Next Article in Journal
Cytotoxic Activity of Novel GnRH Analogs Conjugated with Mitoxantrone in Ovarian Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Application of PLGA-PEG-PLGA Nanoparticles to Percutaneous Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Activity of Amide Derivatives Containing Cyclopropane

1
Department of Chemical and Material Engineering, Lyuliang University, Lvliang 033001, China
2
College of Chemistry & Pharmacy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(17), 4124; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174124
Submission received: 29 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 27 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024

Abstract

:
As an important small organic molecule, cyclopropane is widely used in drug design. In this paper, fifty-three amide derivatives containing cyclopropane were designed and synthesized by introducing amide groups and aryl groups into cyclopropane through the active splicing method, and their antibacterial and antifungal activities were evaluated in vitro. Among them, thirty-five compounds were new compounds, and eighteen compounds were known compounds (F14, F15, F18, F20F26, F36, and F38F44). Bioassay results disclosed that four, three, and nine of the compounds showed moderate activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans, respectively. Three compounds were sensitive to Candida albicans, with excellent antifungal activity (MIC80 = 16 μg/mL). The molecular docking results show that compounds F8, F24, and F42 have good affinity with the potential antifungal drug target CYP51 protein.

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases caused by bacterial pathogens seriously affect human health and have been a main public health problem in recent years [1]. The use of antibiotics has significantly improved the ability of humans to fight bacterial infections, which prolongs human life and improves the quality of human life [2]. However, the continuous use of antibiotics leads to the emergence of bacterial resistance. At present, one of the major challenges of healthcare worldwide is bacterial resistance to antibiotics [3]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new, effective, and safe bactericides.
As an important small organic molecule, cyclopropane is widely found in natural products and drugs [4,5,6]. Cyclopropane is a structurally stable bioisostere, which can be used to replace carbon–carbon double bonds. It has the effects of improving the efficacy of drugs, enhancing metabolic stability, reducing the off-target effect of drugs, improving the dissociation degree of drugs, and enhancing the affinity to receptors [7,8,9,10]. Therefore, it is widely used in drug design. Compounds containing cyclopropane have certain drug properties and biological activities, including antibacterial [11,12], antifungal [13,14,15], antiviral [16,17], antitumor [18], antioxidant [19], and antidepressant activities [20,21,22]. Therefore, compounds with cyclopropane structures have attracted extensive research due to their biological activity and low toxicity.
At present, drugs containing cyclopropane structure have been applied to treat respiratory diseases, infectious diseases, mental disorders, endocrine and metabolic diseases, nervous system diseases, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [23]. These include tranylcypromine, levomilnacipran, arotinib hydrochloride, cypermethrin, and fenpropathrin (Figure 1).
Phenyl, as a scaffold that could be substituted with various groups, can enhance the stability and biological activity of drugs [24]. The amide structure, as an important component of proteins, is widely present in antibacterial and antioxidant agents, and it is an important functional group in drug synthesis [25]. Therefore, we speculate that the introduction of substituted phenyl and cyclopropane with amide structure is likely to lead to new lead compounds with excellent biological activity.
In this study, amide groups and aryl groups of benodanil [26] and cinnamate ester derivatives [27] with excellent antibacterial activity were introduced into the C1 and C2 positions of cyclopropane by the active splicing method, and fifty-three amide derivatives containing cyclopropane were synthesized (Figure 2). The antibacterial and antifungal activity of the target compounds in vitro was tested. Then, the mode of action and binding affinity of the ideal compounds with the highest antifungal activity and CYP51 protein were analyzed by molecular docking to preliminarily explore their antifungal mechanism.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis

In order to explore the effect of different substituent groups on the activity and find more potent compounds, based on the consideration of molecular diversity, 2-phenylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide was used as a template to introduce different substituents into the benzene ring and the amide part, respectively.
The synthetic rout is outlined in Scheme 1. Intermediate B was obtained by Knoevenagel condensation of substituted benzaldehyde A and malonic acid. Intermediate B was amidated with N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride to form intermediate C. Intermediate D was obtained from intermediate C and trimethylsulfonyl iodide by Corey-Chaykovsky cyclopropanation. Intermediate D was hydrolyzed to obtain intermediate E. A series of amide compounds containing cyclopropane F1F53 were obtained by amide reaction of intermediate E with aliphatic amine, methylaniline, ethyl N-piperazinecarboxylate, and 2-aminothiazole, respectively.
Among the fifty-three cyclopropane amide derivatives synthesized in this study, thirty-five compounds were new compounds, and eighteen compounds were known compounds (F14, F15, F18, F20F26, F36, F38F44). All of the synthesized compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra and HRMS of the compounds above are shown in Supplementary Materials.
In 1H-NMR spectra, fatty amides (F1F4, F10F13, F18F21, F27F30, F36F39, F45F48) showed one doublet signal in the ranges of δH 7.95–8.39 due to H-N. Benzamides (F5F7, F14F16, F22F24, F31F33, F40F42, F49F51) and thiazole amides (F9, F17, F26, F35, F44, F53) showed one single signals in the ranges of δH 9.52–10.43 andδH 12.34–12.43 due to H-N, respectively. The two hydrogens on C1 and C2 show two sets of multiple signals in the ranges of δH 2.70–1.65. The two hydrogens on C3 show two sets of multiple signals in the ranges of δH 1.75–1.21. In 13C-NMR spectra, the amides showed a signal of one carbonyl in the ranges of δC 169.43–172.48. In 19F-NMR spectra, the compounds (F36F44) showed a signal of one F in the ranges of δF −116.54–−117.24.

2.2. Antimicrobial Activity In Vitro

Three strains of bacteria, including Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli)) and Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa)), and one strain of fungu (Candida albicans (C. albicans)), which causes great harm to human health, were selected to test the biological activity of the compounds in vitro. The antibacterial activity and antifungal activity against all synthesized amide derivatives containing cyclopropane (F1F53) were evaluated in vitro. The in vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities of the prepared compounds were determined by the MIC80 value (minimum 80% inhibition concentration) using microdilution method with ciprofloxacin or fluconazole as positive controls, respectively. The results are listed in Table 1. Five compounds (F7, F30, F36, F49, and F51) showed some antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus with the MIC80 of 128 μg/mL, and four compounds (F5, F9, F29, and F53) showed moderate inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus aureus with the MIC80 of 32 and 64 μg/mL. Two compounds (F5 and F53) show antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli with the MIC80 of 128 μg/mL. Escherichia coli were relatively sensitive to three compounds (F9, F31, and F45) with the MIC80 of 32 and 64 μg/mL, respectively, but far lower than the antibacterial activity of the positive control ciprofloxacin (MIC80 = 2 μg/mL). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was not sensitive to all compounds with high MIC80 values (>128 μg/mL).
Six compounds (F4, F10, F14, F33, F34, and F36) showed some antifungal activity against Candida albicans with the MIC80 of 128 μg/mL, but the activity was far lower than that of fluconazole (MIC80 = 2 μg/mL). Candida albicans were more sensitive to nine compounds (F5, F7, F9, F22, F23, F32, F49, F50, and F51) which showed moderate activity (MIC80 = 32, 64 μg/mL). Three compounds (F8, F24, and F42) showed promising antifungal activity with the MIC80 of 16 μg/mL.
Although the activity of the synthesized compounds is inferior to ciprofloxacin and fluconazole, this class of compounds showed some attractive advantages, such as simple structure, easy synthesis, and low cost.

2.3. The Preliminary Structure–Activity Relationships

The comparison of the antimicrobial activity and structure of the compounds in Table 1 showed that the types and substitution sites of benzene ring and amide substituents significantly influence the antimicrobial activity of the compounds. The antibacterial activity of the target compounds showed that aryl amides showed higher activity than fatty amides (F1F4, F8 vs. F5F7, F9 (S. aureus, E. coli))). The cyclopropane derivatives substituted by piperazine amide did not show antibacterial activity (F8, F25, F34, F43, F52 (S. aureus, E. coli)). Thiazole amide (F9) showed the best antibacterial activity (MIC80 = 32 μg/mL (E. coli)). The introduction of halogen at the 2-position of the benzene ring showed better antibacterial activity than the 4-position (F9 vs. F52, F44 (S. aureus, E. coli)). The introduction of halogens (F, Cl, Br) in the benzene ring was beneficial to the improvement of antibacterial activity compared with methoxy groups as an electron-donating (F5, F49 vs. F22; F7, F51 vs. F24; F9, F53 vs. F26 (S. aureus, E. coli)). Similar to the antibacterial activity, the presence of fatty amides cannot improve antifungal activity (F1F4, F10F13, F18F21, F27F30, F36F39, F45F48 (C. albicans)) and the introduction of halogens in the benzene ring was beneficial to the improvement of antifungal activity (F5, F49 vs. F14, F31; F7, F42, F51 vs. F16, F33 (C. albicans)). This is consistent with the performance of cinnamic acid ester derivatives with similar structures [28]. Unlike antibacterial activity, the introduction of methoxy groups in the benzene ring also contributed to the improvement of antifungal activity (F22F24 vs. F14F16, F31F33 (C. albicans)). The introduction of benzamide was more conducive to the improvement of antifungal activity, and o-tolyl amide showed better antifungal activity than m-tolyl amide and p-tolyl amide. (F7 vs. F5F6; F24 vs. F22F23; F42 vs. F40F41; F51 vs. F49F50 (C. albicans)).

2.4. Molecular Docking Studies

Sterol 14-α demethylase (CYP51), as a key enzyme in the synthesis of biosterols, is a potential target for antifungal drugs. It has the functions of regulating and distributing proteins and changing the fluidity and permeability of membranes, and it is an enzyme necessary for the growth and development of various eukaryotes [29,30]. In order to further explore the antifungal activity mechanism of the target compounds, molecular docking was used to predict the mode of action and binding affinity of excellent antifungal compounds (F8, F24, and F42) with CYP51 protein. The molecular docking results are shown in Figure 3. Compound F8 is able to bind with CYP51 by interaction with two amino residues of SER378 and HIE377. The binding modes involved one halogen bond and one π…π interaction. Compared with F8, F42 is mainly bound with CYP51 by interaction with TYR118 and HEM601 involved two π…π interaction. Compared with F42, F24 also forms two additional interactions with CYP51 including two hydrogen bond ((CO)N…TYR132, (CH3)O…HEM601). The compounds F8, F24, and F42 have good binding affinity with CYP51 and gave −6.087, −6.526, and −6.874 kcal/mol of docking scores, respectively. Compared with the reported compounds with excellent antifungal activity, the binding energies were slightly lower [13]. This may be the reason why the antibacterial activity of the above compounds was lower than that of fluconazole. The results further verified the potential bacteriostatic effect of derivatives F8, F24 and F42.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

All reactions were monitored by thin-layer silica chromatography (TLC) with GF254 under 254 nm UV light (Beijing Innochem Science&Technology Co.,Ltd, Beijing, China). The melting points (m.p.) of all synthesized chemicals were determined on an XT-4 micro-melting point apparatus (Hanon Technologies, Jinan, China). Compounds were purified by column chromatography with silica gel (200–300 mesh) (Qingdao Haiwan Chemical, Qingdao, China) using a mixture of ethyl acetate and petroleum ether as eluent. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III operating at 400 and 100 MHz (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) instrument in DMSO-d6 and using tetramethyl silane (TMS) as an internal standard. All chemical shifts (δ values) are given in ppm, and coupling constants (J values) are given in Hz. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using a Bruker micrOTOF-Q II focus spectrometer (ESI) (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). All starting materials were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification unless otherwise stated.

3.2. General Synthesis Procedure for Intermediate B

Substituted benzaldehyde (A1A6, 100 mmol), malonic acid (300 mmol), and pyridine (100 mmol) were added to a 500 mL flask containing N,N-dimethylformamide (100 mL) solution. The solution was reacted at 90 °C for 6 h. The reaction process was monitored by TLC. To the mixture was added water (60 mL) and concentrated HCl to pH = 1. Then, the solution was cooled to 0 °C. Filtrate and wash solid with ice water. The solid was collected and dried to give the intermediate B in 80–82% yield [31].

3.3. General Synthesis Procedure for Intermediate C

The intermediates B (70 mmol), N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (105 mmol), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 14 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI, 105 mmol) were added to a 500 mL flask containing 100 mL dichloromethane at 0 °C. Triethylamine (105 mmol) was added slowly, and the reaction mixture was warmed slowly to room temperature and stirred for 2 h. The mixture was quenched with 1 mol/L HCl (10 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL × 3). The combined organic phase was washed with aqueous saturated NaHCO3 (100 mL × 3) and brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to give the intermediate C in 60–70% yield [32].

3.4. General Synthesis Procedure for Intermediate D

To a solution of NaH (174 mmol) in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) (350 mL) was added intermediate C (60 mmol) dropwise under argon at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to be stirred at 0 °C for 0.5 h. Then trimethylsulfonyl iodide (79.8 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 18 h, quenched with water, and extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL × 3). The combined organic phase was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to give the intermediate D in 76–82% yield [33].

3.5. General Synthesis Procedure for Intermediate E

The intermediate D (50 mmol) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 100 mmol) were dissolved in a mixed solution of methanol (75 mL) and water (10 mL) and stirred overnight at 25 °C. To the mixture was added diluted hydrochloric acid HCl to Ph = 3–4. The mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (DCM, 50 mL × 3). The combined organic phase was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to give the intermediate E in 76–82% yield [34].

3.6. General Synthesis Procedure for F1F53

The intermediate E (2 mmol), N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI, 2.4 mmol) and 1-Hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT, 2.4 mmol) were dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF, 10 mL). Then, the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min at room temperature. The corresponding amine (3 mmol) was added and stired at 37 °C overnight. Water (20 mL) was added and extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 3). The combined organic phase was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate as eluent to give F1F53 in 50–80% yield [35].
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-cyclopropylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F1): White solid, Yield: 68.9%, m.p. 119.2–120.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.20 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.59 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.17–7.13 (m, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.68–2.64 (m, 1H), 2.42–2.39 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.74–1.65 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.35–1.32 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.26–1.23 (m, 1H, H-3), 0.64–0.59 (m, 2H), 0.48–0.35 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.33 (C=O), 139.75, 132.29, 128.23,127.91, 127.14, 125.11, 24.52, 24.47, 22.49, 13.97, 5.84, 5.78. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C13H14BrNNaO: 302.0151, found: 302.0160.
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-cyclobutylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F2): White solid, Yield: 73.3%, m.p. 135.4–136.7 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.39 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.60 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.26 (m, 1H),7.19–7.10 (m, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.28–4.17 (m, 1H), 2.44–2.34 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.20–2.12 (m, 2H), 1.94–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.75–1.71 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.65–1.56 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.27 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.25–1.21 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.66 (C=O), 139.78, 132.29, 128.20, 127.92, 127.08, 125.06, 44.05, 30.49, 24.58, 24.35, 14.64, 14.05. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H17BrNO, 294.0488, found: 294.0499.
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-cyclopentylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F3): White solid, Yield: 70.7%, m.p. 164.0–165.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.08 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.60 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.17–7.13 (m, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.08–3.99 (m, 1H), 2.41–2.36 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.86–1.73 (m, 3H), 1.67–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.44 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.30 (m, 3H), 1.24–1.20 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.10 (C=O), 139.89, 132.26, 128.14, 127.88, 127.05, 125.10, 50.44, 32.48, 32.36, 24.61, 24.31, 23.43, 23.40, 13.85. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H19BrNO: 308.0645, found: 308.0654.
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-cyclohexylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F4): White solid, Yield: 76.0%, m.p. 166.0–167.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.00 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.60 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.17–7.13 (m, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 3.62–3.51 (m, 1H), 2.41–2.36 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.87–1.66 (m, 5H), 1.56–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.34–1.30 (m, 1H, H-3),1.28–1.20 (m, 3H), 1.19–1.08 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.71 (C=O), 139.90, 132.25, 128.14, 127.87, 127.07, 125.16, 47.59, 32.63, 32.56, 25.26, 24.65, 24.54, 24.39, 13.82. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H21BrNO: 322.0801, found: 322.0810.
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F5): White solid, Yield: 61.5%, m.p. 160.8–162.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.43 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.88 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.63–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.32 (m, 2H), 2.82–2.79 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.78–2.75 (m, 3H), 2.28–2.19 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.74–1.63 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ169.54 (C=O), 139.48, 136.79, 132.31, 131.98, 129.15, 128.37, 127.94, 127.30, 125.20, 118.37, 25.48, 25.31, 20.45, 14.36. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17BrNO: 330.0488, found: 330.0498.
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F6): White solid, Yield: 68.1%, m.p. 190.4–191.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.59 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.64 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21–7.14 (m, 4H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.13–2.07 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.50–1.38 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.90 (C=O), 139.57, 136.40, 132.31, 131.31, 130.31, 128.40, 127.94, 127.46, 125.96, 125.39, 125.01, 124.79, 25.45, 24.91, 17.93, 13.98. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17BrNO: 330.0488, found: 330.0497.
  • 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-N-(o-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F7): Pale yellow solid, Yield: 66.7%, m.p. 188.9–190.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.60 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.63 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.21–7.14 (m, 4H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.16–2.04 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.49–1.41 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.94 (C=O), 139.59, 136.42, 132.32, 131.33, 130.33, 128.40, 127.95, 127.48, 125.98, 125.42, 125.02, 124.82, 25.49, 24.93, 17.96, 14.01. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17BrNO: 330.0488, found: 330.0498.
  • Ethyl 4-(2-(2-bromophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carbonyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (F8): Pale yellow oil, Yield: 78.7%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.60 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.30 (m, 1H), 7.22–7.14 (m, 2H), 4.08–4.03 (m, 2H), 3.66 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.56–3.46 (m, 2H), 3.42–3.40 (m, 2H), 3.36 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 2.48–2.43 (m, 1H, H-2),2.25–2.14 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.49–1.38 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.45–1.40 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.19 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.70 (C=O), 154.62, 139.50, 132.23, 128.32, 127.83, 127.79, 125.34, 60.93, 44.78, 43.59, 43.25, 41.46, 25.86, 20.68, 15.01, 14.56. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C17H21BrN2NaO3: 403.0628, found: 403.0636.
  • 2-(2-bromophenyl)-N-(thiazol-2-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F9): White solid, Yield: 71.3%, m.p. 161.7–163.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.43 (s, 1H, NH, H-N), 7.63 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.12 (m, 3H), 2.67–2.54 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.19–2.12 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.56–1.52 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.00 (C=O), 157.82, 138.87, 137.64, 132.33, 128.69, 127.96, 127.81, 125.45, 113.47, 26.64, 23.98, 14.99. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C13H12BrN2OS: 322.9848, found: 322.9857.
  • N-cyclopropyl-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F10): White solid, Yield: 51.6%, m.p. 153.7–155.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.16 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.06 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.67–2.60 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.19–2.17 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.75–1.64 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.34–1.21 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.17–1.05 (m, 1H), 0.64–0.55 (m, 2H), 0.42–0.35 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.48 (C=O), 138.47, 135.36, 129.33, 126.15, 25.91, 24.00, 22.89, 21.04, 15.54, 6.18, 6.14. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H18NO: 216.1383, found: 216.1384.
  • N-cyclobutyl-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F11): White solid, Yield: 58.8%, m.p. 165.2–165.7 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.06 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 4.26–4.16 (m, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.16–2.10 (m, 3H), 1.90–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.75–1.71 (m, 1H), 1.65–1.50 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.22 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.12 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.26 (C=O), 138.49, 135.35, 129.33, 126.15, 44.39, 31.00, 30.92, 25.97, 23.94, 21.04, 15.50, 15.04. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C15H19NNaO: 252.1359, found: 252.1367.
  • N-cyclopentyl-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F12): Yellow solid, Yield: 50.6%, m.p. 176.1–176.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.06 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.06 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 4.05–3.94 (m, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.18–2.13 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.85–1.71 (m, 3H), 1.66–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.48 (s, 2H), 1.39–1.24 (m, 3H), 1.14–1.04 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.38 (C=O), 138.19, 134.90, 128.91, 125.71, 50.44, 32.54, 32.36, 25.57, 23.42, 20.63, 15.18. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C16H21NNaO: 266.1515, found: 266.1523.
  • N-cyclohexyl-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F13): White solid, Yield: 63.4%, m.p. 186.7–188.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.96 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.07 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.62–3.45 (m, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.17–2.09 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.90–1.59 (m, 5H), 1.53 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 1.33–1.19 (m, 3H), 1.17–0.96 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.88 (C=O), 138.17, 134.85, 128.86, 125.67, 47.57, 32.64, 32.54, 25.53, 25.24, 24.55, 23.36, 20.59, 15.18. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H24NO: 258.1852, found: 258.1860.
  • N,2-di-p-tolylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F14): White solid, Yield: 55.1%, m.p. 174.1–176.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.13 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.47 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (dd, J = 11.0, 6.6 Hz, 6H), 2.35–2.28 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.26 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.04–1.97 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.46–1.43 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.31–1.26 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.71 (C=O), 137.75, 136.82, 135.10, 131.87, 129.11, 128.92, 125.82, 118.89, 26.47, 24.48, 20.61, 20.44, 15.47. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO: 266.1539, found: 266.1546.
  • N-(m-tolyl)-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F15): White solid, Yield: 56.4%, m.p. 163.9–165.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.52 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.03 (m, 6H), 2.31 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H, H-2), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.18–2.11 (m, 4H), 1.44–1.40 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.32–1.21 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.11 (C=O), 137.88, 136.47, 135.10, 131.02, 130.32, 128.95, 125.94, 125.86, 124.87, 124.59, 25.84, 24.37, 20.64, 17.92, 15.71. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO: 266.1539, found: 266.1548.
  • N-(o-tolyl)-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F16): White solid, Yield: 58.8%, m.p. 165.1–166.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.52 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.03 (m, 6H), 2.35–2.29 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.20 (s, 4H), 1.45–1.40 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.31–1.22 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.77 (C=O), 137.86, 136.86, 135.08, 131.00, 130.30, 128.93, 125.92, 125.84, 124.85, 124.56, 25.81, 24.36, 20.62, 17.90, 15.68. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO: 266.1539, found: 266.1548.
  • N-(thiazol-2-yl)-2-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F17): Pale yellow solid, Yield: 55.3%, m.p. 188.9–190.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.36 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.45 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.11–7.01 (m, 4H), 2.45–2.40 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.26 (s, 3H), 2.21–2.16 (m, 1H), 1.54–1.49 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.46–1.38 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.12 (C=O), 158.00, 137.64, 137.08, 135.44, 129.02, 126.03, 113.41, 25.72, 25.11, 20.64, 16.23. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H15N2OS: 259.0900, found: 259.0908.
  • N-cyclopropyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F18): White solid, Yield: 54.8%, m.p. 158.1–160.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.15 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.08–6.94 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 2.68–2.54 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.23–2.15 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.69–1.65 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.30–1.20 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.15–0.98 (m, 1H), 0.62–0.53 (m, 2H), 0.43–0.25 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.11 (C=O), 157.64, 132.87, 126.90, 113.78, 55.06, 25.31, 23.22, 22.44, 14.88, 5.74, 5.69. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H18NO2: 232.1332, found: 232.1339.
  • N-cyclobutyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F19): White solid, Yield: 72.2%, m.p. 188.3–189.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.32 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.03 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.92–6.74 (m, 2H), 4.26–4.12 (m, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.21–2.06 (m, 3H), 1.90–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.71–1.65 (m, 1H), 1.63–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.28–1.24 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.11–1.07 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.89 (C=O), 157.64, 132.89, 126.89, 113.78, 55.06, 43.94, 30.56, 30.48, 25.36, 23.16, 14.84, 14.58. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H20NO2): 246.1489, found: 246.1495.
  • N-cyclopentyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F20): White solid, Yield: 69.6%, m.p. 194.6–196.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.10–7.93 (m, 1H, H-N), 7.16–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.85–6.81 (m, 2H), 4.08–3.93 (m, 1H), 3.78–3.65 (m, 3H), 2.17–2.12 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.86–1.69 (m, 3H), 1.67–1.56 (m, 2H), 1.54–1.42 (m, 2H), 1.38–1.32 (m, 2H), 1.26 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.09–1.04 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.39 (C=O), 157.62, 133.02, 126.86, 113.78, 55.06, 50.39, 32.52, 32.33, 25.37, 23.39, 23.02, 14.92. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C16H21NNaO2: 282.1465, found: 282.1474.
  • N-cyclohexyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F21): White solid, Yield: 68.3%, m.p. 142.8–144.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.95 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.02 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.58–3.47 (m, 1H), 2.22–2.08 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.81–1.60 (m, 5H), 1.58–1.48 (m,1H, H-3), 1.31–1.18 (m,3H), 1.18–1.02 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.00 (C=O), 157.63, 133.03, 126.87, 113.79, 55.08, 47.59, 32.66, 32.56, 25.38, 25.26, 24.57, 23.05, 14.99. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H24NO2: 274.1802, found: 274.1809.
  • 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F22): White solid, Yield: 74.4%, m.p. 171.4–173.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.11 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.47 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.16–7.01 (m, 4H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 2.33–2.26 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.02–1.91 (m,1H, H-1), 1.43–1.39 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.28–1.23 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.80 (C=O), 157.77, 136.84, 132.61, 131.86, 129.12, 127.04, 118.89, 113.84, 55.09, 26.34, 24.18, 20.45, 15.29. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO2: 282.1489, found: 282.1496.
  • 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F23): White solid, Yield: 80.5%, m.p. 134.4–135.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.51 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.47 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.17 (m, 1H), 7.15 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.13–7.08 (m, 2H), 7.08–7.01 (m, 1H), 6.90–6.83 (m, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 2.33–2.28 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.20 (s, 3H), 2.17–2.12 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.44–1.35 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.28–1.20 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.16 (C=O), 157.76, 136.48, 132.71, 131.00, 130.30, 127.05, 125.92, 124.83, 124.57, 113.85, 55.10, 25.68, 24.05, 17.90, 15.48. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO2: 282.1489, found: 282.1499.
  • 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N-(o-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F24): White solid, Yield: 75.4%, m.p. 135.1–136.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.51 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.49 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 3H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 2.36–2.29 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.3 (s, 3H), 2.18–2.12 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.43–1.38 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.28–1.23 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.16 (C=O), 157.77, 136.49, 132.73, 131.00, 130.30, 127.05, 125.93, 124.84, 124.57, 113.85, 55.10, 25.67, 24.05, 17.91, 15.49. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO2: 282.1489, found: 282.1498.
  • Ethyl 4-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclopropane-1-carbonyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (F25): Yellow oil, Yield: 54.9%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.16–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.89–6.76 (m, 2H), 4.08 –4.01 (m, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.63 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 2H), 3.50 (s, 2H), 3.37 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 4H), 2.34–2.12 (m, 2H), 1.39 –1.32 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.25–1.11 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.95 (C=O), 157.74, 154.63, 132.59, 127.17, 113.79, 60.92, 55.06, 44.65, 43.64, 43.12, 41.37, 24.18, 22.29, 15.96, 14.56. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H24N2NaO4: 355.1628, found: 355.1638.
  • 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N-(thiazol-2-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F26): White solid, Yield: 74.7%, m.p. 172.9–174.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.35 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.45 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.08 (m, 2H), 6.90–6.82 (m, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 2.47–2.39 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.17–2.13 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.51–1.47 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.43–1.38 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.17 (C=O), 158.99, 158.01, 157.95, 137.63, 131.92, 127.29, 113.89, 113.37, 55.11, 25.44, 24.98, 16.04. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H15N2O2S: 275.0849, found: 275.0857.
  • N-cyclopropyl-2-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F27): Yellow oil, Yield: 66.0%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.17 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.13 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92–6.84 (m, 2H), 2.70–2.61 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.20–2.13 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.76–1.71 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.37–1.27 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.19–1.10 (m, 1H), 0.64–0.55 (m, 2H), 0.41–0.34 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.00 (C=O), 141.04, 137.41, 128.22, 126.60, 126.40, 122.94, 25.58, 23.81, 22.45, 20.99, 15.10, 5.72. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H18NO: 216.1383, found: 216.1391.
  • N-cyclobutyl-2-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F28): White solid, Yield: 56.9%, m.p. 146.6–148.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.14 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.93–6.84 (m, 2H), 4.26–4.16 (m, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.20–2.07 (m, 3H), 1.91–1.79 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.72 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.63–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.33–1.25 (m, 1H), 1.19–1.09 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.77 (C=O), 141.06, 137.41, 128.22, 126.59, 126.38, 122.94, 43.95, 30.54, 30.48, 25.64, 23.75, 20.99, 15.05, 14.59. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H20NO: 230.1539, found: 230.1548.
  • N-cyclopentyl-2-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F29): White solid, Yield: 58.7%, m.p. 140.9–142.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.06 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.14 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.05–3.93 (m, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.18–2.13 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.86–1.71 (m, 3H), 1.67–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.44 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.24 (m, 3H), 1.15–1.10 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.27 (C=O), 141.21, 137.41, 128.22, 126.56, 126.34, 122.93, 50.41, 32.51, 32.35, 25.68, 23.62, 23.39, 21.01, 15.17. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H22NO: 244.1696, found: 244.1711.
  • N-cyclohexyl-2-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F30): White solid, Yield: 63.7%, m.p. 159.8–162.4 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.97 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.14 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 3.60–3.49 (m, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.18–2.13 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.87–1.78 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.76–1.59 (m, 4H), 1.58–1.48 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.33–1.18 (m, 3H), 1.17–1.03 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.86 (C=O), 141.21, 137.41, 128.23, 126.56, 126.36, 122.92, 47.59, 32.65, 32.55, 25.69, 25.26, 24.56, 23.64, 21.02, 15.24. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H24NO: 258.1852, found: 258.1858.
  • 2-(m-Tolyl)-N-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F31): White solid, Yield: 57.1%, m.p. 132.0–133.4 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.14 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.52–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.01–6.90 (m, 3H), 2.33–2.28 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.07–1.99 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.48–1.44 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.44–1.27 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.69 (C=O), 140.80, 137.50, 136.83, 131.91, 129.15, 128.29, 126.78, 126.46, 123.10, 118.90, 26.63, 24.75, 21.02, 20.47, 15.52. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO: 266.1539, found: 266.1547.
  • N,2-Di-m-tolylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F32): White solid, Yield: 59.8%, m.p. 150.8–151.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.52 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dd, J = 16.1, 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 7.02–6.92 (m, 3H), 2.36–2.28 (m, 4H), 2.25–2.20 (m, 4H), 1.46–1.41 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.36–1.23 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.07 (C=O), 140.91, 137.50, 136.46, 130.98, 130.32, 128.30, 126.76, 126.47, 125.95, 124.87, 124.55, 123.11, 25.96, 24.61, 21.05, 17.93, 15.78. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H20NO: 266.1539, found: 266.1546.
  • 2-(m-Tolyl)-N-(o-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F33): White solid, Yield: 60.5%, m.p. 150.5–151.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.52 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.21–7.12 (m, 3H), 7.02 (d, J = 28.5 Hz, 4H), 2.29 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 4H), 2.20 (s, 4H), 1.48–1.39 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.35–1.24 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.07 (C=O), 140.92, 137.50, 136.48, 130.99, 130.33, 128.30, 126.76, 126.48, 125.95, 124.87, 124.55, 123.11, 25.97, 24.62, 21.05, 17.93, 15.79. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C18H19NNaO: 288.1359, found: 288.1367.
  • Ethyl 4-(2-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carbonyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (F34): Yellow oil, Yield: 67.2%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.17–7.12 (m, 1H), 7.02–6.92 (m, 3H), 4.10–3.98 (m, 2H), 3.72–3.57 (m, 2H), 3.56–3.40 (m, 4H), 2.29–2.24 (m, 5H), 1.45–1.33 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.27–1.12 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.85 (C=O), 154.63, 140.76, 137.45, 128.21, 126.72, 126.59, 123.23, 60.94, 44.67, 43.59, 43.05, 41.39, 24.74, 22.09, 21.03, 14.57. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C18H24N2NaO3: 339.1679, found: 339.1688.
  • N-(thiazol-2-yl)-2-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F35): White solid, Yield: 50.8%, m.p. 152.8–154.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.34 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.45 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.10 (m, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 2.45–2.37 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.24–2.17 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.55–1.50 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.48–1.43 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.07 (C=O), 157.98, 140.07, 137.65, 137.27, 128.37, 127.05, 126.79, 123.22, 113.43, 25.94, 25.17, 21.02, 16.19. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H15N2OS: 259.0900, found: 259.0909.
  • N-cyclopropyl-2-(4-fluorophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F36): White solid, Yield: 51.4%, m.p. 152.5–153.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.19 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.15 (dd, J = 8.7, 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.11–7.04 (m, 2H), 2.67–2.60 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.247–2.22 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.76–1.67 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.37–1.28 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.18–1.13 (m, 1H), 0.62–0.55 (m, 2H), 0.41–0.35 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.89 (C=O), 160.71 (J C-F= 241.5 Hz), 137.26, 127.63 (J C-F = 8.0 Hz, 2C), 115.06 (J C-F = 21.2 Hz, 2C), 25.68, 23.13, 22.47, 15.16, 5.75, 5.72. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-117.09. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C13H14FNNaO: 242.0952, found: 242.0960.
  • N-cyclobutyl-2-(4-fluorophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F37): White solid, Yield: 62.9%, m.p. 170.2–172.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.36 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.15 (dd, J = 8.6, 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 4.26–4.16 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.20 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.17–2.11 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.76–1.72 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.67–1.51 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.28 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.22–1.12 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.67 (C=O), 160.71 (J C-F = 240.5 Hz), 137.31, 127.62 (J C-F = 8.1 Hz, 2C), 115.06 (J C-F = 21.3 Hz, 2C), 43.98, 30.56, 30.48, 25.74, 23.07, 15.12, 14.61. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-117.17. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H17FNO: 234.1289, found: 234.1296.
  • N-cyclopentyl-2-(4-fluorophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F38): White solid, Yield: 51.8%, m.p. 166.1–167.6 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.06 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.15 (dd, J = 8.6, 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 4.05–3.97 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.20 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.88–1.72 (m, 3H), 1.66–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.53–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.41–1.26 (m, 3H), 1.15–1.11 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.16 (C=O), 160.69 (J C-F = 241.4 Hz), 137.43, 127.58 (J C-F = 7.9 Hz, 2C), 115.04 (J C-F = 21.1 Hz, 2C), 50.44, 32.53, 32.33, 25.75, 23.41, 22.94, 15.20. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-117.21. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H19FNO: 248.1445, found: 248.1455.
  • N-cyclohexyl-2-(4-fluorophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F39): White solid, Yield: 72.4%, m.p. 188.2–190.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.14 (dd, J = 8.4, 5.5 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.54 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.27–2.18 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.84–1.80 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.77–1.61 (m, 4H), 1.53 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H), 1.36–1.19 (m, 3H), 1.17–1.07 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.75 (C=O), 160.70 (J C-F = 241.5 Hz), 137.43, 127.58 (J C-F = 8.0 Hz, 2C), 115.04 (J C-F = 21.1 Hz, 2C), 47.63, 32.66, 32.54, 25.74, 25.26, 24.58, 24.55, 22.95, 15.27. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-117.24. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H21FNO: 262.1602, found: 262.1611.
  • 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-N-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F40): White solid, Yield: 65.9%, m.p. 181.9–183.4 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.13 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.47 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (q, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 2.41–2.32 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.04–1.98 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.48–1.43 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.34–1.30 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.57 (C=O), 160.82 (J C-F = 241.7 Hz), 137.04, 136.80, 131.97, 129.16 (2C), 127.79 (J C-F = 8.0 Hz, 2C), 118.94, 115.12 (J C-F = 21.3 Hz, 2C), 26.67, 24.04, 20.47, 15.54. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-116.92. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17FNO: 270.1289, found: 270.1296.
  • 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-N-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F41): White solid, Yield: 73.2%, m.p. 157.4–159.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.54 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.01 (m, 7H), 2.37 (s, 1H, H-2), 2.20 (s, 4H), 1.45–1.31 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.97 (C=O), 160.84 (J C-F = 242.7 Hz), 137.13, 136.44, 131.06, 130.35, 127.81 (J C-F = 8.0 Hz, 2C), 125.98, 124.94, 124.61, 115.14 (J C-F = 21.3 Hz, 2C), 25.99, 23.91, 17.93, 15.77. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-116.97. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17FNO: 270.1289, found: 270.1297.
  • 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-N-(o-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F42): White solid, Yield: 74.2%, m.p. 158.0–159.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.54 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34–6.83 (m, 7H), 2.40–2.36 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.20 (s, 4H), 1.47–1.23 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.94 (C=O), 160.82 (J C-F = 241.3 Hz), 137.13, 136.44, 131.03, 130.33, 127.80 (J C-F= 8.0 Hz, 2C), 125.96, 124.92, 124.58, 115.13 (J C-F = 21.2 Hz, 2C), 25.98, 23.90, 17.92, 15.75. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-116.97. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C17H16FNNaO: 292.1108, found: 292.1118.
  • Ethyl 4-(2-(4-fluorophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carbonyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (F43): Yellow oil, Yield: 73.3%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.22 (dd, J = 8.6, 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.04 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.67–3.56 (m, 2H), 3.52–3.43 (m, 4H), 3.35–3.27 (m, 2H), 2.38–2.24 (m, 2H), 1.41–1.35 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.22–1.16 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.77 (C=O), 160.81 (J C-F = 241.6 Hz), 154.66, 136.99, 127.94 (J C-F = 8.0 Hz, 2C), 115.05 (J C-F = 21.2 Hz, 2C), 60.96, 44.67, 43.56, 43.07, 41.42, 24.01, 22.07, 16.40, 14.59. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-117.08. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C17H22FN2O3: 343.1428, found: 343.1438.
  • 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-N-(thiazol-2-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F44): Pale yellow solid, Yield: 70.4%, m.p. 187.0–189.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.38 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.45 (s, 1H), 7.36–6.97 (m, 5H), 2.20 (s, 1H, H-1), 1.53–1.46 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.95 (C=O), 160.96 (J C-F = 242.4 Hz), 157.98, 137.66, 136.34, 128.05 (J C-F = 8.0 Hz, 2C), 115.20 (d, J = 21.2 Hz), 113.45, 25.20, 16.24. 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ-116.54. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C13H12FN2OS: 263.0649, found: 263.0657.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-cyclopropylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F45): White solid, Yield: 67.5%, m.p. 160.0–161.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.07 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.18 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.37–2.23 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.14–2.07 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.61 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H, H-3), 1.25–1.19 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.05 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 0.50–0.42 (m, 2H), 0.30–0.24 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.75 (C=O), 140.32, 130.41, 128.24, 127.68, 25.84, 23.23, 22.47, 15.35, 5.75, 5.71. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C13H15ClNO: 236.0837, found: 236.0845.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-cyclobutylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F46): White solid, Yield: 72.8%, m.p. 194.5–195.7 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.37 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.36–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.16–7.11 (m, 2H), 4.26–4.13 (m, 1H), 2.26–2.18 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.17–2.07 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.80–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.65–1.56 (m, 2H), 1.35–1.28 (m, 1H), 1.21–1.13 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.53 (C=O), 140.36, 130.42, 128.25, 127.68, 43.99, 30.54, 30.46, 25.90, 23.17, 15.31, 14.62. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H17ClNO: 250.0993, found: 250.1002.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-cyclopentylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F47): White solid, Yield: 74.6%, m.p. 197.9–199.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.09 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.31 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 4.07–3.95 (m, 1H), 2.32–2.18 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.89–1.70 (m, 3H), 1.67–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.53–1.42 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.25 (m, 3H), 1.16 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.03 (C=O), 140.48, 130.37, 128.24, 127.65, 50.46, 32.53, 32.33, 25.92, 23.41, 23.05, 15.39. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C15H18ClNNaO: 286.0969, found: 286.0980.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-cyclohexylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F48): White solid, Yield: 74.5%, m.p. 181.3–183.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.00 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H-N), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.57–3.50 (m, 1H), 2.26–2.16 (m, 1H, H-2), 1.88–1.80 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.77–1.60 (m, 4H), 1.52 (s, 1H), 1.36–1.29 (m, 1H), 1.27–1.19 (m, 2H), 1.18–1.05 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.61 (C=O), 140.48, 130.37, 128.24, 127.65, 47.65, 32.64, 32.52, 25.92, 25.25, 24.55, 23.06, 15.45. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H21ClNO: 278.1306, found: 278.1313.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-(p-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F49): White solid, Yield: 62.5%, m.p. 192.3–194.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.16 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.47 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.41–2.34 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.07–2.03 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.55–1.44 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.36–1.31 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.43 (C=O), 140.07, 136.76, 132.01, 130.60, 129.17, 128.30, 127.82, 118.96, 26.82, 24.12, 20.47, 15.72. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17ClNO: 286.0993, found: 286.0999.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-(m-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F50): White solid, Yield: 69.4%, m.p. 163.5–165.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.54 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.49 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 3H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.30–2.34 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.21 (s, 4H), 1.49–1.45 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.38–1.27 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.87 (C=O), 140.18, 136.44, 131.08, 130.63, 130.37, 128.34, 127.85, 126.00, 124.98, 124.63, 26.17, 24.04, 17.95, 15.98. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17ClNO: 286.0993, found: 286.1000.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-(o-tolyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F51): White solid, Yield: 67.7%, m.p. 157.9–159.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.55 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.48 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 3H), 7.14 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.03 (m, 1H), 2.40–2.36 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.26–2.22 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.20 (s, 3H), 1.49–1.43 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.36–1.29 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.80 (C=O), 140.17, 136.42, 131.02, 130.59, 130.33, 128.30, 127.82, 125.96, 124.92, 124.57, 26.16, 24.00, 17.93, 15.93. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C17H16ClNNaO: 308.0813, found: 308.0821.
  • Ethyl 4-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)cyclopropane-1-carbonyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (F52): Yellow oil, Yield: 76.0%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.33–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.15 (m, 2H), 4.09–4.00 (m, 2H), 3.73–3.56 (m, 2H), 3.55–3.44 (m, 2H), 3.35 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.38–2.24 (m, 2H), 1.50–1.38 (m, 1H, H-3), 1.18 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.58 (C=O), 154.60, 139.98, 130.60, 128.17, 127.87, 60.92, 44.67, 43.55, 43.07, 41.41, 24.11, 22.31, 16.48, 14.50. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H22ClN2O3: 337.1313, found: 337.1317.
  • 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-(thiazol-2-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide (F53): White solid, Yield: 59.0%, m.p. 218.3–221.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.39 (s, 1H, H-N), 7.45 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.15 (m, 3H), 2.30–2.16 (m, 1H, H-1), 1.63–1.41 (m, 2H, H-3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.81 (C=O), 157.99, 139.35, 137.66, 130.91, 128.36, 127.99, 113.44, 25.38, 25.26, 16.38. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C13H12ClN2OS: 279.0353, found: 279.0363.

3.7. The Antimicrobial Activity In Vitro

Three strains of bacteria (S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa) and one strain of fungal (C. albicans) were selected to determine the antimicrobial activity in vitro by the broth microdilution method. The fungal and bacterial strains were obtained from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center. The bacteria and fungi were cultured to 1–5 × 103 CFU/mL in Mueller Hinton Broth medium and RPMI1640 medium, respectively, before use. The commercial ciprofloxacin or fluconazole was selected as the positive control. All compounds were dissolved in DMSO and serially diluted, and the concentrations of all tested compounds were 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 μg/mL. Then, the plates were continuously incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The OD values were read on a Microplate reader at a wavelength of 600 nm. The plates without drugs acted as the growth control, while the plates without cells and drugs acted as blank control. The MIC80 value was the lowest concentration; the inhibition rate was ≥80%. The test was performed in triplicates.
I n h i b i t i o n   r a t e % = O D c o n t r o l O D s a m p l e O D c o n t r o l O D b l a n k × 100 %

3.8. Molecular Docking Analysis

The 3D crystal structure of CYP51 (PDB code: 6AY6) was acquired from the RCSB Protein Date Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6AY6 (accessed on 7 September 2017)). The molecular docking process was conducted for the investigation of the binding mode of compounds F8, F24, and F42 with CYP51 using Discovery Studio 2016 software (Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA) [32]. ChemBio 3D Ultra 14.0 software was used to generate the 3D structure of the above compounds and treated with energy minimization [36]. Water molecules and the co-crystallized ligand of the 3D crystal structure of CYP51 were removed, and the crystal structure was hydrotreated before molecular docking. The parameters of docking were in accordance with the previously reported method [13].

4. Conclusions

In summary, a series of amide derivatives containing cyclopropane were designed and synthesized, and their antimicrobial activity in vitro was evaluated. The results showed that the four and three of the compounds exhibited moderate activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, respectively. Three compounds were sensitive to Candida albicans and exhibited excellent antifungal activity, with great potential for further development. SAR analysis showed that introducing halogens into the benzene ring was beneficial for improving antibacterial and antifungal activity. The presence of thiazolamide contributed to the improvement of antibacterial activity, while benzamides were beneficial to the improvement of antifungal activity. Compounds F8, F24, and F42 showed the highest activity against C. albicans (MIC80 = 16 μg/mL). The molecular docking results showed that the above compounds had a good binding affinity with the CYP51 protein. Thus, amide compounds containing cyclopropane can be considered promising antimicrobial lead compounds. It is necessary to further study the in vivo activity and mechanism of action of these compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29174124/s1, Compounds characterization—Pages S2–S86: 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS spectrum of all the target compounds.

Author Contributions

D.C. and Z.D. designed the experiments and wrote the main manuscript text; Y.C., D.C., L.S., X.G. and Y.H. performed the experiments; D.C. and Z.D. took part in data analysis and discussion. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 20210302124072).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Chemical Experiment Teaching and Research Center for providing us with nuclear magnetic resonance analysis and thank the core service of Life Science Research for providing us with HRMS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.; Feng, X.Z.; Xiao, Z.Q.; Fan, G.R.; Chen, S.X.; Liao, S.L.; Luo, H.; Wang, Z.D. Design, synthesis, antibacterial, antifungal and anticancer evaluations of novel β-pinene quaternary ammonium salts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khalilzadeh, M.; Saberi, S.; Noori, G.; Vaziri, M.; Sepehri, S.; Bakherad, H.; Esmaeili-Fallah, M.; Mirzayi, S.; Farhadi, G. Synthesis, biological assessment, and computational investigations of nifedipine and monastrol analogues as anti-leishmanial major and anti-microbial agents. Mol. Divers. 2023, 27, 2555–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sapozhnikov, S.V.; Sabirova, A.E.; Shtyrlin, N.V.; Druk, A.Y.; Agafonova, M.N.; Chirkova, M.N.; Kazakova, R.R.; Grishaev, D.Y.; Nikishova, T.V.; Krylova, E.S.; et al. Design, synthesis, antibacterial activity and toxicity of novel quaternary ammonium compounds based on pyridoxineand fatty acids. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 211, 113100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thibodeaux, C.J.; Chang, W.; Liu, H. Enzymatic chemistry of cyclopropane, epoxide, and aziridine biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1681–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Faust, R. Fascinating natural and artificial cyclopropane architectures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2251–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wessjohann, L.A.; Brandt, W.; Thiemann, T. Biosynthesis and metabolism of cyclopropane rings in natural compounds. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1625–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Talele, T.T. The “cyclopropyl fragment” is a versatile player that frequently appears in preclinical/clinical drug molecules. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8712–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, K.L.; Sin, N.; Civiello, R.L.; Wang, X.A.; Combrink, K.D.; Gulgeze, H.B.; Venables, B.L.; Wright, J.J.K.; Dalterio, R.A.; Zadjura, L.; et al. Respiratory syncytial virus fusion inhibitors. Part 4: Optimization for oral bioavailability. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abe, H.; Kikuchi, S.; Hayakawa, K.; Iida, T.; Nagahashi, N.; Maeda, K.; Sakamoto, J.; Matsumoto, N.; Miura, T.; Matsumura, K.; et al. Discovery of a highly potent and selective MEK inhibitor: GSK1120212 (JTP-74057 DMSO solvate). ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reichelt, A.; Martin, S.F. Synthesis and properties of cyclopropane-derived peptidomimetics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amiri Moghaddam, J.; Dávila-Céspedes, A.; Kehraus, S.; Crüsemann, M.; Köse, M.; Müller, C.E.; König, G.M. Cyclopropane-containing fatty acids from the marine bacterium Labrenzia sp. 011 with antimicrobial and GPR84 activity. Mar. Drugs. 2018, 16, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kharlamova, T.V.; Gabdrakipov, A.V.; Seidakhmetova, P.B.; Praliyev, K.D. Antibacterial activity of synthesized derivatives of purpurin containing cyclopropane and cyclobutane fragment. Eurasian Chem.-Technol. J. 2020, 22, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zambrano-Huerta, A.; Cifuentes-Castañeda, D.D.; Bautista-Renedo, J.; Mendieta-Zerón, H.; Melgar-Fernández, R.C.; Pavón-Romero, S.; Morales-Rodríguez, M.; Frontana-Uribe, B.A.; González-Rivas, N.; Cuevas-Yañez, E. Synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of 1,3-bis-(1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-propan-2-ol derivatives as antifungal compounds fluconazole analogues. Med. Chem. Res. 2019, 28, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Biernasiuk, A.; Berecka-Rycerz, A.; Gumieniczek, A.; Malm, M.; Łączkowski, K.Z.; Szymańska, J.; Malm, A. The newly synthesized thiazole derivatives as potential antifungal compounds against Candida albicans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 6355–6367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Du, D.; Ji, C.; Zheng, S.; Chen, Y.; Cai, H.; Li, Z.; Yan, D.; Teng, H. Synthesis of difluorocyclopropanes via visible-light-mediated [1+2] cycloaddition of diazo esters with gem-difluoroalkenes and evaluation of their antifungal activity. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2024, 366, 1738–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Köllmann, C.; Wiechert, S.M.; Jones, P.G.; Pietschmann, T.; Werz, D.B. Synthesis of 4′/5′-spirocyclopropanated uridine and d-xylouridine derivatives and their activity against the human respiratory syncytial virus. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 6966–6971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, R.; Ksebati, M.B.; Drach, J.C.; Zemlicka, J. Synthesis and antiviral activity of methylenedifluorocyclopropane analogues of nucleosides. Nucleos. Nucleot. Nucl. 2007, 20, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oubella, A.; Fawzi, M.; Auhmani, A.; Riahi, A.; Morjani, H.; Robert, A.; Ait Itto, M.Y. Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel heterocyclic systems with monoterpenic skeleton combining dichlorocyclopropane and 1,3,4-thiadiazole nucleus. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 6403–6406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pourshab, M.; Asghari, S.; Tajbakhsh, M.; Khalilpour, A. Diastereoselective sonochemical synthesis of spirocyclopropaneoxindoles and evaluation of their antioxidant and cytotoxic activities. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1900087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Donaldson, W.A. Synthesis of cyclopropane containing natural products. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8589–8627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ulrich, S.; Ricken, R.; Buspavanich, P.; Schlattmann, P.; Adli, M. Efficacy and adverse effects of tranylcypromine and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychopharm. 2020, 40, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vallgårda, J.; Appelberg, U.; Arvidsson, L.E.; Hjorth, S.; Svensson, B.E.; Hacksell, U. trans-2-Aryl-N,N-dipropylcyclopropylamines: Synthesis and interactions with 5-HT1A receptors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1485–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, M.R.; Li, H.L.; Ba, M.Y.; Cheng, W.; Zhu, H.L.; Duan, Y.T. Cyclopropyl scaffold: A generalist for marketed drugs. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem 2021, 21, 150–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Subbaiah, M.A.M.; Meanwell, N.A. Bioisosteres of the phenyl ring: Recent strategic applications in lead optimization and drug design. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 14046–14128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wallace, M.J.; Dharuman, S.; Fernando, D.M.; Reeve, S.M.; Gee, C.T.; Yao, J.; Griffith, E.C.; Phelps, G.A.; Wright, W.C.; Elmore, J.M.; et al. Discovery and characterization of the antimetabolite action of thioacetamide-linked 1,2,3-triazoles as disruptors of cysteine biosynthesis in gram-negative bacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Luo, B.; Ning, Y.L. Comprehensive overview of carboxamide derivatives as succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2022, 70, 957–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. De Vita, D.; Friggeri, L.; D’Auria, F.D.; Pandolfi, F.; Piccoli, F.; Panella, S.; Palamara, A.T.; Simonetti, G.; Scipione, L.; Di Santo, R.; et al. Activity of caffeic acid derivatives against Candida albicans biofilm. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 1502–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kun Zhou, K.; Chen, D.; Li, B.; Zhang, B.; Miao, F.; Zhou, L. Bioactivity and structure-activity relationship of cinnamic acid esters and their derivatives as potential antifungal agents for plant protection. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176189. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, N.; Abramyan, E.D.; Cheng, W.; Perlatti, B.; Harvey, C.J.B.; Bills, G.F.; Tang, Y. Targeted genome mining reveals the biosynthetic gene clusters of natural product CYP51 inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6043–6047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kholodniak, O.V.; Kazunin, M.S.; Meyer, F.; Kovalenko, S.I.; Steffens, K.G. Novel N-cycloalkylcarbonyl-N’-arylthioureas: Synthesis, design, antifungal activity and gene toxicity. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Sheng, J.; Huang, G.; Ma, R.; Yin, F.; Song, D.; Zhao, C.; Ma, S. Design, synthesis and antibacterial activity of cinnamaldehyde derivatives as inhibitors of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Eskildsen, J.; Redrobe, J.P.; Sams, A.G.; Dekermendjian, K.; Laursen, M.; Boll, J.B.; Papke, R.L.; Bundgaard, C.; Frederiksen, K.; Bastlund, J.F. Discovery and optimization of Lu AF58801, a novel, selective and brain penetrant positive allosteric modulator of alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: Attenuation of subchronic phencyclidine (PCP)-induced cognitive deficits in rats following oral administration. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Maeta, N.; Kamiya, H.; Okada, Y. Radical-cation vinylcyclopropane rearrangements by TiO2 photocatalysis. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 6551–6566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lakkaraju, S.K.; Mbatia, H.; Hanscom, M.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, J.; Stoica, B.; MacKerell Jr, A.D.; Faden, A.I.; Xu, F. Cyclopropyl-containing positive allosteric modulators of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2275–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, W.; Wang, J.H.; Wu, J.P.; Jin, M.Y.; Li, J.L.; Jin, S.Y.; Li, W.X.; Xu, D.; Liu, X.L.; Xu, G. Rational design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of fluorine- and chlorine-substituted pyrazol-5-ylbenzamide derivatives as potential succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2022, 70, 7566–7575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Wei, P.; Liu, L.; Bai, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, L. Design, bioactivity and mechanism of N′-phenyl pyridylcarbohydrazides with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. Mol. Divers. 2024. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of commercial drugs of cyclopropane.
Figure 1. Structure of commercial drugs of cyclopropane.
Molecules 29 04124 g001
Figure 2. Design strategy of title compounds.
Figure 2. Design strategy of title compounds.
Molecules 29 04124 g002
Scheme 1. Synthetic reaction and structures of target compounds. Reagents and conditions: (i) Malonic acid, DMF, 90 °C, 6 h, yield: 80–82%; (ii) DMAP, N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride, EDCI, DCM, rt, 2 h, yield: 60–70%; (iii) NaH, Trimethylsulfonyl iodide, THF, 25 °C, yield: 76–82%; (iv) MeOH, NaOH, 25 °C, yield: 80–90%; (v) THF, EDCI, HOBT, amine, 37 °C, yield: 50–80%.
Scheme 1. Synthetic reaction and structures of target compounds. Reagents and conditions: (i) Malonic acid, DMF, 90 °C, 6 h, yield: 80–82%; (ii) DMAP, N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride, EDCI, DCM, rt, 2 h, yield: 60–70%; (iii) NaH, Trimethylsulfonyl iodide, THF, 25 °C, yield: 76–82%; (iv) MeOH, NaOH, 25 °C, yield: 80–90%; (v) THF, EDCI, HOBT, amine, 37 °C, yield: 50–80%.
Molecules 29 04124 sch001
Figure 3. Binding interactions of compounds (F8, F24, and F42) with CYP51 protein (PDB code: 6AY6).
Figure 3. Binding interactions of compounds (F8, F24, and F42) with CYP51 protein (PDB code: 6AY6).
Molecules 29 04124 g003
Table 1. The results of antimicrobial and antifungal activity of tested compounds (MIC80, μg/mL).
Table 1. The results of antimicrobial and antifungal activity of tested compounds (MIC80, μg/mL).
CompoundGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaFungusCompoundGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaFungus
No.RS. aureusE. coliP. aeruginosaC. albicansNo.RS. aureusE. coliP. aeruginosaC. albicans
Molecules 29 04124 i001  (F1–F9)Molecules 29 04124 i002  (F27–F35)
F1Molecules 29 04124 i003>128>128>128>128F27Molecules 29 04124 i003>128>128>128>128
F2Molecules 29 04124 i004>128>128>128>128F28Molecules 29 04124 i004>128>128>128>128
F3Molecules 29 04124 i005>128>128>128>128F29Molecules 29 04124 i00564>128>128>128
F4Molecules 29 04124 i006>128>128>128128F30Molecules 29 04124 i006128>128>128>128
F5Molecules 29 04124 i00764128>12864F31Molecules 29 04124 i007>12864>128>128
F6Molecules 29 04124 i008>128>128>128>128F32Molecules 29 04124 i008>128>128>12864
F7Molecules 29 04124 i009128>128>12832F33Molecules 29 04124 i009>128>128>128128
F8Molecules 29 04124 i010>128>128>12816F34Molecules 29 04124 i010>128>128>128128
F9Molecules 29 04124 i0116432>12864F35Molecules 29 04124 i011>128>128>128>128
Molecules 29 04124 i012  (F10–F17)Molecules 29 04124 i013  (F36–F44)
F10Molecules 29 04124 i003>128>128>128128F36Molecules 29 04124 i003128>128>128128
F11Molecules 29 04124 i004>128>128>128>128F37Molecules 29 04124 i004>128>128>128>128
F12Molecules 29 04124 i005>128>128>128>128F38Molecules 29 04124 i005>128>128>128>128
F13Molecules 29 04124 i006>128>128>128>128F39Molecules 29 04124 i006>128>128>128>128
F14Molecules 29 04124 i007>128>128>128128F40Molecules 29 04124 i007>128>128>128>128
F15Molecules 29 04124 i008>128>128>128>128F41Molecules 29 04124 i008>128>128>128>128
F16Molecules 29 04124 i009>128>128>128>128F42Molecules 29 04124 i009>128>128>12816
F17Molecules 29 04124 i011>128>128>128>128F43Molecules 29 04124 i010>128>128>128>128
Molecules 29 04124 i014  (F18–F26)F44Molecules 29 04124 i011>128>128>128>128
F18Molecules 29 04124 i003>128>128>128>128Molecules 29 04124 i015  (F45–F53)
F19Molecules 29 04124 i004>128>128>128>128F45Molecules 29 04124 i003>12864>128>128
F20Molecules 29 04124 i005>128>128>128>128F46Molecules 29 04124 i004>128>128>128>128
F21Molecules 29 04124 i006>128>128>128>128F47Molecules 29 04124 i005>128>128>128>128
F22Molecules 29 04124 i007>128>128>12832F48Molecules 29 04124 i006>128>128>128>128
F23Molecules 29 04124 i008>128>128>12864F49Molecules 29 04124 i007128>128>12864
F24Molecules 29 04124 i009>128>128>12816F50Molecules 29 04124 i008>128>128>12864
F25Molecules 29 04124 i010>128>128>128>128F51Molecules 29 04124 i009128>128>12832
F26Molecules 29 04124 i011>128>128>128>128F52Molecules 29 04124 i010>128>128>128>128
F53Molecules 29 04124 i01164128>128>128
Ciprofloxacin222-Ciprofloxacin222-
Fluconazole---2Fluconazole---2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, D.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, L.; Gao, X.; Huang, Y.; Du, Z. Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Activity of Amide Derivatives Containing Cyclopropane. Molecules 2024, 29, 4124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174124

AMA Style

Chen D, Cheng Y, Shi L, Gao X, Huang Y, Du Z. Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Activity of Amide Derivatives Containing Cyclopropane. Molecules. 2024; 29(17):4124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Dongdong, Yu Cheng, Lele Shi, Xueting Gao, Yuhang Huang, and Zhenting Du. 2024. "Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Activity of Amide Derivatives Containing Cyclopropane" Molecules 29, no. 17: 4124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop