Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis, In Vitro Biological Evaluation and In Silico Molecular Docking Study of Benzimidazole-Based Oxazole Analogues: A Promising Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemometric Evaluation of RI-Induced Phytochemicals in Phaseolus vulgaris Seeds Indicate an Improvement on Liver Enzymes in Obese Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Exposure to Pyraclostrobin and to a Pyraclostrobin/Boscalid Mixture on the Mitochondrial Function of Human Hepatocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predictions of the Biological Effects of Several Acyclic Monoterpenes as Chemical Constituents of Essential Oils Extracted from Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 20
10.3390/molecules28207014
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition, Market Survey, and Safety Assessment of Blue Lotus (Nymphaea caerulea Savigny) Extracts

by
Noura S. Dosoky
1,
Sara A. Shah
2,
Joseph T. Dawson
2,
Sushant Sharma Banjara
1,
Ambika Poudel
1,
Cécile Bascoul
2 and
Prabodh Satyal
1,*
1
Essential Oil Science, dōTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA
2
Product Safety, dōTERRA International, Pleasant Grove, UT 84062, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(20), 7014; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207014
Submission received: 7 August 2023 / Revised: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 29 September 2023 / Published: 10 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study on Extraction and Chemical Constituents of Natural Extracts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Blue lotus, also known as Nymphaea caerulea (Nymphaeaceae), is a water lily found globally in lakes and rivers. With its long history of use in Egyptian culture, blue lotus has been associated with spiritual rituals and health benefits. Nowadays, blue lotus is still consumed as a tea or tincture to induce relaxation and heightened spiritual awareness. In this study, six authentic N. caerulea extracts from trusted sources and eleven commercial products were analyzed using gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Authentic blue lotus extracts were produced in industrial settings. Overall, the extracts were a mixture of aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic alcohols, fatty acids, phenyl derivatives, diterpenoids, phytosterols, and stigmastanes. Apomorphine and nuciferine, which are responsible for psychoactive effects of the blue lotus flower, were virtually absent from the authentic blue lotus extract. Although blue lotus has a long history of use, the safety data on the plant and its extracts is limited; however, together with the analytical data, the available information does not indicate major safety concerns for the topical application of authentic blue lotus flower concrete or absolute when diluted as a fragrance ingredient.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Blue lotus, water lily, and Egyptian lotus are common names of Nymphaea caerulea Savigny (Nymphaeaceae). It is an aquatic perennial plant that grows globally along rivers and lakes at altitudes ranging from sea level to 2700 m asl [1]. N. caerulea is a recognized synonym of N. nouchali var. caerulea (Sav.) Verdc. [2]. The plant is characterized by its floating round or oval flat leaves (up to 40 cm in diameter) that arise from a perennial spongy rhizome submerged in the mud of pond habitats. The leaves stay afloat because of their top surface, which is covered with a smooth, waxy cuticle and slightly rolled-up margins [1]. The flowers of N. caerulea are its characteristic feature. Blooming in September until February, the flowers are presented in a star-like pattern when fully open, measuring about 15–20 cm in diameter. The flowers close in the afternoon after opening in mid-morning and can be found in a range of colors, such as blue, white, and pink, with blue being the most common.
Blue lotus has long-standing historical and cultural significance. Drawings and paintings of the blue lotus flower were reported on Egyptian papyri and tombs from the 14th century B.C., indicating its use in shamanistic rituals and health-related practices [3,4]. Nymphaea species were revered as the epitome of holiness and beauty in ancient Greece and Rome. Based on its regional distribution, the plant is classified into tropical and hardy water lilies [5]. Blue lotus is a popular ornamental plant used in landscaping and is used in water purification. The flowers, stems, and roots are used for health-related purposes [6,7]. In traditional medicine, N. caerulea is reputed to have calming and soothing effects. In Ayurvedic medicine, it is used for a variety of health-related issues [8]. The family Nymphaeaceae has been studied extensively in the field of pharmacognosy due to their ability to produce aminogenic secondary metabolites. These metabolites have been found to have a range of pharmacological activities including analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. N. caerulea is a rich source of different secondary metabolites such as anthocyanins, anthraquinones, fatty acids, flavonoids, leuecoanthocyanins, phenols, coumarins, tannins, and triterpenoids [9,10,11,12]. The leaf and flower extracts are excellent sources of phytoconstituents when compared with the rhizome and root [11]. The flavonoid composition has been reported to determine the flower color. Cultivars with amaranth flowers contain delphinidin 3-galactoside, blue flowers contain delphinidin 3-O-galactoside, red flowers contain derivatives of delphinidin and cyanidin, while white and yellow flowers lack anthocyanins [13]. Because of its high content of polyphenols, blue lotus is recognized as a natural source of antioxidants that can delay food spoilage, slow down the aging process, support healthy cell growth, and promote cardiovascular health [12,14]. Kaempferol, quercetin, quercitin, chalcone, and gallic acid have been identified from the plant [12,15,16]. According to Agnihotri et al. [7], the ethyl acetate fraction of N. caerulea flowers and nine isolated compounds can be used as a natural solution for oxidative stress. The blue lotus flower has been chiefly utilized in relation to relaxation and sleep in modern times. At high doses, some users might experience hallucinations and euphoria [4]. In a case series, five active-duty patients presented to the emergency department with altered mental status following the use of blue lotus products, four after vaping and one after making an infused beverage [4]. Although the case series did not include confirmatory analytical data, the effects were attributed to two compounds, apomorphine and nuciferine, which were previously found to be present in these types of products [17]. Interestingly, these two compounds have been studied and used as therapeutic agents using oral doses in the range of 15–150 mg/day [18,19]. Little is known about industrially produced blue lotus extracts. Currently, various blue lotus products are accessible online including dried leaves, teas, plant resins, flower extracts, oils, concentrated alkaloids, and electronic cigarette liquids [17]. These products are labeled as natural, but mostly have not been approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for human consumption. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the chemical composition of industrially produced floral extracts of N. caerulea and compare the composition to the commercial products available in the U.S. market. Moreover, we assessed the safety of N. caerulea extracts.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Authentic Blue Lotus Extracts

Authentic blue lotus extracts were produced in industrial settings. The average yields were 0.18% and 0.09% for the concrete and absolute, respectively. The aroma of N. caerulea extracts can be described as floral, fruity, sweet, fig-like, leathery, and slightly herbaceous. The volatile fraction ranged from 38.7–65.1% of the total extract. Table 1 summarizes the chemical compositions of authentic N. caerulea extracts. Overall, the extracts were a mixture of aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic alcohols, fatty acids, phenyl derivatives, diterpenoids, phytosterols, and stigmastanes. The chemical makeup of the flower is quite complex. Fossen and coworkers identified seven flavonoids and five anthocyanins, including three acylated anthocyanins from the methanolic extract of the flower [20,21]. Agnihotri and colleagues isolated and identified several compounds from the flower ethanolic extract with a considerable antioxidant activity [7]. In a study using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by GC-MS analysis, the vapor phase of a trapped N. caerulea live flower contained benzyl acetate (10.4%), pentadecane (15.5%), 6,9-heptadecadiene (40.1%), and 8-heptadecene (15.3%) as the main components [22]. When the stamens, pistils, and petals were compared, it was reported that the majority of volatiles were produced by the stamens, with alkanes, alkenes, aldehydes, and ketones being the most abundant [23].

2.2. Alkaloids

Alkaloids are mainly found in lotus leaves [24,25]. Nuciferine is insoluble in water and soluble in acidic aqueous solutions and organic solvents such as chloroform, ethanol, and methanol [24]. While acid-ethanol extraction was traditionally used to extract nuciferine, ultrasound-assisted acid-ethanol extraction seemed to improve the results [24]. In the current study, blue lotus concretes and absolutes were free of apomorphine and contained negligible traces of nuciferine (10–72 ppb). This finding indicates that the extraction conditions to produce concrete and absolute using hexane followed by ethanol were not optimal for their extraction.

2.3. Commercial Products

Eleven commercially available blue lotus products were purchased online. Interestingly, the aroma varied greatly between the commercial products and none of these products resembled the original aroma. More than 150 compounds were identified from the obtained products (Table 2). All of the tested samples contained synthetic fragrance components. Unlike the authentic samples, terpenes were among the identified compounds. C1, C2, and C7 showed signs of a Citrus oil, Lavandula oil, and Geranium oil addition, respectively. It was hard to recognize which oil was added to C8-C11. Furthermore, there is evidence that herculyn D was used as a fragrance fixative in C4, C8, and C9, as indicated by the presence of abietic acid derivatives.

2.4. Safety Assessment

N. caerulea is not GRAS classified, and no published safety data were found on the plant or the extracts as a whole. However, the plant has a long history of use. The safety data for all constituents present at 1% and above are presented in Table 3. The three main constituents detected in the concrete were 6,9-heptadecadiene (11.95 ± 1.65%), n-tricosane (8.03 ± 0.18%), and benzyl alcohol (7.58 ± 0.85%). The three main constituents identified in the absolute were 6,9-heptadecadiene (11.05 ± 1.53%), benzyl alcohol (10.46 ± 1.42%), and tetradecanol (5.32 ± 0.74%). Tsai et al. [22] studied the volatile compounds of N. caerulea (water lily) flowers using GC-MS and reported four main compounds: 6,9-heptadecadiene (40.1%), pentadecane (15.5%), 8-heptadecene (15.3%), and benzyl acetate (10.4%). This is different from our GC-FID results, except that the main compound, 6,9-heptadecadiene, was identified as the most abundant compound, although at a substantially lesser concentration in the flower extracts.
As these are absolute and concrete materials, they may contain an unknown and significant portion of nonvolatile compounds. As such, quantification through GC-FID may not be accurate and compounds present in the absolute and concrete may not be detected and therefore not evaluated as part of this assessment. Since the safety of unidentified compounds cannot be guaranteed, this presents an unknown safety risk.
Of the 28 compounds investigated (making up 85.43% of the concrete and 80.52% of the absolute), safety information was not found for 10 compounds (making up 27.29% of the concrete and 25.11% of the absolute) including 6.9-heptadecadiene, n-pentacosane, tetrapenol, 3-((8Z,11Z)-heptadeca-8,11-dien-1-yl)-5-methoxyphenol, 2-nonadecanone, heptacosane, benzyl linoleate, methyl cholesterol, benzyl linolenate, and benzyl hexadecanoate. We were able to gather safety information for the remaining 18 compounds (making up 58.69% of the concrete and 56.68% of the absolute) including n-tricosane, benzyl alcohol, tetradecanol, heneicasane, nonadecane, pentadecane, oleic acid, E-squalene, linoleic acid, γ-sitosterol, palmitic acid, phytol, E-β-farnesene, ethyl stearate, stigmasterol, hexadecyl acetate, ethyl linoleate, and ethyl palmitate. According to the data available from CIR, all of the assessed compounds, except two, were found to be at concentrations considered safe in accordance with current usage practices, as indicated in Table 3. Benzyl alcohol and tetradecanol are slightly above the maximum concentrations; however, when blue lotus extracts are used as part of a formulation, the concentration of these compounds will be reduced. For compounds with data on genotoxicity, there was no indication of genotoxicity risks. Very limited information was available on acute or chronic toxicity and phototoxicity or photoallergenicity. However, the data are not indicative of major safety risks.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material and Extraction

Authentic blue lotus absolutes and concrete samples were prepared using industrial extraction methods. Cultivated blue lotus plants were collected from Hainan and Guangdong, China (Figure 1). The plant prefers high temperatures, humidity, and sunlight. Fresh flowers were shredded with a flower-cutting machine. About 1000 Kg of the shredded material was extracted twice with hexane (1: 2, w/v) in an enamel extraction tank with continuous stirring for 12 h. After soaking, the hexane was discharged and filtered with 120 mesh stainless steel mesh. The collected extracts were allowed to settle for 4 h, then filtered. The solvent was then recovered by heating with jacketed steam. The extract was concentrated under atmospheric pressure with a spherical concentrator until all of the hexane was evaporated. The concentrated extract is called concrete. To prepare the absolute, the blue lotus concrete was dewaxed with 95% ethanol (1:5, w/v) in a stainless-steel barrel, stirred carefully, and placed in the freezer for more than 12 h. The resulting extract was filtered and the floral was separated. The filtrate was concentrated under low pressure in a spherical concentrator until all of the solvent was evaporated. Samples of both the concrete and absolute were tested for solvent residue. Eleven commercially available blue lotus oil products were purchased online (Amazon and Etsy). The product labels of these samples contained the information listed in Table 4.

3.2. Gas Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) Analysis

Authentic and commercial samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer QP2010 Ultra (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) with electron impact (EI) mode with 70 eV, as previously described [55]. The components were identified by comparing the mass spectral fragmentation patterns (over 80% similarity match) and retention indices (RI) based on a series of homologous C8-C20 n-alkanes with those reported in databases (NIST database, and our in-house library) using the Lab Solutions GCMS post-run analysis software version 4.45 (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA).

3.3. Gas Chromatography–Flame Ionization Detection (GC–FID) Analysis

Analysis of E. purpurea essential oil was carried out using a Shimadzu GC 2010 equipped with a flame ionization detector (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA), as previously described [56], with a ZB-5 capillary column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA).

3.4. Detection and Quantification of Nuciferine and Apomorphine

LCMS-grade methanol, LCMS-grade water, and HPLC-formic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nuciferine and apomorphine were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Stock solutions of each standard at a concentration of 10 ppm were prepared by diluting the powder in methanol. Nuciferine and apomorphine were quantified using a NEXERA UPLC system (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a mass spectrometer (Triple quadrupole, LCMS8060, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) as previously described [18,25]. The detection was completed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) (Table 5). Samples were run in triplicate with external standards in between and the injection volume was 1 μL. The acquired chromatographic results were processed in LabSolutions Insight software version 3.2 (Shimadzu). For each compound, calibration curves (0.005–0.1 ppm) were created by linking the peak area and the concentration.

3.5. Safety Assessment

The safety assessment of blue lotus extracts was conducted by applying standard toxicology and risk assessment methods using the analytical results (Table 2), published safety data on the raw material as a whole plant, plant extract, and the constituents identified in the extracts. The information considered for the safety assessment included the historical use of the plant and extracts, safety and toxicology data on the plant and extracts, and safety and toxicology data of all constituents present at 1% and above. This safety assessment is based solely on the available literature. The documents collected and reviewed included scientific articles from books and scientific journals on botany and the safety of natural complex substances, fragrances, and flavors. Studies using different degrees of evidence from in vitro methods, pre-clinical models, clinical trials, and case reports were used as evidence of the safety or toxicity of the raw material as a whole. The sources of information used to evaluate the safety of individual constituents included the RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.) Fragrance and Flavor Database, CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) assessments, and ECHA (European Chemical Agency) REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals) registrations. The main endpoints of interest included genotoxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, skin irritation and sensitization, photoirritation and photoallergenicity, as well as acute and chronic toxicity for oral, dermal, and inhalation routes of exposure.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the chemical composition of six authentic blue lotus extracts and eleven commercial products. The extracts were a mixture of aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic alcohols, fatty acids, phenyl derivatives, diterpenoids, phytosterols, and stigmastanes. The main constituents in the authentic concrete were 6,9-heptadecadiene (11.95 ± 1.65%), n-tricosane (8.03 ± 0.18%), and benzyl alcohol (7.58 ± 0.85%), while the main constituents of the authentic absolute were 6,9-heptadecadiene (11.05 ± 1.53%), benzyl alcohol (10.46 ± 1.42%), and tetradecanol (5.32 ± 0.74%). Surprisingly, none of the investigated commercial products resembled authentic extracts in aroma or composition. Nuciferine and apomorphine were found in traces or were absent, respectively, from the studied authentic extracts, suggesting that the risk of psychoactive effects associated with these compounds would be virtually absent for a small dose of either of these extracts applied topically. Other than the psychoactive effects associated with nuciferine and apomorphine, the available safety data from the literature are limited and do not show major safety concerns for the authentic extracts. Surprisingly, none of the investigated commercial products resembled authentic extracts in aroma or composition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S.D., C.B. and P.S.; methodology, N.S.D., S.S.B., A.P. and C.B.; validation, N.S.D.; formal analysis, N.S.D., P.S. and A.P.; safety investigation, S.A.S., J.T.D. and C.B.; data curation, N.S.D., P.S. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.D. and S.A.S.; writing—review and editing, N.S.D., S.A.S., J.T.D., P.S., C.B. and A.P.; supervision, P.S. and C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Tim Valentiner, Simon Zhou, and Emilie Bell for kindly providing the authentic samples and photos. Special thanks to Megan Bean for purchasing the commercial blue lotus products.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Nymphaea nouchali Var. Caeruleae. Available online: https://pza.sanbi.org/nymphaea-nouchali-var-caerulea (accessed on 24 April 2023).
  2. The World Flora Online. Nymphaea caerulea Savigny. Available online: http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000382331 (accessed on 25 April 2023).
  3. Emboden, W. The Sacred Journey in Dynastic Egypt: Shamanistic Trance in the Context of the Narcotic Water Lily and the Mandrake. J. Psychoact. Drugs 1989, 21, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schimpf, M.; Ulmer, T.; Hiller, H.; Barbuto, A.F. Toxicity from Blue Lotus (Nymphaea caerulea) After Ingestion or Inhalation: A Case Series. Mil. Med. 2021, 188, e2689–e2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, G.Z.; Deng, H.Q.; Li, Z.X.; Li, G. Water Lily; Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Daboor, S.M.; Haroon, A.M. In Vitro: Antimicrobial Potential and Phytochemical Screening of Some Egyptian Aquatic Plants. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2012, 38, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agnihotri, V.K.; ElSohly, H.N.; Khan, S.I.; Smillie, T.J.; Khan, I.A.; Walker, L.A. Antioxidant Constituents of Nymphaea caerulea Flowers. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 2061–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brown, D. Encyclopedia of Herbs and Their Uses; DK Publishing: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs, R. Chemotaxonomy of Flowering Plants; McGill-Queen’s University Press: London, UK, 1974; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Makkar, H.P.S.; Blümmel, M.; Borowy, N.K.; Becker, K. Gravimetric Determination of Tannins and Their Correlations with Chemical and Protein Precipitation Methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1993, 61, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prasad, K.S.; Savithramma, N. Screening of Phytochemical Constituents of Nymphaea caerulea Savigny. An Aquatic Plant Resource for Drug Development. Am. J. Adv. Drug Deliv. 2016, 4, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao, J.; Xu, F.; Ji, T.F.; Gu, Z.Y.; Li, C.Y. Advances in the Study on Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities in Nymphaea Genus. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2014, 26, 142–147. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhu, M.; Zheng, X.; Shu, Q.; Li, H.; Zhong, P.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, L. Relationship between the Composition of Flavonoids and Flower Colors Variation in Tropical Water Lily (Nymphaea) Cultivars. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kerio, L.C.; Wachira, F.N.; Wanyoko, J.K.; Rotich, M.K. Total Polyphenols, Catechin Profiles and Antioxidant Activity of Tea Products from Purple Leaf Coloured Tea Cultivars. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1405–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nafisi, S.; Hashemi, M.; Rajabi, M.; Tajmir-Riahi, H.A. DNA Adducts with Antioxidant Flavonoids: Morin, Apigenin, and Naringin. DNA Cell Biol. 2008, 27, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yagura, T.; Motomiya, T.; Ito, M.; Honda, G.; Iida, A.; Kiuchi, F.; Tokuda, H.; Nishino, H. Anticarcinogenic Compounds in the Uzbek Medicinal Plant, Helichrysum maracandicum. J. Nat. Med. 2008, 62, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Poklis, J.L.; Mulder, H.A.; Halquist, M.S.; Wolf, C.E.; Poklis, A.; Peace, M.R. The Blue Lotus Flower (Nymphea caerulea) Resin Used in a New Type of Electronic Cigarette, the Re-Buildable Dripping Atomizer. J. Psychoact. Drugs 2017, 49, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Y.-L.; Shi, L.; Agbo, F.; Yong, S.H.; Tan, P.-S.; Ngounou Wetie, A.G. LC-MS/MS Simultaneous Quantification of Apomorphine and Its Major Metabolites in Human Plasma: Application to Clinical Comparative Bioavailability Evaluation for the Apomorphine Sublingual Film and a Subcutaneous Product. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 190, 113493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Apomorphine Dosage. Available online: https://www.drugs.com/apomorphine.html#dosage (accessed on 5 August 2023).
  20. Fossen, T.; Larsen, P.; Kiremire, B.; Andersen, O. Flavonoids from Blue Flowers of Nymphaèa caerulea. Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fossen, T.; Andersen, Ø.M. Delphinidin 3′-Galloylgalactosides from Blue Flowers of Nymphaéa caerulea. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsai, F.-J.; Liu, H.-J.; Lee, M.-Y.; Lin, C.-C. Determination of Volatile Components from Live Water Lily Flowers by an Orthogonal-Array-Design-Assisted Trapping Cell. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yuan, R.; Li, S.; Zheng, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L. Determination of Volatiles in Water Lily Flowers Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 2014, 47, 1541–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Du, X.; Pan, X.; Guo, L.; Zhu, Y. Extractions and Purification of Nuciferine from Lotus Leaves. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 10, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gu, S.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, G.; Li, X. A Sensitive Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Nuciferine in Rats. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 961, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Tricosane (CAS RN: 638-67-5). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  27. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Benzyl Alcohol (CAS RN: 100-51-6). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  28. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Bhatia, S.; Bruze, M.; Calow, P.; Dagli, M.L.; Dekant, W.; Fryer, A.D.; Kromidas, L.; La Cava, S.; et al. RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, Benzyl Alcohol, CAS Registry Number 100-51-6. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 84, S1–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Johnson, W.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.C.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Safety Assessment of Benzyl Alcohol, Benzoic Acid and Its Salts, and Benzyl Benzoate. Int. J. Toxicol. 2017, 36, 5S–30S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Tetradecanol (CAS RN 112-72-1). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 14 June 2023).
  31. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. 1-Tetradecanol (CAS RN: 112-72-1). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  32. Cosmetic Ingredient Review. Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Cetearyl Alcohol, Cetyl Alcohol, Isostearyl Alcohol, Myristyl Alcohol, and Behenyl Alcohol. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1988, 7, 359–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Heneicosane (CAS RN: 629-94-7). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  34. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Nonadecane (CAS RN: 629-92-5). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  35. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Pentadecane (CAS RN: 629-62-9). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  36. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Pentadecane (CAS RN: 629-62-9). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  37. Cosmetic Ingredient Review. Safety Assessment of Fatty Acids & Fatty Acid Salts as Used in Cosmetics. Tentative Report for Public Comment. 2019. Available online: https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/facids122018tent.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  38. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Oleic Acid (CAS RN: 112-80-1). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  39. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. 2,6,10,15,19,23-Hexamethyltetracosa-2,6,10,14,18,22-Hexaene (CAS RN: 111-02-4). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  40. Cosmetic Ingredient Review. Safety Assessment of Squalane and Squalene as Used in Cosmetics. Re-Review for Panel Review. 2019. Available online: https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/Squalene%20and%20Squalane.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  41. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Linoleic Acid (CAS RN: 60-33-3). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  42. Cosmetic Ingredient Review Safety Assessment of Phytosterols as Used in Cosmetics. Draft Report for Panel Review. 2013. Available online: https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/phytosterols_0.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  43. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Palmitic Acid (CAS RN: 57-10-3). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  44. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Palmitic Acid (CAS RN: 57-10-3). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  45. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Phytol (CAS RN: 150-86-7). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  46. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. (E)-7,11-Dimethyl-3-Methylenedodeca-1,6,10-Triene (CAS RN: 18794-84-8). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  47. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. β-Farnesene (CAS RN: 18794-84-8). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  48. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Ethyl Octadecanoate (CAS RN: 111-61-5). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  49. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Hexadecyl Acetate (CAS RN: 629-70-9). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  50. Heldreth, B.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Final Report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel on the Safety Assessment of Methyl Acetate. Int. J. Toxicol. 2012, 31, 112S–136S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Ethyl Linoleate (CAS RN: 544-35-4). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 5 June 2023).
  52. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Ethyl Linoleate (CAS RN: 544-35-4). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  53. RIFM Fragrance and Flavor Database, Version 2.0.7. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. n.d. Ethyl Palmitate (CAS RN: 628-97-7). Available online: https://rifmdatabase.rifm.org (accessed on 19 June 2023).
  54. REACH Database. European Chemical Agency. n.d. Ethyl Palmitate (CAS RN: 628-97-7). Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/en/home (accessed on 5 June 2023).
  55. Dosoky, N.S.; Poudel, A.; Satyal, P. Authentication and Market Survey of Sweet Birch (Betula lenta L.) Essential Oil. Plants 2022, 11, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Decarlo, A.; Johnson, S.; Ouédraogo, A.; Dosoky, N.S.; Setzer, W.N. Chemical Composition of the Oleogum Resin Essential Oils of Boswellia dalzielii from Burkina Faso. Plants 2019, 8, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 07014 g001
Figure 1. Fresh Nymphaea caerulea flowers harvested from the field.
Figure 1. Fresh Nymphaea caerulea flowers harvested from the field.
Molecules 28 07014 g001
Table 1. Chemical composition of authentic blue lotus extracts.
Table 1. Chemical composition of authentic blue lotus extracts.
RIexp aRTCompound NameConcrete (Area %)Absolute (Area %)
123AvgSD123AvgSD
103813.253Benzyl alcohol7.948.206.617.580.8512.099.749.5310.461.42
116619.126Benzyl acetate0.210.100.170.160.050.280.200.130.200.07
128424.686p-Anisyl alcohol0.590.410.150.380.231.150.790.800.910.20
143531.304(E)-α-Bergamotene0.280.280.360.300.050.270.370.380.340.06
145432.119(E)-β-Farnesene1.431.271.481.390.111.441.591.871.630.22
150034.135Pentadecane4.244.165.534.640.773.414.405.014.270.81
150434.275(E,E)-α-Farnesene0.730.630.780.710.080.730.861.040.880.16
152535.084β-Sesquiphellandrene0.640.630.830.700.110.590.800.820.740.13
167040.7526,9-Heptadecadiene11.1010.8913.8511.951.659.8011.9612.7511.501.53
167440.901(Z,Z,Z)-1,8,11,14-Heptadecatetraene0.480.460.610.520.080.450.550.620.540.08
167841.058Tetradecanol5.515.467.015.990.884.565.376.045.320.74
169741.8232-Pentadecanone0.210.150.210.190.030.310.310.310.310.00
170041.932Heptadecane0.500.871.150.840.330.710.780.840.780.07
183746.789Neophytadiene0.520.420.480.470.050.230.250.260.250.01
190048.999Nonadecane4.784.454.724.650.184.513.102.903.500.88
190849.234(E,E)-7,11,15-Trimethyl-3-methylene-hexadeca-1,6,10,14-tetraene0.340.260.280.290.040.380.320.330.340.03
195950.907Palmitic acid2.221.811.911.980.223.112.572.282.650.42
199352.041Ethyl Palmitate0.440.690.520.550.131.311.161.331.270.09
200852.512Hexadecyl acetate0.870.941.271.030.210.831.391.031.080.28
210155.438Heneicosane4.524.475.554.850.611.882.202.572.220.35
210455.5442-Nonadecanone1.501.631.781.640.140.170.100.200.160.05
210855.649Phytol1.921.461.231.530.352.742.092.212.350.35
212956.277Linoleic acid3.262.612.572.810.384.773.503.523.930.73
213556.454Oleic Acid4.294.264.104.220.106.124.424.384.971.00
215957.189Ethyl Stearate1.161.421.011.200.212.751.091.451.760.87
216557.363Ethyl linoleate0.851.150.850.950.172.342.141.512.000.43
218057.832Tetrapenol3.123.122.692.980.254.423.303.323.680.64
228760.929(E,E,E)-2,6,10,14-Hexadecatetraen-1-ol 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl acetate0.490.470.410.460.040.560.480.540.530.04
230161.34n-Tricosane7.848.068.198.030.181.392.272.622.090.63
240064.105n-Tetracosane0.230.240.220.230.01
250166.78n-Pentacosane3.043.192.913.050.140.230.560.580.460.19
257768.726Benzyl hexadecanoate0.810.730.810.780.041.061.491.591.380.28
260069.344n-Hexacosane0.120.140.190.150.04
268371.394n- Heptacosane1.541.691.511.580.100.510.710.480.570.12
274973.056Benzyl linoleate 1.361.231.221.270.081.732.27 2.000.38
275773.256Benzyl linolenate 0.830.710.820.790.061.171.581.731.490.29
277973.833Benzyl stearate0.200.130.180.170.040.220.240.280.250.03
279074.114Octacosane0.120.090.140.120.03
280374.447(E)-Squalene3.674.093.783.850.222.302.232.162.230.07
288076.5123-((8Z,11Z)-Heptadeca-8,11-dien-1-yl)-5-methoxyphenol2.532.971.092.200.982.792.482.602.620.16
302380.457β-Sitosterol acetate0.250.350.140.250.100.200.13 0.170.05
305581.361Vitamin E0.220.210.210.210.000.261.021.120.800.47
312383.327Methyl cholesterol1.0471.110.991.050.061.181.291.281.250.06
314283.885Stigmasterol0.971.121.111.070.081.201.281.281.250.05
318485.156γ-Sitosterol2.832.132.142.370.403.343.903.873.700.32
Total identified %91.7390.8593.76 89.4787.2887.52
RIexp = experimental retention index, RT = retention time, a retention index determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column.
Table 2. Chemical composition of commercial (C) samples.
Table 2. Chemical composition of commercial (C) samples.
RICompoundsC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11
778Isobutyl acetate0.12
931α-Pinene0.060.090.04 0.04tr 0.070.07
948Camphene 0.01 0.03 0.01
962Benzaldehyde0.020.17 0.01
967Glycerin 58.33
971Sabinene0.06 0.01 0.020.03
978β-Pinene0.370.180.14 0.03 0.360.38
9833-Octanone 0.05
988Myrcene0.05 0.05 0.040.05
9912,6-Dimethyl-2-heptanol 0.05 0.010.01 0.040.05
997Diethyl diglycol 0.24 0.840.780.420.33
1010Hexyl acetate 0.04
10131,4-Cineole 0.06 0.040.04
1019p-Methyl anisole 0.15
1023p-Cymene0.09 6.92 3.002.17
1024Dipropylene glycol 1 0.692.61
1026Dipropylene glycol 2 6.03 0.906.04
1027Limonene3.080.803.480.03 0.29 0.040.063.754.21
10311,8-Cineole 0.050.21 0.07 0.280.280.09
1033(Z)-β-Ocimene 0.17 0.37
1034Benzyl alcohol 0.01
1043Dipropylene glycol 3 0.64 1.914.66
1044(E)-β-Ocimene 0.01
1045(E)-β Ocimene 0.01
1046Dipropylene glycol 4 4.67 6.041.11
1049Dipropylene glycol 5 1.06 0.73
1056Dipropylene glycol 6 4.66
1057γ-Terpinene0.220.110.23 0.380.55
1069(Z)-Linalool oxide (furanoid) 0.29 0.01
1069Dihydro myrcenol3.22 3.40 3.623.42
1080Dipropylene glycol 7 0.66
1085Terpinolene 0.05 0.02 0.020.10
1086(E)-Linalool oxide (furanoid) 0.27 0.01
10903-(Z)-Hexenyl methyl carbonate 0.04 0.030.04
1094Methyl benzoate 0.31
1098Linalool6.8512.3812.33 4.732.222.642.6412.7511.69
1114Phenyl ethyl alcohol 0.31 1.87 7.017.744.113.79
11183-Octanol acetate 0.37
1127allo-Ocimene 0.01
1127(E)-Rose oxide 0.02
1134Dihydro linalool0.070.08 0.040.02
1149Camphor 2.47 0.02 0.290.29
1151Citronellal 0.04
1157Menthone 0.30
1161Benzyl acetate 0.55 1.23 2.262.071.161.23
1164Borneol
1166Isomenthone 0.15
1170Isononyl acetate 0.19 0.190.18
11742-Phenyl ethyl formate 0.07
1178(Z)-Pinocamphone 0.02
1181Terpinen-4-ol 0.18 0.07 0.37 0.120.12
1192Methyl salicylate 0.31
1194Dihydro citronellol 0.01
1195α-Terpineol 0.080.09 0.160.010.150.150.080.08
1198Florosa 0.44 0.320.770.480.41
1215(E)-Rozanol 1.52 1.293.932.202.03
1225Citronellol0.691.39 3.12 8.5511.774.684.18
1225Nerol 0.811.71
1226Sabinene hydrate acetate 0.02
1239Neral 0.02
1247Linalyl acetate7.782.925.141.70 3.53 2.432.365.195.10
1248Geraniol 0.40 1.723.232.151.37
1267Dihydro linalyl acetate0.10 0.05 0.03 0.070.07
1267Geranial 0.03 0.03
12691-Isoprpyl-3-tert-butylbenzene 0.040.04
1272Citronellyl formate 0.79
1275Neryl formate 0.04
1279Lavandulyl acetate 0.14
1286Hydroxy citronellal 7.430.192.01 3.594.072.392.380.180.20
1288(Z)-2-tert-butyl cyclohexanol acetate1.01
1292Indole 0.07 0.090.090.080.09
1297Geranyl formate 0.16
13302-Propanol, 1,1’-[(1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis2.51
1345α-Terpinyl acetate0.06 0.03 0.030.03
1347Citronellyl acetate 0.22
1354Neryl acetate0.160.21 0.05 0.20 0.070.06 0.02
1374Geranyl acetate0.290.520.340.11 0.120.210.160.150.340.36
1377α-Copaene 0.2
1380α-α-α-2-Trimethyl benzeneacetic 0.020.03
1388(E)-α-Damascone0.17 0.03 0.020.03
1395Vanillin 0.63
1408β-Maaliene 0.17
1410Calone0.15 0.27 0.270.32
1421β-Caryophyllene 1.10 0.08 0.420.010.110.11
1423Allyl cyclohexyl propanoate 0.06 0.050.07
1438Coumarin0.22
1442Dihydro curcumene0.231.47
1443(E)-Cinnamyl acetate 0.29
1446(E)-Isoeugenol 0.21
14471-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propan-2-one0.16 0.05 0.240.280.100.10
1449(E)-β-farnesene 0.25
1458α-humulene 0.09
1460Cyclamanal 0.76 1.861.730.940.94
1465γ-Decalactone0.550.93
1472Isomethyl-α-(Z)-ionone1.15
1478(E)-β-Ionone 0.29 0.270.31
1480Sandal mysore core 1.81
1501Butylated hydroxy toluene 0.22 0.210.26
1502α-Bulnesene 0.08
15136-Methyl α-ionone0.34
1527(Z)-Nerolidol 0.08
1529Lilial 5.65 13.689.34 16.9315.439.6910.1313.7914.04
1538(E)-α-Bisabolene 0.07
1549Raspberry ketone0.19
1553Geranyl butyrate 0.01
1560(E)-Nerolidol 0.150.31 0.29 0.280.30
1565Tropional0.88
1569Methyl-β-ionone0.13
1570γ-Undecalactone 0.18 0.190.19
1585Caryophyllene oxide 0.28
1625γ-Eudesmol 0.07
1626Cedryl methyl ether 0.25 0.250.31
1649(Z)-Methyl dihydro jasmonate2.2910.2621.796.75 12.7312.027.347.3021.3720.66
1656(7-α-Isopropenyl-4,5-dimethyl octahydroinden-4-yl)methanol 2.54
1659Lyral1.719.70 6.67 9.299.385.465.41
16693-(Z)-Hexenyl salicylate0.475.83
1669Iso-(E)-γ-Super 2.17 2.200.58
1675(E)-Methyl dihydro jasmonate0.271.412.340.80 2.160.050.860.842.492.65
1678Salicylic acid hexyl ester 1.94 9.74
1693Iso-(E)-α-Super 0.44 0.53
16962-(Z)-6-(Z)-Farnesol 0.35
17292-Methoxy ethoxy cyclododecane 0.86 1.731.740.970.98
17462-Hexyl-(E)-cinnamaldehyde11.84 2.564.34 8.290.474.864.852.622.95
1756Cosmone isomer II 0.040.07 0.04
1768Ambroxide 0.260.210.180.18
1768Benzyl benzoate 0.56
1769Methyl cedryl ketone2.41
17702-Hexyl-(Z)-cinnamaldehyde 0.16 0.45 0.340.320.110.16
1802(Z, E)-Farnesyl acetate 0.08
1827(E,E)-Farnesyl acetate
1844Acetyl methyl tetralin10.15 5.03 4.725.96
1870Galaxolide 10.24 0.16 0.150.21
1871Benzyl salicylate 0.39
1875Galaxolide 20.18 0.14 0.130.19
1892Galaxolide 30.31 0.2 0.180.25
1903Galaxolide 40.31 0.19 0.180.23
2011Ethylene brassylate 1.101.89 1.832.02
2057Ricenalidic acid lactone 8.40
2098Benzyl cinnamate 0.03
2234Methyl Pimarate 0.09 0.130.11
2249Methyl pimar-8(14)-en-18-oate 1.72 2.026.08
2290Methyl pimaran-18-oate 2.24 2.892.96
2300Methyl-8-piramen-18-oate isomer I 2.64
2311trans-3-Phenylpropyl cinnamate 0.54
2315Methyl 13-abieten-18-oate 2.98 3.032.99
2324Methyl-8-piramen-18-oate isomer II 23.82 5.84
2330Methyl 7-isopimaren-18-oate 0.29 0.200.20
2338Methyl dehydroabietate 6.47 6.17
2360Methyl abiet-7-en-18-oate 0.56 0.580.62
2387Methyl abietate 1.82 1.872.07
2420Cinnamyl cinnamate 0.95
2435Methyl neoabietate 0.18 0.230.25
2695Verdantiol isomer II 0.070.05 0.050.09
2927Tricaprylin Triglyceride 1.68
3084β-Sitosterol acetate 7.54
3116Caprin Biscaprylin Triglyceride 3.19
3301Caprylin Biscaprin Triglyceride 1.82
3325β-Amyrone 0.17
3376Lupenone 2.85
3486Tricaprin Triglyceride 0.40
Total66.8170.8497.7697.0674.2791.8291.9977.6668.3997.8397.59
Unidentified33.228.82.192.7525.698.187.8822.2431.592.132.38
Table 3. Toxicological reference values from CIR, RIFM, and ECHA for compounds ≥1% identified in authentic blue lotus extracts.
Table 3. Toxicological reference values from CIR, RIFM, and ECHA for compounds ≥1% identified in authentic blue lotus extracts.
Compound NameCAS NumberAverage Concentration (%)CIRRIFMECHARef.
Max Use ConcentrationGenotoxicityPhototoxicityNOAEL (mg/kg/day)NESIL (ug/cm2)LD50Repeated Dose ±
ConcreteAbsoluteRepeated Dose Developmental & ReproductiveOral (mg/kg)Dermal (mg/kg)Inhalation (mg/L)Oral NOAEL (mg/kg/d)Inhalation NOAEC (mg/m3)
6,9-Heptadecadiene -11.95%11.50%-----------N.A.
n-Tricosane638-67-58.03%2.09%-NIG---------[26]
Benzyl alcohol100-51-67.58%10.46%≤10%NGNPT/A100 †50059001620>2000>4.2400 *1072 ‡[27,28,29]
Tetradecanol 112-72-15.99%5.32%<5%NIG---->20008000>1.53548 ‡1000 †[30,31,32]
Heneicosane629-94-74.85%2.22%-NIG---------[33]
Nonadecane629-92-54.65%3.50%-NIG---------[34]
Pentadecane629-62-94.64%4.27%-NIG---->5000 #>2000 #>6.0 #≥500 #,†≥6000 #,†[35,36]
Oleic acid112-80-1 4.22%4.97%≤20.9%NIG---------[37,38]
(E)-Squalene111-02-43.85%2.23%≤10%----->5000-13,800>600 ‡-[39,40]
n-Pentacosane 629-99-23.05%0.46%-----------N.A.
Tetrapenol 24034-73-92.98%3.68%-----------N.A.
Linoleic acid60-33-32.81%3.93%≤21.8%NIG---------[37,41]
γ-Sitosterol 83-47-62.37%3.70%≤10%----------[42]
3-((8Z,11Z)-Heptadeca-8,11-dien-1-yl)-5-methoxyphenol -2.20%2.62%-----------N.A.
Palmitic acid57-10-31.98%2.65%≤21%NGNPT/A--->5000>2000 #>0.15 #1000–5000 #,†-[37,43,44]
2-Nonadecanone 629-66-31.64%0.16%-----------N.A.
Heptacosane 593-49-71.58%0.57%-----------N.A.
Phytol150-86-71.53%2.35%-NG #NPT/A333 #,†-2700 #>10,000>4000-100-[45]
(E)-β-Farnesene18794-84-81.39%1.63%-NG #NPT/A #--3700 #>5000>5000>2.06≥1000 †-[46,47]
Benzyl linoleate 47557-83-51.27%2.00%-----------N.A.
Ethyl Stearate 111-61-51.20%1.76%-NIG---------[48]
Stigmasterol 83-48-71.07%1.25%≤10%----------[42]
Methyl cholesterol 4651-51-81.05%1.25%-----------N.A.
Hexadecyl acetate 629-70-91.03%1.08%≤12.6%----->40 mL/kg>5000---[49,50]
Ethyl linoleate544-35-40.95%2.00%-NIG---->2000 #>2000 #---[51,52]
Benzyl linolenate 77509-02-50.79%1.49%-----------N.A.
Benzyl hexadecanoate 41755-60-60.78%1.38%-----------N.A.
Ethyl Palmitate 628-97-70.55%1.27%-NIG---->2000 #>2000 #-1000 #-[53,54]
CIR = Cosmetic Ingredient Review, RIFM = Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., ECHA = European Chemical Agency, CAS = Chemical Abstracts Service, NOAEL = No Observed Adverse Effect Level, LD50 = Lethal Dose 50, NESIL = No Expected Sensitization Induction Level, Ref. = References, N.A. = Not Available, NG = Not Genotoxic, NIG = No Indication of Genotoxicity, NPT/A = not phototoxic/photoallergenic, # = read-across, † = sub-acute study, ‡ = sub-chronic study, * = chronic study, - = not available, ± = No ECHA Dermal Repeated Dose NOAEL was available for the compounds listed.
Table 4. Available information on commercial blue lotus products.
Table 4. Available information on commercial blue lotus products.
SampleOil NameDescriptionBotanical Name
C1Egyptian Sahasrana 100%
Blue Lotus Oil Euphoria		100% Blue Lotus Oil EuphoriaNA
C2Blue Lotus OilTherapeutic grade NA
C3Lotus Blue OilPure essential oil, steam distilledNymphaea caerulea
C4Blue Lotus Extra StrengthEuphoric mood + dream tonic and liquid tincture, glycerin, alcohol, filtered waterNymphaea c. 200:1
C5Blue Lotus Absolute100% pure, natural, and undiluted EONymphaea caerulea
C6Blue Lotus EO100% natural ingredients NA
C7Blue Lotus Oil100% pure EONA
C8Blue Lotus EONANA
C9Blue Lotus absolute OilOrganic • 100% PURE • AbsoluteNA
C10Blue Lotus essential OilNANA
C11Blue Lotus essential OilNANA
NA = not applicable.
Table 5. Multiple reaction monitoring mode parameters (MRM).
Table 5. Multiple reaction monitoring mode parameters (MRM).
NameCAS #Precursor
(m/z)		Product 1
(m/z)		Product 2
(m/z)		Product 3
(m/z)		RT (min)r2
Apomorphine58117-94-5309.05268.20237.15191.11.470.9995
Nuciferine475-83-2296.00265.10250.10235.152.870.9995
r2, equation and coefficient of determination.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dosoky, N.S.; Shah, S.A.; Dawson, J.T.; Banjara, S.S.; Poudel, A.; Bascoul, C.; Satyal, P. Chemical Composition, Market Survey, and Safety Assessment of Blue Lotus (Nymphaea caerulea Savigny) Extracts. Molecules 2023, 28, 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207014

AMA Style

Dosoky NS, Shah SA, Dawson JT, Banjara SS, Poudel A, Bascoul C, Satyal P. Chemical Composition, Market Survey, and Safety Assessment of Blue Lotus (Nymphaea caerulea Savigny) Extracts. Molecules. 2023; 28(20):7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dosoky, Noura S., Sara A. Shah, Joseph T. Dawson, Sushant Sharma Banjara, Ambika Poudel, Cécile Bascoul, and Prabodh Satyal. 2023. "Chemical Composition, Market Survey, and Safety Assessment of Blue Lotus (Nymphaea caerulea Savigny) Extracts" Molecules 28, no. 20: 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207014

APA Style

Dosoky, N. S., Shah, S. A., Dawson, J. T., Banjara, S. S., Poudel, A., Bascoul, C., & Satyal, P. (2023). Chemical Composition, Market Survey, and Safety Assessment of Blue Lotus (Nymphaea caerulea Savigny) Extracts. Molecules, 28(20), 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop