Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Reactivity Assessment of AgM and CuM (M = Cr, Fe) Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane Process with CO2
Previous Article in Journal
The Chemistry of Selenosilanes: A Topic Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Free Radical Scavenging Effect and Immunomodulatory Activity of Total Saponins Extract of Ginseng Fibrous Roots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Seagrass Meadows: Prospective Candidates for Bioactive Molecules

1
Postgraduate Department of Environmental Sciences, All Saints’ College (Affiliated to the University of Kerala), Thiruvananthapuram 695007, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 641112, India
3
Department of Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(19), 4596; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194596
Submission received: 28 August 2024 / Revised: 16 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 27 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products from Plant: From Determination to Application)

Abstract

:
Seagrass meadows consist of angiosperms that thrive fully submerged in marine environments and form distinct ecosystems. They provide essential support for many organisms, acting as nursery grounds for species of economic importance. Beyond their ecological roles, seagrasses and their associated microbiomes are rich sources of bioactive compounds with the potential to address numerous human healthcare challenges. Seagrasses produce bioactive molecules responding to physical, chemical, and biological environmental changes. These activities can treat microbe-borne diseases, skin diseases, diabetes, muscle pain, helminthic diseases, and wounds. Seagrasses also offer potential secondary metabolites that can be used for societal benefits. Despite numerous results on their presence and bioactive derivatives, only a few studies have explored the functional and therapeutic properties of secondary metabolites from seagrass. With the increasing spread of epidemics and pandemics worldwide, the demand for alternative drug sources and drug discovery has become an indispensable area of research. Seagrasses present a reliable natural source, making this an opportune moment for further exploration of their pharmacological activities with minimal side effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the biochemical, phytochemical, and biomedical applications of seagrasses globally over the last two decades, highlighting the prospective areas of future research for identifying biomedical applications.

1. Introduction

Marine ecosystems are the largest aquatic ecosystems with a rich biodiversity. It consists of a wide variety of organisms that exhibit a unique gene pool and genetic characteristics due to the ecosystem’s high physical, chemical, and biological diversity. Marine organisms take part in various critical processes that directly or indirectly affect the health of marine ecosystems [1]. A substantial proportion of the human population benefits from the marine environment for their livelihood and survival. Along with the marine fauna, the marine plants also provide many services, and marine angiosperm is a prominent group.
Seagrasses are the only blooming plants in the marine realm, adapted to complete their lifecycle as wholly or partially submerged flora. Coastal ecosystems are often overseen by coral reefs and mangrove ecosystems. It is believed that seagrasses were once terrestrial vegetation and later inhabited the shallow waters of the sea [2]. There are only 72 odd seagrass species, which comprise less than 0.02% of angiosperms. Seagrasses have morphological, physiological, ecological, and genetic adaptations for submerged growth, such as the marine dispersal of seeds, the internal movement of gasses, aquatic pollination, and epidermal chloroplasts. Generally, they inhabit intertidal and mid-tidal shallow zones with more light exposure. They are monocotyledonous plants that come under four families: Posidoniaceae, Zosteraceae, Hydrocharitaceae, and Cymodoceaceae [3]. Seagrass beds provide valuable services as nourishing and breeding places for various marine lifeforms, including sea turtles, dugongs, and fishes [4]. They are also considered the “lungs of the sea” due to their rich oxygen generation through photosynthesis. The released oxygen purifies the ocean environment and contributes to the dissolved oxygen that other marine organisms can use. These outstanding floral groups influence their environment’s prevailing physicochemical and biological conditions [5] and are crucial in combating climate change [6]. Seagrass beds help stabilize loose sediments and filtrate solid pollutants, improving water quality [7]. As per the Wealth of India Division (2013) [2], one hectare of seagrass meadow absorbs nutrients equivalent to treated effluent from 200 people. It sequesters approximately 33 grams of carbon per square meter per year. This quantity of carbon corresponds to automobile emissions when traveling 2500 km. One hectare of seagrass meadow is also responsible for 12% of locked organic carbon, which reduces greenhouse gasses. Almost every nation with seagrass resources, including India, uses seagrasses for their nutritional and medicinal properties (Figure 1).
Seagrasses have surface microbial communities inhabiting their roots, leaves, rhizomes, and endophytes, and many species act as the source for potential novel bioactive compounds [8,9,10,11] in addition to the bioactive molecules produced by the seagrasses themselves. A recent review article [12] highlights the importance of seagrasses by detailing the pharmacological potential of Thalassia hemprichii and Thalassia testudinum, their fractionation processes, phytochemical constituents, bioactive potential, pharmacological capabilities, and their action mechanisms. Marine lifeforms will adapt to immoderate environmental conditions, including higher pressure and salt concentration, minimal nutrient concentration, low-level but consistent temperature, limited sunlight, and low oxygen. Thus, marine organisms require and possess distinct characteristics, distinguishing them from terrestrial organisms [13].
The emergence of novel diseases, changes in pathogenicity, and antibiotic and drug resistance necessitate an alternative source or novel bioactive compounds [14]. This scenario leads to the necessity of bioprospecting. Even though numerous investigations have focused on the bioprospecting of many marine species [15,16], information regarding the bioactivity of marine angiosperms is still scarce. The coastal population uses seagrasses for healing skin diseases, fever, muscle pains, stomach aches, and wounds, and is also used in children as tranquilizers for ray stings [17]. In folk medicines, seagrasses are used widely for various ailments. However, the scientific approach to studying bioactive molecules from seagrasses is still in its infancy. This review aims to familiarize the biochemical composition of seagrasses and the current state of seagrass bioprospecting, and to make an inventory of bioactive compounds isolated from seagrass in the last two decades. The analysis of the available literature finds some gaps in the research on seagrasses. While extensive study exists on the phytochemical and biochemical characteristics of seagrasses, inquiry on the functional heterogeneity and roles of seagrass-related microbiomes remains sparse. The interactions between seagrasses and their microbiomes in the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds require investigation. There is an apparent shortage of research linking bioactive compounds to their specific ecological functions. Additionally, understanding how environmental stressors such as climate change and pollution affect seagrass bioactivity is important. Moreover, there is a lack of detailed research that combines genetic, metabolomic, and ecological data to emphasize the ecological effects of bioactive compounds and their biosynthetic pathways.

2. Methodology of Literature Retrieval

A thorough and deliberate evaluation of the literature has been carried out by exploiting the reputable scientific data repositories “Scopus” (https://www.scopus.com, accessed on 30 April 2024), “ISI Web of Science” (http://apps.webofknowledge.com, accessed on 15 August 2024), and Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com, accessed on 2 August 2024). All significant and important published research on the subject has been examined and sorted based on demand (Figure 2). Keywords have been applied to the following Boolean logic: [(Bioactivity*seagrass) * OR seagrass distribution* OR nutritional analysis of seagrass* phytochemical analysis of seagrass* OR antimicrobial activity * OR anticancerous activity * OR antidiabetic activity * OR anti-inflammatory activity * OR seagrass ecosystems*] AND [(Potential activity* seagrass microbiome) OR larvicidal activity* OR antibacterial* OR antiviral* OR antifungal* OR seagrass ecosystem*, OR seagrass endophytes*, OR bioprospecting*]. From the data repositories referenced, a total of 5063 records were obtained. Using the Zotero reference manager, 397 duplicate records were identified and removed. Additionally, fifteen records were manually excluded due to lack of clarity. Of the remaining 4651 records, 4468 were removed for various reasons, 2357 were unrelated works (though the search using the keywords showed the manuscripts, they were not in the bioprospecting genre), 678 had irrelevant titles (the titles could not be related to the manuscripts under consideration), 1115 had irrelevant abstracts (the abstracts were not of the study area under consideration), and 318 had either no full text available or were in other languages. The excluded 318 articles also reported human trials, old reports, redundant works, and low-quality sources. A total of 183 whole-text publications were reviewed; these serve as the investigation’s output (Figure 3). This manuscript complies with the PRISMA guidelines [18]. After each study was evaluated, a final screening was conducted to ensure that all articles considered directly influenced seagrass bioprospecting.

3. Trends in Seagrass Research

The literature was examined methodologically by compiling the available literature on seagrasses, bioprospecting, and bioactivity studies, as explained in the previous section [18]. The distribution of publications through the years 2000 to 2024 is shown in the line chart (Figure 4). The vertical axis displays the total number of publications, and the horizontal axis represents the years. The line graph shows an upward trend between 2000 and 2012. With a few notable exceptions, the number of publications steadily increased from 9 in 2000 to a maximum of 2020 in 2020, with 444 publications in that year. This upward trajectory denotes a significant period of increased research output. After 2020, though, the trend drastically changed, with an abrupt decline to 265 publications in 2021. After this decline, there is a modest comeback in 2022 and 2023, with 333 publications on average. Based on the data, there are significant dynamics in seagrass research, and after 2020, there seems to be a shift in the priority areas of research.
In the current scenario of emerging pandemics, the relevance of bioprospecting natural resources has become increasingly evident. The study on the area again found a hike, with 333 articles published during 2023 and 198 articles published in 2024 within eight months. As novel pathogens and resistant strains challenge existing medical treatments, there is a demand to explore and tap the therapeutic potential of natural compounds [14]. Bioprospecting, particularly in underutilized resources like seagrasses, offers a promising avenue for discovering new bioactive substances with antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties. By looking into the rich chemical diversity of natural marine resources, researchers can identify novel agents that could create effective aid and preventive measures against emerging infectious diseases.
The distribution of publications on seagrass bioprospecting from various subject domains [15,16] during the years 2000–2024 is shown in Figure 5. The vertical axis indicates the number of publications. In contrast, the horizontal axis represents studies from different subject domains, such as environmental sciences, microbiology, biomedical and clinical sciences, chemical sciences, plant biology, industrial and environmental biotechnology, pharmacology, marine biology and oceanography, and environmental legal studies. The maximum number of publications came from the domain of environmental Sciences, with a total of 424 articles, making it the most researched area. Subsequently, the ‘microbiology’ domain shows a noteworthy number of publications of 373. The other fields with the highest representation were biomedical and clinical sciences, chemical sciences, plant biology, industrial and environmental biotechnology, and pharmacology, with 362, 298, 256, 121, and 114 publications, respectively. The fields with the lowest number of publications were “marine biology and oceanography” and “environmental legal studies,” with 45 and 20 publications, respectively.

3.1. Seagrasses: The Marine Angiosperms

As the only submersed marine angiosperms with a buried root, the rhizome system of seagrasses is specifically adapted to thrive in marine habitats. Even though they emerged early in the angiosperm evolutionary timeline, Burt (2001) [19] observes that their evolutionary path differs from their terrestrial counterparts, showing a relative stasis. Seagrass beds are vital to maritime countries worldwide because of their products and services [20,21,22]. This comprises significant contributions like the filtration and cycling of nutrients [23], the retention of sedimentary carbon [24], and the significant support for worldwide fishing industries [25,26]. Even though seagrasses only constitute a small part of the marine realm, they render a wide array of ecosystem services. Seagrass serves as a protective home for a diverse number of marine lifeforms, a food source and habitat for several fish species, including Egretta garzetta, a seasonal migratory bird, as well as for threatened species like endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas), seahorses, and dugongs (Dugong dugon) [27].
Several studies show the critical ecological roles of seagrasses in coastal ecosystems, including providing habitat for marine life, stabilizing sediments, and mitigating coastal erosion. However, only a few studies are reported detailing the bioactive potential of seagrasses [28,29]. Seagrasses are abundant reserves of bioactive products with potent pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications. Bioprospecting involves systematically screening seagrass extracts to identify bioactive compounds with biomedical potential. Such compounds may possess anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancerous, or antioxidant activities, offering potential benefits for human health [30,31,32,33,34]. A nutritional analysis is essential for identifying and quantifying these bioactive compounds. The bioprospecting of seagrasses can promote their conservation and sustainable use by demonstrating their economic value beyond ecological values and traditional uses. Identifying novel applications for seagrasses can incentivize their protection and restoration, enhancing the overall wellness and durability of coastal ecosystems.

3.2. Nutritional Analysis of Seagrass

Seagrasses have been traditionally consumed by coastal communities in various parts of the world. Understanding their nutritional composition through analysis is crucial for assessing their potential as a food source and determining their contribution to human nutrition and health. Nutritional analysis can identify essential nutrients, such as proteins, lipids, vitamins, and minerals in plants, essential for overall well-being [35]. Compared to other marine organisms like seaweeds and seagrasses, vascular plants usually contain higher concentrations of complex carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids [36]. They also include vitamins, zinc, and iron, among other vital micronutrients. Many compounds found in seagrass have beneficial nutritional and calorific value. Even though they are high in nutrients, limiting factors like tannin and phenol preclude them from being used in human diets. In the recent two decades, there has been a surge in research into their biochemical composition and potential for use as a food source [37,38]. Several macrophyte species like Halymenia dilatata, H. maculata, Halophila ovalis, and Enhalus acoroides were loaded with at least one mineral (e.g., P, Si, Zn, K, S, or V). Compared to some common edible seaweeds and terrestrial plant sources, the mineral concentrations were significantly greater in many tested species [39].
The pigment, biochemical composition, and secondary metabolites of eight species (Enhalus acoroides, Halophila ovalis, H. beccarii, Cymodocea rotundata, C. serrulata, Halodule pinifolia, H. uninervis, and Syringodium isoetifolium) of seagrasses were studied by the author. The results show a distinct seasonal fluctuation in chlorophyll concentration, with the lowest measure in the monsoon season and high carbohydrate and protein content in the summer [40]. Because seagrass has a large amount of carbs, using a carbohydrate-rich plant source to compensate for the protein-sparing effect in the diet could be a viable option. Micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Ni, Cd, Cu, and Cr) and macronutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na) are found in leaves of seagrass like H. uninervis, C. serrulata and S. isoetifolium. Carbohydrate, protein, and lipid composition were high in Cymodocea serrulata and H. uninervis but low in S. isoetifolium [41]. Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the results of another investigation that determined the biochemical composition (carbohydrate, protein, ash, phenol, flavonoids, tannin, and lipids) of six distinct seagrasses, Thalassia hemprichii, Enhalus acoroides, Halodule pinifolia, Cymodocea serrulata, Syringodium isoetifoilum, and Cymodocea rotundata [42]. In another study on the biochemical composition of seagrass S. isoetifolium, the carbohydrate (37.77 ± 0.27%) and ash (29.005 ± 0.455%) were found to be more significant when compared to the protein (15.92 ± 0.81%), lipid (5.1 ± 0.6%) and moisture (1.75 ± 0.15%). Thus, it indicates that S. isoetifolium is a good source of carbohydrate and protein [43].

3.3. Phytochemical Analysis

Phytochemical screening not only assist in identifying the more dominant components of plant extracts, but it also helps search for bioactive compounds that can be utilized to produce valuable drugs. Numerous studies illustrate the phytochemical components found in various marine life forms, but there is very little data on similar aspects connected to seagrasses, mainly from India [44]. These phytochemical compounds can be extracted with various solvents such as ethanol, acetone, hexane, and methanol. Phytochemicals like terpenoids, alkaloids, phenols, quinone, steroids, flavonoids, and glycosides were found in Cymodocea serrulata extracts, according to preliminary phytochemical analysis. The viability and existence of C. serrulata in marine waters could be due to these phytocompounds, which are an essential part of the defense system [45]. A phytochemical characterization of the methanolic fraction of Enhalus acaroides through liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) identified the three kaempferol derivatives, like flavones, apigenin, luteolin, and azelaic acid [46]. According to another study, seagrass leaves have a higher phenolic content than roots and rhizomes, and there were differences in tannin concentrations among different species [47]. A pair of interesting prenylated flavon-di-O-glycosides from C. nodosa, labeled as cymodioside A and B, were discovered by phytochemical screening [48]. Coumarins, phenols, flavonoids, quinones, saponins, proteins, sterols, sugars, free amino acids, and terpenoids were discovered in aqueous methanolic extracts of six seagrasses (Halodule pinifolia, Enhalus acoroides, Syringodium isoetifolium, Cymodocea serrulata, C. rotundata, and Thalassia hemprichii). All six seagrasses lacked alkaloids and glycosides, while E. acoroides and S. isoetifolium lacked quinone [49]. According to Setyoningrum et al. [50], the phytochemical analysis revealed that E. acoroides extract included various bioactive components, including flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, saponins, and steroids, and have some biological activity. When considering other fractions, the methanol fraction of S. isoetifolium displayed the most phytochemical components. Flavonoids, steroids, proteins, glycosides, alkaloids, and phenolic substances were found in methanol and acetone extracts of S. isoetifolium. Tannin and terpenoids were not present [43]. Phenols, tannins, and flavonoids were some of the phytocompounds in the chloroform–ethanolic (9:1) leaf fraction of E. acoroides. The most common functional groups discovered were phenols, benzenoid compounds, secondary amines, fatty acids, alkanes, and lipids [51]. Flavonoid, triterpenoid, terpenoid, steroid, tannin, and saponin were revealed to be active compounds in a recent study, with results varying from 3.21 to 8.63% for ethanol extracts and 0.21–0.76% for n-hexane extracts of E. acoroides [52]. In a recent study using Diaion® HP-20 column chromatography, medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC), and ODS column chromatography, a polyphenol substance MP-1 was refined from a 70 percent aqueous methanol fraction of Phyllospadix japonica and determined as rosmarinic acid (molecular weight-360 and molecular formula-C18H16O8) using electrospray ionization (ESI)-mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis [53]. In a recent study, the phytochemical components of C. serrulata were assessed. The existence of glycosides, flavonoids, steroids, phenolic compounds, tannins, carbohydrates, and ashes was identified. Using GC-MS analysis, metabolic profiling was carried out, and it uncovered the existence of 104 bioactive compounds in C. serrulata, including phytol, butanoic acid, heptadecane, diphenylamine, benzophenone, 2-hydroxyl-ethyl ether, benzene, octadecanoic acid, dotriaconate, vanillin and decane, all of which had significant roles in bioactive potential [54].
Essential metabolites like carbohydrates and proteins were discovered during the phytochemical analysis of Enhalus acoroides, as well as secondary metabolites like alkaloids, saponins, phenolics, monoterpenes, tannins, flavonoids, and sesquiterpenes [55]. Flavones from Thallasia hemprichii were found to be methoxy flavones or sulfated flavone glycosides [56]. Seven flavone glucosides were identified by Bitam et al. [57], as well as two malonylated flavone glucosides. Phenols and saponins were detected in significant concentrations in the phytochemical investigation of Halodule ovalis [58]. Phytochemical and proximate examinations were conducted on the seagrass H. pinifolia, and the outcome showed that the methanolic fraction of the seagrass H. pinifolia contained a variety of active secondary metabolites with remarkable bioactive potential [59].

3.4. Bioactivity of Seagrasses

Studying the marine environment to discover various complex and novel chemical entities is a new trend in drug development from natural sources. It provides new lead compounds for treating several diseases, including diabetes, Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), inflammatory conditions, cancer, arthritis, malaria, and a wide range of microbial infections [60]. In indigenous medicines, seagrasses have been used for many therapeutic purposes, including managing fevers, muscle aches, wounds, stomach issues, and skin conditions. They are also utilized as tranquilizers for infants and as a cure for various types of ray stings [61]. According to the existing literature and folk medicinal knowledge, seagrass possesses potent bioactivities (Figure 9).
For the past fifty years, natural products from marine ecosystems have caught the interest of scientists worldwide. Compared to terrestrial products, marine lifeforms are a remarkable source of new bioactive compounds with a broader scope of structural and chemical characteristics [62]. Therefore, they are an excellent resource for determining and synthesizing bioactive compounds in marine organisms, and seagrass is an exceptional candidate. It is well known that seagrasses generate an ample range of metabolites, which serve as shields when they are under stress. Several varieties of seagrass provide biologically active metabolites, which include polyphenols, terpenoids, and halogenated compounds. These molecules have been shown to exhibit anticancer, antimicrobial, anti-inflammation, antidiabetic, antioxidant, cytotoxic, and anti-aging abilities. Numerous secondary metabolites produced by seagrasses improve the pool of novel and efficient medications for treating various illnesses. The bioactive characteristics of seagrasses, such as their anti-tumor, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties, are primarily present due to these secondary metabolites [63]. Table 1 summarizes the bioactive compounds separated from various seagrasses, and Figure 10 depicts their structures.
Table 2 summarizes the bioactivity of seagrasses. The following section discusses the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral, antioxidant, and tranquilizer properties of seagrass and their potential prospects.
Seagrasses are known for their diverse range of bioactive compounds, which are essential to their ecological roles and have great potential for various uses. Quercetin and kaempferol are seagrasses’ most common flavonoid compounds [70,73]. Kaempferol shows antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, along with potential cardiovascular benefits. Quercetin is well-known for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral qualities. Additionally, phytol and other phenolic acids, such as coumaric and caffeic acids, are commonly found in seagrasses [64,65,68,81]. Seagrasses are consistently rich in essential vitamins (A, C, E, and K) and essential minerals (Ca, Mg, K, and Fe), all of which add to their nutritional and therapeutic value [40,41]. The literature suggests that the best extraction conditions for seagrass are usually achieved by using solvents such as methanol, ethanol, or chloroform, keeping the temperature between room temperature and 60 °C, and using techniques like maceration or Soxhlet extraction [85,86,87]. Depending on the need for extraction, the solvent-to-sample ratio ranges from 1:10 to 1:20 (w/v), and the extraction time can be about 3 to 5 days [72,74]. Particle size and pH changes may also improve the effectiveness of extraction. Extraction conditions must be modified to the particular objectives of the research or application, as each study may differ depending on the targeted compounds and seagrass species. Table 2 summarizes the bioactivity of seagrasses. The following sections discuss the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral, antioxidant, and tranquilizer properties of seagrass and their potential prospects.

3.5. Anti-Infectious and Antimicrobial Potential (Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral)

Antimicrobial agents are substances that destroy pathogenic organisms while also limiting their development. The majority of microorganisms are highly immune to current antimicrobial medicines. As a result, many microbial infections necessitate using a novel agent. Seagrass-derived marine fungi have various biochemical potential and anti-infective and anti-tumor effects [10]. Of the three seagrasses (Halodule pinifolia, Halophila stipulacea, and Cymodocea serrulata) screened for antibacterial activity, H. pinifolia and H. stipulacea, outperformed C. serrulata in controlling the growth of human pathogens and also in controlling their spread. Methanol and chloroform fractions suppressed the development of all infectious agents among the solvents tested, with methanol fraction being the most involved [68]. Analyzing the EtOAc extract of the Egyptian seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forsk.) den Hartog, a novel dihydrochalcone diglycoside was isolated. It was recognized as 6′-O-rhamnosyl-(1‴ → 6″)-glucopyranosyl asebogenin, for which a name, Thalassodendrone, was proposed. The newly isolated compound’s anti-influenza A virus activity was assessed, and the results showed that its cytotoxic concentration and inhibition dose concentration were CC50—3.14 μg/mL and IC50—1.96 μg/mL, respectively [125].
The antibacterial potential of the three different seagrasses (Cymodocea serrulata, Halophila ovalis, and Zostera capensis) was examined using six different solvents against some human pathogens. The result shows that ethyl acetate extract of all three seagrass extracts was active against all Gram-positive and most Gram-negative pathogenic organisms studied, including Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella typhimurium, with methanolic extracts active against Staphylococcus aureus, S. typhimurium, M. luteus and Salmonella paratyphi. Compared to other solvents, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts displayed the most activity against most pathogens [126]. Human bacterial pathogens such as S. aureus, Shigella dysenteriae, S. boydii, Vibrio cholerae, and S. paratyphi were found to have the most robust growth inhibitory activity in H. pinifolia and C. rotundata [49]. According to earlier research, seagrasses generate secondary metabolites that act as a suppressor against marine pathogens. With MIC values varying from 5 to 8 μg/mL, isoscutellarein and its glycosylated derivatives that were extracted from Thalassia hemprichii demonstrated antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger and Candida albicans [127]. The cyclohexane extract of Posidonia oceanica showed excellent antibacterial activity. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, S. typhi, and Escherichia coli were all inhibited by the extract [128]. Compared to infectious microbial (fungi and bacteria) species, six solvent crude fractions of Thalassia hemprichii were tested for antimicrobial properties. The acetone crude fraction of T. hemprichii possesses high antibacterial activity, and pathogenic fungal species are inhibited by ethanol crude extracts [129]. Syringodium isoetifolium methanol and ethanol extracts have the highest antimicrobial activity against E. coli. Also, the extracts of S. isoetifolium suppressed the growth of bacteria such as Psuedomonas aerunginosa, Bacillus cereus, Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus [130] and saphrophytic fungus in silkworms [131]. Thalassia testudinum possesses an excellent series of HIV integrase inhibitors, which were detected and isolated [69]. The antiviral properties of polyphenol complex derived from the Zosteraceae family involve the direct deactivation of the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus by the inhibition of its multiplication at an early stage, which consequently indicates a decline in the virus concentration [132].
According to a study by Setyoningrum et al. [50], Enhalus acoroides ethanol extract had antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Methanol and the n-hexane fraction of E. acoroides has antibacterial action against Staphylococcus aureus with a bland zone diameter of 5.9 mm and 5.6 mm. Alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, and steroids are found in methanol extract, while steroids and flavonoids are found in the n-hexane extract of E. acoroides [32]. The antimicrobial activity of the E. acoroides extract was assessed by using two different methods, the diffusion method and the minimum microdilution concentration method, against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Candida albicans ATCC 10231 and Escherichia coli ATCC 8739. At an MIC of 500 ppm, the ethyl acetate fraction of E. acoroides inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Candida albicans ATCC 10231, and S. aureus ATCC 6538 [31]. A recent study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of chloroform extract of seagrass Cymodocea serrulata against the following five pathogenic bacteria: Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio alginolyticus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The antimicrobial properties were antagonistically effective against all infectious strains, where the highest inhibitory effect was observed against V. parahaemolyticus with a zone formation of 26 ± 0.08 mm. In contrast, the lowest inhibitory activity was seen against V. alginolyticus with a zone formation of 20 ± 0.04 [54].

3.6. Antioxidant and Anticancerous Potential

Antioxidants can help to protect the biological system from oxidative harm. Synthetic antioxidants have more side effects, whereas natural antioxidants are more effective at scavenging free radicals and have few side effects. The antioxidant property of phenolic compounds in seagrasses (Cymodocea rotundata, Syringodium isoetifolium, Thalassia hemprichii, Enhalus acoroides) was discovered. The ability to scavenge free radicals shows that it has antioxidant potential [133]. C. rotundata leaf and rhizome extracts serve as a prospective point of antioxidant compounds, with caffeic acid and coumaric acid being the most abundant compounds. This paves the way for their use as a multipotent antioxidant in the nutritional and biomedical industries [134]. The antioxidant potential of E. acoroides is primarily because of phenolic material, which was the main reason for the seagrasses’ antioxidant capability [68]. Methanol extracts of Halodule pinifolia seagrass have more potent antioxidant activity than ethyl acetate and n-hexane extracts [135]. The antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory properties of S. isoetifolium were evaluated, and the existence of phenolic compounds may justify the observed biological activities [42]. The antioxidant potential of the methanolic extracts was in the order of H. pinifolia > H. ovalis > S. isoetifolium. Seagrass extracts’ antioxidant functions can be due to their ability to scavenge free radicals. Moreover, phenolic compounds are accountable for seagrass extracts’ antioxidant function [136]. The ethanol extract of C. serrulata has the highest free radical scavenging activity and contains many total phenols and flavonoids. The ethanolic fraction of C. serrulata’s efficient free radical scavenging and reducing properties demonstrate its fantastic antioxidant potential. Thus, it can cure different free radical-mediated diseases [45]. C. serrulata methanolic extract has antioxidant and cytotoxic properties. Since the sum of the compounds was proportional to the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity, the results showed that phenols and flavones may have played a significant role in the DPPH assay. As a result, the methanolic extract of C. serrulata can help prevent or treat such diseases, reducing the severity of oxidative stress-related diseases [137]. Recently, fibroblast cell line HS-68 was used to assess ethanolic extracts from Posidonia oceanica leaves in vitro while exposed to UV-induced oxidative stress. This study shows that antioxidant compounds in the ethanolic extract of P. oceanica are beneficial because pre-treating cells with Gd-E4 extracts significantly shield against oxidative damage and UV-induced mortality [138].
The bioactivity of Red Sea seagrass, Enhalus acoroides (L.f.) Royle, as an antioxidant and anticancer agent, was compared in a recent study. When tested on the normal cell line HSF, the leaves, roots, and rhizomes displayed excellent antioxidant activity and no cytotoxicity. The most potent antioxidant was found in the foliage, which also had a concentration-dependent detrimental effect on the viability of the three following cell lines: MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and HepG-2, whereas roots and rhizomes had no impact [139]. In a recent study, the MTT assay measured the antiproliferative activity of E. acoroides metabolites, while the antioxidant activity was assessed by ABTS assay. This study showed that extracts can fight breast cancer by employing molecular docking to inhibit the HER2/EGFR/HIF-1α pathway. Additionally, the MTT assay showed that increasing the dosage of E. acoroides metabolites enhanced their morbidity in cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the investigation revealed that the secondary metabolites can operate as strong antioxidants, successfully obstructing an array of carcinogenic pathways [140]. Various tumor cell lines have shown anticancer activity in vitro when exposed to marine natural products. Furthermore, most reports on their mode of operation mediate through cancer cells’ lysis, necrosis, and apoptosis. Seagrass extracts demonstrate anticancer activity through their antiproliferative, antimetastatic, cytostatic, and cytotoxic, properties, as well as their capacity to induce apoptosis and antioxidative activity, induce cell-cycle arrest, restrict angiogenesis, and decrease cancer cell viability [141].

3.7. Anti-Inflammatory Potential

Inflammation is a complicated physiological reaction to various negative influences, defined by the recruitment and stimulation of immune cells (innate and adaptive immunity), which quickly regulate the stabilization and repair of injured body parts [142]. A recent study examined the anti-inflammatory potential of Pasidonia oceanica extract. The results showed that the high levels of COX-2 induced by LPS were reduced by the ethanolic extract of P. oceanica, suggesting an anti-inflammatory function linked to antioxidant effects. Furthermore, by modifying the intracellular cascades of ERK1/2 and Akt, P. oceanica can inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway, suggesting its anti-inflammatory potential [143]. A seagrass-derived fungus Aspergillus insuetus SYSU6925 produced one novel cyclohexenone derivative, two unexplained drimane sesquiterpenes, and seven additional known drimane sesquiterpenes. These metabolites were assessed for their anti-inflammatory activity, which revealed their anti-inflammatory solid properties by obstructing the creation of nitric oxide (NO) in cells under study [144].

3.8. Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Larval, Anti-Aging and Anti-Tumor Potential

Molecular visualizations using PyMOL and Discovery studio visualizer BIOVIA 2019 demonstrate that phytochemical substances found in seagrass Enhalus acoroides can block the action of glucosidase. This suggeststhat they could be employed as anti-diabetic therapeutics [145,146,147]. According to the research carried out by Ravikumar et al. [148], the phytochemical constituent in Syringodium isoetifolium extract is the least sensitive to fish pathogens. The methanolic extracts of seagrass Thalassia hemprichii leaves, rhizomes, and roots have larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti 3rd instar larvae [91]. Cornara et al. [149] evaluated the anti-aging properties of seagrass Posidonia oceanica. As fibroblasts produce collagen, maintaining fibroblasts is necessary to slow down the aging process of the skin. Ethanolic extract P. oceanica L. Delile is a good candidate for the development of antiaging medications because it significantly increased the production of collagen in fibroblasts exposed to 5 and 10 µg/mL and increased lipolysis in the concentration limit of 10–200 µg/mL [149]. According to Abdelhameed et al. [71], β-sitosterol glucoside, 7β-hydroxy cholesterol, 7β-hydroxy sitosterol, stigmasterol glucoside, and TCC-1, a novel phytoceramide molecular species derived from the methylene dichloride–methanol fraction of T. ciliatum, exhibited cytotoxic effects with an IC50 value close to 20 μM against HepG2 and MCF7 cells. Another research work by Vani et al. [150] revealed that the crude extract of Halophila beccarii strongly suppresses α-amylase and α-glucosidase when considering the standard enzyme inhibitor acarbose. This study determined that the antidiabetic action was concentration-dependent, and the antihyperglycemic action was shown by inhibiting the carbohydrate digestive enzymes and glucose movement; consequently, the post-prandial hyperglycemia significantly dropped. E. acoroides develops anti-feedant, antibacterial, and antilarval secondary metabolites, which may serve as a chemical defense against predatory animals, competitors, and infectious agents [66].
According to the literature, the anti-inflammatory activity of methanol fraction from Seagrass Zostera japonica is reported [151]. According to a recent study, Halophila stipulaceae extract effectively treats diabetes-related oxidative stress and hyperlipidemia [152]. Thalassia hemprichii and Cymodocea serrulata and C. serrulata metabolites have strong antioxidant properties, while H. uninervis extract has a cytotoxic effect on human SKOV-3 ovarian and MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells [153]. The extract of seagrass, H. ovalis, collected from Pulicat Lake in Tamil Nadu, contains active principles such as kaempferol, p-hydroxy benzoic acid, t-cinnamic acid, syringic acid, catechin, and luteolin in significant amounts, which could be accountable for anticancer potential, providing an area for further experiments with isolated potential metabolites against breast cancer cells [154]. The effectiveness of a standardized polyphenol extract of seagrass T. testudinum (TTE) has been demonstrated in in vitro/in vivo using a syngeneic allograft murine colorectal cancer model and colon tumor cell lines (RKO, SW480, and CT26). Following the in vitro/in vivo findings, TTE treatment initiates autophagy stress pathways and ATF4-P53-NFκB specific gene expression. As a result, it encourages anti-tumor immunogenic cell death in vivo and suppresses colon cancer cell proliferation, motility, and angiogenesis pathways in vitro [155]. In a column chromatography study, the bioactive component of aqueous ethanol extract Syringodium isoetifolium was separated, and its anticancer properties were studied against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro, in silico, and in vivo. The results show that the separated compound ‘phlorizin’ had good anticancer activity against hepatocellular carcinoma [156]. A recent investigation demonstrated that the bioderived TiO2 NPs could be an exciting candidate for medicinal purposes by highlighting the diverse attributes of C. serrulata-mediated TiO2 NPs, which included the antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-biofilm inhibition effects that have minimal cell damage in nature [157]. Phytocompounds and the biomedical characteristics of seagrasses have been highlighted in the preceding sections. However, at least for many species, knowledge gaps regarding various aspects of seagrasses can be seen. Therefore, this review aims to identify the areas that require further investigation.
Figure 11 shows the mechanisms of various bioactivities shown by seagrass extracts and their isolated compounds.
Figure 11 is a consolidation of the mechanism of anti-cancer activity [158,159], anti-inflammatory activity [160], and antimicrobial activity [161].
Other activities like antioxidant [162], and antidiabetic activities [163] were shown by these seagrass compounds which is well explained in the above sessions.

3.9. Bioprospecting Seagrass Microbiome

Numerous studies of endophytes of terrestrial plants have been conducted and provided a wide array of information regarding the diversity, distribution, and bioactive potential of endophytes. These endophytes were found to be a potential source of various unique bioactive molecules [164,165] and commercial enzymes [166], with characteristics that make them suitable for technological exploitation. On the other hand, comparatively little knowledge is available concerning endophytes of marine plants, such as seagrasses. According to some recent research, seagrasses are home to potential endophytes, which are beneficial for bioprospecting [167,168].
Compared to epiphytic microbes, endophytic microbes from seagrasses usually exhibited greater sensitivity against several human pathogenic microbes [169]. Research was carried out to evaluate the capability of the bacterial microbiome of seagrass Enhalus sp., from which 6 endophytes and 17 epiphytes were isolated; however, endophytes exhibited more significant biological activity than epiphytes against bacteria that form biofilms. Additionally, bacterial endophytes obstructed the growth of biofilm-forming bacteria than epiphytes [170].
Another study was executed to identify and determine the species of the endophytic bacteria that inhibit methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from the seagrasses of Rote Ndao, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. The findings indicated that eight strains of endophytic bacteria isolated from different seagrasses Enhalus acoroides, Cymodocea rotundata and Thalassia hemprichii, in the Litianak and Oeseli Beaches, Rote, have antibacterial activity against MRSA [171]. Another study investigated the antibacterial activity of bacteria associated with seagrass from Indonesia’s North Java Sea against drug-resistant bacteria. This study aimed to examine the ability of bacteria associated with seagrasses—E. acoroides, Syringodium sp., T. hemprichii, and Cymodocea sp.—as sources of potential antibiotics. Two isolates showed antibacterial activity against bacteria resistant to multiple drugs [172]. In a recent investigation, the cultivable fungal group of the Baltic Z. marina was separated and recognized using a scientific method. Additionally, this study illustrates every fungal extract’s bioactivity and range of chemicals [173]. Another investigation was carried out to isolate and identify endophytic bacteria from seagrass, T. hemprichii, as producers of antibacterial agents. Some endophytic bacterial strains exhibited antibacterial properties against infectious bacteria like S. aureus, Salmonella thyphi, and E. coli [174]. A recent study found that endophytic fungi from T. testudinum exhibit potential bioactivity against Labyrinthula spp., a seagrass pathogenic organism, resulting in the death of plants [175].
The role of the epiphytic and endophytic microbes of the seagrass Zostera marina in pathogen elimination from the seagrass ecosystem was analyzed by Tasdemir et al. [176]. This study opens the door for more research to clarify the complex functions (as well as the mechanism) of the seagrass microbiome in preserving the well-being of coastal ecosystems and seagrass meadows.

3.10. Comprehensive Methodologies for Assessing Bioactivity in Seagrasses: Chemical, Biological, and Ecological Approaches

Various approaches are used to investigate the biochemical composition, biological activities, and ecological relationships of seagrasses through the study of bioactivity. Bioactive compounds, like antioxidants and antimicrobial agents, are identified and quantified using chemical analysis techniques like gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [177,178]. The structural details of the compounds found in seagrass are further ascertained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [179]. The antioxidant capacity of seagrass extracts is evaluated by biological assays like DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging tests, while their efficacy against pathogens is assessed by antimicrobial assays [180]. The activity of seagrass extracts on cell viability is measured by cytotoxicity assays, such as MTT and LDH release tests [181]. By tracking growth patterns and environmental reactions, field research and remote sensing methods shed light on seagrass distribution, health, and ecological roles [182]. Molecular techniques that uncover genetic and metabolic pathways connected to bioactivity include metabolomics and DNA/RNA sequencing [183,184,185]. Finally, research on chemical ecology examines how chemical signaling functions in interactions between marine organisms and seagrasses [186,187,188,189,190]. When taken as a whole, these approaches provide a thorough knowledge of seagrass bioactivity and their ecological importance, which will, in turn, help the conservation strategies.
Comprehensive methods for determining the bioactivity of seagrasses use various analytical techniques, each with advantages and disadvantages. It usually involves a blend of various analytical methods [177,178]. The objectives of the study often influence the methodological choice. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a commonly used analytical tool for volatile and semi-volatile metabolites in metabolite profiling. It is less effective, nevertheless, with non-volatile or thermally unstable substances. It is not as effective in detecting polar metabolites, but it is especially helpful in profiling lipophilic compounds. Phenolic compounds and other secondary metabolites in seagrass extracts are separated and quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), frequently in conjunction with UV–Vis detection. It is beneficial when examining substances with unique UV absorbance characteristics. Integrated platforms that combine multiple analytical techniques—such as GC-MS, LC-MS, HPLC, and NMR—are frequently employed to accomplish thorough metabolite profiling. By enabling the simultaneous analysis of several metabolite classes, these platforms improve the scope and depth of profiling and enable the analysis of potential compounds found in the seagrass extracts.

4. Conclusions and Future Prospects

This article extensively reviews 183 research studies focused on the bioprospecting of seagrasses and their associated microbiomes. The reviewed literature encompasses a broad array of subjects, including the phytochemical and biochemical analysis of seagrasses, the assessment of seagrass bioactivities, and the exploration of the bioactive potential of seagrass-associated microbiomes. Using the available scientific literature, the authors of this article report biochemical and phytochemical constituents and pharmacological and other potent activities in various seagrasses. Since seagrasses are one of the most critical components of all marine habitats, studies focused on them have become increasingly important, as they are highly productive and serve as breeding grounds for several commercially important species. The biochemical contents of these plants can solve many human problems, such as several diseases, and have the potential for new inventions, such as natural antifoulants and UV sunscreens. This review touches on the critical points of the essential bioactive metabolites and seagrass’s antimicrobial and antioxidative properties in great depth. This review does not include an analysis of the literature on human clinical trials using bioactive molecules of seagrasses, as they form another vast area. However, several bioactive metabolites or compounds of seagrasses are still unknown, and researchers are working to discover all the essential compounds that aid human welfare. In the future, it will be essential to concentrate on isolating minor novel metabolites of potent therapeutic significance by utilizing innovative technologies to achieve good results.
The potential advantages of seagrass extracts in several disciplines, such as nutrition, environmental science, and skincare, have drawn attention. Seagrass extracts have several benefits over more conventional plant extracts, including the fact that they are a rich source of antioxidants, minerals (calcium, magnesium, and potassium), and vitamins (A, C, E, and K), a more environmentally responsible and sustainable choice than conventional plant extracts. It also possesses unique bioactive substances that are uncommon in terrestrial plants. Because of their adaptations, seagrasses can thrive in harsh marine environments with fluctuating salinities and reduced underwater lighting. This resilience may confer advantageous properties on seagrass extracts.
Despite the tremendous progress made in seagrass bioprospecting, some unanswered questions still need further investigation. First, more systematic research is required to understand the variety and functional roles of microbiomes associated with seagrasses, especially concerning their contributions to synthesizing bioactive compounds and ecosystem services. Furthermore, although a large number of research focuses on phytochemical and biochemical analyses, very little is known about how these discoveries relate to particular ecological roles or how environmental changes affect seagrass bioactivity. To better understand the possible uses of seagrasses, further research is needed to look into the metabolic and genetic pathways associated with the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds in seagrasses. Furthermore, the synergistic effects of combined seagrass species and their microbiomes on bioactivity have not received much attention. By encompassing these gaps, we may gain the best perspective possible on the potential applications of seagrasses and their microbiomes in environmental management and biotechnology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.A., A.J. and G.P.; methodology, H.M.A.; software, H.M.A. and D.I.N.; validation, A.J., G.P. and D.I.N.; formal analysis, H.M.A.; investigation, H.M.A.; resources, A.J. and G.P.; data curation, H.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.A.; writing—review and editing, H.M.A., A.J., G.P. and D.I.N.; visualization, H.M.A.; supervision, A.J. and G.P.; project administration, A.J. and G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the faculty and library of ALL SAINTS’ COLLEGE and the UNIVERSITY OF KERALA for providing the required research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that no competing financial interests or personal relationships influenced this manuscript.

Abbreviations

ODS columnOctadecyl-silica column
MICMinimum inhibitory concentration
DPPH2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate
MECSMethanolic extract of Cymodocea serrulata
AIDSAcquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome

References

  1. Steele, J.H.; Beet, A.R. Marine Protected Areas in “Nonlinear” Ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, S230–S233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. The Oxygen Pumps in the Sea Seagrasses the Wealth of India Raw Materials Series (a Wealth of Information on Plants, Animals and Minerals of India). Available online: https://niscpr.res.in/includes/images/wealthofindia/WoI-Extension-Bulletin-Seagrasses-Jan13.pdf (accessed on 27 August 2024).
  3. Duffy, J.E.; Benedetti-Cecchi, L.; Trinanes, J.; Muller-Karger, F.E.; Ambo-Rappe, R.; Boström, C.; Buschmann, A.H.; Byrnes, J.; Coles, R.G.; Creed, J.; et al. Toward a Coordinated Global Observing System for Seagrasses and Marine Macroalgae. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ruiz-Frau, A.; Gelcich, S.; Hendriks, I.E.; Duarte, C.M.; Marbà, N. Current State of Seagrass Ecosystem Services: Research and Policy Integration. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 149, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Papenbrock, J. Highlights in Seagrasses’ Phylogeny, Physiology, and Metabolism: What Makes Them Special? ISRN Bot. 2012, 2012, 103892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. James, R.K.; Keyzer, L.M.; van de Velde, S.J.; Herman, P.M.J.; van Katwijk, M.M.; Bouma, T.J. Climate Change Mitigation by Coral Reefs and Seagrass Beds at Risk: How Global Change Compromises Coastal Ecosystem Services. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reynolds, L.K.; Waycott, M.; McGlathery, K.J.; Orth, R.J. Ecosystem Services Returned through Seagrass Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2016, 24, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Raja, S.; Subhashini, P.; Thangaradjou, T. Differential Methods of Localisation of Fungal Endophytes in the Seagrasses. Mycology 2016, 7, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Venkatachalam, A.; Thirunavukkarasu, N.; Suryanarayanan, T.S. Distribution and Diversity of Endophytes in Seagrasses. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 13, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Supaphon, P.; Phongpaichit, S.; Rukachaisirikul, V.; Sakayaroj, J. Antimicrobial Potential of Endophytic Fungi Derived from Three Seagrass Species: Cymodocea serrulata, Halophila ovalis and Thalassia hemprichii. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sakayaroj, J.; Preedanon, S.; Supaphon, O.; Jones, E.B.G.; Phongpaichit, S. Phylogenetic Diversity of Endophyte Assemblages Associated with the Tropical Seagrass Enhalus acoroides in Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2010, 42, 27–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patil, R.; Mallya, R. A Mini Review on Biological Activities of Genus Thalassia: A Marine Seagrass. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2023, 12, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, G.-P.; Yuan, J.; Sun, L.; She, Z.-G.; Wu, J.-H.; Lan, X.-J.; Zhu, X.; Lin, Y.-C.; Chen, S.-P. Statistical Research on Marine Natural Products Based on Data Obtained between 1985 and 2008. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Harvey, A.L.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Quinn, R.J. The Re-Emergence of Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the Genomics Era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Blunt, J.W.; Copp, B.R.; Munro, M.H.G.; Northcote, P.T.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Capon, R.J. Marine bioprospecting—Trawling for treasure and pleasure. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2001, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. de la Torre-Castro, M.; Rönnbäck, P. Links between humans and seagrasses—An example from tropical East Africa. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2004, 47, 361–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haddaway, N.R.; Page, M.J.; Pritchard, C.C.; McGuinness, L.A. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2022, 18, e1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Burt, D.B. Evolutionary Stasis, Constraint and Other Terminology Describing Evolutionary Patterns. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2001, 72, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orth, R.J.; Carruthers, T.J.; Dennison, W.C.; Duarte, C.M.; Fourqurean, J.W.; Heck, K.L.; Williams, S.L. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 2006, 56, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nordlund, L.M.; Jackson, E.L.; Nakaoka, M.; Samper-Villarreal, J.; Beca-Carretero, P.; Creed, J.C. Seagrass Ecosystem Services—What’s Next? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 134, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mtwana Nordlund, L.; Koch, E.W.; Barbier, E.B.; Creed, J.C. Seagrass Ecosystem Services and Their Variability across Genera and Geographical Regions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hemminga, M.A.; Duarte, C.M. Seagrass Ecology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fourqurean, J.W.; Duarte, C.M.; Kennedy, H.; Marbà, N.; Holmer, M.; Mateo, M.A.; Apostolaki, E.T.; Kendrick, G.A.; Krause-Jensen, D.; McGlathery, K.J.; et al. Seagrass Ecosystems as a Globally Significant Carbon Stock. Nat. Geosci. 2012, 5, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gillanders, B.M. Seagrasses, Fish, and Fisheries. In Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 503–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lilley, R.J.; Unsworth, R.K.F. Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Benefits from the Availability of Seagrass (Zostera marina) Nursery Habitat. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2014, 2, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bujang, J.S.; Zakaria, M.H.; Arshad, A. Distribution and Significance of Seagrass Ecosystems in Malaysia. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2006, 9, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maxwell, P.S.; Eklöf, J.S.; van Katwijk, M.M.; O’Brien, K.R.; de la Torre-Castro, M.; Boström, C.; van der Heide, T. The fundamental role of ecological feedback mechanisms for the adaptive management of seagrass ecosystems—A review. Biol. Rev. 2017, 92, 1521–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cullen-Unsworth, L.; Unsworth, R. Seagrass Meadows, Ecosystem Services, and Sustainability. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2013, 55, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Elias, N.; Farag, M.A.; Chen, L.; Saeed, A.; Hegazy, M.-E.F.; Moustafa, M.S.; Abd El-Wahed, A.; Al-Mousawi, S.M.; Musharraf, S.G.; et al. Marine Natural Products: A Source of Novel Anticancer Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prasad, G.; Ramesh, M.V.; Ramesh, T.; Thomas, G.M. Changing profile of natural organic matter in groundwater of a Ramsar site in Kerala implications for sustainability. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gayathri, N.; Prasad, G.; Prabhakaran, V.; Priya, V. Understanding the impact of microplastic contamination on soil quality and eco-toxicological risks in horticulture: A comprehensive review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2024, 9, 100633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Widiastuti, E.L.; Rima, K.; Busman, H. Anticancer Potency of Seagrass (Enhalus acoroides) Methanol Extract in the HeLa Cervical Cancer Cell Culture. In Advances in Engineering Research/Advances in Engineering Research; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shailaja, V.; Christina, V.; Mohanapriya, C.; Sneha, P.; Sundaram, R.L.; Magesh, R.; Doss, C.G.P.; Gnanambal, K.M.E. A Natural Anticancer Pigment, Pheophytin A, from a Seagrass Acts as a High Affinity Human Mitochondrial Translocator Protein (TSPO) Ligand, in Silico, to Reduce Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (∆ψ) in Adenocarcinomic A549 Cells. Phytomedicine 2019, 61, 152858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Imran, M.; Talpur, F.N.; Jan, M.I.; Khan, A.; Khan, I. Analysis of nutritional components of some wild edible plants. J. -Chem. Soc. Pak. 2007, 29, 500. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, D.H.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Sadeer, N.B.; Seok, P.G.; Zengin, G.; Palaniveloo, K.; Khalil, A.A.; Rauf, A.; Rengasamy, K.R. Nutritional and Bioactive Potential of Seagrasses: A Review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 137, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cui, L.; Jiang, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y. Identification of Food Sources in Tropical Seagrass Bed Food Web Using Triple Stable Isotopes and Fatty Acid Signatures. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1093181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clores, M.A. Food-Web Dynamics in Three Seagrass Systems in Caramoan Peninsula, Philippines. Environ. Ecol. Res. 2023, 11, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rondevaldova, J.; Quiao, M.A.; Drabek, O.; Dajcl, J.; Dela Pena-Galanida, G.D.; Leopardas, V.E.; Kokoska, L. Mineral Composition of Seaweeds and Seagrasses of the Philippines. Phycologia 2023, 62, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pradheeba, M.; Dilipan, E.; Nobi, E.P.; Thangaradjou, T.; Sivakumar, K. Evaluation of seagrasses for their nutritional value. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2011, 45, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
  41. Immaculate, J.K.; Lilly, T.T.; Patterson, J. Macro and micro nutrients of seagrass species from Gulf of Mannar, India. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2018, 6, 391–398. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rengasamy, R.R.K.; Radjassegarin, A.; Perumal, A. Seagrasses as Potential Source of Medicinal Food Ingredients: Nutritional Analysis and Multivariate Approach. Biomed. Prev. Nutr. 2013, 3, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bharatharathna, P.; Santhanam, P. Analyses of phytochemical, biochemical, pigments and antioxidant activity of seagrass Syringodium isoetifolium. J. Adv. Sci. Res. 2019, 10 (Suppl. 2), 267–271. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ragupathi Raja Kannan, R.; Arumugam, R.; Thangaradjou, T.; Anantharaman, P. Phytochemical Constituents, Antioxidant Properties and P-Coumaric Acid Analysis in Some Seagrasses. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bharathi, N.P.; Jayalakshmi, M.; Amudha, P.; Vanitha, V. Phytochemical screening and in vitro antioxidant activity of the seagrass Cymodocea serrulata. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2019, 48, 1216–1221. [Google Scholar]
  46. De Vincenti, L.; Glasenapp, Y.; Cattò, C.; Villa, F.; Cappitelli, F.; Papenbrock, J. Hindering the Formation and Promoting the Dispersion of Medical Biofilms: Non-Lethal Effects of Seagrass Extracts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Baby, L.; Sankar, T.V.; Chandramohanakumar, N. Changes in Phenolic Compounds in Seagrasses against Changes in the Ecosystem. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 742–747. [Google Scholar]
  48. Smadi, A.; Ciavatta, M.; Bitam, F.; Carbone, M.; Villani, G.; Gavagnin, M. Prenylated Flavonoids and Phenolic Compounds from the Rhizomes of Marine Phanerogam Cymodocea nodosa. Planta Medica 2017, 84, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kannan, R.R.R.; Arumugam, R.; Anantharaman, P. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Indian Seagrasses against Urinary Tract Pathogens. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2470–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Setyoningrum, D.; Yamindago, A.; Hikmah Julinda Sari, S.; Maftuch, M. Phytochemical Analysis and in vitro Antibacterial Activities of Seagrass Enhalus acoroides against Staphylococcus aureus. Res. J. Life Sci. 2020, 7, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pharmawati, M.; Wrasiati, L.P. Phytochemical screening and FTIR spectroscopy on crude extract from Enhalus acoroides leaves. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2020, 24, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  52. Noor, N.M.; Febriani, D.; Ali, M. Seagrass of Enhalus acoroides as a Traditional Body Scrubs in Preventing Malarial Bites by Pahawang Island Community in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1012, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, H.S.; Park, N.H.; Suk, H.Y.; You, S.G.; Woo, J.H. Identification of Polyphenol Substances (MP-1) from Seagrass, Phyllospadix japonica Makino. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 2022, 41, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Das, D.; Arulkumar, A.; Paramasivam, S.; Lopez-Santamarina, A.; del Carmen Mondragon, A.; Miranda Lopez, J.M. Phytochemical Constituents, Antimicrobial Properties and Bioactivity of Marine Red Seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii) and Seagrass (Cymodocea serrulata). Foods 2023, 12, 2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Windyaswari, A.S.; Purba, J.P.; Nurrahmah, S.S.; Ayu, I.P.; Imran, Z.; Amin, A.A.; Kurniawan, F.; Pratiwi, N.T.M.; Iswantari, A. Phytochemical Profile of Sea Grass Extract (Enhalus acoroides): A New Marine Source from Ekas Bay, East Lombok. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 278, 012081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qi, S.-H.; Huang, L.-S.; He, F.; Zhang, S.; Dong, J.-D. Phytochemical and Chemotaxonomic Investigation of Seagrass Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb.) Aschers (Hydrocharitaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2012, 43, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bitam, F.; Ciavatta, M.L.; Carbone, M.; Manzo, E.; Mollo, E.; Gavagnin, M. Chemical Analysis of Flavonoid Constituents of the Seagrass Halophila stipulacea: First Finding of Malonylated Derivatives in Marine Phanerogams. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yuvaraj, N.; Kanmani, P.; Satishkumar, R.; Paari, A.; Pattukumar, V.; Arul, V. Seagrass as a potential source of natural antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents. Pharm. Biol. 2012, 50, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tangon, E.; Elvinia, R.A.; Jocelyn, A.P.; Kingpu, O.A. Phytochemical Screening and proximate composition of the seagrass Halodule pinifolia of the coastal waters of Carmen, Agusan Del Norte, Philippines. Int. J. Mod. Pharm. Res. 2021, 5, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  60. Nazar, S.; Ravikumar, S.; Williams, G.P.; Ali, M.S.; Suganthi, P. Screening of Indian coastal plant extracts for larvicidal activity of Culex quinquefasciatus. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 2, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grignon-Dubois, M.; Rezzonico, B. Phenolic Fingerprint of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica from Four Locations in the Mediterranean Sea: First Evidence for the Large Predominance of Chicoric Acid. Bot. Mar. 2015, 58, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Blunt, J.W.; Carroll, A.R.; Copp, B.R.; Davis, R.A.; Keyzers, R.A.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 8–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kavitha, D.; Padmini, R.; Dhanaraju, M.D.; Gopi, C.; Thiyagarajan, D.; Veeramaneni, A. Syringodium isoetifolium Fosters an Antioxidant Defense System, Modulates Glycolytic Enzymes and Protects Membrane Integrity in DEN-induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Albino Wistar Rats. Ind. J. Pharm. Edu. Res. 2023, 57, s690–s700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Haznedaroglu, M.Z.; Zeybek, U. HPLC Determination of Chicoric Acid in Leaves of Posidonia oceanica. Pharm. Biol. 2007, 45, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nuissier, G.; Rezzonico, B.; Grignon-Dubois, M. Chicoric Acid from Syringodium filiforme. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Qi, S.-H.; Zhang, S.; Qian, P.-Y.; Wang, B.-G. Antifeedant, Antibacterial, and Antilarval Compounds from the South China Sea Seagrass Enhalus acoroides. Bot. Mar. 2008, 51, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kontiza, I.; Stavri, M.; Zloh, M.; Vagias, C.; Gibbons, S.; Roussis, V. New Metabolites with Antibacterial Activity from the Marine Angiosperm Cymodocea nodosa. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1696–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kannan, R.R.R.; Arumugam, R.; Anantharaman, P. Antibacterial Potential of Three Seagrasses against Human Pathogens. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2010, 3, 890–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rowley, D.C.; Hansen, M.S.T.; Rhodes, D.; Sotriffer, C.A.; Ni, H.; McCammon, J.A.; Bushman, F.D.; Fenical, W. Thalassiolins A–C: New Marine-Derived Inhibitors of HIV CDNA Integrase. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3619–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hamdy, A.-H.A.; Mettwally, W.S.A.; El Fotouh, M.A.; Rodriguez, B.; El-Dewany, A.I.; El-Toumy, S.A.A.; Hussein, A.A. Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from the Egyptian Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Z. Für Naturforschung C 2012, 67, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdelhameed, R.F.; Ibrahim, A.K.; Yamada, K.; Ahmed, S.A. Cytotoxic and Anti-Inflammatory Compounds from Red Sea Grass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 1238–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bel Mabrouk, S.; Reis, M.; Sousa, M.L.; Ribeiro, T.; Almeida, J.R.; Pereira, S.; Antunes, J.; Rosa, F.; Vasconcelos, V.; Achour, L.; et al. The Marine Seagrass Halophila stipulacea as a Source of Bioactive Metabolites against Obesity and Biofouling. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kjersti Hasle, E. Analysis of Polyphenolic Content in Marine and Aquatic Angiosperms from Norwegian Coastal Waters. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 2018. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17676 (accessed on 5 July 2024).
  74. Velika, B.; Kron, I. Antioxidant Properties of Benzoic Acid Derivatives against Superoxide Radical. Free Radic. Antioxid. 2012, 2, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gao, J.; Hu, J.; Hu, D.; Yang, X. A Role of Gallic Acid in Oxidative Damage Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X1987417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zduńska, K.; Dana, A.; Kolodziejczak, A.; Rotsztejn, H. Antioxidant Properties of Ferulic Acid and Its Possible Application. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018, 31, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jones, D.A. Rosacea, reactive oxygen species, and azelaic acid. J. Clin. Aesthetic Dermatol. 2009, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed Central]
  78. Weimann, E.; Silva, M.B.B.; Murata, G.M.; Bortolon, J.R.; Dermargos, A.; Curi, R.; Hatanaka, E. Topical Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Palmitoleic Acid Improves Wound Healing. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tao, C.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.; Yang, R.; Lv, Z. Antimicrobial Activities of Bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla Cv. Pubescens) Leaf Essential Oil and Its Major Components. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 244, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yoon, B.; Jackman, J.; Valle-González, E.; Cho, N.-J. Antibacterial Free Fatty Acids and Monoglycerides: Biological Activities, Experimental Testing, and Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Islam, M.T.; Ali, E.S.; Uddin, S.J.; Shaw, S.; Islam, M.A.; Ahmed, M.I.; Chandra Shill, M.; Karmakar, U.K.; Yarla, N.S.; Khan, I.N.; et al. Phytol: A Review of Biomedical Activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 121, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ahmed, N. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant potential, isolation and characterization of bioactive compound from Enhalus acoroides. J. Pharm. Negat. Results 2022, 13, 4118–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Anzaku, A.A.; Akyala, J.I.; Juliet, A.; Obianuju, E.C. Antibacterial Activity of Lauric Acid on Some Selected Clinical Isolates. Ann. Clin. Lab. Res. 2017, 5, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, H.; Dolan, H.L.; Ding, Q.; Wang, S.; Tikekar, R.V. Antimicrobial Action of Octanoic Acid against Escherichia coli O157:H7 during Washing of Baby Spinach and Grape Tomatoes. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 108523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sangeetha, J.; Asokan, S. Antibacterial activity of different sea grass Extracts against some human eye pathogens. World J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 4, 677–683. [Google Scholar]
  86. Prabhakaran, S.; Rajaram, R.; Balasubramanian, V.; Mathivanan, K. Antifouling potentials of extracts from seaweeds, seagrasses and mangroves against primary biofilm forming bacteria. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S316–S322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ali, M.S.; Ravikumar, S.; Beula, J.M. Bioactivity of Seagrass against the Dengue Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti Larvae. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kolenchenko, E.A.; Khotimchenko, M.Y.; Khozhaenko, E.V.; Khotimchenko, Y.S. Strontium Sorption by Pectins Isolated from the Sea Grasses Zostera marina and Phyllospadix iwatensis. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2012, 38, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Athiperumalsami, T.; Kumar, V.; Jesudass, L.L. Survey and Phytochemical Analysis of Seagrasses in the Gulf of Mannar, Southeast Coast of India. Bot. Mar. 2008, 51, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kolsi, R.B.A.; Gargouri, B.; Sassi, S.; Frikha, D.; Lassoued, S.; Belghith, K. In Vitro Biological Properties and Health Benefits of a Novel Sulfated Polysaccharide Isolated from Cymodocea nodosa. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Purnomo, H.K.; Handayani, W.; Yasman, Y. Bioprospecting of Potential Seagrass Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb. Ex Solms) Asch. (Hydrocharitaceae) Extract from Pramuka Island against Aedes aegypti L. Larvae. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Current Progress in Mathematics and Sciences 2017 (ISCPMS2017), Bali, Indonesia, 26–27 July 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bengen, D.G.; Khoeri, M.M.; Marhaeni, B.; Radjasa, O.K.; Sabdono, A.; Sudoyo, H. Antifouling Activity of Bacterial Symbionts of Seagrasses against Marine Biofilm-Forming Bacteria. J. Environ. Prot. 2011, 2, 1245–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hammami, S.; Ben Salem, A.; Ashour, M.L.; Cheriaa, J.; Graziano, G.; Mighri, Z. A Novel Methylated Sesquiterpene from Seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 1265–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kalaivani, P.; Amudha, P. Identification of Bioactive Components in the Hydroalcoholic Extract of Syringodium isoetifolium and Assessment of Its Biological Activity by Gas Chromatography—Masspectrometry. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 12, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Vijayalingam, T.A.; Rajesh, N.V. Seagrasses as Potential Source of Fodder for Livestock: Complete Proximate and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) Analysis. Ann. Phytomedicine Int. J. 2019, 8, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wisespongpand, P.; Khantavong, A.; Phothong, P.; Wanghom, W. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Antifouling Activity from Extracts of Aboveground and Belowground Parts of Seagrasses Cymodocea rotundata and Cymodocea serrulata. J. Fish. Environ. 2022, 46, 37–53. [Google Scholar]
  97. Farid, M.M.; Marzouk, M.M.; Hussein, S.R.; Elkhateeb, A.; Abdel-Hameed, E.S. Comparative study of Posidonia oceanica L.: LC/ESI/MS analysis, cytotoxic activity and chemosystematic significance. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2018, 9, 1676–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hawas, U.W.; Abou El-Kassem, L.T. Thalassiolin D: A New Flavone O-Glucoside Sulphate from the Seagrass Thalass. Hemprichii. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 2369–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Abdelmohsen, M.; Hassanein, H.D.; Hassan, R.A.; Abreu, A.C.; Simões, M.; Nazif, N.M.; Abou-Setta, L.M. Phytochemical analysis, in vitro evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of phenolic extracts from Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile leaves. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2016, 8, 449–457. [Google Scholar]
  100. Alfattani, A.; Blanchet, E.; Da Silva, J.O.; Leoni, S.; Allard, P.; Queiroz, E.; Roy, M.; Chave, J.; Lami, R.; Perron, K.; et al. Bioactive Potential and Role of Secondary Metabolites within the Microorganism Community of the Sea Grass Posidonia oceanica. Planta Medica Int. Open 2017, 4, S1–S202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mettwally, W.S.; Ragab, T.I.; Hamdy, A.-H.A.; Helmy, W.A.; Hassan, S.A. Preliminary Study on the Possible Impact of Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forss.) Den Hartog Acidic Polysaccharide Fractions against TAA Induced Liver Failure. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 138, 111502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Piazzini, V.; Vasarri, M.; Degl’Innocenti, D.; Guastini, A.; Barletta, E.; Salvatici, M.C.; Bergonzi, M.C. Comparison of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Soluplus Micelles to Optimize the Bioactivity of Posidonia oceanica Extract on Human Neuroblastoma Cell Migration. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Delange, D.M.; Garcia, K.G.; Rivera, Y.H.; Suárez, Y.A.; Cuesta, R.G.; Riera-Romo, M.; Echemendia, O.; Dutra, L.M.; Almeida, J.R.G.D.S.; Pérez-Martínez, D.; et al. Chemical Composition and Biological Potential of a Chloroform Fraction from the Leaves of Marine Plant Syringodium filiforme Kützing. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2020, 16, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Riera-Romo, M.; Marrero-Delange, D.; Hernandez-Balmaseda, I.; González, K.; Pérez-Martínez, D.; Manso, A.; Labrada, M.; Rodeiro, I. Chemical Characterization and Cytotoxic Potential of a Chloroform Fraction Obtained from Marine Plant Thalassia testudinum. J. Chromatogr. Sep. Tech. 2018, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Susilo, B.; Oktavianty, O.; Rahayu, F.; Handayani, M.L.W.; Rohim, A. Potential Transformation of Seagrass (Syringodium isoetifolium) into a Bioactive Food Ingredient Using Different Extraction Techniques. F1000Research 2023, 12, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Thinh, P.D.; Hang, C.T.T.; Trung, D.T.; Nguyen, T.-D. Pectin from Three Vietnamese Seagrasses: Isolation, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity. Processes 2023, 11, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Punginelli, D.; Vazzana, M.; Mauro, M.; Catania, V.; Arizza, V.; Schillaci, D. Antimicrobial activity from Polypeptide-rich extracts of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica. J. Biol. Res. 2021, 94, 1826–8838. Available online: https://iris.unipa.it/handle/10447/523288 (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  108. Abruscato, G.; Chiarelli, R.; Lazzara, V.; Punginelli, D.; Sugár, S.; Mauro, M.; Librizzi, M.; Di Stefano, V.; Arizza, V.; Vizzini, A.; et al. In Vitro Cytotoxic Effect of Aqueous Extracts from Leaves and Rhizomes of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile on HepG2 Liver Cancer Cells: Focus on Autophagy and Apoptosis. Biology 2023, 12, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Punginelli, D.; Catania, V.; Abruscato, G.; Luparello, C.; Vazzana, M.; Mauro, M.; Cunsolo, V.; Saletti, R.; Di Francesco, A.; Arizza, V.; et al. New Bioactive Peptides from the Mediterranean Seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile and Their Impact on Antimicrobial Activity and Apoptosis of Human Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Amiin, M.K.; Lahay, A.F. Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Cymodocea rotundata Extract and Assay for Primary Bioactive Composition. J. Aquatropica Asia 2023, 8, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kalaivani, P.; Amudha, P.; Chandramohan, A.; Vidya, R.; Prabhaharan, M.; Sasikumar, P.; Albukhaty, S.; Sulaiman, G.M.; Abomughaid, M.M.; Abu-Alghayth, M.H. Evaluation of Cytotoxic Activity of Syringodium isoetifolium against Human Breast Cancer Cell Line—An in Silico and in Vitro Study. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 105179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Amutha, V.; Aiswarya, D.; Deepak, P.; Selvaraj, R.; Tamilselvan, C.; Perumal, P.; Balasubramani, G. Toxicity Potential Evaluation of Ethyl Acetate Extract of Cymodocea serrulata against the Mosquito Vectors Vis-a-Vis Zebrafish Embryos and Artemia salina Cysts. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 152, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Berfad, M.A.; Fahej, M.A.S.; Kumar, A.; Edrah, S. Preliminary phytochemical and antifungal studies of seagrass, Posidonia oceanica obtained from Mediterranean Sea of Libya. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015, 4, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  114. Phandee, S.; Buapet, P. Photosynthetic and Antioxidant Responses of the Tropical Intertidal Seagrasses Halophila ovalis and Thalassia hemprichii to Moderate and High Irradiances. Bot. Mar. 2018, 61, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sitania, M.; Kakisina, P.; Nindatu, M.; Moniharapon, M.; Kunda, R.M. Alveolar Performance of Mice (Mus musculus) Exposure to Cigarette Smoke After-Treatment of Ethanol Extract of Seagrass (Enhalus acoroides). In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Basic Sciences 2021 (ICBS 2021), Ambon, Indonesia, 23–24 November 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kavitha, D.; Padmini, R.; Chandravadivelu, G.; Magharla, D.D. Phytoconstituents Screening and Antioxidant Activity of Syringodium isoetifolium Leaf Extracts. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 84, 1309–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dilipan, E.; Sivaperumal, P.; Kamala, K.; Ramachandran, M.; Vivekanandhan, P. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Seagrass Cymodocea serrulata (R.Br.) Asch. & Magnus, Characterization, and Evaluation of Anticancer, Antioxidant, and Antiglycemic Index. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2023, 70, 1346–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Narayanan, M.; Chanthini, A.; Devarajan, N.; Saravanan, M.; Sabour, A.; Alshiekheid, M.; Chi, N.T.L.; Brindhadevi, K. Antibacterial and Antioxidant Efficacy of Ethyl Acetate Extract of Cymodocea serrulata and Assess the Major Bioactive Components in the Extract Using GC-MS Analysis. Process Biochem. 2023, 124, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wagey, B.T.; Gunawan, W.B.; Lasabuda, R.; Mayulu, N.; Al Mahira, M.F.N.; Lailossa, D.G.; Nurkolis, F. New insight on antioxidants and anti-obesity properties of two Indonesian seagrass Thalassia hemprichii and Zostera marina: An integrated molecular docking simulation with in vitro study. F1000Research 2023, 12, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chaabani, E.; Rebey, I.B.; Wannes, W.A.; Ksouri, R.; Shili, A. Variability on the Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Ruppia cirrhosa Extract Using Two Different Methods of Extraction. Avicenna J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023, 10, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abd-Elraoof, W.A.; Tayel, A.A.; El-Far, S.W.; Mohamed, O.; Diab, A.M.; Abonama, O.M.; Assas, M.A.; Abdella, A. Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of a Chitosan-Selenium Nanocomposite Biosynthesized Using Posidonia oceanica. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 26001–26014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Santoso, J.; Purwaningsih, S.; Ramadhan, W.; Noveliyana, Y. Bioactive Compounds, Phenol content and antioxidants activity of tropical seagrass Halodule pinifolia. Coast. Ocean. J. 2023, 7, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kevrekidou, A.; Assimopoulou, A.N.; Trachana, V.; Stagos, D.; Malea, P. Antioxidant Activity, Inhibition of Intestinal Cancer Cell Growth and Polyphenolic Compounds of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica’s Extracts from Living Plants and Beach Casts. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mabrouk, S.B.; Grami, B.; Ayache, S.B.; Kacem, A. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and analgesic activities of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea leaf and stem extracts. Authorea Preprints 2024. [Google Scholar]
  125. Magdy, M.D.; Mohammed; Hamdy, A.-H.A.; El-Fiky, N.M.; Mettwally, W.S.A.; El-Beih, A.A.; Kobayashi, N. Anti-Influenza a Virus Activity of a New Dihydrochalcone Diglycoside Isolated from the Egyptian Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forsk.) Den Hartog. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kumar, C.S.; Sarada, D.V.L.; Gideon, T.P.; Rengasamy, R. Antibacterial Activity of Three South Indian Seagrasses, Cymodocea serrulata, Halophila ovalis and Zostera capensis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1989–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hawas, U.W. A New 8-Hydroxy Flavone O-Xyloside Sulfate and Antibacterial Activity from the Egyptian Seagrass Thalassia hemprichii. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2014, 50, 629–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Berfad, M.A.; Alnour, T.M. Phytochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of the 5 different extract from the seagrasses Posidonia oceanica. J. Med. Plants Stud. 2014, 15, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  129. Emmanuel Joshua Jebasingh, S.; Lakshmikandan, M.; Sivaraman, K.; Uthiralingam, M. Assessment of Antibacterial, Antifungal Property and Purification of Bioactive Compounds from Seagrass, Thalassia hemprichii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 86, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mayavu, P.; Sugesh, S.; Ravindran, V.J. Antibacterial activity of seagrass species against biofilm forming bacteria. Res. J. Microbiol. 2009, 4, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kumar, S.R.; Ramanathan, G.; Subhakaran, M.; Inbaneson, S.J. Antimicrobial Compounds from Marine Halophytes for Silkworm Disease Treatment. Int. J. Med. Med. Sci. 2009, 1, 184–191. [Google Scholar]
  132. Krylova, N.V.; Leonova, G.N.; Maystrovskaya, O.S.; Popov, A.M.; Artyukov, A.A. Mechanisms of Antiviral Activity of the Polyphenol Complex from Seagrass of the Zosteraceae Family against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 165, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Santoso, J.; Anwariyah, S.; Rumiantin, R.O.; Putri, A.P.; Ukhty, N.; Yoshie-Stark, Y. Phenol content, antioxidant activity and fibers profile of four tropical seagrasses from Indonesia. J. Coast. Dev. 2012, 15, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  134. Jeyapragash, D.; Subhashini, P.; Raja, S.; Abirami, K.; Thangaradjou, T. Evaluation of In-Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Seagrasses: Signals for Potential Alternate Source. Free Radic. Antioxid. 2016, 6, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Baehaki, A.; Widiastuti, I.; Nurul Jannah, H. Antioxidant Activity of Extracts of Halodule pinifolia Seagrass from Solvents with Different Polarities. Orient. J. Chem. 2017, 33, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Girija, K.; Parthiban, C.; Hemalatha, A.; Saranya, C.; Anantharaman, P. Evaluation of antioxidant activities and preliminary phytochemical analysis of seagrasses Halodule pinifolia, Halophila ovalis and Syringodium isoetifolium. J. Phytochem. 2013, 114, 181–187. [Google Scholar]
  137. Ramalingam, N.; Ramakrishnan, K.; Krishnan, C.; Sankar, S. Phytochemical Analysis, HPTLC Finger Printing, in Vitro Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity of Cymodocea serrulata. Pharmacogn. J. 2013, 5, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Messina, C.M.; Arena, R.; Manuguerra, S.; Pericot, Y.; Curcuraci, E.; Kerninon, F.; Renda, G.; Hellio, C.; Santulli, A. Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Beach Cast Leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. El Shaffai, A.; Mettwally, W.S.A.; Mohamed, S.I.A. A Comparative Study of the Bioavailability of Red Sea Seagrass, Enhalus acoroides (L.f.) Royle (Leaves, Roots, and Rhizomes) as Anticancer and Antioxidant with Preliminary Phytochemical Characterization Using HPLC, FT-IR, and UPLC-ESI-TOF-MS Spectroscopic Analysis. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2023, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Prajoko, Y.W.; Qhabibi, F.R.; Gerardo, T.S.; Kizzandy, K.; Tanjaya, K.; Willyanto, S.E.; Permatasari, H.K.; Surya, R.; Mayulu, N.; Taslim, N.A.; et al. Revealing Novel Source of Breast Cancer Inhibitors from Seagrass Enhalus acoroides: In Silico and in Vitro Studies. Molecules 2024, 29, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Su, S.; Cheng, X.; Wink, M. Cytotoxicity of Arctigenin and Matairesinol against the T-Cell Lymphoma Cell Line CCRF-CEM. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 67, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Chen, L.; Deng, H.; Cui, H.; Fang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L. Inflammatory Responses and Inflammation-Associated Diseases in Organs. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 7204–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Vasarri, M.; Leri, M.; Barletta, E.; Ramazzotti, M.; Marzocchini, R.; Degl’Innocenti, D. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of the Marine Plant Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 247, 112252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Hu, Z.; Chen, J.; Liu, Q.; Wu, Q.; Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, L.; Gao, Z. Cyclohexenone Derivative and Drimane Sesquiterpenes from the Seagrass-Derived Fungus Aspergillus insuetus. Chem. Biodivers. 2023, 20, e202300424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Al-Ansari, M.M.; Nora Dahmash Al-Dahmash, G.K. Jhanani. Anti-Candida, Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Potential of Ethyl Acetate Extract Fraction-7a from Cymodocea serrulata and Its Bioactive Compound Characterization through FTIR and NMR. Environ. Res. 2023, 229, 115985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Fatmawati, Y.; Sandrina, S.; Aina, R.N.; Narulita, E. Molecular Docking Analysis of Seagrass (Enhalus acoroides) Phytochemical Compounds as an Antidiabetic. J. Biol. Res. Boll. Della Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 2022, 95, 10224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Baehaki, A.; Herpandi, H.H.; Lestari, S.; Hendri, M.; Ariska, F. Antidiabetic Activity with N-Hexane, Ethyl-Acetate and Ethanol Extract of Halodule uninervis Seagrass. Pharmacogn. J. 2020, 12, 805–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ravikumar, S.; Vinoth, R.; Selvan, G.P. Bioactive Potential of a Seagrass Syringodium isoetifolium against Bacterial Fish Pathogens. J. Pharm. Res. 2011, 4, 1854–1856. [Google Scholar]
  149. Cornara, L.; Pastorino, G.; Borghesi, B.; Salis, A.; Clericuzio, M.; Marchetti, C.; Damonte, G.; Burlando, B. Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile Ethanolic Extract Modulates Cell Activities with Skin Health Applications. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Vani, M.; Vasavi, T.; Uma, M.D.P. Evaluation of in Vitro Antidiabetic activity of Methanolic extract of Seagrass Halophila beccarii. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hua, K.-F.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Su, Y.-C.; Lin, I.-F.; Yang, S.-S.; Chen, Y.-M.; Chao, L.K. Study on the Antiinflammatory Activity of Methanol Extract from Seagrass Zostera japonica. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 54, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hegazi, N.M.; Saad, H.; Marzouk, M.M.; Abdel, M.F.; El, H.; Zayed, A.; Ulber, R.; Ezzat, S.M. Molecular Networking Leveraging the Secondary Metabolomes Space of Halophila stipulaceae (Forsk.) Aschers. And Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb. Ex Solms) Asch. In Tandem with Their Chemosystematics and Antidiabetic Potentials. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ghandourah, M.; Hawas, U.W.; Abou El-Kassem, L.T.; Shaher, F.M. Fatty Acids and Other Chemical Compositions of Some Seagrasses Collected from the Saudi Red Sea with Potential of Antioxidant and Anticancer Agents. Thalass. Int. J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 37, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sharma, H.; Stephen, N.M.; Gopal, S.S.; Udayawara Rudresh, D.; Kavalappa, Y.P.; Haranahalli Shivarudrappa, A.; Gavirangappa, H.; Ponesakki, G. Phenolic Extract of Seagrass, Halophila ovalis Activates Intrinsic Pathway of Apoptosis in Human Breast Cancer (MCF-7) Cells. Nutr. Cancer 2020, 73, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Hernández-Balmaseda, I.; Guerra, I.R.; Declerck, K.; Isidrón, J.A.H.; Pérez-Novo, C.; Van Camp, G.; De Wever, O.; González, K.; Labrada, M.; Carr, A.; et al. Marine Seagrass Extract of Thalassia testudinum Suppresses Colorectal Tumor Growth, Motility and Angiogenesis by Autophagic Stress and Immunogenic Cell Death Pathways. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. PPerumal, P.; Arthanari, U.; Sanniyasi, E. Phlorizin Isolated from Seagrass Syringodium isoetifolium Inhibits Diethylnitrosamine and Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in BALB/c Mice. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 155, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Narayanan, M.; Srinivasan, S.; Gnanasekaran, C.; Ramachandran, G.; Chelliah, C.K.; Rajivgandhi, G.; Maruthupandy, M.; Quero, F.; Li, W.-J.; Hayder, G.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Marine Seagrass (Cymodocea serrulata) Mediated Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for Antibacterial, Antibiofilm and Antioxidant Properties. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 189, 106595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hemmati, S.; Noveiry, B.B.; Keshavarz-Fathi, M. Cancer and Allergy; Molecular Association and Integrated Therapies. Immunol. Genet. J. 2021, 4, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bushehri, R.H.; Navabi, P.; Saeedifar, A.M.; Keshavarzian, N.; Rouzbahani, N.H.; Mosayebi, G.; Ghazavi, A.; Ghorban, K.; Ganji, A. Integration of phytotherapy and chemotherapy: Recent advances in anticancer molecular pathways. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2023, 26, 987–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Mohammadi, A.; Rahbardar, M.G.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Antidotal and protective effects of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) against natural and chemical toxicities: A review. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2023, 26, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bertrand, B.; Morales-Martínez, A.; Hernández-Adame, P.L.; Muñoz-Garay, C. Multirresistencia antibióticos y alternativas para resolver esta crisis. Rev. Digit. Univ. 2023, 24, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Varshney, M.; Kumar, B.; Rana, V.S.; Sethiya, N.K. An overview on therapeutic and medicinal potential of poly-hydroxy flavone viz. Heptamethoxyflavone, Kaempferitrin, Vitexin and Amentoflavone for management of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases: A critical analysis on mechanistic insight. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 2749–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Javadi, B.; Sobhani, Z. Role of apigenin in targeting metabolic syndrome: A systematic review. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2024, 27, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Thirunavukkarasu, N.; Govindarajulu, M.B.; Sasse, F.; Jansen, R.; Murali, T.S. Fungal Endophytes and Bioprospecting. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2009, 23, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Nair, A.M.; Yesodharan, G.; Arun, K.; Prasad, G. Unveiling the factors influencing groundwater resources in a coastal environment-a review. Agron. Res. 2023, 21, 1487–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Thirunavukkarasu, N.; Govindarajulu, M.B.; Gopalan, V. Fungal Endophytes: An Untapped Source of Biocatalysts. Fungal Divers. 2012, 54, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Supaphon, P.; Phongpaichit, S.; Sakayaroj, J.; Rukachaisirikul, V.; Kobmoo, N.; Spatafora, J.W. Phylogenetic Community Structure of Fungal Endophytes in Seagrass Species. Bot. Mar. 2017, 60, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Prasad, G.; Mamane, H.; Ramesh, M.V. Geogenic and anthropogenic contamination of groundwater in a fragile eco-friendly region of southern Kerala, India. Agron. Res. 2022, 20, 1072–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ravikumar, S.; Thajuddin, N.; Suganthi, P.; Jacob Inbaneson, S.; Vinodkumar, T. Bioactive potential of seagrass bacteria against human bacterial pathogens. J. Environ. Biol. 2010, 31, 387. [Google Scholar]
  170. Marhaeni, B.; Radjasa, O.K.; Bengen, D.G.; Kaswadji, R.F. Screening of Bacterial Symbionts of Seagrass Enhalus Sp. against biofilm-forming bacteria. J. Coast. Dev. 2024, 13, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  171. Fitri, D.S.; Pangastuti, A.; Susilowati, A.; Sutarno, S. Endophytic Bacteria Producing Antibacterial against Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Seagrass from Rote Ndao, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2017, 18, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Cristianawati, O.; Sibero, M.T.; Ayuningrum, D.; Nuryadi, H.; Syafitri, E.; Riniarsih, I.O.; Radjasa, O.K. Screening of antibacterial activity of seagrass-associated bacteria from the North Java Sea, Indonesia against multidrug-resistant bacteria. AACL Bioflux 2019, 12, 1054–1064. [Google Scholar]
  173. Petersen, L.-E.; Marner, M.; Labes, A.; Tasdemir, D. Rapid Metabolome and Bioactivity Profiling of Fungi Associated with the Leaf and Rhizosphere of the Baltic Seagrass Zostera marina. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ginting, E.L.; Maarisit, I.; Kemer, K.; Siby, M.S.; Tilaar, S.O.; Moko, E.M.; Tumbol, R.A. Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Bacteria from Seagrass Thalassia hemprichii as Antibacterial Producer. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2023, 59, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ugarelli, K.; Jagels, A.; Choi, C.J.; Loesgen, S.; Stingl, U. Fungal Endophytes from Thalassia testudinum Show Bioactivity against the Seagrass Pathogen, Labyrinthula spp. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1359610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Tasdemir, D.; Scarpato, S.; Utermann-Thüsing, C.; Jensen, T.; Blümel, M.; Wenzel-Storjohann, A.; Welsch, C.; Echelmeyer, V.A. Epiphytic and Endophytic Microbiome of the Seagrass Zostera marina: Do They Contribute to Pathogen Reduction in Seawater? Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 908, 168422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Goda, M.; Eltamany, E.E.; Habib, E.S.; Hassanean, H.; Ahmed, S.A.E.; Abdelhameed, R.F.; Ibrahim, A.K. B:Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Marine Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum Collected from Red Sea. Rec. Pharm. Biomed. Sci./Rec. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Menaa, F.; Wijesinghe, U.; Thiripuranathar, G.; Althobaiti, N.A.; Albalawi, A.E.; Khan, B.A.; Menaa, B. Marine Algae-Derived Bioactive Compounds: A New Wave of Nanodrugs? Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Grauso, L.; Li, Y.; Scarpato, S.; Shulha, O.; Rárová, L.; Strnad, M.; Teta, R.; Mangoni, A.; Zidorn, C. Structure and Conformation of Zosteraphenols, Tetracyclic Diarylheptanoids from the Seagrass Zostera marina: An NMR and DFT Study. Org. Lett. 2019, 22, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sarvesh, N.; Afeeza, K.; Suresh, V.; Dilipan, E. Development of the Antioxidant Property of Seagrass Extract-Based Hydrogel for Dental Application. Cureus 2024, 16, e54544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Grauso, L.; Li, Y.; Scarpato, S.; Cacciola, N.A.; De Cicco, P.; Zidorn, C.; Mangoni, A. A Cytotoxic Heterodimeric Cyclic Diarylheptanoid with a Rearranged Benzene Ring from the Seagrass Zostera marina. J. Nat. Prod. 2022, 85, 2468–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Veettil, B.K.; Ward, R.D.; Lima, M.D.A.C.; Stankovic, M.; Hoai, P.N.; Quang, N.X. Opportunities for Seagrass Research Derived from Remote Sensing: A Review of Current Methods. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 117, 106560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Davey, P.A.; Pernice, M.; Sablok, G.; Larkum, A.; Lee, H.T.; Golicz, A.; Edwards, D.; Dolferus, R.; Ralph, P. The Emergence of Molecular Profiling and Omics Techniques in Seagrass Biology; Furthering Our Understanding of Seagrasses. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2016, 16, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Kumar, M.; Kuzhiumparambil, U.; Pernice, M.; Jiang, Z.; Ralph, P.J. Metabolomics: An Emerging Frontier of Systems Biology in Marine Macrophytes. Algal Res. 2016, 16, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Griffiths, L.L.; Melvin, S.D.; Connolly, R.M.; Pearson, R.M.; Brown, C.J. Metabolomic Indicators for Low-Light Stress in Seagrass. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 114, 106316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Arnold, T.M.; Targett, N.M. Marine tannins: The importance of a mechanistic framework for predicting ecological roles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002, 28, 1919–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Paul, V.J.; Arthur, K.E.; Ritson-Williams, R.; Ross, C.; Sharp, K. Chemical Defenses: From Compounds to Communities. Biol. Bull. 2007, 213, 226–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Sieg, R.D.; Kubanek, J. Chemical Ecology of Marine Angiosperms: Opportunities at the Interface of Marine and Terrestrial Systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 687–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Zupo, V.; Maibam, C.; Buia, M.C.; Gambi, M.C.; Patti, F.P.; Scipione, M.B.; Lorenti, M.; Fink, P. Chemoreception of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica by Benthic Invertebrates Is Altered by Seawater Acidification. J. Chem. Ecol. 2015, 41, 766–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Mutalipassi, M.; Fink, P.; Maibam, C.; Porzio, L.; Buia, M.C.; Gambi, M.C.; Patti, F.P.; Scipione, M.B.; Lorenti, M.; Zupo, V. Ocean Acidification Alters the Responses of Invertebrates to Wound-Activated Infochemicals Produced by Epiphytes of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2020, 530–531, 151435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Societal benefits of seagrasses—ecosystem services, including the bioactive potential of seagrasses. The figure shows the various ecosystem services rendered by seagrasses, listed as follows: carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, the maintenance of water quality, the protection of coasts, recreational values, the provision of feeding and breeding grounds, fishing, and recreational values.
Figure 1. Societal benefits of seagrasses—ecosystem services, including the bioactive potential of seagrasses. The figure shows the various ecosystem services rendered by seagrasses, listed as follows: carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, the maintenance of water quality, the protection of coasts, recreational values, the provision of feeding and breeding grounds, fishing, and recreational values.
Molecules 29 04596 g001
Figure 2. Bibliographic search pathway. The figure shows the details of the databases used for the literature study using the set of keywords from 2000 to 2024. After applying filters, 183 full-text manuscripts were used to write this manuscript.
Figure 2. Bibliographic search pathway. The figure shows the details of the databases used for the literature study using the set of keywords from 2000 to 2024. After applying filters, 183 full-text manuscripts were used to write this manuscript.
Molecules 29 04596 g002
Figure 3. PRISMA flow diagram (Haddaway et al. [18]). The figure shows the methodology adopted for selecting manuscripts to prepare this review through identification, screening and inclusion. * Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar. ** 4468 records were excluded due to various reasons unrelated work, irrelevant titles, irrelevant abstract, unavailability of full texts, reports in other languages, human trials, old reports, redundant work and low-quality sources.
Figure 3. PRISMA flow diagram (Haddaway et al. [18]). The figure shows the methodology adopted for selecting manuscripts to prepare this review through identification, screening and inclusion. * Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar. ** 4468 records were excluded due to various reasons unrelated work, irrelevant titles, irrelevant abstract, unavailability of full texts, reports in other languages, human trials, old reports, redundant work and low-quality sources.
Molecules 29 04596 g003
Figure 4. Line graph showing the number of publications through the years 2000–2024. The figure shows a surge in publications related to seagrasses during the years 2012 and 2020.
Figure 4. Line graph showing the number of publications through the years 2000–2024. The figure shows a surge in publications related to seagrasses during the years 2012 and 2020.
Molecules 29 04596 g004
Figure 5. Bar graph showing seagrass bioprospecting publications in different subject domains. The bar graph shows that the publication on seagrasses is highest in the environmental sciences field and minimum in environmental legal studies.
Figure 5. Bar graph showing seagrass bioprospecting publications in different subject domains. The bar graph shows that the publication on seagrasses is highest in the environmental sciences field and minimum in environmental legal studies.
Molecules 29 04596 g005
Figure 6. Nutritional composition of Enhalus acoroides and Thalassia hemprichii [35,36,40,42]. The most significant component of E. acoroides and T. hemprichii is ash and the least is lipid.
Figure 6. Nutritional composition of Enhalus acoroides and Thalassia hemprichii [35,36,40,42]. The most significant component of E. acoroides and T. hemprichii is ash and the least is lipid.
Molecules 29 04596 g006
Figure 7. Nutritional composition of Halodule pinifolia and Cymodocea serrulata [35,36,40,42]. The most significant component of H. pinifolia and C. serrulata is ash and the least is carbohydrate in H. pinifolia and lipid in C. serrulata.
Figure 7. Nutritional composition of Halodule pinifolia and Cymodocea serrulata [35,36,40,42]. The most significant component of H. pinifolia and C. serrulata is ash and the least is carbohydrate in H. pinifolia and lipid in C. serrulata.
Molecules 29 04596 g007
Figure 8. Nutritional composition of Syringodium isoetifolium and Cymodocea rotundata [35,36,40,42]. The most significant component of S. isoetifolium is carbon. In C. rotundata, carbon, and fiber constitute the major bulk of the plant, and the most negligible content in S. isoetifolium is protein, and in C. rotundata is lipid.
Figure 8. Nutritional composition of Syringodium isoetifolium and Cymodocea rotundata [35,36,40,42]. The most significant component of S. isoetifolium is carbon. In C. rotundata, carbon, and fiber constitute the major bulk of the plant, and the most negligible content in S. isoetifolium is protein, and in C. rotundata is lipid.
Molecules 29 04596 g008
Figure 9. The bioactive potential of seagrasses. The figure shows the various bioactive potentials of seagrasses, which can be applied in various fields.
Figure 9. The bioactive potential of seagrasses. The figure shows the various bioactive potentials of seagrasses, which can be applied in various fields.
Molecules 29 04596 g009
Figure 10. Structures of bioactive compounds isolated from seagrasses. This figure shows the chemical structure of bioactive compounds isolated from seagrasses by various researchers.
Figure 10. Structures of bioactive compounds isolated from seagrasses. This figure shows the chemical structure of bioactive compounds isolated from seagrasses by various researchers.
Molecules 29 04596 g010
Figure 11. Mechanisms of bioactivities by seagrass compounds. Seagrass extracts and seagrass compounds show anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities.
Figure 11. Mechanisms of bioactivities by seagrass compounds. Seagrass extracts and seagrass compounds show anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities.
Molecules 29 04596 g011
Table 1. Bioactive compounds in seagrasses (Astrix denotes the stereochemical configuration of the compound).
Table 1. Bioactive compounds in seagrasses (Astrix denotes the stereochemical configuration of the compound).
Compound NameSeagrassBioactivityReferences
Caffeic acidPosidonia oceanica,
Zostera marina,
Thalasia testudinum,
Thalasia hemprichii,
Thalassodendron ciliatum
Antioxidant, Antiviral and Cytotoxic [64,65]
  • Stigmasta-4,22-dien-6b-ol-3-one
  • p-hydroxy-benzaldehyde
  • Daucosterol
  • Stigmast-22-en-3-one
Enhalus acoroidesAntifeedant[66]
  • Stigmasta-4,22-dien-3,6-dione
  • Hexacosyl alcohol
  • Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-O-b-dglucopyranoside
Enhalus acoroidesAntibacterial and antilarval activities[66]
  • Deoxycymodienol
  • Isocymodiene
  • Nodosol
  • Cymodienol
  • (1S*,2S*,3S*,7R*,8S*,9R*,11R*,12S*,14R*)−7-bromo-tetradecahydro-12-hydroxy-1-isopropyl-8,12-dimethyl-4-methylene phenanthren-9,14-yl diacetate
Cymodocea nodosaAntibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains[67]
Coumaric acidPosidonia oceanica,
Zostera marina;
Thalassia testudinum,
Halodule pinifolia,
Thalassia hemprichii
Antioxidant activity[68]
Thalassiolins A (luteolin 7-O-ß-D-glucopyranosyl-2′-sulfate)Thalassia hemprichii
Thalasia testudinum
Anti-HIV activity and Antifouling activity[56,69]
Thalassiolins BThallasia testudinum,
Thallasia hemprichii
Anti-HIV activity, skin-regenerating activities and antioxidant[56,69]
Thalassiolins CThallasia testudinumAnti-HIV activity[69]
  • Rutin
  • Asebotin
  • 3-hydroxyasebotin
  • Quercetin-3-O-ß-d-xylopyranoside
  • Catechin
Thalassodendron ciliatumAntioxidant, Antiviral and Cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines[70]
  • TCC-1 (10), 7β-hydroxy cholesterol
  • 7β-hydroxysitosterol
  • stigmasterol glucoside
  • β-sitosterol glucoside
Thalassodendron ciliatumCytotoxic activity against HepG2 and MCF7 cells [71]
LuteolinHalophila stipulaceaAnticancerous activity[72]
QuercetinZostera marina L., Zostera noltiiAntioxidant activity[73]
Benzoic acidThallasia testudinum
Syringodium filiforme
Antioxidant activity[74]
Gallic acid Posidonia oceanicaRadical scavenging activity [75]
Chicoric acid Posidonia oceanicaAntioxidant activity[76]
Azelaic acid Syringodium filiforme
Thalassia testudinum
Antioxidant activity[77]
Palmitoleic acidSyringodium filiformeAnti-inflammatory activity[78]
TricosaneSyringodium filiformeAntibacterial[79]
Oleic acid
Linolenic acid
Myristic acid
Palmitic acid
Halophila ovalisAntibacterial[80]
Phytol Thalassia hemprichii
Enhalus acoroides
Cymodocea serrulata
Cymodocea rotundata
Antibacterial[81]
Lyngbyabellin A Halophila stipulaceaAnticancerous[72]
Heptacosane Enhalus acoroidesAntioxidant[82]
Lauric acidSyringodium filiforme
Thalassia testudinum
Antibacterial[83]
Octanoic acidSyringodium filiforme
Thalassia testudinum
Antibacterial[84]
Table 2. Bioactivity of seagrass.
Table 2. Bioactivity of seagrass.
Solvent Seagrass SpeciesBiological ActivityReference
Chloroform, ethyl acetate, ethanol and hexaneHalophila ovalis, Cymodocea serrulata, Halodule pinifoliaAntimicrobial[85]
Ethanol, methanol Halodule pinifolia, Cymodocea serrulataAntimicrobial[86]
Methanol Halophila ovalisAntimicrobial[58]
Aqueous ethanolSyringodium isoetifolium, Cymodocea serrulata, Halophila beccariiLarvicidal[87]
PectinZostera marina, Phyllospadix iwatensisCerium binding activity[88]
Methanol Halodule pinifolia, Halophila ovalis, Syringodium isoetifolium, Thallasia hemprichii, Cymodocea serrulataAntioxidant[89]
Ethanol Enhalus acoroides, Halophila ovalis, Halophila ovata, Halophila stipulacea, Thalassia hemprichii, Syringodium isoetifolium, Cymodocea serrulata, Halodule pinifoliaAntibacterial[49]
Methanol Syringodium isoetifoliumAntioxidant[43]
Sulfated polysaccharide Cymodocea nodosaAntioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties[90]
Methanol Thalassia hemprichiiLarvicidal [91]
n-hexane Thalassia hemprichii, and Enhalus acoroidesAntifouling [92]
ChloroformPosidonia oceanicaAntimicrobial[93]
HydroalcoholicSyringodium isoetifoliumAntibacterial, antifungal, antimicrobial, antifouling and anticancerous[94]
Ethanol Cymodocea serrulata, Syringodium isoetifolium and Enhalus acoroidesNutritional supplements[95]
70% AcetoneCymodocea rotundata and Cymodocea serrulataAntimicrobial, antifouling and antioxidant[96]
MethanolEnhalus acoroides and Halophila ovalisAntifungal[46]
MeOH/H2O(7:3)Posidonia oceanicaAntiviral (against H5N1)[97]
MethanolThalassia hemprichiiAntiviral[98]
Aqueous EtOHPosidonia oceanicaAntioxidant and antimicrobial[99]
Ethyl acetatePosidonia oceanicaAntimicrobial[100]
Hexane and methanolHalophila stipulaceaCytotoxic activity, lipid-reducing activity, and antifouling activity.[72]
85% EthanolThalassodendron ciliatumAntioxidant and hapatoprotective activity[101]
EtOH/H2O (7:3)Posidonia oceanicaAnticancerous[102]
Chloroform Syringodium filiformeAnticancerous[103]
ChloroformThalassia testudinumAnticancerous[104]
50% Ethanol Syringodium isoetifoliumAnti-inflammatory[105]
Ethanol Enhalus acoroides, Thalassia hemprichii, and Halophila ovalis.Antioxidant[106]
Acetic acidPosidonia oceanicaAntimicrobial[107]
WaterPosidonia oceanicaAnticancerous[108]
Acetic acid Posidonia oceanicaAntimicrobial and anticancerous[109]
96% EthanolCymodocea RotundataAntibacterial [110]
70% EthanolSyringodium isoetifoliumAnticancerous[111]
Ethyl acetateCymodocea serrulataLarvicidal[112]
Water Posidonia oceanicaAntifungal[113]
Hydroalcoholic Enhalus acoroidesAntioxidant [82]
Ethanol Thalassia hemprichii and Halophila ovalisAntioxidant [114]
EthanolEnhalus acoroidesAntioxidant [115]
Water, alcohol, hydro alcohol, acetone and n-hexane.Syringodium isoetifoliumAntioxidant [116]
Ethanol Cymodocea serrulataAntidiabetic, anticancerous and antioxidant activity[117]
Ethyl acetateCymodocea serrulataAntibacterial and antioxidant[118]
EthanolThalassia hemprichii and
Zostera marina
Antioxidant and antiobesity activity[119]
Hexane, petroleum ether and acetoneRuppia cirrhosaAntioxidant and antimicrobial[120]
70% ethanolPosidonia oceanicaAntimicrobial activity[121]
Ethyl acetateHalodule pinifoliaAntioxidant activity[122]
Methanol Posidonia oceanicaAntioxidant activity and anticancerous activity[123]
Ethyl acetate, hexane and methanolHalophila stipulaceaAntioxidant, antimicrobial and analgesic activity[124]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ameen, H.M.; Jayadev, A.; Prasad, G.; Nair, D.I. Seagrass Meadows: Prospective Candidates for Bioactive Molecules. Molecules 2024, 29, 4596. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194596

AMA Style

Ameen HM, Jayadev A, Prasad G, Nair DI. Seagrass Meadows: Prospective Candidates for Bioactive Molecules. Molecules. 2024; 29(19):4596. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194596

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ameen, Hazeena M., Ayona Jayadev, Geena Prasad, and Deepa Indira Nair. 2024. "Seagrass Meadows: Prospective Candidates for Bioactive Molecules" Molecules 29, no. 19: 4596. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194596

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop