Next Article in Journal
Immunomodulatory Effects of Green Tea Catechins and Their Ring Fission Metabolites in a Tumor Microenvironment Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Concentration of Ga-68 and Proof-of-Concept Microscale Labeling of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in a Droplet Reactor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 19
10.3390/molecules29194574
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evidence of Cooperative Effects for the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 Spin Crossover Molecular Complex in Polyaniline Plus Iron Magnetite

by
Wai Kiat Chin
1,†,
Binny Tamang
2,†,
M. Zaid Zaz
1,
Arjun Subedi
1,
Gauthami Viswan
1,
Alpha T. N’Diaye
3,
Rebecca Y. Lai
2,* and
Peter A. Dowben
1,*
1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
3
Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(19), 4574; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194574
Submission received: 16 August 2024 / Revised: 16 September 2024 / Accepted: 19 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The spin crossover complex Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and its composite, Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, combined with the conducting polymer polyaniline (PANI) plus varying concentrations of iron magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles were studied. A cooperative effect is evident from the hysteresis width in the plot of magnetic susceptibility multiplied by temperature versus temperature ( χ m T versus T) for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 with PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The hysteresis width in the composites vary no more than 2 K with respect to the pristine Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin crossover crystallites despite the fact that there exists a high degree of miscibility of the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin crossover complex with the PANI. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite tend to agglomerate at higher concentrations regardless of the spin state of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2. Of note is that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are shown to be antiferromagnetically coupled with the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 when Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is in the high spin state.

1. Introduction

The study of the effects of mixing a conducting polymer with bi-stable spin crossover (SCO) molecular complexes is fairly recent and sparse [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Efforts have been made in an attempt to lower the on-state resistance of spin crossover molecular films by forming composites with various conducting polymers [1,3,4,6], largely with the goal of improving the utility of SCO film-based devices [4,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. A previous study of a polymeric spin crossover [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 plus the conducting polymer polyaniline (PANI) showed a reduction in the hysteresis width in the χ m T versus T, which is an indication of a reduced cooperative effect [5]. However, the cooperative effect of [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 was restored and enhanced following the addition of iron magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles into the [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 plus PANI composite. This was understood to be due to the phase separation of [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 in the PANI matrix caused by the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Such a phase separation turned the miscible [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 plus PANI composite into immiscible domains of [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 and PANI, where the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are preferentially segregated to the [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 domains. Overall, the prior study has suggested that the miscibility gap in the SCO-polymer system could be easily perturbed.
Similarly, the spin crossover complex Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 has been much studied [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and the spin state transition temperature for this complex is in the vicinity of 176 K [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,37,38,39]. Prior studies of Mn-doped and Zn-doped Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 thin films [38,39,40], as well as [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] crystallites coated with an organic, like glycerol [41], showed that the hysteresis width, in χ m T versus T, varied depending on the dopant [38,39] and the coating layer [41], respectively. In this study, we observed that for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticle composites, the hysteresis width of χ m T versus T remains largely unchanged. The hysteresis width behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is starkly different from that of the [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1% loading by weight) [5], indicating that the dispersion of a spin crossover complex in PANI and the exchange between the spin crossover complex and the Fe3O4 nanoparticles, which is mediated by PANI, depends very much on the choice of spin crossover molecule. With this work, there are now examples of both ferromagnetic [5] and antiferromagnetic coupling between a spin crossover molecular complex and iron magnetite nanoparticles, mediated by polyaniline.

2. Experimental Details

All the reagents and solvents were used as received. Ammonium iron (II) sulfate hexahydrate (99%), aniline (99.8%), ammonium persulfate (APS), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) (ACS reagent, 37%) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH, USA). 1–10 phenanthroline monohydrate was purchased from Chem-Impex (Wood Dale, IL, USA). Sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN) (99%) was purchased from Avantor (Radnor Township, PA, USA). Ethanol and methanol (≥99.9%) were purchased from Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Iron (II, III) nano-powders (50–100 nm particle size, 97% trace metals) were purchased from Millipore Sigma (Burlington, MA, USA). The solutions used in this study were made with deionized (DI) water purified through a Millipore Synergy system (18.2 MΩ·cm, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
The method used for the synthesis of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 was adapted from the one used by Akabori et al. [42]. In brief, 1.95 g of ammonium iron (II) sulfate hexahydrate and 3.00 g of 1–10 phenanthroline were dissolved together in 200 mL of DI water, resulting in a dark-red solution. Next, 21 g of NaSCN was added to 15 mL of DI water to create a saturated solution, and this solution was added to the dark-red solution while stirring. Fine crystals were observed immediately, but the solution mixture was stirred for another four hours at room temperature to complete the reaction. The crude product was collected on Whatman filter paper and rinsed with methanol. It was further purified via recrystallization in methanol and dried in air. The purity was determined by IR spectroscopy (Supplementary Materials Figure S1).
The synthesis of PANI was adapted from the methods used by Tang et al. [43] and Adams et al. [44]. A solution containing 0.25 M aniline (683 µL) in 30 mL of DI water was placed in an ice bath with magnetic stirring at 800 rpm, and 0.25 M APS in 10 mL of 1 M HCl was added to the aniline solution. The solution was allowed to stir for six hours at 0 °C. A dark green precipitate began to form within the first half hour. After six hours, the reaction was left to proceed overnight with stirring at room temperature. The dark green precipitate was collected using ultracentrifugation at 4500 rpm for 30 min and washed several times with 1 M HCl, ethanol, and DI water.
The fabrication of the composite thin films of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 together with PANI and Fe3O4 nanoparticles was accomplished through a solvent approach. In total, 20 mg of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and 20 mg of PANI were added to 5 mL of methanol, and this mixture was sonicated in a Branson 2510R-MT bath sonicator at room temperature for 10 min to create a uniform dispersion. This mixture, also known as the 1:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2/PANI bi-composite, was then dried to completion in air prior to vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) analysis. The 1:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2/PANI bi-composite ratio is emphasized in this work to make the comparison with the prior study of the [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 plus PANI composite [5] more facile. To fabricate the tri-composite samples containing Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, PANI, and Fe3O4, different amounts (1, 5, and 10% by weight) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles were added to the 1:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2/PANI bi-composite and sonicated again for 10 min until uniformly dispersed. These samples were dried in air prior to VSM analysis.
The measurements of DC magnetic susceptibility times temperature ( χ m T ) were carried out in DynaCool PPMS from Quantum Design. The elemental mapping of iron and sulfur in the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] and its composites was performed using the FEI Tecnai Osiris S/TEM with the means of energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) and high-angle annular dark-field imaging mode with a 200 kV accelerating voltage of scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM). The Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and its composites plus polyaniline (PANI) plus various concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticle solutions were drop-casted on formvar/carbon 200 mesh copper TEM grids from Ted Pella.
The room temperature DC current-voltage I(V) measurements of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 (10% loading by weight) drop-cast between two copper electrodes were taken using the two-point probe method and recorded using a 4200A SCS parameter analyzer connected to a Lakeshore cryogenic probe station. The measurements were carried out in the absence of visible light illumination and a sweep rate of 260 ms per data point.
The coupling between the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the composite was probed with X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy (XMCD), as a function of temperature, at the Advanced Light Source (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) beamline 6.3.1, with a constant circularly polarized light whose estimated degree of polarization was 0.66. Throughout the experiments, the XAS spectra were taken in the total electron yield mode across the Fe L 3,2 edges ranging from 700 eV to 735 eV with an alternating magnetic field of ± 1.5 T, which are anti-parallel ( σ ↓ ) and parallel ( σ ↑ ) with respect to the helicity of the incoming photon. The XMCD signal was later evaluated as a difference of the two XAS spectra taken with two oppositely applied magnetic fields.

3. Miscibility and Cooperativity

The intermolecular interactions, namely the cooperative effects [45,46,47,48], were examined through thermal hysteresis in terms of the magnetic susceptibility ( χ m ) times temperature versus temperature, i.e., the hysteresis width in the plot of χ m T versus T. The hysteresis width, in principle, is a measure of the strength of the cooperativity between adjacent SCO molecules, with a larger hysteresis width equivalent to stronger cooperative effects [45,46,47,48]. The hysteresis widths in the χ m T versus T for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and for the combination of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI were 10.6 K and 11.3 K, respectively, as shown in Figure 1 (Supplementary Figure S4). The percentage error in the measured χ m T versus T hysteresis width was less than 6%. The observed hysteresis width in this study is significantly larger than the 0.15 to 1.5 K [27,29,30,33,34] and 6.1–8.5 K [31] reported previously but roughly similar to the hysteresis width of Mn-doped and Zn-doped Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 thin films, which were 10 K [39] and 14 K [38]. This is surprising as this is very different from the example of [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4, where a significant 7 K reduction of χ m T versus T hysteresis width was observed upon mixing with PANI [5].
A comparison of the mixtures of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 with PANI in the ratios of 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1, as seen in Figure 2, illustrates that the magnetization for the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI in the ratio of 1:1 is slightly larger than that seen for the ratios of 1:2 and 2:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI compositions. The temperature-dependent hysteresis varies only slightly, with the hysteresis loop (ΔT1/2) for both the 1:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI and the 1:2 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI bi-composite measuring ~11 K, but for the 2:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI bi-composite, the hysteresis is ~12 K.
From the elemental mapping of both iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] in the pristine Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 crystallites and the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, respectively, in Figure 3 and Figure 4, the fact that the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is uniformly distributed within the PANI matrix is clear. In other words, there is a high degree of miscibility of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 within the PANI matrix. The two different spin crossover complexes, [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, while both are apparently miscible with the PANI, do not mix the same way in the PANI, judging from the differences in the changes to the hysteresis width in the χ m T versus T seen with mixing [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 with PANI and not seen when Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 was mixed with PANI, as noted above. One notable difference between these two spin crossover molecules is that [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 is a polymeric spin crossover complex and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is not.
We offer two possible explanations as to why the cooperative effects (as indicated by the temperature-dependent hysteresis of the susceptibility) of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 moieties mixed in the PANI remain largely unchanged. First, there could exist tiny Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 crystallites with the correct packing for enhancing the hysteresis [31] that are evenly distributed within the PANI matrix. For Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, the hysteresis width can also be affected by the crystallite quality [31,34]. Alternatively, there is the possibility of strong cooperativity between Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 moieties in widely distributed crystallites or PANI, which enhances the χ m T versus T hysteresis observed in this study here. The large and unperturbed χ m T versus T hysteresis suggests that PANI encapsulates the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, which could enhance the overall cooperativity. Similar polymer-encapsulation-induced hysteresis enhancement of [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] has been reported [25,41]. The explanation is consistent with the observations where there is strong cooperativity for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 when encapsulated by organics [7,9,25,41]. The latter explanation is consistent with the observed increased hysteretic spin transition behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in several different embedding matrices [9].

4. Phase Separation and Cooperativity

With increasing Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentrations in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, the Fe3O4 nanoparticles tend to agglomerate and become less uniformly distributed (Figure 5b, Figure 6b and Figure 7b) in the PANI matrix, while the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 remains uniformly distributed within the PANI, as indicated by the sulfur spatial map (Figure 5c, Figure 6c and Figure 7c). Although there is always a possibility that the coupling between the Fe3O4 nanoparticles could lead to magnetic frustration, this is excluded here as the overall paramagnetic susceptibility scales with the Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentration in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite.
As shown in Figure 8, the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite leads to an increasing paramagnetic susceptibility background with an increasing concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite. In general, as shown in Figure 8, the paramagnetic susceptibility at a fixed temperature is linearly proportional to the concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite.
The hysteresis width in the χ m T versus T remains remarkably consistent, with changes no more than 2 K across varying concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite (Figure 8, Supplementary Materials Table S1, Figures S2 and S3). These largely consistent hysteresis widths indicate that the cooperative effect seen for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is stable and remains unperturbed upon mixing with the PANI and the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into the composite. This differs from the doped Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 thin film [38,39], where Mn doping has a profound effect on the hysteresis width in the temperature.
Above the spin state transition temperature, Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 has a significant magnetic moment that can overwhelm the moment from the Fe3O4 nanoparticles at very low Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentrations, as shown in the insets in Figure 9 and Figure 10. For the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticle (1% loading by weight) composite, there is an increase in the XMCD signal at the Fe 2p core edges (Figure 10) as the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 goes from the diamagnetic low spin state (at 80 K) to the paramagnetic high spin state (at 300 K). At higher Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentrations in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, the effect of the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin state is more complex.
The XMCD response, Figure 10a, extracted from the XAS spectra (the insets in Figure 9 and Supplementary Materials Figures S5–S8) with oppositely applied magnetic fields does increase with increasing Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentrations when Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is in the diamagnetic low spin state (at 80 K). The increase in the XMCD signal is not linear with respect to the increasing Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentration (Figure 11a). This is true even for Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite at 80 K, where Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is in a low spin state (diamagnetic) and does not contribute to the net magnetization. The surmise is that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are the primary overall XMCD signal source when Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is in a low spin state. This hypothesis that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are the primary overall XMCD signal source when Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is in a low spin state is consistent with the fact that below the spin crossover transition temperature (<172 K), the magnetic susceptibility is fairly constant in temperature. The non-linear increase in the XMCD signal with respect to the increasing concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles can be attributed to the fact that the agglomeration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Figure 4b, Figure 5b and Figure 6b) is ferromagnetically coupled with the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, as the Fe3O4 nanoparticles aggregate.
Despite the fact that the magnetic susceptibility times temperature, χ M T , at a constant temperature of 210 K increases linearly with respect to an increasing concentration of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 9, a comparison of the XMCD signal at the Fe L3 (2p3/2) edge in Figure 10b provides evidence that there is anti-ferromagnetic coupling between the Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles composite. Hence, there is an overall reduction in the XMCD signal (Figure 10b, Supplementary Figure S8), with an increasing concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite when the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] is in a high spin state. The decrease in the XMCD response is rather significant, and, therefore, the antiferromagnetic coupling between both the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and the Fe3O4 nanoparticles cannot be restricted to only the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 at the surface of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Furthermore, it implies that Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 retains nontrivial paramagnetic correlation lengths in PANI.

5. I(V) Characteristics

The transport measurements also suggest that the behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the composites of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 is not perturbed by the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The room temperature DC current-voltage I(V) measurement shown in Figure 12 is, in fact, characteristic of the transport behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 by itself [21], which was carried out on thin films of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 (10% loading by weight) drop-casted between two copper electrodes on a glass substrate without light illumination. As anticipated from the transport behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 by itself [21], the transport characteristic is Ohmic with a linear slope of 1.02, as plotted in the double log I(V) curve, Figure 12b, approximately below 0.6 V. Above 0.6 V, the transport characteristic remains linear with a slope of 1.38, which is an indication that it tends towards a space charge-limited current regime. Such space charge-limited current behavior of the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 thin film itself has been reported previously with a linear slope of 2.04 [21]. The slope of 1.38 obtained in this study can be understood as a diminishing of the space charge with Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the PANI matrix. This further confirms that mixing Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 with the PANI, which is nominally a conducting polymer, reduces the overall on-state resistance.
We can understand part of this overall behavior, i.e., the diminishing of the space charge, when different concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are added to the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite by noting that Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 remains uniformly mixed with PANI, at least on the scale of the scanning TEM, but as the concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles increases, the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are phase separated, as seen in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6.

6. Summary

The cooperative effect, in general, is sensitive to the sample synthesis method [9,29,31,34,42]. Here, the hysteretic behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 is larger than generally observed. Yet the large hysteretic behavior of approximately 10 to 11 K is largely retained upon the addition of PANI and Fe3O4 nanoparticles, unlike what was observed with [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF)4 combined with PANI [5] and Mn-doped Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 [38,39]. At the same time, the cooperative effect in this study is among the largest of those reported in the literature [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], although it is smaller than the 14 K inferred from [38]. While small groupings of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 moieties may occur in the PANI matrix, there is no phase separation of the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 from the PANI. In other words, the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 tends to mix fairly homogeneously with the PANI.
The agglomeration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, which is an indication of the phase separation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, is observed and it is observed to be directly proportional to the concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. However, the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin crossover molecules remain uniformly distributed within the PANI in all cases, which suggests that there exists a relatively high degree of miscibility.
Surprisingly, adding varying concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite did not perturb the cooperativity. The hysteresis width in the χ m T versus T for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, at the spin state transition, remains consistent, with a hysteresis width change of less than 2 K throughout various concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite. In addition, from the XMCD at the Fe edges, we observed that the overall XMCD signal does not increase in a linear fashion with respect to an increasing concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite. In addition, the phase-separated Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite tend to exhibit antiferromagnetic coupling between the nanoparticles and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 when the latter is in the high spin state. The quenching of the XMCD signal with as much as 10% (loading by weight) of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite suggests that a considerable volume of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the PANI is antiferromagnetically coupled to the Fe3O4.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29194574/s1, Figure S1: The Fourier transform IR (FTIR) spectrum of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 nano-powder that was used for all bi-composite and tri-composite fabrication; Table S1: The hysteresis width in χMT versus T plot for composites of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 (from 0.5 % up to 20 % by weight). The applied magnetic field is 2 T. Third column δ, is evaluated as the hysteresis width changes of that sample with respect to the hysteresis width of pristine Fe(phen)2(NCS)2, as the reference; Figure S2: The plots of χMT versus T for composites of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus various concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (% loading by weight) with an external applied magnetic field of 2 T; Figure S3: Plots of χMT versus T, for composites of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 (% by weight). The χMT versus T of (a) pristine Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 crystallites while Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI is plotted in black, (b) Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus 5% (by weight) of Fe3O4, (c) [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] plus PANI plus 1% (by weight) of Fe3O4, (d) [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] plus PANI plus 10% (by weight) of Fe3O4. The applied magnetic field is 2 T; Figure S4: The χMT versus T plot for (gray) Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and (red) Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite. The applied magnetic field is 2 T; Figure S5: The XAS spectra of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus and Fe3O4 nanoparticles (5% loading by weight) composite at 80 K; Figure S6: The XAS spectra of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus and Fe3O4 nanoparticles (10% loading by weight) composite at 80 K; Figure S7: The XAS spectra of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus and Fe3O4 nanoparticles (5% loading by weight) composite at 300 K; Figure S8: The XAS spectra of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus and Fe3O4 nanoparticles (10% loading by weight) composite at 300 K.

Author Contributions

Sample Preparation: B.T. and W.K.C.; Data Acquisition: W.K.C., B.T., M.Z.Z., A.S., G.V. and A.T.N.; Data Analysis: B.T., R.Y.L., P.A.D. and W.K.C.; Data Curation: W.K.C., R.Y.L., A.T.N. and P.A.D.; Manuscript Preparation: W.K.C. and P.A.D.; Final Manuscript Preparation: W.K.C., R.Y.L. and P.A.D.; Project Supervision: A.T.N., R.Y.L. and P.A.D.; Funding: R.Y.L. and P.A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through the NSF-DMR-EPM 2317464 (WKC, MZZ, GV, and PAD), EPSCoR RII Track-1: Emergent Quantum Materials and Technologies (EQUATE), award number OIA-2044049 (AS, RL) and NSF-PREM award number 1827690 (AS, RL and BT). LBNL was supported by the Office of Science, the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US DOE (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231).

Data Availability Statement

The Data will gladly be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The research was performed in part at the Nebraska Nanoscale Facility: National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure which supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. ECCS: 1542182.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

References

  1. Nieto-Castro, D.; Garcés-Pineda, F.A.; Moneo-Corcuera, A.; Sánchez-Molina, I.; Galán-Mascarós, J.R. Mechanochemical Processing of Highly Conducting Organic/Inorganic Composites Exhibiting Spin Crossover–Induced Memory Effect in Their Transport Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Joseph, A. Modifying Magnetic Properties by Ion Irradiation or Light-Matter Coupling: Towards Innovative Magnetic Memory Devices; L’université de Strasbourg: Strasbourg, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mishra, E.; Ekanayaka, T.K.; McElveen, K.A.; Lai, R.Y.; Dowben, P.A. Evidence for long drift carrier lifetimes in [Fe(Htrz)2(trz)](BF4) plus polyaniline composites. Org. Electron. 2022, 105, 106516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dowben, P.A.; Mishra, E.; Ekanayaka, T.K.; Cheng, R. Progress towards the competitive multiferroic molecular transistor. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Conference (NMDC), Paestum, Italy, 22–25 October 2023; pp. 626–627. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mishra, E.; Chin, W.; McElveen, K.A.; Ekanayaka, T.K.; Zaz, M.Z.; Viswan, G.; Zielinski, R.; N’Diaye, A.T.; Shapiro, D.; Lai, R.Y.; et al. Electronic transport properties of spin-crossover polymer plus polyaniline composites with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Mater. 2024, 7, 015010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koo, Y.; Galán-Mascarós, J.R. Spin Crossover Probes Confer Multistability to Organic Conducting Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6785–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Enriquez-Cabrera, A.; Rapakousiou, A.; Piedrahita Bello, M.; Molnár, G.; Salmon, L.; Bousseksou, A. Spin crossover polymer composites, polymers and related soft materials. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 419, 213396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kilic, M.S.; Brehme, J.; Pawlak, J.; Tran, K.; Bauer, F.W.; Shiga, T.; Suzuki, T.; Nihei, M.; Sindelar, R.F.; Renz, F. Incorporation and Deposition of Spin Crossover Materials into and onto Electrospun Nanofibers. Polymers 2023, 15, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanasa, R.; Laisney, J.; Stancu, A.; Boillot, M.-L.; Enachescu, C. Hysteretic behavior of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin-transition microparticles vs. the environment: A huge reversible component resolved by first order reversal curves. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 031909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kahn, O.; Kröber, J.; Jay, C. Spin Transition Molecular Materials for displays and data recording. Adv. Mater. 1992, 4, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kahn, O.; Martinez, C.J. Spin-Transition Polymers: From Molecular Materials Toward Memory Devices. Science 1998, 279, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bousseksou, A.; Molnár, G.; Demont, P.; Menegotto, J. Observation of a thermal hysteresis loop in the dielectric constant of spin crossover complexes: Towards molecular memory devices. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 2069–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bousseksou, A.; Molnár, G. The spin-crossover phenomenon: Towards molecular memories. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2003, 6, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Miyamachi, T.; Gruber, M.; Davesne, V.; Bowen, M.; Boukari, S.; Joly, L.; Scheurer, F.; Rogez, G.; Yamada, T.K.; Ohresser, P.; et al. Robust spin crossover and memristance across a single molecule. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kuch, W.; Bernien, M. Controlling the magnetism of adsorbed metal–organic molecules. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 023001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prins, F.; Monrabal-Capilla, M.; Osorio, E.A.; Coronado, E.; van der Zant, H.S.J. Room-Temperature Electrical Addressing of a Bistable Spin-Crossover Molecular System. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1545–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ekanayaka, T.K.; Hao, G.; Mosey, A.; Dale, A.S.; Jiang, X.; Yost, A.J.; Sapkota, K.R.; Wang, G.T.; Zhang, J.; N’Diaye, A.T.; et al. Nonvolatile Voltage Controlled Molecular Spin-State Switching for Memory Applications. Magnetochemistry 2021, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zaz, M.Z.; Ekanayaka, T.K.; Cheng, R.; Dowben, P.A. Variability of the Conductance Changes Associated with the Change in the Spin State in Molecular Spin Crossover Complexes. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ridier, K.; Salmon, L.; Séguy, I.; Molnár, G.; Bousseksou, A. Switching endurance of the molecular spin crossover complex [Fe(HB(tz)3)2]: From single crystals to thin films and electronic devices. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 8193–8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Séguy, I.; Ridier, K.; Shalabaeva, V.; Piedrahita-Bello, M.; Rotaru, A.; Salmon, L.; Molnár, G.; Bousseksou, A. Resistance switching in large-area vertical junctions of the molecular spin crossover complex [Fe(HB(tz)3)2]: ON/OFF ratios and device stability. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 214010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, S.; Schmerber, G.; Arabski, J.; Beaufrand, J.-B.; Kim, D.J.; Boukari, S.; Bowen, M.; Kemp, N.T.; Viart, N.; Rogez, G.; et al. Study of molecular spin-crossover complex Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 043303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Real, J.A.; Gallois, B.; Granier, T.; Suez-Panama, F.; Zarembowitch, J. Comparative investigation of the spin-crossover compounds Fe(btz)2(NCS)2 and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 (where btz = 2,2′-bi-4,5-dihydrothiazine and phen = 1,10-phenanthroline). Magnetic properties and thermal dilatation behavior and crystal structure of Fe(btz)2(NCS)2 at 293 and 130 K. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4972–4979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ellingsworth, E.C.; Turner, B.; Szulczewski, G. Thermal conversion of [Fe(phen)3](SCN)2 thin films into the spin crossover complex Fe(phen)2(NCS)2. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Laisney, J.; Tissot, A.; Molnár, G.; Rechignat, L.; Rivière, E.; Brisset, F.; Bousseksou, A.; Boillot, M.-L. Nanocrystals of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and the size-dependent spin-crossover characteristics. Dalt. Trans. 2015, 44, 17302–17311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Enachescu, C.; Tanasa, R.; Stancu, A.; Tissot, A.; Laisney, J.; Boillot, M.-L. Matrix-assisted relaxation in Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin-crossover microparticles, experimental and theoretical investigations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 031908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beniwal, S.; Sarkar, S.; Baier, F.; Weber, B.; Dowben, P.A.; Enders, A. Site selective adsorption of the spin crossover complex Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 on Au(111). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 324003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bousseksou, A.; Negre, N.; Goiran, M.; Salmon, L.; Tuchagues, J.P.; Boillot, M.L.; Boukheddaden, K.; Varret, F. Dynamic triggering of a spin-transition by a pulsed magnetic field. Eur. Phys. J. B 2000, 13, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Mu, S.; Chastanet, G.; Daro, N.; Palamarciuc, T.; Rosa, P.; Létard, J.-F.; Liu, J.; Sterbinsky, G.E.; Arena, D.A.; et al. Complexities in the Molecular Spin Crossover Transition. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 16293–16302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sorai, M.; Seki, S. Phonon coupled cooperative low-spin 1A1high-spin 5T2 transition in [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] and [Fe(phen)2(NCSe)2] crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1974, 35, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gallois, B.; Real, J.A.; Hauw, C.; Zarembowitch, J. Structural changes associated with the spin transition in bis(isothiocyanato)bis(1,10-phenanthroline)iron: A single-crystal x-ray investigation. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Valverde-Muñoz, F.J.; Gaspar, A.B.; Shylin, S.I.; Ksenofontov, V.; Real, J.A. Synthesis of Nanocrystals and Particle Size Effects Studies on the Thermally Induced Spin Transition of the Model Spin Crossover Compound [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2]. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 7906–7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Granier, T.; Gallois, B.; Gaultier, J.; Real, J.A.; Zarembowitch, J. High-pressure single-crystal x-ray diffraction study of two spin-crossover iron(II) complexes: Fe(Phen)2(NCS)2 and Fe(Btz)2(NCS)2. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 5305–5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qi, Y.; Müller, E.W.; Spiering, H.; Gütlich, P. The effect of a magnetic field on the high-spin α low-spin transition in [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2]. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 101, 503–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Müller, E.W.; Spiering, H.; Gütlich, P. Spin transition in [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] and [Fe(bipy)2(NCS)2]: Hysteresis and effect of crystal quality. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 93, 567–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bousseksou, A.; McGarvey, J.J.; Varret, F.; Real, J.A.; Tuchagues, J.-P.; Dennis, A.C.; Boillot, M.L. Raman spectroscopy of the high- and low-spin states of the spin crossover complex Fe(phen)2(NCS)2: An initial approach to estimation of vibrational contributions to the associated entropy change. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 318, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bertoni, R.; Lorenc, M.; Graber, T.; Henning, R.; Moffat, K.; Létard, J.-F.; Collet, E. Cooperative elastic switching vs. laser heating in [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] spin-crossover crystals excited by a laser pulse. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 7269–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gruber, M.; Miyamachi, T.; Davesne, V.; Bowen, M.; Boukari, S.; Wulfhekel, W.; Alouani, M.; Beaurepaire, E. Spin crossover in Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 complexes on metallic surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 092312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saha, S.; Chandra, P.; Mandal, S.K. Spin state bistability in (Mn, Zn) doped Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 molecular thin film nanocrystals on quartz. Physica B 2022, 642, 414128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saha, S.; Mandal, S.K. Spin transition properties of metal (Zn, Mn) diluted Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin-crossover thin films. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 91, 20301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saha, S.; Mandal, S.K. Methanol sensing characteristics in undoped and (Zn, Mn) doped Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 spin-crossover thin films. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 3387–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tissot, A.; Enachescu, C.; Boillot, M.L. Control of the thermal hysteresis of the prototypal spin-transition FeII(phen)2(NCS)2 compound via the microcrystallites environment: Experiments and mechanoelastic model. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20451–20457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akabori, K.; Matsuo, H.; Yamamoto, Y. Thermal properties of tris(1,10-phenanthroline) complexes of iron(II) and nickel(II) salts. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1973, 35, 2679–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tang, S.-J.; Wang, A.-T.; Lin, S.-Y.; Huang, K.-Y.; Yang, C.-C.; Yeh, J.-M.; Chiu, K.-C. Polymerization of aniline under various concentrations of APS and HCl. Polym. J. 2011, 43, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Adams, P.N.; Laughlin, P.J.; Monkman, A.P.; Kenwright, A.M. Low temperature synthesis of high molecular weight polyaniline. Polymer 1996, 37, 3411–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ekanayaka, T.K.; Maity, K.P.; Doudin, B.; Dowben, P.A. Dynamics of Spin Crossover Molecular Complexes. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hao, G.; Dale, A.S.; N’Diaye, A.T.; Chopdekar, R.V.; Koch, R.J.; Jiang, X.; Mellinger, C.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, R.; Xu, X.; et al. Intermolecular interaction and cooperativity in an Fe(II) spin crossover molecular thin film system. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2022, 34, 295201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hauser, A.; Jeftić, J.; Romstedt, H.; Hinek, R.; Spiering, H. Cooperative phenomena and light-induced bistability in iron(II) spin-crossover compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 190–192, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Félix, G.; Nicolazzi, W.; Salmon, L.; Molnár, G.; Perrier, M.; Maurin, G.; Larionova, J.; Long, J.; Guari, Y.; Bousseksou, A. Enhanced Cooperative Interactions at the Nanoscale in Spin-Crossover Materials with a First-Order Phase Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 235701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 04574 g001
Figure 1. The enlarged view of the magnetic susceptibility time temperature, χ M T , versus T plot for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 crystallites (gray) and its composite Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI (1:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2/PANI weight %) plotted in red.
Figure 1. The enlarged view of the magnetic susceptibility time temperature, χ M T , versus T plot for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 crystallites (gray) and its composite Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI (1:1 Fe(phen)2(NCS)2/PANI weight %) plotted in red.
Molecules 29 04574 g001
Molecules 29 04574 g002
Figure 2. The thermal hysteresis behavior of χ M T versus T for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI bi-composites in the different ratios of 2:1 (green), 1:1 (blue), and 1:2 (orange). The arrows indicate increasing (up) and decreasing (down) temperature paths.
Figure 2. The thermal hysteresis behavior of χ M T versus T for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 to PANI bi-composites in the different ratios of 2:1 (green), 1:1 (blue), and 1:2 (orange). The arrows indicate increasing (up) and decreasing (down) temperature paths.
Molecules 29 04574 g002
Molecules 29 04574 g003
Figure 3. (a) Image of pristine Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Figure 3. (a) Image of pristine Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Molecules 29 04574 g003
Molecules 29 04574 g004
Figure 4. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 combined with polyaniline (PANI) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Figure 4. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 combined with polyaniline (PANI) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Molecules 29 04574 g004
Molecules 29 04574 g005
Figure 5. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1% loading by weight) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Figure 5. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1% loading by weight) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Molecules 29 04574 g005
Molecules 29 04574 g006
Figure 6. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (5% loading by weight) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Figure 6. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (5% loading by weight) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Molecules 29 04574 g006
Molecules 29 04574 g007
Figure 7. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (10% loading by weight) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Figure 7. (a) Image of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (10% loading by weight) obtained using scanning transmission microscopy in high-angle annular dark-field mode. (b,c) Elemental mapping of iron and sulfur of the [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2], respectively.
Molecules 29 04574 g007
Molecules 29 04574 g008
Figure 8. The χ M T versus T plots for composites of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 (percent loading, by weight), with an applied magnetic field of 2 T.
Figure 8. The χ M T versus T plots for composites of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus varying concentrations of Fe3O4 (percent loading, by weight), with an applied magnetic field of 2 T.
Molecules 29 04574 g008
Molecules 29 04574 g009
Figure 9. The value χ M T is plotted as a function of the Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentration in Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, for T = 210 K. Insets are the X-ray absorption spectra of Fe L3 (2p3/2) and L2 (2p1/2) edges at 80 K (top left corner) and 300 K (bottom right corner) of the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 (1% loading by weight).
Figure 9. The value χ M T is plotted as a function of the Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentration in Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite, for T = 210 K. Insets are the X-ray absorption spectra of Fe L3 (2p3/2) and L2 (2p1/2) edges at 80 K (top left corner) and 300 K (bottom right corner) of the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 (1% loading by weight).
Molecules 29 04574 g009
Molecules 29 04574 g010
Figure 10. The Fe ( L 3 and L 2 edges) XMCD signals for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1%, 5% and 10% loading by weight). Data were taken for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the low spin state (a) at 80 K and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the high spin state (b) at 300 K.
Figure 10. The Fe ( L 3 and L 2 edges) XMCD signals for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1%, 5% and 10% loading by weight). Data were taken for Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the low spin state (a) at 80 K and Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 in the high spin state (b) at 300 K.
Molecules 29 04574 g010
Molecules 29 04574 g011
Figure 11. The XMCD signal of the F e O h 2 + site for varying concentrations (% by weight) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite at (a) 80 K and (b) 300 K.
Figure 11. The XMCD signal of the F e O h 2 + site for varying concentrations (% by weight) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI composite at (a) 80 K and (b) 300 K.
Molecules 29 04574 g011
Molecules 29 04574 g012
Figure 12. (a) The dc I(V) characteristics of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 (10% by weight) and (b) double-log plot of the I(V) characteristics.
Figure 12. (a) The dc I(V) characteristics of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 plus PANI plus Fe3O4 (10% by weight) and (b) double-log plot of the I(V) characteristics.
Molecules 29 04574 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chin, W.K.; Tamang, B.; Zaz, M.Z.; Subedi, A.; Viswan, G.; N’Diaye, A.T.; Lai, R.Y.; Dowben, P.A. Evidence of Cooperative Effects for the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 Spin Crossover Molecular Complex in Polyaniline Plus Iron Magnetite. Molecules 2024, 29, 4574. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194574

AMA Style

Chin WK, Tamang B, Zaz MZ, Subedi A, Viswan G, N’Diaye AT, Lai RY, Dowben PA. Evidence of Cooperative Effects for the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 Spin Crossover Molecular Complex in Polyaniline Plus Iron Magnetite. Molecules. 2024; 29(19):4574. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chin, Wai Kiat, Binny Tamang, M. Zaid Zaz, Arjun Subedi, Gauthami Viswan, Alpha T. N’Diaye, Rebecca Y. Lai, and Peter A. Dowben. 2024. "Evidence of Cooperative Effects for the Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 Spin Crossover Molecular Complex in Polyaniline Plus Iron Magnetite" Molecules 29, no. 19: 4574. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194574

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop