Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Trilobatin Production via Screening and Modification of Glycosyltransferases
Previous Article in Journal
The Iodine/Iodide/Starch Supramolecular Complex
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Water Oxidation and CO2 Reduction with a Nickel Molecular Catalyst
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules29030642
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On the Fragmentation of Ni(II) β-Diketonate-Diamine Complexes as Molecular Precursors for NiO Films: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation

by
Cristiano Invernizzi
1,
Gloria Tabacchi
1,*,
Roberta Seraglia
2,
Mattia Benedet
2,3,
Marco Roverso
2,3,
Chiara Maccato
2,3,
Sara Bogialli
2,3,
Davide Barreca
2,* and
Ettore Fois
1
1
Department of Science and High Technology, Insubria University and INSTM, 22100 Como, Italy
2
CNR-ICMATE and INSTM, Department of Chemical Sciences, Padova University, 35131 Padova, Italy
3
Department of Chemical Sciences, Padova University and INSTM, 35131 Padova, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(3), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030642
Submission received: 20 December 2023 / Revised: 22 January 2024 / Accepted: 26 January 2024 / Published: 30 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structures and Applications of Transition Metal Complexes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
NiO-based nanomaterials have attracted considerable interest for different applications, which have stimulated the implementation of various synthetic approaches aimed at modulating their chemico-physical properties. In this regard, their bottom-up preparation starting from suitable precursors plays an important role, although a molecular-level insight into their reactivity remains an open issue to be properly tackled. In the present study, we focused on the fragmentation of Ni(II) diketonate-diamine adducts, of interest as vapor-phase precursors for Ni(II) oxide systems, by combining electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) with multiple collisional experiments (ESI-MSn) and theoretical calculations. The outcomes of this investigation revealed common features in the fragmentation pattern of the target compounds: (i) in the first fragmentation, the three complexes yield analogous base-peak cations by losing a negatively charged diketonate moiety; in these cations, Ni-O and Ni-N interactions are stronger and the Ni positive charge is lower than in the parent neutral complexes; (ii) the tendency of ligand electronic charge to migrate towards Ni further increases in the subsequent fragmentation, leading to the formation of a tetracoordinated Ni environment featuring an interesting cation-π intramolecular interaction.

1. Introduction

Nanomaterials based on NiO, a multi-functional p-type semiconductor with a wide band gap (3.5 eV) [1], have been the object of numerous studies in view of their various technological end-uses, among which are electrochromic devices [2,3,4,5,6,7], solar cells [8,9,10,11,12], gas sensors [13,14,15,16,17], and heterogeneous catalysts for a variety of processes [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. This wide perspective of attractive utilization has triggered interest in their preparation by different strategies [1], among which sol-gel and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [27,28,29], that are endowed with several degrees of freedom to tailor material structure, chemical composition, and morphology. In particular, the CVD family encompasses a variety of routes based on heterogeneous nucleation and growth processes, significantly influenced by the characteristics of the starting molecular compounds [30,31,32].
In this context, metal β-diketonate complexes are among the most widely used precursors for the CVD of metal oxide films and nanomaterials [33,34]. They present significant flexibility for the modification of their chemico-physical properties by varying the steric hindrance, features, and dimensions of the ligand backbone [33]. Nevertheless, as regards the CVD of NiO, the conventional [Ni(acac)2] [22,35] and [Ni(thd)2] [36,37] (Hacac = 2,4-pentanedione; Hthd = 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionate) suffer from concurrent problems, including their high melting points and limited gas phase stability [33,35,38,39,40], that hinder the achievement of a precise process control and prevent their straightforward large-scale use.
In order to circumvent these problems, following our previous works on homologous first-row transition metal complexes [30,31,41,42,43,44,45], we have focused on the preparation and characterization of Ni(II) β-diketonate-diamine compounds of the general formula NiL2TMEDA [HL = 1,1,1,-trifluoro-2,4-pentanedionate (tfa), 2,2-dimethyl-6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptafluoro-3,5-octanedionate (fod), or thd; TMEDA = N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine]. The results of a comprehensive experimental and theoretical investigation [46,47] highlighted that these compounds offer several amenable characteristics as CVD precursors of NiO films with modular properties. Insights into the compound reactivity were previously obtained by electron ionization mass spectrometry (EI-MS) [46], typically considered more appropriate for the investigation of CVD precursor gas-phase reactivity, especially in plasma-assisted processes [46]. Nonetheless, the hard ionization conditions lead to the destruction of specific ions, which is diagnostic of compound fragmentation [31]. Conversely, such information can be usefully obtained by soft ionization methods like electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) [41,42,43], enabling a deeper knowledge on precursor decomposition behavior.
In the present study, the fragmentation behavior of the three compounds Ni(tfa)2TMEDA (1), Ni(fod)2TMEDA (2), and Ni(thd)2TMEDA (3) (Scheme 1) is investigated by electrospray ionization high resolution mass spectrometry (ESI-HRMS), ESI-MSn experiments, and theoretical investigations. A detailed computational study based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations was carried out with the aim of thoroughly elucidating the molecular and electronic structure of NiL2TMEDA-derived fragments (where L = tfa, fod, or thd). The outcomes reveal how metal–ligand bonding schemes evolve upon passing from the pristine precursor to the fragments identified by MS analyses. The obtained data provide for the first time a valuable picture of the gas-phase fragmentation mechanisms of such compounds as a function of the ligand nature, as well as information on both the geometric and electronic structures of the fragmentation products, setting the basis for a molecular-level understanding of their chemical reactivity.

2. Results

2.1. ESI-MS Experiments

Positive ion mode ESI-HRMS mass spectra for the three complexes are displayed in Figure 1, whereas the identification of the main fragments, m/z ratios, and relative abundances are provided in Table 1. In all cases, the base peak (m/z = 327.0830, 469.1229, and 357.2041 for 1, 2, and 3, respectively) was related to [M−L]+ species (where M indicates compound 1, 2, or 3) arising from the loss of a β-diketonate ligand L. Ions due to the protonated diamine [TMEDA+H]+ were detected at m/z = 117.1390, with a relative abundance > 45% for all three compounds. Only for 2, the molecular ion was detected as a sodium adduct at m/z = 787.1690 ([M+Na]+), together with [M−TMEDA+Na]+ species formed through TMEDA loss (m/z = 671.0379). The presence of [M+Na]+ for 2 can be attributed to a good efficiency in the formation of Na+ adducts under ESI-MS conditions, promoted by the partial negative charge of CF2CF2CF3 groups due to fluorine atoms [48]. For compound 3, the signal at m/z = 425.2190 was attributed to TMEDA loss from the protonated molecular ion (not detectable). MS/MS experiments (see Figure 2) on [M−L]+ ions revealed further decomposition due to TMEDA-related rearrangements. In particular, NH(CH3)2 loss from the TMEDA moiety turned out to be the most favored fragmentation process, resulting in the formation of ions at m/z = 282, 424, and 312 for 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Furthermore, for fluorinated compounds 1 and 2, the loss of -CH3CH2N(CH3)2 from [M−L]+ led to ionic species at m/z = 254 and 396, respectively. Only for [M−L]+ of compound 2, an additional rearrangement of the fod ligand led to species at m/z = 413, due to C(CH3)2=CH2 loss.

2.2. DFT Calculations

To elucidate the molecular structures of fragment ions detected in MS experiments, DFT calculations were performed, starting with the computation of the minimum energy structures of the three neutral complexes [Ni(L)2TMEDA] (Figure 3). Additionally, all fragments discussed in the previous section were subjected to structural optimization. Since, in electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry, the ions are ejected from the charged droplets of solvent through many desolvation steps in the ion source region, and consequently, only gas-phase ions arrive at the analyzer [49,50], all of the detected ions observed and described in this manuscript should be considered non-solvated. Accordingly, no solvation effects were considered in the DFT calculations. Concerning the choice of DFT approximation, the M06 hybrid meta-functional by Zhao and Truhlar was selected [51], in consideration of its broad applicability and good accuracy “across-the-board” for transition metal compounds [52]. In particular, this functional provided a good description of several complexes of the [M(L)2TMEDA] family (M = Fe, Co, Cu, Zn) [53], including the detailed fragmentation behavior of [Cu(hfa)2TMEDA] in ESI-MS experiments [45].
The optimized geometries of neutral complexes and fragment ions are displayed in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figures S1 and S2, while relevant geometrical parameters and electronic properties are reported in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 and Table S1. A graphical representation of the optimized structures for the parent neutral complexes is proposed in Figure 3a,c,e. Since all ESI-HRMS spectra showed a base peak due to the loss of a β-diketonate ligand L, a search for the minimum energy structures of [M−L]+ species was performed, starting from neutral complexes and removing a β-diketonate ligand. The resulting [Ni(L)TMEDA]+ optimized geometries are displayed in Figure 3b,d,f.
The molecular geometries of the three neutral complexes are similar, and the structural parameters are close to those computed using another density functional approximation [46]. In all cases, Ni exhibits a slightly distorted octahedral coordination environment, characterized by Ni-O distances shorter than the Ni-N ones (Table 2), suggesting nickel–oxygen interactions stronger than nickel–nitrogen ones. This hypothesis is substantiated by the bond order (BO) trend, since Ni-O BOs are systematically higher than Ni-N ones for all three complexes (Table 2). Interestingly, whereas BO values for Ni-O bonds are quite similar, the Ni-N bond order for the non-fluorinated compound 3, bearing two tert-butyl groups per diketonate ligand, is slightly lower than for fluorinated complexes 1 and 2. These data indicate that, whereas F-containing groups promote an increase in Ni-N bond strength, the presence of tert-butyl substituents has the opposite effect. Nevertheless, other than these slight differences, both molecular geometry and electronic structure underlying the metal–ligand bonding scheme show a strong similarity among the three compounds (see Figure 3 and Table 2). This result might rationalize the similar fragmentation behavior of the target complexes, in particular the presence of [M−L]+ as the base peak in all ESI-HRMS spectra (Figure 1).
Similar observations hold for the minimum energy structures calculated for [M−L]+ fragments, characterized by very similar geometric arrangements and metal–ligand bonding schemes. Specifically, all three ions are characterized by a square-planar geometry (Figure 3b,d,f) typical of tetra-coordinated Ni(II) complexes in the singlet spin state. In addition, both geometrical parameters and BO values show only very slight differences upon passing from 1 to 2 to 3 (Table 2). This result is supported by natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis performed on the electronic structure of the three [M−L]+ fragments. In particular, the data in Table S2 indicate a very strong similarity of the NBOs localized on metal–ligand bonds. Irrespective of the nature of the diketonate ligand, all NBOs have σ-character. While the bonding components [BD(σ)] are mostly localized on the ligand’s N and O atoms (≈90%), the antibonding components [BD(σ*)] are predominantly localized on Ni. Taken together, NBO data indicate that electron charge is transferred from ligands to Ni. This finding is further clarified by the representation of bonding NBOs (Figures S3–S5), highlighting the net σ-character as well as Ni’s participation in the bonding scheme. Such a close similarity in the electronic structure suggests that all three ions possess an analogous stability and may all easily form in ESI-HRMS conditions.
Notably, for all three complexes, Ni-O and Ni-N distances undergo a significant shortening upon passing from neutral compounds to [M−L]+ fragments. This variation is accompanied by the considerable increase in the corresponding bond orders, which are nearly doubled in the fragment ions. Hence, in terms of the metal–ligand bonding, the loss of a diketonate ligand results in significantly strengthened Ni-TMEDA interactions and Ni-O bonds of the remaining diketonate moiety.
A useful feature of NBO analysis is the opportunity for partitioning the electronic density between specific portions of a given molecule, thus enabling the estimation of the total charge on each. In this case, it is particularly instructive to inspect the total NBO charges localized on Ni, diketonate ligand L, and TMEDA (Table 3). Interestingly, the data show that the positive charge on Ni decreases by ≈25–30% on passing from neutral complexes to [M−L]+ cations. This result, which may appear counterintuitive due to the fragments’ positive charge, may be explained by considering that electronic charge donation from L and TMEDA to Ni significantly increases upon the loss of a diketonate ligand. Indeed, the total negative charge on L decreases by 50%, whereas the total (positive) charge on TMEDA is more than doubled (Table 3). Hence, these data indicate that all [M−L]+ species are stabilized by a strong electronic density donation from ligands towards Ni. This effect is slightly more pronounced in the fragment derived from compound 3, due to the higher electron-donor character of the two tert-butyl substituents on the diketonate moiety with respect to fluorine-containing groups, present in compounds 1 and 2.
In addition to the main peak common to the three complexes, ESI-HRMS spectra indicated the formation of other cations (see Figure 1 and Table 1), for which a careful computational search of minimum energy structures was also performed. Graphical representations of optimized geometries of [M+Na]+, [M−TMEDA+Na]+, [M−TMEDA+H]+, [HL+H]+, and [TMEDA+H]+ are shown in Figure S1, whereas selected geometrical parameters are reported in Table S1. It should be pointed out that Na+ is present only in the ESI-HRMS spectra of the fluorine-richest compound 2. In [M+Na]+, Ni maintains its octahedral environment in spite of Na+ entrance in the second coordination shell (Figure S1a). Specifically, three O atoms are located at coordination distances from sodium (average Na-O distance = 2.416 Å), which is also interacting with a fluorine atom (Na-F distance = 2.441 Å). The consequent octahedral Ni environment distortion is evidenced by the lengthening of Ni-O and Ni-N bonds with respect to the neutral Ni(fod)2TMEDA. This effect is particularly relevant for the bonds involving the three oxygen atoms also coordinated with Na+ (Table S1). Similarly, the ion [M−TMEDA+Na]+, featuring a distorted square-planar Ni coordination, is characterized by significant O-Na+ and F-Na+ interactions (Table S1, Figure S1b). In a different way, [M−TMEDA+H]+, namely, [Ni(thd)2+H]+, is protonated at the CH1 carbon. For this ion, two structures very close in energy (ΔE = 0.32 kcal/mol) have been found (Figure S1c,d). The most stable one exhibits a distorted tetrahedral arrangement around the Ni center and triplet spin multiplicity. On the other hand, the least stable structure is characterized by a square-planar Ni coordination geometry and a singlet spin multiplicity. Due to the modest energy difference, both structures might be formed during the ESI process. The presence of the protonated diketonate species [HL+H]+ was detected only in the case of the more electron-donor thd ligand, whose optimized structure is characterized by the protonation of both carbonylic groups (Figure S1e). On the other hand, the protonated ligand [TMEDA+H]+ is detected in the fragmentation of all complexes, and in this case, the protonation occurs on one of the nitrogen atoms (see Figure S1f).
As far as MS2 spectra are concerned, attention was focused on the subsequent fragmentation of [M−L]+ cations. Even in this case, the spectra of the three cations presented common features, in particular the formation of [M−L]+—NH(CH3)2 species. The theoretical search for minimum energy structures for these moieties led to the results depicted in Figure 4a,c,f. Remarkably, these cations have very similar geometries and Ni–ligand bonding patterns. Whereas the diketonate remains coordinated to Ni with both its O atoms, only one N atom (the one that survived the fragmentation) is linked to the metal center. Nevertheless, Ni maintains its nearly square-planar coordination geometry thanks to the interaction with a double C=C bond formed upon -NH(CH3)2 release. Specifically, the Ni-CHT and Ni-CH2T distances become ≈2 Å in these fragments (see Table 4). In addition, the data reported in Table 4 indicate a net shortening of the CHT-CH2T bond length (Figure 4) in comparison to the same distance in [M−L]+ species (Table 2). This phenomenon is accompanied by a significant increase in the CHT-CH2T bond order (from ≈1 to >1.5; see Table 2 and Table 4). Correspondingly, Ni-CHT and Ni-CH2T BO values become comparable to those of Ni-O/Ni-N bonds, indicating appreciable Ni-C interactions that are greater for the terminal C atom (CH2T), which is closer to Ni. These observations are common to the three cations, underscoring once again the similarity of metal–ligand bonding schemes for systems derived from compounds 1, 2, 3.
The loss of a -CH3CH2N(CH3)2 group was observed only for fluorinated [M−L]+ species derived from 1 and 2. In these cations (Figure 4b,d), the bonding pattern around Ni is practically the same as in the [M−L]+-NH(CH3)2 species previously discussed. The square planar tetra-coordinated Ni structure is characterized by two Ni-O bonds, one Ni-N bond, and a cation-π intramolecular interaction between the Ni center and the CHT=CH2T double bond. Figures S6–S10 display the relevant orbitals involved in this interaction, whereas Tables S3 and S4 report the quantitative NBO analysis. As can be observed, the Ni cation actively participates in this interaction, with the π structure predominantly localized on the CHT=CH2T double bond.
As regards compound 2, species corresponding to the loss of a CH3C=CH2 group from [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+ ([Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-(CH3)2C=CH2) were observed in the ESI-MS spectra. Their stoichiometry indicates a rearrangement of the fod ligand (see Figure 1 and Table 1). To identify the structure of these cations, geometry optimizations were carried out on different hypothetical structures possessing such a stoichiometry. Figure S2 reports the six most stable structures, along with their relative stability (including the zero-point contribution). The most stable structure (Figure S2a) presents a distribution of F atoms on both diketonate ligand sides. A similar feature is also shown by other isomers characterized by modest energy differences with respect to the minimum energy structure.
Finally, the trend of the Bader charges on passing from the neutral complex to the positive ions further evidences common features in the fragmentation of the three complexes (see Tables S5–S8). The obtained data highlight an electron displacement from ligands to the Ni center, whose positive charge is significantly depleted during the fragmentation, in line with the findings obtained from NBO analysis.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Experimental Details

Ni(L)2TMEDA complexes (L = tfa, fod, thd) were synthesized following recently reported procedures, and their characterization by elemental analyses, IR, and various complementary techniques has already been reported [46]. Electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometric (ESI-HRMS) data were acquired by a Q Exactive™ hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in positive ion mode (resolution = 70,000; sheath gas N2 at 10 psi; spray voltage = 3.5 kV; and capillary temperature 280 °C). Orbitrap MS calibration was performed using a standard ThermoFisher Scientific Pierce® ESI positive-ion calibration solution. Low-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analyses were performed using a LCQFleet ion trap instrument (ThermoFisher Scientific), operating in positive ion mode. The spray voltage and capillary temperature were 4.0 kV and 250 °C, respectively. In both cases, 10−6 M solutions of the target compounds were introduced by direct infusion using a syringe pump (flow rate = 10 μL × min−1). MSn experiments were performed by applying a supplementary radio frequency (RF) voltage to the end caps of the ion trap (5 V peak-to-peak).

3.2. Computational Details

Density functional theory calculations were performed on [Ni(L)2TMEDA] (with L = tfa, fod, thd) and their fragments. Specifically, the M06 functional [51] was adopted, and the Gaussian 09 code was employed [54]. This functional was chosen for its capability of delivering a good description of the molecular and electronic structures of transition metal compounds, in particular, ionic species, as evidenced in a study of fragmentation of a similar Cu(II) complex, [Cu(hfa)2TMEDA] [45]. For Ni, an “energy-adjusted” abinitio pseudopotential and (8s7p6d2f1g)/[6s5p3d2f1g] basis set were employed [55]. For all the other atoms, the D95(d) basis set was adopted, except for sodium, for which the 6–31G(d) set was employed [56]. All the computed optimized structures were characterized by no imaginary frequencies. The reported energy differences were calculated by including the zero-point-energy (ZPE) correction.
Bonding properties were theoretically investigated via the natural bond orbitals (NBOs) analysis [57]. In particular, the NBO charges on Ni, diketonate ligand L, and TMEDA reported in Table 3, the bond order values in Table 2 and Table 4, the quantitative NBO analyses in Tables S2–S4, as well as the natural bond orbitals depicted in Figures S3–S10, were obtained using the same combination of DFT functional/basis sets adopted in the geometry optimizations. The NBO analysis was performed by employing the NBO code (Version 3.1) available in Gaussian 09. Bond order values were calculated according to the Wiberg scheme [58].
Atomic charges reported in Tables S5–S8 were calculated through the Bader approach [59,60]. As in the case of the NBO analysis, the Bader charges were also computed using the same level of theory as adopted in the structural optimizations.

4. Conclusions

The chemical reactivity of three Ni(L)2TMEDA complexes (L = tfa, fod, thd) in decomposition processes was explored by adopting soft fragmentation procedures and using computational models. The combined experimental and theoretical analyses presented in this work, in addition to some ligand-dependent features, evidenced relevant common elements in the fragmentation pattern of the target compounds: (i) in cations formed in the first fragmentation, Ni-O and Ni-N interactions are stronger, and the positive charge on Ni is lower than in neutral complexes; (ii) the tendency of ligand electronic charge to progressively migrate towards Ni further increases in the subsequent fragmentation processes, leading to the formation of a tetracoordinated Ni environment involving C atoms belonging to partially fragmented TMEDA. From both the structural and electronic points of view, it is also interesting to note the formation of a C-C double bond in TMEDA rearrangements. As evidenced by NBO analysis and substantiated by the bond order trend, such a double bond is actually interacting with the Ni cation via an intramolecular cation-π interaction. In perspective, these analyses can be relevant for the understanding of the compounds’ reactivity under CVD conditions and shed light on the corresponding molecule-to-material conversion.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29030642/s1. The supporting material file contains the graphical representations of minimum energy structures relevant for the fragmentation processes (Figures S1 and S2). Graphical representations of relevant Natural Bond Orbitals for diverse fragments (Figures S3–S10). Tables relative to relevant geometrical parameters and NBO analyses of fragments discussed in the main text (Tables S1–S4). Tables containing the atomic charges obtained via the Bader analysis (Tables S5–S8).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.I., G.T., E.F. and D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T., M.B. and C.M.; investigation, R.S., M.R. and S.B.; data curation, C.I. and G.T.; formal analysis, C.I., E.F. and G.T.; validation, R.S., M.R. and S.B.; project administration, D.B., C.M., E.F. and G.T.; visualization, E.F., C.I. and G.T.; funding acquisition, D.B., E.F., G.T. and C.M.; writing—reviewing and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CNR (Progetti di Ricerca @CNR—avviso 2020—ASSIST), Padova University (PDiSC#04BIRD2020-UNIPD EUREKA, DOR 2021–2023), INSTM Consortium (INSTM21PDBARMAC-ATENA), and Insubria University (FAR2021).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to D. Canton for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nachammai, J.; Perumal, P.; Deivamani, D.; Saravanakumar, S. Effect of concentrations and characterization of nickel oxide thin films prepared by SILAR method. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 64, 1789–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sialvi, M.Z.; Mortimer, R.J.; Wilcox, G.D.; Teridi, A.M.; Varley, T.S.; Wijayantha, K.G.U.; Kirk, C.A. Electrochromic and colorimetric properties of nickel(II) oxide thin films prepared by aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 5675–5682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Su, X.; Tu, Z.; Ji, L.; Wu, H.; Xu, H.; Liu, C. Electrochromic properties of NiO films prepared by atomic layer deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2023, 41, 062407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khera, E.A.; Ullah, H.; Hussain, F.; Abubakar, S.; Majeed, A.; Tabssum, I.; Batool, Z.; Nazir, A.; Gilanie, G. Characterizing nickel oxide thin films for smart window energy conversion applications: Combined experimental and theoretical analyses. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e20230232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brioual, B.; Ghannam, H.; Rossi, Z.; Aouni, A.; El-Habib, A.; Diani, M.; Addou, M.; Matassa, R.; Nottola, S.; Jbilou, M. Effect of In-doping on electrochromic behavior of NiO thin films. Materialia 2023, 30, 101832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carrillo-Delgado, C.; Arano-Martínez, J.A.; Vidales-Hurtado, M.A.; Torres-Torres, D.; Martínez-González, C.L.; Torres-Torres, C. Electrically induced directional self-focusing in electrochromic NiO thin solid films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, Y.; Shen, H.; Wang, T.; Peng, S.; Jin, K.; Qian, Q.; Li, G.; Gan, Z. Study on electrochemical ion behavior and electrochromic properties of NiO thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering with different oxygen levels. Thin Solid Films 2023, 769, 139754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wilson, R.L.; Macdonald, T.J.; Lin, C.-T.; Xu, S.; Taylor, A.; Knapp, C.E.; Guldin, S.; McLachlan, M.A.; Carmalt, C.J.; Blackman, C.S. Chemical vapour deposition (CVD) of nickel oxide using the novel nickel dialkylaminoalkoxide precursor [Ni(dmamp′)2] (dmamp′ = 2-dimethylamino-2-methyl-1-propanolate). RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 22199–22205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rajesh, M.; Vengatesan, K.; Aly, M.H.; Sitharthan, R.; Dhanabalan, S.S.; Karthikeyan, M. Electrical and optical properties of sol–gel-deposited NiO films and corresponding response to annealing temperature. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, X.; Meng, X.; Li, B. Direct-current-sputtered nickel oxide (NiO) films with improved p-type conduction characteristic: Impact of substrate temperature on structure, optical and electrical properties. Phys. Scr. 2023, 98, 085916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aivalioti, C.; Manidakis, E.G.; Pelekanos, N.T.; Androulidaki, M.; Tsagaraki, K.; Viskadourakis, Z.; Spanakis, E.; Aperathitis, E. Niobium-doped NiO as p-type nanostructured layer for transparent photovoltaics. Thin Solid Films 2023, 778, 139910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, Q.S.; Wu, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wei, M.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Xun, W.; Cao, S.; Wang, C. Syntheses of efficient nickel oxide film by low-temperature fabrication technique for high-performance perovskite solar cells. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 106401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rajesh, K.; Pothukanuri, N.; Reddy, M.V.R. Studies on pure and Zn doped NiO nanostructured thin films for enhanced ammonia gas sensing applications. Chem. Phys. Impact 2024, 8, 100397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ambi, R.R.; Mane, A.A.; Tasgaonkar, R.D.; Mane, R.D. Highly porous NiO microstructure for NO2 detection. Physica B 2024, 674, 415567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Nie, L.; Liu, Q.; Pan, G. In-situ synthesis of needle-like PdO-decorated NiO thin films on Al2O3 substrates for high-performance H2 sensors. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 31746–31754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Srivastava, S.; Dwivedi, C.; Yadav, A.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, G.; Singh, P. Enhanced H2S gas sensing of Pd functionalized NiO thin films deposited by the magnetron sputtering process. Mater. Lett. 2023, 351, 135040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dastan, D.; Shan, K.; Jafari, A.; Marszalek, T.; Mohammed, M.K.A.; Tao, L.; Shi, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yin, X.-T.; Alharbi, N.D.; et al. Influence of heat treatment on H2S gas sensing features of NiO thin films deposited via thermal evaporation technique. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2023, 154, 107232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, S.W.; Kim, I.H.; Kim, D.H.; Park, K.J.; Park, E.J.; Jeong, M.-G.; Kim, Y.D. Temperature regulated-chemical vapor deposition for incorporating NiO nanoparticles into mesoporous media. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 385, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kitchamsetti, N.; Ramteke, M.S.; Rondiya, S.R.; Mulani, S.R.; Patil, M.S.; Cross, R.W.; Dzade, N.Y.; Devan, R.S. DFT and experimental investigations on the photocatalytic activities of NiO nanobelts for removal of organic pollutants. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 855, 157337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zywitzki, D.; Taffa, D.H.; Lamkowski, L.; Winter, M.; Rogalla, D.; Wark, M.; Devi, A. Tuning coordination geometry of nickel ketoiminates and its influence on thermal characteristics for chemical vapor deposition of nanostructured NiO electrocatalysts. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 10059–10070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. An, W.-J.; Thimsen, E.; Biswas, P. Aerosol-chemical vapor deposition method for synthesis of nanostructured metal oxide thin films with controlled morphology. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weidler, N.; Schuch, J.; Knaus, F.; Stenner, P.; Hoch, S.; Maljusch, A.; Schäfer, R.; Kaiser, B.; Jaegermann, W. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic investigation of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposited NiOx, NiOx(OH)y, and CoNiOx(OH)y: Influence of the chemical composition on the catalytic activity for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 6455–6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hussain, N.; Yang, W.; Dou, J.; Chen, Y.; Qian, Y.; Xu, L. Ultrathin mesoporous F-doped α-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets as an efficient electrode material for water splitting and supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 9656–9664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jellal, I.; Daoudi, O.; Nouneh, K.; Boutamart, M.; Briche, S.; Fahoume, M.; Naja, J. Comparative study on the properties of Al- and Ni-doped ZnO nanostructured thin films grown by SILAR technique: Application to solar photocatalysis. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Haghverdi Khamene, S.; van Helvoirt, C.; Tsampas, M.N.; Creatore, M. Electrochemical activation of atomic-layer-deposited nickel oxide for water oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 22570–22582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Munawar, K.; Mansoor, M.A.; Naeem, R.; Rizwan, M.; Ahmad, M.S.; Zaharinie, T.; Zubir, M.N.M.; Aspanut, Z. Effect of deposition temperature on topography and electrochemical water oxidation of NiO thin films. Thin Solid Films 2023, 782, 140031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mishra, S.; Daniele, S. Metal–organic derivatives with fluorinated ligands as precursors for inorganic nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 8379–8448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bekermann, D.; Barreca, D.; Gasparotto, A.; Maccato, C. Multi-component oxide nanosystems by Chemical Vapor Deposition and related routes: Challenges and perspectives. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 6347–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, S.; Daniele, S. Molecular engineering of metal alkoxides for solution phase synthesis of high-tech metal oxide nanomaterials. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 9292–9303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barreca, D.; Fois, E.; Gasparotto, A.; Maccato, C.; Oriani, M.; Tabacchi, G. The early steps of molecule-to-material conversion in chemical vapor deposition (CVD): A case study. Molecules 2021, 26, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Klotzsche, M.; Barreca, D.; Bigiani, L.; Seraglia, R.; Gasparotto, A.; Vanin, L.; Jandl, C.; Pöthig, A.; Roverso, M.; Bogialli, S.; et al. Facile preparation of a cobalt diamine diketonate adduct as a potential vapor phase precursor for Co3O4 films. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 10374–10385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Barreca, D.; Bigiani, L.; Klotzsche, M.; Gasparotto, A.; Seraglia, R.; Jandl, C.; Pöthig, A.; Fois, E.; Vanin, L.; Tabacchi, G.; et al. A versatile Fe(II) diketonate diamine adduct: Preparation, characterization and validation in the chemical vapor deposition of iron oxide nanomaterials. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 277, 125534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stienen, C.; Grahl, J.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S.; Bendt, G. Fluorinated β-diketonate complexes M(tfac)2(TMEDA) (M = Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn) as precursors for the MOCVD growth of metal and metal oxide thin films. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 22974–22983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Utke, I.; Swiderek, P.; Höflich, K.; Madajska, K.; Jurczyk, J.; Martinović, P.; Szymańska, I.B. Coordination and organometallic precursors of group 10 and 11: Focused electron beam induced deposition of metals and insight gained from chemical vapour deposition, atomic layer deposition, and fundamental surface and gas phase studies. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 458, 213851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Utriainen, M.; Kröger-Laukkanen, M.; Johansson, L.-S.; Niinistö, L. Studies of metallic thin film growth in an atomic layer epitaxy reactor using M(acac)2 (M=Ni, Cu, Pt) precursors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000, 157, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lindahl, E.; Ottosson, M.; Carlsson, J.-O. Atomic layer deposition of NiO by the Ni(thd)2/H2O precursor combination. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2009, 15, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lindahl, E.; Lu, J.; Ottosson, M.; Carlsson, J.O. Epitaxial NiO (100) and NiO (111) films grown by atomic layer deposition. J. Cryst. Growth 2009, 311, 4082–4088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Utriainen, M.; Kröger-Laukkanen, M.; Niinistö, L. Studies of NiO thin film formation by atomic layer epitaxy. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 1998, 54, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chandrakala, M.; Raj Bharath, S.; Maiyalagan, T.; Arockiasamy, S. Synthesis, crystal structure and vapour pressure studies of novel nickel complex as precursor for NiO coating by metalorganic chemical vapour deposition technique. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 201, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Emmenegger, F.; Schlaepfer, C.W.; Stoeckli-Evans, H.; Piccand, M.; Piekarski, H. Chelate effect in the gas phase. The complexes of Ni(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionate)2 with bidentate ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3884–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maccato, C.; Bigiani, L.; Carraro, G.; Gasparotto, A.; Seraglia, R.; Kim, J.; Devi, A.; Tabacchi, G.; Fois, E.; Pace, G.; et al. Molecular engineering of MnII diamine diketonate precursors for the vapor deposition of manganese oxide nanostructures. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 17954–17963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barreca, D.; Carraro, G.; Devi, A.; Fois, E.; Gasparotto, A.; Seraglia, R.; Maccato, C.; Sada, C.; Tabacchi, G.; Tondello, E.; et al. β-Fe2O3 nanomaterials from an iron(II) diketonate-diamine complex: A study from molecular precursor to growth process. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bandoli, G.; Barreca, D.; Gasparotto, A.; Maccato, C.; Seraglia, R.; Tondello, E.; Devi, A.; Fischer, R.A.; Winter, M. A cobalt(II) hexafluoroacetylacetonate ethylenediamine complex as a CVD molecular source of cobalt oxide nanostructures. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fois, E.; Tabacchi, G.; Barreca, D.; Gasparotto, A.; Tondello, E. “Hot” surface activation of molecular complexes: Insight from modeling studies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1944–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barreca, D.; Fois, E.; Gasparotto, A.; Seraglia, R.; Tondello, E.; Tabacchi, G. How does CuII convert into CuI? An unexpected ring-mediated single-electron reduction. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 10864–10870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Benedet, M.; Barreca, D.; Fois, E.; Seraglia, R.; Tabacchi, G.; Roverso, M.; Pagot, G.; Invernizzi, C.; Gasparotto, A.; Heidecker, A.A.; et al. Interplay between coordination sphere engineering and properties of nickel diketonate–diamine complexes as vapor phase precursors for the growth of NiO thin films. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 10677–10688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Benedet, M.; Maccato, C.; Pagot, G.; Invernizzi, C.; Sada, C.; Di Noto, V.; Rizzi, G.A.; Fois, E.; Tabacchi, G.; Barreca, D. Growth of NiO thin films in the presence of water vapor: Insights from experiments and theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 22304–22314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kruve, A.; Kaupmees, K.; Liigand, J.; Oss, M.; Leito, I. Sodium adduct formation efficiency in ESI source. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 48, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fenn, J.B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C.K.; Wong, S.F.; Whitehouse, C.M. Electrospray ionization–principles and practice. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1990, 9, 37–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fenn, J.B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C.K.; Wong, S.F.; Whitehouse, C.M. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 1989, 246, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Y.; Verma, P.; Jin, X.; Truhlar, D.G.; He, X. Revised M06 density functional for main-group and transition-metal chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10257–10262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tabacchi, G.; Fois, E.; Barreca, D.; Gasparotto, A. CVD precursors for transition metal oxide nanostructures: Molecular properties, surface behavior and temperature effects. Phys. Status Solidi A 2014, 211, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision D.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  55. Martin, J.M.L.; Sundermann, A. Correlation consistent valence basis sets for use with the Stuttgart–Dresden–Bonn relativistic effective core potentials: The atoms Ga–Kr and In–Xe. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 3408–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dunning, T.H., Jr.; Hay, P.J. Modern Theoretical Chemistry; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1977; Volume 3, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  57. Reed, A.E.; Weinhold, F. Natural localized molecular orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 1736–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wiberg, K.B. Application of the pople-santry-segal CNDO method to the cyclopropylcarbinyl and cyclobutyl cation and to bicyclobutane. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bader, R.F.W. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 893–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tang, W.; Sanville, E.; Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 084204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 29 00642 sch001
Scheme 1. Sketch of the structures of the three Ni(II) diketonate-diamine adducts targeted in the present work.
Scheme 1. Sketch of the structures of the three Ni(II) diketonate-diamine adducts targeted in the present work.
Molecules 29 00642 sch001
Molecules 29 00642 g001
Figure 1. Positive ESI-HRMS spectra of methanolic solution of compounds 1–3.
Figure 1. Positive ESI-HRMS spectra of methanolic solution of compounds 1–3.
Molecules 29 00642 g001
Molecules 29 00642 g002
Figure 2. ESI-MS2 spectra of [M−L]+ ions for compounds 1, 2, and 3.
Figure 2. ESI-MS2 spectra of [M−L]+ ions for compounds 1, 2, and 3.
Molecules 29 00642 g002
Molecules 29 00642 g003
Figure 3. DFT-computed minimum energy structures for [Ni(L)2TMEDA] with L = tfa (a), fod (c), thd (e), and for [Ni(L)TMEDA]+ with L = tfa (b), fod (d), and thd (f). Color codes: green = Ni; yellow = F; blue = N; red = O; grey = C; white = H.
Figure 3. DFT-computed minimum energy structures for [Ni(L)2TMEDA] with L = tfa (a), fod (c), thd (e), and for [Ni(L)TMEDA]+ with L = tfa (b), fod (d), and thd (f). Color codes: green = Ni; yellow = F; blue = N; red = O; grey = C; white = H.
Molecules 29 00642 g003
Molecules 29 00642 g004
Figure 4. Optimized structures of: (a) [Ni(tfa)TMEDA]+-NH(CH3)2; (b) [Ni(tfa)TMEDA]+-CH3CH2N(CH3)2; (c) [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-NH(CH3)2; (d) [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-CH3CH2N(CH3)2; (e) [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-(CH3)2C=CH2, due to an additional fod ligand rearrangement; (f) [Ni(thd)TMEDA]+-NH(CH3)2. Color codes as in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Optimized structures of: (a) [Ni(tfa)TMEDA]+-NH(CH3)2; (b) [Ni(tfa)TMEDA]+-CH3CH2N(CH3)2; (c) [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-NH(CH3)2; (d) [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-CH3CH2N(CH3)2; (e) [Ni(fod)TMEDA]+-(CH3)2C=CH2, due to an additional fod ligand rearrangement; (f) [Ni(thd)TMEDA]+-NH(CH3)2. Color codes as in Figure 3.
Molecules 29 00642 g004
Table 1. Main fragments, m/z ratios, and relative abundances (%) obtained in ESI-HRMS analyses of compounds 1, 2, and 3. --- = not detected.
Table 1. Main fragments, m/z ratios, and relative abundances (%) obtained in ESI-HRMS analyses of compounds 1, 2, and 3. --- = not detected.
123
Ionic Speciesm/z (%)m/z (%)m/z (%)
[M+Na]+---787.1690 (25)---
[M−TMEDA+Na]+---671.0379 (12)---
[M−TMEDA+H]+------425.2190 (15)
[M−L]+327.0830 (100)469.1229 (100)357.2041 (100)
[HL+H]+------185.1535 (18)
[TMEDA+H]+117.1391 (70)117.1389 (50)117.1388 (55)
Table 2. Selected bond lengths (BL) (in Å) and corresponding bond orders (BO) from the optimized structures of neutral complexes M and fragments [M−L]+ for compounds 1, 2, and 3. Different colors in the BO columns refer to different ligands (brown and violet = first and second diketonate ligand, respectively; gray = TMEDA). Atom labels as in Figure 3.
Table 2. Selected bond lengths (BL) (in Å) and corresponding bond orders (BO) from the optimized structures of neutral complexes M and fragments [M−L]+ for compounds 1, 2, and 3. Different colors in the BO columns refer to different ligands (brown and violet = first and second diketonate ligand, respectively; gray = TMEDA). Atom labels as in Figure 3.
123
M[M-tfa]+M[M-fod]+M[M-thd]+
BL  BOBL  BOBL  BOBL  BOBL  BOBL  BO
Ni-O12.024 0.2841.831 0.4712.035 0.2421.833 0.4542.018 0.2411.828 0.476
Ni-O42.024 0.284-2.035 0.242-2.018 0.241-
Ni-O22.041 0.2941.848 0.4692.023 0.2581.842 0.4522.009 0.2561.828 0.476
Ni-O32.041 0.294-2.023 0.258-2.010 0.256-
Ni-N12.147 0.2301.946 0.4052.153 0.2011.946 0.3932.165 0.1781.957 0.368
Ni-N22.147 0.2301.946 0.3992.153 0.2011.947 0.3872.165 0.1781.957 0.368
O1-C51.260 1.3621.276 1.2851.260 1.3631.276 1.2791.267 1.3521.284 1.267
O2-C71.257 1.4271.274 1.3181.258 1.4181.276 1.3161.263 1.3761.284 1.267
O4-C61.260 1.362-1.260 1.363-1.267 1.352-
O3-C81.257 1.427-1.258 1.418-1.263 1.376-
C5-CH11.392 1.4231.380 1.4501.393 1.4211.381 1.4511.411 1.3481.400 1.367
C7-CH11.424 1.2641.413 1.3001.425 1.2601.413 1.2881.414 1.3251.400 1.367
C6-CH21.392 1.423-1.393 1.421-1.411 1.348-
C8-CH21.424 1.264-1.425 1.260-1.414 1.325-
CHT-CH2T1.520 1.0211.508 1.0271.518 1.0211.507 1.0271.520 1.0201.508 1.026
Table 3. NBO charges on Ni, diketonate ligand L, and on TMEDA computed for the optimized structures of neutral complexes M and fragments [M−L]+ for compounds 1, 2, and 3. Different colors refer to different ligands (brown = diketonates, gray = TMEDA).
Table 3. NBO charges on Ni, diketonate ligand L, and on TMEDA computed for the optimized structures of neutral complexes M and fragments [M−L]+ for compounds 1, 2, and 3. Different colors refer to different ligands (brown = diketonates, gray = TMEDA).
1 23
M[M-tfa]+M[M-fod]+M[M-thd]+
Ni1.000.731.080.751.120.75
L−0.65−0.35−0.68−0.36−0.69−0.32
TMEDA0.300.620.280.610.260.57
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (BL) (in Å) and corresponding bond orders (BO) from the optimized structures of fragments detected in ESI-MS2 spectra of [M−L]+ ions for compounds 1, 2, and 3. Different colors in the BO columns refer to different ligands (brown = diketonate, gray = TMEDA). Atom labels as in Figure 3.
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (BL) (in Å) and corresponding bond orders (BO) from the optimized structures of fragments detected in ESI-MS2 spectra of [M−L]+ ions for compounds 1, 2, and 3. Different colors in the BO columns refer to different ligands (brown = diketonate, gray = TMEDA). Atom labels as in Figure 3.
12 3
[M-tfa]+-
NH(CH3)2		[M-tfa]+-
CH3CH2N(CH3)2		[M-fod]+-
NH(CH3)2		[M-fod]+-
CH3CH2N(CH3)2		[M-fod]+-
-(CH3)2C=CH2		[M-thd]+-
NH(CH3)2
BL  BOBL  BOBL  BOBL  BOBL  BOBL  BO
Ni-O11.811 0.5231.799 0.5571.814 0.5061.794 0.5541.837 0.4501.808 0.535
Ni-O21.830 0.5111.819 0.5411.816 0.5181.815 0.5431.842 0.4531.803 0.546
Ni-N1--1.929 0.3911.946 0.4021.938 0.4151.941 0.368
Ni-N21.932 0.3931.943 0.408--1.937 0.414-
Ni-CHT1.972 0.2481.987 0.2641.976 0.2391.986 0.264-1.974 0.243
Ni-CH2T2.096 0.3942.128 0.3682.098 0.3932.128 0.363-2.108 0.375
O1-C51.277 1.2881.281 1.2671.280 1.2581.281 1.2631.265 1.3421.288 1.264
O2-C71.281 1.2971.279 1.3081.279 1.3141.280 1.2991.270 1.3181.287 1.264
C5-CH11.384 1.4441.381 1.4631.380 1.4681.381 1.4581.400 1.3451.399 1.381
C7-CH11.409 1.3151.412 1.3001.417 1.2811.413 1.2921.389 1.4041.403 1.361
CHT-CH2T1.379 1.5661.373 1.5881.380 1.5671.373 1.5901.508 1.0271.378 1.579
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Invernizzi, C.; Tabacchi, G.; Seraglia, R.; Benedet, M.; Roverso, M.; Maccato, C.; Bogialli, S.; Barreca, D.; Fois, E. On the Fragmentation of Ni(II) β-Diketonate-Diamine Complexes as Molecular Precursors for NiO Films: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation. Molecules 2024, 29, 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030642

AMA Style

Invernizzi C, Tabacchi G, Seraglia R, Benedet M, Roverso M, Maccato C, Bogialli S, Barreca D, Fois E. On the Fragmentation of Ni(II) β-Diketonate-Diamine Complexes as Molecular Precursors for NiO Films: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation. Molecules. 2024; 29(3):642. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Invernizzi, Cristiano, Gloria Tabacchi, Roberta Seraglia, Mattia Benedet, Marco Roverso, Chiara Maccato, Sara Bogialli, Davide Barreca, and Ettore Fois. 2024. "On the Fragmentation of Ni(II) β-Diketonate-Diamine Complexes as Molecular Precursors for NiO Films: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation" Molecules 29, no. 3: 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030642

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop