Next Article in Journal
Robust Ferromagnetism in Hexagonal Honeycomb Transition Metal Nitride Monolayer
Previous Article in Journal
Density Functional Study of Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction in Fourth-Period Transition Metal–Tetrahydroxyquinone Organic Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recently Reported Biological Activities and Action Targets of Pt(II)- and Cu(II)-Based Complexes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Coordinative Compounds Based on Unsaturated Carboxylate with Versatile Biological Applications

by
Gina Vasile Scaeteanu
1,
Mihaela Badea
2 and
Rodica Olar
2,*
1
Department of Soil Sciences, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 59 Mărăști Str., 011464 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Inorganic and Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Catalysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Bucharest, 90–92 Panduri Str., S5, 050663 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(10), 2321; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102321
Submission received: 30 March 2024 / Revised: 12 May 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Developing Complexes as Biological Active Species II)

Abstract

:
This review presents an overview of the biological applications of coordinative compounds based on unsaturated carboxylates accompanied by other ligands, usually N-based heterocyclic species. The interest in these compounds arises from the valuable antimicrobial and antitumor activities evidenced by some species, as well as from their ability to generate metal-containing polymers suitable for various medical purposes. Therefore, we describe the recently discovered aspects related to the synthesis, structure, and biological activity of a wide range of unsaturated carboxylate-containing species and metal ions, originating mostly from 3d series. The unsaturated carboxylates encountered in coordinative compounds are acrylate, methacrylate, fumarate, maleate, cinnamate, ferulate, coumarate, and itaconate. Regarding the properties of the investigated compounds, it is worth mentioning the good ability of some to inhibit the development of resistant strains or microbial biofilms on inert surfaces or, even more, exert antitumor activity against resistant cells. The ability of some species to intercalate into DNA strands as well as to scavenge ROS species is also addressed.

1. Introduction

Lately, there have been significant research efforts in the fields of both polymers and metal-containing polymers, driven by the promising prospect of using the resulting materials in biomedical applications. As a result, the design of new polymeric matrices obtained from unsaturated carboxylates has become a very interesting subject adopted by many researchers. Among them, acrylates and vinylic monomers stand out, being used as building blocks for polymer synthesis, with biomedical and bioengineering applications such as ophthalmology, orthopedics, dentistry tissue engineering, and drug delivery systems [1]. For instance, polyacrylates (PAA) were used to perform drug delivery control in pH-responsive systems. Consequently, pH-sensitive hydrogels based on chitosan, cross-linking PAA to control the release of antibiotics, were prepared [2].
Poly(methyl)methacrylates (PMMA) are used as bone cement [3]. Lately, commercial formulations loaded with antibiotics have been employed to prevent/treat orthopedic infections [4]. For example, 12-methacryloyloxydodecyl-pyridinium bromide, which presents antibacterial properties, has been added to methacrylate composites and adhesives used in the dentistry area [5]. A biodegradable polymer, namely poly(propylene)fumarate (PPF), has been investigated intensively because its resulting materials are used for their regenerative medicine applications (repair of various tissues, bone tissue engineering, and hydrogel for bioprinting). The hallmarks of such materials include excellent biocompatibility, degradability, and the possibility to be tuned for time-certain resorption [6].
In addition, PMMA hydroxyapatite composites are used to produce implant materials for cranioplasty [7]. Polymeric Al2O3 nanocomposites, resulting from PMMA and poly methacrylic acid (PMAA), are reported to be denture resins with enhanced mechanical and rheological properties [8].
Also, a formulation of sodium polymethacrylate with silver nanoparticles was reported as being used for laser light-controlled drug release [9]. Moreover, the addition of silver nanoparticles to acrylic resins used in the dentistry area led to good antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli [1]. Furthermore, some studies succeeded in modifying conventional PMMA by the incorporation of Zr(IV) and Sn(IV) methacrylate monomers and this procedure led to high activity against biofilms produced by Candida albicans [10].
Considering that the incorporation of metal ions into a polymeric matrix can significantly modify its properties, some metal-containing polymers with valuable biological properties were developed [11,12,13,14]. Such materials can be obtained either by the incorporation of metal ions into a preformed polymer-bearing group with coordinative abilities, or by the polymerization or co-polymerizations of a monomeric complex possessing a ligand with a polymerizable group in the structure, for example an unsaturated carboxylate. For example, the former method was used to generate new copper (II) and nickel (II) complexes with polymeric ligands via a complex multistep protocol which starts with a methacrylate derivative. Both species displayed antimicrobial efficiency against C. albicans, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus, but the Cu(II) species exhibited an enhanced potency [15].
The literature also presents metal polymer composites that result from metal acrylates and maleates, with potential use in the medicinal area [16]. Although examples of discrete complexes involved in polymerization for biomedical purposes are scarce [17], there are many studies concerning the synthesis and biological applications of several coordinative compounds bearing polymerizable groups, such as unsaturated carboxylates. This represents a suitable platform for the future development of new metal-containing polymerizable materials with valuable biological properties.
Therefore, this paper presents aspects relating to the synthesis and biological properties of a wide range of coordinative compounds containing unsaturated carboxylates (acrylate, methacrylate, fumarate, maleate, cinnamate, ferulate, coumarate, itaconate, and their derivatives) and metal ions such as Ni(II), Cu(II), Co(II), Mn(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), Sn(IV), Pt(IV), and Ag(I). The most used unsaturated carboxylic acids for this purpose are presented in Figure 1.
In order to modulate their biological potential, most compounds also contain a N-based heterocyclic species (imidazole, pyrazole, pyridine, and quinoline derivatives) as an auxiliary ligand. As a result, the majority of these compounds are developed as antimicrobial or antitumor species, the aspects of which are detailed in the following sections.

2. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate Developed for Antimicrobial Applications

The continuous evolution of diseases observed in recent years requires a continuous diversification of treatment approaches.
For instance, in the case of microbial infections, both resistance [18,19,20,21,22,23,24] and biofilm (mono- and polymicrobial) development [25,26,27,28,29,30] complicate the process of finding an adequate treatment. These aspects finally produced the necessity of searching for new antimicrobials that are more efficient in both cases and the scientific results evidence that these complexes can provide promising treatment in both situations [23,25].
Consequently, the compounds described in this section are metal-containing monomers, based on acrylate, methacrylate, fumarate, maleate, cinnamate, coumarate, and itaconate as the main ligands, accompanied in some species by N-based heterocycles such as an imidazole, pyrazole, pyridine, or quinoline derivatives that exhibit good antimicrobial activity, including against resistant and biofilm-embedded strains. A selection of the most active species is presented in Table 1.

2.1. Coordinative Compounds with Antimicrobial Activity on Planktonic Strains

2.1.1. Complexes with Acrylate and N-Based Heterocycles

A series of complexes were derived from acrylate anion. They were synthesized and characterized in order to develop species with good antimicrobial activity, both in planktonic states and biofilm-embedded ones. In order to modulate this activity, a second ligand selected from a N-based heterocycle (imidazole, benzimidazole, pyridine, and pyrazole derivatives) was used.
(a)
Complexes with mixed ligands—acrylate and imidazole/alkyl-imidazole
Thus, the species [Ni(acr)2(Him/2-MeIm)2(H2O)n]∙nH2O 1, 2 (Hacr = acrylic acid; Him = imidazole; n = 0); MeIm = methylimidazole; n = 1) [31] were synthesized and characterized by IR, UV-Vis-NIR, mass spectroscopy, magnetic measurements, and thermal analysis. The acrylate anions adopt a chelate coordination mode in 1 and a combination of chelate and unidentate in 2. The antimicrobial activity was tested using an ATCC reference and clinical isolate strains, but only a moderate activity was proved for both compounds.
By using Cu(II) acrylate and several imidazole derivatives, octahedral species with cis- and trans-isomerism were obtained. These were isolated and fully characterized via single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The complexes cis-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm/2-EtIm)2]∙nH2O (n = 2) 3 and 4 (EtIm = ethylimidazole, n = 0) [32] were also subjected to the investigation of in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (Enterococcus faecium, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) strains isolated from clinical samples and from deteriorated historical monuments. Both complexes exhibited improved activity in comparison with imidazole derivatives but only 4 exhibited very good activity concerning the B. subtilis strain, with an inhibition zone diameter (IZD) of 20 mm.
Continuing the survey, another of the reported geometric isomers formulated, trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm)2] 5, presented improved activity in comparison with 2-MeIm ligand against the same bacterial strains as 3 and 4 acted on. Furthermore, similar complex with 2-ethylimidazole, trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 6 demonstrated higher antibacterial activity in comparison with 2-EtIm against S. aureus and B. subtilis strains. However, for trans-[Cu(acr)2(5-MeIm)2], 7 presented low antibacterial activity against the same strains.
A chelate coordination mode was observed via X-ray for acrylate for complexes 4 (Figure 2a) and 5 (Figure 2b), while a unidentate mode was seen for 6 (Figure 2c). The Cu(II) adopts an octahedral distorted stereochemistry, excepting 6 where the surroundings are square–planar.
Among all the trans-complexes discussed above, it appears that complex 5 with 2-MeIm presents the best antimicrobial activity, evidenced by high IZD values of 35 mm (B. subtilis) and 30 mm (E. faecium). Also, on the basis of the IZD values, it could be assumed that the antibacterial activity respects the order 5 > 6 > 7 or, considering imidazole ligands, 2-MeIm > 2-EtIm > 5-MeIm [32].
Comparing the antibacterial activity of cis and trans pair complexes, it may be stated that trans isomers inhibit the growth of tested bacterial strains more efficiently.
(b)
Complexes with mixed ligands—acrylate and benzimidazole/alkylbenzimidazole
The violet complex [Co(acr)2(BzIm)2]∙0.5H2O 8 (BzIm = benzimidazole) exhibited higher antimicrobial activity, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 62.5 μg∙mL−1 for E. faecium E5, B. subtilis, E. coli. and S. aureus [33].
The antibacterial activity of [Cu2(acr)4(BzIm)2] 9 was very good, with MIC values between 31.25 and 62.5 μg∙mL−1 against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. faecium E5, and E. coli, the most susceptible being S. aureus. Instead, complex [Cu(acr)2(HBzIm)2(H2O)]∙(H2O) 10, resulting from the same synthesis as 9 after several days of slow evaporation, exhibited a lower activity than 9 [34].
Continuing the inventory of benzimidazole complexes and their derivatives with biological properties, we identified species [Ni(acr)2(BzIm)2(H2O)]∙3H2O 11 and [Ni(acr)2(2-MeBzIm)2(H2O)]∙1.5H2O 12 (MeBzIm = methylbenzimidazole). These presented modest antibacterial properties, with their MIC values of 500 μg∙mL explained by a stable octahedral stereochemistry, which limits interactions with tested strains [35]. Moreover, complexes [Co(acr)2(2-MeBzIm)2]∙0.5H2O 13 and [Co(acr)2(5-MeBzIm)2] 14 exhibit antibacterial activity against E. faecium E5, B. subtilis, and E. coli, with MIC values ranging between 31.25 and 62.5 μg∙mL−1 [33]. Complex [Ni(acr)2(5-MeBzIm)2(H2O)] 15 presented rather moderate activity against E. faecium E5 and E. coli [35]. Comparing the antimicrobial activity of cobalt (II) complexes with that of nickel (II) species discussed above, it could be concluded that those of Co(II) present superior activity, this behavior being sustained by the coordinative unsaturation of this ion in the mentioned complexes.
Very good antibacterial activity was reported for [Co(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 16 (5,6-Me2BzIm = 5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole). This displays an interesting structure, with Co(II) configured in a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal stereochemistry and acrylate coordinated to be both unidentate and chelate (Figure 2d). This complex inhibits the growth of E. faecium E5, B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. aureus. Excepting the MIC of E. faecium E5, which was 62.5 μg∙mL−1, for all mentioned strains, the MIC values were 31.25 μg∙mL−1 [33].
In the same series, we obtained and characterized complexes [Cu2(acr)4(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 17, [Cu(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2(H2O)]∙H2O 18, and [Cu(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)4] 19. From these species, 19 was most active against S. aureus, with an MIC of 250 μg∙mL−1 [36]. Complex [Ni(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 20 was also reported [35] to be an antibacterial agent, but its activity was rather modest.
(c)
Complexes with mixed ligands—acrylate and 2,2′-bipyridine complexes
Even if antibacterial agents that contain 2,2′-bipyridine are found in the literature in great numbers, those that contain 2,2′-bipyridine and unsaturated carboxylate are limited. For instance, [Cd(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙1.5H2O 21 (2,2′-bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) was reported in [37] due to its antibacterial activity against Shigella sp., Acinetobacter boumani, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus MRSA, which was sustained by MIC values between 128 and 256 μg∙mL−1. In addition, the best antibacterial activity was evidenced against Salmonella sp.
Complexes [Cu(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 22 and [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 23, tested against S. aureus and E. Coli, were found to display a modest activity [38]. Instead, [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)]∙mlm 24 (mlm = melamine) exhibited very good activity against S. aureus, with an MIC value of 70 μg∙mL−1 [39].
The asymmetric units of 22 display two crystallographic independent entities (Figure 2e), with Cu(II) configured in a distorted octahedral stereochemistry and acrylate behaving as unidentate and chelate simultaneously [38]. The same coordination mode was evidenced for 23 (Figure 2f) and 24 (Figure 2g), along with 2,2′-bipy acting as chelate and water behaving as unidentate [38,39].
The interesting trinuclear complex [Mn3(acr)6(2,2′-bipy)2] 25 was reported and fully characterized through single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 2h). The acrylate ions present different coordination modes such as bridges through one or two oxygen atoms, as is usually encountered in trinuclear linear complexes. These bridges link the central atom to the other two, while as a chelate bipy completes the coordination sphere for terminal Mn(II) ions. The antibacterial activity of 25 was tested against S. aureus and E. coli, when MIC values of 512 and 256 μg∙mL−1 were obtained. These values were much lower than those obtained for sodium acrylate [38]. Furthermore, complex [Zn(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙H2O 26 was tested against the same bacterial strains as 25, and the result was that it was more active against S. aureus, a fact proven by an MIC value of 128 μg∙mL−1 [38].
The complex [Cd(acr)2(phen)(H2O)] 27 (phen = 1,10-phenantroline) was found to be active against Acinetobacter boumani, with an MIC of 64 μg∙mL−1, and against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus MRSA strains, with MICs of 256 μg∙mL−1 for both strains [37].
(d)
Complexes with mixed ligands—acrylate and pyrazole/pyrazole derivatives
Complexes with mixed ligands, dubbed [Co(acr)2(Hpz)2] 28 (Hpz = 1H-pyrazole), [Co(acr)2(3-MeHpz)2] 29 (MeHpz = methyl-1H-pyrazole), [Co(acr)2(4-Me-Hpz)2] 30, and [Co(acr)2(dmpz)2] 31 (dmpz = 3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole), were tested against S. aureus 1263 MRSA, E. coli, K. preumoniae, and B. subtilis, but good activity was only exhibited against B. subtilis, with an MIC of 125 μg∙mL−1 [40].

2.1.2. Complexes with Methacrylate/Methacrylate Derivatives and Different N-Donor Ligands

Even though methacrylate/methacrylate-based products are used for different dental and medical applications [41], complexes with mixed ligands, methacrylate, and different accompanying N-donor heterocycles with biological properties are scarcely reported in the literature. For example, series of such species were reported, with a general formula of [M(macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙nH2O (Hmacr = methacrylic acid; 4,4′-bipy = 4,4′-bipyridine). Among these, it is worth mentioning that [Co(macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙0.5H2O 32, [Cu(macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙0.5H2O 33, [Mn(macr)2(4,4′-bipy)] 34, and [Ni(macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙1.5H2O 35 presented very good activity against the resistant strain of E. coli ESBL 1576, with MIC values of 31.25 and 62.5 μg∙mL−1 [42].
From other series, [Co(macr)2(HIm)2] 37, [Co(macr)2(2-MeIm)2] 38 and [Co(macr)2(2-EtIm)2] 39 were reported as being good antibacterial agents. The structures of these compounds can be observed in Figure 2j–l. For instance, complex 37 presents very good antibacterial activity against E. coli (MIC 31.2 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus (MIC 15.6 μg∙mL−1), and E. faecalis (MIC 31.2 μg∙mL−1), while 38 is active against E. faecalis (MIC 62.5 μg∙mL−1), E. coli (MIC = 31.2 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), and S. aureus (MIC = 15.6 μg∙mL−1), respectively. Concluding, the Gram-positive strains were significantly more sensitive to the investigated complexes, in comparison to the ligands. An interesting structural feature was observed for complex 39, with the asymmetric unit containing three crystalographically independent molecules, where the metallic ions adopted different stereochemistries (distorted octahedral, tetrahedral, and distorted square–pyramidal) (Figure 2l) [43].
Figure 2. Molecular structures of cis-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 4 (a) [32], trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm)2] 5 (b) [32], trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 6 (c) [32], [Co(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 16 (d) [33], [Cu(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 22 (e) [38], [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 23 [38] (f), [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)]∙MA 24 [39] (g), [Mn3(acr)6(2,2′-bipy)2] 25 [38] (h), [Zn(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙H2O 26 [38] (i), [Co(Macr)2(HIm)2] 37 [43] (j), [Co(Macr)2(2-MeIm)2] 38 [43] (k), and [Co(Macr)2(2-EtIm)2] 39 [43] (l).
Figure 2. Molecular structures of cis-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 4 (a) [32], trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm)2] 5 (b) [32], trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 6 (c) [32], [Co(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 16 (d) [33], [Cu(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 22 (e) [38], [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 23 [38] (f), [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)]∙MA 24 [39] (g), [Mn3(acr)6(2,2′-bipy)2] 25 [38] (h), [Zn(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙H2O 26 [38] (i), [Co(Macr)2(HIm)2] 37 [43] (j), [Co(Macr)2(2-MeIm)2] 38 [43] (k), and [Co(Macr)2(2-EtIm)2] 39 [43] (l).
Molecules 29 02321 g002aMolecules 29 02321 g002b
Antibacterial properties were found for a series of organotin compounds with 3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylate (Hcpma); these were formulated as [Me2Sn(cpma)2] 40, [Bu2Sn(cpma)2] 41, [Oct2Sn(cpma)2] 42, [Me3Sn(cpma)] 43 (Figure 3a), [Bu3Sn(cpma)] 44, and [Ph3Sn(cpma)] 45 (Figure 3b). All complexes were mononuclear, with carboxylate acting in a unidentate manner, excepting 43, for which the single-crystal X-ray diffraction evidenced a polymeric structure with carboxylate as the bridge. Compound 45 presented the best antibacterial activity against S. aureus strain (IZD = 30 mm), followed by 44 (IZD = 22 mm). Complex 43 was the most active against Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 30 mm), and we found that compound 45 had good activity against Micrococcus luteus with an IZD of 27 mm. Even if all species from this series showed antibacterial abilities against the tested strains, the best antibacterial activity was shown by 43 and 45 [44].

2.1.3. Complexes with Cinnamate/Cinnamate Derivatives and Different N-Donor Ligands

Cinnamic acid and its derivatives are encountered in plants and are reported due to their antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antiparasitic properties, and potential therapeutic behavior against Alzheimers’ disease [45,46]. Given these attributes, it was expected that cinnamate-based complexes would exhibit similar properties, and so the literature was accordingly scanned to identify such complexes.
A cinnamate complex, [Cu(cin)2(tmeda)]∙0.7H2O 46 (Hcin = cinnamic acid; tmeda = N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylenediamine), was reported due to its remarkable antibacterial activity against Bacillus spizizenii (MIC 10 μg∙mL−1) and Staphylococcus aureus (MIC 25 μg∙mL−1). In addition, moderate activity was determined against Enterobacter aerogenes, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Copper(II) adopts a distorted octahedral stereochemistry, with both cinnamate and amine ligands acting as chelates (Figure 3c) [47].
Complex [Cu2(tea)2(cin)2](H2O) 47 (Htea = triethanolamine) was synthesized and fully characterized as a binuclear species through single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The octahedral stereochemistry of Cu(II) ions was assured by the unidentate cinnamate and triethanolamine, acting both as a tetradentate chelate and a bridge through the deprotonated hydroxyl group (Figure 3d). The complex exhibited very good inhibitory activity against an S. aureus strain in a planktonic state with an MIC of 25 μg∙mL−1, showing activity comparable with that of cephalexin and its complexes [48].
Several Ni(II) complexes with cinnamate derivatives, namely, [Ni(cin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 48 (py = pyridine), [Ni(mcin)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)2] 49 (Hmcin = p-methyl cinnamic acid), {[Ni(mcin)2(en)2][Ni(en)2(H2O)2](mcin)∙H2O} 50 (en = ethylenediamine), and [Ni(ncin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 51 (Hncin = p-nitro cinnamic acid), were obtained and characterized as mononuclear species, with cinnamate derivatives acting in a unidentate manner (Figure 3d–h). Complexes 48, 50, and 51 presented significant activity against Micrococcus luteus, with IZDs of about 20 mm [49].
Figure 3. Molecular structures of [Me3Sn(cpma)] 43 (a) [44], [Ph3Sn(cpma)] 45 (b) [44], [Cu(cin)2(tmeda)]∙0.7H2O 46 (c) [47], [Cu2(cin)2(tea)](H2O) 47 (d) [48], trans-[Ni(cin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 48 (e) [49], trans,cis-[Ni(mcin)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)2] 49 [49] (f), trans-[Ni(ncin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 51 [49] (g), and {trans-[Ni(mcin)2(en)2][Ni(en)2(H2O)2](mcin)∙H2O} 50 [49] (h).
Figure 3. Molecular structures of [Me3Sn(cpma)] 43 (a) [44], [Ph3Sn(cpma)] 45 (b) [44], [Cu(cin)2(tmeda)]∙0.7H2O 46 (c) [47], [Cu2(cin)2(tea)](H2O) 47 (d) [48], trans-[Ni(cin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 48 (e) [49], trans,cis-[Ni(mcin)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)2] 49 [49] (f), trans-[Ni(ncin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 51 [49] (g), and {trans-[Ni(mcin)2(en)2][Ni(en)2(H2O)2](mcin)∙H2O} 50 [49] (h).
Molecules 29 02321 g003
A derivative of cinnamic acid, namely, p-coumaric acid (p-hydroxicinnamic acid), is widely encountered in nature, its antibacterial properties being intensively studied [50,51,52]. Although the antibacterial properties of this compound are fully proven, reports of complexes with such properties are scarce.
For example, a polynuclear complex that was formulated [Zn4(Hcou)8(H2O)6]∙4H2O 52 (Hcou = coumaric acid) has been reported due to its antibacterial properties, evaluated on the basis of percentage growth inhibition (PGI). More specifically, it was found that complex 52 presents significant activity against S. aureus, with a PGI of 77 [53].
Furthermore, ferulic acid, also found in the vegetal species, has proven its antimicrobial properties [52]. Considering these, complex [Zn(Hfer)2]·1.5H2O 53 (H2fer = ferulic acid or 3-methoxy-4-hydroxicinnamic acid) revealed significant activity against E. coli (PGI 97.1%), B. subtilis (PGI 90.8%), S. aureus (PGI 93.7%), and P. vulgaris (PGI 96.5%), with a level much higher than that of ferulic acid or sodium ferulate [54].
Organotin (IV) compounds receive special attention due to their antibacterial activities and their use as biocidal agents [55,56,57]. Considering these aspects, [Me3Sn(hmpp)] 54 (Me = methyl; Hhmpp = 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylpropenoic acid) was tested and presented a good and enhanced activity against P. aeruginosa (IZD 18 mm) in comparison with a ligand [58].
The [Eu(cfa)3(H2O)3]·2H2O 55 (Hcfa = caffeic acid) also exhibits an enhanced activity against E. coli and B. subtilis compared to Hcfa, behavior which can be explained by increased lipophilicity. However, the activity was modest, with an MIC of 400 μg∙mL−1 [59].
Table 1. Coordination compounds with unsaturated carboxylates with antimicrobial activity.
Table 1. Coordination compounds with unsaturated carboxylates with antimicrobial activity.
Compound FormulationUnsaturated Carboxylate LigandAuxiliary LigandBiological ActivityRef.
Molecules 29 02321 i001
cis-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 4
acrylate
(chelate) *
2-ethylimidazoleABA **: B. subtilis (IZD = 22 mm)[32]
Molecules 29 02321 i002
trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm)2] 5
acrylate
(chelate) *
2-methylimidazoleABA: E. faecium (IZD = 30 mm), B. subtilis (IZD = 35 mm), S. aureus (IZD = 18 mm)[32]
Molecules 29 02321 i003
trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 6
acrylate
(unidentate semicoordination) *
2-ethylimidazoleABA: B. subtilis (IZD = 27 mm) P. aeruginosa (IZD = 18 mm)[32]
Molecules 29 02321 i004
[Co(acr)2(HBzIm)2]∙0.5H2O 8
acrylatebenzimidazoleABA: E. faecium E5 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis ATCC 6683 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
AFA ***: C. albicans (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
[33]
Molecules 29 02321 i005
[Cu2(acr)4(HBzIm)2] 9
acrylatebenzimidazoleABA: S. aureus ATCC 6538 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis 6683 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), E. faecium E5 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans 1760 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
[34]
Molecules 29 02321 i006
[Cu(acr)2(HBzIm)2(H2O)]∙(H2O) 10
acrylatebenzimidazoleABA: S. aureus ATCC 6538 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis 6683 (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), E. faecium E5 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), E.coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1)[34]
Molecules 29 02321 i007
[Co(acr)2(2-MeBzIm)2]∙0.5H2O 13
acrylate2-methylbenzimidazoleABA: E. faecium E5 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis ATCC 6683 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1)
E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
[33]
Molecules 29 02321 i008
[Co(acr)2(5-MeBzIm)2] 14
acrylate5-methylbenzimidazoleABA: E. faecium E5 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis ATCC 6683 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
[33]
Molecules 29 02321 i009
[Co(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 16
acrylate
(unidentate + chelate) *
5,6-dimethylbenzimidazoleABA: E. faecium E5 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis ATCC 6683 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1)
[33]
Molecules 29 02321 i010
[Cu2(acr)4(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 17
acrylate5,6-dimethylbenzimidazoleABA: MRSA 1263 (MIC = 250 μg∙mL−1)[36]
Molecules 29 02321 i011
[Cu(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2(H2O)]∙H2O 18
acrylate5,6-dimethylbenzimidazoleABA: E. coli (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), K. pneumoniae (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), MRSA 1263 (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), B. subtilis (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1)[36]
Molecules 29 02321 i012
[Cu(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)4] 19
acrylate5,6-dimethylbenzimidazoleABA: S. aureus (MIC = 250 μg∙mL−1), MRSA 1263 (MIC = 250 μg∙mL−1)[36]
Molecules 29 02321 i013
[Cd(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙1.5H2O 21
acrylate2,2′-bipyridineABA: Shigella sp. (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1), Acinetobacter boumani (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa 1700 (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus MRSA (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1)
[37]
Molecules 29 02321 i014
[Cu(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 22
acrylate
(unidentate) *
2,2′-bipyridineABA: E. coli (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1)
[38]
Molecules 29 02321 i015
[Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 23
acrylate
(unidentate + chelate)
2,2′-bipyridineAFA: C. albicans (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1)[38]
Molecules 29 02321 i016
[Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)]∙MA 24
acrylate
(unidentate + chelate)
2,2′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus ATCC 25923 (MIC = 70 μg∙mL−1)[39]
Molecules 29 02321 i017[Mn3(acr)6(2,2′-bipy)2] 25acrylate
(bridge through one or two oxygen atoms) *
2,2′-bipyridineABA: E. coli (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1)
[38]
Molecules 29 02321 i018
[Zn(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙H2O 26
acrylate
(chelate) *
2,2′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 128 μg∙mL−1)
[38]
Molecules 29 02321 i019
[Cd(acr)2(phen) (H2O)] 27
acrylate1,10-phenantrolineABA: Acinetobacter boumani (MIC = 64 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa 1700 (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus MRSA (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans (MIC = 256 μg∙mL−1)
[37]
Molecules 29 02321 i020
[Co(acr)2(Hpz)2] 28
acrylate1H-pyrazoleABA: B. subtilis (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1)[40]
Molecules 29 02321 i021
[Co(acr)2(3-MeHpz)2] 29
acrylate3-methyl-1H-pyrazoleABA: B. subtilis (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1)[40]
Molecules 29 02321 i022
[Co(acr)2(4-MeHpz)2] 30
acrylate4-methyl-1H-pyrazoleABA: B. subtilis (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1)[40]
Molecules 29 02321 i023
[Co(acr)2(dmpz)2] 31
acrylate3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazoleABA: B. subtilis (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1)[40]
Molecules 29 02321 i024
[Co(Macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙0.5H2O 32
methacrylate4,4′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ESBL 1576 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1)[42]
Molecules 29 02321 i025
[Cu(Macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙0.5H2O 33
methacrylate4,4′-bipyridineABA: P. aeruginosa (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ESBL 1576 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)[42]
Molecules 29 02321 i026
[Mn(Macr)2(4,4′-bipy)] 34
methacrylate4,4′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), E. cloacae (MIC = 250 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ESBL 1576 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)[42]
Molecules 29 02321 i027
[Ni(Macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙1.5H2O 35
methacrylate4,4′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 250 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ESBL 1576 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)[42]
Molecules 29 02321 i028
[Zn(Macr)2(4,4′-bipy)]∙0.5H2O 36
methacrylate4,4′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), E. cloacae (MIC = 250 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ESBL 1576 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1), E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)[42]
Molecules 29 02321 i029
[Co(Macr)2(HIm)2] 37
methacrylate
(unidentate + chelate) *
imidazoleABA: E. coli ATCC 8739 (MIC = 31.2 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa ATCC 1671 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus ATCC 6538 (MIC = 15.6 μg∙mL−1), E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (MIC = 31.2 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans ATCC 26790 (MIC = 7.8 μg∙mL−1)
[43]
Molecules 29 02321 i030
[Co(Macr)2(2-MeIm)2] 38
methacrylate
(unidentate + chelate) *
2-methylimidazoleABA: E. coli ATCC 8739 (MIC = 31.2 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa ATCC 1671 (MIC = 15.6 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus ATCC 6538 (MIC = 15.6 μg∙mL−1), E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (MIC = 31.2 μg∙mL−1)[43]
Molecules 29 02321 i031[Co(Macr)2(2-EtIm)2] 39methacrylate
(unidentate + chelate in left unit; unidentate in middle unit; chelate in right unit) *
2-ethylimidazoleABA: E. coli ATCC 8739 (MIC = 125 μg∙mL−1), P. aeruginosa ATCC 1671 (MIC = 31.2 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus ATCC 6538 (MIC = 15.6 μg∙mL−1), E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (MIC = 62.5 μg∙mL−1)
AFA: C. albicans ATCC 26790 (MIC = 15.6 μg∙mL−1)
[43]
Molecules 29 02321 i032
[Me2Sn(cpma)2] 40
3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylatemethylABA: S. aureus (IZD = 20 mm), E. coli (IZD = 20 mm), Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 25 mm), Micrococcus luteus (IZD = 20 mm)
AFA: A. fumigatus (PGI = 65%)
[44]
Molecules 29 02321 i033
[Bu2Sn(cpma)2] 41
3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylaten-butaneABA: S. aureus (IZD = 20 mm), E. coli (IZD = 20 mm), Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 25 mm)
AFA: A. flavus (PGI = 50%), A. fumigatus (PGI = 55%), Fusarium solani (PGI = 95%)
[44]
Molecules 29 02321 i034
[Oct2Sn(cpma)2] 42
3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylaten-octaneABA: E. coli (IZD = 16 mm), Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 10 mm)[44]
Molecules 29 02321 i035
[Me3Sn(cpma)]n43
3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylate
(unidentate) *
methylABA: S. aureus (IZD = 20 mm), E.coli (IZD = 25 mm), Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 30 mm)
AFA: A. flavus (PGI = 96%), A. niger (PGI = 100%), A. fumigatus (PGI = 100%), Fusarium solani (PGI = 100%)
[44]
Molecules 29 02321 i036
[Bu3Sn(cpma)] 44
3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylatebutylABA: S. aureus (IZD = 22 mm), E. coli (IZD = 23 mm), Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 25 mm), Micrococcus luteus (IZD = 20 mm)
AFA: A. niger (PGI = 58%), A. fumigatus (PGI = 75%), Fusarium solani (PGI = 75%)
[44]
Molecules 29 02321 i037
[Ph3Sn(cpma)] 45
3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylate
(bidentate chelate) *
phenylABA: S. aureus (IZD = 30 mm), E. coli (IZD = 20 mm), Bortedella bronchiseptica (IZD = 20 mm), Micrococcus luteus (IZD = 27 mm)
AFA: A. flavus (PGI = 98%), A. niger (PGI = 97%), A. fumigatus (PGI = 100%), Fusarium solani (PGI = 96%)
[44]
Molecules 29 02321 i038
[Cu(cin)2(tmeda)]∙0.7H2O 46
cinnamate
(unidentate) *
N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylenediamineABA: Bacillus spizizenii (MIC = 10 μg∙mL−1), S. aureus (MIC = 25 μg∙mL−1)[47]
Molecules 29 02321 i039[Cu2(cin)2(tea)](H2O) 47cinnamate
(unidentate) *
triethanolamineABA: S. aureus (MIC = 25 μg∙mL−1)[48]
Molecules 29 02321 i040
trans-[Ni(cin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 48
cinnamate
(unidentate) *
pyridineABA: Micrococcus luteus (IZD = 25 mm)[49]
Molecules 29 02321 i041trans,cis-[Ni(mcin)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)2] 49p-methylcinnamate
(unidentate) *
2,2′-bipyridineABA: S. aureus (IZD = 20 mm)[49]
Molecules 29 02321 i042{trans-[Ni(mcin)2(en)2][Ni(en)2(H2O)2](mcin)∙H2O} 50p-methylcinnamate
(unidentate) *
ethylenediamineABA: Micrococcus luteus (IZD = 21 mm)[49]
Molecules 29 02321 i043trans-[Ni(ncin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 51p-nitrocinnamate
(unidentate) *
pyridineABA: Micrococcus luteus (IZD = 21 mm), B. subtilis (IZD = 18 mm)[49]
Molecules 29 02321 i044
[Me3Sn(hmpp)2]n54
3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylpropenoatemethylABA: E. coli (IZD = 15 mm), B. subtilis (IZD = 15 mm), P. aeruginosa (IZD = 18 mm)[58]
Molecules 29 02321 i045
[Cu(acr)2(HBzIm)2] 60
acrylatebenzimidazoleAFA: C. albicans 1760 (MIC = 31.25 μg∙mL−1)[34]
Molecules 29 02321 i046
[Bu3Sn(hmpp)] 61
3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylpropenoatebutylAFA: A. flavus (PGI = 70%), Microsporum canis (PGI = 65%)[58]
Molecules 29 02321 i047
[Ph3Sn(hmpp)] 62
3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylpropenoatephenylAFA: Microsporum canis (PGI = 60%)[58]
* carboxylate coordination mode evidenced in X-ray structure; ** ABA = antibacterial activity; *** AFA = antifungal activity.

2.1.4. Complexes with Maleate and Different Heterocyclic Amine

Maleic acid is seldom encountered as a ligand in complexes that are mainly discussed from a structural perspective [60,61,62] and is rarely associated with biological properties, its antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis biofilm being reported on instead [63].
For example, a series of Co(II) complexes with maleate and heterocyclic derivatives was evaluated to assess their antibacterial properties. Consequently, complexes [Co(mal)(2-apy)] 56 (H2mal = maleic acid; 2-apy = 2-aminopyridine), [Co(mal)(qn)2] 57 (qn = quinoline), [Co(mal)(iqn)2] 58 (iqn = iso-quinoline) and K[Co(mal)(8-hqn)] 59 (hqn = hydroxiquinoline) were tested on several pathogenic bacteria and the results were more than satisfactory. More specifically, complexes 57, 58, and 59 inhibited the growth of Streptococcus haemolyticus efficiently, with IZD values of 32, 33, and 37 mm, respectively. Among these, 59 presented the best antimicrobial activity against all tested bacterial strains, the highest IZD of 40 mm being found for Shigella dysenteriae [64].

2.2. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate with Activity on Bacterial Biofilm

Bacterial biofilms are usually developed on both living or abiotic surfaces, thus generating chronic and persistent infections that cannot be eradicated with classical antimicrobials due to their increased tolerance to antimicrobials and the host’s immune system. Fortunately, several complexes based mostly on 3d ions have shown promising potential for fighting biofilm-associated infections as a result of their large spectrum of antibacterial biofilm activities [23,25]. Some species from among them, bearing unsaturated carboxylate, are presented below.
Hence, the complexes [Ni(acr)2(HBzIm)2(H2O)]∙3H2O 11, [Ni(acr)2(5-MeBzIm)2(H2O)] 15, [Ni(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 20 exhibited an inhibitory effect upon microbial adherence to an inert substrate against E. faecium E5, with a minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of 250 μg∙mL−1 [35]. In addition, related complex [Ni(acr)2(2-MeBzIm)2(H2O)]∙1.5H2O 12 [35] evidenced activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae at a MBEC of 250 μg∙mL−1.
Furthermore, complexes [Cu2(acr)4(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 17, [Cu(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2(H2O)]∙H2O 18, and [Cu(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)4] 19 were subjected to investigations to find out how they interact with biofilms formed by different bacterial strains. It was evidenced that the effect was either inhibitory or stimulatory, depending on the tested strain or the concentration of the tested complex [36]. It was found that complexes 17 and 18 presented inhibitory effects upon adherence of K. pneumoniae 1204 (1.95 μg∙mL−1) and C. albicans (1.95 μg∙mL−1), respectively. Also, complex 19 presented the most evident inhibitory effect upon the adherence ability of E. coli 13147 and K. preumoniae 1204, even at a subinhibitory concentration (1.95 μg∙mL−1). The antibiofilm activity of 19 in the case of E. coli 13529 and C. albicans 249 was only evidenced above concentrations of 7.81 and 125 μg∙mL−1, respectively.
The co-crystal [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)]∙mlm 24 [39] was investigated against S. aureus 25923, E. faecalis 29212, E. coli 25922, and P. aeruginosa 27853, with a resulting MBEC range between 150 and 1250 μg∙mL−1, very close to the MIC values presented in Section 2.1. Co-crystal 24 presents a better antibiofilm effect by comparison to melamine and is more active on Gram-positive strains.
The complexes formulated with methacrylate and imidazole/imidazole derivatives, namely, [Co(macr)2(HIm)2] 37, [Co(macr)2(2-MeIm)2] 38, and [Co(macr)2(2-EtIm)2] 39, proved their efficacy against biofilms developed by E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. faecalis, with MBEC values ranging between 15.6 and 62.5 μg∙mL−1. Among the tested bacterial strains, the most susceptible was S. aureus with an MBEC value of 15.6 μg∙mL−1, followed closely by P. aeruginosa, with MBEC values that range between 15.6 and 31.2 μg∙mL−1. In the crystal structures of the neutral species 37 and 38, two unidentate imidazole and two methacrylate ions can be observed. These are both unidentate and chelate, existing in a trigonal–bipyramidal stereochemistry (Figure 2j,k). The structure of complex 39 reveals very interesting features, with three crystallographically independent neutral molecules in the asymmetric unit (Figure 2l). All three Co(II) ions exhibit different stereochemistries: Co1 presents a square–pyramidal geometry, Co2 presents a tetrahedral stereochemistry, while Co3 adopts a slightly distorted octahedral one (Table 1). Furthermore, the methacrylate acts either as chelate, unidentate, or in both fashions for the three independent Co(II) moieties [43].

2.3. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate with Antifungal Properties

The geometric isomers cis-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm)2]∙2H2O 3 and trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-MeIm)2] 5, which exhibit antibacterial activity (see Section 2.1), were also tested on antifungal strains C. albicans, Penicillium sp., and Aspergillus sp., and the results evidenced that trans isomer 5 is more active than cis isomer 3. In addition, another similar complex known as trans-[Cu(acr)2(5-MeIm)2] 7 was subjected to the same tests. We found that it did not influence the mycelium growth, the result being similar with the positive control. Among cis-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 4 and trans-[Cu(acr)2(2-EtIm)2] 6, it was found that cis isomer 4 exhibits fungicidal effect against Penicillium sp., this being evidenced by the complete inhibition of mycelium growth [32].
Complex [Co(acr)2(HBzIm)2]∙0.5H2O 8 [33] exhibits activity against C. albicans, with an MIC value of 62.5 μg∙mL−1. Furthermore, species [Cu2(acr)4(HBzIm)2] 9, [Cu(acr)2(HBzIm)2] 60, and [Cu(acr)2(HBzIm)2(H2O)]∙(H2O) 10 have also proven their antifungal properties against C. albicans, with MIC ranging between 2 and 62.5 μg∙mL−1 [34].
Antifungal activity against C. albicans was identified also for [Ni(acr)2(HBzIm)2(H2O)]∙3H2O 11, [Ni(acr)2(2-MeBzIm)2(H2O)]∙1.5H2O 12, [Ni(acr)2(5-MeBzIm)2(H2O)] 15, and [Ni(acr)2(5,6-Me2BzIm)2] 20, but the effect was rather modest [35].
Good antifungal activity, sustained by an MIC of 62.5 μg∙mL−1, was reported for [Co(acr)2(2-MeBzIm)2]∙0.5H2O 13 and [Co(acr)2(5-MeBzIm)2] 14 [33].
Moderate activity against C. albicans was proven for [Cd(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙1.5H2O 21 and [Cd(acr)2(phen) (H2O)] 27, with an MIC value of 256 μg∙mL−1 [37], and there was a good one for [Cu(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 22, [Ni(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)] 23, [Mn3(acr)6(2,2′-bipy)2] 25, and [Zn(acr)2(2,2′-bipy)]∙H2O 26, with an MIC value of 128 μg∙mL−1 [38].
Complexes [Co(macr)2(HIm)2] 37, [Co(macr)2(2-MeIm)2] 38 and [Co(macr)2(2-EtIm)2] 39 also inhibited the growth of C. albicans, with assessed MIC values ranging between 7.8 and 15.6 μg∙mL−1. In addition, these complexes were tested as antibacterial agents too (see Section 2.1) and by comparing those results with the antifungal activity presented here it could be considered that the most susceptible microorganism was fungal strain C. albicans [43].
Organometallic species [Me2Sn(cpma)2] 40, [Bu2Sn(cpma)2] 41, [Oct2Sn(cpma)2] 42, [Me3Sn(cpma)] 43, [Bu3Sn(cpma)] 44, and [Ph3Sn(cpma)] 45 (Hcpma = 3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylate) were screened for antifungal activity against A. flavus, A. niger, A. fumigatus, and Fusarium solani and, based on the percentage of growth inhibition (PGI) values around compound 41, presented significant activity against F. solani (PGI 95%) [44].
The antifungal activities of trans-[Ni(cin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 48, trans,cis-[Ni(mcin)2(2,2′-bipy)(H2O)2] 49, {trans-[Ni(mcin)2(en)2]∙[Ni(en)2](mcin)2∙H2O} 50, and trans-[Ni(ncin)2(py)2(H2O)2] 51 were investigated recently. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed species a mononuclear structure for all, unidentate behavior of carboxylate, and a trans configuration of different ligands (Figure 3f–h). Significant antifungal activity (PGI higher than 70%) was noticed in the case of complex 48 against Mucor piriformis and of complexes 49 and 51 against A. niger. Good antifungal activity (PGI 60–70%) was identified for complex 49 against M. piriformis and Helminthosporium solani and for complex 51 against H. solani [49].
A complex containing p-coumaric acid (p-hydroxicinnamic acid), formulated [Zn4(HCou)8(H2O)6]∙4H2O 52, was found to present good activity against C. albicans, with a PGI value of 63% [53].
In addition, [Zn(Hfer)2]·1.5H2O 53 (H2fer = ferulic acid or 3-methoxy-4-hydroxicinnamic acid) [54] inhibits the growth of C. albicans. This behavior is sustained by a PGI of 98.9%, which is higher than the level of ferulic acid or sodium ferulate.
Going further, organometallic species [Me2Sn(hmpp)2] 54, [Bu3Sn(hmpp)] 61 (Bu = n-butyl), [Ph3Sn(hmpp)] 62 (Ph = phenyl) presented good antifungal activity against A. flavus with a PGI of 60–70%, and against Microsporum canis with a PGI of around 60% [58].
The evaluation of the antifungal activity of [Co(mal)(2-apy)] 56 and K[Co(mal)(8-hqn)] 59 evidenced the good activity of 56 against Bipolaris sorokiniana (IZD 26 mm) in comparison with 56 (IZD 22 mm). In addition, complex 59 presented very good antifungal activity against Trichophyton with an IZD of 44 mm [64].
The analysis of the scarce literature data related to fumarate complexes with biological properties revealed complex [Mn2(fum)2(phen)2.5]∙3H2O 63 (H2fum = fumaric acid), which presents good antifungal activity against C. albicans with a PGI of 69%. Furthermore, it has been found that the antifungal potential is related with 1,10-phenantroline rather than fumarate one [65].

3. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate Developed for Antitumor Applications

Cancer is one of the most insidious diseases of this century. This comes from its manifestation in various forms and its ability to develop metastases and to adapt to available drugs by developing acquired resistance. These aspects require not only the finding of new drugs, combinatory therapies, and efficient antitumor drug carriers, but also the development of efficient species for both metastases and resistant tumor treatment.
Among the current species under clinical testing, the complexes seem to be a valuable choice in view of their multiple mechanisms of action and good activity against a great number of tumors [66].
Unmistakable, the available platinum anticancer drugs (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) still play an important role in cancer treatment [67]. However, they exhibit severe side effects and as a result both prescribed doses and effectiveness are limited to a small number of tumor cells. Most importantly, all develop intrinsic resistance [68,69,70]. Interestingly, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin also exhibit cancer immunomodulatory functions and the ability to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) [66,71].
Recent findings indicate that cisplatin and its analogs effectively inhibit the differentiated tumor cells, but not the cancer stem cells (CSCs) ones. It was shown that if a very small number of such cells remained after treatment, these could lead to resistance, metastases, and relapse; these aspects all diminish the drug’s effectiveness [72].
A selection of the most active antitumor species is presented in Table 2.

3.1. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate with Antitumor Activity

The experience gained in Pt(II)-based antitumor agents indicated that the use of the advantageous properties of octahedral Pt(IV) complexes was an efficient approach in developing effective agents for treating resistant tumor cells. On the other hand, the design of such compounds also enables their conjugation in axial positions with diverse biologically active ligands to achieve both improved and targeted delivery [70,72,73,74,75,76]. Thus, a combinatory therapy can be developed through both the ligands and Pt(II)-species after accumulation and the reduction of the complex inside the tumor cells, where they act via several mechanisms on different cellular targets [77,78]. As a result, such conjugates can carry both the platinum component and other antitumor components into the tumor cells, some being recognized specifically by certain cells.
To develop species able to inhibit both the proliferation of the differentiated tumor cells and CSCs, some Pt(IV) prodrugs with axial cinnamate ligands were synthesized. This series of complexes was designed by considering the ability of cinnamic acid to reduce the tumorigenic ability of CSCs [73]. Complexes cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(OH)(cin)Cl2] 64 and cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(cin)2Cl2] 65 exhibit enhanced antiproliferative activity in both monolayer and 3D spheroid assays in cervical adenocarcinoma (HeLa), colon carcinoma (HCT116, both p53-positive and p53-non-expressing), breast cancer (invasive ductal carcinoma) (MDA-MB-231), adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), and muscle rhabdomyosarcoma. It is worth mentioning the enhanced activity in comparison with the cisplatin of both species, with 65 also being more active in comparison to 64. The released Pt(II) compound inhibits cancer cells via the DNA damage mechanism and, moreover, the cinnamic acid, thus liberated, makes the CSCs more sensitive to platinum [73].
On the other hand, the species cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(cin)(ole)Cl2] 66 was proved to be active on a series of tumor cell lines, with the overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) via breast cancer lines MCF-7, T47D, MDA 453, and SK-BR-3. Data indicate that the sensitivity of cells toward 66 correlated with the level of HER2 expression, with the highly HER2-expressing SK-BR-3 cells being significantly (4.4-fold) more sensitive than HER2-non-expressing MCF-7 cells [79].
Prodrug cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(cin)(val)Cl2] 67 (Hval = valproic acid) was constructed to develop antiproliferative triple action against human lung (A549), breast (MCF-7), hepatocellular (HepG-2), bladder (5637), mice bladder (MB49), and breast (4T1) carcinoma. This complex, bearing a cisplatin moiety and cin and val as axial ligands, acts synergistically via DNA damage, MMP-2 and -9 activity inhibition, tumor cell invasion, and metastasis blocking, suppressing HDAC activity to increase the accessibility of DNA to Pt(II) moiety by decondensing chromatin. Its activity against all cell lines was enhanced in comparison with cisplatin, its antiproliferative activity being evidenced at submicromolar concentrations [80].
The Pt(IV) prodrug cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(fer)2Cl2] 68, developed by starting from ferulic acid, was screened against lung carcinoma (A549 and A549/DDP) cells and was found to be more active than cisplatin, acting at a submicromolar level [81]. Moreover, organometallic species [Bu3Sn(fer)] 69 was able to reduce the viability of human colon cancer cells (HCT116, HT-29 and Caco-2) at a nanomolar range. The cell viability reduction induced by 69 was associated with G2/M cell cycle arrest, increases in membrane permeabilization, and the appearance of typical morphological signs, like autophagic proteins, that finally trigger the cell death process. As a result, this derivative represents a promising therapeutic agent for colon cancer since it is able to trigger autophagic cell death, an important aspect for overcoming resistance [82].
Compared with other species with cinnamate, the complex [Mg(cin)2(H2O)2]n 70 adopts a layered structure with a pseudooctahedral coordination around the metal center and exhibits very low cytotoxicity against neoplastic A549 (lung), MCF-7 (breast), P388 (murine leukemia), and normal BALB3T3 (mouse fibroblasts) cell lines. In silico parameter calculations indicate good lipophilicity, which suggests this species has an optimal pharmacokinetic profile [83]. Some lanthanide compounds, namely, [M(cin)3] 71 (M = Y, La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Yb), [La(4-OMecin)3]·2H2O 72, and [La(4-Clcin)3]·2H2O 73 (4-HOMecinn = 4-methoxicinnamic acid; Clcin = 4-chlorocinnamic acid), contain cinnamate-derived anions, which act as bidentate chelate ligands in all complexes. Unfortunately, activity against HL60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), K562 (human erythromyeloblastoid leukemia), and MCF7 (breast cancer) cell lines was rather very modest [84].
In the series of monomeric organometallic species bearing cinnamate moieties [Sb(p-tolyl)3(fnacr)2] (Hfnacr = 3-(furan-2-yl)acrylic acid) 74, [Sb(p-tolyl)3(mfnacr)2] (Hmfnacr = 3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)acrylic acid) 75, and [Sb(p-tolyl)3(tfacr)2] 76 (Htfacr = 3-(thiophen-2-yl)acrylic acid), antimony (V) was found to adopt a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry, with p-tolyl groups in equatorial positions and carboxylate in axial positions. These species were found to display modest cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells, with IC50 values of 7.44, 4.61, and 5.0 mg∙mL−1, respectively [85].
Fumarate bridged Zn(II) coordination polymer {[Zn2(μ-fum)2(dmpz)4]·3H2O}n 77 was synthesized and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 4). The zig-zag polymeric chain of 77 parts self-assembles into a 2D supramolecular network via noncovalent CH⋯π, CH⋯C, NH⋯O and CH⋯O interactions. The compound exhibits cytotoxicity in Dalton’s lymphoma (DL) malignant cancer cell line in a micromolar range, with activity enhanced compared to cisplatin [86].
Table 2. Coordination compounds of unsaturated carboxylates with antitumor activity.
Table 2. Coordination compounds of unsaturated carboxylates with antitumor activity.
Compound Structure */FormulationUnsaturated Carboxylate LigandAuxiliary LigandBiological ActivityRef.
Molecules 29 02321 i048
cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(OH)(cin)Cl2] (64)
cinnamateammonia, hydroxyl, chlorideHeLa, HCT116 (p53 positive and p53 non-expressing), MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, rhabdomyosarcoma human cells
(IC50 in micromolar range)
[73]
Molecules 29 02321 i049
cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(cin)2Cl2] (65)
cinnamateammonia, chlorideHeLa, HCT116 (p53 positive and p53 non-expressing), MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, rhabdomyosarcoma human cells (IC50 in submicromolar range)[73]
Molecules 29 02321 i050
cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(cin)(ole)Cl2] (66)
cinnamate, oleateammonia, chlorideMCF-7, T47D, MDA 453 and SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells
(IC50 in micromolar range)
[79]
Molecules 29 02321 i051
cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(cin)(val)Cl2] (67)
cinnamateammonia, valproate, chloridehuman lung (A549), breast (MCF-7), hepatocellular (HepG-2), bladder (5637), mice bladder (MB49) and breast (4T1) carcinoma
(IC50 in submicromolar range)
[80]
Molecules 29 02321 i052
cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(fer)2Cl2] (68)
ferulateammonia, chloridelung carcinoma (A549 and A549/DDP) (IC50 in submicromolar range)[81]
Molecules 29 02321 i053
[Bu3Sn(fer)] (69)
ferulatebutylHCT116, HT-29 and Caco-2
(IC50 in nanomolar range)
[82]
Molecules 29 02321 i054
{[Zn2(μ-fum)2(Hdmpz)4]∙3H2O}n (77)
fumarate
(bridge) *
3,5-dimethylpyrazoleDL (IC50 in micromolar range)[86]
* carboxylate coordination mode evidenced by X-ray structure.
Of note, the introduction of unsaturated carboxylate ligand(s) into the axial position of the Pt(IV) derivatives of cisplatin or in organotin species componence led to significant activity for some selected tumor cell lines with known poor sensitivity to platinum drugs. These results support the dual action of such compounds through a synergistic mechanism, involving both the effects of cisplatin/organotin species and of unsaturated carboxylate moieties, thus leading together to the tumor cells apoptosis.

3.2. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate with Antitumor Activity on Resistant Cells

For efficient drug delivery and high therapeutic effects towards resistant cancer tumors, multimodal chemotherapy and immunotherapy were developed. This led to an interesting nanoformulation, generated based upon the self-assembly of a polymerizable cis,trans,cis-[Pt(NH3)2(icemac)2Cl2] 78 (Hicemac = 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylic acid) complex with a thermosensitive polymer with azo bonds that can generate radicals upon exposure to heat. The nanoparticles exhibit a higher cellular uptake than the molecular drug cisplatin and, upon exposure to irradiation, the azo bonds are broken, and therapeutically active species are released. Due to the presence of reactive acrylate moieties, the complex undergoes in situ polymerization inside the cancer cells, resulting in the formation of a cross-linked polymeric network. After that, the reduction to cisplatin into cancer cells triggers cell death via a combination of apoptosis and immunogenic cell death. The therapeutic efficiency of the system was evaluated in a clinical ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft mouse model as well as in SKOV3DDP, SKOV3, and ES2 ID8 subcutaneous tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mouse models [87].

4. Coordinative Compounds with Unsaturated Carboxylate with DNA-Intercalative Abilities and Antioxidant Activity

The interactions of coordinative compounds with DNA have been an active area of research in the last years since these biomolecules represent the primary intracellular targets of antitumor drugs. As a result, complexes with DNA-intercalative properties can be further studied in order to develop new species for cancer treatment [88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95].
In this regard, some complexes with unsaturated carboxylates and an ancillary ligand with aromatic rings or heterorings, able to establish π-π stacking interactions with purine or pyrimidine bases of nucleic acids, were designed.
A selection of the most active species is depicted in Table 3.
Such abilities were evidenced for ternary complexes [Cu(acr)(bba)](NO3)⋅H2O 79, [Cu(macr)(bba)]ClO4 80, and [Cu(crot)(bba)]ClO4 81 (bba = bis(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amine). The structure consists of cationic species with Cu(II) in a square–pyramidal geometry, constructed using amine as tetradentate and carboxylate as chelate, excepting 79, where both carboxylate and methanol act as unidentate ligands (Figure 5a–c). The interaction of these species with calf thymus DNA was investigated via electronic absorption, fluorescence spectroscopy and viscosity measurements, and all suggest that both the ligand and complexes bind to DNA in an intercalation mode. The DNA-binding affinity follows the order 80 > 81 > 79 > bba, and this behavior can arise from the large coplanar aromatic rings in the benzimidazole structure [96].
Antioxidants or free radical scavengers are species that can reduce or prevent the cellular damage generally caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Since there are various neurological disorders based on the mechanism of oxidative injury associated with free radicals, their scavengers are useful for the prevention and delaying of neurological disorders [97]. As antioxidant activity, the superoxide radical scavenging ability of the above complexes has been investigated indirect through nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) method. The results indicate that all complexes exhibit superoxide radical scavenging activity in a micromolar range [96].
The same ability was evidenced for [Ag2(macr)2(etobb)2]·CH3CN 82, [Ag(macr)(bobb)] 83, and [Ag2(macr)2(aobb)]n 84 (etobb = 1,3-bis(1-ethylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxapropane, bobb = 1,3-bis(1-benzylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxapropane, aobb = 1,3-bis(1-allylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxapropane). In binuclear complexes 82 and 83, each Ag(I) atom is surrounded by one unidentate methacrylate, while the benzimidazole derivative acts as bridge (Figure 5d,e). Compound 82 displays the highest intercalative ability and 83 has the best ability to scavenge hydroxyl radical [98].
By using sodium crotonate, species [Ag(crot)(bobb)] 85 [99], [Ag(crot)(bebt)] 86 (bebt = 1,3-bis(1-ethylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-thiapropane) [100] and [Ag2(crot)2(aobb)]n 87 [101] were designed for the same purpose. The structural characterization of 85 revealed a mononuclear three-coordinate configuration, in which carboxylate acts as a unidentate and benzimidazole derivative as a chelate (Figure 5f) [99].
Compound [Zn(tbima)(cinn)]NO3⋅DMF 88 (tbima = tris(2-benzimidazylmethyl)amine) was also synthesized and characterized as both the DNA intercalator and hydroxyl radical scavenger. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed that Zn(II) is five-coordinated in a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry, with cinnamate serving as a unidentate and amine as a tetradentate chelate (Figure 5g) [102].
The strong electrostatic DNA binding properties which may be employed in the design of new drugs were revealed also for complexes [Zn(ncin)2(H2O)2] 89 and [Zn(ncin)2(DMSO)2] 90. Metallic ions adopt a distorted octahedral stereochemistry for 89 and tetrahedral one for 90, while carboxylate ligands act as a bidentate in both species, as X-ray diffraction analysis revealed (Figure 5h,i) [103].
Table 3. Coordination compounds with unsaturated carboxylates with DNA binding ability and antoxidant activity.
Table 3. Coordination compounds with unsaturated carboxylates with DNA binding ability and antoxidant activity.
Compound Structure */FormulationUnsaturated Carboxylate LigandAuxiliary LigandBiological ActivityRef.
Molecules 29 02321 i055
[Cu(acr)(bba)(CH3O)]NO3∙H2O 79
acrylate
(unidentate) *
bis(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amine, methanolDNA binding, superoxide radical scavenger (IC50 = 1.55 mM)[96]
Molecules 29 02321 i056
[Cu(macr)(bba)]ClO480
methacrylate
(chelate) *
bis(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amineDNA binding, superoxide radical scavenger (IC50 = 0.87 mM)[96]
Molecules 29 02321 i057
[Cu(crot)(bba)]ClO481
crotonate
(chelate) *
bis(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amineDNA binding; superoxide radical scavenger (IC50 = 1.27 mM[96]
Molecules 29 02321 i058
[Ag2(macr)2(etobb)2]∙CH3CN 82
methacrylate
(unidentate) *
1,3-bis(1-ethylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-
oxapropane
DNA binding[98]
Molecules 29 02321 i059
[Ag(macr)(bobb)] 83
methacrylate
(unidentate) *
1,3-bis(1-benzylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-
oxapropane
DNA binding; hydroxyl radical scavenger[98]
Molecules 29 02321 i060
[Ag(crot)(bobb)] 85
crotonate
(unidentate) *
1,3-bis(1-benzylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-
oxapropane
DNA binding; hydroxyl radical scavenger[99]
Molecules 29 02321 i061
[Zn(cin)(tbima)]NO3∙DMF 88
cinnamate
(unidentate) *
tris(2-benzimidazylmethyl)amineDNA binding; hydroxyl radical scavenger[102]
Molecules 29 02321 i062 [Zn(ncin)2(H2O)2] 89p-nitro cinnamate
(chelate) *
waterDNA binding[103]
Molecules 29 02321 i063
[Zn(ncin)2(DMSO)2] 90
p-nitro cinnamate(unidentate) *dimethylsulfoxideDNA binding[103]
* carboxylate coordination mode evidenced by X-ray structure.
Figure 5. Molecular structures of [Cu(acr)(bba)(CH3O)]NO3∙H2O 79 (a) [96], [Cu(macr)(bba)]ClO4 80 (b) [96], [[Cu(crot)(bba)]ClO4 81 (c) [96], [Ag2(macr)2(etobb)2]∙CH3CN 82 (d) [98], [Ag(macr)(bobb)] 83 (e) [98], [Ag(crot)(bobb)] 85 [99] (f), [Zn(cin)(tbima)]NO3∙DMF 88 [102] (g), [Zn(ncin)2(H2O)2] 89 [103] (h), and [Zn(ncin)2(DMSO)2] 90 [103] (i).
Figure 5. Molecular structures of [Cu(acr)(bba)(CH3O)]NO3∙H2O 79 (a) [96], [Cu(macr)(bba)]ClO4 80 (b) [96], [[Cu(crot)(bba)]ClO4 81 (c) [96], [Ag2(macr)2(etobb)2]∙CH3CN 82 (d) [98], [Ag(macr)(bobb)] 83 (e) [98], [Ag(crot)(bobb)] 85 [99] (f), [Zn(cin)(tbima)]NO3∙DMF 88 [102] (g), [Zn(ncin)2(H2O)2] 89 [103] (h), and [Zn(ncin)2(DMSO)2] 90 [103] (i).
Molecules 29 02321 g005aMolecules 29 02321 g005b

5. Conclusions

Some unsaturated carboxylates, such as acrylate, methacrylate, fumarate, maleate, cinnamate, ferulate, coumarate, and itaconate, often accompanied by N-based heterocyclic species (pyridine, imidazole, and pyrazole derivatives), were used to generate valuable compounds with biological properties. Thus some complexes, mostly made with metal ions from 3D series (Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Mn(II) and Zn(II)), were observed to assess their ability to inhibit resistant strains or develop microbial biofilms on inert surfaces. In addition to enhanced antitumor activity based on a dual-action mechanism, involving both the effects of cisplatin/organotin species and of unsaturated carboxylate moieties, antitumor activity was evidenced against resistant cells. Moreover, the ability to intercalate into DNA strands as well as to scavenge the ROS species was also evidenced for some species, suggesting their future use as antitumor or anti-inflammatory drugs. It is obvious that the trend in this field is to use mainly essential ions for generating biologically active species in order to minimize the toxicity observed for Pt(IV) and Sn(IV). Unmistakably, these activities cannot be directly connected with the presence of unsaturated carboxylates, but this contributes to stereochemistry, stability, water solubility and lipophilicity. All these attributes account for certain biological behaviors. Regarding the synthesis of compounds with mixed ligands (unsaturated carboxylate and N-donor based systems), it is worth mentioning that it was fulfilled for the majority of species, going through a general two-step protocol. First, this included the preparation of carboxylate derivatives, either from metal oxide/carbonate in reaction with carboxylic acid or from a salt in reaction with sodium carboxylate, followed by the addition of N-donor ligand in a proper ratio. Instead, for Sn(IV) derivatives, the synthetic protocol consists in mixing the corresponding organotin chloride, either with silver or sodium salt of carboxylate.

6. Further Perspectives

The interest in complexes bearing unsaturated carboxylates could arise from their ability to generate metal-containing polymers with medical applications. Although several metal containing-monomers with unsaturated carboxylates exhibit valuable antimicrobial and antitumor properties, none were studied in order to generate polymers, so this research direction represents an open field for scientists. There are several reports concerning the polymerization of such compounds, but this process is performed at higher temperatures when complex decomposition occurs, resulting in either nano-oxide or nanometal particles [104,105]. It may be considered that a polymerization method in mild conditions should perhaps be developed for such species in order to preserve the core of the coordination compound. Compounds with good biological activity can also be tested for the inhibition of microbial biofilms or resistant tumors, aspects that have been poorly investigated. In addition, according to our knowledge, the preclinical tests for such compounds have not been reported so far.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.V.S., M.B. and R.O.; writing—original draft preparation, G.V.S., M.B. and R.O.; writing—review and editing, G.V.S., M.B. and R.O.; supervision, R.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks to Cătălin Maxim for the help with all cif files acquired from Cambridge Structural Database and single-crystal X-ray structures drawing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABAantibacterial activity
AFAantifungal activity
aobb1,3-bis(1-allylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxopropane
apyaminopyridine
ATCCAmerican Type Culture Collection
bbabis(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amine
bebt1,3-bis(1-ethylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-thiapropane
bipybipyridine
bobb1,3-bis(1-benzylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxapropane
Bun-butyl
DMFN,N-dimethylformamide
dmpz3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole
DMSOdimethylsulfoxide
enethylenediamine
Etethyl
EtImethylimidazole
Etobb1,3-bis(1-ethylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxapropane
H2coucoumaric acid
H2ferferulic acid
H2fumfumaric acid
H2malmaleic acid
Hacracrylic acid
HBzImbenzimidazole
Hcincinnamic acid
HClcinchlorocinnamic acid
Hcpma3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylacrylic acid
Hcrotcrotonic acid
Hhmpp3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylpropenoic acid
HImimidazole
Hicemac2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylic acid
Hmacrmethacrylic acid
Hmcinmethylcinnamic acid
HMeOcinmethoxy cinnamic acid
Hncinpara-nitro cinnamic acid
Holeoleic acid
Hpaa2-phenyl-3-thiophen-2-yl-acrylic acid
Hpz1H-pyrazole
hqnhydroxyquinoline
Htaa3-thiophen-2-yl-acrylic acid
Hvalvalproic acid
iqnisoquinoline
IZDinhibition zone diameter
MBECminimum biofilm eradication concentration
Memethyl
Me2BzImdimethylbenzimidazole
MeBzImmethylbenzimidazole
MeHpzmethyl-1H-pyrazole
MeImmethylimidazole
MICminimum inhibitory concentration
mlmmelamine
PAApolyacrylates
PGIpercentage growth inhibition
Phphenyl
phenphenantroline
PMAApolymethacrylic acid
PMMApoly(methyl)methacrylates
PPFpoly(propylene)fumarate
pypyridine
qnquinoline
ROSreactive oxygen species
tbimatris(2-benzimidazylmethyl)amine
teatriethanolamine
tmedaN,N,N’,N’-tetramethylenediamine

References

  1. Serrano-Aroca, A.; Deb, S. (Eds.) Acrylic-Based Materials for Biomedical and Bioengineering Applications; Acrylate Polymers for Advanced Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuan, Z.; Han, H.; Li, T.; Li, L.; Guo, X. Chitosan cross-linked poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels: Drug release control and mechanism. Colloids Surf. B 2017, 152, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dunne, N.; Tzagiollari, A.; Sahebalzamani, M.; Dunne, T.J. Acrylic cements for bone fixation in joint replacement. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Joint Replacement Technology, 3rd ed.; Revell, P., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 213–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Corsaro, C.; Neri, G.; Santoro, A.; Fazio, E. Acrylate and Methacrylate Polymers’ Applications: Second Life with Inexpensive and Sustainable Recycling Approaches. Materials 2022, 15, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Abou Neel, E.A.; Young, A.M. Antibacterial adhesives for bone and tooth repair. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Joining and Assembly of Medical Materials and Devices; Zhou, Y., Breyen, M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2013; pp. 491–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cai, Z.; Wan, Y.; Becker, M.; Long, Y.-Z.; Dean, D. Poly(propylene fumarate)-based materials: Synthesis, functionalization, properties, device fabrication and biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2019, 208, 45–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Russo, T.; De Santis, R.; Gloria, A.; Barbaro, K.; Altigeri, A.; Fadeeva, I.V.; Rau, J.V. Modification of PMMA Cements for Cranioplasty with Bioactive Glass and Copper Doped Tricalcium Phosphate Particles. Polymers 2020, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Saboktakin, M.R.; Tabatabaie, R.; Maharramov, A.; Ramazanov, M.A. Synthesis and rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/polymethacrylic acid nanocomposites as denture resins. Compos. B Eng. 2011, 42, 851–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Corsaro, C.; Neri, G.; Mezzasalma, A.M.; Fazio, E. Weibull Modeling of Controlled Drug Release from Ag-PMA Nanosystems. Polymers 2021, 13, 2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Da Silva Barboza, A.; Fang, L.; Ribeiro, J.; Cuevas-Suarez, C.; Moraes, R.; Lund, R. Physicomechanical, optical, and antifungal properties of polymethyl methacrylate modified with metal methacrylate monomers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 125, 706.e1–706.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, L.; Tang, C. Metal-containing and related polymers for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5232–5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dzhardimalieva, G.I.; Rabinskiy, L.N.; Kydralieva, K.A.; Uflyand, I.E. Recent advances in metallopolymer-based drug delivery systems. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 37009–37051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Basak, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Tethering smartness to the metal containing polymers—Recent trends in the stimuli-responsive metal containing polymers. J. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 956, 122129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bäumer, N.; Matern, J.; Fernández, G. Recent progress and future challenges in the supramolecular polymerization of metal-containing monomers. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 12248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Metwally, A.M.; Mohamed, H.I.; ElKhawaga, H.A.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Reda, L.M. Novel bioactive copper and nickel polymeric complexes: Synthesis, characterization, antimicrobial activity, and DFT calculations. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 141, e55037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pomogailo, A.; Rozenberg, A.; Dzhardimalieva, G. Polymer nanocomposites on the base of metal carboxylates. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2001, 1, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tabasi, H.; Babaei, M.; Abnous, K.; Taghdisi, S.M.; Saljooghi, M.; Ramezani, A.S.; Alibolandi, M. Metal–polymer-coordinated complexes as potential nanovehicles for drug delivery. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2021, 11, 501–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schrader, S.M.; Botella, H.; Vaubourgeix, J. Reframing antimicrobial resistance as a continuous spectrum of manifestations. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023, 72, 102259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rogers, P.D.; Lee, R.E. Editorial overview: Recent advances in antimicrobial drug discovery and resistance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023, 71, 102242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ye, J.; Chen, X. Current Promising Strategies against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Infections. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wahab, S.; Salman, A.; Khan, Z.; Khan, S.; Krishnaraj, C.; Yun, S.-I. Metallic Nanoparticles: A Promising Arsenal against Antimicrobial Resistance—Unraveling Mechanisms and Enhancing Medication Efficacy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barbu, I.C.; Gheorghe-Barbu, I.; Grigore, G.A.; Vrancianu, C.O.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Antimicrobial Resistance in Romania: Updates on Gram-Negative ESCAPE Pathogens in the Clinical, Veterinary, and Aquatic Sectors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rees, T.W.; Ho, P.-Y.; Hess, J. Recent Advances in Metal Complexes for Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy. ChemBioChem 2023, 24, e202200796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tasnim, N.T.; Ferdous, N.; Rumon, M.M.H.; Shakil, M.S. The Promise of Metal-Doped Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agent. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Olar, R.; Badea, M.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Metal Complexes—A Promising Approach to Target Biofilm Associated Infections. Molecules 2022, 27, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mishra, S.; Gupta, A.; Upadhye, V.; Singh, S.C.; Sinha, R.P.; Häder, D.-P. Therapeutic Strategies against Biofilm Infections. Life 2023, 13, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Diban, F.; Di Lodovico, S.; Di Fermo, P.; D’Ercole, S.; D’Arcangelo, S.; Di Giulio, M.; Cellini, L. Biofilms in Chronic Wound Infections: Innovative Antimicrobial Approaches Using the In Vitro Lubbock Chronic Wound Biofilm Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, X.; Yao, H.; Zhao, X.; Ge, C. Biofilm Formation and Control of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Molecules 2023, 28, 2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Juszczuk-Kubiak, E. Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based on Quorum Sensing (QS) Signal-Response System and Innovative Non-Antibiotic Strategies for Their Elimination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zafer, M.; Mohamed, G.; Ibrahim, S.; Ghosh, S.; Bornman, C.; Elfaky, M. Biofilm-mediated infections by multidrug-resistant microbes: A comprehensive exploration and forward perspectives. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vlaicu, I.D.; Olar, R.; Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Silvestro, L.; Maurer, M.; Stănică, N.; Badea, M. Thermal, spectral and biological investigation of new nickel complexes with imidazole derivatives. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 134, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vlaicu, I.D.; Borodi, G.; Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Măruțescu, L.; Popa, M.; Stefan, M.; Mercioniu, I.F.; Maurer, M.; Daniliuc, C.; et al. X-ray, crystal structure, geometric isomerism, and antimicrobial activity of new copper (II) carboxylate complexes with imidazole derivatives. Molecules 2018, 23, 3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vlaicu, I.D.; Olar, R.; Maxim, C.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Bleotu, C.; Stănică, N.; Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Dulea, C.; Avram, S.; Badea, M. Evaluating the biological potential of some new cobalt (II) complexes with acrylate and benzimidazole derivatives. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Badea, M.; Vlaicu, I.D.; Olar, R.; Constand, M.; Bleotu, C.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Măruțescu, L.; Lazăr, V.; Grecu, M.N.; Marinescu, D. Thermal behaviour and characterisation of new biologically active Cu(II) complexes with benzimidazole as main ligand. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 118, 1119–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Olar, R.; Vlaicu, I.D.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Bleotu, C.; Stănică, N.; Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Silvestro, L.; Dulea, C.; Badea, M. Thermal behaviour of new nickel (II) complexes with unsaturated carboxylates and heterocyclic N-donor ligands. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vlaicu, I.D.; Constand, M.; Olar, R.; Marinescu, D.; Grecu, M.N.; Lazăr, V.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Badea, M. Thermal stability of new biologic active copper (II) complexes with 5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2013, 113, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Badea, M.; Olar, R.; Marinescu, D.; Lazar, V.; Chifiriuc, C.; Vasile, G. Thermal behaviour of new biological active cadmium mixed ligand complexes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 97, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Bleotu, C.; Karmezan, C.; Măruțescu, L.; Daniliuc, C.; Maxim, C.; Calu, L.; Olar, R.; Badea, M. Synthesis, structural characterization, antimicrobial activity, and in vitro biocompatibility of new unsaturated carboxylate complexes with 2,2’-bipyridine. Molecules 2018, 23, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Olar, R.; Daniliuc, C.G.; Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Cerc Korošec, R.; Čelan Korošin, N.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Badea, M. Structural and antimicrobial characterization of co-crystal [Ni(bpy)(acr)2(H2O)]∙MA. Crystals 2022, 12, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vlaicu, I.D.; Olar, R.; Marinescu, D.; Lazăr, V.; Badea, M. Physico-chemical and thermal characterization of new Co(II) complexes with pyrazole derivatives. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2013, 113, 1337–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Soleymani Eil Bakhtiari, S.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Karbasi, S.; Tavakoli, M.; Razzaghi, M.; Ismail, A.F.; Rama Krishna, S.; Berto, F. Polymethyl Methacrylate-Based Bone Cements Containing Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Oxide: An Overview of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vasile, G.; Olar, R.; Marinescu, D.; Kriza, A.; Măruțescu, L.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Lazăr, V.; Badea, M. Thermal study of new biologic active complexes with mixed ligands. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2013, 111, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fudulu, A.; Olar, R.; Maxim, C.; Scăețeanu Vasile, G.; Bleotu, C.; Matei, L.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Badea, M. New cobalt (II) complexes with imidazole derivatives: Antimicrobial efficiency against planktonic and adherent microbes and in vitro cytotoxicity features. Molecules 2021, 26, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tariq, M.; Ali, S.; Shah, N.A.; Muhammad, N.; Tahir, M.N.; Khalid, N. Catalytic, biological and DNA interaction studies of 3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-methylmethacrylate organotin (IV) carboxylates derivatives: Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization and X-ray structures. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2013, 405, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ruwizhi, N.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Cinnmic Acid Derivatives and Their Biological Efficacy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Drakontaeidi, A.; Pontiki, E. Multi-Target-Directed Cinnamic Acid Hybrids Targeting Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Batool, S.S.; Gilani, S.R.; Zainab, S.S.; Tahir, M.N.; Harrison, W.; Haider, M.S.; Syed, Q.; Mazhar, S.; Shoaib, M. Synthesis, crystal structure, thermal studies and antimicrobial activity of a mononuclear Cu(II)-cinnamate complex with N,N,N’, N’-tetramethylenediamine as co-ligand. Polyhedron 2020, 178, 114346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kondratenko, Y.; Zolotarev, A.A.; Ignatyev, I.; Ugolkov, V.; Kochina, T. Synthesis, crystal structure and properties of copper (II) complexes with triethanolamine and carboxylic acids (succinic, salicylic, cinnamic). Trans. Met. Chem. 2020, 45, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Begum, R.; Rehman, M.; Shahid, K.; Haider, A.; Iqbal, M.; Tahir, M.N.; Ali, S. Synthesis, structural elucidation, DNA-binding and biological activity of nickel (II) mixed ligand carboxylate complexes. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1242, 130801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lou, Z.; Wang, H.; Rao, S.; Sun, J.; Ma, C.; Li, J. p-Coumaric acid kills bacteria through dual damage mechanisms. Food Control 2012, 25, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Zhao, N.; Xu, R.; Li, G.; Dong, H.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.; Fan, M.; Wei, X. Deciphering the antibacterial activity and mechanism of p-coumaric acid against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris and its application in apple juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 378, 109822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lobiuc, A.; Pavăl, N.-E.; Mangalagiu, I.I.; Gheorghiță, R.; Teliban, G.-C.; Amăriucăi-Mantu, D.; Stoleru, V. Future Antimicrobials: Natural and Functionalized Phenolics. Molecules 2023, 28, 1114. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kalinowska, M.; Mazur, L.; Piekut, J.; Rzączyńska, Z.; Laderiere, B.; Lewandowski, W. Synthesis, crystal structure, spectroscopic properties, and antimicrobial studies of a zinc (II) complex of p-coumaric acid. J. Coord. Chem. 2013, 66, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kalinowska, M.; Piekut, J.; Bruss, A.; Follet, C.; Sienkiewicz-Gromiuk, J.; Swislocka, R.; Rzaczynska, Z.; Lewandowski, W. Spectroscopic (FT-IR, FT_raman, 1H, 13C NMR, UV/VIS), thermogravimetric and antimicrobial studies of Ca(II), Mn(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II) complexes of ferulic acid. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 122, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Van Kerk, G.J.M.D.; Luijten, J.G.A. Investigations on organo-tin compounds. III. The biocidal properties of organo-tin compounds. J. Appl. Chem. 1954, 4, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Debnath, P.; Debnath, P.; Roy, M.; Sieroń, L.; Maniukiewicz, W.; Aktar, T.; Maiti, D.; Novikov, A.S.; Misra, T.K. Novel Organotin(IV) Complexes of 2-[4-Hydroxy-3-((2-hydroxyethylimino)methyl)phenylazo]benzoic Acid: Synthesis, Structure, Noncovalent Interactions and In Vitro Antibacterial Activity. Crystals 2022, 12, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dhingra, N.; Singh, J.B.; Singh, H.L. Synthesis, spectroscopy, and density functional theory of organotin and organosilicon complexes of bioactive ligands containing nitrogen, sulfur donor atoms as antimicrobial agents: In vitro and in silico studies. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 8821–8831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rehman, S.; Khan, B.A. Organotin (IV) carboxylates of substituted α-cinnamic acid, RnSn(OCOC(R2)=CHR1)4−n: Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization and biological evaluation. Heteroat. Chem. 2015, 26, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Arciszewska, Z.; Gama, S.; Kalinowska, M.; Swiderski, G.; Swisłocka, R.; Gołebiewska, E.; Naumowicz, M.; Worobiczuk, M.; Cudowski, A.; Pietryczuk, A.; et al. Caffeic acid/Eu(III) complexes: Solution equilibrium studies,structure characterization and biological activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, Z.-Y.; Xu, D.-J.; Wu, J.-Y.; Chiang, M. Synthesis and crystal structure of a binuclear maleato copper (II) complex with phenantroline. J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2005, 35, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wiehl, L.; Schreurer, J.; Haussühl, E. Crystal structure of triaqua-1,10-phenantroline-nickel (II) maleate dihydrate, Ni(H2O)3(C12H8N2)(C4H2O4)∙2H2O. Z. Kristallogr. NCS 2008, 223, 82–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Savchenkov, A.; Grigoriev, M.; Udivankin, P.; Pushkin, D.; Serezhkina, L. Maleate ions as ligands in crystal structures of coordination compounds, including two uranyl complexes. Polyhedron 2017, 127, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ferrer-Luque, C.M.; Arias-Moliz, M.T.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M.P.; Baca, P. Antimicrobial activity of maleic acid and combinations of cetrimide with chelating agents against Enterococcus Faecalis biofilm. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 1673–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Islam, S.; Hossain, B.; Reza, Y. Antimicrobial studies of mixed ligand transition metal complexes of maleic acid and heterocyclic amine bases. J. Med. Sci. 2003, 3, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Devereux, M.; McCann, M.; Leo, V.; Geraghty, M.; McKee, V.; Wikaira, J. Synthesis and fungitoxic activity of manganese (II) complexes of fumaric acid: X-ray crystal structures of [Mn(fum)(bipy)(H2O)] and [Mn(Phen)2(H2O)2](fum)∙4H2O (fumH2=fumaric acid; bipy=2,2’-bipyridine; phen=1,10-phenantroline). Polyhedron 2000, 19, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, Z.Y.; Shen, Q.-H.; Mao, Z.-W.; Tan, C.-P. Rising interest in the development of metal complexes in cancer immunotherapy. Chem. Asian J. 2022, 17, e202200270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rottenberg, S.; Disler, C.; Perego, P. The rediscovery of platinum-based cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Oun, R.; Moussa, Y.E.; Wheate, N.J. The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs: A review for chemists. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 6645–6653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Paprocka, R.; Szadkowska, M.W.; Janciauskiene, S.; Kosmalski, T.; Kulik, M.; Basa, A.H. Latest developments in metal complexes as anticancer agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 452, 214307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Roberts, N.B.; Alqazzaz, A.; Hwang, J.R.; Qi, X.; Keegan, A.D.; Kim, A.J.; Winkles, J.A.; Woodworth, G.F. Oxaliplatin disrupts pathological features of glioma cells and associated macrophages independent of apoptosis induction. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2018, 140, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dilruba, S.; Kalayda, G.V. Platinum-based drugs: Past, present and future. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2016, 77, 1103–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Temesgen, A.; Murthy, H.C.A.; Enyew, A.Z.; Revathi, R.; Perumal, R.V. Emerging Trends in Metal-based Anticancer Agents: Drug Design to Clinical Trials and their Mechanism of Action. Chem. Sel. 2023, 8, e202302113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zajac, J.; Novohradsky, V.; Markova, L.; Brabec, V.; Kasparkova, J. Platinum (IV) derivatives with cinnamate axial ligands as potent agents against both differentiated and tumorigenic cancer stem rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3329–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ravera, M.; Gabano, E.; McGlinchey, M.J.; Osella, D. A view on multi-action Pt(IV) antitumor prodrugs. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2019, 492, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aher, S.; Zhu, J.; Bhagat, P.; Borse, L.; Liu, X. Pt(IV) Complexes in the Search for Novel Platinum Prodrugs with Promising Activity. Top. Curr. Chem. 2024, 382, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Štarha, P.; Křikavová, R. Platinum(IV) and platinum(II) anticancer complexes with biologically active releasable ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 501, 215578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gibson, D. Multi-action Pt(IV) anticancer agents; do we understand how they work? J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 191, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gibson, D. Platinum(IV) anticancer agents; are we en route to the holy grail or to a dead end? J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 217, 111353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kostrhunova, H.; Zajac, J.; Markova, L.; Brabec, V.; Kasparkova, J. A multi-action PtIV conjugate with oleate and cinnamate ligands targets human epithelial growth factor receptor HER2 in aggressive breast cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 21157–21162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Y.; Shi, S.; Zhang, S.; Gan, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, X.; Li, W. ctc-[Pt(NH3)2(cinnamate)(valproate)Cl2] is a highly potent and low-toxic triple action anticancer prodrug. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 11180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tan, M.-X.; Wang, Z.-F.; Qin, Q.-P.; Zou, B.-Q.; Liang, H. Oxoplatin complexes with rhein and ferulic acid ligands as platinum (IV) prodrugs with high anti-tumor activity. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 1613–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pellerito, C.; Emanuele, S.; Ferrante, F.; Celesia, A.; Giuliano, M.; Fiore, T. Tributyltin(IV) ferulate, a novel synthetic ferulic acid derivative, induces autophagic cell death in colon cancer cells: From chemical synthesis to biochemical effects. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 205, 110999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Puszyńska-Tuszkanow, M.; Zierkiewicz, W.; Grabowski, T.; Daszkiewicz, M.; Maciejewska, G.; Adach, A.; Kucharska-Ziembicka, K.; Wietrzyk, J.; Filip-Psurska, B.; Cieślak-Golonka, M. Magnesium cinnamate complex, [Mg(cinn)2(H2O)2]n; structural, spectroscopic, thermal, biological and pharmacokinetical characteristics. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1134, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aragón-Muriel, A.; Camprubí-Robles, M.; González-Rey, E.; Salinas-Castillo, A.; Rodríguez-Diéguez, A.; Gómez-Ruiz, S.; Polo-Cerón, D. Dual investigation of lanthanide complexes with cinnamate and phenylacetate ligands: Study of the cytotoxic properties and the catalytic oxidation of styrene. Polyhedron 2014, 80, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sarwar, S.; Iftikhar, T.; Rauf, M.K.; Badshah, A.; Waseem, D.; Tahir, M.N.; Khan, K.M.; Khan, G.M. Synthesis of heteroleptic pentavalent antimonials bearing heterocyclic cinnamate moieties and their biological studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2018, 476, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gogoi, A.; Das, A.; Frontera, A.; Verma, A.; Bhattacharyya, M. Energetically significant unconventional π−π contacts involving fumarate in a novel coordination polymer of Zn(II): In-vitro anticancer evaluation and theoretical studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2019, 493, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hou, H.; Tang, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, D.; Xiao, H.; Li, B. NIR light triggered intracellular polymerization via nanoparticles containing acrylates prodrugs and azo-polymers for inhibiting cisplatin efflux for combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Nano Today 2023, 50, 101858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shahlaei, M.; Asl, S.M.; Derakhshani, A.; Kurek, L.; Karges, J.; Macgregor, R.; Saeidifar, M.; Kostova, I.; Saboury, A.A. Platinum-based drugs in cancer treatment: Expanding horizons and overcoming resistance. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1301, 137366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Patil, V.M.; Gupta, S.P.; Masand, N.; Balasubramanian, K. Experimental and computational models to understand protein-ligand, metal-ligand and metal-DNA interactions pertinent to targeted cancer and other therapies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Rep. 2024, 10, 100133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhou, Z.; Shi, P.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y.; Gao, C. Recent updates in nanoscale delivery systems of platinum(IV) antitumor prodrugs. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 508, 215774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Maciel-Flores, C.E.; Lozano-Alvarez, J.A.; Bivián-Castro, E.Y. Recently Reported Biological Activities and Action Targets of Pt(II)- and Cu(II)-Based Complexes. Molecules 2024, 29, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. De, S.; Nag, S. Homo and heterometallic ruthenium and platinum complexes with multiple targets for therapeutic applications: A review. Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 44, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Casini, A.; Pöthig, A. Metals in Cancer Research: Beyond Platinum Metallodrugs. ACS Cent. Sci. 2024, 10, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Abdolmaleki, S.; Aliabadi, A.; Khaksar, S. Riding the metal wave: A review of the latest developments in metal-based anticancer agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 501, 215579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kumar, S.; Kumari, S.; Karan, R.; Kumar, A.; Rawal, R.K.; Gupta, P.K. Anticancer perspectives of vanadium complexes. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 161, 112014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wu, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Pan, G.; Shi, F.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Kong, J. V-shaper ligand bis(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amine containing three copper (II) ternary complexes: Synthesis, structure, DNA-binding properties and antioxidant activity. N. J. Chem. 2014, 38, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sindhu, R.K.; Kaur, P.; Kaur, P.; Singh, H.; El-Saber Batiha, G.; Verma, I. Exploring multifunctional antioxidants as potential agents for management of neurological disorders. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 24458–24477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wu, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Aderinto, S.O.; Fan, X. Mono-, bi- and multinuclear silver complexes constructed from bis(benzimidazole)-2-oxapropane ligands and methacrylate: Synthesis, crystal structures, DNA-binding properties and antioxidant activities. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 83697–83708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, H.; Wang, F.; Shi, F.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Peng, H. Three- and four-coordinate Ag(I) complexes of crotonate and bis(benzimidazole)-2-oxapropane ligands: Syntheses, crystal structures, DNA-binding studies and antioxidant activities. Trans. Met. Chem. 2015, 40, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, H.; Yang, Z.; Chen, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Peng, H.; Wang, F. Synthesis, crystal structures, antioxidant activities and DNA-binding studies of two silver (I) complexes with 1,3-bis(1-ethylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-thiapropane and α,β-unsaturated carboxylates. J. Coord. Chem. 2016, 69, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mao, S.; Shen, K.; Shi, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, H. Two silver (I) complexes with bis(benzimidazole)-2-oxopropane ligands: Syntheses, crystal structures and DNA binding studies. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 31, e3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tang, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, C.; Wu, H. Synthesis, structure, antioxidation and DNA-binding studies of a zinc (II) complex with and cinnamate. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2015, 41, 4349–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hafeez, S.T.; Ali, S.; Tahir, M.N.; Iqbal, M.; Munawar, K.S. One-pot synthesis, structural elucidation, DNA binding and alkaline phosphatase inhibition studies on zinc (II) complexes with 4-nitrocinnamic acid and ethylene diamine. J. Coord. Chem. 2014, 67, 2479–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Semenov, S.A.; Drobot, D.V.; Musatova, V.Y.; Pronin, A.S.; Pomogailo, A.D.; Dzhardimalieva, G.I.; Popenko, V.I. Synthesis and thermal conversions of unsaturated cobalt(II) dicarboxylates as precursors of metallopolymer nanocomposites. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 60, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shershnev, V.A.; Dzhardimalieva, G.I.; Kiryukhin, D.P.; Zhorin, V.A.; Pomogailo, A.D. Synthesis and reactivity of metal-containing monomers 72. Monomeric and polymeric metal acetylenecarboxylates and their nanocomposite products: Synthesis, structures, and properties. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2013, 62, 1649–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Unsaturated carboxylic acids used for obtaining monomeric coordinative compounds with biological activity.
Figure 1. Unsaturated carboxylic acids used for obtaining monomeric coordinative compounds with biological activity.
Molecules 29 02321 g001
Figure 4. Molecular structures of {[Zn2(μ-fum)2(Hdmpz)4]∙3H2O}n (77) [86].
Figure 4. Molecular structures of {[Zn2(μ-fum)2(Hdmpz)4]∙3H2O}n (77) [86].
Molecules 29 02321 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vasile Scaeteanu, G.; Badea, M.; Olar, R. Coordinative Compounds Based on Unsaturated Carboxylate with Versatile Biological Applications. Molecules 2024, 29, 2321. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102321

AMA Style

Vasile Scaeteanu G, Badea M, Olar R. Coordinative Compounds Based on Unsaturated Carboxylate with Versatile Biological Applications. Molecules. 2024; 29(10):2321. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vasile Scaeteanu, Gina, Mihaela Badea, and Rodica Olar. 2024. "Coordinative Compounds Based on Unsaturated Carboxylate with Versatile Biological Applications" Molecules 29, no. 10: 2321. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102321

APA Style

Vasile Scaeteanu, G., Badea, M., & Olar, R. (2024). Coordinative Compounds Based on Unsaturated Carboxylate with Versatile Biological Applications. Molecules, 29(10), 2321. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102321

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop