Next Article in Journal
Entanglements of Macromolecules and Their Influence on Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Water Hyacinth Leaves Are an Efficient, Green, and Cost-Effective Biosorbent for the Removal of Metanil Yellow from Aqueous Solution: Kinetics, Isotherm, and Thermodynamic Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterization of a Novel Prophage Lysin against Streptococcus dysgalactiae

1
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
2
College of Agriculture and Forestry, Linyi University, Linyi 276005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(14), 3411; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143411 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 June 2024 / Revised: 13 July 2024 / Accepted: 18 July 2024 / Published: 20 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Enzymes and Enzyme Inhibitors in Drug Research)

Abstract

:
Streptococcus dysgalactiae infection can cause bovine mastitis and lead to huge economic losses for the dairy industry. The abuse of antibiotics has resulted in growing drug resistance of S. dysgalactiae, which causes hard-to-treat infections. Bacteriophage lysin, as a novel antibacterial agent, has great potential for application against drug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. However, few studies have been conducted on the prophage lysin of S. dysgalactiae. In this study, we mined a novel prophage lysin, named Lys1644, from a clinical S. dysgalactiae isolate by genome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Lys1644 was expressed and purified, and the lytic activity, antibacterial spectrum, optimal pH and temperature, lytic activity in milk in vitro, and synergistic bacteriostasis with antibiotics were assessed. The Lys1644 prophage lysin showed high bacteriolysis activity specifically on S. dysgalactiae, which resulted in CFU 100-fold reduction in milk. Moreover, Lys1644 maintained high activity over a wide pH range (pH 5–10) and a wide temperature range (4–42 °C). Synergistic bacteriostatic experiments showed that the combination of low-dose Lys1644 (50 μg/mL) with a subinhibitory concentration of aminoglycoside antibiotics (kanamycin or spectinomycin) can completely inhibit bacterial growth, suggesting that the combination of Lys1644 and antibiotics could be an effective therapeutic strategy against S. dysgalactiae infection.

1. Introduction

Bovine mastitis, mainly caused by microorganisms invading mammary tissue, is one of the most common diseases in the global dairy farming, resulting in huge economic losses for the dairy industry [1]. Streptococcus dysgalactiae is one of the most prevalent pathogens in dairy farming, which can cause streptococcal mastitis, endometritis in dairy cows, and skin injury, as well as meningitis in humans [2,3]. Antimicrobials are widely used to prevent and control bovine mastitis. However, the overuse of antibiotics has led to the development of bacterial resistance [4,5]. In previous studies, clinical strains of S. dysgalactiae have exhibited resistance in many areas to kanamycin, erythromycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and lactamases [6,7,8]. These resistant strains have the potential to spread to humans through the food chain, thereby presenting a notable threat to human health [9]. Consequently, the exploration of novel antimicrobial agents to replace antibiotics holds importance in achieving antibiotics-free farming within the dairy industry and the protection of the development of the livestock industry and human health.
Bacteriophage lysin, a cell wall hydrolase, is expressed during the late stage of bacteriophage infection. Its specificity to host bacteria, potent antibacterial properties, low capacity to produce drug resistance, and potential for synergistic effects with other antibacterial agents position it as a promising novel antibacterial drug [10,11]. Phage lysin can be sourced from virulent phages or prophages. The prophage genome is an excellent source of Streptococcus, for which it is difficult to isolate virulent phages [12]. Previous studies have reported lysins against other streptococci, such as PlyC and PlyPy against Streptococcus pyogenes [13,14], PlyGBS and B30 against Streptococcus agalactiae [15,16], and Pal and Cpl-1 against Streptococcus pneumoniae [17,18]. The lysins PlySK1249 [19], CF-301 [20], λSA2, B30 [21], Ply700 [22], and PlySs2 [23], derived from Streptococcus suis, S. agalactiae, group B Streptococcus, and Streptococcus uberis, as well as the engineered chimeric enzymes ClyR [24] and Ply187N-V12C [25], have been reported to exhibit lytic activity against S. dysgalactiae. These lysins typically demonstrate a broad lytic spectrum within Streptococcus, and also show certain lytic effects on S. agalactiae, S. uberis, and S. pyogenes.
In this study, we mined a novel lysin that specifically lyses S. dysgalactiae, Lys1644, from a prophage genome of S. dysgalactiae and explored its bactericidal activity and its synergistic effect with antibiotics.

2. Results

2.1. The Gene Lys1644 Encoding Lysin Exists in the Prophage pp6 Genome of S. dysgalactiae Lu24

To obtain the genome sequence of the prophage, whole-genome sequencing of S. dysgalactiae Lu24 (NCBI sequence ID: NZ_CP142018.1) was performed. The length of the whole genome of S. dysgalactiae Lu24 was 2,105,488 bp, encoding about 2117 genes (Figure 1A). As shown in Figure 1B, the prophage pp6 was about 46,800 bp in length, located between 1,649,758 bp and 1,696,561 bp of the S. dysgalactiae Lu24 genome. Among the 69 genes of the prophage, a binary lytic system containing lysin encoded by pp6-1644 (named Lys1644; amino acid sequence is shown in Table S3) and holin encoded by pp6-1645 was identified.

2.2. The Lysin Lys1644 Containing Two Lytic Domains Was Successfully Expressed and Purified

The domain prediction conducted using the Interpro sever (Figure 2A) revealed that Lys1644 contained a glucosaminidase domain (1–145 aa), a cysteine histidine-dependent amidohydrolase/peptidase (CHAP) domain (163–296 aa), and a SH3-5 domain (322–390 aa). Among them, glucosaminidase could cleave the 1,4-glycoside bond between N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid, while CHAP could cleave the amide bond between glycans and peptides. The SH3-5 domain located at the C-terminus exhibited a binding function to the cell wall. The structure prediction by Alphafold2 (Figure 2B) showed that the three domains (glucosaminidase: red, CHAP: blue; SH3-5: purple) exhibited relatively independent spatial units interconnected by linkers (green). Although the linker regions displayed relatively low prediction confidence, the three domains showed very high prediction confidence (>90). Further, the SDS-PAGE analysis (Figure 2C) showed an additional protein band of 45 kD in BL21 DE3 (pEC-Lys1644, Lane 2) compared to BL21 DE3 (pEC, Lane1). Through affinity chromatography, the Lys1644 protein was successfully purified (Lane 3,4). After purification, there was a coarse protein band at 34 kD, which we suspected might have been caused by protein degradation of Lys1644.

2.3. Lys1644 Is a Specific Lysin against S. dysgalactiae

The lytic activity of Lys1644 was assessed using S. dysgalactiae Lu24. As shown in Figure 3A, the Lys1644 exhibited dose-dependent lytic efficacy of Lys1644 against S. dysgalactiae Lu24. When the concentration of Lys1644 reached 50 μg/mL, the cleavage efficacy was already good. When the concentration exceeded 50 μg/mL, there was no discernible variation in lytic activity against S. dysgalactiae. The turbidity of bacteria exhibited a significant decrease following the application of Lys1644 for 1 h (Figure 3B). In addition, the activity spectrum of Lys1644 was determined. The results (Table 1) demonstrated that Lys1644 only exhibited lytic activity against S. dysgalactiae (3/3) while displaying no lytic activity against other Streptococcus species, such as S. uberis, S. agalactiae, S. infantarius, S. suis, S. pneumoniae, and S. pyogenes, nor against other bacteria, such as L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. faecium, and E. coli. It is evident that Lys1644 possesses specific lysis properties targeting only S. dysgalactiae.
Further, the optional pH and temperature of Lys1644 were tested according to the decrease in OD600 of S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 cells treated with Lys1644 at different pHs and temperatures. The enzymatic activity of Lys1644 was found to be minimal at pH 4 and 11, while it exhibited high activity across a broad pH range (pH 5–10), with an optimal pH of 6 (Figure 4A). In addition, the enzyme Lys1644 exhibited the highest activity at 37 °C, while displaying lower activity at temperatures of 4, 25, 42, and 56 °C (Figure 4B).

2.4. Lys1644 Has Fairly Strong Lytic Activity in Milk

Considering the practical application of lysin, the lytic activity of Lys1644 in milk was determined. As shown in Figure 5, the concentration of Lys1644 at 100 μg/mL exhibited a reduction in S. dysgalactiae levels in milk by about an order of magnitude. When the concentration reached 800 μg/mL, Lys1644 exhibited a reduction in S. dysgalactiae in milk by about two orders of magnitude. The lytic activity of 1ys1644 in milk is comparable to that observed in Tris-HCl buffer. This result indicates that Lys1644 has practical value in the treatment of S. dysgalactiae infection.

2.5. Lys1644 Has a Synergistic Effect with Antibiotics

To explore the potential synergistic effect of Lys1644 in combination with antibiotics, we assessed the time-inhibit curves of the S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 strain treated with Lys1644 alone, antibiotics (kanamycin or spectinomycin), or a combination of Lys1644 and antibiotics. As shown in Figure 6A, the growth of bacteria could not be effectively inhibited to a stable stage by treatment with 50 μg/mL of Lys1644 or 16 μg/mL of kanamycin. However, the combination of Lys1644 and kanamycin completely inhibited bacterial growth. In addition, the combination of Lys1644 and spectinomycin also completely inhibited bacterial growth (Figure 6B). These results indicate that the combination of Lys1644 with kanamycin or spectinomycin exhibits a pronounced synergistic antibacterial effect.

3. Discussion

Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a significant challenge in the treatment of bovine mastitis, posing a potential threat to human health through the food chain [26]. Consequently, the development of a new generation of antimicrobials has become an urgent need. Phage lysins, characterized by a low probability of resistance development and a high effect against bacteria, offer a promising alternative to antibiotics [27,28]. Phage lysins are generally obtained by screening and sequencing the phages against specific bacteria. The virulent phages of Streptococcus are difficult to isolate, especially since no lytic phages against S. dysgalactiae have been reported so far [29,30,31]. However, some streptococcal genomes have integrated prophage genomes, which are either complete or incomplete. Some prophage genomes have genes encoding lysin, which is not harmful to bacteria during the lysogenic cycle due to strict regulation. It is an effective way to obtain the streptococcus lysin. The heterologous expression of lysin could verify its lytic activity against bacteria.
In this study, we obtained a lysin named Lys1644 from the prophage genome of a S. dysgalactiae clinical isolate. Notably, Lys1644 differs from previously reported streptococcal lysins such as PlyC, PlyPy, PlyGBS, B30, Pal, Clp-1 [13,14,15,16,17,18]. It possesses a specific and efficient lytic capability, showing stability within a certain pH and temperature range (Figure 3 and Figure 4; Table 1). Lys1644 can only kill S. dysgalactiae specifically, which ensures that it does not kill other bacteria, especially beneficial bacteria. This is where it has an advantage over antibiotics. Phage lysin could be applied for the prevention and control of mastitis in dairy cows through intra-milk infusion therapy and nipple dip disinfection in milking in dairy farms [12], so it is necessary to consider the activity of Lys1644 in milk. The activity of Lys1644 in milk is comparable to that in Tris-HCl (Figure 5), which indicates that it is a potential antibacterial agent in practical application.
A high dose of Lys1644 could result in a 2log10 CFUs/mL reduction in S. dysgalactiae, but was not suitable for practical use, so we explored the effect of a combination of low doses of Lys1644 with antibiotics. Antibiotics at concentrations below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or low doses of lysin alone were insufficient to completely inhibit the growth of bacteria. However, the combination of these agents demonstrated a significant synergistic effect (Figure 6). The antibiotics utilized in this study, kanamycin and spectinomycin, are both aminoglycoside antibiotics that can penetrate the bacterial cell and bind the 30S subunit of the ribosome to inhibit protein synthesis [32], whereas Lys1644 targets the peptidoglycan in the cell wall. A low dose of Lys1644 may not completely disrupt the peptidoglycan layer to cause bacterial death, but it can partially break the chemical bonds within peptidoglycan. This partial disruption leads to a more permeable structure, which in turn enhances the penetration of antibiotics. The use of a phage, its derived lysin, or depolymerase in conjunction with other antibacterial agents has demonstrated a synergistic effect, although the precise mechanism remains unclear [33,34]. While our hypothesis appears plausible, further investigation will be required in order to explore the specific synergy mechanism.
In this research, we introduce a newly discovered prophage lysin, Lys1644, that demonstrates potent bactericidal properties against S. dysgalactiae. Lys1644 has specific activity against S. dysgalactiae, high lytic activity in milk, and synergistic antibacterial effects with aminoglycoside antibiotics, which indicates that it might represent a potential therapeutic for the treatment of infections caused by S. dysgalactiae.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacteria and Plasmids

All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S1. Streptococcus strains were cultured in brain heart infusion medium (BHI, Qingdao Haibo, Qingdao, China) at 37 °C. Escherichia coli was cultured in Luria–Bertani broth medium (LB, Qingdao Haibo, Qingdao, China) at 37 °C.

4.2. Genome Sequencing and Prophage Analysis

The genomic DNA of S. dysgalactiae Lu24 was extracted and purified using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The quantity and quality of the DNA was measured using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer 2000 (Equl-Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The DNA samples were sent to Personalbio (Shanghai, China) and subjected to mechanical fragmentation for the construction of a whole-genome shotgun library. The library was subjected to sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform to generate paired-end (2 × 250 bp) reads through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the PacBio platform using third-generation single-molecule sequencing technology. Prophages in the genome were predicted by PhiSpy [35].

4.3. Structural Analysis of Lys1644

The gene pp6_1644, which was predicted to encode the lysin of the prophage pp6, was Lys1644. The amino acid sequence of Lys1644 was subjected to analysis using the Interpro server [36] and the AlphaFold2 server [37] to predict both the structure domain and the three-dimensional conformation.

4.4. Cloning of Lys1644

The gene lys1644 was amplified by PCR using the following primers: AGGAGATATACCATGGGATCCATGACCTTTTTAGATAACAT (forward) and AAAATACAGGTTTTCGGTACCATTTAATTTACCCCAAAGAC (reverse). The gene lys1644 was cloned into the expression plasmid pEC (carried a C-terminal 8×His tag) to construct the recombinant plasmid pEC-lys1644 using a One-Step Cloning Kit (cat. number: C112-01, Vazyme, Nanjing, China). More information about pEC plasmids can be found in Figure S1 and Table S2. The pEC-lys1644 vector was transformed into E. coli DH5α cells through transformation (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).

4.5. Recombinant Expression and Purification of Lys1644 Protein

The plasmid pEC-lys1644 was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells and cultured in LB medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C. When the OD600 reached a range of 0.4 to 0.6, induction was initiated by adding 0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG), followed by cultivation at 25 °C for 16 h. Subsequently, the cells were collected, washed, subjected to ultrasonic disruption, and then purified using Ni-IDA affinity chromatography on a column (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Finally, the purified protein Lys1644 was analyzed via separation using sodium 12% dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to check the purification efficiency and determine its molecular weight.

4.6. Lytic Activity of Lys1644

To test the lytic activity of Lys1644, S. dysgalactiae cells were adjusted to 0.6 of OD600 and subsequently treated with different final concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75, 100 μg/mL) of Lys1644 at 37 °C. The OD600 was measured at 10-minute intervals for 1 h. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

4.7. Antibacterial Spectrum of Lysin Lys1644

The different bacterial species (Table 1) were cultured until reaching the mid-log phase and adjusted to an OD600 of 0.6 using a 50 mM Tris-HCl solution. The bacteria were each mixed with lysin Lys1644 (final concentration: 50 μg/mL) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, the mixture was subsequently subjected to spectrophotometer analysis using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer, TU-1810PC (PERSEE, Beijing, China), to measure the OD600. The decrease ratio of OD600 > 20% indicated the susceptibility of this strain to cleavage by Lys1644. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

4.8. Optimal pH of Lys1644

To test the optimal pH of Lys1644, S. dysgalactiae cells and Lys1644 were both prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer with varying pH values (ranging from 4 to 11). The cell cultures were adjusted to 0.6 of OD600. Subsequently, Lys1644 (final concentration: 50 μg/mL) was added to cells and incubated at 37 °C. After 1 h, the OD600 was measured. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

4.9. Optimal Temperature of Lys1644

To test the optimal temperature of Lys1644, S. dysgalactiae cells and Lys1644 were prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer at various temperatures (4, 25, 37, 42, and 56 °C). The cell cultures were adjusted to 0.6 of OD600. Subsequently, Lys1644 (final concentration: 50 μg/mL) was added to the cells and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After 1 h, the OD600 was measured. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

4.10. Lytic Activity of Lys1644 in Milk

To test the lytic activity of Lys1644 in milk, an equal number of S. dysgalactiae cells were prepared in milk and 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (as control), respectively. Then, different final concentrations (0, 100, 200, 400, 800 μg/mL) of Lys1644 were added and incubated at 37 °C. After 1 h, serial dilutions of the mixture were performed, and subsequent plating on BHI solid medium was carried out. Following overnight incubation at 37 °C, the colonies were counted. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

4.11. Synergistic Bacteriostasis of Lys1644 and Antibiotics

The synergistic antibacterial effect of Lys1644 in combination with kanamycin and spectinomycin was selected for evaluation. Overnight-cultured S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 cells were inoculated into BHI medium at a 1/100 volume ratio and treated with Lys1644 (50 μg/mL), kanamycin (Kan, 1/4 of MIC:16 μg/mL), spectinomycin (Spc, 1/4 of MIC:8 μg/mL), combinations of Lys1644 and Kan, or combinations of Lys1644 and Spc. The A600 was measured every 1 h using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) over a period of 12 h.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29143411/s1, Figure S1: Map of pEC plasmid; Table S1: Bacteria strains and plasmids in this study; Table S2: Base sequence of pEC; Table S3: Sequence of Lys1644.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X., X.L., X.Y. and J.M.; Methodology, L.X., X.L., X.Y. and J.M.; Software, Y.Z. and S.J.; Validation, S.J.; Formal analysis, J.N. and S.J.; Investigation, L.X. and X.L.; Resources, X.Z.; Data curation, X.Z.; Writing—original draft, L.X.; Writing—review & editing, L.X., J.M. and X.Z.; Visualization, J.M.; Supervision, X.Z.; Project administration, X.Z.; Funding acquisition, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province, China (ts20190955); the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2019ZD21); the Project of High-Tech SMES Innovation Improvement of Shandong Province (2022TSGC2524, 2023TSGC0419); and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0103900).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supplementary Materials files (F‘igshare’ https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25965196).

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the laboratory for technical advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no affiliations with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.

References

  1. Ashraf, A.; Imran, M. Causes. types, etiological agents, prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, effects on human health and future aspects of bovine mastitis. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2020, 21, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saintot, C.; André, J.; Hentgen, C.; Jacques, L.; Barrans, A. Meningitis and septic shock caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp equisimilis. Med. Mal. Infect. 2018, 48, 221–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Crippa, B.L.; Rodrigues, M.X.; Tomazi, T.; Yang, Y.; de Oliveira Rocha, L.; Bicalho, R.C.; Silva, N.C.C. Virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance and phylogeny of bovine mastitis-associated Streptococcus dysgalactiae. J. Dairy Res. 2023, 90, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gomes, F.; Henriques, M. Control of Bovine Mastitis: Old and Recent Therapeutic Approaches. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Naranjo-Lucena, A.; Slowey, R. Invited review: Antimicrobial resistance in bovine mastitis pathogens: A review of genetic determinants and prevalence of resistance in European countries. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, S.Y.; Piepers, S.; Shan, R.X.; Cai, L.; Mao, S.; Zou, J.; Ali, T.; De Vliegher, S.; Han, B. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance profiles in Streptococcus dysgalactiae isolated from bovine clinical mastitis in 5 provinces of China. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3344–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Olivares-Pérez, J.; Kholif, A.E.; Rojas-Hernández, S.; Elghandour, M.M.M.Y.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Bastida, A.Z.; Velázquez-Reynoso, D.; Cipriano-Salazar, M.; Camacho-Díaz, L.M.; Alonso-Fresán, M.U.; et al. Prevalence of bovine subclinical mastitis, its etiology and diagnosis of antibiotic resistance of dairy farms in four municipalities of a tropical region of Mexico. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2015, 47, 1497–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vélez, J.R.; Cameron, M.; Rodríguez-Lecompte, J.C.; Xia, F.; Heider, L.C.; Saab, M.; McClure, J.T.; Sánchez, J. Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus dysgalactiae Isolates from Canadian Dairy Herds. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017, 22, 4–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ikebe, T.; Okuno, R.; Sasaki, M.; Kanda, Y.; Otsuka, H.; Kawahara, R.; Ohya, H.; Suzuki, M.; Uchida, K.; Nihonmatsu, H.; et al. Molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis isolated from patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. J. Infect. Chemother. 2018, 24, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murray, E.; Draper, L.A.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. The Advantages and Challenges of Using Endolysins in a Clinical Setting. Viruses 2021, 13, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El-Sayed, A.; Kamel, M. Bovine mastitis prevention and control in the post-antibiotic era. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Linden, S.B.; Alreja, A.B.; Nelson, D.C. Application of bacteriophage-derived endolysins to combat streptococcal disease: Current State and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nelson, D.; Loomis, L.; Fischetti, V.A. Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4107–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lood, R.; Raz, A.; Molina, H.; Euler, C.W.; Fischetti, V.A. A highly active and negatively charged Streptococcus pyogenes lysin with a rare D-alanyl-L-alanine endopeptidase activity protects mice against streptococcal bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3073–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, Q.; Nelson, D.; Zhu, S.; Fischetti, V.A. Removal of group B streptococci colonizing the vagina and oropharynx of mice with a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pritchard, D.G.; Dong, S.; Baker, J.R.; Engler, J.A. The bifunctional peptidoglycan lysin of Streptococcus agalactiae bacteriophage B30. Microbiol. 2004, 150, 2079–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Loeffler, J.M.; Nelson, D.; Fischetti, V.A. Rapid killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with a bacteriophage cell wall hydrolase. Science 2001, 294, 2170–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Loeffler, J.M.; Djurkovic, S.; Fischetti, V.A. Phage lytic enzyme Cpl-1 as a novel antimicrobial for pneumococcal bacteremia. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 6199–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, H.; Linden, S.B.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.P.; Nelson, D.C.; Wei, H.P. A chimeolysin with extended-spectrum streptococcal host range found by an induced lysis-based rapid screening method. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Watson, A.; Oh, J.T.; Sauve, K.; Bradford, P.A.; Cassino, C.; Schuch, R. Antimicrobial Activity of Exebacase (Lysin CF-301) against the Most Common Causes of Infective Endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, Q.H.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Wei, C.H.; Yu, J.P.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.E.; Wei, H.P. Construction of a chimeric lysin Ply187N-V12C with extended lytic activity against staphylococci and streptococci. Microb Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schmelcher, M.; Powell, A.M.; Camp, M.J.; Pohl, C.S.; Donovan, D.M. Synergistic streptococcal phage λSA2 and B30 endolysins kill streptococci in cow milk and in a mouse model of mastitis. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2015, 99, 8475–8486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oechslin, F.; Menzi, C.; Moreillon, P.; Resch, G. The multidomain architecture of a bacteriophage endolysin enables intramolecular synergism and regulation of bacterial lysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Celia, L.K.; Nelson, D.; Kerr, D.E. Characterization of a bacteriophage lysin (Ply700) from Streptococcus uberis. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 130, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, Y.L.; Yang, H.; Yu, J.P.; Wei, H.P. Molecular dissection of phage lysin PlySs2, Integrity of the catalytic and cell wall binding domains is essential for its broad lytic activity. Virol. Sin. 2015, 30, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wong, K.Y.; Megat Mazhar Khair, M.H.; Song, A.A.L.; Masarudin, M.J.; Chong, C.M.; In, L.L.A.; Teo, M.Y.M. Endolysins against Streptococci as an antibiotic alternative. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 935145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tang, F.; Lu, C. Lytic phages and prophages of Streptococcus suis--a review. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 2015, 55, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. McShan, W.M.; McCullor, K.A.; Nguyen, S.V. The Bacteriophages of Streptococcus pyogenes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Forge, A.; Schacht, J. Aminoglycoside antibiotics. Audiol. Neurotol. 2000, 5, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Segall, A.M.; Roach, D.R.; Strathdee, S.A. Stronger together? Perspectives on phage-antibiotic synergy in clinical applications of phage therapy. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 51, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tagliaferri, T.L.; Jansen, M.; Horz, H.P. Fighting Pathogenic Bacteria on Two Fronts: Phages and Antibiotics as Combined Strategy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kim, J.W.; Dutta, V.; Elhanafi, D.; Lee, S.; Osborne, J.A.; Kathariou, S. A Novel Restriction-Modification System Is Responsible for Temperature-Dependent Phage Resistance in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1995–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blum, M.; Chang, H.Y.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Kandasaamy, S.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Qureshi, M.; Raj, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2021, 49, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Adler, J.; Wu, Z.; Green, T.; Zielinski, M.; Žídek, A.; Bridgland, A.; Cowie, A.; Meyer, C.; Laydon, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 2021, 596, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Awandkar, S.P.; Kulkarni, M.B.; Khode, N.V. Bacteria from bovine clinical mastitis showed multiple drug resistance. Vet. Res. Commun. 2022, 46, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abdelrahman, F.; Easwaran, M.; Daramola, O.I.; Ragab, S.; Lynch, S.; Oduselu, T.J.; Khan, F.M.; Ayobami, A.; Adnan, F.; Torrents, E.; et al. Phage-Encoded Endolysins. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, B.; Guo, Q.; Li, Z.; Guo, X.; Liu, X. Bacteriophage Endolysin: A Powerful Weapon to Control Bacterial Biofilms. Protein J. 2023, 42, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Genome sequencing circle of S. dysgalactiae Lu24 (A) and the gene cluster of the prophage pp6 (B). These genes, pp6_l644 and pp6_1645, are predicted to encode lysin and holin, respectively.
Figure 1. Genome sequencing circle of S. dysgalactiae Lu24 (A) and the gene cluster of the prophage pp6 (B). These genes, pp6_l644 and pp6_1645, are predicted to encode lysin and holin, respectively.
Molecules 29 03411 g001
Figure 2. Structure analysis and expression of Lys1644. (A) The structural domain of Lys1644 predicted by Intropro server. (B) The 3D structure of Lys1644 predicted by AlphaFold2. The Glucosaminidase domain is in red, the CHAP domain is in blue, the SH3-5 domain is in purple, and the linker is in green. (C) Expression and purification of Lys1644 visualized by SDS-PAGE. M: protein marker; 1, total proteins of BL21 DE3 (pEC); 2, total proteins of BL21 DE3 (pEC-Lys1644); 3,4, purification of lys1644.
Figure 2. Structure analysis and expression of Lys1644. (A) The structural domain of Lys1644 predicted by Intropro server. (B) The 3D structure of Lys1644 predicted by AlphaFold2. The Glucosaminidase domain is in red, the CHAP domain is in blue, the SH3-5 domain is in purple, and the linker is in green. (C) Expression and purification of Lys1644 visualized by SDS-PAGE. M: protein marker; 1, total proteins of BL21 DE3 (pEC); 2, total proteins of BL21 DE3 (pEC-Lys1644); 3,4, purification of lys1644.
Molecules 29 03411 g002
Figure 3. Lytic activity of Lys1644 against S. dysgalactiae. (A) Lysis curve of Lys1644 under different concentrations (25, 50, 75, 100 μg/mL). (B) Bacterial turbidity after lytic action of Lys1644 at 60 min. Tris-HCl buffer was used as a control.
Figure 3. Lytic activity of Lys1644 against S. dysgalactiae. (A) Lysis curve of Lys1644 under different concentrations (25, 50, 75, 100 μg/mL). (B) Bacterial turbidity after lytic action of Lys1644 at 60 min. Tris-HCl buffer was used as a control.
Molecules 29 03411 g003
Figure 4. Determination of optimal pH (A) and temperature (B) of Lys1644.
Figure 4. Determination of optimal pH (A) and temperature (B) of Lys1644.
Molecules 29 03411 g004
Figure 5. Lytic activity of Lys1644 in milk. Tris-HCl buffer was used as a control. *** p  ≤  0.001, * 0.05 < p < 0.1.
Figure 5. Lytic activity of Lys1644 in milk. Tris-HCl buffer was used as a control. *** p  ≤  0.001, * 0.05 < p < 0.1.
Molecules 29 03411 g005
Figure 6. Synergistic effect of antibiotics and Lys1644. (A) Time-inhibit curves of S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 treated with Lys1644 (50 μg/mL), kanamycin (Kan, 1/4 MIC:16 μg/mL), or a combination of Lys1644 and Kan. (B) Time-inhibit curves of S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 treated with Lys1644 (50 μg/mL), spectinomycin (Spc, 1/4 MIC:8 μg/mL), or combinations of Lys1644 and Spc.
Figure 6. Synergistic effect of antibiotics and Lys1644. (A) Time-inhibit curves of S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 treated with Lys1644 (50 μg/mL), kanamycin (Kan, 1/4 MIC:16 μg/mL), or a combination of Lys1644 and Kan. (B) Time-inhibit curves of S. dysgalactiae GS4-4 treated with Lys1644 (50 μg/mL), spectinomycin (Spc, 1/4 MIC:8 μg/mL), or combinations of Lys1644 and Spc.
Molecules 29 03411 g006
Table 1. Activity spectrum of Lys1644.
Table 1. Activity spectrum of Lys1644.
SpeciesStrainsLytic Effect
S. dysgalactiaeLu24+
SD5-1+
GS4-4+
S. uberisHB19-2
SX5-2
S. agalactiaeH11-1
S. infantariusHB10-1
S. suisTA16
S. pneumoniaeATCC49619
S. pneumoniaeCCUG1407
S. pyogenesATCC12344
L. monocytogenesEGDe
S. aureusSA2
E. faecalisV583
E. faeciumSX4-1
E. coliATCC25922
Note: “+” indicated can be lysed, “−” indicated can not be lysed.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Niu, J.; Jiang, S.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Prophage Lysin against Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Molecules 2024, 29, 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143411

AMA Style

Xu L, Li X, Yang X, Zhao Y, Niu J, Jiang S, Ma J, Zhang X. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Prophage Lysin against Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Molecules. 2024; 29(14):3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Linan, Xingshuai Li, Xiangpeng Yang, Yuzhong Zhao, Jianrui Niu, Shijin Jiang, Junfei Ma, and Xinglin Zhang. 2024. "Identification and Characterization of a Novel Prophage Lysin against Streptococcus dysgalactiae" Molecules 29, no. 14: 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143411

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop