. For instance, Liang employed modified Fe3O4/HA composites, which were generated from Fe3O4 nanoparticles and humic acid (HA), to remove rhodamine B (RhB) from wastewater [91]. The adsorption equilibrium for RhB by Fe3O4/HA composites was reached within 15 min, with a maximum adsorption capacity of 161.8 mg/g and a removal efficiency of ≥98.5%. The characterization results showed that the Fe3O4/HA composites aggregated after decolorization of the aqueous suspension. These composites could be rapidly recovered from the liquid using a low magnetic field after the adsorption process. Ren investigated magnetic core-shell Fe3O4@polypyrrole@4-vinylpyridine (Fe3O4@PPy@4-VP) composites for the removal of multiple dyes [92]. The results demonstrated the significant dye adsorption properties of the Fe3O4@PPy@4-VP composites. Electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and π−π interactions between the composites and dye molecules contributed to the efficient adsorption of different dyes (shown in Figure 3). Even after five cycles of adsorption–desorption, the adsorption efficiency remained unchanged. With a saturation magnetization of 33.84 emu/g, rapid separation of the Fe3O4@PPy@4-VP from the solution could be achieved.

4.2. Heavy Metal Removal

Magnetic composites exhibit excellent adsorption capacity for removing heavy metals, primarily due to their high specific surface area and abundant active sites. These composites, obtained through polymer assembly, possess numerous active groups that contain lone electron pairs capable of chelating with heavy metals. This allows the formation of stable chelates, enabling effective removal of heavy metals from wastewater [99]. For example, Feng prepared magnetic Fe3O4-chitosan@bentonite (Fe3O4-CS@BT) composites using natural materials and applied them in removing Cr(VI) from acid mine drainage (AMD) during remediation [93]. The results demonstrated that the Fe3O4-CS@BT had an adsorption capacity of 54.3 mg/g for Cr(VI) removal. The optimum conditions for adsorption were found to be an adsorbent dose of 0.05 g, pH 2, contact time of 120 min, initial Cr(VI) concentration of 60 mg/L, and a temperature of 25 °C. After undergoing five cycles of adsorption and desorption, the decrease in the adsorption efficiency was only 3%. Furthermore, the Fe3O4-CS@BT exhibited excellent performance in the removal of various heavy metals.
In Wang’s study, a magnetic xanthate-modified polyvinyl alcohol and chitosan composite (XMPC) was synthesized for the efficient removal and recovery of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions [94]. This material was utilized to remove Pd(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) ions. Adsorption equilibrium was achieved at 303 K after 120 min, with removal efficiencies of 67 mg/g, 100 mg/g, and 307 mg/g, respectively. The proposed mechanism for Cd(II) removal involved the gradual occupation of vacancies on the hydrogel surface by heavy metal ions as the reaction progressed (shown in Figure 4). Due to the magnetic properties of Fe3O4, the XMPC could be rapidly separated from the solution after the reaction.

4.3. Removal and Separation of Microalgae

The bioflocculation effect between magnetic composites and microalgae is facilitated by the electrostatic interaction, which can occur due to the porous structure, high active sites, and rich functional groups of magnetic composites. The magnetic aggregates are formed through strong hydrogen bonding between the magnetic composites and microalgae, allowing them to be easily separated from the solution using an external magnetic field [100,101]. In Ma’s research, the magnetic flocculation properties required for purifying algae-laden raw water were investigated using Fe3O4/CPAM magnetic composites [57]. It was found that the removal efficiency of chlorophyll a (Chl a) was over 97% with a Fe3O4/CPAM dosage of 1.2 mg/L, a mass ratio of Fe3O4 to CPAM of 1.5:1, and a pH range of 4.0 to 9.0. The main mechanism of flocculation involved charge neutralization at a pH of less than 9.0, while hydrogen bonding adsorption became dominant at a pH greater than 9.0.
Liu conducted a study where various materials fabricated using different methods were employed to harvest Chlorella sp. [102]. In the preparation of magnetic composites, Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using two methods (chemical coprecipitation and thermal decomposition) and modified with amino acids using three different approaches (ultrasonic, long-time mixing, and one step). The results revealed significant variations in oleaginous microalgae harvesting among the different materials. The amount of attached amino acid molecules on the surface of the Fe3O4 varied depending on the coating methods employed. The adsorption efficiency of oleaginous microalgae was found to be closely related to the types of amino acid groups present. Furthermore, the variation in the amount of amino acid groups on the surface of the magnetic composites influenced the harvesting performance. The structure of the amino groups also played a role in determining the harvesting efficiency. A higher number of amino groups, an increased isoelectric point, more surface active sites, and stronger electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding between algae cells resulted in better harvesting performance.

4.4. Emulsification and Separation of Oily Wastewater

In the treatment of oily wastewater, the effectiveness of the process is influenced by factors such as the van der Waals forces, oil viscosity, pore shape, and hydrophobic interactions between the oil and the adsorbent. Magnetic composites have proven to be effective in treating oily wastewater due to their high active sites, terminal functional groups, high interfacial activity, controllable viscosity, and strong ferromagnetism [103,104].
Xu’s research demonstrated the preparation of a new magnetic composite material for separating oily wastewater [95]. The process involved modifying expanded perlite (EP) with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), resulting in EP@APTES. Then, Fe3O4 nanoparticles were coated onto the surface of the EP@APTES to synthesize the novel EP@APTES-Fe3O4 composite. This synthesized composite was then employed as an eco-friendly and recyclable demulsifier for emulsified oil effluent treatment. The results showed that the EP@APTES- Fe3O4 exhibited good demulsification performance and excellent salt resistance effects. These properties were attributed to the amphiphilicity of the material and the interactions between the molecules of asphaltenes and resins at the oil–water interface. Furthermore, there was no significant reduction in the separation efficiency of the EP@APTES-Fe3O4 even after four recycling cycles, indicating its potential for repeated use in the treatment of oily wastewater.
Ma successfully prepared a new magnetic flocculant called FS-MC by combining modified chitosan (MCS) with Fe3O4@SiO2 using a silane coupling agent [96]. The flocculation performance and mechanism of the FS-MC on emulsified oil wastewater were investigated in the study. The results showed that the FS-MC exhibited significant removal efficiency for organic matter with a molecular weight greater than or equal to 10 kDa. The researchers also explored the reaction mechanism of the FS-MC. It was observed that the introduction of cationic and hydrophobic groups into the FS-MC enhanced the removal efficiency of emulsified oil, as depicted in Figure 5. The potential mechanisms involved in the separation of oily wastewater included charge neutralization, compression double-layer interaction, hydrophobic interaction, interface adsorption bridging, scavenging, and other synergistic effects.

5. Recycling of Magnetic Composites

As the strongly ferromagnetic nature of magnetic composites allows them to be recycled and regenerated, it is necessary to determine how to collect the flocs from the obtained magnetic aggregates and evaluate the reusability of the magnetic composites after the separation process [105,106,107]. However, it is important to note that during the recycling process, there is a potential risk of releasing pollutants back into the environment. This can occur when regenerated magnetic composites are not properly controlled, leading to secondary pollution. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on selecting suitable material recycling technologies that can effectively avoid secondary pollution. The regeneration of magnetic composites employing electrostatic repulsion is conducted by adjusting the pH conditions, adding polyelectrolyte with an opposite charge, thermal regeneration or by using the ultrasound method. Due to the similarity in electrostatic repulsive forces under certain pH conditions, pH values have no significant influence on the removal efficiency of the recycled Fe3O4 particles by employing ultrasonication [4]. Therefore, the ultrasound method is adopted frequently in the recycling process of magnetic particles.
In the case of reduced graphene oxide Fe3O4 recyclable composites (RGFs), the RGFs can be recovered using a thermal regeneration method, which involves simple calcination in air at 300 °C, and then applied in methylene blue (MB) adsorption. During this process, the MB molecules undergo thermal degradation through combustion, while the Fe3O4 transforms into magnetic γ-Fe2O3 rather than non-magnetic α-Fe2O3, ensuring the materials maintain stable adsorption performance and magnetic separation properties. In recycling experiments, no significant degradation in adsorption performance was observed, indicating the potential for the effective and sustainable recycling of RGFs [108]. Thus, the advantages of the thermal regeneration method (no secondary pollution, durable adsorption performance and stable magnetic separation property) make it a favorable regeneration and recycling technique for RGFs or other similar magnetic composites.
Ghosh developed a modified magnetic nanocomposite (CDen-MNPs), which found application in two cycles of PhACs removal. The reusability of the CDen-MNPs was evaluated by conducting the adsorption–desorption process for three cycles for all pollutants, and an alcohol solution was employed as an eluent to achieve the efficient desorption of pollutants after the adsorption process. The results showed that the adsorbent could be reused at least for two cycles with consistent adsorption efficiency. Thus, the CDen-MNPs could provide a new platform for the removal of PhACs and EDCs using the magnetic separation technique, and the alcohol solution can be employed as the surfactant in the recycling process [109].
Although magnetic composites can be rapidly recycled due to their paramagnetic properties, certain types in some parts of the composites still decreased with the recycling processes, which was due to the unstable assembly of the functional groups (–NH2, –N+, –COOH, etc.) on the Fe3O4 frames [110]. Consequently, ensuring the assembly stability of recycling magnetic composites is still a significant challenge in relation to the further research and application of these materials.

6. Conclusions

Over the past several studies, various aspects of the process of magnetic separation in water treatment have been investigated, for instance, the synthesis of magnetic nano-Fe3O4 particles, the controlled assembled of magnetic composites, the magnetic separation process in water treatment, and the recycling and reuse of magnetic particles. With either in situ assembly or ectopic assembly, the obtained magnetic composites showed excellent potential magnetic separation efficiency with advantages such as convenience, rapid separation process, high efficiency, low energy consumption, and the reusability of the medium and magnetic particles. With the ever increasing employment of magnetic composites, their significant affects will perform more distinctly and thus render large-scale separation processes economically feasible.

7. Prospects

As the application of magnetic composites primarily relies on mechanisms of charge neutralization, hydrogen bonding, and covalent bonds, thus resulting in the formation of high-density magnetic flocs, so if high binding capacities are provided and high separation efficiencies are achievable, the corresponding disposal costs of the obtained flocs in the further dewatering process will be reduced significantly. Hence, it is necessary to further decrease the costs of the magnetic separation process in the future large-scale industrial application. To achieve a more effective, economic and renewable magnetic separation process, further development on some key points could be investigated in the near future:
(i)
Taking assembly polymers as the starting point, to further improve the assembly stability of magnetic composites, and the regeneration and reusing properties can be promoted accordingly, thus consistent separation efficiency will be ensured.
(ii)
To develop more efficient, biocompatible, degradable, highly assessable and reusable magnetic composites, which have a minimum environmental impact.
(iii)
More thorough understanding of the composites–targets interactions in the magnetic separation process is essential, which could refer to the classical DLVO model and the magnetism modified M-DLVO, thus assisting in the design of magnetic composites and optimization of the magnetic separation process.
(iv)
The downstream processes following magnetic separation still need to be investigated, including the re-separation of magnetic composites from the culture medium/suspensions, the extraction of desired products, etc. In addition, the design process should take the characteristic of the desired end products into account.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and Q.F.; methodology, Q.F. and Y.L.; software, C.Z.; validation, Y.Z., Q.F. and H.X.; formal analysis, Y.Z. and Y.L.; investigation, M.Z., X.W. and A.N.; resources, Y.L., A.N. and Q.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z., Q.F., Y.L. and H.X.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and H.X.; visualization, Y.Z. and J.L.; supervision, Q.F.; project administration, Y.Z. and Q.F.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (No. 212300410138), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42207493), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515110525), the Key Project of Henan Province (No. 222102320314), and the Student Research and Training Program of Henan University of Science and Technology (No. 2023182).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cao, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, D.; Xu, M.; Shen, Q.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Ding, S. A critical review of the appearance of black-odorous waterbodies in China and treatment methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ghazvini, M.; Kavosi, M.; Sharma, R.; Kim, M. A review on mechanical-based microalgae harvesting methods for biofuel production. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 158, 106348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Qin, L.; Li, H.; Liang, W. Magnetic coagulation and flocculation of a kaolin suspension using Fe3O4 coated with SiO2. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maldonado, E.A.; Guzman, M.T.; Baizaval, J.L.; Teran, A.O. Coagulation-flocculation mechanisms in wastewater treatment plants through zeta potential measurements. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 279, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pugazhendhi, A.; Shobana, S.; Bakonyi, P.; Nemestothy, N.; Xia, A.; Banu, J.R.; Kumar, G. A review on chemical mechanism of microalgae flocculation via polymers. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, S.; Hu, T.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Chu, R.; Yin, Z.; Mo, F.; Zhu, L. A review on flocculation as an efficient method to harvest energy microalgae: Mechanisms, performances, influencing factors and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 131, 110005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, L.; Han, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, Y. Study on polymer-bridging flocculation performance of ultrafine specular hematite ore and its high gradient magnetic separation behavior: Description of floc microstructure and flocculation mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 276, 119304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, Z.; Lu, D.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Z.; Xu, S. Development of a high-gradient magnetic separator for enhancing selective separation: A review. Powder Technol. 2023, 421, 118435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Du, S.; Liang, W. Synthesis of chitosan-based grafting magnetic flocculants for flocculation of kaolin suspensions. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 139, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, W.; Cheng, S.; Zhou, L.; Han, Y. Enhanced iron recovery from magnetic separation of ultrafine specularite through polymer-bridging flocculation: A study of flocculation performance and mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 308, 122882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, J.; Wu, G.; Zhang, R.; Xia, W.; Nie, Y.; Kong, Y.; Jia, B.; Li, S. Emulsified oil removal from steel rolling oily wastewater by using magnetic chitosan-based flocculants: Flocculation performance, mechanism, and the effect of hydrophobic monomer ratio. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 304, 122329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.; Han, Q.; Wang, K.; Li, S.; Luo, W.; Liang, Q.; Zhong, J.; Ding, M. Recent advances in development of functional magnetic adsorbents for selective separation of proteins/peptides. Talanta 2023, 253, 123919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, L.; Lin, J. Recent advances on magnetic nanobead based biosensors: From separation to detection. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 128, 115915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Furlani, I.L.; Oliveira, R.V.; Cass, Q.B. Immobilization of cytochrome P450 enzymes onto magnetic beads: An approach to drug metabolism and biocatalysis. Talanta Open 2023, 7, 100181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, S.; Yu, B.; Wang, S.; Shen, Y.; Cong, H. Preparation, surface functionalization and application of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Colloid Interfac. 2020, 281, 102165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mallakpour, S.; Tukhani, M.; Hussain, C.M. Sustainable plant and microbes-mediated preparation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and industrial application of its chitosan, starch, cellulose, and dextrin-based nanocomposites as catalysts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 179, 429–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Yang, T.; Sridhar, D.; Algadi, H.; Xu, B.B.; El-Bahy, Z.M.; Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Li, T.; et al. An overview of metal-organic frameworks and their magnetic composites for the removal of pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 320, 124144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sahin, F.; Genc, O.; Gökcek, M.; Çolak, A.B. An experimental and new study on thermal conductivity and zeta potential of Fe3O4/water nanofluid: Machine learning modeling and proposing a new correlation. Powder Technol. 2023, 420, 118388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prochazkova, G.; Podolova, N.; Safarik, I.; Zachleder, V.; Branyik, T. Physicochemical approach to freshwater microalgae harvesting with magnetic particles. Colloids Surf. B 2013, 112, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, P.; Shen, J.; Hu, Z.; Bai, G.; Wang, M.; Peng, B.; Shen, R.; Linghu, W. High-efficient scavenging of U(VI) by magnetic Fe3O4@gelatin composite. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 221, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, Y.; Fan, Q.; Wang, X.; Jiang, X.; Jiao, L.; Liang, W. Application of Fe3O4 coated with modified plant polyphenol to harvest oleaginous microalgae. Algal Res. 2019, 38, 101417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, L.; Jiang, R.; Zhu, F.; Liu, H.; Ouyang, G. Application of functionalized magnetic nanoparticles in sample preparation. Anal Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 377–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Singh, S.; Singh, G.; Bala, N. Corrosion behavior and characterization of HA/Fe3O4/CS composite coatings on AZ91 Mg alloy by electrophoretic deposition. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 237, 121884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Huang, Z.; Yin, Y.; Liang, X.; Qin, Y.; Liang, J. Valorization of manganese residue to prepare a highly stable and active Fe3O4@SiO2/starch-derived carbon composite for catalytic degradation of dye waste water. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, R.; Cai, Y.; Su, Z.; Ma, X.; Wu, W. High positively charged Fe3O4 nanocomposites for efficient and recyclable demulsification of hexadecane-water micro-emulsion. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 133050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Toh, P.Y.; Ng, B.W.; Chong, C.; Ahmad, A.L.; Yang, J.W.; Derek, C.J.C.; Lim, J.K. Magnetophoretic separation of microalgae: The role of nanoparticles and polymer binder in harvesting biofuel. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 4114–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lim, J.K.; Chieh, D.C.J.; Jalak, S.A.; Toh, P.Y.; Yasin, N.H.M.; Ng, B.W.; Ahmad, A.L. Rapid magnetophoretic separation of microalgae. Small 2012, 8, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, S.; Stiles, A.R.; Guo, C.; Liu, C. Harvesting microalgae by magnetic separation: A review. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eivazzadeh-Keihan, R.; Bahreinizad, H.; Amiri, Z.; Aliabadi, H.A.M.; Salimi-Bani, M.; Nakisa, A.; Davoodi, F.; Tahmasebi, B.; Ahmadpour, F.; Radinekiyan, F.; et al. Functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for the separation and purification of proteins and peptides. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 141, 116291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Liang, W. In-situ self-assembly of plant polyphenol-coated Fe3O4 particles for oleaginous microalgae harvesting. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 214, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, D.; Teoh, W.Y.; Gooding, J.J.; Selomulya, C.; Amal, R. Functionalization Strategies for Protease Immobilization on Magnetic Nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 1767–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kobyliukh, A.; Olszowska, K.; Szeluga, U.; Pusz, S. Iron oxides/graphene hybrid structures—Preparation, modification, and application as fillers of polymer composites. Adv. Colloid Interfac. 2020, 285, 102285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, C.; Tian, X.; Chang, X.; Ren, Y.; Yu, S. Applications of surface functionalized Fe3O4 NPs-based detection methods in food safety. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sharma, J.; Kumar, P.; Sillanpaa, M.; Kumar, D.; Nemiwal, M. Immobilized ionic liquids on Fe3O4 nanoparticles: A potential catalyst for organic synthesis. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 145, 110055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Venugopal, R.; Dhanyaprabha, K.C.; Thomas, H.; Sini, R. Optical characterisation of cadmium doped Fe3O4 ferrofluids by co-precipitation method. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 25, A1–A5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khatamian, M.; Divband, B.; Shahi, R. Ultrasound assisted co-precipitation synthesis of Fe3O4/bentonite nanocomposite: Performance for nitrate, BOD and COD water treatment. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fraga-Garcia, P.; Kubbutat, P.; Brammen, M.; Schwaminger, S.; Berensmeier, S. Bare iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic harvesting of microalgae: From interaction behavior to process realization. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rahmawati, R.; Permana, M.G.; Harison, B.; Nugraha; Yuliarto, B.; Suyatman; Kurniadi, D. Optimization of frequency and stirring rate for synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles by using coprecipitation-ultrasonic irradiation methods. Procedia Eng. 2017, 170, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jin, X.; Zhang, L.; Tao, J.; Bai, J.; Yang, C.; Zhang, C.; Meng, S.; Wu, J. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of polyimide/Fe3O4 aerogel microspheres as magnetically controllable oil sorbents. Fuel 2023, 333, 126288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yaghoobi, M.; Asjadi, F.; Sanikhani, M. A facile one-step green hydrothermal synthesis of paramagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with highly efficient dye removal. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 144, 104774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liao, D.; Wang, R.; Zheng, Y.; Ma, J.; Sun, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, G. In-situ growth of small-size Fe3O4 nanoparticles on N-doped hollow carbon spheres for electrochemical high-efficiency determination of ofloxacin-contaminated water. Microchem. J. 2023, 191, 108927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wei, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, L. Synthesis of Fe3O4/C composites derived from cornstalk by one-step hydrothermal method as a reusable adsorbent for dyes. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 143, 109762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rani, N.; Dehiya, B.S. Influence of anionic and non-ionic surfactants on the synthesis of core-shell Fe3O4@TiO2 nanocomposite synthesized by hydrothermal method. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 23516–23525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maleki, S.T.; Babamoradi, M.; Rouhi, M.; Maleki, A.; Hajizadeh, Z. Facile hydrothermal synthesis and microwave absorption of halloysite/polypyrrole/Fe3O4. Synth. Met. 2022, 290, 117142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jesu, A.C.B.; Jesus, J.R.; Limac, R.J.S.; Mourad, K.O.; Almeidae, J.M.A.; Duquea, J.G.S.; Meneses, C.T. Synthesis and magnetic interaction on concentrated Fe3O4 nanoparticles obtained by the co-precipitation and hydrothermal chemical methods. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 11149–11153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Banic, N.; Merkulov, D.S.; Despotovic, V.; Fincur, N.; Ivetic, T.; Bognar, S.; Jovanovic, D.; Abramovic, B. Rapid removal of organic pollutants from aqueous systems under solar irradiation using ZrO2/Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Molecules 2022, 27, 8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, J.; Huang, M.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Li, G. Magnetic separation techniques in sample preparation for biological analysis: A review. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 2014, 101, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Markeb, A.A.; Llimos-Turet, J.; Ferrer, I.; Blanquez, P.; Alonso, A.; Sanchez, A.; Moral-Vico, J.; Font, X. The use of magnetic iron oxide based nanoparticles to improve microalgae harvesting in real wastewater. Water Res. 2019, 159, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, Z.; Lei, M.; Zeng, W.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, D.; Liu, C. Synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2-(-NH2/-COOH) nanoparticles and their application for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 20470–20479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, X.; Liu, C.; Qin, L.; Liang, W. Self-assembly of Fe3O4 with natural tannin as composites for microalgal harvesting. Fuel 2022, 321, 124038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Ouyang, Z.; Shen, T.; Wang, X. Preparation and characterization of polymer-coated Fe3O4 magnetic flocculant. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, T.; Yang, W.; Hong, Y.; Hou, Y. Magnetic nanoparticles grafted with amino-riched dendrimer as magnetic flocculant for efficient harvesting of oleaginous microalgae. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 297, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hu, Y.; Guo, C.; Wang, F.; Wang, S.; Pan, F.; Liu, C. Improvement of microalgae harvesting by magnetic nanocomposites coated with polyethylenimine. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, S.; Wang, F.; Hu, Y.; Stiles, A.R.; Guo, C.; Liu, C. Magnetic flocculant for high efficiency harvesting of microalgal cells. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 2014, 6, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, X.; Fan, Q.; Li, X.; Jiao, L.; Liang, W. Harvesting of Chlorella vulgaris using Fe3O4 coated with modified plant polyphenol. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 26246–26258. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ma, J.; Xia, W.; Fu, X.; Ding, L.; Kong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fu, K. Magnetic flocculation of algae-laden raw water and removal of extracellular organic matter by using composite flocculant of Fe3O4/cationic polyacrylamide. J. Cleaner Prod. 2020, 248, 119276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.M.; Yoon, I.H.; Kim, I. Application of polyethylenimine-coated magnetic nanocomposites for the selective separation of Cs-enriched clay particles from radioactive soil. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 21822–21829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, G.; Tu, H.; Niu, F.; Lu, S.; Liu, Y.; Gao, K.; Chen, Z.; Wang, P.; Li, Z. Synthesis of polymer-functionalized β-cyclodextrin, Mg2+ doped, coating magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle carriers for penicillin G acylase immobilization. Colloids Surf. A 2023, 657, 130609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hingrajiya, R.D.; Patel, M.P. Fe3O4 modified chitosan based co-polymeric magnetic composite hydrogel: Synthesis, characterization and evaluation for the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 244, 125251. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, J.; Yue, D.; Wang, H. In situ Fe3O4 nanoparticles coating of polymers for separating hazardous PVC from microplastic mixtures. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 407, 127170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shabzendedar, S.; Modarresi-Alam, A.R.; Noroozifar, M.; Kerman, K. Core-shell nanocomposite of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with poly(m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid) for polymer solar cells. Org. Electron. 2020, 77, 105462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zheng, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, W.; Zhao, X.; Gan, T.; Lu, Y.; Li, P.; Xu, W. In situ construction of Fe3O4@PDA@Au multi hotspot SERS probe for trace detection of benzodiazepines in serum. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2023, 300, 122897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, C.; Jiang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Liang, W. Magnetic polyphenol nanocomposite of Fe3O4/SiO2/PP for Cd(II) adsorption from aqueous solution. Environ. Technol. 2020, 43, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Shen, W. Preparation and characterization of the magnetic Fe3O4@TiO2 nanocomposite with the in-situ synthesis coating method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 216, 496–501. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Ur Rehman, S.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Long, F.; Shen, S.; Chen, C.; Liang, T. In situ synthesis of Fe3O4 coated on iron-based magnetic microwave absorbing materials and the influence of oxide magnetic materials on microwave absorption mechanism. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 12972–12979. [Google Scholar]
  67. An, G.S.; Han, J.S.; Shin, J.R.; Chae, D.H.; Hur, J.U.; Park, H.Y.; Jung, Y.G.; Choi, S.C. In situ synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2 core–shell nanoparticles via surface treatment. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 12233–12237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhao, Y.; Liang, W.; Liu, L.; Li, F.; Fan, Q.; Sun, X. Harvesting Chlorella vulgaris by magnetic flocculation using Fe3O4 coating with polyaluminium chloride and polyacrylamide. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, Z.; Duan, X.; Zhan, P.; Liu, R.; Nie, F. Coagulation performance and microstructural morphology of a novel magnetic composite coagulant for pre-treating landfill leachate. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 2507–2518. [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu, Y.; Jin, W.; Zhou, X.; Han, S.; Tu, R.; Feng, X.; Jensen, P.D.; Wang, Q. Efficient harvesting of Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Scenedesmus obliquus cultivated in urban sewage by magnetic flocculation using nano-Fe3O4 coated with polyethyleneimine. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 290, 121771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Dendrimer modified composite magnetic nano-flocculant for efficient removal of graphene oxide. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 307, 122851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lü, T.; Chen, Y.; Qi, D.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, H. Treatment of emulsified oil wastewaters by using chitosan grafted magnetic nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 696, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.M.; Yoon, I.H.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, I. Selective separation of Cs-contaminated clay from soil using polyethylenimine-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 706, 136020. [Google Scholar]
  74. Gerulová, K.; Bartošová, A.; Blinová, L.; Bártová, K.; Dománková, M.; Garaiová, Z.; Palcut, M. Magnetic Fe3O4-polyethyleneimine nanocomposites for efficient harvesting of Chlorella zofingiensis, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella sorokiniana, Chlorella ellipsoidea and Botryococcus braunii. Algal Res. 2018, 33, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Hu, D.; Li, S.; Chu, R.; Liu, C.; Lv, Y.; Bao, J.; Xiang, M.; Zhu, L. Biocompatible magnetic flocculant for efficient harvesting of microalgal cells: Isotherms, mechanisms and water recycling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 279, 119679. [Google Scholar]
  76. Luo, Y.; Gao, B.; Wang, J.; Yue, Q. Synchronous removal of CuO nanoparticles and Cu2+ by polyaluminum chloride-Enteromorpha polysaccharides: Effect of Al species and pH. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 88, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, X.; Zheng, H.; Xiang, W.; An, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, S. Magnetic flocculation of anion dyes by a novel composite coagulant. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 143, 282–294. [Google Scholar]
  78. Zheng, H.; Jiang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Tan, M.; Feng, L.; Liu, L.; Chen, W. Study on structural characterization and algae-removing efficiency of polymeric aluminum ferric sulfate (PAFS). Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51, 5674–5681. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ajao, V.; Fokkink, R.; Leermakers, F.; Bruning, H.; Rijnaarts, H.; Temmink, H. Bioflocculants from wastewater: Insights into adsorption affinity, flocculation mechanisms and mixed particle flocculation based on biopolymer size-fractionation. J. Colloid Interf. Sci 2021, 581, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liimatainen, H.; Sirvio, J.; Sundman, O.; Visanko, M.; Hormi, O.; Niinimaki, J. Flocculation performance of a cationic biopolymer derived from a cellulosic source in mild aqueous solution. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 9626–9632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Y.; Shi, G.; Wu, W.; Ali, A.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Qi, W.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z. Magnetic biochar composite decorated with amino-containing biopolymer for phosphorus recovery from swine wastewater. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 634, 127980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jamali, M.; Akbari, A. Facile fabrication of magnetic chitosan hydrogel beads and modified by interfacial polymerization method and study of adsorption of cationic/anionic dyes from aqueous solution. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, H.; Zhou, F.; He, B.; Wang, G.; Xie, W.; Liang, E. Efficient Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions by A Novel AO-PAN-g-Chitosan/Fe3O4 Composite. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 8033–8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yu, C.; Geng, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chu, L.; Luo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y. Preparation of the chitosan grafted poly (quaternary ammonium)/Fe3O4 nanoparticles and its adsorption performance for food yellow 3. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 152, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Jin, W.; Nan, J.; Chen, M.; Song, L.; Wu, F. Superior performance of novel chitosan-based flocculants in decolorization of anionic dyes: Responses of flocculation performance to flocculant molecular structures and hydrophobicity and flocculation mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131273. [Google Scholar]
  86. Qiu, Y.; Ma, Z.; Hu, P. Environmentally benign magnetic chitosan/Fe3O4 composites as reductant and stabilizer for anchoring Au NPs and their catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2014, 2, 13471–13478. [Google Scholar]
  87. Dai, D.; Qv, M.; Liu, D.; Tang, C.; Wang, W.; Wu, Q.; Yin, Z.; Zhu, L. Structural insights into mechanisms of rapid harvesting of microalgae with pH regulation by magnetic chitosan composites: A study based on E-DLVO model and component fluorescence analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 456, 141071. [Google Scholar]
  88. Yin, Z.; Chu, R.; Zhu, L.; Li, S.; Mo, F.; Hu, D.; Liu, C. Application of chitosan-based flocculants to harvest microalgal biomass for biofuel production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Maleki, B.; Esmaeili, H. Application of Fe3O4/SiO2@ZnO magnetic composites as a recyclable heterogeneous nanocatalyst for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: Response surface methodology. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 11452–11463. [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhu, M.; Kurniawan, T.A.; You, Y.; Dzarfan Othman, M.H.; Avtar, R.; Fu, D.; Hwang, G.H. Fabrication, characterization, and application of ternary magnetic recyclable Bi2WO6/BiOI@Fe3O4 composite for photodegradation of tetracycline in aqueous solutions. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110839. [Google Scholar]
  91. Peng, L.; Qin, P.; Lei, M.; Zeng, Q.; Song, H.; Yang, J.; Shao, J.; Liao, B.; Gu, J. Modifying Fe3O4 nanoparticles with humic acid for removal of Rhodamine B in water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209–210, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ren, J.; Wang, C.; Ding, J.; Li, T.; Ma, Y. Magnetic core–shell Fe3O4@polypyrrole@4-vinylpyridine composites for the removal of multiple dyes. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 9449–9462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Feng, G.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Wang, S. Magnetic natural composite Fe3O4-chitosan@bentonite for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage. J. Colloid Interf. Sci 2019, 538, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Yang, A.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, H.; Sun, P.; Yao, B.; Zang, Y.; Du, X.; Dong, L. Xanthate-modified magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2-based polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan composite material for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from water. Polymers 2022, 14, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xu, H.; Jia, W.; Ren, S.; Wang, J. Novel and recyclable demulsifier of expanded perlite grafted by magnetic nanoparticles for oil separation from emulsified oil wastewaters. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ma, J.; Fu, X.; Xia, W.; Zhang, R.; Fu, K.; Wu, G.; Jia, B.; Li, S.; Li, J. Removal of emulsified oil from water by using recyclable chitosan based covalently bonded composite magnetic flocculant: Performance and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126529. [Google Scholar]
  97. Neves, T.D.F.; Dalarme, N.B.; Silva, P.M.M.d.; Landers, R.; Picone, C.S.F.; Prediger, P. Novel magnetic chitosan/quaternary ammonium salt graphene oxide composite applied to dye removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103820. [Google Scholar]
  98. Zeng, X.; Sun, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q.; Yang, Y. Supramolecular gel composites reinforced by using halloysite nanotubes loading with in-situ formed Fe3O4 nanoparticles and used for dye adsorption. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 122, 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  99. Xiao, X.; Yu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, X.; Chen, A. Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions by chitosan-based magnetic composite flocculants. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 108, 22–32. [Google Scholar]
  100. Liu, P.; Wang, T.; Yang, Z.; Hong, Y.; Hou, Y. Long-chain poly-arginine functionalized porous Fe3O4 microspheres as magnetic flocculant for efficient harvesting of oleaginous microalgae. Algal Res. 2017, 27, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang, X.; Han, D.; Hua, Z.; Yang, S. Porous Fe3O4 and gamma-Fe2O3 foams synthesized in air by sol-gel autocombustion. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 684, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, P.; Wang, T.; Yang, Z.; Hong, Y.; Xie, X.; Hou, Y. Effects of Fe3O4 nanoparticle fabrication and surface modification on Chlorella sp. harvesting efficiency. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hesas, R.H.; Baei, M.S.; Rostami, H.; Gardy, J.; Hassanpour, A. An investigation on the capability of magnetically separable Fe3O4/mordenite zeolite for refinery oily wastewater purification. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 241, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Qiao, S.; Liu, Q.; Fan, Z.; Tong, Q.; Cai, L.; Fu, Y. Magnetic hyperbranched molecular materials for treatment of oily sewage containing polymer in oilfield compound flooding. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 865832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shan, R.; Yan, L.; Yang, K.; Yu, S.; Hao, Y.; Yu, H.; Du, B. Magnetic Fe3O4/MgAl-LDH composite for effective removal of three red dyes from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 252, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shi, Y.; Wang, B.; Ye, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Feng, Y.; Han, W.; Liu, C.; Shen, C. Magnetic, superelastic and superhydrophobic porous thermoplastic polyurethane monolith with nano-Fe3O4 coating for highly selective and easy-recycling oil/water separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 535, 147690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, D.; Zuo, X.; Gao, W.; Huang, H.; Zhang, H.; Cong, T.; Yang, S.; Zhang, J.; Pan, L. Recyclable ZnO/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with piezotronic effect for high performance photocatalysis. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 148, 111677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gao, Y.; Zhong, D.; Zhang, D.; Pu, X.; Shao, X.; Su, C.; Yao, X.; Li, S. Thermal regeneration of recyclable reduced graphene oxide/Fe3O4 composites with improved adsorption properties. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 1859–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ghosh, S.; Badruddoza, A.Z.M.; Hidajat, K.; Uddin, M.S. Adsorptive removal of emerging contaminants from water using superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles bearing aminated β-cyclodextrin. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, W.; Zhou, S.; Li, R.; Peng, Y.; Sun, C.; Vakili, M.; Yu, G.; Deng, S. Preparation of magnetic powdered carbon/nano-Fe3O4 composite for efficient adsorption and degradation of trichloropropyl phosphate from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of using Fe3O4/PP magnetic composites after five cycles of regeneration (a) and FTIR spectra (b) [31]. Dosage = 20.0 g/L. Initial algal cell density = 2.0 × 1010 cells/L. Initial pH = 9.03. n = 3.
Figure 1. Effect of using Fe3O4/PP magnetic composites after five cycles of regeneration (a) and FTIR spectra (b) [31]. Dosage = 20.0 g/L. Initial algal cell density = 2.0 × 1010 cells/L. Initial pH = 9.03. n = 3.
Molecules 28 05799 g001
Figure 2. Synthetic route of Fe3O4@APFS-G-CS [72].
Figure 2. Synthetic route of Fe3O4@APFS-G-CS [72].
Molecules 28 05799 g002
Figure 3. Adsorption mechanism of dyes by Fe3O4@PPy@4-VP composites [92].
Figure 3. Adsorption mechanism of dyes by Fe3O4@PPy@4-VP composites [92].
Molecules 28 05799 g003
Figure 4. The adsorption mechanism of the XMPC for Cd(II) [94].
Figure 4. The adsorption mechanism of the XMPC for Cd(II) [94].
Molecules 28 05799 g004
Figure 5. The possible flocculation mechanism of emulsified oily water treatment [96].
Figure 5. The possible flocculation mechanism of emulsified oily water treatment [96].
Molecules 28 05799 g005
Table 1. Summarize of nano-Fe3O4 particle preparation.
Table 1. Summarize of nano-Fe3O4 particle preparation.
Physical MethodsChemical Methods
MethodsBall milling, ultrasonic treatmentLiquid-phase reactions, hydrothermal synthesis
AdvantagesSimple operation processMild reaction conditions, single reaction mechanism
DisadvantagesUneven particle size distribution, different morphologies, prone to oxidationEasy agglomeration, irregular particle size distribution
Table 3. Summary of magnetic composite application for water treatment.
Table 3. Summary of magnetic composite application for water treatment.
Processing ObjectDye WastewaterHeavy MetalMicroalgaeOily Wastewater
MaterialsFe3O4/HA [91]
Fe3O4@PPy@4-VP [92]
Fe3O4-CS@BT [93]
XMPC [94]
Fe3O4/CPAM [57]EP@APTES-Fe3O4 [95]
FS-MC [96]
TargetsRhodamine B
multiple dyes
Cr(VI)
Pd(II), Cu(II), Cd(II)
Algae-laden raw water
Chlorella sp.
Emulsified oil
MechanismAdsorptionAdsorption, chelatingFlocculationFlocculation
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Fan, Q.; Zhu, C.; Liu, J.; Zhu, M.; Wang, X.; Niu, A. Preparation and Application of Magnetic Composites Using Controllable Assembly for Use in Water Treatment: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 5799. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155799

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Liu Y, Xu H, Fan Q, Zhu C, Liu J, Zhu M, Wang X, Niu A. Preparation and Application of Magnetic Composites Using Controllable Assembly for Use in Water Treatment: A Review. Molecules. 2023; 28(15):5799. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yuan, Yinhua Liu, Hang Xu, Qianlong Fan, Chunyou Zhu, Junhui Liu, Mengcheng Zhu, Xuan Wang, and Anqi Niu. 2023. "Preparation and Application of Magnetic Composites Using Controllable Assembly for Use in Water Treatment: A Review" Molecules 28, no. 15: 5799. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155799

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop