Next Article in Journal
Changes in Metabolism and Content of Chlorophyll in Common Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) Caused by Environmental Contamination with Fluorides
Previous Article in Journal
Decabromodifenyl Ether (BDE-209) in Surface Soils from Warsaw and Surrounding Areas: Characterization of Non-Carcinogenic Risk Associated with Oral and Dermal Exposure
Previous Article in Special Issue
State-to-State Quantum Dynamics Study of Intramolecular Isotope Effects on Be(1S) + HD (v0 = 2, j0 = 0) → BeH/BeD + H/D Reaction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Cholinergic Selectivity of FDA-Approved and Metabolite Compounds Examined with Molecular-Docking-Based Virtual Screening

Molecules 2024, 29(10), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102333
by Michael D. Gambardella 1,*, Yigui Wang 1,2,* and Jiongdong Pang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Molecules 2024, 29(10), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102333
Submission received: 20 April 2024 / Revised: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 16 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Dynamics Study on Chemical Reactions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article titled " Cholinergic Selectivity of FDA-approved and Metabolite Compounds Examined with Molecular Docking-based Virtual Screening" performed docking-based virtual screening for searching selective modulators targeting AChE and BChE. The work could be acceptable for this journal after major revision. The following are the questions in this manuscript:

Comment 1: The necessary binding models between FDA-approved modulators and AChE/BChE need to be thoroughly discussed, particularly focusing on the crucial interactions of ligands and receptors.

Comment 2: Please provide the experimental data of those FDA compounds targeting AChE and BChE in order to facilitate a better comparison of affinity and selectivity through virtual screening.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Authors presented important theoretical research on acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors, results are valuable for design drugs for application as Alzheimer’s Disease medications. Selectivity issues are discussed, difference between AChE and BChE active sites are established, the best ligands were revealed. The manuscript can be published after minor revision. Some comments:

1)      Line 122 - serine contains hydroxymethyl group (not ethyl hydroxyl groups

2)      Table 1. It would be better to put only the title above the table, and below the table: ΔEA  - the difference in energy between AChE and BChE, etc

3)      Lines 150-151 – “residue” is more correct than “group” for indole and imidazole.

4)      References to some figures and tables are absent in the Chapter 3.

5)      Line 336. “Due to purine nature” is better than “adenosine-related structure” about caffein.

6)      Line 347 – uncompetitive

7)      Please format references properly (Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D. Title of the article. Abbreviated Journal Name YearVolume, page range).

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The revised manuscript resolved my concerns about binding models between FDA-approved modulators and AChE/BChE, and the authors also deeply disscussed the interactions of ligands and recepters. I suggest this manuscript can be accepted.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Back to TopTop