Next Article in Journal
Macrocycle-Based Supramolecular Drug Delivery Systems: A Concise Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Addition of Inorganic Fillers on the Properties of Degradable Polymeric Blends for Bone Tissue Engineering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Aromaticity Effects on Electronic Transport in Cyclo[n]carbon Single-Molecule Junctions

1
Key Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices, School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2
Institute of Spin Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 511442, China
3
Centre for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(16), 3827; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163827
Submission received: 24 June 2024 / Revised: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 7 August 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nanochemistry)

Abstract

:
Cyclo[n]carbon (Cn) is one member of the all-carbon allotrope family with potential applications in next-generation electronic devices. By employing first-principles quantum transport calculations, we have investigated the electronic transport properties of single-molecule junctions of Cn, with n = 14, 16, 18, and 20, connected to two bulk gold electrodes, uncovering notable distinctions arising from the varying aromaticities. For the doubly aromatic C14 and C18 molecules, slightly deformed complexes at the singlet state arise after bonding with one Au atom at each side; in contrast, the reduced energy gaps between the highest occupied and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals due to the orbital reordering observed in the doubly anti-aromatic C16 and C20 molecules lead to heavily deformed asymmetric complexes at the triplet state. Consequently, spin-unpolarized transmission functions are obtained for the Au-C14/18-Au junctions, while spin-polarized transmission appears in the Au-C16/20-Au junctions. Furthermore, the asymmetric in-plane π-type hybrid molecular orbitals of the Au-C16/20-Au junctions contribute to two broad but low transmission peaks far away from the Fermi level (Ef), while the out-of-plane π-type hybrid molecular orbitals dominate two sharp transmission peaks that are adjacent to Ef, thus resulting in much lower transmission coefficients at Ef compared to those of the Au-C14/18-Au junctions. Our findings are helpful for the design and application of future cyclo[n]carbon-based molecular electronic devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

All-carbon allotropes such as graphene [1], fullerenes [2], and carbon nanotubes [3] have attracted great attention for their outstanding physicochemical properties and potential applications in next-generation technologies. Cyclo[n]carbons (Cn) are ring-like structures of all-carbon allotropes composed of two coordinated sp-hybridized carbon atoms. While early experiments have confirmed the existence of cyclo[n]carbons in the gas phase [4,5,6,7], their instability has hindered their real-space characterization until recently, whereby bond-resolved atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of C18 on the NaCl surface [8] revealed its polyynic structure, followed by C10, C12, C14, C16, and then C20 [9,10,11]. Their successful synthesis has spurred extensive theoretical studies into various aspects of Cn, including their geometry [12,13,14,15], aromaticity [16,17,18,19], electronic structure [14,20,21], bonding character [21], electric field effect [14,22], optical properties [14,23], carbon tunneling [24], and surface coupling [20,25]. Applications such as catalysts [26] and spintronic devices [27,28] have also been explored.
Understanding how electrons propagate through Cn is essential for their practical applications in electronic devices. Molecular junctions consisting of a single or a few molecules sandwiched between two electrodes provide a platform for studying the electronic transport properties at the molecular scale. Zhang et al. reported current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of C18 molecular junctions with one-dimensional (1D) carbon chain electrodes, two-dimensional (2D) graphene electrodes, and three-dimensional (3D) bulk silver electrodes; however, they neglected the atomic changes of C18 possibly brought by their contact with the electrodes [29]. Other studies have focused on the I–V characteristics like negative differential resistance [30], or spintronic transport characteristics [27,28,31] like the spin filtering effect and the magnetoresistance of C18 sandwiched between graphene nanoribbons. The electronic transport properties of other Cn remain unexplored, particularly in junctions formed with conventional metal electrodes like gold. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated the variations in the electronic structures of isolated Cn based on their aromaticities [9,16,17,18]; therefore, how the aromaticity affects the electronic propagation is very intriguing.
Herein, we present a systematic study of the electronic transport properties of Cn (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) molecular junctions with gold electrodes using the non-equilibrium Green’s function formalism combined with density functional theory (that is, the NEGF + DFT approach) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Our calculations reveal distinct junction geometries and spin states resulting from different Cn aromaticities, which lead to significantly different electronic transport performances between the doubly aromatic C14/18 and the doubly anti-aromatic C16/20 after connecting to the gold electrodes. Furthermore, we extend our calculations to larger Au-Cn-Au junctions involving more carbon atoms.

2. Results and Discussion

The optimized atomic structures of cyclo[n]carbons (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) at the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d,p) level are displayed in Figure S1. Our calculations indicate that C14 is an intermediate with a tiny bond length alternation (BLA) of 0.047 Å and a large bond angle alternation (BAA) of 25.67°, possessing a C7h symmetry; in contrast, C16, C18, and C20, which are, respectively, of C8h, D9h, and C10h symmetries, exhibit polyynic structures consisting of alternating triple and single bonds with a much larger BLA (0.15 Å, 0.12 Å, and 0.14Å, respectively) and nearly zero or no BAA (0.70°, 0, and 0.14°, respectively). The less symmetric atomic structures of Cn with n = 16, 18, and 20 may result from the symmetry breaking event, a consequence of the second-order Jahn–Teller effect [13]. Our calculations agree well with previous experimental observations [8,9,10,11] and theoretical calculations applying HF (Hartree–Fock) [40], CCSD (coupled-cluster singles and doubles) [21,41], ab initio CASSCF (complete active space self-consistent field) [20], and DFT [12,14,16,17,20,21,26]. Despite sharing a similar ring structure with benzene, these Cn molecules possess two types of orthogonal π MOs. One is the out-of-plane π (πout) MOs (see the upper panel of Figure 1a), and the other is the in-plane π (πin) MOs (see the bottom panel of Figure 1a). These two types of π orbitals are separately occupied by electrons [17]. Consequently, depending on the occupancy of these two types of π MOs, Cn can exhibit double aromaticity, double anti-aromaticity, or conflicting aromaticity [42].
The frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) and their corresponding energies of Cn (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) are presented in Figure S1. Our calculations suggest C14/18 is doubly aromatic, containing 14/18 (4k + 2) πin and πout electrons. In contrast, C16/20 is doubly anti-aromatic, since it has 16/20 (4k) πin and πout electrons. Furthermore, upon closer examination of their FMOs and energies, we observe that for the doubly aromatic C14/18, π orbitals appear as degenerate or nearly degenerate pairs of the same orientation and semblable structures distinguished by rotation. For instance, the HOMO and HOMO−1 orbitals of C18 are degenerate πin orbitals. However, for the doubly anti-aromatic C16/20, obeying this rule will result in the occupancy of the two types of π orbitals by 4k + 2/4k − 2 electrons. Therefore, in order to preserve the double anti-aromaticity, orbital reordering occurs where one of the πout orbitals pairs with one of the πin orbitals as HOMO−1 and HOMO, while the other πout orbital related to the rotation pairs with the left πin orbital as LUMO and LUMO + 1 (see the orbital reordering process in C20, as shown in Figure 1b). This orbital reordering is likely to reduce the HOMO–LUMO gaps of the doubly anti-aromatic molecules. Indeed, the HOMO–LUMO gaps of the doubly anti-aromatic C16/20 are, respectively, calculated to be 5.87 eV and 5.67 eV, which are much smaller compared to those of the doubly aromatic C14/18, which are 7.14 eV and 6.76 eV.
Having illustrated the atomic and electronic structures of the isolated Cn molecules, we now move on to explore the electronic transport characteristics of the Au-Cn-Au molecular junctions. We construct the junctions by attaching the Cn molecules to the gold electrodes through one gold adatom on both sides without any other anchor groups, because it has been experimentally demonstrated that carbon atoms with radially oriented π orbitals can directly bond to the gold electrodes [43,44]. Before probing the junction transport properties, we first explore the interactions between the Cn molecules and Au atoms. Hence, we construct isolated Au-Cn-Au complexes to examine the atomic and electronic changes in the Cn molecules after bonding to the Au atoms. The structures at both the singlet and triplet states can be obtained. By comparing the total energy of the optimized structures and considering the possibility of the Cn molecules bonding with the gold electrodes, we identify the most probable Au-Cn-Au (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) configurations appearing in the junctions (see Figure 2). Large Au-C bonding energies are obtained, of 1.60 eV, 1.45 eV, 1.39 eV, and 1.29 eV for n = 14, 16, 18, and 20, respectively. This suggests the formation of strong covalent Au-C bonds [45], and also results in severe deformations of Cn. A similar deformation has also been reported for the C18 molecular junction with graphene nanoribbon electrodes [31,46]. Meanwhile, clear distinctions between the doubly aromatic and doubly anti-aromatic Cn molecules are observed after bonding with the Au atoms, including the more asymmetrical atomic structure and the spin-polarized triplet state for the Au-C16/20-Au complexes. We attribute this difference to the lower HOMO–LUMO gaps of the doubly anti-aromatic C16/20 molecules, which are easier to overcome via the exchange energy acting on electrons with the same spin, favoring a structure at a triplet state after bonding with the Au atoms.
Then, we construct the junction structures with the obtained Au-Cn-Au complexes, which are shown in the upper panels of Figure 3 and Figure S2. And the corresponding equilibrium transmission functions around the Fermi Level (Ef) are also plotted in the bottom panels of Figure 3 and Figure S2, with Ef being set to zero. The transmission coefficients at Ef (T(Ef)) are, respectively, calculated to be 0.53, 0.18 (spin-up)/0.01 (spin-down), 0.50, and 0.16 (spin-up)/0.01(spin-down) for the C14, C16, C18, and C20 junctions. Remarkable spin-polarized features with a much smaller T(Ef) are observed for the Au-C16/20-Au junctions compared to the Au-C14/18-Au junctions. This observation is somewhat perplexing because the doubly anti-aromatic molecules are expected to exhibit a higher T(Ef) due to their smaller HOMO–LUMO gaps. Attempting to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon, conducting eigenchannels were calculated to identify the dominating MOs (depicted in Figure 3 and Figure S2) [47].
For the doubly aromatic C14/18, spin-unpolarized and highly similar transmission functions are obtained for their single-molecule junctions with Au electrodes, which display two apparent resonance peaks below Ef (see Figure 3a and Figure S2a). In the case of the Au-C14-Au junction, the transmission peaks located at −0.69 eV and −0.65 eV can be decomposed into multiple eigenchannels, resulting in their heights exceeding unity. Due to the strong coupling between Cn and the two Au adatoms, MO switching happens, and some MOs heavily hybridize with each other or with some orbitals of the Au adatoms, generating new orbitals contributing to the junction transmission. The shapes of the eigenchannels suggest that after connecting to the gold electrodes, HOMO−1 and HOMO exchange their energetic order. The HOMO and LUMO of the isolated deformed C14 molecule (C14_D) hybridize and contribute to one eigenchannel of the peak centered at −0.69 eV (see FMOs and their hybrid shown in Figure 4a), along with the other one, which is dominated by the HOMO. Moreover, besides the one eigenchannel contributed by the HOMO, the HOMO−1 of C14_D combining with the 6s and 5dz2, 5dyz orbitals of the Au adatoms forms two new orbitals contributing to the peak at −0.65 eV. And the sharpness of this peak arises from the nodes of the HOMO−1 at the C atoms bonded to the Au adatoms, leading to reduced coupling. Despite the large transmission coefficients of these two peaks, they decay rapidly towards Ef and thus contribute negligibly to the transmission around Ef. In contrast, the LUMO of C14_D, which exhibits a much stronger coupling with the 6s orbitals of the Au adatoms due to its πin character, results in a broadened and steady transmission between −0.5 eV and 1 eV and thus dominates T(Ef). The overall shape of the transmission spectrum of the Au-C18-Au molecular junction is similar to that of the Au-C14-Au junction (see the dominating MOs of the isolated deformed C18 molecule (C18_D) contributing to the transmission peaks shown in Figures S2a and S3a), except that the two transmission peaks change their places because of the different coupling effects between C18_D and C14_D with the Au electrodes; additionally, they also move towards Ef due to the smaller HOMO–LUMO gap of C18_D.
For the doubly anti-aromatic C16/20, the difference between the spin-up and spin-down population of the Cn molecules in the junctions is calculated to be 1.53, leading to remarkable spin-polarized transmission functions (see Figure 3b and Figure S2b). This spin-unpolarized to spin-polarized transition of the C16/20 molecules indicates their much stronger electronic couplings with the Au adatoms so that the FMOs of the isolated Au-C16/20-Au complexes are employed to analyze the dominating MOs of the transmission peaks (see Figure 4b and Figure S3b). The transmission function of the Au-C16-Au junction reveals two prominent peaks for both the spin-up and spin-down channels located at −1 eV and −0.11 eV (spin-up)/0.29 eV (spin-down). For the spin-up channel, the peak away from Ef is dominated by one hybrid MO composed of the HOMO−3 and HOMO−2 orbitals of the isolated Au-C16-Au complex. While its πin character exhibits a significant coupling to one gold electrode, leading to the broadening of the peak, its asymmetric nature also results in a much lower peak height. Inspecting the HOMO−3 and HOMO−2 orbitals, we can find that these two MOs exhibit similar orbital shape patterns and adjacent energies. This observation suggests that a potential rule for MO hybridization may exist for these doubly anti-aromatic Cn molecules in the junctions. The spin-up HOMO−1 and HOMO orbitals are another pair that satisfies this criterion; indeed, they hybridize and dominate the transmission peak centered at −0.11 eV. However, as this πout MO has less asymmetry, this hybrid MO contributes to the relatively higher peak decaying rapidly towards Ef. Likewise, for the spin-down channel, the asymmetric hybrid πin MO formed by HOMO−1 and HOMO dominates the broadened yet low peak centered at −1 eV, while the less asymmetric hybrid πout MO composed of the LUMO and LUMO + 1 dominates the relatively high but sharp peak located at 0.29 eV. Therefore, although both the spin-up and spin-down resonance peaks are much closer to Ef, their asymmetric πout nature makes them decay quickly towards Ef, thus the total transmission at Ef is still less than that of the Au-C14/18-Au junctions. The overall shape of the transmission function of the Au-C20-Au molecular junction is nearly identical to that of the Au-C16-Au junction, as shown in Figures S2b and S3b.
Finally, we further explore the electronic transport properties of larger Au-Cn-Au junctions containing more carbon atoms (n = 22, 24, 26, 28). For the doubly aromatic C22/26, they form slightly deformed complexes at the singlet state after bonding with two Au atoms like C14/18, and their molecular junctions share similar spin-unpolarized transmission functions with the Au-C14/18-Au junctions, possessing a large T(Ef) (see Figure S4a,c). Meanwhile, the reduced HOMO–LUMO gaps of the doubly anti-aromatic C24/28 molecules lead to heavily deformed and asymmetric complexes at the triplet state after bonding to two Au atoms, so that their molecular junctions have spin-polarized transmission functions and a small T(Ef), resembling the transport characteristics observed in the Au-C16/20-Au junctions (see Figure S4b,d).

3. Computational Methods

Geometry optimization and electronic structure calculations of the isolated Cn and Au-Cn-Au complexes were carried out by employing the Gaussian16 DFT package with the range-separated hybrid functional ωB97XD [48], which has been proven to provide the correct qualitative polyynic structure of cyclo[n]carbons (n > 14) [11,16,20,21]. The 6-311+G(d,p) basis set is employed for carbon atoms; the SDD basis set is employed for gold atoms [49,50,51]. Frequency analysis is performed to verify the nature of the stationary points. For comparison, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) within the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) formulation [52] is also used for calculating the molecular orbitals (MOs) of the Au-Cn-Au complexes and the deformed Cn molecules in the gas phase.
Quantum transport calculations were performed using TRANSISESTA code, which is a practical implementation of the NEGF + DFT approach, employing SIESTA as the DFT engine [53,54,55]. The atom cores are described using improved Troullier–Martins norm-conserving pseudopotentials (PPs), and the wave functions of the valence electrons are expanded over a finite-range numerical orbital basis set [56]. The default double-zeta plus polarization (DZP) basis set is used for Au atoms and a user-defined DZP is constructed for C atoms. The PBE GGA is used as the approximate exchange-correlation functional. Although GGA, like PBE, often underestimates the energy gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) since it is unable to describe the derivative discontinuity of the DFT potential [57], we have compared the MOs of the Au-Cn-Au complexes and the deformed Cn molecules at both the ωb97XD and PBE levels (see Figure S5); their similar MO shapes and energy orders suggest that our calculations are able to qualitatively describe the transport properties of the Au-Cn-Au molecular junctions. The unit cell of the extended molecule is composed of the central Cn molecule, the gold adatoms, and ten Au (111) atomic layers with a 4 × 5 in-plane supercell. The Cn molecule is placed in the y-z plane, and the transport is defined along the z-axis. We always consider periodic boundary conditions in the plane transverse to the transport. An equivalent energy cutoff of 200.0 Ry is taken for the real-space mesh, and the Brillouin zone is sampled using a 4 × 4 × 1 k-point mesh. The spin-polarized transmission function T σ ( E ) for the spin-up and spin-down electrons ( σ = ↑/↓) is evaluated as follows:
T σ E = 1 Ω 2 D B Z 2 D B Z T σ ( k , E ) d k
where Ω 2 D B Z is the area of the two-dimensional Brillouin zone (2DBZ) that is orthogonal to the transport direction. The k-dependent transmission coefficient T σ ( k ; E ) is defined as follows:
T σ k , E = T r [ Γ L , σ G M , σ r Γ R , σ G M , σ r + ]
where G M , σ r is the retarded Green’s function matrix of the extended molecule, and Γ L / R ,   σ represents the broadening function matrix describing the interaction between the left/right electrode and the extended molecule. In a spin-unpolarized junction, the same transmission functions are obtained for both the spin-up and spin-down channels.

4. Conclusions

We have systemically investigated the electronic transport properties of cyclo[n]carbon (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) single-molecule junctions connected to bulk gold electrodes by employing the NEGF+DFT approach. Our calculations show that the isolated C14 and C18 molecules exhibit double aromaticity, while the C16 and C20 molecules in the gas phase display double anti-aromaticity with a smaller HOMO–LUMO gap associated with orbital reordering. The bonding to Au atoms induces the deformation of the Cn, especially for the doubly anti-aromatic C16/20 molecules for which the corresponding more asymmetric complexes are in the triplet state due to their reduced HOMO–LUMO gaps. Distinguished spin states and junction geometries originating from different aromaticities lead to significantly different transport properties between these doubly aromatic and anti-aromatic Cn molecules when they form Au-Cn-Au single-molecule junctions. In detail, the Au-C14/18-Au junctions demonstrate a spin-unpolarized transport with a relatively large transmission around Ef. In contrast, spin-polarized transmission occurs in the Au-C16/20-Au molecular junctions, and the asymmetric hybrid πin MOs contribute to two broad but low peaks well below Ef, while the two peaks adjacent to Ef are dominated by hybrid πout MOs decaying fast towards Ef, which result in a much smaller T(Ef). We further extend our studies to larger junctions with more carbon atoms, and obtain very similar transport characteristics for cyclo[n]carbons with n = 22, 24, 26, and 28. These findings are beneficial to design and construct molecular electronic devices with cyclo[n]carbon molecules.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29163827/s1, Figure S1: Optimized atomic structures and FMOs of the isolated Cn molecules with n = 14, 16, 18, and 20 calculated at the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d, p) level; Figure S2: The atomic structures (upper panel) and the corresponding equilibrium transmission spectra (bottom panel) of the Au-C18-Au (a) and Au-C20-Au (b) molecular junctions, together with the conducting eigenchannels for selected transmission peaks; Figure S3: FMOs and the hybrid MOs of the isolated C18_D molecule (a) and the Au-C20-Au complex (b); Figure S4: The equilibrium transmission spectra of the Au-C22-Au (a), Au-C24-Au (b), Au-C26-Au (c) and Au-C28-Au (d) molecular junctions are displayed in the left panels, and their corresponding atomic structures are shown in the right panels; Figure S5: FMOs of the isolated C14_D/18_D molecules (a) and the Au-C16/20-Au complexes (b) calculated at both the ωB97XD and PBE levels; Cartesian coordinates of the Au-Cn-Au molecular junctions (unit: Å).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Y. and S.H.; theoretical calculations and data analysis, P.Y., H.P., and Y.W. (Yudi Wang); writing—original draft, P.Y.; visualization, P.Y., H.P., J.L., and Y.D.; writing—review and polishing, S.H. and Y.W. (Yongfeng Wang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 21933002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the High-performance Computing Platform of Peking University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kroto, H.W.; Heath, J.R.; O’Brien, S.C.; Curl, R.F.; Smalley, R.E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985, 318, 162–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Diederich, F.; Rubin, Y.; Knobler, C.B.; Whetten, R.L.; Schriver, K.E.; Houk, K.N.; Li, Y. All-carbon molecules: Evidence for the generation of cyclo[18]carbon from a stable organic precursor. Science 1989, 245, 1088–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. von Helden, G.; Gotts, N.G.; Bowers, M.T. Experimental evidence for the formation of fullerenes by collisional heating of carbon rings in the gas phase. Nature 1993, 363, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McElvany, S.W.; Ross, M.M.; Goroff, N.S.; Diederich, F. Cyclocarbon coalescence: Mechanisms for tailor-made fullerene formation. Science 1993, 259, 1594–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Diederich, F.; Kivala, M. All-carbon scaffolds by rational design. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kaiser, K.; Scriven, L.M.; Schulz, F.; Gawel, P.; Gross, L.; Anderson, H.L. An sp-hybridized molecular carbon allotrope, cyclo[18]carbon. Science 2019, 365, 1299–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gao, Y.; Albrecht, F.; Rončević, I.; Ettedgui, I.; Kumar, P.; Scriven, L.M.; Christensen, K.E.; Mishra, S.; Righetti, L.; Rossmannek, M.; et al. On-surface synthesis of a doubly anti-aromatic carbon allotrope. Nature 2023, 623, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sun, L.; Zheng, W.; Kang, F.; Gao, W.; Xu, W. On-surface synthesis and characterization of anti-aromatic cyclo[12]carbon and cyclo[20]carbon. Res. Sq. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, L.; Zheng, W.; Gao, W.; Kang, F.; Zhao, M.; Xu, W. On-surface synthesis of aromatic cyclo[10]carbon and cyclo[14]carbon. Nature 2023, 623, 972–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brémond, E.; Pérez-Jiménez, A.J.; Adamo, C.; Sancho-García, J.C. Stability of the polyynic form of C18, C22, C26, and C30 nanorings: A challenge tackled by range-separated double-hybrid density functionals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 4515–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pereira, Z.S.; da Silva, E.Z. Spontaneous symmetry breaking in cyclo[18]carbon. J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 1152–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, B.-C.; Liu, C.-J.; Deng, P.-J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, L.; Liao, Y.-H.; Bao, L.; Bao, J. DFT-based study on the differences between odd and even Cn (n = 6–31) ring clusters. Results Phys. 2023, 52, 106852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zheng, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Li, H. Parallel-self-assembling stack, center-capture effect, and reactivity-enhancing effect of n-layer (n = 1, 2, 3) cyclo[18]carbon. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 21345–21355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baryshnikov, G.V.; Valiev, R.R.; Nasibullin, R.T.; Sundholm, D.; Kurten, T.; Ågren, H. Aromaticity of even-number cyclo[n]carbons (n = 6–100). J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 10849–10855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fowler, P.W.; Mizoguchi, N.; Bean, D.E.; Havenith, R.W.A. Double aromaticity and ring currents in all-carbon rings. Chem.—Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6964–6972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baryshnikov, G.V.; Valiev, R.R.; Valiulina, L.I.; Kurtsevich, A.E.; Kurtén, T.; Sundholm, D.; Pittelkow, M.; Zhang, J.; Ågren, H. Odd-number cyclo[n]carbons sustaining alternating aromaticity. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 2445–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dai, C.; Chen, D.; Zhu, J. Achieving adaptive aromaticity in cyclo[10]carbon by screening cyclo[n]carbon (n=8−24). Chem.—Asian J. 2020, 15, 2187–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baryshnikov, G.V.; Valiev, R.R.; Kuklin, A.V.; Sundholm, D.; Ågren, H. Cyclo[18]carbon: Insight into electronic structure, aromaticity, and surface coupling. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 6701–6705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.; Lu, T.; Chen, Q. An sp-hybridized all-carboatomic ring, cyclo[18]carbon: Bonding character, electron delocalization, and aromaticity. Carbon 2020, 165, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, T.; Chen, Q. Ultrastrong regulation effect of the electric field on the all-carbon atomic ring cyclo[18]Carbon. ChemPhysChem 2021, 22, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Z.; Lu, T.; Yuan, A.; Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Yan, X. Remarkable size effect on photophysical and nonlinear optical properties of all-carboatomic rings, cyclo[18]carbon and its analogues. Chem.—Asian J. 2021, 16, 2267–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nandi, A.; Solel, E.; Kozuch, S. Carbon tunneling in the automerization of cyclo[18]carbon. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iyakutti, K.; Surya, V.J.; Lakshmi, I.; Rajeswarapalanichamy, R.; Kawazoe, Y. 18 and 12—Member carbon rings (cyclo[n]carbons)—A density functional study. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 263, 114895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hassani, N.; Hassani, M.R.; Neek-Amal, M. Catalytic properties of cyclo-carbon clusters: An investigation on o2 activation and CO oxidation. Surf. Sci. 2022, 720, 122050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tang, C.; Xu, D.; Ouyang, G. Cross-plane transport in cyclo[18]carbon-based molecular devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 122, 044101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiong, S.; Dong, X.; Xie, L.; Guan, Z.; Long, M.; Chen, T. Spin-resolved transport of multifunctional C(18)molecule-based nanodevices: A first-principles study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2023, 35, 395302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Feng, Y.P.; Shen, L. Diverse transport behaviors in cyclo[18]carbon-based molecular devices. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 2611–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rojas, C.; León, A.; Pacheco, M.; Chico, L.; Orellana, P.A. Transport signatures of few-atom carbon rings. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 15973–15981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hou, L.; Hu, H.; Yang, G.; Ouyang, G. Giant switching effect and spintronic transport properties in cyclo[18]carbon-based molecular devices. Phys. Status Solidi—Rapid Res. Lett. 2021, 15, 2000582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864–B871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Meir, Y.; Wingreen, N.S. Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 2512–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xue, Y.; Datta, S.; Ratner, M.A. First-principles based matrix Green’s function approach to molecular electronic devices: General formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 281, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brandbyge, M.; Mozos, J.-L.; Ordejón, P.; Taylor, J.; Stokbro, K. Density-functional method for nonequilibrium electron transport. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 165401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rocha, A.R.; García-suárez, V.M.; Bailey, S.W.; Lambert, C.J.; Ferrer, J.; Sanvito, S. Towards molecular spintronics. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, D.; Liu, S.; Rong, C.; Zhong, A.; Liu, S. Toward understanding the isomeric stability of fullerenes with density functional theory and the information-theoretic approach. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 17986–17990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, C.; He, X.; Zhong, A.; Liu, S.; Zhao, D. What dictates alkane isomerization? A combined density functional theory and information-theoretic approach study. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2023, 142, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Plattner, D.A.; Houk, K.N. C18 Is a polyyne. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4405–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arulmozhiraja, S.; Ohno, T. CCSD calculations on C14, C18, and C22 carbon clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 114301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gaweł, P.; Foroutan-Nejad, C. Carbon rings push limits of chemical theories. Nature 2023, 623, 922–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lin, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Yang, B.; Du, P.; Chen, C.; Zang, Y.; Zhu, D. Highly efficient charge transport across carbon nanobelts. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eade4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lv, Y.; Lin, J.; Song, K.; Song, X.; Zang, H.; Zang, Y.; Zhu, D. Single cycloparaphenylene molecule devices: Achieving large conductance modulation via tuning radial π-conjugation. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabk3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xin, N.; Guan, J.; Zhou, C.; Chen, X.; Gu, C.; Li, Y.; Ratner, M.A.; Nitzan, A.; Stoddart, J.F.; Guo, X. Concepts in the design and engineering of single-molecule electronic devices. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019, 1, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, Y.; Wu, W. High-efficiency switching effect and negative differential conductance in cyclo[18]carbon–graphene nanoribbon junction. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 194303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Paulsson, M.; Brandbyge, M. Transmission eigenchannels from nonequilibrium Green’s functions. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 115117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. A.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  49. Andrae, D.; Häußermann, U.; Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Preuß, H. Energy-adjustedab initio pseudopotentials for the second and third row transition elements. Theoret. Chim. Acta 1990, 77, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Binning, R.C., Jr.; Curtiss, L.A. Compact contracted basis sets for third-row atoms: Ga–Kr. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fuentealba, P.; Preuss, H.; Stoll, H.; Von Szentpály, L. A proper account of core-polarization with pseudopotentials: Single valence-electron alkali compounds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 89, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. García, A.; Papior, N.; Akhtar, A.; Artacho, E.; Blum, V.; Bosoni, E.; Brandimarte, P.; Brandbyge, M.; Cerdá, J.I.; Corsetti, F.; et al. Siesta: Recent developments and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 204108–204131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Papior, N.; Lorente, N.; Frederiksen, T.; García, A.; Brandbyge, M. Improvements on non-equilibrium and transport Green function techniques: The next-generation transiesta. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2017, 212, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Soler, J.; Artacho, E.; Gale, J.; Garcia, A.; Junquera, J.; Ordejón, P.; Sánchez-Portal, D. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 2745–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Troullier, N.; Martins, J.L. Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Y.; Pan, H.; Lin, D.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Sanvito, S.; Hou, S. Robust covalent pyrazine anchors forming highly conductive and polarity-tunable molecular junctions with carbon electrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 21337–21347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Visualizations of the πout (upper) and πin MOs (bottom) of the C20 molecule. (b) The orbital reordering process in the anti-aromatic C20 molecule.
Figure 1. (a) Visualizations of the πout (upper) and πin MOs (bottom) of the C20 molecule. (b) The orbital reordering process in the anti-aromatic C20 molecule.
Molecules 29 03827 g001
Figure 2. The atomic structures for the most probable Au-Cn-Au (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) complexes and their spin states appearing in the corresponding molecular junctions. The arrows point to the C atoms that are bonded with the Au atoms after coupling.
Figure 2. The atomic structures for the most probable Au-Cn-Au (n = 14, 16, 18, 20) complexes and their spin states appearing in the corresponding molecular junctions. The arrows point to the C atoms that are bonded with the Au atoms after coupling.
Molecules 29 03827 g002
Figure 3. The atomic junction structures (upper panel) and the corresponding equilibrium transmission spectra (bottom panel) of the Au-C14-Au (a) and Au-C16-Au (b) molecular junctions, together with the conducting eigenchannels for selected transmission peaks.
Figure 3. The atomic junction structures (upper panel) and the corresponding equilibrium transmission spectra (bottom panel) of the Au-C14-Au (a) and Au-C16-Au (b) molecular junctions, together with the conducting eigenchannels for selected transmission peaks.
Molecules 29 03827 g003
Figure 4. FMOs and the hybrid MOs of the isolated C14_D molecule (a) and the Au-C16-Au complex (b).
Figure 4. FMOs and the hybrid MOs of the isolated C14_D molecule (a) and the Au-C16-Au complex (b).
Molecules 29 03827 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, P.; Pan, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hou, S. Exploring Aromaticity Effects on Electronic Transport in Cyclo[n]carbon Single-Molecule Junctions. Molecules 2024, 29, 3827. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163827

AMA Style

Yang P, Pan H, Wang Y, Li J, Dong Y, Wang Y, Hou S. Exploring Aromaticity Effects on Electronic Transport in Cyclo[n]carbon Single-Molecule Junctions. Molecules. 2024; 29(16):3827. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163827

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Peiqi, Haoyang Pan, Yudi Wang, Jie Li, Yangyu Dong, Yongfeng Wang, and Shimin Hou. 2024. "Exploring Aromaticity Effects on Electronic Transport in Cyclo[n]carbon Single-Molecule Junctions" Molecules 29, no. 16: 3827. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163827

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop