Next Article in Journal
On the Nature of the Partial Covalent Bond between Noble Gas Elements and Noble Metal Atoms
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Spin Distribution and Electronic Properties in FeN4-Graphene Catalysts with Edge Terminations
Previous Article in Journal
Scissor-like Au4Cu2 Cluster with Phosphorescent Mechanochromism and Thermochromism
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Stability of a Mixed-Phase Barium Cerium Iron Oxide under Reducing Conditions in the Presence of Hydrogen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modulating Optoelectronic and Elastic Properties of Anatase TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

1
Department of Physics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
2
Department of Physics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, NFC Institute of Engineering & Technology, Multan 60000, Pakistan
4
Department of Nano Energy Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(7), 3252; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073252
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 3 April 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 5 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Simulations of Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been investigated for solar-energy-driven photoelectrical water splitting due to its suitable band gap, abundance, cost savings, environmental friendliness, and chemical stability. However, its poor conductivity, weak light absorption, and large indirect bandgap (3.2 eV) has limited its application in water splitting. In this study, we precisely targeted these limitations using first-principle techniques. TiO2 only absorbs near-ultraviolet radiation; therefore, the substitution (2.1%) of Ag, Fe, and Co in TiO2 significantly altered its physical properties and shifted the bandgap from the ultraviolet to the visible region. Cobalt (Co) substitution in TiO2 resulted in high absorption and photoconductivity and a low bandgap energy suitable for the reduction in water without the need for external energy. The calculated elastic properties of Co-doped TiO2 indicate the ductile nature of the material with a strong average bond strength. Co-doped TiO2 exhibited fewer microcracks with a mechanically stable composition.

1. Introduction

Overcoming the energy crisis without affecting the environment is a crucial challenge for scientists and engineers in the near future. For this purpose, various techniques have been proposed, and the utilization of absorbed sunlight energy through photo/electrocatalysis is an especially promising solution. Honda and Fujishima achieved water splitting using a TiO2-based photo/electrocatalyst. TiO2 exists in three phases: anatase, brookite, and rutile [1]. They are all used in photo-electrochemical water-splitting applications [2]. Among them, TiO2 anatase has been hailed as one of the most promising candidates due to its indirect bandgap [3]. In contrast, brookite and rutile exhibited a direct bandgap of 3.0 and 3.5 eV [2,4,5]. Photo-excited electrons have a longer lifetime in indirect bandgap semiconductors than in direct bandgap semiconductors [2,6] because photo-excited electrons cannot migrate directly from the conduction band (CB) to the valence band (VB) [2], decreasing the charge carrier recombination rate. Additionally, due to the rapid migration of charge carriers [2], TiO2 anatase had a lower charge-carrier-recombination rate and the smallest average effective mass [7] of photo-generated electrons, as compared to the brookite and rutile phases; therefore, the superior photo-electrochemical water-splitting properties exhibited by TiO2 anatase were not surprising.
Semiconductors such as hematite Fe2O3 [8,9,10], tungsten trioxide WO3 [11,12,13], and TiO2 [14,15,16], as well as perovskites including ABX3 [17], SrTiO3 [18], metal oxides [19], and metal sulfides [20], have been used for this purpose. However, due to its low cost of production [21], easy availability, non-toxicity [22], and thermodynamic stability, TiO2 anatase has been investigated meticulously [23,24]. Modern industrialization, technological development, and the rapidly growing global population have caused higher energy consumption, which has resulted in severe environmental pollution due to the burning of hydrocarbons. Clean energy is required to achieve a green environment. Hydrogen is a renewable source, and water is available in an unlimited supply. Photo-electrochemical water splitting resulting in hydrogen fuel and oxygen gas by utilizing sunlight through the application of photo-electrode materials has considerable technological potential [25]. The nature of the delocalized photo-excited holes and electrons, which are generated because of the absorption of light photons of appropriate energy, could play a vital role in the application of water for redox reactions to produce hydrogen and oxygen. The reaction of water with the photo-anode surface occurs in the following manner.
H 2 O + 2 e +     2 H + + 1 2 O 2
After the oxidation of water, the electrons are transferred to the cathode using an external circuit, while H+ moves toward the cathode within the electrolyte, where H+ and e react in the following manner:
2H+ + 2e → H2
Pure TiO2 anatase absorbs only ultraviolet light (3–4% of the solar spectrum) due to its wide (3.2 eV) bandgap [3]. Furthermore, it is extremely easy for photo-generated holes and electrons to recombine into pure TiO2 anatase, which reduces the photo-electrochemical water-splitting phenomena [26]. Therefore, only two problems have been encountered during this enhanced photo-electrochemical water splitting: (1) a shrinking of the bandgap and (2) a reduction in the charge-carrier-recombination rate. Various existing techniques, such as doping, surface modification, and the construction of heterojunctions, have been proposed to overcome these flaws [27,28]. Among them, doping techniques have significantly improved the optical, electrical, and photocatalytic performance of TiO2. Using the developed methodology, the aforementioned issues have been addressed with nonmetallic (N, S, P, B, and C [29,30]) and metallic (Fe, Mo, Au, Rh, and Cu) dopants [31]. Giovanni et al. investigated the N-doping effect on anatase surfaces using first-principle calculations and realized enhanced light absorption because of the creation of oxygen vacancy [23]. Xiaoye et al. studied metal-doped anatase and reported that Cu-doping significantly enhanced its photocatalytic activity in PEC applications. Furthermore, Anindita et al. performed thermoelectric mismatching and bandgap calculations for anatase thin films [24]. Illyas et al. comprehensively studied the optical and electrical properties of TiO2 rutile and found that Co-doped TiO2 rutile absorbed a large spectrum of solar light. To obtain sufficient knowledge regarding the interatomic and other solid-state phenomena, understanding the elastic properties are crucial. Due to the super-hard nature of TiO2 anatase, it has become a prevalent interest of researchers; therefore, the calculations of the mechanical properties are as vital as those of the electronic and optical properties [32].
Herein, the anatase phase of TiO2 was comprehensively studied using density-functional-theory (DFT) calculations for PEC water-splitting applications. We thoroughly investigated the impact of Ag, Fe, and Co dopants on the electronic and optical properties of pristine anatase using a DFT + U approach. In addition, the elastic constants (Cij), as well as the shear (G) and bulk (B) moduli, were probed for multifarious fundamental solid-state physical characteristics, including Young’s modulus (Y), the Poisson coefficient (υ), and anisotropy (AU).

Computational Methods and Details

We performed our calculations using DFT with the base variable as the density of electrons, instead of the wave function implemented in SIESTA [33,34,35]. The functionals of the exchange correlation GGA with exchange correlation of revised the Pardew–Burke–Ernzerhof (RPBE) [36,37] for geometry relation were used. A 2 × 2 × 1 supercell was modeled with 48 atoms to perform the calculations. Furthermore, 6 × 6 × 6 k-points were used for the optical properties, and 3 × 3 × 1 k-points were used for the geometry optimization. A cutoff energy of 200 Ry was selected for all structural optimizations as well as for electronic and optical property calculations. Due to the presence of the strongly correlated d-orbital of Ti, we used an effective U-value of 3.5 eV of the Hubbard model (RPBE+U). Herein, a pseudo-atomic orbital (PAO) basis set with a double-zeta potential (DZP) was assigned to all the atoms in the configuration. In addition, we performed all the calculations using the GGA+U method. Elastic property calculations were carried out using the CASTEP code by considering the GGA proposed by PBE with a 340 eV cut-off plane wave basis set. Additionally, all optical properties’ calculations, including absorption coefficients, reflectivity, and energy loss functions were obtained from [38,39,40] in the interval from 250 to 700 nm.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Geometrical Analysis

The effects of doping (Ag, Co, and Fe) on the tetragonal structure of TiO2 anatase were explored using DFT. The defects produced by the dopants in the host supercell matrix were simulated. The defect geometries were obtained by substituting the Ti atoms with each dopant individually. The optimized geometries of the doped and pure TiO2 anatases are given in Figure 1.
The lattice vectors estimated at the lowest energies are listed in Table 1. The bond lengths of Ti and each dopant with O atoms were calculated and found to be in good agreement with the experimental data and, therefore, deemed favorable for further study. The incorporation of Fe and Co resulted in decreased bond lengths, which caused the cell volume to decrease, as shown in Table 1. Furthermore, the Ag dopant expanded the cell volume due to the long Ag–O bond length. The thermodynamic stability of each doped TiO2 sample was calculated using the formation energy of pristine and doped TiO2, using the following equations:
E F = 1 N E T i = Ti , O , Ag , Co , Fe n i E i
where ET represents the total energy of the preferred system consisting of N atoms. The variable Ei demonstrates the total energy of an isolated i (Ti, O, Ag, Co, Fe) atom, and ni is the total number of a specific atom i per unit cell. Our estimated formation energy for pristine and Fe-, Co-, and Ag-doped TiO2 were −9.534, −9.444, −9.418, and −9.245 eV, respectively. Higher negative values of the formation energy indicated their favorable and easy synthesis in the laboratory; this was consistent with the data in the literature. The comparative formation energies of doped and pristine TiO2 are shown in Figure 2.

2.2. Electronic Properties

To understand the electronic and optical properties of the pristine and doped compositions, an investigation of the electronic band structure was of prime importance. The band structures of pristine and doped TiO2 in the SIESTA code were calculated using the GGA+U approximation. All band-structure calculations were performed using high-symmetry points along special lines in the k-space. Figure 3 depicts the band structures of the pristine and doped systems. As shown in Figure 3, TiO2 was an indirect bandgap (3.18 eV) semiconductor, which was in good agreement with the experimental results [41].
Furthermore, TiO2/Ag, TiO2/Co, and TiO2/Fe showed direct bandgaps of 1.50, 2.02, and 1.58 eV, respectively, along the high-symmetry directions of the Brillouin zones and were in good agreement with another work, as shown in Table 2 [43,44].
The incorporation of the dopants (Ag, Co, and Fe) in TiO2 caused the bandgaps for each compound to shrink, which resulted in the maximum absorption of the solar spectrum, tumbling the rate of recombination and increasing the generation of electron–hole pairs for efficient PEC activity. This reduction occurred in the bandgaps because of the generation of novel energy states near the Fermi level.
To unravel the composition of the valence and conduction bands, the projected density of the states (PDOS) for both the pristine and doped TiO2 were calculated, as portrayed in Figure 4. For comparison, the PDOS of pristine TiO2 is also shown in Figure 4a, in which the valance band edge was mostly composed of O-2p states, whereas the conduction band edge was attributed to the unoccupied Ti-3d atomic orbitals. In the case of the Ag dopant, the new states generated by the Ag-3d atomic orbital occurred in the valence-band edge with the overlapping of O-2p states. Similarly, when a Ti atom was substituted by a Co atom, it induces new states of the Co-3d orbitals mixed in with the O-2p and Ti-3d states in the valence band. For the Fe substitution of Ti, the Fe-3d states occurred in the valence band, causing a redshift of absorption and enhancing the photo-response in the visible region. Conclusively, the substitutional impurities in titania caused the shrinkage of the bandgap due to the creation of novel states in the mid-gap, thus reducing the energy barrier in the photon-absorption process, which was the primary condition for high-efficiency photo-anodes in the PEC process.
The generation of H2 via water splitting has been of great importance [46]. To induce water splitting without external energy, the positions of the valence and conduction bands had to be more positive and negative than the oxidation and reduction potentials of the water, respectively. The oxidation potential of water is +1.23 V while its reduction potential is +0 V vs. NHE [47]. In photocatalytic processes, charge separation is a vital factor. If successful charge separation occurs, these charges move to the semiconductor surface and participate in the oxidation and reduction processes. Figure 5 illustrates the energies of the VBM and the CBM of pristine and doped anatase for efficient photocatalytic properties [15]. However, Figure 5 shows that the CBM of anatase was more negative than the water oxidation potential, whereas the VBM edge was more positive, indicating its superiority for PEC activity.
The Ag-doped anatase had a suitable conduction-band position for the water reduction reaction, whereas Co-doped anatase had a suitable valence-band position for the water oxidation reaction. Specifically, all dopants significantly improved the VBM position, representing better and promising oxidation reactions for the water-splitting half-reaction. The shift in the CBM and the VBM occurred because of the transition-metal dopants, which contributed to the new energy states.

2.2.1. Real and Imaginary Parts of Dielectric Functions

Dielectric functions define the electronic properties of materials under the effect of incident radiation; they are given by ε(ω) = ε1(ω) + i ε2(ω). The real part “ε1(ω)” demonstrates the material polarizability, whereas the imaginary part ε2(ω) describes the electronic absorption of the material when illuminated by a certain incident photon energy. The calculated values of the real and imaginary parts of the pristine and doped TiO2 are shown in Figure 6. For pristine TiO2, ε1 had a peak value of 5.11 at 387 nm, and the incorporation of the dopants increased this value up to 6.14 at the same wavelength, suggesting the maximum electronic polarization for energy storage devices. Among all the dopants, Co exhibited a high polarizability near 387 nm, as shown in Figure 6a. In Figure 6b, the imaginary part ε2 exhibited a first peak at 317 nm for pristine TiO2. The first edge of each material was associated with the fundamental bandgap Eg, which represents the transition between the valence-band maximum (VBM) and the conduction-band minimum (CBM). In the case of pristine TiO2, the transition of electrons occurred from the O-2p-occupied state (VBM) to the Ti3d unoccupied state (CBM) near the Fermi level in the ultraviolet region, suggesting a higher energy loss than that of the doped TiO2. Furthermore, for the Co-doped anatase, the peak value was observed at 300 nm. In general, the substitutional doping improved the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric functions in the overall solar spectrum, with considerable advancement in the visible region.

2.2.2. Optical Absorption and Conductivity

To describe the effect of dopants (Ag, Co, and Fe) on the optical absorption and conductivity, we first calculated the two parameters for pristine and doped TiO2, as portrayed in Figure 7. Pristine TiO2 had a wide bandgap (3.18 eV) and could only absorb ultraviolet light [42]. The substitutional doping significantly improved the absorption peak in the visible region, showing much better and more promising material properties for photo-electrochemical water-splitting applications. The improvements in the absorption edge, as shown in Figure 7a, were attributed to the narrow bandgap of the pristine TiO2, and the existence of the new mediator energy states between the VBM and the CBM had decreased the electronic excitation energy needed. Such states were capable of absorbing low-energy photons and generating electron–hole pairs, both of which increased the photoconversion efficiency of the materials. Our computed optical absorption properties for iron (Fe)-doped TiO2 were consistent with theoretical and experimental data [48]. Among all the dopants, Co showed a substantially larger absorption than the other dopants due to the high density of the occupied and unoccupied states, which utilized low-energy photons for the transition from the VBM to the CBM.
In addition, the enhancements of the optical conductivity played a vital role in water splitting and opto-electronic devices, which depend solely on the absorption and refractive index. If a material absorbs greater photon energy than its bandgap, electron–hole pair generation occurs. These pairs move freely in the crystal, which induces optical conductivity. Optical conductivity does not contribute to electrical conductivity because of electronic charge neutrality [49]. For semiconductors and insulators, the electrical conductivity has always been negligible; however, the optical conductivity had been finite due to the optical bandgap. Figure 7b illustrates that the incorporation of the dopants in TiO2 increased its conductivity, with the largest (by a considerable margin) peak in Co-doped anatase. This enhancement would increase the water reduction reactions due to a redshift in the bandgap energy, which would result in the maximum absorption of the solar spectrum. Optical conductivity followed the same trend as the absorption coefficient.
The calculated reflectance and refractive index for both pristine and transition-metal-doped TiO2 as a function of the wavelength is shown in Figure 8. The refractive index determines the speed of light propagation in a medium. For a given material, the maximum value of the refractive index indicates that the light slowly propagates within the material; the opposite is true for the minimum refractive index. For doped TiO2, the refractive index showed a decreasing trend at higher wavelengths and an increasing trend at lower wavelengths. The decreasing trend was due to the optical dispersion of the materials [50]. Cobalt-doped TiO2 exhibited a maximum refractive index value of 2.51 at n = 380 nm, as portrayed in Figure 8.
Figure 8a demonstrates the estimated values of the reflectance for the materials. The reflectivity for Co-doped TiO2 exhibited a maximum value of approximately 20%. In addition, the pristine and Fe- and Ag-doped TiO2 showed < 15% reflectivity in the visible range, suggesting their suitability in antireflective-coating applications [51]. All the compositions with weak absorption and conduction exhibited stronger reflectance.
The loss spectrum was another optical parameter that revealed the spectrum loss during its propagation through the medium. When electrons moved inside the solids, inelastic scattering occurred, which was related to the energy-loss function. Figure 9 displays the energy-loss spectrum as a function of the wavelength from the VBM to the CBM. In addition, the loss spectrum indicated the trailing edges of the reflection spectrum. The highest energy-loss peak characterized the plasma frequency and related resonance. Furthermore, Co-doped TiO2 showed a sharp decrease, as compared to the other dopants, indicating a rapid decrease in reflectivity.

2.3. Elastic Properties

The crystal responses to the external parameters, such as strain and pressure, were governed by the elastic characteristics of the material, which included its mechanical stability, the modes of the phonons, and other solid-state phenomena. To understand the mechanical properties of any solid, the elastic constants (Cij) listed in Table 3 were of great importance; they could be obtained by the Taylor-series expansion [52].
Due to the symmetry, each crystal had its own specific elastic constant. As TiO2 (anatase) exists in tetragonal symmetry, there were six independent elastic constants: C11, C12, C13, C33, C44, and C66. These elastic constants correlated the stress (σ) and strain (ε) tensors using Hooke’s law. Table 4 depicts the estimated values of the elastic moduli, could be derived from the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximations and were in good agreement with existing theoretical and experimental results [54]. The mechanical stability was determined by the strain energy, which had to be positive for any elastic deformation. For tetragonal symmetry, the crystal had to fulfill the following criteria: C11 > 0, C44 > 0, C66 > 0, C11 − C12 > 0, and C11C33 + C12C33 − 2C132 > 0. Our findings revealed that all the conditions were successfully satisfied, and that all the materials were mechanically stable.
Bulk modulus (B) is the capability of the material volume to resist elastic deformation. It indicates the binding energy and average bond strength of atoms in a crystal [52]. Table 3 shows the bulk modulus of pristine and Co-doped TiO2 with the values of 192.736 and 176.590 GPa, respectively, indicating a high average bond strength between Ti and O [55].
Figure 4 shows that the structural properties were attributed to the O-2p and Ti-3d states, indicating ionic and partially covalent bonds. This spatial arrangement made it arduous to modify the atomic displacement through the action of an external force. Meanwhile, the isoionic bond and covalent bond directionality made dislocation almost impossible and created obstacles to dislocation propagation for the surrounding grains. At room temperature, the pristine and doped TiO2 were sensitive to deformation. Under the influence of an external force, if breaking occurred in the structure, it indicated brittleness, poor toughness, and a relatively low shear modulus, as shown in Table 4.
In addition, Poisson’s ratio (υ) governs material brittleness and ductility, along with the expansion capability in the direction normal of the compression. A material with a Poisson’s ratio less than 0.33 was considered to be fragile; otherwise, it was considered ductile [39]. Pristine TiO2 has a higher Poisson’s ratio than Co-doped TiO2, indicating a higher ductility. Moreover, a Pugh’s ratio (B/G) greater than 1.75 suggested a ductile nature, and our estimated results also indicated a ductile nature in both systems, suggesting consistency with Poisson’s ratio [39].
To understand the directional dependence of physical properties, anisotropy (AU) is very important. The null value of anisotropy indicates the isotropic nature of the material. Furthermore, it also determines the nature of the microcracks and the phase stability of crystal structures. A higher anisotropy value indicates microcracks and stress concentration. Our calculation revealed that the incorporation of Co produced fewer microcracks than found in pristine TiO2. Moreover, the Poisson’s ratio and anisotropy values were in good agreement with the literature data and are listed in Table 4. The elastic properties were related to the thermal properties, including the Grüneisen parameter and Debye temperature. The corresponding mechanical properties were promising for energy-associated applications [56].

3. Conclusions

The optoelectronic properties of pristine and doped TiO2 were meticulously analyzed for PEC water splitting using DFT simulations. It was observed that a 2.1% incorporation of each dopant accentuated the optical absorption and the charge transport capabilities in a broad range of the solar spectrum. The calculated bandgap was reduced to 1.50 eV, 2.02 eV, and 1.58 eV in the doped variants of silver, cobalt, and iron, respectively, due to the generation of novel states and the sensitization of the materials to the visible and infrared region, indicating promising PEC water-splitting activity. Furthermore, a more negative CBM and a more positive VBM, with respect to the water oxidation and reduction, respectively, made the materials more efficacious for water splitting. In addition, the enhancement in the optical absorption due to substitutional doping increased the carrier concentration, which overcame the electron–hole pair recombination. Because of the suitable bandgap of TiO2/Co, we estimated its elastic properties and observed that it had the highest average bond strength, as well as high ductility. Our calculations also revealed mechanically stable configurations, fewer microcracks, and lower stress concentrations in Co-doped TiO2, as compared to pristine TiO2. In general, substitutional doping significantly altered the optical conductivity, the dielectric function, the reflectance, and the refractive index of the materials, suggesting their technological potential in PEC water splitting.

Author Contributions

Simulation Study, A.H.; Investigation, A.H.; A.R., E.A. and M.S.K.; Writing—original draft, S.A.M.; writing—review and editing, J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1A2C1010936).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Vorontsov, A.V.; Valdés, H.; Smirniotis, P.G.; Paz, Y. Recent advancements in the understanding of the surface chemistry in TiO2 photocatalysis. Surfaces 2020, 3, 72–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, J.; Zhou, P.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20382–20386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Wei, Z.; Shi, L. A Fundamental DFT Study of Anatase (TiO2) Doped with 3d Transition Metals for High Photocatalytic Activities. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Sci. Ed. 2018, 33, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ilyas, M.; Hussain, A.; Rauf, A.; Rahman, I.U.; Naveed, A.; Basit, M.A.; Rabbani, F.; Khan, S.U.; Ahmed, E.; Hussain, M.; et al. Tailoring the antifouling agent titanium dioxide in the visible range of solar spectrum for photoelectrochemical activity with hybrid DFT & DFT+ U approach. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 27, 102366. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dharmale, N.; Chaudhury, S.; Kar, J. Technology. Pressure-Induced Phase Transition Study on Brookite to Rutile TiO2 Transformation. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 071021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, T.; Chen, W.-L.; Foley, B.J.; Lee, J.; Ruff, J.P.; Ko, J.P.; Brown, C.M.; Harriger, L.W.; Zhang, D.; Park, C.; et al. Origin of long lifetime of band-edge charge carriers in organic–inorganic lead iodide perovskites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 7519–7524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Huy, H.A.; Aradi, B.; Frauenheim, T.; Deák, P. Calculation of carrier-concentration-dependent effective mass in Nb-doped anatase crystals of TiO2. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 155201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tamirat, A.G.; Rick, J.; Dubale, A.A.; Su, W.-N.; Hwang, B.-J. Using hematite for photoelectrochemical water splitting: A review of current progress and challenges. Nanoscale Horiz. 2016, 1, 243–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, C.; Yang, X.; Mayer, M.T.; Hoyt, H.; Xie, J.; McMahon, G.; Bischoping, G.; Wang, D. Hematite-based water splitting with low turn-on voltages. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 12924–12927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sivula, K.; Le Formal, F.; Grätzel, M. Solar water splitting: Progress using hematite (α-Fe2O3) photoelectrodes. Chemsuschem 2011, 4, 432–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Tian, W.; Chen, C.; Xu, W.; Li, L. Tungsten trioxide nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting: Material engineering and charge carrier dynamic manipulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1809036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Enesca, A.; Duta, A.; Schoonman, J. Study of photoactivity of tungsten trioxide (WO3) for water splitting. Thin Solid Films 2007, 515, 6371–6374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, J.H.; Park, O.O.; Kim, S. Photoelectrochemical water splitting at titanium dioxide nanotubes coated with tungsten trioxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 163106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fujishima, A.; Zhang, X.; Tryk, D.A. TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 515–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hisatomi, T.; Kubota, J.; Domen, K. Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7520–7535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, S.U.; Al-Shahry, M.; Ingler, W.B., Jr. Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science 2002, 297, 2243–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guerrero, A.; Bisquert, J. Perovskite semiconductors for photoelectrochemical water splitting applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 2, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.; Qiu, H.; Inoue, T.; Yao, Q. Band gap engineering of SrTiO3 for water splitting under visible light irradiation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 12507–12514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Niu, S.; Han, D.; Liu, T.; Wang, G.; Li, Y. Progress in developing metal oxide nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chandrasekaran, S.; Yao, L.; Deng, L.; Bowen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Lin, Z.; Peng, F.; Zhang, P. Recent advances in metal sulfides: From controlled fabrication to electrocatalytic, photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4178–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rueda, D.; Arias, V.; Zhang, Y.; Cabot, A.; Agudelo, A.C.; Cadavid, D. Monitoring; Management. Low-cost tangerine peel waste mediated production of titanium dioxide nanocrystals: Synthesis and characterization. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 13, 100285. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kanakaraju, D.; Glass, B.D.; Oelgemöller, M. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2014, 12, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, X.; Cui, F.; Guo, X.; Li, D. Effects of nanosized titanium dioxide on the physicochemical stability of activated sludge flocs using the thermodynamic approach and Kelvin probe force microscopy. Water Res. 2013, 47, 3947–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.; Hamilton, J.W.; Byrne, J.A.; O’shea, K.; et al. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, S.; Takata, T.; Domen, K. Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qian, R.; Zong, H.; Schneider, J.; Zhou, G.; Zhao, T.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Bahnemann, D.W.; Pan, J.H. Charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer during TiO2 photocatalysis: An overview. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.C.; Yang, M.; Zhang, G.; Dionysiou, D.D. HNO3-involved one-step low temperature solvothermal synthesis of N-doped TiO2 nanocrystals for efficient photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) in water. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 142, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.C.; Li, J.; Xu, H.Y. One-step in situ solvothermal synthesis of SnS2/TiO2 nanocomposites with high performance in visible light-driven photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr (VI). Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 123, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Basavarajappa, P.S.; Patil, S.B.; Ganganagappa, N.; Reddy, K.R.; Raghu, A.V.; Reddy, C.V. Recent progress in metal-doped TiO2, non-metal doped/codoped TiO2 and TiO2 nanostructured hybrids for enhanced photocatalysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 7764–7778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yalçın, Y.; Kılıç, M.; Çınar, Z. The role of non-metal doping in TiO2 photocatalysis. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2010, 13, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Lin, S. First-principles study on transition metal-doped anatase TiO2. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. He, G.; Zhu, L.; Liu, M.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, L. Optical and electrical properties of plasma-oxidation derived HfO2 gate dielectric films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 3413–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pandey, S.C.; Xu, X.; Williamson, I.; Nelson, E.B.; Li, L. Electronic and vibrational properties of transition metal-oxides: Comparison of GGA, GGA+ U, and hybrid approaches. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017, 669, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Orhan, O.K.; O’Regan, D.D. TDDFT+ U: A critical assessment of the Hubbard U correction to exchange-correlation kernels and potentials. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 165120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Parr, R.G. Density functional theory of atoms and molecules. In Horizons of Quantum Chemistry; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  36. Arshad Javid, M.; Khan, Z.U.; Mehmood, Z.; Nabi, A.; Hussain, F.; Imran, M.; Nadeem, M.; Anjum, N. Structural, electronic and optical properties of LiNbO3 using GGA-PBE and TB-mBJ functionals: A DFT study. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2018, 32, 1850168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nisar, J.; Århammar, C.; Jämstorp, E.; Ahuja, R. Optical gap and native point defects in kaolinite studied by the GGA-PBE, HSE functional, and GW approaches. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 075120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sharma, S.B. Optoelectronic and elastic response of fluorinated hexagonal boron nitride monolayer. ChemRxiv 2021. ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mazumder, J.T.; Mayengbam, R.; Tripathy, S. Theoretical investigation on structural, electronic, optical and elastic properties of TiO2, SnO2, ZrO2 and HfO2 using SCAN meta-GGA functional: A DFT study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 254, 123474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Uspenskii, Y.A.; Kulatov, E.; Halilov, S. Effect of anisotropy on magneto-optical properties of uniaxial crystals: Application to CrO2. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wanbayor, R.; Ruangpornvisuti, V. Adsorption of CO, H2, N2O, NH3 and CH4 on the anatase TiO2 (0 0 1) and (1 0 1) surfaces and their competitive adsorption predicted by periodic DFT calculations. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 124, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Howard, C.; Sabine, T.; Dickson, F. Structural and thermal parameters for rutile and anatase. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 1991, 47, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Pan, Y.; Wen, M. Noble metals enhanced catalytic activity of anatase TiO2 for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 22055–22063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, H.-C.; Li, S.-H.; Lin, S.-W. Effect of Fe concentration on Fe-doped anatase TiO2 from GGA+ U calculations. Int. J. Photoenergy 2012, 2012, 823498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Pan, L.; Ai, M.; Huang, C.; Yin, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, R.; Wang, S.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.-J.; et al. Manipulating spin polarization of titanium dioxide for efficient photocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Cendula, P.; Tilley, S.D.; Gimenez, S.; Bisquert, J.; Schmid, M.; Grätzel, M.; Schumacher, J.O. Calculation of the energy band diagram of a photoelectrochemical water splitting cell. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 29599–29607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, S.; Wang, L.-W. Thermodynamic oxidation and reduction potentials of photocatalytic semiconductors in aqueous solution. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3659–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lin, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Zhu, C.; Hu, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, X.; Fan, J.; Lin, S.H. The optical absorption and hydrogen production by water splitting of (Si, Fe)-codoped anatase TiO2 photocatalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 5209–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dash, L.; Vast, N.; Baranek, P.; Cheynet, M.-C.; Reining, L. Electronic structure and electron energy-loss spectroscopy of ZrO2 zirconia. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 245116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, P.; Katyal, S. Determination of optical parameters of a-(As2Se3)90Ge10 thin film. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khoshman, J.M.; Kordesch, M.E. Optical properties of a-HfO2 thin films. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 3530–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pfrommer, B.G.; Côté, M.; Louie, S.G.; Cohen, M.L. Relaxation of crystals with the quasi-Newton method. J. Comput. Phys. 1997, 131, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Yao, H.; Ouyang, L.; Ching, W.Y. Ab initio calculation of elastic constants of ceramic crystals. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 90, 3194–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mahmood, T.; Malik, H.; Batool, R.; Perveen, Z.; Saleemi, F.; Rasheed, H.; Saeed, M.; Cao, C.; Rizwan, M. Elastic, electronic and optical properties of anatase TiO2 under pressure: A DFT approach. Chin. J. Phys. 2017, 55, 1252–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, X.; Fu, J. Electronic and elastic properties of the tetragonal anatase TiO2 structure from first principle calculation. Optik 2020, 206, 164342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lü, X.; Yang, W.; Quan, Z.; Lin, T.; Bai, L.; Wang, L.; Huang, F.; Zhao, Y. Enhanced electron transport in Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles via pressure-induced phase transitions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Relaxed geometries of (a) TiO2, (b) TiO2/Fe, (c) TiO2/Co, and (d) TiO2/Ag.
Figure 1. Relaxed geometries of (a) TiO2, (b) TiO2/Fe, (c) TiO2/Co, and (d) TiO2/Ag.
Molecules 28 03252 g001
Figure 2. Formation energies per atom of pure and doped TiO2.
Figure 2. Formation energies per atom of pure and doped TiO2.
Molecules 28 03252 g002
Figure 3. Band structure of (a) pristine and (b) Ag-, (c) Co-, and (d) Fe-doped TiO2.
Figure 3. Band structure of (a) pristine and (b) Ag-, (c) Co-, and (d) Fe-doped TiO2.
Molecules 28 03252 g003
Figure 4. Projected density of states of (a) pristine and (b) Ag-, (c) Co-, and (d) Fe-doped TiO2.
Figure 4. Projected density of states of (a) pristine and (b) Ag-, (c) Co-, and (d) Fe-doped TiO2.
Molecules 28 03252 g004
Figure 5. Band-edge comparisons of pure and doped TiO2 anatase in electron volts. The energy scale is represented in (eV) using either the normal hydrogen-electrode potential (NHE) or the vacuum level as a reference.
Figure 5. Band-edge comparisons of pure and doped TiO2 anatase in electron volts. The energy scale is represented in (eV) using either the normal hydrogen-electrode potential (NHE) or the vacuum level as a reference.
Molecules 28 03252 g005
Figure 6. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the dielectric function for pure and transition-metal-doped TiO2.
Figure 6. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the dielectric function for pure and transition-metal-doped TiO2.
Molecules 28 03252 g006
Figure 7. (a) Absorption coefficient and (b) optical conductivity of pure and metal doped TiO2 anatase.
Figure 7. (a) Absorption coefficient and (b) optical conductivity of pure and metal doped TiO2 anatase.
Molecules 28 03252 g007
Figure 8. (a) Reflectance and (b) refractive index for pure and doped TiO2 anatase.
Figure 8. (a) Reflectance and (b) refractive index for pure and doped TiO2 anatase.
Molecules 28 03252 g008
Figure 9. Energy loss vs. wavelength for pristine and transition-metal-doped TiO2.
Figure 9. Energy loss vs. wavelength for pristine and transition-metal-doped TiO2.
Molecules 28 03252 g009
Table 1. Lattice parameters, volume, and c/a of pristine and doped TiO2 anatase.
Table 1. Lattice parameters, volume, and c/a of pristine and doped TiO2 anatase.
Typea (Å)c(Å)c/aV (Å)3
TiO2-Pure
DFT [41]
Experiment [42]
3.791
3.737, 3.741
3.785
9.510
9.981, 9.964
9.514
2.51
2.57, 2.66
2.51
549.537
TiO2/Ag
DFT [43]
3.821
3.905
9.588
9.825
2.51
2.52
559.621
TiO2/Co3.8029.4472.48545.971
TiO2/Fe
DFT [44]
3.785
3.771
9.496
9.489
2.51
2.49
545.984
Table 2. Comparative bandgaps of pristine and doped TiO2 anatase.
Table 2. Comparative bandgaps of pristine and doped TiO2 anatase.
MaterialsThis WorkOther DFTExperimental
TiO23.18 eV3.3 eV [45]3.2 eV [42]
TiO2/Ag1.50 eV0.9 eV [43]---
TiO2/Co2.02 eV------
TiO2/Fe1.58 eV1.74 eV [44]---
Table 3. Elastic constants (Cij; GPa) for pure and Co-doped TiO2 anatase comparison data.
Table 3. Elastic constants (Cij; GPa) for pure and Co-doped TiO2 anatase comparison data.
Elastic ConstantsThis Work
TiO2
Other DFT
[39]a [53]b
This Work
TiO2/Co
C11369.140a399.1, b336.5340.595
C12153.918a167.6, b138.6155.326
C13153.260a159.9, b136.0138.609
C33215.389a250.8, b192.1196.803
C4444.281a70.49, b49.460.523
C6658.665a61.28, b58.363.446
a Ref. [39]; b [53].
Table 4. Estimated elastic moduli and allied parameters of pristine and Co-doped TiO2.
Table 4. Estimated elastic moduli and allied parameters of pristine and Co-doped TiO2.
Elastic
Properties
Current Work
TiO2
Other Work
TiO2 [55]
Current Work
Co dope TiO2
BV208.283221.982193.675
BR192.736204.210176.590
BH200.510213.096185.132
Gv62.32751.27566.595
GR55.23032.08563.099
GH58.77941.68064.847
EV170.023142.829179.241
ER151.24391.466169.152
EH160.640117.388174.203
υV0.3630.3930.346
υR0.3690.4250.340
υH0.3660.4080.343
BV/GV3.3424.3292.908
BR/GR3.4896.3652.799
BH/GH3.4115.1132.855
AU0.4230.3680.374
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussain, A.; Rauf, A.; Ahmed, E.; Khan, M.S.; Mian, S.A.; Jang, J. Modulating Optoelectronic and Elastic Properties of Anatase TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Molecules 2023, 28, 3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073252

AMA Style

Hussain A, Rauf A, Ahmed E, Khan MS, Mian SA, Jang J. Modulating Optoelectronic and Elastic Properties of Anatase TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Molecules. 2023; 28(7):3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussain, Akbar, Abdur Rauf, Ejaz Ahmed, Muhammad Saleem Khan, Shabeer Ahmad Mian, and Joonkyung Jang. 2023. "Modulating Optoelectronic and Elastic Properties of Anatase TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting" Molecules 28, no. 7: 3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073252

APA Style

Hussain, A., Rauf, A., Ahmed, E., Khan, M. S., Mian, S. A., & Jang, J. (2023). Modulating Optoelectronic and Elastic Properties of Anatase TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Molecules, 28(7), 3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073252

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop