Next Article in Journal
Reversible Photochromic Reactions of Bacteriorhodopsin from Halobacterium salinarum at Femto- and Picosecond Times
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism-Based Allylic Carbasugar Chlorides That Form Covalent Intermediates with α- and β-Galactosidases
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Isolation of Cellulose Nanocrystals from Seaweed Waste via a Radiation Process and Their Conversion to Porous Nanocarbon for Energy Storage System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards New Delivery Agents for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of a Set of Fluorinated Carbohydrate Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ferric Chloride Promoted Glycosidation of Alkyl Thioglycosides

Department of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, 3501 Laclede Ave., St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(20), 4845; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204845
Submission received: 28 August 2024 / Revised: 6 October 2024 / Accepted: 10 October 2024 / Published: 13 October 2024

Abstract

:
Reported herein is a new reaction for glycosylation with thioglycosides in the presence of iron(III) chloride. Previously, FeCl3 was used for the activation of thioglycosides as a Lewis acid co-promoter paired with NIS. In the reported process, although 5.0 equiv of FeCl3 are needed to activate thioglycosides most efficiently, no additives were used, and the reactions with reactive glycosyl donors smoothly proceeded to completion in 1 h at 0 °C. This work showcases a new direction in developing glycosylation methods using greener and earth-abundant activators.

1. Introduction

Carbohydrates, the most abundant class of biomolecules, play a significant role in many fundamental processes such as energy storage, disease progression, and immune responses to viral and bacterial invasions [1]. Hence, access to these molecules is important for vaccine and pharmaceutical research and development. While synthetic strategies for glycosylation have been thoroughly investigated, the need for greener and less toxic methods is imperative to the advancement of glycochemistry. Among the glycosyl donors developed for chemical glycosylation, thioglycosides are a popular choice due to their stability and ability to withstand harsh conditions associated with protecting group manipulations. The activation of thioglycosides for glycosylation can be achieved by the use of electrophilic or thiophilic promotors, often under mild reaction conditions [2]. Among these, organosulfur compounds [3,4,5,6,7,8]; photo-activators [9,10,11,12]; and halogens [13,14,15,16,17,18] are the most popular. Activation with metal salts has also shown to be a promising direction in methodology development [19].
Metal salt activation was introduced by Ferrier [20] who employed mercury(II) salts. More recently, Pohl et al. demonstrated that stoichiometric amounts of Ph3Bi(OTf)2 were effective in activating thioglycosides for glycosylation [21,22]. Further studies of metal salt-promoted glycosylations reported by Sureshan et al. employed donor activation using AuCl3 in sub-stoichiometric amounts [23]. Activation using Au(III) salts was also achieved by Zhu et al. through direct coordination of Au(III) on the sulfur atom [24]. These methodological studies indicated that transition metal activation of thioglycosides can lead to promising regio- and stereoselectivity and provide good yields. To further the advancement of transition metals as promotors in thioglycosides, our group previously reported the use of palladium(II) bromide and copper(II) bromide to activate aryl/alkylthio glycosides [25,26]. While successful, the need to identify greener, cheaper, and more accessible transition metal salts capable of activating thioglycosides remains vital to the expansion of glycochemistry.
Iron(III) chloride, a salt formed with the second most abundant metal on earth, is naturally abundant, inexpensive, and relatively benign [27]. Ferric chloride has been applied in the introduction of protecting groups in carbohydrates [28,29]. The application of FeCl3 in O-glycosylation has also emerged, most commonly for the activation of glycosyl donors bearing the anomeric acetate group [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Other applications for the activation of aryl glycoside [40], pivaloate [41], bromide [42], imidate [43], chloride [44], or propargyl glycoside [45] have also been explored. FeCl3 has also been employed as a co-catalyst for the activation of hemiacetal donors [46] and aryl-thioglycosides in the presence of N-iodosuccinimide [43,47]. Herein, we report a new protocol for efficient and versatile glycosidation of thioglycosides in the presence of iron(III) chloride without any co-promoters or additives.

2. Results and Discussion

For the preliminary study, we selected per-O-benzylated (armed) ethylthio galactosyl donor 1 which was reacted with primary glycosyl acceptor 2 in the presence of molecular sieves (3 Å) at 0 °C. Glycosylation in the presence of catalytic amount of FeCl3 (0.2 equiv) in DCM was ineffective (entry 1, Table 1). However, when the amount of FeCl3 was increased to 1.0 equiv, disaccharide 3 was obtained, albeit in low yield: 12% for the reaction in DCM and 15% for the reaction in MeCN (entries 2 and 3). Interestingly, when the reaction was carried out in a DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v) mixture, the yield was doubled in respect to reactions wherein either solvent was used individually (24%, entry 4).
When the amount of FeCl3 was further increased to 2.0 equiv, disaccharide 3 was obtained in improved yields, which were practically identical for both individual solvents: 23% for the reaction in DCM and 22% for the reaction in MeCN (entries 5 and 6). Again, when the reaction was carried out in DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v) solvent mixture, the yield for the formation of disaccharide 3 is doubled (54%, entry 7). The reaction was stopped after 1 h, and prolonged experiments conducted over 16 or 24 h provided identical yields. Investigations into the effects of temperature did not offer any gains at −30 °C, rt, or 40 °C, and was detrimental to yields. Regardless of the reaction solvent, some anomerization of donor 1 into its α-linked counterpart was observed in the majority of experiments.
With DCM/MeCN as the reaction solvent at 0 °C, we performed glycosylation in the presence of 3.0 equiv FeCl3 to afford disaccharide 3 in an improved yield of 64% in 1 h (entry 8). When the amount of FeCl3 was increased to 5.0 equiv, the reaction smoothly proceeded to completion in 1 h, and disaccharide 3 was isolated in a high yield of 96% (entry 9). We note that although the reaction was performed in the presence of MeCN, which is known to be a β-directing solvent, the β-anomer was only slightly favored in this reaction (α/β = 1/1.5).
With the most favorable reaction conditions established, FeCl3 (5 equiv), DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v), and molecular sieves (3 Å) at 0 °C (entry 9, Table 1), we proceeded with investigating other glycosylation reactions using different donor–acceptor combinations. The outcome of this study is summarized in Table 2. The activation of glycosyl donor 1 for reactions with secondary glycosyl acceptors 4, 6, and 8 produced respective disaccharides 5, 7, and 9 in good to excellent yields of 73–94% in 1 h (entries 1–3). The highest yield of 94% was obtained for glycosylation of 3-OH glycosyl acceptor 6 (entry 2). We note that although MeCN is a known β-directing solvent, we observed no stereoselectivity in these reactions (α/β from 1.6/1 to 1/1.8).
Glycosidation of galactosyl donor 10 equipped with the super-arming protecting group pattern, 2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl, also worked well in reactions with glycosyl acceptors 2, 4, 6, and 8, and the respective disaccharides 1114 were obtained in good to excellent yields of 68–94% (entries 4–7). The highest identical yields of 94% were obtained for glycosylations of 6-OH and 3-OH glycosyl acceptors 2 and 6 (entries 4 and 6). These glycosylations were all β-selective due to the neighboring 2-O-benzoyl group participation.
Along similar lines, we investigated per-O-benzylated glucosyl donor 15. These glycosylations also worked very efficiently with glycosyl acceptors 2, 4, 6, and 8, and the respective disaccharides 1619 were obtained in excellent yields of 80–92% (entries 8–11). We noticed some preference for β-selectivity in this series (α/β = 1/2.6–4.1), probably due to the effect of MeCN, a known participating solvent.
Glycosidation of glucosyl donor 20 equipped with the super-arming protecting group pattern, 2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl, also worked well in reactions with glycosyl acceptors 2, 4, 6, and 8. The respective disaccharides 2124 were obtained in good to excellent yields of 71–91% (entries 12–15). The highest yields of 87–91% were obtained for glycosylations of 6-OH and 2-OH glycosyl acceptors 2 and 4 (entries 12 and 13). These glycosylations were all β-selective due to the neighboring group participation of 2-O-benzoyl substituent. Finally, we investigated the less reactive per-O-benzoylated galactosyl donor 25. Disaccharide 26 was obtained in a good yield of 77% with exclusive β-selectivity (entry 16).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

The reactions were performed using commercial reagents and the ACS grade solvents used for reactions were purified and dried in accordance with standard procedures. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh); reactions were monitored by TLC on Kieselgel 60 F254. The compounds were detected by examination under UV light and by charring with 10% sulfuric acid in methanol. Solvents were removed under reduced pressure at <40 °C. CH2Cl2 was distilled from CaH2 directly prior to application. Molecular sieves (3 Å) used for reactions were crushed and activated in vacuo at 390 °C for 8 h in the first instance and then for 2–3 h at 390 °C directly prior to application. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz (Bruker); 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz. The 1H NMR chemical shifts are referenced to tetramethyl silane (TMS, δ = 0 ppm) or CDCl3 (CHCl3 δ = 7.26 ppm) for 1H NMR spectra for solutions in CDCl3. The 13C NMR chemical shifts are referenced to the central signal of CDCl3 (δ = 77.00 ppm) for solutions in CDCl3. To assist structural assignments, further information was obtained utilizing gCOSY and gHSQC experiments. Anomeric ratios (if applicable) were determined by comparison of the integral intensities of relevant signals in 1H NMR spectra (see the Supporting Information).

3.2. Synthesis of Building Blocks

Ethyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (1) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [15,48].
Methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (2) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [49].
Methyl 3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (4) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [49].
Methyl 2,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (6) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [49,50].
Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (8) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [49].
Ethyl 2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (10) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [51,52].
Ethyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside (15) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [53].
Ethyl 2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside (20) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [52,54].
Ethyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzoyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (25) was synthesized as reported previously and its analytical data were in accordance with that previously described [55].

3.3. Synthesis of Disaccharides

General procedure for glycosidation. A mixture containing thioglycoside donor (50 mg, 0.078–0.086 mmol), glycosyl acceptor (0.062–0.071 mmol), and freshly activated molecular sieves (3 Å, 300 mg) in CH2Cl2/CH3CN (1.0 mL, 1/1, v/v) was stirred under argon for 2 h at rt. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, anhydrous ferric chloride (FeCl3, 0.390–0.430 mmol, 5.0 equiv to donor) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred under argon for 1 h at 0 °C. After that, sat. aq. NaHCO3 (3 mL) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred for 10 min. The solids were filtered off through a pad of Celite and rinsed successively with CH2Cl2. The combined filtrate (~15 mL) was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with DCM (5 mL) and washed with H2O (5 mL) and brine (2 × 5 mL). The organic phase was separated, dried with Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate-hexane gradient elution or acetone-toluene gradient elution) to afford a disaccharide derivative in yields listed in tables and below.
Methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-6-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-galactopyranosyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (3) was obtained from thioglycoside 1 and glycosyl acceptor 2 by the general glycosylation method in 96% yield (α/β = 1/1.5) as a colorless syrup. Analytical data for 3 were in accordance with that reported previously [56].
Methyl 2-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-galactopyranosyl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (5) was obtained from thioglycoside 1 and glycosyl acceptor 4 by the general glycosylation method in 89% yield (α/β = 1.6/1) as a colorless syrup. Analytical data for 5 were in accordance with that reported previously [57].
Methyl 2,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-3-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-galactopyranosyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (7) was obtained from thioglycoside 1 and glycosyl acceptor 6 by the general glycosylation method in 94% yield (α/β = 1/1.4) as a colorless syrup. Analytical data for 7 were in accordance with that reported previously [58].
Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-4-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-galactopyranosyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (9) was obtained from thioglycoside 1 and glycosyl acceptor 8 by the general glycosylation method in 73% yield (α/β = 1/1.8) as a colorless syrup. Analytical data for 9 were in accordance with that reported previously [59].
Methyl 6-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (11) was obtained from thioglycoside 10 and glycosyl acceptor 2 by the general glycosylation method in 94% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 11 were in accordance with that reported previously [60].
Methyl 2-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (12) was obtained from thioglycoside 10 and glycosyl acceptor 4 by the general glycosylation method in 77% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 12 were in accordance with that reported previously [25].
Methyl 3-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-2,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (13) was obtained from thioglycoside 10 and glycosyl acceptor 6 by the general glycosylation method in 94% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 13 were in accordance with that reported previously [60].
Methyl 4-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (14) was obtained from thioglycoside 10 and glycosyl acceptor 8 by the general glycosylation method in 68% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 14 were in accordance with that reported previously [60].
Methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-6-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-glucopyranosyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (16) was obtained from thioglycoside 15 and glycosyl acceptor 2 by the general glycosylation method in 92% yield (α/β = 1/4.1) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 16 were in accordance with that reported previously [61].
Methyl 2-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-glucopyranosyl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (17) was obtained from thioglycoside 15 and glycosyl acceptor 4 by the general glycosylation method in 89% yield, in which α was obtained in 17.81 mg and β in 44.68 mg (α/β = 1/2.6) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 17 were in accordance with that reported previously [62].
Methyl 2,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-3-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-glucopyranosyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (18) was obtained from thioglycoside 15 and glycosyl acceptor 6 by the general glycosylation method in 80% yield (α/β = 1/2.8) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 18 were in accordance with that reported previously [63].
Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-4-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-α/β-D-glucopyranosyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (19) was obtained from thioglycoside 15 and glycosyl acceptor 8 by the general glycosylation method in 85% yield (α/β = 1/3.6) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 19 were in accordance with that reported previously [64].
Methyl 6-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (21) was obtained from thioglycoside 20 and glycosyl acceptor 2 by the general glycosylation method in 87% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 21 were in accordance with that reported previously [65].
Methyl 2-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (22) was obtained from thioglycoside 20 and glycosyl acceptor 4 by the general glycosylation method in 91% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 22 were in accordance with that reported previously [66].
Methyl 3-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-2,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (23) was obtained from thioglycoside 20 and glycosyl acceptor 6 by the general glycosylation method in 80% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 23 were in accordance with that reported previously [66].
Methyl 4-O-(2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (24) was obtained from thioglycoside 20 and glycosyl acceptor 8 by the general glycosylation method in 71% yield (β only) as a white amorphous solid. Analytical data for 24 were in accordance with that reported previously [66].
Methyl 6-O-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (26) was obtained from thioglycoside 25 and glycosyl acceptor 2 by the general glycosylation method in 77% yield (β only) as a colorless syrup. Analytical data for 26 were in accordance with that reported previously [67].

4. Conclusions

A new method for the activation of alkyl thioglycosides using inexpensive and abundant FeCl3 has been developed. Upon optimization of the reaction conditions using the per-O-benzylated galactosyl donor, it was determined that efficient activation could be achieved using stoichiometric amounts of FeCl3 in a mixture of DCM/MeCN. Extension of these reaction conditions to armed and superarmed galactosyl and glucosyl donors with a series of primary and secondary glycosyl acceptors produced disaccharides in good to excellent yields. Broadening the scope of this method to glycosidation of less reactive glycosyl donors, investigation of the reaction mechanism, and application to the synthesis of glycans are currently underway in our laboratory.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29204845/s1, Figure S1. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 3; Figure S2. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 3; Figure S3; 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 5; Figure S4. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 5; Figure S5. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 7; Figure S6. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 7; Figure S7. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 9; Figure S8. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 9; Figure S9. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 11; Figure S10. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 11; Figure S11. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 12; Figure S12. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 12; Figure S13. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 13; Figure S14. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 13; Figure S15. 1H NMR Spectrum of (CDCl3, 400 MHz) Compound 14; Figure S16. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 14; Figure S17. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 16; Figure S18. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 16; Figure S19. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 17β; Figure S20. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 17β; Figure S21. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 17α; Figure S22. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 17α; Figure S23. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 18; Figure S24. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 18; Figure S25. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 19; Figure S26. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 19; Figure S27. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 21; Figure S28. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 21; Figure S29. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 22; Figure S30. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 22; Figure S31. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 23; Figure S32. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 23; Figure S33. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 24; Figure S34. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 24; Figure S35. 1H NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 26; Figure S36. HSQC NMR Spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of Compound 26.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.S. and A.V.D.; methodology, A.D.; formal analysis, L.M.R.; investigation, L.M.R.; data curation, M.L.S. and L.M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.R.; writing—review and editing, A.D. and A.V.D.; supervision, A.D. and A.V.D.; project administration, A.V.D.; funding acquisition, A.V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are indebted to the NIGMS (GM152125) and NSF (CHE-2350461) for support of this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Demchenko, A.V. Handbook of Chemical Glycosylation: Advances in Stereoselectivity and Therapeutic Relevance; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lian, G.; Zhang, X.; Yu, B. Thioglycosides in Carbohydrate research. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 403, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fugedi, P.; Garegg, P.J. A novel promoter for the efficient construction of 1,2-trans linkages in glycoside synthesis, using thioglycosides as glycosyl donors. Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 149, c9–c12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dasgupta, F.; Garegg, P.J. Use of sulfenyl halides in carbohydrate reactions. Part I. Alkyl sulfenyl triflate as activator in the thioglycoside-mediated formation of beta-glycosidic linkages during oligosaccharide synthesis. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 177, C13–C17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Crich, D.; Smith, M. S-(4-Methoxyphenyl) benzenethiosulfinate(MPBT)/trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (Tf2O): A convenient system for the generation of glycosyl triflates from thioglycosides. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4067–4069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Crich, D.; Smith, M. 1-Benzenesulfinyl piperidine/trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride: A potent combination of shelf-stable reagents for the low-temperature conversion of thioglycosides to glycosyl triflates and for the formation of diverse glycosidic linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9015–9020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Codee, J.D.C.; Litjens, R.E.J.N.; Heeten, R.; Overkleeft, H.S.; van Boom, J.H.; van der Marel, G.A. Ph2SO/Tf2O: A powerful promotor system in chemoselective glycosylations using thioglycosides. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1519–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Duron, S.G.; Polat, T.; Wong, C.H. N-(Phenylthio)-ε-caprolactam: A new promoter for the activation of thioglycosides. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 839–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mao, R.-Z.; Guo, F.; Xiong, D.-C.; Li, Q.; Duan, J.; Ye, X.-S. Photoinduced C-S Bond Cleavage of Thioglycosides and Glycosylation. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5606–5609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wever, W.J.; Cinelli, M.A.; Bowers, A.A. Visible Light Mediated Activation and O-Glycosylation of Thioglycosides. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Spell, M.L.; Deveaux, K.; Bresnahan, C.G.; Bernard, B.L.; Sheffield, W.; Kumar, R.; Ragains, J.R. A Visible-Light-Promoted O-Glycosylation with a Thioglycoside Donor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6515–6519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mao, R.-Z.; Xiong, D.-C.; Guo, F.; Li, Q.; Duan, J.; Ye, X.-S. Light-driven highly efficient glycosylation reactions. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Veeneman, G.H.; van Leeuwen, S.H.; van Boom, J.H. Iodonium ion promoted reactions at the anomeric centre. II. An efficient thioglycoside mediated approach toward the formation of 1,2-trans linked glycosides and glycosidic esters. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1331–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nicolaou, K.C.; Seitz, S.P.; Papahatjis, D.P. A mild and general method for the synthesis of O-glycosides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2430–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kihlberg, J.O.; Leigh, D.A.; Bundle, D.R. The in situ activation of thioglycosides with bromine: An improved glycosylation method. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2860–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kartha, K.P.M.; Aloui, M.; Field, R.A. Iodine: A versatile reagent in carbohydrate chemistry II. Efficient chemospecific activation of thiomethylglycosides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5175–5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burkart, M.D.; Zhang, Z.; Hung, S.-C.; Wong, C.-H. A new method for the synthesis of fluoro-carbohydrates and glycosides using selectfluor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11743–11746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ercegovic, T.; Meijer, A.; Magnusson, G.; Ellervik, U. Iodine monochloride/silver trifluoromethanesulfonate (ICI/AgOTf) as a convenient promoter system for O-glycoside synthesis. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 913–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Escopy, S.; Demchenko, A.V. Transition-Metal-Mediated Glycosylation with Thioglycosides. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202103747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferrier, R.J.; Hay, R.W.; Vethaviyasar, N. A potentially versatile synthesis of glycosides. Carbohydr. Res. 1973, 27, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Goswami, M.; Ellern, A.; Pohl, N.L. Bismuth(V)-mediated thioglycoside activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52, 8441–8445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Goswami, M.; Ashley, D.C.; Baik, M.H.; Pohl, N.L. Mechanistic Studies of Bismuth(V)-Mediated Thioglycoside Activation Reveal Differential Reactivity of Anomers. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 5949–5962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vibhute, A.M.; Dhaka, A.; Athiyarath, V.; Sureshan, K.M. A versatile glycosylation strategy via Au (III) catalyzed activation of thioglycoside donors. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4259–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhu, X.; Schmidt, R.R. New principles for glycoside-bond formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1900–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Escopy, S.; Singh, Y.; Demchenko, A.V. Palladium(II)-assisted activation of thioglycosides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 2044–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pooladian, F.; Escopy, S.; Demchenko, A.V. Activation of thioglycosides with copper(II) bromide. Molecules 2022, 27, 7354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bauer, I.; Knolker, H.J. Iron catalysis in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170–3387. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang, T.Y.; Zulueta, M.M.; Hung, S.C. Regioselective one-pot protection, protection-glycosylation and protection-glycosylation-glycosylation of carbohydrates: A case study with D-glucose. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gouasmat, A.; Lemétais, A.; Solles, J.; Bourdreux, Y.; Beau, J.-M. Catalytic Iron(III) Chloride Mediated Site-Selective Protection of Mono- and Disaccharides and One Trisaccharide. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 3355–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kiso, M.; Anderson, L. The ferric chloride-catalyzed glycosylation of alcohols by 2-acylamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranose 1-acetates. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 72, C12–C14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kiso, M.; Anderson, L. The synthesis of disaccharides by the ferric chloride-catalyzed coupling of 2-acylamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranose 1-acetates to protected sugar acceptors. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 72, C15–C17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kiso, M.; Nishiguchi, H.; Hasegawa, A. Application of ferric chloride-catalyzed glycosylation to a synthesis of glycolipids. Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 81, C13–C15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dasgupta, F.; Garegg, P.J. Synthesis of ethyl and phenyl 1-thio-1,2-trans-D-glycopyranosides from the corresponding per-O-acetylated glycopyranoses having a 1,2-trans-configuration using anhydrous ferric chloride as a promoter. Acta Chem. Scand. 1989, 43, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lerner, L.M. Ferric chloride-molecular sieve-catalyzed formation of a nonreducing disaccharide derivative. Carbohydr. Res. 1990, 207, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chatterjee, S.K.; Nuhn, P. Stereoselective α-glycosidation using FeCl3 as a Lewis acid catalyst. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1729–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Seibel, J.; Hillringhaus, L.; Moraru, R. Microwave-assisted glycosylation for the synthesis of glycopeptides. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, G.; Lv, X.; Du, Y. FeCl3-catalyzed alpha-glycosidation of glycosamine pentaacetates. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 3096–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Narayanaperumal, S.; César da Silva, R.; Monteiro, J.L.; Corrêa, A.G.; Paixão, M.W. Iron(III) Chloride Catalyzed Glycosylation of Peracylated Sugars with Allyl/Alkynyl Alcohols. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2012, 23, 1982–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marzag, H.; Robert, G.; Dufies, M.; Bougrin, K.; Auberger, P.; Benhida, R. FeCl3-promoted and ultrasound-assisted synthesis of resveratrol O-derived glycoside analogs. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 22, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Laursen, J.B.; Petersen, L.; Jensen, K.J. Intramolecular glycosylation under neutral conditions for synthesis of 1,4-linked disaccharides. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 687–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rasmussen, M.R.; Marqvorsen, M.H.; Kristensen, S.K.; Jensen, H.H. A protocol for metal triflate catalyzed direct glycosylations with GalNAc 1-OPiv donors. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 11011–11019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shetye, G.S.; Singh, N.; Jia, C.; Nguyen, C.D.; Wang, G.; Luk, Y.Y. Specific maltose derivatives modulate the swarming motility of nonswarming mutant and inhibit bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 1514–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mukherjee, M.M.; Basu, N.; Ghosh, R. Iron(III) chloride modulated selective 1,2-trans glycosylation based on glycosyl trichloroacetimidate donors and its application in orthogonal glycosylation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 105589–105606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Geringer, S.A.; Demchenko, A.V. Iron(III) chloride-catalyzed activation of glycosyl chlorides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 9133–9137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sun, G.; Wu, Y.; Liu, A.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Substoichiometric FeCl3 Activation of Propargyl Glycosides for the Synthesis of Disaccharides and Glycoconjugates. Synlett 2018, 29, 668–672. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mukaiyama, T.; Matsubara, K.; Hora, M. An efficient glycosylation reaction of 1-hydroxy sugars with various nucleophiles using a catalytic amount of activator and haxamethyldisiloxane. Synthesis 1994, 1994, 1368–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mukherjee, M.M.; Ghosh, R. Synthetic Routes toward Acidic Pentasaccharide Related to the O-Antigen of E. coli 120 Using One-Pot Sequential Glycosylation Reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 5751–5760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chatterjee, S.; Moon, S.; Hentschel, F.; Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P.H. An Empirical Understanding of the Glycosylation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11942–11953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ranade, S.C.; Kaeothip, S.; Demchenko, A.V. Glycosyl alkoxythioimidates as complementary building blocks for chemical glycosylation. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5628–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shrestha, G.; Kashiwagi, G.A.; Stine, K.J.; Demchenko, A.V. Streamlined access to carbohydrate building blocks: Methyl 2,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-alpha-d-glucopyranoside. Carbohydr. Res. 2022, 511, 108482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Grube, M.; Lee, B.-Y.; Garg, M.; Michel, D.; Vilotijević, I.; Malik, A.; Seeberger, P.H.; Varón Silva, D. Synthesis of Galactosylated Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Derivatives from Trypanosoma brucei. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 3271–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Forsythe, N.P.; Mize, E.R.; Kashiwagi, G.A.; Demchenko, A.V. Expedient synthesis of superarmed glycosyl donors via oxidative thioglycosidation of glycals. Synthesis 2024, 56, 1147–1156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Andersson, F.; Fugedi, P.; Garegg, P.J.; Nashed, M. Synthesis of 1,2-cis-linked glycosides using dimethyl(methylthio)sulfonium triflate as promoter and thioglycosides as glycosyl donors. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3919–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ekelof, K.; Oscarson, S. Synthesis of oligosaccharide structures from the lipopolysaccharide of Moraxella catarrhalis. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7711–7718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sail, D.; Kovac, P. Benzoylated ethyl 1-thioglycosides: Direct preparation from per-O-benzoylated sugars. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 357, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nguyen, H.M.; Chen, Y.N.; Duron, S.G.; Gin, D.Y. Sulfide-mediated dehydrative glycosylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8766–8772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Premathilake, H.D.; Demchenko, A.V. 2-Allylphenyl glycosides as complementary building blocks for oligosaccharide and glycoconjugate synthesis. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kobashi, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Glycosyl phosphonium halide as a reactive intermediate in highly α−selective glycosylation. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wegmann, B.; Schmidt, R.R. Glycosylimidates. 27. The application of the trichloroacetimidate method to the synthesis of α-D-glucopyranosides and α-D-galactopyranosides. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1987, 6, 357–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mukaiyama, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Jona, H.; Maeshima, H.; Saitoh, T. A catalytic and stereoselective glycosylation with β-glycosyl fluorides. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1901–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nigudkar, S.S.; Parameswar, A.R.; Pornsuriyasak, P.; Stine, K.J.; Demchenko, A.V. O-Benzoxazolyl imidates as versatile glycosyl donors for chemical glycosylation. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 4068–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ito, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Numata, M.; Sugimoto, M. Benzeneselenenyl triflate as an activator of thioglycosides for glycosylation reactions. Carbohydr. Res. 1990, 202, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chiba, H.; Funasaka, S.; Mukaiyama, T. Catalytic and stereoselective glycosylation with glucosyl thioformimidates. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 1629–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pougny, J.R.; Nassr, M.A.M.; Naulet, N.; Sinay, P. A novel glucosidation reaction. Application to the synthesis of α-linked disaccharides. Nouveau J. Chem. 1978, 2, 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  65. Shi, L.; Kim, Y.-J.; Gin, D.Y. C2-Acyloxyglycosylation with Glycal Donors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6939–6940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mydock, L.K.; Demchenko, A.V. Superarming the S-benzoxazolyl glycosyl donors by simple 2-O-benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl protection. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2103–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Codee, J.D.C.; Van den Bos, L.J.; Litjens, R.E.J.N.; Overkleeft, H.S.; Van Boeckel, C.A.A.; Van Boom, J.H.; Van der Marel, G.A. Chemoselective glycosylations using sulfonium triflate activator systems. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1057–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. FeCl3 promoted glycosidation of thioglycoside donor 1 with glycosyl acceptor 2.
Table 1. FeCl3 promoted glycosidation of thioglycoside donor 1 with glycosyl acceptor 2.
Molecules 29 04845 i001
EntryConditionsYield
1FeCl3 (0.2 equiv), DCM, 2 hNR a
2FeCl3 (1.0 equiv), DCM, 2 h3, b 12%
3FeCl3 (1.0 equiv), MeCN, 2 h3, 15%
4FeCl3 (1.0 equiv), DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v), 1 h3, 24%
5FeCl3 (2.0 equiv), DCM, 2 h3, 23%
6FeCl3 (2.0 equiv), MeCN, 2 h3, 22%
7FeCl3 (2.0 equiv), DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v), 1 h3, 54%
8FeCl3 (3.0 equiv), DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v), 1 h3, 64%
9FeCl3 (5.0 equiv), DCM/MeCN (1/1, v/v), 1 h3, 96%
a NR—no reaction; b in all reactions, compound 3 was obtained as a mixture of anomers.
Table 2. Expanding the scope of FeCl3 promoted glycosylation to other donors and acceptors a.
Table 2. Expanding the scope of FeCl3 promoted glycosylation to other donors and acceptors a.
EntryDonorAcceptorProduct, Yield, Ratio α/β
11Molecules 29 04845 i002
4
Molecules 29 04845 i003
5, 89%, α/β = 1.6/1
21Molecules 29 04845 i004
6
Molecules 29 04845 i005
7, 94%, α/β = 1/1.4
31Molecules 29 04845 i006
8
Molecules 29 04845 i007
9, 73%, α/β = 1/1.8
4Molecules 29 04845 i008
10
2Molecules 29 04845 i009
11, 94%, β only
5104Molecules 29 04845 i010
12, 77% β only
6106Molecules 29 04845 i011
13, 94%, β only
7108Molecules 29 04845 i012
14, 68%, β only
8Molecules 29 04845 i013
15
2Molecules 29 04845 i014
16, 92%, α/β = 1/4.1
9154Molecules 29 04845 i015
17, 89%, α/β = 1/2.6
10156Molecules 29 04845 i016
18, 80%, α/β = 1/2.8
11158Molecules 29 04845 i017
19, 85%, α/β = 1/3.6
12Molecules 29 04845 i018
20
2Molecules 29 04845 i019
21, 87%, β only
13204Molecules 29 04845 i020
22, 91%, β only
14206Molecules 29 04845 i021
23, 80%, β only
15208Molecules 29 04845 i022
24, 71%, β only
16Molecules 29 04845 i023
25
2Molecules 29 04845 i024
26, 77%, β only
a Reactions were performed using benchmark conditions stated in Table 1 (entry 9).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ridgway, L.M.; Das, A.; Shadrick, M.L.; Demchenko, A.V. Ferric Chloride Promoted Glycosidation of Alkyl Thioglycosides. Molecules 2024, 29, 4845. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204845

AMA Style

Ridgway LM, Das A, Shadrick ML, Demchenko AV. Ferric Chloride Promoted Glycosidation of Alkyl Thioglycosides. Molecules. 2024; 29(20):4845. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204845

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ridgway, Lacie M., Anupama Das, Melanie L. Shadrick, and Alexei V. Demchenko. 2024. "Ferric Chloride Promoted Glycosidation of Alkyl Thioglycosides" Molecules 29, no. 20: 4845. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204845

APA Style

Ridgway, L. M., Das, A., Shadrick, M. L., & Demchenko, A. V. (2024). Ferric Chloride Promoted Glycosidation of Alkyl Thioglycosides. Molecules, 29(20), 4845. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204845

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop