Next Article in Journal
Enrichment of Total Flavonoids and Licochalcone A from Glycyrrhiza inflata Bat. Residue Based on a Combined Membrane–Macroporous Resin Process and a Quality-Control Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Highly Sensitive and Group-Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for the Detection of AFB1 in Agriculture and Aquiculture Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advancements in Thermal Insulation through Ceramic Micro-Nanofiber Materials

1
School of Textile and Clothing, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
2
National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Technical Fiber Composites for Safety and Health, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(10), 2279; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102279
Submission received: 3 April 2024 / Revised: 1 May 2024 / Accepted: 8 May 2024 / Published: 12 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Ceramic fibers have the advantages of high temperature resistance, light weight, favorable chemical stability and superior mechanical vibration resistance, which make them widely used in aerospace, energy, metallurgy, construction, personal protection and other thermal protection fields. Further refinement of the diameter of conventional ceramic fibers to microns or nanometers could further improve their thermal insulation performance and realize the transition from brittleness to flexibility. Processing traditional two-dimensional (2D) ceramic fiber membranes into three-dimensional (3D) ceramic fiber aerogels could further increase porosity, reduce bulk density, and reduce solid heat conduction, thereby improving thermal insulation performance and expanding application areas. Here, a comprehensive review of the newly emerging 2D ceramic micro-nanofiber membranes and 3D ceramic micro-nanofiber aerogels is demonstrated, starting from the presentation of the thermal insulation mechanism of ceramic fibers, followed by the summary of 2D ceramic micro-nanofiber membranes according to different types, and then the generalization of the construction strategies for 3D ceramic micro-nanofiber aerogels. Finally, the current challenges, possible solutions, and future prospects of ceramic micro-nanofiber materials are comprehensively discussed. We anticipate that this review could provide some valuable insights for the future development of ceramic micro-nanofiber materials for high temperature thermal insulation.

1. Introduction

Industrial production, firefighting and rescue operations, aerospace, and other fields are frequently confronted with high-temperature environments, which could pose health risks to individuals or lead to serious safety accidents. Therefore, various high-temperature insulation techniques and materials are used to protect personnel and equipment, ensuring the completion of work or emergency rescue tasks. High-temperature insulation materials are generally ceramic-based materials, which could be classified into three categories from the perspective of morphology, named porous, powdery, and fibrous ceramic materials. Porous ceramic insulation materials, including foam ceramics, honeycomb ceramics, and granular ceramics, are designed to have high porosity and small pore size, which enables them to exhibit favorable thermal insulation properties [1]. However, there exist some intrinsic drawbacks in porous ceramics, such as fragility, limited temperature range, and their being prone to structural collapse under wet conditions [2,3]. Powdered ceramic insulation materials are typically composed of brittle powders, such as glass beads, vermiculite powder, and perlite, that are processed and molded into hard materials. These materials are known for their lightweight nature, low thermal conductivity, and high temperature resistance. However, this type of material has high hygroscopicity and poor shock resistance [4,5,6]. Alternatively, fibrous ceramic insulation materials have been extensively applied in numerous fields benefitting from their low thermal conductivity, superior thermal stability, high thermal shock resistance, and favorable chemical resistance [7].
Ceramic fibers are typically produced by melting or spinning a mixture of ceramic raw materials (e.g., alumina, silica, or zirconia) to create long and thin fibers. At present, the common ceramic fiber insulation materials on the market mainly include basalt fiber, aluminum silicate fiber, high silica fiber, quartz fiber, mullite fiber, and so on. The traditional ceramic fibers are relatively coarse with diameter over 5 μm, brittle, and have high thermal conductivity, which greatly limits their practical applications in the field of thermal insulation. When the fiber diameter is further refined to the order of microns or nanometers, its thermal insulation performance could be significantly improved, and the mechanical properties of ceramic fibers could be effectively enhanced [8]. Therefore, research on ceramic micro-nano fiber thermal insulation materials is increasing. Various techniques have been developed for preparing ceramic micro-nano fibers, such as the template synthesis method, the vapor deposition method, sol-gel, and electrospinning [9]. Among these methods, electrospinning is considered to be an attractive and promising approach for the fabrication of ceramic nanofibers with tailored properties for various technological applications based on the significant advantages in the following aspects: relative simplicity, scalability, versatility in material selection, and controllable fiber structure [10].
Up to now, various types of ceramic micro-nano fibers have been developed, such as oxide ceramic fiber, nitride ceramic fiber, and carbide ceramic fiber. However, due to limitations in the existing manufacturing technology, the currently fabricated ceramic micro-nanofiber materials tend to be two-dimensional (2D) membranes, making it difficult to achieve larger thickness and higher porosity. Therefore, researchers are constantly striving to explore more effective manufacturing techniques to overcome this limitation and expand the application range of ceramic micro-nanofiber materials. Numerous approaches have been developed for preparing three-dimensional (3D) ceramic fiber-based aerogels, such as the direct spinning method, template method, gel drying method, freeze drying method, stacking method, and suction method.
In this review, we systematically expounded on the thermal insulation mechanism of ceramic fibers to clarify the main ways to significantly improve the high-temperature thermal insulation performance of these materials. Subsequently, we thoroughly summarized the physicochemical properties, thermal insulation performance, and research status of the currently developed ceramic fibrous materials, including 2D ceramic fibers and 3D ceramic fibrous aerogels, as shown in Figure 1. And then, we provided a detailed summary of bulk ceramic fibrous materials, including the preparation strategy, and the advantages and disadvantages of the preparation methods. Finally, the present application status and the prospect of ceramic fibrous materials in high-temperature insulation are analyzed.
Figure 1. Ceramic fiber-based high temperature insulation materials, including 2D ceramic fibers (oxide ceramic fiber, carbide ceramic fiber, and nitride ceramic fiber) and 3D ceramic fibrous aerogels constructed via varieties of approaches. The images are of 2D ceramic fibers. Reproduced with permission [11]. Copyright 2022, Springer. Reproduced with permission [12]. Copyright 2012, WILEY-VCH. Reproduced with permission [13]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [14]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [15]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [16]. Copyright 2017, Springer. Reproduced with permission [17]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [18]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [19]. Copyright 2020, WILEY. Reproduced with permission [20]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [21]. Copyright 2023, WILEY. Reproduced with permission [22]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [23]. Copyright 2016, WILEY. Reproduced with permission [24]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [25]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). Reproduced with permission [26]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. The images of 3D ceramic fibrous aerogels. Reproduced with permission [27]. Copyright 2022, Nature Portfolio. Reproduced with permission [28]. Copyright 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Reproduced with permission [29]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [30]. Copyright 2019, AAAS. Reproduced with permission [31]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society (ACS). Reproduced with permission [32]. Copyright 2020, ACS. Reproduced with permission [33]. Copyright 2020, AAAS. Reproduced with permission [34]. Copyright 2018, AAAS. Reproduced with permission [35]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 1. Ceramic fiber-based high temperature insulation materials, including 2D ceramic fibers (oxide ceramic fiber, carbide ceramic fiber, and nitride ceramic fiber) and 3D ceramic fibrous aerogels constructed via varieties of approaches. The images are of 2D ceramic fibers. Reproduced with permission [11]. Copyright 2022, Springer. Reproduced with permission [12]. Copyright 2012, WILEY-VCH. Reproduced with permission [13]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [14]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [15]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [16]. Copyright 2017, Springer. Reproduced with permission [17]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [18]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [19]. Copyright 2020, WILEY. Reproduced with permission [20]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [21]. Copyright 2023, WILEY. Reproduced with permission [22]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [23]. Copyright 2016, WILEY. Reproduced with permission [24]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [25]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). Reproduced with permission [26]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. The images of 3D ceramic fibrous aerogels. Reproduced with permission [27]. Copyright 2022, Nature Portfolio. Reproduced with permission [28]. Copyright 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Reproduced with permission [29]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission [30]. Copyright 2019, AAAS. Reproduced with permission [31]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society (ACS). Reproduced with permission [32]. Copyright 2020, ACS. Reproduced with permission [33]. Copyright 2020, AAAS. Reproduced with permission [34]. Copyright 2018, AAAS. Reproduced with permission [35]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02279 g001

2. Heat Transfer in Ceramic Fiber Materials

Fiber-based insulation materials typically consist of two main components: the gas phase and the solid phase. The transfer of heat energy through these materials involves a combination of heat conduction, heat convection, heat radiation, and gas–solid coupled heat transfer. This combination of heat transfer mechanisms allows fiber insulation materials to effectively reduce the transfer of heat and improve thermal insulation in various applications.

2.1. Heat Conduction

Heat conduction is the transfer of thermal energy through a material or between objects in direct contact when there is no relative displacement between their parts. It is caused by the unpredictable thermal movement of small particles, such as molecules, atoms, and free electrons. In a solid material, these particles vibrate and transfer energy to the neighboring ones, causing the heat to propagate through the material. In the absence of any macroscopic movement, the transfer of heat occurs purely through the conduction process [36]. Heat conduction could be categorized into gas heat conduction and solid heat conduction, based on the medium through which heat is transferred. For gas heat conduction, when there is a temperature gradient in a gas medium, the high-energy molecules transfer some of their kinetic energy to lower-energy molecules through collisions, as presented in Figure 2a. Similarly, when the gas comes into contact with a solid surface, heat transfer occurs through collisions between gas molecules and the solid surface. These collisions cause energy transfer, and contribute to the overall heat conduction in the gas phase. The thermal conductivity of gas could be mathematically represented by Equation (1) [8]:
λ g = λ g , 0 θ + 2 ψ β l g , 0 f v P r ε d
where λg represents the thermal conductivity of gas and λg,0 denotes the intrinsic thermal conductivity of individual gas molecules. The symbols θ, Ψ, and β correspond to parameters associated with the Couson number, while Pr represents the Prandtl number. The symbol ε represents a constant, fv represents the fiber volume fraction, and d denotes the fiber diameter. lg,0 represents the average distance traveled by gas molecules between successive collisions. As indicated by Equation (1), the reduction of gas thermal conductivity can be achieved not only by substituting gas molecules with high thermal conductivity, but also by enhancing the mean free path of the gas, augmenting the fiber volume fraction, and decreasing the fiber diameter. Comparatively, the gas thermal conductivity can be significantly and conveniently reduced by elevating the fiber volume fraction and decreasing the fiber diameter. However, for ceramic fiber assemblies, a high fiber volume fraction could also increase the solid thermal conductivity between fibers. Hence, when engineering fiber thermal insulation materials, it is essential to strike an appropriate equilibrium between augmenting the fiber volume fraction and diminishing the fiber diameter in order to attain optimal thermal insulation performance.
Solid heat conduction is mainly achieved through phonon heat transfer, and the characteristics of phonon motion, including frequency, scattering mechanisms, and group velocity, determine the thermal conductivity of solids. Phonon scattering at lattice defects, grain boundaries, impurities, and other locations impacts their heat-carrying ability, as shown in Figure 2b. Scattering can alter the propagation direction and velocity of phonons, thereby affecting heat transfer and leading to a reduction in thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity of a solid can be expressed by Equation (2) [8]:
λ s = 1 3 C S V p h l S
where λs is the solid thermal conductivity, Cs is the constant volume specific heat capacity of the unit volume phonon, Vph is the average velocity of the phonon, and ls denotes the mean free path of the phonon. It can be seen from Equation (2) that decreasing the average phonon mean free path could efficiently reduce the thermal conductivity. As for the ceramic fiber insulation materials, increasing the complexity of the material’s crystal structure, defect concentration, impurity content, and the number of grain boundaries could decrease the average phonon mean free path, thereby improving the thermal insulation performance.
Given the extremely low electrical conductivity of conventional ceramics, the electronic contribution to thermal conductivity could generally be considered negligible [37]. However, in some cermet composites, graphite, 2D materials (e.g., graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides, black and blue phosphorus), metal carbides, semiconductor materials, and the contribution of electronic conduction to the effective thermal conductivity may be equal to or greater than that of lattice vibrations (phonons). The electrons responsible for heat and electricity conduction can be considered as a gas of nearly free electrons that move randomly within the periodic potential of the crystal lattice [37]. When exposed to electrical fields or temperature gradients, the electrons are driven in a specific direction, resulting in the transfer of charge or thermal energy. It is widely acknowledged that the electronic thermal conductivity (λe) at a given absolute temperature (T) could be governed by the Wiedemann–Franz law [38]:
L ( T ) λ e σ T = π 2 3 K B 2 e 2 L 0
where L(T) represents the effective Lorentz number varying with T, σ is electrical conductivity, KB is the Boltzmann constant, e is the electron charge, and L0 is the Sommerfeld value derived from Fermi liquid theory, and L0 = 2.4453 × 10−8 W·Ω·K−2.
Figure 2. Heat transfer mode in porous materials: (a) gas heat transfer. (b) Solid heat conduction. (c) Heat convection. (d) Heat radiation. Reproduced with permission [39]. Copyright 2021, WILEY-VCH.
Figure 2. Heat transfer mode in porous materials: (a) gas heat transfer. (b) Solid heat conduction. (c) Heat convection. (d) Heat radiation. Reproduced with permission [39]. Copyright 2021, WILEY-VCH.
Molecules 29 02279 g002

2.2. Heat Convection

Thermal convection is the process of heat transfer through the movement of air or fluid, and can be divided into natural convection and forced convection [40]. Natural convection is the fluid motion caused by density differences in the flow field due to temperature changes, while forced convection is the convection caused by external factors [41]. When heat is applied to ceramic fibers, air or gas may form a convection loop between the fibers to transfer heat and maintain temperature uniformity. In the porous fiber assembly, the fluid and the fiber surface have thermal energy transfer to each other, as illustrated in Figure 2c.
Researchers have conducted in-depth research on the thermal convection process in fibrous materials. Fricke [42] proposed that when the bulk densities of porous-structured fiber aggregates exceed 2 × 104 g·cm−3, the fibers can separate the gas fluid into small enough pores, and it can be considered that there is no heat convection inside the aggregate. This means that for the fibrous materials with high volumetric density, heat transfer is mainly achieved through thermal conduction, with a relatively small contribution from thermal convection. Therefore, in this case, the fiber material can be treated as a medium without internal thermal convection. However, when the volumetric density is low, the gaps between fibers are larger, allowing fluid to flow freely between the fibers and giving rise to thermal convection. This is due to density differences caused by temperature variations, leading to convective circulation of fluid within the fiber assembly, thereby facilitating heat transfer. Daryabeigi [43] also proposed that when the bulk density of the fiber insulation material is not less than 2.4 × 104 g·cm−3, there is no natural convection inside the fiber material.
For the ceramic fibrous materials, adjusting the texture, length, and arrangement of fibers to create more voids and channels inside the assemblies could efficiently promote thermal convection effects, and thereby improve the thermal insulation performance. Moreover, the arrangement and compaction of ceramic fibers could be adjusted to enhance the connectivity and fluidity of convection channels, contributing to the increase of the strength and efficiency of the thermal convection effect. From the perspective of material surface modification, adding microstructures or surface coatings onto the surface of ceramic fibers might improve the process of convective heat transfer, further enhancing the thermal convection effect. Additionally, combining ceramic fibers with other thermal insulation materials, such as aerogels, porous materials, or metal layers, could form composite material structures to further optimize the thermal convection effect and improve the insulation performance.

2.3. Heat Radiation

Radiative heat transfer primarily depends on the material’s optical response to infrared radiation. Compared to the average free path of infrared radiation photons, fiber insulation materials have a relatively large optical thickness. Thermal radiation transmits energy by emitting electromagnetic waves from the surface of an object, as depicted in Figure 2d. In the process of thermal radiation, it is accompanied by the energy conversion between the internal energy of the object and the electromagnetic wave energy. The thermal radiation process is affected by the optical thickness, extinction coefficient, albedo, and photon scattering of materials [40]. At room temperature, the contribution of radiation heat transfer is generally much smaller compared to conduction and convection. However, as the temperature increases, the significance of radiation heat transfer becomes more prominent. At high temperatures, the energy emitted by an object in the form of electromagnetic waves increases significantly. This is described by the Stefan–Boltzmann law, which states that the amount of heat radiated by an object is proportional to the fourth power of its temperature [44]. As a result, the rate of heat transfer by radiation increases with temperature. The radiation thermal conductivity (λr) can be expressed by Equation (4) [8]:
λ r = 16 K B n 2 T 3 3 ρ e
where KB is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, n represents the refractive index of the material, T denotes temperature, ρ stands for density of the material, and e is extinction coefficient. Through increasing the refractive index or decreasing the extinction coefficient of the ceramic fibrous materials could efficiently reduce the radiation thermal conductivity.
Constructing high reflectivity coatings or using coatings with infrared energy absorption capabilities can effectively reduce the fiber’s infrared transmittance and enhance its ability to reflect infrared radiation [45,46]. Currently, there are several types of high reflectivity coatings that have been constructed on the fiber surface, including TiO2, In2O3, CeO2, and SiC. It should be noted that the constructed high reflectivity coatings on the fiber surface has increased the ability to reflect infrared radiation, while the high thermal conductivity of coatings would enhance the solid-state heat conduction between the fibers, resulting in the coated fiber having a higher thermal conductivity compared to the fiber without the coating. It suggests that, in some cases, the choice of coating material needs to balance the desired infrared reflectance with the overall thermal conductivity requirements of the fiber materials.

2.4. Thermal Conductivity Modeling of Ceramic Fibrous Materials

Heat transfer in fiber insulation materials involves solid conduction through fibers, gaseous conduction, natural convection in the spaces between fibers, and radiative heat exchange in the participating media. The effective thermal conductivity (λeff) of the fibrous material is given by
λ eff = λ c + λ c o n v e c t i o n + λ r
where λc is effective thermal conductivity due to solid and gaseous conduction, λconvection is effective thermal conductivity due to convection, and λr is effective thermal conductivity due to radiation. As previously documented in the literature, the natural convection phenomenon is deemed to be insignificant in fibrous insulation materials with a density exceeding 20 kg m−3 [43]. This is attributed to the effective partitioning of gas molecules into sufficiently small interstices by the fibers. Thus, the effective thermal conductivity of the fibrous material could be expressed as follows:
λ e f f = λ c + λ r
The structure of fibrous materials is complex, and they are commonly thought of as simplified semi-transparent media consisting of elongated, slender fibers, typically a few micrometers in diameter, interspersed with air or other gases that fill the interstitial space between the fibers. To facilitate the study of the thermal conductivity of fiber insulation materials, several basic theoretical thermal conductivity models due to solid and gas conductions for fibrous media have been developed, such as the Parallel model [43,47,48,49,50,51,52], Series model [47,53,54,55], Singh model [56,57], Bankvall model [54,58,59,60], Maxwell–Eucken model [55], Effective medium theory (EMT) model [51,61,62], Hamilton model [53,61,63], and Bhattacharyya model [43,64,65].
As summarized in Table 1, the Parallel model assumes that the fibers in the insulation material are parallel to each other, and accounts for the heat transfer through the fibers and the surrounding air or gas. The Series model considers the fibers in the insulation material to be in series and that heat sequentially flows through each fiber. This model accounts for the thermal resistance of each individual fiber and the cumulative effect on overall insulation performance. In many cases, there may be a certain angle (θ) between the fiber arrangement direction and the heat flow direction. Therefore, Jagjiwanram and Singh [56] proposed a new model based on the Parallel model and the Series model. Moreover, Bankvall et al. [58] postulated that the conduction of solids and gases is both parallel and series, where α is the ratio of parallel heat conduction. The Maxwell model assumes that the filler is randomly dispersed in the matrix, and then calculates the thermal conductivity of the composite without considering the interaction of the dispersed particles in the matrix [55]. The EMT model assumes that the two-phase components can be distributed continuously or discontinuously in the composite, which can be transmitted independently or dispersed in a material [51,61]. Hamilton et al. [63] introduced the empirical shape factor (n) into the model. For spherical particles, n = 3; for infinitely long cylinders, n = 6. Bhattacharyya et al. [64] considered the fiber orientation and introduced the orientation parameter into the model. When the fibers are randomly oriented, the orientation parameter is considered to be 2/3. The aforementioned models permit researchers to describe the effective thermal conductivity of fiber materials in accordance with the specific structural parameters of fiber insulation materials, and to introduce appropriate structural correction factors.

3. 2D Ceramic Fiber Membranes

When further decreasing the fiber diameter, the number of interfibrous contact points is decreased, resulting in an increase in the heat transfer path and the encountered interface barrier. Moreover, thinner fibers with increased surface areas could enhance their ability to absorb and scatter incoming infrared radiation, thus reducing the infrared transmittance. Therefore, preparing fibers with a diameter at the micron or even nanometer level is one of the effective means to enhance the thermal insulation capabilities of fibrous materials. Recently, with the continuous innovation of preparation methods, ceramic micro-nano fiber-based insulation materials have been developed rapidly (Figure 3). The currently developed ceramic micro-nano fibers could be roughly divided into two categories, including oxide ceramic fibers and non-oxide ceramic fibers. In this section, we present a comprehensive review on the categorization of ceramic fibers into oxide ceramic fibers, carbide ceramic fibers, and nitride ceramic fibers.

3.1. Oxide Ceramic Fiber Insulation Material

The oxide ceramic fibers reported in the current literature for high-temperature insulation mainly include silicon dioxide (SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), zirconium oxide (ZrO2), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), and magnesium oxide (MgO). These have been extensively studied for their exceptional thermal properties and suitability for various industrial applications requiring elevated temperature environments.

3.1.1. SiO2 Fiber

SiO2 fibers exhibit advantageous characteristics, such as remarkable thermal stability at elevated temperatures, limited heat transfer properties, significant surface area, and corrosion resistance, which enables their considerable potential in high-temperature insulation applications, particularly within industries such as aerospace, chemical, and energy sectors. Among numerous preparation methods, the sol-gel electrospinning method is widely considered a highly efficient technique for the fabrication of SiO2 nanofibers. Yu and co-workers [11] prepared an ultra-soft SiO2 nanofiber membrane by using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as template and commercial SiO2 sol as a silicon source (Figure 4a). Among the various fabricated SiO2 fibrous membranes, the sample prepared using a 5% PVA precursor sol and sintering temperature of 900 °C exhibits a tension strength of 4.145 MPa and a thermal conductivity of 0.05285 W·m−1·K−1 (Figure 4b). Due to the fact that pure SiO2 exhibits high transparency to near-infrared (NIR) radiation within a wavelength range of 1 to 8 mm, enhancing the anti-infrared radiation properties of SiO2 nanofiber membranes is crucial for expanding their potential applications and improving their high-temperature insulation performance. To address this issue, Song and co-workers [66] employed an effective approach, in which they combined SiO2 sol and TiO2 sol to attain a uniform dispersion of the infrared opacifier TiO2 within the SiO2 nanofiber matrix (Figure 4c). The findings from their study demonstrate a clear relationship between the TiO2 content and the infrared transmittance of the SiO2/TiO2 fibrous membranes. With the gradual increase in TiO2 concentration, a notable decrease in infrared transmittance was observed (Figure 4d), highlighting the significant impact of TiO2 addition on reducing the passage of infrared radiation through the fiber membrane. The resultant SiO2/TiO2 fibrous membranes possess a thermal conductivity of 0.045 W·m−1·K−1 at room temperature (Figure 4e). More notably, when compared to pure SiO2 fibrous membranes, the introduction of TiO2 resulted in a notable reduction in thermal conductivity at a temperature of 500 °C. Specifically, for the composite fibers with a TiO2 content of 12%, the thermal conductivity decreased by 25%, ranging from 0.12 W·m−1·K−1 to 0.089 W·m−1·K−1. Additionally, to improve the tensile strength of SiO2 fibrous membranes, Si and co-workers [67] added NaCl into the SiO2 sol to form a bonded structure between SiO2 nanofibers for effectively reducing the slippage of fibers during the tensile process, thereby increasing the tensile strength of the nanofiber membrane to 5.5 MPa. Furthermore, the fabricated membranes exhibited outstanding flexibility and insulation performance.

3.1.2. Al2O3 Fiber

In high-temperature settings, Al2O3 fibers demonstrate pronounced benefits in oxidation resistance, specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and other properties, thereby garnering considerable interest from researchers. According to previous research [68], Al2O3 exhibits diverse crystal structures, including η, γ, χ, δ, κ, θ and α, among which only the α-Al2O3 phase is thermodynamically stable, while the others are metastable. With rising temperatures, the metastable state will transition to a stable state; however, the transition temperature for stable α-Al2O3 is exceedingly high, which typically surpasses 1200 °C, poses challenges to the fabrication of fine fibers. As a result, achieving the desired characteristics of Al2O3 fibers in terms of size, morphology, and uniformity becomes increasingly difficult. Mitigating the transition temperature to a more manageable range is crucial for enhancing the feasibility and efficiency of the fiber preparation processes. Zhang and co-workers [12] fabricated α-Al2O3 nanofibers composed of nanosheets by the integration of the sol-gel approach and the electrostatic spinning technique (Figure 5a). To impede the conversion of γ-Al2O3 to α-Al2O3, the addition of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) was employed as a stabilizing agent. Consequently, the formation of MgAl2O4 at the grain boundaries facilitated the inhibition of grain growth and effectively enhanced the sintering process. The resulting α-Al2O3 nanofibers exhibit superior thermal stability, retaining their microstructure even after subjecting them to a prolonged heat treatment of 1400 °C for 12 h (Figure 5b). Afterwards, Wang and co-workers [69] employed aluminum isopropoxide as the precursor to fabricate Al2O3 nanofibers through electrospinning and heat treatment processes. The resulting fibers exhibited a thermal conductivity of 0.318 W·m−1·K−1 at 1000 °C, and the α-Al2O3 transformation temperature is as low as 1000 °C, which is 100 to 200 °C lower than the conventional transformation temperature.
Unlike conventional aluminum sources that rely on metal aluminum salts, Li and co-workers [71] select pseudo-boehmite nanoparticles as the aluminum source to fabricate Al2O3-based nanofibers. Nitric acid was chosen as the peptizing agent and PVP as the spinning additives to prepare the spinnable solution. After the electrospinning process and the subsequent calcination at 1300 °C, continuous Al2O3-SiO2 composite nanofibers was obtained. The thermal conductivity of the Al2O3-SiO2 fibrous composite calcined at 1300 °C is 0.08867 W·m−1·K−1. Recently, Li and co-workers [70] prepared Al2O3/ZrO2 fibrous membrane through sol-gel electrospinning approach (Figure 5c). The resulting membranes display favorable flexibility, dramatic fire and temperature resistance, as well as low thermal conductivity of 0.03166 W·m−1·K−1 at room temperature (Figure 5d–f).

3.1.3. ZrO2 Fiber

ZrO2 fibers possess the integrated characteristics of low thermal conductivity, good insulation properties, a high melting point, a high refractive index, excellent thermal shock resistance, and stable chemical properties, making them highly desirable in industries such as aerospace, automotive, and defense. ZrO2 exists in three distinct crystal structures, namely monoclinic, tetragonal, and cubic. It is notable that the transformation from the tetragonal phase to the monoclinic phase results in a volumetric expansion, leading to structural deterioration in ZrO2. To mitigate the detrimental effects of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in ZrO2, the addition of specific crystal stabilizers is commonly employed. These stabilizers include yttrium oxide, calcium oxide, and magnesium oxide. Their incorporation during the fabrication process of ZrO2 helps prevent the occurrence of this undesired phase transition and subsequent structural integrity degradation [72].
Mao and co-workers [73] utilize electrospinning to fabricate flexible yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) nanofibers and achieved a transition from brittle to flexible to brittle by controlling the yttrium content in the fibers. The brittle-to-flexible-to-brittle transition of YSZ membranes is studied with regard to the influences of crystalline phase, grain size, and pore width. They found that the optimal grain size for the YSZ nanofibrous membranes is 23.8 nm. Moreover, to further enhance the mechanical and insulation properties of ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibers, they incorporate the ultrathin montmorillonite (MMT) nanosheets into ZrO2-SiO2 fiber substrate and establishing interfaces with fibers (Figure 6a). The synthesized MMT@ZrO2-SiO2 membranes exhibited favorable softness, tension strength of 1.83 MPa, exceptional fire resistance, and remarkable thermal insulation capabilities (~0.026 W·m−1·K−1 at room temperature), as demonstrated in Figure 6b,c. Subsequently, following a direct polymer template-regulated sol-gel electrospinning process and follow-up calcination, a range of yttria-doped zirconia (YDZ) nanofibrous membranes were successfully fabricated, demonstrating flexibility, foldability, and exceptional thermal stability [74]. The study illustrated the controllability of fibrous dimensions, grain morphology, mechanical characteristics, and thermal resistance of YDZ fibrous membranes through manipulation of polymer template composition and molecular weight. The resultant YDZ fibrous membranes demonstrate extraordinary performance, including outstanding tensile strength of approximately 4.82 MPa, excellent thermal durability up to a temperature of 1200 °C, low thermal conductivity ranging from 0.008 to 0.023 W·m−1·K−1 across the temperature range of 25 to 1000 °C, and outstanding fire resistance.
Peng [75] incorporated a high concentration of amorphous silica to impede grain growth, leading to the fabrication of a YSZ/SiO2 nanofiber membrane. This ceramic fiber membrane exhibits a degree of flexibility, with a measured tensile strength of 4.0 ± 0.7 MPa. Additionally, the membrane demonstrates a thermal conductivity ranging from 0.0287 to 0.0469 W·m−1·K−1. In a separate study, Peng [76] successfully fabricated a two-phase hydrophobic SiO2-ZrO2 composite ceramic nanofiber membrane. The fiber membrane exhibits a considerable strength ranging from 5 to 8.4 MPa, along with a thermal conductivity of 0.030 W·m−1·K−1. Notably, it possesses a remarkable heat radiation reflectivity of 90% and demonstrates high hydrophobic temperature resistance up to 450 °C. Even in a water vapor environment of 350 °C, the membrane maintains its complete hydrophobicity. These exceptional properties make it a promising material for the production of fire-fighting thermal insulation clothing.
Additionally, some scholars have enhanced the thermal insulation performance of ZrO2 fibers by constructing a hollow structure within them. Wang et al. [13] successfully synthesized a novel variety of hollow ZrO2 fiber characterized by exceptional thermal resistance and stability through a template approach. They employed cogon fiber as a natural template, resulting in the formation of ZrO2 fibers with inherited hollow structures (Figure 6d,e). The hollow structure inherent in the biomorphic ZrO2 fiber significantly enhances its ability to impede heat flow when compared to solid fibers, thereby leading to a noteworthy reduction in thermal conductivity, as shown in Figure 6f. Consequently, these fibers demonstrate superior heat-insulating properties compared to traditional solid fibers.

3.1.4. Y2O3 Fiber

Y2O3 fiber, as a significant rare earth oxide, exhibits traits such as a high melting point, robust thermal corrosion resistance, exceptional high temperature stability, and a high dielectric constant. These properties render it widely applicable in high-temperature heat insulation, flame retardant materials, and various related fields. Furthermore, the nanoscale Y2O3 demonstrates high reflectivity within the NIR region, indicating its potential utility as a material with NIR-reflective properties to mitigate the failure of metallic foils in high temperature oxidation environments [14]. Therefore, Xie and co-workers [14] fabricated high near-infrared reflective Y2O3 nanofiber membranes through electrospinning and heat treatment processes. As depicted in Figure 7a, a polyacetylacetone-yttrium precursor was synthesized and used to prepare a spinnable solution. The fabricated Y2O3 nanofibrous membranes exhibit extraordinary flexibility, which could be folded into various shapes with ease (Figure 7b). After calcination, the Y2O3 nanocrystals are clearly visible on the surface and cross-section of the fibers (Figure 7c,d). The wavelength-dependent reflectance of a Y2O3 nanofiber membrane spanning the range of 300 to 2500 nm are examined. Notably, upon undergoing calcination at 800 °C, the Y2O3 nanocrystals exhibited exceptional optical characteristics on both the surface and cross-section of the fibers. In the near-infrared (NIR) region, specifically within the wavelength range of 750–2500 nm, the treated membrane showcased an average reflectivity surpassing 92% and a maximum reflectivity peaking at 95%. These remarkable findings highlight the impressive near-infrared reflective effect achieved by Y2O3 nanofibrous membranes. By incorporating a 100 μm thick Y2O3 nanofiber membrane onto a zirconia fiber sheet with a hot surface temperature of 1500 °C, it becomes feasible to lower the temperature of the cold surface by approximately 20 °C.
Furthermore, they synthesized the metal-acetylacetone coordination polymerization precursor and fabricated yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) nanofibrous membranes through electrospinning technique and the subsequent heat treatment (Figure 7e) [77]. During the calcination process, almost no mesophase is formed in YAG fibers. The resultant YAG nanofibrous membranes display a remarkable tensile strength measuring 2.43 MPa and demonstrate excellent heat resistance and thermal stability, which could effectively maintain a constant temperature of 320 °C on the cold surface when exposed to a hot surface temperature of 1200 °C (Figure 7f). The thermal conductivities of the YAG fibrous membrane remained stable within the range of 0.0252–0.0276 W·m−1·K−1 after undergoing a 2 h heat treatment at temperatures ranging from 900 to 1200 °C (Figure 7g). This level of conductivity is comparable to that observed in other high-performance materials such as SiO2 nanowire aerogel, Al2O3 aerogel, and ceramic fiber aerogel.

3.1.5. MgO Fiber

Due to their elevated melting point, exceptional thermal stability, and resistance to oxidation and thermal degradation, MgO fibers serve as reinforcing agents in high-temperature insulating refractory materials and high-strength composite materials. Shao et al. [78] employed magnesium acetate as the metal precursor and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as the spinning agent to fabricate a spinnable solution. Subsequent to the electrospinning procedure and calcination performed at 800 °C, MgO nanofibers with diameters ranging from 50 to 200 nm were successfully synthesized. Afterwards, Zheng et al. [79] fabricated MgO fibers utilizing the synthesized magnesium propionate as the precursor, followed by pretreatment of the as-spun precursor fibers within two distinct settings of water vapor and atmospheric air. In the presence of water steam, it was anticipated that the propionate groups within the precursor fibers would be eliminated as molecules, yielding MgO fibers with a sleek and compact surface. Conversely, MgO fibers treated in air exhibit a notable presence of internal pores resulting from the release of gases during the combustion decomposition of organic groups. It is observed that the thermal conductivity of fibers treated in air is lower compared to those treated with water steam.
Subsequently, Xu et al. [15] employ two polymeric magnesium salts, magnesium acetate (MA) and magnesium citrate (MC), as precursor materials to effectively synthesize polycrystalline MgO nanofibers via the electrospinning method and heat treatment. The compactness of MgO nanofibers exhibited variation in response to alterations in the mass ratio of magnesium acetate and chitosan within the precursor solution. MgO nanofibers obtained from a magnesium acetate (MA) to magnesium citrate (MC) mass ratio of 1:2 demonstrated enhanced compactness and superior morphological characteristics following heat treatment at 1000 °C. MgO nanofibers featuring a mass ratio of 1:1 demonstrate the highest surface area and the lowest thermal conductivity among the tested specimens.

3.1.6. Other Oxide Ceramic Fibers

In addition to the aforementioned oxide ceramic fibers, researchers have pioneered the development of a variety of composite oxide fibers, aiming to advance fiber mechanical properties, high-temperature insulation performance, and other application capabilities, such as mullite fibers [16], La2Zr2O7 fibers [80], Y2Zr2O7 fibers [81], Gd2Zr2O7/ZrO2 fibers [82], YAG-Al2O3 fibers [83], YSZ-Al2TiO5 fibers [84], etc.
Continuous mullite (3Al2O3·2SiO2) fibers play a significant role in ceramic materials due to their exceptional dielectric properties, low thermal conductivity, minimal thermal expansion coefficient, remarkable chemical stability, and superior thermal resistance at elevated temperatures. Thus, the research on mullite fibers has garnered increasing attention from academia and industry. Typically, utilizing the electrospinning technique with a nonhydrolytic sol precursor, Wei et al. [16] successfully fabricated mullite nanofibers characterized by superior flexibility and exceptional high-temperature resistance, demonstrating promising prospects for applications in advanced materials and thermal management systems. The electrospun mullite nanofibers exhibit a small crystal grain size, uniform diameter distribution, and limited presence of the amorphous phase, contributing to their exceptional flexibility. More importantly, following calcination at 1500 °C, the fabricated mullite nanofibers retain their fibrous morphology, thereby demonstrating potential for applications in high-temperature industrial and aerospace sectors. Subsequently, Wang et al. [85] have examined the influence of polymer template variations on the microscopic morphology and mechanical characteristics of mullite nanofibers. PVP and polyvinyl butyral (PVB) were chosen as templates for the production of mullite-based precursor fibers in this study. The results demonstrate that after the calcination process at 1000 °C, fibers incorporating PVB manifest a porous architecture favoring a higher surface area and mullite crystal formation, while those incorporating PVP exhibit denser features with the presence of both γ-Al2O3 and mullite crystals. These observations underscore the significance of template selection in tailoring the properties of mullite-based fibers for advanced applications. The differences in phase composition, specific surface area, and mechanical properties induced by polymer templating are believed to stem from the distinct coordination modes of polymer and Al-Si sol, leading to varied distributions of components within the spun fibers.
Yuan et al. [80] employ three different lanthanide salts (LaCl3·7H2O, La(NO3)3·7H2O, and La(CH3COO)3·4H2O) as metal sources to formulate precursor spinning solutions, which were subsequently processed into nanofibers using electrospinning technology. The results indicate that the La2Zr2O7 fibers prepared using LaCl3·7H2O as precursor possess finer grain sizes as compared to the other two metal sources, resulting in a relatively higher mechanical strength of the fibers. However, La2Zr2O7 fibers derived from La(CH3COO)3·4H2O precursor exhibit the lowest thermal conductivity, possibly attributed to the larger pore size and porosity on the fibers. Xie et al. [81] proposed an effective approach to fabricate flexible Y2Zr2O7 fibers using the synthesized polyacetylacetone yttrium-zirconium as precursor. The resulting Y2Zr2O7 fibrous membranes demonstrate exceptional thermal stability, retaining their phase integrity up to 1200 °C without undergoing any phase transition. Furthermore, the Y2Zr2O7 fibrous membranes exhibit remarkable heat radiation reflectivity with an average diffuse reflectance of 96.34% in the NIR band ranging from 750 to 2500 nm. The Y2Zr2O7 fibrous membranes integrate the exceptional thermal insulation properties (thermal conductivity of 0.038 W·m−1·K−1) arising from its ultra-low density and high resistance to elevated temperatures characteristic of ceramics.

3.2. Nitride Ceramic Fiber Insulation Material

Nitride ceramic fibers exhibit outstanding characteristics such as excellent high-temperature stability, high strength, and lightweight properties, making them extensively utilized in applications including aircraft engines and aerospace thermal protection structures. They provide reliable high-temperature insulation protection, ensuring the stable operation of equipment in extreme temperature environments. The currently developed ceramic nitride fibers mainly include silicon nitride (Si3N4) fibers, silicon boron nitride (SiBN) fibers, SiBCN fibers, boron nitride (BN) fibers, etc. Nitride ceramic fibers are predominantly prepared via the precursor conversion method, where specialized organic polymer fibers with unique composition structures are initially spun and formed into polymer fibers, followed by thermal treatment and inorganic conversion processes to obtain ceramic fibers. Typically, nitrogen-containing polymer precursors are employed as raw materials or nitrogen elements are introduced through the nitridation reaction of polymer fibers.

3.2.1. Si3N4 Fiber

Silicon nitride fibers, known for their excellent mechanical strength, thermal stability, and corrosion resistance, are extensively utilized in the aerospace industry for manufacturing lightweight components with superior performance under harsh operating conditions.
Various methodologies have been employed for the synthesis of Si3N4 nanowires, including nitrogenation of nanocrystalline Si powder produced by cryomilling, thermal decomposition of polymeric precursor, thermal decomposition-nitriding of silicon monoxide (SiO), chemical vapor deposition, combustion synthesis, carbothermal reduction of SiO2-containing compound with carbon sources, utilization of rice husk ash or carbonaceous SiO2 xerogel in nitrogen-rich environments, as well as high-temperature treatment of a Si wafer in NH3 and N2 atmospheres [17].
Wang et al. [86] demonstrate an economical and scalable synthesis method for α-Si3N4 nanofibers and nanobelts, utilizing mesoporous silica-carbon nanocomposites as precursor materials through a carbothermal reduction and nitridation process. At elevated temperatures, the reaction between SiO2 and C initiates the formation of SiO and CO gases, followed by the subsequent reaction of SiO gas with N2 in the presence of C, leading to the nucleation of Si3N4 crystallites. Additionally, SiO2 xerogel and SiO2 nanoparticles are employed as precursor SiO2 sources to synthesize Si3N4 nanofibers through the carbothermal reduction process. Li and co-workers [17] have proposed a novel vapor-phase synthesis method for producing millimeter-scale single-crystalline α-Si3N4 nanowires. This process involves heating pre-oxidized silicon powders in a corundum crucible at 1390 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere, rather than using ammonia or a reducing atmosphere such as methane or hydrogen. It also excludes the inclusion of carbon or any metal catalysts in the process.
Liu et al. [18] have successfully synthesized a Si3N4 nanowire membrane with exceptional flexibility, outstanding high-temperature resistance, and robust mechanical stability utilizing the precursor pyrolysis method. As illustrated in Figure 8a, the synthesized powders resulting from the drying of a composite precursor solution containing polyureasilazane, xylene, and ferrocene are deposited onto a U-shaped graphite paper substrate. Subsequently, the powders undergo a thermal treatment at 1300–1450 °C, transitioning into a Fe–Si–C–N liquid alloy phase. During this process, the Fe–Si–C–N liquid alloy incorporates N element from the surrounding N2 atmosphere, leading to the precipitation of Si3N4 nanowires. Subsequent to this, guided by gas flow dynamics, the Si3N4 nanowires self-organize into an intricately interlocked configuration. Finally, upon cooling of the furnace and subsequent detachment of the resultant products from the substrate, a Si3N4 nanowire membrane of significant structural integrity is obtained. The resultant Si3N4 nanowire membrane retains its intricately interlocked structure without experiencing substantial alterations in its macroscopic dimensions following heat treatment at 1300 °C (Figure 8b,c). The thermal conductivity of the Si3N4 nanowire membrane at room temperature was 0.056 W·m−1·K−1, which made it possible to protect the researcher’s arm from being burned by a 1000 °C flame (Figure 8d).
Moreover, Biesuz et al. [87] propose a rapid and straightforward approach for synthesizing Si3N4 nanofelts, that is, pyrolysis of polyurethane foam impregnated with liquid siloxane under N2 flow is carried out (Figure 8e). At a specified temperature, solid-phase SiO2 is carburized and reduced to SiO vapor, and then being converted to α-Si3N4 through the carbothermal reduction process. The resulting α-Si3N4 nanofelts exhibit exceptional porosity of 99.7% (10 kg·m−3) and demonstrate a low thermal conductivity of 0.011 W·m−1·K−1 in an argon (Ar) atmosphere (Figure 8f,g). This streamlined synthesis approach emphasizes the significant potential of these nanofelts for advanced thermal insulation applications.

3.2.2. SiBN Fiber

SiBN fibers synergistically integrate the exceptional oxidation resistance inherent in Si3N4 fibers with the remarkable thermal stability characteristic of BN fibers, positioning it as a superior wave-transmitting reinforcing material in current applications. Tang et al. [88] successfully synthesized a novel high-performance SiBN fiber via the pyrolysis process of a carbon-containing polyborosilazane precursor. The resulting fiber exhibited remarkable thermal resistance, as evidenced by the sustained mechanical strength even after exposure to high temperatures of 1700 °C in a N2 atmosphere or 1400 °C in an O2 environment. Subsequently, Long et al. [19] studied the effect of boron content (3.56–6.81 wt%) on high-temperature stability of SiBN fibers. Higher concentrations of boron have been found to improve thermal durability of SiBN fibers at elevated temperatures, enhancing their suitability for use as microwave-transparent composites in demanding high-temperature environments. The synthesized SiBN fibers displayed complete amorphy, featuring a predominant presence of Si3N4 phase in conjunction with amorphous BN phases interconnected via Si–N–B networks. After being subjected to a temperature of 1600 °C, the SiBN fibers retained their original smooth surface and fully amorphous structure, leading to the preservation of their initial tensile strength to a significant extent. Moreover, as the temperature elevated from ambient conditions to 1200 °C, the SiBN fibers exhibited outstanding microwave-transmittance characteristics characterized by a minimal dielectric constant and loss.
Moreover, Long et al. [89] conducted a study examining the high-temperature oxidation behavior of SiBN fibers across a spectrum of boron concentrations, spanning from 1000 to 1400 °C under ambient air conditions. When the temperature above 1100 °C, SiBN fibers underwent oxidation, leading to the conversion of Si3N4 and BN phases into SiO2 and B2O3, respectively. The volatilization of molten B2O3 at high temperatures resulted in the retention of amorphous SiO2 on the fiber surface. Following oxidation, the penetration of molten B2O3 into the inner structure of the fiber facilitated its reaction with Si3N4, resulting in the emergence of hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) nanoparticles and the development of a SiO2/BN layer. As a result, the oxidizing process yielded intricate oxidation layers consisting of two discernible concentric sublayers, each accompanied by two transitional sublayers.

3.2.3. SiBCN Fiber

SiBCN fibers represent a new class of amorphous materials characterized by superior corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, low density, high temperature resistance, commendable mechanical properties, and excellent wave penetration capabilities when compared to traditional Si3N4 and SiC binary fibers. Owing to the relatively low diffusion coefficients exhibited by non-oxide binary phases, such as SiC, BN, and Si3N4, alongside their thermal decomposition thresholds remaining below the corresponding melting points, the synthesis of this particular group of amorphous ceramics necessitates the utilization of the preceramic polymer pathway.
Wilfert et al. [90] utilized the pre-ceramic polymers derived from the aminolysis of dichloroboryl-methyl-trichlorosilyl-amine (DMTA) for the fabrication of SiBCN felts through electrospinning technique. Then, the fabricated precursor fibers were cured in an ammonia (NH3) environment rendering them infusible to avoid the melting during the subsequent process of pyrolysis. Finally, the polymeric fibrous materials were positioned in corundum crucibles and subjected to pyrolysis in quartz tubes under a N2 atmosphere at 1400 °C. Based on Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) investigations, the decomposition of SiBCN commences around 1700 °C and only a cumulative mass reduction of 14% was observed even at the terminal temperature of 1900 °C, highlighting the excellent thermal resistance of SiBCN felts.
Following this, Chen et al. [91] developed a new polyborosilazane precursor characterized by high purity and excellent formability. This was achieved through the utilization of tris(dichloromethylsilylethyl)borane as the primary raw material, in combination with boron trichloride and hexamethyldichlorosilane as crosslinking agents. After the electrospinning process and the follow-up pyrolysis treatment at 1000 °C under N2 atmosphere, the SiBCN nanofibers were obtained. However, in comparison to the SiBCN felts prepared by Wilfert et al. [90], the thermal stability of the resultant SiBNC nanofibers developed by Chen et al. has exhibited a slight decrease, with significant weight loss observed in the temperature range of 1500 to 1700 °C.
In a recent study, Tian et al. [21] integrated finely dispersed SiC nanograins into SiBCN fibers via a polymer-derived approach utilizing chemically modified polyborosilazane. Upon analysis, it becomes evident that the resultant SiBCN fibers were predominantly composed of amorphous SiBCN matrix, SiC nanograins, unbound carbon, and graphite-like BN(C) phase. The incorporated SiC nanograins could evidently enhance the tensile strength of SiBCN fibers. The remarkable resilience at extremely high temperatures can be traced to the existence of thermodynamically robust nanograins of SiC, alongside the encapsulation of these nanograins by the graphite-like BN(C) phase and the amorphous SiBCN matrix. This encapsulation mechanism further enhances the overall stability of the material system under extreme thermal conditions.

3.3. Carbide Ceramic Fiber Insulation Material

Carbide ceramic fibers exhibit outstanding properties, including being lightweight, strong, and having a high modulus. They also have exceptional resistance to high temperatures, corrosion, and oxidation. These fibers find extensive use in aerospace, nuclear, and other high-temperature sectors. They are used for insulation in rocket engines, lining high-temperature pipes, and manufacturing high-temperature electronic components. Currently, carbide ceramic fibers that are commonly prepared include silicon carbide (SiC) and zirconium carbide (ZrC).

3.3.1. SiC Fiber

SiC fiber has gained increasing attention due to its high-temperature stability, corrosion resistance, thermal conductivity, and semiconductor characteristics that make it applicable in demanding environments [92]. Currently, the precursor conversion method is one of the primary techniques for preparing SiC fibers. This method involves using organic polymers that contain carbon and silicon as precursors [93,94,95]. These precursors are then spun into fibers using either melt spinning or electrospinning techniques. Following high-temperature pyrolysis, SiC fibers with diameters spanning from tens of nanometers to several micrometers are successfully synthesized. Polycarbosilane (PCS) is acknowledged as a highly suitable precursor for the fabrication of SiC fibers. Chen et al. [96] employed a hybrid approach, combining electrospinning with the polymer-derived ceramic method, to fabricate a pliable and ultrafine polycrystalline SiC fibrous membrane, as presented in Figure 9a–c. The resulting SiC fibers exhibit impressive flexibility, outstanding oxidation resistance, and exceptional high temperature thermal stability (Figure 9d). The fibers experienced only a 1.52% weight loss when subjected to temperatures up to 1900 °C in an Ar environment and a mere 4.1% weight gain when exposed to temperatures up to 1500 °C in an air atmosphere. The ultrafine SiC fibers have a crystalline structure consisting of SiC crystals with an average grain size of about 100 nm. They have a slight excess of carbon, as indicated by a C/Si ratio of 1.06, and a negligible presence of oxygen elements, constituting only 0.47 wt%. These compositional characteristics synergistically contribute to the remarkable thermal resistance exhibited by the fibers.
To enhance the thermal insulation performance of SiC fibers, Tian et al. [26] developed hollow-structured SiC ultrafine fibers using the emulsion electrospinning technique, followed by pre-oxidation and pyrolysis treatment. The resulting SiC fibers were consistently hollow with a narrow diameter distribution ranging from 1.2 to 2.5 μm and a wall thickness measuring 250 nm (Figure 10a,b). The extinction coefficient of hollow SiC fibers in the infrared region of 2.5 to 6 μm increases by approximately 30% when compared to the solid SiC fiber mat (Figure 10c). At a temperature of 800 °C, the thermal conductivity of hollow SiC fiber measures 0.1049 W·m−1·K−1, signifying a considerable reduction compared to that of solid SiC fiber, which registers at 0.3631 W·m−1·K−1. This indicates the crucial role of the hollow structures in improving the fibers’ thermal insulation performance. In contrast, Liu et al. [97] utilized the co-axial electrospinning technique to create N-doped hollow SiC fibrous mats, as demonstrated in Figure 10d. The shell layer was composed of PCS solution while the core layer consisted of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) solution. To preserve the fiber morphologies during the pyrolysis process, the precursor fibers were crosslinked through thermal oxidation in an atmospheric environment of air. Afterward, the crosslinked fibers underwent pyrolysis at varying temperatures in a N2 atmosphere to prepare N-doped hollow SiC fibers (Figure 10e). Alternatively, the as-spun core–shell fibrous mats fibers were cured through electron beam irradiation (EBI) (Figure 10f). The introduction of nitrogen doping led to a noteworthy reduction in thermal conductivity for the hollow SiC fibers, with the N-doped variant exhibiting a value of 0.026 ± 0.013 W·m−1·K−1 at 25 °C, as compared to the 0.138 W·m−1·K−1 observed for the undoped fibers at the same temperature (Figure 10g). This observation underscores the significant impact of nitrogen doping on enhancing thermal insulation properties.
To enhance the high-temperature resistance and thermal insulation capabilities even further, Zhang and co-workers [98] introduced zirconium precursor into the spinning solution. After the electrospinning process and subsequent treatment at 1300 °C in an Ar atmosphere, ZrO2/SiC nanofibrous membranes were obtained. TGA indicated negligible weight loss upon heating the ZrO2/SiC nanofibrous membranes to 1400 °C, a temperature notably surpassing the threshold necessary for SiC nanofibers alone, which is approximately 1100 °C. It shows that the introduction of ZrO2 has a great promoting effect on the temperature resistance of the membranes. The addition of ZrO2 phases with low thermal conductivity, SiC phases with infrared shielding properties, and residual carbon within the ZrO2/SiC composite nanofibers leads to a decrease in thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity was measured to be 0.032 W·m−1·K−1 at room temperature and 0.217 W·m−1·K−1 at 1300 °C. In addition, hollow SiO2 nanospheres were incorporated as a pore-forming agent into the SiC fiber matrix to construct dense cellular structures [99]. Due to the closed pore structure and the existence of multiphase interfaces, the resulting SiO2/SiC fibrous membranes exhibit low thermal conductivity (0.026 W·m−1·K−1) and high temperature resistance (1400 °C).

3.3.2. ZrC Fiber

ZrC fibers exhibit exceptional physical and chemical properties, including high hardness, elevated melting point, thermal shock resistance and superior mechanical strength. As a prominent component of ultrahigh temperature ceramics, ZrC fibers have extensive applications in the aerospace industry, particularly in hypersonic aircraft and related fields. Currently, the main methods for producing ZrC fibers include carbothermal reduction, mechanical alloying, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis, and electrospinning [100], among which electrospinning is considered to be an efficient and facile approach. In 2008, Cui and co-workers [101] successfully fabricated ZrC nanofibers by electrospinning and annealing at 1600 °C for 2 h in an Ar atmosphere. The ZrC crystalline phase started to form initially at 1500 °C. Subsequently, Li et al. [102] found that the carbon source has a great influence on the fiber morphologies by modulating the kinetics of the carbothermal reduction process.
Ge et al. [103] incorporated ZrC and SiC into uniform fibers to resist the creep of SiC fibers. By subjecting a preceramic precursor of polyzirconocenecarbosilanes (PZCS) to melt spinning, electron beam curing, and pyrolysis processes, a continuous ceramic fiber with SiC-ZrC binary phases was successfully fabricated. After subjecting the green fiber cured by the electron beam to decarbonization in a hydrogen atmosphere at 1000 °C, the resulting fiber was calcined in an Ar environment at 1600 °C. This process generated stoichiometric α-SiC and ZrC phases within the fibers. ZrC particles with average diameters in the range of 15 to 20 nm were generated and uniformly distributed in the SiC fiber matrix.
Afterward, Wang and co-workers [22] prepared ZrC fibers through centrifugal melt-spinning using zirconium-containing polymers as precursor. The synthesized precursor solution was placed into the melting chamber where rapid melting occurred. The molten material was then extruded through the spinneret orifice, facilitated by centrifugal forces, and formed into ZrC precursor fibers that were collected using a concentric barrel arrangement. Then, the fabricated precursor fibers were annealed at 1500 °C for 2 h. Compared with the previously reported ZrC fibers, the structure of the fibers prepared by centrifugal melt-spinning is more compact.

4. 3D Ceramic Fiber Aerogels

Although the traditional 2D micro-nanofiber thermal insulation material exhibits good high-temperature thermal insulation performance, it still faces challenges such as limited thickness, low porosity and thermal insulation performance that require further improvement. Compared to 2D fibrous membranes, 3D fiber aerogel materials offer advantages such as controllable size, high porosity, and a high degree of pore zigzagging. Hence, they possess broad potential applications in areas such as thermal insulation, heat retention, and acoustical absorption. A wide variety of ceramic fibers have been constructed into 3D fibrous aerogels by a variety of preparation methods, as summarized in Table 2. Considering that the preparation method of fiber aerogels has a decisive influence on their spatial structure, which in turn directly affects their high-temperature thermal insulation performance, we classify and review 3D ceramic fiber aerogels according to different preparation methods (direct spinning, template, sol-gel impregnation, vacuum filtration molding, freeze drying, and stacking) in the following sections.

4.1. Direct Spinning Method

The process of depositing fibers directly into bulk fiber material in the receiver by electrospinning, blowing, and other spinning technologies is called direct spinning. Cheng et al. [27] proposed a three-dimensional reaction electrospinning process to directly fabricate a ceramic nanofibrous aerogel through manipulating the sol jet coagulation during its trajectory. Low quantities (0.1 wt%) of high molecular weight polymer were added into the synthesized precursor sol to change the jet injection mode into a multi-jet spinning, as demonstrated in Figure 11a. Through adjusting the vertical displacement of the spinning nozzle and collector, they were able to obtain a 3D interwoven nanofiber aerogel precursor through interknitting the crimped nanofibers (Figure 11b,c). The fabricated ceramic aerogels exhibited good tensile and torsion resistance as well as superior compressibility (Figure 11d). Furthermore, the resultant ceramic aerogels demonstrated exceptional thermal stability across a wide temperature range from −196 to 1400 °C, accompanied by a notably low thermal conductivity of 0.0228 W·m−1·K−1 at room temperature and robust fire resistance (Figure 11e). Dong et al. [121] developed a lamellar-structured ZrO2-TiO2 fiber sponge by a coaxial electrospinning technique followed by the calcination process. The precursor solutions for ZrO2 and TiO2 were prepared separately using the synthesized polyaceticzirconium and polyacetylacetonatotitanium, respectively. The solutions were injected into the core and shell channels of the coaxial needle. The ZrO2-TiO2 fiber sponge was designed to be highly compressible and resilient in the temperature range of −196 to 1200 °C. The ZrO2-TiO2 fiber sponge exhibited a low thermal conductivity of 0.027 W·m−1·K−1 and a high near-infrared reflectivity of over 97%, rendering it highly suitable for lightweight insulation applications requiring high temperature resistance.
Wang et al. [28] produced ceramic nanofiber sponges, including TiO2, ZrO2, YSZ, and BaTiO3, using a solution blow-spinning process. An air-permeable cage-like container was used as the fiber collector, as exhibited in Figure 11f–h. The prepared ceramic nanofiber sponge can recover rapidly after compression of more than 20% strain at room temperature and 400 °C, and maintain good recovery after compression at 1300 °C (Figure 11i). The ZrO2 nanofiber sponge exhibited a low room-temperature thermal conductivity of 0.027 W·m−1·K−1, benefitting from its high porosity and porous cellular structures. Afterwards, Zhu et al. [112] prepared elastic layered mullite fiber sponge with high compression and high temperature resistance using the same strategy. The fabricated mullite fiber sponge could maintain 94.34% of the initial maximum stress after 100 compression cycles with ~50% strain, demonstrating the remarkable compressibility. In addition, the mullite fiber sponge exhibits excellent compressive elasticity within a broad temperature interval extending from −196 to 1200 °C and a thermal conductivity of 0.0265 W·m−1·K−1 at 40 °C.
To enhance the heat-insulating capabilities of ceramic fiber sponge, Xu et al. [107] used blow spinning and atom layer deposition (ALD) to prepare PVP/Al2O3 nanofibrous aerogel. Subsequently, Al2O3 nanotube aerogels were obtained by calcination treatment after removing the sacrificial template PVP. The Al2O3 nanotube aerogels demonstrated high resilience, exhibiting only 20% plastic deformation after 100 compression cycles at approximately 60% strain. The Al2O3 nanotube aerogels showed remarkable elasticity even after being subjected to a temperature of 900 °C for 2 h. Additionally, they displayed a low room-temperature thermal conductivity of 0.022 W·m−1·K−1.
The ceramic nanofiber sponge material prepared by the direct spinning method exhibits certain compression and rebound characteristics. However, irregular shape of the collected fiber material, difficulty in controlling the thickness, and poor bonding between fibers are some of the problems that arise due to the need to use a specific receiver to collect the fiber material.

4.2. Template Method

To ensure the controllable shaping of the prepared 3D ceramic nanofiber aerogel, 3D fiber blocks with regular shapes are used as templates. Ceramic components are deposited on the surface of the block by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or ALD, and then the template is removed to obtain a 3D ceramic fiber aerogel. Su et al. [119] employed a porous carbon foam (CF) as a sacrificial template and coated SiC layer onto the CF skeleton through CVD process. SiC foam was obtained after removing the carbon matrix in the bulk by heat treatment in a muffle furnace at 800 °C for 10 h. Using the CVD technique, SiC nanowires (SiCnw) were subsequently deposited into the SiC skeleton resulting in the synthesis of SiCnw@SiC foam with a double network structure. The SiCnw@SiC foam demonstrated outstanding thermal insulation performance at high temperatures, with a thermal conductivity of 0.304 W·m−1·K−1 at 1200 °C. Additionally, the compressive strength was measured at 1.53 MPa, indicating the composite foam’s potential for use in harsh environments.
Xu and co-workers [30] used the freeze-dried graphene aerogel as a sacrificial template to synthesize hexagonal boron nitride aerogels (hBNAGs) and β-silicon carbide aerogels (βSiCAGs) by a catalyst-free CVD method and subsequent annealing treatment to etch the graphene template (Figure 12a). The synthesized ceramic aerogels possessed hyperbolic-patterned macrostructures with a negative Poisson’s ratio of −0.25 and superelasticity with a maximum strain of 95% (Figure 12b,c). Moreover, the resultant aerogels showcased a combination of characteristics including ultralow density (reaching as low as 0.1 mg·cm−3), low thermal conductivity of approximately 0.02 W·m−1·K−1 in air (Figure 12d), robust thermal stability even under rapid thermal shocks (up to ~275 °C·s−1), and sustained performance under prolonged exposure to high temperatures (900 °C in air and 1400 °C in vacuum). This approach is versatile and could be used to prepare various varieties of ceramic fibrous aerogels. Thereafter, Guo et al. [29] prepared a foam of single-crystal Si3N4 nanowires by growing them in situ on a green body composed of activated carbon particles, followed by heat treatment to remove the activated carbon.

4.3. Sol-Gel Impregnation Method

Conventional ceramic aerogels are generally in a state of particle accumulation, with high static air retention and low thermal conductivity. However, they have defects such as high brittleness and poor vibration resistance, which limit their application. In addition, the fusion between the particles would easily cause the structure to collapse at high temperature, so the high temperature resistance of the granular ceramic aerogel is poor. The introduction of ceramic fibers as reinforcing phases in aerogels can improve the aerogel skeleton and bridging, thereby producing ceramic aerogel composites with improved mechanical properties and excellent thermal insulation properties.
He et al. [122] first used a molding press method to construct the mullite fiber green body, and then impregnated it into the ZrO2-SiO2 sol to form wet gel. After aging and supercritical drying, the aerogels/fibrous ceramic composite was obtained. The as-synthesized composite aerogel exhibited a remarkable compressive strength of up to 1.05 MPa and a low room-temperature thermal conductivity of 0.0524 W·m−1·K−1. Moreover, the thermal conductivity in the temperature range of 500 to 1200 °C was 0.082 to 0.182 W·m−1·K−1, highlighting its superior thermal insulation performance over a wide temperature range. Subsequently, they developed large-scale fiber/aerogel composites using ZrO2 fiber felt as the skeleton and ZrO2-SiO2 aerogels as the obturator by vacuum impregnation, aging, and supercritical drying [123]. The ZrO2 fiber/ZrO2-SiO2 composite aerogels demonstrated significantly reduced thermal conductivity, measuring 0.0341 W·m−1·K−1 at ambient temperature and ranging from 0.046 to 0.096 W·m−1·K−1 within the temperature span of 500 to 1100 °C.
Zhang et al. [31] proposed a facile and scalable approach for fabricating ceramic nanorod aerogels featuring hierarchical macroporous and mesoporous architectures. This approach involves the controlled assembly of Al2O3 nanorods and SiO2 nanoparticles (Figure 13a–d). The subsequent high-temperature annealing treatment ensures the strong Si-O-Al bond between adjacent nanorods, giving the aerogel a high compressive strength of 1.5 MPa, extraordinary fire resistance and a temperature resistance of up to 1400 °C (Figure 13e–g). Furthermore, the ceramic nanorod aerogels demonstrated low thermal conductivity of 0.026 W·m−1·K−1 at 25 °C and 0.089 W·m−1·K−1 at 1200 °C. The synthesized ceramic nanorod aerogels demonstrated a combination of characteristics, including heightened thermal stability, reduced thermal conductivity, increased mechanical resilience, light weight, superior thermal insulation capability, and scalability in fabrication. These properties collectively underscore their significant potential for application in extreme environments.

4.4. Vacuum Filtration Molding Method

The vacuum filtration molding process involves mixing the fibers, binders, and solvents to create a uniformly dispersed slurry. This slurry is then poured into a porous mold and subjected to vacuum filtration molding under the pumping force of a vacuum pump. The resulting green body are dried and then subjected to high-temperature sintering to produce porous structured ceramic fibrous aerogel.
Zhang et al. [110] used mullite fiber as a skeleton, polyethyleneimine (PEI) as a dispersant, polyacrylamide (PAM) as an adsorbent, SiC and B4C as inorganic binders, and starch as an organic binder to prepare the fibrous slurry. The well-stirred slurry was filtrated using a vacuum pump and an initial pressure of 160 kPa was applied on the head during the filtration process. After vacuum filtration treatment, the wet fiber network was dried and then calcined at 1400 °C for 1 h to remove the organic binder and form bonding points between the fibers. The resulting ceramic fibrous aerogel exhibited a high compressive strength of 2.1 MPa with a porosity of 87.3%. Moreover, the thermal conductivity of the fibrous porous mullite ceramics at room temperature was 0.093 W·m−1·K−1. Afterwards, Zhang’s group [124] created mullite-ZrO2 ceramics with a lower thermal conductivity of 0.052 W·m−1·K−1 using the same procedure.
Subsequently, Dong et al. [125] prepared fiber slurry by mechanically mixing mullite fiber, silicon resin, and solvent, followed by vacuum filtration treatment. The resulting green bodies were subjected to a heating and crosslinking process, and then calcined at various temperatures to obtain the molded fiber block. After undergoing vacuum filtration treatment, a portion of the binder becomes trapped between the fibers, resulting in the formation of bonding points after calcination treatment. The resulting mullite fibrous aerogel exhibited a high compressive strength of 1.21–1.58 MPa and a high rebound-resilience of 70–85%. The minimum thermal conductivity of the constructed fibrous ceramics was 0.083 W·m−1·K−1 (room temperature).
Moreover, An and co-workers [32] uniformly dispersed the aluminoborosilicate nanofiber in water with SiO2 aerogel precursor and the dried SiO2 aerogel powder to prepare fiber slurries, respectively (Figure 14a). The obtained slurries were then treated by vacuum filtration process to prepare the resultant aerogel composite. The resulting lamellar-structured aerogel composite demonstrated high flexibility, outstanding recoverability with a strain recoverable compressibility larger than 50%, and excellent fatigue resistance (Figure 14b,c). The interfacial interaction between aluminoborosilicate nanofibers and SiO2 aerogels plays a major role in the anisotropic thermal insulation of the obtained aerogel, contributing to the low thermal conductivity of 0.0224 W·m−1·K−1 (Figure 14d).

4.5. Freeze-Drying Method

The methods described above have proven to be efficient approaches for preparing ceramic fiber aerogels. However, the resulting ceramic materials still have weak thickness controllability and relatively high-volume density. Alternatively, the freeze-drying method involves low-temperature freezing to solidify the precursor solution. The solidified solvent crystals are then sublimated by vacuum drying, preserving the shape and structure of the sample. Thus, the size, shape, and volume density of the ceramic fiber aerogels could be precisely regulated.
Si et al. [34] manufactured lamellar-structured nanofibrous ceramic aerogels (CNFAs) with super-lightweight properties using flexible SiO2 nanofibers as skeleton and aluminoborosilicate (AlBSi) sol as high-temperature adhesive (Figure 15a–c). The resulting CNFAs exhibited structural robustness and high resilience; however, the aerogels with a disordered structure or an unbonded network derived from identical precursors exhibited structural collapse under significant compressive loads, demonstrating that cellular structures and stable bonding between fibers play an important role in elastic recovery. After 500 load-unload cycles at 60% strain, the plastic deformation was 12%, indicating the good long-term cycling performance of the resulting CNFAs (Figure 15d). The CNFAs exhibited a low thermal conductivity of 0.025 W·m−1·K−1 and a temperature resistance of 1100 °C (Figure 15e,f). Subsequently, other species of ceramic fiber aerogel have been developed using the freeze-drying method, such as SiC@SiO2 nanowire aerogel, mullite nanofibrous aerogels, Si3N4 fiber aerogel, TiO2 nanofiber aerogel, BN aerogels, etc.
The aforementioned aerogels are generally produced by high-temperature calcination to create bonding points between fibers. In this process, ceramic fibers are easily transformed from amorphous to crystalline state or secondary growth of grains. The brittle crystalline structure limits further improvements of mechanical properties. For this reason, Wang et al. [126] fabricated a biomimetic SiO2 nanofiber aerogel exhibiting superelasticity through the integration of flexible SiO2 nanofibers and a rubber-like Si-O-Si bonding network. The resulting ceramic aerogels achieve in situ fiber bonding during the freeze-drying process, and their superelasticity could be achieved without further calcination, avoiding the brittle structure caused by secondary high-temperature calcination. They found that the elastic restitution of ceramic aerogels prepared with trimethoxymethylsilane (MTMS) as the silicon source was superior to that of aerogels prepared with tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS)and dimethoxydimethylsilane (DMDMS) as the silicon source. The resulting ceramic fiber aerogel demonstrated robust fatigue resistance, enduring over a million compressions, and the aerogels exhibited low thermal conductivity of 0.024 W·m−1·K−1 with a temperature resistance of 1100 °C.
To further enhance the thermal insulation capabilities of the ceramic fibrous aerogels, Dou et al. [127] used SiO2 nanofibers and SiO2 nanoparticle aerogels as building blocks for the construction of hierarchical cellular structured ceramic nanofiber aerogel. The SiO2 fibers and SiO2 aerogel particles form a stable Si-O-Si bond structure that ensures the mechanical stability of the aerogel material in the process. The prepared composite aerogel has excellent fire resistance and high temperature thermal insulation properties with a thermal conductivity of 0.02327 W·m−1·K−1.

4.6. Stacking Method

Although a ceramic fiber aerogel with certain resilience can be prepared by the above freeze-drying method, the internal fibers of the aerogel bear the external stress in a point-to-point contact manner, which is difficult to endure intense mechanical forces or heat flow impact in practical application. Therefore, the aerogel will cause structural collapse and strength degradation under external force or long-term exposure to high temperature, which will seriously affect its stability. The ceramic fiber layers are stacked in parallel, which could largely withstand the compressive deformation and stress.
Su et al. [115] first prepared the paper-like α-Si3N4 nanoribbon sheets using siloxane xerogels as raw materials, and then the α-Si3N4 papers were annealed at 1000 °C in air to form thin SiO2 shell on the surface of nanoribbons. Afterward, the treated film was assembled layer by layer and the aerogel bulk was obtained after hot pressing heating treatment at 1200 °C. The resulting amorphous SiO2 layer would act as a binder to create adhesion points between the nanobelts during the hot-pressing heat treatment. The resulting α-Si3N4 nanobelt aerogel has adjustable bulk density ranging from 1.8 to 9.6 mg·cm−3. The α-Si3N4 nanobelt aerogel exhibited resilient compressibility with a recoverable strain of 40 to 80% and a low thermal insulation of 0.029 W·m−1·K−1 with a temperature resistance of 1200 °C in ambient air. Although a certain bonding structure is established between the nanobelts after heat treatment, there is still a lack of support structure between the layers, and the interaction force between the layers is weak, resulting in the problem that the material is still easy to peel off between the layers.
To further tackle this problem, Zhang et al. [114] constructed a lamellar multiarch structured ceramic nanofiber aerogel by a three-dimensional construction method combining impregnation stacking and freeze-drying process, using flexible ZrO2-Al2O3 nanofibrous membranes as the building blocks and aluminum dihydrogen phosphate (Al(H2PO4)3) as the binder. The ZrO2-Al2O3 nanofibrous aerogels that have been produced exhibited a comprehensive set of properties, including rapid strain recovery up to 90%, compressive strength in excess of 1100 kPa at 90% strain, remarkable fatigue resistance, and consistent superelasticity over a range of temperatures. In addition, the ZrO2-Al2O3 nanofibrous aerogels demonstrated a relatively low thermal conductivity of 0.0322 W·m−1·K−1 and high temperature resistance of up to 1300 °C.
To solve the problem of poor fatigue life caused by large energy dissipation of the above prepared ceramic nanofiber aerogel, Zhang et al. [35] immersed the flexible ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous membranes with a predetermined size into the SiO2 sol solution, and then prepared an aerogel with a fluffy layered arched honeycomb structure by ultrasonication, stacking, freeze-drying, and calcination, as displayed in Figure 16a,b. The developed ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous aerogel demonstrated constant superelasticity across a temperature range of −196 to 1100 °C and a high compressive strength of 950 kPa at 90% strain (Figure 16c). In particular, the resulting aerogel exhibited a low energy loss coefficient of 0.28 and exceptional fatigue resistance, maintaining nearly zero plastic deformation even after undergoing 1000 compression-recovery cycles (Figure 16d). Moreover, the aerogel possessed a low room-temperature thermal conductivity of 0.0268 W·m−1·K−1. Subsequently, the thermal insulation performance of the ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous aerogel was further improved through employing the silicon particle aerogel into the matrix. On the basis of maintaining the excellent elastic recovery and compression fatigue resistance of aerogels, the thermal conductivity of aerogels was further reduced to 0.024 W·m−1·K−1. As demonstrated in Figure 16e, the flowers could be protected from burn-out by ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous aerogels, revealing their extraordinary thermal insulation performance.

5. Challenges and Future Trends

Although significant progress has been made in the development of ceramic micro-nanofiber insulation materials, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed before ceramic micro-nanofibers can be applied in practice:
  • Although some ceramic micro-nanofibers can be transformed from brittle to flexible by adjusting the sol-gel process, calcination process parameters and ion doping, there is still no flexible mechanism to explain this transformation process. Therefore, in situ mechanical devices can be used to study the structural transformation of ceramic micro-nanofibers during the stress process. With the help of molecular dynamics and finite element simulation, the models of single fiber and fiber assembly are constructed to simulate the stress process of ceramic fiber materials, so as to provide a scientific explanation of the flexible mechanism of ceramic fiber, and to provide guidance for the preparation of other kinds of high-temperature resistant flexible ceramic micro-nanofiber materials.
  • At present, the mechanical strength of ceramic micro-nanofibrous materials is relatively low, which makes it challenging to fulfill the needs of practical applications. Therefore, it is of vital importance to further improve the mechanical properties of ceramic micro-nanofibrous materials. The tensile strength of a single fiber can be enhanced by various means, such as controlling the crystallinity of the ceramic fiber, changing the direction of grain orientation, reducing micro defects in the fiber, and densifying the fiber. In addition, the mechanical properties of fiber aggregates can be improved by creating adhesion points between fibers, changing the direction of fiber accumulation, and increasing the degree of entanglement between fibers.
  • Presently, the thermal conductivity of the ceramic micro-nanofiber insulation material has been reduced to some extent. However, the material still exhibits high thermal conductivity at high temperatures. In addition, the currently manufactured ceramic oxide nanofibers are typically polycrystalline. When used under high temperature conditions, there is secondary growth of grains, which further reduces the strength of the material. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the high-temperature insulation performance and resistance of the material. By directly processing ceramic materials with low solid thermal conductivity and high infrared reflectivity into 2D flexible ceramic micro-nanofibrous membranes or 3D aerogels. Alternatively, high reflectivity or high infrared shielding coatings are sprayed onto the surface of existing ceramic fiber materials. These approaches can be helpful in improving the high-temperature thermal insulation performance of materials.
  • Electrospinning and air-jet spinning technologies are the primary methods for producing ceramic micro-nanofibers, and industrial equipment is now available. Despite these advances, the efficiency and yield of these technologies remain lower than those of conventional ceramic fibers, requiring further improvements in the stability of material morphology and structure. In addition, the development of ceramic fiber aerogels is still in the experimental phase, with a relatively long process flow, indicating the need for optimization in the production process. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the production process and transform the production equipment based on the existing research and existing equipment to realize the industrial production of ceramic micro-nanofibrous materials.

6. Conclusions

Ceramic fiber materials have the advantages of high temperature resistance, oxidation resistance, superior chemical stability, and good mechanical vibration resistance, and have been applied in aerospace, energy, metallurgy, construction, personal protection, and other thermal protection fields. In recent years, breakthroughs have been made in the refinement of ceramic fibers, flexible designs, and the development of body-shaped ceramic materials, which have simultaneously improved the lightness and thermal insulation properties of ceramic fiber materials. The research and development of these ceramic micro-nanofibrous materials could have a positive impact on the technological innovation and industrial upgrading in the field of high-temperature insulation in the future. This review starts by elaborating the thermal insulation mechanism of ceramic fiber, and then summarizes the theoretical thermal conductivity models due to solid and gaseous conductions. Subsequently, the ceramic micro-nanofibrous thermal insulation materials, which are available in a variety of dimensions, including 2D ceramic fibrous membranes and 3D ceramic fibrous aerogels, are presented in a comprehensive manner. The 2D ceramic micro-nanofiber membranes used for high-temperature insulation applications are categorized into three types: oxide ceramic fibers (e.g., SiO2, Al2O3, ZrO2, Y2O3, MgO, and others), nitride ceramic fibers (e.g., Si3N4, SiBN, SiBCN), and carbide ceramic fibers (e.g., SiC, ZrC). The construction strategies for 3D ceramic micro-nanofiber aerogels are summarized, including the direct spinning method, template method, sol-gel impregnation method, vacuum filtration molding method, freeze-drying method, and stacking method. Furthermore, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and future trends associated with ceramic micro-nanofiber materials. It is anticipated that this review could provide some valuable insights for the future development of ceramic fiber thermal insulation materials.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, W.W., H.S. and Q.F.; data curation, W.W., H.S., Q.F., J.G., S.X., Q.L. and J.Z.; visualization, W.W., H.S. and Q.F.; writing—review and editing, H.S., Q.F., J.G., S.X., Q.L. and J.Z.; supervision, Q.L., J.Z., J.G. and S.X.; formal analysis, Q.F., J.G. and S.X.; funding acquisition, H.S. and Q.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52003126 and 52103055), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Nos. BK20210846 and BK20200967), Nantong Natural Science Foundation (No. JC2023011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Wang, N.N.; Ola, O.; Xia, Y.D.; Zhu, Y.Q. Porous ceramics: Light in weight but heavy in energy and environment technologies. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2021, 143, 100589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ohji, T.; Fukushima, M. Macro-porous ceramics: Processing and properties. Int. Mater. Rev. 2012, 57, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hammel, E.C.; Ighodaro, O.L.R.; Okoli, O.I. Processing and properties of advanced porous ceramics: An application based review. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 15351–15370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rashad, A.M. Vermiculite as a construction material—A short guide for civil engineer. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Jing, Q.; Liu, P. Synthesis of composite insulation materials-expanded perlite filled with silica aerogel. J. Porous Mater. 2018, 25, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kehal, M.; Reinert, L.; Duclaux, L. Characterization and boron adsorption capacity of vermiculite modified by thermal shock or H2O2 reaction and/or sonication. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, R.; Sun, Q.; Ye, X.; Ma, X. Fabrication and applications of ceramic-based nanofiber materials service in high-temperature harsh conditions—A review. Gels 2023, 9, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, X.; Wang, B.; Wu, N.; Han, C.; Wu, C.; Wang, Y. Micro-nano ceramic fibers for high temperature thermal insulation. J. Inorg. Mater. 2021, 36, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jia, C.; Xu, Z.; Luo, D.; Xiang, H.; Zhu, M. Flexible ceramic fibers: Recent development in preparation and application. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 573–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Esfahani, H.; Jose, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun ceramic nanofiber mats today: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Materials 2017, 10, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, L.; Huang, L.; Zhang, S. Silica ceramic nanofiber membrane with ultra-softness and high temperature insulation. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 4080–4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, P.; Chen, D.; Jiao, X. Fabrication of flexible α-alumina fibers composed of nanosheets. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012, 4167–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Dai, C.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Kong, J.; Wong, C. Amorphous silicon and silicates-stabilized ZrO2 hollow fiber with low thermal conductivity and high phase stability derived from a cogon template. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 7120–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xie, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, B.; Zhu, L.; Shi, S.; Wang, X. Flexible, controllable, and high-strength near-infrared reflective Y2O3 nanofiber membrane by electrospinning a polyacetylacetone-yttrium precursor. Mater. Des. 2018, 160, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, C.; Yuan, K.; Jin, X.; Yu, Z.; Zheng, L.; Lü, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, D. High-temperature stable electrospun MgO nanofibers, formation mechanism and thermal properties. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 16210–16216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, H.; Li, H.; Cui, Y.; Sang, R.; Wang, H.; Wang, P.; Bu, J.; Dong, G. Synthesis of flexible mullite nanofibres by electrospinning based on nonhydrolytic sol–gel method. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2017, 82, 718–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Li, X.; Jin, Z.; Ji, H. Non-catalytic vapor synthesis of millimeter-scale α-Si3N4 nanowires from oxidized silicon powders. Mater. Lett. 2014, 124, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Shao, S.; Sun, L.; Wan, X.; Wang, T. Thermal insulating and fire-retardant Si3N4 nanowire membranes resistant to high temperatures up to 1300 °C. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 155, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Long, X.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y. Effects of boron content on the microwave-transparent property and high-temperature stability of continuous SiBN fibers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 4436–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ji, X.; Gao, H.; Zhang, S.; Jia, Y.; Ji, M.-S.; Zhou, X.; Shao, C. Fine-diameter Si–B–C–N ceramic fibers enabled by polyborosilazanes with N-methyl pendant group. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 5016–5025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tian, Y.; Long, X.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y. SiC nanograins stabilized Si–C–B–N fibers with ultrahigh-temperature resistance. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 106, 1981–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, K.; Meng, Q.; Zhao, K.; Li, X.; Bai, Q.; Jiao, H.; Tang, Y. A facile method to prepare ZrC ceramic fibers by centrifugal melt-spinning using zirconium-containing polymeric precursors. Mater. Lett. 2022, 312, 131693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ghelich, R.; Mehdinavaz Aghdam, R.; Torknik, F.S.; Jahannama, M.R. Low temperature carbothermal reduction synthesis of ZrC nanofibers via cyclized electrospun PVP/Zr(OPr)4 hybrid. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2016, 13, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, B.; Sun, L.; Wu, N.; Wang, Y. Combined synthesis of aligned SiC nanofibers via electrospinning and carbothermal reduction. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 10619–10623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Wu, N.; Gou, Y.; Han, C.; Fang, D. Hierarchically porous SiC ultrathin fibers mat with enhanced mass transport, amphipathic property and high-temperature erosion resistance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 20873–20881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tian, Q.; Wu, N.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y. Fabrication of hollow SiC ultrafine fibers by single-nozzle electrospinning for high-temperature thermal insulation application. Mater. Lett. 2019, 239, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cheng, X.; Liu, Y.-T.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Direct synthesis of highly stretchable ceramic nanofibrous aerogels via 3D reaction electrospinning. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, N.; Li, Y.; Feng, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Z.; Fang, M.; Ou, G.; et al. Ultralight, scalable, and high-temperature–resilient ceramic nanofiber sponges. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1603170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Guo, C.; Ye, F.; Cheng, L. In situ growth of single crystal Si3N4 nanowire foam with good wave-transparency and heat insulation performance. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2021, 224, 109129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Hao, M.; Hu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Peng, L.; Wang, T.; Ren, X.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Double-negative-index ceramic aerogels for thermal superinsulation. Science 2019, 363, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, E.; Zhang, W.; Lv, T.; Li, J.; Dai, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, H. Insulating and robust ceramic nanorod aerogels with high-temperature resistance over 1400 °C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 20548–20558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. An, L.; Wang, J.; Petit, D.; Armstrong, J.N.; Hanson, K.; Hamilton, J.; Souza, M.; Zhao, D.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; et al. An all-ceramic, anisotropic, and flexible aerogel insulation material. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 3828–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Su, L.; Wang, H.; Niu, M.; Dai, S.; Cai, Z.; Yang, B.; Huyan, H.; Pan, X. Anisotropic and hierarchical SiC@SiO2 nanowire aerogel with exceptional stiffness and stability for thermal superinsulation. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaay6689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Si, Y.; Wang, X.; Dou, L.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Ultralight and fire-resistant ceramic nanofibrous aerogels with temperature-invariant superelasticity. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaas8925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Elastic and highly fatigue resistant ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous aerogel with low energy dissipation for thermal insulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 133628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shin, S.; Wang, Q.; Luo, J.; Chen, R. Advanced materials for high-temperature thermal transport. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1904815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flynn, D.R. Thermal conductivity of ceramics. In Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Ceramics; Wachtman, J.B., Ed.; Special Publication; National Bureau of Standards: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1969; Volume 303, pp. 63–123. [Google Scholar]
  38. Crossno, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, K.; Liu, X.; Harzheim, A.; Lucas, A.; Sachdev, S.; Kim, P.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; et al. Observation of the Dirac fluid and the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene. Science 2016, 351, 6277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Apostolopoulou-Kalkavoura, V.; Munier, P.; Bergstrom, L. Thermally insulating nanocellulose-based materials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2001839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tychanicz-Kwiecien, M.; Wilk, J.; Gil, P. Review of high-temperature thermal insulation materials. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 2019, 33, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kudo, K.; Kato, T.; Chida, H.; Takagi, S.; Tsui, N. Modelling of combined forced- and natural-convection heat transfer over upward-facing horizontal heated flat plates. Int. J. Energy Res. 2003, 27, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stark, C.; Fricke, J. Improved heat-transfer models for fibrous insulations. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1993, 17, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Daryabeigi, K. Heat transfer in high-temperature fibrous insulation. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 2003, 17, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Montambaux, G. Generalized Stefan-Boltzmann law. Found. Phys. 2018, 48, 395–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Long, E.; Li, Y.; Li, P. Solar radiation reflective coating material on building envelopes: Heat transfer analysis and cooling energy saving. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2017, 35, 748–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gan, X.; Yu, Z.; Yuan, K.; Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, D. Preparation of a CeO2-nanoparticle thermal radiation shield coating on ZrO2 fibers via a hydrothermal method. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 14183–14191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bogaty, H.; Hollies, N.R.S.; Harris, M. Some thermal properties of fabrics: Part I: The effect of fiber arrangement. Text. Res. J. 1957, 27, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zimmerman, R.W. Thermal conductivity of fluid-saturated rocks. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 1989, 3, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tavman, I.H. Effective thermal conductivity of isotropic polymer composites. Int. Commun. Heat Mass 1998, 25, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daryabeigi, K. Thermal analysis and design optimization of multilayer insulation for reentry aerodynamic heating. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2002, 39, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carson, J.K.; Lovatt, S.J.; Tanner, D.J.; Cleland, A.C. Thermal conductivity bounds for isotropic, porous materials. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2005, 48, 2150–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, S.; Zhang, B.; He, X. Temperature and pressure dependent effective thermal conductivity of fibrous insulation. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2009, 48, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Agarwal, S.; Khan, M.M.K.; Gupta, R.K. Thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites made with carbon nanofibers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2008, 48, 2474–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, S.; Zhang, B.; Du, S.; He, X. Inverse identification of thermal properties of fibrous insulation from transient temperature measurements. Int. J. Thermophys. 2009, 30, 2021–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Islam, S.; Bhat, G. A model for predicting thermal conductivity of porous composite materials. Heat Mass Transf. 2023, 59, 2023–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jagjiwanram; Singh, R. Effective thermal conductivity of highly porous two-phase systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2004, 24, 2727–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xie, T.; He, Y.; Hu, Z. Theoretical study on thermal conductivities of silica aerogel composite insulating material. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2013, 58, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bankvall, C. Heat transfer in fibrous materials. J. Test. Eval. 1973, 1, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pawel, R.E.; McElroy, D.L.; Weaver, F.J.; Graves, R.S. High temperature thermal conductivity of a fibrous alumina ceramic. In Thermal Conductivity; Yarbrough, D.W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1985; Volume 19, pp. 301–313. [Google Scholar]
  60. Daryabeigi, K. Analysis and testing of high temperature fibrous insulation for reusable launch vehicles. In Proceedings of the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA, Reno, NV, USA, 11–14 January 1999; p. 1044. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, M.; Pan, N. Predictions of effective physical properties of complex multiphase materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2008, 63, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gong, L.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H. A novel effective medium theory for modelling the thermal conductivity of porous materials. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 68, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hamilton, R.L.; Crosser, O.K. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1962, 1, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bhattacharyya, R.K. Heat-transfer model for fibrous insulations. In Thermal Insulation Performance; ASTM STP 718; MeElroy, D.L., Tye, R.P., Eds.; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1980; pp. 272–286. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tugnoli, A.; Moricone, R.; Scarponi, G.E.; Cozzani, V. Effective thermal conductivity of fibrous fireproofing materials. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 136, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Song, Y.; Zhao, F.; Li, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Huang, H.; Yang, M. Electrospinning preparation and anti-infrared radiation performance of silica/titanium dioxide composite nanofiber membrane. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 23901–23907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Si, Y.; Mao, X.; Zheng, H.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Silica nanofibrous membranes with ultra-softness and enhanced tensile strength for thermal insulation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 6027–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, X.; Su, X.; Xiao, H.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Tang, M. Continuous α-Al2O3 fibers grown by seeding with in-situ suspension. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 15638–15645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, N.; Xie, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, L.; Jia, Z.; Tao, X. Preparation of ultrafine flexible alumina fiber for heat insulation by the electrospinning method. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 19460–19466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, S.; Wu, F.; Zhang, X.; Han, G.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Flexible Al2O3/ZrO2 nanofibrous membranes for thermal insulation. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 1859–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, C.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y.; He, D.; Shen, X. Preparation and characterization of Al2O3/SiO2 composite nanofibers by using electrostatic spinning method. Inorg. Nano-Metal Chem. 2017, 47, 1275–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, Z.; Wang, F.; Yin, X.; Cheng, L.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.; Ding, B. Recent advances in ZrO2 nanofibers: From structural design to emerging applications. Sci. China Mater. 2023, 66, 421–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mao, X.; Hong, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K. An efficient strategy for reinforcing flexible ceramic membranes. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 9419–9425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mao, X.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, K.; Wang, Y.; Ding, B. Highly flexible ceramic nanofibrous membranes for superior thermal insulation and fire retardancy. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 2592–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Peng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Zhu, S.; Ma, D.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, X. High-temperature flexible, strength and hydrophobic YSZ/SiO2 nanofibrous membranes with excellent thermal insulation. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Peng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Deng, Z.; Ma, D.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, L. Dual-phasic, well-aligned, and strong flexible hydrophobic ceramic membranes for efficient thermal insulation in extreme conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 14835–14845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xie, Y.; Peng, Y.; Ma, D.; Liu, W.; Deng, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, X. Lightweight, high-strength, flexible YAG fibrous membrane for efficient heat insulation. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 159978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shao, C.; Guan, H.; Liu, Y.; Mu, R. MgO nanofibres via an electrospinning technique. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 3821–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zheng, L.; Yu, Z.; Yuan, K.; Jin, X.; Feng, C.; Lin, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, D. Fabrication, heat-treatment and formation mechanism of MgO fiber using propionic acid as ligand. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 2004–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yuan, K.; Feng, C.; Gan, X.; Yu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, D. Fabrication of La2Zr2O7 ceramic fibers via electrospinning method using different La2O3 precursors. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 16633–16639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xie, Y.; Wang, L.; Peng, Y.; Ma, D.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, X. High temperature and high strength Y2Zr2O7 flexible fibrous membrane for efficient heat insulation and acoustic absorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 416, 128994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Xie, Y.; Shi, S.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, L. Preparation and fine thermal insulation performance of Gd2Zr2O7/ZrO2 composite fibers. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1615–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jiang, J.; Ni, N.; Zhao, X.; Guo, F.; Fan, X.; Xiao, P. Flexible and robust YAG-Al2O3 composite nanofibrous membranes enabled by a hybrid nanocrystalline-amorphous structure. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 2463–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, W.; Xie, Y.; Deng, Z.; Peng, Y.; Dong, J.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, D.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, X. Modification of YSZ fiber composites by Al2TiO5 fibers for high thermal shock resistance. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, J.; Yao, S.; Yu, S.; Huang, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhu, M. Polymer templates effects on microstructure and mechanical properties of electrospun mullite nanofibers. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 5787–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, K.; Wang, H.; Cheng, Y. Large-scale synthesis of α-Si3N4 nanofibers and nanobelts from mesoporous silica-carbon nanocomposites. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  87. Biesuz, M.; Zera, E.; Tomasi, M.; Jana, P.; Ersen, O.; Baaziz, W.; Lindemann, A.; Sorarù, G.D. Polymer-derived Si3N4 nanofelts for flexible, high temperature, lightweight and easy-manufacturable super-thermal insulators. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tang, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Xie, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, W.; Wang, X. Polymer-derived SiBN fiber for high-temperature structural/functional applications. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6458–6462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Long, X.; Wu, Z.; Shao, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. High-temperature oxidation behavior of SiBN fibers in air. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wilfert, J.; von Hagen, R.; Fiz, R.; Jansen, M.; Mathur, S. Electrospinning of preceramic polymers for the preparation of SiBNC felts and their modification with semiconductor nanowires. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 2099–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, Q.; Jia, D.; Liang, B.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, D.; Riedel, R.; Zhang, T.; Gao, C. Electrospinning of pure polymer-derived SiBCN nanofibers with high yield. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 10958–10964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xie, F.; Mo, G.; He, L.; Huang, Q.; Huang, Z. Fabrication of SiC ultrafine fiber with low oxygen content by electrospinning, thermal curing and pyrolysis of cyano-polycarbosilane. Silicon 2023, 15, 6421–6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xie, F.; Duan, Y.; Mo, G.; Huang, Q.; Huang, Z. Structural evolution of polyaluminocarbosilane during the polymer–ceramic conversion process. Materials 2023, 16, 4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, D.; Mo, G.; Qian, J.; He, L.; Huang, Q.; Huang, Z. Synthesis of cyano-polycarbosilane and investigation of its pyrolysis process. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 5226–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shan, J.; Mo, G.; Sun, Q.; Huang, J.; Ouyang, Q.; Huang, Q. Fabrication of SiC(OAl) and SiC(Al) fibers by melt-spinning, UV curing, thermolysis and sintering of photo-sensitive polyvinylaluminocarbosilane. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 44, 3501–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, D.; Gou, Y. Flexible ultrafine nearly stoichiometric polycrystalline SiC fibers with excellent oxidation resistance and superior thermal stability up to 1900 °C. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 1938–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Choi, W.C.; Chae, S.; Lee, J.; Kim, B.-S.; Park, M.; Kim, H.Y. Highly flexible, erosion resistant and nitrogen doped hollow SiC fibrous mats for high temperature thermal insulators. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2664–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, B.; Tong, Z.; Yu, H.; Xu, H.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Ji, H. Flexible and high-temperature resistant ZrO2/SiC-based nanofiber membranes for high temperature thermal insulation. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 872, 159618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, B.; Wang, W.; Tong, Z.; Xu, H.; Li, X.; Ji, H. Design and preparation of hollow SiO2 nanospheres/SiC-based nanocomposite fiber membrane for high temperature thermal insulators. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 329, 111551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tao, X.; Zhou, S.; Ma, J.; Xiang, Z.; Hou, R.; Wang, J.; Li, X. A facile method to prepare ZrC nanofibers by electrospinning and pyrolysis of polymeric precursors. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 3910–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cui, X.M.; Nam, Y.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, W.H. Fabrication of zirconium carbide (ZrC) ultra-thin fibers by electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 1961–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, F.; Kang, Z.; Huang, X.; Zhang, G. Fabrication of zirconium carbide nanofibers by electrospinning. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 10137–10141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ge, M.; Lv, X.; Zhang, H.; Yu, S.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, W. Microstructures of a SiC–ZrC ceramic fiber derived from a polymeric precursor. Materials 2020, 13, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Super strong, shear resistant, and highly elastic lamellar structured ceramic nanofibrous aerogels for thermal insulation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 27415–27423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. An, Z.; Hou, X.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, R.; Fang, D. A novel flexible, layered, recoverable SiO2 fiber skeleton and aerogel composites material prepared by papermaking process. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 12963–12969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shafi, S.; Navik, R.; Ding, X.; Zhao, Y. Improved heat insulation and mechanical properties of silica aerogel/glass fiber composite by impregnating silica gel. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2019, 503–504, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xu, C.; Wang, H.; Song, J.; Bai, X.; Liu, Z.; Fang, M.; Yuan, Y.; Sheng, J.; Li, X.; Wang, N.; et al. Ultralight and resilient Al2O3 nanotube aerogels with low thermal conductivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101, 1677–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yu, H.; Tong, Z.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Su, D.; Ji, H. Thermal radiation shielded, high strength, fire resistant fiber/nanorod/aerogel composites fabricated by in-situ growth of TiO2 nanorods for thermal insulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 418, 129342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xian, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Dong, X.; Liu, J.; Guo, A. Microstructural evolution of mullite nanofibrous aerogels with different ice crystal growth inhibitors. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1869–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, R.; Ye, C.; Hou, X.; Li, S.; Wang, B. Microstructure and properties of lightweight fibrous porous mullite ceramics prepared by vacuum squeeze moulding technique. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 14843–14848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Peng, F.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J.; Cai, H.; Feng, J.; Li, L. Thermally insulating, fiber-reinforced alumina–silica aerogel composites with ultra-low shrinkage up to 1500 °C. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 128402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhu, J.; Zhu, R.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z. Low-cost and temperature-resistant mullite fiber sponges with superior thermal insulation and high-temperature pm filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 305, 122445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. All-ceramic and elastic aerogels with nanofibrous-granular binary synergistic structure for thermal superinsulation. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 5487–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, X.; Wang, F.; Dou, L.; Cheng, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Ultrastrong, superelastic, and lamellar multiarch structured ZrO2–Al2O3 nanofibrous aerogels with high-temperature resistance over 1300 °C. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 15616–15625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Su, L.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; Niu, M.; Lu, D.; Cai, Z. Resilient Si3N4 nanobelt aerogel as fire-resistant and electromagnetic wave-transparent thermal insulator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 15795–15803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tong, Z.; Zhang, B.; Yu, H.; Yan, X.; Xu, H.; Li, X.; Ji, H. Si3N4 nanofibrous aerogel with in situ growth of SiOx coating and nanowires for oil/water separation and thermal insulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 22765–22773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Li, G.; Zhu, M.; Gong, W.; Du, R.; Eychmüller, A.; Li, T.; Lv, W.; Zhang, X. Boron nitride aerogels with super-flexibility ranging from liquid nitrogen temperature to 1000 °C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1900188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lu, D.; Su, L.; Wang, H.; Niu, M.; Xu, L.; Ma, M.; Gao, H.; Cai, Z.; Fan, X. Scalable fabrication of resilient SiC nanowires aerogels with exceptional high-temperature stability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 45338–45344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Su, K.; Wang, Y.; Hu, K.; Fang, X.; Yao, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, J. Ultralight and high-strength SiCnw@SiC foam with highly efficient microwave absorption and heat insulation properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 22017–22030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Huo, Y.; Zhao, K.; Xu, Z.; Li, F.; Zhao, X.; Meng, Q.; Tang, C.; Tang, Y. Ultralight and superelastic polyvinyl alcohol/SiC nanofiber/reduced graphene oxide hybrid foams with excellent thermal insulation and microwave absorption properties. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 25986–25996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dong, J.; Xie, Y.; Liu, L.; Deng, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhu, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, D.; Zhang, G. Lightweight and resilient ZrO2–TiO2 fiber sponges with layered structure for thermal insulation. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2101603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. He, J.; Li, X.; Su, D.; Ji, H.; Wang, X. Ultra-low thermal conductivity and high strength of aerogels/fibrous ceramic composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 1487–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. He, J.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Su, D.; Ji, H.; Yu, H.; Hu, Z. Large-scale and ultra-low thermal conductivity of ZrO2 fibrofelt/ZrO2-SiO2 aerogels composites for thermal insulation. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 8742–8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, R.; Hou, X.; Ye, C.; Wang, B. Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of anisotropic fibrous porous mullite–zirconia composites produced using sol-gel impregnation. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 699, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Dong, X.; Sui, G.; Yun, Z.; Wang, M.; Guo, A.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J. Effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of mullite fibrous ceramics with a 3D skeleton structure prepared by molding method. Mater. Des. 2016, 90, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, F.; Dou, L.; Dai, J.; Li, Y.; Huang, L.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. In situ synthesis of biomimetic silica nanofibrous aerogels with temperature-invariant superelasticity over one million compressions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 132, 8285–8292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Dou, L.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; Ma, Z.; Wang, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Hierarchical cellular structured ceramic nanofibrous aerogels with temperature-invariant superelasticity for thermal insulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 29056–29064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 3. (a) The count of search results of publication and citations related to ‘ceramic micro-nanofibers’ on Web of Science from year 2003 to 2023. (b) The count of search results of publication and patents related to ‘ceramic fiber’ and ‘thermal insulation’ on web of science and incoPat from year 2003 to 2023.
Figure 3. (a) The count of search results of publication and citations related to ‘ceramic micro-nanofibers’ on Web of Science from year 2003 to 2023. (b) The count of search results of publication and patents related to ‘ceramic fiber’ and ‘thermal insulation’ on web of science and incoPat from year 2003 to 2023.
Molecules 29 02279 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic depicting the fabrication procedure for SiO2 nanofibrous membranes. (b) Variation in thermal conductivity among SiO2 nanofibrous membranes prepared using different precursor sols and emphasizing the excellent thermal insulation properties exhibited by SiO2 fiber membranes. (c) SEM images of SiO2/TiO2 fiber membrane at 900 °C. (d) Infrared transmittance spectra of specimens with varying TiO2 contents. (e) Thermal conductivity profiles of the dual fiber membranes at different temperature intervals. (a,b) Reproduced with permission [11]. Copyright 2022, Springer. (ce) Reproduced with permission [66]. Copyright 2021, RSC.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic depicting the fabrication procedure for SiO2 nanofibrous membranes. (b) Variation in thermal conductivity among SiO2 nanofibrous membranes prepared using different precursor sols and emphasizing the excellent thermal insulation properties exhibited by SiO2 fiber membranes. (c) SEM images of SiO2/TiO2 fiber membrane at 900 °C. (d) Infrared transmittance spectra of specimens with varying TiO2 contents. (e) Thermal conductivity profiles of the dual fiber membranes at different temperature intervals. (a,b) Reproduced with permission [11]. Copyright 2022, Springer. (ce) Reproduced with permission [66]. Copyright 2021, RSC.
Molecules 29 02279 g004
Figure 5. (a) TEM image of the sol particles (black dots) in the electrospinning precursor. (b) SEM images of α-Al2O3 nanofibers before and after calcining at 1400 °C for 12 h, demonstrating their extraordinary thermal stability. (c) Schematic depicting the preparation procedure of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanofibrous membranes. (d) SEM images of Al2O3/ZrO2 membrane bending and folding at the microscale. (e) Illustration of the outstanding thermal insulation performance of the Al2O3/ZrO2 fibrous membrane. (f) Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanofibrous membranes. (a,b) Reproduced with permission [12]. Copyright 2012, WILEY-VCH. (cf) Reproduced with permission [70]. Copyright 2022, RSC.
Figure 5. (a) TEM image of the sol particles (black dots) in the electrospinning precursor. (b) SEM images of α-Al2O3 nanofibers before and after calcining at 1400 °C for 12 h, demonstrating their extraordinary thermal stability. (c) Schematic depicting the preparation procedure of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanofibrous membranes. (d) SEM images of Al2O3/ZrO2 membrane bending and folding at the microscale. (e) Illustration of the outstanding thermal insulation performance of the Al2O3/ZrO2 fibrous membrane. (f) Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanofibrous membranes. (a,b) Reproduced with permission [12]. Copyright 2012, WILEY-VCH. (cf) Reproduced with permission [70]. Copyright 2022, RSC.
Molecules 29 02279 g005
Figure 6. (a) The synthetic steps for MMT@ZrO2−SiO2 fibrous membranes. (b) SEM image and flexible display photograph of the resultant fibrous membrane. (c) Presentation of MMT@ZrO2-SiO2 fibrous membranes in firefighter uniforms and its thermal insulation performance in a 1000 °C flame. (d) Optical image of cogon (the inset depicts a high-magnification SEM image of cogon fiber). (e) high-magnification SEM image and (f) thermal conductivities of the biomorphic ZrO2 fibers. (ac) Reproduced with permission [73]. Copyright 2021, ACS. (df) Reproduced with permission [13]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Figure 6. (a) The synthetic steps for MMT@ZrO2−SiO2 fibrous membranes. (b) SEM image and flexible display photograph of the resultant fibrous membrane. (c) Presentation of MMT@ZrO2-SiO2 fibrous membranes in firefighter uniforms and its thermal insulation performance in a 1000 °C flame. (d) Optical image of cogon (the inset depicts a high-magnification SEM image of cogon fiber). (e) high-magnification SEM image and (f) thermal conductivities of the biomorphic ZrO2 fibers. (ac) Reproduced with permission [73]. Copyright 2021, ACS. (df) Reproduced with permission [13]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02279 g006
Figure 7. (a) Scheme illustrating the preparation of Y2O3 nanofibers. (b) SEM images of Y2O3 nanofibers treated at 800 °C for 2 h (the inset is the fiber cross section and optical photo). (c,d) TEM images of Y2O3 nanofibers heat treated at 800 °C. (e) SEM image of YAG fiber after heat treatment at 1200 °C. (f) Relationship between temperature change of cold surface and time under a butane torch. (g) The thermal conductivity, density, and porosity of YAG fiber membranes calcinated at different temperature. (ad) Reproduced with permission [14]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (eg) Reproduced with permission [77]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 7. (a) Scheme illustrating the preparation of Y2O3 nanofibers. (b) SEM images of Y2O3 nanofibers treated at 800 °C for 2 h (the inset is the fiber cross section and optical photo). (c,d) TEM images of Y2O3 nanofibers heat treated at 800 °C. (e) SEM image of YAG fiber after heat treatment at 1200 °C. (f) Relationship between temperature change of cold surface and time under a butane torch. (g) The thermal conductivity, density, and porosity of YAG fiber membranes calcinated at different temperature. (ad) Reproduced with permission [14]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (eg) Reproduced with permission [77]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02279 g007
Figure 8. (a) Scheme illustrating the synthesis of Si3N4 nanowire membrane. (b,c) SEM images of the Si3N4 nanowires at different magnifications after heat treatment at 1300 °C. (d) Demonstration of fireproof and thermal insulation performance of Si3N4 nanowire membrane. (e) Si3N4 nanofelts with complex shapes. (f) The impact of relevant experimental parameters on the density of Si3N4 nanofelts. (g) Thermal conductivity of Si3N4 nanofelts. (ad) Reproduced with permission [18]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (eg) Reproduced with permission [87]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Figure 8. (a) Scheme illustrating the synthesis of Si3N4 nanowire membrane. (b,c) SEM images of the Si3N4 nanowires at different magnifications after heat treatment at 1300 °C. (d) Demonstration of fireproof and thermal insulation performance of Si3N4 nanowire membrane. (e) Si3N4 nanofelts with complex shapes. (f) The impact of relevant experimental parameters on the density of Si3N4 nanofelts. (g) Thermal conductivity of Si3N4 nanofelts. (ad) Reproduced with permission [18]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (eg) Reproduced with permission [87]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02279 g008
Figure 9. (a) Diagrammatic drawing of the SiC fiber membrane. (b,c) SEM images of the resulting SiC fibers at different magnifications. (d) Flexible demonstration of SiC fibers in a blowtorch flame at 1100 °C. (ad) Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 9. (a) Diagrammatic drawing of the SiC fiber membrane. (b,c) SEM images of the resulting SiC fibers at different magnifications. (d) Flexible demonstration of SiC fibers in a blowtorch flame at 1100 °C. (ad) Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02279 g009
Figure 10. (a,b) SEM images of hollow-structured SiC fibers, inset histogram showing the diameter distribution of the fibers. The arrows indicate the location of the hollow SiC fibers. (c) The effective extinction coefficients of the two types of fiber mats. (d) Schematic diagram of the preparation of N-doped hollow SiC fiber mats. SEM images of the resulting N-doped hollow SiC fiber prepared through (e) thermal decomposition at 1500 °C and (f) electron beam irradiation. (g) The thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of these two fibers within the temperature range of 0–600 °C. (ac) Reproduced with permission [26]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (dg) Reproduced with permission [97]. Copyright 2017, RSC.
Figure 10. (a,b) SEM images of hollow-structured SiC fibers, inset histogram showing the diameter distribution of the fibers. The arrows indicate the location of the hollow SiC fibers. (c) The effective extinction coefficients of the two types of fiber mats. (d) Schematic diagram of the preparation of N-doped hollow SiC fiber mats. SEM images of the resulting N-doped hollow SiC fiber prepared through (e) thermal decomposition at 1500 °C and (f) electron beam irradiation. (g) The thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of these two fibers within the temperature range of 0–600 °C. (ac) Reproduced with permission [26]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (dg) Reproduced with permission [97]. Copyright 2017, RSC.
Molecules 29 02279 g010
Figure 11. (a) Schematic diagram of direct fabrication of 3D ceramic fiber aerogels by electrospinning. (b,c) SEM images of 3D interwoven nanofiber aerogel. (d) A 1000-cycle tensile test conducted at a tensile strain of 40%. (e) The resulting nanofibrous aerogels heated by a burner flame at 1300 °C for 10 min. (f) Scheme depicting the fabrication of 3D fibrous aerogel using blow-spinning technique. (g,h) SEM image of TiO2 fibrous sponge at different magnifications. (i) The compression recovery process of TiO2 fibrous sponges at ambient conditions and under alcohol lamp flame. (ae) Reproduced with permission [27]. Copyright 2022, Nature Portfolio. (fi) Reproduced with permission [28]. Copyright 2017, AAAS.
Figure 11. (a) Schematic diagram of direct fabrication of 3D ceramic fiber aerogels by electrospinning. (b,c) SEM images of 3D interwoven nanofiber aerogel. (d) A 1000-cycle tensile test conducted at a tensile strain of 40%. (e) The resulting nanofibrous aerogels heated by a burner flame at 1300 °C for 10 min. (f) Scheme depicting the fabrication of 3D fibrous aerogel using blow-spinning technique. (g,h) SEM image of TiO2 fibrous sponge at different magnifications. (i) The compression recovery process of TiO2 fibrous sponges at ambient conditions and under alcohol lamp flame. (ae) Reproduced with permission [27]. Copyright 2022, Nature Portfolio. (fi) Reproduced with permission [28]. Copyright 2017, AAAS.
Molecules 29 02279 g011
Figure 12. (a) Flowchart of chemical vapor deposition process for generating hyperbolic ceramic aerogels with a dual-pane structure. (b,c) SEM images of the obtained dual-paned aerogel. (d) Thermal conductivity of hBNAGs in different atmospheres. (ad) Reproduced with permission [30]. Copyright 2019, AAAS.
Figure 12. (a) Flowchart of chemical vapor deposition process for generating hyperbolic ceramic aerogels with a dual-pane structure. (b,c) SEM images of the obtained dual-paned aerogel. (d) Thermal conductivity of hBNAGs in different atmospheres. (ad) Reproduced with permission [30]. Copyright 2019, AAAS.
Molecules 29 02279 g012
Figure 13. (a) Scheme illustrating the preparation procedure of ceramic nanorod aerogels. (b) Digital photograph and (c,d) SEM images of the synthesized ceramic nanorod aerogels. (e) Thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) analysis for ceramic nanorod aerogels. (f) Compression stress–strain curves of the aerogels before and after heat treatment. (g) The resulting ceramic nanorod aerogels heated by a burner flame at 1300 °C without damage. (ag) Reproduced with permission [31]. Copyright 2021, ACS.
Figure 13. (a) Scheme illustrating the preparation procedure of ceramic nanorod aerogels. (b) Digital photograph and (c,d) SEM images of the synthesized ceramic nanorod aerogels. (e) Thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) analysis for ceramic nanorod aerogels. (f) Compression stress–strain curves of the aerogels before and after heat treatment. (g) The resulting ceramic nanorod aerogels heated by a burner flame at 1300 °C without damage. (ag) Reproduced with permission [31]. Copyright 2021, ACS.
Molecules 29 02279 g013
Figure 14. (a) Schematic illustration of the manufacturing process of fibrous aerogels. (b) SEM image and digital photo of the resultant stacked aerogel sheet. (c) Compressive strain versus stress curves for the fibrous aerogels after sintering at 400 °C. (d) The relationship between thermal conductivity in different directions and the sintering temperature. (ad) Reproduced with permission [32]. Copyright 2020, ACS.
Figure 14. (a) Schematic illustration of the manufacturing process of fibrous aerogels. (b) SEM image and digital photo of the resultant stacked aerogel sheet. (c) Compressive strain versus stress curves for the fibrous aerogels after sintering at 400 °C. (d) The relationship between thermal conductivity in different directions and the sintering temperature. (ad) Reproduced with permission [32]. Copyright 2020, ACS.
Molecules 29 02279 g014
Figure 15. (a) Scheme illustrating the fabrication of CNFAs. (b) SEM and STEM-EDS images of CNFAs. (c) The photo depicts CNFAs with a bulk density of 0.15 mg·cm−3 positioned at the extremity of a feather. (d) A compressive fatigue test consisting of 500 cycles under strain of 60%. (e) The relationship between the thermal conductivity of CNFAs and their bulk density. (f) Optical and infrared images of CNFAs under the torch flame for 120 s. (af) Reproduced with permission [34]. Copyright 2018, AAAS.
Figure 15. (a) Scheme illustrating the fabrication of CNFAs. (b) SEM and STEM-EDS images of CNFAs. (c) The photo depicts CNFAs with a bulk density of 0.15 mg·cm−3 positioned at the extremity of a feather. (d) A compressive fatigue test consisting of 500 cycles under strain of 60%. (e) The relationship between the thermal conductivity of CNFAs and their bulk density. (f) Optical and infrared images of CNFAs under the torch flame for 120 s. (af) Reproduced with permission [34]. Copyright 2018, AAAS.
Molecules 29 02279 g015
Figure 16. (a) Sketch presentation for the construction of ceramic nanofiber aerogel with layered multi-arch structures. (b) SEM images of the resulting lamellar multiarch structured fiber aerogel at different magnifications. (c) Compression cycle curves under various strains. (d) Relationship between compression cycles and Young’s modulus, energy loss coefficient, and maximum stress. (e) The ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous aerogels could protect the flowers from burning out. (ae) Reproduced with permission [35]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 16. (a) Sketch presentation for the construction of ceramic nanofiber aerogel with layered multi-arch structures. (b) SEM images of the resulting lamellar multiarch structured fiber aerogel at different magnifications. (c) Compression cycle curves under various strains. (d) Relationship between compression cycles and Young’s modulus, energy loss coefficient, and maximum stress. (e) The ZrO2-SiO2 nanofibrous aerogels could protect the flowers from burning out. (ae) Reproduced with permission [35]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02279 g016
Table 1. Theoretical thermal conductivity models due to solid and gas conductions.
Table 1. Theoretical thermal conductivity models due to solid and gas conductions.
ModelStructure SchematicEquationsRef.
Parallel modelMolecules 29 02279 i001 λ c = ω λ s + ( 1 ω ) λ g   [43,47,48,49,50,51,52]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, and ω is the volume fraction of solid.
Series modelMolecules 29 02279 i002 λ c = λ s λ g ω λ g + ( 1 ω ) λ s   [47,53,54,55]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, and ω is the volume fraction of solid.
Singh modelMolecules 29 02279 i003 λ c 2 = [ ω λ s + ( 1 ω ) λ g ] 2 cos 2 θ + [ λ s λ g ω λ g + ( 1 ω ) λ s ] 2 sin 2 θ [56,57]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, ω is the volume fraction of solid, and θ is the angle between fiber orientation and heat flow direction.
Bankvall modelMolecules 29 02279 i004 λ c = α [ ε p λ g + ( 1 ε p ) λ s ] + ( 1 α ) λ s λ g [ ε s λ s + ( 1 ε s ) λ g ] [54,58,59,60]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, α is the proportion of fibers parallel to heat flow, and εp and εs represent structural parameters, relating to parallel and series heat transfer mechanisms, respectively. The total porosity (ε) of the fibrous materials could be expressed as ε = α·εp + (1 − α)·εs.
Maxwell–Eucken modelMolecules 29 02279 i005 λ c = λ g ( 1 ω ) + λ s ω 3 λ g 2 λ g + λ s ( 1 ω ) + ω 3 λ g 2 λ g + λ s [55]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, and ω is the volume fraction of solid.
EMT modelMolecules 29 02279 i006 ω λ s λ c λ s + 2 λ c + ( 1 ω ) λ g λ c λ g + 2 λ c = 0 [51,61,62]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, and ω is the volume fraction of solid.
Hamilton modelMolecules 29 02279 i007 λ c = λ g λ s + ( n 1 ) λ g ω ( n 1 ) ( λ g λ s ) λ s + ( n 1 ) λ g + ω ( λ g λ s ) [53,61,63]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, and ω is the volume fraction of solid. n is an empirical shape factor. For spherical particles, n = 3; for infinitely long cylinders, n = 6.
Bhattacharyya modelMolecules 29 02279 i008 λ c = λ s + λ g λ s 1 + ω 1 ω 1 + 2 ( λ g λ s ) 3 ( λ g + λ s ) [43,64,65]
where λc is thermal conductivity due to solid and gas conductions, λg is the gas thermal conductivity, λs is the solid thermal conductivity, and ω is the volume fraction of solid.
Table 2. Preparation methods and related properties of 3D ceramic fiber aerogels.
Table 2. Preparation methods and related properties of 3D ceramic fiber aerogels.
CategoryPreparation MethodCalcination ParametersDiameter (μm)Density (mg·cm−3)Porosity
(%)
Thermal Conductivity
Test Method
Thermal Conductivity
(W·m−1·K−1)
Ref.
SiO2Direct spinning method900 °C, 60 min, Air0.343>96Hot Disk instrument0.0389 (25 °C)[104]
Vacuum filtration molding method~380–22090–96.4Hot Disk method0.023–0.037
(room temperature)
[105]
Sol-gel impregnation method8–12226–27187.2–91.3Transient hot-wire method0.0179–0.0283
(25 °C)
[106]
Freeze-drying method900 °C, 30 min, Air0.206>0.1599.993Hot Disk instrument0.025–0.032
(room temperature)
[34]
Al2O3Direct spinning method900 °C, 2 h;
1200 °C, 2 h, Air
2>99.9Hot Disk instrument0.022
(room temperature)
[107]
Sol-gel impregnation method1200 °C, 1 h, Air0.151469625 °C: Heat flow method
200–1200: Heat flow meter apparatus
0.026 (25 °C);
0.089 (1200 °C)
[31]
ZrO2Direct spinning method800 °C, 200 min, Air0.027
(room temperature)
[28]
TiO2Sol-gel impregnation method600 °C, 6 h, Air0.01–0.02304Transient hot-wire technique0.071 (1100 °C)[108]
MulliteFreeze-drying method1400 °C, 2 h, Air0.7349.13–82.2197.07–98.25Hot Disk instrument0.038–0.058
(room temperature)
[109]
Vacuum filtration molding method1400 °C, 1 h, Air6410–65079.4–87.3Heat flow test method0.095
(room temperature)
[110]
Sol-gel impregnation method800 °C, 24 h, Air4360Water flow plate method0.082 (1200 °C)[111]
Direct spinning method1000–1500 °C, 1 h, Air215Transient plane source method0.0265 (40 °C)[112]
Direct spinning method1100–1500 °C, 1 h, Air0.29 ± 0.031.599.95Hot Disk instrument0.0228
(room temperature)
[27]
ZrO2-SiO2Stacking method1000 °C, Air0.52399.58Hot Disk instrument0.024
(room temperature)
[113]
Stacking method1000 °C, 2 h, Air0.4–0.8Hot Disk instrument0.0268 (25 °C);
0.11 (900 °C)
[35]
ZrO2-Al2O3Stacking method800 °C, 2 h, Air0.38–0.74>98Hot Disk instrument0.0322
(room temperature)
[114]
Si3N4Stacking methodPartial-hot-pressing at 1200 °C, 30 min, Air0.5–1.61.8–9.6~99.94Transient hot-wire method0.029
(room temperature)
[115]
Freeze-drying method~0.0510>99Transient hot-wire method0.0157
(room temperature)
[116]
Template method1300 °C, 2 h, N2;
700 °C, 4–7 h, Air
~0.088.996.6674Hot Disk instrument0.03–0.11
(room temperature)
[29]
BNFreeze-drying method1200 °C, 3 h, NH30.6–1.815.50.0346 ± 0.0015[117]
Template method90 °C, 1 h,
500 °C, 1 h, 1500 °C, 3 h, Air
0.199.99Homemade steady-state device0.02[30]
SiCVacuum filtration molding method700 °C, 3 h, Air0.03–0.283–19>99Hot Disk instrument0.025
(room temperature)
[118]
Template method800 °C, 10 h, Air0.326–20684.34–98.01Laser thermal conductivity meter0.304 (1200 °C)[119]
Freeze-drying method1000 °C, 30 min, Air0.02–0.056.598Laser flash apparatus0.014[33]
Freeze-drying method0.210Hot Disk instrument0.053 (50 °C)[120]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Fu, Q.; Ge, J.; Xu, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Shan, H. Advancements in Thermal Insulation through Ceramic Micro-Nanofiber Materials. Molecules 2024, 29, 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102279

AMA Style

Wang W, Fu Q, Ge J, Xu S, Liu Q, Zhang J, Shan H. Advancements in Thermal Insulation through Ceramic Micro-Nanofiber Materials. Molecules. 2024; 29(10):2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wenqiang, Qiuxia Fu, Jianlong Ge, Sijun Xu, Qixia Liu, Junxiong Zhang, and Haoru Shan. 2024. "Advancements in Thermal Insulation through Ceramic Micro-Nanofiber Materials" Molecules 29, no. 10: 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102279

APA Style

Wang, W., Fu, Q., Ge, J., Xu, S., Liu, Q., Zhang, J., & Shan, H. (2024). Advancements in Thermal Insulation through Ceramic Micro-Nanofiber Materials. Molecules, 29(10), 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102279

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop