Next Article in Journal
Cancer Vaccines Based on Fluorine-Modified KH-1 Elicit Robust Immune Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Multicomponent Domino Cyclization of Ethyl Trifluoropyruvate with Methyl Ketones and Amino Alcohols as A New Way to γ-Lactam Annulated Oxazacycles
Previous Article in Journal
Amphiphilic Grafted Polymers Based on Citric Acid and Aniline Used to Enhance the Antifouling and Permeability Properties of PES Membranes
Previous Article in Special Issue
ESIPT-Capable 4-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-(Pyridin-2-yl)-1H-Imidazoles with Single and Double Proton Transfer: Synthesis, Selective Reduction of the Imidazolic OH Group and Luminescence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules28041937
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

3-Aryl-5-aminobiphenyl Substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties

by
Alexandra E. Kopotilova
1,
Tatyana N. Moshkina
1,
Emiliya V. Nosova
1,2,*,
Galina N. Lipunova
2,
Ekaterina S. Starnovskaya
1,2,
Dmitry S. Kopchuk
1,2,
Grigory A. Kim
1,2,
Vasiliy S. Gaviko
1,3,
Pavel A. Slepukhin
1,2 and
Valery N. Charushin
1,2
1
Department of Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
2
I. Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia
3
M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(4), 1937; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041937
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 13 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in the Synthesis and Functionalization of Nitrogen Heterocycles)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Amino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-containing 3-aryl-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline derivatives with fluorescent properties have been designed and synthesized. The type of annelation of the triazole ring to the pyrimidine one has been unambiguously confirmed by means of an X-ray diffraction (XRD) method; the molecules are non-planar, and the aryl substituents form the pincer-like conformation. The UV/Vis and photoluminescent properties of target compounds were investigated in two solvents of different polarities and in a solid state. The samples emit a broad range of wavelengths and display fluorescent quantum yields of up to 94% in toluene solutions. 5-(4’-Diphenylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline exhibits the strongest emission in toluene and a solid state. Additionally, the solvatochromic properties were studied for the substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines. Moreover, the changes in absorption and emission spectra have been demonstrated upon the addition of water to MeCN solutions, which confirms aggregate formation, and some samples were found to exhibit aggregation-induced emission enhancement. Further, the ability of triazoloquinazolines to detect trifluoroacetic acid has been analyzed; the presence of TFA induces changes in both absorption and emission spectra, and acidochromic behavvior was observed for some triazoloquinazoline compounds. Finally, electronic-structure calculations with the use of quantum-chemistry methods were performed for synthesized compounds.

1. Introduction

Heterocyclic scaffolds containing the triazole rings, which are annelated with natural pyrimidine heterocycles, represent “lead compounds” for organic synthesis [1], medicinal chemistry [2] and pharmacology [3,4]. Recently, the ability of some [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines to act as penetrating DNA intercalators has been demonstrated [5,6]. 3,5-Diphenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline was reported as a selective A3A adenosine receptor antagonist [7], and 5-aryl-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline-3-amine demonstrated anticonvulsant activity [8].
The main advantage of the azolodiazine domain of 1,2,4-triazole-containing hybrid molecules is associated with a planarized skeleton of aza-heterocyclic core, which has an important effect on structural modifications [9], biological interactions [10] and chromophore properties [11]. Benzoimidazo[1,2-a][1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-e]pyrimidines A (Figure 1) demonstrated aggregation-induced emissions (AIE) and acidochromic behaviour [12]. The emission spectra of 2H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivatives B in acetonitrile solutions are sensitive to the presence of nitroaromatic explosives [13]. Fluorescent 2-aryl-1,2,3-triazolopyrimidine C was demonstrated to penetrate cells and selectively accumulate in the cell membrane, Golgi complex and endoplasmic reticulum, which opens up wide opportunities in bioimaging [11].
The quinazolinyl moiety possesses a stronger electron-withdrawing ability than the pyrimidinyl core due to extra electron delocalization into the fused benzene ring. Enhanced intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) in quinazoline chromophores was illustrated by red-shifted absorption and emission with regard to their pyrimidine analogs [14]. There is limited data on the optical properties of 3,5-diarylsubstituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines. 5-Fluorenyl-, 5-spirofluorenyl and 5-(3(4)-fluorenyl)phenyl substituted 3-(4-cyanophenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines (compounds D–F, Figure 2) were reported as novel electron transport heterocycles for efficient OLED materials possessing proper molecular dipole moments, which are able to be in compact contact with other organic layers in the process of forming a device [15]. Analogs of compounds D–F bearing a triphenyl-1,3,5-triazine fragment instead of a cyanophenyl one were mentioned in patent [16], and some 5-phenyl-, 5-biphenyl- and 5-napthyl- derivatives of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines containing triphenyl-1,3,5-triazine residue in position C(3) have been developed [17].
Our research group is working on synthetic approaches to quinazoline fluorophores and investigating the photophysical properties, as well as possible practical applications. Recently, the π-conjugated chromophores based on 2-aryl/thienyl-4-cyanoquinazolines, including 2-(4′-amino[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)-containing derivatives G–I (Figure 2), have been studied [18,19]. 4-Cyanoquinazolines are shown to be less emissive in solvents and solid state than quinazolin-4-ones [19] and morpholinyl [20] counterparts; the introduction of the cyano group into position C(4) leads to orange/red coloured powder and dual emission bands [19]. Annelation of the triazole cycle can be considered another way to enhance the electron-acceptor character of the quinazoline core.
Herein, we develop the series of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines bearing 3-aryl and 5-aminobiphenyl fragments to handle the detailed investigation of photophysical properties and to discover preferable structures for practical applications. The synthetic approach involves the cross-coupling of a bromo-derivative with boronic acid under typical conditions. The target compounds appeared to exhibit fluorescent properties both in solution and solid state; the fluorophores demonstrated changes in absorption and emission spectra upon the addition of water to MeCN solutions. Moreover, triazoloquinazolines show sensing properties toward acid.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis

Triazoloquinazoline fluorophores 2a–i were obtained by a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. The approach involves a Pd-catalyzed interaction of the corresponding 4-bromophenyl derivative 1a–c with arylboronic acid or an arylboronic acid pinacol ester; the yields were from moderate to good (25–65%), Scheme 1. The starting 3-(p-tolyl), 3-(4-methoxyphenyl) or 3-(4-trifluoromethyl) substituted 5-(4-bromophenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines 1a–c were prepared from appropriate hydrazones by oxidative cyclization with bromine in glacial acetic acid at room temperature, as previously described [21].
1H NMR, 13C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry (Supplementary Materials—Figures S1–S9) and elemental analysis data confirmed the identity and purity of target compounds. 13C NMR data for sample 2i has not been obtained due to its poor solubility in organic solvents, including DMSO-d6 under heating.
Single crystals of quinazolines 2a and 2e were obtained by a slow evaporation technique (MeCN and n-hexane/chloroform mixture, respectively, used as a solvent) and analyzed by an X-ray diffraction method (XRD) (Figure 3, Supplementary Materials—Tables S1–S4, Figure S10). According to XRD data, compound 2a is crystallized in the centrosymmetric space group of the monoclinic system. The molecule is non-planar, and the aryl substituents form the pincer-like conformation (Figure 3). The mean bond lengths and angles are near expectations. The configuration of the nitrogen atom in the diethyl amino group is near to planar. The deviation of the N(34) atom from the plane C(31)C(35)C(37) is 0.099 Å. The C–N bond distances of the ethyl substituents at the amino moiety are varied within a range of 1.456–1.462 Å. The distance C(31)–N(34) of 1.387 Å is significantly shortened, and the conjugation between the N(34) atom and the aryl substituent is observed. The shortened π-π interactions between the heterocyclic part and π-donating NEt2-phenyl substituent are observed, the distance C(5)…C(29) [1 − x, y − 0.5, 1.5 − z] was found to be 3.274 Å, which is 0.13 Å less than sum of the V-d-W radii.
Compound 2e is crystallized in the non-primitive centrosymmetric space group. As well as 2a, molecule 2e is non-planar, and the aryl substituents form the pincer-like conformation (Figure 3). The mean bond lengths and angles were also close to expectations. The three N–C bonds at the triarylamino group are almost in the same plane. The deviation of the N(34) atom from the C(31)C(35)C(39) plane is 0.10 Å, significant torsion angles were defined between all aryl substituents and the plane of the C–N bonds. The C–N bond distances of the triarylamino moiety are varied within the range of 1.409–1.443 Å. The T-shaped Csp2–H…N π-contacts take place with the participation of the nitrogen atom of the triazolo moiety. No shortened π-π interactions in the molecular packing were found.
An undoubted significance of the XRD data obtained for compounds 2a, e is that the type of annelation of the triazole moiety to the quinazoline one has been unambiguously confirmed. Unfortunately, there is still conflicting information in the literature; in particular, some patents report the formation of the [4,3-c] isomer of triazoloquinazoline [15,17] from arylhydrazone, and others state the [1,5-c] isomer [16] in the presence of the same oxidant PhI(OAc)2. Evidence of structure, causes of different reactions, and Dimroth rearrangement conditions were not provided.

2.2. UV/Vis and Fluorescence Spectroscopy

The UV/Vis absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopic data for toluene and MeCN solutions of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline fluorophores 2a–i are presented in Table 1; the corresponding spectra are shown in Supplementary Materials Figures S11–S23. The solutions of a c ≈ 10−5 M concentration were prepared for the experiments.
Based on the nature of substituent R1 in the aryl fragment, we have outlined the grouping of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline chromophores 2a–i for the discussion of optical properties: Me-group (2a–c), MeO-group (2d–f) and CF3-group (2e–h); in each group of compounds, the substituent NR2 in the biphenyl fragment was NEt2, NPh2 or 9H-carbazol-9-yl.
The positions of the longest wavelength absorption bands of Et2N and Ph2N-containing fluorophores 2a, b, d, e, g, h are observed in the UV region: 360–381 nm in toluene and 350–371 nm in MeCN (Table 1). The carbazolyl-derivatives 2c, 2f and 2i are characterized by a blue-shifted (about 20–40 nm in toluene and 30–50 nm in MeCN) absorption band with respect to their diethylamino or diphenylamino counterparts, which is due to the decrease in conjugation length caused by the rigid structure of the carbazolyl unit. Notably, the profile of absorption spectra and positions of maxima in toluene are similar for compounds 2c, 2f and 2i and are not influenced by the nature of substituent R1 in the aryl fragment (Me, OMe or CF3), whereas the absorption band of CF3C6H4-containing triazoloquinazolines with a diethyl- or diphenyl-amino fragment (2g and 2h, respectively) is bathochromically shifted with respect to the corresponding fluorophores 2a,d and 2b,e (Table 1).
Triazoloquinazolines 2a–i have fluorescence emission maxima at 412–502 nm in toluene and 530–640 nm in MeCN, with quantum yields up to 94% (Table 1). We considered the influence of substituents R and R1 on PL characteristics. For example, a red shift in emission maximum was observed in the order 2d→2a→2g for diethylamino-containing 2a, 2d and 2g both in toluene and MeCN solution (Supplementary Materials—Figures S20a and S21a), which can be explained by the decrease in electron-donating influence of the CH3 group compared to MeO (compounds 2d and 2a) and by the increase in electron-withdrawing ability of the aryltriazol fragment due to the replacement of CH3 with CF3 (compounds 2a and 2g). For this set of compounds (2a, 2d and 2g), we observed the attenuation of PL emission intensity when going from toluene to MeCN, which was probably caused by the reinforced charge transfer process in the excited state. On the contrary, the emission band of diphenylamino-containing fluorophores 2b, 2e and 2h does not depend on the nature of the aryl unit at the triazole ring (Supplementary Materials—Figures S20b and S21b). The QY of (trifluoromethyl)phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline 2h appeared to be the strongest in both solvents (ΦF = 94% in toluene), which clearly indicates that the trifluorophenyl group plays an essential role in the intense emission for NPh2-containing derivatives 2b, e, h. Fluorophores 2c, 2f and 2i bearing the carbazolyl unit display the emission maxima at 530, 550 and 560 nm in MeCN and show the same dependence of emission wavelength on aryl fragment nature, 2f→2c→2i (Supplementary Materials—Figure S21c) as their diethylamino counterparts. It is worth noting that derivatives 2c (R1 = CH3) and 2i (R1 = CF3) display a bimodal emission band in non-polar solvent (toluene) with a peak in high energy region at 467 and 434 nm, respectively, and at low energy, wavelengths at 515 and 517 nm, whereas compound 2f (R1 = OCH3) only shows the high energy band in toluene with a maximum at 412 nm (Supplementary Materials—Figure S20c). The bimodal emission can arise, for example, due to the existence of associates with solvents or aggregates. For the establishment of the exact reasons, additional studies will be conducted.
Along each series of quinazolines (Me-group, MeO-group, and CF3-group), the carbazolyl-containing fluorophores 2c, 2f and 2i demonstrate emissions in the highest energetic region in MeCN (λmax = 550, 530 and 560 nm, Table 1, Supplementary Materials—Figure S23), which agrees with the low electron-donating ability of the carbazol-9-yl unit. The introduction of NEt2 or NPh2 results in the bathochromically shifted emission band (compounds 2a, b, d, e, g, h, Supplementary Materials—Figure S23).
The quinazoline-based fluorophores 2a–i display an emission in the range of 416–512 nm in the solid state (powder), as shown in Table 1. The influence of the electron-donating substituent NR2 on the emission maximum is similar in each group of compounds; a blue shift is observed in the order NEt2→NPh2→carbazol-9-yl. The quantum yield increases in the order NEt2→NPh2, and obviously, the steric effect of a non-planar propeller-like configuration of the NPh2 group prevents molecules from packing via π-π stacking and quenching [22,23,24,25,26]. (Figure 4, Supplementary Materials—Figure S24, Table 1). A very high quantum yield of the compound 2h (>95%) should be noted.
It is interesting to compare the triazolo-containing fluorophores 2a–i with their 4-morpholinylquinazoline, 4-cyanoquinazoline or quinazolin-4-one counterparts containing the same 4′-amino[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl substituents [19,20]. We can conclude that the absorption maximum is not significantly influenced by the nature of the quinazoline core in the set of triazoloquinazoline, 4-morpholinylquinazoline and quinazolin-4-one, whereas emission bands of compounds 2a–i undergo a shift to longer wavelengths in all cases compared to their analogs. For example, compound 2a demonstrates an emission maximum at 491 nm in toluene and 612 nm in MeCN, whereas 2-(4′-N,N-diethylamino[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one exhibits emissions with λmax = 450 nm in toluene and 535 nm in MeCN [19], and 2-(4′-N,N-diethylamino[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)-4-(morpholin-4-yl)quinazoline has λmax = 443 nm in toluene and 554 nm in MeCN [20]), which confirms the reinforcement of interactions between the donor and acceptor part. Moreover, photophysical characteristics of 2a–i differ considerably from those of cyano derivatives (for example, the absence of a shoulder in the red region of the absorption band, a higher quantum yield both in solution and solid state, etc. [19]). Notably, in the series of triazoloquinazolines 2, the great bathochromic shift of the emission band is observed when the electron donor NR2 group changes from NEt2 to NPh2 and further to carbazolyl (78–87 nm, Table 1), while for other types of fluorophores, the position of emission maximum is less dependent on NR2. This is probably because the presence of an aryl fragment in the triazole ring and the formation of a pincer-type structure prevents structure twisting, which leads to a more considerable and dependent correlation between the aryl donor group and emission maximum.

2.3. Effects of Solvent Polarity for 2a, d, g, h

A study of luminescent properties in solvents of different polarity was performed for compounds 2a, 2d, 2g and 2h possessing high emission intensity in toluene (ΦF 47−94%) and MeCN (ΦF 24−34%) (Supplementary Materials—Tables S5–S8, Figure S25). The values of the emission maxima in different solvents are presented in Table 2. It has been shown that with increasing solvent polarity, the emission maximum of these chromophores underwent a red shift; the positive emission solvatochromism was observed. The most significant changes in the emission spectrum were noticed for compound 2a (λem = 451 nm in cyclohexane and λem = 648 nm in methanol) (Figure 5a).
We observed a rather large difference in the emission maxima upon passing from the least polar to the most polar solvent for other studied compounds 2d, g, h as well (Supplementary Materials—Figure S25).
In addition, a mathematical analysis of the solvatochromic behavior was performed for the obtained compounds according to the typical procedure based on the Lippert–Mataga equation [27,28,29]. The data are presented in Table 3 and Figure 5b. The linearity of the plots was found to confirm the positive solvatochromic effect in all the cases. The obtained values of the difference between the dipole moments of the ground and excited states are in the range of 17.54–22.34 D, and the maximum value of 22.34 D is observed for [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline 2h bearing a triphenylamine donor moiety and p-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl residue. Notably, the nature of the aryl substituent at the triazole ring has a significant impact on the Δµ value (the value increases in the order 2d→2a→2g). Thus, a pronounced intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process upon photoexcitation occurs in molecules 2a, d, g, h.
We analyzed the dependence of the emission maxima bathochromic shift on the quantitative polarity criteria of the solvents used, in particular, according to Kosower [31,32] and Dimroth/Reichardt mathematical models [33,34]. In most cases, the longest wavelength emission maximum is observed for methanol, and the shortest value corresponds to cyclohexane. In general, the obtained values of the emission maxima correspond to the criteria for the polarity of solvents. Deviations occur for compound 2d bearing the 4-methoxyphenyl substituent at position 3; in this case, the longest wavelength maximum is characteristic of DMSO, but a very small difference between the values of emission maxima in DMSO and methanol was noticed (2 nm). However, in all cases, the emission maximum in DMSO corresponds with the longer wavelength than in the case of acetonitrile (the difference is 3–24 nm), even though the difference between their polarity criteria is minimal.
The comparison of the obtained characteristics of 2a, 2d, 2g, 2h with the ones of some early published (hetero)aryl-substituted quinazolines allowed us to conclude that the condensation of an additional triazole ring led to a significant increase in Δµ values. Thus, in the case of 2-(hetero)aryl-4-(4-aminophenyl)quinazolines [35], the obtained Δµ values were 15.93–18.26 D. At the same time, it should be noted that the introduction of the aromatic substituent, instead of the heteroaromatic one at position C(2) of quinazoline, led to an increase in Δµ values. For the group 2 compounds bearing aromatic substituents at the analogs position C(5), developed in the current work, the larger Δµ values (up to 22.34 D) were determined.
It should be noted that the revealed positive solvatochromism phenomenon opens up a number of prospects for the application of novel group 2 compounds as potential candidates for designing fluorescent probes and as components for fluorescent and non-linear optical materials [36].

2.4. Absorption and Fluorescence Behavior of Compounds 2b, 2e and 2h in MeCN/water Mixture

Frequently, triphenylamino (TPA)-containing compounds demonstrate enhancement of emission intensity (AIEE) or inducement of emission (AIE) upon aggregation [22,23,24,25,26]. The X-ray data (Figure 3) obtained for quinazoline derivative 2e bearing the TPA unit confirms the non-planar structure of the studied molecules. We considered the absorption and emission behavior of the compounds 2b, 2e and 2h upon the addition of water based on the above-mentioned analysis on passing from MeCN solution to solid state. For this aim, we registered absorption and emission spectra of fluorophores 2b, 2e and 2h (at c = 2 × 10−6 M) in pure MeCN and in MeCN/water mixtures with various water fractions (fw); see Figure 6 and Supplementary Materials Figures S26–S28. Figure 6 demonstrates changes in fluorescence spectra of 2e in MeCN and MeCN/water mixtures (a) and a plot of relative PL intensity (I/I0) and wavelength at emission maxima of 2e versus the composition of the water fraction (b) at room temperature. After the first portion of H2O, we observe a dramatic attenuation of emission intensity and red shift of the band. After 70vol% of water, the band shifts toward the blue region with the regeneration of intensity, and the strongest emission was measured at 80vol% of water. Other compounds (2b and 2h) demonstrate similar changes in emission spectra. These changes are typical for luminogens with a rotatable donor–acceptor (D–A) structure, which possess two excited states: a locally excited (LE) state and a twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) state. When the polarity of media increases (upon the addition of water), the TICT state becomes dominant, leading to red-shifted emission and the quenching of intensity. Further addition of water most likely led to the formation of aggregates that are less polar than initial single molecules, and this phenomenon resulted in blue-shifted emission. The intensity restores due to the restriction of rotation in the TPA group and phenylene moieties and the reducing non-radiative transitions. Thus, compounds 2b, 2e and 2h exhibited aggregation-induced emission enhancement to some extent.
As for UV/vis spectra for quinazolines 2b, 2e and 2h, we observed that the absorption band registered at 90%, 80% and 70% water fraction, respectively, was bathochromically shifted compared to pure MeCN, which can be ascribed to the formation of J-type aggregates with head-to-tail arrangement (Supplementary Materials—Figures S26c, S27a and S28c) [37,38,39].
Additionally, we carried out a time-resolved fluorescence study of quinazolines 2b, 2e and 2h in a pure MeCN and MeCN/water mixture (Supplementary Materials—Figures S26d, S27b, S28d and S29–S31); fluorescence lifetimes were estimated to complete the photophysical characterization of the fluorophores. The lifetime of compound 2b is fitted with bi-exponential decay with an average lifetime of 2.38 ns, whereas compounds 2e and 2h are characterized by mono-exponential decay curves and lifetimes of 3.17 and 2.46 ns, respectively (Supplementary Materials—Table S9). Fluorescence decay profiles of aggregated quinazolines at the highest emission intensity are fitted with three-exponential decay. Notably, the highest fractional contribution is different for all three compounds. While for p-tolyl-containing fluorophores, the highest fractional contribution at τ2 = 2.96 ns was detected, for their methoxy counterparts, it was observed at τ1 = 7.76 ns. On the contrary, the introduction of an electron-withdrawing CF3 group is reflected in the increased contribution of shorter time, τ3 = 1.36 ns (Supplementary Materials—Table S9). Generally, the average lifetimes of compounds 2b and 2e increase (for 2e more considerable) and were found to be 3.57 and 7.72 ns, respectively, while τav of 2h decreases by 1.36 ns in the MeCN/water mixture with respect to pure MeCN.

2.5. Absorption and Fluorescence Behavior of Compounds 2e and 2h in Acidic Media

Because triazoloquinazolines 2a–i bear nitrogen atoms that can bind with proton, we intend to investigate the absorption and fluorescence sensory properties of some samples toward acid. For the experiment, we have chosen quinazoline 2e, containing an electron-donating p-methoxy substituent that reinforces the basicity of the triazole ring. On the contrary, the p-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl residue (compound 2h) attenuates the basicity of the nitrogen atoms, and this derivative possesses the strongest fluorescence intensity in pure toluene, as was mentioned above. Nevertheless, both compounds demonstrate similar behavior upon the addition of TFA to toluene solution under UV light and daylight by the naked eye (Supplementary Materials—Figure S32). The color of the solution turns from colorless to yellow (for 2e) or orange (for 2h) under daylight. The emission changes from dark blue or blue to orange. Both compounds demonstrate the reversibility of absorption and emission upon the consecutive addition of TFA and TEA. The titration experiment shows that the longwave absorption peak is red-shifted (from 360 to 372 nm in the case of 2e and from 381 to 389 nm for 2h), forming a tail-shaped band in the region of 380–440 nm and 420–460 nm, respectively, upon the addition of an excess of TFA (Figure 7a and Figure S33a). The emission behaviour of fluorophore 2e is more interesting in acidic media, and the changes are observed at a lower equivalent than that of compound 2h (Figure 7). After the first portion of acid, we observe the bathochromic shift of the emission band and gradual enhancement of emission intensity. When 200 equivalents of TFA were added, the fluorescent intensity reached the highest value, and the peak at 528 nm appeared. The subsequent addition of acid resulted in the attenuation of intensity and further red shift by 540 nm at 500 eq of acid.
The emission band of compound 2h shifts to the red region with a gradual attenuation of intensity (Supplementary Materials—Figure S33b). The appearance of red-shifted absorption and emission bands in both cases can be associated with the reinforcement of electron-withdrawing strength of the triazoloquinazoline core due to the protonation of the nitrogen atom resulting in a stronger interaction of acceptor and donor units compared to neutral molecules. Therefore, significant acidochromic behavior was observed for compounds 2e, h. We can suppose that changes in emission intensity (enhancement or quenching) of compounds 2e and 2h might be due to intramolecular photo-induced electron transfer (PET) or photo-induced proton transfer [40], and the elucidation of the exact interaction mechanism of the analyte with TFA is under progress.

2.6. Quantum-Chemical Calculations

Furthermore, we performed the DFT calculations of quinazolines 2a–i in the gas phase at the B3LYP/6–311 G* level using the Orca 4.0.1 software package [41,42,43,44,45] and conducted the chemical optimization on their energy levels based on DFT/B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) using Gaussian 09. The distribution plots of the HOMOs and LUMOs, as well as energy levels and energy gaps, are presented in Figure 7. Notably, the distribution plots of the HOMOs of diethylamino-containing fluorophores 2a and 2d are distinctly different from other counterparts. For molecules 2a and 2d, the HOMO electrons are mainly distributed on the 3-aryltriazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline fragment, which shows the considerable influence of the electronic nature of the substituent at the para-position of the phenylene ring. For compounds 2b, c, e–i, the HOMO electrons are mainly located at the electron-donating arylamino unit, with the phenylene ring less involved in carbazolyl-derivatives 2c, 2f and 2i, which confirms weaker π-conjugation of these molecules due to twisting of the rigid carbazolyl fragment and is consistent with photophysical data. The LUMOs plots are similar for all the compounds 2a–i (Figure 8); electrons are distributed on the 5-(biphenyl-4-yl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline framework. In general, the value of the energy gap decreases in each set of compounds bearing the same aminoaryl group with an increase in electron-withdrawing ability of the aryl substituent at position C(3). It is worth noting that energy levels of triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines are closer to that of previously described 2-biphenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one derivatives than to ones for 4-morpholinyl or 4-cyano counterparts [19,20].
Obviously, different electronic distributions on HOMO and LUMO levels for compounds 2a–i confirm the intense intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process, which is consistent with solvatochromic studies for the considered compounds.

3. Experimental Methods

3.1. General Information

Unless otherwise indicated, all common reagents and solvents were used from commercial suppliers without further purification. Melting points were determined on Boetius-combined heating stages. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, on a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). Hydrogen chemical shifts were referenced to the hydrogen resonance of the corresponding solvent (DMSO-d6, δ = 2.50 ppm or CDCl3, δ = 7.26 ppm). Carbon chemical shifts were referenced to the carbon resonances of the solvent (DMSO-d6, δ = 39.5 ppm CDCl3, δ = 77.2 ppm). Peaks are labelled as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q) and multiplet (m). Mass spectra were recorded on the SHIMADZU GCMS-QP2010 Ultra instrument (Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) with the electron ionization (EI) of the sample. Microanalyses (C, H, N) were performed using the Perkin–Elmer 2400 elemental analyser (Perkin–Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.2. Photophysical Characterization

UV/vis absorption spectra were recorded on the Shimadzu UV-1800 Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) using quartz cells with 1 cm path length at room temperature. Emission spectra were measured on the Horiba FluoroMax-4 (HORIBA Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) at room temperature using quartz cells with 1 cm path length. The fluorescence quantum yield of the target compounds in solution and solid state were measured by using the Integrating Sphere Quanta-φ of the Horiba-Fluoromax-4. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements were carried out using time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) with a nanosecond LED (λ = 370 nm).

3.3. Crystallography

The single crystal (light yellow block of 0.38 × 0.24 × 0.20) of compound 2a and the single crystal (yellow block of 0.43 × 0.35 × 0.28) of compound 2e were used for X-ray analysis. Structural studies were performed using equipment available in the Collaborative Access Center “Testing Center of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials” at the Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. The X-ray diffraction analysis was performed at room temperature on Rigaku OD XtaLAB Synergy-S diffractometer (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Tokyo, Japan). Using Olex2 [46], the structure was solved with the ShelXT structure solution program using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the ShelXL [47] refinement package using full-matrix least squares minimization. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined in an anisotropic approximation; the H-atoms were placed in the calculated positions and refined isotropically in the “rider” model. Crystal data for 2a C32H29N5, M = 483.60, monoclinic, a = 12.64210(10) Å, b = 11.96340(10) Å, c = 17.2021(2) Å, α = 90°, β = 103.4260(10)°, γ = 90°, V = 2530.59(4) Å3, space group P21/c, Z  =  4, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.077 mm−1. On the angles 4.75 < 2Θ < 52.744°, 5154 reflections were measured, 3812 unique (Rint = 0.1062), which were used in all calculations. Goodness to fit at F2 1.151; the final R1 = 0.1290, wR2 = 0.2736 (all data) and R1 = 0.0770, wR2 = 0.2018 (I > 2σ(I)). Largest diff. peak and hole 0.21 and –0.23 ēÅ−3.
Crystal data for 2e C40H29N5, M = 595.68, orthorhombic, a = 76.1636(13) Å, b = 17.3954(3) Å, c = 9.57464(12) Å, α = 90°, β = 90°, γ = 90°, V = 12685.4(4) Å3, space group Fdd2, Z = 16, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.077 mm−1. On the angles 2.14 < 2Θ < 29.48°, 8203 reflections were measured, 3575 unique (Rint = 0.2091), which were used in all calculations. Goodness to fit at F2 0.975; the final R1 = 0.1695, wR2 = 0.2165 (all data) and R1 = 0.0605, wR2 = 0.1491 (I > 2σ(I)). Largest diff. peak and hole 0.18 and –0.20 ēÅ−3.
The results of the X-ray diffraction analysis for compounds 2a and 2e were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC 2218321 for 2a and CCDC 2217179 for 2e). The data are free and can be accessed at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 8 November 2022 for 2a and 3 November 2022 for 2e).

3.4. General Procedures of Suzuki Cross-Coupling

To the mixture of bromo derivative 1a–c (0.65 mmol) in toluene (10 mL), the corresponding boronic acid or boronic acid pinacol ester (0.70 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (46 mg, 65 mol), PPh3 (34 mg, 130 μmol), saturated solution of K2CO3 (3.7 mL) and EtOH (3.7 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 85 °C for 7–20 h in argon atmosphere in a round-bottom pressure flask. The reaction mixture was cooled. After cooling, the organic layer was separated, washed sequentially with EtOAc (10 mL) and H2O (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and the organic layer was evaporated at reduced pressure. The product was isolated by gradient column chromatography on silica gel, a mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate was used as an eluent.
5-(4′-Diethylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2a). Yellow powder, yield 25%; mp 195–197 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 1.21 (6H, t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 2CH3), 2.24 (3H, s, CH3), 3.42 (4H, q, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 2CH2), 6.74 (2H, d, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 6.91 (2H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.08 (2H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.23–7.30 (4H, m, 4CHphenylene), 7.36 (2H, d, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.73 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.81 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.04 (1H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, m, CHquinaz), 8.76 (1H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, m, CHquinaz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 12.7 (2CH3), 21.4 (CH3), 44.5 (2CH2), 111.9, 116.5, 123.6, 125.0, 125.3, 126.7, 128.1, 128.4, 128.6, 129.1, 129.3, 129.5, 129.7, 131.8, 139.5, 141.3, 143.7, 146.1, 147.8, 149.3, 150.0; EIMS m/z 484 [M + 1]+ (26), 483 [M]+ (69), 469 (37), 468 (100) 234 (21); anal. C 79.47, H 14.48, N 8.94%, calcd for C32H29N5 (483.62) C 79.40, H 6.12, N 14.11%.
5-(4′-Diphenylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2b). Beige powder, yield 48%; mp 205–207 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 2.24 (3H, s, CH3), 6.93 (2H, d, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.09–7.18 (10H, m), 7.28–7.36 (10H, m), 7.76 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.84 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.06 (1H, d, 3J = 8.0 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.78 (1H, d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, CHquinaz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.4 (CH3), 116.6, 123.5, 123.6, 124.9, 125.0, 126.0, 127.9, 128.4, 128.6, 129.3, 129.4, 129.5, 129.7, 130.6, 131.9, 133.7, 139.5, 141.3, 143.1, 145.8, 147.6, 148.1, 149.2, 150.0; EIMS m/z 580 [M + 1]+ (44), 579 [M]+ (100), 578 (11), 289 (17); anal. C 82.88, H 5.04, N 12.08%, calcd for C40H29N5 (579.71) C 82.88, H 5.01, N 12.00%.
5-(4′-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2c). After cooling, the reaction mixture was filtered and washed with hexane. Colourless powder, yield 65%; mp 236–238 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 2.27 (3H, s, CH3), 6.97 (2H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.12 (2H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.32 (2H, m, 2CHcarbaz), 7.42–7.50 (10H, m), 7.69 (4H, m), 7.77 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.84 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.07 (1H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.17 (2H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2CHcarbaz), 8.80 (1H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, CHquinaz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.5 (CH3), 109.9, 116.6, 120.3, 120.6, 123.6, 123.7, 125.0, 126.2, 126.6, 127.6, 128.5, 128.6, 128.7, 129.4, 129.6, 129.8, 131.6, 132.0, 137.8, 139.2, 139.6, 140.9, 141.2, 142.6, 145.6, 149.1, 150.0; EIMS m/z 579 [M + 2]+ (10), 578 [M + 1]+ (45), 577 [M]+ (100), 344 (11), 288 (24), 241 (11), 102 (17), 88 (12), 77 (14), 57 (10), 44 (39), 43 (28), 41 (13); anal. C 83.17, H 4.71, N 12.12%, calcd for C40H27N5 (577.69.) C 83.12, H 4.11, N 12.15%.
5-(4′-Diethylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2d). After cooling, the reaction mixture was filtered and washed with hexane. The product was additionally recrystallized from CH2Cl2/hexane mixture. Yellow powder, yield 29%; mp 189–191 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 1.21 (6H, t, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 2CH3), 3.41 (4H, q, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 2CH2), 3.63 (3H, s, OCH3), 6.62 (2H, d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 6.74 (2H, d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.11 (2H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.8 (4H, m, 4CHphenylene), 7.37 (2H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.73 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.78 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.03 (1H, d, 3J = 7.3, CHquinaz), 8.75 (1H, d, 3J = 7.2, CHquinaz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 12.8 (2CH3), 44.8 (2CH2), 55.5 (OCH3), 112.0, 113.4, 116.6, 120.2, 123.5, 125.3, 126.7, 128.1, 128.4, 129.1, 129.4, 129.5, 131.2, 131.8, 141.3, 143.6, 146.1, 147.8, 149.1, 150.0, 160.6; EIMS m/z 500 [M + 1]+ (32), 499 [M]+ (85), 485 (34), 484 (100), 242 (47), 228 (11), 207 (10); anal. C 76.93, H 5.85, N 14.02%, calcd for C32H29N5O (499.62) C 76.90, H 5.87, N 14.10%.
5-(4′-Diphenylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2e). The product was additionally recrystallized from CH2Cl2/hexane mixture. Pale yellow powder, yield 51%; mp 242–244 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 3.64 (3H, s, OCH3), 6.62 (2H, d, 3J = 6.6 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.02–7.16 (10H, m), 7.26–7.36 (10H, m), 7.74 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.82 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.04 (1H, d, 3J = 8.2 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.76 (1H, d, 3J = 7.7 Hz, CHquinaz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 55.4 (OCH3), 113.5, 116.6, 120.2, 123.5, 123.6, 124.8, 126.0, 127.9, 128.4, 129.3, 129.5, 129.5, 130.6, 131.2, 131.9, 133.7, 141.2, 143.0, 145.8, 147.6, 148.1, 149.0, 149.9, 160.6; EIMS m/z 597 [M + 2]+ (10), 596 [M + 1]+ (45), 595 [M]+ (100), 298 (20); anal. C 80.65, H 4.91, N 11.76%, calcd for C40H29N5O (595.71) C 89.90, H 4.77, N 11.44%.
5-(4′-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2f). After cooling, the reaction mixture was filtered and washed with hexane. The product was additionally recrystallized from DMSO. Grey powder, yield 38%; mp 277−279 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 3.64 (3H, s, OCH3), 6.68 (2H, d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.17 (2H, d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.31 (2H, m, 2CHcarbaz), 7.42 – 7.50 (m, 8H), 7.74 (2H, d, 3J = 8.2 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.80–7.86 (3H, m), 7.91 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.04 (1H, d, 3J = 8.0 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.24 (2H, m, 2CHcarbaz), 8.63 (1H, d, 3J = 7.8 Hz, CHquinaz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 55.4(OCH3), 109.9, 113.5, 116.6, 120.2, 120.3, 120.6, 123.6, 123.7, 126.2, 126.6, 127.6, 128.5, 128.7, 129.4, 129.7, 131.3, 131.6, 131.9, 137.8, 139.2, 140.9, 141.2, 142.5, 145.6, 148.9, 149.9, 160.6; EIMS m/z 594 [M + 1]+ (44), 593 [M]+ (100), 344 (16), 319 (14), 296 (30), 241 (17), 223 (12), 166 (17), 140 (12), 102 (12), 88 (17), 55 (16), 44 (32), 43 (38), 42 (19), 41 (11), 39 (17); anal. C 80.68, H 4.33, N 11.97%, calcd for C40H29N5O (593.69) C 80.92, H 4.58, N 11.80%.
5-(4′-Diethylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2g). The product was additionally recrystallized from CH2Cl2/hexane mixture. Yellow powder, yield 46%; mp 202–204 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 1.21 (6H, t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 2CH3), 3.41 (4H, q, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 2CH2), 6.72 (2H, d, 3J = 7.4 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.30–7.42 (10H, m), 7.76 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.84 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.06 (1H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.77 (1H, d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, CHquinaz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz) δ – 62.73 (3F, s, CF3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.7 (2C, 2CH3), 44.5 (2C, 2CH2), 111.9, 116.3, 123.6 (1C, q, 1JCF = 272.5 Hz, CF3) 123.7, 124.7 (2C, q, 3JCF = 3.7 Hz, C6H5CF3), 125.6, 126.2, 128.1, 128.3, 128.5, 128.9, 129.2, 129.3, 129.4, 130.0, 130.2, 131.2, 131.5, 131.7, 132.2, 141.4, 144.5, 145.5, 147.9, 148.0, 150.6; EIMS m/z 538 [M + 1]+ (30), 537 [M]+ (78), 523 (36), 522 (100), 465 (12), 390 (11), 261 (25), 176 (10), 161 (12), 146 (12), 49 (12); anal. C 71.50, H 4.88, N 13.03%, calcd for C32H26F3N5 (537.59) C 71.40, H 4.98, N 13.00%.
5-(4′-Diphenylamino-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2h). Yellow powder, yield 64%; mp 197–199 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.08 (2H, m, 2Hphenyl), 7.14–7.21 (6H, m, 4Hphenyl, 2Hphenylene), 7.27–7.33 (4H, m, 4 CHphenyl), 7.61 (2H, d, 3J = 6.5 Hz, 2CHphenylene), 7.76 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.80 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2Hphenylene), 7.85 (2H, d, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2Hphenylene), 7.90 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 8.17 (1H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.56 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2Hphenylene), 8.67 (1H, d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.75 (2H, d, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 2Hphenylene); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz) δ – 62.73 (3F, s, CF3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 117.4, 123.5, 123.6, 123.9, 124.3 (1C, q, 1JCF = 271.7 Hz, CF3), 124.9, 125.8, 125.9, 126.6, 128.1 (2C, q, 3JCF = 3.7 Hz, C6H5CF3), 128.5, 129.0, 129.5, 130.0, 131.1, 132.1, 132.4, 133.6, 133.9, 143.2, 144.0, 146.3, 147.7, 148.2, 153.3, 162.8; EIMS m/z 635 [M + 2]+ (14), 634 [M + 1]+ (55), 633 [M]+ (100), 318 (10), 317 (34), 231 (14), 218 (13), 167 (21), 166 (15), 77 (19); anal. C 75.82, H 4.14, N 11.05%, calcd for C40H26F3N5 (633.68) C 75.72, H 4.18, N 10.98%.
5-(4′-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-[1,1′]-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline (2i). After cooling, the reaction mixture was filtered and washed with hexane. Grey powder, yield 50%; mp 305–307 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.32 (2H, m, 2CHcarbaz), 7.39–7.49 (12H, m), 7.69 (4H, m), 7.81 (1H, m, CHquinaz), 7.88 (1H, t, CHquinaz), 8.10 (1H, d, 3J = 8.2 Hz, CHquinaz), 8.17 (2H, d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, 2CHcarbaz), 8.81 (1H, d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, CHquinaz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz) δ – 61.29 (3F, s, CF3); EIMS m/z 633 [M + 2]+ (10), 632 [M + 1]+ (45), 631 [M]+ (100), 344 (16), 342 (11), 315 (34), 264 (12), 241 (19), 230 (24), 201 (11); anal. C 76.06, H 3.83, N 11.09%, calcd for C40H24F3N5 (631.66) C 76.04, H 3.80, N 11.15%.

4. Conclusions

Nine push-pull molecules based on [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines were designed and synthesized by cross-coupling reactions. The structure of target compounds, namely the arrangement of the triazole ring, has been confirmed by means of the X-ray data method. The triazoloquinazolines 2 were shown to emit in solution and solid state. Photophysical properties (absorption, emission and QY) are influenced by the nature of arylamino residue, 3-aryltriazole fragment, as well as solvent polarity. Variations of structure and media can be used for the fine-tuning of characteristics that are necessary for practical application. Moreover, fluorophores display solvatochromic behavior and their emission maxima show bathochromic shifts with an increase in solvent polarity. Furthermore, changes in absorption and emission spectra upon the addition of water to MeCN solution, attributed to the aggregation process, have been shown. The twisted structure of fluorophores revealed by X-ray analysis can inhibit intermolecular π-π stacking interactions, thus favoring the strong solid-state emission and active aggregate forms. Additionally, triazoloquinazolines display reversible changes in color and optical properties upon the treatment with TFA and have the potential application as sensors. In general, this type of fluorophore represents a promising group of compounds for different applications and further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28041937/s1, Figures S1–S9: NMR and mass spectra of 3-aryl-5-aminobiphenyl substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines 2a–i; Tables S1–S4: Selected bond lengths and angles of compounds 2a, 2e; Figure S10: Planarity of compounds 2a and 2e; Figures S11–S23: Absorption and emission spectra of fluorophores 2a–i in toluene and MeCN; Figure S24: Emission spectra of fluorophores 2a–i in solid state; Tables S5–S8: Orientation polarizability for solvents (Δf), absorption and emission maxima (λabs, λem, nm) and Stokes shift (nm, cm−1) of compounds 2a, d, g, h in different solvents; Figure S25: Fluorescence spectra of compound 2d (a), 2g (b), 2h (c) in different solvents; Figures S26–S28: Absorption and emission behavior of compounds 2b, e, h in MeCN/water mixture; Table S9, Figures S29–S31: Detailed data of the fluorescence lifetime measurements of 2b, 2e, 2h. Figures S32 and S33: Absorption and fluorescence behavior of compounds 2e and 2h in acidic media.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.N.C.; methodology, A.E.K.; investigation, A.E.K., E.S.S., G.A.K., V.S.G. and P.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.N.M., E.V.N. and D.S.K.; writing—review and editing, G.N.L.; supervision, G.N.L. and E.V.N.; project administration, E.V.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research funding from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Ural Federal University Program of Development within the Priority-2030 Program) is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

Our work was performed using «Uran» supercomputer of IMM UB RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of compounds 2a–i are available from the authors.

References

  1. Singh, P.K.; Choudhary, S.; Kashyap, A.; Verma, H.; Kapil, S.; Kumar, M.; Arora, M.; Silakari, O. An Exhaustive Compilation on Chemistry of Triazolopyrimidine: A Journey through Decades. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 88, 102919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zuniga, E.S.; Korkegian, A.; Mullen, S.; Hembre, E.J.; Ornstein, P.L.; Cortez, G.; Biswas, K.; Kumar, N.; Cramer, J.; Masquelin, T.; et al. The Synthesis and Evaluation of Triazolopyrimidines as Anti-Tubercular Agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 3922–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jacobson, K.A.; Boeynaems, J.-M. P2Y Nucleotide Receptors: Promise of Therapeutic Applications. Drug Discov. Today 2010, 15, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, N.; Ayral-Kaloustian, S.; Nguyen, T.; Hernandez, R.; Lucas, J.; Discafani, C.; Beyer, C. Synthesis and SAR of 6-Chloro-4-Fluoroalkylamino-2-Heteroaryl-5-(Substituted)Phenylpyrimidines as Anti-Cancer Agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. El-Adl, K.; Ibrahim, M.-K.; Alesawy, M.S.I.; Eissa, I.H. [1,2,4]Triazolo[4,3-c]Quinazoline and Bis([1,2,4]Triazolo)[4,3-a:4′,3′-c]Quinazoline Derived DNA Intercalators: Design, Synthesis, in Silico ADMET Profile, Molecular Docking and Anti-Proliferative Evaluation Studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2021, 30, 115958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. El-Adl, K.; Ibrahim, M.; Alesawy, M.S.; Eissa, I.H. Triazoloquinazoline Derived Classical DNA Intercalators: Design, Synthesis, in Silico ADME Profile, Docking, and Antiproliferative Evaluations. Arch. Pharm. 2022, 355, 2100506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burbiel, J.C.; Ghattas, W.; Küppers, P.; Köse, M.; Lacher, S.; Herzner, A.-M.; Kombu, R.S.; Akkinepally, R.R.; Hockemeyer, J.; Müller, C.E. 2-Amino[1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-c]Quinazolines and Derived Novel Heterocycles: Syntheses and Structure-Activity Relationships of Potent Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 2272–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, Y.; Bian, M.; Deng, X.-Q.; Wang, S.-B.; Quan, Z.-S. Synthesis and Anticonvulsant Activity Evaluation of 5-Phenyl-[1,2,4]Triazolo[4,3-c]Quinazolin-3-Amines. Arch. Pharm. 2013, 346, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Esteban-Parra, G.M.; Sebastián, E.S.; Cepeda, J.; Sánchez-González, C.; Rivas-García, L.; Llopis, J.; Aranda, P.; Sánchez-Moreno, M.; Quirós, M.; Rodríguez-Diéguez, A. Anti-Diabetic and Anti-Parasitic Properties of a Family of Luminescent Zinc Coordination Compounds Based on the 7-Amino-5-Methyl-1,2,4-Triazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidine Ligand. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 212, 111235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oukoloff, K.; Kovalevich, J.; Cornec, A.S.; Yao, Y.; Owyang, Z.A.; James, M.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M.Y.; Smith, A.B.; Brunden, K.R.; et al. Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Photoactivatable Derivatives of Microtubule (MT)-Active [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 2180–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eltyshev, A.K.; Agafonova, I.A.; Minin, A.S.; Pozdina, V.A.; Shevirin, V.A.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Benassi, E.; Belskaya, N.P. Photophysics, Photochemistry and Bioimaging Application of 8-Azapurine Derivatives. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 9880–9896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Taniya, O.S.; Fedotov, V.V.; Novikov, A.S.; Sadieva, L.K.; Krinochkin, A.P.; Kovalev, I.S.; Kopchuk, D.S.; Zyryanov, G.V.; Liu, Y.; Ulomsky, E.N.; et al. Abnormal Push-Pull Benzo[4,5]Imidazo[1,2-a][1,2,3]Triazolo[4,5-e]Pyrimidine Fluorophores in Planarized Intramolecular Charge Transfer (PLICT) State: Synthesis, Photophysical Studies and Theoretical Calculations. Dyes Pigments 2022, 204, 110405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verbitskiy, E.V.; Gorbunov, E.B.; Baranova, A.A.; Lugovik, K.I.; Khokhlov, K.O.; Cheprakova, E.M.; Kim, G.A.; Rusinov, G.L.; Chupakhin, O.N.; Charushin, V.N. New 2H-[1,2,3]Triazolo[4,5-e][1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5- a]Pyrimidine Derivatives as Luminescent Fluorophores for Detection of Nitroaromatic Explosives. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 4954–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Achelle, S.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Guen, F.R. Photoluminescence Properties of Aryl-, Arylvinyl-, and Arylethynylpyrimidine Derivatives. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 1852–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, E.; Fang, R.; Liu, S.; Wu, J. Compound and Application Thereof. Patent CN113527302A, 22 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun, E.; Fang, R.; Liu, S. Organic Compound for Light-Emitting Device, Application of Organic Compound and Organic Light-Emitting Device. Patent CN112174968A, 5 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun, E.; Liu, S.; Feng, J.; Wu, J. Organic Electroluminescent Material and Organic Electroluminescent Device. Patent CN110256439A, 20 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Moshkina, T.N.; Le Poul, P.; Barsella, A.; Pytela, O.; Bureš, F.; Robin-Le Guen, F.; Achelle, S.; Nosova, E.V.; Lipunova, G.N.; Charushin, V.N. Electron-Withdrawing Substituted Quinazoline Push-Pull Chromophores: Synthesis, Electrochemical, Photophysical and Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 5445–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moshkina, T.N.; Nosova, E.V.; Permyakova, J.V.; Lipunova, G.N.; Zhilina, E.F.; Kim, G.A.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Charushin, V.N. Push-Pull Structures Based on 2-Aryl/Thienyl Substituted Quinazolin-4(3H)-Ones and 4-Cyanoquinazolines. Molecules 2022, 27, 7156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moshkina, T.N.; Nosova, E.V.; Permyakova, J.V.; Lipunova, G.N.; Valova, M.S.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Sadieva, L.K.; Charushin, V.N. Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of 2-Aryl-4-(Morpholin-4-yl)Quinazoline Chromophores: The Effect of π-Linker Moiety. Dyes Pigments 2022, 206, 110592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nosova, E.V.; Kopotilova, A.E.; Ivan’kina, M.A.; Moshkina, T.N.; Kopchuk, D.S. Synthesis of 5-(4-Bromophenyl)- and 5-(5-Bromothiophen-2-yl)-Substituted 3-Aryl[1,2,4]Triazolo[4,3-c]Quinazolines. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2022, 71, 1483–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mei, J.; Leung, N.L.C.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-Induced Emission: Together We Shine, United We Soar! Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11718–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, C.; Cheng, Z.; Shang, A.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, A.; Lei, C.; Chang, Y.; Lv, Y.; Lu, P. Two Different Implementation Strategies for Highly Efficient Non-Doped Fluorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Benzothiadiazole Derivatives. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 135010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suman, G.R.; Pandey, M.; Chakravarthy, A.S.J. Review on New Horizons of Aggregation Induced Emission: From Design to Development. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 1541–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wan, Q.; Zhang, B.; Tong, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Pan, Y.; Tang, B.Z. Feasible Structure-Modification Strategy for Inhibiting Aggregation-Caused Quenching Effect and Constructing Exciton Conversion Channels in Acridone-Based Emitters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 9837–9844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, W.; Lee, M.M.S.; Zhang, Z.; Sung, H.H.Y.; Williams, I.D.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Wang, D.; Tang, B.Z. Facile Synthesis of AIEgens with Wide Color Tunability for Cellular Imaging and Therapy. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3494–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Lakowicz, J.R., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-38731-278-1. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lippert, E. Spektroskopische Bestimmung Des Dipolmomentes Aromatischer Verbindungen Im Ersten Angeregten Singulettzustand. Z. Für Elektrochem. Ber. Der Bunsenges. Für Phys. Chemie 1957, 61, 962–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mataga, N.; Kaifu, Y.; Koizumi, M. Solvent Effects upon Fluorescence Spectra and the Dipolemoments of Excited Molecules. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1956, 29, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Maka, V.K.; Moorthy, J.N. Remarkable Influence of ‘Phane Effect’ on the Excited-State Properties of Cofacially Oriented Coumarins. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 4758–4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kosower, E.M. An Introduction to Physical Organic Chemistry; Wiley: New York City, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kosower, E.M. The Effect of Solvent on Spectra. I. A New Empirical Measure of Solvent Polarity: Z-Values. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3253–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dimroth, K.; Reichardt, C.; Siepmann, T.; Bohlmann, F. Über Pyridinium-N-Phenol-Betaine Und Ihre Verwendung Zur Charakterisierung Der Polarität von Lösungsmitteln. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1963, 661, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Richard, P. 2-Aryl-4(3H)Quinazolinones. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1971, 8, 699–702. [Google Scholar]
  35. Moshkina, T.N.; Nosova, E.V.; Kopotilova, A.E.; Savchuk, M.I.; Nikonov, I.L.; Kopchuk, D.S.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Kim, G.A.; Lipunova, G.N.; Charushin, V.N. Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of Pyridyl- and Quinolinyl-Substituted 4-(4-Aminophenyl)Quinazolines. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2022, 429, 113917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Varghese, A.; Akshaya, K.B. Application of Fluorescence in Solvatochromic Studies of Organic Compounds. In Reviews in Fluorescence 2017; Geddes, C.D., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 99–121. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ilharco, L.M.; Brito de Barros, R. Aggregation of Pseudoisocyanine Iodide in Cellulose Acetate Films: Structural Characterization by FTIR. Langmuir 2000, 16, 9331–9337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jia, W.B.; Wang, H.W.; Yang, L.M.; Lu, H.B.; Kong, L.; Tian, Y.P.; Tao, X.T.; Yang, J.X. Synthesis of Two Novel Indolo[3,2-b]Carbazole Derivatives with Aggregation-Enhanced Emission Property. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 7092–7101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, P.; Kumar, A.; Chowdhury, A.; Mukherjee, P.S. Aggregation-Induced Emission and White Luminescence from a Combination of π-Conjugated Donor-Acceptor Organic Luminogens. ACS Omega. 2018, 3, 13757–13771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Valeur, B.; Berberan-Santos, M.N. Molecular Fluorescence; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; Volume 53, ISBN 978-3-52732-837-6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J.S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J.A. Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XX. A Basis Set for Correlated Wave Functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McLean, A.D.; Chandler, G.S. Contracted Gaussian Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations. I. Second Row Atoms, Z=11–18. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639–5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Clark, T.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Spitznagel, G.W.; Schleyer, P.V.R. Efficient Diffuse Function-augmented Basis Sets for Anion Calculations. III. The 3-21+G Basis Set for First-row Elements, Li–F. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frisch, M.J.; Pople, J.A.; Binkley, J.S. Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods 25. Supplementary Functions for Gaussian Basis Sets. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 3265–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Neese, F. The ORCA Program System. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sheldrick, G.M. A Short History of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 28 01937 g001 550
Figure 1. Representatives of triazolopyrimidine-containing chromophores (A–C).
Figure 1. Representatives of triazolopyrimidine-containing chromophores (A–C).
Molecules 28 01937 g001
Molecules 28 01937 g002 550
Figure 2. Representatives of biphenyl-substituted quinazoline chromophores D–I.
Figure 2. Representatives of biphenyl-substituted quinazoline chromophores D–I.
Molecules 28 01937 g002
Molecules 28 01937 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3-aryl-5-(4′-amino[1,1′]-biphenyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines 2a–i.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3-aryl-5-(4′-amino[1,1′]-biphenyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines 2a–i.
Molecules 28 01937 sch001
Molecules 28 01937 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Molecular structure of 2a and 2e in the thermal ellipsoids of 50% probability. (b) Selected torsion angles of compounds 2a and 2e.
Figure 3. (a) Molecular structure of 2a and 2e in the thermal ellipsoids of 50% probability. (b) Selected torsion angles of compounds 2a and 2e.
Molecules 28 01937 g003
Molecules 28 01937 g004 550
Figure 4. Normalized emission spectra of quinazolinones 2a–c in solid state; inset: emission of compounds 2a–c in solid state (powder). Photographs were taken in the dark upon irradiation with a hand-held UV lamp (λem = 366 nm).
Figure 4. Normalized emission spectra of quinazolinones 2a–c in solid state; inset: emission of compounds 2a–c in solid state (powder). Photographs were taken in the dark upon irradiation with a hand-held UV lamp (λem = 366 nm).
Molecules 28 01937 g004
Molecules 28 01937 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Fluorescence spectra of compound 2a in different solvents; (b) Lippert–Mataga plot of fluorophores 2a, 2d, 2g, 2h in cyclohexane (for 2a, 2g), toluene, THF, DCM, DMSO, MeCN and MeOH.
Figure 5. (a) Fluorescence spectra of compound 2a in different solvents; (b) Lippert–Mataga plot of fluorophores 2a, 2d, 2g, 2h in cyclohexane (for 2a, 2g), toluene, THF, DCM, DMSO, MeCN and MeOH.
Molecules 28 01937 g005
Molecules 28 01937 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The fluorescence spectra of 2e in MeCN and MeCN/water mixtures with different water fractions (fw); (b) a plot of relative PL intensity (I/I0) and wavelength at emission maxima of 2e versus the composition of the water fraction (vol %). T = 23 °C.
Figure 6. (a) The fluorescence spectra of 2e in MeCN and MeCN/water mixtures with different water fractions (fw); (b) a plot of relative PL intensity (I/I0) and wavelength at emission maxima of 2e versus the composition of the water fraction (vol %). T = 23 °C.
Molecules 28 01937 g006
Molecules 28 01937 g007 550
Figure 7. Changes in absorption (a) and emission (b) spectra of the toluene solution (c = 10−5 M) of 2e upon gradual addition of TFA.
Figure 7. Changes in absorption (a) and emission (b) spectra of the toluene solution (c = 10−5 M) of 2e upon gradual addition of TFA.
Molecules 28 01937 g007
Molecules 28 01937 g008 550
Figure 8. Optimized molecular structures and molecular orbitals of the HOMO and LUMO levels, energy gaps and electron cloud distribution of triazoloquinazolines 2a–i.
Figure 8. Optimized molecular structures and molecular orbitals of the HOMO and LUMO levels, energy gaps and electron cloud distribution of triazoloquinazolines 2a–i.
Molecules 28 01937 g008
Table
Table 1. Photophysical properties of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines 2a–i in toluene and MeCN solutions.
Table 1. Photophysical properties of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines 2a–i in toluene and MeCN solutions.
CompoundSolventλabs, nm
(ε M, 104 M−1cm−1)		λem, nmΔνSt a, cm−1ΦF c, %Solid
λem, nmΦF c, %
2aToluene361 (2.65)4917334754996
MeCN356 (2.79), 260 (4.31)61211,75034
2bToluene361 (0.81), 301 (0.75)4746604346323
MeCN350 (4.10)62712,62213
2cToluene340 (6.25), 330 (6.40), 293 (8.09)515 *, 467 9994 b<142126
MeCN318 (2.05), 291 (2.34), 255 (3.48)55013,2641
2dToluene367 (2.54)472606263512<1
MeCN371 (2.58), 264 (2.52)59210,06231
2eToluene360 (5.07)4746680344743
MeCN350 (1.84)62512,57118
2fToluene340 (1.53), 329 (1.59)41251403642520
MeCN320 (0.91), 292 (1.52), 260 (2.10)53012,3822
2gToluene371 (2.36)50270344750134
MeCN357 (2.39)64012,38624
2hToluene381 (3.33)473510594479>95
MeCN371 (3.12), 269 (4.82)61510,69425
Toluene340 (5.02), 328 (4.97)517, 434 * 6370 b<14168
MeCN318 (4.55)56013,58935
a Stokes shifts were calculated considering the lowest energetic absorption band. b Relative to the major emission peak (in bold). c Absolute quantum yield in the solid state was measured by the integrated sphere method. * The major emission peak.
Table
Table 2. Emission maxima of triazoloquinazolines 2a, d, g, h in different solvents (excitation at longest wavelength absorption maximum) and parameters Z and ET(30) for the chosen solvents.
Table 2. Emission maxima of triazoloquinazolines 2a, d, g, h in different solvents (excitation at longest wavelength absorption maximum) and parameters Z and ET(30) for the chosen solvents.
SolventZ, kcal/molET(30), kcal/molλem, nm
2a2d2g2h
Methanol83.655.4648614651624
Acetonitrile71.345.6614593622614
DMSO71.145.1632616643624
DCM64.740.7555531565554
THF58.837.4553538565546
Toluene-33.9489478500482
Cyclohexane-30.9451424 *, 452460427, 468 *
* The major emission peak.
Table
Table 3. Data from Lippert–Mataga plot for quinazolines 2a, 2d, 2g and 2h.
Table 3. Data from Lippert–Mataga plot for quinazolines 2a, 2d, 2g and 2h.
Comp.SlopesR2aa, ÅΔµ, D
2a17,8740.934.7119.26
2d14,5430.804.7417.54
2g18,8930.944.7820.24
2h19,7470.955.0322.34
aa—Onsager radius, calculated following the literature [30].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kopotilova, A.E.; Moshkina, T.N.; Nosova, E.V.; Lipunova, G.N.; Starnovskaya, E.S.; Kopchuk, D.S.; Kim, G.A.; Gaviko, V.S.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Charushin, V.N. 3-Aryl-5-aminobiphenyl Substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties. Molecules 2023, 28, 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041937

AMA Style

Kopotilova AE, Moshkina TN, Nosova EV, Lipunova GN, Starnovskaya ES, Kopchuk DS, Kim GA, Gaviko VS, Slepukhin PA, Charushin VN. 3-Aryl-5-aminobiphenyl Substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties. Molecules. 2023; 28(4):1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041937

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kopotilova, Alexandra E., Tatyana N. Moshkina, Emiliya V. Nosova, Galina N. Lipunova, Ekaterina S. Starnovskaya, Dmitry S. Kopchuk, Grigory A. Kim, Vasiliy S. Gaviko, Pavel A. Slepukhin, and Valery N. Charushin. 2023. "3-Aryl-5-aminobiphenyl Substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties" Molecules 28, no. 4: 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041937

APA Style

Kopotilova, A. E., Moshkina, T. N., Nosova, E. V., Lipunova, G. N., Starnovskaya, E. S., Kopchuk, D. S., Kim, G. A., Gaviko, V. S., Slepukhin, P. A., & Charushin, V. N. (2023). 3-Aryl-5-aminobiphenyl Substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties. Molecules, 28(4), 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041937

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop