Next Article in Journal
Deep Eutectic Solvents as Agents for Improving the Solubility of Edaravone: Experimental and Theoretical Considerations
Previous Article in Journal
High-Pressure Processing of Fruit Smoothies Enriched with Dietary Fiber from Carrot Discards: Effects on the Contents and Bioaccessibilities of Carotenoids and Vitamin E
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanism of Acrylate Emulsion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
2
College of Science & Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Lanzhou 730020, China
4
Gansu Zhongyan Tongchuang Material Technology Co., Ltd., Lanzhou 730020, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(6), 1260; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061260
Submission received: 24 February 2024 / Revised: 10 March 2024 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 / Published: 12 March 2024

Abstract

:
Polymer-modified cement-based materials have been widely used in building materials. Polymers play a crucial role in improving the performance of cement-based materials. At the same time, different polymers are added according to specific special requirements to meet the needs of the industry. Therefore, this paper reviewed the research on the performance and mechanism of acrylic lotion in modifying cement-based materials. Firstly, the role of acrylate lotion in the improvement of the volume stability, mechanical properties, and durability of cement-based materials was discussed to explore the advantages and disadvantages further, optimize the application of polymer in cement-based materials according to the performance improvement, and amplify the advantages of polymer modification. Secondly, the physicochemical mechanism of acrylate-lotion-modified cement-based materials was discussed, and the products and reactants of acrylate lotion in the reaction process of cement-based materials, as well as the interaction mechanism of acrylic lotion and cement hydrates, were clarified. Cement hydration is a crucial step in exploring the mechanism of polymer-modified cement-based materials. Due to the acrylate lotion filled on the cement surface and the physical and chemical interaction between them, the cement hydration is delayed, resulting in the cement retarding phenomenon. This paper describes its mechanism. Finally, the improvement effect of acrylate lotion on the performance of cement-based materials was reviewed, the research methods of mechanism research on acrylate-lotion-modified cement-based materials were evaluated, and suggestions for future research methods were provided.

1. Introduction

Cement is a porous and brittle material that tends to crack under external forces [1,2,3], leading to safety hazards and weakening concrete structures over time. Polymer materials are popular in terms of their short-term performance [4], because they possess excellent properties such as anti-corrosion, waterproofing, seismic resistance, wear resistance, and light weight [5,6]. The interaction between cement and polymer particles redefined the microstructure and interface characteristics of traditional cement-based materials, improving bending resistance and durability at the macro level [4,7,8]. With the gradual maturity of polymer-modified concrete technology, various polymers are now added to meet industry-specific performance requirements. For instance, polymer-modified cement mortar is known for its good crack and acid–alkali corrosion resistance [9,10,11,12].
Concrete polymer composite materials have a long history, dating back to 3000–2000 BC [13,14,15]. While natural and semi-synthetic polymers were used in the early days, synthetic polymers have recently become the preferred choice for modifying cement-based materials due to their excellent water solubility stability and ease of preparation and modification [16,17]. In the 1940s, products modified with polyvinyl chloride were developed to enhance the bonding strength between new and old concrete and manufacture concrete pipes [18]. Today, polymer concrete materials are still a new trend in modified cement-based materials [19,20]. Latex polymers such as acrylic ester (PAE), styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) are among the non-toxic and environmentally friendly materials used for polymer modification, with high resistance to chemical corrosion and high bonding strength [4,21,22,23]. While there was a misconception in the past that adding any polymer would affect the performance of concrete, this viewpoint has yet to be confirmed. With the progress of scientific research and an understanding of the mechanism of polymer-modified cement-based materials, the development goal of polymer cement concrete has been repositioned [24,25,26].
This paper mainly studies the modification effect of acrylate lotion on cement-based materials, reveals the mechanism of acrylate lotion modifying cement-based materials, and summarizes the influence of polymers on the hydration process of cement-based materials based on the modification mechanism. The microstructure of materials is inevitably changed by polymer lotion. To better control the internal structure of polyacrylate-lotion-modified cement composites and optimize the cement-based performance, it is necessary to conduct a deeper study on the mechanism of polymer-modified cement-based materials. This not only provides a theoretical basis for the further application of acrylate-lotion-modified cement-based materials, but also brings new ideas for the development of new polymer-lotion-modified cement materials.

2. Properties of Cement-Based Materials Modified by Acrylate Lotion

Polymer latex is used in modified concrete in the following two ways: 1. Polymer latex without active groups on the polymer chain. It changes the physical properties of cement by covering the surface of cement hydration products and porous areas of cement. 2. Latex has active groups that improve cement’s physical and chemical properties. It forms a three-dimensional network structure during the hydration process of cement [27]. Acrylate lotion polymer is a suitable choice due to its good flexibility, corrosion resistance, elastic deformation performance, compatibility with cement-based materials, high versatility, and sustainability. It meets the requirements of green environmental awareness, resource conservation, and extended infrastructure service life [28,29,30,31,32]. Therefore, acrylate lotion has become the first choice for modified cement-based materials.

2.1. Volume Stability

In construction engineering, cement hydrates release a lot of heat, which can cause the internal temperature to rise up to 70–80 °C. During the cooling process, the concrete undergoes thermal shrinkage, and the restrained structural concrete generates significant tensile force, ultimately leading to cracking [33,34]. Therefore, controlling the heat of hydration and reducing thermal shrinkage during the cooling process can suppress concrete cracking. Adding polymers reduces the temperature gradient of concrete and the risk of concrete cracking. The heat flow curve of cement hydration is divided into four stages, namely, the initial dissolution stage, induction stage, acceleration stage, and attenuation stage [35,36]. Sifan Li et al. [37] showed that when butyl acrylate (PBA) lotion was added to concrete, the second exothermic peak was mainly concentrated in the cement hydration process, it slowed down due to the increase and decrease rate of PBA addition, and the degree of reduction in the hydration heat peak was positively related to the increase in PBA content (Figure 1). Polymer lotion significantly inhibits the hydration of cement and reduces the heat release of hydration, and the effect of reduction increases with the amount of lotion, thus improving the crack resistance of cement-based materials.
Cement hydration is a complex thermodynamic system where many heterogeneous compounds interact to form cement hydrates. High water-absorbing polymers (SAPs) can be added to improve the internal hardening ability of cement-based materials and reduce self-shrinkage [38]. Lewis et al. [39] studied the thermal analysis of SAP polyacrylic acid acrylamide copolymer suspension cement. The SAP concentration and particle size distribution and their impact on the ordinary Portland cement hydration process were analyzed. The results showed that an increase in SAP concentration was beneficial for forming Ca(OH)2 precipitation, and a particle size of 50–75 nm would produce more Ca(OH)2. Therefore, the cation exchange and interlocking mechanism in the cementitious solution may influence cement hydration.
Junpeng Mei et al. [40] studied the anti-cracking performance of styrene–acrylic acid lotion (SAE) on cement-based materials. SAE significantly reduces cement-based materials' brittleness coefficient, elastic modulus, elastic strength ratio and drying shrinkage. SAE also reduces the cracking sensitivity of the material. Meanwhile, SAE reduces the number of pores that adversely affect shrinkage, refine the microstructure, and reduce the formation of Ca(OH)2 and microcracks in cement-based materials.
There are several reasons for engineering cracks: temperature changes, load, frost heave, foundation deformation, construction process quality, steel corrosion, shrinkage, and material quality. The methods of handling include 1. changing the concrete material itself; 2. using prestressed concrete to reduce load cracks in components; 3. taking repair and reinforcement measures after cracking [41]. The first two methods cannot change rigid materials’ properties, so the crack resistance improvement is limited. The third method is unsuitable for solving the interface problem between new and old materials. Therefore, the treatment of cracks in engineering has not been well addressed yet [42].
With the further hydration of cement, a continuous and closely arranged polymer particle layer is formed on the surface of the cement gel unhydrated cement particle mixture. Cementitious materials and polymer particles will fill larger pores, but the particle size of the polymer is far larger than the pores left by cement hydration. Therefore, the problem between the mortar and the interface is also a complex problem in crack repair. The chemical reactions of polymers such as polyacrylate (PA), acrylate (SAE), and chloroprene rubber (CR) on the surface of the mortar are expected to improve this phenomenon [43,44,45,46]. Binmeng Chen et al. used molecular dynamics to study interface bond structure, kinetics, and mechanical properties between sodium polyacrylate molecules and cement-based materials. The carboxyl groups on polyacrylate provide oxygen sites were shown to receive hydrogen bonds from protonated silicate tetrahedra and adjacent water molecules. Ca2+ and Na+ act as a bridge between the functional group oxygen atom of hydrated calcium silicate and the silicate chain oxygen. O-Ca-O and O-Na-O salt bridges enhance interface bonding, suppress crack development, and improve the ductility of cement–polymer composites [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].

2.2. Mechanical Properties

The uneven distribution of polymers in cement leads to an incomplete polymer network structure, which significantly reduces the modification effect [48,49,50,51,52]. Additionally, the amount of polymer is also a challenge for polymer-modified cementitious materials. A large amount of polymer improves the water resistance performance of mortar, but it significantly decreases strength [53,54]. There are two ways to add polymers. The first is to increase consistency by adjusting the water–cement ratio, while the second involves the use of admixtures. Adjusting the water–cement ratio is a laboratory procedure, whereas adding additives involves a trial and error process, and its structure can be directly used in practice [55,56].
In Figure 2, Jinxi Dou et al. [57] studied the mechanical properties of cement-based materials through modified styrene–acrylic lotion. When the polymer content was less than 7.5%, the flexural strength significantly increased, but when the content reached 10%, the flexural strength was equivalent to that of the control sample. Zahra Bahranifard et al. [58] investigated the influence of styrene–butyl acrylate (SBA) lotion on concrete. Polymer creates a network which fills the pores of concrete and positively influences its micro-structure. This structure promotes the uniform distribution of materials and improves the compressive strength of cement. Cheng et al. [59] studied the influence of styrene–acrylic acid lotion (SA) on the toughness and wear resistance of cement-based materials. SA can significantly improve the bending and compression properties of materials. At 3%, the maximum bending strength was 10.94 MPa, 49.5% higher than the control sample. The influence of styrene–acrylic acid lotion on the performance of concrete was studied. It was found that the flexural strength of styrene–acrylic acid lotion cement had an increasing trend, and the maximum value at 28 days was 9.7% higher than that of the control sample [60].

2.3. Durability

The surface roughness of polymer-modified cement-based materials significantly improves the hydrophobicity of a sample, which helps to improve its durability. Tsigarida et al. studied the effect of material surface roughness on the durability of a sample and found that the surface of the sample had high hydrophobicity after latex treatment, while the durability of the sample was improved [14]. Zhang et al. [61] studied the acid resistance of polymer mortar. Adding styrene–acrylic acid lotion, the corrosion degree of the sample immediately decreased, reducing the loss rate. In a study conducted by Jiang Chao et al. [62], the bonding performance and durability of polyacrylate silica fume mortar were investigated. It was discovered that the polymer effectively enhanced the carbonization resistance of the mortar. Moreover, the improvement effect was more pronounced with an increase in polymer content. Similarly, Zhang Xijun et al. [4] investigated polymer-modified cement mortar and reported that the modified material exhibited excellent waterproof performance, impermeability, water retention, high flexibility, and resistance to acid–alkali corrosion.
The anti-permeability of polymer-modified cement-based materials is attributed to the physical blocking of polymer networks but does not affect the hydrophilicity of the mortar. In recent years, there has been increasing research on the durability of hydrophobic cement-based materials in solutions and freeze–thaw environments, which has become an effective method for enhancing their impermeability [63]. Jin Yang et al. [53] found that the impermeability of concrete mortar modified by styrene–acrylic lotion (SAE) is very strong, but the impermeability is enhanced while the flexural strength is severely lost. Therefore, besides the modification of the polymer itself, secondary modification of the polymer has become a new direction in the research of polymer-modified cementitious materials. In Table 1, the effects of different polymers on the various properties of cement-based materials are compared.

3. Mechanism of Acrylate-Lotion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

3.1. Mechanism of Acrylate-Lotion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

There are two theories on the mechanism of polymer-modified concrete: 1. There is no interaction between concrete and polymers. During the hydration process of cement, the hydrophilic end of the polymer is close to the water phase, while the hydrophobic end is close to the gas phase. During the drying process, water is evaporated, and hydrophobic polymer particles gather together to form a thin film. 2. Cement hydration products interact with polymers to form a semi-permeable membrane. The Ca(OH)2 causes the polymer to form a semi-transparent film. As the amount of Ca(OH)2 increases, the amount of film formation decreases, ultimately leading to no film formation. Because Ca2+ interacts with carboxyl groups in the polymer, carboxylate ions undergo crosslinking, inhibiting the formation of the film [18,49]. The mechanism process of polymer-modified cement-based materials still focuses on a series of chemical reactions after cement hydration [71,72,73,74,75].

3.2. Physical and Chemical Mechanism of Acrylate-Lotion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

There are two views on the mechanism of acrylic acid lotion (PAE) modifying cement substrate: 1. During the hydration process, polyacrylic acid latex covers the surface of cement particles and hydration products or fills cracks in the cement hydration system. These physical effects can improve the porosity of cement. 2. PAE also has chemical reactions and physical behavior. They improve the performance of cement-based materials by connecting chemical bonds through chelation [76,77].

3.2.1. Physical Mechanism of Acrylate-Lotion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

Polymer particles fill the pores of cement-based materials. As the hydration reaction proceeds, these particles accumulate between the pores and the interface transition zones, adsorbing and polymerizing in situ into thin, flexible films. This process forms a network structure that enhances the density and impermeability of cement-based materials, as observed in previous studies [7,78]. Additionally, the interface structures between organic and inorganic materials in polymer-modified cement-based materials create interactions between atoms and molecules in the polymers and the hydration products of cement-based materials through hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, and other mechanisms [20].
The modification of cement-based materials by polymer lotion occurs locally. Even if more polymer is added, the overall polymer film or network structure will not be formed, but the performance of cement-based materials can be modified at these local locations. This phenomenon is called polymer modification localization [49,79], as shown in Figure 3. Initially, polymer particles, cement particles, water, and sand are mixed together without any physical or chemical reactions, but they are evenly distributed. As the cement hydration reaction progresses, some of the polymers start participating in chemical reactions, while others begin to fill up pores or adsorb onto the surface of cement-based materials, due to adsorption and various ion bonds, which is a physical reaction [80].

3.2.2. Chemical Mechanism of Acrylate-Lotion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

In the second stage of polymer-modified cement-based materials, as the hydration reaction between cement and water progresses, the cement hydration products and Ca2+ are released into the pore solution. Some polymers adhere to the surface of cement particles and hydration products, while the other portion combines with Ca2+ to form a flocculent structure.
The polymer particles that cover the cement surface will slow down the cement’s hydration process, and eventually, the cement hydrates will break through this barrier. As hydration progresses, the water phase in the pore solution is consumed, and cement hydrates continue to grow or embed into polymer flocs. The accumulated polymer particles will partially accumulate and coagulate into polymer network spatial structures or polymer membranes, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 [81,82].
As early as 1987, the three-step model proposed by Ohama [83] was the most popular in the principle of PMCs (polymer-modified cement-based materials). During the cement hydration process, the polymer forms a continuous and dense thin film on the surface of the cement particles. The adsorbed polymer particles changes the interface structure between the liquid and these particles, thereby affecting the performance of the interface. The interface performance will significantly affect the rheological properties of the cement and further determine the pumpability, self-compaction, and self-leveling of the cement, similar to the cement mixed with water-reducing agents [84,85]. Guo Yanfei et al. [86] studied the influence of polyacrylic acid lotion (PAE) on the fluidity of cement paste and found that when the content of PAE is less than 5.0%, the fluidity is reduced compared to when the content of PAE is more than 5.0%. The addition of PAE combines carboxyl groups with Ca2+ in the solution and Ca2+ on the surface of cement particles, while polymer PAE adsorbs on the surface of cement particles, both of which may affect the dispersion of the polymer and the rheological properties of PMCs [87,88,89].
The Konietzko model divides the mechanism of polymer-modified cement-based materials into four stages: the uniform dispersion of polymer particles, the accumulation of polymer particles, the aggregation of polymer particles into films, and the formation of spatial network structures by polymers in cement-based materials. The commonality between the Ohma model and the Konietzko model is that the formation of thin films causes the mechanism of polymer modification. But the Ohama model suggests that polymers form a spatial network structure in cement-based materials, and the hardened cement is encapsulated. The Konietzko model suggests that the products of polymer and cement, after hardening, penetrate each other to form a spatial network structure [90,91]. Therefore, both theoretical models are beneficial in explaining the mechanism of polymer-modified cement-based materials.
As further research reveals that the amount of polymer varies, the two theoretical models have different interpretations. When the polymer content is small, it cannot completely wrap the cement-based material, the polymer film forms a three-dimensional network structure with the cement hydration products. When the polymer content is high, the polymer forms a unique network structure to encapsulate cement-based materials. When the amount of polymer decreases, the polymer cannot form a continuous film but is dispersed in cement-based materials [92]. However, the current models established by researchers assume that polymer particles are uniformly dispersed in cement to form a polymer spatial network. The network structure ensures that polymer-modified cement-based materials have good toughness and corrosion resistance. After the polymer and cement paste are mixed, various ions generated by cement hydration impact the polymer’s stability, which may lead to the polymer particles being unable to form a continuous network structure [82,93,94]. Therefore, these models only apply to some of the explanations of the mechanism of polymer lotion-modified cement-based materials.
Wang Ming et al. [76] found three stages of chemical reactions in studying the mechanism of the PAE modification of cement-based materials. Ca(OH)2 produced by the hydration of cement leads to the whole system being alkali-rich and exothermic in the first stage, which is very helpful to the hydrolysis of ester groups in the acrylate chain, causing the carboxyl group to be formed in the second stage. In the last stage, the carboxyl group on the polyacrylate lotion chain reacts with Ca(OH)2, resulting in the final cross-linking network structure of the product [95]. Cement-based materials were modified using butyl styrene latex (SBR) and carboxyl butadiene styrene latex (XSBRI). After characterization, it was found that no chemical reaction occurred in the SBR latex-modified cement. However, the carboxyl groups in the XSBRI chain react with Ca2+ in Ca(OH)2, as shown in Figure 6. Hydration products connect the polymer lotion to obtain a three-dimensional network structure, improving polymer-latex-modified cement’s bending strength.
At the same time, a possible physical modification mechanism model of polymer-latex-modified cement is also established, as shown in Figure 7. Polymer film and particles fill in cracks and pores and reflect some external forces during the fracturing process, improving the flexural strength of cement-based materials. Therefore, the polymer-modified cement-based materials mechanism includes physical and chemical aspects. When no active groups in the polymer can react with hydration products, the modification system only includes the physical modification mechanism. Polymer film covers the surface of crystals and fills the pores, improving the cement’s waterproof performance and bending strength. At the same time, polymer film occupies the position of hydration products, leading to a decrease in compressive strength. However, when the polymer chain of the polymer contains active groups, its mechanisms include physical and chemical modification mechanisms. The physical modification mechanism is the same as that of a polymer without active groups. In the chemical modification mechanism, active groups react with hydration products, connecting polymer latex chains to form a three-dimensional network structure, thereby improving the flexural strength of modified cement [75].

3.3. Cement Hydration-Retarding Mechanism in Acrylate-Lotion-Modified Cement-Based Materials

A common disadvantage of polymer lotion is that it hinders the hydration of cement, which will slow the development of concrete strength and even lead to the nonhardening of concrete under extreme conditions. Its retarding principle is the physical and chemical interaction between lotion and cement-based materials [96]. The physical action is the electrostatic interaction between charged polymer particles and the surface of cement-based materials, which drives the adsorption of polymer particles on the substrate surface [97,98]. The chemical action is the complexation reaction between Ca2+ in pores and carboxyl groups, which prevents cement hydration [99,100].
The overall hydration rate of cement can be divided into four stages: (1) initial reaction, (2) slow reaction period, (3) acceleration period, and (4) deceleration period [101,102]. Understanding the hydration mechanism of cement can improve the microstructure of cement hydration and develop new types of cement [103]. The C-S-H formed by cement hydration is the backbone of concrete strength. Due to the complexity of the cement hydration mechanism, controlling the structure and properties of C-S-H remains a challenge. This is also due to the complexity of its structure and chemistry and its interactions during the hydration process of cement [104,105]. In Figure 8 and Figure 9, at each stage of cement hydration, it is assumed that the diffusion mechanism of the spherical C-S-H shell and the growth of C-S-H with the progress of hydration reactions are involved, but more realistic reactions still require future exploration [37,106,107].
Kong Xiangrong et al. [95] took styrene acrylate-based polymer lotion (SA) as an example to reveal the retarding mechanism of cement hydration. Using SA lotion of polymer particles with different surface charges as a model lotion, methacrylic acid (MAA), sodium styrene sulfonate (SSS), and methyl polyethylene glycol methacrylate (MPEGMA) were synthesized as water-soluble monomers (WSMs). They observed whether the surface charge of polymer particles would change due to the use of different water-soluble monomers. Through the characterization of the lotion, it was found that methacrylic acid (MAA) provides carboxyl groups for the surface of polymer particles, and SSS has sulfonic acid groups on the surface of polymer particles. In contrast, MPEGMA has a relatively neutral surface formed by attaching polyepoxyethane (-EO-) chains on the surface of polymer particles. It was found that the “Ca2+ capture” in the acrylate polymer should be the reason for the strong retarding effect of the acrylate lotion. Due to the complexation effect, many studies have confirmed the strong interaction between Ca2+ and polymer particles with carboxylic acid functional groups. The interaction between Ca2+ and polymers containing R-COO− reduces the availability of free Ca2+ in pore solutions, which are necessary for forming hydration products such as C-S-H and Ca(OH)2. This should be the primary mechanism for extending the guidance period of cement hydration [95,105,108]. During polymer modification, whether the particles in the polymer can adsorb on the surface of cement-based materials is the most crucial step in the retarding behavior of cement hydration. D. S. Hazmmah et al. [109] measured the zeta potential to investigate the influence of anions and cations on the hydration behavior of Portland cement. The results showed that charged particles selectively adsorb on the surface of opposite-charged hydrated cement particles. At the same time, anions in the lotion adsorb positively charged Ca2+ in the pores. Research has found an interaction between the polymer and ions (Ca2+, SO42−, OH) released during the hydration process of cement [110]. It is widely believed that the adsorption between polymer particles and the substrate surface is driven by electrostatic interactions [111], as shown in Figure 10.
In previous studies, styrene acrylate (SA) polymer lotion has had a super retarding effect on cement hydration, which is due to the hydrolysis of butyl acrylate in SA polymer lotion at high temperatures [106,112]. Therefore, modifying the surface of polymer particles to alter the complexation between the polymer and Ca2+ is also an essential part of modifying cement-based materials. Zichen Lu et al. [100] modified SA lotion by introducing a PEO hairlike layer and found that polymer particles with a PEO hairlike layer had the smallest retardation on cement hydration. At the same time, it did not affect the hydrolysis of acrylate and the complexation of carboxyl groups generated.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

1. Interaction between polymers and cement results in an interpenetrating network structure, which increases the density of cement-based materials and enhances their waterproofing properties, durability, and mechanical strength.
2. The carboxyl group of the acrylate lotion reacts with the cement hydration product, enhancing the cohesion of the cement-based materials and strengthening the structure of the cement-based materials from the inside, thus improving the performance of the cement-based materials.
3. When acrylate lotion improves the performance of cement-based materials, the compressive strength tends to decrease. This may be related to the amount and method of polymer addition, as air may be introduced during the polymer addition process, increasing porosity. During the hydration process of cement, polymers hinder the hydration reaction, resulting in a decrease in strength. However, polymers significantly improve flexural strength, durability, and toughness.
4. Many research experiments have established the physical and chemical mechanisms of polymer-modified cement-based materials. However, there are many types of polymers, and current research has also focused on specific types of polymers, and the established polymer models could be better. At the same time, the experimental conditions, testing methods, and characterization indicators of researchers are different, so the evaluation of results is different.
5. It is necessary to standardize and optimize the design and establish a comprehensive mechanism model, especially for the addition method and dosage of polymers and various controllable strips during the experimental process.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

Haiyan Wang was employed by Gansu Zhongyan Tongchuang Material Technology Co., Ltd. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

Superabsorbent polymersSAPs
Styrene–butyl acrylateSBA
Ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymerEVA
Epoxy resinEP
Styrene–butadiene rubberSBR
Polyvinyl alcoholPVA
Chloroprene rubberCR
Styrene lotionSA
Polymer-modified cement-based materialsPMCs
Methacrylic acidMAA
Sodium styrene sulfonateSSS
Methyl polyethylene glycol methacrylateMPEGMA
Water-soluble monomersWSMs
Carboxyl butadiene styrene latex XSBRI

References

  1. Shen, J.; Liang, J.; Lin, X.; Lin, H.; Yu, J.; Yang, Z. Recent progress in polymer-based building materials. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 2020, 8838160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Makul, N. Advanced smart concrete-A review of current progress, benefits and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 122899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, W.; Roy, D.M. Microstructural aspects of high-performance cement-based materials. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 1994, 370, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, X.; Du, M.; Fang, H.; Shi, M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, F. Polymer-modified cement mortars: Their enhanced properties, applications, prospects, and challenges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 299, 124290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, R. Source radon control of cement-based materials and application prospect of polymer delayed plugging strategy. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2022, 331, 4417–4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aggarwal, L.K.; Thapliyal, P.C.; Karade, S.R. Properties of polymer-modified mortars using epoxy and acrylic emulsions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarde, B.; Patil, Y.D. Recent research status on polymer composite used in concrete-an overview. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 3780–3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, C.; Zou, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, P.; Niu, M. Influence of humidity on the mechanical properties of polymer-modified cement-based repair materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 261, 119928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cai, R.; Qi, H.; Mao, J.; Lv, J.; Jin, D. Improved crack resistance and pore structure of cement-based materials by adding EVA powder. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2022, 34, 04022012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, K.R.; Zhang, D.; Song, J.M. Properties of polymer-modified cement mortar using pre-enveloping method. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, D.; Yuan, Y.F.; Wen, Z.Y. Study on the Corrosion Resistance of Polymer-Modified Reactive Powder Concrete. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 250, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Czarnecki, L. Concrete-polymer composites: Trends shaping the future. Int. J. Soc. Mater. Eng. Resour. 2007, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thong, C.C.; Teo DC, L.; Ng, C.K. Application of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in cement-based composite materials: A review of its engineering properties and microstructure behavior. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 107, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jalali, S. Sulphuric acid resistance of plain, polymer modified, and fly ash cement concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 3485–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khayat, K.H. Viscosity-enhancing admixtures for cement-based materials—An overview. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1998, 20, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, B.; Shi, J.; Sun, M.; He, Z.; Xu, H.; Tan, J. Mechanical and permeability properties of polymer-modified concrete using hydrophobic agent. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandra, S.; Flodin, P. Interactions of polymers and organic admixtures on portland cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 1987, 17, 875–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, K.; Jiang, D.; Hou, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, P. Insights on the role of particulate filler on the polymer-modified cement-based coating and its application. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 76, 107395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, R.; Zhang, L. Mechanism and durability of repair systems in polymer-modified cement mortars. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2015, 594672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, P.; Zhang, B.; Fang, Y.; Chang, J. Study on Carbonation Resistance of Polymer-Modified Sulphoaluminate Cement-Based Materials. Materials 2022, 15, 8635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cui, Y.; Tan, Z.; An, C. Research and application of multi-functional acrylic resin grouting material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 359, 129381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, R.; Wang, P.M. Application of styrene-butadiene rubber in cement-based materials. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 306, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Czarnecki, L. Concrete-polymer composites C-PC–Reading with understanding. Restor. Build. Monum. 2012, 18, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bagheri, A.; Hashemi, S. Investigation of performance and compatibility of cement-based and polymer-modified cement-based repair concrete. In Proceedings of the Concrete Solutions: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, Saint-Malo, France, 7 June 2006; pp. 610–618. [Google Scholar]
  25. Eren, F.; Gödek, E.; Keskinateş, M.; Tosun-Felekoğlu, K.; Felekoğlu, B. Effects of latex modification on fresh state consistency, short term strength and long term transport properties of cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 133, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xie, Z.; Yao, H.; Yuan, Q.; Zhong, F. The roles of water-soluble polymers in cement-based materials: A systematic review. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 73, 106811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chung, D.D.L. Multifunctional Cement-Based Materials; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohama, Y. Recent progress in concrete-polymer composites. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1997, 5, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garbev, K.; Black, L.; Beuchle, G.; Stemmermann, P. Inorganic polymers in cement based materials. Wasser-Und Geotechnol. 2002, 1, 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ali, D.S.H. Investigation on the Properties of Acrylic Emulsion Polymer Based Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete Reinforced with Hooked Steel Fiber. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Malaysia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Guo, Z.; Ru, Y.; Song, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, J. Water-soluble polymers with strong photoluminescence through an eco-friendly and low-cost route. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2017, 38, 1700099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khalel, H.H.Z.; Khan, M.; Starr, A. Dynamic response-based crack resistance analysis of fibre reinforced concrete specimens under different temperatures and crack depths. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 66, 105865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pang, X.; Sun, L.; Sun, F.; Zhang, G.; Guo, S.; Bu, Y. Cement hydration kinetics study in the temperature range from 15 C to 95 C. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 148, 106552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jansen, D.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F.; Lothenbach, B.; Neubauer, J. The early hydration of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC): An approach comparing measured heat flow with calculated heat flow from QXRD. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Möschner, G. A Thermodynamic Approach to Cement Hydration: The Role of Retarding Admixtures and Fe-Minerals during the Hydration of Cements. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, S.; Mao, Z.; Deng, M. Preparation of Butyl Acrylate Copolymer Emulsion and Its Regulation Effect on Cement Hydration. Materials 2023, 16, 2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Esteves, L.P. Internal Curing in Cement-Based Materials. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  38. Esteves, L.P.; Lukošiūtė, I.; Čėsnienė, J. Hydration of cement with superabsorbent polymers. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 118, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mei, J.P.; Li, H.N.; Xu, Z.D. Effect of Styrene-Acrylic Emulsion on Crack Resistance of Cement-Based Materials. In Materials Science Forum; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1036, pp. 288–300. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ercolani, G.D.; Felix, D.H.; Ortega, N.F. Crack detection in prestressed concrete structures by measuring their natural frequencies. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2018, 8, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thanoon, W.A.; Jaafar, M.S.; Kadir MR, A.; Noorzaei, J. Repair and structural performance of initially cracked reinforced concrete slabs. Constr. Build. Mater. 2005, 19, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, H.; Li, A.; Huang, H.; Song, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, Y.; Gao, P.; Hu, J.; Wei, J.; Yu, Q. Gradient microstructure and strain field at interfacial zone between cement-based repair and concrete substrate. Compos. Part B Eng. 2023, 260, 110775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mirza, J.; Mirza, M.S.; Lapointe, R. Laboratory and field performance of polymer-modified cement-based repair mortars in cold climates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2002, 16, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yassene, A.A.M.; Ismail, M.R.; Afify, M.S. Physicomechanical properties of irradiated SBR latex polymer-modified cement mortar composites. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2020, 26, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qian, J.; You, C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Jia, X. A method for assessing bond performance of cement-based repair materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 68, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, B.; Qiao, G.; Hou, D.; Wang, M.; Li, Z. Cement-based material modified by in-situ polymerization: From experiments to molecular dynamics investigation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 194, 108036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yin, B.; Qi, D.; Hua, X.; Fan, F.; Han, K.; Hou, Y.; Hou, D.; Chen, B. Mechanical properties and micro-mechanism of cement-based materials strengthened by in-situ organic-inorganic polymerization. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 142, 105202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, Y.; Jin, X.; Jin, N.; Zhao, R.; Li, Z.; Ma, H. Research on the microstructure formation of polyacrylate latex modified mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 1381–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brandt, A.M. Cement-Based Composites: Materials, Mechanical Properties and Performance; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, G.; Niu, X.; Chang, C.; Lacidogna, G. Review of research on micromechanical properties of cement-based materials based on molecular dynamics simulation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 312, 125389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Göbel, L.; Osburg, A.; Pichler, B. The mechanical performance of polymer-modified cement pastes at early ages: Ultra-short non-aging compression tests and multiscale homogenization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 173, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, J.; Wang, J.; He, X.; Yu, X.; Su, Y.; Huang, J.; Oh, S. Sodium Oleate and Styrene-Acrylate Copolymer Emulsion-Modified Cement Mortar: Functional Combination of Physical Barrier and Hydrophobicity. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2023, 35, 04023242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yin, B.; Hua, X.; Qi, D.; Han, K.; Wang, P.; Hou, D.; Liu, C. Multi-scale synergistic modification and mechanical properties of cement-based composites based on in-situ polymerization. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 137, 104945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ma, H.; Li, Z. Microstructures and mechanical properties of polymer modified mortars under distinct mechanisms. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cao, Q.Y.; Hao, T.Y.; Sun, W. Study on polymer-modified concrete for improving flexural toughness. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 405, 2815–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dou, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, S.; Tian, C.; Ji, C.; Zhang, C. Properties of degraded waste pet-modified styrene-acrylic emulsions for cement materials. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 4624907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bahranifard, Z.; Tabrizi, F.F.; Vosoughi, A.R. An investigation on the effect of styrene-butyl acrylate copolymer latex to improve the properties of polymer modified concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 205, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheng, J.; Shi, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, S.; Yan, L. Investigation of the effects of styrene acrylate emulsion and vinyl acetate ethylene copolymer emulsion on the performance and microstructure of mortar. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 75, 106965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tian, Y.; Gao, P.; Wang, R.; Wang, L.; Zhong, J.; Li, J. Study on the influence of organic polymers on the physical and mechanical properties of cement-based materials. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 474, p. 072028. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tsigarida, A.; Tsampali, E.; Konstantinidis, A.A.; Stefanidou, M. On the use of confocal microscopy for calculating the surface microroughness and the respective hydrophobic properties of marble specimens. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 33, 101876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Song, Z. Influence of styrene-acrylic copolymer latex on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Portland cement/Calcium aluminate cement/Gypsum cementitious mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jiang, C.; Huang, S.; Gao, P.; Chen, D. Experimental study on the bond and durability properties of mortar incorporating polyacrylic ester and silica fume. Adv. Cem. Res. 2018, 30, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Falchi, L. Study of Innovative Water Repellent Systems for the Preservation and Restoration of Artificial Stone Materials. Ph.D. Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, Venezia, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  64. Jensen, O.M.; Hansen, P.F. Water-entrained cement-based materials: II. Experimental observations. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hasholt, M.T.; Jensen, O.M.; Kovler, K.; Zhutovsky, S. Can super absorent polymers mitigate autogenous shrinkage of internally cured concrete without compromising the strength? Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 31, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mei, Y.-J.; Li, Z.; Wang, P.; Liang, N. Effect and Mechanism of Styrene-butadiene Rubber Latex on the Long Term Shrinking Performance of Mortar. J. Civ. Archit. Environ. Eng. 2009, 31, 142–146. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lewis, W.; Lewis, G. The influence of polymer latex modifiers on the properties of concrete. Composites 1990, 21, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Su, F.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; He, T.; Lin, Y. Review of the Influence of Acrylate Lotion on the Properties of Cement-Based Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 6597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Assaad, J. Development and use of polymer-modified cement for adhesive and repair applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 163, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yuan, Q.; Xie, Z.; Yao, H.; Huang, T.; Fan, M. Hydration, mechanical properties and microstructural characteristics of cement pastes with different ionic polyacrylamides: A comparative study. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 56, 104763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lou, C.; Xu, J.; Wang, T.; Ren, W. Microstructure and pore structure of polymer-cement composite joint sealants. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bahraq, A.A.; Al-Osta, M.A.; Al-Amoudi, O.S.B.; Saleh, T.; Obot, I. Atomistic simulation of polymer-cement interactions: Progress and research challenges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 327, 126881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hou, D.; Yu, J.; Wang, P. Molecular dynamics modeling of the structure, dynamics, energetics and mechanical properties of cement-polymer nanocomposite. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 162, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, M.; Wang, R.; Yao, H.; Farhan, S.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Z.; Du, C.; Jiang, H. Research on the mechanism of polymer latex modified cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, L.; Huang, Y. Microstructure and Mechanism of Polymer Cement. Integr. Ferroelectr. 2021, 215, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tian, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, H.Y.; Jin, X.; Jin, N. Physical and chemical influence of polyacrylate latex on cement mortars. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 261, 807–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Peng, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Xu, S.; Zhao, G.; Wang, P.; Liu, X. BSE-IA reveals retardation mechanisms of polymer powders on cement hydration. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 3373–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zárybnická, L.; Pokorný, J.; Machotová, J.; Ševčík, R.; Šál, J.; Viani, A. Study of keto-hydrazide crosslinking effect in acrylic latex applied to Portland cements with respect to physical properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 375, 130897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, H.; Wu, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, W. The re-swelling mechanism of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in the SAP voids of cement-based materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 130, 104561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Silva DA, D.; Roman, H.R.; Gleize, P.J.P. Evidences of chemical interaction between EVA and hydrating Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, R.; Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Czarnecki, L. Chemical interaction between polymer and cement in polymer-cement concrete. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kardon, J.B. Polymer-modified concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 1997, 9, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ohama, Y. Handbook of Polymer-Modified Concrete and Mortars: Properties and Process Technology; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  84. Yang, Z.; Shi, X.; Creighton, A.T.; Peterson, M.M. Effect of styrene–butadiene rubber latex on the chloride permeability and microstructure of Portland cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2283–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhong, S.; Chen, Z. Properties of latex blends and its modified cement mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 1515–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Guo, Y.; Ma, B.; Zhi, Z.; Tan, H.; Liu, M.; Jian, S.; Guo, Y. Effect of polyacrylic acid emulsion on fluidity of cement paste. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 535, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jenni, A.; Zurbriggen, R.; Holzer, L.; Herwegh, M. Changes in microstructures and physical properties of polymer-modified mortars during wet storage. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhao, F.; Li, H.; Liu, S.; Chen, J. Preparation and properties of an environment friendly polymer-modified waterproof mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 2635–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Konietzko, A. Polymerspezifische Auswirkungen auf das Tragverhalten modifizierter zementgebundener Betone (PCC). Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  90. Fan, L.; Xu, F.; Wang, S.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, J. A review on the modification mechanism of polymer on cement-based materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Afridi MU, K.; Ohama, Y.; Demura, K.; Iqbalc, M.Z. Development of polymer films by the coalescence of polymer particles in powdered and aqueous polymer-modified mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 1715–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, B.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, R.; Duan, A.; Li, Z.; Ma, H. Microstructure and modification mechanism of polyacrylate latex modified mortars. J. ZheJiang Univ. Eng. Sci. 2014, 1, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar]
  93. Plank, J.; Gretz, M. Study on the interaction between anionic and cationic latex particles and Portland cement. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2008, 330, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kong, X.; Emmerling, S.; Pakusch, J.; Rueckel, M.; Nieberle, J. Retardation effect of styrene-acrylate copolymer latexes on cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 75, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Han, D.; Chen, W.; Zhong, S. Physical retardation mechanism of latex polymer on the early hydration of cement. Adv. Cem. Res. 2018, 30, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mollah, M.Y.A.; Adams, W.J.; Schennach, R.; Cocke, D.L. A review of cement–superplasticizer interactions and their models. Adv. Cem. Res. 2000, 12, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, Y.; Liu, Q. Investigation on fundamental properties and chemical characterization of water-soluble epoxy resin modified cement grout. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 299, 123877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lu, Z.; Kong, X.; Zhang, C.; Xing, F.; Cai, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, B. Effect of surface modification of colloidal particles in polymer latexes on cement hydration. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 155, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Silva, D.A.; John, V.M.; Ribeiro, J.L.D.; Roman, H.R. Pore size distribution of hydrated cement pastes modified with polymers. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bullard, J.W.; Jennings, H.M.; Livingston, R.A.; Nonat, A.; Scherer, G.W.; Schweitzer, J.S.; Scrivener, K.L.; Thomas, J.J. Mechanisms of cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1208–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dorn, T.; Blask, O.; Stephan, D. Acceleration of cement hydration–A review of the working mechanisms, effects on setting time, and compressive strength development of accelerating admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 323, 126554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Su, Z.; Sujata, K.; Bijen, J.; Fraaij, A.L.A. The evolution of the microstructure in styrene acrylate polymer-modified cement pastes at the early stage of cement hydration. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1996, 3, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Scrivener, K.; Ouzia, A.; Juilland, P.; Mohamed, A. Advances in understanding cement hydration mechanisms. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 124, 105823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kang, S.; Kim, J.; Moon, C.; Song, M. Early hydration-retarding mechanism of polymer-modified cement. Mater. Res. Innov. 2015, 19, S8-22–S8-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nair, P.A.K.; Vasconcelos, W.L.; Paine, K.; Calabria-Holley, J. A review on applications of sol-gel science in cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 291, 123065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Starr, J.; Soliman, E.M.; Matteo, E.N.; Dewers, T.; Stormont, J.C.; Reda Taha, M.M. Mechanical characterization of low modulus polymer-modified calcium-silicate-hydrate (C–S–H) binder. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 124, 104219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chaudhari, O.; Biernacki, J.J.; Northrup, S. Effect of carboxylic and hydroxycarboxylic acids on cement hydration: Experimental and molecular modeling study. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 13719–13735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hazimmah, D.S.; Mohd, S. Mechanical characterization of acrylic—Emulsion polymer-modified concrete reinforced with steel fibre by Taguchi application. In Proceedings of the 2011 Fourth International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 19–21 April 2011; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  109. Hazimmah, D.S.; Muthusamy, K. Characterization of steel Fiber Reinforced acrylic emulsion polymer modified concrete (SFRPMC) through X-Ray diffraction (XRD) Analysis. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2016, 833, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Merlin, F.; Guitouni, H.; Mouhoubi, H.; Sandrine Mariot, S.; Vallée, F.; Damme, H. Adsorption and heterocoagulation of nonionic surfactants and latex particles on cement hydrates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 281, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sivakumar, M.V.N. Effect of Polymer modification on mechanical and structural properties of concrete-An experimental investigation. Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng. 2011, 1, 732. [Google Scholar]
  112. Lu, P.-F. Research on Toughening Effect of Epoxy Resin Emulsion and Microemulsion on Cement-based Materials. Value Eng. 2017, 36, 107–108. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of PBA on rise in cement hydration temperature [37].
Figure 1. Effect of PBA on rise in cement hydration temperature [37].
Molecules 29 01260 g001
Figure 2. Effect of modified styrene–acrylic lotion on mechanical properties of hardened cement [57].
Figure 2. Effect of modified styrene–acrylic lotion on mechanical properties of hardened cement [57].
Molecules 29 01260 g002
Figure 3. Physical modification simulation of polymer lotion in cement-based materials.
Figure 3. Physical modification simulation of polymer lotion in cement-based materials.
Molecules 29 01260 g003
Figure 4. Chemical modification simulation of polymer lotion in cement-based materials.
Figure 4. Chemical modification simulation of polymer lotion in cement-based materials.
Molecules 29 01260 g004
Figure 5. Second electronic image of ethylene vinyl acetate modified cement. (a)The absorption of polymer particles on the surface of cement particles; (b) porous C-S-H caused by polymer particles; (c) the local pore morphology of porous C-S-H; (d) formation of a polymer film on the surface of glass [78].
Figure 5. Second electronic image of ethylene vinyl acetate modified cement. (a)The absorption of polymer particles on the surface of cement particles; (b) porous C-S-H caused by polymer particles; (c) the local pore morphology of porous C-S-H; (d) formation of a polymer film on the surface of glass [78].
Molecules 29 01260 g005
Figure 6. Chemical model of polymer-latex-modified cement. (a) The chemical reaction between polymer latex and hydration products. (b) A three-dimensional network structure obtained through chemical reactions in polymer-latex-modified cement systems [95].
Figure 6. Chemical model of polymer-latex-modified cement. (a) The chemical reaction between polymer latex and hydration products. (b) A three-dimensional network structure obtained through chemical reactions in polymer-latex-modified cement systems [95].
Molecules 29 01260 g006
Figure 7. Physical model of polymer-latex-modified cement. (a) Polymer latex covers hydrated crystals (b) and polymer particles and films are filled in cracks and pores [95].
Figure 7. Physical model of polymer-latex-modified cement. (a) Polymer latex covers hydrated crystals (b) and polymer particles and films are filled in cracks and pores [95].
Molecules 29 01260 g007
Figure 8. Function of hydration rate over time measured by isothermal calorimetry [101].
Figure 8. Function of hydration rate over time measured by isothermal calorimetry [101].
Molecules 29 01260 g008
Figure 9. Transport and boundary nucleation growth mechanism of cement hydration [106].
Figure 9. Transport and boundary nucleation growth mechanism of cement hydration [106].
Molecules 29 01260 g009
Figure 10. Mechanism of hindrance of polymer latex on cement hydration [95].
Figure 10. Mechanism of hindrance of polymer latex on cement hydration [95].
Molecules 29 01260 g010
Table 1. Effects of different polymers on the properties of cement-based materials.
Table 1. Effects of different polymers on the properties of cement-based materials.
Polymer TypeVolume StabilityMechanical Properties
Superabsorbent polymers (SAPs)SAPs can compensate for the decrease in relative humidity caused by self drying and completely eliminate self shrinkage [64]SAPs lack a unified and reliable conclusion on the macroscopic mechanical properties of cement-based materials, and their contribution to strength ranges from 20% enhancement to 30% weakening [65]
Styrene–butadiene rubber (SBA)SBA effectively improves the long-term shrinkage performance of mortar, and the larger the dosage, the smaller the long-term shrinkage deformation [66]SBA reduces the compressive strength and elastic modulus of concrete [67]
Ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)Mortar had no volume expansion [68]EVA reduces the compressive strength of mortar [69]
Polyacrylamide [70]Added drying shrinkage of cement samplesAnionic PAM significantly reduces the compressive strength and flexural strength of cement
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, F.; He, T.; He, Z.; Yu, Q.; Wang, H. Mechanism of Acrylate Emulsion-Modified Cement-Based Materials. Molecules 2024, 29, 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061260

AMA Style

Su F, He T, He Z, Yu Q, Wang H. Mechanism of Acrylate Emulsion-Modified Cement-Based Materials. Molecules. 2024; 29(6):1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Fuyun, Tingshu He, Zhongmao He, Qihao Yu, and Haiyan Wang. 2024. "Mechanism of Acrylate Emulsion-Modified Cement-Based Materials" Molecules 29, no. 6: 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061260

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop