Next Article in Journal
Fluorescent Probes cis- and trans-Parinaric Acids in Fluid and Gel Lipid Bilayers: A Molecular Dynamics Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanochemistry Frees Thiourea Dioxide (TDO) from the ‘Veils’ of Solvent, Exposing All Its Reactivity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Phosphanide Gold(III)/Gold(I) Complexes and Their Thallium(III) and Gold(III) Precursors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules28052240
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bio-Inspired Iron Pentadentate Complexes as Dioxygen Activators in the Oxidation of Cyclohexene and Limonene

by
Katarzyna Rydel-Ciszek
*,
Tomasz Pacześniak
,
Paweł Chmielarz
and
Andrzej Sobkowiak
*
Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszów University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(5), 2240; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052240
Submission received: 3 February 2023 / Revised: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organometallic Compounds: Synthesis and Structural Characterization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The use of dioxygen as an oxidant in fine chemicals production is an emerging problem in chemistry for environmental and economical reasons. In acetonitrile, the [(N4Py)FeII]2+ complex, [N4Py—N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-N-(bis-2-pyridylmethyl)amine] in the presence of the substrate activates dioxygen for the oxygenation of cyclohexene and limonene. Cyclohexane is oxidized mainly to 2-cyclohexen-1-one, and 2-cyclohexen-1-ol, cyclohexene oxide is formed in much smaller amounts. Limonene gives as the main products limonene oxide, carvone, and carveol. Perillaldehyde and perillyl alcohol are also present in the products but to a lesser extent. The investigated system is twice as efficient as the [(bpy)2FeII]2+/O2/cyclohexene system and comparable to the [(bpy)2MnII]2+/O2/limonene system. Using cyclic voltammetry, it has been shown that, when the catalyst, dioxgen, and substrate are present simultaneously in the reaction mixture, the iron(IV) oxo adduct [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ is formed, which is the oxidative species. This observation is supported by DFT calculations.

1. Introduction

Although the oxygen molecule in its triplet ground state is diradical, contrary to expectations, it does not react in a way typical for radicals. It is unreactive with respect to the diamagnetic organic substrates. According to the Pauli exclusion principle, dioxygen to be able to react with diamagnetic substrates needs to change spin, but this process requires not only energy but also time, approximately 10−9 s. However, the lifetime of the active complex is considerably shorter, approximately 10−13 s, and the change of spin during its existence is impossible [1]. For this reason, dioxygen has to be activated to react with organic compounds. One route of dioxygen activation is its interactions with transition metal complexes. Knowledge of the dioxygen activation mechanism can contribute to understanding the reaction mechanisms that occur in living organisms (the action of enzymes, oxygen toxicity) [2]. Proteins containing non-heme iron centers are widespread in nature, for example, cytochrome P450 [3], Rieske oxygenases [4,5], or iron-activated bleomycin [6,7]. They exhibit a variety of activities, in particular, they activate dioxygen and hydroperoxides [8,9,10,11,12] mainly for selective oxidation of C-H bonds [5,13,14,15,16,17].
The possibility of dioxygen activation by metalloenzymes has inspired a vast number of papers, in which the interactions of transition metal complexes with dioxygen and hydroperoxides for the oxidation of organic compounds have been investigated. From the very beginning, a controversy has arisen about whether the oxidative species in such systems is a free hydroxyl radical or an oxygen adduct with the metal complex [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
In recent years, the structures of oxygen adducts with transition metal complexes that possess pentadentate and tetradentate ligands containing nitrogen atoms (for example, in the case of iron LFeIV=O, LFeIII-OOH, and LFeIII-OO-FeIIIL) have been characterized in detail [10,16,27,28,29,30,31]. These species have been found to react with C-H bonds of various organic substrates [15,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The other group of metal dioxygen adducts shows the structures LFeV=O and LFeV=O(OH) [16,39,40]. These adducts, in addition to activating the C-H bond, cause also the oxidation of water [40].
The oxidative functionalization of hydrocarbons to useful chemicals using environmentally friendly oxidants under mild conditions is still a challenging area of chemistry [41,42,43,44]. Dioxygen (or air) is the best oxidant because of its low cost and significant environmental advantages. Both cyclohexene and limonene are essential industrial raw materials. Their catalytic oxidation can lead to the formation of useful synthetic intermediates used in fragrance, medicine, pesticide, surfactant, and polymer materials.
Cyclohexene contains both C=C and C-H bonds, therefore, in the presence of dioxygen, it is susceptible to allylic oxidation [45]. Scheme 1 presents the products of the cyclohexene oxidation reaction: ketone (2-cyclohexen-1-one), alcohol (2-cyclohexen-1-ol), epoxide (cyclohexene oxide), and hydroperoxide (2-cyclohexenyl hydroperoxide).
Over the past three decades, the oxidation of cyclohexene by dioxygen has been performed under various conditions using homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts in different solvents and in a solvent-free environment. A recent review summarizes the controllable and selective routes for the oxidation of cyclohexene [46].
There are not many studies using homogeneous catalysts in the process. It has been found that ruthenium(II) complexes with 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), triphenylphosphine (Ph3P) [47], and with tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) [48] catalyze the oxidation of cyclohexene by dioxygen in acetonitrile to form mainly ketone and alcohol, epoxide was produced in much smaller quantities. In acetonitrile, the ruthenium(IV)-oxo complex [(py)(bpy)2RuIV=O]2+ oxidizes cyclohexene to its ketone and alcohol [49,50]. As the ratio of cyclohexene to [LRuIV=O]2+ increases, the ratio of ketone to alcohol decreases [50].
Schiff-base iron and manganese complexes have also been used as catalysts for cyclohexene oxidation with dioxygen. A manganese complex with salicylaldehyde and L-phenylalanine was reported to catalyze the discussed process; ketone, alcohol, and hydroperoxide were found as products [51]. Our research [52] has indicated that several manganese(III) complexes in combination with tert-butyl hydroperoxide activate dioxygen to oxygenate cyclohexene to its ketone, alcohol, and epoxide. The product profiles depend on the composition of the ligand and solvent. With picolinate, 2,2′-bipyridine, and triphenylphosphine oxide as ligands in pyridine/acetic acid (2:1 molar ratio) the dominant product is ketone, while Schiff–base complexes produce ketone, alcohol and epoxide in almost equal yields. However, in MeCN ketone is the dominant product for all of the complexes. We have also found [53] that the [(salen)FeIII]+ complex [salen—N,N′-ethylenebis(salicylimine)] is a useful catalyst for the cyclohexene oxidation with dioxygen in acetonitrile, ketone and alcohol are formed as main products.
Considering iron-based catalysts, we have reported [54] that labile iron(II) and iron(III) aqua or bpy complexes in acetonitrile activate dioxygen for the direct oxygenation of cyclohexene to produce mainly ketone and alcohol, epoxide was formed in much smaller amounts. It has been postulated that the oxidation process occurs within iron hydroperoxide complexes that also contain a substrate (Fe-OO-R). It is worth to notice that the formation of a similar complex has been proposed during the activation of dioxygen by the mononuclear cobalt(II) complex with tris [2-(N-tetramethylguanidyl) ethyl]amine in the presence of tetrahydrofuran and cyclohexene [55]. It has also been reported [34] that a non-heme iron(II) complex with TMC (1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11- tetraazacyclotetradecane) activates dioxygen and generates its corresponding iron(IV)-oxo complex in the presence of substrates with weak C-H bonds (e.g., olefins and alkylaromatic compounds). Another study [35] has shown that an iron complex with tetraamido macrocyclic ligand [(TAML)FeIII]− in acetonitrile is an efficient and selective catalyst for the oxidation of cyclohexene with dioxygen. For the low substrate-to-catalyst ratio only ketone and much smaller amounts of epoxide were detected, no alcohol was formed. It has been suggested that an iron(V)-oxo complex, [(TAML)FeV(O)]−, formed in the presence of dioxgen and cyclohexene, was responsible for the initiation of the cyclohexene oxidation process.
Limonene (1-isopropenyl-4-methylcyclohexene) is a cheap and abundant raw material; its oxidation products are high value compounds used mainly in the flavor and fragrance industry [56]. Therefore, the oxidation of limonene attracts attention, and a recent review [57] presents the state of the art of terpene oxidation processes. Possible products of limonene oxidation are presented in Scheme 2.
Using dioxygen and homogeneous catalysts, the following systems have been applied for limonene oxidation. The first is the Wacker oxidation process using PdCl2/CuCl2/O2 in glacial acetic acid [58,59,60,61]. Carvyl acetates, carveol, and carvone are among the major products. The other approach uses cobalt(II) salts as catalysts [62,63]. Co(OAc)2/Br–/O2 in acetic acid gives products similar to the Wacker system [62] while the CoCl2/O2 system in acetonitrile [63] gives three main products: limonene oxide (in acetic acid: mixture of limonene glycol and its acetates), carvone, and carveol. Aerobic oxidation of limonene under Mukaiyama conditions (atmospheric pressure of dioxygen, transition metal complex in the presence of an excess of sacrificial aldehyde) gives mainly 1,2-epoxylimonene [64,65,66], although small amounts of 8,9-epoxylimonene have also been observed. We have found that labile iron(II), iron(III) [67], and manganese(II) [68] complexes with 2,2′-bipyridine [FeII(bpy)2]2+, [FeIII(bpy)2]3+, and [MnII(bpy)2]2+ (prepared in situ by combination of the appropriate amounts of components) catalyze limonene oxidation by dioxygen in acetonitrile. Carvone, carveol, 1,2-epoxylimonene, and perillaldehyde were the main products. The iron(III) complex is reduced by the substrate to iron(II), which activates dioxygen. Perillaldehyde is likely formed directly from oxidation of the methyl group (not via alcohol). In the case of manganese(II), the reaction efficiencies after 24 h reaction time are approximately 5-times higher than those obtained for analogous iron(II) complexes, however, the 5 h long induction period was observed. When t-BuOOH was present in the reaction mixture, the induction period did not appear.
Taking into account the findings, we have decided to apply the iron(II) complex with the pentadentate ligand N4Py [N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-N-(bis-2-pyridylmethyl) amine] as the catalyst for the oxidation of cyclohexene and limonene by dioxygen in acetonitrile. The catalyst has not yet been used for aerobic oxidation of limonene. The complex [(N4Py)FeII]2+ and its adduct with oxygen [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ have been the subject of many investigations. The available literature provides detailed information on their structures derived from X-ray crystallography [69,70,71], UV-vis [71,72,73,74], NMR [70,71], EPR [73], and EXAFS [75] spectra, as well as electrospray ionization mass spectra [74], and Mössbauer parameters [9].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Oxidation of Cyclohexene

In acetonitrile dioxygen is activated by [(N4Py)FeII]2+ for the oxidation of cyclohexene to form mainly ketone (2-cyclohexen-1-one) and alcohol (2-cyclohexen-1-ol). Epoxide is produced in much smaller amounts. Our previous study [54] indicated that under the same experimental conditions in the absence of a catalyst no cyclohexene oxidation was observed and in the presence of uncomplexed iron(II) only traces of ketone and alcohol were formed. In this study, it has been found that in a solution containing the substrate and catalyst in the oxygen-free atmosphere no oxidation products were found.
Table 1 presents the products concentrations after 24 h reaction time for dioxygen and air used as oxidants for different catalyst and substrate concentrations.
For example, as follows from the results shown in Table 1 after 24 h reaction time in dioxygen atmosphere, using 1 M cyclohexene and 1 mM catalyst, the products obtained were 114 mM ketone, 77 mM alcohol, and 10 mM epoxide, which means that approximately 0.2 M of the substrate has been reacted with the 201 product/catalyst turnovers. In the air atmosphere under the same experimental conditions, the product concentrations were slightly lower. The results presented also indicate that for 1 M cyclohexene, the increase in catalyst concentration from 0.5 to 2.5 mM in the case of dioxygen and to 5 mM in the case of air does not cause significant differences in the amounts of all products formed. For the catalyst concentration equal to 5 mM, a decrease in ketone concentration was observed when dioxygen was used and its increase in the case of air use. For higher catalyst concentrations (7.5 and 10 mM), no products were detected, which demonstrates that at higher concentrations the catalyst is decomposed. This behavior has been previously reported for iron-based catalysts that activate dioxygen [54,68]. For the catalyst concentration equal to 1 mM, an increase in cyclohexene concentration from 0.5 to 2 M causes almost a proportional increase in the amount of products both in the case of dioxygen and air. The presence in the reaction mixture of iodosobenzene (PhIO), which in the reaction with [(N4Py)FeII]2+ gives [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ [72], causes the increase of the concentration of the products formed, however the molar ratio of the products is approximately the same. The presence of small amounts of water in the reaction mixture causes a slight decrease in the yield of the products formed (Table S1).
The dependence of product concentrations on time for oxidation with dioxygen and air is illustrated in Figure 1. The concentration profiles suggest that the products are formed independently.

2.2. Oxidation of Limonene

Similar to cyclohexene, limonene is oxidized in acetonitrile by dioxygen. The process catalyzed with [(N4Py)FeII]2+, gives limonene oxide, carvone, and carveol as main products, and much smaller amounts of perillaldehyde and perillyl alcohol are also formed. As in the case of cyclohexene, appropriate blank experiments with limonene did not produce oxidation products or only traces when uncomplexed iron salt was used as catalyst [68].
The products concentrations obtained after 24 h reaction time for different catalyst and substrate concentrations using oxygen and air as oxidants are presented in Table 2. For example, the combination of 1 mM catalyst, 1 M limonene in dioxygen atmosphere after 24 h gave 89 mM limonene epoxide, 52 mM carvone, 31 mM carveol, 6 mM perillaldehyde, and 3 mM perillyl alcohol, which means that approximately 0.18 M of the substrate has reacted with the 181 product/catalyst turnovers. This indicates that the reaction efficiency is slightly lower in comparison to that of cyclohexene. As in the case of cyclohexene oxidation, the addition of iodosobenzene (PhIO) to the reaction mixture causes the concentration of the products formed to increase, and the molar ratio of the products is approximately the same.
As follows from the data presented in Table 2 for 1 M limonene, for low catalyst concentrations (0.5–1 mM), the use of dioxygen gave higher yields than the use of air, while the increase in its concentration (2.5–10 mM) caused the opposite effect to occur. It might suggest that the rate of the decomposition of the catalysts is higher in the case of the use of dioxygen, however in contrast to cyclohexene, for 7.5 and 10 mM of catalyst the products of limonene oxidation were formed. For all higher catalyst concentrations (5, 7.5, and 10 mM), the amounts of the products formed were similar for both dioxygen and air. It should be also noticed that for the catalyst concentration equal to 1 mM, there are no substantial differences among the yields of the products formed for different concentrations of limonene. As in the case of cyclohexene oxidation, the addition of small amounts of water to the reaction environment results in a slight decrease in the concentrations of the observed products (Table S2).
Figure 2 presents the dependence of the products concentrations on time. The product profiles suggest that, similar to cyclohexene, they are formed independently.

2.3. Electrochemical Investigation of the [(N4Py)FeII]2+ Complex

Our previous research [54,67,68] indicated that cyclohexene and limonene interact with iron and manganese complexes used as catalysts for the oxygenation of these substrates. Electrochemical measurements can provide useful information in this area. Figure 3 presents the cyclic voltammogram of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in acetonitrile. Three anodic peaks have been observed at potentials equal to +1.05 V, +1.65 V, and +1.95 V (vs. SCE). The electrochemical behavior of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ has previously been reported [71,76,77,78] however, it was limited to the first anodic peak (Figure 3 inset).
Electrochemical oxidation of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ at +1.05 V is a reversible, diffusion-controlled process, which is confirmed by the linear dependence of the heights of the anodic and subsequent cathodic peaks on the square root of the scan rate (ν1/2) [79] (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials). There is a common agreement that at this potential oxidation of iron(II) to iron(III) takes place.
[(N4Py)FeII]2+ -e− → [(N4Py)FeIII]3+
Since iron(III) is reduced by N4Py [69], the electrochemical oxidation of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ can be used as a way to prepare [(N4Py)FeIII]3+.
The second oxidation peak at +1.65 V is irreversible but also diffusion controlled (the plot of its height vs. square root from scan rate is linear, Figure S2b). This behavior indicates that oxidation of iron(III) to iron(IV) probably occurs.
[(N4Py)FeIII]3+ -e− → [(N4Py)FeIV]4+
This hypothesis is supported by the fact that high-valent transition metal ions can be generated by electrochemical oxidation in aprotic solvents [80,81,82].
The third irreversible oxidation peak that occurs at +1.95 V is not controlled by the diffusion process, rather by the adsorption/kinetic process, which is confirmed by the linear dependence of the peak height on the scan rate (ν) [79] (Figure S3), and also by the slight decrease in the dependence of the cathodic peak current at +1.0 V on (ν1/2) for higher scan rates (Figure S4). This suggests that [(N4Py)FeIV]4+ reacts with basic electrolyte components, including traces of water, to form the iron(IV) oxo adduct [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ and/or other iron oxygen adducts. Such a possibility is confirmed by the existence of the broad cathodic peak at +0.25 V observed in the reverse cathodic scan originated after the appearance of the anodic peaks at +1.65 V and +1.95 V (see Figure S1 and Figure S2a, respectively). The peak is not present when the anodic scan is reversed after the appearance of the anodic peak at +1.05 V. On the basis of the results presented in the following paragraph, the cathodic peak discussed can be attributed to the iron(IV) oxo species. The substantial difference between the oxidation potential of the iron(III) complex and the reduction potential of the iron(IV) oxo complex is probably caused by the presence of acetonitrile in coordination sphere of iron(III) and iron(II) complexes and its absence in coordination sphere of iron(IV) oxo complex. It has been shown [77,83] that the presence of acetonitrile in coordination sphere of an iron complex causes its redox potential to shift toward more positive values. Moreover, the generation of [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ by the electrochemical oxidation of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in acetonitrile has been reported [76].
It is known that [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+is formed in a reaction of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ with iodosobenzene (PhIO) [72]. Figure 4a presents a voltamogram registered in the solution containing [(N4Py)FeII]2+ and PhIO, and the cathodic peak present at 0.0 V results in a reduction of [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ [71,76,77,78]. Iodosobenzene alone does not exhibit any electrochemical activity in the investigated potential region (Figure S5). The presence of a proton source in the solution mentioned above causes the iron(IV) oxo reduction peak to shift toward more positive values, approximately +0.3 V. In the both cases, in the reversed scan a small anodic peak was observed around +1.0 V, which corresponds to the electrooxidation of [(N4Py)FeII]2+.
Voltammetric measurements were used to check for possible interactions between the catalyst and the investigated substrates. A catalyst concentration equal to 1 mM has been applied to mimic the oxidation processes performed (cyclohexene is not oxidized when the catalyst concentration exceeds 5). Figure 5 presents voltamograms of a combination of 1 mM catalyst, 1 M cyclohexene (Figure 5a), or limonene (Figure 5b) after 5 h in air atmosphere. In the both cases, a small reduction peak was observed at 0.0 V, which corresponds to a reduction of [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+.
This indicates that the iron(IV) oxo species is formed when the catalyst, substrate, and dioxygen are present simultaneously in the reaction mixture. The other reduction peaks visible in the voltammograms at more negative potentials (–0.3 V and –0.5 V for cyclohexene and limonene, respectively) are probably caused by the reduction of the other iron-oxygen species, which can be formed in the reaction mixture. Figures S6 and S7 show a series of voltammograms, presented separately for the anodic or cathodic scan recorded first, which have led to the results presented in Figure 5. It is worth to notice that the voltammograms confirm that [(N4Py)FeII]2+ is air stable in acetonitrile [77]. The presence of dioxygen in the solution (without organic substrate) has a minimal effect on the potential and height of the first oxidation peak (compare curves II and III in Figure S6a). Additionally, any reduction peak is present in the first cathodic scan (Figures S6b and S7b, curve III), which means that iron(III) is not formed in the presence of dioxygen.

2.4. DFT Calculations

In order to better understand the mechanism of reactions catalyzed by the [(N4Py)FeII]2+/O2 system, in addition to preparative and electrochemical methods, quantum calculations were also conducted. DFT calculations were performed for [(N4Py)FeII]2+ and for the possible structures that the complex can form with the oxygen molecule, and the optimized structures are shown in Figure 6. The calculations were made for various spin states of the complex molecules using MeCN as the solvent model and the results of the calculated thermodynamic parameters (energies, enthalpies, and free energies) are shown in Table S3.
Based on the data presented in Table S3, the Gibbs free energies corresponding to the reactions shown in Table S4 were calculated for the basic optimized structures, visualized in Figure 6. Table S4 shows that under standard conditions, most catalyst activation reactions proceed spontaneously (∆rG < 0). Electrochemical studies have shown that the presence of an organic substrate, as a hydrogen donor, is necessary for the formation of reactive iron(IV) oxo species. In DFT studies of cyclohexene oxidation with dioxygen, transformations of oxygen adducts such as: [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ (Figure 7 and Figure S8, Tables S5 and S6) and the hypothetical one [(N4Py)FeIIIOOC6H9]2+ (Figure S9, Table S7) were analyzed. The reaction profile of the hydrogen atom transfer from cyclohexene to 1,3,5[(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ is presented in Figure 7, and related thermodynamic data are collected in Table S5. Substrates (S) [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + C6H9-H, through the transition state (TS), give products (P) [(N4Py)FeIII-OH]2+ + C6H9 according to reaction:
[(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + H-C6H9 ↔ [(N4Py)FeIII---O---H-C6H9]2+ →
[(N4Py)FeIII-OH]2+ + C6H9
The activation energies (Ea) of the reaction (3) for the analyzed states: singlet, triplet, and quintet, calculated on the basis of relative Gibbs free energies, are equal to 4.5, 10.9, and 1.7 kcal/mol, respectively (Figure 7 and Table S5), whereas the values calculated using relative electronic energies are equal to 2.5, 8.3, and 0.1 kcal/mol. The values change in the same order. The data indicate that the quintet state is the most favorable because it has the lowest activation energy. However, due to the lowest relative energies of the substrates in the triplet state, the state is also probable. The occurrence of substrates in the singlet state, because of the significant difference in energy about 30 and 21 kcal/mol higher compared to the triplet and quintet states, respectively, is unexpected.
Molecules 28 02240 g007 550
Figure 7. Relative Gibbs free energies (Table S5) of the singlet (1, gray), triplet (3, black), and quintet (5, green) states for the reaction of cyclohexene oxidation by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ with the use of MeCN as a solvent model. For the substrates S (in three various spin states), the values of starting relative Gibbs free energies are given next to the corresponding levels. The symbols used: S—substrates: [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + H-C6H9, TS—transition state: [(N4Py)Fe---O---H-C6H9]2+, and P—products: [(N4Py)FeIII-OH]2+ + C6H9.
Figure 7. Relative Gibbs free energies (Table S5) of the singlet (1, gray), triplet (3, black), and quintet (5, green) states for the reaction of cyclohexene oxidation by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ with the use of MeCN as a solvent model. For the substrates S (in three various spin states), the values of starting relative Gibbs free energies are given next to the corresponding levels. The symbols used: S—substrates: [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + H-C6H9, TS—transition state: [(N4Py)Fe---O---H-C6H9]2+, and P—products: [(N4Py)FeIII-OH]2+ + C6H9.
Molecules 28 02240 g007
High-valent iron(IV) oxo complexes can react with alcohols giving iron(III) hydroxy species [84], therefore the thermodynamic parameters for the reaction of [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ with C6H9OH were also calculated. The reaction profile is presented in Figure S8, and the calculated data are collected in Table S6. For this reaction, the triplet and quintet states were analyzed only because substrates in the singlet multiplicity had energy 33 and 25 kcal/mol higher than the triplet and quintet states, respectively (Table S6). For the reaction of alcohol oxidations, the triplet state of [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ is privileged, however the activation energy of hydrogen atom transfer from the substrate to the iron(IV) oxo species is higher than that for cyclohexene. This result supports the experimental finding that 2-cyclohexen-1-ol is not oxidized in the presence of cyclohexene excess. The parameters calculated for the transformation of hypothetical adduct [(N4Py)FeIIIOOC6H9]2+ toward the formation of the ketone (Figure S9, Table S7) have shown that the process has a high activation energy (127 kcal/mol was the lowest value).
In the cyclohexene oxidation process, the [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ adduct seems to be the most probable reactive species. Therefore, only this adduct was used to model the limonene oxidation reaction. Based on the data collected in Table S8 and presented in Figure S10, it was found that the activation energies (calculated on the basis of relative Gibbs free energies) for the hydrogen atom transfer from limonene to the complex [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ are higher than for cyclohexene oxidation and are equal to 33.0 kcal/mol for the singlet, 25.9 kcal/mol for the triplet, and 40.5 kcal/mol for the quintet state. This indicates that the triplet state is the most favorable one.
The activation energy of hydrogen atom transfer from the cyclohexene to the iron(IV) oxo species is lower than that for limonene, which indicates that in the presence of this complex, the cyclohexene oxidation reaction should proceed more effectively than the limonene oxidation reaction. This observation is consistent with the catalytic results obtained for these two examined organic substrates. When comparing the data presented in Table 1 and Table 2, it can be seen that for the cyclohexene oxidation reaction, a significantly (even twice) higher number of TONs was obtained than for the reaction with limonene.

2.5. Considerations on Oxidation Mechanism

The experimental data presented indicate that [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ adduct is the reactive species in the oxidation of cyclohexene and limonene. The adduct is formed when the catalyst [(N4Py)FeII]2+, dioxygen and the substrate are simultaneously present in the reaction environment. The sequence of possible processes, which are presented in Scheme 3, leading to the formation of iron(IV) oxo species causes also the formation of an alcohol [30,34,77].
The assumption that [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ is the reactive intermediate allows easy explanation of the formation of an alcohol and epoxide by insertion of an oxygen atom into the substrate molecule. Equations (4) and (5) present the overall processes.
[(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + R-H → [(N4Py)FeII]2+ + R-OH
[(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + R-H → [(N4Py)FeII]2+ + (O)R-H (epoxide)
The mechanistic details of these transformations have been described in [85,86]. In the above processes [(N4Py)FeII]2+ appears among the products, allowing the catalytic process to occur.
However, to explain the formation of ketone during the oxidation process, this straightforward mechanism including the iron(IV) oxo intermediate cannot be applied. Taking into account our previous research [52,54,67,68] we propose that, in the reaction mixture, the combination of iron(IV) oxo species, dioxygen, and substrate produces a hypothetical adduct (1) (Scheme 4).
Possible transformations of the hypothetical adduct can include its: decomposition to form ketone and iron(IV) oxo species (path A), reaction with the substrate molecule to produce ketone and alcohol and also the catalyst (path B), and interaction with the catalyst that gives ketone and iron(III) μ-oxo complex, which in many cases is catalytically inactive (path C) [87,88].
In our previous research [54,68] structures analogous to the (1) were postulated as an intermediate step of the oxidation process when the Fe or Mn catalysts applied were coordinately unsaturated, e.g., they were prepared in-situ with fewer ligands then available metal coordination sites. The same type of structures was proposed for iron complexes with tetradentate ligands [16]. Since N4Py is a pentadentate ligand, the postulated mechanism seems to be questionable.
However, it has been shown [71] that in water solution of the [(N4Py)FeII]2+ complex, one nitrogen atom of the N4Py ligand can free iron ion coordination site for water molecule or hydroxyl ion. By analogy, it can be assumed that such release of iron coordination place can be possible during the oxidation process investigated. It is necessary to emphasize that the proposed mechanism is a hypothetical one, but it gives reasonable explanation of the observed experimental data.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Equipment

The reaction products were separated and identified with a Hewlett-Packard 4890A Series gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-1 capillary column (cross-linked methyl-silicone gum phase, 30 m x 0.53 mm i.d). 1H and 13C NMR analysis was carried out in DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 using Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 25 °C. Princeton Applied Research Model 273A potentiostat was used to perform voltammetric measurements.

3.2. Chemicals and Regents

The reagents used for the investigations and syntheses were of the highest purity commercially available and were used without further purification. The solvent for all experiments was acetonitrile (≥99.9%, HPLC grade) purchased from Aldrich. High-purity argon (grade 5.0) supplied by Linde (Poland) was used to de-aerate the solutions. Iron(II) perchlorate, Fe(ClO4)2·6H2O, sodium hydroxide (98%), biphenyl (PhPh, ≥99%), cyclohexene (≥99%), 2-cyclohexen-1-one (95%), 2-cyclohexen-1-ol (95%), cyclohexene oxide (98%), (R)-(+)-limonene (97%), (-)-carveol, mixture of isomers, (97%), (R)-(-)-carvone (98%), (+)-limonene oxide, mixture of cis and trans, (97%), (S)-(-)-perillyl alcohol (96%), (S)-(-)-perillaldehyde (92%), di-2-pyridilketone oxime (98%), 2-picolyl chloride hydrochloride (98%), iodobenzene (98%), and chloroform (98%) were obtained from Aldrich. Peracetic acid (39%) and perchloric acid (70%) were delivered by Fluka. Ammonium acetate (97%), sodium sulfate anhydrous (99%), magnesium sulfate anhydrous (99%), and ammonia solution (25%) were purchased from POCH (Poland). PhIO was synthesized by a well-known procedure [89,90].

3.3. Synthesis of [(N4Py)FeII]2+

N4Py used as a ligand and its iron complex [(N4Py)FeII]2+ were synthesized according to the procedure given in the literature [69,91,92] using the Schlenk line system. 1H NMR analysis with the use of DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 for the synthesized ligand; N4Py and the [(N4Py)FeII]2+ complex confirmed that the characteristic bands [69] were obtained. 1H NMR N4Py (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C): δ (ppm) = 3.86 (s, 4H, CH), 5.25 (s, 1H, CH), 7.22 (m, 4H, Py), 7.42 (m, 8H, Py), 8.48 (d, 2H, Py), 8.50 (d, 2H, Py). The obtained spectrum contained four doublets with chemical shifts in the range of 7.42–7.67 ppm derived from the hydrogen of the pyridine group connected to the ligand’s methine group. However, the chemical shift of the methine group had a slightly higher value than that reported in [69]. 1H NMR N4Py (500 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ (ppm) = 3.87 (s, 4H, CH), 5.23 (s, 1H, CH), 7.11 (m, 4H, Py), 7.63 (m, 8H, Py), 8.48 (d, 2H, Py), 8.63 (d, 2H, Py). 13C NMR analysis C (N4Py): δ (ppm) = 64.71 (CH2, aliphatic), 68.73 (CH2, aliphatic), 71.60 (CH, aliphatic), 122.9–149.0 ppm (CH, 2-pyridine), 159.85–162.36 (C, 2-pyridine).

3.4. Methods

Voltammetric measurements were performed in a 2 mL electrochemical cell with provision to control the presence of oxygen with an argon purge system. The working electrode was a 1 mm diameter glassy carbon in PEEK (Cypress Systems, Division of ESA, Inc., Wan Chai, Hong Kong), the auxiliary electrode—a platinum wire, and the reference electrode—Ag/AgCl wire in an aqueous tetramethylammonium chloride solution that was adjusted to give a potential of 0.00 V vs. SCE. The reference electrode was contained in a Pyrex tube with a Vycor tip, which was placed inside a Luggin capillary [93]. Before each experiment, the working electrode was polished using a Buehler Micropolish Alumina Gamma 3B and Buehler Microcloth polishing cloth, then rinsed with deionized water and dried.
During the oxidation processes, the appropriate amount of catalyst was dissolved in de-aerated acetonitrile (O2, 0 atm) followed by the addition of the substrate (usually 1 M, total volume equal to 2.5 mL) in the reaction cell (25 cm3 vial with cut-out cap and Teflon-faced septum). The excess of the substrate was used to minimize the over-oxidation of the initial oxidation products and protect the catalyst from oxidative degradation. The solution was saturated with dioxygen (O2, 1 atm) or air (O2, 0.2 atm). After saturation, dioxygen or air was passed over the solution during the duration of the experiment to maintain a constant concentration of dioxygen in the reaction mixture. The reactions were allowed to proceed for 24 h with constant stirring at room temperature (23 ± 1 °C). The samples (0.2 µL) were periodically withdrawn to follow the progress of the reaction, using gas chromatography (GC) analysis. Biphenyl (5 mM for cyclohexene oxidation or 10 mM for limonene oxidation) was used as an internal standard. The presented values of the products concentrations are the mean values of 3 independent experiments.
Calculations of thermodynamic parameters were made in Gaussian 16 [94] using DFT methods with the hybrid density functional B3LYP and the basis set Def2-SVP. The GaussView program was used to model the structures of both cyclohexene and limonene molecules as well as the different spin states of the [(N4Py)FeII]2+ of complexes and their adducts with oxygen. Geometry optimization was performed using the B3LYP/Def2SVP method with the added D3 version of Grimme’s dispersion with Becke-Johnson damping [95,96]. The final electronic energies of the stationary points were calculated using the Def2-TZVP basis set with the added D3 version of Grimme’s dispersion with Becke-Johnson damping and the PCM model of acetonitrile. Reported in this paper values combine these electronic energies with the ZPE correction or Gibbs free energy correction. The most stable form of the calculated structures was used to calculate the Gibbs free energy for the reactions analyzed.

4. Conclusions

In spite of the fact that [(N4Py)FeII]2+ complex does not react with dioxygen in acetonitrile their combination with an alkene causes its oxidation. The system is not selective, in the case of cyclohexene as the main products 2-cyclohexen-1-one and 2-cyclohexen-1-ol are formed roughly in the 2:1 molar ratio, whereas in the case of limonene 1,2-epoxylimonene, carvone, and carveol in the nearly 2:1.5:1 molar ratio occur after reaction. However, the system is twice as efficient as the [(bpy)2FeII]2+/O2/cyclohexene system [54] and comparable to the [(bpy)2MnII]2+/O2/limonene system [68].
The electrochemical measurements presented indicate that the [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ adduct is formed during the interaction of the catalyst, dioxygen, and substrate in the cases of both cyclohexene and limonene. The adduct also is likely to form when the oxidation of [(N4Py)FeII]2+ (without the presence of organic substrates) takes place at the potentials more positive than +1.65 V, i.e., the formation of the second oxidation peak. The discussed iron(IV) oxo adduct is considered as a reactive intermediate in the oxidation process [30,34]. Indeed the addition of PhIO to the reaction mixture, which causes the formation of [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ [72] increases the amount of products formed both in the case of cyclohexene and limonene. The DFT calculations confirms that the adduct is a favorable oxidant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28052240/s1, Table S1: Oxidation of 1 M cyclohexene with air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+, in MeCN. Analysis of the effect of water addition. Reaction time 24 h; Table S2: Oxidation of 1M limonene with air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+, in MeCN. Analysis of the effect of water addition. Reaction time 24 h; Figure S1: The dependence of the current on the square root of the scan rate (ν1/2) registered for 5 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4 on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE 0.008 cm2), for: (a) the anodic peak at the potential +1.05 V, (b) the subsequent cathodic peak; Figure S2: The electrochemical behaviour of 5 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V. (a) Cyclic voltammogram with anodic scan reversed after the appearance of the peak at potential +1.65 V, scan rate 0.1 V s−1. (b) The dependence of the current on the square root of the scan rate (ν1/2) for the anodic peak at potential +1.65 V; Figure S3: The dependence of the current registered for the anodic peak at +1.95 V on: (a) the square root of the scan rate (ν1/2) and (b) the scan rate, (ν), registered for 5 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4 on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE 0.008 cm2); Figure S4: The dependence of the current of the cathodic peak at +1.0 V on the square root of the scan rate (ν1/2) registered for 5 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ when the scan was reversed after the appearance of the anodic peak at +1.95 V, in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4 on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE 0.008 cm2); Figure S5: Cyclic voltammogram of 15 mM PhIO in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V; Figure S6: Cyclic voltammograms for 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4, (a) the anodic scan, (b) the cathodic scan, was recorded first. I— basic electrolyte in Ar atmosphere, II—after addition of 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in Ar atmosphere, III—as (II) in air atmosphere, IV—as (III) after addition 1 M cyclohexene, V—as (IV) after 5 h. Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V; Figure S7: Cyclic voltammograms for 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN with 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4, (a) the anodic scan, (b) the cathodic scan, was recorded first. I—basic electrolyte in Ar atmosphere, II—after addition of 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in Ar atmosphere, III—as (II) in air atmosphere, IV—as (III) after addition 1 M limonene, V—as (IV) after 5 h. Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V; Table S3: The energies (with and without zero point correction), enthalpies, free energies (G), and respective relative values for different catalyst molecules calculated with Def2TZVP and acetonitrile as PCM model; Table S4: Reaction Gibbs free energy for the activation of complexes; Table S5: The energies (with and without zero point correction), enthalpies, free energies (G), and respective relative values for the singlet (1), triplet (3), and quintet (5) states for reaction of cyclohexene oxidation catalyzed by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ in PCM model; Figure S8: Relative Gibbs free energies (Table S6) of the triplet (3, black) and quintet (5, green) states for the reaction of 2-cyclohexen-1-ol oxidation by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ with the use of MeCN as a solvent model. For the substrates S (in two various spin states), the values of starting relative Gibbs free energies are given next to the corresponding levels. The symbols used: S—substrates: [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + HO-C6H9, TS—transition state: [(N4Py)Fe---O---HO-C6H9]2+, P—products: [(N4Py)FeIII-OH]2+ + O-C6H9; Table S6: The energies (with and without zero point correction), enthalpies, free energies (G), and respective relative values for the singlet (1), triplet (3), and quintet (5) states for reaction of 2-cyclohexen-1-ol oxidation by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ in MeCN as PCM model; Figure S9: Relative Gibbs free energies (Table S7) of the doublet (2, gray), quartet (4, black), and sextet (6, green) states for transformations of [(N4Py)FeIIIOOC6H9]2+ to [(N4Py)FeIIIOH]2+ and ketone with the use of MeCN as a solvent model. For the substrates S (in three various spin states), the values of starting relative Gibbs free energies are given next to the corresponding levels. The symbols used: S—substrate: [(N4Py)FeIIIOOC6H9]2+, TS—transition state: [(N4Py)FeIIIO---OC6H8---H]2+, P—products: [(N4Py)FeIIIOH]2+ + C6H8O; Table S7: The energies (with and without zero point correction), enthalpies, free energies (G), and respective relative values for the doublet (2), quartet (4), and sextet (6) states for the reaction of [(N4Py)FeIIIOOC6H9]2+ (S) to [(N4Py)FeIIIOH]2+ and ketone (P) in PCM model; Table S8: The energies (with and without zero point correction), enthalpies, free energies (G), and respective relative values for the singlet (1), triplet (3), and quintet (5) states for reaction of limonene oxidation by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ in PCM model; Figure S10: Relative Gibbs free energies (Table S8) of the singlet (1, gray), triplet (3, black), and quintet (5, green) states for the reaction of limonene oxidation by [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ with the use of MeCN as a solvent model. For the substrates S (in three various spin states), the values of starting relative Gibbs free energies are given next to the corresponding levels. The symbols used: S—substrates: [(N4Py)FeIV=O]2+ + H-C10H15, TS—transition state: [(N4Py)Fe---O---H-C10H15]2+, P—products: [(N4Py)FeIII-OH]2+ + C10H15.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.R.-C. and A.S.; methodology, K.R.-C. and A.S.; formal analysis, K.R.-C. and A.S.; investigation, K.R.-C.; resources, K.R.-C. and A.S.; data curation, K.R.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.R.-C.; writing— review and editing, K.R.-C., T.P., P.C. and A.S.; visualization, K.R.-C.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, K.R.-C.; and funding acquisition, K.R.-C., P.C. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support from Rzeszów University of Technology within PB25.CF.22.001 grant is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials or on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by PLGrid Infrastructure. Computations were performed in the AGH Cyfronet Supercomputer Centre.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Simándi, L.I. Catalytic Activation of Dioxygen by Metal Complexes; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992; Volume 13, pp. 1–397. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sawyer, D.T. Oxygen Chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  3. De Montellano, P.R.O. (Ed.) Cytochrome P450, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 690. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferraro, D.J.; Gakhar, L.; Ramaswamy, S. Rieske Business: Structure–Function of Rieske Non-heme Oxygenases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 338, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pati, S.G.; Bopp, C.E.; Kohler, H.-P.E.; Hofstetter, T.B. Substrate-Specific Coupling of O2 Activation to Hydroxylations of Aromatic Compounds by Rieske Non-heme Iron Dioxygenases. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 6444–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Burger, R.M. Nature of Activated Bleomycin. In Metal-Oxo and Metal-Peroxo Species in Catalytic Oxidations; Meunier, B., Ed.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 287–303. [Google Scholar]
  7. Burger, R.M.; Grigoryants, V.M.; Scholes, C.P. Exchangeable Proton ENDOR as a Probe of the Redox-Active Iron Center in Activated Bleomycin and Ferric Bleomycin. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 13263–13272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wallar, B.J.; Lipscomb, J.D. Dioxygen Activation by Enzymes Containing Binuclear Non-Heme Iron Clusters. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2625–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Costas, M.; Mehn, M.P.; Jensen, M.P.; Que, L. Dioxygen Activation at Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Active Sites:  Enzymes, Models, and Intermediates. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 939–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jasniewski, A.J.; Que, L., Jr. Dioxygen Activation by Nonheme Diiron Enzymes: Diverse Dioxygen Adducts, High-Valent Intermediates, and Related Model Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2554–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Banerjee, R.; Lipscomb, J.D. Small-Molecule Tunnels in Metalloenzymes Viewed as Extensions of the Active Site. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 2185–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. de Visser, S.P.; Mukherjee, G.; Ali, H.S.; Sastri, C.V. Local Charge Distributions, Electric Dipole Moments, and Local Electric Fields Influence Reactivity Patterns and Guide Regioselectivities in α-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Non-heme Iron Dioxygenases. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Que, L.; Tolman, W.B. Biologically Inspired Oxidation Catalysis. Nature 2008, 455, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Company, A.; Gómez, L.; Costas, M. Chapter 6 Bioinspired Non-heme Iron Catalysts in C–H and C=C Oxidation Reactions. In Iron-Containing Enzymes: Versatile Catalysts of Hydroxylation Reactions in Nature; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2011; pp. 148–208. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oloo, W.N.; Que, L., Jr. Bioinspired Nonheme Iron Catalysts for C-H and C=C Bond Oxidation: Insights into the Nature of the Metal-Based Oxidants. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2612–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kal, S.; Xu, S.; Que, L., Jr. Bio-inspired Nonheme Iron Oxidation Catalysis: Involvement of Oxoiron(V) Oxidants in Cleaving Strong C−H Bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7332–7349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, X.-P.; Chandra, A.; Lee, Y.-M.; Cao, R.; Ray, K.; Nam, W. Transition Metal-Mediated O–O Bond Formation and Activation in Chemistry and Biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4804–4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Walling, C. Fenton’s Reagent Revisited. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sawyer, D.T.; Sobkowiak, A.; Matsushita, T. Metal [MLx; M = Fe, Cu, Co, Mn]/Hydroperoxide-Induced Activation of Dioxygen for the Oxygenation of Hydrocarbons:  Oxygenated Fenton Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barton, D.H.R. Gif Chemistry: The Present Situation. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 5805–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Walling, C. Intermediates in the Reactions of Fenton Type Reagents. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. MacFaul, P.A.; Wayner, D.D.M.; Ingold, K.U. A Radical Account of “Oxygenated Fenton Chemistry”. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Goldstein, S.; Meyerstein, D. Comments on the Mechanism of the “Fenton-Like” Reaction. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stavropoulos, P.; Celenligil-Cetin, R.; Tapper, A.E. The Gif Paradox. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gozzo, F. Radical and Non-radical Chemistry of the Fenton-like Systems in the Presence of Organic Substrates. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2001, 171, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Masarwa, A.; Rachmilovich-Calis, S.; Meyerstein, N.; Meyerstein, D. Oxidation of Organic Substrates in Aerated Aqueous Solutions by the Fenton Reagent. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Que, L., Jr. The Road to Non-Heme Oxoferryls and Beyond. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cho, J.; Jeon, S.; Wilson, S.A.; Liu, L.V.; Kang, E.A.; Braymer, J.J.; Lim, M.H.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K.O.; Valentine, J.S.; et al. Structure and Reactivity of a Mononuclear Non-haem Iron(III)–peroxo Complex. Nature 2011, 478, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. McDonald, A.R.; Que, L. High-valent Nonheme Iron-oxo Complexes: Synthesis, Structure, and Spectroscopy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 414–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hong, S.; Lee, Y.-M.; Ray, K.; Nam, W. Dioxygen Activation Chemistry by Synthetic Mononuclear Nonheme Iron, Copper and Chromium Complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 334, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ehudin, M.A.; Gee, L.B.; Sabuncu, S.; Braun, A.; Moënne-Loccoz, P.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K.O.; Solomon, E.I.; Karlin, K.D. Tuning the Geometric and Electronic Structure of Synthetic High-Valent Heme Iron(IV)-Oxo Models in the Presence of a Lewis Acid and Various Axial Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5942–5960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roelfes, G.; Lubben, M.; Hage, R.; Que, J.L.; Feringa, B.L. Catalytic Oxidation with a Non-Heme Iron Complex that Generates a Low-Spin FeIIIOOH Intermediate. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2152–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shan, X.; Que, L., Jr. High-valent Nonheme Iron-oxo Species in Biomimetic Oxidations. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, Y.-M.; Hong, S.; Morimoto, Y.; Shin, W.; Fukuzumi, S.; Nam, W. Dioxygen Activation by a Non-Heme Iron(II) Complex: Formation of an Iron(IV)−Oxo Complex via C−H Activation by a Putative Iron(III)−Superoxo Species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10668–10670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sankaralingam, M.; Lee, Y.-M.; Nam, W.; Fukuzumi, S. Selective Oxygenation of Cyclohexene by Dioxygen via an Iron(V)-Oxo Complex-Autocatalyzed Reaction. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5096–5104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sankaralingam, M.; Lee, Y.-M.; Nam, W.; Fukuzumi, S. Amphoteric Reactivity of Metal–oxygen Complexes in Oxidation Reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 365, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singh, R.; Ganguly, G.; Malinkin, S.O.; Demeshko, S.; Meyer, F.; Nordlander, E.; Paine, T.K. A Mononuclear Nonheme Iron(IV)-Oxo Complex of a Substituted N4Py Ligand: Effect of Ligand Field on Oxygen Atom Transfer and C–H Bond Cleavage Reactivity. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 1862–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Masferrer-Rius, E.; Borrell, M.; Lutz, M.; Costas, M.; Klein Gebbink, R.J.M. Aromatic C−H Hydroxylation Reactions with Hydrogen Peroxide Catalyzed by Bulky Manganese Complexes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 3783–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, P.; Que, L., Jr. Iron Catalyzed Competitive Olefin Oxidation and ipso-Hydroxylation of Benzoic Acids: Further Evidence for an FeV=O Oxidant. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 9479–9485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ezhov, R.; Ravari, A.K.; Pushkar, Y. Characterization of the FeV=O Complex in the Pathway of Water Oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 13502–13505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schröder, K.; Junge, K.; Bitterlich, B.; Beller, M. Fe-Catalyzed Oxidation Reactions of Olefins, Alkanes, and Alcohols: Involvement of Oxo- and Peroxo Complexes. In Iron Catalysis; Topics in Organometallic, Chemistry; Plietker, B., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 33, pp. 83–109. [Google Scholar]
  42. Canta, M.; Rodríguez, M.; Costas, M. Recent Advances in the Selective Oxidation of Alkyl C-H Bonds Catalyzed by Iron Coordination Complexes. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 372, 27–54. [Google Scholar]
  43. Shul’pin, G.B. New Trends in Oxidative Functionalization of Carbon–Hydrogen Bonds: A Review. Catalysts 2016, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yadav, G.D.; Mewada, R.K.; Wagh, D.P.; Manyar, H.G. Advances and Future Trends in Selective Oxidation Catalysis: A Critical Review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 7245–7269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Denekamp, I.M.; Antens, M.; Slot, T.K.; Rothenberg, G. Selective Catalytic Oxidation of Cyclohexene with Molecular Oxygen: Radical Versus Nonradical Pathways. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cao, H.; Zhu, B.; Yang, Y.; Xu, L.; Yu, L.; Xu, Q. Recent Advances on Controllable and Selective Catalytic Oxidation of Cyclohexene. Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Leising, R.A.; Takeuchi, K.J. Aerobic Oxidation of Cyclohexene with a Phosphine-ruthenium(II)-aquo Catalyst. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 4391–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kojima, T.; Matsuda, Y. Catalytic Hydrocarbon Oxygenation by a Dinuclear Ruthenium(II) Complex with Molecular Oxygen. Chem. Lett. 1999, 28, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Seok, W.K.; Dobson, J.C.; Meyer, T.J. Mechanisms of Oxidation of Phenol and Cyclohexene by an Oxo Complex of Ruthenium(IV). Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stultz, L.K.; Huynh, M.H.V.; Binstead, R.A.; Curry, M.; Meyer, T.J. Allylic Oxidation of Cyclohexene and Indene by cis-[RuIV(bpy)2(py)(O)]2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5984–5996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, R.-M.; Hao, C.-J.; Wang, Y.-P.; Li, S.-B. Amino Acid Schiff Base Complex Catalyst for Effective Oxidation of Olefins with Molecular Oxygen. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1999, 147, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Matsushita, T.; Sawyer, D.T.; Sobkowiak, A. MnIIILx/t-BuOOH-induced Activation of Dioxygen for the Oxygenation of Cyclohexene. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1999, 137, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rydel-Ciszek, K.; Pacześniak, T.; Miłaczewska, A.; Chmielarz, P.; Sobkowiak, A. ‘Oxygen-Consuming Complexes’-Catalytic Effects of Iron-Salen Complexes with Dioxygen. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sobkowiak, A.; Naróg, D.; Sawyer, D.T. Iron(III, II)-induced Activation of Dioxygen for the Oxygenation of Cyclohexene and Related Unsaturated Hydrocarbons. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2000, 159, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Malik, D.D.; Chandra, A.; Seo, M.S.; Lee, Y.-M.; Farquhar, E.R.; Mebs, S.; Dau, H.; Ray, K.; Nam, W. Formation of Cobalt–Oxygen Intermediates by Dioxygen Activation at a Mononuclear Nonheme Cobalt(II) Center. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 11889–11898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Malko, M.W.; Wróblewska, A. The Importance of R-(+)-Limonene as the Raw Material for Organic Syntheses and for Organic Industry. Chemik 2016, 70, 193–202. [Google Scholar]
  57. Denicourt-Nowicki, A.; Rauchdi, M.; Ait Ali, M.; Roucoux, A. Catalytic Oxidation Processes for the Upgrading of Terpenes: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends. Catalysts 2019, 9, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Gusevskaya, E.; Gonsalves, J. Palladium(II) Catalyzed Oxidation of Naturally Occurring Terpenes with Dioxygen. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1997, 121, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. El Firdoussi, L.; Baqqa, A.; Allaoud, S.; Ait Allal, B.; Karim, A.; Castanet, Y.; Mortreux, A. Selective Palladium-Catalysed Functionalization of Limonene: Synthetic and Mechanistic Aspects. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1998, 135, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Silva, A.D.; Patitucci, M.L.; Bizzo, H.R.; D’Elia, E.; Antunes, O.A.C. Wacker PdCl2–CuCl2 Catalytic Oxidation Process: Oxidation of Limonene. Catal. Commun. 2002, 3, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gonçalves, J.A.; Gusevskaya, E.V. Palladium Catalyzed Oxidation of Monoterpenes: Multistep Electron Transfer Catalytic Systems Pd(OAc)2/Benzoquinone/M(OAc)2 (M=Cu, Co or Mn) for the Allylic Oxidation of Limonene with Dioxygen. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2004, 258, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gomes, M.d.F.T.; Antunes, O.A.C. Autoxidation of Limonene, α-Pinene and β-Pinene by Dioxygen Catalyzed by Co(OAc)2/Bromide. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1997, 121, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. da Silva, M.J.; Robles-Dutenhefner, P.; Menini, L.; Gusevskaya, E.V. Cobalt Catalyzed Autoxidation of Monoterpenes in Acetic Acid and Acetonitrile Solutions. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 201, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mastrorilli, P.; Nobile, C.F.; Suranna, G.P.; Lopez, L. Aerobic Oxidations of Unsaturated Substrates under Mukaiyama’s Conditions: The Role of the Metal and of the Sacrificial Aldehyde. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7943–7950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Corain, B.; Tessari, A.; Zecca, M. Epoxidation of Cyclohexene Catalyzed by Copper(II) Complexes under Mukaiyama’s Conditions. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1995, 96, L9–L10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wentzel, B.B.; Alsters, P.L.; Feiters, M.C.; Nolte, R.J.M. Mechanistic Studies on the Mukaiyama Epoxidation. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3453–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Naróg, D.; Szczepanik, A.; Sobkowiak, A. Iron(II, III)-Catalyzed Oxidation of Limonene by Dioxygen. Catal. Lett. 2008, 120, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Szczepanik, A.; Sobkowiak, A. Manganese(II)-Induced Oxidation of Limonene by Dioxygen. Catal. Lett. 2008, 126, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Roelfes, G.; Lubben, M.; Leppard, S.W.; Schudde, E.P.; Hermant, R.M.; Hage, R.; Wilkinson, E.C.; Que, L.; Feringa, B.L. Functional Models for Iron-bleomycin. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1997, 117, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Klinker, E.J.; Kaizer, J.; Brennessel, W.W.; Woodrum, N.L.; Cramer, C.J.; Que, L., Jr. Structures of Nonheme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes from X-ray Crystallography, NMR Spectroscopy, and DFT Calculations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3690–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Draksharapu, A.; Li, Q.; Logtenberg, H.; van den Berg, T.A.; Meetsma, A.; Killeen, J.S.; Feringa, B.L.; Hage, R.; Roelfes, G.; Browne, W.R. Ligand Exchange and Spin State Equilibria of FeII(N4Py) and Related Complexes in Aqueous Media. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 900–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Kaizer, J.; Klinker, E.J.; Oh, N.Y.; Rohde, J.-U.; Song, W.J.; Stubna, A.; Kim, J.; Münck, E.; Nam, W.; Que, L. Nonheme FeIVO Complexes That Can Oxidize the C−H Bonds of Cyclohexane at Room Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 472–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Draksharapu, A.; Li, Q.; Roelfes, G.; Browne, W.R. Photo-induced Oxidation of [FeII(N4Py)CH3CN] and Related Complexes. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 13180–13190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Mukherjee, G.; Lee, C.W.Z.; Nag, S.S.; Alili, A.; Cantú Reinhard, F.G.; Kumar, D.; Sastri, C.V.; de Visser, S.P. Dramatic Rate-enhancement of Oxygen Atom Transfer by an Iron(IV)-oxo Species by Equatorial Ligand Field Perturbations. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 14945–14957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Rohde, J.-U.; Torelli, S.; Shan, X.; Lim, M.H.; Klinker, E.J.; Kaizer, J.; Chen, K.; Nam, W.; Que, L. Structural Insights into Nonheme Alkylperoxoiron(III) and Oxoiron(IV) Intermediates by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16750–16761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Collins, M.J.; Ray, K.; Que, L. Electrochemical Generation of a Nonheme Oxoiron(IV) Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 8009–8011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Hong, S.; Lee, Y.-M.; Shin, W.; Fukuzumi, S.; Nam, W. Dioxygen Activation by Mononuclear Nonheme Iron(II) Complexes Generates Iron−Oxygen Intermediates in the Presence of an NADH Analogue and Proton. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13910–13911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wang, D.; Zhang, M.; Bühlmann, P.; Que, L., Jr. Redox Potential and C−H Bond Cleaving Properties of a Nonheme FeIV=O Complex in Aqueous Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7638–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Greef, R.; Peat, R.; Peter, L.M.; Pletcher, D.; Robinson, J. Instrumental Methods in Electrochemistry, Southampton Electrochemistry Group; Halsted Press: Chichester, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  80. Ghosh, A.; Steene, E. High-valent Transition Metal Centers and Noninnocent Ligands in Metalloporphyrins and Related Molecules: A Broad Overview Based on Quantum Chemical Calculations. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 6, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pacześniak, T.; Błoniarz, P.; Rydel, K.; Sobkowiak, A. Electrochemical Catalytic Processes with Hydrogen Peroxide Showing Oxidative and Reductive Properties (Acting as Oxidant or Reductant). Electroanalysis 2007, 19, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Awasthi, A.; Leach, I.F.; Engbers, S.; Kumar, R.; Eerlapally, R.; Gupta, S.; Klein, J.E.M.N.; Draksharapu, A. Formation and Reactivity of a Fleeting NiIII Bisphenoxyl Diradical Species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202211345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pacześniak, T.; Sobkowiak, A. The Influence of Solvent on the Reaction Between Iron(II), (III) and Hydrogen Peroxide. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 194, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Oh, N.Y.; Suh, Y.; Park, M.J.; Seo, M.S.; Kim, J.; Nam, W. Mechanistic Insight into Alcohol Oxidation by High-Valent Iron–Oxo Complexes of Heme and Nonheme Ligands. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4235–4239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rana, S.; Dey, A.; Maiti, D. Mechanistic Elucidation of C–H Oxidation by Electron Rich Non-heme Iron(IV)–oxo at Room Temperature. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 14469–14472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Terencio, T.; Andris, E.; Gamba, I.; Srnec, M.; Costas, M.; Roithová, J. Chemoselectivity in the Oxidation of Cycloalkenes with a Non-Heme Iron(IV)-Oxo-Chloride Complex: Epoxidation vs. Hydroxylation Selectivity. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30, 1923–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Karasevich, E.K.; Kulikova, V.S.; Shilov, A.E.; Shteinman, A.A. Biomimetic Alkane Oxidation Involving Metal Complexes. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1998, 67, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Taktak, S.; Kryatov, S.V.; Haas, T.E.; Rybak-Akimova, E.V. Diiron(III) Oxo-Bridged Complexes with BPMEN and Additional Monodentate or Bidentate Ligands: Synthesis and Reactivity in Olefin Epoxidation with H2O2. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 259, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Saltzman, H.; Sharefkin, J.G. Iodosobenzene. Org. Synth. 1963, 43, 60. [Google Scholar]
  90. Saltzman, H.; Sharefkin, J.G. Iodosobenzene diacetate. Org. Synth. 1963, 43, 62. [Google Scholar]
  91. Blicke, F.F.; Maxwell, C.E. Naphthylaminoalkanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 1780–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Niemers, E.; Hiltmann, R. Pyridylalkyl-substituierte Amine. Synthesis 1976, 1976, 593–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sawyer, D.T.; Sobkowiak, A.; Roberts, J.L. Electrochemistry for Chemists, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  94. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  95. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 02240 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Products of cyclohexene oxidation.
Scheme 1. Products of cyclohexene oxidation.
Molecules 28 02240 sch001
Molecules 28 02240 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Possible products of limonene oxidation.
Scheme 2. Possible products of limonene oxidation.
Molecules 28 02240 sch002
Molecules 28 02240 g001 550
Figure 1. Dependence of products concentrations on time for oxidation of 1 M cyclohexene with (a) dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm) and (b) air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by 1mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN.
Figure 1. Dependence of products concentrations on time for oxidation of 1 M cyclohexene with (a) dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm) and (b) air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by 1mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN.
Molecules 28 02240 g001
Molecules 28 02240 g002 550
Figure 2. Dependence of products concentrations on time for oxidation of 1 M limonene with (a) dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm), (b) air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by 1mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN.
Figure 2. Dependence of products concentrations on time for oxidation of 1 M limonene with (a) dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm), (b) air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by 1mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN.
Molecules 28 02240 g002
Molecules 28 02240 g003 550
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammogram of 5mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+in MeCN containing 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4 as a supporting electrolyte in argon atmosphere. Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V. Inset, the anodic scan has been reversed after the appearance of the first peak.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammogram of 5mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+in MeCN containing 0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4 as a supporting electrolyte in argon atmosphere. Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V. Inset, the anodic scan has been reversed after the appearance of the first peak.
Molecules 28 02240 g003
Molecules 28 02240 g004 550
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) the mixture of 5mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ and 10 mM PhIO in MeCN [0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4] and (b) after the addition of 15 mM HClO4 to the solution shown in (a). Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V.
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) the mixture of 5mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ and 10 mM PhIO in MeCN [0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4] and (b) after the addition of 15 mM HClO4 to the solution shown in (a). Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008 cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V.
Molecules 28 02240 g004
Molecules 28 02240 g005 550
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms for 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in air atmosphere after 5 h of introduction of (a) 1 M cyclohexene and (b) 1 M limonene into the system, registered in MeCN [0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4]. Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V.
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms for 1 mM [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in air atmosphere after 5 h of introduction of (a) 1 M cyclohexene and (b) 1 M limonene into the system, registered in MeCN [0.1 M (t-Bu)4NClO4]. Scan rate, 0.1 V∙s−1, GCE (0.008cm2), SCE vs. NHE +0.242 V.
Molecules 28 02240 g005
Molecules 28 02240 g006 550
Figure 6. Optimized structures, visualized with GaussView, of iron complexes with relative electronic energies (in kcal/mol). The zero energy level corresponds to the most stable structure in the multiplicity examined. The key bond lengths (in Å) are presented for 1-singlet/3-triplet/5-quintet or 2-doublet/4-quarted/6-sextet states, respectively. Def2TZVP method with MeCN as the PCM model.
Figure 6. Optimized structures, visualized with GaussView, of iron complexes with relative electronic energies (in kcal/mol). The zero energy level corresponds to the most stable structure in the multiplicity examined. The key bond lengths (in Å) are presented for 1-singlet/3-triplet/5-quintet or 2-doublet/4-quarted/6-sextet states, respectively. Def2TZVP method with MeCN as the PCM model.
Molecules 28 02240 g006
Molecules 28 02240 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Proposed route for iron(IV) oxo species formation.
Scheme 3. Proposed route for iron(IV) oxo species formation.
Molecules 28 02240 sch003
Molecules 28 02240 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Tentative mechanism of the oxidation process leading to ketone formation.
Scheme 4. Tentative mechanism of the oxidation process leading to ketone formation.
Molecules 28 02240 sch004
Table
Table 1. Oxidation of cyclohexene with dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm) and air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN. Reaction time 24 h.
Table 1. Oxidation of cyclohexene with dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm) and air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN. Reaction time 24 h.
Catalyst,
mM		Substrate,
M		O2,
atm		Ketone,
mM		Alcohol,
mM		Epoxide,
mM		TON
0.5111357113438
0.510.2924711300
1111147710201
110.21086220190
1 a10.21447423241
2.511115281262
2.510.210455867
5115132317
510.212650737
10.515518982
10.50.23910857
1 b111147710201
1 b10.21086220190
11.5117410715296
11.50.217710016293
12124811942409
120.229312940462
TON—product molecules per catalyst molecule. a—3 mM PhIO has been added to the reaction mixture. b—repeated values.
Table
Table 2. Oxidation of limonene with dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm) and air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN. Reaction time 24 h.
Table 2. Oxidation of limonene with dioxygen (pO2 = 1 atm) and air (pO2 = 0.2 atm) catalyzed by [(N4Py)FeII]2+ in MeCN. Reaction time 24 h.
Catalyst,
mM		Substrate, MOxidantLimonene Oxide,
mM		Carvone, mMCarveol,
mM		Perill Aldehyde, mMPerillyl Alcohol,
mM		TON
0.51148332400210
0.510.243322213202
11189523163181
110.263422733138
1 a10.293553237190
2.5115640281251
2.510.27447292563
5114936261123
510.25943291227
7.5115137280015
7.510.26042312419
10115741335114
1010.25741282313
10.514622102383
10.50.25122132391
1 b1189523163181
1 b10.263422733138
11.5175593525176
11.50.258463000134
12191704234210
120.264583512160
TON—product molecules per catalyst molecule. a—3 mM PhIO has been added to the reaction mixture. b—repeated values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rydel-Ciszek, K.; Pacześniak, T.; Chmielarz, P.; Sobkowiak, A. Bio-Inspired Iron Pentadentate Complexes as Dioxygen Activators in the Oxidation of Cyclohexene and Limonene. Molecules 2023, 28, 2240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052240

AMA Style

Rydel-Ciszek K, Pacześniak T, Chmielarz P, Sobkowiak A. Bio-Inspired Iron Pentadentate Complexes as Dioxygen Activators in the Oxidation of Cyclohexene and Limonene. Molecules. 2023; 28(5):2240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rydel-Ciszek, Katarzyna, Tomasz Pacześniak, Paweł Chmielarz, and Andrzej Sobkowiak. 2023. "Bio-Inspired Iron Pentadentate Complexes as Dioxygen Activators in the Oxidation of Cyclohexene and Limonene" Molecules 28, no. 5: 2240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052240

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop