Next Article in Journal
Rigid Rod-like Viscoelastic Behaviors of Methyl Cellulose Samples with a Wide Range of Molar Masses Dissolved in Aqueous Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Rational Photodeposition of Cobalt Phosphate on Flower-like ZnIn2S4 for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Porphyrin-Based MOF Thin Film on Transparent Conducting Oxide: Investigation of Growth, Porosity and Photoelectrochemical Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework Materials: Design, Construction, and Application in the Field of Photocatalysis

by
Chuanyin Tang
,
Xiaoyu Li
,
Yingxu Hu
,
Xin Du
,
Shuo Wang
,
Bo Chen
and
Shengjie Wang
*
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(2), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020467
Submission received: 30 December 2023 / Revised: 15 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 17 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-Organic Framework-Based Composites: Synthesis and Applications)

Abstract

:
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a novel category of porous crystalline materials with an exceptionally high surface area and adjustable pore structure. They possess a designable composition and can be easily functionalized with different units. Porphyrins with conjugated tetrapyrrole macrocyclic structures can absorb light from ultraviolet to visible light regions, and their structures and properties can be facilely regulated by altering their peripheral groups or central metal ions. Porphyrin-based MOFs constructed from porphyrin ligands and metal nodes combine the unique features of porphyrins and MOFs as well as overcoming their respective limitations. This paper reviewed the design and construction, light absorption and charge transfer pathways, and strategy for improving the photocatalytic performance of porphyrin-based MOFs, and highlighted the recent progress in the field of CO2 reduction, hydrogen evolution, organic synthesis, organic pollutant removal, and nitrogen fixation. The intrinsic relationships between the structure and the property of porphyrin-based MOFs received special attention, especially the relationships between the arrangements of porphyrin ligands and metal nods and the charge transfer mechanism. We attempted to provide more valuable information for the design and construction of advanced photocatalysts in the future. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives of the porphyrin-based MOFs are also discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The utilization of fossil energy brings great benefits to human beings. However, over reliance on traditional fossil energy such as coal and petroleum results in serious problems such as energy shortages and environment pollution [1,2]. People search for alternative energy resources to reduce their reliance on traditional fossil fuels [3,4,5]. As is known, solar energy is an important alternative energy source. About 120,000 terawatts (TW) of solar energy reaches the earth’s surface every year, far exceeding the global total energy demand [6]. Moreover, solar energy has emerged as a crucial sustainable energy resource due to its abundance, cleanliness, affordability, and inexhaustibility. However, efficient capturing and utilization of solar energy is still challenging because of its lower energy density and its being affected by the weather, season, and geographical position. Therefore, solar energy is converted to thermal energy, electrical energy, and chemical energy to solve the problem of direct utilization.
Photocatalytic technology is one of the most promising methods to solve both environmental and energy problems due to its simple reaction conditions, low cost, lack of secondary pollution, and environmental protection [7], and it exhibits extensive applications in hydrogen evolution, nitrogen fixation, CO2 reduction, as well as the elimination of organic and inorganic pollutants. The design and development of efficient photocatalysts attract great attention since photocatalysts play a crucial role in photocatalytic reactions [8]. So far, metal oxides [9,10], metal phosphides [11,12], metal sulfides [13,14,15], and carbon-based composites [16,17,18,19] have been developed and used in energy conversion systems. However, these traditional photocatalysts suffered from different challenges such as low electronic conductivity, low apparent quantum efficiency, rapid recombination of electron-hole pairs, poor chemical stability and cycle stability, and so on [20]. Therefore, the construction of photocatalysts with high performance and physical/chemical stability holds great promise in addressing the current energy and environmental issues.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline nanoporous hybrid materials composed of metal nodes connected by organic ligands [21]. They can be modularly assembled with suitable inorganic and organic building units, allowing for the design of functional frameworks with specific topologies, adjustable porosity, and desirable properties [22]. Different from other porous compounds such as zeolites, MOFs are easily modifiable. The products can be obtained under relatively simple conditions and thus obtain good specificity and selectivity. The rich coordination chemistry of MOFs enables the adjustment of their photoelectric properties by changing their composition [23]. In this context, MOFs can be widely used in various fields including gas storage and separation [24,25], photocatalysis [22,26,27], sensors [28,29], pollutant degradation [30,31], ion exchange [32], and so on.
Porphyrin molecules have unique photophysical and electrochemical properties, as well as remarkable visible light absorption and energy transfer characteristics [33,34,35,36,37]. Using porphyrin as an organic ligand of MOFs, porphyrin molecules can be uniformly dispersed in precisely adjustable MOFs. The incorporation of porphyrin endows the MOFs with unique optical properties and catalytic activity and at the same time, overcomes some inherent drawbacks of porphyrin molecules, such as the tendency towards self-aggregation and light instability [32].
Moreover, MOFs are believed to be an ideal platform for solar light absorption and energy transfer in artificial photosystems owing to their repeated and order arrangement [38]. The introduction of porphyrin units into MOFs can broaden their absorption spectrum to the visible light range. Therefore, porphyrin-based MOFs obtained by integrating porphyrins with metal nodes become multifunctional carriers with excellent photocatalytic performance and desired functionality [39,40]. Thus, porphyrin-based MOFs have received significant attention due to their tremendous potential in various fields, such as photocatalysis [41,42,43], biomedicine [44,45,46,47], electrochemistry [48,49,50,51], and molecular adsorption [52]. Especially in the design of new photocatalytic materials, the photocatalytic activity of porphyrin-based MOFs can be regulated by the design of porphyrin molecule structure, and can also be optimized by the co-structure design of mixed ligands in MOF and the co-assembly doping design with other materials. In this paper, we mainly review the design and construction of porphyrin-based MOFs and their applications in the fields of photocatalytic generation of hydrogen, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis, and degradation of pollutants. We also discuss the research direction in the future and potential applications of porphyrin-based MOFs.

2. Photocatalytic Mechanism

2.1. Light Absorption

The light absorption of semiconductors is determined by their band gap. According to the band theory, the energy gap of MOFs depends on the distance between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy levels, which correspond to VB and CB of inorganic semiconductors [20,53,54], respectively (Figure 1a,b). Photocatalysts absorb light energy and facilitate the transition of electrons from HOMO to LUMO. Charge transfer from ligand to metal cluster or ligand (n→π*, π→π*) constitutes the majority of the charge transition in MOFs under irradiation (Figure 1c) [55].
In addition, light-responsive characteristics can be easily regulated by a reasonable selection of ligands and metal ions. As one of the most commonly used photosensitive organic ligands that have large π-bonding [58], porphyrin exhibits great potential in improving light response owing to its high molar extinction coefficient. The molar extinction coefficient is a measure of a substance’s ability to absorb light, and it can be used to describe the strength of a material’s absorption of light at different wavelengths. The porphyrin molecule itself contains a large number of conjugated double bonds and aromatic ring structures, which endows it with a higher molar extinction coefficient than most organic ligands used in MOFs. Therefore, porphyrin molecules exhibit excellent light-harvesting capabilities and great potential in light-responsive MOFs. Typically, porphyrins absorb light at 400–450 nm (Soret band) and 500–650 nm (Q bands). Interestingly, the incorporation of porphyrin within MOFs results in a wider absorption region in visible light region [59]. This endows porphyrin-based MOFs with improved light absorption capacity.

2.2. Charge Transfer Pathway

The combination of organic ligands and metal clusters in MOFs endows them with semiconductor behavior and a similar principle of photocatalysis [60,61]. Metal clusters and photoactive ligands absorb light energy and result in photo-induced charge separation, that is, electrons with reducing ability e and holes with oxidizing ability h+. Then the photo-generated charges migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst to participate in the redox reaction. That is to say, metal clusters accept electrons generated by organic ligands for subsequent redox reactions [62]. Transferring e from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of organic ligands to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of metal clusters is labeled as the ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) pathway in MOFs [63]. Studies have shown that the LMCT pathway plays an important role in enhancing the charge separation and photocurrent density in MOFs, and therefore is beneficial to enhancing their photocatalytic ability [64]. There are two pathways including the ligand-to-ligand charge transfer (LLCT) and metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) in addition to the LMCT pathway (Figure 1c) [65,66]. The photo-generated electrons and holes through the above-mentioned pathways will proceed to reduce and oxidize the substances adsorbed on the surface of the MOFs, and then produce different products in the processes of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis, pollutant degradation, and nitrogen fixation [67,68].

3. Design and Construction of Porphyrin-Based MOFs

3.1. Design of Porphyrin-Based MOFs

Some drawbacks of MOFs including rapid recombination and deactivation of photo-generated charges as well as poor cycling stability greatly impede their large-scale application in photocatalysis; although, MOFs and their composite materials possess advantages of tunable pores, high porosity, and a large surface area. These limitations hinder the efficient utilization and long-term stability of MOFs in photocatalytic processes. Porphyrins and their derivatives have excellent light absorption capacity and are easily coordinated with metal ions, which facilitates addressing these problems of MOFs. Therefore, the incorporation of porphyrins into MOF materials endows them with the advantages of porphyrin molecules and MOF materials. In addition, MOFs with various topologies and functions can be obtained by the design of the connectivity and geometry of the porphyrin linker.
The chemical properties and coordination abilities can also be regulated by introducing different functional groups onto porphyrin molecules. For example, the electron affinity and electron conductivity of porphyrins can be changed by the introduction of various substituents or modified peripheral groups [69,70,71]. This modification allows for the attainment of appropriate orbital energy levels and band gaps, and results in the construction of porphyrin-based MOFs with exceptional light-harvesting capabilities and efficient charge separation and transfer efficiencies. 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) with the capacity to coordinate with Zr, Cu, Al, Cr, La, and other metals, is the most commonly used organic linker in porphyrin-based MOFs. Moreover, the incorporation of metal ions helps to address the issues of low stability, poor dispersion, and easy aggregation of MOFs, and results in enhanced photocatalytic performance.

3.2. Construction of Porphyrin-Based MOFs

In porphyrin-based MOFs, porphyrin or metal porphyrin molecules act as organic ligands to coordinate with metal ions or metal clusters. The porphyrin linkers in porphyrin-based MOFs mainly include carboxylic acids, pyridines, and polyazole groups [72,73,74]. The following are most of the porphyrin ligands that are commonly used in porphyrin-based MOFs, shown in Figure 2 [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82].

3.2.1. Porphyrin-Based MOFs with Carboxylic Acid Linkers

The porphyrin ligand with a carboxylic acid linker is the most widely used in the construction of porphyrin-based MOFs. It is connected to the metal center through a flexible coordination mode, resulting in a controllable and adjustable ligand structure. Such porphyrin-based MOFs usually exhibit high stability and controllability in structures and are suitable for application in gas adsorption, catalysis, and photocatalysis.
An atomically Pt-dispersed aluminum-porphyrin-based MOF (Al-TCPP-Pt) was synthesized using tetracarboxylic porphyrin (H2TCPP) as the organic ligand to interconnect Al(OH)O4 chains by a hydrothermal reaction and a subsequent Pt(II) metalation [83]. The hybrid Al-TCPP-Pt MOFs showed significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity, utilizing the highly efficient electron transfer channel provided by platinum (Pt) atoms (Figure 3a). Similarly, alkaline earth-porphyrin-based MOFs [Sr4(TCPP)2(DMF)8]n and [Ba4(TCPP)2(DMF)8]n were synthesized using H4TCPP ligand and Sr2+/Ba2+ ions by hydrothermal reaction [84]. The PMOFs exhibited excellent fluorescence properties. The size and morphology of the MOFs were altered by replacing the TCPP ligand with 5,15-bis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (H2DCPP); thus, a series of four porphyrin alkaline earth-based MOFs were obtained. They exhibited excellent adsorption capabilities for methylene blue [85].
The nucleation and growth rate of nano-MOFs can be regulated by adjusting the ratio of metal ions to organic ligands, solvent type, reaction temperature, pH value, reaction time, and other conditions. A series of MOFs based on carboxylic acid zirconium-porphyrin, namely PCN-222, PCN-223, and PCN-224, were synthesized by changing the experimental conditions. They were used as CO2-reducing photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. The results showed that PCN-224 with the lowest linker connectivity exhibited a higher catalytic performance compared to that of PCN-222 and PCN-223 which had higher node connectivity [86].

3.2.2. Porphyrin-Based MOFs with Nitrogen-Containing Heterocyclic Linkers

Nitrogen-containing heterocyclic ligands include imidazole, polyazole, pyridine, pyrazole ligands, and so on. The coordination strength between nitrogen atoms and metal ions is greater than that between oxygen atoms and metal ions. Therefore, MOFs composed of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic ligands exhibit comparable chemical and thermal stability to carboxylic acid-based MOFs. At the same time, nitrogen-containing heterocyclic MOFs may exhibit better stability than carboxylic MOFs under extreme pH conditions through appropriate metal-ligand matching.
In 1994, Robson and coauthors [87] first reported a coordinated framework material containing Cu(II) and neutral pyridyl-substituted porphyrin units. Since then, an increasing number of porphyrin-based MOFs have been reported. Pyridine-containing porphyrin-based MOFP was prepared by encapsulating platinum metalized porphyrin (Pt(II)TMPyP) in a rho zeolite-like metal-organic framework (rho-ZMOF) via a post-modification method (Figure 3b). They exhibited excellent sensitivity and selectivity for various anions in both aqueous and methanol media, leading to a significant enhancement in the detection limit of anions [88]. In addition, a novel pyridine-containing porphyrin ligand 5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4,4-dipyridylaminophenylene) porphyrin (TDPAP) was designed and synthesized, and introduced four peripheral 4,4′-bipyridylamine moieties in the porphyrin platform (Figure 3c) [89]. The novel-designed porphyrin molecule contains eight peripheral pyridines, so it can coordinate with up to nine metal centers. Different MOFs were formed using a solvothermal method with TDPAP and various metal ions such as Mn2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+ metal ions. These materials show excellent fluorescence properties except for the MOFs prepared from Mn2+.
Pyrazole carboxylate is another nitrogen-containing heterocyclic group similar to imidazole. In the pyrazole carboxylate connectivity, the coordination between the linker and the metal cluster occurs through the sp-hybridized nitrogen atom and the hydrogen bonding between the adjacent NH group and the carbonyl moiety of the metal cluster. For example, PCN-601 and PCN-602, pyrazole carboxylate-based porphyrin MOFs, exhibit excellent stability even in highly alkaline conditions. Their porosity and crystallinity are kept intact even after treatment with a saturated NaOH solution at 100 °C [90,91].
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the preparation of Al-TCPP-Pt photocatalyst [83]; (b) synthesis method of Pt(II)TMPyP/rho-ZMOF composites [88]; (c) four coordination modes of porphyrin TDPAP [89].
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the preparation of Al-TCPP-Pt photocatalyst [83]; (b) synthesis method of Pt(II)TMPyP/rho-ZMOF composites [88]; (c) four coordination modes of porphyrin TDPAP [89].
Molecules 29 00467 g003

4. Improvement in Photocatalytic Performance of Porphyrin-Based MOFs

4.1. Modification of Porphyrin Ligands

As one of the important components of MOFs, organic ligands play a crucial role in determining their topological structure, pore size, shape, and surface properties. They serve as the main supporting unit of the framework and their size and shape affect the aforementioned characteristics [92,93]. In addition, organic ligands in MOFs act as ‘photosensitive antennas’, determine the light-capturing ability, and are responsible for the charge transfer processes of LMCT or MLCT pathways [94,95]. Therefore, the rational selection and modification of organic ligands can remarkably improve the photocatalytic ability of MOFs. As the most commonly used photosensitive ligand with a large π structure, porphyrin has become an important target for ligand modification and hybridization strategies. It is well known that incorporating ligands with a large π structure or photosensitive units in MOFs can enhance their light response and charge transfer efficiency. Selecting porphyrin molecules as organic ligands for MOFs and modifying them is of great significance in improving the photocatalytic ability of MOFs.

4.1.1. The Introduction of Metal Coordination Center

The modification of porphyrin ligands mainly refers to the insertion of metal ions into the porphyrin core to form metalloporphyrin complexes [96]. After metalation, the coordination bonds are formed between the metal ion and the porphyrin ring which enhances the symmetry of the porphyrin molecule, resulting in stronger absorption in the visible and near-infrared regions and suppressed recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pairs [97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. The optical properties and catalytic activity of metalloporphyrin-based MOFs can be regulated by selecting different metal ions and controlling the structure of the porphyrin ligands.
The stability and biocompatibility of the materials can be enhanced to meet the requirements for different applications. For example, a new ligand-to-linker metal charge-transfer (LLMCT) pathway was found by anchoring non-precious metal Cu in the center of the porphyrin in Ti-porphyrin-based MOFs (Figure 4a,c). The photo-generated electrons initially originated from the excited eosin Y (EY*) can transfer from the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of the porphyrin to the transient CuI/CuII center via rapid delocalization through the conjugated 18-π electron system of the porphyrin. This can reduce the width of the bandgap and at the same time, improve the charge separation and transfer rate, thereby enhancing the charge transfer efficiency (Figure 4b). Experimental results show that the addition of metal ions in MOFs can achieve a hydrogen evolution rate of 5465.689 μmol g−1 h−1, approximately 27.71 times that of the pristine MOFs (Figure 4d), indicating the Cu in porphyrin core plays a key role in improving the photocatalytic performance [104].

4.1.2. Incorporation of Functional Groups

The structures and properties of MOFs depend on the organic ligands and metal clusters and can be regulated by the incorporation of active ingredients. In addition, by functionalizing organic linkers (ligands) with other groups (such as amino), the light capture properties of MOFs can be regulated [105]. Therefore, the incorporation of functional groups on the ligand can optimize the structure and properties of the materials, such as increasing the porosity and surface area, decreasing the band gap, and thus improving the catalytic performance of MOFs. A series of isomorphic UiO-66-X (X = H, NH2, Br, (OH)2, (SH)2) catalysts have been successfully synthesized by incorporating various functional groups in the ligands (Figure 5a). The ligand modification of UiO-66 was carried out to enhance the photocatalytic activity for the degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light. The results showed that UiO-66-NH2 and UiO-66-(OH)2 have narrow band gaps and good visible light absorption, but they cannot effectively catalyze the degradation of organic dyes, possibly due to their conduction band being close to the redox potential of Rhodamine B (Figure 5b) [106]. However, different results can be obtained when amino groups are incorporated in other MOFs. MIL-125-NH2 modified with amino functional groups can decompose 97% of Congo Red dye under 3 h of irradiation, while the original material MIL-125 can only degrade 60% pollute [107]. Three RE-PMOFs (BUT-224/225/226) with new topological structures were successfully obtained by introducing phenyl/pyridine groups in the middle of the porphyrin core (Figure 5c) and adjusting the symmetry and connectivity of the ligands. In addition, BUT-225 (Co) exhibits stronger CO2 absorption capacity and higher catalytic activity than other MOFs during CO2 reduction [108].

4.2. Construction of Donor-Acceptor System

The design of the internal structure of MOFs is an alternative strategy for high-powered photocatalysts. The donor-acceptor (D-A) system, which involves the interaction between electron-rich and electron-deficient organic components, has garnered significant interest from researchers. This system shows promising potential for optical and electrical materials. The unique electronic properties of the component endow the D-A system with different electron transfer behaviors between the donor and acceptor components [109,110], which lays the foundation for the charge transfer (CT) and energy transfer (ET) of MOFs containing the D-A system. The different connection or packaging of the donor and acceptor components will affect their mode of interaction, thereby determining the properties of the system.
Photo-induced electron transfer (PET) can be achieved by assembling electron donor and acceptor chromophores in a single MOF. Weak interactions, such as electrostatic and hydrogen bonding between the molecular entities of the donor and acceptor, provide a long-range ordered electron transfer channel and help to inhibit the recombination of charges [111]. In addition, MOFs provide an unprecedented level of controlling the D-A system layout through the design of metal nodes and organic linkers, the modularity of the framework topology, and the combination of different subjects (Figure 6a) [112]. The modularity and versatility of MOFs endow them with directional energy and charge transport by adjusting the geometric parameters, such as the distance or angle between the donor and acceptor (D-A), or by changing the electronic structure of the D-A system [113]. Additionally, the narrowed band gap of the material can be obtained by adjusting the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the D-A system, thereby improving the performance of MOFs.

4.2.1. Effect of D-A System in Promoting Light Harvesting

A donor-acceptor system containing MOFs with molecular-level heterojunctions was synthesized from a linear trinuclear Mn(II) cluster, a 1,1,3,6-tetraphenyl pyrene-based photoactive linker, and a D-π-A cationic dye cyanine (DMP) under isothermal conditions (Figure 6b) [114]. The interplay between the chromophore and energy acceptor, and the bandgap can be adjusted to a large extent. The resulting MOFs exhibited unique light absorption across the UV/visible to NIR light region, extremely high luminescence polarization anisotropy (0.97), and high light responsivity.
As a typical electron-rich chromophore molecule, porphyrin has a strong tendency to capture visible light. Extensive applications have been shown in homogeneous photocatalytic processes. Therefore, the introduction of porphyrins as building blocks into donor-acceptor system-containing MOFs shows promising prospects. Recently, several research teams have made significant advancements in developing D-A system-containing MOFs that are sensitive to visible light utilizing exceptional light-harvesting porphyrins. For example, the donor-acceptor system-containing MOFs constructed from H2TCPP and boron dipyrromethene can capture the light in the entire visible region, which greatly improves the utilization of solar energy. At the same time, efficient electron energy transfer from ligand to ligand was also observed between the pillared boron dipyrromethene (D) and porphyrin derivatives (A) [115].
Figure 6. (a) Diagram of donor-acceptor-based MOF structure [112]; (b) schematic diagram of the ion exchange experiment by the incorporation of DMP cations where a, b and c represents the 3D spatial directions [114]; (c) chemical structure of the NDI and H2DPBP ligands [116]; (d) photocatalytic mechanism of amine coupling reaction over the mixed ligands Zr-NDI-H2DPBPMOF based on donor H2DPBP and acceptor NDI [116]; (e) schematic diagrams of the SBUs for the construction of TBAPy-Zr NS and TCPP-Zr NS (left), schematic illustration of the acceptor-on-donor-NS model (right, top), the EnT process (right, middle), and the donor-on-acceptor-NS model (right, bottom) [117].
Figure 6. (a) Diagram of donor-acceptor-based MOF structure [112]; (b) schematic diagram of the ion exchange experiment by the incorporation of DMP cations where a, b and c represents the 3D spatial directions [114]; (c) chemical structure of the NDI and H2DPBP ligands [116]; (d) photocatalytic mechanism of amine coupling reaction over the mixed ligands Zr-NDI-H2DPBPMOF based on donor H2DPBP and acceptor NDI [116]; (e) schematic diagrams of the SBUs for the construction of TBAPy-Zr NS and TCPP-Zr NS (left), schematic illustration of the acceptor-on-donor-NS model (right, top), the EnT process (right, middle), and the donor-on-acceptor-NS model (right, bottom) [117].
Molecules 29 00467 g006

4.2.2. Effect of D-A System in Facilitating Electron Separation

The porphyrin-based MOF based on the donor-acceptor system also exhibits excellent performance in promoting electron separation. For example, a mixed ligand MOF (Zr-NDI-H2DPBP) photocatalyst was constructed using 5,15-bis (p-benzoic acid) porphyrin (H2DPBP) as the electron donor and naphthalene diimide (NDI) as the electron acceptor (Figure 6c). The prepared MOFs can produce high-efficiency photo-induced electron transfer, optimize charge separation efficiency, and thus improve photocatalytic performance (Figure 6d). The MOFs were used for the oxidation of different benzylamine derivatives in which the imine formation rate is 136 mmol g−1 h−1 higher than that of previously reported noble metal-free MOF photocatalysts [116].
Diverse ligands are used to construct the donor-acceptor system, and the catalytic performance of prepared MOFs can be affected by the functions and properties of the ligands. MOFs with high energy transfer efficiency can be constructed by selecting tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (H4TCPP) and 1,3,6,8-tetrakis(p-benzoic acid) pyrene (H4TBAPy) as the acceptor and donor parts, respectively. The results demonstrate that the energy transfer between the TBAPy donor and the TCPP acceptor can be fulfilled. The energy transfer efficiency of the TBAPy-Zr nanosheets with 22% TCPP reached 82% (Figure 6e). Compared to the unmodified MOFs, these MOF photocatalysts containing TCPP linkers exhibit a designed energy transfer process and reduced self-quenching as well as high photocatalytic activity by the introduction of an acceptor-on-donor system [117].

4.3. The Introduction of Co-Catalysts

Photocatalysts are catalysts that can utilize light energy to catalyze reactions. However, the performance of photocatalysts may not be ideal in some applications, which makes it challenging to achieve efficient photocatalytic reactions. The introduction of co-catalysts is a recognized approach to enhance the performance of photocatalysts and amplify their advantageous effectiveness. Unlike optimizing the internal composition and structure design of MOFs, the introduction of co-catalysts can provide additional active sites to enhance the reaction rate. It can also modulate the band structure of the photocatalysts, alter their light absorption and photoelectron transfer properties, accelerate charge transfer, and suppress charge recombination [118,119]. For example, a hybrid MOF composed of platinum co-catalysts and black phosphorus (BP) was synthesized [120]. The prepared hybrids showed efficient charge transfer and excellent light absorption properties. The doping of platinum endows them with a narrowed band gap (Figure 7a), improves the harvesting efficiency of photo-induced electrons, inhibits the recombination of electrons and holes, and therefore improves the production efficiency of H2. The results show that the photocatalytic hydrogen production of titanium-based MOFs (BP/R-Ti-MOFs/Pt) with Pt co-catalysts is 10.3 times that of the original Ti-MOFs.
Besides, CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots (QD) can also be used to functionalize porphyrin-based MOFs (Figure 7b). Energy transfer from QD to MOF can enhance the light collection ability of composite materials. QDs have a wide-range light absorption in the visible region, and the construction of QD-MOF hybrid structures can further expand their absorption in the solar spectral range. Time-resolved emission studies show that the energy is transferred from quantum dots to MOF after quantum dot excitation with efficiencies greater than 80%, suggesting effective enhancement of the light capturing and energy transfer ability for porphyrin-based MOFs by the introduction of the co-catalysts [121]. Qin and colleagues constructed GQDs@PCN-222 complexes by encapsulating graphene quantum dots into porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks (PCN-222) for the reduction of CO2. The results showed that the activity of GQDs@PCN-222 was nearly four times that of pure PCN-222, and the rate of CO generation was up to 147.8 μmol g−1 h−1 under visible light irradiation [122].

5. Application of Porphyrin-Based MOFs in Photocatalysis

5.1. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Hydrogen, a clean and efficient energy resource, produced from solar energy-driven water splitting exhibits great prospects [123,124,125,126]. The visible light absorption of MOFs is effectively broadened when porphyrin ligands are introduced. At the same time, specific active groups such as co-catalysts can be introduced into the larger pore size of MOFs, which endows porphyrin-based MOFs with great potential and advantages in using solar energy to produce hydrogen [127].
In 2012, Fateeva and coauthors [128] reported the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over porphyrin-based MOFs. A water-stable porphyrin-based MOF (Al-PMOF) was constructed from the tetra (4-carboxy) porphyrin (H2TCPP) linker and the Al (OH)O4 chain node. The photocatalytic performance of Al-PMOF with free-base porphyrin and zinc metalloporphyrin in H2 evolution was studied. The MOF/EDTA/Pt system is adopted to harness the excited state energy of the porphyrin, namely, EDTA is used as the sacrificial electron donator and Pt as the co-catalyst to facilitate the reaction. The results indicated that Zn2+ can be introduced into the porphyrin core to form a zinc-porphyrin-based MOF. Both the porphyrin-based MOFs and the Zn-porphyrin-based MOFs can be used to produce hydrogen by a solar energy-driven water-splitting reaction.
The activity in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of MOFs can be improved by the introduction and assembly of active metals in MOF frameworks. Porphyrin-based MOFs ([FeFe]@ZrPF) have high stability and high photocatalytic hydrogen production efficiency. In this system, the porphyrin unit is used as a photosensitizer, and the iron hydride enzyme is used as a hydrogen evolution catalytic site. The short distance between the two parts and the nature of chemical bonding allows for the fast transfer of photo-generated carriers. The chemical bonding within the materials can provide robust hydrogen elution systems by avoiding the use of electron mediators to transfer electrons from the photosensitizer to the catalyst [126].
The shape and structure of MOFs can also exert influence on their photocatalytic activity. Compared to bulk MOFs, MOFs with two-dimensional lamellar structures are more conducive to exerting the light absorption ability of porphyrin units in the framework, increasing the contact opportunity between the substrate and the active sites, and thus improving the catalytic activity. Two-dimensional MOF materials also show great potential in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution due to their ability to reduce the recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pairs. Ultrathin two-dimensional MOF nanosheets were constructed using metalloporphyrin (Pt@TCPP) as a linker and Cu2(COO)4 as a metal node through a surfactant-stabilized coordination strategy [124]. The preformed single Pt atom coordination porphyrin precursor is assembled into free-standing ultrathin metal-organic framework (MOF) nanosheets, in which a highly loaded single Pt atom is used for efficient photocatalytic H2 production (Figure 8). The single Pt atom-coordinated porphyrin-based MOFs achieved a new historical record in photocatalytic H2 production (11,320 μmol g−1 h−1) under visible light irradiation using ascorbic acid as the sacrificial agent and water as the solvent. The MOF nanosheets can be easily drop-casted onto a solid surface to create a thin film for significant practical application.

5.2. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

Fossil fuels including gasoline, oil, coal, and natural gas are used in large quantities every day, and excessive amounts of carbon dioxide are discharged into the air, which causes increasingly serious environmental problems [129,130,131,132]. Therefore, the collection and conversion of carbon dioxide into renewable energy fuels or high-value-added compounds have attracted great interest from scientists and entrepreneurs around the world, and various strategies for converting carbon dioxide into usable substances have been developed [133]. Among them, one of the most promising and economical methods is the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide driven by solar energy [134,135]. For example, photocatalytic CO2 reduction can produce various fuels such as CO, formic acid, and hydrocarbons [103]. In recent years, MOFs have been widely studied for photocatalytic CO2 reduction due to their adjustable composition and structure, easy integration with other functional substances, and large surface area [136,137,138,139].
Synthesis of MOFs with appropriate organic linkers to promote light absorption is the first step in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. So far, various organic linkers including porphyrin-based, metal complex-functionalized, and amine-functionalized organic linkers have been used to regulate the band gap of MOF photocatalysts. In 2013, Fu and coauthors [140] demonstrated for the first time that MOF photocatalysts can photocatalytically reduce CO2 to HCOO. Researchers synthesized an aminated MOF photocatalyst using 2-aminoterephthalic acid as an organic linker and evaluated its photocatalytic performance in acetonitrile electrolyte with triethanolamine as the electron donator. The results confirm that the amino functionalization of MOFs promotes photocatalytic activity in CO2 reduction.
Porphyrin-based MOFs absorb visible light effectively and generate charge carriers, which make them suitable for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. For example, the porphyrin ligand in zirconium-based MOF PCN-222 serves as a visible-light-harvesting unit. It can suppress the detrimental, radiative electron-hole recombination owing to the presence of a deep electron trap state in PCN-222 and holes and improve the catalytic activity of photo-reduced CO2 [141].
The stability of MOFs can be enhanced by in situ substitution of porphyrin. A labile MOF (BUT-109(Zr)) was converted to a stable porphyrin-based MOF (BUT-110) by replacing a naphthalene diimide dibenzoate (NDIDB2−) with a size- and geometry-matching porphyrin ligand (DCPP2−). Compared with BUT-109(Zr), BUT-110 MOFs with different porphyrin contents showed various chemical stability enhancements. The obtained BUT-110 material exhibited excellent stability at a wide pH range (1–10) when the porphyrin content exceeded 50%. Moreover, the BUT-110 series with metalloporphyrin ligands showed better photocatalytic activity in the CO2 reduction to CO. By adjusting the type and content of metal porphyrins in BUT-110, BUT-110-50%-Co is believed to be the best compromise in terms of chemical stability, photocatalytic efficiency, and synthesis cost [101].
The MOFs with two-dimensional lamellar structures also show good catalytic ability in CO2 reduction. An ultra-thin two-dimensional zinc-porphyrin-based metal-organic framework (Zn-MOF nanosheets) photocatalyst exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity and high CO selectivity under mild conditions because of its better charge transfer ability and longer lifetime of photo-generated charges. The conversion number (TON) of CO is 26.2 within 6 h in the presence of Zn-MOF nanosheets, indicating their stronger CO2 reduction ability [142].
To further improve their ability of photocatalytic CO2 reduction, porphyrin-based MOFs can also be integrated with other functional materials to construct photocatalytic composites. As shown in Figure 9a, a new hybrid catalyst was formed from the combination of two-dimensional (2D) ultrathin porphyrin MOFs and zero-dimensional (0D) carbon nitride quantum dots (g-CNQDs). g-CNQDs are coordinated with Co active sites in PMOF, which greatly shortens the migration pathways of photo-generated charges and gaseous substrates (Figure 9b). Effective separation of electron-hole pairs and long-life capture of electrons in the Co center endow the material with enhanced activity in photocatalytic CO2 reduction and improved selectivity to CH4. The average lifetime (τ) of g-CNQDs/PMOF with a feed ratio of 1:6 is 5.25 ns, much lower than 7.73 ns of g-CNQDs. This indicates the highest electron transfer efficiency from g-CNQDs to PMOF and the highest inhibiting degree of the recombination of photo-generated carriers. The effective separation of electron-hole pairs generated by this material and the long-lived captured electrons in the Co center result in a 2.34-fold improvement in the CO generation rate (16.10 μmol g−1 h−1) compared to the pristine PMOF. The methane (CH4) generation rate increased 6.02 times (6.86 μmol g−1 h−1) and at the same time, the selectivity of CH4 was also enhanced [143]. In addition, CuTCPP-UiO-66/TiO2 (CTU/TiO2) composites (Figure 9c) were prepared by immobilizing Cu(II) (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin into an UiO-66 MOF structure through a coordination mode. The composite exhibited unusual activity in CO2 reduction in which the released CO was about seven times that of pure TiO2. The light-induced carriers in the composites were separated between the MOF and TiO2 components, which promoted the separation of electron-hole pairs (Figure 9d). Therefore, CTU/TiO2 showed good catalytic activity and recyclability in the process of photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO [144].

5.3. Photocatalytic Synthesis of Organic Compounds

Singlet oxygen is a reactive oxygen species that can be used for many catalytic transformations [145,146,147,148,149]. For the photocatalysts, their ability to effectively generate singlet oxygen and prolong its lifetime is crucial for their use in photooxidation reactions such as sulfide oxidation and amine oxidation.
Sulfoxide is an indispensable intermediate in pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and other fine chemical industries [150,151]. The thionyl group in the sulfoxide molecule is chemically unstable and easily overoxidized to sulfone. Strong oxidants such as potassium permanganate or dichromate are usually used for the oxidation of sulfoxide, resulting in serious environmental pollution [152]. Porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks have remarkable advantages in the photocatalytic oxidation of sulfoxide due to their wide absorption from ultraviolet to the visible light region, high chemical stability, and environmental friendliness. PCN-222/MOF-545, NU-1000, and UMCM-313, MOFs with porphyrin, pyrene, and perylene ligands, respectively, were used as photocatalysts to complete the oxidation of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES) using the generated singlet oxygen under LED irradiation (Figure 10a,b) [148]. The results show that the oxidation rate of CEES is positively correlated with the singlet oxygen quantum yield which is dependent on the organic linker of Zr-based MOF, that is, porphyrin (PCN-222/MOF-545) < pyrene (NU-1000) < perylene (UMCM-313). Additionally, the strong coordination between metal atoms and porphyrins improves their chemical stability and simplifies the recovery process. Porphyrin-based MOFs (AgTPyP) with two-dimensional structures produce singlet oxygen effectively, and the conversion and selectivity are close to 100%. Moreover, the selectivity and conversion efficiency of AgTPyP were not reduced after five cycles, indicating their excellent stability and reusability [153].
Imines are important biomedical intermediates with excellent pharmacological and biological activities. The Ti-porphyrin-based metal-organic framework (Ti-PMOF-DMA) was synthesized by solvent-controlled synthesis, showed excellent catalytic activity, and was selective in the photocatalytic aerobic oxidation of benzylamine. The results showed that benzylamine could be oxidized to N-benzylbenzaldehyde diamine in 40 min, achieving 94% conversion and 88% selectivity (Figure 10c,d). At the same time, the porphyrin-based MOF also showed high stability [154].
It is reported that the photocatalytic ability of porphyrin-based MOFs can be improved by prolonging the lifetime of singlet oxygen. For example, the presence of certain metal dots can promote the conversion of the energy of the excited photocatalyst to ground-state oxygen and enhance the spin-orbit coupling effect, thereby generating singlet oxygen. The lifetime of singlet oxygen produced by MOF-Eu-TPPS composed of TPPS bridged rare earth material is 23 μs, which is longer than that of TPPS (4 μs) inserted in Eu-based layered double hydroxides (LDH) in oxygen. It is confirmed that the coordination and rigid separation in MOF will enhance the production of singlet oxygen. The extension of singlet oxygen lifetime over porphyrin-based MOFs provides a more efficient approach to photocatalytic synthesis and conversion [155].

5.4. Photocatalytic Removal of Pollutants

Environmental issues related to clean energy and pollution have become increasingly prominent. In the past few decades, a large quantity of pollutants has been discharged into the environment due to urbanization and population growth [156,157,158,159]. Organic dyes pose a serious threat to the environment and are difficult to remove from the environment due to their varying resistance to photodecomposition and oxidation [160]. So far, many technologies have been developed and used to remove harmful pollutants in the environment, such as adsorption [161], biological oxidation [162], chemical treatment, and photo-degradation [163,164]. Among them, photocatalytic methods have shown high selectivity for organic pollutants, minimal damage to ecosystems, and are usually low cost [165,166,167]. Particularly, porphyrin-based MOFs have a wide light response range and easily regulated structure and function, which endow them with clear advantages in treating pollutants by the utilization of solar energy.
MOF-525 and MOF-545 comprised of Zr-oxide clusters and porphyrin moieties in different geometries can be applied to the adsorption and removal of an organic pollutant sulfamethoxazole (SMX). Both MOFs showed adsorption ability to SMX due to their mesoporous structure. The adsorption kinetic rate of MOF-545 with mesopores was about 20 times that of MOF-525 micropores, although their maximum adsorption capacities are 690 and 585 mg/g for MOF-545 and MOF-525, respectively. The π-π interactions and hydrogen bonding between the SMX molecule and the N sites of the porphyrin units control the adsorption of SMX on the porphyrin-based MOFs. The adsorbent is easy to regenerate after washing with acetone and can be reused for four adsorption-desorption cycles without a significant decrease in performance [168].
Pollutant removal can be improved by strengthening the adsorption of organic pollutants on the materials by incorporating other materials with porphyrin-based MOFs. For example, Zr-porphyrin-based MOFs (PCN-224-TiO2) were synthesized by porphyrin, ZrCl4, and nano-TiO2. They showed significant visible light absorption and high photocurrent. Compared with the mixture of TiO2 (TCPP/TiO2) and PCN-224, PCN-224-TiO2 exhibited higher performance in the removal of methylene blue under visible light. The removal rate of methylene blue reached 93.2% within 4 h of low-power light irradiation. Moreover, the PCN-224-TiO2 photocatalyst was kept stable during the cycling reactions [169].
In addition, the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of organic pollutants over porphyrin-based MOFs can be regulated by the selection and assembly of porphyrin ligands and metal nodes. PCN-224 (Zr/Ti) with bimetallic nodes was synthesized by a simple cation exchange method to partially replace Zr with Ti in the Zr-porphyrin-based MOF (PCN-224). The partial replacement with Ti in the MOFs allows faster electron transfer from TCPP to oxygen clusters, enhanced photocurrent, and significantly improved degradation efficiency of pollutants [170]. Fe(III)-TCPPCl⸦UiO-66 MOF, a derivative of the zirconium-based metal-organic framework, achieved a 100% degradation of organic pollutant rhodamine B [171]. The mixed ligand FeIII-TCPPCl that was incorporated in the pore of UiO-66 not only acted as a photosensitizer that promoted light absorption and transfered electrons from the excitic state of FeIII-TCPPCl (FeIII-TCPPCl*) to the conductive band of UiO-66 rapidly to suppress the recombination of photo-induced charges over the combined structure, but also functioned as a co-catalyst to decompose hydrogen peroxide to hydroxyl radicals (Figure 11). In addition, porphyrin-based MOFs also showed excellent removal effects on inorganic pollutants. The Zr-MOF-SH/MF composites can be used to selectively remove Hg2+ from water with an adsorption capacity of 412.5 mg g−1. Moreover, the Zr-MOF-SH/MF composites could be used to simultaneously remove oil and Hg2+ from water, and the removal efficiency of Hg2+ increased with the enhancement of oil content in the oil-water mixture. In addition, the composites can be recycled and reused five times, in which only a slight decrease in adsorption was observed [172].

5.5. Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation

Nitrogen fixation, as it can convert atmospheric nitrogen into nitrogen-containing molecules that can be used by all living organisms including humans, has been regarded as one of the most important natural processes in the Earth’s nitrogen cycle. For example, ammonia (NH3) is the most common industrial chemical and carbon-free energy storage molecule [173]. However, the industrial preparation of NH3 is a highly energy-intensive and environmentally unfriendly process. Therefore, an alternative sustainable method for efficient generation of NH3 from N2 under mild conditions is sorely needed to alleviate the increasing energy and environmental issues. Porphyrin-based MOFs are highly porous crystalline materials with large surface areas and highly ordered pores, which can effectively enhance N2 adsorption. Porphyrin molecules, as a strong photosensitive linker, can significantly broaden the light response of MOFs. Furthermore, the photocatalytic nitrogen fixation efficiency can be significantly improved by rationally designed porphyrin-based MOFs to enhance the separation of photo-generated charges [68]. Therefore, porphyrin-based MOFs exhibit excellent performance and a positive future in photocatalytic nitrogen fixation.
Until now, few investigations about the utilization of MOFs for photocatalytic nitrogen fixation have been reported. For example, a comparative study of Ti-based isostructural MOFs (NH2-MIL-125 (Ti), OH-MIL-125 (Ti), and CH3-MIL-125 (Ti)) showed that NH2-MIL-125 (Ti) (Figure 12a) had the optimal performance in nitrogen reduction where the amine-functionalized linker effectively enhanced the light absorption and the Ti3+ sites increased the efficiency of N2 adsorption and reduction [174]. Porphyrin molecules have strong light absorption capabilities and can be used as linkers to construct MOFs, endowing them with excellent performance in photocatalytic nitrogen fixation. For example, Shang et al. developed a porphyrin-based metal-organic framework (PMOF) with Fe as the active center, serving as an artificial photocatalyst for the nitrogen reduction reaction at room temperature (Figure 12b). Porphyrin is an efficient light-harvesting ligand, Al serves as the metal node to stabilize the MOF frameworks, and Fe acts as the active center for N2 adsorption and reduction. The Al-PMOF (Fe) exhibits excellent performance in visible-light-driven nitrogen fixation under a N2 flow rate of 20 mL min−1 and reaches an ammonia production rate of 127 μg g−1 h−1, which is 50% higher than that of Al-PMOF. The reason for this is the insertion of Fe into the porphyrin ring which endows Al-PMOF(Fe) with a higher charge separation efficiency and faster interface charge transfer speed. In addition, electrons will quickly transfer from the free porphyrin ring to the inserted Fe, which effectively suppresses the recombination of charge carriers [175].

6. Conclusions and Foresight Perspective Outlooks

In the context of the gradual depletion of global fossil energy and increasingly serious environmental pollution, it is of great significance to develop high-powered photocatalysts to efficiently utilize solar energy and remove pollutants. Porphyrin-based MOFs, integrating versatile functional porphyrins and porous and adjustable MOFs in which metal or metal-oxide clusters through carboxylate or nitrogen-containing heterocyclic linkers, are believed to be an ideal platform for photocatalysis due to their precisely tailorable structures and properties. Moreover, their photocatalytic performance can be further improved by the modification of porphyrin ligands, construction of donator-acceptor systems, and introduction of co-catalysts. Thus, the well-designed porphyrin-based MOFs show excellent photocatalytic performance and great potential in the fields of hydrogen evolution, organic synthesis, CO2 reduction, and pollutant removal.
However, some challenges limit the development of porphyrin-based MOFs. The first challenge is the high cost and low yield of porphyrin-based MOFs, which are well aligned with those in MOFs in general. Especially for asymmetric porphyrin ligands, their production usually requires a complicated synthesis process and laborious purification in addition to expensive raw materials, which hinders their wider application. Although immobilizing atomic-scale co-catalysts in MOFs can reduce the use of expensive metals, further efforts are required to decrease the cost of materials. The second challenge is their limited structural stability, especially in some harsh conditions such as high temperatures, strong light, strong acids or alkalis, and so on. The third challenge is their relatively poor conductivity. It is necessary to study the charge carriers, electron mobility, and conductivity mechanism [176]. The mechanism of charge transfer of porphyrin-based MOFs with different composites (or structures) in particular needs special attention and more effort. Finally, high-symmetry orientation design is crucial for the design and construction of porphyrin blocks, which prevents the expansion of porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks and affects their potential catalytic applications. Therefore, exploring the structure-activity relationship of porphyrin-based metal-organic framework materials is of great significance for the design and synthesis of such materials. In general, porphyrin-based MOFs with a low cost, structure robustness, high conductivity, and low limitation on structure symmetry will have a promising future [177].

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773310).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. McGlade, C.; Ekins, P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 degrees C. Nature 2015, 517, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, X.; Nie, X.; Guo, X.; Song, C.; Chen, J.G. Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation to Methanol via Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7984–8034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhong, Q.; Ma, X. In situ self-assembly of 3D hierarchical 2D/2D CdS/g-C3N4 hereojunction with excellent photocatalytic performance. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2020, 105, 104734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, S.; Li, M.; Patil, A.J.; Sun, S.; Tian, L.; Zhang, D.; Cao, M.; Mann, S. Design and construction of artificial photoresponsive protocells capable of converting day light to chemical energy. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24612–24616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, F.; Cao, H.; Xu, L.; Fu, H.; Sun, S.; Xiao, Z.; Sun, C.; Long, X.; Xia, Y.; Wang, S. Design and preparation of highly active TiO2 photocatalysts by modulating their band structure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 629, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Ren, K.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Fan, Z. Porphyrin-based heterogeneous photocatalysts for solar energy conversion. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 33–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ni, Y.; Yan, K.; Xu, F.; Zhong, W.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, K.; Yan, K.; Wang, D. Synergistic effect on TiO2 doped poly (vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) nanofibrous film for filtration and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Compos. Commun. 2019, 12, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qian, Y.T.; Zhang, F.F.; Pang, H. A Review of MOFs and Their Composites-Based Photocatalysts: Synthesis and Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2104231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Foo, C.; Li, Y.; Lebedev, K.; Chen, T.; Day, S.; Tang, C.; Tsang, S.C.E. Characterisation of oxygen defects and nitrogen impurities in TiO(2) photocatalysts using variable-temperature X-ray powder diffraction. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nguyen, C.T.K.; Quang Tran, N.; Seo, S.; Hwang, H.; Oh, S.; Yu, J.; Lee, J.; Anh Le, T.; Hwang, J.; Kim, M.; et al. Highly efficient nanostructured metal-decorated hybrid semiconductors for solar conversion of CO2 with almost complete CO selectivity. Mater. Today 2020, 35, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cao, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Shi, X.; Li, H.; Cheng, P.; Liu, X.; Liu, M.; Piao, L. Ultrasmall CoP Nanoparticles as Efficient Cocatalysts for Photocatalytic Formic Acid Dehydrogenation. Joule 2018, 2, 549–557. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong, H.; Xiao, M.; Yu, S.; Wu, H.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Chen, G.; Li, C. Insight into the Activity and Stability of RhxP Nano-Species Supported on g-C3N4 for Photocatalytic H2 Production. ACS Catal. 2019, 10, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, J.; Seo, S.; Luo, Y.; Sun, Y.; Oh, S.; Nguyen, C.T.K.; Seo, C.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.; Lee, H. Efficient and Stable Solar Hydrogen Generation of Hydrophilic Rhenium-Disulfide-Based Photocatalysts via Chemically Controlled Charge Transfer Paths. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 1715–1726. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sun, Q.; Wang, N.; Yu, J.; Yu, J.C. A Hollow Porous CdS Photocatalyst. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1804368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meng, X.-B.; Sheng, J.-L.; Tang, H.-L.; Sun, X.-J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, F.-M. Metal-organic framework as nanoreactors to co-incorporate carbon nanodots and CdS quantum dots into the pores for improved H2 evolution without noble-metal cocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 244, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Velumani, A.; Sengodan, P.; Arumugam, P.; Rajendran, R.; Santhanam, S.; Palanisamy, M. Carbon quantum dots supported ZnO sphere based photocatalyst for dye degradation application. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar]
  17. Syed, N.; Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Cao, L. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials via Heterojunction Serving as Photocatalyst. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kundu, S.; Bramhaiah, K.; Bhattacharyya, S. Carbon-based nanomaterials: In the quest of alternative metal-free photocatalysts for solar water splitting. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5130–5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Srisasiwimon, N.; Chuangchote, S.; Laosiripojana, N.; Sagawa, T. TiO2/Lignin-Based Carbon Composited Photocatalysts for Enhanced Photocatalytic Conversion of Lignin to High Value Chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 13968–13976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qian, Z.; Zhang, R.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ma, T.; Sun, X. Trace to the Source: Self-Tuning of MOF Photocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2300086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eddaoudi, M.; Moler, D.B.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Reineke, T.M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Modular chemistry: Secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal-organic carboxylate frameworks. Accounts. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, L.; Wang, K.-Y.; Joseph, E.; Zhou, H.-C. Catalytic Porphyrin Framework Compounds. Trends Chem. 2020, 2, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qin, Y.; Hao, M.; Li, Z. Metal-organic frameworks for photocatalysis. In Surface Science of Photocatalysis; Elsevier: London, UK, 2020; Volume 31, pp. 541–579. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, Z.; Li, P.; Anderson, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Robison, L.; Redfern, L.R.; Moribe, S.; Islamoglu, T.; Gomez-Gualdron, D.A.; et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 2020, 368, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J.; Rosi, N.; Vodak, D.; Wachter, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science 2002, 295, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xin, X.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, Y.; Tan, J.; Shi, Y.; Ren, H.; Yang, D.; Jiang, Z. Dual-Ligand Ti-MOFs with Push-Pull Effect for Photocatalytic H(2) Production. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hussain, M.B.; Kang, B.; Cheng, X.; Ma, C.; Wang, X.; Mehmood, R.; Iqbal, S. Oxygen vacancy induced Pt-decorated MOF photocatalyst for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 13780–13790. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ko, M.; Mendecki, L.; Eagleton, A.M.; Durbin, C.G.; Stolz, R.M.; Meng, Z.; Mirica, K.A. Employing Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for Voltammetric Detection of Neurochemicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11717–11733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kreno, L.E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O.K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105–1125. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rojas, S.; Garcia-Gonzalez, J.; Salcedo-Abraira, P.; Rincon, I.; Castells-Gil, J.; Padial, N.M.; Marti-Gastaldo, C.; Horcajada, P. Ti-based robust MOFs in the combined photocatalytic degradation of emerging organic contaminants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14513. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie, W.; Yuan, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, S.-R.; Xu, G.-J.; Xu, Y.-H.; Su, Z.-M. Heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulfate by stable Co-MOF for the efficient degradation of organic dye pollutants. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 6786–6792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, X.; Wasson, M.C.; Shayan, M.; Berdichevsky, E.K.; Ricardo-Noordberg, J.; Singh, Z.; Papazyan, E.K.; Castro, A.J.; Marino, P.; Ajoyan, Z.; et al. A historical perspective on porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks and their applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 429, 213615. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tasaki, M.; Okabe, Y.; Iwami, H.; Akatsuka, C.; Kosugi, K.; Negita, K.; Kusaka, S.; Matsuda, R.; Kondo, M.; Masaoka, S. Modulation of Self-Assembly Enhances the Catalytic Activity of Iron Porphyrin for CO2 Reduction. Small 2021, 17, 2006150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, D.; Liu, J.; Du, P.; Zhang, Z.; Ning, X.; Deng, Y.; Yin, D.; Chen, J.; Han, Z.; Lu, X. Cross-Linked Surface Engineering to Improve Iron Porphyrin Catalytic Activity. Small 2020, 16, 1905889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, J.; Fan, Y.Z.; Li, X.; Xu, Y.W.; Zhang, L.; Su, C.Y. Catalytic Space Engineering of Porphyrin Metal-Organic Frameworks for Combined CO2 Capture and Conversion at a Low Concentration. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 2340–2347. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xiu, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, F.; Xia, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, S. Mechanistic Process Understanding of the Biomimetic Construction of Porphyrin-Based Light-Capturing Antennas from Self-Assembled Fmoc-Blocked Peptide Templates. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15761–15771. [Google Scholar]
  37. Xiu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Feng, Y.; Wei, R.; Wang, S.; Xia, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, S. Peptide-mediated porphyrin based hierarchical complexes for light-to-chemical conversion. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 15201–15208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hu, M.-L.; Masoomi, M.Y.; Morsali, A. Template strategies with MOFs. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 387, 415–435. [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang, Z.W.; Hu, K.Q.; Mei, L.; Kong, X.H.; Yu, J.P.; Liu, K.; Zeng, L.W.; Chai, Z.F.; Shi, W.Q. A mixed-ligand strategy regulates thorium-based MOFs. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, J.; Zhou, W.; Liu, J.; Fujimori, Y.; Higashino, T.; Imahori, H.; Jiang, X.; Zhao, J.; Sakurai, T.; Hattori, Y.; et al. A new class of epitaxial porphyrin metal-organic framework thin films with extremely high photocarrier generation efficiency: Promising materials for all-solid-state solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 12739–12747. [Google Scholar]
  41. He, Y.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, C.; Tu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Gu, L.; Wang, S.; Tan, J.; Jiang, M.; Liu, X. In situ grown CdS on 2D Cd-based porphyrin MOFs enhances the significant separation and transfer of charge carriers with an appropriate heterojunction during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 5077–5085. [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson, J.A.; Luo, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.-S.; Morton, M.D.; Echeverría, E.; Torres, F.E.; Zhang, J. Porphyrin-Metalation-Mediated Tuning of Photoredox Catalytic Properties in Metal-Organic Frameworks. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5283–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, S.; Mei, H.M.; Yao, S.L.; Chen, Z.Y.; Lu, Y.L.; Zhang, L.; Su, C.Y. Well-distributed Pt-nanoparticles within confined coordination interspaces of self-sensitized porphyrin metal-organic frameworks: Synergistic effect boosting highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 10577–10585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, D.; Duan, Q.; Yu, H.; Dong, W. Photodynamic therapy based on porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 5976–5989. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, P.; Mirkin, C.A.; Farha, O.K. DNA-Functionalized Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticles for Intracellular Delivery of Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2215–2219. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, X.; Ding, B.; Sun, C.; Liu, G.; Hu, C.; Shao, S.; Pang, M. Postsynthetic Ligand Exchange of Metal-Organic Framework for Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 7884–7892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zeng, J.-Y.; Wang, X.-S.; Zhang, M.-K.; Li, Z.-H.; Gong, D.; Pan, P.; Huang, L.; Cheng, S.-X.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, X.-Z. Universal Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Framework Coating to Various Nanostructures for Functional Integration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 43143–43153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Liang, Z.; Guo, H.; Zhou, G.; Guo, K.; Wang, B.; Lei, H.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, H.; Apfel, U.P.; Cao, R. Metal-Organic-Framework-Supported Molecular Electrocatalysis for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 8472–8476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vesborg, P.C.K.; Jaramillo, T.F. Addressing the terawatt challenge: Scalability in the supply of chemical elements for renewable energy. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 7933–7947. [Google Scholar]
  50. Dong, B.-X.; Qian, S.-L.; Bu, F.-Y.; Wu, Y.-C.; Feng, L.-G.; Teng, Y.-L.; Liu, W.-L.; Li, Z.-W. Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO by a Heterogeneous Catalyst of Fe-Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 4662–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vesborg, P.C.; Seger, B.; Chorkendorff, I. Recent Development in Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysts and Their Practical Implementation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 951–957. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zou, C.; Wu, C.D. Functional porphyrinic metal-organic frameworks: Crystal engineering and applications. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 3879–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, Q.; Gao, Q.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; Nafady, A.; Ma, S. Recent advances in MOF-based photocatalysis: Environmental remediation under visible light. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 300–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, X.; Tang, C.; Zhang, L.; Song, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks: Design, Synthesis, Photoelectric Conversion Mechanism, and Applications. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, C.; Pan, Y.; Wan, G.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Zhou, H.; Yu, S.-H.; Jiang, H.-L. Turning on Visible-Light Photocatalytic C-H Oxidation over Metal-Organic Frameworks by Introducing Metal-to-Cluster Charge Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19110–19117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, S.; Luo, P.; Wu, H.; Wei, C.; Hu, Y.; Qiu, G. Strategies for Improving the Performance and Application of MOFs Photocatalysts. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 2978–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zeng, J.Y.; Wang, X.S.; Xie, B.R.; Li, Q.R.; Zhang, X.Z. Large pi-Conjugated Metal-Organic Frameworks for Infrared-Light-Driven CO(2) Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 1218–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xiu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Xia, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, S. Bioinspired construction of light-harvesting antenna via hierarchically co-assembling approach. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 587, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guo, X.; Tian, X.; Xu, X.; He, J. Enhancing visible-light-activity of Ti-based MOFs based on extending the conjugated degree of organic ligands and photocatalytic degradation process and mechanism in real industrial textile wastewaters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106428. [Google Scholar]
  60. Xiao, J.D.; Jiang, H.L. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis and Photothermal Catalysis. Account. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qiu, J.; Zhang, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Yao, J. Modified metal-organic frameworks as photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 231, 317–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Alvaro, M.; Carbonell, E.; Ferrer, B.; Llabrés i Xamena, F.X.; Garcia, H. Semiconductor Behavior of a Metal-Organic Framework (MOF). Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 5106–5112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Wu, T.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, M.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, G.; Shao, B.; Liang, Q.; Zhang, W.; He, Q.; et al. Application of QD-MOF composites for photocatalysis: Energy production and environmental remediation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 403, 213097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, W.; Liu, L.; Ye, J.; Wang, D. An ultrathin porphyrin-based metal-organic framework for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Nano Energy 2019, 62, 250–258. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu, X.P.; Choudhuri, I.; Truhlar, D.G. Computational Studies of Photocatalysis with Metal-Organic Frameworks. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wen, M.; Li, G.; Liu, H.; Chen, J.; An, T.; Yamashita, H. Metal-organic framework-based nanomaterials for adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of gaseous pollutants: Recent progress and challenges. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 1006–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pan, Y.; Abazari, R.; Yao, J.; Gao, J. Recent progress in 2D metal-organic framework photocatalysts: Synthesis, photocatalytic mechanism and applications. J. Phys.-Energy 2021, 3, 032010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fan, L.; Yu, Q.; Chen, J.; Khan, U.; Wang, X.; Gao, J. Achievements and Perspectives in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Materials for Photocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, L.-L.; Yang, C.-J.; Chen, W.-H.; Lin, K.-J. Towards the Development of Electrical Conduction and Lithium-Ion Transport in a Tetragonal Porphyrin Wire. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1543–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Medforth, C.J.; Wang, Z.; Martin, K.E.; Song, Y.; Jacobsen, J.L.; Shelnutt, J.A. Self-assembled porphyrin nanostructures. Chem. Commun. 2009, 47, 7261–7277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Beletskaya, I.; Tyurin, V.S.; Tsivadze, A.Y.; Guilard, R.; Stern, C. Supramolecular chemistry of metalloporphyrins. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1659–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tian, Y.-Q.; Zhao, Y.-M.; Chen, Z.-X.; Zhang, G.-N.; Weng, L.-H.; Zhao, D.-Y. Design and generation of extended zeolitic metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs): Synthesis and crystal structures of zinc(II) imidazolate polymers with zeolitic topologies. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 4146–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wong-Foy, A.G.; Matzger, A.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Exceptional H2 saturation uptake in microporous metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3494–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dybtsev, D.N.; Chun, H.; Kim, K. Three-dimensional metal-organic framework with (3,4)-connected net, synthesized from an ionic liquid medium. Chem. Commun. 2004, 14, 1594–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, Z.; Sun, Q.; Liu, B.; Kuang, Y.; Gulzar, A.; He, F.; Gai, S.; Yang, P.; Lin, J. Recent advances in porphyrin-based MOFs for cancer therapy and diagnosis therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 439, 213945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kubovics, M.; Careta, O.; Vallcorba, O.; Romo-Islas, G.; Rodríguez, L.; Ayllón, J.A.; Domingo, C.; Nogués, C.; López-Periago, A.M. Supercritical CO2 Synthesis of Porous Metalloporphyrin Frameworks: Application in Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 1080–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhao, Y.; Qi, S.; Niu, Z.; Peng, Y.; Shan, C.; Verma, G.; Wojtas, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Feng, Y.; et al. Robust Corrole-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks with Rare 9-Connected Zr/Hf-Oxo Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14443–14450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, H.; Yang, F.; Lv, X.-L.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Zhao, M.-J.; Li, J.-R. A stable porphyrinic metal-organic framework pore-functionalized by high-density carboxylic groups for proton conduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 14525–14529. [Google Scholar]
  79. Yang, X.-L.; Xie, M.-H.; Zou, C.; He, Y.; Chen, B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Wu, C.-D. Porous Metalloporphyrinic Frameworks Constructed from Metal 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(3,5-biscarboxylphenyl)porphyrin for Highly Efficient and Selective Catalytic Oxidation of Alkylbenzenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10638–10645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Johnson, J.A.; Zhang, X.; Reeson, T.C.; Chen, Y.-S.; Zhang, J. Facile Control of the Charge Density and Photocatalytic Activity of an Anionic Indium Porphyrin Framework via in Situ Metalation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15881–15884. [Google Scholar]
  81. Shultz, A.M.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T.; Nguyen, S.T. A Catalytically Active, Permanently Microporous MOF with Metalloporphyrin Struts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4204–4205. [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu, D.; Liu, T.-F.; Chen, Y.-P.; Zou, L.; Feng, D.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, S.; Zhong, C.; Zhou, H.-C. A Reversible Crystallinity-Preserving Phase Transition in Metal-Organic Frameworks: Discovery, Mechanistic Studies, and Potential Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7740–7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Fang, X.; Shang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Yao, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Jiang, H.L. Single Pt Atoms Confined into a Metal-Organic Framework for Efficient Photocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705112. [Google Scholar]
  84. Hou, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J. Synthesis, crystal structures, and fluorescence properties of porphyrin alkaline earth MOFs. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2018, 95, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hou, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, D.; Qi, D.; Jiang, J. Porphyrin-Alkaline Earth MOFs with the Highest Adsorption Capacity for Methylene Blue. Chemistry 2016, 22, 6345–6352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jin, J. Porphyrin-based metal-organic framework catalysts for photoreduction of CO2: Understanding the effect of node connectivity and linker metalation on activity. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 15362–15368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Abrahams, B.F.; Hoskins, B.F.; Michail, D.M.; Robson, R. Assembly of porphyrin building blocks into network structures with large channels. Nature 1994, 369, 727–729. [Google Scholar]
  88. Masih, D.; Chernikova, V.; Shekhah, O.; Eddaoudi, M.; Mohammed, O.F. Zeolite-like Metal-Organic Framework(MOF) Encaged Pt(II)-Porphyrin for Anion-Selective Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 11399–11405. [Google Scholar]
  89. Zha, Q.; Ding, C.; Rui, X.; Xie, Y. A Novel Porphyrin-Based Ligand Containing Four 4,4′-Dipyridylamine Moieties: Syntheses, Structures, and Luminescent Properties of Mn(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) Coordination Polymers. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 4583–4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lv, X.L.; Wang, K.; Wang, B.; Su, J.; Zou, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, J.R.; Zhou, H.C. A Base-Resistant Metalloporphyrin Metal-Organic Framework for C-H Bond Halogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang, K.; Lv, X.L.; Feng, D.; Li, J.; Chen, S.; Sun, J.; Song, L.; Xie, Y.; Li, J.R.; Zhou, H.C. Pyrazolate-Based Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Framework with Extraordinary Base-Resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 914–919. [Google Scholar]
  92. Feng, L.; Day, G.S.; Wang, K.-Y.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, H.-C. Strategies for Pore Engineering in Zirconium Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem 2020, 6, 2902–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, X.; Frey, B.L.; Chen, Y.S.; Zhang, J. Topology-Guided Stepwise Insertion of Three Secondary Linkers in Zirconium Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7710–7715. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Hendon, C.H.; Tiana, D.; Fontecave, M.; Sanchez, C.; D’Arras, L.; Sassoye, C.; Rozes, L.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Walsh, A. Engineering the optical response of the titanium-MIL-125 metal-organic framework through ligand functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10942–10945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pan, S.; Kong, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Q.; Wang, M.; Wei, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X. Rational modulating electronegativity of substituents in amorphous metal-organic frameworks for water oxidation catalysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 9723–9732. [Google Scholar]
  96. De, S.; Devic, T.; Fateeva, A. Porphyrin and phthalocyanine-based metal-organic frameworks beyond metal-carboxylates. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 1166–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shi, L.; Yang, L.; Zhang, H.; Chang, K.; Zhao, G.; Kako, T.; Ye, J. Implantation of Iron(III) in porphyrinic metal-organic frameworks for highly improved photocatalytic performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 224, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wu, Y.; Luo, H.; Wang, H. Synthesis of iron(iii)-based metal-organic framework/graphene oxide composites with increased photocatalytic performance for dye degradation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 40435–40438. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang, M.; Ma, Y.; Lv, B.; Hua, F.; Meng, S.; Lei, X.; Wang, Q.; Su, B.; Lei, Z.; Yang, Z. Fe Doped MIL-101/Graphene Nanohybrid for Photocatalytic Oxidation of Alcohols Under Visible-Light Irradiation. Catal. Lett. 2021, 151, 2384–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Choi, S.; Jung, W.-J.; Park, K.; Kim, S.-Y.; Baeg, J.-O.; Kim, C.H.; Son, H.-J.; Pac, C.; Kang, S.O. Rapid Exciton Migration and Amplified Funneling Effects of Multi-Porphyrin Arrays in a Re(I)/Porphyrinic MOF Hybrid for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 2710–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kong, X.J.; He, T.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, C.; Li, T.C.; Wu, X.Q.; Wang, K.; Li, J.R. In Situ Porphyrin Substitution in a Zr(IV)-MOF for Stability Enhancement and Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Small 2021, 17, 2005357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fang, Z.-B.; Liu, T.-T.; Liu, J.; Jin, S.; Wu, X.-P.; Gong, X.-Q.; Wang, K.; Yin, Q.; Liu, T.-F.; Cao, R.; et al. Boosting Interfacial Charge-Transfer Kinetics for Efficient Overall CO2 Photoreduction via Rational Design of Coordination Spheres on Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 12515–12523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Qin, J.-H.; Xu, P.; Huang, Y.-D.; Xiao, L.-Y.; Lu, W.; Yang, X.-G.; Ma, L.-F.; Zang, S.-Q. High loading of Mn(ii)-metallated porphyrin in a MOF for photocatalytic CO2 reduction in gas-solid conditions. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 8468–8471. [Google Scholar]
  104. Chen, M.; Zhang, C.; Tang, Y.; Cai, Q.; Yu, J.; Chen, Y.; He, Y.; Bai, J.; Fu, M.; Chen, S.; et al. Cu ions anchored in the porphyrin center act as transient metal centers of 2D-MOFs to enhance photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2023, 13, 581–586. [Google Scholar]
  105. Pan, Y.; Abazari, R.; Tahir, B.; Sanati, S.; Zheng, Y.; Tahir, M.; Gao, J. Iron-based metal-organic frameworks and their derived materials for photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 499, 215538. [Google Scholar]
  106. Mu, X.; Jiang, J.; Chao, F.; Lou, Y.; Chen, J. Ligand modification of UiO-66 with an unusual visible light photocatalytic behavior for RhB degradation. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 1895–1902. [Google Scholar]
  107. Castellanos, N.J.; Martinez Rojas, Z.; Camargo, H.A.; Biswas, S.; Granados-Oliveros, G. Congo red decomposition by photocatalytic formation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH) using titanium metal-organic frameworks. Transit. Metal Chem. 2018, 44, 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  108. Wu, W.; Xie, Y.; Lv, X.-L.; Xie, L.-H.; Zhang, X.; He, T.; Si, G.-R.; Wang, K.; Li, J.-R. Expanding the Structural Topologies of Rare-Earth Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Frameworks through Ligand Modulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 5357–5364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jin, S.; Supur, M.; Addicoat, M.; Furukawa, K.; Chen, L.; Nakamura, T.; Fukuzumi, S.; Irle, S.; Jiang, D. Creation of Superheterojunction Polymers via Direct Polycondensation: Segregated and Bicontinuous Donor-Acceptor pi-Columnar Arrays in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Long-Lived Charge Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7817–7827. [Google Scholar]
  110. Jin, S.; Furukawa, K.; Addicoat, M.; Chen, L.; Takahashi, S.; Irle, S.; Nakamura, T.; Jiang, D. Large pore donor-acceptor covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 4505–4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zeng, Y.; Fu, Z.; Chen, H.; Liu, C.; Liao, S.; Dai, J. Photo- and thermally induced coloration of a crystalline MOF accompanying electron transfer and long-lived charge separation in a stable host-guest system. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8114–8116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, B.; Qian, B.-B.; Li, C.-T.; Li, X.-W.; Nie, H.-X.; Yu, M.-H.; Chang, Z. Donor-acceptor systems in metal-organic frameworks: Design, construction, and properties. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 5538–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Antonietta Loi, M.; Denk, P.; Hoppe, H.; Neugebauer, H.; Winder, C.; Meissner, D.; Brabec, C.; Serdar Sariciftci, N.; Gouloumis, A.; Vázquez, P.; et al. Long-lived photoinduced charge separation for solar cell applications in phthalocyanine-fulleropyrrolidine dyad thin filmsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Plots of the refractive index, extinction coefficient and dielectric function of Pc-C60. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 700–704. [Google Scholar]
  114. Yang, X.-G.; Qin, J.-H.; Huang, Y.-D.; Zhai, Z.-M.; Ma, L.-F.; Yan, D. Highly enhanced UV-vis-NIR light harvesting and photoelectric conversion of a pyrene MOF by encapsulation of the D-π-A cyanine dye. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 17169–17175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lee, C.Y.; Farha, O.K.; Hong, B.J.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Nguyen, S.T.; Hupp, J.T. Light-harvesting metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): Efficient strut-to-strut energy transfer in bodipy and porphyrin-based MOFs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15858–15861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Xu, W.-J.; Huang, B.-X.; Li, G.; Yang, F.; Lin, W.; Gu, J.-X.; Deng, H.-G.; Gu, Z.-G.; Jin, H.-G. Donor-Acceptor Mixed-Naphthalene Diimide-Porphyrin MOF for Boosting Photocatalytic Oxidative Coupling of Amines. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 5723–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cai, P.; Xu, M.; Meng, S.S.; Lin, Z.; Yan, T.; Drake, H.F.; Zhang, P.; Pang, J.; Gu, Z.Y.; Zhou, H.C. Precise Spatial-Designed Metal-Organic-Framework Nanosheets for Efficient Energy Transfer and Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 27258–27263. [Google Scholar]
  118. Cui, G.W.; Wang, W.L.; Ma, M.Y.; Zhang, M.; Xia, X.Y.; Han, F.Y.; Shi, X.F.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Dong, Y.B.; Tang, B. Rational design of carbon and TiO2 assembly materials: Covered or strewn, which is better for photocatalysis? Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6415–6417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Han, M.; Zhu, S.; Lu, S.; Song, Y.; Feng, T.; Tao, S.; Liu, J.; Yang, B. Recent progress on the photocatalysis of carbon dots: Classification, mechanism and applications. Nano Today 2018, 19, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Liu, X.; Fan, P.; Xiao, L.; Weng, J.; Xu, Q.; Xu, J. Reduced Ti-MOFs encapsulated black phosphorus with high stability and enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 53, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jin, S.; Son, H.J.; Farha, O.K.; Wiederrecht, G.P.; Hupp, J.T. Energy transfer from quantum dots to metal-organic frameworks for enhanced light harvesting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 955–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yu, Q.; Wang, X.; Wu, W.; Feng, X.; Kong, D.; Khan, U.; Ren, X.; Li, L. In Situ Encapsulation of Graphene Quantum Dots in Highly Stable Porphyrin Metal-Organic Frameworks for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Molecules 2023, 28, 4703. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Wang, Q.; Xu, R.; Wang, X.-S.; Liu, S.-D.; Huang, Y.-B.; Cao, R. Platinum Nanoparticle-Decorated Porous Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 33, 2038–2044. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zuo, Q.; Liu, T.; Chen, C.; Ji, Y.; Gong, X.; Mai, Y.; Zhou, Y. Ultrathin Metal-Organic Framework Nanosheets with Ultrahigh Loading of Single Pt Atoms for Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic H(2) Evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 10198–10203. [Google Scholar]
  125. He, T.; Chen, S.; Ni, B.; Gong, Y.; Wu, Z.; Song, L.; Gu, L.; Hu, W.; Wang, X. Zirconium-Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework Hollow Nanotubes for Immobilization of Noble-Metal Single Atoms. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3493–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sasan, K.; Lin, Q.; Mao, C.; Feng, P. Incorporation of iron hydrogenase active sites into a highly stable metal-organic framework for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10390–10393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Liang, Z.; Guo, H.; Lei, H.; Cao, R. Co porphyrin-based metal-organic framework for hydrogen evolution reaction and oxygen reduction reaction. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 3999–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Fateeva, A.; Chater, P.A.; Ireland, C.P.; Tahir, A.A.; Khimyak, Y.Z.; Wiper, P.V.; Darwent, J.R.; Rosseinsky, M.J. A water-stable porphyrin-based metal-organic framework active for visible-light photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7440–7444. [Google Scholar]
  129. Rahman, F.A.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Saidur, R.; Bakar, W.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Putrajaya, R.; Hassan, N.A. Pollution to solution: Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Afroz, R.; Hassan, M.N.; Ibrahim, N.A. Review of air pollution and health impacts in Malaysia. Environ. Res. 2003, 92, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  131. Choe, J.H.; Kim, H.; Hong, C.S. MOF-74 type variants for CO2 capture. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 5172–5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liang, J.; Yu, H.; Shi, J.; Li, B.; Wu, L.; Wang, M. Dislocated Bilayer MOF Enables High-Selectivity Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 to CO. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209814. [Google Scholar]
  133. Xu, L.; Xiu, Y.; Liu, F.; Liang, Y.; Wang, S. Research Progress in Conversion of CO2 to Valuable Fuels. Molecules 2020, 25, 3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Schneider, J.; Jia, H.; Muckerman, J.T.; Fujita, E. Thermodynamics and kinetics of CO2, CO, and H+ binding to the metal centre of CO2 reduction catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2036–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Peter, S.C. Reduction of CO2 to Chemicals and Fuels: A Solution to Global Warming and Energy Crisis. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1557–1561. [Google Scholar]
  136. Chen, X.; Cong, M.; Tang, M.; Liu, J.; Chen, S.; Gao, Y. Tandem ZnCo-porphyrin metal-organic frameworks for enhanced photoreduction of CO2. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 4369–4375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sadeghi, N.; Sharifnia, S.; Sheikh Arabi, M. A porphyrin-based metal-organic framework for high rate photoreduction of CO2 to CH4 in gas phase. J. CO2 Util. 2016, 16, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chen, E.X.; Qiu, M.; Zhang, Y.F.; Zhu, Y.S.; Liu, L.Y.; Sun, Y.Y.; Bu, X.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Q. Acid and Base Resistant Zirconium Polyphenolate-Metalloporphyrin Scaffolds for Efficient CO(2) Photoreduction. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, F.; Shen, X.; Duan, C. A simple strategy for engineering heterostructures of Au nanoparticle-loaded metal-organic framework nanosheets to achieve plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 11355–11361. [Google Scholar]
  140. Sun, D.; Fu, Y.; Liu, W.; Ye, L.; Wang, D.; Yang, L.; Fu, X.; Li, Z. Studies on photocatalytic CO(2) reduction over NH2-Uio-66(Zr) and its derivatives: Towards a better understanding of photocatalysis on metal-organic frameworks. Chemistry 2013, 19, 14279–14285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xu, H.Q.; Hu, J.; Wang, D.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Yu, S.H.; Jiang, H.L. Visible-Light Photoreduction of CO2 in a Metal-Organic Framework: Boosting Electron-Hole Separation via Electron Trap States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13440–13443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ye, L.; Gao, Y.; Cao, S.; Chen, H.; Yao, Y.; Hou, J.; Sun, L. Assembly of highly efficient photocatalytic CO2 conversion systems with ultrathin two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 227, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  143. Zheng, C.; Qiu, X.; Han, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, S. Zero-Dimensional-g-CNQD-Coordinated Two-Dimensional Porphyrin MOF Hybrids for Boosting Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42243–42249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wang, L.; Jin, P.; Duan, S.; She, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, Q. In-situ incorporation of Copper(II) porphyrin functionalized zirconium MOF and TiO(2) for efficient photocatalytic CO(2) reduction. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 926–933. [Google Scholar]
  145. Ogilby, P.R. Singlet oxygen: There is indeed something new under the sun. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3181–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jiang, Z.W.; Zou, Y.C.; Zhao, T.T.; Zhen, S.J.; Li, Y.F.; Huang, C.Z. Controllable Synthesis of Porphyrin-Based 2D Lanthanide Metal-Organic Frameworks with Thickness- and Metal-Node-Dependent Photocatalytic Performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3300–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Liu, Y.; Howarth, A.J.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K. Selective Photooxidation of a Mustard-Gas Simulant Catalyzed by a Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9001–9005. [Google Scholar]
  148. Buru, C.T.; Majewski, M.B.; Howarth, A.J.; Lavroff, R.H.; Kung, C.W.; Peters, A.W.; Goswami, S.; Farha, O.K. Improving the Efficiency of Mustard Gas Simulant Detoxification by Tuning the Singlet Oxygen Quantum Yield in Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Corresponding Thin Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 23802–23806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Li, L.; Yu, X.; Xu, L.; Zhao, Y. Fabrication of a novel type visible-light-driven heterojunction photocatalyst: Metal-porphyrinic metal-organic framework coupled with PW12/TiO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 386, 123955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Padwa, A.; Bullock, W.H.; Dyszlewski, A.D. Studies dealing with the alkylation-[1,3]-rearrangement reaction of some phenylthio-substituted allylic sulfones. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 55, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Fernandez, I.; Khiar, N. Recent developments in the synthesis and utilization of chiral sulfoxides. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3651–3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ren, C.; Fang, R.; Yu, X.; Wang, S. A highly efficient reusable homogeneous copper catalyst for the selective aerobic oxygenation sulfides to sulfoxides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 982–986. [Google Scholar]
  153. Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, P.; Zheng, Z.; Cheng, H.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. Enhanced singlet oxygen production over a photocatalytic stable metal-organic framework composed of porphyrin and Ag. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 602, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  154. Sheng, W.; Huang, F.; Dong, X.; Lang, X. Solvent-controlled synthesis of Ti-based porphyrinic metal-organic frameworks for the selective photocatalytic oxidation of amines. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 628 Pt A, 784–793. [Google Scholar]
  155. Demel, J.; Kubat, P.; Millange, F.; Marrot, J.; Cisarova, I.; Lang, K. Lanthanide-porphyrin hybrids: From layered structures to metal-organic frameworks with photophysical properties. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 2779–2786. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  156. Wei, F.; Zhang, H.; Ren, Q.; Chen, H.; Yang, L.; Ding, B.; Yu, M.; Liang, Z. Removal of organic contaminants from wastewater with GO/MOFs composites. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Xu, L.; Yang, L.; Johansson, E.M.J.; Wang, Y.; Jin, P. Photocatalytic activity and mechanism of bisphenol a removal over TiO2-x/rGO nanocomposite driven by visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 350, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Awfa, D.; Ateia, M.; Fujii, M.; Johnson, M.S.; Yoshimura, C. Photodegradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water treatment using carbonaceous-TiO(2) composites: A critical review of recent literature. Water Res. 2018, 142, 26–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Fang, H.; Zhang, H.; Han, L.; Mei, J.; Ge, Q.; Long, Z.; Yu, Y. Exploring bacterial communities and biodegradation genes in activated sludge from pesticide wastewater treatment plants via metagenomic analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243 Pt B, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ramasubbu, V.; Kumar, P.R.; Chellapandi, T.; Madhumitha, G.; Mothi, E.M.; Shajan, X.S. Zn(II) porphyrin sensitized (TiO2@Cd-MOF) nanocomposite aerogel as novel photocatalyst for the effective degradation of methyl orange (MO) dye. Opt. Mater. 2022, 132, 112558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Akpinar, I.; Yazaydin, A.O. Rapid and Efficient Removal of Carbamazepine from Water by UiO-67. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 15122–15130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Trapido, M.; Tenno, T.; Goi, A.; Dulova, N.; Kattel, E.; Klauson, D.; Klein, K.; Tenno, T.; Viisimaa, M. Bio-recalcitrant pollutants removal from wastewater with combination of the Fenton treatment and biological oxidation. J. Water Process Eng. 2017, 16, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhang, S.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; Zhao, G.; Hu, B.; Lu, Z.; Wen, T.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Recent developments of two-dimensional graphene-based composites in visible-light photocatalysis for eliminating persistent organic pollutants from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 390, 14642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cao, H.; Liu, F.; Tai, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Li, P.; Zhao, H.; Xia, Y.; Wang, S. Promoting photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanomaterials by structural and electronic modulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 466, 143219. [Google Scholar]
  165. Al-Nuaim, M.A.; Alwasiti, A.A.; Shnain, Z.Y. The photocatalytic process in the treatment of polluted water. Chem. Zvest. 2022, 77, 677–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Feng, Y.Y.; Luo, C.J.; Chen, X.S.; Gu, J.C.; Zhang, Y.M.; Chao, M.; Li, M.R.; Chen, T.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; et al. Shell inspired heterogeneous membrane with smaller bandgap toward sunlight-activated sustainable water purification. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135910. [Google Scholar]
  167. Li, L.X.; Luo, C.J.; Chen, X.S.; Chu, N.; Li, L.; Chao, M.; Yan, L.K. A Novel Multifunctional Photocatalytic Separation Membrane Based on Single-Component Seaweed-Like g-C3N4. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yu, K.; Ahmed, I.; Won, D.I.; Lee, W.I.; Ahn, W.S. Highly efficient adsorptive removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solutions by porphyrinic MOF-525 and MOF-545. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Zhu, L.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, C.; Huo, T.; Hou, X.; Guo, D.; Zhang, H.; Xia, D. Enhanced visible-light catalytic degradation of methylene blue by improving adsorption of porous zirconium-based porphyrin MOFs sensitized TiO2 photocatalyst. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 36, 2961–2972. [Google Scholar]
  170. He, J.; Zhang, Y.; He, J.; Zeng, X.; Hou, X.; Long, Z. Enhancement of photoredox catalytic properties of porphyrinic metal-organic frameworks based on titanium incorporation via post-synthetic modification. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 8610–8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, L.; Jin, P.; Duan, S.; Huang, J.; She, H.; Wang, Q.; An, T. Accelerated Fenton-like kinetics by visible-light-driven catalysis over iron(iii) porphyrin functionalized zirconium MOF: Effective promotion on the degradation of organic contaminants. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 2652–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shi, M.; Lin, D.; Huang, R.; Qi, W.; Su, R.; He, Z. Construction of a Mercapto-Functionalized Zr-MOF/Melamine Sponge Composite for the Efficient Removal of Oils and Heavy Metal Ions from Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 13220–13227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Li, L.; Lv, X.; Jin, L.; Du, K.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, X.; Liang, H.; Guo, Y.; Wang, X. Facile synthesis of Sn-doped MOF-5 catalysts for efficient photocatalytic nitrogen fixation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 344, 123586. [Google Scholar]
  174. Huang, H.; Wang, X.-S.; Philo, D.; Ichihara, F.; Song, H.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Qiu, T.; Wang, S.; Ye, J. Toward visible-light-assisted photocatalytic nitrogen fixation: A titanium metal organic framework with functionalized ligands. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 267, 118686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Shang, S.; Xiong, W.; Yang, C.; Johannessen, B.; Liu, R.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Gu, Q.; Leung, M.K.H.; Shang, J. Atomically Dispersed Iron Metal Site in a Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 9670–9678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Son, H.-J.; Jin, S.; Patwardhan, S.; Wezenberg, S.J.; Jeong, N.C.; So, M.; Wilmer, C.E.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Schatz, G.C.; Snurr, R.Q.; et al. Light-Harvesting and Ultrafast Energy Migration in Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Feng, L.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, S.; Wang, K.-Y.; Li, J.-L.; Day, G.S.; Qiu, D.; Cheng, L.; Chen, W.-M.; Madrahimov, S.T.; et al. Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Frameworks Installed with Bronsted Acid Sites for Efficient Tandem Semisynthesis of Artemisinin. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 5111–5118. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Photocatalytic mechanism of the semiconductor [56]; (b) mechanism of MOF photocatalytic reduction of CO2 [57]; (c) schematic diagram of charge transfer pathways in MOFs, such as LMCT, LLCT, and MLCT.
Figure 1. (a) Photocatalytic mechanism of the semiconductor [56]; (b) mechanism of MOF photocatalytic reduction of CO2 [57]; (c) schematic diagram of charge transfer pathways in MOFs, such as LMCT, LLCT, and MLCT.
Molecules 29 00467 g001
Figure 2. Representative chemical structures of porphyrin ligands in porphyrin-based MOFs.
Figure 2. Representative chemical structures of porphyrin ligands in porphyrin-based MOFs.
Molecules 29 00467 g002
Figure 4. (a) Synthesis of Cu-PTM [104]; (b) photocatalytic mechanism of Cu-PTM for hydrogen evolution under visible light [104]; (c) UV-visible spectra of 2H-PTM, Cu-PTM, Co-PTM, and Ni-PTM [104]; (d) photocatalytic hydrogen evolution diagrams in the presence of 2H-PTM, Cu-PTM, Co-PTM, and Ni-PTM photocatalysts [104].
Figure 4. (a) Synthesis of Cu-PTM [104]; (b) photocatalytic mechanism of Cu-PTM for hydrogen evolution under visible light [104]; (c) UV-visible spectra of 2H-PTM, Cu-PTM, Co-PTM, and Ni-PTM [104]; (d) photocatalytic hydrogen evolution diagrams in the presence of 2H-PTM, Cu-PTM, Co-PTM, and Ni-PTM photocatalysts [104].
Molecules 29 00467 g004
Figure 5. (a) Molecule structure of functionalized terephthalic acid linker, H2BDC-X [106]; (b) band gap diagram, energy transfer between UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2, and the degradation mechanism of Rhodamine B over UiO-66-(SH)2 [106]; (c) the chemical structures of BBCPPP, BBCPPP-Ph, and BBCPPP-Py [108].
Figure 5. (a) Molecule structure of functionalized terephthalic acid linker, H2BDC-X [106]; (b) band gap diagram, energy transfer between UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2, and the degradation mechanism of Rhodamine B over UiO-66-(SH)2 [106]; (c) the chemical structures of BBCPPP, BBCPPP-Ph, and BBCPPP-Py [108].
Molecules 29 00467 g005
Figure 7. (a) Synthetic diagram of BP/R-Ti-MOFs/Pt hybrids [120]; (b) schematic diagram of a QD-MOF complex [121].
Figure 7. (a) Synthetic diagram of BP/R-Ti-MOFs/Pt hybrids [120]; (b) schematic diagram of a QD-MOF complex [121].
Molecules 29 00467 g007
Figure 8. Synthesis of Pt single-atom-coordinated ultrathin MOF nanosheets (PtSA-MNSs) for photocatalytic hydrogen production [124].
Figure 8. Synthesis of Pt single-atom-coordinated ultrathin MOF nanosheets (PtSA-MNSs) for photocatalytic hydrogen production [124].
Molecules 29 00467 g008
Figure 9. (a) Preparation of g-CNQDs PMOF hybrids [143]; (b) carbon dioxide reduction diagram over g-CNQDs PMOF hybrids [143]; (c) schematic diagram of CTU/TiO2 synthesis route [144]; (d) pathway of photocatalytic CO2 reduction over CTU/TiO2 hybrids [144].
Figure 9. (a) Preparation of g-CNQDs PMOF hybrids [143]; (b) carbon dioxide reduction diagram over g-CNQDs PMOF hybrids [143]; (c) schematic diagram of CTU/TiO2 synthesis route [144]; (d) pathway of photocatalytic CO2 reduction over CTU/TiO2 hybrids [144].
Molecules 29 00467 g009
Figure 10. (a) Structure of NU-1000, PCN-222/MOF-545, and UMCM-313 and their corresponding linkers and common Zr6-node [148]. (b) Mechanistic diagram of photocatalytic oxidation of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide over the MOF thin film [148]; (c) selective photocatalytic oxidation of amines on Ti-PMOF-DMA under red LED irradiation [154]; (d) mechanism of selective photocatalytic aerobic oxidation of benzylamine over Ti-PMOF-DMA [154].
Figure 10. (a) Structure of NU-1000, PCN-222/MOF-545, and UMCM-313 and their corresponding linkers and common Zr6-node [148]. (b) Mechanistic diagram of photocatalytic oxidation of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide over the MOF thin film [148]; (c) selective photocatalytic oxidation of amines on Ti-PMOF-DMA under red LED irradiation [154]; (d) mechanism of selective photocatalytic aerobic oxidation of benzylamine over Ti-PMOF-DMA [154].
Molecules 29 00467 g010
Figure 11. The proposed photocatalytic mechanism of FeIII-TCPPCl⊂UiO-66 co-catalytic Fenton-like reaction [171].
Figure 11. The proposed photocatalytic mechanism of FeIII-TCPPCl⊂UiO-66 co-catalytic Fenton-like reaction [171].
Molecules 29 00467 g011
Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram of the targeted visible light active MOFs for photocatalytic N2 fixation [174]. (b) The structure of Al-PMOF(Fe) [175].
Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram of the targeted visible light active MOFs for photocatalytic N2 fixation [174]. (b) The structure of Al-PMOF(Fe) [175].
Molecules 29 00467 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, C.; Li, X.; Hu, Y.; Du, X.; Wang, S.; Chen, B.; Wang, S. Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework Materials: Design, Construction, and Application in the Field of Photocatalysis. Molecules 2024, 29, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020467

AMA Style

Tang C, Li X, Hu Y, Du X, Wang S, Chen B, Wang S. Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework Materials: Design, Construction, and Application in the Field of Photocatalysis. Molecules. 2024; 29(2):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Chuanyin, Xiaoyu Li, Yingxu Hu, Xin Du, Shuo Wang, Bo Chen, and Shengjie Wang. 2024. "Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework Materials: Design, Construction, and Application in the Field of Photocatalysis" Molecules 29, no. 2: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020467

APA Style

Tang, C., Li, X., Hu, Y., Du, X., Wang, S., Chen, B., & Wang, S. (2024). Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Framework Materials: Design, Construction, and Application in the Field of Photocatalysis. Molecules, 29(2), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020467

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop